PEO - IWS

Program Executive Office
Integrated Warfare Systems
2010 National Defense Center of Excellence for
Research in Ocean Sciences Industry Day
30 September 2010
Mr. Jimmy Smith, Director, Above Water Sensors Directorate
UNCLASSIFIED
Content
•
•
PEO IWS Background
Advanced Development (PEO IWS 5A)
• ACB
• APB
• Capability Gaps
•
System Engineering (PEO IWS 7)
• Information Assurance
• Open Architecture
• Fleet Synthetic Training
•
Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR)
155 Programs
What We Do
•
The PEO IWS organization is aligned to develop,
procure and deliver Enterprise Warfighting Solutions
for Surface Ships
•
PEO IWS has life cycle responsibilities for analysis of
combat system performance, system planning, design
management, systems engineering, integration,
installation, test, maintenance and disposal
•
Navy’s Open Architecture (OA) Enterprise lead for
Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research,
Development and Acquisition (ASN(RDA))
PEO IWS International Partners
155 Programs
Undersea Systems
IWS 5.0
MPM – CAPT Davis
DPM – Mr. Thomas
Maximum 30 Contact ‘Entities’
Mutual
Interference
Wake Effects
Surface Ship
Echoes
Surface Duct
Range Dependent SVP
(Worldwide Coverage)
Schools of Fish
Directional
Ambient Noise
Surface Clutter
High Fidelity
Target Model
Water-Borne Propagation
Bottom Bounce
Propagation
Shipwrecks
Range
Dependent
Bottom
Bottom Clutter
7
7
Advanced Development Projects
Submarine Advanced Processing Build
Submarine Sensors
Twin-Line Thin-Line Concept
4-Step Process Transitions Advanced Development
Engineering Measurement Programs Assess
System Performance Operationally
3. Lab-based End-to-End
Developmental
System T&E
Improved Modeling, Assessments &
Requirements Generation
APB
System Engineering
4 Step Process
Development
Cycle
2. Technology
Evaluation
4. At-sea
Developmental
System T&E
Performance
Measurement
Upgrades/ Targeted
Enhancements
1. Technology
Survey
EMP
LCCA
Vector Sensor
Concept
Production System
Integration/Test
Certification
Data
Operational
System
1.
2.
3.
4.
Component level open data set survey
Component level closed data set independent evaluation – risk mitigation step
Integrated system level closed data set evaluation
Integrated system build on production HW at sea evaluation
Operational
Environment
Surface Ship Advanced Capability Build
CAVES
Distributed Netted Sensors
3. Lab-based End-to-End
Developmental
System T&E
APB
System Engineering
4 Step Process
- Surface ASW Synthetic Trainer
2. Technology
Evaluation
4. At-sea
Developmental
System T&E
1. Technology
Survey
Advanced Capability
Build (ACB)
- Continuous Active Sonar
- Different noise characteristics
- Collocated with prior ONR data collected
Relay Buoy
- Active Clutter Reduction
Active Clutter
RAP VLA
SAST
Over-the-horizon
communications
In-buoy processing
high power
acoustic source
DWADS
Volumetric Receive Array
Implementing Open Architecture
Surface Ship USW Combat Systems
Legacy to Future Systems through the ACB Process
100
ACB-09
ACB-11
80
ACB-13
60
ACB-15
40
ACB-17
Legacy
20
IPS
SIPS
Legacy Systems and
IPS / SIPS
• DDG
• AN/SQQ-89(V)4/6/10/14/15
• (V)15-EC200/204
• SIPS/IPS
• CG
• AN.SQQ-89(V)6/7/12.A(V)15-0
• SIPS
• FFG
• AN/SQQ-89(V)2/9
TI09/ACB 09
Search
• CZ improvements
• Bi-Static Capability
• Clutter Mitigation
Classify
•Automated Classification
Engage
•MK54 OTS
Supportability
• Synthetic Training Baseline
Establishes a common H/W & S/W architecture
Provides improved capabilities through the APB process
Reconstitutes Towed Array for DDG 51 Flight IIA
Basis for USW Combat Systems on DDG 1000 and LCS
FY16
FY14
FY12
FY10
FY08
FY06
FY04
0
ACB 11 and Beyond
Search
• Mutual Interference Mitigation
• Improved Active Capability
Classify
• ATTDS Signal Processing
• Sonar Situational Awareness
• Automated Data Fusion
• Distributed Netted Sensors
Engage
• MK-54 VLA
• Netted Engagement
Supportability
• Reality Based Environment
• Fully Integrated Synthetic Training
Communications
• ACOMMS
• USW-DSS integration
ACB Capability Gaps
Active Detection
 Needs:
– Improved detection and classification at extended ranges
– Reduce false alarm rate from automation and operators
– Reduce mutual interference between multiple active ships
Torpedo Defense
 Needs:
– Full coverage at extended ranges
– Reduce false alert rate
Command and Control
 Recent capabilities increase operator workload, common displays will mitigate
this issue
Passive
 Need improved passive detection capability against diesel submarines
Training
 Need full simulation of full sensor suite and recorded data playback capability
System Performance Improvements
Through Incremental Development
PEO IWS Rapid Capability
Improvement Process
3
4
2
1
Upgrades/
Enhancements
• Improved Modeling, Assessments
• Requirements Generation
• Employment Guidelines Development
• Tactics & Training
ONR
IWS5A / IWS5B
APL
Technology
Assessment
Performance
Measurement
Advance Development
Environment
Engineering
Measurement
Programs
System Integration
Testing
Certification
IWS5 AN/SQQ-89(V)
PMS 401 - ARCI
PMS 425 - BYG-1
PMS 435 - ISIS
Production System
EMP
Tactical Systems
“Apples-to-Apples”
Embedded
Data Collection
Operational
Environment
A Proven Process for Rapid Capability Improvement
APB Capability Gaps
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Passive Signal Processing
Imaging
Active Signal Processing
Automation
 Contact Management
 Contact Followers
 Target Motion Analysis
Information Management
Training
Gaps and Seams Analysis still in progress - More
detail to be provided at the Dec 2010 Submarine
Industry Day
IWS 5A
Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)
Advanced Undersea Technologies BAA
N0002410IWS5A01 (FEDBIZOPS)
Open from 8 June 2010 to 7 June 2011
 Three focus areas:
– Submarine Combat System Signal Processing Technologies
– Surface Antisubmarine Warfare Systems Signal Processing Technologies
– Undersea Sensor, Handling, and Communication Technologies
 Industry Days
– Surface Ship Industry Day was 19 August
– Submarine Industry Day in November/December 2010
 White Papers
– Submitted with technical approach, experience, capabilities, past performance,
and initial cost estimate
– Papers evaluated and if selected will be invited to submit full technical and/or
cost proposal for a maximum of 5 year period including all options.
 Emphasis on maturing technologies for laboratory and at-sea
testing and subsequent transition into Naval combat systems.
155 Programs
Future C/S & HSI
IWS 7.0
MPM – CAPT Gannon
DPM – Mr. Miranda
IA Technologies
NAVSEA afloat systems require IA and IA enabled
products that
 Support the establishment of a robust defense-in-depth (DiD)
security architecture to protect, detect, react, and recover
information systems from inadvertent operator error, malicious
attack (internal and external), and major calamity (fire, flooding,
loss of power, etc.)
and
 Promote the availability, integrity, confidentiality, authentication,
and non-repudiation of information
IA Technologies
Key characteristics include:
 Effective against nation state information operations






tradecraft
Support real-time, tactical data exchanges
Are complementary across network infrastructure, systems,
applications, and hosts (within a layer of the architecture)
Are complementary across levels in the shipboard
architecture
Automated, where possible and practical, to support
decreased manning
Relatively easy and inexpensive to implement, maintain, and
update
User friendly
Component Based Radar Open Architecture
Challenges
Business Area #1: Establishing an Enabling Environment,
Demonstrating Life cycle Affordability, Encouraging
Competition and Collaboration;
Business Area #2: Designating Key Interfaces;
Technical Area #1: Achieving Interoperability between Joint
Warfighting Applications, Providing Secure Information
Exchange, using Selected Open Standards;
Technical Area #2: Architecting Modular Designs and
Generating Design Disclosures, Employing Modular
Designs;
Technical Area #3: Using Reusable Applications Software;
Technical Area #4: Certifying Conformance.
Fleet Synthetic Training
•
The Fleet Synthetic Training goal is to provide a system that can produce a
higher level of operational proficiency and readiness in a measurably shorter
period of time reducing the cost of preparing for operations. This will be
achieved by taking advantage of advances in advanced and distributed training
applications:
•
Focus Area – Crew Performance Definition, Assessment, and Debrief
–
–
–
–
–

Cognitive Theory Analysis
• Decompose surface ship crew functions into a set of metrics based competencies
• Competency based training metrics tracking to achieve a higher level of proficiency, reduce incidents
& minimize training cost
• Develop a Measurement Model of Performance in Multi-tasking Environments
Competency Based Metrics Automated Analysis
• Automate decomposition of metrics for analyses and feedback of complex training events
• Adaptability for specific levels of training (individual, team, unit, Strike Group, Coalition)
Scenario Generation & Control (SGC)
• Competency based training requires a cognitive theory based SGC system
• Adaptive Scenario Generation and Control
Data Collection Based Upon Competencies
• Schema that recognizes exercise competencies & collects appropriate data
Verbal Command Data Collection
• Capture & understand verbal commands utilized by an automated
assessment tool/system
Debriefs
– Capability to diagnose crew performance deficiencies
– Provide relevant sample best practice guidance and examples
– Evaluate training scenario effectiveness
– Systematically track trends in performance and establish performance distributions and performance
benchmarks
Fleet Synthetic Training
•
Focus Area – Distributed Training Applications
– Intelligent Agent – Exercise Conduct Phase “Rational / Thinking”
Injections
• Agent-based modeling to provide Mission level doctrinally correct behaviors
• Realistic and automated team simulation supporting training with low
overhead while providing high fidelity representations of crew, own ship, Strike
Group and opposing forces
• Reactive entities and environment (e.g., shifting radar ducts, water column
temps, etc.)
– Mission Rehearsal, In-Theater Scenario Management
Optimization
•
•
•
•
•
•
Overcome communications s/ bandwidth limitations
Near real-time Intelligence insertion
Rapid injection of Objective Area Phenomenon
Schema to approach ‘Real World’ fidelity
Higher, High Level Architecture replacement / adaptation
Robust replication of C4ISR entities and organizations with integrated exercise
capability
• Determine Strike Group Effectiveness
Enterprise Sensing
Rapidly evolving, layered, net-centric sensors and C3
enterprise services
155 Programs
PEO IWS
SBIR Efforts
PEO IWS FY09 Spending
Total Small Business
Contract Dollars:
$11,571,557
Contract
Vehicles/Avenues:
 Requirements
 IDIQ
 BOA
 GSA
 Seaport-e
Product Service Code (PSC) Descriptions
Administrative and Management Support Services
Ammunitions and Explosives
Ships, Small Craft, Pontoons, and Floating Docks
Electrical and Electronic Equipment Components
Engineering and Technical Services
Fire Control Equipment
Guided Missiles
Weapons
Radar Equipment, Except Airborne
Research and Development
Other
1000+ FY09 contract actions
PEO IWS FY09 Small Business Contracts
IWS FY09 Dollars
Veteran Owned
SDVOSB
Woman Owned
Minority Owned
Asian Pacific
Black
Hispanic
Disadvantaged
Small Disadvantaged
8(a)
Veteran Owned
SDVOSB
Woman Owned
Minority Owned
Asian Pacific
Black
Hispanic
Disadvantaged
Small Disadvantaged
8(a)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
IWS FY09 SB
Contract Values
3,537,845
306,345
6,681,731
11,011,287
5,042,985
2,440,000
2,622,044
125,881
8,048,787
7,948,787
Total Small Business
Contract Dollars:
$11,571,557
Small Business Dollars Only
Large Business Prime Contract Dollars Excluded
PEO IWS ACTIVE SBIR TOPICS
(FY02.1 – FY10.2 Solicitations )
N01-130
N02-136
N02-139
N08-167
N01-122
N04-059
N06-181
N02-138
N07-055
N01-095
N01-120
N01-118
N02-017
N02-126
N02-130
N02-140
N03-064
N03-087
N03-214
N03-215
N04-064
N04-163
N05-147
N06-049
N06-052
N06-178
N06-179
N07-052
N07-055
N07-214
N07-215
N08-164
N08-170
N08-173
N08-208
N08-209
N09-045
N09-121
N09-141
N09-188
N09-212
N09-217
N10-156
N03-066
N03-080
N05-124
N01-093
N01-184
N10-148
N10-146
N09-188
N08-171
N08-216
N01-090
N03-202
N04-211
N10-148
N00-059
N00-120
N01-060
N02-045
N03-063
N03-079
N04-062
N04-164
N05-126
N06-050
N06-052
N10-044
N10-067
N10-145
N10-149
N10-154
N00-065 N08-164
N01-091 N08-165
N03-064
N03-074
N03-082
N03-086
N03-089
N04-065
N06-180
N07-052
N08-215
N02-042
N02-044
N03-202
N06-051
N08-053
N08-056
N10-048
Phase II to Phase III
Transition Rate
41%
N02-039
N03-080
N04-057
N06-178
N08-170
N08-172
N00-123
N02-139
N03-076
N03-213
N04-058
N04-165
N05-123
N06-179
N06-180
N08-209
N04-162
N09-200
N03-088
N05-127
N99-144
N03-083
N06-181
N03-078
N02-130
N96-076
N10-153
B02-004
N02-047
N09-193
N01-121
N02-044
N02-048
N10-153
N04-211
N06-051
N08-054
N08-055
N09-187
N10-153
N99-083
N99-118
N00-062
N00-067
N00-123
N01-039
N01-059
N01-092
N04-138
N10-145
N99-153
N01-058
N02-042
N02-043
N02-066
N03-063
N07-214
N04-066
N02-028
N01-100
N02-125
N03-077
N03-084
N03-218
N04-067
N05-123
N10-149
N10-158
N02-046
N08-213
N10-154
N01-077
N01-103
N02-029
N03-065
N03-219
N04-161
N04-162
N04-163
N04-168
N06-049
N07-214
N08-053
N08-167
N08-172
N08-213
N08-215
N08-217
N09-121
N09-125
N09-141
N09-187
N09-200
N09-209
N03-048
N04-068
N04-166
N04-169
N05-125
N05-127
N08-171
N08-208
N09-137
N09-217
N10-067
N05-124
N05-125
N05-148
N06-050
N07-213
N08-055
N08-056
N08-165
N08-173
N10-152
N08-216
N08-219
N09-136
N09-137
N09-138
N09-193
N09-212
N10-044
N10-048
26
Small Business Funding Profile
As of
September
2010
SBIR
Execution
Outside
Sources
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
$M
7.59
11.90 12.38 12.18 14.53 15.12 19.61 20.03
29.60
2.17
22.68 25.99 36.06 53.32 24.26 46.96 56.30
37.62
60
Execution
Outside
50
40
$M
30
20
10
0
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
Questions?