minutes of the deprtmental promotion committee meeting held on 10

OF THE DEPARTMENTAL
, MINUTES
IO.I}-2OI1IN THE CONF'ERENCE
PROMOTION COM]\ItrTTEE MEETING HELD ON
CPO. PESHAWAR
A meeting of Departmental Promotion Committee was held on 10.12.2015 at 1500 hours in
the CPO Conference Room-II, under the Chairmanship of Mian Muhammad Asit Addl: IGP/Headquarters
Khyber to discuss the representation cases of Ministerial Staff.
2.
The following officers attended the meeting:I
il.
III.
IV
V
Mian Muhammad Asif, Addl: IGP/HQrs: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Mr. Muhammad Alam Shinwari, DIG/HQrs: I(hyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Dr, Masood Saleem, DlG/Enquiry & Inspection, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Mr. Naieeb ur Rahman Bugvi, AlG/Establishment, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Mr. Falak Nawaz, Acting AIGiLegal, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Chairman
Member
Member
Member
Member
3.
The Committee discussed the following representation cases in detail and took decision noted
below in each case:-
I.
REPRESENTATION OF MT'HAMMAD KHAN STENOGRAPHER
He submitted that Seniority List of the Stenographers issued vide CPO No. 3930/E-V, dated
0l-06-2015 is not correct wherein his name come at Sr. No.3 but mistakenly shown at Sr. No. ? of the Seniority
List, which needs correction as his date of appointment in Police Department is 16.03.1982 and he is the most
Senior than others.
DECISION
According to Rules l0-b of KPK Police Department Ministerial Service Rules, 1974, seniority
shall be determined from the date of continuous regular appointment. The applicant was promoted Stenographer
on 04.09.2008, while on whom the applicant raised objections, Abdur Rashid was promoted on 17.10.1991,
Matiullah Khan on 28.06.1997, Muhammad Ilyas on 23.05.2001, Fazal Subhan on 23.05.2001, respectively.
Therefore, his representation was found not maintainable and filed.
I
REPRESENTATION OF ASSTT: GRADE CLERK SARDAR.UR-REHMAN
He submiffed that in the Seniority List of Asstt: Grade Clerks issued on 17.06.2015 his name
exists at S.No.l7 wherein Asstt: Grade Clerks at S.Nos. 3,4,5,7,ll & 14 have been shown senior to him
.
despite they promoted later than the appellant. He requested for his due seniority with his colleagues.
DECISION
Sardar-ur-Rahman appeared before the committee and stated that after perusal of the record, he
was satisfied with his position on Seniority List. He requested to withdraw his representation.
IIL
REPRESENTATION OF ASSTT: GRADE CLERK MUZAFFAR IOBAL
He submitted that he was appointed as Junior Clerk on 13.05.19'19 and promoted as Senior
Clerk on 27.10.1991. He was promoted as Asst: Grade Clerk on24.02.2015 after 24years while his junior
colleagues were promoted as Asstt: Grade Clerks after 14 years being 9/10 years prior. He was deprived from
promotion as Asstt: Grade Clerk with his colleagues. He requested for the fixation of his due seniority with
colleagues.
DECISION
As per record, Muzaffar Iqbal case was discussed in the DPC meeting held on 01.1 1.2007. He
was superseded due to indifferent record and for his being under enquiry. Later on, he was promoted as Asstt:
Grade Clerk on 04.02.2015. His seniority was affected due to indifferent record and for being under enquiry.
Therefore, his representation was found not maintainable and filed.
IV.
REPRESENTATIONOFASSTT:GRADECLERKNOORAFGHAN
He submitted that his date of appointment in Police Department is 06-08-1981 and promoted as
Senior Clerk on 10.12.1990 and Assistant Grade Clerk on 08-1L2A07. The appellant was not assigned the
duties of sgnior post due to departmental enquiry pending against him. Later on, departmental proceedings
culminated into exoneration of applicant and promoted on 23-05-2009 with his colleagues. The upshot of
Notification regarding his promotion as Asstt: Grade Clerk was that his seniority will be reckoned from
08.11.2007. But, his name has been shown at S.No.Sl of impugned Seniority List while the name of Abdul
Ghaffar-Il exists at S.No.18. Abdul Ghaffar-Il and appellant were promoted to the post of Asstt: Grade Clerk
vide same notification but Abdul Ghaffar-Il was shown senior to him. The name of appellant was required to
be placed below the name of Abdul Ghaffar-Il at S.No.l8 and above the name of Fazal Shah at S.No.19. His
seniority neither fixed in accordance with date of appointment in the post of Junicir Clerk nor in accordance to
the post of Asstt: Grade Clerk. He has requested that his seniority may be revised and his name may be placed
below the name of Abdul Ghaffar-Il at S.No.l8.
DECISION
As per record, Noor Afghan case was discussed in the DPC meeting held on 01.11'2007. He
was deferred due to incomplete record for the periods for years 2003,2004,2005 &2006.Later on, he was
promoted as Asstt: Grade Clerk vide CPO Notification No. 13 170/E-IIL dated 23 .05.2009 with his colleagues
with the condition that he will be reverted back to his substantive rank in case his ACR for the year 2007 did
not turn out satisfactory. Later-on, his ACR for the year 2007 was received satisfactory, which is available on
record.
.N
te
2
The committee accepted his appeal for restoration of his seniority in the light of Para-7 of
Services & General Administration Department Notification No. SOR-I (S&GAD) l-29175, dated l3th April
1987. His name may be placed in the Seniority List at due place.
Chairman
ASIF)
Addl:
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,
Peshawar.
(Mt HAMMAD
(DR.
& lnspection,
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa,
Peshawar
Peshawar.
q
NnI&
jr"-
(FAL4I(NAwAz)
(NAJEEB uR RAHn{.}Y
Acting AIGiLegal,
AIG/Establishment,
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,
Peshawar.
Peshawar.
Approved
(NASIRKHAN DURRANT)
Provincial Police Offi cer,
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,
Peshawar.
Lr.