¿Manipulan los ácaros el sistema inmunológico?
Transcription
¿Manipulan los ácaros el sistema inmunológico?
¿Manipulan los ácaros el sistema inmunitario? Dr. Enrique Fernández-Caldas Director Científico, Inmunotek S.L. Índice • • • • Introducción a la manipulación Inmunidad innata y adaptada Alérgenos de los ácaros Alérgenos e inmunidad innata • Actividad enzimática – Der p 1 • Mimetismo molecular – Der p 2 y Der p 7 • ¿Actúan los ácaros solos, o tienen cómplices internos? • Conclusiones Manipular (del lat. manipŭlus) • Operar con las manos o con cualquier instrumento. • Trabajar demasiado algo, sobarlo, manosearlo. • Manejar alguien los negocios a su modo, o mezclarse en los ajenos. • Intervenir con medios hábiles y, a veces, arteros, en la política, en el mercado, en la información, (sistema inmunológico) etc., con distorsión de la verdad o la justicia (equilibrio), y al servicio de intereses particulares. Real Academia Española; Diccionario de la Lengua Española - Vigésima segunda edición ¿Qué es la Manipulación? • La Manipulación es el antiguo arte, ciencia y tecnología de hacer que otros hagan lo que tu quieres que hagan, mientras piensan que es idea propia. • Tiene sus raíces en las primeras épocas de la civilización: el primer manipulador fue la serpiente cuando le endulzó los oídos a Eva con las promesas de omnisciencia y omnipotencia. • Los griegos perfeccionaron la ciencia pero la llamaron diplomacia. Evolución del parasitismo El problema: los patógenos Clasificación biológica Solución: el sistema inmunitario Patógenos extra- e intracelulares Líneas de defensa Innata (fagocitos) Adaptativa (anticuerpos) El sistema inmunitario: tejidos, células y moléculas defensivas Integrated Human Immune System Turvey SE, Broide DH. Innate Immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;125:S24-32 TOLL Like Receptors Alérgenos de los Ácaros Patologías mediadas por ácaros • Rinoconjuntivitis, Asma y Dermatitis atópica • Anafilaxia por ingestión de harinas contaminadas por varias especies de ácaros – 80% son alérgicos a la aspirina; inhibición COX? • • • • • • • • Acariasis pulmonar (perros) Dermatitis (Pyemotes triticum, Pediculoides ventricosus) Urticaria papular (Cheyletus spp.) Blefaritis y Acne rosacea (Demodex folliculorum) Sarna (Sarcoptes scabiei) Enfermedad de Lyme y otras por Garrapatas (Rickettsias) Scrapie (TSE) en ovejas Transmisión de virus, bacteria y priones Alergenicidad de los ácaros • Potentes alérgenos que unen IgE especifica in vivo e in vitro • Pruebas cutáneas positivas • Test de provocación positivos • Estudios de inmunoterapia que demuestran eficacia • Estudios de control ambiental con resultados controvertidos Association between Indoor Allergens and Asthma ● IgE mediated sensitization to indoor allergens is a major risk factor for asthma, as evidenced by: ● Case control studies (e.g. in Emergency Rooms and schools) ● Prospective studies in high risk cohorts ● Longitudinal population based cohort* *Sears et al, NEJM 2003;349:1414-22 A longitudinal, population-based, cohort study of childhood asthma (onset-26 yr)* Multivariate Model Persistence (Significant Risk Factors) O.R. P Value O.R. P Value PC20 ≤ 8mg/ml or BDR > 10% at any assessment (9-12 yr.) 3.00 <0.001 3.03 <0.001 Positive mite ST at 13 yr. 2.41 0.001 2.18 0.01 Female sex 1.71 0.03 ---- ---- Smoking at 21 yr. 1.84 0.01 ---- ---- ---- ---- 0.89 <0.001 Age of onset of wheezing Relapse *Odds Ratios for factors predicting persistence or relapses of wheezing Sears et al., NEJM, 2003: 329:1414-22 Grupo Alérgenos MW (kDa) Identidad Bioquímica Grupo 1 Bt, Dp, Df, Dm, Em 25 Cisteina proteasas Grupo 2 Bt, Dp, Df, Ds, Em, Ld, Tp, Gd, As 14 Unión a Lipidos (MD2) Grupo 3 Bt, Dp, Df, Ds, Em 24-31 Tripsina Grupo 4 Bt, Dp, Dp, Dm, Em 57 α-Amilasa Grupo 5 Bt, Dp, Ld 14-17 Desconocida Grupo 6 Bt, Dp, Df 25 Quimiotripsina Grupo 7 Dp, Df, Ld 24-31 Desconocida Grupo 8 Ld, Gd, Bt, Dp 26 Glutatión-S-transferasa Grupo 9 Dp, Bt 30 Serina proteasa Grupo 10 BT, Dp,, Df, Ld, Tp 33-37 Tropomiosina Grupo 11 Bt, Dp, Df 98-110 Paramiosina Grupo 12 Bt, Ld 14 Unión a quitina Grupo 13 Bt, Ld, Gd, Tp, As 14-15 Unión a ácidos grasos Grupo 14 Df, Dp, Em 117 Vitelogenina Grupo 15 Df, Bt 62,5; 98; 105 Quitinasa Grupo 16 Df 55 Gelsolina Grupo 17 Df 33 Proteínas de unión a calcio Grupo 18 Df, Bt 60 Quitinasa Grupo 19 Bt 7 Peptido antimicrobiano Grupo 20 Dp 40,4 Arginina quinasa Grupo 21 Dp, Bt 13,2 Desconocida Grupo 22 Df 17 Desconocida Mite Allergens • Serve a broad range of functions in their respective hosts, from structural to enzymatic • The common house dust mite allergens include: – Cysteine proteases (Der p 1, Der p 3) – Serine proteases (Der p 3, Der p 6, Der p 9) – Chitinases (Der p 15, Der p 18) – lipid-binding molecules (Der p 2) – Tropomyosin (Der p 10) Cuerpos y heces de ácaros Bodies Faecal material > 90% D. pteronyssinus bodies > 95% D. pteronyssinus faeces Perfil antigénico de extractos de cuerpos y heces de D. pteronyssinus Texto cuerpos heces S B F Boquete et al. Skin test results with body and faecal extracts of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus containing variable quantities of major allergens. EAACI, Gotebörg 12/06/07 Alergenicidad de ambos extractos Body extract Faecal extract Protein (%) 31.6 34.3 Der p 1 (µg/mg) 11.6 15.8 Der p 2 (µg/mg) 7.6 12.4 50% inhibition (µg) 1.5 1.5 Boquete et al. Skin test results with body and faecal extracts of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus containing variable quantities of major allergens. EAACI, Gotebörg 12/06/07 Correlación entre los niveles de Der p 1 y Der p 2 en sueros (n = 27) (IU IgE/ml) 100 Der p 2 120 40 80 60 20 0 0 10 20 30 Der p 1 40 50 60 70 (IU IgE/ml) Iraola V, Boquete M. et al. Pattern of sensitization to major allergens Der p 1 and Der p 2 in mite sensitized individuals from Galicia. J. Invest Allergol Clin Immunol 2010; 20(3): in press. Ratios individuales de los valores de IgE específica Der p 1/Der p 2 Log Ratio Der p 1/Der p 2 10 1 0,1 0,01 0,001 Iraola V, Boquete M. et al. Pattern of sensitization to major allergens Der p 1 and Der p 2 in mite sensitized individuals from Galicia. J. Invest Allergol Clin Immunol 2010; 20(3): in press. Allergens and Innate Immunity Introduction • The normal pulmonary response to harmless airborne particles such as pollen, animal dander and house dust mites is tolerance, achieved by a complex network of cells and molecules within the lung. • However, asthmatic individuals respond with inflammatory reactions: – leading to cellular infiltration of the lungs coupled with changes to lung function, airway hyperresponsiveness and bronchospasm, or ‘wheezing’. Allergens and Innate Immunity • Allergens are linked by their ability to activate the innate immune system of mucosal surfaces, triggering an initial influx of innate immune cells that subsequently promote Th2-polarized adaptive immune responses – Natural exposure is not to single proteins, but to complex mixtures of molecules • The innate immune-activating molecules may not be identical to the proteins recognized by allergic responses – Why are those particular proteins so recognized among the many present during exposure ? Wills-Karp M, et al. New insights into innate immune mechanisms underlying allergenicity. Mucosal Immunol. 2010 Mar;3(2):104-10. ¿Usan los ácaros otros mecanismos (manipuladores) para incrementar su alergenicidad? • Actividad enzimática – Der p 1 – Der p 3, Der p 6 y Der p 9 • Mimetismo celular – Der p 2 y Der p 7 • Otros factores adyuvantes (¿presencia de bacterias?) • Inhibición de COX en pacientes alérgicos a la aspirina Zymograma: Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus kDa 97,4 66,2 45,0 31,0 21,5 14,4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fernández-Caldas E. et al. Enzymatic activity of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extracts after acidic treatment. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2008;145(4):298-304. Zymograme: Lane 1: Body extract; Lane 2: Faeces extract Carnés J, Boquete M, Carballada FJ, Iraola V, Gallego MT, Fernández-Caldas E. Enzymatic activity in body and fecal extracts of the storage mite Chortoglyphus arcuatus. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2008;145(3):207-12. Evidence suggests that proteases may facilitate allergen sensitization - 1 • Intrinsic protease activity appears to be linked with sensitization ability in several allergens. • Removal of proteases decreases airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in mouse models of allergic asthma. Allergens with cysteine or serine protease activity • • • • • House dust mites and cockroaches A. alternata, Cladosporium herbarum Mammals (e.g., Felis domesticus ) Pollens (ragweed, Phl p 1) Proteolytic enzymes in the manufacture of detergents (alkaline detergents), or food industry (papain). Evidence suggests that proteases may facilitate allergen sensitization - 2 • Direct exposure of mice to proteolytic enzymes such as papain can induce allergic sensitization. • Co-administration of active proteases from A. fumigatus with the tolerogenic antigen OVA resulted in allergic sensitization. • Proteases found in ambient air derived from bacterial and viral species may have accessory roles. Evidence suggests that proteases may facilitate allergen sensitization - 3 • Subcutaneous injection of a serine protease inhibitor, nafamostat mesilate, during sensitization to house dust mite extracts blunted the development of allergic inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. Mite proteases as potential Th2 adjuvants in allergic inflammation Proteases as Th2 adjuvants. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2007 Sep;7(5):363-7. Immunologically relevant substrate targets of Der p 1 Shakib F, Ghaemmaghami AM, Sewell HF. The molecular basis of allergenicity. Trends Immunol. 2008 Dec;29(12):633-42. Reed CE, Kita H. The role of protease activation of inflammation in allergic respiratory diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Nov;114(5):997-1008. Shakib F, Ghaemmaghami AM, Sewell HF. The molecular basis of allergenicity. Trends Immunol. 2008 Dec;29(12):633-42. However, …. other allergens commonly associated with asthma are not proteases … • Group 2 allergens, group 5, group 7, and group 10 allergens are not enzymes • Most animal allergens are lipocalins (or ligandbinding proteins) • The major cat allergen, Fel d 1, is structurally homologous to secretoglobin • Fel d 3 is a cystatin (cysteine protease inhibitor) • Can f 1 may serve a similar function Crystal structure of Der p 2 Derewenda et al J Mol Biol 2002;318:189-97 Der p 2: shows structural homology to lipid binding proteins ● MD-2, binds LPS with high affinity through association with Toll-like Receptor 4 (TLR4) ● NPC2, cholesterol binding protein associated with Niemann Pick disease ● GM2, ganglioside activating protein, binds to glycolipids Fold recognition studies suggest a >95% probability that Der p 2 and MD-2 share the same structure fold. Gruber et al, JBC 279: 28475-82, 2004 Mite Group 2 Allergens Mimetismo • The main house-dust-mite allergen, Der p 2, has structural homology with MD-2 , the LPS-binding component of the TLR 4 signaling complex. • Der p 2 also has functional homology, facilitating signalling through direct interactions with the TLR4 complex, and reconstituting LPS-driven TLR4 signalling in the absence of MD-2. Nature 2009 Jan 29;457(7229):585-8. Allergic mimicry • MD2 binds LPS, TLR4 and the co-factor CD14, and is essential for LPS recognition and the initiation of TLR4 signalling. • Der p 2 could reconstitute LPS induced TLR4 signalling in cells that lack MD2 and also could enhance the response in the presence of MD2 • LPS–Der p 2 complex might mimic the TLR4 activating properties of the LPS–MD2complex. Rizzo MC, Naspitz CK, Fernández-Caldas E, et al. Endotoxin exposure and symptoms in asthmatic children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1997 Aug;8(3):121-6. Rizzo MC, Naspitz CK, Fernández-Caldas E, et al. Endotoxin exposure and symptoms in asthmatic children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1997 Aug;8(3):121-6. Rizzo MC, Naspitz CK, Fernández-Caldas E, et al. Endotoxin exposure and symptoms in asthmatic children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1997 Aug;8(3):121-6. Actúan los ácaros solos, o tienen cómplices internos? Martínez-Girón R. Antiprotozoal drugs in the treatment of respiratory allergy: a side that should be explored. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2009 Feb;3(1):47-8. Valerio CR, Murray P, Arlian LG, Slater JE. Bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA in house dust mite cultures. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Dec;116(6):1296-300. Conclusions • The allergenicity of molecules resides in their ability to activate innate immune pathways at mucosal surfaces, rather than in any structural similarities. • Allergens contain multiple innate immuneactivating components, which trigger the initial mucosal influx of innate immune cells that subsequently promote Th2-polarized adaptive immune responses. Conclusions • The function of dust mite allergens, which are cysteine and serine proteases, enhances their ability to elicit IgE responses and has inflammatory effects on the lung including: – direct damage to the epithelium – recognition by dendritic antigen-presenting cells – release of proinflammatory cytokines from epithelial cells, mast cells, and basophils Conclusions • Der p 2 mimics the function of MD2 and can facilitate TLR4 signalling and airway TH2-type inflammation under conditions of low levels of ambient LPS exposure that normally would induce tolerance. • More than 50% of major allergens are lipidbinding proteins; such mimicry could also underline the allergenicity of these allergens. Conclusions • The synergistic effects of biologically active enzyme allergens on Th2 responses and allergic inflammation may explain why mites are the predominant allergens associated with asthma. • A central paradox remains that other important asthma-associated allergens (eg., cockroach and animal allergens) are not proteolytic enzymes. – Enzymatic and nonenzymatic allergens can mediate Th2 responses, inflammation, and asthma. Conclusions • The study of innate activating properties of allergens is in its infancy. • A better molecular understanding of the fundamental origins of allergenicity may lead to the development of new therapeutic strategies to block allergen recognition and the ensuing inflammatory cascade effectively. Innate immune mechanisms activated by allergens New insights into innate immune mechanisms underlying allergenicity. Wills-Karp M, Nathan A, Page K, Karp CL. Mucosal Immunol. 2010 Mar;3(2):104-10.