Second post-election report on media coverage of political scene in

Second post-election report on media coverage of political scene in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Released on 24 December 2014
Media Plan, an independent, non-partisan organization dedicated to freedom of expression and
the media, has been systematically monitoring the media coverage of the political scene in
Bosnia and Herzegovina prior to the October general elections and beyond. Media Plan seeks to
evaluate the level of diversity in monitored media’ political news reporting.1 The main objective
of the project is to inform the public about the conduct of the media in providing objective and
unbiased coverage and to initiate a discussion about professional standards. The project is
supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the UK
Government, the Embassy of the Kingdom of Norway, the National Endowment for Democracy
(NED), and the European Union.
The findings have so far been compiled into four monitoring reports about the media’s behavior
during the election campaign as well as the media coverage of post-election developments,
including the process of forming the new governments on the state and entity levels of
administration. The methodology was developed by the Slovak media-monitoring organization
MEMO
98. 2 The
previous
monitoring
reports
can
be
found
at:
http://www.mediaplan.ba/en/?ID=142. Following is the summary of the main monitoring
findings covering the period (1 – 30 November):
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
 Unlike during the pre-election period when the coverage of political parties in
the news programs was limited, all monitored media reported intensively on the
political parties in the news during November.
 Similar to the pre-election period, some monitored outlets continued to show
their open sympathies towards particular political subjects.
 Most monitored media reported intensively on negotiations between various
parties to form governments on all levels, including the SDA-DF-SzP agreement
1
2
The monitoring is intended to offer professional, comprehensive, and objective assessment of
political diversity, accuracy, and balance in news and current affairs coverage on seven
television channels, five newspapers, and two online media outlets. Monitored media Television: BHTV1, FTV, RTRS, NTV Hayat, TV BN, TV1, and ATV
Newspapers: Glas Srpske, Nezavisne novine, Oslobodjenie, Večernji list, and Dnevni avaz
Web portals: Frontal, and Klix
Given its comprehensive content-oriented approach, the methodology is specially designed to
provide in-depth feedback on pluralism and diversity in media reporting, including coverage of
chosen subjects and themes. The outcome of the monitoring is not just a set of data, but a
detailed analysis and evaluation of the current level of political diversity in media reporting,
examined in the proper context, and incorporating concrete comparisons and analysis. For more
information on the methodology, see also the first monitoring report at:
http://www.mediaplan.ba/docs/2014FirstPreliminaryReportEN.pdf
Main findings
The media monitoring results for the period of 1 – 30 November showed that the media in
general focused on forming the governments at all levels election results, providing detailed
reporting on negotiations amongts political parties. In addition, some media provided analysis of
these processes and also predictions on these coalitions. Unlike during the pre-election period
when the news coverage suffered from restrictive interpretation of legal provisions on the part of
broadcasters which resulted in a limited coverage of political parties in the news, the news
coverage of the post-election period has been characterized by an intensive coverage of political
parties. The media continue to be divided along political, ethinic and territorial lines and thus
show their more or less open symphaties towards certain political parties.
TELEVISION
All monitored TV stations dedicated the bulk of their coverage to political entities which were
featured to a much greater extent than during the period of election campaign when the media
focus was on the activities of state officials. More coverage was devoted to the parties which
have been involved in attempts to form governments on both state and entity level. As for the
topics and issues covered by the monitored channels, the most covered topic was the negotiations
between parties on forming of new governments (especially in Republika Srpska where series of
accusations and insults were recorded between the two main political blocks). The monitoring
team also noted that there were a number of news items critical towards both the incumbent as
well as the future government in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the slow process of its formation.
In particular, such critical coverage was seen on BHT, FTV, TV Hayat, TV1, ATV and TV BN.
Public service broadcasters
Television of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BHT), Daily News at 19:00
In November, BHT reported intensively on negotiations between political entities, creation of
coalitions and forming of governments on state, entity and cantonal level. The reporting was
balanced overall with statements and viewpoints of all relevant actors involved in the formation
of governments. The election winners - the SNSD and the SDA (receiving respectively 13 per
cent) and the HDZ (11per cent) - were the most covered political entities. The tone of the
coverage was mainly neutral and positive. Apart from providing factual reporting on negotiations
between political parties, BHT offered its viewers with views and interpretations of the current
events through comments and statement from experts and analysts.
On several occasions, BHT presented critical viewpoints vis-à-vis the effectiveness of the
agreement signed between the SDA, the DF and the HDZ BiH. For example, on 19 November
the following views were presented in a news item: “The SDA, HDZ and DF have reached a
framework agreement on working principles for the establishment and functioning of
government in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The agreement does not contain any facts indicating
that the government of Bosnia and Herzegovina will be formed in any near future.” In addition,
some analysts who commented on the process of forming of the government between these three
utterly different political parties expressed their doubt in the long-term effectiveness and
sustainability of such government.
Federal Television (FTV), Daily News at 19:30
During November, FTV dedicated the bulk of its coverage to the results of the general elections,
government forming on both state and entity levels and post-elections coalitions in both the
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska. In comparison with the election
campaign, FTV covered a greater diversity of political subjects with the biggest attention given
to the winners. The most covered party was the SDA with 14 per cent, followed by the HDZ BiH
(12 per cent), the DF (11 per cent) and the SNSD (10 per cent). The SDP, which received
substantial coverage after the elections (due to its defeat and party’s internal upheaval), was
given only a minor coverage (3 per cent against 22 per cent in October). The tone of the
coverage was predominantly neutral or positive.
On 9 November, FTV featured signing of an agreement concerning the state-level cooperation
between the SDA, the DF and the Alliance for Changes. The tone of the report was positive
because it featured principles that are supposed to bring prosperity to Bosnia and Herzegovina.
However, between the first and second news item, FTV showed Željko Komšić (DF) and Dragan
Čavić (NDP) who were both shown for some 12 minutes. The news presenter posed provocative
questions such as – “Have you started being coalition partners from this evening?”. On 22
November, FTV broadcast an item on Milorad Dodik’s meeting with Momčilo Krajišnik, a
convicted war criminal, with the following critical statement: “In his efforts to get MPs to join
his coalition, the president of the SNSD found enough time to receive a convicted war criminal”.
In terms of institutions, the biggest coverage went to the Federation Government (5 per cent)
which was mainly neutral or negative. This was due to the reporting about Zoran Mikulić, the
Federal Minister of Justice (on 18 and 20 November) who allowed Duško Zorić (a person held in
suspicion for war crimes in Prijedor) to go on his annual leave despite knowing that the
Prosecutor’s Office was planning to indict him with new charges. After this, nobody was able to
track Zorić down.
Radio Television of Republika Srpska (RTRS), Daily News at 19:30
While unlike in the pre-election period, RTRS devoted more coverage to the opposition parties
as well as parties from the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the SNSD still remained the
most covered party (with 18 per cent of the coverage). The next most covered entities were the
institutions controlled by the SNSD – the President of Republika Srpska, Milorad Dodik (14 per
cent) and the Government of Republika Srpska (8 per cent). The tone of their coverage was
mainly neutral or positive. The HZD party received 8 per cent of the coverage in connection with
the statements by Dragan Čović when he declared cooperation with the SNSD in forming the
state-level coalition. While the SDS received as much as 7 percent of the coverage (more than
during the election campaign), almost half of this coverage was negative. RTRS featured news
items containing regular (sometimes even vulgar) arguments between the SNSD, the Alliance for
Changes and the SDA.3
3
On 11 November, RTRS featured an item in which the Vice President of the NDP Dragan Čavić
and the PDP’s party member Igor Crnadak commented on the agreement between the SDA, the
DF and the Alliance for Changes. Both of them expressed an opinion that this agreement would
not affect the existence of RS. Noticeably, Bakir Izetbegović’s statement that “People from the
Alliance for Changes are ready to take a step forward that will stabilize Bosnia and
Herzegovina“ was featured twice in this news item. Igor Crnadak stated that he did not see
anything problematic with it, while the Vice President of the NDP Dragan Čavić said the
following: „Could you please find it in here? How did you say it? Stabilizing and strengthening
On 10 November, the RS President Milorad Dodik commented on the agreement between the
SDA, the DF and the Alliance for Changes by saying that this supported integral Bosnia and
Herzegovina, thus negating the existence of Republika Srpska, for which the SNSD was
struggling for. On 14 November, RTRS reported on the parties that were going to constitute
majority in the National Assembly of Republika Srpska. In this news item, President Milorad
Dodik said that the opposition in Republika Srpska had schizophrenia. In another item on the
agreement reached between the SDA, the DF and the Alliance for Changes, Nikola Špirić,
(member of the SNSD) was shown commenting it with the following words: “Pants full of shit
cannot hide their own smell.” Similarly, commenting on the same topic, Milorad Dodik on 15
November said: “Every day, Bakir Izetbegović has to read the Islamic Declaration written by his
father, in order to know what he is supposed to do on that day.” After the SNSD’s decision not to
partake in the state level government, such comments from Milorad Dodik and the SNSD against
the SDA and the Serbian opposition parties ceased to appear in the news.
Private TV stations
TV 1, Daily News at 19:00
The most covered political entities were the parties that won the elections – the SNSD, the SDA
and the HDZ BiH (14, 13 and 10 per cent respectively). In addition, the SDS too received some
significant coverage (8 per cent). This was due to the fact that TV1 broadcast a number of items
on forming of the governments. While the coverage of the SDA and HDZ BiH was mainly
neutral and positive, the coverage of the SNSD was mainly neutral and negative. This was also
the case for the coverage of the President of Republika Srpska Milorad Dodik. For example, on
26 November, TV1 broadcast an item on Milorad Dodik, who, after swearing an oath in the
National Assembly of Republika Srpska, went along with several MPs to a church and swore and
oath before God. This, according to TV1 (and some other media outlets) normally does not
happen in this part of the world. Commenting on this event, analyst Suad Kurtčehajić stated:
“This can be irritating. So what? Should Bosniak MPs in this smaller entity go to a mosque? One
should take into consideration the sensibility of the area in which events take place. Bosnia and
Herzegovina is a country that is equally divided into Islamic and Christian culture, and therefore
I think that this is not a very prudent act. This should be a private matter of every individual. If
this practice were to take place in Sarajevo, it would irritate both the Serbs and the Croats.
NTV Hayat, News at 19:00
The SDA was the most featured party in the NTV Hayat’s news with 16 per cent coverage,
followed by the parties that constitute the state and entity government – the SNSD (10 per cent),
the DF and the HDZ BiH (9 per cent respectively). The tone of their coverage was mostly neutral
and positive because leaders of political parties used the opportunity to make new promises. The
SNSD was the only party to receive neutral and negative coverage. However, potential future
government also received some negative references, mostly through the statements of political
analysts. For example, on 5 November, analyst Esad Bajtal spoke about the SDA – HDZ BiH
coalition. “This coalition was found on self-interest. They want to protect their political and
private interests and that is the basis of their coalition.” Another political analyst Almir Terzić
of Bosnia and Herzegovina? Bakir makes his own interpretations for the sake of Bosniaks’
public opinion. I suppose you trust me more than you trust Bakir Izetbegović? You come from a
Serbian TV station. “
also commented: “I think that this coalition will only distribute positions of directors in
numerous institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and nothing more.”
On 9 November, NTV Hayat reported on the SDA-DF-Alliance for Changes agreement,
broadcasting statements by various politicians - Bakir Izetbegović said: “You could say that the
DF and the SDA have almost common perspective in terms of priorities, stabilization of public
finances, and reduction of public spending on all levels of government.” A statement from
Željko Komšić: “We talked about something that was actually very specific. Believe it or not,
nobody mentioned the distribution of positions. The intention was to show people in Bosnia and
Herzegovina that there is hope for this country, and that things can be done differently.” Mladen
Bosić said: “We immediately agreed that we should move from the stage of conflict politics to a
stage of mutual interests and agreement. We consider that it would be very good to constitute the
government in Bosnia and Herzegovina as soon as possible in order to unblock the processes that
were blocked in the past eight years, in all aspects of life.”
Alternative Television (ATV), News at 19:00
The most covered political entities on ATV news were two strongest parties from RS, the SNSD
and the SDS (with 23 and 14 per cent respectively). While the tone of the SDS coverage was
mainly neutral and positive in tone, the presentation of the SNSD was mainly neutral and
negative. The negative coverage for the SNSD is the result of statements issued by its political
rivals. For example, on 23 November, Mladen Bosić criticized Milorad Dodik for breaking the
unity of Serbian parties in Sarajevo, when he pushed the SDS out of the coalition: “What are you
thinking right now? After what happened, we are not going to join someone who is going to stab
us in the back at our most difficult moments. The SNSD destroyed our trust. Milorad Dodik did
not even try to say that he was sorry and that she should not have done it. Back then he said that
he had more success defending the interests of Republika Srpska with the HDZ and the SDP,
than the SDS.” Although the tone of reporting was mostly neutral, journalists sometimes
expressed their own criticism in the form of comments against long and exhaustive process of
parties’ negotiations. “The saga called forming of government at state level of Bosnia and
Herzegovina is continuing.” (13 November) “Media war between Bakir Izetbegović and Milorad
Dodik continues.”(21 November). On a regular basis, ATV aired news reports featuring social
issues that stressed that the citizens are the ones suffering because of the politicians. “Next week,
negotiations on parliamentary majority could reach its flash point, whereas the citizens wanted to
see their radiators reaching the flash point. Winter is at our doorstep and politics does not keep
the houses warm.”(2 November) “While surgeons are struggling with stents to save lives, the
politicians are too busy counting other politicians and struggling for power as if their life was on
the line.” (23 November)
BN TV, Daily News 2 at 19:30
TV BN allocated most of its coverage to the SDS (19 per cent) and the SNSD (14 per cent),
followed by the SDS’s two coalitions partners, the NDP and the PDP with 10 and 9 percent of
the coverage, respectively. While the coverage of the SDS was mainly neutral and positive, the
coverage of the SNSD was mainly negative and neutral. The dominant presence of the Alliance
for Changes in the ATV news programs’ is continuation of the trend detected in the monitoring
of the election campaign. As for the coverage of state institutions, the RS government and the RS
president received 10 per cent respectively. While the coverage of the RS president was mainly
neutral and positive, the coverage of the RS government was mainly negative. As for the
coverage of parties and entities from the BiH Federation, the SDA and the HDZ received
respectively 4 per cent of the coverage.
Milorad Dodik was featured positively when speaking about his coalition as well as about his
reelection. He was also featured positively in instances when journalists were reading press
releases on his recent activities. However, no politician featured by TV BN said anything
positive about the RS president, with the exception of Dragan Čović, president of the HDZ. “I
hold Mr. Dodik in highest esteem, being a person I have talked and worked with for the past 15
years. Mr. Dodik is a politician with extensive skill and experience. His election results are what
they are. Someone can dispute him in different ways, but I am sure that he has enough capacities
to form a government in RS and I think that it’s clear to anyone that a state level government
cannot function without him.” (11 November) However, right after that, a statement from
Dragan Čavić (NDP) ensued: „The only consistent policy from Milorad Dodik is his political
inconsistency. He is such an incredible political jester.” Incidentally, for the entire duration of
November, there were series of comments by Dodik’s rivals from the Alliance for Changes on
his alleged political inconsistency, crime, tough economic situation in RS, for which, as stated,
he is considered responsible.
NEWSPAPERS
Glas Srpske continued with its practice to publish mainly stories related to the RS with a very
few articles regarding federal or state level of government. As in the previous period, two
dominant subjects were the SNSD (26 per cent) and the RS Government (21 per cent). As
elections are over, it was notable that Glas Srpske wrote less about political parties, but the
SNSD was still dominant in its reporting. The tone towards the SNSD was mainly neutral and
the tone towards the RS Government was neutral and positive. However, Glas Srpske did publish
some articles that had negative tone towards the BiH Federation (such as article “Federations
Stops BiH Progress Towards EU” on 7 November which wrote about all negative aspects of BiH
as a state). It is also notable that tone towards most of the political institutions was neutral, while
the tone towards certain political parties (mainly those coming from the BiH Federation and
opposition parties from RS) was negative and neutral. Articles with negative tone toward
political parties were those that were mainly related to political parties from both entities that
signed agreement on forming the government on the state level. This agreement was portrayed as
something bad for both the RS and Serbs, and in such articles statements of RS leaders (Milorad
Dodik and Nebojša Radmanović) were quoted. Milorad Dodik in general was the most quoted
and most represented person in Glas Srpske in November, and there was no day in November
without a statement of Dodik in Glas Srpske. As such, we may say that Glas Srpske continued
the same trend of reporting as in the pre-election period.
Nezavisne novine did report on diverse political subjects, so no party had predominant position.
However, the most presented were the SNSD (14 per cent), the HDZ BIH (11 per cent) and the
SDA (11 per cent). While the tone towards the SNSD was mainly positive and neutral, the
coverage of the SDA was mainly neutral and negative. Milorad Dodik was dominant figure that
was present in Nezavisne novine, commenting both political situation in RS (12 November - two
pages article on how RS was prosperous and stabile during his mandate) and international
presence in BiH (14 November - commenting HR Valentin Inzko and his engagement in BiH).
On 13 November, Nezavisne novine started with survey “Choosing the best minister in RS”,
which is not finished yet.
Oslobođenje continued its reporting on political parties in post-election time mostly through
covering daily events and commenting them in columns by Oslobođenje journalists. Three most
covered political parties were the HDZ (17 per cent), the SDP (16 per cent) and the SNSD (10
per cent). While the tone of the HDZ BiH coverage was mainly positive and negative, the tone of
the SNSD coverage was mainly negative and neutral. The SDP’s coverage was mainly positive
and neutral. The SDA was the fourth most presented party (9 per cent) and the tone of its
coverage was overwhelmingly neutral and positive. Milorad Dodik and Dragan Čović were the
dominant persons especially in the columns and comments and tone towards them was mainly
negative. Josip Vričko in his column on 19 November mentioned Dodik in a very sarcastic way,
connecting him with Vojislav Šešelj (Title: “Dodik and Šešelj – Natural Allies”). The SDA-DFSzP agreement, election of the SDP president and relations between Dragan Čović and Milorad
Dodik were three dominant topics in this month.
Večernji list – HDZ BiH was the most presented political party (22per cent) with mainly neutral
or positive tone. It is interesting that, although Večernji list reported on different political parties
in this post-election time (percentages were small, but diversity was present), the only political
party to received negative coverage was the HDZ 1990, direct political opponent of HDZ BIH.
Dragan Čović on 17 November had an interview in Večernji list. An interesting fact was that
since Milorad Dodik and Dragan Čović established a coalition, Večernji list started paying more
attention to Dodik, the SNSD and in general the RS political parties. These parties and their
representatives received more attention now than in the pre-election campaign. Ognjen Tadić
(SDS) had an interview on 13 November, Željka Cvijanović (the SNSD) was present in Večernji
list on 17 November etc.
Dnevni avaz mainly reported on the coalition agreements that were in place and on a postelection political scene. The SDA was still the most dominant party (20 per cent) with mainly
negative or neutral tone. However, the interesting fact was that Bakir Izetbegović was not the
dominant SDA person in Dnevni avaz any more (which was the case in pre-election campaign).
Instead, Dnevni avaz reported mainly local SDA politicians who were presented negatively (such
as mayors of two Sarajevo municipalities Nedzad Koldžo and Semir Efendić who are the SDA
members and who were portrayed as incompetent to solve citizen’s problems in these
municipalities). The SDP was present in 10 per cent of articles, mainly in negative tone and the
dominant topic was election of the SDP president. The SBB was present in 7 per cent of articles,
all in positive or neutral tone. However, Fahrudin Radončić was not as present as in the election
campaign. The most presented person from the SBB in Dnevni Avaz was Ibrahim Hadžibajrić
the mayor of Stari Grad Sarajevo municipality (trend of positive reporting on SBB and negative
on SDA continued, however, now on the local government level).
WEB MEDIA
Frontal.rs continued with the same trend of reporting as in the pre-election campaign. Mostly,
space was given to the SNSD (22 per cent), other parties received less than 10 per cent of space
(the SDS 9 per cent, and the SDA 7per cent). The tone towards all these parties was mainly
neutral. The RS government and the SNSD received the biggest amount of negative coverage.
Frontal.rs published mainly news from news agencies (SRNA), as well as press releases of
political parties which were published in detail. The dominant topic was the establishment of the
RS government.
Klix.ba reported extensively and in details on election results, coalition agreements etc. a
number of press releases and reports by news agencies were published, as in the pre-election
time. Klix also published names of all members of Cantonal Assemblies and Parliamentary
Assembly of BiH. The SDA (16 per cent), the SNSD (10 per cent), the SDP (9 per cent) and the
HDZBIH (9 per cent) were the most presented parties. The tone of the coverage was mainly
neutral with the SNSD receiving the biggest amount of negative coverage. Klix reported also on
some interesting topics related to the elections that other media did not mention, such as who
were candidates who received less than 5 votes (on 2 November) or what was education
background of election officials (on 11 November). On 15 November, Klix published an audio
story on Željka Cvijanović, secretly recorded when talking about “buying” certain politicians.
Frontal.rs published this story as well on the same date. Klix journalists were invited to Banja
Luka police to give statement on this afterwards. Klix and some other media reported about that.
CONCLUSION
The post-election monitoring continues to confirm that the problems identified during the preelection period in the media were not results of short-term anomalies but reflect genuine trends
in the BiH media. During the pre-election period as well as after the elections, media more or
less showed their open preferences towards certain politicians and /or parties in the news
programs and newspapers.
A number of important reforms and changes will be necessary in order for the media to provide
their audience with a more diverse coverage of political views and opinions.. The final report,
will include concrete recommendations for the above mentioned reforms and changes. The postelection monitoring by the Media Plan Institute will last until the end of December and there will
be one more monitoring report published in January.
!
!
BiH – Monitoring media
Media Monitoring
From 1 September 2014, the Media Plan, with the support of the United States Agency for International
Development (USAID), the UK Government, the Embassy of the Kingdom of Norway, the National
Endowment for Democracy (NED), and the European Union, has monitored nine television channels, three
radio stations, six newspapers and four online media outlet. The monitoring of the media coverage of the
pre-election period finished on 10 October. On 13 October, the Media Plan Institute resumed its monitoring
of the media to focus on the post-election period, including the forming of the new state administration. The
monitoring included quantitative and qualitative methods of analysis. The following monitoring data cover
the period 1-30 November. The monitoring included quantitative and qualitative methods of analysis.
Quantitative analysis includes a number of numeric measures and indicators that can be counted and
analysed, including assessing and producing findings regarding the time or space allocated to each
contestant or other relevant political subjects (in the prime time news programmes) and also evaluating the
tone of the coverage in which these subjects were portrayed – positive, neutral or negative.
Qualitative analysis evaluates the performance of selected media outlets against ethical and professional
standards, such as balance, accuracy, timely, choice of issues, omission of information, advantage of
incumbency, positioning of items, inflammatory language etc. The enclosed charts show the coverage of
political parties and other relevant subjects in the prime time news programs.
Explanation of the charts
Political parties and other relevant subjects
!
!
The pie charts show the total percentage of airtime allocated to relevant political subjects for each
media outlet in the defined period.
The bar charts show the total number of hours and minutes of positive (green), neutral (white) and
negative (red) airtime/space devoted to relevant political subjects by each media outlet in the
defined period.
Monitored media outlets:
Television:
!
BHT1, FTV, RTRS, NTV Hayat, TV BN, TV1, and ATV
Monitoring media - BiH 2014
BHTV1 - news program (Dnevnik 2 at 19.00)
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
(Filtered
to type
BiH'News')
PresCr
USD
SDPBiH
DF
5%
NSRzB
1%
BiH PresSr
2%
3%
1%
6%
BiH PresBo
1%
RSPres
5%
DNS
3%
BiHCoM
7%
SP
3%
FBiHGov
5%
RSGov
3%
SNSD
13%
HDZBiH
11%
SNSD - DNS - SP
1%
NDP
3%
KD
2%
SDS
5%
PDPRS
2%
SDA
13%
SzP
4%
Total Neg.
Total Neutr.
Total Pos.
0:17:17
0:14:24
0:11:31
0:08:38
0:05:46
0:02:53
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
PUPRS
USD
SRSRS
SDPBiH
NS
NSRzB
HDZ1990
DF
DNS
SP
SNSD
NDP
SNSD - DNS SP
SDS
SzP
PDPRS
SDA
KD
RSGov
HDZBiH
FBiHGov
BiHCoM
RSPres
BiH PresBo
BiH PresSr
BiH PresCr
0:00:00
Monitoring media - BiH 2014
TV FTV - news programs (Dnevnik at 19.30)
A-SDA
1%
LSBiH
1%
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
(Filtered
toBiHtype
'News')
SRSRS
PresCr
1%
BiH PresSr
1%
1%
BiH PresBo
1%
USD
1%
RSPres
2%
SDPBiH
3%
BiHCoM
4%
FBiHGov
5%
HDZ1990
1%
RSGov
1%
DF
11%
DNS
2%
HDZBiH
12%
KD
1%
SP
3%
SDA
14%
SNSD
10%
NDP
5%
SDS
6%
SbiH
1%
SBB
3%
SzP
3%
PDPRS
5%
Total Neg.
Total Neutr.
Total Pos.
0:28:48
0:25:55
0:23:02
0:20:10
0:17:17
0:14:24
0:11:31
0:08:38
0:05:46
0:02:53
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
INDEP
SRSRS
USD
LSBiH
A-SDA
NS
SDPBiH
DF
HDZ1990
BPSSH
DNZ
BOSS
SP
DNS
SNSD
SNSD - DNS -
SDS
NDP
SzP
PDPRS
SDBiH
SBB
HSP
SbiH
KD
SDA
HSPAS
HNS
HDZBiH
RSGov
FBiHGov
RSPres
BiHCoM
BiH PresSr
BiH PresBo
BiH PresCr
0:00:00
Monitoring media - BiH 2014
TV RTRS - news programs (Dnevnik at 19.30)
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
(Filtered to type 'News')
SRSRS
1%
SNS
1%
DF
4%
PUPRS
1%
BiH PresCr
1%
BiH PresSr
1%
BiH PresBo
1%
DNS
5%
RSPres
14%
SP
3%
BiHCoM
3%
SNSD
18%
RSGov
8%
HDZBiH
8%
SNSD - DNS - SP
1%
KD
2%
NDP
4%
SDS
7%
SDA
9%
SzP
3%
PDPRS
4%
Total Neg.
Total Neutr.
Total Pos.
1:04:48
0:57:36
0:50:24
0:43:12
0:36:00
0:28:48
0:21:36
0:14:24
0:07:12
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
PUPRS
INDEP
SRSRS
PEiSP
NS
SNS
DF
BOSS
BPSSH
SP
DNS
SNSD
NDP
SNSD - DNS SP
SDS
SzP
PDPRS
SBB
SDA
KD
HNS
HDZBiH
RSGov
BiHCoM
FBiHGov
RSPres
BiH PresBo
BiH PresSr
BiH PresCr
0:00:00
Monitoring media - BiH 2014
NTV Hayat - news programs (Vijesti at 19.00)
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
(Filtered BiH
to type
INDEP
BiH PresSr
PresCr'News')
1%
3%
1%
USD
5%
BiH PresBo
3%
SDPBiH
3%
RSPres
3%
DF
10%
BiHCoM
5%
FBiHGov
7%
BPSSH
1%
DNS
2%
RSGov
1%
SP
2%
HDZBiH
9%
SNSD
10%
NDP
2%
SDA
16%
SDS
4%
PDPRS
7%
SbiH
1%
SBB
2%
SzP
1%
Total Neg.
Total Neutr.
Total Pos.
0:17:17
0:14:24
0:11:31
0:08:38
0:05:46
0:02:53
SRSRS
USD
INDEP
A-SDA
NS
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
SDPBiH
NSRzB
DF
HDZ1990
SDU
BPSSH
SP
DNS
SNSD
SNSD - DNS -
SDS
NDP
SzP
PDPRS
SDU
SBB
SbiH
KD
SDA
RSGov
HDZBiH
FBiHGov
RSPres
BiHCoM
BiH PresSr
BiH PresBo
BiH PresCr
0:00:00
Monitoring media - BiH 2014
TV BN - news programs (Dnevnik 2 at 19.30)
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
(Filtered
toSRSRS
type 'News')
INDEP
DF
1%
DNS
4%
2%
1%
PUPRS
1%
BiH PresSr
3%
RSPres
10%
SP
3%
BiHCoM
1%
SNSD
14%
RSGov
10%
HDZBiH
4%
SNSD - DNS - SP
1%
KD
0%
NDP
10%
SDA
4%
SzP
2%
PDPRS
9%
SDS
19%
Total Neg.
Total Neutr.
Total Pos.
1:04:48
0:57:36
0:50:24
0:43:12
0:36:00
0:28:48
0:21:36
0:14:24
0:07:12
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
PUPRS
SRSRS
INDEP
DF
DNS
SP
SNSD
NDP
SNSD - DNS SP
SDS
PDPRS
SzP
HSP
SBB
SbiH
SDA
KD
HDZBiH
RSGov
BiHCoM
RSPres
BiH PresBo
BiH PresSr
BiH PresCr
0:00:00
Monitoring media - BiH 2014
TV1 - news programs (Dnevnik at 19.00)
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
(Filtered to type 'News')
USD
2%
SDPBiH
4%
NS
1%
INDEP
1%
SRSRS
1%
BiH PresCr
2%
BiH PresSr
6%
BiH PresBo
3%
DF
7%
RSPres
5%
BPSSH
1%
BiHCoM
3%
DNS
1%
FBiHGov
7%
SP
2%
RSGov
1%
SNSD
14%
HDZBiH
10%
NDP
3%
KD
1%
SDS
8%
PDPRS
2%
SDA
13%
SBB
1%
SzP
2%
Total Neg.
Total Neutr.
Total Pos.
0:36:00
0:28:48
0:21:36
0:14:24
0:07:12
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
SRSRS
PUPRS
USD
INDEP
A-SDA
NS
SDPBiH
NSRzB
DF
HDZ1990
BPSSH
SP
DNS
SNSD
SNSD - DNS -
SDS
NDP
SzP
PDPRS
SBB
SbiH
KD
SDA
RSGov
HDZBiH
BiHCoM
FBiHGov
VicepresBo
RSPres
RSVicepresCr
BiH PresSr
BiH PresBo
BiH PresCr
0:00:00
Monitoring media - BiH 2014
ATV news programs (Vijesti at 19.00)
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
(Filtered to typeBiH
'News')
PresCr
PUPRS
1%
SRSRS
1%
DF
3%
1%
BiH PresSr
4%
BiH PresBo
2%
RSPres
6%
DNS
6%
BiHCoM
2%
SP
4%
RSGov
6%
HDZBiH
5%
SNSD
23%
KD
4%
SDA
7%
NDP
4%
PDPRS
5%
SDS
14%
SzP
2%
Total Neg.
Total Neutr.
Total Pos.
0:57:36
0:50:24
0:43:12
0:36:00
0:28:48
0:21:36
0:14:24
0:07:12
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
SRSRS
PUPRS
INDEP
DF
BPSSH
DNS
BOSS
SP
NDP
SNSD
SDS
SzP
PDPRS
SBB
HSP
SbiH
KD
SDA
HDZBiH
RSGov
FBiHGov
BiHCoM
RSVicepresCr
RSPres
BiH PresSr
BiH PresBo
BiH PresCr
0:00:00
Monitored subjects
Croatian Member of the BiH Presidency
Serbian Member of the BiH Presidency
Bosnian Member of the BiH Presidency
President of FBiH
Bosniak Vice-president of FBiH
Serbian Member of Federal Presidency
President of Republika Srpska
Vice-president of Republika Srpska Croat
Vice-president of Republika Srpska Bosniak
BiH Council of Ministers
FBiH Government
RS Government
BiH PresCr
BiH PresSr
BiH PresBo
FedPres
Fed VicepresBo
FedVicepresSr
RSPres
RSVicepresCr
VicepresBo
BiH CoM
FBiH Gov
RS Gov
HNS
•
•
•
•
•
HNS
Hrvatska(demokratska(zajednica2((
(
(
Hrvatska(seljačka(stranka2(
(
(
(
Hrvatska(kršćansko2demokratska(unija(BiH(–(((
Hrvatska(stranka(prava(Ante(Starčevića2(
(
Hrvatska(stranka(prava(Herceg2Bosne(2(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Borci za novu politiku
•
•
BNP
Savez(za(novu(politiku(2((
(
(
(
Stranka(socijalne(sigurnosti(srpskih(boraca(2(( (
(
(
Koalicija Domovina
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
SNP(
SSSSB(
KD
Stranka(demokratske(akcije(2(( (
(
(
Stranka(za(Bosnu(i(Hercegovinu(2((
(
(
Savez(za(bolju(budućnost2Fahrudin(Radončić(((
Hrvatska(stranka(prava(
(
(
(
Prva(stranka(2(( (
(
(
(
(
Stranka(dijaspore(BiH(2((
(
(
(
Demokratska(fronta(BiH(
(
(
(
Stranka(demokratske(unije( (
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Savez za promjene
•
•
HDZ(BiH(
HSS(
HKDU(BiH(
HSP(AS(
HSPHB(
SDA(
SbiH(
SBB(
HSP(
PS(
SDBiH(
DF(BiH(
SDU(
SzP
Partija(demokratskog(progresa(Republike(Srpske(2((
Srpska(demokratska(stranka(2(((
(
(
(
(
PDP(RS(
SDS(
Savet SNSD-DNS-SP
•
•
•
Savez(nezavisnih(socijaldemokrata(–(( Milorad(Dodik( (
Socijalistička(partija(–(((
(
(
(
(
Demokratski(narodni(savez(–(( (
(
(
(
Snaga BiH
•
Hrvatska(stranka(prava(BiH(
SNSD((
SoP(
DNS(
SNBiH
(
(
(
(
HSP(BiH(
•
Demokratska(stranka(invalida(BiH(–(( (
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Zajedno za promjene
•
•
•
Stranka(pravde(i(povjerenja(( (
Demokratska(narodna(zajednica(
Socijal2demokratska(unija(
(
DSI(BiH(
ZZP
(
(
(
Bosanska stranka Bosansko podrinjska narodna stranka Bosanskohercegovačka patriotska stranka Sefer Halilović –
Demokratska Fronta - Željko Komšić –
Demokratska narodna zajednica BiH –
Demokratska stranka srpske Demokratski pokret Srpske Hrvatska demokratska unija BiH –
Hrvatska demokratska zajednica Bosne i Hercegovine 1990 –
Liberalnodemokratska stranka BiH Narodna stranka radom za boljitak – Za boljitak
Naša stranka Komunistička partija Bosne i Hercegovine –
Socijaldemokratska partija Bosne i Hercegovine –
Socijaldemokratska unija liberalnodemokratska stranka Stranka demokratske aktivnosti za evropsku BiH Stranka penzionera umirovljenika Bosne i Hercegovine –
Stranka za narod Bosne i Hercegovine Unija socijaldemokrata-unija za sve nas Laburistička stranka BiH - Laburisti Bih Novi pokret BiH Stranka pravedne politike Regionalni demokratski savez Tuzla Hrvatski savez HKDU – HRAST Srpska napredna stranka Savez za Promjene Partija ekonomske i socijalne pravde Složna narodna stranka Narodni demokratski pokret Seljačka stranka Za pravdu i red - lista Nebojše Vukanovića Snaga naroda Srpska radikalna stranka RS Srpska radikalna stranka Vojislav Šešelj Savez mladih za promjene Nezavisni demokratski savez Nezavisna demokratska stranka Nezavisna lista Partia ujedinjenih penzionera Republike Srpske
Vizionarski demokratski savez Savez za Bolje Goražde Independent candidates Nova hrvatska iniciativa Stranka nova srpska
SPP(
DNZ(
SDU(
BOSS
BPNS
BPS SH
DF
DNZ BiH
DSS
Depos
HDU BIH
HDZ1990
LDS BiH
NSRzB
NS
KP BiH
SDP BiH
SDU-LDS S
A-SDA
SP/U BIH
SzNBiH
USD
LSBiH
NPBiH
StrPP
RDS
HKDU - HRAST
SNS
SP
PEiSP
SLNS
NDP
SELS
ZPiR
SnN
SRS RS
SRS VJ
SMZP
NDS
NeDS
NL
PUPRS
VDS
SzBG
INDEP
NHI
SRNS
!
!
BiH – Monitoring media
Media Monitoring
From 1 September 2014, the Media Plan, with the support of the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID), the UK Government, the Embassy of the Kingdom of
Norway, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), and the European Union, has monitored
nine television channels, three radio stations, six newspapers and four online media outlet. The
monitoring of the media coverage of the pre-election period finished on 10 October. On 13
October, the Media Plan Institute resumed its monitoring of the media to focus on the postelection period, including the forming of the new state administration. The monitoring included
quantitative and qualitative methods of analysis. The following monitoring data cover the period
1-30 November. Quantitative analysis includes a number of numeric measures and indicators that
can be counted and analysed, including assessing and producing findings regarding the time or
space allocated to each contestant or other relevant political subjects (in the prime time news
programmes) and also evaluating the tone of the coverage in which these subjects were portrayed
– positive, neutral or negative.
Qualitative analysis evaluates the performance of selected media outlets against ethical and
professional standards, such as balance, accuracy, timely, choice of issues, omission of
information, advantage of incumbency, positioning of items, inflammatory language etc. The
enclosed charts show the coverage of political parties and other relevant subjects in the prime time
news programs.
Explanation of the charts
Political parties and other relevant subjects
!
!
The pie charts show the total percentage of airtime allocated to relevant political subjects
for each media outlet in the defined period.
The bar charts show the total number of hours and minutes of positive (green), neutral
(white) and negative (red) airtime/space devoted to relevant political subjects by each
media outlet in the defined period.
Monitored media outlets:
Newspapers: Glas Srpske, Nezavisne novine, Oslobodjenie, Večernji list, and Dnevni avaz
Web portals: Frontal and Klix
!
Monitoring media - BiH 2014
Glas Srpske
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
DF
1%
BOSS
1%
BiH PresSr
4%
SRSRS
1%
BiH PresBo
1%
DNS
5%
RSPres
9%
SP
3%
RSVicepresCr
1%
BiHCoM
7%
SNSD
26%
RSGov
21%
NDP
2%
HDZBiH
4%
SDS
4%
SzP
1%
PDPRS
3%
SDA
5%
SBB
1%
Total Pos.
Total Neutr.
Total Neg.
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
PUPRS
SRSRS
SDPBiH
DF
BOSS
SDU
DNS
SP
SNSD
NDP
SNSD - DNS
- SP
SDS
PDPRS
SzP
SBB
SDA
KD
HDZBiH
RSGov
BiHCoM
RSVicepresCr
RSPres
FedPres
BiH PresBo
BiH PresSr
BiH PresCr
0
Monitoring media - BiH 2014
Nezavisne novine
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
SDPBiH
4%
BiH PresCr
1%
USD
1%
DF
7%
BiH PresSr
2%
BiH PresBo
2%
RSPres
10%
DNS
4%
BiHCoM
4%
FBiHGov
1%
SP
5%
RSGov
8%
SNSD
14%
HDZBiH
11%
NDP
2%
KD
0%
SDS
5%
PDPRS
4%
SDA
11%
SzP
1%
Total Pos.
Total Neutr.
Total Neg.
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
SRSVS
USD
SRSRS
SDPBiH
DF
SP
DNS
SNSD
SNSD - DNS
- SP
SDS
NDP
PDPRS
SzP
SBB
HSP
SDA
KD
HNS
HDZBiH
RSGov
FBiHGov
BiHCoM
RSVicepresCr
RSPres
BiH PresBo
BiH PresSr
BiH PresCr
0
Monitoring media - BiH 2014
Oslobodjenie
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
BiH PresBo
1%
SRSRS
1%
SDPBiH
16%
RSPres
1%
BiHCoM
3%
FBiHGov
10%
NS
4%
HDZ1990
1%
RSGov
1%
DF
2%
HDZBiH
17%
BOSS
1%
DNS
1%
KD
1%
SP
2%
SDA
9%
SNSD
10%
SDS
11%
NDP
2%
PDPRS
3%
SBB
1%
SzP
1%
Total Pos.
2,500
Total Neutr.
Total Neg.
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
PEiSP
SRSRS
USD
SDPBiH
NS
DF
HDZ1990
DNS
BOSS
SP
NDP
SNSD
SDS
PDPRS
SzP
SBB
SDA
KD
HDZBiH
HNS
RSGov
FBiHGov
BiHCoM
RSPres
RSVicepresCr
BiH PresBo
FedVicepresB
o
FedVicepresS
r
0
Monitoring media - BiH 2014
Vecernij List
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
DF
4%
INDEP
2%
SDPBiH
4%
HDZ1990
5%
BiH PresCr
2%
BiH PresBo
1%
BiH PresSr
6%
RSPres
2%
BPSSH
1%
RSVicepresCr
3%
SPP
1%
BiHCoM
6%
SP
1%
FBiHGov
11%
SNSD
6%
SDS
5%
PDPRS
1%
HNS
2%
SDBiH
1%
SBB
2%
HDZBiH
22%
SDA
9%
Total Pos.
Total Neutr.
Total Neg.
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
INDEP
USD
HKDU -
NSRzB
SDPBiH
LDSBiH
DF
HDZ1990
SPP
BPSSH
HSPBiH
SP
DNS
SNSD
SDS
NDP
SzP
PDPRS
SBB
SDBiH
SDA
SbiH
HSPAS
HNS
HDZBiH
RSGov
BiHCoM
FBiHGov
RSPres
RSVicepresCr
FedVicepresB
BiH PresSr
BiH PresBo
BiH PresCr
0
Monitoring media - BiH 2014
Dnevni Avaz
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
NS
1%
USD
1%
SDPBiH
10%
BiH PresCr
1%
BiH PresSr
2%
BiH PresBo
2%
NSRzB
1%
RSPres
2%
DF
8%
BiHCoM
4%
BPSSH
1%
FBiHGov
9%
DNS
1%
RSGov
1%
SP
1%
HDZBiH
9%
SNSD
7%
NDP
1%
SDS
9%
SDA
20%
PDPRS
1%
SzP
1%
SBB
7%
Total Pos.
Total Neutr.
Total Neg.
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
INDEP
PUPRS
USD
LSBiH
A-SDA
NS
SDPBiH
NSRzB
DF
HDZ1990
BPSSH
SDU
BOSS
SP
DNS
SNSD
SDS
NDP
SzP
PDPRS
SBB
SDU
KD
SDA
RSGov
HDZBiH
FBiHGov
RSPres
BiHCoM
FedPres
BiH PresSr
BiH PresBo
BiH PresCr
0
Media monitoring - BiH 2014
Frontal
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
SDPBiH
1%
BiH PresSr
1%
SRSRS
3%
INDEP
3%
RSPres
11%
DF
4%
RSVicepresCr
1%
DNS
6%
BiHCoM
1%
SP
4%
RSGov
4%
HDZBiH
8%
KD
2%
SNSD
22%
SDA
7%
NDP
5%
SDS
9%
SzP
3%
PDPRS
3%
Total Pos.
50,000
Total Neutr.
Total Neg.
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
PUPRS
SRSRS
PEiSP
INDEP
SDPBiH
NSRzB
DF
HDZ1990
DNZ
BPSSH
SP
DNS
SNSD
SNSD - DNS
SDS
NDP
SzP
PDPRS
SBB
SbiH
KD
SDA
HDZBiH
HNS
RSGov
BiHCoM
RSVicepresC
RSPres
BiH PresSr
BiH PresBo
BiH PresCr
0
Monitoring media - BiH 2014
Klix
1/11/14 - 31/11/14
USD
3%
PUPRS
1%
INDEP
1%
BiH PresCr
1%
BiH PresSr
2%
SDPBiH
9%
BiH PresBo
2%
RSPres
5%
BiHCoM
8%
NS
1%
DF
5%
FBiHGov
4%
BPSSH
1%
RSGov
5%
DNS
1%
HDZBiH
9%
SP
1%
KD
1%
SNSD
10%
SDA
16%
NDP
4%
PDPRS
3%
SDS
4%
SBB
1%
SzP
2%
Total Pos.
Total Neutr.
Total Neg.
100,000
90,000
80,000
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
© MEMO 98, Martinengova 8, 811 02 Bratislava, tel./fax. (02) 6280 1199, www.memo98.sk
SRSRS
PUPRS
PEiSP
INDEP
USD
StrPP
A-SDA
NS
SDPBiH
NSRzB
DF
HDZ1990
BOSS
BPSSH
ZZP
SDU
SP
DNS
SNSD
SNSD - DNS
SDS
NDP
SzP
PDPRS
SBB
SDU
SbiH
KD
SDA
HNS
HDZBiH
RSGov
FBiHGov
RSPres
BiHCoM
FedPres
BiH PresSr
BiH PresBo
BiH PresCr
0
Monitored subjects
Croatian Member of the BiH Presidency
Serbian Member of the BiH Presidency
Bosnian Member of the BiH Presidency
President of FBiH
Bosniak Vice-president of FBiH
Serbian Member of Federal Presidency
President of Republika Srpska
Vice-president of Republika Srpska Croat
Vice-president of Republika Srpska Bosniak
BiH Council of Ministers
FBiH Government
RS Government
BiH PresCr
BiH PresSr
BiH PresBo
FedPres
Fed VicepresBo
FedVicepresSr
RSPres
RSVicepresCr
VicepresBo
BiH CoM
FBiH Gov
RS Gov
HNS
•
•
•
•
•
HNS
Hrvatska(demokratska(zajednica2((
(
(
Hrvatska(seljačka(stranka2(
(
(
(
Hrvatska(kršćansko2demokratska(unija(BiH(–(((
Hrvatska(stranka(prava(Ante(Starčevića2(
(
Hrvatska(stranka(prava(Herceg2Bosne(2(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Borci za novu politiku
•
•
BNP
Savez(za(novu(politiku(2((
(
(
(
Stranka(socijalne(sigurnosti(srpskih(boraca(2(( (
(
(
Koalicija Domovina
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
SNP(
SSSSB(
KD
Stranka(demokratske(akcije(2(( (
(
(
Stranka(za(Bosnu(i(Hercegovinu(2((
(
(
Savez(za(bolju(budućnost2Fahrudin(Radončić(((
Hrvatska(stranka(prava(
(
(
(
Prva(stranka(2(( (
(
(
(
(
Stranka(dijaspore(BiH(2((
(
(
(
Demokratska(fronta(BiH(
(
(
(
Stranka(demokratske(unije( (
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Savez za promjene
•
•
HDZ(BiH(
HSS(
HKDU(BiH(
HSP(AS(
HSPHB(
SDA(
SbiH(
SBB(
HSP(
PS(
SDBiH(
DF(BiH(
SDU(
SzP
Partija(demokratskog(progresa(Republike(Srpske(2((
Srpska(demokratska(stranka(2(((
(
(
(
(
PDP(RS(
SDS(
Savet SNSD-DNS-SP
•
•
•
Savez(nezavisnih(socijaldemokrata(–(( Milorad(Dodik( (
Socijalistička(partija(–(((
(
(
(
(
Demokratski(narodni(savez(–(( (
(
(
(
Snaga BiH
•
Hrvatska(stranka(prava(BiH(
SNSD((
SoP(
DNS(
SNBiH
(
(
(
(
HSP(BiH(
•
Demokratska(stranka(invalida(BiH(–(( (
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Zajedno za promjene
•
•
•
Stranka(pravde(i(povjerenja(( (
Demokratska(narodna(zajednica(
Socijal2demokratska(unija(
(
DSI(BiH(
ZZP
(
(
(
Bosanska stranka Bosansko podrinjska narodna stranka Bosanskohercegovačka patriotska stranka Sefer Halilović –
Demokratska Fronta - Željko Komšić –
Demokratska narodna zajednica BiH –
Demokratska stranka srpske Demokratski pokret Srpske Hrvatska demokratska unija BiH –
Hrvatska demokratska zajednica Bosne i Hercegovine 1990 –
Liberalnodemokratska stranka BiH Narodna stranka radom za boljitak – Za boljitak
Naša stranka Komunistička partija Bosne i Hercegovine –
Socijaldemokratska partija Bosne i Hercegovine –
Socijaldemokratska unija liberalnodemokratska stranka Stranka demokratske aktivnosti za evropsku BiH Stranka penzionera umirovljenika Bosne i Hercegovine –
Stranka za narod Bosne i Hercegovine Unija socijaldemokrata-unija za sve nas Laburistička stranka BiH - Laburisti Bih Novi pokret BiH Stranka pravedne politike Regionalni demokratski savez Tuzla Hrvatski savez HKDU – HRAST Srpska napredna stranka Savez za Promjene Partija ekonomske i socijalne pravde Složna narodna stranka Narodni demokratski pokret Seljačka stranka Za pravdu i red - lista Nebojše Vukanovića Snaga naroda Srpska radikalna stranka RS Srpska radikalna stranka Vojislav Šešelj Savez mladih za promjene Nezavisni demokratski savez Nezavisna demokratska stranka Nezavisna lista Partia ujedinjenih penzionera Republike Srpske
Vizionarski demokratski savez Savez za Bolje Goražde Independent candidates Nova hrvatska iniciativa Stranka nova srpska
SPP(
DNZ(
SDU(
BOSS
BPNS
BPS SH
DF
DNZ BiH
DSS
Depos
HDU BIH
HDZ1990
LDS BiH
NSRzB
NS
KP BiH
SDP BiH
SDU-LDS S
A-SDA
SP/U BIH
SzNBiH
USD
LSBiH
NPBiH
StrPP
RDS
HKDU - HRAST
SNS
SP
PEiSP
SLNS
NDP
SELS
ZPiR
SnN
SRS RS
SRS VJ
SMZP
NDS
NeDS
NL
PUPRS
VDS
SzBG
INDEP
NHI
SRNS