cebars - The TETRAD
Transcription
cebars - The TETRAD
CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview CEBARS Community Education Behavioral Adjustment Retraining and Stabilization Overview of an innovative, flexible, open-ended program for communities (including educational, social service and law enforcement agencies) to assist youth, adults, and the general population, including the long-term unemployed, as well as ex-offenders and repeatoffenders, in developing personal and social skills, education (with a focus upon science, technology, engineering and mathematics, and the arts and crafts) for (re)introduction and advancement in their families and communities. Version 0.1 (begun) Tuesday, 6.March.2012 (released) Monday, March12, 2012 Martin Dudziak, PhD Note: this version (0.1) is a set of “rough-hewn” notes. As a very simple document, without certain figures and drawings as well, this will leave many open questions. Some of them are easily answered, and some of them are indeed still “open.” The purpose of this early release is to provide specific leading persons with the “core information” about the program, and in particular how it relates to work underway presently which is desirable to continue. Note: there is no solicitation for funding or expenses in the CEBARS program from public agencies or departments. This is an entirely privately-funded and probono program. Key accompanying referential and background documents are listed in APPENDIX 1; these and more are available online. Within APPENDIX 2 is information on the main project task proposed for CEBARS in 2012-2015, namely MOSES, a science project with global participation and impact, and one very well suited by participation by the cultural and demographic diversity of participants within CEBARS. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 1 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview I – Executive Summary The Problem Situation Virtually every community, including many in Virginia and neighboring states of the USA, and at epidemic levels in other countries, faces an extraordinary combination of four closely-coupled and interdependent social problems that have severe implications for crime and violent crime in particular, and for the decline of our fundamental social order, our rule of law, our social stability. CEBARS is a well-defined program to mitigate the increase in crime and the repeat of offenses, especially those that are of a high-impact upon children, youth and families, by creating a positive and reinforcing drive for self-esteem and selfactualization through an integration of science, technology and the arts. In spite of many admirable and dedicated efforts by social service, judicial and law enforcement communities, and in spite of significant expenditures of budgets in present times when budgets are being curtailed, these four problems are only becoming worse and they are bringing more severe threats to overall community stabilization and integrity. If we are unable to stem the tide, we will accelerate a slide into disorder and decadence with highly unpredictable and uncontrollable consequences. These four problems may be summarized as follows: (1) Decline in educational interest, achievement, retention and lifelong use of fundamental areas of learning, particularly in the domains of Critical Thinking and “STEM” (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) by increasing numbers of the population. This is especially the case among economically disadvantaged and minority population segments, and most dramatically among separated or single-parent households where one or both parents have been imprisoned for a variety of criminal and/or civil judgments. (2) Rising and continued unemployment, underemployment and abandonment of employment efforts by members of the population, especially among the aforementioned groups. This situation is tightly coupled with concomitant rising disaffection and depression with respect to employment and achievement hopes and goals, causing reduction in personal vocation ambitions, lifestyle goals, and self-actualization hopes. One of the major consequences is a general angst and sense of hopelessness that aids and abets actions of violence against self and others, abuse of alcohol and drugs, petty and grand larceny, and acts of aggression toward family members and friends, and especially toward children. (3) Increase in repetitive crimes and a general “ambient” criminal lifestyle, particularly involving the use of drugs, alcohol, and related abuses, and particularly linked with domestic violence, abuse, and threats thereof, including DUI abuses of motor vehicle operation, prostitution, child abuse and sexual abuse in general. Two major consequences of this include the decline of individual and family stability, further impoverishment, and a general decline in critical and ethical thinking among persons who are inherently intelligent and capable of living balanced lives if there can be infused into their lifestyle a greater sense of worth, self-esteem, respect for self and others, and a vision that there really can be “light at the end of the tunnel.” (4) Declines in the outreach, connectivity, and general effectiveness of many traditional, conventional programs – especially those offered by public service providers (e.g., DSS, DOH, Community Mental Health, DCJ). This decline is due in great part to the three aforementioned major problems coupled with the added “volatile accelerants” of long-term economic depression affecting state and local budgets and the economic stability of the populations most affected and Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 2 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview most in need of positive, innovative, appropriate support and reinforcement. The decline is not a fault of the individuals and staff who are working on those programs, but the fact is simply that our present society is overwhelmed with these problems, there are not enough resources, and furthermore, many of these traditional approaches are lacking in one major respect – they do not provide the engagement, the enthusiasm, the excitement, the positive reinforcement, that is necessary for many individuals to build up the self-esteem and self-respect and long-term vision that is necessary for them to want to really “climb out of the pit in which they have allowed themselves to sink.” CEBARS as a Different Tool and Pathway to Success CEBARS is a program that can make a very significant change for some of these individuals and their families. It “flies in the face” of many traditional views about how to conduct education, rehabilitation, community readjustment and workforce retraining. It will be criticized as being unorthodox and nonstandard, and the emphasis upon such scientific and artistic domains such as involve space exploration and off-planet development will at first seem to be unrealistic given today’s economic situation in particular. However it can and will be demonstrated that CEBARS will not only work but that it is the best approach to be taken in order to save our future generations. The central purpose of this overview white paper is to outline how and why it can be successful where other programs, especially those that are more “classroom” or “group encounter session” oriented, cannot work as well. These rapidly increasing problems, as summarized into four categories above, are choking and stifling both our general communities and the public service agencies that are trying their best to serve them. The outlook now, in 2012, is not promising or encouraging at all. However, there is a remarkably positive and innovative approach that can definitely “turn the tide” and produce dramatic, rapid, and measurement effective – and lasting – results that serve everyone’s best interests and which can be a powerful “role model” and “success story” for those communities and their governmental agencies that are bold, strong, and willing to “give change a chance” for the benefit of everyone. This new approach is CEBARS and it is described here in the context of one singular and very unique implementation that will dominate the intial activites of the program. CEBARS is a program for Community education, for Behavioral Adjustment, for workforce Retraining and for personal, familial and social Stabilization. The historical development of CEBARS extends back in time for more than two decades, arguably even longer, to work initiated in the context of community-based crisis counseling volunteer services. There are several distinct “prototype” successes, and this history of work by several closely collaborating individuals and groups encompasses “hands-on, feet on the ground” work as well as formal studies. In short, CEBARS is not an “academic exercise” but a series of experiments and experiences that have provided foundations for each next step forward. CEBARS does not put people, willing or unwilling, into a purely classroom setting. It provides them ways to work as teams of 2, 3, 4, or up to 7 people as a Team, and to do specific, tangible, physical (as well as academic and computerbased) tasks, and to Learn By Doing and by seeing the results all come together in the specific project undertaken. CEBARS also provides rewards, and it is modeled in part after successful science/education oriented competitions that range from spelling bees to science fairs. Participants will have goals that are not only abstract, not only “maybe in the future”, but measurable and with rewards that build social stamina and esteem. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 3 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview Where have some of these prior projects been conducted? The following list provides a summary; separate papers and reports are available for review about details of those projects. USA New York – volunteer-assisted after-school program focused on life sciences for high school students Michigan – STEM and general education program for participants in community mental health program (former inmates released from state hospitals) Ohio – on-site weekend science lessons and experiments conducted at Battelle Laboratories California – “On the Beach” and inner city programs for rehabilitating former drug users Virginia – after-school and weekend programs that enabled inner-city high school students to participate in such advanced experienced as using scanning probe (nanoscale) microscopes and virtual reality computing Texas – hands-on learning of environmental testing and monitoring for middle and high school students, focusing upon sample collection in streams and wetlands Louisiana – hands-on environmental testing in post-Katrina neighborhoods of New Orleans Costa Rica – “Saño y Salvo” program involving middle and high school students and young adults with internet-based project for providing advice, safe havens, and relief for persons suffering from abuse and victimization, especially involving drugs and human trafficking for illicit sex and other purposes. Also, a program focused upon instilling a spirit of innovation and open-ended creativity, for children of ages 8 and up, using simple robotics. Germany, Spain, Israel, Egypt, Russia, Japan, Jordan, Ukraine, Sweden, United Kingdom, USA – participation by teams of diversified-age students in FUTURES GATEWAY, an online future-world oriented competition to develop projects reflecting future lifestyles, technologies, and potential breakthroughs – refer to additional documents and websites. These projects varied widely and were deliberately very open-ended in order to instill a sense of freedom and independence of thinking among each team and within each participant. II - CEBARS Activities and Implementation One of the critical tasks to advance education and training is to engage and sustain interest. Put a group of people together into a classroom type setting where there are negative associations from the past and combined with feelings of “I can’t” and general resentment over the environment, and there will not be as good an outcome as if people are put together into a setting where they are physically doing something, seeing the results of their learning, literally in hand, and where there is the ability to work as a team. What is more fun? Standing alone shooting a basketball through the hoop or hitting the tennis ball against the wall, or playing in an actual game of basketball or tennis? Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 4 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview The CEBARS approach is to do so through having small teams of student-participants working together on a project that is not just a “book exercise” but a project with physical, tangible results, with visibility, and with the payoff that participants can feel that they are a genuine part of something bigger than themselves and greater in value than doing book or computer exercises and taking some exams. Enter MOSES – a project that is physical, concrete, and with high attraction and visibility for the public worldwide. MOSES is about energy, environment, health, national and planetary security, and foremost, it is about Space. Exploration, commercialization and space-based defense of no less than the whole of planet Earth. “MOSES” = Modular Organic-assembly Space-based Engineering System. It is a robotically assembled and operated platform for conducting a variety of sequential and parallel operations, one of the foremost being planetary defense against collisions from a variety of asteroids, comets and meteors. APPENDIX 2 provides a rough-draft introduction to what MOSES entails. A first reaction may be, from some readers, “This is impossible! Too complex, too difficult, too demanding, too…” In fact, the situation is quite the opposite. Building a small-scale, on-the-ground demonstration model of MOSES is precisely what will help people to get engaged and get excited about subjects like math, geometry, earth science, space, mechanics, and a variety of both vocational and academic skills. The nature of the project will provide for learning that goes hand-in-hand with hands-on doing and making of simple components that illustrate how MOSES will work. There are no complex electronics or computational components involved. There are no motors, no elaborate and detailed photovoltaics, nothing that is in the real MOSES, but there will be everything needed to illustrate how MOSES will operate, because things will be built with manual features that can be handled by people without the use of advanced technology or skill sets. Let’s remember who this is for, CEBARS and specifically the construction of a MOSES demo-prototype. The target audience consists of youth from ages 12 and up, young adults, and middle-aged adults, and senior-aged adults. Some are in high school, some are identified as being intelligent and brilliant and without any social problems, and some are identified as being at-risk, or even juvenile/adult offenders with criminal records. Some of the people are mentors and experts, and it is a pleasure to be able to say that there are quite a few recognized figures from different disciplines who have volunteered to serve in such mentorship capacities. In some ways CEBARS is creating a learning environment that spans literally from GED through to college-level and beyond, and indeed there are similarities with such programs as the Intel Science Fair, the work of the X Prize Foundation and the international Academic Olympiad. Here in Virginia there is the Mathematics and Science Center and every year competitions are help for middle/high school students to create and submit projects, with aspirations of taking their projects to the state level and national level and to the Inel-sponsored Science Fair where awards including even full scholarships are among the possibilities. CEBARS will no doubt have something similar at for those who participate and keep going all the way until the project – in this case the manual working prototype demo of MOSES – is completed. The details will be worked out – it is just a matter of getting underway and not sitting still but going forward into Action. It is very important to remember the importance of participants being able to say to themselves and to others, “Look at this! I did that! I learned this and made that and it works and it looks cool!” This is such a big difference from sitting in a chair, listening to someone lecture and draw on the blackboard, and Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 5 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview doing exercises, reading, and then taking exams in order to get a grade, a simple number. Here the result is something that can be held, turned, given, and shown to others – including family and friends. Moreover, MOSES as built through CEBARS is not going to be seen by only a few people in isolated places. The whole project, even though barely stated and barely off the drawing board, is getting attention in not only formal scientific and academic circles but also within the national media. This is very important. People are going to be able to fo their work as participants and to be able to see what they have made, with their minds and hands, getting media attention. Think of what this is going to do for selfesteem, for self-respect, for self-actualization, and for changing someone’s life around so that they are not looking to the “street” and its drugs and crime for attention and affirmation and approval, but rather to their brains and to their collaboration with others on creative, innovative, and ethically sound Work! CEBARS is about People, not just “cool projects” The reason for focusing upon MOSES and upon STEM topics in general is because these are the things that will bet and most engage people to participate, to act, to be creative and to get excited. Recall the fundamental goals: reduction in alcohol and drug abuse, reduction in bullying, reduction in petty and grand larceny, reduction in DUI, reduction in domestic abuse and violence, reduction in many other crimes both small and severe, non-violent and violent. And with these reductions, a positive surge in genuine interest in things like science and math, and in vocational, mechanical workshop skills and trades, and very important – an increase in self-esteem, self-worth, and having goals that one can believe are attainable. CEBARS, in any of its projects, will give participants not only ideas, concepts, and “book learning” (whether in a book, a lecture or something on a computer screen), but also something that they can call their own and that will be visible to others. It’s publicity and a moment to claim ownership for what one has done. This is exactly what is needed for many people today, especially those who have been abused, neglected, ignored, put down, bullied, and for whom “the American Dream” has often seemed to be something far and forever out of reach, unattainable, closed-off behind a big stone wall. Through CEBARS activities we can dissolve that wall and let people see that they can get attention, recognition, praise and reward as Persons, as Individuals, and that one does not have to either “give up and surrender” to depression and hopelessness, nor go the route of criminal activities in order to have meaning and a sense of worth in life. We all need attention, recognition, esteem, respect. Especially when we are young and getting our first steps out into the World. Here in CEBARS, and especially with a “hot shot” project like MOSES, we have the means not only to energize and empower some individuals into a direction totally differently from that which leads down, down, down to low self-esteem, depression and hopelessness, and thereafter to become an abuser, an addict, a criminal, a derelict, but also we can build and distribute a Model that can be used in many communities worldwide. Specifics The first undertaking within CEBARS will have a very open-ended and growing team of students and learners participating under the guidance and management of experienced professionals and mentors Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 6 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview who come with backgrounds in several complementary and necessary disciplines. The network of small teams will construct a demonstration model, a working prototype albeit with manual simulation and operation, of MOSES. All of the seven fundamental operational categories will be demonstrated, visually, for people to see and understand, albeit manually. How will this be accomplished, with teams that are physically diverse in different communities and indeed countries, and with the claim that this can be done with practically no budget in comparison to other major scientific projects? First we begin, literally, with the equivalent of sticks, strings, and sheets. Yes, we will be using everyday simple materials. We begin with wood, cloth, pastic, cabling, wires, and some “nuts and bolts.” Also, we begin with some basic elementary arithmetic, geometry, and classical science., ibn the process training and teaching earth sciences, computers, elementary physics, chemistry and biology, and Space – yes, Space, the Final Frontier. Organizationally, CEBARS is organized and ready to start work immediately. The infrastructure is set up, the volunteers are assembling and training, and materials, tools and a workplace are being prepared. Restatement of the Problems and the Solutions Offered Given the problems as presented in the Executive Summary, compounded by an extensive and continuing economic depression that affects especially the middle and lower income segments of the American population, we are experiencing and will continue to experience declines in education levels, performance and achievement in areas of STEM fields and especially where innovation, discovery and advancement are involved. The following areas are critical for not only the USA but for the entire free, democratic-aspiringk, nonradical world, and indeed for the entire planet of all our diverse societies. We are a totally globalinterconnected, global-interdependent society. Unless we properly, effectively and speedily address our needs and deficits in these fundamental areas, we face everything from stagnation and backsliding into a new “Dark Age” period. To the very real and imminent risk of civilization’s collapse and the extinction of life as we know it and have known it in our lifetimes and in those of the past fifty generations. Here is what MOSES, the first focus of CEBARS, will provide, and this is what we need to be working on today, not putting off to undefined future decades and centuries. But remember please! Within CEBARS, right now, we are building mock-up, demonstrable prototypes of how this will work – we are not going to initially produce the full-scale launchable system! However, by doing the former, and by raising population awareness and consciousness, we will be able to get the full MODES assembled, launched, and operational within a timeframe already worked on rigorously, one that has a potential launch date as early as 2013: ASTRIC Used for ASTRIC functions, MOSES is deployed to operate as a self-powered robotic net that will use its cabling and panes to wrap itself around an object such as a small asteroid or some piece of space debris. Then, by use of the tnodes (tetranodes) and their manipulation of the cabling, this “captured” or “contained” object can be either moved or have some critical aspects of its trajectory altered. The most obvious and significant such trajectory alteration would be to alter the trajectory of an asteroid that would be on a collision course with the Earth, doing such modifications as are necessary for the object to either miss hitting the earth or else having a Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 7 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview new course that will cause it to burn up completely or sufficiently so as to cause less damage and loss of life on Earth. CBRAS Using the SAP modules that are attached as part of MOSES, in –space or on-planet surveying, observation, and sensing for specific chemicals, biological agents, or radioactive substances is conducted. The operations are powered by the photovoltaic power generation of the MOSES sheet. Some of the sensor technologies that may be used for CBRAS operations include variations of PAS and RePAS using lasers as well as FTIR for short-range applications. Essentially, the core suite of technologies are those which are employed today for aerial as well as astrophysical exploration. CMEMP This is a critical and highly advanced defense operation for protecting regions of Earth from either natural (i.e., solar discharge) or intentional (i.e., nuclear weapon discharge) electromagnetic pulses (EMP) that can be extremely disruptive to electronics including computers and communication devices. Using a special SAP module designed for this purpose and kept “charged” by the power generated through the MOSES sheet, MOSES will generate a counter-pulse, along the principles of noise-cancellation but in this case using an electromagnetic burst, that will mitigate and disrupt the EMP that is a threat. The capability of MOSES will be limited in comparison to some possible EMP events, but it can nonetheless be effective at reducing an EMP catastrophe on Earth. EMPGT Given the ability of MOSES to adjust individual panes and larger panels, regions and the entire positioning of the main sheet, MOSES is an optimal architecture for generating electrical power that can be then beamed, for instance as a microwave laser (maser) yo other points in space, or to any specific (and even mobile) reception point on Earth. This enables MOSES to be a rapiddeployment power generator and transmitter for emergency applications where power has been severely disrupted on Earth. Align the sheet, generate the power, and beam it through one of the SAPs to a particular point on the planet. EOM Using different SAPs, MOSES can be emp,oyed for round-the-clock permanent observation and monitoring of a variety of Earth-based (or Moon—based) environmental conditions. With respect to Earth, the main focus areas will include monitoring of climate change, vegetation, chemical spills, storms, tsunamis, and illicit operations ranging from logging to chemical and industrial pollution. RSBE The SAP modules employed for these operations will provide for safe, off-planet, roboticmaintained experimentation with both natural and synthetic biological organisms. MOSES provides the power through its sheet, and the experiments are controlled by experimenters on Earth or in another space vehicle (e.g., ISS). Thus, MOSES provides the ‘ultimate biohazard Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 8 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview clean room” for potentially dangerous experiments such as modifications to natural viral strains or experiments with synthetic organisms. SAC As a reconfigurable large-scale and divisible set of regions and panels making up a singular sheet, and with options for different types of SAP units that can include robotic arms, MOSES can be employed in a variety of ways for space-based assembly and construction of other structures including manned stations and colonies, as well as very large scale power generation systems. Comments on Space Exploration, Commercialization, Security, and National Space Programs Given our economic problems and our political/social fragmentation, as a planetary society and also within nations such as the USA, there can be huge questions about how we can proceed to work effectively on what may be termed, “Manhattan” or “Bletchley Park” scale projects. Big ones, involving many diverse people and skill sets. Let’s consider just one country that has been a leader in space science and exploration, the USA. America has, unfortunately, virtually dropped off the map in terms of new space exploration, development and commercialization. The nation is in deep risk of losing not only its former long-standing leadership and prowess in space technology, and a solid presence among countries that are active in space projects, but we are slipping even further beyond other nations that arguably have less than planetary, unified goals in mind – for instance, China, Russia, and even Iran. Furthermore, it is arguable that space engineering and systems, both manned and unmanned, are critical now and in the future for not only “space” per se but also for other important dimensions of industrial, manufacturing, medical, and even consumer electronics business, because of the importance to conduct certain types of work (e.g., some nanoscalar manufacturing and some important but dangerous synthetic biology research) in the low/zero gravity and the safety of outer space. MOSES is just one system, one project, one new Beginning. However, it is one of the most, and arguably the most, practical and feasible project on which persons in the CEBARS program can work and really accomplish something that will stand out in their lives, among their peers, and be of definite long-term benefit for America and the World. Simple, bold, clear, and defensible, this is our main point. A true “STEM” project that can be effectively started (and is already started) with a minimalist budget, minimalist resources including tools, materials and workspace, with some low-tech and some very high-tech tools (already donated, for instance, a “3D printer” system for making plastic physical models based upon 3D (“CAD”) computer data), and all of this being done in a manner that attracts and pulls in the interest, support and international collaboration of many participants and expert mentors. MOSES is the centerpiece, the focal work of the young, global initiative known as the ECOADUNA Programme (described at http://ecoaduna.instinnovstudy.org/forum and other websites). MOSES is not only the centerpiece but literally the platform, the physical base, for several other ECOADUNA projects, all of which are open to and purposively designed to sustain and nurture CEBARS activities. The name, “ECOADUNA”, comes from the synthesis of “economics,” “ecosystem,” and “coadunatio” (the Latin word for “bringing and gathering together things, people, objetcs, ideas, that together form a whole, a system, a synergy”). What CEBARS (and the ECOADUNA Programme as a whole) needs now, today, in early 2012, is something that can be physically seen, shown, and demonstrated, here on Earth, not only technical Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 9 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview papers, reports, exam scores, computer simulations, and visual “virtuals.” This “special something” starts literally with wood, plastic, textiles, metal wires and cables, nuts and bolts, and very ordinary, everyday “Home Depot” hardware. This starts with design and fabrication that is done with hand tools and power tools and yes, some sophisticated ones including computers, but all – ALL – things and methods that can be learned, understood, and used by anyone with a keen mind and a desire to better themselves, to “get out of any hole or crack in which they happened to fall into during life.” For many people, those holes and cracks originated with childhood neglect and abuse. For others, it was some problem or problems during adolescence or adulthood. For some it was connected with health, with loss of employment, with bad judgments and unforgiving, unrelenting other people and institutions. Now back to MOSES as a physical project being made by people, by teams that are also diverse in their geography as well as their membership demographics. At first MOSES is literally and purely a Model, but one large enough to be seen by and to impress many other people, even from a distance – outdoors. In carefully planned stages already prepared, the Model becomes increasingly, step by step, realistic and functional in several important respects so that anyone and everyone seeing it, touching it, can understand how it works. This is why the MOSES prototype starts out large enough to span a basketball court but small enough to be packed up and hauled from one demo site to another in a pickup truck. This is why this first MOSES can be lifted aloft into the sky by a hot air balloon, for instance, and carried aloft at a low altitude for some very realistic, live, in-the-air demos so that people can see how it can be manipulated and controlled remotely by not only its own computers and robots but by someone who is operating an interface with today’s consumer communications and gaming technology (e.h., iPad, iPhone, Android, Kinect). It is important to recognize that all of the technologies that will be employed in the first “manual, on-ground, demo version” of MOSES is being designed and built with existing, proven, post-research, postcommercialization components. This is very important. Among other things it enables many types of persons to “jump in” to the project without having a steep learning curve, since sl many of the components are already quite familiar through everyday use. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 10 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview The MOSES Project Team is set to commence work on Phase 1 of the overall task as soon as possible, aiming for an official start date of April 5, 2012. We are set to engage a number of individuals as volunteers and suppliers of different resources including labor. This is precisely the best type of project for serving critical, under-nourished community education, workforce retraining, and at-risk or postoffense (including repeat offender) juvenile and adult individuals. MOSES is simply “just right” and “just what the doctor ordered” for meeting important, growing needs in almost all of our communities, large or small, urban or rural. All of this activity needs to start somewhere, physically, geographically, and simply, to “Get Going and Just DO IT.” Talk and discussion, evaluation and further re-evaluation, can go on and on ad infinitum. Simply because some organizations and entities, especially those of a political nature, often seem to become mired in the quicksands and tar pits of endless talk and no action, does not mean that MOSES, and the entire CEBARS program, needs to follow, lemming-like, to the same ill end of inaction and stagnation. Meanwhile, great city-killer and country-killer rocks like Apophis and still-undetected asteroids are hurtling at thousands of miles per hour toward possible collision with our planet Earth which is presently our only Home. There is no “emergency shelter” for an Apophis scale event on Earth. There is, however, MOSES as an emergency protector for the planet. Join with us and let us build together MOSES, starting with the equivalent of LEGO, KBEX and Erector set components. Then go with us as we show the whole world, not only through YouTube videos and computer models, but concretely, visually, in a touch-and-feel way, how the real MOSES works and how important it is for our Future. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 11 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview III – Solution and Implementation Summary The reader is refered to APPENDIX 2 for material describing MOSES itself as a system. In this section we want to make a few points clear about the topic of “how it will all be done.” We can build the MOSES prototype starting with a small and distributed crew of volunteers using basic building materials and tools that are familiar to anyone who has ever, built, repaired, or maintained a home. There will be at least one physical place for parts fabrication and assembly. In fact, we propose that there should be two teams with two places for work, one in or near Richmond, Virginia, and one in or near Bogota, Colombia. The reasons for these two locations as “hubs” has to do with the presence of “pioneer innovator people” who are the founders and initiators, and the mentors, and the volunteer learner-participants. This initial dual focus (not to block any third, fourth, and subsequent other “hubs”, will be very valuable for bridging a number of thresholds and removing old-style, old-era paradigms about age, sex, ethnicity and nationality, economic status, and other inappropriate discriminators. CEBARS is about women and men, children and adults of all ages, white and black, English-speaking and non-English-speaking, pre-college education and postgraduate education. How will the first version of MOSES be constructed? It will be a single array (sheet) of panes that consist of nodes (“tnodes”) and pane fabrics. This will result ina quilt-like structure that will resemble a real MOSES array. What matters very much is that this array can be manually manipulated to take on different contours, different topologies. There will be no full-scale photovoltaic power generation and storage. There will be no cable extension/retraction motors, and there will be no thrusters to cause movement. Initially, everything will be managed manually. But the entire array, the Sheet, will be able to be reshaped and contoured from convex to concave and with ripples and waves in the structure, as it will be done automatically and electronically, and with thrusters, in actual space-based operations. Thus, tnodes will be made of polyethylene or wood or both, with screws and epoxy cement and angle brances. Thruster and cable retractor components will be replicated with plastic or wood elements for the proper visual effects. Remember that the initial version is to show people how it will appear, and to be giving the learner-participants reasonable things to do, to learn, and to gain a sense of accomplishment from the construction. [ Several figures go here with short explanations ] The cable wires between tnodes will be adjustable, using small screw and clamp mechanisms. In a manner similar to the actual design, the tcables will be inserted through wrap-around loops on the pane fabrics. Indeed this means that changing the geometry of the Sheet will require a lot of small adjustments, but that is alright for the purposes of the first version model. The pane fabrics may be ordinary materials, but there will be replication of image and effect of the photovoltaic and mirrored panes, again for realism. Some of the panes will actually be polymer-based photovoltaic surfaces and they will operate and generate power that can be stored and then used to operate small instruments. Once again, this is about “show and tell” and not about creating the first launchable system. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 12 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview There will be more material in subsequent versions of this document, concerning specific dimensions of each pane and each tnode, as well as about schedule, budget, and personnel. In the interests of getting this initial information out ot the right audience as soon as possible, those data sections are being omitted in this “pre-pre-release” version. Time is of the essence and what is given above should be adequate for people to understand the basics. Do we have a schedule? Yes. Is there a budget? Yes. Approximately $64,000 in total, including the costs for taking the entire MOSES array on a “road tour” to a few cities. Are mechanisms in place and are processes underway to secure this budget from grants and contributions? Yes, absolutely. How far along are we? Around the $10K mark. However, there may be a big boost from some private contributions and special awards in the next few months, in perfect timing with the projected pace of activities. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 13 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview APPENDIX 1 Supportive Prior Documents and Web-based References These are provided online at the following URL: http://cebars.instinnovstudy.org/supporting-social-documents This list will gradually grow and for now it is a simple list of downloadable files. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 14 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview APPENDIX 2 Supportive MOSES Documentation MOSES is a space-based (and optionally high-altitude-based), unmanned platform that is designed to serve multiple functions which relate to space-based engineering and the operation of several different categories of operation that may be conducted both sequentially and in parallel. The MOSES platform consists of an array of small, uniform components that are connected by extensible/retractable cables that are also the edges of flexible triangular panes. These panes, and the complete array of panes constituting one MOSES platform, constitute mobile surfaces that are used for photovoltaic power generation or visible/infrared light reflection or (in certain operations) for physical wrapping and collecting of a variety of objects. Such “target” objects for gathering or for trajectory reorientation include both natural and man-made objects. In both cases these objects may be either parts of an assembly (construction) process or else they may pose a threat for collision with another space object (e.g., satellite or space station) or for collision with Earth. These categories of operation, listed here, are described within this document and they comprise the seven interconnected and interchangeable types of operations that can be conducted with the MOSES platform: • ASTRIC Astronomical Object Retrieval, Intervention and Countermeasures • CBRAS Chemical, Biological and radioactive Agent Surveying, Observation and Sensing (CBRASOS) • CMEMP EMP Countermeasure by Counterpulse • EOM Environmental Observation and Monitoring • EMPGT Electromagnetic Power Generation and Transmission • RSBE Remote Synthetic Biology Experimentation • SAC Space-based Assembly and Construction Each of these categories of operations is described in Section III. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 15 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview MOSES is a system designed primarily for use in orbital space regions around the Earth, moon or other astronomical bodies including asteroids and other planets. The development of MOSES is planned as the primary, focal project of the ECOADUNA Programme which is an international programme designed to produce results such as MOSES by the interaction and collaboration of many institutions and individuals from an open global community. The term, “MOSES”, is derived from the fact that the entire system is highly modular, and it is assembled and physically developed in a manner that can be termed “organic” rather than “mechanistic.” It is spacebased in its operations, but there is a way to employ MOSES in high-altitude situations using balloons and aircraft as support vehicles. It is an engineering system, because it is designed to provide the means to conduct different types of engineering, as evidenced by the major categories of operation that have been listed above.. [THERE IS MORE TO COME FOR HERE IN SUBSEQUENT VERSIONS] Section II – MOSES Formal Architectural Definition MOSES is a very flexible sheet or plane of segmented components and it is principally a flat structure that unfolds and self-assembles once it has been brought by a launch or carrier vehicle to its primary location for deployment. There are optionally one or two additional components that extend above and below the primary sheet (array) and which can be manipulated in their positions as well. Within the set of Figures 1 through 5 are provided artist renditions of how MOSES appears from different views. The highly abstracted image in Figure 1 is intended to provide a very rough sense of the general geometry of MOSES, although it should be understood that the main array is not necessarily square (it may be closer to a circle, or an ellipse, or any of several polygons that can be composed of a finite number of triangular components), and there is no solid exterior surface as is the case with the crystal structure of Figure 1. Figure 1 – the abstract MOSES model Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 16 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview Figure 2 –the MOSES sheet model Figure 3 – the MOSES 3D model showing the SAP Figure 4 –MOSES launch structure unwrapping itself and deploying Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 17 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview Figure 5 –MOSES tnode (tetranode) component Brief Formal Definitions and Descriptions of Components MOSES is assembled from two fundamental types of components or “building blocks” – panes and nodes that connect the panes. A pane (pn) is a unit structure made of a pane fabric, three tnodes and three tcables. The pane fabric is a flexible triangular segment of material that can have one or more different properties, including an OLEDtype polymer photovoltaic generating surface or a mirrored material for high-intensity reflection of light. For one example, there is CIGS photovoltaic technology, and for another, there is the polymer materials produced by Konarka and other companies. A node is termed a tetranode or tnode (tn) and this is the tetrahedron-shaped unit to which panes are attached through high-strength composite-material cabling that runs through loops on the slides of the pane. Each node has four thrusters, one in the center of each face of the tnode, and four motors for extending and retracting cables from each of the vertices of the tnode. A tcable (tc) is a high-performance, composite-material-based cable that is extensible and retractable through the operations of motors that is in the tnode(s) to which the tcable is connected. Tcables run through loops that are on the sides of each pane, and they run from tnode vertiex to tnode vertex. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 18 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview A panel (pnl) is a contiguous group of panes. There is no fixed size or other requirements but a panel is a section of more than one pane and corresponding tnodes that can be moved separately as a unit. Although there is no requirement that the panes within a panel be all of the same type, that would be the usual case. A region (reg) is a contiguous set of panels. Again there are no absolute fixed requirements for uniformity of the pane surfaces and functions, but it would be the usual case for all panels in a given region to be similar. A sheet (sh) is a contiguous set of regions that comprise the entirely of the MOSES main platform, excluding any SAP units. The sheet essentially defines the entire platform that makes up one MOSES installation. A SAP (Sensor-Actuator-Pod.Platform) is a specialized and interchangeable unit that is positioned above and/or below the center of the sheet. It is adapted to hold multiple instruments including those for sensing (optical, other EM frequencies) and also equipment such as an adjustable-frequency laser that can be used for actions on nearby or far-away targets. Each SAP is entirely powered electronically and/or optically (e.g., acting as a lens for light focused on its inside base from the sheet or some regions thereof0. Each SAP is equipped with one ion propulsion engine and two thrusters for movement in sync with various tnodes of the entire system of sheet plus tnodes, when the entire MOSES platform needs to be moved as a whole. Such movements may be for reorientation or for linear, longer-distance translation movement. There is a maximum of two SAPs for each MOSES platform, although others can be maintained by a tethering mechanism, in storage for future use by replacement of current-position SAPs. Each SAP is connected to 4 tnodes with retractable, adjustable tensegrity cables. The following may aid in understanding the relations between MOSES components and the manners in which the system is both assembled and disassembled. • Three tnodes, three tcables, and one pane fabric make up a pane. • An indefinite number (n) of panes make up one panel. • An indefinite number (p) of panels makes up one region. • An indefinite number (r) of regions makes up one sheet. • One sheet plus one or more SAPs make a complete MOSES. [THERE IS MORE TO COME FOR HERE IN SUBSEQUENT VERSIONS] Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 19 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview Section III – MOSES Categories of Operation ASTRIC Used for ASTRIC functions, MOSES is deployed to operate as a self-powered robotic net that will use its cabling and panes to wrap itself around an object such as a small asteroid or some piece of space debris. Then, by use of the tnodes (tetranodes) and their manipulation of the cabling, this “captured” or “contained” object can be either moved or have some critical aspects of its trajectory altered. The most obvious and significant such trajectory alteration would be to alter the trajectory of an asteroid that would be on a collision course with the Earth, doing such modifications as are necessary for the object to either miss hitting the earth or else having a new course that will cause it to burn up completely or sufficiently so as to cause less damage and loss of life on Earth. CBRAS Using the SAP modules that are attached as part of MOSES, in –space or on-planet surveying, observation, and sensing for specific chemicals, biological agents, or radioactive substances is conducted. The operations are powered by the photovoltaic power generation of the MOSES sheet. Some of the sensor technologies that may be used for CBRAS operations include variations of PAS and RePAS using lasers as well as FTIR for short-range applications. Essentially, the core suite of technologies are those which are employed today for aerial as well as astrophysical exploration. CMEMP This is a critical and highly advanced defense operation for protecting regions of Earth from either natural (i.e., solar discharge) or intentional (i.e., nuclear weapon discharge) electromagnetic pulses (EMP) that can be extremely disruptive to electronics including computers and communication devices. Using a special SAP module designed for this purpose and kept “charged” by the power generated through the MOSES sheet, MOSES will generate a counter-pulse, along the principles of noise-cancellation but in this case using an electromagnetic burst, that will mitigate and disrupt the EMP that is a threat. The capability of MOSES will be limited in comparison to some possible EMP events, but it can nonetheless be effective at reducing an EMP catastrophe on Earth. EMPGT Given the ability of MOSES to adjust individual panes and larger panels, regions and the entire positioning of the main sheet, MOSES is an optimal architecture for generating electrical power that can be then beamed, for instance as a microwave laser (maser) yo other points in space, or to any specific (and even mobile) reception point on Earth. This enables MOSES to be a rapid-deployment power generator and transmitter for emergency applications where power has been severely disrupted on Earth. Align the sheet, generate the power, and beam it through one of the SAPs to a particular point on the planet. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 20 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview EOM Using different SAPs, MOSES can be emp,oyed for round-the-clock permanent observation and monitoring of a variety of Earth-based (or Moon—based) environmental conditions. With respect to Earth, the main focus areas will include monitoring of climate change, vegetation, chemical spills, storms, tsunamis, and illicit operations ranging from logging to chemical and industrial pollution. RSBE The SAP modules employed for these operations will provide for safe, off-planet, robotic-maintained experimentation with both natural and synthetic biological organisms. MOSES provides the power through its sheet, and the experiments are controlled by experimenters on Earth or in another space vehicle (e.g., ISS). Thus, MOSES provides the ‘ultimate biohazard clean room” for potentially dangerous experiments such as modifications to natural viral strains or experiments with synthetic organisms. SAC As a reconfigurable large-scale and divisible set of regions and panels making up a singular sheet, and with options for different types of SAP units that can include robotic arms, MOSES can be employed in a variety of ways for space-based assembly and construction of other structures including manned stations and colonies, as well as very large scale power generation systems. [THERE IS MORE TO COME FOR HERE IN SUBSEQUENT VERSIONS] Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 21 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview THE FOLLOWING MATERIAL COMES FROM EARLIER AND VERY ROUGH, CRUDE OUTLINES AND NOTES REGARDING ONLY THE ASTRIC CATEGORIY OF MOSES OPERATIONS. ===================================================== ===================================================== Design Workbook for ASTRIC Project (and suggested Planetary Society Prize) Version 1.0 Begun 31.Aug.2007 Last Edit 5.Dec.08 mjd 1 31.Aug.07 notes This is more about geometry + carbon (nanotubes + graphites) + computing than about anything difficult or exotic in terms of space flight and satellite missions. The basic idea is not so strange and people have been using this concept in engineering for more than six thousand years – torque, leveraging some beam on a fulcrum: 1 Not to worry, Apophis is only 350 – 415m long, and besides, all indicators are that it will miss the Earth. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 22 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview A single ASTRIC vehicle (ASTRIC-Pod) is put earth-launched and moved into position near the target (asteroid). The Pod separates into four or more components, ASTRIC-Seeds. Structurally these all are all designed so that there are no excess or unused parts of the Pod – this is conceptually like a 3d puzzle – the Seed pieces all fit together in such a way that their outer shells or skins are part of the Pod or otherwise internal – nothing is just left “hanging” in space, nor is there excess vehicle weight. The Seeds maneuver into a configuration known as the “Capture Position.” In doing so, a high-strength carbon nanotube composite net is stretched across the target in such a way that there is now tension in the net which is linked in its end vertices with the seeds. Think of the Seeds as being basically selfpropelled satellites that are spools of thread. Their movements to release the graphite lines that make up the Net are essentially spool unwinding movements. At this point, the geometry of the configuration of Target + Net + Seeds is known and can be thoroughly simulated. Under command from earth-based control, the Seeds exert force by local thrusters in order to leverage (by the fulcrum principle, a classical torque application, using the Net) the orientation of the Target into a new orientation that will cause the Target to either miss the earth entirely, burn up, or have an impact that is less catastrophic. This design offers several specific advantages: More fine-control than by simple impacts, nearby presence (and reliance upon some local gravitational pull involving the mission vehicle and the target), or explosive force. More control and opportunity for multi-axis influence on the target than by one vehicle only. More fault-tolerance in that there will still be some utility to having fewer operating mission vehicles in the even of the failure of one, as opposed to zero effectiveness if there is only one vehicle and it fails. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 23 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview Fig. 1-a Original deployment model for ASTRIC Additions and new material 5.Dec.08 Two types of technology are in ASTRIC. One is the use of simple gravity from the multiple (4, 8, more) operand units (previously referred to as “seeds”), arranging themselves in a configuration around the object. The second is the above use of the Net that is spun between the seeds and used to further adjust the course of the asteroid by means of a Tensegrity operation. In order to maximize the versatility of the ASTRIC system (assembly), all of the operands are connectable in a manner similar to Knex or similar erector-lego type sets, in the following way: Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 24 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview An operand is a tetrahedron in shape. Each can bind to another by any face. The binding is performed by bringing the units close together and then electromagnets are activated and these finish the final connection into position. At this time servomotors activate a reversible toggle bolt mechanism that latches the two surfaces in a way that exact fitting is not so critical and getting stuck in the bound condition is not a serious possibility – it is important to be able to pull any two operands apart. The operands start out in a bound configuration but that may be arranged as groups of four in order to fit well into the lift vehicle. Cables (made of carbon nanofibres bound up like suspension bridge cables, in subassemblies that are then woven into larger subassemblies) are reeled out and pulled in from the operands by small motors that are run by batteries which are kept charged by one or more solar panels that are part of the ASTRIC main operand (like a mother ship) that is from where the operands emerged after the whole ship reached its primary waypoint after leaving Earth. These cables can be routed through any one of the four corners (vertices) of the tetrahedron in an interesting manner. The cable has two ends, obviously. Call its total length Ltot and its effective operating (extension) length, Ltot – some amount that is bound to be wrapped up in the internal mechanism, to be Leff. If the vertices are A, B, C and D, then the cable can be extended in the following way: A max. of Leff from vertex A, B, C, or D, then retracted and deployed again from another, and so on – deployments are not permanent or final. A max. of Leff/2 from any two vertices at the same time. A max. of d1 < Leff/2 and a max. of d2 > Leff/2 from any two vertices at the same time. There can be two cables per operand. A given two-cable full deployment (extension) configuration could be any of the combinations: (I) {A,B}, {A,C}, {A,D}, {B,C}, {B,D}, {C,D} where in each case each cable is deployed to Leff fully from each of the vertices indicated by {v1, v2} Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 25 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview (II) {AB,CD}, {AC,BD}, {AD,BC}, where in each pairing of vertices there is a combination of cable deployments such that the total is a maximum of Leff. Cables may thus be deployed from 0 – 4 vertices of a given operand unit. Some operands may have no cables connecting them. It is to be determined still if cables should be able to meet in the middle of space where each has one end at an operand and the free ends connect with each other – this will be more complicated to engineer but it would offer the possibility that a cable extension between two operands could be up to 2*Leff in length. What is at the end of the cable? A connector that can attach to either: The connector at the end of another cable, from the same operand or from another one. The connector at a vertex of another operand. Operands can move by means of two mechanisms: 1. Being pulled or even pushed by another operand, including by the use of the cables that can be connecting them, and remember that any two or more operands can be connected by more than one cable from each other. Any operand can be connected by four cables from its vertices. 2. Self-propulsion. There are nozzles in the centers of the four faces. If the body of the operand, the remaining space inside the faces, apart from the instruments and the cable mechanisms, can be used for fuel storage using metal hydride for hydrogen, for instance, then the operand can have a simple gas propulsion system; otherwise some other type of small rocket mechanism can be employed. The point is that the operands are maneuverable in a 5-axis type of versatility, with or without any cables extended or connected. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 26 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview All of this is designed in order that the network of operands can be deployed in virtually any configuration among themselves. By having this versatility, the network can be arranged in the vicinity of an asteroid in a manner that with or without the use of the cabling system, and relying upon either local gravitational attraction among objects, or mechanical work among the objects using the cabling network and the self-propulsion capabilities of each operand, the asteroid can be adjusted in its 5-axis orientation, thereby altering its path through space and avoiding a collision with Earth. Fig. 1-b Deployment of operand units from ASTRIC delivery vehicle. Note that the delivery (“mother”) vehicle, indicated here by the cylinder at upper left, may itself be one of the operands. The deployment of cables must involve some controllable unit at the end of the cables, and this has not been addressed in notes above. There are a few different ways this can be done, including microjets and magnetic elements. But this connecting process has to be done with the two operands involved for a given connection being close to one another, and then the cable between them can be “spun out” once the two ends are linked. Given the deployment of the operands and cables, a mesh is over the asteroid in a manner allowing for controlled 5-axis reorientation of the asteroid by the coordinated movements (rocket firings) of 1-n operands. This is what the following figure (2, below) illustrates. It is not necessary to have a densely woven array but only to have sufficiently strong and strategically placed lines. The principle of operation for moving the asteroid is to act upon several points at once, applying force in several key vectors, as roughly illustrated by figure 3. Such coordinated actions can be performed in a variety of stages and Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 27 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview sequences, for changing pitch, roll, yaw orientation of the object, and for influencing the primary trajectory which is the main objective. Fig. 2 More current ASTRIC model illustrating deployment of cables Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 28 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview Fig. 3 Simple representation of coordinated push-pull actions Engineering issues Power for maneuvering the operands (tetrahedron units). Engine type and fuel. Weight of the operands. Cable material. Cable deployment and connectivity, including cable movement from one unit to another. Packing and disassembly of the operands from the main vehicle. Use of supplementary solar power generators. Packing and deployment of such supplementary units. Communication with Earth base. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 29 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview Communication between operands. Real-time modification and adjustment to the pre-mission simulation and control programs. What is the pre-mission mapping that is possible for understanding the geometry and the materials of the asteroid? We need to understand accurately not only its surface geometry but its composition in order to understand the concentrations of mass in different regions. We can surely make good estimates but they will almost assuredly be off by some percentage points and this will significantly affect the ways that the operands and the net/mesh can effectively change the orientations and the trajectory of the object. Many simulations can be run and compared. Many “job control” sequences can be set up and ready, depending upon detailed findings once the ASTRIC mission has reached the vicinity of the asteroid. But the success is going to depend upon high-speed reaction and adaptation. This implies having powerful processing and also data resources onboard, namely in the “mother vehicle” plus very high-speed and uninterruptible communications with supercomputing resources on Earth. ===================================================== ===================================================== ASTRIC (Astrophysical Reconnaissance, Intervention and Control) Program Command, Control and Communication Language (ASTRICOL, ASL, ASTRA) M. Dudziak January, 2009 The functions of ASTRIC components (e.g., a tetrad capsule) are of two basic types: Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 30 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview movement (consisting of a change in the orientation or location of a component including countermovements to offset some external force applied to a component) activation (consisting of the operating of some device or instrument that is part of the component, such as the release and extension of a tethering or grappling cable) This is the world of ASTRIC – components break apart, move, reassemble, and do things in space, by themselves or as part of an array (network) comprised by several components, with or without the use of equipment that is an internal part of a component or an externalizable part that is in some fashion separated or else linked between components. Another way to think of ASTRIC behavior is in terms of the phenomenological behavior of molecules. They move, they come apart, come together, and sometimes exchange things among themselves. By keeping the language as simple as possible, planning and programming ASTRIC missions will be easier. Ultimately, ASTRA is a language for describing behaviors of many distinct and different units, and these descriptions then need to be translated into the languages of specific devices that implement those behaviors. Those devices and their computational requirements do not really matter from the standpoint of the high-level ASTRIC mission model. Those devices and any microprocessors running them may be implemented with a variety of hardware and software. What matters is how they execute the fundamental operations as specified in ASTRA. There will be other interfaces both “hard” and “soft” (e.g., USB, XML, 802.11). These do not enter into ASTRA descriptions. ASTRA is inspired by Java and also by OCCAM. It is an interpretive language designed to be machineindependent and also capable of being translated into any number of other languages (e.g., C++, Java, Python) that will ultimately run some devices such as thrusters, servocontrollers, sensors, actuators). Asynchronous parallelism is an essential feature, but the specifics of how that is implemented in terms of processors and digital hardware is at a lower level of detail. An ASTRIC operation consists of one or more components (units) of which the self-propelled tetrad capsules are one variety. These units operate in a coordinate space that is (by definition) absolute with Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 31 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview respect to an origin (x,y,z) that is related to the component’s location and range of movement. Movement within this operational space consists of: Translate (maintain orientation and move to a new (x,y,z) position over time interval t) Rotate (maintain position and rotate on internal (x,y,z) axes over time interval t) How a given component accomplishes this translation or rotation process depends upon its individual engineering, but from the standpoint of the mission being accomplished, there are these basic tasks. Movement is relatively straightforward. Do this, within a certain time period. Activation is more complex and varied and there are obviously mechanics at work that will have influence over a component’s position and thus require compensatory force applications by one or more components in order to prevent undesirable displacement (e.g., release or retraction of a cable, tugging between tetrads that are attached by a cable, etc.). move (x, y, z, t) x = target x-coord y = target y-coord z = target z-coord t = duration for completing the movement operation rotate (xt, yt, zt, t) xt = delta in degrees rotation around x-axis xxxxxxxx Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 32 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview What is present position and orientation What are effects upon neighboring units Calculate thrust for each engine Calculate waypoints and checkpoints Begin operations ===================================================== ===================================================== ASTRIC Prototype Modeling, Mock-Up, Interactive Demo – Design and Construction Notes Martin D 31.Dec.2008 A key element in the design of ASTRIC 1, namely the system focusing upon asteroid collision deterrence (ACD), is in experimental, trial-and-error, visually-enhanced model building. Part of this happens on the computer using Matlab, AutoCad, and a suite of tools. Part of it will make use of a physical demo model that is principally a 3D mock-up prototype, not built to scale or to proportion, not realistic in many respects, but a real aid for both the design team and for others with whom communication about the entire architecture is important (including those who are needed as sponsors, financial and political and otherwise). As a tool for “thinking things through” this latter resource comes even before the computational models and simulations, and in fact it will be used to help design those other resources. The physical mock-up actually should come first. Components: Asteroid - 1 Tetrads (pods) – 4 to 8 Cables Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 33 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview Motorized reels – 4 per tetrad Tension wires and pulleys Laser pointer pens – 2 Asteroid Chicken wire frame over wood skeleton, covered in fiberglass cloth, treated with resin, painted Four eyehooks in corner positions, used for support wires suspending asteroid in mid-air Asteroid suspension The unit must be stable but adjustable both by manual operation for basic positioning and by the effects of tetrad-spun cable nets (deflection repositioning). Both are explained below. Basic positioning The asteroid support wires run to fixtures in or near the ceiling. Each wire is spliced – wire, bungie-cord, wire, thereby allowing some elasticity besides through adjustments of the wire, namely by the tetrad cable nets. The support wires run through pulleys and are then attached to ropes or chains that can be manipulated by operators on the floor. This enables adjustments to be made so that the asteroid can be positioned almost anywhere in the room and at different orientations. The laser pointer pens are fixed in two ends of the asteroid and are used to illustrate the changes in orientation of the asteroid when tensions are changed in the tetrad cabling net that is strtetched over the asteroid and adjusted by means of both the tetrad support wires and main tetrad cables (as described below). Tetrads Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 34 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview The tetrads have tetrahedral geometries and are made to look just like the components of an ASTRIC system. Each tetrad is positioned by two or three support wires that run through the centers of the tetrad faces (and not the vertices). These are used for supporting the tetrads into “starting positions” for any demo operations and for simulating the self-propulsion of the tetrads. Tetrad cabling and harnessing/lassoing ACD operations with the asteroid Cables are permanently connected between tetrads for purposes of demonstrating how they would be at the commencement of ACD operations. Optionally, each cable end is connected through a tetrad vertex to a servocontrolled reel which can be wirelessly operated or controlled by wires running alongside the support wires to the tetrad. By manipulation of the support wires and the tetrad cables, the positions of the tetrads can be changed, and the tensions of the cables changed, and this will demonstrate the changes in orientation of the asteroid. ===================================================== ===================================================== TETRADYN and the SPACE INDUSTRY in 2008 and Beyond What we have designed and produced, what we are doing, and how it is of special value to innovators and companies that are going beyond the conventional limits to create vehicles and habitats for spaced-based exploration and development. Preface Our economic model and business process plan is such that we have been steadfastly building a basis for stable and sustainable revenue through applications (products and services) that are not dependent upon governmental or private funding for the explicit space industry, in order that from this revenue stream we can generate sufficient capital and maintain sufficient human and equipment resources for working on space-focused products and projects. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 35 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview Thus, we have performed research and developed products and provided services that pertain to vehicle engineering, analytical chemistry, environmental and emergency response, and information technology, all because of two important reasons: (1) These provide components, parts, skills, important for more advanced and challenging tasks for space power, flight, exploration and habitation; (2) These provide the basis for business sustainability in an economic and social climate wherein space science and engineering is not high on the list for investors or customers. We now (Dec., 2008) have people, facilities, and a complement of equipment and resources ranging from machines and tools for fabrication and testing, simulation and modeling, and prototype vehicles for demonstration and experimentation. We have our product line, our expertise, our tools and resources, our research results, and our capabilities, for delivering something special for designers, builders and testers of engines, vehicles, and other components for LEO, NEO, lunar and planetary missions. It is time for partnering and working as part of other teams that are reasonably well-established in the field. This is what we have to offer today, and it is the result of years of research and development by a team working during this time at five leading universities, four private companies. Moreover, we are able to engage in this work more economically, we believe, than almost all others in a similar position – this is very important in our present socio-economic era. Capabilities and Offerings While not all of these will be applicable to a specific project or task, we believe that the fact that we have worked in all of these areas as a compact team does increase our value to a partner or customer for working in any one very specific application that may demand all of our resources plus the proverbial “thinking outside the box” capability that is often the missing ingredient for success. Composite materials and structures Carbon nanotube based films, meshes, cables, and other composites for improving structural integrity, safety, durability, and also reducing weight and incorporating intelligent self-testing and self-healing materials. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 36 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview Energy process optimization Application of inverse method algorithms for redesign of solid-fuel rockets and for improving fuel consumption in liquid-fuel and non-oxidation engines Control and optimization of hybrid engine systems (e.g., electric + multifuel; E-Fusion™). Hybrid and integrated energy and propulsion systems Fuel cells, solar and thermal photovoltaics, and multi-fuel combustion Lift and atmospheric propulsion Integration of rocket, multiple-vehicle and lighter-than-air ground lift systems Optimization in solid and liquid fuel chemical combustion MEMS sensors, actuators and controllers Employing PRMC, LBL, PAS and RePAS sensing elements Standard interfaces Parallel element and processor operations Fault-tolerance Customizable architectures for multiple types of chemical and biological sensing/activation targets Pattern classification, identification and recognition Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 37 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview Adaptive learning algorithms based upon refinements in Bayesian, Connectionist (neural) and Heuristic (rule-based) network models Application of inverse, mutual-information and deformable registration models from medical and subsurface imaging to more generalized object recognition tasks Radiation absorption skins for space structures Removable external coatings for protection against low-energy/high-mass radioactive particle dust Robotics Flexible-geometry, surface-contour movement robots Modular interconnectable robots Sensor-actuators and networks Wide-area wireless capabilities Nomad Eyes™ sensor fusion logics and algorithms Improved human-machine communications and knowledge acquisition Shelters (manned or unmanned applications including in-orbit or in-transit fuel storage) Gas-inflated and solar-enabled, based upon Smart Shelters™ and EcOasis PodLab™ designs employed for emergencies, hazardous conditions, and field testing. Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 38 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview Space-based assembly Improved tethering and communications among assembly units Improved connectivity and bonding for parts Tetrahedral and tensegrity-based component design Space-based solar power Conductive-polymer film flexible and self-assembly sheets in tandem with conventional cellbased photovoltaics Large-area unfolding and streaming solar collector/converter sheets and module surfaces. Tensegrity structures Fixed-geometry modules, vehicles and machinery including robots and spacesuits TETRANOD™ Soliton-beam technology for compact nuclear reactor elements (initially developed within nuclear fusion and particle-beam research communities) Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 39 CEBARS Rough-Draft Overview SPARE TEXT, NOTES, DRAWINGS Copyright © 2012 Martin Joseph Dudziak, PhD and the Institute for Innovative Study 40