The PixFEL project: advanced fine-pitch X
Transcription
The PixFEL project: advanced fine-pitch X
The PixFEL project: advanced fine-pitch X-ray pixel detectors for the next generation FEL facilities Valerio Re Università di Bergamo and INFN Pavia Workshop on Research opportunities at the European X-ray Free Electron Laser Università di Bologna, July 4, 2014 PixFEL project profile Goal of the project: high performance X-ray imaging instrumentation for the experiments at the next generation of free electron laser facilities • Small pitch active edge silicon pixel sensors • 65 nm CMOS technology for front-end and readout electronics • 3D integration techniques for the vertical interconnection of sensor and readout electronics layers Participating INFN groups • INFN Pavia: Lodovico Ratti, Massimo Manghisoni, Daniele Comotti, Francesco De Canio, Lorenzo Fabris, Marco Grassi, Piero Malcovati, Valerio Re, Gianluca Traversi • INFN Pisa: Giuliana Rizzo, Giovanni Batignani, Stefano Bettarini, Giulia Casarosa, Francesco Forti, Marcello Giorgi, Eugenio Paoloni, Fabio Morsani • INFN Trento: Lucio Pancheri, Gian-Franco Dalla Betta, Giorgio Fontana, Ekaterina Panina, Giovanni Verzellesi, Xu Hesong V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 2 of 25 m m V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 m 3 of 25 Beam-line and beam-time structure Beam lines with different photon energies available at each facility Beam-line structure @Eu-XFEL Very different beam structure from one FEL facility to the other Each pulse is always very short LCLS: continuous operation @ 120Hz XFEL: 220ns spacing, with time to readout Future (i.e. LCLS II): continuous 1MHz spacing Most challenging for detectors are XFEL & LCLS II, taken as target for PixFEL Today: LCLS, … Eu-XFEL Tomorrow: NGLS/LCLS II V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 4 of 25 Pixel detectors at X-ray FELs: great expectations… From Report of Working Group on XPCS experiments at XFEL (2010): The required angular resolution of the detector is 23 µrad. In order to achieve this resolution a pixel size well below 100 μm plus a transverse floor space of at least 10 m in the experimental hutch is required. …. In order to obtain a significant counting statistics in an acceptable time 108 pixels are required. ….. The frame rate should be as high as possible under these specifications. Ideal pixel detector From P. Siddons Various physical and fiscal realities conspire to prevent this being realized. V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 5 of 25 …XFEL Instrumentation: the real devices Although each experiment at FELs may require a specific detection system, two main scientific case may be identified • energy sensitive detectors with Fano limited energy resolution for spectroscopic experiments, possible position sensitivity for angular dispersive experiments (0D or 1D) • silicon drift detectors • high-Z detectors • cryogenic detectors • area detectors for imaging experiments, based on X-ray diffraction (2D) • charge coupled devices • hybrid pixel detectors • monolithic active pixel sensors V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 6 of 25 Problem of missing data Modules of limited size and gaps between modules è lots of missing data Reconstruction may become ambiguous V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 7 of 25 Microelectronic technologies and XFEL instrumentation Potential benefits of new microelectronic technologies to future detector systems for X-ray imaging at free electron laser facilities: § Reduction of pixel size (100x100 mm2 or even less), presently limited by the need of complex electronic functions in the pixel cell § Larger memory capacity to store more images (ideally, 2700 frames at 4.5 MHz every 100 ms) § Advanced pixel-level processing (1 – 10000 photons dynamic range, 10-bit ADC, 5 MHz operation) § 4-side buttable tiles for a large area detector with minimum or no dead area V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 8 of 25 Long term goal of PIXFEL Develop a four-side buttable module for the assembly of large area detectors with no or minimum dead area to be used at FEL experiments Good efficiency up to 10 keV 9 bit resolution (effective), 5 MHz sampling rate wide dynamic range (1 to 10000 photons), single photon sensitivity burst and continuous mode operation 1 kframe V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 9 of 25 PixFEL detector specifications q Extremely wide dynamic range, from 1 to 104 photons at fixed energy, which may change between about 1 keV and about 10 keV according to the specific experiment; q single photon resolution capability at low energies (up to about 100 photons); q a pixel side of 100 µm, which can be reasonably assumed to satisfy the spatial resolution specifications for a wide range of experiments at FELs; q capability of recording one image every 200 ns and to store on chip as many images as possible, since no direct readout can be performed at event rates in the MHz range; the goal is a front-end full capacity of 103 images; q tolerance to very high ionizing radiation doses, even exceeding 10 MGy, especially close to the central hole of the detector. V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 10 of 25 PixFEL technologies: active edge pixel sensors • trench etching • trench polysilicon filling • support wafer removal metal p+ oxide n/p distance n+ polysilicon Active edge pixel sensors were proposed to minimize the gap between the active area and the edge of the detector; key steps Field plate passivation Bondanneal oxide Support wafer Thickness ≥ 450 µm needed for good efficiency @10 keV 5 mm n+ Field plate n/p gap p+ Trench edge n- substrate V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 11 of 25 The active edge pixel sensorfor for FEL(1) applications Active edge sensor optimization FELs TN • Active edge sensor to minimize dead area between tiles. Key steps: • trench etching/polysilicon filling/support wafer removal • Already under development by FBK for Alice and Atlas, but specific optimization for FEL needed. • Main difference/issues: 1. Plasma effect: high charge concentration from huge signal (10^4 photons 1 keV à 2.8x10^6 e-/h>100 MIP) reduces the collection field and deteriorate charge Collection Distance (CD) and Collection Time (CT) à High bias voltage needed but breakdown voltage might be critical for active edge sensor! 5 mm n+ Field plate n/p gap p+ Trench edge n- substrate • TCAD simulation results: à High Bias voltage mitigates plasma effect: with Vbias=400 V can reach our target design à coll dist < Pitch=100 µm Coll Time~30 ns. – Edge geometry optimized to increase edge breakdown voltage: • Edge distance & floating guard rings, • field plate & oxide thickness • Vbreak > 400 V obtained even after 1GRad (Qox=3x10^12) V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 12 of 25 e from the injection point for 95% charge PixFEL enabling technologies: 65 nm CMOS readout electronics • Mature technology: – Available since ~2007 • High density and low power – High density vital for smaller pixels and increased data buffering during bunch trains – Low power tech critical to maintain acceptable power for higher pixel density and much higher data rates • Long term availability – Strong technology node used extensively for industrial/automotive • Significantly increased density, speed, and complexity compared to previous generations! A 50 µm x 50 µm mixed-signal pixel cell readout for the phase II upgrade of LHC in 65 nm CMOS V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 13 of 25 PixFEL detector design and technology Multilayer device: active edge thick pixel sensor, two tiers CMOS readout chip (analog+digital/memory), fabricated in 65 nm CMOS, to increase memory and functionality in a small pixel pitch of 100 µm. V DD W L • Wide dynamic range, 1-104: à Preamplifier with gain compression in • A/D conversion in 200 ns à Successive approximation 10 bit ADC • Pitch: 100 µm 200 mV à 65 nm CMOS readout chip to increase functional density • Readout and memory: 1k frame depth à Use 3D integration to increase depth by adding a memoryV.layer Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 R oo - V out + out !" #$% $& ' %() #* 14 of 25 PixFEL enabling technologies: 3D integration • 3D electronics: “the vertical integration of thinned and bonded silicon integrated circuits with vertical interconnects between the IC layers.” • 3D integration makes it possible to stack and interconnect silicon layers fabricated in different technologies, each optimized for its function • Through-silicon vias (TSV) are a key technology ingredient for 3D integration Through Silicon Via (TSV) An example: “via last” process for 3D integration of 2 layers in heterogeneous technologies (CMOS chip + high resistivity sensor), 4-side buttable device with low density interconnections (pitch > 50 µm) in the device periphery (tested in the AIDA project). V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 15 of 25 Technologies for through-silicon vias (TSV) Low density TSVs for chip to PCB bump-bonding No gaps, no need for complicate tiling (provided that the detector has minimum dead area) V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 CEA-LETI T-Micro 16 of 25 PIXFEL Work Packages (3-year program) WP1: Enabling technologies (Lucio Pancheri, UNITN and INFN TN) – will investigate the technologies with potential to enable the fabrication of advanced 2D X-ray imagers to be used at FELs; the activity will mainly focus on active edge pixel sensors and low density through silicon vias, as the most important processes for the fabrication of a four-side buttable chip. WP2: Building blocks (Massimo Manghisoni, UNIBG and INFN PV) – will address the design of the fundamental building blocks for the readout of a pixel detector in a 2D X-ray imager to be operated at FELs, and concentrate on the development of individual stages and with their integration in a single tier 8×8 matrix at first, and with the design of a 32×32, single tier matrix to be interconnected to a fully depleted pixel sensor in a later phase of the WP WP3: Architectures and testing (Giuliana Rizzo, UNIPI and INFN PI) – will deal with a two-phase task: study of the readout architecture for the X-ray imager front-end chip; development of the hardware and software test systems and the placement of the final characterization of the detector in a beam line V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 17 of 25 Front-endchannel channelindesign (2) PV The analog front-end the pixel readout cell SR Vref G C f0 S3 S1 W/L CF V DD 9W/L S4 S0 SH gnd 1 keV / 10 keV S2 b0 - Vin - Vref 10-bit ADC + b9 Csh 25' &%$*6$" , 4( 3$*78 9:4; $& < 4#5*64%" ' :*2) 8 9&$, , 4) " * 01#) 1! 2) "3$&, 4) " !" #$%&' ( ) " **' " +* , - . #&' /( ) " *, #' %$ 6' 8 9:$* A*B ) :+ =>1. 4#* 67? *7 @2 Good preliminary results from simulation of the full front-end channel with 50 ns integration time: • ENC=50 e rms à S/N=5.5 for single photon 1 keV * + * ,- . /0. /,123/456,718 ( "! $ ( ( ,0C ! "#' ! "#& ( ! ! ,0C ! "#% ! "#$ > 4=63:<6 ?</65@ 4/:2< A:5<43 A6//3:<5 A:5<43 ?</65@ 4/:2< B6=6/ ! "# ! )! (! ! ()! $! ! 9:; 6,7<=8 4. Simulat ed out put channel volt age swing 1 and 100 in18forof 25 V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014F ig. coming 1 keV phot ons signals at 5 M Hz t iming operat ion. Gain compression in the preamplifier Wide dynamic range front-end channel • 1-104 photons between 1-10 keV • Bilinear Amplifier: use the non-linear features of MOSFET capacitors to dynamically change the gain with the input signal amplitude • W/L gnd Vout Q in oo R High gain for low energy & Low gain for high energy in ' "# &! ! AB - * ,C1 D, #! ! E" ' ) * +,- . /0. /,1 23/456,78 19 Vsd=Vout * ++, - . / 012 . 3. / 45. 6/ +173* 8 Vg=Vin=+0.8 V out ! "& F@A B1C: D1 #! ! E' ! "% ? @AB1C: D1 #! ! E' ! "$ ! "# %! ! FB - * ,C1D, #! ! E" & $! ! % $ #! ! # "! ! " ! ! ! # % ' ( "! ! ! ' !! #! ! 9: (!! ; <51=1: 46917> $! ! :8 )!! ! #! ! ! %! ! ! ' !!! (!!! "! !! ! : ; 6<5=,70>,? ," ,@ 61 9 V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 19 of 25 Building blocks of the analog front-end electronics: bilinear amplifier SR Vref G Design in a 65 nm CMOS technology C f0 W/L 9W/L gnd 1 keV / 10 keV Vin - V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 20 of 25 Building blocks: 10-bit A-to-D converter 9 effective bits (guarantees single photon resolution at small signal, small quantization noise in Poisson-limited regime), 5 MHz sample rate (for operation at the Eu-XFEL) SAR ADC Critical points are power dissipation, area, clock distribution and readout speed V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 21 of 25 Readout architectures No sparsification technique can be applied to imaging detectors à a large amount of data needs to be read out in a relatively short amount of time, also depending on the structure of the X-ray beam Burst mode operation: data need to be stored locally and read out in the interval between two bursts; 65 nm CMOS technology is supposed to guarantee enough density to exceed the state-of-the-art of FEL instrumentation in terms of storage capacity Continuous operation: data are read out as soon as they are collected, frame by frame. For FELs operated in continuous mode at a relatively low repetition rate (~100 Hz) direct readout of a megapixel detector is a task within reach of present technology. For higher repetition rates (Eu-XFEL, LCLS-II), high speed features of scaled CMOS processes and advanced readout strategies have to be exploited. The capability of switching from one mode of operation to the other may be an important asset for a 2D imager V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 22 of 25 In-pixel logic & readout Pixel cell Concept for matrix readout V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 23 of 25 Conclusion The PixFEL project will be the first step towards the ambitious goal of developing a new pixelated X-ray camera with high space, time and amplitude resolution for applications to photon science at X-ray FEL facilities The aim is to improve the current state-of-the-art of pixel X-ray cameras for FELs by applying the more recent technologies for pixel detectors in high energy physics (65 nm CMOS, 3D integration, active edge pixel sensors) The ultimate goal is to provide FEL experimenters with a novel instrument to be used at the more advanced facilities: XFEL, LCLS, LCLS II(NGLS) V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 24 of 25 Backup 21 cm (1024 pixels) DSSC X-ray camera x-y Gap • 1024x 1024 pixels • 16 ladders/hybrid boards • 32 monolithic sensors 128x256 6.3x3 cm2 • DEPFET Sensor bump bonded to 8 Readout ASICs (64x64 pixels) • 2 DEPFET sensors wire bonded to a hybrid board connected to regulator modules • Dead area: ~15% V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 26 of 25 Problem of missing data Modules of limited size and gaps between modules è lots of missing data Reconstruction may become ambiguous V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 27 of 25 Aim of the PixFEL project Investigating the enabling technologies for the design of chips with minimum dead area and high functional densities • standard and slim edge sensors • vertical integration for double tier design of the front-end • low density TSVs for chip interconnection to the hybrid board • interposers for sensor to front-end pitch adaptation Studying, designing and testing the building blocks (CMOS 65 nm) for the front-end electronics (100 um pitch), complying with the application requirements • low noise, (reconfigurable) wide input range front-end channel (1 to 104) with dynamic compression, single photon detection • 9 bit (effective), 5 MS/s ADC (successive approximation register) • circuits for gain calibration Looking into architectures for fast chip operation and readout • frame storage mode (memory cell, maximum memory size, readout) • continuous readout mode (maximum speed, accounting for DAQ limitations) • reconfigurability (impact on the performance) V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 28 of 25 PixFEL enabling technologies: 3D integration Current situation SENSOR Desired situation SENSOR ASIC 1 (ampl) ASIC 2 (ADC) ASIC Bulk ASIC 3 (Storage) ASIC 4 (I/O) V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 29 of 25 Plans and Milestones 2014 • Specification of the 2D X-ray imager • Design and submission of wide input range amplifier with bilinear feature • Design and submission of a 9 bit SAR ADC • Design and submission of slim edge and fully depleted pixel sensor structures 2015 • Test of the amplifier and ADC submitted in the first year • Test of the pixel sensor submitted in the first year • Design and submission of a thick active edge pixel detector • design of a 32x32 chip with 100 um pitch 2016 • Test of the 32x32 readout chip • Test of the thick active edge pixel detector submitted in the second year • Interconnection of the 32x32 readout chip to a pixel sensor and test of the structure • VHDL description of the readout architecture V. Re - PixFEL – Workshop on European XFEL, Bologna, July 4, 2014 30 of 25