Hawai`i Labor History Handout from Ray Catania
Transcription
Hawai`i Labor History Handout from Ray Catania
Hawaii and International Workers Day This handout is dedicated to Hawaii's first strike on Hawaii's first sugar plantation atKoloa, Kauai in 1841. The all Kanaka Maoli workforce was only being paid "pasteboard scrip"at the measley rate of12 and a half cents a day. Unfortunately, the strikers were crushed, but they laid the groundworkfor a rebellious labor movement that was soon to follow. Also to be recognized are the 2,500 sugar workers that held Hawaii's first May Day parade on Maui on May 1st 1937, marching four miles from Wailuku to Kahului with signs that read, "We Want to Work-But We Want Justice" and "Make This a Workers' Paradise." The lead organizer of the event, Bill Bailey, left the islands facing a decade ofjail time for violating the "Criminal Syndicalism Act." Included in this handout is "Blood in the fields: The Hanapepe Massacre and the 1924 Filipino Strike" by I Dean Alegado former UH Ethnic Studies instructor. *Also featured- Public Worker battles against layoffs 2009/2010 and Kauai Sheraton Workers take direct action on "Go Green" initiative and being treated "second class" 2/2/2011. ]^AL Ha OLAA T^ International Workers Day This past May 1st marked the yearly celebration of International Workers Day, observed all over the world except Wall Street controlled America. Workers take to the streets to fight for such human rights as livable wages, humane working conditions, free health care for all, affordable housing for everyone, pensions for all retirees and the basic right to organize unions that will defend our interests free of employer intimidation. Here in Hawaii, public school teachers with the HSTA, government employees represented by the HGEA and UPW and hotel workers represented by Local 5, have settled in, voted on, are in arbitration or are ratifying contracts that will improve their living standards. Non-union workers are denied this democratic right. Wal-Mart happily does business in countries like Bangladesh where its workers have no protections. Just recently, over 1,120 mostly women workers in Dhaka, were crushed to death when their shoddily built factory collapsed. Wal-Mart has stood firmly against these workers quest to raise their wages and to better their working conditions. The garment workers fight for fairness runs counter to Wal-Mart's demanding attitude of paying for these goods at the lowest cost possible. On May 14th, six European clothing contractors signed on to an agreement monitored by independent human rights investigators that would force the government of Bangladesh and its garment factory owners to abide by stringent safety standards, and have these same contractors not conspire with owners to keep costs so low, so that nothing is spent on employee safety and economic welfare. Wal-Mart refused to sign the agreement. And all across the U.S., Wal-Mart is cutting its "associates" hours, trying to reduce many employees to part-time help so that it doesn't have to pay them needed benefits. Wal-Mart has set the worldwide template to downgrade the rights of labor. Hawaii legislators shamed themselves by not voting to increase the minimum wage. Hawaii's poorest workers long for an increase from the present $7.25 an hour to the little more decent $9.00 by January 1, 2017. New York City's workers got an increase because they were organized. We don't hear the Hawaii Chamber of Commerce, who vigoursly opposed the increase, cry about the 28% jump in Hawaii's top CEO compensation since 2011, as reported by the Star-Advertiser on 4/21/2013. Bank of Hawaii's Peter Ho got an outrageous 93% increase- he made more than $3,390,000 in 2012. Working people shouldn't be reduced to beggars; it's time for organization and action. Ray Catania, Puhi 634-2737 4212 Kole Place, Lihue Hawaii 96766 James Alalem, Wailua 635-0835 Mural by Jean Chariot on Hawaii 1946 Sugar Strike led by ILWU. 28 thousand sugar workers were involved in this winning strike. A year later 20 thousand pineapple workers joined the union. "An injury to one is an injury to all." HOW LABOR DAY REPLACED INTERNATIONAL WORKERS DAY International Workers Day actually had it's start in the U.S.A. On May 1st 1886 in Haymarket Square (Chicago, Illinois), the police fired into a large and peaceful assembly of laborers, who were organizing for something that most of us take for granted, the eight hour day. The demonstration was considered illegal. Police agents threw a bomb into the crowd, used this as an excuse to break up the affair, then beat up and arrested hundreds and killed four workers. By the next year, "the Haymarket Affair", became an international event remembered by working people all over the world with it's main purpose of celebrating the power of workers uniting for social justice and world peace. The commemoration rapidly spread throughout the world with over 80 countries eventally making it a national paid holiday and many more taking to the streets every May 1st to fight for workers rights. From the start, it was decried as a "communist inspired" holiday, attacked viciously by the wealthy, their pals in government and especially their conservative allies in organized labor that feared a revolutionary or socialist workers movement that calledfor an end to most union's top down leadership style, and the just redistribution of society's wealth. The Knights of Labor, and largely conservative craft unions that fought for white males only, like the building trades, feared democratically run organizations like the influential anarchists of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), who were uncompromising in their fight for all workers no matter what race or nation of origin. With the help of President GroverCleveland, the conservatives pushed for the "Labor Day" holiday instead in September of 1887. It must be mentioned that the powerful slogan, "An injury to one is an injury to all", was first popularized by the IWW. This history has been effectively hidden by our government, media and the educational system. Instead, we have the trade-off of a tame "Labor Day". What we now have is a smattering of events organized by unions calling for "labor unity", where handshaking politicians canfreely roam, and the societal contributions made by organized labor are touted. This holiday has been successfully marketed by business as a three-day weekend sales extravaganza. This is a time when we can buy new pick-ups on sale at the local auto dealer, purchase discounted propane barbecue grills at the nearby WalMart, gorge on hot dogs, catch a ballgame, and are reminded by the National Security Agency, that "freedom isn't free". BASIC DAMAGE CONTROL rom Garden Island Newspaper 6/12/2013 Op/ED section GUEST COMMENTARY Walmart is doing right by employees, economy, environment R a y Catania's and James Alalem's letter (5-2813) shows they fail to understand something Walmart customers and associates already know; entry-level jobs often lead to bigger jobs. Our average hourly full-time wage for our 4,000 associates in Hawaii is $14.70 as of January 2013. As Kauai Walmart's store manager, I've seen first hand how supportive our company is to associates. I've had the opportunity to build my career right here in Hawaii since starting 18 years ago as an hourly cus tomer service manager in the Kailua-Kona store. At Walmart, you can climb the ladder from a stocker to a department manager to a store manager and beyond. About 75 percent of our store manage ment teams started as hourly associates just like me, and they earn between $50,000 and $250,000 a year - similar to the earnings of firefighters, accountants and even healthcare professionals. Not only do our wages and benefits already meet or exceed most competitors, but in the past fiscal year alone, Walmart associates received more than $1.5 bil lion in bonuses, $800 million in 401(k) contributions and $550 million in savings via our 10 percent associ cause they wanted to work for us again. I am proud to work at Kauai Walmart. The com pany has given me and the thousands of employees here in Hawaii the opportunity to build a career. See for yourself at www.therealwalmart.com ate discount. across the industry. Taking part in the development of a broader safety plan with other brands, retailers and the Bipartisan Policy Center, building upon our previ ously announced commitments, is part of that work. For these reasons and others, we have more than a quarter-million associates that have been with the com pany for 10 years or more. Last year we received more than 5 million applications to come work in our stores. Of those hired last year, 20 percent were rehires, mean ing they worked for Walmart, left, but came back be Mr. Catania and Alalem also fail to mention that Walmart had no authorized production in any of the government-closed factories in Bangladesh, including at the site of the Rana Plaza tragedy. Walmart believes that workers have the right to work in a safe environment, and companies and gov ernments have a responsibility to help ensure appropri ate factory working conditions. We've taken a number of actions that meet or exceed other factory safety proposals. These include strength ening safety standards for factories, a zero-tolerance policy for unauthorized subcontracting, increased transparency, and requiring that in-depth safety audits and remediations be made to every factory directly producing product for us in Bangladesh, reflected in the cost of the goods that we buy. We also believe there is a need to partner with other stakeholders to improve the standards for workers • Crystal Fernandes is the store manager for Walmart in Lihue. IS WAL-MART DOING ANYTHING RIGHT? Sorry, Wal-Mart is not doing it's workers, the environment or the economy right. The two letters below are responses to Wal-Mart's "boilerplate" mutterings in it's guest commentary by manager Crystal Fernandez in the Garden Island Newspaper on 6/12/2013. They were both submitted but haven't made the paper yet. Nevertheless, they raise some related counterpoints that need exposure. Both letters were quick responses submitted on June 12, 2013. Mahalo to both of them. BY KATY ROSE, formerly of Kauai now of San Francisco The corporate boilerplate served up by Walmart's Crystal Fernandes doesn't impress me. $14 an hour is not enough to feed my family, even if Walmartsays that's a decent wage. Butwho cares what Walmart says? The onlything that matters is what we who have to work for a paycheck say. We have to ask ourselves if we are gettingwhat we deserve. Ifthe answer is "no,"then we have to ask what we are prepared to do about it. Garment workers in Bangladesh aren't waiting for their bosses to "do the right thing"- they take matters in their own hands and go on strike to win better conditions. Walmart warehouse workers in California and others along the supply chain have also taken strike actions to improve their lives. Working people inTurkey have recentlyjoinedthe fight. These battles are picking up steam because we understand that multi-billion-dollar profits for companies likeWalmart come from one source: the underpaid labor of everyone from the factory worker in Asia to the stocker at the local store. One of myfavorite historical figures, Big Bill Haywood,said it best a century ago: "For every dollar the boss has and didn't workfor, one of us worked for a dollar and didn't get it." But Haywood also said that ifwe all "put our hands in our pockets" at once, we would have the bosses whipped, and that is just as true today as it was back then. BY KIP GOODWIN, of Kapaa In response to Walmart store manager Femandes' mea culpa regarding her employer's shortcomiongs ( Walmart doing right by employees, economy, environment, TGI 6/12/13); WhatMs.Femandes fails to understand is that most employees of Walmart or anyotherplacedon't aspire to be manager. They simply want to put inan honest day of dignified work for a living wage, andgo home at theendof the day free of the cares andstress of management. Walmart's policy of part time instead offull time jobs and unpredictable hours isaninsult to its workers and its miserly entry level pay isa well known scandal. Worse, companies down the supply chain, all the way to Bangladesh garment makers, are forced to adhere to the Walmart draconian, survival of the fittest economic template. This says nothing of the carbon dioxide loading up the atmosphere from all the global transportation ofthe vast array of stuff you see at Walmart. Since Ms. Femandes supports herthesis with big numbers re: bonuses and 401(k) contributions, here's another one. The four heirs to the Walmart founder are richer than the bottom 40% of Americans. That means the economic vitalityof communitiesall over the U.S., like Kauai, is vacuumed up making us poorerand the already ridiculously wealthy even richer. The answer is to define whether you really need it orjust want it, to buyit locally made if at all possible, anddon't shop Walmart. SHAPE UP WALMART Walmart is the richest company in America. It has topped the Fortune 500 list seven times this past decade. Its total revenues average S421 billion yearly. IfWalmart were a country itwould have the 25th largest economy in between prosperous Taiwan and modern Norway. cvf low price . . Let's get beyond Walmart's phony patriotism and "yankee doodle dandy." CEO MikeDukes pulls down an average of S35 million a year. Compare this to the nationwide average of its "associates" who only make S10toS12per hour. Yet these bosses have the audacity to cut full-time worker's hours from 40 down to 33, 34 hours a week and still label it full time. Walmart can do this because they have working class communities by the throat. Because there is no national organization behind them, the workers are rightfully afraid. For speaking up they can be disciplined or fired. If union organizing goes on, Walmart pulls up and leaves. They want every associate to just accept it and sigh, "At least I have a job." Well, the slaves had jobs too. Every worker deserves a decent wage and needed benefits like medical, especially if their employer can afford it We also should be able to speak up against any injustice that happens on the job. It's a simple human right Come on, Kaua'i's politicians, how about calling Walmart and telling them not to cut anyone's hours. Shoppers can do the same. Also, check out online "Walmart workers speak out." Ray Catania, Puhi James Alalem, Wailua Graphicfrom DVD "Wal-Mart- the high cost of low price" from www.walmartmovie.com Protesters hold upa signcommemorating thosekilled inrecent clothing factory tragedies in Bangladesh outside Walmart Stores Inc. headquarters in Benton\Alle, Arkansas, June 5, 2013 OUR Walmart members and others sat in outside Yahoo's annual (Reuters/Rick Wilking) shareholder meeting on June 24. The workers are targeting Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer, who is also a Walmart board member, demanding and end to illegal firings. Photo: OURWalmart. August 13.2013 HUFF POST BUSINESS Walmart's War Against Unions -- and the U.S. Laws That Make It Possible Posted: 06/05/2013 3:02 pm For several years, Walmart's annual shareholders meeting has been the staging ground for high-profile protests against the retailgiants treatment of its employees. As Walmart workers from across the country - many of whom are on strike - once again converge this week on the corporation's headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas, one startling fact stands out: none of them, or any of the retail giant's 1.4 million workers, are represented by a union. Walmart's success in keeping its American workforce entirely nonunion is, of course, well documented - so much so that observers of the company's chronic labor strife almost take it for granted. But even in the context of a long national decline in union membership among American workers, it is staggering that the country'slargest employer, and one of its stingiest, has remained union free. While Walmart contends that its employees have no use for union representation, it stretches credulity beyond the breaking pointto thinkthat no group of workersat any of the company's morethan 4,000 U.S. stores would choose to organize themselves into a bargaining unit Afterall, Walmart has become almost as famous for its lowwages and paltry health benefits as it is forits low prices. And despite the weakened position of unions in the U.S. economy, unionized workersstill enjoywages that are 13.6 percent higher on average than those of their nonunion counterparts. Likewise, unionized workers are 28.2 percent more likely to be covered by employer-provided health insurance and 53.9 percent more likely to have employerprovided pensions. So whats the secret to Walmart's "success" in remaining 100 percent nonunion? In short, it's the corporation's thorough exploitation of our nation's anemic labor laws. Ina blistering 2007 reportthat sadly still holds true, Human Rights Watch meticulously analyzed howWalmarthas taken advantage of the gaping holes in U.S. labor lawto turn back every effort at unionization. For example, because American employers are allowed to actively oppose union organizing campaigns, Walmart "bombards workers withthe message that disastrous results will ensue ifthey organize, while largely denying them access to contrary views." Similarly, since national labor law allows employers to permanently replace workers who strike for economic reasons, "WalMartuses this threat of permanent replacement as part of its strategy to scare workers into rejecting union formation at its U.S. stores." This message is drummed home not only during organizing efforts, but also in trainings for new workers, which are part of Walmart's coordinated, pro-active approach to stopping organizing campaigns in their tracks. Perhaps Walmart's most powerful tool in resisting unionization efforts is the incredibly weak penalties for employers that violate labor law. There are no punitive awards for labor law infractions, which means that employers - particularly those with the enormous resources that Walmart enjoys —have little economic incentive to obey the law. Even on the rare occasions when efforts to organize Walmart workers have overcome all these obstacles, the company has still managed to prevail. In 2000, for instance, when butchers at a Texas Walmart voted to join the United Food and Commerical Workers Union, Walmart announced two weeks later that it was closing all 180 of its meat counters. In 2004, the company went so far as to close an entire store after its employees voted to unionize. Its not surprising that, given Walmarts determination to remain nonunion and the complicity of U.S. labor law in supporting this goal, Walmart workers and their supporters have turned to non-traditional alternatives. The caravans transporting striking Walmart employees to Bentonville this week are part of this growing movement, which has succeeded in keeping the company on the defensive about its labor practices. These workers will need every ounce of creative strength they can muster to prevail against a system that is stacked against them, and a corporation that has mastered that system. Real Labor Internationalism Pacific Beach Hotel workers win 10-year struggle for union rights and ILWU contract The ILWU has called an end to the boycott of the Pacific Beach Hotel with the signing of the union contract with Highgate Hotels. the Pacific Beach Hotel have finally won . and elected officials. At the request of the ILWU International, the AFL-CIO placed union representation and a fair contract. It the Pacific Beach Hotel on its national took tremendous courage, dedication and solidarity from the workers of the hotel, and it took the support and determination when union federations in the Philippines, It took over ten years, but the workers of of the ILWU to stand with the workers. On the afternoon of December 29, 2012 at the Pacific Beach Hotel, instead of chants and slogans of countless rallies and demonstrations led by the ILWU, there were cheers, hugs, and high-fives. After more than ten years of struggle, an boycott list. The boycott wentinternational Canada, and Japan also came forward to support the Pacific Beach workers. The solidarity of unions in Japan—led by Zenkowan, the All-Japan Dockworkers Union—was especially critical because most of the hotel's guests came from Japan. agreement was reached on a first union "This fight could not have been won without the strength and determination contract for Pacific Beach workers. of the Pac Beach workers. These workers For more than a decade, showing up for work at the Pacific Beach Hotel meant facing eight hours of intimidation and disrespect from management. The intimidation peaked in 2007 when 31 union supporters were fired—including seven of the ten negotiating committee members. faced firings, harassment, and intimidation for over ten years—but they still stuck with the ILWU and the ILWU stuck with them," stated International Vice President- Hawaii Wesley Furtado. "But the workers weren't alone. Global solidarity was also key to this victory." Pacific Beach Hotel workers voted to approve their ILWU contract by nearly a The fight intensified A local boycott of the hotel was called by Hawaii unions, community groups, unanimous vote. The new contract gives workers in non-tipped jobs a five percent raise in the first year and a total increase of 13 percent over four years. Tipping category workers improved and secured their tips, and all workers will see major improvements in their benefits and job security. But Pacific Beach workers did more than just improve their standard of living. They also built the foundation of a strong unit organization in the hotel to take on the struggles that lie ahead and negotiate more improvements in future contract negotiations. Virginia Recaido, a 20-year housekeeper and union negotiating committee member, was fired in 2007. She found another better paying job, but went back to the hotel after a judge ordered her reinstated. Why did she return? "I had to show the company they didn't win. I don't want people who come after me to suffer like I did." Kapena Kanaiaupuni, a bellman with nearly 30 years seniority, is also a member of the union negotiating committee who was fired and reinstated. After the contract was approved, he was approached by immigrant Korean and Chinese workers excited about their first union contract. Differences in languages and cultures had kept them apart, but the workers' victory changed that. Kanaiaupuni told them: "Never mind about nationality—we're all one now!" The article above showcases a real act of labor internationalism from the ILWU's "Voice of the ILWU" January/February 2013 issue. ILWU standing for the International Longshore and Warehouse Union which reflects gender equity. Hawaii's local workers not passive One often hears in Hawaii from well-meaning transplants, that local working class folks, especially those of us from plantation history heritage, are afraid to organize against authority, that we're somehow living in the passive stupor of a "plantation mentality." I can still remember one muggy morning as a 16 year old summer hire picking pineapples in Wahiawa, Oahu, how the truck drivers that took us to the fields, refused to drive their vehicles that morning. All of us student hires were told to go home and to wait for a call to come back to work. Most of us were very confused as to what was going on, but I can recall, even though I didn't comprehend it then, the angry verbal exchanges that the drivers were leveling at their supervisor. Not everyone received calls that afternoon telling us to report back to work the next morning. Upon returning, we "lucky ones" learned the work refusal had to do with not all of the union seasonal hires being called back. The drivers wouldn't work until they were. The minimum wage back in 1966 was $1.40 an hour and we student hires from Leilehua and Wailua High School were a big time bargain. I worked for Dole Pineapple for a summer and a spring break. Almost every kid in the neighborhood picked pine during the summers if he was old enough. The town kids packed sliced pineapples at the Dole Cannery. I got used to it after the first week, but for a lazy kid like myself who was full excuses, it felt like torture, and I couldn 't understand how people worked like this their whole lives. My parents took most of my pay, but left me enough to buy school supplies, a concert ticket to see the Rolling Stones and those goofy bell bottomed jeans from Liberty House that I was crazy about. Today, the mighty plantation system no longer exists. Not till the early 1970's did Ifinally figure the refusal incident out. studying Hawaii's labor history in the University of Hawaii's (UH) Ethnic Studies Department. At the time, there were veryfew Filipinos and Polynesians going to UH, I was one of the few Filipinos going to college, and I was only half. The only Filipino college instructor I ever had was some brooding and sarcastic assistant named "Omar"in the Hawaii Labor History class, being taught by some fiery Indonesian named Ahmad, who had witnessed the massacre of ethnic Chinese and the violent attacks on the student and worker movements in his country of Indonesia during the 1960's. Whenever these guys ranted, they had the nerve to call it "lectures", one could vividly imagine the slave master's mansion going up in flames. With all respects to movie producer Quentin Tarantino, their class was the original version of "Django Unchained", with Ahmad being the abolisionist Dr. King Shultz and Omar unleashed as the avenging Django Freeman. On several occasions, Omar would mention the only time one would see "brown folks" at UH was at night cleaning the toilets. I hung out with him one night verifying his claim. The following 2 articles showcase how workers on Kauai have challenged the so-called "plantation mentality" misconception and won. ^syftiH This photo as well as front cover from ILWU led sugar strike of 1946 covering 33 of 34 sugar plantations. This parade shows "union guards" to protect strikers from any potential violence. Both photos from Anne Rand Library,ILWU San Francisco. Graphic on top page of this essay done by muralist Jean Chariot from University of Hawaii collection. Mural depicts the all important power of labor connected and united, from the intellectual to the physical. THURSDAY- FEBRUARY 3.2011 • ONLINE: WWW.THEGARDENISLAND.COM Employees picket Poipu resort over benefits Labor dispute includes right to wear buttons Dennis Fujimoto THE GARDEN ISLAND PO'IPU —Buttons, benefits and green initiatives were at the heart of a labor dispute involving about 230 workers Wednesday morning at the Sheraton Kaua'i. "We went to work and wore our unionbuttons that we're allowed to in our contract, but were sent home," said Angela Prigge, a housekeeping clerk. "Every other Sheraton employee is allowed to wear the buttons un der the contract, but on Kaua'i they changed the policy in the last two months." Photos by Dennis Fujimoto/The Garden Island Above: WhenLocal 5 employees at the Sheraton Kaua'i.showed up to work with these two buttons Wednesday, they were sent home, sparking a rescheduling of picketing plans at the Po'ipu resort. Top: Angela Prigge, a housekeeping clerk at the Sheraton Kaua'i, leadsMgroup of picketers on the sidewalk fronting the Ocean~Lobby, Wednesday. r Chip Bahouth, the Sheraton Kaua'i general manager, collected his department heads and made offers of cold water to the picketers, although the offer was refused. "Our ability to provide a world class experience for our guests is made possible by the hard work and spirit of aloha of our associates, who are an essential part of our 'ohana and the lifeblood of our business," Bahouth said in a statement. "We intend to work directly with the union to resolve this issue as quickly as possible to See Picket, A5 Continued from Al minimize any impact on our associates, our guests and •our community.'' Prigge said the workers' are tired of being treated as ''second-class citizens." "I'm here because of our treatment on Kaua'i as sec-. ond-class people," she said. "They have a green program that made housekeeping people lose benefits and hours of work. That was stopped on the other is lands, except Kaua'i." Cade Watanabe, repre- . senting Local 5, said in a phone interview that the green initiative involved guests being able to opt out of having their rooms serviced in lieu of cash op tions. That program was stopped at all the Starwood properties except onKaua'i. . . "The rooms get dirty," said Isaac Silva of the Sheraton Kaua'i culinary department. "The contract is not over and yet they're cutting everything." . According to several of work with two union but that case, Starwood covered tons, they were sent home by the general manager. the employees' benefits Workers in the houskee- ping, food and beverage, culinary, bell, front desk,and engineering were in volved in the directive. "That's about 95 per during the work. Watanabe added that Starwood should cover the anticipated seven-month layoff period for Sheraton Kaua'i workers. cent of the Sheraton Kaua'i Kerwin said he feels the issue of the buttons is a workers," said Justin Jansen, a Local 5 representative language in the contract who met with the workers at Anne Knudsen Park in Koloa after they were sent home. During the renovation work at the Sheraton Kaua'i misinterpretation of the' because other Starwood properties are allowing its employees to wear more than one union button. Watanabe said the Shera ton Kaua'i workers' con which started recently, one tract expired June 30, 2010, of the areas involved is the and Local 5 is in the midst customizing of food ser of negotiations for a new vices and the hotel menu. "This involves between contract. He said there was an 40 to 50 people in food .and beverage," Watanabe said. "Some of these people will find other jobs during the renovation period, but informational picket scheduled for 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, but after the workers were sent home, a management company, the schedule for picketing was moved up to 1p.m. and was set to run until 5 p.m. "We've already had em ployees who have had their hours cut," Silva said. "They keep changing things. was faced with a similar We understand about the there will be about 15 to 20 people who won't be able -tofind jobs and will be left without medical coverage." Watanabe said Starwood, the Sheraton Kaua'i work- situation during the rede velopment of the Princess ers, when they reported to Ka'iulani hotel on O'ahu. In renovations, and we all like .move forward, but I don't know what to do already." «"«*A "You really forgot your workforce," said Priscilla Badua, a state employee for 39 The Garden island 820 Scattered Clouds years. "I cannot believe you're supporting this plan. Give me a break." • DHS workers brace for another round of layoffs Clients launch protest strategy Posted: Friday, February 25, 2010 11:45 pm Paul C. Curtis - The Garden Island LIHU'E — Not long ago, state workers experienced office-shuffling when some of their colleagues lost jobs through reductions in force late last year. Now, some of those same state Department of Human Services employees on Kaua'i are readying for even more cuts that seem likely to also include closure of certain Kaua'i DHS offices. Penny Rubio, an income maintenance worker in the DHS Kapa'a (East) office of the Benefit, Employment and Support Services Division, is at the same time worried that her job and office are targeted for closure while also concerned for low-income clients who Photos by Paul C. CurtisfThe Garden Island depend on the face-to-face contact to start or keep necessary financial benefits flowing. Protest signs line a fence outside the Kaua'i War Memorial Convention Hall in Lihu'e Thursday at a meeting of the Governor's Council of Neighbor How is a person who signs her name with an "X" Island Advisers. with state DHS workers via fax, phone, or computer, because she can't read or write supposed to navigate a mechanized system that may soon require her to deal Rubio asked Thursday night at a public meeting to discuss the planned DHS reorganization. "Those people are going to fall through the cracks." said Rubio, who said she has been told by a supervisor that her position will be eliminated, and her office closed, in the DHS reorganization. State DHS Director Lillian Koller, Deputy Director Henry Oliva and consultant Sandie Hoback said at least one Kaua'i office will remain open for face-to-face interviews, though most of the other initial claims processing workers will all be in either Honolulu or Hilo on the Big Island at proposed new Eligibility Processing Operations Division centers. Photos by Paul C. Curtis/The Garden Island Anne Punohu of Kalaheo, standing left, one of several dozen clients Gf the state Department of Human Services attending a public meeting at the Few specific details of the plan were available at the Governor's Council of Neighbor Island Advisors meeting at the Kaua'i War MemorialConvention Hallin Kaua'i War Memorial Convention Hall in Lihu'e Lihu'e Thursday night, but Friday Kollersaid 31 DHS Thursday night, has organized other DHS clients on offices statewide would close, and 230 DHS positions Kaua'i and said a federal lawsuit is being considered should DHS go ahead with a planned increase efficiencies for all involved, save the state reorganization that will see workers lose jobs and would be eliminated, in the reorganization she says will millions of dollars, and move the DHS system into the present century. some Kaua'i offices closed. She said the state 'war on the poor" penalizes beneficiaries with little or no means to Tight back. "We cannot get out of this hole by cutting," said state Rep. JimmyTokioka, D-Wailua-Lihu'e-Koloa, adding that the reorganization is'not a good idea." Clients and employees of DHS on Kaua'i Thursday night saw things differentlyfrom the DHS leaders and "I think that takes the 'human' out of 'human services,'" said Linda Shigeta, a DHS worker for 18 years who added that she doesn't think the planned DHS reorganization will comply with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act. "This is not being accessible." Around 60 people attended the meeting. Hoback and Oliva said the reorganization should "create enormous efficiencies," and that the current system is simply not fiscally sustainable. The new system planned to be patterned after a similar Florida reorganization would be "very efficient, very accurate, and allow the whole system to become very efficient," said Hoback. It would also provide more options (fax, e-mail, computer, telephone) to enter into the system, she said. "I'm not somebody that doesn't understand bottom line,' said Lihu'e attorney Michael Ratcliffe, acknowledging that a one-hour, face-to-face interview is inefficient, "but for some that's all that works." "No more layoffs, no more furloughs, and no more client suffering,"said Raymond Catania, a DHS worker who survived the first reduction in force. "Without face-to-face (interviews), you're asking for fraud," said Anne Punohu, of the Kaua'i DHS Clients Coalition, adding that clients without access to telephone, fax or computer will have a difficult time communicating with DHS workers. "It's definitely not client-friendly," said Punohu, like other clients also concerned about the loss of "terrific"DHS workers. The DHS recently announced consolidation of offices and positions involving determination of eligibilityfor certain state financial and medical benefits to low-income and otherwise challenged residents. The DHS fact sheet on the proposed establishment of the EPOD indicates two centers, in Honolulu and Hilo on the Big Island, where centralized processing of applications would take place. Details of the plan indicate that several current DHS offices on Kaua'i might end up closing, with several positions eliminated or moved off-island as a result, leaving just a "south" office to serve the entire island's client base requiring face-to-face contact. The plan so far has not been warmly received by the workers' union, the Hawai'i Government Employees Association, nor affected employees or clients. Rubio, who works in the first-to-work and child care unit's East income maintenance unit in Kapa'a, which may be closed in the reorganization, worries both about her job and her clients, she said. "Of course I'm concerned about losing my job," said Rubio, who with five years of stale employment might not have enough seniority to supplant or "bump" another state worker witti fewer years of service. "I'mconcerned about my clients," including one elderly woman who comes in every year to have Rubio help fill out her paperwork necessary to keep her benefits flowing or the homeless person who has no access to a phone, fax or computer. "We offer them a kind face, a kind voice." human "contact. They're used to the old way" of face-to-face interaction, said Rubio. "They're not used to change," or leaving a telephone message with a call center and not knowing when the call will be returned. Rubio said she has been told by supervisors that her otfice could be closed as early as July 1, and that she would likely lose her job in the process. "I'm kind of lower on the totem pole," said Rubio. Judy Lenthall, executive directorof the Kaua'i Food Bank, said she has twofears: the new system won't be implemented, leaving the existing, broken status quo; or the new system will be implemented but not correctly. "Both of them scare me to death. That's not good enough for Hawai'i." A DHS client said someone who applies for food stamps appears before a DHS interviewer, and through the process of the face-to-face interview it becomes clear the client is eligible for services in addition to food stamps and the appropriate referrals are made, under the current system. "It's a very personal issue" that can't be totally accomplished via computers or other electronic means, she said. When you get it right it helps. "When you get it wrong a lot of people suffer," said another client. "Youfolks are taking away the human element." said Janice Shitanaka, a DHS worker for 26 years. "It's so sad because clients are powerless. It's an injustice. "I pray that this does not go through because you're going to be hurting thousands of people in Hawai'i." "Youreally forgot your workforce."said Priscilla Badua. a state employee for 39 years. "Icannot believe you're supporting this plan. Give me a break." UBLIC UMPLOYEES WORK FOR YOU EVERYDAY NO LAYOFFS!! State workers brace for uncertain future Story State workers protest layoffs Posted: Thursday, July 9, 2009 12:00 am By Coco Zickos - The Garden Island Posted: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:00 am KAPA'A — Still faced with the possibility of layoffs, state employees on Kaua'i are nervous about the future of their employmenL V Raymond Catania of the state Department of Human Services, along with co-workers, have been glued to every media outlet, concerned with how they will make ends meet if they lose their jobs. feMLE m "Workers are very worried," he said. "They're scared because where are they going to find work?" With the island's unemployment rate reaching 10.3 percent in May. finding jobs has become a difficult feat It took Hawai'i job seekers an average of 22.7 weeks to find a new job, according to May data from the federal Current Population Survey. "I really feel it's important for state and public workers to make their plight known to the rest of the community — to let them know that what happens to us. happens to a lot of working people. It's not an isolated thing," Catania said, explaining that, economically speaking, layoffs would have a negative trickle-down effect After calling last week's announcement that Gov. Linda Lingle's furlough plan was blocked in court a "victory," Catania said she is now "threatening" employees with potential job losses in order to help relieve budget deficits People, several of whom were recipients and has not offered much room for negotiation in the meantime. of the state layoff notices, take their displeasure to the streets with a lunchhour sign-waving campaign outside the Kapa'a Library. Paula Schultz, a state employee of 15 years, right, is one of the "The state has a take-it-or-leave-it kind of an attitude," Catania said. Unions are blaming Lingle and her chief labor negotiator of "bad faith bargaining," the Associated Press reported Wednesday United Public Workers reportedly submitted a prohibited practices complaint Tuesday with the Hawai'i Labor state workers who received a layoff notice. Next to her, Iwalani Kaauwai- Herrod, a supervisor, said her department received seven notices. Relations Board, contending that state Human Resources Development Director Marie Laderta engaged in unfair Photos by Dennis Fujimoto/The Garden bargaining on Monday by abruptly leaving negotiations on new contracts with four state worker unions. Island The complaint also apparently asserts that Laderta canceled talks on June 25 and refused to meet last Friday. Laderta argued Tuesday the state did not cancel the June 25 meeting and the talks last Friday were never confirmed. (Correction: Original photo by In addition, Laderta and Lingle have said they will not participate in talks until the unions submit their own formal proposal. "Lingle is not serious about negotiating with our unions," Catania said. "We want to discuss more. We want the state to be serious and sit down with us and help alleviate this crisis." He said his ideal situation would be finding other ways to cut government spending rather than employee furloughs or layoffs. An estimated 2,500 individuals or more could potentially lose their jobs statewide and it's hard to say at this point who or what offices would be affected, though Catania said it will likely be based on seniority (duration of employment). Dennis Fujimoto, but it mistakenly identifies Paula Schultz, a nurse and Family Support Worker, and a state employee at that time of 15 years, for retired DHS Social Worker Janice Askenazy. Both of them were very passionate fighters in this struggle.) Union workers are typically required to get 90 days notice, he added. "Employers have to make an attempt to find work for those employees," Catania said, noting his experience with similar situations in the past. "We dont really know how her system willwork," he said, but hopefully Lingle will "sit down at the table and do the right thing." • Coco Zickos, business and environmental writer, can be reached at 245-3681 (ext. 251) or czickosrSkauaipubcp corn • 2013 Thegardenisland.com. AJI rights reserved This material m3y not be published, broadcast, rewnllen of redistributed. In late 2009 the Gov. Lingle Administration began layoffs of public workers, with the Department of Human Services (DHS) taking the brunt of the attacks. Unfortunately, determined and outspoken resistance by the Hawaii Government Employees Union (HGEA) was not able to stop the elimination of over 900 HGEA positions. Republican Lingle and her business supporters successfully turned large sections of the community against the workers. Eventually, the public began to turn against Lingle when she started enforcing public school closures or "furlough fridays." She could conduct austerity measures on public workers, but ignited an outrage when she picked on our children. In early 2010, her next attack ended in failure. Although a number of DHS service centers were closed, we were able to beat off any more layoffs. Unfortunately today, the workload has increased for the hard pressed clerical staff that is left. What helped the workers the second time, was more community support from DHS clients themselves, led by recipients like Ann Punohu of the DHS Clients Coalition and homeless activists like John Zapalla that leafleted the homeless on the beaches encouraging them to call Gov. Lingle and get involved. Other community supporters like the Kauai Alliance for Peace and Social Justice did sign holdings and put up huge wooden signs around key intersections in the Kapaa and Lihue areas declaring how important public employees are to the overall community. We also had critical support from Democratic Party legislators like John Mizuno who understood how the economic stability of the community would be severely disrupted with the lost of decent paying jobs. It should be remembered that his political support and the support from any politician can only happen when people are organized and direct the struggle themselves. UBLIC EMPLOYEES WORK FOR rOU EVERYDAY NO LAYOFFSI V biooci in r i i e rieias: i ne Hanapepe Massacre And The 1924 Filipino Strike November 26, 2012 / Dean Alegado Pablo Manlapit, labor leader and self-made lawyer, couldn't be stopped by arrests, intimidation and exile. (Courtesy of Filipinas Magazine) n Sept. 9,1924, striking Filipino workers from the Makaweli plantation in Hanapepe, on the Hawaiian island of Kauai, armed themselves with guns, knives, rocks and clubs and plunged headlong into a bloody confrontation with the police. What came to be alternately known as the Battle of Hanapepe and the Hanapepe Massacre was only one of several dramatic battles that shaped the relationship between labor and capital in the state of Hawaii. And Filipinos figured centrally in almost all of them. Between 1920 and 1940, Filipinos, making the greatest sacrifices, led the struggle of Hawaii's working class for the democratic right to belong to a union and for an end to racial discrimination and the feudal practices of plantation bosses. When Filipinos first arrived in Hawaii at the turn of the century, they found a colonial backwater dominated by a small elite of (white) businessmen whose corporations were known as the BigFive— Castle & Cooke, Theo H. Davies, Alexander & Baldwin, C. Brewer and Amfac. The Big Five controlled the islands' economy and politics, following the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom and annexation by the UnitedStates in 1898. At the bottom of society were the masses of immigrants and Hawaiian laborers who produced the wealth of the islands. Theplantationsystem was sharply divided not only along class lines, but also along race and nationality. The Hawaii Sugar Planters Association (HSPA) skillfully practiced divide-and-rule by deliberately recruiting workers of different nationalities and races, and abetting cultural and linguistic differences by housing workers in segregated camps: Pake (Chinese), Japanese, Podagee (Portuguese), Spanish and Filipino. Work assignments and wageswere often determined by race. By the 1920s, the Chinese, Japanese and Koreans — who had suffered bitter defeats in earlier strikes — were leaving plantations for betterjobs and payin Honolulu and other big towns, or migrating to the U.S. mainland. To make up for the loss of workers, the HSPAencouraged the immigration of more than 100,000 Filipinos to Hawaii between 1910 and 1932. Oncethe Filipinos arrived, they were distributed among 40HSPA-affuiated plantations on the islands of Kauai, Oahu, Maui, Molokai, Lanai and the Big Island of Hawaii, drastically changing the ethnic composition of the plantations. In 1915,Filipinos constituted only 19 percent of the work force, the Japanese, 54 percent. By 1932,only 19 percent of the plantation workers were Japanese and nearly 70 percent were Filipino. Most Filipino workers were from the Ilocos provinces and the Visayan islands. Between 1916 and 1928, HSPA labor recruiters brought 66,436 FiUpinos to the islands. Of this number, 37,114 (about 60 percent) came from the four Ilocano provinces of IlocosSur, Ilocos Norte, Abra and La Union; 17,799 (or about 27 percent) originated from Cebu, Bohol, Leyte and Negros. About 8,525 reported that they came from Pangasinan and Tarlac. The rest came from 35 other provinces. "The Hanapepe Massacre was only one of several dramatic battles that shaped the relationship between labor and capital in the State of Hawaii." HSPA labor recruitersin the Philippinesconsciously selecteduneducated workers of peasant origins. As late as 1930, seven out of ten Filipino plantation workers could neither read nor write. Recruits suspected of having even slight schooling were systematically screened out by the HSPA as potential troublemakers. Most of the early Filipino immigrants were young men who came without parents, wives or children. From1920 to 1930, the HSPA brought in 65,618 Filipino laborers, while allowing 5,286 women and 3,091 children to accompany the men. The Filipino male to female ratio was almost 14 to 1. The social handicaps of the early Filipino immigrants made them ideal candidates for the most arduous and monotonous tasks,such as hoeing, planting and weeding during caneplanting and cutting,hauling, loading and flurning during harvest. Their lives revolvedaround the 10-12 hour work day and the factory mill whistle. It didn't takelong beforethe first wave of Filipino immigrants, like the other nationalities before them, began to rebel against the social and economic conditions they found in paradise. BLOOD-UNIONISM HSPA's divide-and-rulepolicy resulted in ''blood unionism" among the various ethnic groups. Each group—the Chinese, Japanese, Portuguese, Hawaiians and Filipinos—fought the plantation bosses separately and without coordination. All strikes prior to the establishment of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) in the 1940s ended in tragic and costly defeat for the workers. The exception was the strike of Filipinos on Maui in 1937led by Vibora Luviminda, the last of the racially-based unions in Hawaii. Between1920 and 1940,Filipinos organized 12 strikes against the sugar barons. The most dramatic and bloodiest of these occurred in 1920,1924 and 1937. The most important historical figure in Hawaii's Filipino community before World War II was Pablo Manlapit, the founder of the early Filipino labor movement. Unlike most Filipino workers, who were Ilocanos or Visayan, Pablo Manlapit was a Tagalog. Born in Lipa, Batangas, Manlapit was five years old when Jose Rizal, the Philippine national hero, was executed by the Spanish in 1896 and eight years old when the Philippine-American War began in February 1898. Manlapit came to Hawaii as a 19-year-old in 1910. He had completed grade school in the Philippines but was somehow able to convince labor recruiters that he was a suitable worker. He was assigned to a plantation on the island of Hawaii but was soon dismissed. He moved to the town of Hilo, where he started two newspapers and ran a pool hall. Later, he moved to Honolulu and worked as a salesman and stevedore. Manlapit becamean interpreter and janitor in a legal office, where he studied law. In 1918, he qualified as a DistrictCourt Practitioner, becoming the first Filipino lawyer in Hawaii. A labor historian wrote that Manlapit was "an eloquent agitator, but an incapable administrator." For all his faults, Manlapit had charisma, and elderly Filipinos still speak of him with awe and respect. A plantation-era house Mestizo-looking and tall for a Filipino-he was six feet tall-Manlapit tirelessly represented Filipino workers intheir grievances against their employers, becoming enormously popular among Filipinos throughout the territory. He also drew the attention and hatred of the HSPA. In1919, Manlapit traveled from island to island recruiting members into the Filipino Labor Union (FLU). In 1920, Manlapit and Japanese labor leaders formed the Higher Wage Movement. Following the HSPA's rejection oftheir demands for better wages, improved working conditions and equal pay for the same work regardless of race and sex, Manlapit and the Japanese labor leaders asked their respective unions to strike. It was the first time unions representing different nationalities united in a joint strike with a common demand. Filipinos and Japanese workers left the fields and kept the millsidle in Waipahu, Waialua, Ewa, Kahuku and Waimanalo. At the height of the strike, the HSPA's hired goons evicted more than 12,000workers from their plantation housing. But the strike was broken when Manlapit suddenly pulled the Filipinos out ofit due to an apparent dispute with the Japanese leaders. The HSPA took ' advantage ofthe splitby spreading rumors and intrigues to demoralize the strikers. The first interracial strike in thehistory ofHawaii lasted three months, with the HSPA spending several million dollars to crush it. The defeat dealt a severe blow to the Japanese union, and it would be another 20 yearsbefore it would again play a centralrolein Hawaii's labor movement. THE HIGHER WAGE MOVEMENT After, the defeat ofthe 1920 strike, Manlapit started a new labor organization with the help ofGeorge Wright, later to become the English editor of the Hawaii Hochi, the Japanese community newspaper. The HSPA had Manlapit thrown in jail twice and madeit difficult for him to practice law.Undaunted, Manlapit continued visiting various plantations to forge the Filipino Higher Wage Movement. The Movement petitioned the HSPA in1923 for a $2a-day, 40-hour work week and an end to abuses. The HSPA ignored these demands. Manlapit appealed to the colonial Philippine government tosend a labor commissioner to investigate the working conditions inHawaii and to mediate between the planters and theFilipino workers. Governor General Leonard Wood appointed former Ilocos Norte governor Cayetano Ligot as special investigator. Escorted by HSPA officials, Ligot paid token visits to severalplantations. In an authoritativestatementon the situation of Filipino laborers in Hawaii, Ligot blamed theFilipinos themselves for their troubles. They were too unstable, said Ligot, and had fallen prey to parasitic gamblers and con men who snuck into theplantations to disrupttheir otherwise pleasant situation. Management, he said, was doing its best to provide wholesome working conditions and decent wages. He urged his compatriots to give their services wholeheartedly to the plantations to bring honor to the Filipino people. Ligot concluded his report by attacking the activities of Filipino labor leaders, especially Manlapit. Ligot was only one ofmany labor cornmissioners sent by the colonial government in Manila who would work hand in glove with the HSPA against the interest of Filipino workers. While Ligot was discouraging Filipino workers from fighting to get more than their $20 a month wage, his report included arequest to increase his monthly salary to $250. Ligot's subservience earned him notoriety among Filipinos in Hawaii. Filipino old-timers still speak jokingly of "mistake Ligot" when something goes wrong over matters which they have little or no control. THE 1924 HANAPEPE MASSACRE In April 1924, one month after Ligot's report was made public, Manlapit called on all Filipino workers to walk out and strike. Twelve thousand Filipinos from 23 of the 45 plantations went on along, violent and tragic strike that would last eight months. Thestrikewas doomed from the start. The HSPA again employed its time-tested weapon ofdivide- and-rule. This time they pitted Filipinos against Filipinos-Ilocanos against Visayans. Ilocano laborers wererecruited from the Philippines as strikebreakers. The tragic scene ofstriking Filipino workers and their families being evicted from their plantation-owned houses and replaced with newly arrived workers from the Philippines was repeated throughout the islands. Thousands ofstrikers pitched tents nearbeaches and sugarcane fields. HSPA agents set up an elaborate spy network to infiltrate strike meetings, sow dissension and break up rallies. The plantation bosses adeptly used bribes as well as actual physical beatings. What became the bloodiest incident in the history of labor in Hawaii occurred in Hanapepe on the island of Kauai on Sept. 9,1924. Strikers at the Makaweli plantation armed themselves with guns, cane knives, rocks and clubs and captured two Ilocano strikebreakers. Kauai Sheriff William Rice led a posse to this camp on the banks of a small river just above the town of Hanapepe to demand the release of the captured scabs. The strikers resisted, and a battle ensued lasting several days. When the smoke cleared, 16 Filipinos and four policemen were dead and scores wounded. At Sheriff Rice's request, Gov. Farrington sent two machine-gun squads and rifle companies of the National Guard to Kauai. The National Guard restored order, arresting more than 100 strikers. Seventy-six Filipinos were brought to trial, and 60 were given four-year sentences. .*•- ... HASCOMETOeE^m 2&3&J&&J* TWE AM) THE UBSOgl SKS^™«" OESmir^W^'fea^»«Bi rossaiEthrough the effortsofthe laiivnicEMiDMN. y,.r'T.,'r>.J'>iVrt^".'''-v^ •", -'*{0>ffm?ipO»tSAFL-C». ~"HAHftPEPE;kAUIU•r'SWtWBBfMOM —. -TCP' The marker commemorating the sacrifice of Filipino workers in the history of Manlapit and Cecil Basan, another prominent Filipino labor leader, were sentenced to ten years, even though the two men weren't even present in Kauai during the massacre. Years later, one elderly Filipino woman, then a nurse at the immigration station in Honolulu, stated that several witnesses, who had been promised $10,000 each and a ticket back to the Philippines, testified falsely against Manlapit and Basan. The Hawaii Hochi wrote that Manlapit had been railroaded into prison, avictim of made-up evidence, perjured testimony, racial prejudice and class hatred. Manlapit was exiled from Hawaii and left for California where he stayed until 1932. With Filipino leaders jailed or exiled and their organization shattered, the strike of 1924 continued ineffectively, albeit heroically, for another three months. THE 1937 MAUI STRIKE Labor activity on the plantations declined until the height of the Great Depression in 1933, when Manlapit returned from his exile. Together with Antonio Fagel and Epifanio Taok, Manlapit formed a new Filipino Labor Union. To avoid arepeat of 1924, the HSPA made apreemptive move by jailing Taok and banishing Manlapit permanently to the Philippines in 1935. Fagel took the union underground and renamed it Vibora Luviminda. Vibora was the nom de guerre of the Filipino patriot Artemio Ricarte, who fought in the Philippine revolution against Spain and refused to sign an oath ofloyalty to the UnitedStates. Luviminda stood for Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao - signifying the unity of the Filipinos. In 1936, Fagel brought Vibora Luviminda out into the open and launched astrike atPuunene plantation on Maui. Three thousand Filipinos joined the strike. With the Depression still atits height, the HSPA hired scabs from the massive ranks of the unemployed. The Philippine Commissioner in Washington sent awire, as did President Manuel Quezon, to the striking Filipinos calling on themto return to work. After three months, the HSPA negotiated with the union to end the strike, afirst in Hawaii's history. The striking workers won a15-percent wage increase. In the midst of the negotiations, however, Fagel was arrested on trumped-up charges of kidnapping a Filipino strikebreaker. Fagel and seven other strike leaders were brought to trial, which dragged on for months. They were found guilty and sent to jail. The Vibora Luviminda, the last of Hawaii's racial union, then fell into disarray, making the Puunene strike the last racial strike in Hawaii. The Vibora Luviminda strike of1937 also marked the first time that haole labor leaders extended strike support to plantationworkers. Jack Hall,the founder of the ILWU, who was sent to organize Hawaii's waterfront workers by the left-wing Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO), played a central role in building support for the strike. So did William Bailey, the editor of The Voice ofLabor, who was also an organizer ofthe American Communist Party in Hawaii. ONE BIG UNION After 1937, the idea ofan industry-wide, interracial union began to take hold among plantation and waterfront workers. The plantation-based Filipino community was drawninto thekey social drama unfolding in Hawaii-the struggle to build one big union. Taking the lessons from the bitter labor wars waged by Filipinos between 1920 and 1940, the ILWU started its drive tounite Hawaii's ethnically diverse working class under the slogan, "An injury to one is an injury to all." The years following World War II saw epic battles between Hawaii's workers-led by the ILWU-and the Big Five: the three-month-long 1946 Sugar Strike, the 1947 Pineapple Strike; the bitter six-month-long 1949 Long-Shore Strike and the four-month-long 1958 Sugar Strike. The ILWU won each time. As the largest ethnic group onthe plantations, Filipinos played a crucial role in the outcome of these historic events. The question of victory ordefeat hinged on theirunity and determination to stand behind their left-wing unions, which often came under intense anti-communist attacks. With the ILWU firmly established as a political and economic force in Hawaii, those in powerhave had to listen with begrudging respect to the voice of the Filipino plantation workers. Hawaii's sugar and pineapple workers would emerge as the highest-paid agricultural workers in the world. The lowest paid sugar and pineapple workers in the field earn more than nine dollars an hour. They have comprehensive medical plans, paid holidays and vacation andreceive sick and severance pay. They're entitled to workmen's compensation ifthey get injured on the job, andarecovered by the state's collective bargaining law. Hawaii isthe only state inwhich all workers inlarge-scale agricultural enterprises are organized in alabor union and have been for nearly 50 years. But the captains of Hawaii's agribusiness never fully reconciled themselves with labor's gains. Firms such as Castle &Cooke, Dole and Del Monte have shifted practically all of their sugar and pineapple operations to countries suchas the Philippines, Thailand and Costa Rica, where they can pay workers one-tenth of the wages earnedby Hawaii's workers. After World War II, there were 36 sugar and nearly a dozen pineapple plantations employing more than 35,000 workers. Today, there are only four sugar and two pineapple plantations operating inHawaii, employing fewer than 2,000 people. The decline helps mask the islands' history of epic labor struggles, a tumultuous past in which Filipinos played a heroic role. Dean Alegado was a -professor in ethnic studies and director ofthe Center for Philippines Studies in the School for Hawaiian, Asian and Pacific Studies at the University ofHawaii in Honolulu. He currently lives in Suhic, Philippines. Reprintedfrom Filipinas Magazine, October 1997. DEBUNKING THE DEMEANING "PLANTATION MENTALITY" MYTH With the help of close friend and a very effective activist, Jimbo Alalem, the essay and letter to the Garden Island on International Workers Day (IWD) was written. Lihue WalMart manager, Crystal Femandes, wrote a typical corporate response. The interesting thing about her op/ed piece was that only a few of her workers actually read the letter on IWD, which not only focused on Wal-Mart, but the benefits of union contracts and most importantly the struggle to increase the minimum wage for our poorest workers, points she never refered to at all. Over the past couple of years there have been a number of letters to the Garden Island Newspaper very critical of Walmart, with their Lihue "associates" avidly reading them. In this case, because the letter was entitled as an international worker observance, many of her workers missed it. Wal-Mart's response shows how worried they are of the worldwide critisism they are getting daily and the twisted arguments they will use to keep their huge profits rolling in. At this point, our local letters on Wal-Mart are like a few annoying mosquito bites on a very big, but very thin-skinned and nervous elephant, trying it's best to hide from a major swarm. As of today, 6-20-2013, letters responding to Wal-Mart's half truths and outright lies, written by union organizer and former Kauai resident Katy Rose and David Carr of Honolulu's "Labor Fest" have not been printed in the Garden Island. I patiently wait for it to make the paper. Ifone gets a chance, check out the books by Gerald Home, "Fighting in Paradise" on the influential role played by radical labor in Hawaii's history and, "Wal-Martthe face of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism", edited by Nelson Lichenstien." I would also like to thank the ILWU and the workers of the Pacific Beach Hotel in Waikiki in their ten-year struggle to win union recognition and garnering needed international support. Also a big mahalo to Mike Miranda for turning me on to Dean Alegado's excellent account of the little known "Hanapepe Massacre", required reading for all Kauai social justice fighters. Hawaii, and in particular Kauai's "local" or multi-racial working class has a long history of fighting back against injustice, both in the community and in the workplace, were not brainwashed with the so-called "plantation mentality" or the inability to stand up to authority. If you hear anyone mouthing that crap, please correct them. Ray Catania (808 634-2737) [email protected]