Barend van der Heijden Embajada del Reino de los Países Bajos
Transcription
Barend van der Heijden Embajada del Reino de los Países Bajos
Mm"te, '0 dpl/\mb,,'nte San Isidro, Ot.cio N° "Decenio de las Personas con Discapacidad en el Perú" "Ano de la Consolidación E<¡OIl6mica YSocial del Perú" o7 OCT. 2010 /'31-), -2010-SG/MINAM • Señor Embajador Barend van der Heijden Embajada del Reino de los Países Bajos Presente. Proyecto Foro Perú Holanda sobre Gestión del Agua Asunto . Referencia a) Su Carta sIr) de fecha 02 de agosto 2010 (Registro N° 9290-2010) b) Informe N° 200-201 O-SG/DGCCDRH/DVMERN/MINAM De mi especial consideración, .Es grato dirigirme a usted para saludarlo cordialmente en relación al documento de la referencia, Adenda al Acuerdo suscrito con la Representación a su cargo para la ejecución de la actividad del Proyecto "Foro Perú Holanda sobre Gestión del Agua". . . Al respecto, la Dirección General de Cambio Climático Desertificación y Recursos Hídricos del Ministerio del Ambiente, mediante ·ellnforme de la referencia b) sustenta la reproglJilmací6n del presupuesto del Proyecto, consignándose los recursos que aportará el MINAM para la realización del "Foro Perú- Holan.da sobre Gestión del Agua" el cual tendrá lugar los días 21 y 22 de octubre del 2010, así como la vigencia del Acuerdo hasta diciemhre del 2010. Se adjunta copia Qel informe y de la reprogramación presupuesta!. Sobre el particular, el Ministerio del Ambiente expresa su conformidad con el contenido de la citada Adenda la cual suscribo en dos ejemplares, haciendo llegar uno de ellos a su Representación para los· fines del caso. Sin otro particular y agradeciendo por el apoyo brindado para la realización de tan importante evento, hago propicia la ocasión para expresarle los sentimientos de mi especial consideración y estima personal Atentamente, Secretario General CVlCEF ce: OCNII DGCCDRH GOROON ANO BETTY MOORE Guillermo Castilleja Chief Program OfficCI', Environment FOUNOATION gui Uermo.casíi [email protected] 1 110 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL April 22, 2010 Dr. Antonio Brack Egg Ministro del Ambiente, Perú Av. Javier Prado Oeste 1440, San Isidro LimaPeru Email: [email protected] Ms. Julia Justo Executive Director, Fondo Nacional del Ambiente Calle Hermanos Quinteros 103 Urb. La Castellana, Santiago de Surco Lima 33 - PERU / ..¿;ú.Ei::¡>~mail: [email protected] I;g;~~;¡.)\"~ ~ ;'I')'.rf'4~..{ ¡ ¡"c ,~" ~ ' ~: \" ," , Grant Award Letter Agreement for Ministerio del Ambiente, Republica del Peru .ffi'ri ;;i" t \ .·<~/;'f:I~::'~~',;:'/ (#2242) "''::':!._:::~'/' Dear Minister Brack and Ms. Justo: On behalf of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (the "Foundation"), it is a pleasure to inform you that the Ministerio del Ambiente, Republica del Peru ("MINAM") has been awarded a grant in the amount ofPEN S/5,600, 166 (Five Million Six Hunrlred Thousand One Hundred Sixty-Six Peruvian Nuevo Soles) the equivalent of US$1,972,931 (One Million Nine Hundred Seventy-Two Thousand Nine Hi.mdred Thirty-One Dollars) ("Grant"). This Grant is in support of the development of the instítutíonal, legal and technical capacíty of MINAM and other relevant institutions involved in developing a Reduction in Emissions due to Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) program in Peru. This grant will support the preparatory phase of a national strategy to reduce emissions from deforestation, forest degradation, and other forest sector activities (REDD+), as well as the selection and implementation ofrelated activities REDD+ in several regions ofPeru. Fondo Nacional del Ambiente (FONAM) ("Agent") has agreed to act as agent for the F oundation for this Grant. Gordon and ~etty Moore Foundation Te!. 650-213-3000 1661 Page Mill Road www.moore,org Palo Alto. CA 94304 Fax 650-213-3003 .. Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, MINAM Ms. J\llia Justo, FONAM April13,2010 This Grant is to be used to aehieve the outeomes and/or outputs deseribed in Attaehment 1 (eolleetively "Purposes"), in aeeordanee with the payments and requirements plan in Attaehment 2, and the budget in Attaehment 3 (the "Budget"). ~is grant award letter agreement (ineluding all attaehments), is colleetively referred to as the "Grant Agreement." By signing this Grant Agreement; MINAM and Agent agree to the following terms eonneetion with the Foundation's Grant: 1. In Disbursement of Funding to Agent: (a) Grant funds will be disbursed by the Foundation to an aeeount designated by Agent aeeording to the schedule in Attachment 2, subject to the eonditions of this Grant Agreement, and sueh funds will be used solely in eonformity with the terms of this Grant Agreement. (b) No gift or grant to Agent is ¡ntended by the Foundation's transfer to Agent of the Grant funds pursuant to this Grant Agreement. (e) Agent will provide the Foundation with funding instructions from its financial institution, and will advise its financial institution that the Foundation's ordering bank will be The Northem Trust Company. Ifthe Grant funds need to go through an intermediary bank(s), Agent will provide this information to the Foundation in the requisite order, with the reeeiving bank listed last. Agent will provide all necessary bank codes, aeeount numbers and aeeount names for eaeh institution, along with the name and telephone number of a eontaet at Agent's organization who can answer questions regarding the banking information supplied to Blake Barthold, Aeeountant ([email protected]). (d) Grant funds will be disbursed in US Dollars to Agent according to the schedule shown in Attaehment 2 subject to the conditions of this Grant Agreement. The US Dollar disbursements will be the equivalent ofthe Nuevo Soles payment amounts shown in Attachment 2 at the time of wire. The US dollar equivalent of the Nuevo Soles payments may inerease or deerease over time due to fluctuations in the foreign currency exehange rate, but in no event will the Foundation disburse funds under this Grant having an aggregate US dollar value in exeess ofUS$2,367,518 (120 percent ofthe US dollar value of this Grant at the time of the award). To determine the aggregate value of all disbursements for the purpose of the aboye limitation, the Foundation will use the US dollar amount of eaeh disbursement ealculated as of the time it is disbursed to Agent by the Foundation. Agent will exehange US dollars for Nuevo Soles pursuant to the terms and eonditions in the Operations Manual agreed to by Agent and MINAM and approved by the Foundation. Upon each oeeasion that Agent exehanges Foundation funds through a contraet with its bank, Agent will send a eopy of the official transaction doeument, stating the exaet exehange rate and total value in Nuevo Soles, to Ana Villegas, Program Offieer ([email protected]) with a eopy to K.ristin Gilliss (kristí[email protected]). 2 (Gran! # 1956) Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, MfNAM Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM April13,2010 (e). Funding for MINAM will not eonstitute part of the national budget of Peru nor of any state therein. 2. Payments; Disbursement ofFunding to MINAM: (a) Payment Disbursements: Grant funds will be disbursed by Agent to MINAM aeeording to Agent's policies and proeedures for hiring and proeurement as defined in the Operations Manual, subjeet to the terms and eonditions of this Grant Agreement. . (b) Use of Grant funds: Grant fundswiH be used solely for the purposes deseribed in this Grant Agreement. Agent will repay to the Foundation any portion of the amount granted that is not used for these purposes. Any ehange in the purposes for which Grant funds are spent must be approved in writing by the Foundation before implementation. Moreover, MINAM and Agent must obtain the prior approval of the Foundation for any budget modification that results in a variance to any subtotal line item in the Budget that exceeds the lesser of 20 pereent or $500,000, whether or not the requested varianee willaffect the Grant purposes. Subtotal Une items inelude salaries, eontract fees, expenses and equipment. In addition, no reaHocation of Grant funds may be made to a category of Overhead or Indirect Costs. MINAM understands that this Grant is not a "gift," and understands and agrees that funds are being granted to MINAM through Agent to pursue the Purposes outlined in this Grant Agreement. (e) Payment Contingencies: The Foundation's funding of future payments is contingent upon (i) the Foundation's review ofMINAM's work in connection with this Grant and its determination that satisfactory progress and performance of the expected purposes is occurring, (H) the Foundation's timely receipt and the Foundation's review and approval of Grant Reports and other documentation to besubmitted by MINAM and Agent, and (iii) MINAM's compliance with aH applicable laws and the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreemenl. Grant funding may be curtailed or discontinued and any advancements must be repaid if at any time Grant purposes are not meto (d) Right to Curtail or Terminate Grant: The Foundation reserves the right to eurtail or terminate the Grant if at any time the Foundation determines that the Grant Purposes or terms and conditions of the Grant Agreement are not being met or are unlikely to be mel. The Foundation will endeavor to give MINAM reasonable written notice prior to curtailment or termination to discuss the Foundation's concems, but the determination to continue, curtail or terminate the Grant will remain in the Foundation's sole discretion. Any unspent or uncommitted funds as ofthe date ofthe Foundation's notice must be repaid to the Foundation. 3 . ,( r . • (Grant #1956) Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, MINAM Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM April13,201O 3. Agency: 4. (a) Agent declares thát it has no beneficial interest in the Grant funds and that it has no authority to charge, offset for purposes of indemnification or otherwise sell, transfer, or deaI with the Grant funds or any interest or benefit derived from the Grantfunds except as provided under the terms of this Grant Agreement. Any benefits derived from the Grant funds do not in any manner belong to Agent. (b) Agent acknowledges that, in dealing with the Grant funds and any ¡nterest or benefits derived from the Grant funds, under the terms of this Grant Agreement, Agent will be merely fulfilling its obligation as agent for the Foundation and will not exercise any power, authority. or discretion in dealing with the Grant funds but only act as directed or as required under the terms of this Grant Agreementor other agreement, memorandum of understanding, or instructions executed by the Foundation. (c) Agent assumes full responsibility for the use of Grant funds in accordance with this Grant Agreement. (d) Agent shall invest 'the Grant funds and the interest eamed thereon in cash or cash equivalents in insured, interest-bearing accounts and otherwise in accordance with Agent's current investment policy. Any interest eamed on the Grant funds by Agent from the investment of such funds should be used by MINAM to cover project-related activities supporting ,the Purposes of the' Grant. (e) Agent shall keep the Grant funds separate from and may not commingle it with any other funds, under its controL (t) The Foundation reserves the right to terminate the agency of the Agent, and the Foundation and MINAM will jointly work together to designate a new agent to carry out the terms ofthis Grant Agreement. (g) Agent will receive afee for its services pursuant to the Grant Budget. Reporting and Notifications: (a) J ... t . , 'i' i -', A" ,,/,',.}' ' ' " Grant Reports: MINAM and Agent will deliver written reports to the Foundation (each a "Grant Report"), according to the schedule in Attachment 2 and directions in the Operations Manual. The Grant Report will contain a detailed narrative report by MINAM and financial report by the Agent. Grant Reports will be submitted to the Foundation, by electronic mail where possible, to the attention of Ana Cristina Villegas, Program Officer, (Ana~ [email protected]) and Grants Adrninistration, ([email protected]). 4 (Grant #1956) Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, MINAM Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM April 13, 2010 (b) Narrative Reports: The narrative report should describe what was accomplished by this Grant as of the date of the Grant Report, outlining the activities that were undertaken by MINAM, the strategic choices that were made as a result of the Grant, and achievement of Grant Purposes described in Attachment l. In addition, the narrative report should also inelude the outcome table with' the percentage of the activities that have been accomplished by the time of the report and the actual dates they are expected to be deliver if different from the initial date stated. The narrative report should also inelude the documents or materials produced with grant funds that are identified with a check mark in the outcome tableo (c) Financial Reports: The financial report should reflect the expenditures of the Grant funds, and any income eamed thereon, in accordance with the Budget, as of the end of the reporting period and cumulative across the Grant term (in nuevos soles). The financial reports should inelude an analysis of Budget versus actual spending by outcome or output at the level of detail contained in the Budget, and include a narrative explanation of the Budget variances. Total project spending, in addition to Foundation Grant spending, will also be provided. In addition, the financial reports must ¡nclude proposed Budget revisions for future years, if applicable . (d) Grant Report Follow~up: The Foundation may request in-person meetings with MINAM and/or Agent to discuss details of the Grant Report, and if any Reports are deemed inadequate in the Foundation's reasonable discretion, the Foundation may require additional supporting documentation or clarifications to the Grant Report prior to release of the next scheduled payment. Upon completion of the Grant, MINAM and Agent will submit a Final Grant Report according to the schedule in Attachment 2. If any funds are remaining to be expended after the reporting period, MINAM and Agent will submit one or more additional Grant Reports until all Grant funds are expended in full or the Grant is otherwise closed. (e) Notification for Collaborative Projects: MINAM and Agent will notify the Foundation in writingof any substantive issues or concems that may develop between MINAM, Agent, other Foundation grantees andlor other MINAM partners that have the potential to significantly impair or impact the Purposes, progress or schedule ofthis Grant. '(f) Notification of Change.in Key Personnel: MINAM and Agent will notify the Foundation immediately of any change in their respective executive staff, key Grant staff or consultants responsible for achieving the Grant Purposes. In addition, if Eduardo Durand, Director of the Climate Change office, leaves his position the foundation should be notified immediately. Any hiring or change in personnel should follow the specifications and procedures agreed on in the Operations Manual for the project. 5 1 ,·1 - ,", •. -. , f- r. .'. .... . (Grant #1956) Dr. Antonio "Srack Egg, MINAM Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM April 13,2010 (g) Grant Modifications: The terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement may not be amended or modified, except as agreed to by the parties in writing. Any change in the Purposes for which Grant funds are spent must be approved in writing by the Foundation before implementation. 5. Maintenance of Financial Records: Agent and MINAM will maintain financial books and records in such a fashion that each can provide the Foundation with sufficient detail to substantiate all expenditures related to the Grant. Agent and MINAM will make such books and records available to the Foundation at reasonable times. Agent and MINAM will keep copies of all books and record s and aH reports to the Foundation for at least three years after completion of the use of Grant funds. 6. Selection of Entities by MINAM: MINAM retains full discretion and control over the identification and selection, of any consultants, contractors, subgrantees or other entities ("Entities") to assist (either individually or collectively) in carrying out the Purposes of the Grant. There is no agreement, written or oral, by which the Foundation may cause MINAM to choose any of these Entities. MINAM agrees to identify, select and engage other Entities pursuant to the terms and conditions in the Operations Manual. Compliance with Laws: (a) MINAM and Agent agrees to comply fully with aH laws and regu'lations (national, regional and local) applicable to any of its activities associated with this Grant. (b) MINAM and Agent specificaHy agrees to comply with prOVISlOns of the United States Internal Revenue Code ("Code") ~nd regulations applicable to MINAM as a government agent and as a tax exempt organization, respectively. This Grant is not earmarked for lobbying (within the meaning of Section 4945(d)(l) of the Code). Neither MINAM nor Agent nor the Foundation has entered into any agreement, written or oral, nor made any representation to the effect that any portion of the funds to be provided under this Grant may be earmarked for lobpying. MINAM and Agent will not use any portio n of the Grant funds to influence the outcome of any specific election for candidates to public office or to carry on any voter registration drive except as provided in Section.4945(f) ofthe Codeo 6 .:,' ( )JI' .........• (Gran! # 1956) Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, MINAM Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM Apríl 13, 2010 8. Publicity and Acknowledgements: (a) Foundation Reporting and Website Publication: The Foundation may include basic information about this Grant in its periodic public reports, ¿nce the Foundation receives a fully~executed Grant Agreement. AddiHonally, information will be posted on the Foundation's website immediately following receipt of the fully~executed Grant Agreement, unless the parties t¡lake altemative arrangements. . (b) Publicity and Acknowledgements by MINAM: AH press releases, announcements, publicity or other references to the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation eoneerning the Grant, ineluding use ofthe Fouridation's logo must be approved inadvanee by the Foundation's Communications Department (eommunicatió[email protected] or 650-213-3000). AdditionaUy, MINAM agrees to obtain advariee written approval from the Foundation's Communieations Department of any eommunication that may reasonably be understood to represent the views of the Foundation and to provide the Foundation with reasonable opportunity to review, eomment and approve the eommunieation in advance. (e) Pre-Approved Attribution Language: MINAM may use the foHowing standard language in making attributions for funding without prior approval of the Communieations Department. However, aH other referenees to the Foundation in press releases or other Grant publieity will require advanee written approval ofthe Foundation's Communieations Department: (i) About the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation: "The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundatiori, established in 2000,seeks to advanee environmental eonservation and eutting-edge scientifie researeh around the world and improve the quality of life in the San Francisco Bay Area. For more information, visit www.moore.org." (ii) Attributionfor full Grantfunding: "This (researeh, publieation, projeet, Web site, report, etc.) is funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation." (iii) Attribution for partial Grant funding: "This (researeh, publieation, projeet, Web site; report, etc.) is funded in part by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation." 7 (Gran! #1956) Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, MINAM Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM April13,2010 (d) Logo: The Foundation encourages the use of its lago in connection with Grant Publicity. Various file formats may be obtained by contacting the Foundation's Communications Department at [email protected] 650-213-3000. Supported uses of the lago include presentation materials, papers, symposia and conference brochures; use of the lago for promotional materials or commercial use (e.g., caps, jackets, mugs, tote bags, etc.) are not permitted. MINA M may use the Foundation logo in connection with Pre Approved Attribution Language without the prior approval of the Communications Department. MINAM will obtain the Foundation's advance written approval from the Communications Department for all other uses of its lago. 9. Information and Data Sharing: The parties understand that a material condition of this Grant Agreement is that MINAM makes thedata, research, knowIedge and other information deveIoped with any Grant funds freely accessibIe to the Foundation, other grantees of the Foundation and the public generally. MINAM understands and agrees that any delay in the release of sorne or aH of the data, research, knowledge and other information developed with any Grant funds foIlowing its completion must be approved in writing by the F oundation 10. Tax-exempt Status. By entering into this Grant Agreement, MINAM confirms that it is an agency of the Government of Peru. The Foundation has determined that expenditure responsibility is not required with respect to this Grant based on the fact that MINAM is an agency ofthe Peruvian government. MINA M will notify the Foundation immediately /."..~ ofany change in MINAM's status as an agency ofthe Peruvian government . /.1, f~,~ '''''''''-' .~"\;:?"~'\ "o.~\ '" MütRN,l.,~1 No Promise of Future Funding: ",'" MINAM acknowledges that the Foundation and its \7-., 1r:¡ representatives have made no actual or implied promise of funding except for the \,,~ cé¿;1:';j~:~>/ amounts specified by this Grant Agreement. However, the foregoing is not intended to "-..;';.~~'" 'prohibit the Foundation from providing a future grant to MINAM, if the Foundation in its sale discretion determines that a future grant is appropriate. 12. MisceHaneous Provisions: This Grant Agreement supersedes any prior oral or written understandings or communications between the parties and constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter. Any dispute arising from or related to this Grant Agreement will be resolved by the laws of and in the State of California. If this Grant Agreement correctly sets forth your understanding of the terms of this Grant, pIease indicate your organization's agreement to its terms by having an authorized officer of MINAM and an authorized officer of Agent sign a copy of this letter and return it to the Foundation by electronic mail to ([email protected]), orby fax (866-913-8929). We will arrange for the first payÍnent of th~ Grant, by wire transfer to Agent within two weeks of 8 " . " ,·':·'~' rf ;' : ' jo \ '," , (Grant #1956) Dr. Antonio Brack Egg, M1NAM Ms. Julia Justo, FONAM April 13,2010 our receipt of the countersigned copy of this Grant Agreement and subject to completion of any contingencies in Attachment 2. Congratulations on yourGrant. On behalf of the Foundation, 1 extend every good wish for the success of containing deforestation in the Peruvian Amazon. Best regards, Guillermo Castilleja ChiefProgram Officer, Environment cc: Mr. Eduardo Duran, Director General de Cambio Climático, Desertificación y Recursos Hídricos Email: [email protected] Aftachments 1, 2 a,nd 3 Enclosure (Request for Wire Transfer Form) Title: Date: o SECRETARIO GENERAL J'i-00~ AGREED AND ACCEPTED for Fondo Nacional del Ambiente (FONAM) By: Title: Date: 9 (Gran! #1956) ATTACHMENT 1 OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242) ¡Outcome: Government of ,Peru has the technícal, instltutional and legal capacity to put in place a REDD program and contribute sígnificantly to reducing ~eforestation. • ~ ... _------------ Output 1.: Project governance and inter-institutlonal participation fully defined and operational. Expected Date: June 2010 SulrOUtputs Activities Ilndicators Reportíng Expected Monitor ,/ Completion Date Progress Actual Date (% Complete) 1. Project structure established and implementation plan designed and refined. '. '; . J ',,' .' .". ,',"', .~~ 1. Implement project structure 2. Approve (approval by steering committee) the operationsmanual. 3. Refine work plan and timetable for project implementation. 4. Establish and approve plan for inter institutional coordination for project implementation by steering committee. Indícators: (1) Work plan and operations manual defined and implemented. (2) Steering and technical committees formed and functioning. (3) Plan for inter-institutional coordination approved. 1. Identify key personnel requirements and job 2. Key personnel for implementation of the projec descrlptions. identified, recruited, hired and trained a5 2. Contract key personnel for project appropriately. implementation. 3. Complete training for key personnel in technical and management aspects as needed. ' 10 April2010 .r April2010 .r June 2010 .r -------- ATTACHMENT 1 OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242) putput 1: Project governance and inter-institutional participation fully defined and operational. Expected Date: June 2010 Sub-Outputs Activities / Indicators Reporting Expected Completion Date Monitor Progress ./ (% Complete) Indicators: (l)Terms of references for key personal (2) Personnel hired (3) Personnel trained rr-""'-"'" Á\O:.iGrl~ v<;'~,./\(í\k· -v .\-,:; ~¡A o\. -l' f4;~l~i"'" . ;~';~~ñ\ ""ul:R" .•, Z) \~:~~O!~;~e,,,:é~~~ ¡e"." . ,. .~ ,J¡;\~, ,,,_.,,""- ,- . .,. fA ;' ...... ~. :; ",;':;. ~'I 11 Apr2010 Apr 2010 Ago 2010 .r .r Actual Date AITACHMENT 1 OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242) putput 2: Methodologles for Peru's national system for the measurement, reporting and verificatlon (MRV) of forest carbon compJeted, land a plan for its implementation developed, and forest-c:arbon baselines establlshed. Expected Date: February 2010 Sub-Outputs Activities /Indicators ----------- 1. Conceptual frameworks for establishing baseline seenarios (eurrent and projeeted) from deforestation and forest degradation defined and relevant national and regional data on forests and land use compiled Monitor Progress ./ 11% Complete) 1. Revise, consolidate and analyze existing information on: (a) deforestation and forest degradation; (b) GIS and remote sensing monitoring of deforestation (remote and field); (e) modeling of detorestation and forest degradation using GIS and remote sensing; 2. Conduct 2 workshops with international and national experts to assess and agree on criteria tor conceptual framework, data requirements, methods, information teehnology and software needs tor establishing baseline seenarios (eurrent and projeeted) from deforestation and forest degradation. Indicators: (1) A document eontaining the conceptual framework for establishing baseline scenarios (eurrent and projeeted) from deforestation and forest degradation. (2) Assessment of eurrent and outstanding data needs. 2. Conceptual frameworks for the quantification and eeonomie valuation of earbon stoeks defined and relevant national and regional data on torest earbon stoeks compiled Expected Completion Date. Reporting 1. Revise, consolidate and analyze existing information on: (a) torest inventories; (b) earbon stocks¡ 2. Conduct 2 workshop with ínternational and I or national experts to assess and agree on eriteria about the conceptual framework, data, methods, information . technology and software tor: 12 Nov 2010 Jul2010 ~ ~ , Actual Date ATTACHMENT 1 OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242) Output 2: Methodologies for Peru's national system for the measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) of forest carbon completed, ¡and a plan for its implementation developed, and forest-carbon baselines established. ~xpected Date: February 2010 Sub-Outputs ~ Activities / Indicators (a) inventory development, assessment and monitoring of carbon stocks. (b) quantification and economic valuation of environmental services of carbon sequestration and carbon stock. (c) estímate of the costs associated wíth implementing REDD (e.g. opportuníty costs, implementatíon cost). 3. Define the National conceptual framework for forests carbon stocks inventory, and monitoring. 4. Define the conceptual framework for economic valuation of environmental services of carbon sequestration and forest carbon stocks and calculate the opportunity and implementation cost of conservation of these services. Indicators: (1) A document containing the National conceptual framework for ferest and carbon stocks inventory and monítoring. (2) A document containing the conceptual framework for economic valuation of environmental services of carbon sequestration and forest carbon stocks and the calculation of the opportunity and implementation cost of conservation of these services. 13 Expected Completion Date Monitor ,¡' Reporting Progress . % Complete} Nov 2010 ti' Nov 2010 ti' Actual Date ATTACHMENT 1 OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242) Output 2: Methodologies tor Peru's national system tor the measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) of forest carbon completed, ~nd a plantor its implementation developed, and forest-carbon baselines established. Reporting Expected Date: February 2010 Sub-Outputs ,¿ÓOEL~'>-, (~~i;;;'\':'\ ' ":,:f:!~~\ p:"~\{,,nfRN, ',:Z\) \:!¡:; " :.",' ',l~;, \~,.<:r;JE~:;;:-' ~/ ""l:"" .. .. if, , ' , -" ,", '.,g '. -,~ ~~' 3. Teehnieal proeedures for the establishment of a system for the monitoring, verification and reporting (MRV) of REDD projeets at national and sub national sea les defined. Activities / Indicators l.Conduet workshops and/or expert revJew panels with national and international experts on: (a) teehnieal evaluation of resourees and skills to estimate and monitor earbon stoeks; (b) identifieation and agreement on methodologies for national forest inventory; (e) identifieation and agreement on methodologies for remote sensing and GIS applied to the analysis of deforestation and forest degradation; (d) identifieation of available remote sensing methods; (e) definition of the required training for image proeessing and ehoosing the best teehnology for the eountry; (f) agreement on the seleetion of images required, seale of analysis and proeessing teehniques; (g) projeetion models of deforestation and forest degradation. 2. Establish proeedures for forest inventory, assessment and monitoring that allows for quantification of the environmental serviees of earbon sequestration and storage. 3. Establish proeedures for estimating the eeonomie value of environmental services of carbon sequestration and storage. 4. Establish proeedures to projeet seenarios of deforestation and forest degradation in REDD projeets at national and sub national seales. 14 Expected Completion Date Monitor ./ Progress 11% Complete) . Actual Date ATTACHMENT 1 OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242) Output 2: Methodologies for Peru's national system for the measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) of forest carbon completed, and a plan for its implementation developed, and forest-carbon baselines established. Expected Date: February 2010 Sub-Outputs Actillities Ilndicators Expected Completion Date Monitor 4. Current and projected scenarios of deforestation and forest degradation developed and validated, and spatial information available. . . :.?.'. JfJ': . . 1. Develop and validate current and projected scenarios of deforestation and forest degradation and make spatial information available. 2. Design and implement the plan for improving national capacities for the establishment of baseline scenarios for deforestation and forest degradation. 3. Conduct training workshops on methods for projecting deforestation and monitoring avoided deforestation and degradation. 4. Conduct multi-temporal analysis of land use and land use changes (includes acquisitíon of satellite imagery, field verification and online GIS platform). 5. Perform multí-temporal analysis of changes in forest 15 Feb 2011 Progress ./ 1/% Complete} 5. Establish procedures to monitor and verify deforestation and forest degradation at national and sub natíonal scales. 6. Adjust procedures and methodologies with the Nationallnformation and Monitoring System for Greenhousé Gases. 7. Establish procedures for monitoring, verification and reporting (MRV) of REDD projects at sub-national scale. 8. Establish a national registry of REDD projects. Indicators: (1) Documents containing technical procedures established in activities 2 to 7. Reporting " Actual Date ATTACHMENT 1 OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242) Output2: Methodologies for Peru's national syste!11 for the measurement, reportíng and veríflcation(MRV) of forest carbon completed, and a plan for its implemen~atlon developed, and forest-carbon baselines established. Expected Date: February 2010 Sub-Outputs Actillities Ilndicaton Expected Completion Date Monitor (1) National forest / non-forest map. (2) Nationál carbon map tier 2 (3) National data on historical deforestation and emissions. (4) Capacities developed in 5 regions to establish curren and projected scenarios of deforestation and forest degradation. (5) Information on current and projected scenarios of deforestatfon and forest degradation available on web platform. (6) Geospatial information available on Vleb platform. Jun 2011 Jun 2011 Jun 2011 % Complete) I.C, ... JjJr, 16 .r .r .r Jan 2012 .r Jan 2012 .r Feb 2012 .r --- Progress ./ cover (1990-2000-2005-2008) through remote sensing at national scale. 6. Elaborate scenarios of GHG emissions from deforestation and forest degradation for 2 or more regions. Indicators: Reporting Actual Date ATTACHMENT 1 OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242) Output 3: Institutional and legal framework for the implementation of REDD aetivities at National and Sub National seales proposed for Peru., ExpectedDate: Deeember 2010 //;o:;Q~I.." :<11, ,ir<:~\.,.f')~N\ -:'l.:' /~"l 'C;~~t~ l'~,~; VMt FRN ~~ .$ \::,,,"~\ ',i"'~;í"'l,,l~~ ~dif.!fJ·;!: /~ ",~.';"",.:,~.~~:;.,~, __ -1' ' " ;/ , Activities / Indicators ;"IJ,,', 1 .' Sub-Outputs -........... .:. -,' 1. Strengths and weaknesses of legal and institutional issues related to land use rights, environmental services, forest governance and payment of ecosystem benefits distribution identified for Peru. Expected Completion Date Monitor 17 Progress Actual Date ,/ (% Complete) 1. Review and analysis of current institutional and legal framework in Peru on land use rights, forest policy, governance (definition of roles and institutional responsibilities). 2. Review and analysis of the implementation of technical and policy tools for forest conservation, zoning and land management. 3. Identify policy necessary for implementing the REDD strategy (e.g. ownership of environmental services, taxation, distribution of benefits related to REDD) developed and with input from a diverse group of stakeholders 4. Refine policy needs based on input from (3) and vetted with stakeholders again. Indicators: (1) Gap analysis of legal framework for ecosystem services and REDD. (2)Policy needs for REDD implementation ideritified Reporting I Nov 2010 ,/ Dec 2010 ,/ ATTACHMENT 1 OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242) ---------- Output4: Economic and institutional feasibility of REDD at National and Sub National scales evaluated and its implementation in priority areas promoted by MINAM. ExpectedDate: January 2012 Sub-Outputs 1. Ex-ante evaluation of economic and institutional feasibility of REDD in Peru. ;/ .......,:,. . " . . f . Actlvities / Indicators Expected Completian Date Monitor 18 Feb 2011 Feb 2011 Progress y" (% Complete) 1. Conduct workshops on economic and financial tools for REDD feasibility analysis at sub-national scale. 2. Identify economic, financial and institutional preconditions for REDD feasibility at national scale. 3. Macro-scale spatial analysis of the opportunity costs of REDD. 4. Evaluate economic, financial and social feasibility tor REDD at national and sub national scales and under different scenarios (e.g. carbon price and land use). 5. Evaluate the need for a taxation and institutional bilis to facilitate the implementation of projects on avoided deforestation and degradation at national and sub-national scales. Indicators: (1) A document containing the results of the economic, institutional and financial feasibility analysis of REDD at national and sub-national scales. (2) A document containing the results of the opportunity and implementation costs of REDD analysis at national and sub national scales. Reporting y" .,/ Actual Date I ATTACHMENT l' OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242) Output4: Economicand institutionalfeasibility of REDD at National and Sub National scalesevaluated and its implementation in priority areas promoted by MINAM. Expected Date: January 2012 Sub-Outputs 2. Classification of areas for sub-national REDD projects and prioritization or suitable REOD pilot projects. Actillities / Indicators ,-'\ • "" ) ','" - M I! 3. Implementation of pilot projects promoted by MINAM . Monitor Progress ,/ Actual Date (% Complete) 1. Conduct workshops wíth regional governments, MINAM and MINAG on selection criteria and methodology for the implementation of REDD projects. 2.Refine the criteria for selecting suitable areas for REDD projects (e.g. areas of high importance for biodiversity). 3. Identify criteria for prioritizing areas for implementing REDD projects (e.g. biodiversity, poverty). 4. Identify priority areas (map) for the implementation of REDD pilot demonstration projects. Indicators: (1) Criteria for priorization of areas for implementing REOD projects. (2) Map of prioritized areas for implementation of REDD át sub-national scale. ···71":'''· ....·· .·.'.· .. Expected Completion Date Reportíng 1. Conduct information and consultation processes with key stakeholders and local communities in prioritized areas for REDD. 2. Technical support for participatory design and implementation of (at least 2) REOD pilot projects. 19 Nov 2010 ,/ April2011 ,/ ) 1 OUT COME PLAN (# 2242) ATTACHMENT Output 4~ Economic and institutional feasibilityofREDD atNational andSub National scalesevaluated and itsimplementation in priority areas promoted by MINAM. Expected Date: January 2012 . Sub-Outputs Activities / Indicators Expected Completion Date Monitor ." 20 Sep 2011 ." Dct 2011 Jan 2012 Progress (% Complete) 3. Validate at REDD pilot project level proposed procedures (e.g. distribution of profits, carbon accounting, etc.). 4. Provide training at local scale according to the needs and requirements identified as priority areas to implement REDD activities. 5. Develop strategies to address deforestation and forest degradation agents (e.g" sustainable forest management projects, improve forest law enforcement, etc.). 6. Develop community I local monitoring procedures of REDD projects to track the socio-environmental indicators agreed by the community. 7. Systematization and analysis of REDD experiences and potential for replication: Indicators: (1) Co design and technical support of two REDD projects at sub-national scale. (2) Validation of proposed procedures at sub-national scale. (3) A document containing the systematization of REDD experiences at sub-national sea le. Reportíng ." Actual Date .. ATTACHMENT 1 OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242) Output 4: Economic and institutional feasibility of REDD at NationalandSub National scales evaluated and itsimplementation in priority areas promoted by MINAM. Expected Date: January 2012 Sub-Outputs Activities / Indicators (4) A map containing potential areas for extrapolation of REDD experiences at sub national scale. 21 Expected Completion Date Jan 2012 Monitor o/ Reporting Progress (% Complete) ,/ Actual Date ATTACHMENT 1 OUTCOME PLAN (# 2242) Output 5: Project results dlsseminatedand contributlng to the skills and capacities to negotiate the Peruvian position in the context of theUnited Natlons Framework Convention on elimate ehange (UNFeCC). Expected Date: February 2012 Sub-Outputs 1. Peruvian delegates to the UNFCCC are knowledgeable about key poliey and teehnical issues of REDD implementation in PERU and ean effectively apply information to UNFCCC negotiations. Actillities /Indicators JI; Monitor .r Jul2010 Nov2010 .r .r Feb 2012 F.eb 2012 .r .r 1. Disseminate project results such as: (a) quantification of carbon stoeks; (b) rates of deforestation ano forest degradation; (e) modeling of deforestation; (d) monitoring, verifieation and reporting of avoided deforestation and forest degradation of REDD projects. Indicators: (1) Workshops in the 5 regions of focus. (2) Publie report to summarize and disseminate results of the project in MINAM web-pages. 22 Progress (% Complete) 1. Identify any gaps in policy or teehnical knowledge related to REDD within the Peruvian negotiation team to the UNFCCC. . 2. Develop training material and hold workshop to inform Peruvian delegation about gaps identified in (1). Indicators: (1) Training materials developed (2)10 negotiators trained. 2. Project results disseminated with the five regions of focus for REDD implementation in Peru and public in general. Expected Completion Date Reporting I Actual Date ATTACHMENT 2 PAYMENTS & REQUIREMENTS PLAN (# 2242) Year Other 1 Projecie4" ,;.15infllJpi'!fIJa"afive . . . ~c~eIJ~fld .~~~1~led . . . . . . <.(Conditiom,jor PaymentIOther AntDunt1':~nt ·.. ·R¡itDue1 Rpt DutlActurttiesor Mt;etm(l pate . Date . Events p:qYnzent Payment#1 FulIy Executed Grant Agreement 4/16 1,144,325 PEN First complete draft of Operations Manual submitted to and accepted by the F oundation. 2010 7/30 Check-in meeting/conference call with Steering committee to review progress, personnel hiring status and approve Operations ManuaL '1 ,J.{ 2010 I Payment #2 Not to exceed 2,416,400 PEN 9/30 9/1 Payment contingent on grantee submitting revised budget compared to original budget detailing necessary resources for satellite equipment and images. "fIIl~ 1 Financial 2 Report should ¡nelude budget vs. actual accofding to Budget Plan Attachment Narrative Report should ¡nelude progress updates to Grant Outcome Plan attachment. • 23 ATTACHMENT 2 PAYMENTS & REQUIREMENTS PLAN (# 2242) . . l'" Year Payment Amount Projected . Filiancial Payment RptDue l ' Date , ." 20lO Payment #3 11/30 10/30 , 11/15 10/30 1,061,255 PEN Interim Narrative and Financial Report (reporting on 6 mo. period through 9/30/10) and cash balance statement. Check-in meeting! conference call scheduled for 7/30 and approval of refined work-plan and budget are contingencies for this payment. 1--- 2011 2011 .' Oth'er Narrative " Schedllled ~chediíled \. Co~ditions Jor Payment IOther RptDue2 .Aétivitiesor Meeting Date , . Events>' ,.". 1/14 PaymeI)t #4: 6/30 6/1 Check-in meeting! conference call with Steering committee to review progress. Annual NaÍTative and Financial Report (reporting on períod through 4/30/11) and cash balance statement. 6/1 611,366 PEN Check-in meeting! conference call scheduled for 1/14 is a contingency for this payment. '" \ ji " ,' , " 6/30 2011 .~ '.'..:~- '"' ,:' / ".. " ' " 24 Check-in meeting/conference call withSteering committee to review progress. I '. ATTACHMENT 2 P AYMENTS & REQUIREMENTS PLAN (# 2242) ,()f~,. .' " Year Payfnent Amount Projected ' I Final1cial Payment RptDue 1 Date Natrative RptDui' 'Schedll'ed ", Si;heduled ' ConditionsforPaymi!nt jOther Activitlesor Mi!eiing.1Jate Events "'.' 2011 Payment#5: 11/30 10/31 11115 10/31 366,820PEN 'i'iit/¡~ .rw.""'":-. ~) 2012 5/31 d ,,"" "k ".' Check-in meeting/conference cal! with Steering committee to review progress. Final Narrative andFinancial Report 5/31 , : .' Intedm Narrative and cash balance statement (reporting on 6 mo. period through 9/30/11) , ~;;~! I " .' " :,' ,'t 25 ATTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) -- YEAR 1 (Perlod: mm/yy • mm/yy) OUTPUT 1: Project govemance and inter-institutional parti~pation fu"y defined. CÚRRENC·y·:·SOLES..·.. ·· ..·..·................·..·.................................... CURRENT USO EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80 SUB-OUTPUT 1,1: Project structure established and implementation plan designed .and refined. .í-~~~L~ ~~";'i'-¡.;. .';,~:'~1~:i ,'0 f :~~"/''I,'l~r,J(' \~ \, ~,~ .'.; .... " ,:~onnel , ,. ,.. ."r.,.,.· OTHER TOTAL '~::)Dire~r Ejecutivo O O O O ; NI Administrador ~, ! Comunicador / Responsable Componente (3) Procesadores de Imagenes Beneflts spec!fy: Subtotal Peraonnel Salaries Consultanta and Contractora National Consultants International Consultants Subtotal Consultant and Contractor Fees Other Dire¡;t Exeen§es l!lle gIQl!!ll!D/:1 Travel (Transportation & Lodging) Training, Conferences and wor1<shops Communication & Publications Field Supplies Other Supplies Computers/Software/Salellite imagery Su btotal Other Dlrect Expenses Caeital Exeenditures & Egulllmenll§ee glos§aD/:) Scientific Equipment Vehicles (boats, trucks, motorcycles) Infraslructure/renovation Subtotal Equipment & Expenditures Fm TOTAL speclfv: 108,000 72,000 72,000 192,000 ~ 96,000 o O O O O O O O O 444,000 108,000 72,000 72,000 288,000 96,000 540,000 o O O O O O O 84,000 22,400 O 106,400 O 134,800 24,520 84,000 22,400 O O O 106,400 Note # 18,080 18,080 134,800 24,520 O O O O O O 18,080 O 18,080 O 11,200 170,520 O 11,200 170,520 Nota' O O O O 1 .. 4.0% Total Costa IFiscal Agent Fee OTHER Noto' Total Direct Costa Indirect Costs GBMF Note # "'~.'?;:I .·.t.~\' ~~~.!;~ , . ·<·.i c fIJ' '. GBMF Bud!let :, :D.etalled Annual Budget SUB-OUTPUT 1.2: Key peraonnel for implementation of !he project identified, recruited, hired and lrained as appropriately . '6:0%1 O O O O O O O O 18,080 O 18,080 720,920 96,000 816,920 28,837 O 723 18,803 96,000 846,757 723 18,803 1,086 749,767 28,837 43,256 26. ATIACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) 1 OUTPUT 2: Methodologie. 10r Pen.!'. natlonal.ayatem 10r tila rneaaurement, nlportlng and varificatlon (MRV) of 10raat carbon daveiopad, and a plan 10r ImplementationOftha ayatem aatabllahed. ... " ............................ CÜRRENCy':sóLes' CURRENT uso EXCHANGE AATE: 2.80 "'"" ..... "., .. " ... " .... SUB-oUTPUT 2.1: Conceptual ¡tramewOrkS for establishing baseline scenarios (current aOO projected) from deforestation and forast degradation delined and reievantnatíonal and regional data on forasls and latid Úse compRed, SUB-oUTPUT 2.2: Conceptual frameworks for the quantification and economic valuatíon of carbon stocks defined and relevan! national and regional data onforast carbon·stocks compilad SUB-oUTPUT 2.3: Technical proceduras for tIle establishment, of a $ystam for tIle monitoring, lIerificatíon and reporting (MRV) of REDOproject:s al natíona1 anó sub nationálsca/es definad; SUB-oUTPUT 2.4: Current and projected scenarios of deforastatíor and torest degradatíon developed and validalad, and spatia! inforrnatíon available. ..... Detailed Annual Budgat Personnal Director Ejecutivo Administrador Comunicador Responsable Componente (3) Procesadores de Imagenes Benaflts specity. Subtotal Paraonnel Salaria. Consultan1s and Contracto... Natíonal Consultants Intamational Consultanls v·!' ·'.:.l"v; .' '. .",~ Subtotal Consultant and Contractor Feas Oth!!r QiWil ElSl!eOSeS Isee gIQ!!saCt:1 Travel (Transportalion & Lodging) Traíniog, Conferences and workshops Communicatioo & Publications Field Supplies Otller Supplies Computérs/SoftwarelSatellite imagery Subtotal Other Olrect E!E!;oses Cal!ltal EXl!!!ngltll!!!I , Egllill!Il!nt IlIee glolluCt:1 ScientiflC Equipment Vehides (boats, trucks, motorcydas) InfrastructureJrenovation Subtotal EQulpment & ExDenditures GBMF OTHER TOTAL GBMF TOTAL OTHER GBMF GBMF TOTAL OTHER OTHER TOTAL Note' O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O O. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 118,80C O O O 118,800 O O O O O O O O O O 59,400 O O O 59,400 Note' 9,900 33,600 43,500 O 9,900 33,600 O O 43,500 9,900 67,200 9,900 67,200 O 118,800 e 77,100 O 77,100 118,800 O 60,000 20,000 59,400 59,400 Note. O 80,000 80,000 60,000 O O O O O O O 80,000 O O O O O O O 80,000 O 20,000 60,000 O 60,000 20,000 O O O O 1,178,800 20,000 1,178,800 1,178,800 O 1,178,800 Not..# O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 123.500 O 123,500 137,100 O 137,100 138,800 O 138.800 1,238.200 O 1.238200 4940 5,4841 142,584 01 O 6.484 142,584 5,6521 144,362 01 6,55 49.5281 144,352 1,287,728 O 1,287,728 O """ TotalOirectCos1s lodirect Coste Total Coste !Flscal speclfV: . ,4.0% 4.940 128,440 Agent F e e o & ( O m r , 4 1 0 O 128.440 8,226 8,328 27 O un 1 74,292 1';~,.n28 ATTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) CÚRREÑ·CY":·sóLes·················.................................................... CURRENT USO EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80 Detalled Annual Budget Personnel Director Ejecutivo Administrador Comunicador Responsable Componente (3) Procesadores de Imagenes Beneflts speclfy: Subtotal Personnel Salaries Consultants and Contractors National Consultants Intemational Consultants p'>t.. : I.c•. Subtotal Consultant and Contractor Fees Oth!!r Di[ect Ex(!enses Isee glossa!:ll) Travel (Transportation & Lodging) Training, Conferences and workshops Communication & Publications Field Supplies Other Supplies Computers/Software/Satellite imagery Subtotal Other Direet Expenses Ca(!iml Ex(!en!!itur!!!i & Egul(!!!lent Isee glossa!:ll) Scientific Equipment Vehides (boats, trucks, motorcydes) Infrastructure/renovation Subtotal Equipment & Expenditures OUTPUT 3: Institulional and legal framework for !he implementation of REDD activities at National and Sub National scales proposed for Peru. SUB-OUTPUT 3.1: Strangths and weaknesses of legal and institutional issues related lo land use rights, SUB-OUTPUT 4.1: Ex-ante environmental services, forest evaluation of economic and govemance and benefits distribution institutional feasibility of REDD in identified for Peru.servicios Peru. ambientales, gobemanza forestal y distribucion de beneficios identificadas para el Perú. GBMF sDecifv: OTHER TOTAL GBMF OTHER SUB-OUTPUT 4.2: Classification of areas for sub-national REDD projects and prioritization orsuitable REDD pilo projects. TOTAL OTHER GBMF TOTAL SUB-OUTPUT 4.3: 3. Implementation of pilot projects promoted by MINAM. GBMF OTHER TOTAL Note' O O O F7.O% O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 29,700 O 19,800 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 19,800 O 19,800 O O O O O Note' 29,700 29,700 O 29,700 O O O 22,600 O O 19,800 O O O O 19,800 O 19,800 O 19,800 O 19,800 Note' O O 14,500 O O O O O O O O 22,600 O O O 22,600 O 22,600 14,500 O O O O O O O O O 14,500 O 14,500 O O O O Note' 1~:i;itiQ"" Total Costs IFiscal Agent Fee~~%1 O O O O O Total Direet Costs Indirect Costs OUTPUT 4: Economic and institutional feasibility of REDD at National and Sub Nationat scales evaluated and its implementation in prlority araas promoted by MINAM. O O O 01 O O O O O 29700 O 29,700 22,600 O 22,600 34300 O 34,300 19800 O 19,800 1,1881 30,888 01 O 1,188 9041 23,504 01 O 904 23,504 1,3721 35,672 01 O 1,372 7921 20,592 01 O 20,592 1,782 30,888 O O O O O O O O O' O 1,356 28 2,058 35,672 , 1,188 792 A TTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) OUTPUT 5: Project results disseminated and c::ontríbuting lo Ihe skills and capadties to negotiate the Peruvian position -in the c::ontext of the United Natíons Framework Convention on Climate Changastrengthened. SUB-TOTAL YEAR 1 CURRENCy'·SOlES .. ·· ..··....... " .. " .................................. CURRENT USO EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80 SUB-OUTPUT 5.1: Peruvian delegates lo tIle UNFCCC are knowledgeable about key policy and technical issues of REDD implementation in PERU and can effectively apply information to UNFCCC negotiations. Detalled AnnuaJ Budget Personnel Director Ejl!cutivo Administrador Comunicador Responsable Componente (3) Procesadores de Imagenes Beneflts speclfy: Subtotal Personnel Salarles Consultants and Contractors National Consultanta Intemational Consultants /"~..".~' J)J~l'~ . GBMF : r::o:G'% OTHER TOTAL GBMF TOTAL OTHER O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O 108.000 72,000 72,000 192,000 O O 444,000 O O O 96,000 O 108,000 72,000 72,000 288,000 O O O 96,000 540,0001 O 410,700 123,200 Note~ 59,400 59,400 O 59,400 O O O O O O O 59,400 O O O 124,000 124,000 4,480 410,700 123,200 O O O 533900 O O O O 533,900' 134,800 324,900 4,480 O 124,000 O 134,800 448,900 4,480 O O Note' O O 85,200 85,200 O 4,480 o O O O O 1,190,000 O O O 85,200 . O 85,200 4,480 124,000 128480 1,654,180 o O O O 1,190,000 124,000 1,778,180 Note' L'é¡;íf:o% Total Costa IFiscal AVení Fea GBMF TOTAL O O O O Total Dlrect Costs BD8Clfv: ~ Note. Subtotal Conaultant and Contractor F_ Qlh!![ !;!I[!!!t.t ¡¡liRID!!!! (S!!!! glossaIXI Travel (Transportstion & Lodging) Traíning, Conferences and workshops Communication & PUblications Fíeld Supplíes Other Supplies ComputersJSoftware/Satellite imagerv Subtotal Other Dlrect Expenses C!!Rim! ElSR!!ndj!u[!!1 & EgulRm!!m lIt!!!! gI2HIIX) Scientific Equípment Vehicles (boats. trueks, molorcycles) Infralltructure/renovation Subtotal Equlpment & Expenditures Indirect Costa OTHER SUB-OUTPUT 5~2: Project results disseminated with· Ihe five regións of tocus tor REOO implementation in Peru and public in general. 1: 6.0%1 O O O O O O 144,600 O 144,600 4,480 124,000 5,7841 01 5784 49601 150,384 O 160,384 1791 4,659 8,676 O O 128,960 269 O O O O O O O O 128480 2632,080 5139 105,2831 133,619 2,737,363 157,925 29 O O O O O O O O' 220,000 2,862,080 8,8001 114,083 228,800 2,966,163 ATTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) YEAR 2 Period: mmlvv • mmlyy: OUTPUT1: ProJed govemance and inler-instHutlonal participetlon tuUy defined. CÜ·¡¡RENCy·;·SOi:is···......·····....···..·..····....·..··..··········....................... CURRENT USD EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80 SUB-OUTPUT 1.2: Key personnal for '!11p!ementatlOn oflhe project klentlfied, recruited,l1ired end treinad as approprlately. SUB-OUTPUT 1.1: Project structure estsbli9hed end implernentstlon plan designad end refinad • . .p'~-::~r.:.>-'i "1 " t -'" /;"t'ii\\\\ ""\~ít~ /."'" P '{{iR' t!!¡ I '\~,::~¿~ GBMF Budaet Oetalléd Annual Budget PelSonnel Director Ejecutivo Administrador Comunicador Responsable Componenle (3) Procesadores de Imagenes OTHER -~ ....."": Benefils Subtotal PelSonnel Salarie. Consultanls and Contractors Natlonal Consultanls Intematlonal Consullanls ro:o% O O GBMF Budoet TOTAL O O O O O O O O OTHER TOTAL 108,000 72.000 72,000 192,000 96,000 O 444,000 96,000 108.000 72,000 72,000 288,000 O O 540,000 O 84,000 22,400 O O 106,400 O ·134,800 O O O O 11,200 146,000 ¡ -~ O O O 84,000 22,400 O ¡f' Subtotal Consultant and Contnlctor Feas Q!Il!r Oirect EXl!!!nses !see glossa!l!l T ravel (T ransportation & Lodging) Training, Conferences and worksoops Communication & Publicallons Field Supplies Other Supplias CompulerslSotlwareJSalelli1e inlaAer¡ Subtotal Olher Dlreet Expenses Cae!!!! ~ndltut!!! & ESl!ll!lDa!l! ¡sea gIOSS8!l!1 Scíentific Equipment Vellidas (bOals, trucks, moloo:ycle9) Infraslruclurelrenovatlon Subtotal EqulPIIIllnt & Expendltures O specffv: 106,400 134,800 O O O O O O O O O O O 11,200 146,000 Nole' O O O O O O O O O 696.400 96000 792400 O O O 4.0% Total Costs IFiscall Agaot Fea O Nole' Total Direct Costs Indirect Costs O 0.061 O O O O O O O O O O 278561 724,256 3,840 31696 99,840 824,096 41,784 30 ATTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) OUTPUT 2: Metbodologles ro.. Peru's nallonal system for lbe measunrment, nrportlng and verlflcatlon (MRV) of forat carbon developed, and a plan foI'lniplémantatlon ofthe systam establlshed. CÜ·RRENCy·:·SruS········..·..,··....·....····..···......·····..·.... ·................... CURRENT USO EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80 SUB.()UTPUT 2.1 : Conceplual ffamewor1<s lor estab!lshing basellne scenanos (currenl and projected) from deforestation and fores! degradation defined and relevanl national and regional data on forests and land use compiled. ~~ y",.,./L$.t" if~:t:/¡W¡'Df?~"~ "\:"~~'-;?:"y\ ¡ ;:;, .; ,:¡" .,--.' 1 {>-' .ii~ "," ~f "~~:~!}~J~~:'> ,J(,," ¡P" Detaited Annual Sudg.! Personnel Director Ejecutivo Administrador Comunicador Responsable Componente (3) Procesadores de Imagenes BenefllS spe<:lly: Subtotal Personnel Salaries COlI$ultanlS and Contractors Natlonal Consultants Inlemational Conaultants Subtotal Consultant and Contractor F_ Qther Dlreet Ex!!!n!!es ¡aee glossa~ Travel (Transportation & Lodging) Training, Conferences and workshops Communication & Publicalions Field Supplies Olhar Supplies Computers/Software/SateRile imagery Subtotal Olber Direct Expenses' CaelHl !iillll!nditures & Eguiement ¡see glossa!:l(l Scientific Equipment Vellidas (boats, truck •• moton::ycles) lnfraslrudure/renovalion Subtotal Equlpment & EXJ)8ndltl.lres - (O:ii% Nold soeeifv: O O O a a a o SUB-OUTPUT 2.3: Technical procedures for Ihe establishment, and economic valuation 01 carbon 01 a system for lhe monilorlng, stocks defined and relevan1 verificalion and reportlng (MRV) 01 naOonal and regional dilla on foresl REDD projects at national and sub cernon stocks compiled natlonal seales delined. GBMF Budoet TOTAL O O O O O O O O o o o o O o O OTHER O O O O O O O O O O o a O O O O O O O O O O a O O O O 4.0% 0.061 O O o o 01 o o o o O O O o o o O o O o O O O O O o O o o 01 o o o o o 01 o o o o o ·0 o O o o o o o o O a O O O 19,800 134,400 154,200 O 154,200 O o o o 58,000 58,000 o a o o O O 1237600 O 1,295.600 O a 1,237,600 1,295,600 o O O O O O O O 19,800 134,400 a o 31 TOTAL O O O O Nolol o OTHER O a a a O GBMF Budget TOTA,L a O O o SUB..oUTPUT 2.4: Currenl and proje<:;ted scenarios 01 defotllstation and fores! degredation deveIoped and valldated, and spúl information available. O O O O O o O 01liER o O O O GBMF Budllet TOTAL O TotalCosts !Flscar AgentF¡¡e- OTHER, -~ Total Oirect Costa Indirect Costa GBMF Budget SUB-OUTPUT 2.2: Conceptual ffameworks for Ihe quantl1k:ation a O O O o o 1449800 o 1449 800 679921 O 67992 o 1,501,7112 86,988 o 1,507792 ATTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) - - OUTPUT 3: Institutional ene! legal framework for \he implemantállOfl ot REDD aCtIvlties al Natlonal and OUTPUT 4: Economic and institulional teasibilltyot REDD at Nalioilal and Sub National scales evaluated and lis Implementation in príority areas promated by MINAM. Sub NatlOnal scaléII proposed for Peru. ·CURRE¡;ic'¡:-;SOLES· .. ······......·..·.......... ··....·......,..·,......·.................. SUB-OUTPUT 3.1: Slrengths and weaknesses ot legal and Institutionallssues related lo land use rights, envlronmenlal servlces, foresl govemance and banelils dislribution idenlilied tor Pero.servlcios ambientales, gobemanza forestal y dísmbución de beneficios identificadas para el Perú. CURRENT USO EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80 h ""-'.., "1":'. /1~~\"\ * ~v.?:;P'~~~"i\ /~:~;{'\ ' .:~'~t f ..","~, '"¡ERI\! ~~_ t%~,~ '\">"" -~''s .~,.:; .,.:~"" ~ etl:,\j,~';'~ ~/ ',,-\ ~.~ ~,::Z:t~~~~ .~ ... .¡,c" /Al " OetaUad AnRual Budgat Personnel Director Ejecutivo Administrador Comunicador Responsable Componente (3) Procesadores de Imagenes Beneflls ••odIY: SuMotal Personnel Salaries Consultants and Contractors National Consultanls Inlamational Consultants , GBMF Budget TOTAL O O O O O O O ~ ~ O -, í"i.ii% GBMF Budget OTHER SUB-OUTPUT 4.3: 3. Implemenlation of pilol projects promoted by MINAM. GBMF Budge' TOTAL TOTAL OTHER O O O O a O e o O O O 49,500 o O O O 49.500 19.800 O o 49,500 o O 22,600 O O O O 22,600 O O O O O O O O O O 19.800 118,800 o O O o 118,800 O O O 118,800 O o o O O 49500 O O e o O O O 19,800 O 19,800 118,800 o o o O Noo., o O O o 22,600 o o O O O O 22,600 O O O o O O O o o O O O O !l O O O O O O o 118800 NoteN I 4.0% 0,061 ~ O O O O O Total Cosls IFlScalAgentFee OTHER SUB-OUTPUT 4.2: Classificadon ot areas tor sub-national REDD projects and priorltization orsuitáble REDD pilol projeds. NoteN Total Dlrect Costs soecifv: GBMF Budget TOTAL ~ Subiotal Consultant and Contractor F_ QlI!er OIn¡et E!l!!nses ¡see glossaw Trave! (TranspOrietion & lodging) Trainlng, Confe<'ences and wortshops Communícatlon & PUbllcations Field Supplíes Other Supplles ComllularslSoftwarelSatellite lmagerv Subtotal Other Direct Expenses Caeltal Emendltures & Egulement (see glossaDl:I Scientific Equlpment Vehicles (boats, lruells, motorcyc/es) Infraslructurelrenovatlon Subtotal Equlpment & Expenditures Indirect Costs OTHER SUB-OUTPUT 4.1: Ex-anla evaluatlOn ot economic ane! Institutional feaslbillly ot REDD in i'elU. e o O O O O O O O O O O o o o 72100 19,800 o 19800 118800 01 01 2,884 7921 01 792 o o o o o o 72100 01 o 20592 28841 74,984 o 74,98 4,326 20,592 1,188 32 4,7621 123,652 7,128 01 4752 o 123,652 ATTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) OUTPUT 5: ProjecI results disseminaled and conlribuling lo Ihe skills and capacities lo negotiale !he Peruvian position -in Ihe conlext of Ihe Unlled Nalipns Framework Conventlon on Climale Changa- slrenglhened. SUB·TOTAl YEAR 2 CÚRREN'Cy':soLiüi"'''' '.................................................................. CURRENT USD EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80 .",...-- /" n~, ~t~~: ~""I!.,¡,,,,\) i"!!!:~ SUB-OUTPUT 5.1: Peruvian delegales 10 Ihe UNFCCC are knowledgeable aboul key policy and lechnical issues of REDD implementalion in PERU and can effectively apply infonmation lo UNFCCC negotiations. ~-,., ,,,4t\ "',;":1;',>\ , Xc ~,; 1 GBMF Budget " O<¡taU8d Annual Budget ~rii~nel 1 ' ~¡rector Ejecutivo ~, Administrador Comunicador Responsable Componenle (3) {;1-.:8: I.i.¡'i!: o (1')8. V t:z\ \ ::~¡.. -...; : "1) \ 1.... ~t~ ~ ~z '''~\' i-¡ :;frt; .(~c,\'d'" / ~ P '\'''-' '!L: -l.! ::.Lr: r-'. OTHER TOTAL TOTAL O O O O O O O O Sub!o!al Consultan! and Contrac!or Fees Other Direc! Exeanses Isee glossa!lll Traval (Transportation & Lodging) Training, Conferences and workshops Communication & Publicalions Field Supplies Olher Supplies Compulers/Software/Salellile imagery Subtotal Other Direct Expenses Caeital Exeenditures & Egulement Isee glossa!lll Scientific Equipmenl Vehicles (boals, trucks, mOlorcycles) Infrastructure/renovation Subtotal Equipment & Expenditures ro:D% GBMF Budge! TOTAL OTHER sDecifv: O O O O O O O O 108,000 72,000 72,000 192,000 O O O 96,000 108,000 72,000 72,000 288,000 O O O Ó 444,000 O 96,000 O 540,000 331,500 156,800 O O 488,300 O 331,500 156,800 O O 488,300 Noto. 39,600 39,600 39,600 O O O O 39,600 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Not.~ O 58,000 4,480 O O O O O 62,480 O O O O O O O 39600 O 39,600 62,480 1584 O 1584 2499 41,184 O 41,184 O O O 134,800 58,000 138,600 4,480 4,480 O O O O O 1,248,800 62,480 1,526,680 O 134,800 O 138,800 4,480 O O O O O O 1,248,800 O 1,526,680 Note # Total Direct Costs 4.0'10 Total Costs [FIscal Agent Fee OTHER O O O O Procesadores de Imagenes Indirect Costs GBMF Budge! Noto. Banetlts specify: Subtotal Personnel Salaries Consultants and Contracto,," Nalional Consultanls Inlemational Consultanls 4-é;,.~)"; SUB-OUTPUT 6.2: Projecl results disserninaled wllh Ihe five regions of focus for RED O implementalion in Peru and public in general. 0.06! 2,376 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 62,480 2458,980 96,000 2,554 980 64,979 '98359 01 2,499 O 64,979 2,557,339 99,840 2,657,179 3,749 147,539 O 33 38401 102,188 =-::J ATTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) TOTAL IYears 1 - 2) , ,'" yEAR 1 IPerlod: mmlYl ~,lÍIín!yYt ,VEAR 2lPértod: mm/Yy-mtrum /::"~l ,~,\\ 1 Del. A~' !~?~?"", ."''',:::~~ -, ~ \"':, '( "j;""i~ , ,\ ~I'\., ~ ::,;:ít", " CURRENT USO EXCHANGE RATE: 2.80 Detalled Budget Total Personnel • Director Ejecutivo Administrador Comunicador Responsable Componente (3) Procesadores de Imegenes Beneflts Subtotal Personnel Salarles Consultants aOO Contractors Natíonal Consultants Intematíonal Consultents ~,~~ ,¡;)'?!;'. -_ ¡ "rti' 8;"0\/"// o1iN¡i;t~/" .........,.,,~....."'.~ • .¡; I Subtotal Consultan! and Contractor F_ Sub-Grants Subtotal Other Dlrecl Expenses Equlpment & Capital Expendltures Scienlific Equípment Vehicles (boals, trucks, motorcyclesJ Infraslructurelrenoyation Subtotal Equlpment & Expendltures Total Dlrect Costs IOOlrect Costs JrP' J:'J', ' GElMF OTHER ~1l-tCJtal: MINAM ,.' , TOTAL GBMF OTHER O O O 96,000 O O 96,000 108,000 72,000 72,000 288,000 O 540,000 108,000 72,000 72,000 192,000 O O 444,000 410,700 123,200 O O 533,900 O O O O 410,700 123,200 O O 533,900 331,500 156,800 O O 488,300 O O O o O O O O O 220 000 2 862 080 2,458,980 114,083 98,359 O O O 2,737.363 O O O O O O O O 105,28~ O O O O O O 124,000 2.6~2,080 O O 134,800 134,800 448,900 138,600 4,480 4,480 O O O O 1,190,000 1,248,800 O O 1,778,180 1,526,680 134,800 324,900 4,480 O O 1,190,000 O 1,654,180 O O 96,000 O O 96,000 o o O O O O O O O O O O O 124,000 O O O 8,800 o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O , 'T'V' TOTAL o o .o O O c "".:' ", 108,000 72,000 72,000 192,000 O O 444,000 O Subtotal Sub-Grants Other Dlrect Expenses Trayel (Transportalion & Lodging) Training, Conferences and Workshops Communication & Publlcatlons Field Supplies OIher Supplíes Computers/SoftwarelSatellite ímagery TÓTAL ('lears 1 - 2) ',' CÜRRENCY;'SOÚ¿S" ,". '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ..",......,..,.. ,,, GBMF 108,000 72,000 72,000 288,000 O OTHER 216,000 144,000 144,000 384,000 O O 888,000 216,000 144,000 O 144,000 192,000. 576,000 O O O O 192,000 1,080,000 742,200 331,500 280,000 156,800 O O O O 488,300 1,022200 742,200 O 280,000 O O O O O O 1,022,200 e 54O,OOC O O O O O O O o o o o O 289,600 567,500 8,960 O O 2,438,800 O 3,304,860 134,800 269,600 138,600 463,600 8,960 4,480 O O O O 1,248,800 2,438,800 O O 1,526,680 3,180860 O O O O O O O O O O O O 98359 203,642 96,000 2,653,339 5,294,702 228,1l1lll 2,966,163 2,551,339 • 34 O O e 96,000 2,654 980 5091,060 O TOTAL 124,000 O O O O O 124,000 O O O O O O O O O O O O 316 000 5 407 060 8800 212442 324,800 5,619,502 ATTACHMENT 3 BUDGET (#2242) Geospatial Component 5/.2.80000 Estimated Cost (in USO) Satellite Images Alos images $ 360,000 Image processing $ 144,000 Sub-total $ 504,000 Field Veritication Sampling of observation points $ 98,000 Conversion to PEN Notes SI. 1,008,000 Imágenes Alos Multiespectral (70x70Km). Resolution: aprox. 10m (total 401 imágenes a costo unitario de USS 900 c/u) . Fecha Toma: 2006-2009 SI. 403,200 destinado en hombres/mes para el procesamiento de las imágenes durante 18 meses SI. 1,411,200 5/.274,400 Para el muestreo de aproximadamente 50 a 70 puntos de observación en cada una de las 14 zonas o regiones con cobertura de la región Amazónica, a razón de US$ 7000 por zona. ~",,_:_. Trucks for field work $ SI. O Compra de 02 camionetas para trabajos de campo a razón de $ SI. O SI. O /::.;é\?,f;~"l~ ..··c I ~;.:/"" '.' "\~.,~ck maintenance I~~ \}r11n¡:fi~~ .~:.. ,.;!' US$ 35,000 cada una . $ ,iííiJtotal $ 98,000 S/, 274,400 $ 50,000 SI. 140,000 equipos PC Work Station, plotter, escáner y dispositivos de almacenamiento de datos. SI. 168,000 software de procesamiento y análisis de imágenes satelitales (ENVio Similar que incluye la extensión Feature Extraction) SI. 112,000 para la actualización de la plataforma ArcGlS Server que es el sistema.en el que se soporta los servicios geoespaciales del MINAM por 02 años. SI. 140,000 para la programación de sistemas que desarrollen mecanismos de acceso y distribución de información. 5/.84,000 para la adquisición de equipos móviles para recolección de datos en campo y acceso a base de datos, teniendo en cuenta la tecnologla y el soporte de Google. SI. 78,400 en capacitación en procesamiento digital de imágenes aplicado al \.,',i'.J.~s, ; /.' ~ .'1:;'if.jt~~~yGIS Platform ":¡."¡fNl\ \' '~,-~_.•- equipment (PC Work Station, plotter, scanner, storage device) processing software and analysis of $ satellite ¡mages $ ArcGIS Server pi o , " . , 60,000 40,000 Systems for information access and $ distribution $ Field equipmeat 50,000 $ 28,000 Training in digital processing of images 30,000 levantamiento de cobertura de la tierra; y en Análisis y Modelamiento SIG para aplicaciones en medio ambiente. Cada curso es de 02 semanas en ellGAC-Colombia " ':., Sub-total $ 258,000 S/, 722,400 Miscellaneous TOTAL $ 860,000 SI. 2,416,400 5/.8,400 35