PDF, 1.34 MB

Transcription

PDF, 1.34 MB

THE ISSUE Conference 2014
Sustainable Transport TechnologiesCollaboration for Innovation
Holywell Park Conference Centre
11th and 12th February 2014
Post Event Delegate Report
“This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration
under grant agreement no 287088”
Contents
THE ISSUE Conference Overview ....................................................................................................................... 4
THE ISSUE Conference Statistics ........................................................................................................................ 6
Delegate Feedback ........................................................................................................................................ 6
RIA Feedback ................................................................................................................................................. 6
Outputs from Breakout Sessions on 11th February ........................................................................................... 7
SMART TRANSPORT ....................................................................................................................................... 7
SAFETY ........................................................................................................................................................... 8
URBAN MOBILITY, Group 1............................................................................................................................ 9
URBAN MOBILITY, Group 2.......................................................................................................................... 10
GREENER TRANSPORT ................................................................................................................................. 12
AIR QUALITY................................................................................................................................................. 13
Transport Theme Collaboration Interest ......................................................................................................... 15
Appendix .......................................................................................................................................................... 16
Five Transport Theme Groups for Collaboration......................................................................................... 16
Full Delegate Attendees List .......................................................................................................................... 1
2
Dear delegate,
Many thanks for attending THE ISSUE Conference 2014 in February and your valuable contribution to all the
breakout and networking sessions. The event was made a success thanks to the involvement and
enthusiasm of all those that attended.
In this post-conference report, you can find details of the outcomes of the breakout sessions so you can
remind yourself of the actions to take forward, details of individuals that were interested in collaborating
within particular themes and the full delegate list for both days of the conference.
We sincerely hope that you found THE ISSUE Conference a valuable event for building your network and
developing collaborative partnerships for developing solutions in transport that meet local and European
needs.
For any further questions or suggestions for future events, please contact THE ISSUE Project Manager for
De Montfort University, Clare Edwards, [email protected] or THE ISSUE Project Coordinator Steve
Dibnah, [email protected].
3
THE ISSUE Conference Overview
THE ISSUE Conference took place on Tuesday 11th and Wednesday 12th February 2014 at Holywell Park,
Loughborough. Sponsored by THE ISSUE partnership, De Montfort University, UK Trade & Investment, the
Railway Industries Association, Transport iNet, Transport KTN and the Leicester & Leicestershire Enterprise
Partnership, this FREE two day conference brought together delegates and exhibitors from across the UK
and Europe, to network and explore ways of bridging the gap between local and regional policy priorities
and technological innovation. Key themes that were covered at the conference included congestion, urban
mobility and safety in transport, multimodal and modal shift and low carbon vehicles.
Conference hall, day one
The aim of the event was to allow local government, industry and academia to explore how, through more
cross-sectoral collaborative working, new technologies and innovations can be used in transport to ease
urban traffic congestion, help reduce carbon emissions, make transport more efficient and improve the
impact of transport on the local economy, air quality and public health.
Leicester Mayor Sir Peter Soulsby, opened the conference event
4
Key topics that were covered at the conference included: Innovation in Transport; UK and EU Funding
opportunities; Finance and Collaboration; Innovation in Rail; and the launch of our European Special
Interest Group in Transport. Presentations from the full conference can be found at the following web link:
www.theissue.eu/en/a/THE-ISSUE-Conference-2014-presentations.
The opportunity of exhibiting and/or delivering a pitch to engage with potential partners to establish any
collaborative opportunities was also offered. A total of 43 exhibitors took part, with a further 50 delivered
elevator pitches.
Exhibition hall well attended and effective networking
To enhance networking opportunities a Gala Dinner was organised for the evening of 11th February at
Holywell Park. The After Dinner Speaker was Tony Hawks, TV and radio comedian and bestselling author.
Tony Hawks, after dinner speaker
5
THE ISSUE Conference Statistics
11th February registrations:
202 registrations, 168 attendees
12th February registrations:
344 total attendees, 257 attendees
Delegate Feedback
A questionnaire was handed out to all delegates during the event then after the event, an online
questionnaire was sent to all delegates. Most respondents were attracted to the event by the networking
opportunities and the content of the agenda. Feedback showed the event to have been useful, met
attendees’ objectives and provided a good exhibition. Breakout sessions were rated good with some
constructive feedback about how these can be improved for future events. Most delegates planned on
taking further action as a result of the event and would be interested in attending a similar event in two
years’ time.
RIA Feedback
A questionnaire was handed out to all RIA delegates during the event. Over half the delegates attending
the workshop had not attended an RIA workshop before. Feedback showed a good balance between
networking, breakouts and presentations with particular comments on the quality of the speakers, with
Ross Kemp highlighted as a popular speaker. The collaboration of the two events gave delegates
opportunities for networking with people they wouldn’t normally meet.
Conference hall, day two
6
Outputs from Breakout Sessions on 11th February
SMART TRANSPORT
Background
There is increasing demand from citizens to have full visibility of the transport options available and to
travel in the most convenient way they can. However, there is a challenge as to how people, vehicles,
infrastructure, and businesses can be connected into one cooperative transport system. There is a need to
combine integrated traffic and transport management with new elements of ubiquitous data collection and
system self-management.
3 innovative ideas to meet the challenge and their barriers
Idea
1) Identify stakeholder groups and
their requirements including
whether their transport needs can
be reduced.
2) Identify what data is available,
what is missing that is needed,
how they should be gathered,
stored, presented and shared.
3) How, who and with what, do we
convert data into information for
the user?
Barriers
 Identifying the different sectors or category of user.
 Profiling their use or their demands for transport.
 Identifying the person or representative through whom
this communication would take place.
 Factoring events into seasonal or periodic transport
demands.
The consensus was that there were many different sources of
data and a lot of different agencies who provided data. These
included:
The Highways’ Agency
Network Rail
Google
Airlines
HGV operators
Councils
The Police
Public transport fleet
operators
It would be helpful if all this data were available from a single
repository
There would be a need for near real time information available
via mobile apps, preferably of a predictive nature. Ideally
provision for a GIS system, or similar, which could provide
options about travel choices based on a variety of parameters
including: price, time, comfort, weather predictions, real-time
event information etc.
Next Steps: What is now required to overcome these barriers to implementation?
Breakout group had insufficient time remaining to address these. However, it is likely they would need to
consider some of the following criteria:
- Funding
- Policy
- Public engagement
- Technical development
7
SAFETY
Background & Scope:
Pedestrians, cyclists, motorbike and moped riders represent a particularly serious safety concern, since
they account for a disproportionately high percentage of the total number of road fatalities and serious
injuries across Europe. Urban safety is vital as the populations of urban environments continue to increase.



How the improvement in road safety in recent years can be maintained and enhanced?
What advanced safety measures could be introduced?
How can we look after vulnerable transport users to ensure they are safe?
3 innovative ideas to meet the challenge and their barriers
Idea
1) Planning/Policy; to put safety first
and the separation of different
users:
Planning policy, put safety first
in planning
Separation of users
Bike free zones
Cycle lanes against the road
traffic flow
2) Use of drugs/drink/fatigue –
behaviours
3) Autonomous vehicles/proximity &
location sensors
Barriers














Cultural
Ensure one safety feature does not impede the
effectiveness of another, nor create new safety issues
Competing goals/conflicting interests
Cost
Piloting/simulation of proposals
Existing infrastructure
Political objectives/bias and politics
Human nature/reluctance
Acceptance
Cost
No technical barriers but it is consumer choice and
often adds greater costs to car value
Acceptance
Reliability/perception
Consequences of failure
1) Planning/Policy; to put safety first and the separation of different users
- Public engagement
- Guidance for planners across local authority boundaries and specialisms
- Information on best practice
- Cost/benefit information
2) Use of drugs/drink and fatigue – behaviours
- Importance of responsible behaviours in driver’s test
- Insurance impacts
- Enforcement of road rules – to both drivers and cyclists.
3) Autonomous vehicles/proximity & location sensors
- Legislation
- Familiarity/demonstration/education
8
URBAN MOBILITY, Group 1
Background & Scope:
Urban mobility is becoming easier and more user-friendly as more information becomes available to users.
However, as demand continues to increase and the impacts of unsustainable forms of urban mobility
become more pronounced, there is a need to ensure that urban mobility becomes integrated and
sustainable.
3 innovative ideas to meet the challenge and their barriers:
Idea
1) Connected information
Barriers








2) Car-free city cores



3) Allocation of road space in

according to demand

Format
Ownership – paying to access it
Availability
What to do with it
Are we prepared to open it all to Google?
Understanding the business model – is the data free to
use? If so how is it paid for?
‘UBER’ app (this is an App in use in New York that
replicates taxi services – possibly worth examining)
Public acceptability – Connected information is dependent
on collating and analysing information garnered, in the
main, from mobile phones
Some places already do it
Depends on place, culture and how the city is used
Not much innovation here – the barriers are
political/social
This was about ensuring that throngs of pedestrians were
not corralled into narrow footways at the expense of road
space for under-occupied vehicles.
Main problems are gaining evidence on the level of
demand, accounting for goods traffic and acceptability.
For 1) Connected information, it was agreed that much of this information exists; the question then
becomes one of how such information can be gathered in one place and made usefully available. A key
player appears to be Google. The next step is whether or not there is a business model that works; this
requires an assessment of the likely take-up and the potential user demographic. Is this a solution in search
of a problem?
For 2) and 3) [apart from data collection for 3)], much of this is about policy will and public acceptability.
Reallocation of road space/car-free areas are already in the gift of most public authorities. In order for such
initiatives to be implemented, a compelling case has to be made.
9
URBAN MOBILITY, Group 2
Background & Scope:
Urban mobility is becoming easier and more user-friendly as more information becomes available to users.
However, as demand continues to increase and the impacts of unsustainable forms of urban mobility
become more pronounced, there is a need to ensure that urban mobility becomes integrated and
sustainable.
Idea
1) Enabling micropayments to
incentivise volunteers to move
transport resources to where the
resources are needed (instead of,
for instance, TfL moving hire bikes
on lorries around London, but could
also apply to car schemes, etc):
- Rewarding individuals to take
part in activities that benefit
transport providers/systems.
- Not just about payments; it’s
about rewards to incentivise
2) Enabling microfreight depots
3)
Give travellers a challenge to change –
gamification, e.g. competition to do
lowest emissions journey:
- To encourage right behaviour
from users through competition,
c.f. Nike, Waze points system,
etc.
Barriers











Why the problem happens in the first place – may be
best to address the problem at cause
Information required to get the right people to the
right things at the right place at the right time.
Trust and liabilities
Cost model – must cost less to deploy than what is
done now.
Pressure from those who benefit from the current
situation
Convincing people to do it.
No time to discuss in detail.
Cultural issues; transport providers like TfL do not
play games; separating the transport industry from
the gaming industry.
How to measure how users perform? Linking the
behaviour to benefits, e.g. linking modal choice to
carbon emissions.
How do you engage participants; how do you make it
fun?
How do you incentivise engaging those who will give
the rewards, c.f. Tesco points, free journeys, etc.
1)
2)
3)
‘Micropayments’:
- Feasibility study covering: identifying market; is it the best solution (why does it happen in the
first place?); insurance; pricing structure/demand; locations to trial it at; who should lead a trial
(big or small transport provider); who should be involved in the consortium that trials, etc.
- No need for new technology; it is already available off the shelf.
‘Microfreight depots’:
- Conduct a case study of the Amazon solution involving TfL?
‘Gamification’:
- Establish what is to be compared, e.g. emissions.
- Establish what are the rewards, i.e. what can participants win?
- Develop and agree algorithms to link behaviour to benefits.
10
-
Develop mechanism to allow participants to publish how they did and compare themselves
against others.
Further points arising from discussion:
Observations on the briefing note:
1. Is urban mobility getting easier? Information is more readily available to facilitate mobility so from
that perspective it is getting easier.
2. Customer’s expectations are increasing because of their experience from other sectors.
3. Thoughts on questions asked in scope:
a. How can we create changes in mobility behaviour? Through: incentivising, penalising or
transforming, ‘changes’ corresponds to benefits, ‘behaviour’ corresponds to the user.
b. How can innovation and new policy ensure better use of existing infrastructure? Not just
about better use of existing infrastructure; innovation and new policy can be used to create
changes in behaviour.
4. Other questions to ask could be:
a. How can we improve urban mobility without investing in new infrastructure?
b. Do journeys actually need to be made in the first place, c.f. webinars? What do travellers
actually want to do; why are they making the journey in the first place? It is not necessarily
about where they are going, but why they are going.
c. Can we transform the desire for mobility into something else?
d. How can you get freight delivered to households without using existing methods?
Solutions (top three in bold):
1. Give travellers a challenge to change – gamification, e.g. competition to do lowest emissions
journey.
2. Changing policy in major cities for night time freight delivery in silent, CO2 free vehicles.
3. Socialising freight movement by using people already making journeys.
4. Enabling microfreight depots, c.f. TfL ticket offices becoming mini-freight depots (solution to last
mile problem as users order on line and pick up their parcels on the way home).
5. Enabling micropayments to incentivise volunteers to move transport resources to where the
resources are needed (instead of, for instance, TfL moving hire bikes on lorries around London,
but could also apply to car schemes, etc).
6. System to provide access to basic information on different modes for app developers, etc.,
facilitating provision of information targeted to address individual’s needs (context specific, pushed
information, etc). Already being progressed through TSB’s Internet of Things initiative which is
creating a data hub for travel information apps.
11
GREENER TRANSPORT
Background & Scope:
In order to develop more sustainable transport and urban environments, greener transport solutions are
needed. Transport causes significant air pollution and other impacts such as noise and congestion. Even
when greener modes of transport are developed, it can be challenging to increase take-up to the level
where significant improvements result.
Idea
1) Driverless autonomous
delivery
2) Non-road based last mile rail, tube or UAV alternatives
3) National cloud based load
and route optimisation










Barriers
Awareness and limited use
Warehouse to warehouse but no home delivery possible
Education
State of maturity
Expensive for passenger cars
Corporate risk and legislation
Infrastructure doesn’t already exist in most cases
Resistance to change from the public
Public concerns on safety and effectiveness
Cyber attack







Really needs to be real-time to maximise the benefits
Complexity of inputs
RoI and payback period – 3PL operations very low margin
Cost prohibitive
Monolithic system or collaboration of smaller systems?
Diverse range of tools
Integration challenges, open standards and protocols
1)
Driverless autonomous delivery
- Research – funding to research and develop solutions
- Legislative development (adaption of Highway Code)
- Driver information systems
- Specific ‘pod’ routes and similar ideas to bus/cycle lanes
2)
Non-road based last mile - rail, tube or UAV alternatives
- Punitive road tax
- Re-open/re-use disused railways and canals
- Free delivery if using alternative methods and free public transport
3)
National cloud based load and route optimisation
- Sentiment mapping (using social media data)
- Apps rather than expensive software packages – low cost, high market penetration
Approach:
- Standard shipping format, common user interface
- ‘Kick-back’ model or financial incentives to encourage use – ‘pay-per-click’ model of income for
each route planned
- Free service on web etc., externally funded
12
AIR QUALITY
This breakout group met the challenge in broader terms
Emission reduction mechanisms














Electric vehicle incentivisation
Hybrid vehicles
Fuel cells
Gas (LNG/CNG)
Vehicle sharing and car clubs
NOx issues with catalytic systems.
Improved parking information
Incentivisation schemes
o Registration number filtering
o Multi-occupancy car prioritisation
Modal shift (Cycling/walking/public transport)
Demand control
Combustion efficiency improvements
Retrofitting
Identification of primary polluters – Bus and HGV initiatives, old car initiatives?
Better understanding of the real-drive cycle of new vehicles; how are they actually used?
Measurement




Need better understanding of health impact linkages.
Need better population location services – understanding where people are relative to pollution.
Use of MOT emissions data
Improvement in vehicle fleet understanding
Management and Exposure reduction












Standardisation of methodologies
Capture economic cost of pollution (link to fuel and car tax)
There are flaws in current standardisation methods.
Speed of technology development is greater than speed of policy development.
Total versus peak emissions – hard to know which to prioritise.
New technologies will require new metrics for management.
Any strategy needs to accommodate a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.
Intelligent traffic management with air quality feeds.
Hot spot management.
Crowd sourcing of population and transport.
Informed citizens and travel planning.
Improved public awareness.
13
Barriers to AQ solutions
-
-
Siloed budgets
Regulation – not very effective at present, needs to be tax driven?
Regulations need a better evidence base.
Emission drivers – Euro VI not working.
Although AQ needs to be managed, it is not market driven. As there is no economic linkage
between damage from pollution and the cost of vehicles or fuel. Therefore needs market
intervention.
Political agenda (seen as a low priority).
Deregulation and privatisation of public transport – losing some control over operators and
therefore major fleets.
Cost of new technology (although this is not seen as prohibitive).
Evidence base not established.
Current cost of air quality
Health cost of air quality
Effectiveness of different solutions
Modelling and measurement of impacts.
Public support not structured.
Substantial cost of current infrastructure.
Substantial cost of any infrastructure change.
The identified plan towards a solution from this breakout group was as follows:
1. Improve the evidence base, in particular the health impacts, the linkages of pollution and health,
and the effectiveness of different interventions.
2. Increase public support through outreach, education, and awareness raising activities.
3. Increase the position of air quality within the political agenda to enable regulatory steps to be
taken, and budgets to be increased.
Provide a regulatory environment which links the impacts of pollution to the causes of it, and produces a
tax revenue from polluters which can be used on management and mitigation strategies.
14
Transport Theme Collaboration Interest
The delegates were invited to express interest in collaboration within five key transport themes by sharing
their contact information. As per the Breakout Groups, these five themes were:





Smart Transport
Greener Transport
Air Quality
Urban Mobility
Safety
The contact information of interested parties has been grouped in the Appendix of this report.
Most of all, thank you for attending THE ISSUE Conference and
we look forward to seeing you at future events
15
Appendix
Five Transport Theme Groups for Collaboration
Smart Transport:
First Name
Surname
Company
Email Address
Sunil
Maher
Coventry University
Enterprises Ltd
[email protected]
Daniel
Jonas
Atkins Ltd. Rail
Division
[email protected]
Bruce
Ray
Renfew
Kent
Renfrew Group
International
DMU
[email protected]
[email protected]
Mohammad Mesgarpour
Jutta
Shengxiang
Jantunen
Yang
Microlise
VTT Technical
Research Centre of
Finland
DMU
[email protected]
Stirling
Kimkeran
Omnicom Engineering
Ltd
[email protected]
Santiago
Blanco Polo
FundaciÓn Ayesa
[email protected]
Alfredo
Salvatore
Kiunsys
[email protected]
Dale
Richards
Coventry University
[email protected]
Agata
Giles K
Philip
Ciołkosz-Styk
Bailey
Solo
IGiK
Strata Geeb
Daden
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Eduardo
Lazzarotto
DEG Signal Ltd
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
16
Greener Transport:
First Name
Surname
Company
Email Address
Sunil
Maher
Coventry University
Enterprises Ltd
[email protected]
Daniel
Jonas
Atkins Ltd. Rail
Division
[email protected]
Bruce
Ray
Renfew
Kent
Renfrew Group
International
DMU
[email protected]
[email protected]
Mark
Matchett
Eric
Keogh
The Hardstaff Group
CDM Transport/
Impact Global
Emissions Solutions
[email protected]
Mohammad Mesgarpour
Microlise
[email protected]
Jutta
Shengxiang
Norman
Chris
Paul
VTT Technical
Research Centre of
Finland
DMU
Gasfill Ltd
Wego Couriers
Sonobex
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Jantunen
Yang
Leece
Beattie
Gooch
N/A
17
Air Quality:
First
Name
Surname
Company
Email Address
Agata
Ciołkosz-Styk
IGiK
[email protected]
FundaciÓn Ayesa
[email protected]
Santiago Blanco Polo
Bruce
Renfew
Stirling
Philip
Kimkeran
Solo
Renfrew Group
International
Omnicom Engineering
Ltd
Daden
Mark
Matchett
The Hardstaff Group
[email protected]
Keogh
CDM Transport/
Impact Global
Emissions Solutions
N/A
Eric
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Urban Mobility:
First
Name
Surname
Company
Email Address
Agata
Ray
Ciołkosz-Styk
Kent
IGiK
DMU
[email protected]
[email protected]
Santiago
Blanco Polo
FundaciÓn Ayesa
[email protected]
Alfredo
Salvatore
Kiunsys
[email protected]
Monica
Meini
Universita degli Studi
del Molise
[email protected]
Sunil
Giles K
Maher
Bailey
Carlos
Azuaga
Coventry University
Enterprises Ltd
Strata Geeb
Idom, Traction &
Railway Systems
Daniel
Jonas
Atkins Ltd. Rail
Division
[email protected]
David
Convers
Aerospace Valley
[email protected]
Bruce
Renfew
Vladimir
Stoiljkovic
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Renfrew Group
International
Satellite Applications
Catapult
[email protected]
[email protected]
18
Safety:
First Name
Surname
Company
Email Address
Paul A
Hatherly
Great Central
Consulting
[email protected]
Agata
Ray
Ciołkosz-Styk
Kent
IGiK
DMU
[email protected]
[email protected]
Santiago
Blanco Polo
FundaciÓn Ayesa
[email protected]
Alfredo
Salvatore
Kiunsys
[email protected]
Dale
Richards
Coventry University
[email protected]
Mohammad Mesgarpour
Microlise
[email protected]
Stirling
Omnicom Engineering
Ltd
[email protected]
Kimkeran
19
Full Delegate Attendees List
11th February 2014
First name
Jeff
David
Maxime
Philippe
Declan
Craig
Daniel
Santiago
Surname
Screeton
Convers
Guibert
Lattes
O'Brien
Brown
Jonas
Blanco
Organisation
5PL
Aerospace Valley
Aerospace Valley
Aerospace Valley
Aldolex Irl Ltd
Astrium
Atkins
Ayesa
First name
Simon
Joe
Robert
Luke
Alan
Jacques
Louahdi
Nick
Surname
Hobbs
Luker
Evans
Redfern
Williams
Bouffier
Khoudour
Geraghty
Organisation
Canard Design
Canard Design
Cenex
Cenex
Cerulean Visions Ltd
CETE SO
CETE SO
CLC (UK) Ltd
Francisco Jose
Viejo Payan
Ayesa Advanced Technologies
Michael
Carrington
Cobra Multi-Clip
Terry
Kirby
Campaign for Better Transport
(Leicestershire)
Philip
Knight
Consulting Where
Chris
Paul
Dale
Yuri A.
Frank
Philip
Clare
Eric
Nadia
Daniel
Ben
Zoe
Phil
Willoughby
Fairburn
Richards
Vershinin
Suttie
Solo
Edwards
Goodyer
Omar
Paluszczyszyn
Passow
Wanstall
Wilson
Cotswoth group
Coventry University
Coventry University
Coventry University
DAC Beachcroft LLP
Daden Limited
De Montfort University
Nelida
Mark
Ian
Marcus
Rhys
Norman
Paul
Stephen
Paul
Mark
Tony
Neil
Michael
Ancora
Gates
Downey
Mayers
Cowsill
Leece
Bhatia
Fuller
Hatherly
Matchett
King
Malone
McCool
E-Geos SPA
Eseye
European Space Agency
Future Railways
G Step
Gassfil Ltd
Grace
Grace
Great Central Consulting
Hardstaff Duel Fuel Group
Hardstaff Group
Heat Trace Ltd
Heat Trace Ltd
First name
Shengxiang
Yingji
David
Warren
Joanna
Eduardo
Surname
Yang
Yang
Elizondo
Manning
Bailey
Lazzarotto
First name
Carlos
Eric
Marek
Agata
Emma
Peter
Surname
Azuaga
Keogh
Baranowski
Ciołkosz-Styk
Keogh
Fletcher
Organisation
IDOM
Iges Ltd
IGiK
IGiK
IGS
Infotera Ltd
Dariusz
Ciesla
Integraph
Pennyfather
Organisation
DEG Signal Ltd
Department of Business
Innovation & Skills
Derbyshire County Council
Amanda
Brooks
Rebecca
Rita
Sobczyk
Integraph
Ray
Kent
DMU
Neil
Taylor
Integrated Transport Planning Ltd
Peter
Koukoularides
East Midlands trains
Lee
Butler
Intergraph UK
Sunil
Maher
INTRASME Project
Evtim
Peytchev
Nottingham Trent University
Robert
Mike
Martyn
Anthony
Steve
Jolanta
Alan
Hill
Roberts
Wilkinson
Thompson
Dibnah
Obszynska
Rimmer
Invest Northern Ireland
Isseu Global Ltd
Ivy Link Partnership
KeTech Systems
Leicester City Council
Mark
Bryce
Stirling A
Eddie
Neil
Andrew
Llewelyn
Dumville
Lane
Kimkeran
Griffiths
Fellows
Baxter
Morgan
NSL
Omnicom Engineering
Omnicom Engineering Ltd
Optimisation for Everyone Ltd
Oxford Brooks University
Oxfordshire County Council
Ian
Drummond
Leicestershire County Council
Ben
Smith
Sally
Kowel
LLEP
Andrew
Solebury
Pauley
Christos
Katrakazas
Loughborough University
Richard
Groom
PV Publications
Pete
Alexandra
Thomas
Archibald
M4 Technologies Ltd
Jim
Charles
Lupton
Edgington
Railway Industry Association
Recticel
2
First name
Laurence
Ewa
Surname
Archibald
Janczer
Organisation
M4 Technologies Ltd
Marshalls Office
First name
Emma
Bruce
Surname
Taylor
Renfrew
Organisation
Recticel
Renfrew Group International
Piotr
Popik
Marshalls Office
David
Wells
RIA
Krzysztof
Rodziewicz
Fiona
Buckley
Ringtrack Ltd
Andoni
Arroitajauregi
Marshalls Office
Mobility and Logistics Cluster MLC ITS Euskadi
Ashley
Coles
Ringtrack Ltd
Jose
Viteri
Marco
Petrelli
Roma Tre University (Italy)
Alex
Naylor
Vladimir
Stoijkovic
Satellite Applications Catapult
Sean
Murphy
Neil
Turner
SEC UK Industrial Batteries
Zachary
Naylor
Motech Devices/Northern Ireland
Space Office
Network Rail
Richard
Wilson
Sonobex
Helen
Russell-Emmerson
Northamptonshire County Council
Daniel
Elford
Sonobex Limited
Paul
Andy
Gooch
Powell
Carmen
Neil
Green
Ridley
Transport Systems Catapult
Andrew
Ellwood
Sonobex Limited
Space IDEAS Hub
Staffordshire Alliance - Laing
O'Rourke
Polyvios
Polyviou
TWI Ltd
Giles
Bailey
Stratageeb Limited
Mark
Roughsedge
TWI Ltd
Neil
Brown
Sustainable Envrionment Ltd
Mohsen
Zakikhan
TWI Ltd
Peter
Katherine
Alfredo
Fabrizio
Orban
Rooney
Salvatore
Spallone
Simon
Jo
Richard
Vittorio
Grandidge
Pagett
Isles
Astarita
UK Trade & Investment
UKTI
Ultra Global PRT
UNICAL (Università della Calabria)
Melania
Boitor
Sustrans
Sustrans
Sviluppo Italia Molise
Technical University of ClujNapoca
Sarah
Hainsworth
University of Leicester
Moniteye
3
First name
Surname
First name
Surname
Organisation
Roland
Leigh
Funnell
Hart
Organisation
Technical University of ClujNapoca
Technology Strategy Board
Technology Strategy Board
Rodica
Cadar
Cliff
Stephen
(Maria) Teresa
Alan
Raventos
Wells
Andrew
Cholerton
TRANSEARCH International UK Ltd
Svetlana
Zolotikova
John
David
Frodsham
Pickering
Transport iNet
Transport iNET
Joshua
Emiao
Vandehey
Lu
University of Manchester
Kate
Clement
Transport Innovation Network
Xingchen
Zhang
University of Manchester
Pauline
Graham
Monica
Meini
University of Molise
Georgette
Hall
Rosella
Nocera
Rob
Furlong
Suchith
Anand
University of Nottingham
Adrian
Vinsome
Transport Knowledge Transfer
Network
Transport KTN
Mike
Jackson
Lisa
Davison
University of Ulster
Mohammad
Mesgarpur
Roy
David
Sterritt
Stanners
Urquhart-Dykes & Lord
Chris
Will
Beatie
Boult
University of Nottingham &
Microlise Ltd
We Go Couriers
WITT energy limited
Jutta
Jantunen
VTT Technical Research Centre of
Finland
Martin
Wickett
WITT Limited
David
Wallace
Wallace Executive Ltd/ Homeship
Peter
Soulsby
Leicester City Mayor
Christobal
Carmond
4
12th February 2014
First name
Surname
Organisation
First name
Surname
Jeff
Screeton
5PL
Mick
Trosh
Daniela
Romano
Advanced Computing Research
Centre (ACRC) University of
Sheffield
David
Polhill
Association of Train Operating
Companies (ATOC)
David
Maxime
Philippe
Declan
Phil
Mike
Joe
Alan
Convers
Guibert
Lattes
O'Brien
Laxton
Greenan
Coleman
Scott
Aerospace Valley
Aerospace Valley
Aerospace Valley
Aldolex Irl Ltd
Alstom Transport
Altran UK
Andrew Page LTD
Argon Design
Craig
Daniel
Daniel
Sid
Francisco Jose
Richard
David
James
Brown
Jonas
Jonas
Wells
Viejo Payan
French
Hartland
Mcgilvray
Astrium
Atkins
Atkins
autoCAT one
Ayesa Advanced Technologies
Bombardier Transportation
Brecknell Willis
Bridgelight
James
Catmur
Arthur D Little
Terry
Kirby
Campaign for Better Transport
(Leicestershire)
Ross
Tim
James
Mark
Ian
Martin
Kemp
Abbott
Lewis
Walker
Melton
Parkinson
Asap Water Crafts
Capula
Cardno
Carillion Rail
Castlet Limited
Castlet Limited
Simon
Yuri A.
David
Philip
Clare
David
Hobbs
Vershinin
Burden
Solo
Edwards
Elizondo
Canard Design
Coventry University
Daden Limited
Daden Limited
Dave
Fox
Catapult / Satellite Applications
Catapult
Eric
Goodyer
Dave
Fox
Sarah
Greenfield
Robert
Alan
Evans
Williams
Nadia
Daniel
Omar
Paluszczyszyn
Catapult / Satellite Applications
Catapult
Cenex
Cerulean Visions Ltd
5
Organisation
Association of Chief Police Officers
ITS Working Group
First name
Jacques
Louahdi
Nick
Dave
Michael
Craig
Philip
Andrew
Rick
Surname
Bouffier
Khoudour
Geraghty
Smith
Carrington
Adams
Knight
Parsons
Turner
Organisation
CETE SO
CETE SO
CLC (UK) Ltd
Cobra
Cobra Multi-Clip
Codra Software ltd
Consulting Where
Costain
Costain
First name
Jethro
Zoe
Phil
Shengxiang
Eduardo
Eduardo
Peter
Martin
Stephen
Surname
Shell
Wanstall
Wilson
Yang
Lazzarotto
Lazzarotto
Koukoularides
Knapp
Smith
Organisation
DEG Signal Ltd
DEG Signal Ltd
East Midlands trains
Eaton Power Solutions
Eaton Power Solutions
Peter
Roberts
Costain Group
Nelida
Ancora
E-Geos SPA
Paul
Alexeis
David
Angelique
Fairburn
Garcia-Perez
Clarke
Talbot
Nelida
Geoff
Michael
Martin
Ancora
Haswell
McCool
Hodder
E-Geos SPA
Electro Mechanical Developments
Heat Trace Ltd
Higher Mapping Solutions
Steve
Brownless
Richard
Shaw
Hima-Sella
Mark
Rebecca
Ian
Sean
Nick
Alexander
Ted
Marcus
Rhys
Norman
Mark
Gates
Hutchins
Downey
Marshall
Drake
Wade
Elwes
Mayers
Cowsill
Leece
Stabler
Coventry University
Coventry University
Enabling Innovation Team
Enabling Innovation Team
Environmental Technologies/
Panolin
Eseye
ETI
European Space Agency
Eurosigns (UK)
Eurosigns (UK)
Frazer-Nash Consultancy
Fred.Hippe GmbH
Future Railways
G Step
Gassfill Ltd
GMC Instrumentation
Keith
Carlos
Eric
Emma
Marek
Stephen
Peter
Brian
Dariusz
Rita
Neil
Griffiths
Azuaga
Keogh
Keogh
Baranowski
Hoppe
Fletcher
Tillson
Ciesla
Sobczyk
Taylor
I M Kelly Rail
IDOM
iges ltd
iges ltd
IGiK
Imtech Traffic & Infra UK
Infotera Ltd
Innovus Solutions
Integraph
Integraph
Integrated Transport Planning Ltd
6
First name
Dwayne
Brian
Robin
Paul
Stephen
Surname
Browne
Dewayne
Pointon
Bhatia
Fuller
Organisation
Go Travel Solutions
Go Travel Solutions
Go Travel Solutions
Grace
Grace
First name
Rahul
Michael
Robert
James
Anthony
Surname
Desai
Holroyd
Hill
Elliot
Thompson
Organisation
Interfleet Technology
Inventya
Invest Northern Ireland
IXC UK
KeTech Systems
Paul
Hatherly
Great Central Consulting
Dražen
Žgaljić
Klaster Intemodalnog Prijevoza
(Intermodal Transport Cluster)
Lili
Bob
Nigel
Mark
Sally
Phillip
Toby
Elliotte
Alexandra
Tabiner
Holmes
Moore
Matchett
Kowel
Proctor
Goodwin
Brown
Archibald
Craig
Owen
Steve
Jon
Erik
Benjamin
Simon
Walter
Zachary
Philips
Walters
Dibnah
Diaz
Edmonds
Ford
Green
Harrison
Naylor
Kulawe Ltd
Kulawe Ltd
Network Rail
Network Rail
Network Rail
Network Rail
Network Rail
Kevan
Holloway
Tim
Lane
Network Rail Telecom
Ewa
Piotr
Krzysztof
Ian
Janczer
Popik
Rodziewicz
Briggs
Great Central Railway plc
Green Leader
Green Leader
Hardstaff Group
LLEP
Lloyd's Register Rail
London Underground
M4 Technologies Ltd
Manufacturing Technology
Centre
Marshalls Office
Marshalls Office
Marshalls Office
MCT ReMan Ltd (ETS Division)
Michael
Bryce
Stirling A
Eddie
Hutchinson
Lane
Kimkeran
Griffiths
NSL
Omnicom Engineering
Omnicom Engineering Ltd
Optimisation for Everyone Ltd
Nicky
Morgan
Tim
Armitage
Ove Arup and Partners
Andoni
Arroitajauregi
Neil
Fellows
Alex
Grahame
Naylor
Phipps
Ben
Julian
Smith
Lake
PA Consulting
Member of Parliament for
Loughborough
Moniteye
Moniteye
7
First name
Surname
Organisation
Motech Devices/Northern
Ireland Space Office
First name
Surname
Organisation
Sean
Murphy
Andrew
Solebury
Pauley
Steve
Statham
MTC
National Centre for Universities
and Business (NCUB)
Martin
Wallace
Pauley
Allen
Austin-Bishop
Andy
Dean
Pera Technology
Joe
Marshall
National Centre for Universities
and Business (NCUB)
Wallace
Graham
Perudo
Jim
Ian
Morven
Rebecca
Jim
Allenden
Ambrose
Harrison
Kearl
Lupton
Network Rail
Network Rail
Progress Rail Services UK
Jonne
John
Don
Andy
Trevor
Ceserani
Hammond
Pitman
Powell
Oakley
David
Wells
Andrew
Ellwood
Power and Grace
Pre Cast Advanced Track
Skanska Construction
Space IDEAS Hub
Spherical Systems
Staffordshire Alliance- Laing
O'Rourke
Barbara
Rod
Bill
Bill
Charles
Emma
Gabrielle
Paul
Bruce
Fiona
Ashley
Marco
Michael
Williams
Fox
Hopkins
Hopkins
Edgington
Taylor
Hammond
McWhinnie
Renfrew
Buckley
Coles
Petrelli
Healy
Re Valuetech LTD
Re Valuetech LTD
Re Valuetech LTD
Recticel
Recticel
Renaissance
Renaissance
Renfrew Group International
Ringtrack Ltd
Ringtrack Ltd
Roma Tre University (Italy)
Rowe Hankins
Nick
John
Alex
Alfredo
Fabrizio
Melania
Rodica
Jolyon
Richard
Emiao
Xingchen
Philip
Andrew
Trigg
Robinson
Johns
Salvatore
Spallone
Boitor
Cadar
White
Carr
Lu
Zhang
Mason
Cholerton
8
STFC
Subscan Technology
Sustainable Environment Ltd
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
Testudo-Innovation llp
Thales GTS
The University of Manchester
The University of Manchester
Tibco Software
TRANSEARCH International UK Ltd
First name
Surname
Organisation
First name
Surname
Alan
Horrocks
Safety Gravel Ltd
David
Sexton
Jim
Vladimir
Neil
Hammond
Stoijkovic
Turner
SEC UK Industrial Battery
John
Kate
Pauline
Frodsham
Clement
Graham
Transport iNet
David
Heesom
Seeable LLP
Rob
Furlong
Transport Knowledge Transfer
Network
John
Ingram
Transport KTN
Paul
Allen
University of Huddersfield, IRR
Adrian
Kuldeep
John
Andy
Kevin
Polyvios
Mark
Mohsen
Simon
Karyn
Paul
Vinsome
Gharatya
Mooney
Lumby
Richardson
Polyviou
Roughsedge
Zakikhan
Grandidge
Barnes
Griffiths
Transport KTN
TRE
TRW Conekt
TWI Ltd
TWI Ltd
TWI Ltd
UK Trade & Investment
UK Trade and Investment
UK Tram
Sarah
Roland
Paul
Teresa
Alan
Svetlana
Monica
Rosella
Suchith
Mike
Neale
Hainsworth
Leigh
Monks
Raventos
Wells
Zolotikova
Meini
Nocera
Anand
Jackson
Ryan
Karyn
Barnes
UKTI
Mohammad
Mesgarpur
University of Nottingham &
Microlise Ltd
David
Bob
Marron
Beaumont
Ultra PRT
Unipart Rail
Lisa
David
Davison
Stanners
Neil
Tinworth
Unipart Rail
Jutta
Jantunen
David
Steven
Moorhouse
Lua
UnipartDorman
Unitrove
David
Richard
Wallace
Woodburn
9
Organisation
Transport for London (London
Underground)
Urquhart-Dykes & Lord
VTT Technical Research Centre of
Finland
Wallace Executive Ltd/ Homeship
Webro
First name
Aik
Andy
Roger
Martin
Emily
Simon
Craig
Alex
Surname
Lua
Packham
Bromley
Wickett
Barnes
King
Harrison
Roc
Organisation
Unitrove
University of Birmingham
University of Huddersfield
WITT Limited
Woodhouse Communications
Woodhouse Communications
Zep UK - Forward Chemicals
zonegreen
First name
Chris
Will
Mairi
Nick
Paul
Keith
Christopher
Steve
Adam
10
Surname
Beatie
Boult
Wickett
Jones
Morris
Pallett
Pickering
Rogerson
Wilkinson
Organisation
Wego Couriers
WITT energy limited
WITT Limited

PDF, 1.34 MB

Transcription

Similar documents

AVS24 2.4 GHZ Wireless Audio/Video Sender

HEMINEVRIN - Alcohol and Alcoholism

No trophy could ever fully express our

Chaise Lounge

A golden opportunity to A golden opportunity to

Building Capacity, Creating Jobs, Discovering and Developing

New User FFM Marketplace Testing

Exhibition sales brochure Exhibit at the HR Software Showand build

Pookoo Industrial Co., Ltd.

2015 Top Ten News of China`s Paper Industry