VITTA - Infonet 21.2
Transcription
VITTA - Infonet 21.2
The Swedish Model: Innovative learning, innovative spaces & innovative technologies. Polly Graham reports on her visit to a hightech mobile learning school in a poor, crimeridden outer suburb of Stockholm, which breathes fresh life into the futures of disadvantaged youth Ross Tensta Gymnasium is situated in a very poor area of Stockholm, populated by families of immigrants, mostly from North Africa. The school itself is very multicultural, with 95% of its students of non-Swedish ethnicity. Half of these were born in Sweden, but are still mostly considered foreign by the Swedish people. Despite the uneasiness on the streets outside, the school is a light filled emporium of the high tech. An electronic security pass is required by teachers and students to get through the many heavy glass doors and I am immediately aware that little security cameras are trained on my person. The wide, open-plan halls and lobbies are strangely absent of bookshelves and paper, but replaced by small clusters of students working on laptops, around little tables, as if they were in a cafe. It is warm and quiet and beautiful. My vision of School with thirty little people behind desks, lined up in rows, all eyes on the teacher, the School with shelves and shelves of musty books and piles and folders of paper, the School of chalk and whiteboards, the School of shouting and jostling in the cold narrow hallways, suddenly dissolves before my eyes. The Swedish Education Act outlines the fundamental democratic values in education and aims to reflect the Swedish values of egalitarianism. While the government has in the last five years developed a new inspection system and grading system, the pedagogies, learning tasks and assessments are negotiated by each teacher according to the input of the students in each class. Shawn Mendes of Skolverket, the Swedish national agency for education, believes it is exactly this flexibility in providing education to suit students, which best explains the success of the Swedish school model. Another reason might be the 8% of its GDP the Swedish government spends on education, which is around twice that spent by Australia. The School hosts 700 pupils, 64 teachers and 40 support staff and provides two national theoretical programmes including Social Science and Natural Science and two vocational programmes including Nursing/Care and Business. Students from the Science pathway are expected to go on to attend university. All students learn Swedish, English and Mathematics. The similar base education between the different courses makes it easier for students to change courses if they so desire. The school also creates contacts with industries offering internships for students in the hope that they may continue to work for the company upon completion of their schooling. 100% of students get a job upon completion of their studies at this school. According to the school, this is because teachers tell them to believe in themselves. The Ross Tensta Gymnasium is unique compared with any other school in Sweden because it is based on the organisational model and vision of the exclusive Ross School on Long Island, New York. The educational philosophy of the Ross schools is a holistic approach to education, with a focus on integration, the history of each discipline and history as a shared narrative. The school employs a hands-on approach to learning, according to Gardner's Multiple-Intelligences theory in teaching and learning. As well as sharing the school's vision statement and philosophy, Tensta receives extra funding from its American cousins. According to the Ross model, the school is organised into 6 interdisciplinary teacher teams, one for each year level, of which there are 6 team leaders. In this way the focus for learning is not on the subject matter, but on the learning needs of the students. Teachers regularly prepare units, which share the same theme as other subjects so as to help students negotiate between subjects and develop an interdisciplinary understanding of knowledge and learning. The teachers report that by sitting together in this organisational model, they have learnt more about teaching, because each discipline offers a different perspective on pedagogy. In addition to this, there is also a limit of twenty pupils per class, so as to maximise the student to teacher interaction. Students' development is followed through weekly meetings with their Team (class) Leaders and their Domain (subject) Leaders. Teachers, meanwhile, receive in-service training, attend team meetings and continually assess the goals and assignments they set for their students. The team teaching approach creates links between disciplines, as well as aiding the continuity of ideas. This new model has meant that teachers have had to study more to work to this system and participate in yearly professional development. The school works around helping the teachers to help the students, rather than forcing teachers to conform to time-consuming bureaucracy, as happens in most Australian schools. This new vision for the school has lead to decentralisation of the organisational management and fewer meetings; the Vice Principal Kristin Friborg refers to it as 'The Social Efficiency Model'. The school in fact has become a kind of community centre for these students who may otherwise feel they have little place within the fabric of Swedish society. Although there are critics of this model, Ms Friborg believes that 'we need to look at the possibilities, because the obstacles will show up anyhow'. Ross Tensta has a very strong focus on mobile learning. The school is fitted out with a wireless network throughout the campus and numerous lounge areas where students may study and surf the Internet between classes and after school. Using an online portal, teachers set tasks for students, upload resources, and track students' academic progress, while students also submit their assignments paper free. Each student at the school is provided with a laptop, which they are not allowed to take home until the final year of school, so as to avoid theft. Students leave their laptops in special recharging lockers, housed within high-security rooms. In fact a huge amount of money has been spent on security, including Close Circuit Television cameras installed throughout the school. The Swedish media and some authorities disagree with the ethics of this surveillance system, but the school believes it is the only way to maintain such a high-tech school in such an impoverished area. For Ross Tensta, the most important issue is building the computer literacy of disadvantaged students. The school also believes that it is important to give students a sense of accountability. The video surveillance instils the sense that if they do something wrong, they will be accountable for their actions and that the students, in turn, will be safe and protected from violence and theft. Ultimately, the building of cultural familiarity with technology will give these young people the edge as citizens of the 21st century. Another main focus of the Ross model is its focus on wellness. Breakfast and lunch are provided at the school for the students at no cost. The food is prepared on-site and is nutritious and organic. Around 100-150 students have breakfast at school and all students have lunch. According to the Vice-Principal Kirstin Friborg, many poor students come to school without breakfast and therefore cannot fully participate in learning. The school also provides more physical education classes than the standard hours prescribed by the national curriculum, as well as access to school sports teams and other sporting activities. The school feels that a healthy satisfied body feeds a healthy satisfied mind, which is, therefore, better primed for learning. In order to recreate the Ross model, Tensta had to undergo a transformation of its premises to create study halls, spacious interactive classrooms with lots of light, group rooms that create a sense of home and teacher office spaces that favour mobile learning, conversation and the sharing of ideas and resources. Many of the walls in the school were removed and replaced with glass so as to bring in more light and provide greater 'transparency' to build a sense of community, ownership of the space and accountability. Classrooms have glass panelling rather than solid walls and are arranged around central circular lounge style spaces, much like a town square. Here, the ceilings are ten meters high with skylights to watch the clouds passing overhead and to allow the maximum amount of natural light in during the long dark winters. From an architectural point alone, I would love to be a teacher or a student at this school - it is beautiful, creative and functional and creates a sense of calm and productivity. I can see that many students are happy to spend the whole day here, hanging out, doing their homework in groups in the light-filled lounges, rather than return home to a noisy, overcrowded flat where doing homework may be a challenge. The Ross Tensta Gymnasium has gone beyond implementing mobile learning in the classroom. By changing the organisational structure within the school and the syllabus, together with changing the physical spaces within which students can work freely, students really do become central to the learning experience and direct their own learning. Polly Graham