Record of Site Condition # 206833 Record of Site

Transcription

Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # 206833
Record of Site Condition
Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act
Summary
Record of Site Condition Number
Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry
Certification Date
Current Property Use
Intended Property Use
Certificate of Property Use Number
Applicable Site Condition Standards**
Property Municipal Address
206833
29/01/2013
16/10/2012
Commercial
Residential
No CPU
Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,
with Non-potable Ground Water, Coarse
Textured Soil, for Residential property use
185 Bonis Avenue M1T 3W6
Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence
This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has
access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings
with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental
condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.
Contents of this Record of Site Condition
This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from
the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been
submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment.
RSC Information
Each field marked by an asterisk ( * ) must be completed.
Is the property used, or has it ever been used, in whole or in part for an industrial use or as a garage;
a bulk liquid dispensing facility, including a gasoline outlet; or for the operation of dry cleaning equipment? *
Yes
No
Is the property being used or has the property ever been used, in whole or in part
(a) for quarrying to excavate consolidated or unconsolidated aggregate; or
(b) for that aspect of the production of oil and gas consisting of the presence of an oil well or gas well on, in or under the property? *
Yes
No
Is the property currently used for an agricultural or other use, or a community use, an institutional use, a parkland use or a residential use? *
Yes
No
Select Type of RSC *
Phase 1 and 2 RSC
Phase 1 and 2 RSC with RA
Owner Information
Owners' General Information
Submitting Owner's Information
RSC Property Information
Owner's Information
Is the submitting owner(s) a Receiver for the Property? *
Yes
Environmental Condition
Contaminant Concentrations
ESA Information
QP Profile Information
Certification Statement
Supporting Documents
No
Is the submitting owner(s) represented by an Agent? *
Yes
No
Owner Information
Owner's Information
Type of Owner *
Owner Name *
Firm, Corporation or Partnership
Gemterra Developments Corporation
Street Number *
Street Name *
Apt No. /RR No.
200
Consumers Road
805
ESA Information
City, Town or Village *
Province *
Postal Code *
Country
Toronto
Ontario
M2J 4R4
Canada
Submitting Owner's Contact Information
Contact First Name *
Contact Last Name *
Yan
Wang
Phone Number * (including area code) Fax Number (including area code)
Email Address
(416) 498-5585
[email protected]
(416) 498-5586
Owner Information
Property Address
Does the Property have a Municipal Address?
Property Address
Yes
Municipality Information
No
Property Reference Number
Geographical Reference/Area of
RSC Property
Previously Filed RSC(s) and TN(s)
ESA Information
*
Is the property administered by MNR under the Public Lands Act?
*
Yes
No
Street Number * Street Name *
185
Apt No. /RR No.
Bonis Avenue
Province *
Postal Code *
Toronto
Ontario
M1T 3W6
Owner Information
Municipality & Property Address Information
Property Address
Lower or Single Tier Municipality *
Toronto
Tier of Municipality
RSC Property
Single Tier
Toronto District Office
ESA Information
The District Office of MOE *
Address of District Office of MOE
5775 Yonge St., 8th floor, North York ON M2M 4J1
Click here to view the list of municipalities
Owner Information
Municipality & Property Address Information
Property Address
Assessment Roll Number
19-01-11-1-270-07462-0000-03
RSC Property
ESA Information
Property Identifier Number (PIN #)
06105-0247 LT
Owner Information
Geo Reference & Other Properties Details
Geographical References
Property Address
UTM Coordinates
Datum
NAD 83
RSC Property
Zone *
17
Easting *
637,397.00
Northing *
ESA Information
4,849,464.00
Area of RSC Property
Total Area of RSC Property in Hectares *
0.7
Owner Information
Previous Submission Information
Previously Filed Record of Site Condition Number:
Property Address
Previously Filed Transition Notice Number:
RSC Property
ESA Information
Owner Information
Site Condition Information
Other Site Condition Information
Site Conditions for 2011 Generic
Standards
Risk Assessment Information
Property Use and Certification
Date
Additional Ground Water
Information
Remedial Action and Mitigation
Details
Area(s) of Potential Environmental
Concern
Table of Current/Past Property Uses
of Phase One Property
ESA Information
Is the RSC being submitted using the transition provision under Section 21.1 of the Regulation?
Yes
No
*
Owner Information
Standards
Date
Information
Details
Concern
Site Conditions for 2011 Generic Standards
Is Property:
(i) Within an area of natural significance? or
Does Property:
(ii) Include or is adjacent to an area of natural significance or part of such an area? or
(ii) Include land that is within 30 m of an area of natural significance or part of such an area.
*
Yes
No
Soil at the property has:
(i) a pH value for Surface Soil less than 5 or greater than 9 or
(ii) a pH value for Subsurface Soil less than 5 or greater than 11.
*
Yes
No
Is qualified person of the opinion that, given the characteristics of the property and the certifications the
qualified person would be required to make in a record of site condition in relation to the property as specified
in Schedule A, it is appropriate to apply this section to the property? *
Yes
No
ESA Information
What is the intended use of the property? *
Residential
Is the property a shallow soil property?
*
Yes
No
Does the property include or is the property adjacent to a water body or does it include land that is within
30 metres of a water body? *
Yes
No
What is the Assessment/Restoration approach?
*
Background
Full Depth Generic
Stratified
What is the ground water condition for the property?
*
Potable
Non-potable
What is the texture of the soil?
*
Coarse
Medium and Fine
Applicable 2011 Generic Standard Table Number : TABLE 3
Owner Information
Has a Certificate of Property Use (CPU) been issued under section 168.6 of the Act for the RSC property?
Standards
Date
Information
Details
Concern
ESA Information
Yes
No
Owner Information
Property Use and Certification Date
Current Property Use and Certification Date
What is the current use of the property? *
Commercial
Standards
Certification Date *
Date
Information
Details
Concern
ESA Information
2012/10/16
Owner Information
Standards
Data
Information
Additional Ground Water Information
Has municipality been notified of non-potable ground water on site?
Yes
No
Municipality notified of non-potable water by?
QP
Local/Lower tier municipality non-potable water notification date *
2012/12/17
Details
Concern
ESA Information
*
Owner
*
Owner Information
Remedial Action & Mitigation
Standards
Soil Control or Treatment Measures
Identify the estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have
been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the
soil as measured in, or equivalent to, in-ground volume in cubic metres, and indicate the remediation process or
processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.
0
Data
Information
Identify the estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC
property as measured in, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres.
3160 cubic metres removed from the RSC property and not returned.
Details
Concern
Identify the estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the
RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property not
including any soil that may have been remediated off the property and brought back to the property as measured
in, or equivalent to, the in-ground volume in cubic metres.
0
ESA Information
Indicate if any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the
RSC property boundary has been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation.
350 cubic metres of soil within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary that was removed for the purposes of
remediation .
Owner Information
Remedial Action & Mitigation
Standards
Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures
Identify and describe any ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property
prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing; or are or will be required for the
RSC property after the certification date.
None
Data
Information
Identify the estimated volume in litres of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
None
Details
Concern
ESA Information
Other Treatment Measures
Other than the activities identified in the in the Soil or Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures above,
identify any constructed works that, prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing,
were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the
RSC property; or after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement
of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
None
Indicate whether there are any monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or
replacement of any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC
property, after the certification date, and whether any monitoring requirements or requirements for care,
maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works are ground water management measures
or soil management measures.
None
Owner Information
Potential Environmental Concern
Standards
Data
Information
Details
Area(s) of Potential
Environmental Concern
Table of Current/Past Property
Use of Phase One Property
ESA Information
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern
Are there areas of potential environmental concern? *
Yes
No
Click here for Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern Form
Current and Past Property Use
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property
Click here for Table of Current and Past Property Use Form
Owner Information
Contaminants Measured in SOIL
Contaminants Measured in
GROUND WATER
General Information Related to Soil Media
Is there no soil on, in or under the property? *
(Note there is “no soil” if either there is no soil on, in or under the property OR the soil present is not sufficient
to investigate, sample and analyze in a manner which will meet the requirements and objectives
of a phase two environmental site assessment)
Yes
No
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Owner Information
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Contaminant 1-30 *
Measured
*
Type of Measurement *
Concentration
Antimony
Minimum Detectable
Arsenic
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
0.8
7.5
µg/g
Measured
2
18
µg/g
Barium
Measured
58
390
µg/g
Boron (total)
Measured
7
120
µg/g
Boron (Hot Water Soluble)*
Minimum Detectable
0.10
1.5
µg/g
Cadmium
Minimum Detectable
0.5
1.2
µg/g
Chromium Total
Measured
13
160
µg/g
Cobalt
Measured
5.1
22
µg/g
Copper
Measured
12
140
µg/g
Lead
Measured
5
120
µg/g
Molybdenum
Minimum Detectable
0.5
6.9
µg/g
Nickel
Measured
9
100
µg/g
Selenium
Minimum Detectable
0.4
2.4
µg/g
Silver
Minimum Detectable
0.2
20
µg/g
Thallium
Minimum Detectable
0.4
1
µg/g
Uranium
Minimum Detectable
0.5
23
µg/g
Vanadium
Measured
20
86
µg/g
Zinc
Measured
29
340
µg/g
Chromium VI
Minimum Detectable
0.2
8
µg/g
Cyanide (CN-)
Minimum Detectable
0.040
0.051
µg/g
Naphthalene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.6
µg/g
Acenaphthylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.15
µg/g
Acenaphthene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
7.9
µg/g
Fluorene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
62
µg/g
Phenanthrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
6.2
µg/g
Anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.67
µg/g
Fluoranthene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.69
µg/g
Pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
78
µg/g
Benz[a]anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.5
µg/g
Chrysene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
7
µg/g
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Total # of Contaminants 82
Owner Information
Contaminant 31-60 *
Measured
*
Concentration
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Minimum Detectable
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
0.05
0.78
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.78
µg/g
Benzo[a]pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.3
µg/g
Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.38
µg/g
Dibenz[a h]anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.1
µg/g
Benzo[ghi]perylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
6.6
µg/g
Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) ***
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.99
µg/g
Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1****
Measured
9
55
µg/g
Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2
Minimum Detectable
10
98
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
50
300
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
50
2800
µg/g
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
16
µg/g
Vinyl Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.02
0.02
µg/g
Bromomethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Trichlorofluoromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
4
µg/g
Acetone
Minimum Detectable
0.50
16
µg/g
Dichloroethylene, 1,1-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Methylene Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.1
µg/g
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.084
µg/g
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.75
µg/g
Dichloroethane, 1,1-
Minimum Detectable
0.02
3.5
µg/g
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Minimum Detectable
0.50
16
µg/g
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis-
Minimum Detectable
0.02
3.4
µg/g
Chloroform
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.05
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.05
µg/g
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.38
µg/g
Carbon Tetrachloride
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Benzene
Minimum Detectable
0.02
0.21
µg/g
Dichloropropane, 1,2-
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.05
µg/g
Trichloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.061
µg/g
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Owner Information
Contaminant 61-90 *
Measured
*
Concentration
Bromodichloromethane
Minimum Detectable
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
0.05
13
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.50
1.7
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.05
µg/g
Toluene
Measured
0.08
2.3
µg/g
Dibromochloromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.05
9.4
µg/g
Ethylene dibromide
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.05
µg/g
Tetrachloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.28
µg/g
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2-
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.058
µg/g
Chlorobenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
2.4
µg/g
Ethylbenzene
Measured
0.09
2
µg/g
Xylene Mixture
Measured
0.22
3.1
µg/g
Bromoform
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.27
µg/g
Styrene
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.7
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.05
µg/g
Dichlorobenzene, 1,3-
Minimum Detectable
0.05
4.8
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
0.083
µg/g
Minimum Detectable
0.05
3.4
µg/g
Dichloropropene,1,3-
Minimum Detectable
0.04
0.05
µg/g
Hexane (n)
Minimum Detectable
0.05
2.8
µg/g
Mercury
Measured
0.258
0.27
µg/g
Methyl Mercury **
Minimum Detectable
0.0004
0.0084
µg/g
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Minimum Detectable
0.03
0.35
µg/g
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Owner Information
Contaminants Measured in Ground Water
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Ground Water
Contaminant 1-30 *
Measured
*
Concentration
Naphthalene
Minimum Detectable
Acenaphthylene
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
0.20
1400
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.20
1.8
µg/L
Acenaphthene
Minimum Detectable
0.20
600
µg/L
Fluorene
Minimum Detectable
0.20
400
µg/L
Phenanthrene
Minimum Detectable
0.10
580
µg/L
Anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.10
2.4
µg/L
Fluoranthene
Minimum Detectable
0.20
130
µg/L
Pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.20
68
µg/L
Benz[a]anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.20
4.7
µg/L
Chrysene
Minimum Detectable
0.10
1
µg/L
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Minimum Detectable
0.10
0.75
µg/L
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Minimum Detectable
0.10
0.4
µg/L
Benzo[a]pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.01
0.81
µg/L
Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene
Minimum Detectable
0.20
0.2
µg/L
Dibenz[a h]anthracene
Minimum Detectable
0.20
0.52
µg/L
Benzo[ghi]perylene
Minimum Detectable
0.20
0.2
µg/L
Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) ***
Minimum Detectable
0.20
1800
µg/L
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Minimum Detectable
0.1
7.8
µg/L
Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1****
Minimum Detectable
25
750
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
100
150
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
100
500
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
100
500
µg/L
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Measured
2.8
4400
µg/L
Vinyl Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.17
0.5
µg/L
Bromomethane
Minimum Detectable
0.20
5.6
µg/L
Trichlorofluoromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.40
2500
µg/L
Acetone
Measured
220
130000
µg/L
Dichloroethylene, 1,1-
Minimum Detectable
0.30
1.6
µg/L
Methylene Chloride
Minimum Detectable
0.30
610
µg/L
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans-
Minimum Detectable
0.20
1.6
µg/L
Owner Information
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Contaminant 31-60 *
Measured
*
Concentration
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
Minimum Detectable
Minimum Detectable
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Measured
Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis-
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
0.20
190
µg/L
0.30
320
µg/L
44
470000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.20
1.6
µg/L
Chloroform
Minimum Detectable
0.20
2.4
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.20
1.6
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.30
640
µg/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
Minimum Detectable
0.20
0.79
µg/L
Benzene
Measured
0.23
44
µg/L
Dichloropropane, 1,2-
Minimum Detectable
0.20
16
µg/L
Trichloroethylene
Measured
1.2
1.6
µg/L
Bromodichloromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.20
85000
µg/L
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Minimum Detectable
1.0
140000
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.20
4.7
µg/L
Toluene
Measured
0.60
18000
µg/L
Dibromochloromethane
Minimum Detectable
0.10
82000
µg/L
Ethylene dibromide
Minimum Detectable
0.10
0.25
µg/L
Tetrachloroethylene
Minimum Detectable
0.20
1.6
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.10
3.3
µg/L
Chlorobenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.10
630
µg/L
Ethylbenzene
Minimum Detectable
0.10
2300
µg/L
Xylene Mixture
Measured
0.23
4200
µg/L
Bromoform
Minimum Detectable
0.10
380
µg/L
Styrene
Minimum Detectable
0.10
1300
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.10
3.2
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.10
9600
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.10
8
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
0.10
4600
µg/L
Dichloropropene,1,3-
Minimum Detectable
0.10
5.2
µg/L
Hexane (n)
Minimum Detectable
0.20
51
µg/L
Owner Information
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Contaminant 61-90 *
Measured
*
Concentration
Chromium VI
Minimum Detectable
Cyanide (CN-)
Applicable
Standard
Unit Of
Measure
5
140
µg/L
Minimum Detectable
2
66
µg/L
Mercury
Minimum Detectable
0.1
0.29
µg/L
Methyl Mercury **
Measured
0.00103
0.15
µg/L
Antimony
Measured
1.0
20000
µg/L
Arsenic
Measured
2.6
1900
µg/L
Barium
Measured
676
29000
µg/L
Beryllium
Minimum Detectable
0.5
67
µg/L
Boron (total)
Measured
147
45000
µg/L
Cadmium
Measured
0.7
2.7
µg/L
Chromium Total
Measured
22.4
810
µg/L
Cobalt
Measured
20.6
66
µg/L
Copper
Measured
15.5
87
µg/L
Lead
Measured
10.8
25
µg/L
Molybdenum
Measured
25.0
9200
µg/L
Nickel
Measured
44.9
490
µg/L
Selenium
Measured
3.4
63
µg/L
Silver
Minimum Detectable
0.2
1.5
µg/L
Thallium
Measured
0.7
510
µg/L
Uranium
Measured
17.6
420
µg/L
Vanadium
Measured
2.7
250
µg/L
Zinc
Measured
9.2
1100
µg/L
Owner Information
Contaminants Measured in Sediments
Has sediment sampling been conducted at the property?
Yes
No
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
*
Owner Information
Laboratory Information
GROUND WATER
SEDIMENTS
ESA Information
Laboratory Name *
AGAT Laboratories
Owner Information
ESA Information
ESA Reports
Phase One ESA Reports
The date the last work on the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance
components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done.
ESA Information
2012/02/16
Phase Two ESA Reports
Phase One Reports and Other
Documents
Phase Two Reports and Other
Documents
Type of Report *
Phase One ESA
*
Report Title *
Date of Report * Author of Report *
Name of Consulting
Organization
Phase One Environmental
2012/05/15
Site Assessment
Russ Pagulayan
Part Block 3Terraprobe
Plan M2255
Inc.As Part 22 Registe
Owner Information
ESA Information
ESA Reports
The date the last work on the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site
investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done.
ESA Information
2012/10/16
Type of Report *
*
Report Title *
Name of Consulting
Organization
Phase Two ESA
Documents
Documents
Phase Two Environmental
2012/10/30
Site Assessment
Russ Pagulayan
Part Block 3Terraprobe
Plan M2255
Inc.As Part 22 Register
Owner Information
ESA Information
Reports and Other Documents
Phase 1 Reports and Other Documents
List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 1 ESA relied on in certifying
the information set out in Section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 1 ESA
ESA Information
Report Title *
Documents
Documents
Name of Consulting
Organization for Report
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed
2010/08/06
Bonis Avenue
Simon
Residential
Lan
Condominium
Trow Associates
Development
Inc. Bonis Avenue and
Owner Information
ESA Information
Reports and Other Documents
Phase 2 Reports and Other Documents
List the Reports/Documents other than the document(s) used as your Phase 2 ESA relied on in making
any certifications in the RSC in relation to the Phase 2 ESA or otherwise used in conducting the Phase 2 ESA
ESA Information
Report Title *
Documents
Documents
Name of Consulting
Organization for Report
Limited Soil Testing Proposed Bonis Avenue Residential
2010/08/06 Condominium
Clement Development
Chow
Trow
Bonis
Associates
Avenue and
Inc.Kennedy Road Toro
Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Bonis Avenue
2010/08/06
ResidentialClement
Condominium
Chow Development
Trow Associates
bonis Avenue
Inc. and Kennedy Roa
Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Bonis Avenue
2011/05/24
ResidentialClement
Condominium
Chow Development
Exp Services
bonisInc.
Avenue and Kennedy Roa
Owner Information
QP Information
First Name *
Russ
Which one of the following licences under
the Professional Engineers Act do you hold? *
ESA Information
Middle Name
Licence
Last Name *
Pagulayan
Licence Number *
90524018
Which one of the following memberships under
the Professional Geoscientists Act do you hold? *
QP Information
Is the QP Employed? *
Yes
Employer Name *
Terraprobe Inc.
No
QP Contact Information
Phone Number *
(905) 796-2650
Fax Number *
(905) 796-2250
Email *
[email protected]
QP Mailing Address Information
Street Number *
Street Name *
11
Indell Lane
Apt No. / RR No.
Province *
Postal Code *
Brampton
Ontario
L6T 3Y3
Owner Information
QP Certification Statement D
As the qualified person, I certify that: *
ESA Information
A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information
gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has
been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as
required by the regulation.
A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the
information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required,
has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as
required by the regulation.
The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only
and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.
As of 2012/10/16, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental
site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling,
there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under
the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property
will be put, as specified in the RSC.
QP Certification Statement
Owner Certification Statement
Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the
supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition,
given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the
clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier
municipality in which the property is located.
As of 2012/10/16, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase
two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the
applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation
for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which
this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum
Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.
As of 2012/10/16, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant
in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been
performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to
Applicable Site Condition Standards.
I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.
I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.
I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site
condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains
a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own
due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information
in the Registry.
The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally
accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science
profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.
I do not hold and have not held
a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property
which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment
or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based
To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC
are true as of 2012/10/16.
By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.
I, the qualified person named below, on the date stated below, make all of the stated certifications applicable to
the qualified person in this Part of the record of site condition.
Russ Pagulayan
2013/01/17
Owner Information
ESA Information
QP Certification Statement
Click here to download Firm, Corp, Other Form
Owner Information
Please note, only PDF attachments will be accepted with the exception of the
Property Specific Standard, which must be an Excel document.
Certificate of Status or equivalent *
CertofStatus.pdf
ESA Information
Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property *
LawyersLetter.pdf
Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) *
TransferDeed.pdf
A Current plan of Survey *
PlanofSurvey.pdf
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern *
APECTable.pdf
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property *
TableofCandPUses.pdf
Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model *
PhaseTwoCSM.pdf
Owner Certification Statement *
OwnerCerts.pdf
RequestID:
014973504
Demanden˚:
TransactionID:49761242
Transactionn˚:
CategoryID:
CT
Catégorie:
ProvinceofOntario
Provincedel'Ontario
MinistryofGovernmentServices
MinistèredesServicesgouvernementaux
DateReportProduced:2013/01/17
Documentproduitle:
TimeReportProduced:09:53:21
Impriméà:
CERTIFICATEOFSTATUS
ATTESTATIONDUSTATUTJURIDIQUE
Thisistocertifythataccordingtothe
recordsoftheMinistryofGovernment
Services
D'aprèslesdossiersduMinistèredes
Servicesgouvernementaux,nousattestons
quelasociété
GEMTERRA DEVELOPMENTS CORPORATION
OntarioCorporationNumber
Numéromatriculedelasociété(Ontario)
002256127
isacorporationincorporated,
amalgamatedorcontinuedunder
thelawsoftheProvinceofOntario.
estunesociétéconstituée,prorogéeounée
d'unefusionauxtermesdesloisdela
Provincedel'Ontario.
Thecorporationcameintoexistenceon
Lasociétéaétéfondéele
SEPTEMBER 08 SEPTEMBRE, 2010
andhasnotbeendissolved.
etn'estpasdissoute.
Dated
Faitle
JANUARY 17 JANVIER, 2013
Director
Directrice
The issuance of this certificate in electronic form is authorized by the
La dÕlivrance du prÕsent certificat sous forme Õlectronique est autorisÕe par la
Director of Companies and Personal Property Security Branch. Directrice de la Direction des compagnies et des s«retÕs mobiliÒres.
TAN & ASSOCIATES
BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS
1315 LAWRENCE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 506, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA, M3A 3R3
TELEPHONE: (416) 443-8600, FAX NO. (416) 443-8688
[email protected]
November 23, 2012
Our file No.2011-018
Terraprobe Consulting Engineers
11 Indell Lane
Brampton, Ontario, L6T 3 Y3
Attention to: Mr. Russ Pagulayan
Re:
We are solicitors for Gemterra Developments Corporation (the "Owner") in connection with the
development of the Love Condominium Project at 185 Bonis Avenue, in the City of Toronto (the
"Development").
We have been requested to provide the following information to support the filing of the
Record of Site Condition for the Development on behalf of the Owner:
1. We confirm that the legal description of the Development's property is the following:
PIN: 06105-0247 (LT) Interest/Estate Fee Simple
Legal Description: Part Block 3 Plan M2255 Designated as Part 22 on Plan 66R21456; CITY OF
TORONTO
2. We confirm that the Owner changed its name from Cheng Yi Developments Corporation to
Gemterra Developments Corporation on September 23, 2010, and the Owner is a corporation
duly incorporated and validly existing under the laws of the Province of Ontario. Please find
enclosed a copy of the Articles of Amendment dated September 23, 2010 and a Certificate of
Status issued by the Ministry of Government Services dated November 8, 2012.
3. We confirm that the following are the officers of the Owner:
•
•
•
•
President - Zhendong Wang;
Secretary-Treasurer- Yan Zhuang;
Vice-President - Yan Wang and Yuzhi Shi; and
Authorized Signing Officer - Yan Wang.
4. We confirm that the Assessment Roll Numbers for the Development's Property is
19-01-11-1-270-07462-0000-03
5. We confirm that attached to this letter are a copy of the Transfer which was duly registered
on title on September 10,2010 as Instrument No. AT2501740 and a copy of the Application to
Change Name-Owners which was registered on March 8, 2011 as Instrument No. AT2637550.
6. We confirm that we have reviewed the Plan of Survey prepared by Robert Wiegenbroker at
Krcmar Surveyors Ltd., Ontario Land Surveyors, dated November 20th, 2012; and we confirm
that said Plan of Survey and the attached Transfer are of the same property.
Yours very truly,
TAN & ASSOCIATES
LRO # 80
Receipted as AT2501740 on 20100910
Transfer
yyyy mm dd
The applicant(s) hereby applies to the Land Registrar.
at 16:55
Page 1 of2
I
Properties
06105 - 0247 LT
PIN
InterestlEstate
Fee Simple
Description
PART BLOCK 3 PL M2255 DES AS PART 22 ON PL 66R21456; CITY OF TORONTO.
Address
TORONTO
I
Consideration
Consideration
$ 8,360,000.00
I
Transferor(s)
The transferor(s) hereby transfers the land to the transferee(s).
Name
1098748 ONTARIO LIMITED
Address for Service
Agincourt Mall
3850 Sheppard Avenue East
Suite 238
Scarborough, Ontario
M1T 3L4
I, Cecilia Y.T. Lau, President, have the authority to bind the corporation.
This document is not authorized under Power of Attorney by this party.
I
Capacity
Transferee(s)
Name
CHENG YI DEVELOPMENTS CORPORATION
Address for Service
73 Larkfield Drive
Toronto, Ontario
M3B 2H4
Share
STATEMENT OF THE TRANSFEROR (S): The transferor(s) verifies that to the best of the transferor's knowledge and belief, this
transfer does not contravene the Planning Act.
STATEMENT OF THE SOLICITOR FOR THE TRANSFEROR (S): I have explained the effect of the Planning Act to the transferor(s)
and I have made inquiries of the transferor(s) to determine that this transfer does not contravene that Act and based on the
information supplied by the transferor(s), to the best of my knowledge and belief, this transfer does not contravene that Act. I am an
Ontario solicitor in good standing.
STATEMENT OF THE SOLICITOR FOR THE TRANSFEREE (S): I have investigated the title to this land and to abutting land where
relevant and I am satisfied that the title records reveal no contravention as set out in the Planning Act, and to the best of my
,
knowledge and belief this transfer does not contravene the Planning Act. I act independently of the solicitor for the transferor(s) and I
am an Ontario solicitor in good standing.
!SignedBY
John Andrew Ross Collingwood
Tel
4163621812
Fax
4168680673
Box 48 Suite 5300, Td Bank Tower
Toronto
M5K 1E6
acting for
Transferor(s)
Signed
20100910
Signed
20100910
I am the solicitor for the transferor(s) and I am not one and the same as the solicitor for the transferee(s).
I have the authority to sign and register the document on behalf of the Transferor(s).
Ping-Teng Tan
Tel
416-443-8600
Fax
4164438688
506-1315 Lawrence Ave. East
Toronto
M3A3R3
acting for
Transferee(s)
I am the solicitor for the transferee(s) and I am not one and the same as the solicitor for the transferor(s).
I have the authority to sign and register the document on behalf of the Transferee(s).
LRO # 80
Transfer
Receipted as AT2501740 on 20100910
yyyy mm dd
at 16:55
Page 2 of 2
ISubmitted By
Toronto
M3A3R3
TAN & ASSOCIATES
Tel
416-443-8600
Fax
4164438688
IFeeslTaxes/Payment
Statutory Registration Fee
$60.00
Provincial Land Transfer Tax
$123,875.00
Municipal Land Transfer Tax
$123,125.00
Total Paid
$247,060.00
IFile Number
Transferor Client File Number:
206725-423193
Transferee Client File Number:
2010-035
20100910
. PROVINCIAL AND MUNICIPAL LAND TRANSFER TAX STATEMENTS
In the matter of the conveyance of:
06105 - 0247 PART BLOCK 3 PL M2255 DES AS PART 22 ON PL 66R21456; CITY OF
TORONTO.
BY:
1098748 ONTARIO LIMITED
TO:
%(all PINs)
1. ZHENDONG WANG
lam
o(a) A person in trust for whom the land conveyed in the above-described conveyance is being conveyed;
o(b) A trustee named in the above-described conveyance to whom the land is being conveyed;
o(c) A transferee named in the above-described conveyance;
o(d) The authorized agent or solicitor acting in this transaction for _ _ described in paragraph(s) U above.
o (e)DEVELOPMENTS
The President, Vice-President, Manager, Secretary, Director, or Treasurer authorized to act for CHENG YI
CORPORATION described in paragraph(s) (c) above.
o_
(f) A transferee described in paragraph ( ) and am making these statements on my own behalf and on behalf of
_ who is my spouse described in paragraph U and as such, I have personal knowledge of the facts herein
deposed to.
2. I have read and considered the definition of "single family residence" set out in subsection 1(1) of the Act. The land being conveyed
herein:
does not contain a single family residence or contains more than two single family residences.
3. The total consideration for this transaction is allocated as follows:
(a) Monies paid or to be paid in cash
8,360,000.00
(b) Mortgages (i) assumed (show principal and interest to be credited against purchase price)
(ij) Given Back to Vendor
0.00
(c) Property transferred in exchange (detail below)
(d) Fair market value of the land(s)
0.00
0.00
0.00
(e) Liens, legacies, annuities and maintenance charges to which transfer is subject
0.00
(f) Other valuable consideration subject to land transfer tax (detail below)
(g) Value of land, building, fixtures and goodwill subject to land transfer tax (total of (a) to
0.00
(f»
8,360,000.00
(h) VALUE OF ALL CHATIELS - items of tangible personal property
0.00
(i) Other considerations for transaction not included in (g) or (h) above
0.00
(j) Total consideration
8,360,000.00
PROPERTY Information Record
A. Nature of Instrument:
Transfer
LRO 80
B. Property(s):
Registration No.
AT2501740
Date: 2010109/10
PIN 06105 - 0247 Address
TORONTO
C. Address for Service:
73 Larkfield Drive
Toronto, Ontario
M3B 2H4
D. (i) Last Conveyance(s):
PIN 06105 - 0247
Registration No.
AT721705
(ii) Legal Description for Property Conveyed: Same as in last conveyance? Yes
E. Tax Statements Prepared By:
Ping-Teng Tan
506-1315 Lawrence Ave.
East
Toronto M3A 3R3
Assessment
Roll No
0
No
0
Not known
0
LRO # 80
Application To Change Name-Owners
Receipted as AT2637550 on 2011 03 08
yyyy mm dd
at 11:19
Page 1 of 3
I
Properties
06105 - 0247 LT
PIN
Description
PART BLOCK 3 PL M2255 DES AS PART 22 ON PL 66R21456; CITY OF TORONTO.
Address
TORONTO
I
Party From(s)
Name
Address for Service
73 Larkfield Drive, Toronto, Ontario, M38 2H4
I
Capacity
Applicant(s)
Name
GEMTERRA DEVELOPMENTS CORPORATION
Address for Service
73 Larkfield Drive, Toronto, Ontario, M3B 2H4
Share
I, Zhendong Wang, have the authority to bind the corporation
This document is not authorized under Power of Attorney by this party.
I_S_t_a_te_m_e_n_t_s
I
The name has changed as a result of Articles of Amendment and this statement is made for no improper purpose.
Schedule: See Schedules
I
Signed By
Toronto
M3A3R3
Ping-Teng Tan
Tel
416-443-8600
Fax
4164438688
acting for
Applicant(s)
Signed
20110307
I have the authority to sign and register the document on behalf of the Applicant(s).
I
Submitted By
Toronto
M3A3R3
TAN & ASSOCIATES
Tel
416-443-8600
Fax
4164438688
I
Fees/Taxes/Payment
Statutory Registration Fee
$60.00
Total Paid
$60.00
I
File Number
Party From Client File Number:
2011-018
Applicant Client File Number:
2011-018
20110308
,
~~~inistere
I:J!:!:,. -'~ove~nrriimt Se'ivlces
" Ontano
CE R T J FI C AT
a:
.
This,is to certify tha~, these artic;les
af.(effective on
Onlario Corporation Number
Numero de Ie sociele en Onlario
Mlnlsl6re des
Services gouvernementaux,
,
2256127
CE RT IF J CAt
CecL!=ertifie que les pr(l~nts statuts
"entrenten vlgueurle
'SEPTEMBER 2' 3 SEPTEMBRE, 2O~O-
. . . . . . . . . . . · · · · . Z··v
:
.
Director i Dire.ctrf
Buslneas Corporat!on!!·Pict I LOI SU~,l' _
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
STATUTS DE MODIFICATION
Form:l
1.
Business
Corporations
Act
The name of the corporation is: (Set out in BLOCK CAPITAL LElTERS)
Denomination sociale actuelle de la societe (ecrire en LEn-RES MAJUSCULES SEULEMENT) :
C H E N G
Formule :I
y
I
D E V E L 0 P M E N T S
C 0 R P 0 R A T
I
I 0 N
Loisur/es
societes par
actions
2.
The name of the corporation is changed to (if applicable): (Set out in BLOCK CAPITAL LElTERS)
Nouvelle denomination sodale de la sOciete (s'il y a lieu) (eenre en LETIRES MAJUSCULES SEULEMENT) .
G E M T E R R A
D E V E L 0 P ME N T S
C 0 R
plo
R A T
I 0 N
3.
Date ofincorporationlamalgamation:
Date de la constitution ou de la fusion:
2010/09/08
(year, Month, Day)
(annee. mois, jour)
4.
5.
Complete only if there Is a change In the number of directors or the minimum I maximum number of directors.
II faut rempllr cette partie seulement sl Ie nombre d'adminlstrateurs ou slle nombre minimal ou maximal
d'adminlstrateurs a change.
Number of directors is/are:
Nombre d'administrateurs :
minimym and maximum number of directors is/are:
nombres minimum at maximum d'administrateurs :
Number
Nombre
minimum
minimum
and
at
maximum
maximum
or
ou
The articles of the corporation are amended as follows:
Les staMs de la societe sont modifies de la favon sUivante :
The corporation name is changed from CHENG YI DEVELOPMENTS
CORPORATION to GEMTERRA DEVELOPMENTS CORPORATION
07119 (2008106)
@ Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2008 /@ Imprimeur de la Reine pour l'Ontario, 2008
Page 1 of/de 2
6.
The amendment has been duly authorized as required by sections 168 and 170 (as applicable) ofthe Business
Corporations Act.
La modification a ete dOment autorisee conformement aux articles 168 et 170 (selon Ie cas) de la Loi sur les
sociBlas par actions.
7.
The resolution authorizing the amendment was approved by the shareholders/directors (as applicable) of the
corporation on
Les actionnaires ou les administrateurs (selon Ie cas) de la societe ont approuve la resolution autorisant la
modification Ie
2010/09/22
(Year, Month, Day)
(annee, mois, jour)
These articles are signed in duplicate.
Les presents s.tatuts sont signes en double exemplaire.
CHENG Yl DEVELOPMENTS CORPORATION
(Print name of corporation from Article 1 on page 1)
(VeuDiez ecrir Ie nom de la societe de "article un a la page une).
Chief Executive Officer/Chair
(Description of Office)
(Fonellon)
07119 (2008/06)
Page 2 of/de 2
LEGEND
Phase One/Two Property
Record of Site Condition Property
TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN
(Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)
Area of Potential
Environmental
Concern
Location of Area of
Potential Environmental
Concern on Phase One
Property
Potentially Contaminating Activity
Northern Portion of
Record
of
Site
Condition
Property
approximately 1200 m2
Northern portion of Phase
One Property
Sched D, Table 2, Item 30 (Importation
of Fill Material of Unknown Quality).
Area
of
building
footprint near northern
property boundary of
Record
of
Site
Condition
Property
North Central
RSC property
Location of
PCA (on-site
or off-site)
Contaminants of
Potential Concern
Media Potentially
Impacted
On-site
Mercury
Soil
On-site
Petroleum
Hydrocarbon
Fractions, VOCs, Metals
Soil
Impactd soil identified in the fill material.
Portion
of
Sched D, Table 2, Item 28 (Gasoline and
Associated Products Storage in fixed
Tanks)
Ground water
Sched D, Table 2, Item 52 (Storage,
maintenance, fuelling and repair of
equipment, vehicles and materials used
to maintain transportation systems).
Underground storage tank and fueling
pump.
North East portion of
Phase One Property
North East portion of Phase
Two property
Sched D, Table 2, Item 30 (Importation
of Fill Material of Unknown Quality).
Impactd soil identified in the fill material.
Off-site of the
Record of Site
Condition
Property
Polychlorinated Bi-Phenyls
and Mercury
Soil
Notes:
1 - Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present,
as determined through the phase one environmental site assessment, including through,
(a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and
(b) identification of potentially contaminating activity.
2 - Potentially Contaminating Activity means a use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a
phase one study area
3 - when completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the
"Protocol for in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified
below:
ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical Conductivity SAR
CPs PAHs As, Sb, Se Cr (VI)
1,4-Dioxane THMs Na Hg
Dioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B-HWS Methyl Mercury
OCs BTEX Cl- high pH
PHCs Ca, Mg CN- low pH
4 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached
**Cette publication hautement spécialisée n’est disponible qu’en anglais en vertu du règlement 671/92, qui en exempte l’application de
la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en francais, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère de l’Environnement au 1800-461-6290
"TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY"
(Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04)
Year
Property
1799 185 Bonis Avenue
Name of Owner
Margaret Ryckman
Joseph Smith
Samuel Kennedy
James Kennedy
Samuel J. Kennedy
Abel Ingleton
George Spakhall
William G. Sparkhall
Description of
Property Use
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Other Observations from Aerial Photographs,
Fire Insurance Plans, Etc.
Title Search, no other information available.
Assumed agricultural land use because it has the
most strigent land use criteria.
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Property Use
Year
Property
Name of Owner
Description of
Property Use
Property Use
Director, Veterans' Land Act
Agricultural
Agricultural
Director, Veterans' Land Act
Golf Course
Commercial
Golf Course
Commercial
Golf Course
Commercial
Golf Course
Commercial
Sparkhall & Company Limited, as
trustee
Golf Course
Commercial
Marathon Realty Company Limited
Mundet Industries Limited
c.o.b.(formerly Sparkhall & Co) as
Agincourt Mall Partnership
Commercial
Commercial
Marathon Realty Company Limited
3024717 Canada Inc.
Commercial
Commercial
1098748 Ontario Limited
Commercial
Commercial
1098748 Ontario Limited
Commercial
Commercial
1954 Aerial Photography shows buildings on the
property. Assumed commercial and assumed no
change in the property owner.
Assumed commercial.
1960 Aerial Photography shows buidlings on the
property. Assumed commercial and assumed no
change in the property owner
1971 Aerial Photography shows buildings on the
properties and no other significant changes.
Assumed commercial.
Only the title search was available, no
information from other sources. Assumed no
change in property use.
Only the title search was availabel, no
Year
Property
Name of Owner
Description of
Property Use
Property Use
Cheng Yi Developments Corporation
Development on
property expected Commercial
Development on
property expected Commercial
Notes:
1 - for each owner, specify one of the following types of property use (as defined in O.Reg. 153/04) that applies:
Agriculture or other use
Commercial use
Community use
Industrial use
Institutional use
Parkland use
Residential use
2 - when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached
**Cette publication hautement spécialisée n’est disponible qu’en anglais en vertu du règlement 671/92, qui en exempte l’application de la Loi
sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en francais, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère de l’Environnement au 1-800-461-6290
Terraprobe
Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering
Construction Materials Inspection & Testing
PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
PART BLOCK 3 PLAN M2255 AS PART 22
REGISTERED PLAN 66R-21456
185 BONIS AVENUE
TORONTO, ONTARIO
File No 13-12-2015
Dated January 17, 2013
©Terraprobe Inc.
Terraprobe Inc.
Greater Toronto
Hamilton – Niagara
Central Ontario
Northern Ontario
11 Indell Lane
Brampton, Ontario L6T 3Y3
(905) 796-2650 Fax: 796-2250
903 Barton Street, Unit 22
Stoney Creek, Ontario L8E 5P5
(905) 643-7560 Fax: 643-7559
220 Bayview Drive, Unit 25
Barrie, Ontario L4N 4Y8
(705) 739-8355 Fax: 739-8369
1012 Kelly Lake Rd., Unit 1
Sudbury, Ontario P3E 5P4
(705) 670-0460 Fax: 670-0558
www.terraprobe.ca
Phase Two ESA Conceptual Site Model
Part Block 3 Plan M2255 as part 22 Registered Plan 66R-21456
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
1.0
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1
1.1
Property Description ........................................................................................................... 1
2.0
INFORMATION FROM THE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT .......... 3
2.1
Areas Where Potentially Contaminating Activity has occurred ......................................... 3
2.2
Areas of Potential Environmental Concern ........................................................................ 3
2.3
Subsurface Structures and Utilities ..................................................................................... 4
3.0
PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY ........................................................ 5
3.1
Site Stratigraphy ................................................................................................................. 5
3.1.1 Surficial Materials.................................................................................................. 5
3.1.2 Fill Materials .......................................................................................................... 5
3.1.3 Sand and Silt .......................................................................................................... 5
3.1.4 Sand ....................................................................................................................... 5
3.1.5 Silt .......................................................................................................................... 6
3.2
Site Hydrogeological Characteristics .................................................................................. 6
3.2.1 Groundwater Hydraulic Gradients ......................................................................... 6
3.3
Section 41 or 43.1 ............................................................................................................... 7
3.4
Soils Placed On, In or Under the Record of Site Condition Property ................................. 7
3.5
Proposed Buildings ............................................................................................................. 7
4.0
CONTAMINATION IN OR UNDER THE RECORD OF SITE CONDITION PROPERTY ....... 8
4.1
Areas Where Contaminants are Present .............................................................................. 8
4.2
Contaminants Associated with Each Area .......................................................................... 8
4.3
Medium in Which Contaminant are Associated ................................................................. 9
4.4
Information Known about Each Contaminated Area.......................................................... 9
4.5
Reasons for Discharge of Contaminant ............................................................................ 10
4.6
Migration of contaminant ................................................................................................. 10
4.7
Climatic or Meteorological Influences on Migration ....................................................... 10
4.8
Soil Vapour Intrusion into Buildings ................................................................................ 10
4.9
Relevant Construction Features of Buildings ................................................................... 10
4.10
Building HVAC ................................................................................................................ 11
4.11
Subsurface Structures and Utilities ................................................................................... 11
5.0
POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS.................................................... 12
5.1
Description of All Components ........................................................................................ 12
5.2
Receptor Human Health.................................................................................................... 13
5.3
Receptor Terrestrial Environment..................................................................................... 13
5.4
Receptor Aquatic Environment......................................................................................... 14
5.5
Summary of Potential Receptor Risks .............................................................................. 14
Terraprobe
Page No ii
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
FIGURES
Figure 1 – Site Location Plan
Figure 2 – Areas of Potential Environmental Concern
Figure 3 – Borehole and Monitoring Well Location Plan
Figure 4 – Cross Section A – A’
Figure 5 – Soil Exceedances
Figure 6 – Ground Water Exceedances
Figure 7 – Further Delineation (September 14, 2012)
Figure 8 – Cross Section B – B’ Vertical Extent of Delineation
Figure 9 – Final Remediation Record of Site Condition Property (October 16, 2012)
Figure 10 – Cross Section B – B’
Figure 11 – Pathways and Receptors
APPENDICIES
Appendix A – Plan of Survey
Appendix B – Borehole Logs
Appendix C – Grain Size
Terraprobe
Page No iii
1.0
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
INTRODUCTION
The following document presents the Phase Two Conceptual Site Model for the Phase Two Property
which consists of:
a) Pin 06105-0247 LT Interest/Estate Fee Simple
Description PART BLOCK 3 PL M2255 DES AS PART 22 ON PL 66R21456; CITY OF
TORONTO
Address: 185 Bonis Avenue, TORONTO
Assessment Roll Number 19-01-11-1-270-07462-0000-03
The Record of Site Condition Property is identified as Part 1 on the Plan of survey by Krcmar Surveyors
Ltd. Dated November 20, 2012. The Plan of survey is located in the Appendix A.
1.1
Property Description
The Phase Two Property consists of a vacant block of land located within the City of Toronto, and is
bounded to the north and east by Bonis Avenue, a City of Toronto Public Library to the West, and the
parking lot for Agincourt Mall to the south. The land has been subdivided for the purposes of this Record
of Site Condition Submission. The general site location is shown on Figure 1.
Several investigations have occurred on the property. The following is a list of the investigations that
have been completed since 2010.
•
•
•
•
•
Trow Associates Inc., “Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Bonis Avenue
Residential Condominium Development Bonis Avenue and Kennedy Road Toronto, Ontario”,
dated August 6, 2010, prepared in Trust for Zhendong Wang, File BRM-00500611-A0.
Trow Associates Inc., “Limited Environmental Soil Testing Proposed Bonis Avenue Residential
Condominium Development Bonis Avenue and Kennedy Road Toronto, Ontario”, dated August
6, 2010, prepared in Trust for Zhendong Wang, File BRM-00500644-A0.
Trow Associates Inc., “Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Bonis Avenue Residential
Condominium Development Bonis Avenue and Kennedy Road Toronto, Ontario”, dated August
6, 2010, prepared in Trust for Zhendong Wang, File BRM-00500644-A0.
Exp Services Inc., “Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Bonis Avenue Residential
Condominium Development Bonis Avenue and Kennedy Road Toronto, Ontario”, dated May 24,
2011, prepared for Gemterra Developments Corporation, File BRM-00500644-B0.
Terraprobe Inc., “Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Part Block 3 Plan M2255 As Part 22
Registered Plan 66R-21456 Toronto, Ontario” dated May 15, 2012, prepared for Gemterra
Developments Corporation, File 13-12-2015.
Terraprobe
Page No 1
•
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
Terraprobe Inc. “Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Part Block 3 Plan M2255 As Part 22
Registered Plan 66R-21456 Toronto, Ontario” dated October 30, 2012, prepared for Gemterra
Developments Corporation, File 13-12-2015.
During the assessment of the Record of Site Condition property, there were no buildings present on the
site and would generally be described as undeveloped.
Terraprobe
Page No 2
2.0
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
INFORMATION FROM THE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE
ASSESSMENT
2.1
Areas Where Potentially Contaminating Activity has occurred
Potentially contaminating activities had been identified in the Phase One ESA for the site. The potentially
contaminating activities had occurred on specific portions of the Record of Site Condition Property. The
following is the land use is associated with the following potentially contaminating activities:
•
•
•
#52 Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles, and material used to
maintain transportation systems
#28 Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
#30 Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality
Contaminants of concern associated with the potentially contaminating activities include:
•
•
•
•
•
Petroleum Hydrocarbons.
Metals and Inorganics.
Volatile Organic Compounds.
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons.
Polychlorinated Bi-Phenyls.
There were no significant potentially contaminating activities on the adjacent properties.
2.2
Areas of Potential Environmental Concern
The potentially contaminating activities and Areas of Potential environmental concern at the Record of
Site Condition, Phase Two Property and in the Study Area are presented in the following table and shown
on Figure 2.
Area of
Potential
Environmental
Concern
APEC-1
Location of Area of
Potential
Environmental
Concern on RSC
and Phase Two
Property
Northern portion
RSC property.
of
Potentially Contaminating
Activity
Sched D, Table 2, Item 30
(Importation of Fill Material of
Unknown Quality).
Location
of PCA
(on-site or
off-site)
On-site
Contaminants
of Potential
Concern
Mercury
Media
Potentially
Impacted
Soil
Impactd soil identified in the fill
material.
Terraprobe
Page No 3
Area of
Potential
Environmental
Concern
APEC-2
Location of Area of
Potential
Environmental
Concern on RSC
and Phase Two
Property
Potentially Contaminating
Activity
North Central Portion
of RSC property
(Gasoline
and
Associated
Products Storage in fixed Tanks)
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
Location
of PCA
(on-site or
off-site)
On-site
(Storage, maintenance, fuelling
and repair of equipment, vehicles
and materials used to maintain
transportation systems).
Contaminants
of Potential
Concern
Media
Potentially
Impacted
Petroleum
Hydrocarbon
Fractions, VOCs,
Metals
Soil
Polychlorinated
Bi-Phenyls and
Mercury
Soil
Ground water
Underground storage tank and
fueling pump.
APEC-3
North East portion of
Phase Two property
(Importation of Fill Material of
Unknown Quality).
Off-site
Impactd soil identified in the fill
material.
2.3
Subsurface Structures and Utilities
The site is currently vacant and no active utilities within the Record of Site Condition Property. Utilities
are located within the Bonis Avenue Road Allowance.
Terraprobe
Page No 4
3.0
PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY
3.1
Site Stratigraphy
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
A portion of the ground surface at the site is paved and was used as a parking area, while the remainder of
the site is grass covered. Based on the findings in the boreholes advanced during the initial assessment
and delineation (Appendix B), the parking lot structure and topsoil associated with the grass area are
underlain by an earth fill of varying composition, consistency and thickness. Underlying the earth fill
layer, a native deposit of dense to very dense (with depth) silty sand to sandy silt was encountered.
Further details are provided below. The location of the boreholes in the initial assessment is shown on
Figure 3. A cross section showing the site stratigraphy is shown on Figure 4.
3.1.1 Surficial Materials
Portions of the ground surface along the east and west portions of the Phase Two property are paved and
were previously used as parking areas, while the remainder of the site is grass covered. One of the
boreholes encountered an asphaltic concrete 50 mm in thickness.
3.1.2 Fill Materials
All of the boreholes encountered a surficial layer of earth fill that varies in thickness from 1.5 to 3.1
meters below present grade (Elev. 170.2 to 168.0 meters). The earth fill material is primarily silty sand
with some gravel. Boreholes also encountered earth fill that consists of sand and gravel with trace silt, and
sandy clayey silt with trace gravel. Due to the variation and inconsistent placement of the earth fill
material, the relative density/consistency of the earth fill varies significantly. In general though, the fill is
loose to compact and cohesionless.
3.1.3 Sand and Silt
The earth fill was underlain by a deposit of sand and silt with some clay and trace gravel at boreholes
BH3, BH6, BH7, and BH8. The sand and silt was encountered from 1.5 to 6.6 meters below grade (Elev.
170.19 to 165.60 meters) and beyond the vertical extent of investigation.
The sand and silt is characterized as being brown/grey and moist. Standard Penetration Test results (“N”
Values) measured in the clay ranged from 9 to 32 blows per 300 mm of penetration. The “N” Values
indicate a very soft to very firm relative density within the clay.
3.1.4 Sand
The earth fill was underlain by a deposit of silty sand with some clay and trace gravel in boreholes BH2
and BH5, and extended from 2.3 to 4.9 meters below grade (Elev. 169.65 to 167.05 meters).
Terraprobe
Page No 5
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
The sand is characterized as being brown and wet. Standard Penetration Test results (“N” Values)
measured in the sand ranged from 6 to 20 blows per 300 mm of penetration. With only few exceptions,
the “N” Values indicate a compact relative density within the sand.
3.1.5 Silt
The earth fill was underlain by a deposit of sandy/clayey silt with trace gravel at borehole BH/MW1. The
silt was encountered from 3.1 to 6.4 meters below grade (Elev. 168.0 to 164.7 meters) to beyond the
vertical extent of investigation.
The clayey/sandy silt is characterized as being brown and in most cases, damp. Standard Penetration Test
results (“N” Values) measured in the silt ranged from 14 to 29 blows per 300 mm of penetration. The “N”
Values indicate a soft to firm relative density within the silt.
3.2
Site Hydrogeological Characteristics
Unstabilized groundwater levels were measured in each borehole as they were drilled and after
completion, as noted in the borehole logs (Appendix B). Stabilized water levels were also measured
within all monitoring wells installed at the site. Stabilized water levels were measured on various dates
and are summarized in Table 5.
Table 5: Ground Water Levels
Date
March 9, 2012
July 20, 2012
September 19, 2012
Well
Well
Elevation
(m asl)
Water
Level
(m bmp)
Water
Elevation
(m asl)
Water Level
(m bmp)
Water
Elevation
(m asl)
Water Level
(m bmp)
Water
Elevation
(m asl)
MW1
171.10
2.39
169.1
3.70
168.3
damaged
n/a
MW6
171.53
3.17
169.3
4.09
168.4
5.10
167.4
MW4-3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
5.96
166.7
The cohesive sandy, clayey silt and the sand and silt with some clay layers found beneath the site are
within the water table and contain a relatively high percentage of fines.
The ground water measurements at the site during the period of the investigation indicate a static ground
water level in the sandy, clayey silt/sand and silt that generally ranges from Elev. ±167 to ±169 metres.
There appears to be a slight horizontal gradient towards the northwest of the site where the water levels
are generally found lower in elevation.
3.2.1 Groundwater Hydraulic Gradients
The horizontal hydraulic gradient of the groundwater in the area was determined to be approximately
0.003. The vertical hydraulic gradient was not able to be determined.
Terraprobe
Page No 6
3.3
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
Section 41 or 43.1
Section 41 of the regulation (Environmentally Sensitive Areas) does not apply to the Phase Two Property
or the Record of Site Condition Property. Section 43.1 of the regulation (shallow soil property or water
body) does not apply to the property as there is no soil present. O.Reg. 179/11 section 8 “The qualified
person shall ensure that the site investigation includes investigation, sampling and analysis of ground
water on, in or under the phase two property where there is no soil on, in or under the property” does
apply to the property as there is no soil on, in or under the Phase Two Property during the time of the
updated Phase Two ESA. Monitoring wells were installed in the 2012 investigation for the purpose
investigation and analysis of the ground water.
3.4
Soils Placed On, In or Under the Record of Site Condition Property
No soils have been imported or placed on, in or under the Phase Two Property. Soils have been removed
from the property and lowered the elevation of the Phase Two Property from its original 172 masl to the
current bottom of the excavation at about 167 masl.
3.5
Proposed Buildings
The site will be developed over the entire record of site condition property as a residential development.
The development will have multiple levels of underground parking which will cover the area of the
Record of Site Condition Property below grade. The lowest slab elevation that will be present on the
property will be about 163 masl, which is approximately 9 m below the original surface elevation. The
final development plan for the property will develop the property with a have a storage garage that covers
the entire area of the Record of Site Condition Property at the proposed final grade of the building.
Terraprobe
Page No 7
4.0
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
CONTAMINATION IN OR UNDER THE RECORD OF SITE CONDITION
PROPERTY
4.1
Areas Where Contaminants are Present
There are currently no contaminants present at the Record of Site Condition property. Areas where
contaminants were present on the Phase Two Property and the Record of Site Condition Property are
identified in Table 4.1-1 below and shown on Figure 5 and Figure 6.
Table 4.1-1 Contaminated Areas
Area
Fill Materials
APECs 1 and 2 in the fill materials of the Record of Site Condition
Native Soils
APEC 2 extended into the native soils. The impacted soils were removed and the impacts
were not identified below the water table.
No impacts suspected in these soils.
Contaminants were identified in the 2010 investigation conducted by others, and in the Phase Two
investigation at the property. The contaminants were limited to the fill material and the native soils above
the water table. The APECs in the Phase Two property were identified and delineated (Figure 7 &
Figure 8). The APECs in the Record of Site Condition Property were identified, delineated and removed.
4.2
Contaminants Associated with Each Area
The contaminants of concern associated with the Record of Site Condition Property are identified in
Table 4.2-1below.
Table 4.2-1 Contaminants of Concern
Area
Fill Materials
Contaminants identified in the fill material were limited to
•
Mercury
In addition the contaminants of concern for APEC 2 were limited to
Native Soils
•
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
•
Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylenes
In addition the contaminants of concern in the soils for APEC 2 were limited to:
•
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
•
Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylenes.
Terraprobe
Page No 8
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
The Phase Two ESA identified the applicable site condition standards as Table 3Full Depth Generic Site
Conditon Standards in a Non-Potable Ground Water Condition for Residential/Parkland/Institutional land
use as presented in the Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the
Environmental Protection Act (April 15, 2011). Medium and Fine textured soils standards were chosen
based on the grain size analysis conducted on the soils (Appendix C) taken from boreholes identifying
more than two thirds of the soil at the site consist of soil that contains 50 per cent or more by mass of
particles that are smaller than the 75 micrometers in mean diameter (medium and fine textured soils as
defined under O.Reg 153/04, s42(2)).
The delineation of impacts are shown on Figure 7 and Figure 8. The contaminants of concern in the fill
materials (mercury) appear to have come from the placement of fill material of unknown quality placed
on the site after the removal of the golf course. The mercury impacted fill materials were found placed
above the foundation of a building related to the maintenance of the golf course.
The petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants of concern were identified in the vicinity of a pump and tank
that was also related to the golf course. The impacts appear to be related to the historical use of the tank.
The pump and tank were abandoned in place. Delineation samples taken in the vicinity of the tank nest
identified that the soil impacts were localized to the soils near the tank and pump. The confirmatory
samples taken after the removal of the tank show that the extent of the impact related to the contaminants
of concern did not extend to the water table.
Ground water samples collected for the contaminants of concern listed in section 2.1 were found to meet
the Table 3 Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental
Protection Act (April 15, 2011) for residential/parkland/institutional land use. Soil impacts were identified
on the Record of Site Condition Property, the impacts were removed. Confirmatory samples were
collected and the extents of the remediation and the confirmatory samples are shown on Figure 9 and
Figure 10.
4.3
Medium in Which Contaminant are Associated
The medium in which the contaminants were associated with was the soil beneath Record of Site
Condition Property. Ground water impacts were not identified the Phase Two Environmental Site
Assessment investigation. All contamination was removed from the Record of Site Condition Property
when the medium in which the contaminants were associated with were removed.
4.4
Information Known about Each Contaminated Area
The information known about each of the contaminated areas is listed below:
•
Soil Fill – impacts limited to the extent of the fill material across the site. The fill material was
removed from the Phase Two Property prior to the construction foundations.
Terraprobe
Page No 9
•
4.5
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
Underground Storage Tank and Fuelling Facility for the former Golf Course – soil impacts
identified in the area of the storage tanks were removed prior to the construction of the
foundations.
Reasons for Discharge of Contaminant
The origins of the contaminants are likely due to the placement of fill of unknown quality that was placed
during the removal of the golf course clubhouse and facilities, along with housekeeping and maintenance
issues with the use of the sources identified in the previous section.
4.6
Migration of contaminant
Prior to the current property development the Record of Site Condition Property had an elevation that was
higher than the surrounding lands. There were no significant topographical lows on the Record of Site
Condition Property where significant pooling would occur. The native soil on the property is a sand and
silt till with a low hydraulic conductivity, reducing the possibility of vertical migration of the
contaminants.
The final confirmatory sampling of the sand and silt till indicates that these assumptions are correct and
the contaminants did not migrate from the fill material vertically down toward the water table and
remained above the water table in the sand and silt till (Figure 9 and Figure 10).
4.7
Climatic or Meteorological Influences on Migration
Prior to the current property development the Record of Site Condition Property had an elevation that was
higher than the surrounding lands. There were no significant topographical lows on the Record of Site
Condition Property where significant pooling would occur. Due to the site topography, climatic or
meteorological influence on migration of the contamination on the property would be minimal.
4.8
Soil Vapour Intrusion into Buildings
The potential for soil vapour intrusion by contaminants of concern into the buildings is not possible as
there are no contaminants currently present on the Record of Site Condition Property.
4.9
Relevant Construction Features of Buildings
There are no buildings present on the site, however the final building plan includes a storage garage that
covers the entire Record of Site Condition Property at the final grade of the building, approximately 9 m
below ground surface (approximately 167 masl).
Terraprobe
Page No 10
4.10
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
Building HVAC
There are no buildings present on the site. The proposed building will have appropriate ventilation of the
storage garages the ventilation of the storage garage will comply with all applicable requirements as set
out in the Ontario Building Code.
4.11
Subsurface Structures and Utilities
Subsurface structures and utilities that may have affected the distribution and transport of contamination
are presented in Table 4.12-1 below. All of the utilities were well above the water table elevation and
could not affect contaminant migration.
Table 4.11-1 Subsurface Structures and Utilities
Utility Present
Natural Gas
Inactive lines were identified during the excavation impacted soils.
Confirmatory sampling in the area of the lines did were below the applicable
site condition standards for the Contaminants of Concern.
Electrical
No electrical utilities were identified during the excavation of impacted soils.
Telecommunications
No telecommunications utilities were identified during the excavation of
impacted soils.
Water
Sewer
Terraprobe
Page No 11
5.0
POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS
5.1
Description of All Components
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
Following is the list of all risk based components of the potential exposure pathways and receptors. These
components are used in this section as well as the graphical representation of the pathways and receptors
presented on Figure 11.
Please note Figure 11 is a graphical representation of potential pathways and receptors and does not have
a scale or orientation which can be related to the Record of Site Condition property.
GW1 – Ground water for drinking water purposes
GW2 – Ground water for protection from movement to indoor air
GW3 – Ground water for protection of aquatic life
S1 – Soil for protection of a residential receptor from direct contact with surface soil
S2 – Soil for protection from direct soil contact for a lower frequency and intensity exposure than
residential surface soil, such as commercial or industrial scenarios
S3 – Soil for direct soil contact for a low-frequency, high-intensity, human health exposure scenario
without children present that is protective of a worker digging in the soil
S-IA – Soil for protection of movement to indoor air and human exposure
S-OA – Soil for protection of movement to outdoor air and human exposure
S-Odour – Soil for protection of excessive odours
S-GW1 – Soil for protection from movement to ground water for drinking water purposes
S-GW3 – Soil for protection from movement to ground water and then to aquatic life
Plants and Soil Organisms – Soil for protection against adverse effects to plants and soil dwelling
organisms
Mammals and Birds – Soil for protection against adverse effects through direct soil and food ingestion to
mammals and birds
Terraprobe
Page No 12
5.2
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
Receptor Human Health
Potential
Pathway
Potential Risks Sources
Contaminant of Concern
from Phase One ESA
GW1
Contamination not present in groundwater
VOC, Metals, PHC, PAH,
PCBs
Potential Risks
No Risk – No Source
No Risk – No Pathway
No Risk – No Receptor
GW2
PCBs
S1
Contamination not present in fill material
PCBs
PCBs
PCBs
PCBs
PCBs
PCBs
PCBs
Contamination not present in native soil
S2
S3
S-IA
S-OA
S-Odour
S-GW1
5.3
No Risk – No Receptor
Receptor Terrestrial Environment
Potential
Pathway
from Phase One ESA
Potential Risks
Plants and
Soil
Organisms
PCBs
Mammals
and Birds
PCBs
Terraprobe
Page No 13
5.4
January 17, 2013
File No. 13-12-2015
Receptor Aquatic Environment
Potential
Pathway
from Phase One ESA
Potential Risks
GW3
PCBs
S-GW3
PCBs
5.5
Summary of Potential Receptor Risks
Since the potential Contaminates of Concern identified in the Phase One ESA were not present on the
Record of Site Condition property above the applicable Generic Standard, it is concluded that there are no
potential risks associated with the property in relation to the Human Receptor, the Terrestrial
Environment or the Aquatic Environment.
Terraprobe
Page No 14
APPENDIX A
TERRAPROBE INC.
LEGEND
Phase One/Two Property
APPENDIX B
TERRAPROBE INC.
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 1
Client
: Gemterra Development Corporation c/o 59 Management Inc.
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
: Environmental Site Assessment
Date started :
March 2, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
Location : 185 Bonis Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
Elevation Datum : Geodetic (NAD83)
: CME 75, track-mounted
Drilling Method
171.1
GROUND SURFACE
50mm ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
FILL, silty sand, some gravel, trace clay,
trace organics, compact, brown, moist
10
20
30
40
Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Moisture / Plasticity
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
: Solid stem / hollow stem augers
Penetration Test Values
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Type
Number
Description
Graphic Log
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
SPT 'N' Value
0
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
:
Rig type
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
171
1
SS
16
2
SS
15
3
SS
6
5
ppm
15 61 20 4
...trace cobbles
1
5
ppm
170
...trace gravel, very dense
2
168.8
2.3
3
168.1
3.1
169
FILL, silty sand, some clay, trace gravel,
loose, brown, wet
4
SS
7
SANDY SILT, clayey, trace gravel, dense,
grey, wet
5
SS
32
<5
ppm
5 54 30 11
168
4
10
ppm
167
6
SS
100 /
250mm
5
10
ppm
166
6
164.7
6.4
...moist, very dense
END OF BOREHOLE
Borehole was dry and caved to 0.9m below
grade upon completion of drilling.
25mm monitoring well installed.
library: library - terraprobe gint.glb report: terraprobe soil log file: 13-12-2015 bonis av.gpj
<5
ppm
7
SS
50 /
125mm
165
10
ppm
WATER LEVEL READINGS
Date
Water Depth (m)
Elevation (m)
Mar 9, 2012
1.3
169.8
Jul 20, 2012
2.8
168.3
Sep 24, 2012
n/a (damaged)
n/a
1 32 46 21
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 2
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 2, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
Drilling Method
172.0
GROUND SURFACE
1
170.4
1.5
FILL, sand and gravel, trace silt, very
dense, grey, wet
1
SS
14
2
SS
15
3
SS
50 /
125mm
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
169.7
2.3
SILTY SAND, some clay, trace gravel,
loose, brown, wet
(GLACIAL TILL)
4
SS
<5
ppm
<5
ppm
4
<5
ppm
169
3
...dense
5
SS
48
5
ppm
168
4
6
167.1
4.9
END OF BOREHOLE
Unstabilized water level measured at 0.9m
below grade; borehole was open upon
completion of drilling.
SS
70 /
150mm
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
<5
ppm
171
Unstabilized
Water Level
10
Instrument
Details
Dynamic Cone
170
2
: Solid stem augers
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Type
Number
Description
Graphic Log
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
SPT 'N' Value
0
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
:
Rig type
Depth Scale (m)
Position
10
ppm
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 3
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 2, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
Drilling Method
172.2
GROUND SURFACE
1
1
SS
7
2
SS
4
172
171
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
: Solid stem augers
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Type
Number
Description
Graphic Log
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
SPT 'N' Value
0
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
:
Rig type
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
<5
ppm
<5
ppm
...brown / grey
3
SS
6
<5
ppm
2
169.9
2.3
3
169.2
3.1
170
SILTY SAND, some clay, trace gravel, very
dense, grey, damp
4
SS
123
SAND AND SILT, some clay, trace gravel,
very dense, grey, moist
5
SS
102
<5
ppm
169
5
ppm
4
168
6
SS
60
5
ppm
5
167
6
...spoon wet
7
165.7
6.6
END OF BOREHOLE
Borehole was dry and open upon completion
of drilling.
SS
71
166
5
ppm
3 43 36 18
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 4
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 2, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
Drilling Method
171.6
GROUND SURFACE
FILL, silty shale fragments, some gravel,
trace clay, trace organics, compact, brown,
moist
170.7
0.9
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
1
SS
15
2
SS
90 /
175mm
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
: Solid stem augers
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Type
Number
Description
Graphic Log
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
SPT 'N' Value
0
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
:
Rig type
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
<5
ppm
171
<5
ppm
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 4-1
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
August 23, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
171.4
GROUND SURFACE
FILL, sand and silt, some clay, trace
gravel, trace organics, loose, brown, moist
1
169.9
1.5
1
SS
12
2
SS
8
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
3
SS
18
very dense, brown, moist
(GLACIAL TILL)
4
SS
72
5
SS
65
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
171
...at 1.4m, spoon wet
50
ppm
2
169.1
2.3
Lab Data
and
Comments
GR SA SI CL
170
FILL, sandy silt, clayey, trace gravel,
compact, brown, moist
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
169
45
ppm
3
60
ppm
168
4
167
6
5
SS
56
80
ppm
166
6
...compact, grey
7
SS
25
165
50
ppm
7
164
8
8
SS
20
35
ppm
163
9
9
SS
32
to 9.8m
162
161.6
9.8
END OF BOREHOLE
Date
Water Depth (m)
Elevation (m)
Sep 19, 2012
7.2
164.2
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 4-2
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
August 23, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
171.3
GROUND SURFACE
1
169.8
1.5
23
171
2
SS
16
Dynamic Cone
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
170
3
SS
12
4
SS
38
5
SS
64
50
ppm
2
169.0
2.3
Unstabilized
Water Level
SS
(Blows / 0.3m)
Instrument
Details
1
Type
Description
Number
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Elevation Scale
(m)
SOIL PROFILE
Headspace
Vapour
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
(GLACIAL TILL)
169
45
ppm
3
168
60
ppm
4
167
6
5
SS
39
80
ppm
166
6
...compact, grey
7
SS
20
165
50
ppm
7
164
8
8
SS
15
35
ppm
163
9
9
SS
40
to 9.8m
162
161.6
9.8
END OF BOREHOLE
Date
Water Depth (m)
Elevation (m)
Sep 19, 2012
6.4
164.9
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 4-3
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
August 23, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
0
171.7
GROUND SURFACE
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
1
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Number
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Graphic Log
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
: CME 75
Type
:
Rig type
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
5
ppm
171
1
2
SS
12
3
SS
15
4
SS
32
20
ppm
170
20
ppm
2
169.5
2.3
SILTY SAND, some clay, trace gravel,
dense, brown, moist
(GLACIAL TILL)
30
ppm
169
3
5
SS
38
45
ppm
168
4
...at 4.6 m, very dense
6
5
SS
50/
150mm
167
25
ppm
166
6
...at 6.1 m, clayey grey
7
SS
95
20
ppm
165
7
164
8
8
SS
30
30
ppm
163
9
9
162.0
9.8
SS
to 9.8m
50/
150mm
60
ppm
162
END OF BOREHOLE
Date
Water Depth (m)
Elevation (m)
Sep 19, 2012
5.1
166.7
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 5
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 2, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
Drilling Method
172.0
GROUND SURFACE
trace organics
1
1
SS
7
2
SS
8
3
SS
10
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
<5
ppm
...trace clay, green grass to black
170
2
169.7
2.3
SILTY SAND, some clay, trace gravel, very
dense, grey, moist
(GLACIAL TILL)
4
SS
80
5
SS
55 /
150mm
10
ppm
15
ppm
168
4
6
167.2
4.7
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
10
ppm
169
3
SS
63 /
150mm
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
5
ppm
171
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
: Solid stem augers
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Type
Number
Description
Graphic Log
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
SPT 'N' Value
0
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
:
Rig type
Depth Scale (m)
Position
5
ppm
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 6
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 2, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
Drilling Method
171.5
GROUND SURFACE
1
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
AS
2
SS
24
3
SS
17
(GLACIAL TILL)
4
SS
114
5
SS
77
1
170.0
1.5
5
ppm
170
5
ppm
2
169.2
2.3
10
ppm
169
3
10
ppm
168
4
167.0
4.6
5
167
SANDY SILT, clayey, trace gravel, dense,
grey, wet
(GLACIAL TILL)
6
SS
39
10
ppm
166
6
7
165.0
6.6
26
10
ppm
165
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
SS
Date
Water Depth (m)
Elevation (m)
Mar 9, 2012
2.3
169.3
Jul 20, 2012
3.2
168.3
Sep 19, 2012
4.2
167.3
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
5
ppm
171
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
: Hollow stem augers
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Type
Number
Description
Graphic Log
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
SPT 'N' Value
0
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
:
Rig type
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 7
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 2, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
Drilling Method
172.2
GROUND SURFACE
gravel, trace organics, compact, grey /
brown, wet
1
SS
13
2
SS
13
172
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
: Solid stem augers
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Type
Number
Description
Graphic Log
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
SPT 'N' Value
0
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
:
Rig type
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
<5
ppm
...trace cinders
1
<5
ppm
6 45 35 14
5
ppm
0 34 44 22
171
170.7
1.5
FILL, sandy silt, clayey, trace rootlets,
loose, black / greenish grey, moist
3
SS
7
2
170.0
2.3
3
170
dense, grey, moist
(GLACIAL TILL)
...very dense
4
SS
42
5
SS
50 /
150mm
5
ppm
169
10
ppm
4
168
6
167.5
4.7
END OF BOREHOLE
below grade; borehole was open upon
completion of drilling.
SS
50 /
150mm
10
ppm
2 48 38 12
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 8
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 2, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
Drilling Method
171.7
GROUND SURFACE
trace organics, compact, brown / black, wet
1
SS
17
2
SS
19
3
SS
68
4
SS
90
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
: Hollow stem augers
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Type
Number
Description
Graphic Log
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
SPT 'N' Value
0
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
:
Rig type
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
5
ppm
171
1
170.2
1.5
2
very dense, grey / brown, damp
(GLACIAL TILL)
<5
ppm
170
5
ppm
5
ppm
169
3
5
SS
50 /
150mm
5
ppm
168
4
6
SS
66
167
10
ppm
5
166
6
7
165.4
6.3
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
SS
50 /
150mm
5
ppm
Date
Water Depth (m)
Elevation (m)
Mar 9, 2012
1.9
169.8
Jul 20, 2012
2.9
168.8
Sep 19, 2012
2.4
169.3
1 44 44 11
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 11
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 22, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
172.2
GROUND SURFACE
FILL, silty sand, some gravel, some clay,
172
1
1
171.0
1.2
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
GS
171
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 12
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 22, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
172.2
GROUND SURFACE
172
1
2
171.0
1.2
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
GS
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 13
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 22, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
172.2
GROUND SURFACE
172
1
3
170.9
1.3
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
GS
171
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 14
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 22, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
172.2
GROUND SURFACE
172
1
4
170.9
1.3
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
GS
171
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 15
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 22, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
172.2
GROUND SURFACE
172
1
5
170.9
1.3
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
GS
171
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 16
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 22, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
172.2
GROUND SURFACE
172
1
6
171.0
1.2
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
GS
171
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 21
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 30, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
171.3
GROUND SURFACE
1
170.4
0.8
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
171
GS
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 22
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 30, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
171.2
GROUND SURFACE
171
1
GS
2
GS
3
GS
1
169.4
1.9
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
170
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 23
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 30, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
171.4
GROUND SURFACE
171
1
GS
2
GS
3
GS
1
169.5
1.8
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
170
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 31
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 30, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
172.0
GROUND SURFACE
1
GS
171
1
2
170.5
1.5
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
GS
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 32
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 30, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
172.0
GROUND SURFACE
1
GS
171
1
2
170.6
1.4
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
GS
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 33
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 30, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
172.0
GROUND SURFACE
1
GS
171
1
2
170.6
1.4
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
GS
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG 34
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
March 30, 2012
Sheet No. :
1 of 1
172.0
GROUND SURFACE
1
GS
171
1
2
170.5
1.5
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
GS
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Type
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Number
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
0
:
Graphic Log
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG EXP1
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
July 29, 2010
Sheet No. :
1 of 2
0
171.8
GROUND SURFACE
FILL, sandy silt, topsoil, trace gravel, trace
organics, loose to compact, brown, moist
1
170.3
1.5
SANDY SILT, dark brown, moist
(TOPSOIL)
1
SS
11
2
SS
9
3
SS
13
4
SS
16
171
170
2
169.1
2.7
3
SANDY SILT, trace gravel and cobbles,
dense to very dense, brownish grey, moist
(GLACIAL TILL)
169
5
SS
37
168
4
...at 4.6 m, wet
6
SS
93/
275
167
5
...at 5.5 m, moist to saturated, dense to very
dense
166
6
7
SS
43
165
7
8
SS
78/
275
164
8
163
9
9
SS
59
162
10
10
SS
70
161
11
160
(continued next page)
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Number
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Graphic Log
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
: CME 75
Type
:
Rig type
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG EXP1
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
July 29, 2010
Sheet No. :
2 of 2
(continued)
dense to very dense, brownish grey, moist
(GLACIAL TILL) (continued)
12
11
SS
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
95
159
13
12
14
SS
45
158
157
15
13
156.2
15.6
END OF BOREHOLE
of drilling.
SS
95/
250
Date
Water Depth (m)
Elevation (m)
Jul 29, 2010
8.3
163.5
Jul 30, 2010
12.5
159.3
Aug 5, 2010
9.7
162.1
Apr 15, 2011
7.8
164.0
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Number
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Graphic Log
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
: CME 75
Type
:
Rig type
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG EXP2
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
July 30, 2010
Sheet No. :
1 of 2
GROUND SURFACE
FILL, sandy silt, trace gravel, trace
organics, compact, brown, moist
0
1
1.3
2
compact to very dense, brownish grey,
moist
(GLACIAL TILL)
1
SS
11
2
SS
10
3
SS
18
4
SS
41
5
SS
42
6
SS
68
7
SS
55
8
SS
25
9
SS
55
10
SS
87
3
4
...at 4.9 m, moist to 7.0 m
5
6
...at 6.1 m, wet
7
8
9
10
11
11.7
(continued on next page)
(continued next page)
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Number
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Graphic Log
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
: CME 75
Type
:
Rig type
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
Terraprobe
BOREHOLE LOG EXP2
Client
Project No. :
13-12-2015
Project
Date started :
July 30, 2010
Sheet No. :
2 of 2
(continued)
SAND AND GRAVEL, trace cobbles, some
silt, very dense, grey, wet (continued)
12
11
SS
50/
125
12
SS
50/
100
13
SS
65
10
20
30
40
Unconfined
Pocket Penetrometer
40
80
Field Vane
Lab Vane
120
160
Natural
Plastic
Water Content
Limit
Liquid
Limit
PL
MC
LL
10
20
30
13
14
14.5
SILTY FINE SAND, trace gravel, fine sand
layers, very dense, grey, wet
15
15.7
END OF BOREHOLE
below grade; borehole caved to 10.8m
below grade upon completion of drilling.
Date
Water Depth (m)
Elevation (m)
Jul 30, 2010
9.9
Unstabilized
Water Level
Dynamic Cone
Instrument
Details
(Blows / 0.3m)
Headspace
Vapour
Description
Number
Elev
Depth
(m)
SAMPLES
Graphic Log
SOIL PROFILE
Elevation Scale
(m)
SPT 'N' Value
: CME 75
Type
:
Rig type
Depth Scale (m)
Position
Lab Data
and
Comments
GRAIN SIZE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
GR SA SI CL
APPENDIX C
TERRAPROBE INC.
10
0
100
Fractions normalized to 100% passing
the 2mm (#10) sieve
20
90
80
40
50
60
silty clay
loam
clay loam
30
70
.00
<0
EN
TC
RC
PE
m)
2m
.00
-0
silty
clay
sandy
clay
40
05
50
(0.
LA
Y(
T
SIL
60
T
EN
2m
m)
70
RC
PE
30
clay
80
sandy clay loam
20
loam
90
silt loam
sandy loam
10
loamy
silt
10
0
sand
sand
0
library: library - terraprobe gint.glb report: terra enviro triangle plot file: 13-12-2015 bonis av.gpj
Borehole
1
1
1
3
7
7
7
8
Depth (m)
0.4
2.6
6.2
4.8
1.0
1.8
4.6
3.2
Title:
Terraprobe
11 Indell Lane, Brampton Ontario L6T 3Y3
(905) 796-2650
File No.:
USDA Classification
SANDY LOAM
SANDY LOAM
LOAM
LOAM
LOAM
LOAM
SANDY LOAM
LOAM
Sand (%)
74.3
60.9
35.2
50.2
51.9
38.8
54.0
50.4
Silt (%)
19.9
27.4
44.2
31.2
33.9
40.0
33.5
39.0
Clay (%)
5.7
11.7
20.6
18.6
14.2
21.1
12.5
10.6
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION - TERNARY DIAGRAM
(CUSTOM TEXT HERE)
13-12-2015
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
10
PERCENT SAND (2 - 0.05mm)
Terraprobe
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
CLIENT:
BOREHOLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE DEPTH:
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:
SIEVE AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TEST REPORT
FILE NO.:
LAB NO.:
SAMPLE DATE:
SAMPLED BY:
184 Bonis Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
Gemterra
1
1
0.0 - 0.61 m
SILTY SAND, some gravel, trace clay
13-12-2015
1041A
March 2, 2012
K.B.
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES
PERCENT RETAINED (%)
'
3/4"
3/8"
'
'
#4
#10
#20
'
'
'
#40 #60
'
#140
'
'
#200
100
'
10
90
20
80
30
70
40
60
50
50
60
40
70
80
GRAIN SIZE CONTENT
MIT System
30
Gravel…………… 15 %
Sand………………61 %
Silt…………………20 %
Clay………….…… 4 %
20
90
10
100
0
100
10
1
0.1
0.01
0.001
0.0001
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
COARSE
MIT
SYSTEM
UNIFIED
SYSTEM
GRAVEL
COARSE
FINE
GRAVEL
MEDIUM
FINE
SILT
SAND
COARSE
MEDIUM
SAND
CLAY
FINE
SILT AND CLAY
PERCENT PASSING (%)
2.12" 1.5"
0
Terraprobe
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
CLIENT:
BOREHOLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE DEPTH:
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:
TEST REPORT
FILE NO.:
LAB NO.:
SAMPLE DATE:
SAMPLED BY:
184 Bonis Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
Gemterra
1
4
2.29 - 2.74 m
SILTY SAND, some clay, trace gravel
13-12-2015
1041B
March 2, 2012
K.B.
'
3/4"
3/8"
'
'
#4
#10
#20
'
'
'
#40 #60
'
#140
'
'
#200
100
'
10
90
20
80
30
70
40
60
50
50
60
40
70
80
GRAIN SIZE CONTENT
MIT System
30
Gravel………………5 %
Sand………………54 %
Silt…………………30 %
Clay………….……11 %
20
90
10
100
0
100
10
1
0.1
0.01
0.001
0.0001
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
COARSE
MIT
SYSTEM
UNIFIED
SYSTEM
GRAVEL
COARSE
FINE
GRAVEL
MEDIUM
FINE
SILT
SAND
COARSE
MEDIUM
SAND
CLAY
FINE
SILT AND CLAY
PERCENT PASSING (%)
2.12" 1.5"
0
Terraprobe
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
CLIENT:
BOREHOLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE DEPTH:
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:
TEST REPORT
FILE NO.:
LAB NO.:
SAMPLE DATE:
SAMPLED BY:
184 Bonis Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
Gemterra
1
7
6.10 - 6.38 m
SANDY SILT, clayey, trace gravel
13-12-2015
1041C
March 2, 2012
K.B.
'
3/4"
3/8"
'
'
#4
#10
#20
'
'
'
#40 #60
'
#140
'
'
#200
100
'
10
90
20
80
30
70
40
60
50
50
60
40
70
80
GRAIN SIZE CONTENT
MIT System
30
Sand………………32 %
Silt…………………46 %
Clay………….……21 %
20
90
10
100
0
100
10
1
0.1
0.01
0.001
0.0001
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
COARSE
MIT
SYSTEM
UNIFIED
SYSTEM
GRAVEL
COARSE
FINE
GRAVEL
MEDIUM
FINE
SILT
SAND
COARSE
MEDIUM
SAND
CLAY
FINE
SILT AND CLAY
PERCENT PASSING (%)
2.12" 1.5"
0
Terraprobe
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
CLIENT:
BOREHOLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE DEPTH:
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:
TEST REPORT
FILE NO.:
LAB NO.:
SAMPLE DATE:
SAMPLED BY:
184 Bonis Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
Gemterra
3
6
4.57 - 5.03 m
SAND AND SILT, some clay, trace gravel
13-12-2015
1041D
March 2, 2012
K.B.
'
3/4"
3/8"
'
'
#4
#10
#20
'
'
'
#40 #60
'
#140
'
'
#200
100
'
10
90
20
80
30
70
40
60
50
50
60
40
70
80
GRAIN SIZE CONTENT
MIT System
30
Sand………………43 %
Silt…………………36 %
Clay………….……18 %
20
90
10
100
0
100
10
1
0.1
0.01
0.001
0.0001
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
COARSE
MIT
SYSTEM
UNIFIED
SYSTEM
GRAVEL
COARSE
FINE
GRAVEL
MEDIUM
FINE
SILT
SAND
COARSE
MEDIUM
SAND
CLAY
FINE
SILT AND CLAY
PERCENT PASSING (%)
2.12" 1.5"
0
Terraprobe
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
CLIENT:
BOREHOLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE DEPTH:
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:
TEST REPORT
FILE NO.:
LAB NO.:
SAMPLE DATE:
SAMPLED BY:
184 Bonis Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
Gemterra
7
2
0.76 - 1.22 m
13-12-2015
1041E
March 2, 2012
K.B.
'
3/4"
3/8"
'
'
#4
#10
#20
'
'
'
#40 #60
'
#140
'
'
#200
100
'
10
90
20
80
30
70
40
60
50
50
60
40
70
80
GRAIN SIZE CONTENT
MIT System
30
Sand………………45 %
Silt…………………35 %
Clay………….……14 %
20
90
10
100
0
100
10
1
0.1
0.01
0.001
0.0001
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
COARSE
MIT
SYSTEM
UNIFIED
SYSTEM
GRAVEL
COARSE
FINE
GRAVEL
MEDIUM
FINE
SILT
SAND
COARSE
MEDIUM
SAND
CLAY
FINE
SILT AND CLAY
PERCENT PASSING (%)
2.12" 1.5"
0
Terraprobe
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
CLIENT:
BOREHOLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE DEPTH:
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:
TEST REPORT
FILE NO.:
LAB NO.:
SAMPLE DATE:
SAMPLED BY:
184 Bonis Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
Gemterra
7
3
1.53 - 1.98 m
SANDY SILT, clayey
13-12-2015
1041F
March 2, 2012
K.B.
'
3/4"
3/8"
'
'
#4
#10
#20
'
'
'
#40 #60
'
#140
'
'
#200
100
'
10
90
20
80
30
70
40
60
50
50
60
40
70
80
GRAIN SIZE CONTENT
MIT System
30
Sand………………34 %
Silt…………………44 %
Clay………….……22 %
20
90
10
100
0
100
10
1
0.1
0.01
0.001
0.0001
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
COARSE
MIT
SYSTEM
UNIFIED
SYSTEM
GRAVEL
COARSE
FINE
GRAVEL
MEDIUM
FINE
SILT
SAND
COARSE
MEDIUM
SAND
CLAY
FINE
SILT AND CLAY
PERCENT PASSING (%)
2.12" 1.5"
0
Terraprobe
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
CLIENT:
BOREHOLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE DEPTH:
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:
TEST REPORT
FILE NO.:
LAB NO.:
SAMPLE DATE:
SAMPLED BY:
184 Bonis Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
Gemterra
7
6
4.57 - 4.72 m
13-12-2015
1041G
March 2, 2012
K.B.
'
3/4"
3/8"
'
'
#4
#10
#20
'
'
'
#40 #60
'
#140
'
'
#200
100
'
10
90
20
80
30
70
40
60
50
50
60
40
70
80
GRAIN SIZE CONTENT
MIT System
30
Sand………………48 %
Silt…………………38 %
Clay………….……12 %
20
90
10
100
0
100
10
1
0.1
0.01
0.001
0.0001
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
COARSE
MIT
SYSTEM
UNIFIED
SYSTEM
GRAVEL
COARSE
FINE
GRAVEL
MEDIUM
FINE
SILT
SAND
COARSE
MEDIUM
SAND
CLAY
FINE
SILT AND CLAY
PERCENT PASSING (%)
2.12" 1.5"
0
Terraprobe
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
CLIENT:
BOREHOLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE DEPTH:
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION:
TEST REPORT
FILE NO.:
LAB NO.:
SAMPLE DATE:
SAMPLED BY:
184 Bonis Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
Gemterra
8
5
3.05 - 3.35 m
13-12-2015
1041H
March 2, 2012
K.B.
'
3/4"
3/8"
'
'
#4
#10
#20
'
'
'
#40 #60
'
#140
'
'
#200
100
'
10
90
20
80
30
70
40
60
50
50
60
40
70
80
GRAIN SIZE CONTENT
MIT System
30
Sand………………44 %
Silt…………………44 %
Clay………….……11 %
20
90
10
100
0
100
10
1
0.1
0.01
0.001
0.0001
GRAIN SIZE (mm)
COARSE
MIT
SYSTEM
UNIFIED
SYSTEM
GRAVEL
COARSE
FINE
GRAVEL
MEDIUM
FINE
SILT
SAND
COARSE
MEDIUM
SAND
CLAY
FINE
SILT AND CLAY
PERCENT PASSING (%)
2.12" 1.5"
0

Record of Site Condition # 206833 Record of Site

Transcription

Similar documents

88TH RSC HOW TO GUIDE FOR DTS INVITATIONAL

Technical Sheet - Microbes Biosciences

Bodemverontreiniging op het spoor

Revel Casino News 2013

Angiosperm Latin Name: Callisia fragrans Common Name: Basket

AZOMITE granular - Down To Earth Fertilizer

Pro-Grow

Woody Plants Database - Diervilla sessilifolia

NEW SOLUTION