IndustrIal - NAIOP Vancouver
Transcription
IndustrIal - NAIOP Vancouver
Promotional supplement VA N COU VE R C H A P T E R 16th annual Regional METRO VANCOUVER CHAPTER Industrial Development Cost Survey Fall 2015 The Vancouver chapter of the Commercial Real Estate Development Association (NAIOP) is pleased to present the 2015 edition of its Industrial Development “Report Card” Boundary Bay Industrial Park VANCOUVER CHAPTER S ince the economy appears to be withstand this much speculative product improving and the demand for larger being added to inventory. Although blocks of available space is increasing, there may be a slight uptick in vacancy there is currently a “construction boom” rates as some of these new buildings underway. In a recently conducted survey, are completed, recent leasing activity GREATER VANCOUVER CHAPTER there is more than 4.6 million square feet figures have shown that the space will be of inventory coming to the market within leased quickly and the trend of positive the next 18 months. It should be noted absorption will continue (Cushman & however that not all of this space will be Wakefield, 2015). available to the market as approximately With the end of 2015 approaching, 40% of the space is pre-leased. Not the next edition of the Industrial Cost of since 2007 has the market been able to Business Survey is ready for your review. 2015 Highlights Each year, NAIOP Vancouver and Business in Vancouver present the NAME (NAIOP Award for Municipal Excellence) to municipalities in three categories, including Most Business-Friendly, Most Fiscally Responsible and Most Improved. These awards have been given out for the past four years. NAIOP will be acknowledging three municipalities that have excelled in creating environments positive to business creation. The three categories of awards are: Most Improved The most improvement compared to previous survey results Most Fiscally Responsible Cost increases kept in line with overall inflation Most Business-Friendly Implementation of policies to support the creation of new job spaces This year’s winners are: Most Improved: Awarded to the City of Maple Ridge, which has reduced the estimated fees for the development scenario in the study by 34% compared to 2013, when we last did the industrial scenario. In addition, the city reduced its estimated processing time of a rezoning and subdivision application by 38% to 150 days. Most Fiscally Responsible: Awarded to the Corporation of Delta, which has maintained an equivalent annual inflation rate of 1.8% for the 2013-2015 term, while consistently achieving a similar level of equivalent annual inflation for previous terms. Most Business-Friendly: Awarded to the City of North Vancouver and the City of Maple Ridge. The City of North Vancouver is recognized for its encouragement of sustainable design through a variety of mechanisms, such as height, setback and floor area exemptions for green building technologies, e.g., solar installations, green roofs, green building equipment and increased installation. The City of Maple Ridge has an Employment Lands The survey, which is distributed to 20 communities within the Lower Mainland, requires each municipality to identify the costs and processing times associated with the parameters of the case study outlined within this article. For 2015, the development project was, as per the previous surveys, the construction of a two-storey, 100,000-square-foot industrial warehouse distribution building on 5.5 acres of land requiring both subdivision and rezoning. Investment Incentive program for all industrial developments that achieve LEED Silver or better certification or for projects that select energy sources that do not consume nonrenewable resources, and are not provided by BC Hydro, including solar, wind, water, geothermal and biomass. These projects are eligible for a 10-year tax exemption, reduced by 10% per year, plus 50% DCC reduction to a maximum of $75,000. Some Positive Highlights to Note: • Three municipalities decreased their costs by 8% or higher • F our municipalities reported approval times decreased by 33% or greater, with one municipality reporting a 47% decrease Some Not-So-Positive Highlights to Note: • Three municipalities increased their costs by 44% or higher, largely attributed to increased DCC rates in the City and District of North Vancouver • Three municipalities reported slower approval times by 25% or greater, with one municipality reporting a 75% increase in time In producing this annual publication, NAIOP strives to provide its membership and the business community as a whole with a reference tool that quantifies the costs and processing times associated with typical development projects within Metro Vancouver municipal jurisdictions. Moreover, we believe the survey can be utilized by the municipalities, whose active participation makes this survey possible, as a gauge for their own development costs and approval processes. • Index Survey Scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Marketbeat: Industrial Snapshot. . . . 3 Future Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Move Towards Green. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Municipal Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Comparative Tax Burden. . . . . . . . . . 9 Mill Rates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Building Permit Data. . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Timing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 NAME Awards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 CREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2 Regional Industrial Development Cost Survey — Fall 2015 METRO VANCOUVER CHAPTER Industrial Development Scenario VANCOUVER CHAPTER T he proposal consists of constructing a 100,000-square-foot (9,290-squaremetre) concrete tilt-up distribution warehouse with a 15,000-square-foot (1,394-square-metre) office component in a single-storey structure. The office component of the building will be improved throughout as required by code for its designated use/occupancy with two (2) full three-piece washroom facilities and the warehouse component with one (1) full three-piece facility. Both areas will be fully sprinklered, unless this requirement is not mandatory in the particular jurisdiction, and will require all new services from the property line. The building is proposed for an unsubdivided, residentially zoned six-acre lot. The land will have to be subdivided to create one parcel, which will have net size of 5.5 acres less road and other dedications. The newly created parcel will enjoy 490 feet of frontage on a 15-year-old dedicated municipal roadway and interior parcel lines with adjacent lots. The property is located within an area designated on the municipality’s official plan as suitable for industrial use, and the design complies with all of the bylaw regulations governing the general office/ industrial zoning in the jurisdiction. Additionally, the land is located within a DCC applicable area (if the jurisdiction employs a DCC bylaw). Subdivision, rezoning and a development permit will be required. The intent is to accurately reflect all of the municipal costs involved in the process of rezoning, subdividing land and obtaining development and building permits. CHAPTER FRONT ELEVATION 4 SIDE ELEVATION 40'-0" 28'-0" WAREHOUSE 5 CROSS SECTION 30'-0" WAREHOUSE OFFICE 6 CROSS SECTION 12'-0" Scenario The cost to construct the building, exclusive of land cost but inclusive of on-site improvements, is estimated at a total of $87 per square foot ($79.50 per square foot for building and $7.50 per square foot for site improvements) or $8.7 million for the purposes of this exercise. Off-site works will be necessary in the amount of $750,000 for street and drainage improvements and these works are not DCC rebatable. 3 28'-0" GREATER VANCOUVER 3 Regional Industrial Development Cost Survey — Fall 2015 METRO VANCOUVER CHAPTER Marketbeat: Industrial Snapshot Source: RBC Economics INDUSTRIAL MARKET OVERVIEW For the third consecutive quarter, vacancy rates have decreased and have now dipped below 4%, the lowest since Net Absorption/Asking Rent VANCOUVER OUTLOOK Since the economy appears to be improving and the demand for larger blocks of available space is increasing, there is currently a “construction boom” underway. In a recently conducted survey, there is more than 4.6 million square feet of inventory coming to the market within the next 18 months. It should be noted however that not all of this space will be available to the market as approximately 40% of the space is pre-leased. Not since 2007 has the market been able to withstand this much speculative product being added to inventory. Although there may be a slight uptick in vacancy rates as some of these new buildings are completed, recent leasing activity figures have shown that the space will be leased quickly and the trend of positive absorption will continue. • CHAPTER Vancouver Industrial Market Indicators Q3 2014 Q3 2015 12-MONTH FORECAST Overall Vacancy 4.2% 3.9% ▼ Net Absorption 966K 2.0M ▲ REATER Direct Asking Rents G1.7M (psf/yr) Overall Average Ask- $8.07M ing Rent 4.7M VANCOUVER CHAPTER ❚ E conomic indicators point to British Columbia maintaining its position at the top of the provincial growth rankings in 2015, led by the strength of the consumer who benefits from rising housing valuations, low gasoline prices and accommodative borrowing conditions. Stronger U.S. demand and a low Canadian dollar are further buttressing the province’s ongoing economic expansion, although softer growth prospects in Asia are tempering the export sectors. It is expected that real economic activity will expand by 2.9% in 2015 and strengthen marginally to 3.1% in 2016. Q2 2013. Although the average lease rate continues to hover at $8 per square foot (psf) for the overall market, rental rates differ remarkably market to market. Absorption levels spiked this quarter on account of several large tenants such as TJX, Ironwood Studios Ltd. and Lululemon Athletica leasing space. It is expected that this positive absorption trend will continue as several large tenants are in the market looking for new space or are looking to expand. Although leasing activity levels have seen some resurgence, strata and freestanding building sales are also up. Strata sales in some markets are achieving rates of close to $200 psf. So far, 2015 has been a good year for users buying buildings; a prime example this quarter is GFR Pharma’s acquisition of the Sony building in Coquitlam. $8.07M ▲ Economic Indicators Q3 2014 Q3 2015 12-MONTH FORECAST Vancouver Employment 1.29M 1.31M ▼ Vancouver Unemployment 6.2% 6.0% ▲ Canadian Unemployment 6.9% 7.0% ❚ ECONOMIC OVERVIEW Overall Vacancy The Commercial Real Estate Lawyers at Koffman Kalef LLP include: The Commercial Real Estate Group of Koffman Kalef LLP are: Our Commercial Real Estate practice group represents clients in a variety of complex real estate transactions and development matters including: the purchase and sale of shopping centres, office buildings and industrial parks; strata property development matters, including the preparation and filing of Disclosure Statements under the Real Estate Development Marketing Act; land assemblies, subdivision matters, including providing advice regarding environmental and municipal requirements; bare land strata developments, strata hotel and recreational developments, and leasing transactions (industrial, office, retail, and First Nations). We also advise our real estate clients in connection with construction, takeout and inventory financings, and the structuring of joint ventures, co-ownership arrangements and real estate syndications of all types, including limited partnerships. 19th Floor, 885 West Georgia Street Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3H4 Canada Telephone 604-891-3688 Fax 604-891-3788 www.kkbl.com Patrick J. Julian Direct: 604-891-3605 Email: [email protected] Erin K. Tait Direct 604-891-3618 Email: [email protected] Andrew G. Kadler Direct: 604-891-3633 Email: [email protected] Daniel S. Remick Direct: 604-891-3646 Email: [email protected] Stanley Wong Direct: 604-891-3628 Email: [email protected] Daniel B. Newfield Direct: 604-891-3641 Email: [email protected] 4 METRO VANCOUVER Regional Industrial Development Cost Survey — Fall 2015 CHAPTER MARKETBEAT MARKETBEAT Industrial Snapshot Q3 2015 Industrial Snapshot Q3 2015 Vancouver, BC Marketbeat: Industrial Snapshot Vancouver, BC VSUBMARKET A N C O U V E R TOTAL C H A P TINVENTORY ER BLDGS SUBMARKET TOTAL BLDGS INVENTORY Abbotsford N/A 7,177,949 Abbotsford N/A 7,177,949 Burnaby N/A 29,464,485 Burnaby N/A 29,464,485 Coquitlam N/A 7,423,716 Coquitlam N/A 7,423,716 Delta N/A 22,708,174 Delta N/A 22,708,174 Langley N/A 16,548,117 Langley N/A 16,548,117 Maple Ridge N/A 3,026,695 Maple Ridge N/A 3,026,695 New Westminster N/A 5,226,161 New Westminster N/A 5,226,161 North Shore N/A 5,762,577 North Shore N/A 5,762,577 Port 6,451,068 G R E Coquitlam A T E R V A N C O U V EN/A R CHAP TER Port Coquitlam N/A 6,451,068 Port Moody N/A 904,444 Port Moody N/A 904,444 Richmond N/A 37,912,524 Richmond N/A 37,912,524 Surrey N/A 32,305,772 Surrey N/A 32,305,772 Vancouver N/A 23,695,845 Vancouver N/A 23,695,845 VANCOUVER N/A 198,607,527 TOTALS VANCOUVER N/A 198,607,527 TOTALS *Based on 1-3 acre parcel of serviced industrial land *Based on 1-3 acre parcel of serviced industrial land Key Lease Transactions Q3 2015 Key Lease Transactions Q3 2015 PROPERTY PROPERTY Boundary Bay – Phase II Boundary Bay – Phase II 888 S.E. Marine Drive 888 S.E. Marine Drive South Fraser Industrial Centre South Fraser Industrial Centre 24th & 192nd 24th & 192nd 19055 Airport Way 19055 Airport Way Key Sales Transactions Q3 2015 Key Sales Transactions Q3 2015 PROPERTY PROPERTY 12091 88th Avenue 12091 88th Avenue 4671, 4691, 4693, 4700, 4720 & 4740 Vanguard Road 4671, 4691, 4693, 4700, 4720 & 4740 Vanguard Road 65 North Bend Street 65 North Bend Street YTD LEASING ACTIVITY YTD LEASING ACTIVITY OVERALL VACANCY RATE OVERALL VACANCY RATE 74,470 74,470 1,614,081 1,614,081 295,422 295,422 2,048,716 2,048,716 775,094 775,094 321,638 321,638 269,216 269,216 82,940 82,940 406,833 406,833 13,546 13,546 1,750,790 1,750,790 1,740,261 1,740,261 1,188,895 1,188,895 10,581,902 10,581,902 4.0% 4.0% 3.9% 3.9% 2.3% 2.3% 5.8% 5.8% 3.1% 3.1% 13.4% 13.4% 6.7% 6.7% 1.8% 1.8% 4.4% 4.4% 0.3% 0.3% 2.4% 2.4% 4.7% 4.7% 3.3% 3.3% 3.9% 3.9% YTD NET OVERALL YTD NET ABSORPTION OVERALL ABSORPTION 6,088 6,088 26,975 26,975 112,439 112,439 812,759 812,759 526,727 526,727 (206,879) (206,879) (65,417) (65,417) (1,415) (1,415) 195,488 195,488 3,773 3,773 653,457 653,457 178,584 178,584 (104,336) (104,336) 2,138,243 2,138,243 SF SF 427,394 427,394 177,033 177,033 155,562 155,562 150,000 150,000 135,115 135,115 TENANT TENANT TJX TJX Ironwood Studios Ltd. Ironwood Studios Ltd. Lululemon Athletica Lululemon Athletica A-52 A-52 JYSK Linen ‘N Furniture Inc. JYSK Linen ‘N Furniture Inc. SF SF SELLER/BUYER SELLER/BUYER Postmedia Network Inc. / Pacific Press Properties Postmedia Network Inc. /Inc. Pacific Press Properties Inc. Carnarvon Properties Ltd. / South Street Development Carnarvon Properties Ltd. / Group South Street Development Sony of Canada Ltd. / GFR Group Pharma Ltd. Sony of Canada Ltd. / GFR Pharma Ltd. 195,960 195,960 194,000 194,000 121,884 121,884 YTD UNDER CNSTR CNSTR YTD UNDER CNSTR COMPLETIONS CNSTR COMPLETIONS 153,702 153,702 552,489 552,489 0 0 1,759,000 1,759,000 408,318 408,318 308,000 308,000 299,383 299,383 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,999 13,999 845,977 845,977 325,478 325,478 4,665,746 4,665,746 36,000 36,000 86,000 86,000 0 0 527,153 527,153 381,390 381,390 0 0 243,610 243,610 0 0 0 0 0 0 84,300 84,300 498,127 498,127 65,062 65,062 1,921,642 1,921,642 WEIGHTED AVG. WEIGHTED NET RENT AVG. NET RENT $7.30 $7.30 $8.65 $8.65 $10.20 $10.20 $7.31 $7.31 $8.01 $8.01 $7.15 $7.15 $5.59 $5.59 $13.77 $13.77 $7.61 $7.61 $10.81 $10.81 $8.35 $8.35 $7.79 $7.79 $10.16 $10.16 $8.07 $8.07 PROPERTY TYPE PROPERTY TYPE Warehouse Distribution Warehouse Distribution Warehouse Warehouse Warehouse Distribution Warehouse Distribution Warehouse Warehouse Warehouse Distribution Warehouse Distribution WEIGHTED AVG. WEIGHTED ADD. RENT AVG. ADD. RENT $3.12 $3.12 $3.73 $3.73 $4.25 $4.25 $3.26 $3.26 $3.38 $3.38 $2.38 $2.38 $3.67 $3.67 $5.81 $5.81 $3.14 $3.14 $3.75 $3.75 $3.46 $3.46 $2.84 $2.84 $4.19 $4.19 $3.42 $3.42 AV. COST OF LAND * AV. (PER COSTACRE) OF LAND (PER ACRE) * $825K – 1.1M $825K – 1.1M $1.5M – 1.7M $1.5M – 1.7M $1.4M – 1.5M $1.4M – 1.5M $950K – 1.2M $950K – 1.2M $ 950K – 1.5M $ 950K – 1.5M $450K – 1.0M $450K – 1.0M $1.0M – 1.4M $1.0M – 1.4M $2.5M – 3.0M $2.5M – 3.0M $1.3M – 1.5M $1.3M – 1.5M $1.3M – 1.5M $1.3M – 1.5M $1.0M – 1.5M $1.0M – 1.5M $1.0 – 1.6M $1.0 – 1.6M $1.5M – 2.6M $1.5M – 2.6M $1.1M – 1.6M $1.1M – 1.6M SUBMARKET SUBMARKET Delta Delta Vancouver Vancouver Delta Delta Surrey Surrey Pitt Meadows Pitt Meadows PROPERTY TYPE PROPERTY TYPE PRICE PRICE SUBMARKET SUBMARKET Light Impact Industrial Light Impact Industrial $17,600,000 $17,600,000 Surrey Surrey Industrial Retail Industrial Retail $22,000,000 $22,000,000 Richmond Richmond General Industrial General Industrial $19,250,000 $19,250,000 Coquitlam Coquitlam About Cushman & Wakefield About Cushman &isWakefield Cushman & Wakefield a global leader in commercial real estate services, helping clients transform the way Cushman & Wakefield a global leader43,000 in commercial realinestate helping clients theand way people work, shop, andislive. The firm’s employees more services, than 60 countries providetransform deep local peopleinsights work, shop, and live. The firm’s 43,000 employeesand in more thanaround 60 countries provide deep local and global that create significant value for occupiers investors the world. Cushman & Wakefield global insights that create significant occupiers and the world. Cushman & Wakefield is among the largest commercial realvalue estatefor services firms in investors the world around with revenues of $5 billion across core is amongofthe largestleasing, commercial estatecapital services firms infacilities the world with revenues $5 billion acrossglobal core services agency assetreal services, markets, services (brandedofC&W Services), services of agency leasing, asset services, capital markets, facilities services (branded C&W Services), global occupier services, investment management (branded DTZ Investors), tenant representation and valuations & occupier investment management (branded DTZ or Investors), tenant representation advisory. services, To learn more, visit www.cushmanwakefield.com follow @Cushwake on Twitter. and valuations & advisory. To learn more, visit www.cushmanwakefield.com or follow @Cushwake on Twitter. Copyright © 2015 Cushman & Wakefield. All rights reserved. The information contained within this report is gathered from multiple sources considered to be reliable. The Cushman information containAllerrors omissions and is presented without within any warranty or representations to its accuracy. Copyright © 2015 & may Wakefield. rightsorreserved. The information contained this report is gathered fromas multiple sources considered to be reliable. The information may contain errors or omissions and is presented without any warranty or representations as to its accuracy. Economic indicators point to British Columbia maintaining its position at the top of the provincial growth rankings in 2015, led by the strength of the consumer who benefits from rising housing valuations, low gasoline prices and accommodative borrowing conditions Andrea Welburn Andrea Welburn Manager, Information & Research Manager, & Research 700 - 700 Information West Georgia Street Vancouver, BC Georgia V7Y 1A1Street 700 - 700 West Vancouver, BC V7Y 1A1 Tel: (604) 683-3111 Fax:(604) (604)683-3111 683-0432 Tel: Fax: (604) 683-0432 [email protected] [email protected] www.cushmanwakefield.com www.cushmanwakefield.com BC’s #1 law firm for large real estate transactions Since 2010, named more than any other law firm in “Biggest Real Estate Deals” - Business in Vancouver cwilson.com CWRealEstate.ca 5 Regional Industrial Development Cost Survey — Fall 2015 METRO VANCOUVER CHAPTER Future Trends A s an indication of what the future could bring, NAIOP includes a section within its survey on future policy directions and changes to existing policies that were under consideration at the time of publication. This information comes with a general disclaimer that all or a majority of these potential changes are subject to either council or staff approval, and final drafting. Below are some highlights of what could be coming in the near future to a jurisdiction near you. City of Port Moody A review of the DCC Bylaw is underway. City of Vancouver A new planning process is underway for the area known as False Creek Flats, which will include industrial zoning areas. The City of Vancouver is looking to expand usage of industrial lands for the digital industry. City of New Westminster The city is currently doing a comprehensive review of the OCP. The updated OCP will provide a renewed vision for New Westminster, and the regulatory framework to guide growth toward that vision. The OCP will contain policies on housing, parks and open space, arts and culture, heritage, energy, utility services, transportation, well-being, hazards, economy and environment. It will also include a land-use designation map, which will indicate the future land uses that would be supported by council. The land-use designations will determine future development and redevelopment of property within the city. The policies and land-use map, together with tools and actions for implementation, will help to shape the future growth of New Westminster. The city is about to begin the process of creating an economic plan. The city feels it is synergistic to create both this plan and the OCP at the same time. Though the economic plan will have a broad scope, the city has identified six strategic economic priorities that will IMAGINE EXTENDING YOUR BUSINESS BY EXPANDING YOUR CLIENTS’ PREMISES. be integral to the development of a new plan: 1. Continue to attract mediumand high-density residential development along the SkyTrain corridor 2. Promote Class A office space in transit-oriented developments 3. Complete the downtown vision 4. Diversify to a knowledge-based economy by creating technology and innovation opportunities throughout the city 5. Intensify underutilized industrial land by transitioning to new economic opportunities 6. Create an economic health-care cluster The OCP will be one important tool for implementing the findings of the plan. City of Coquitlam The City of Coquitlam has completed the industrial zones consolidation work. The city has consolidated nine industrial zones into three new zones, which should help facilitate industrial business operators in VANCOUVER GREATER VANCOUVER Contact us > 1- 888 -INFO-BDC BDC IS THE ONLY BANK DEDICATED EXCLUSIVELY TO ENTREPRENEURS. BDCad_VAncouver_4,8x6,2_031015_en.indd 2 2015-11-03 3:30 PM CHAPTER A new planning process is underway for the area known as False Creek Flats, which will include industrial zoning areas Real Estate Strategy Due Diligence Architecture Interior Design Engineering Construction Maintenance omicronaec.com Boost your commercial real estate business. Contact us to find out how our flexible financing and consulting services can help your corporate clients expand their horizons. CHAPTER finding appropriate locations to operate their business in Coquitlam’s industrial areas. It will also improve administration of the Zoning Bylaw and the review and processing of development applications for industrial sites. 6 Regional Industrial Development Cost Survey — Fall 2015 METRO VANCOUVER CHAPTER Move Towards Green A VANCOUVER CHAPTER s a snapshot of the increasing move towards sustainability amongst the municipalities, NAIOP has included a section within its survey on whether there are any sustainable/green building requirements (beyond the requirements in the BC Building Code) or incentives in place within each municipality. Of the 18 municipalities interviewed for this year’s survey, 13 had some form of sustainability incentive or requirement for a new development application. This is a small increase over the 2013 results, which saw 12 municipalities identify either a green building incentive or requirement. Most municipalities now require some form of sustainability reporting as part of their rezoning/development application, and many of these are offering incentives including density bonusing, parking reductions, floor area exclusions, CAC exemption, as well as fast-tracking the permit process for “green” projects. In future, the expectation is that many of the processes that are now voluntary will be formalized, as municipalities raise the bar on what is considered green. GREATER VANCOUVER Municipality Green Building Incentives Development Requirements Municipality of Delta Developed a “Green Growth Index” as a tool to identify the sustainability features of major new development projects. These features are reported to council and secured as part of development agreements as appropriate. District of North Vancouver Green Building Policy: projects that require rezoning must be designed to Built Green Gold or LEED Gold (or equivalent). City of Richmond The Zoning Bylaw includes a floor area exemption for green building mechanical and associated service spaces. The Green Roof Bylaw requires industrial buildings >2,000 sq. m. to achieve stormwater runoff objectives. The OCP supports provision of electric vehicle charging infrastructure. The City Centre Area Plan recommends developments achieve a minimum LEED Silver equivalency. The city is introducing District Energy utility systems, mainly within the city centre. City of New Westminster Yes. New Westminster has a community energy efficiency program in place called Energy Save New West that is designed to encourage energy efficiency improvements and greenhouse gas reductions in new and existing buildings. For the business/commercial sector, Energy Save New West engages interested commercial tenants and building owners with current demand-side management programs (rebates and incentives) available from BC Hydro Power Smart and FortisBC. We have also offered a limited number of free energy efficiency assessments to interested businesses to help establish the business case for an energy improvement or retrofit. For businesses interested in exploring a deeper level of improvements, we offer a subsidy on one year of support and engagement to local businesses through the Climate Smart initiative, with 13 firms participating in this program to date (ranging from small businesses to large industrial clients). Not at present for this building typology (i.e., tilt-up construction warehouse with attached office). However, for all development permit applications, the city does have a Sustainability Report Card in place that is used as a scorecard that captures and ranks various building systems or mechanical components as well as architectural design approaches that would have a positive impact on the environment, community or local economy. The scorecard is used as a discussion tool with the applicant to understand how these attributes may (or may not) be ultimately incorporated into the final design of the building. A summary of the result of the Sustainability Report Card is included within the Council Report on the overall development application. Energy efficiency aspects of the proposed building are captured within the environmental section of the Sustainability Report Card. City of Surrey Encouraged and negotiated through the rezoning and development permit application review process. Applicant is required to provide a sustainability checklist as part of rezoning/development permit application. CHAPTER City of Burnaby Green building/LEED standards may be determined on a sitespecific basis with co-operation of developer. Some reduction in parking for co-op car spaces. City of Langley Sustainability checklist is required to be completed with RZ/DP/SD applications. City of Vancouver Vancouver exceeds all BCBC requirements for green buildings. Vancouver has been a leader in green building and energy requirements and is used as a role model for our province, other provinces and municipalities. City of Port Coquitlam Environmental conservation development permit area objective and guidelines were introduced in 2013 to promote energy and water conservation and reduction of greenhouse gases. City of Maple Ridge Yes. The city has an Employment Lands Investment Incentive Program for all industrial developments that achieve LEED Silver or better certification, or for projects that choose energy sources that do not consume non-renewable resources, and are not provided by BC Hydro, including solar, wind, water, geothermal and biomass. These projects are eligible for a 10-year tax exemption, reduced by 10% per year, plus 50% DCC reduction to a maximum of $75,000. City of North Vancouver Yes. The city encourages sustainable design through a variety of mechanisms. These include: floor area exemptions for enhanced code compliance, which includes documenting the integrated design team’s responsibilities, engaging an energy modelling professional and commissioning the building; height, setback and floor area exemptions for green building technologies (e.g. solar installations, green roofs, green building equipment, increased insulation); and sustainable development guidelines that provide guidance to applicants on how to include sustainability in their design proposal. City of Port Moody A sustainability checklist for new development is required with all rezoning and development permit applications. Includes an energy efficiency target for new industrial buildings of 25% better than Model National Energy Code. City of Pitt Meadows Low-flow toilet rebate program. It’s all about working well together. Working with BC’s Real Estate Development Industry since 1991 construction monitoring environmental assessments habitat restoration contamination management See our website for more info. pggroup.com Residential solar hot water ready regulations, sustainability checklist. 7 Regional Industrial Development Cost Survey — Fall 2015 METRO VANCOUVER CHAPTER Municipal Fees VANCOUVER Fees and Schedule that cities such as Richmond that do not vary their DCC levels across their municipality can appear to be highercost jurisdictions when compared to other cities such as Port Coquitlam that do vary DCC charges. Port Coquitlam assumed the parcel of land used in the study was located in a low DCC rate area and the results should be considered in light of these facts. Acknowledgement NAIOP would like to acknowledge and thank all of the municipalities that took part in this year’s Development Cost Survey. Participation is voluntary and the time expended to respond to it can be significant, not unlike a “real” development application. Development in any jurisdiction is a partnership between business and the community. NAIOP is pleased to be in a position to work, on behalf of our members, with all of Fee Changes 2013 to 2015 Administration and Processing Fees DCC Charges Sewer Hookup Cost Water Hookup Cost Landscape/ Street Improvements Fees Development Permit Fee Rezoning Application Fee Metro Regional Sewer and Drainage Fees Refundable Security Deposits / Letters of Credit Other Taxes (Municipallycontrolled portion) Total (Excluding Metro Regional Charges & Taxes) 2013 Total Percentage Change 2001 Total Percentage Change from 2001 Equivalent Annual Average Inflation Rate City of Maple Ridge 2,422 n/a 23,066 820 30,000 71,338 19,400 5,000 n/a 2,492 5,590 81,100 n/a n/a 107,043,060 160,128 242,171 -33.9% 163,165 -2% -0.13% 2 City of Burnaby 2,705 100 88,347 2,104 32,299 n/a 21,420 10,543 n/a 20,880 16,039 81,100 n/a n/a 79,382,280 194,437 184,209 5.6% 73,660 164% 7.18% 6 3 City of New Westminster 1,310 100 71,740 2,113 30,000 112,603 10,000 5,000 5,250 4,872 8,714 81,000 n/a n/a 147,753,840 251,702 280,460 -10.3% 96,209 162% 7.11% 4 4 City of Chilliwack 745 50 71,841 n/a 8,750 191,374 160 80 n/a 742 2,455 n/a n/a n/a 81,531,267 276,197 271,435 1.8% n/a n/a n/a 3 5 City of Port Moody 2,984 80 63,985 1,970 30,000 115,740 60,000 20,500 n/a 21,143 21,943 81,100 4% of cost estimate n/a 161,013,510 338,344 261,239 29.5% 140,251 141% 6.49% 7 6 Municipality of Delta 435 n/a 61,532 1,402 30,000 292,955 8,585 n/a n/a n/a 3,913 93,265 8,380 n/a 89,951,910 398,821 323,104 23.4% 310,784 28% 1.80% 10 7 City of Pitt Meadows 1,950 n/a 71,550 n/a 24,000 287,560 13,200 10,100 2,000 6,620 5,569 81,081 n/a n/a 145,256,940 422,549 418,051 1.1% 154,747 173% 7.44% 11 8 City of Coquitlam 2,500 n/a 70,472 1,393 n/a 320,505 n/a n/a 34,563 8,538 6,142 81,100 n/a n/a 117,668,370 444,112 435,100 2.1% 304,339 46% 2.74% 5 9 City of North Vancouver 1,650 100 70,276 1,420 61,594 212,757 60,000 40,000 n/a n/a 7,406 60,500 146,250 n/a 73,256,958 455,202 272,479 67.1% 259,729 75% 4.09% 12 10 City of Langley 2,100 n/a 72,005 1,159 33,750 303,330 27,000 35,000 n/a 10,000 6,428 81,100 n/a n/a 86,132,610 490,772 488,733 0.4% 132,130 271% 9.83% 15 11 City of Port Coquitlam2 750 n/a 70,320 1,874 27,750 359,630 12,900 8,000 n/a 2,300 12,877 n/a 110% of landscape estimate n/a 115,251,510 496,401 539,810 -8.0% 193,743 156% 6.95% 13 12 District of Mission3 1,535 100 55,089 1,790 37,000 361,399 27,042 7,966 n/a 2,430 4,797 n/a n/a n/a 119,321,370 499,147 507,097 -1.6% n/a n/a n/a 8 13 City of Abbotsford 1,800 100 53,085 1,177 49,925 391,410 150 3,550 38,880 3,925 6,240 n/a n/a n/a 91,898,361 550,242 383,082 43.6% n/a n/a n/a 14 14 City of Surrey 1,677 50 73,645 n/a 37,989 426,289 n/a n/a 6,960 9,346 5,787 81,100 n/a n/a 53,015,538 561,743 530,893 5.8% 322,563 74% 4.04% 16 15 Township of Langley 1,760 0 66,243 1,000 34,250 445,383 n/a 4,900 3,950 7,510 10,000 81,100 n/a n/a 81,517,260 574,996 563,049 2.1% 350,357 64% 3.60% 9 16 District of North Vancouver 1,580 114 98,819 2,739 31,750 476,953 33,333 32,000 n/a 3,800 6,610 69,570 n/a 780 103,371,660 687,698 350,548 96.2% 210,330 227% 8.83% 17 17 City of Vancouver 7,830 n/a 35,519 2,440 n/a 513,000 41,702 18,565 n/a 26,363 48,916 44,300 landscape deposit refunded 515 63,909,330 694,335 676,671 2.6% 202,039 244% 9.22% 18 18 City of Richmond 816 Municipality 1 1 2015 Rank 2 2013 Rank Inspection Fees for Sprinklers CHAPTER Building Permit Application/ Processing Fees GREATER VANCOUVER Site Profile A graph on the page 8 illustrates the percentage change in development fees levied by each municipality between 2013 and 2015. Of the 18 municipalities that responded to the survey, 14 reported a wide range of increases ranging from 0.2% to 96%. Four municipalities reduced fees over this time frame. the Metro Vancouver jurisdictions that participated in the publication of this information for the business community. NAIOP would also like to acknowledge the contributions from Cushman & Wakefield for the Marketbeat report. If you have any questions on the data, please contact the co-ordinator of the Cost of Business Survey, Christopher Correia, at christopher@ pacificlandgroup.ca. Subdivision Permit The total fees levied by each municipality for the construction of a 100,000-squarefoot industrial distribution warehouse and office building development (as described on page 3) are presented below. It is important to note that one of the main fees levied by each municipality is development cost charges (DCCs), which tend to vary amongst, and within, each municipality. Be mindful of the range of DCCs when reviewing the total development costs. As DCCs are normally the largest component of the overall costs of development, we would normally expect “developing” areas to post the highest increases, but in this case it would appear that DCCs are equally high in some already urbanized municipalities, particularly Vancouver and the District of North Vancouver. We would also note CHAPTER Metro Vancouver 58 66,291 n/a 31,086 896,000 11,300 10,800 n/a 12,933 2,869 50,500 n/a n/a 60,402,969 1,032,152 1,030,418 0.2% 416,481 148% 6.70% District of West Vancouver¹ n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a City of White Rock1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 Survey not applicable due to no industrially zoned land in the municipality 2 For area one $96,348/acre, otherwise area 2 is $359,630/acre 3 The administration fee requires a $75,000 warranty fee for one year Increase from 2013 Survey Decrease from 2013 Survey 8 Regional Industrial Development Cost Survey — Fall 2015 METRO VANCOUVER CHAPTER Percentage Change Total Fees, Excluding Metro Regional Charges & Taxes Total fees, excluding Metro Regional charges & taxes Percentage change City of Richmond City of Vancouver VANCOUVER District of North Vancouver $1,032,152 City of Richmond $694,335 CHAPTER $687,698 Township of Langley City of Surrey $561,743 $496,401 City of Langley $490,772 City of North Vancouver City of Surrey $455,202 GREATER VANCOUVER City of Coquitlam CHAPTER City of Pitt Meadows $422,549 $194,437 City of Maple Ridge $200,000 0.42% 67.06% 2.07% 1.08% 23.43% 29.52% City of Chilliwack 1.75% City of New Westminster -10.25% City of Burnaby $160,128 $0 -8.04% City of Langley City of Port Moody $251,702 City of Burnaby City of Port Coquitlam City of Pitt Meadows $276,197 City of New Westminster -1.57% Municipality of Delta $338,344 City of Chilliwack 43.64% District of Mission City of Coquitlam $398,821 City of Port Moody 5.81% City of North Vancouver $444,112 Municipality of Delta 2.12% City of Abbotsford $499,147 City of Port Coquitlam 96.18% Township of Langley $550,242 District of Mission 2.61% District of North Vancouver $574,996 City of Abbotsford 0.17% City of Vancouver $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 5.55% City of Maple Ridge -33.88% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 120% 100% Equivalent Annual Average Inflation Rate City of Richmond 6.70% City of Vancouver 9.22% District of North Vancouver junior.pdf 1 2015-10-06 8.83% 11:42 AM Township of Langley 3.60% City of Surrey FOCUSSED ON THE PRECISION OF OUR CLIENTS’ VISION ONE BUILDING AT A TIME 4.04% City of Port Coquitlam 6.95% City of Langley 9.83% City of North Vancouver 4.09% City of Coquitlam 2.74% City of Pitt Meadows 7.44% Municipality of Delta 1.80% City of Port Moody City of New Westminster 7.11% City of Burnaby 7.18% City of Maple Ridge -2.00% C 6.49% -0.13% 0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% M Y CM MY CY Sobeys Thrifty Foods Distribution Centre Victoria, BC CMY K Design Build General Contracting Construction Management For more information please call us at 604-638-1212 or visit our website at www.walesmclelland.com Counterpoint interiors inC. Design | BuilD | Relocate | Facilitate 745 THURLOW An outstanding new LEED Gold Office Tower. We are proud to have designed and built out the 15th and 16th floors for a first use Tenant, an outstanding Insurance Company. Call us now to be a part of your team. We build what we Design. When you need to be impressed! Brian Carroll, Ken Ly, Taylor Carroll 604-880-2248 [email protected] | www.counterpoints.com 12.00% 9 Regional Industrial Development Cost Survey — Fall 2015 METRO VANCOUVER CHAPTER Comparative Tax Burden W hile it may not be the primary consideration, a growing number of businesses are considering the impact of the property tax burden, and the variations in that burden across the region, when making the decision on where to locate. Property taxes are not, for the most part, factored into per-square-foot lease prices but, like common area and maintenance (CAM) costs, they are paid in addition to the base lease rates. Municipal property taxes pay for city services such as parks, roads, utilities, policing, fire protection and local improvements. Property tax rates within any municipality are impacted by two factors. The first is the assessed value of the property being taxed and the second is the tax rate (mill rate) that the municipality applies to various property types. Municipalities ensure their ability to balance their budgets with their ability to adjust mill rates. The property tax burden for businesses varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction; however, compared to residential tax rates, businesses (“industrial” and “commercial” property designations) pay a significantly greater proportion of the property taxes. For light industrial and commercial properties, research has indicated that the ideal median tax ratio (industrial/ commercial tax rate to residential tax rate) is 3 to 1. Fewer than half the municipalities surveyed are in line with this ratio. The awareness among business owners of the disparity between industrial and residential tax rates is growing. Small and medium-sized industrial businesses are essential to the socio-economic health of the community and contribute to the goal of building compact sustainable cities. High municipal property taxes for these types of businesses have serious impacts on our city, neighbourhoods and employment opportunities for residents. Although it is often said that businesses “don’t vote” in local elections, in reality they do cast a ballot, by making the decision to relocate to lower-cost jurisdictions in which their business can thrive and contribute to the sustainability and vitality of their local communities. It is worth noting that mill rates listed include only mandatory portions of the mill rate designated for the municipality, which may include mandatory business improvement area fees, which are authorized by municipal councils. Even with this potential increase in the mill rate, 16 of 18 municipalities reduced their ratio from 2013 to 2015. The biggest change can be seen by the City of Richmond, which reduced its ratio from VANCOUVER 3.832:1 to 3.174:1. Acknowledging that changes to assessed property values impact mill rates, we commend these municipalities for their efforts by lowering the light industrial tax rate at the expense of an increase in the residential rate. For 2015, the five municipalities with the lowest industrial to residential property tax burden (rated from lowest to highest) were: • City of Chilliwack • City of Abbotsford • City of Surrey • City of Langley • District of Maple Ridge All five of these municipalities remain the lowest since the 2013 edition of the survey. The five Metro Vancouver and Fraser Valley municipalities with the highest industrial to residential property tax burden (rated from highest to lowest) were: • City of Port Moody • District of North Vancouver • City of New Westminster • City of Coquitlam • City of Pitt Meadows Each municipality, except for Pitt Meadows, remains one of the highest since the 2013 edition of the survey. CHAPTER Municipal property taxes pay for city services such as parks, roads, utilities, policing, fire protection and local improvements GREATER VANCOUVER CHAPTER Mill Rates 2013 Rank 2015 Rank Municipality Light Industrial Mill Rate Residential Mill Rate Light Industrial to Residential Tax Ratio 9.37141 4.98666 1.879 Metro Vancouver 1 1 City of Chilliwack 2 2 City of Abbotsford 10.56303 5.09945 2.071 4 3 City of Surrey 6.09374 2.49070 2.447 Light Industrial to Residential Tax Ratio Light industrial to residential tax ratio City of Port Moody 4 City of Langley 9.90030 3.87940 2.552 City of Pitt Meadows 5 City of Maple Ridge 12.30380 4.47130 2.752 City of Vancouver 6 6 District of Mission 13.71510 4.91290 2.792 City of Burnaby City of North Vancouver 7 Township of Langley 9.36980 3.24630 2.886 8 Municipality of Delta 10.33930 3.55060 2.912 11 9 City of Richmond 6.94287 2.18723 3.174 10 10 City of Port Coquitlam 13.24730 3.79500 3.491 4.566 City of Coquitlam 3 7 5.005 City of New Westminster 5 8 5.336 District of North Vancouver 4.296 4.229 4.150 3.978 3.508 City of Port Coquitlam 3.491 City of Richmond 3.174 Municipality of Delta 2.912 Township of Langley 2.886 9 11 City of North Vancouver 8.42034 2.40051 3.508 12 12 City of Burnaby 9.12440 2.29380 3.978 14 13 City of Vancouver 7.34590 1.77001 4.150 City of Langley 13 14 City of Pitt Meadows 16.69620 3.94790 4.229 City of Surrey District of Mission 2.792 City of Maple Ridge 15 15 City of Coquitlam 13.52510 3.14820 4.296 City of Abbotsford 18 16 City of New Westminster 16.98320 3.71910 4.566 City of Chilliwack 16 17 District of North Vancouver 11.88180 2.37397 5.005 17 18 City of Port Moody 18.50730 3.46820 5.336 0.000 2.752 2.552 2.447 2.071 1.879 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 10 Regional Industrial Development Cost Survey — Fall 2015 METRO VANCOUVER CHAPTER Building Permit Data A VANCOUVER CHAPTER cross the Metro Vancouver and Fraser Valley regions, development activity has been steady with significant volume of building permits being issued. The City of Surrey leads this activity with 190 building permits for industrial buildings being issued in 2014. The City of Abbotsford and Township of Langley have issued large amounts of building permits as well, at 50 and 21 building permits, respectively. This demonstrates the significance of this industry in the South of Fraser area. In total, these three municipalities have approved over $164 million in industrial building activity. GREATER VANCOUVER CHAPTER Total value of BPs issued for new industrial buildings in 2014 Total number of BPs issued for new industrial buildings in 2014 Corporation of Delta 300,000 2 District of Mission 106,000 1 City of Abbotsford 16,225,650 50 District of North Vancouver 17,180,708 3 Richmond 10,450,000 5 City of New Westminster 0 0 City of Surrey 98,451,002 190 City of Burnaby 11,718,188 9 Township of Langley 50,133,110 21 City of Chilliwack 10,592,000 7 City of Langley 3,203,100 17 Vancouver 5,780,000 3 Port Coquitlam 7,200,000 3 City of Maple Ridge 697,000 4 City of North Vancouver 0 0 City of Coquitlam 300,000 2 City of Port Moody 0 0 City of Pitt Meadows 7,393,741 12 Over 60 years of industry experience with land and building opportunities in every major industrial area in Metro Vancouver. www.beediegroup.ca 11 Regional Industrial Development Cost Survey — Fall 2015 METRO VANCOUVER CHAPTER Timing 2013 Rank 2015 Rank VANCOUVER CHAPTER Municipality Pre-Application Design Review (days) Rezoning Process (days) Development Permit Process (days) Subdivision Approval (days) Building Permit (days) 2015 Approval Timing1 (days) 2013 Approval Timing (days) Percentage Change Metro Vancouver 1 1 City of Chilliwack n/a 30-90 concurrent concurrent concurrent 90 90 0% 2 2 Township of Langley 30 90-120 concurrent concurrent concurrent 120 120 0% 2 2 City of Richmond 3-5 90-120 concurrent concurrent concurrent 120 120 0% 2 2 District of Mission 14-28 30-90 concurrent concurrent <30 120 120 0% 2 2 City of Langley n/a 30-90 concurrent concurrent <30 120 120 1 2 City of Abbotsford 7 90-120 concurrent concurrent concurrent 120 90 33% 2 3 City of Pitt Meadows 5 90-120 concurrent concurrent <30 150 120 25% 3 3 Municipality of Delta 2 90-120 concurrent concurrent <30 150 150 0% 3 3 City of Burnaby n/a 120-150 concurrent concurrent concurrent 150 150 0% 6 3 City of Maple Ridge n/a 120-150 concurrent concurrent concurrent 150 240 -38% 4 4 City of Port Moody 42 150-180 concurrent concurrent concurrent 180 180 0% 7 5 City of Vancouver n/a >180 concurrent concurrent concurrent 180 270 -33% 2 6 City of Surrey 7 90-120 concurrent concurrent 30-90 210 120 75% 8 6 City of Coquitlam n/a 90-120 concurrent concurrent 30-90 210 360 -42% 6 6 City of North Vancouver n/a 90-120 concurrent concurrent 30-90 210 240 -13% 5 7 District of North Vancouver 30 120-150 concurrent concurrent 30-90 240 210 14% 9 8 City of Port Coquitlam n/a 120-150 concurrent concurrent 90-120 270 510 -47% 7 9 City of New Westminster n/a 120-150 concurrent concurrent 120-150 300 270 11% District of West Vancouver 2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a City of White Rock n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2 1 Outside estimate inclusive of concurrent processing of rezoning, subdivision, DP and BP where allowed, not including pre-application review 2 Survey not applicable due to no industrially-zoned land within the municipality. 0% GREATER VANCOUVER Increase from 2013 Survey Decrease from 2013 Survey Learn more about Delta, visit Delta.ca 2013 NAIOP “Most Fiscally Responsible” 2013 NAIOP “Most Improved Municipality” 2014 finalist Provincial Government’s “Open for Business Awards” 2014 recipient of National CAMA Award of Excellence for SOIL Initiative 2014 ranked 2nd by fDi Intelligence as a city of the future for business friendliness 2015 ranked #13 in MoneySense Magazine's “Canada’s Best Places to Live 2015.” 2015 NAIOP “Most Fiscally Responsible” CHAPTER 12 Regional Industrial Development Cost Survey — Fall 2015 METRO VANCOUVER CHAPTER Approval Times VANCOUVER CHAPTER On the right, the total approval times – from application date to building permit – are shown. Approval time frames shown can and will extend beyond the periods noted if the developer does not supply necessary information with the initial application or respond to requests for additional detail or clarification in a timely manner. Carrying costs (interest and taxes) represent a considerable component of pre-construction expenses, and additional time spent in the municipal approval process increases those costs. GREATER VANCOUVER City of New Westminster 300 City of Port Coquitlam 270 District of North Vancouver 240 City of North Vancouver 210 City of Coquitlam 210 City of Surrey 210 CHAPTER City of Vancouver 180 City of Port Moody 180 City of Maple Ridge 150 City of Burnaby 150 Municipality of Delta 150 City of Pitt Meadows 150 City of Abbotsford 120 City of Langley 120 District of Mission 120 City of Richmond 120 Township of Langley 120 City of Chilliwack 90 0 50 100 150 200 Days 250 300 350 13 Regional Industrial Development Cost Survey — Fall 2015 METRO VANCOUVER CHAPTER NAME Award Winners Municipality of Delta: NAIOP award for Municipal Excellence: Most Fiscally Responsible municipality. City of Maple Ridge: NAIOP award for Municipal Excellence: Most Improved and tied for Most Business-Friendly municipality (with the City of North Vancouver). City ofVNorth A N C O U Vancouver: VER CHAPTER Winner of the NAIOP award for Municipal Excellence for Most Business-Friendly Municipality (tied with city of Maple Ridge). GREATER VANCOUVER Mayor Lois Jackson: Our philosophy is to reduce and/or eliminate the debt load, and to “pay as you go.” I have a background in real estate from several years ago, and that knowledge never leaves you. I have built a connection with the development community and am familiar with issues like rezoning, and have an orientation which is pro-development. Mayor Nicole Read: We are open for business and have made process improvements that expedite licensing and other applications from the business community. We have worked on getting our timelines down and reducing our fees vis-a-vis processing development applications. Relationships with our developers are critical and we have worked hard to rebuild bridges with them. We still have work to do. The secret to a successful relationship between a municipality and the development community includes the following: a transparent process, an expedited timeline, and clarity and consistency of rules and intent in the Official Community Plan. As for the development community, the more effective ones are engaged in building complete communities. CHAPTER Mayor Darrell Mussatto:The development community is a partner with us. We as a city cannot achieve our goals without the success of the business community. We are a livable city only if our businesses, including developers, are successful. We have made great strides in sustainable design by offering incentives to developers and builders through a number of measures, such as removing stairs from the calculation of FSR. Accessible stairs, located in the right places, reduce energy and electrical useand contribute to a healthy lifestyle. The key challenge we face as a city and a region is dealing with densification, and the behavioural changes we need to make around mobility and transit use. We need to focus on goods and services movement, while making adjustments in our use of roads, bridges and the transit system. Property Management • Asset Management • Leasing • Strata Management Tel: (604) 602-1887 | www.warringtonpci.com | [email protected] 14 Regional Industrial Development Cost Survey — Fall 2015 5x8 WeR port_Layout 1 05/06/14 6:27 PM Page 1 METRO VANCOUVER CHAPTER 600 NAIOP Icon Speaker for 2015 VANCOUVER CHAPTER GREATER VANCOUVER 400 300 P eeter Wesik is the president of Wesgroup Properties, a family business started in British Columbia more than 50 years ago. Wesgroup is a private real estate organization with a diversified portfolio spanning residential and commercial real estate. Wesgroup has also invested in the equipment sales and service business under the brand names Williams Machinery and Westerra Equipment, with eight branches located throughout British Columbia. Peeter previously practised law as a partner at Russell & DuMoulin (now Fasken Martineau DuMoulin) and is involved in numerous industry associations including the Urban Development Institute, where he served as a director and 500 200 100 0 CHAPTER Peeter Wesik past chair. He is also a current director of the Royal BC Museum. There are certain things that just make Vancouver, Vancouver. Landmarks, nature, traditions. And of course, Business in Vancouver. In fact, from our perspective, so intertwined are we within the city dynamic, the two are essentially equal parts of the whole. It’s easy, really: Business + Vancouver = Business in Vancouver. We are business in Vancouver. biv.com House FP.indd 1 2015-11-05 4:02 PM 2016 COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE AWARDS OF EXCELLENCE MAY 17, 2016 NAIOP Vancouver, in partnership with Business in Vancouver, is delighted to present its excellence awards gala event: The 2016 Commercial Real Estate Awards of Excellence. This event will recognize excellence in commercial real estate within the Metro Vancouver area for the 2014 and 2015 calendar years. The awards recognize the full range of disciplines involved in creating successful real estate solutions, while highlighting the leadership role played by property owners, developers and professional advisers. The NAIOP and BIV Commercial Real Estate Awards of Excellence recognize quality and performance, innovation and creativity, teamwork and collaboration, as well as community and environmental awareness. Initial submission deadline for nominations: January 1, 2016 Shortlisted submission deadline: January 31, 2016 Gala date: May 17, 2016 AWARDS CATEGORIES INVESTMENT TRANSACTION Award will be given to the team or individual responsible for negotiating the top investment transaction completed during the 2014-15 calendar years. Selection will be based upon the complexity, innovation and creativity of the transaction to meet the objectives of all parties involved. Market impact of the transaction will also be considered. INDUSTRIAL LEASE Award will be given to the team or individual responsible for negotiating the top industrial lease completed during the 2014-15 calendar years. Selection will be based upon the complexity, innovation and creativity of the transaction to meet the objectives of landlord and/or tenant. Market impact of the transaction will also be considered. OFFICE DEVELOPMENT Award will be given to the team or individual responsible for developing the top office project completed during the 2014-15 calendar years. Selection will be based upon the quality, functionality, leasing, sustainability and financial performance of the project. Innovation will also be considered. MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT Award will be given to the team or individual responsible for developing the top mixed-use project completed during the 2014-15 calendar years. Selection will be based upon the quality, functionality, leasing, sustainability and financial performance of the project. Innovation and scale will be considered. OFFICE LEASE Award will be given to the team or individual responsible for negotiating the top office lease completed during the 2014-15 calendar years. Selection will be based upon the complexity, innovation and creativity of the transaction to meet the objectives of the landlord and tenant. Market impact of the transaction will also be considered. RETAIL DEVELOPMENT Award will be given to the team or individual responsible for developing the top retail project completed during the 2014-15 calendar years. Selection will be based upon the quality, functionality, leasing, sustainability and financial performance of the project. Innovation will also be considered. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Award will be given to the team or individual responsible for developing the top industrial development completed during the 2014-15 calendar years. Selection will be based upon the quality, functionality, leasing, sustainability and financial performance of the project. Innovation will also be considered. This category shall include both multiple building projects and single building projects. 35 DEVELOPING LEADER Award will be given to the NAIOP Vancouver developing leader who during the 2014-15 calendar years showed exemplary leadership in the commercial real estate industry and who contributed to the industry in a significant way. Download the application form at www.naiopvcr.com/events/cre-awards-of-excellence-gala/ Board of Directors 2015 Back, left to right: Gordon Wylie, Development Issues and Government Relations (Co-Chair), Chard Development Limited | Ernie Hee, Legal Counsel, McMillan LLP | Steffan Smith, Director, GWL Realty Advisors | Dan Jordan, Developing Leaders Chair, Colliers International Inc | Jennifer Podmore Russell, Breakfast Committee (Co-Chair), Deloitte | Marvin Haasen, Director, Madison Pacific Properties Inc. | Jarvis Rouillard, Director, Triovest Realty Advisors Inc. | Stephanie Setchell, Events Committee (Co-Chair), Farrell Estates Ltd. | Darren Burns, Communications Committee Chair, Stantec Architecture | Chris MacCauley, Vice President, Development Issues & Government Relations (Co-Chair), CBRE Limited Industrial Properties Front, left to right: Donald Harrison, National Director, Past President, GWL Realty Advisors Inc | Janay Koldinges, Events Committee (Co-Chair), Dialog | John Middleton, President, ONNI Group Darlene Hyde, Executive Director | Raymond Choy, Education Committee Chair, Peterson Group Missing: Steve Smith, Breakfast Committee (Co-Chair), Manulife Real Estate | Pav Sikham, CA, Treasurer, KPMG LLP Why become a member of NAIOP? • Local networking opportunities through monthly breakfast speaker series and events. • Mentorship Program and special events for Developing Leaders, under 35 years of age. • A triennial Commercial Real Estate Awards of Excellence Gala, to recognize the best in the industry. • Industry and market information—through breakfast speakers, special publications and the chapter website, www.naiopvcr.com • Access to the NAIOP Canada Sustainability Blog’s wide collection of articles, reports, case studies and other sustainability-related works • The Annual Cost of Business Report—which reviews the effectiveness of local municipalities in addressing office and industrial development projects. • Educational opportunities—through seminars, webinars and symposiums, including the annual Developers’ Symposium. • The “Icon Speaker” series, which provides access to the top tier of industry leaders. • Weekly e-bulletins which keep the membership up to date on industry news and events. • Legislative voice with municipal and provincial officials—through our Development Issues and Government Affairs Committee. • Active online community, allowing members to join the conversation, grow their networks, and obtain the latest commercial real estate news at @NAIOPVancouver NAIOP Vancouver Group NAIOP Vancouver represents commercial real estate developers, owners and investors of office, industrial, retail and mixed-use properties. It provides strong advocacy, education and business opportunities and connects its members through a powerful North American network. NAIOP truly reflects the pulse of the commercial/industrial/development industry in Greater Vancouver. It provides its diverse membership with a valuable network of industry professionals, a powerful forum to exchange ideas, economic information and market news, and a collective voice to lobby for regulatory debate and change. NAIOP works for members year round to enhance market knowledge and exposure, to help streamline the industry, and provide a healthy sprinkling of camaraderie and fun. The Vancouver Chapter of NAIOP is one of 51 chapters within an extensive network that represents the interests of developers and owners of industrial, office and related commercial real estate throughout North America. NAIOP’s Award Winning annual Cost of Business Survey provides a benchmark for performance of over 21 municipalities in the Metro Vancouver area with respect to their development costs and ease of doing business. For more information on NAIOP – Vancouver Chapter or any of its events, please visit the website at www.naiopvcr.com, email [email protected] or call 604.601.5106