101 Chilled water system narrative
Transcription
101 Chilled water system narrative
CHILLED WATER SYSTEM INTRODUCTION New Mexico State University currently uses a chilled water production and distribution system in order to provide space cooling services for 56 buildings on the main campus, comprising nearly 3,800,000 square feet of conditioned space. According to recent history, approximately 18,250,000 ton-hrs of refrigeration is delivered to campus annually at a peak rate of roughly 6,600 tons. CHILLED WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The current chilled water production manifold for the NMSU campus consists of three 1500 ton Carrier 19XR electrically driven centrifugal chillers and two nominal 1570 ton Carrier 16JR-150L double effect absorption chillers. Also included in the production manifold is a thermal storage facility consisting of two 1.5 million gallon tanks underground at the central utility plant capable of storing up to 25,000 ton-hrs of refrigeration. In all, the production manifold is capable of producing up to 6,600 tons of chilled water. Chilled water is delivered to campus through a primary-secondary-tertiary pumping arrangement, representative of dedicated constant speed chiller pumps, independent building booster pumps and the main pumping manifold which moves chilled water from the central utility plant out to the buildings as demanded and back to the central plant. This main secondary pumping manifold consists of four 3300 gpm units capable of producing 210 ft of head for a total delivery capacity to campus of 13,200 gpm. Due to the fact that the thermal storage tank is open to atmosphere and also open to the system without a closed loop separation, the returning pressure of the chilled water must be reduced to a level of about 15 psi. The secondary distributional pumping manifold is thereby arranged in a somewhat unorthodox configuration being able to lower the return chilled water pressure by forcing the flow through charging turbines which are directly connected to the pump and motor assembly in order to supplement the electrical work of the pump motor. Although there are still inherent losses in pressure through this arrangement, given the configuration of the thermal storage facility, this pumping scheme makes the best out of a somewhat unattractive energy drain. Chilled water is delivered to campus via a distribution network consisting of roughly 20,000 linear feet of both supply and return piping routed both in the utility tunnels and underground in a direct bury configuration. Chilled water piping is mostly schedule 40 steel with some lengths of pipe being PVC. Chilled water is delivered to campus at a temperature of 42°F and returns to the central utility plant at a temperature of 54°F for a total campus delta T of 12°F. As it stands, the system does appear to have some trouble delivering the level of demand of chilled water during peak conditions, mostly late in the summer. Because of this fact, GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. Not For Construction June 16, 2009 Chilled Water System 0874.00 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage Two Report the system should not be considered adequate for the current needs of the campus and further review is necessary to consider opportunities to alleviate this issue. CHILLED WATER LOADS As stated above, recent annual records indicate an operational peak chilled water delivery capacity of 6,600 tons for an annual consumption of roughly 18,250,000 ton-hrs annually. Due to the lack of and format of recorded data available, these figures, along with the U.S. Department of Energy open source building energy modeling software known as eQUEST, have been used to generate an hourly annual profile of chilled water usage on campus in order to attain the highest resolution of data available for evaluation. Figure 1 below represents the monthly consumption of chilled water by the NMSU main campus, representative of the year 2008. Figure 1 – 2008 Monthly Chilled Water Usage As seen in Figure 1, usage peaks in the summer months and dies down to a minimum for building core cooling in the winter, as would be expected, ranging from 800,000 ton-hrs a month in the winter to 2,750,000 ton-hrs a month in the summer. Utilizing the hourly annual chilled water profile developed in eQUEST, a chilled water load envelope for the year has been developed. Average days for each month are generated on an hourly scale in order to obtain a brief comprehensive view of the hourly, GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. Not For Construction June 16, 2009 Chilled Water System 0874.00 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage Two Report monthly and annual behavior of the system. Figure 2 below represents what the annual chilled water load envelope was for the campus in 2008. Figure 2 – 2008 NMSU Chilled Water Load Envelope As seen in Figure 2, levels peak midday in the summer months and bottom out during the winter nights, as would be expected. The area under this curve is representative of the totalized annual chilled water usage by the main campus. This is a somewhat typical load envelope for chilled water usage at any level and is representative of what is happening on an hourly level for each month of the year. FLOW ANALYSIS According to the Physical Plant Department, the chillers are maxed out on capacity during peak flow conditions. The individual building loads were reverse calculated knowing the capacity of the chiller manifold and using adjusted standard cooling load densities relative to each building type. The combination of this data set along with the known averaged campus delta T of 12°F allows procuring of the flow information to effectively evaluate system as it currently exists. GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. Not For Construction June 16, 2009 Chilled Water System 0874.00 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage Two Report In order to best procure a comprehensive flow model of the NMSU chilled water distribution system, a software package known as Pipe-FLO has been utilized to simulate existing campus peak flow conditions. It should be noted that this model is a best representation of the campus chilled water system and should not be considered an absolute representation. In order to fill in gaps between available data sets, assumptions have been made to determine individual building cooling densities according to function. It should also be noted that for the purposes of evaluating the distribution system, the pumping arrangement of the model does not include individual building pumps, and it is assumed that, in general, these tertiary pumps pick up nearly all of the head loss through individual building piping systems and are sized to do just that. It should also be understood that as individual building improvements are made in the near future, the delta T for each building may increase or decrease depending on the specific cooling issues relative to that building, whether it is a three way valve system with constant speed pumping and mixing or a situation in which pipes are clogged and restricting proper flow through heat transfer coils. It is for this reason, in addition to the knowledge that projects are currently in planning and operation to optimize the heat transfer systems in delinquent buildings, that in analyzing flow in consideration for expansion, or rather a future state of the system, all building temperature differentials are brought to an average number of 12°F for the purposes of this study. Before examination of the flow model, there are a few configurations that should be noted. There is a separate 14” line leaving the east side of the plant that serves the new science hall and the Zuhl Library with a connection to the main distribution network at the Branson Hall Library and Hershel Zohn Theatre area. This connection is shown as normally closed in this model, corresponding to operator observation at the Physical Plant Department. There is another connection shown as normally closed between Breland Hall and Milton Hall, also according to operator observation. It should also be observed that the existing tunnel connection at the Chamisa Village is unorthodox in that it pulls supply water from the tunnel return line and returns it to the same line. This ultimately means that there is no supply demand for the Chamisa Village in terms of flow. It is assumed this sort of connection was implemented with oversized fan coils and sub-par cooling capacity and ventilation in order to make an addition to a system believed to already be at capacity. Head loss through the existing system is calculated in the existing flow model and shown to be estimated at 136’ for a delivery of 13,093.5 gpm. This is an estimated figure and does not take into account the open atmosphere thermal storage facility or building tertiary pumps. It is, however, a relatively accurate estimation of the energy lost in delivering and returning chilled water up to the building level. In order to plan for expansion it is crucial to understand distributional pipe capacity, which can be indicated in a comprehensive flow model by showing flow velocities. It is apparent in looking at this velocity gradient that there are very high velocities in and around the central plant area, indicating that the roots of the distribution network have become too small to sufficiently support flow to the extents of the system. It can also be seen that the system is approaching unacceptable velocities just to the north of the plant GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. Not For Construction June 16, 2009 Chilled Water System 0874.00 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage Two Report and extending east though the Pan Am Tunnel. It is also evident that velocities are approaching unacceptable levels in the Sweet Tunnel due south from the plant. The most noticeable high flow velocity is within the central plant itself, forcing 13,000 gpm through a 20” main distribution header during times of peak flow for a velocity of over 15 ft/s. With high velocities branching off in every direction from the area of chilled water production, there is the indication that additional loads to the system at any location could push the central plant beyond its capacity for flow distribution not only in terms of pumping capacity, but in relation to flow capacity in the existing pipeline network. In calculating existing peak flow values, it was discovered that the central plant’s capacity for chilled water production and distribution did not match the recommended cooling densities in this climatic zone for the buildings on the system. It is currently estimated the central utility plant is capable of providing only 2/3 of the ideal refrigeration to campus during times of peak conditions. Discussions with NMSU facilities staff indicate that during peak conditions, the central plant does in fact have problems with successful delivery of chilled water to every building on campus. During peak flow the central plant and facilities personnel have devised ways of rerouting flow from the plant and around campus by changing valve positions, sometimes hourly, according to what buildings have reported unacceptable service. It is also believed that in order to best condition buildings on campus with consideration to the low chilled water production capacity, many of the campus buildings are receiving less than adequate ventilation air in order to significantly cut down on load. Aside from the issues of chilled water production, distribution capacity has been found to be limited on a similar scale. As the distribution pumping scheme exists, there is no defined distribution header where flow can gather before it is separated off appropriately in different directions to campus. Rather, the distribution pumps are scattered throughout the plant and route all flow to the east side of the building for campus distribution. There does exist a length of pipe routing some pressurized flow from the east to the west side of the plant in order to serve buildings to the north and west of the plant, however, in the flow model this line becomes restricted in capacity during peak flow periods, making for significant head loss in the system and reducing the plant’s capacity to deliver chilled water to this set of buildings. At times this issue becomes so intense that one chiller is routed away from the secondary distribution pumps and delivers as best it can to the distribution system with only pressurization from its dedicated primary pump, according to central plant staff. Outside of the plant there are significant restrictions to flow delivery in all directions in the distribution system with the heaviest restrictions to the north and northeast areas of campus. In addition to the questionable physical nature of the distribution pumping system, sheer pumping capacity alone seems to fall short of the ideal. There have been reports by central plant staff that often during the hotter months of the year, isolation valves in the plant and around the distribution area are constantly being manipulated in order to maintain adequate delivery pressure to buildings at the extents of the system. This is an indication of an undersized pumping array and is just as important to consider as chilled water production when making additions to the campus. There is currently no redundancy GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. Not For Construction June 16, 2009 Chilled Water System 0874.00 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage Two Report in either chilled water production or distribution capacities, leaving no contingency for equipment failure or opportunities for expanding the system. CHILLED WATER SYSTEM STRATEGIES FOR CAMPUS EXPANSION New Mexico State University has developed an architectural master plan to aid in facilitating structured campus growth in five year phases out through the year 2034. A chilled water system development plan is a crucial counterpart of this equation. Not only are there significant deficiencies with the existing system, but it will need to change in configuration as well to match the progressing architectural build out of the main campus. As noted above, the current chilled water system is vastly undersized for the area of service which means that not only will the system need to expand for the growth of the campus, it will need to immediately expand to begin to appropriately satisfy the chilled water demand for space cooling. Likewise, immediate expansion is a necessity before consideration of adding any building to the load. SYSTEM EXPANSION FOR GROWTH OF CAMPUS Following are brief descriptions of changes to the chilled system through the set phases of campus development. Cost estimates are also provided with inflation factored in. Cost estimates for distributional piping are not included here and can be referenced in the Utility Tunnel System report. For phased distributional piping improvements, see the phased set of utility layout drawings in the back of this section. Phase 1 – 2014 Accounting for not only the current deficiency in production capacity but also the growth of the campus in the first phase, the chilled water peak load increases from 6,600 tons to about 12,500 tons. This is an extreme increase in the system and according to the net present value analyses described below, warrants the addition of a secondary utility plant to connect to the main system. This utility plant can be built having the capability for modular expansion. In other words, not only can chillers be installed only as they become necessary, but the plant can be continuously built up from its base building in a modular fashion as the additional chillers are required. This option reduces the first cost of building the facility greatly as it only needs to be built up to hold the present capacity of equipment. Also as discussed below in the net present value analysis is the attractiveness of adding an ice storage facility to the secondary utility plant. This item is therefore included in the costs for the first phase of development. The last major item included in the first phase is the re-piping and re-sizing of the existing plant chilled water headers. The headers are undersized to a point of constricting flow to campus, increasing the cost of moving chilled water and need to be reconfigured in such a manner so that manual intervention by means of valve repositioning is not required in order to provide appropriate flow to all corners of the campus. In summation, the suggested additions include two 1030 ton double effect absorbers and peripherals, two 2000 ton electric chillers and peripherals, one 1000 ton glycol chiller and peripherals, 43 ice storage tanks, the base building for a secondary utility plant, and the re-piping of the existing plant GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. Not For Construction June 16, 2009 Chilled Water System 0874.00 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage Two Report chilled water headers. The combination of these items will be able to meet the foreseen campus peak load while boasting an n+1 redundancy in production and results in a first phase cost of roughly $18,350,000. Additionally, the Arts Complex Ph I, the Bookstore, and Chamisa Ph II are all buildings planned for construction within the next two years. This will possibly not be enough time to expand the current chilled water system to match growth and will need contingency plans to address their chilled water needs. It is recommended that the buildings be outfitted with chilled water distribution systems and temporarily connected to outdoor pad-mounted air cooled reciprocating chillers as standalone systems until the chilled water distribution system is prepared to take on additional load. At this time the main building connections can be disconnected from the air cooled chillers and connected up to the campus chilled water system. The air cooled chillers can then be stored to be used in the future for similar incidents. Cost estimates for outfitting these systems for each of these buildings are included in this report. Phase 2 – 2019 The second phase of development encompasses further growth of the chilled water system and creates an additional peak load of over 2,500 tons. Additions to the system production capacity include one 2000 ton electric chiller and peripherals and results in a second phase cost of roughly $4,519,697. Phase 3 – 2024 This phase of growth harvests an additional peak load of over 3,000 tons and warrants the addition of two 2000 ton electric chillers with peripherals. Estimates for this phase come out to roughly $10,479,000. Phase 4 – 2029 Phase 4 continues the addition of buildings warranting chilled water service and creates an additional peak load of nearly 4,000 tons. The addition of four 2000 ton electric chillers and peripherals will be necessary for this phase and results in costs totaling roughly $17,223,000. Phase 5 – 2034 The final phase of development creates an additional peak chilled water load of nearly 5,500 tons and is mostly on the southern tip of the built out distribution system. At this point in time, should the campus grow according to plan, it may be feasible to create a tertiary chilled water facility in this vicinity and connect it to the main system. Either way, it will be necessary to replace some of the equipment installed in the first phase, as their useful lives will have run their course, and install some new equipment to keep up with the additive loads. In all, this phase will add two 1030 ton absorbers, five 2000 ton electric chillers, one 1000 ton glycol chiller and all the peripherals to match. In all, estimates for this phase come to roughly $36,563,000. GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. Not For Construction June 16, 2009 Chilled Water System 0874.00 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage Two Report NET PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS As mentioned in the Cogeneration System section of this report, the cogeneration model has been outfitted to analyze multiple optional equipment configurations, including the options for ice storage and the comparison between adding two absorbers to the HRSG steam output versus one absorber and one steam driven turbine. Most importantly, the cogeneration model has been outfitted with the capability of projecting system dynamics with respect to the phased build out of the campus. In other words, estimates for the cost of energy consumption in the forms of natural gas and electricity have been generated and used in conjunction with estimates for capital investments in equipment to produce estimates for net present values of the entire 25 year investment as well as leveled annual costs should this be looked at from a “borrowing” perspective. For each run of the net present value analysis, equipment additions have been tailor made to suit each individual scenario. There are a total of 8 scenarios, creating every permutation of the 3 general options. Secondary Utility Plant The first option is to either begin construction of a new utility plant or to tear down and rebuild part of the existing plant. Even if the existing plant were rebuilt there would still be a need for a secondary utility plant, but construction of the new plant could be delayed until about 2019. Plausible locations for the secondary plant include the parking lot immediately east of the Health and Social Services Building, the parking lot just south of the Corbett Center, and the northwest corner of the intramural fields just south of the Activity Center. Since there is an immediate need for improved flow to the northern section of campus and since many of the parking lots around the Corbett Center are already scheduled for demolition, the parking lot immediately east of Health and Social Services and west of the proposed Jordan Parking Garage became a prime candidate. In general, the net present value analysis yielded higher overall costs if the existing plant is rebuilt versus constructing a new facility immediately. Not only does cost analysis indicate near term construction of a secondary facility to be most feasible, but there are many complications to rebuilding an existing facility, especially considering that total shutdown of any branch of equipment is unacceptable, as the campus is constantly requiring these utilities. A preliminary drawing set of a conceptual secondary utility plant are included in this report. Ice Storage System An ice storage option for the chilled water system can be an extremely attractive investment, especially working in conjunction with a demand based electrical rate. Ice storage allows for a dedicated glycol chiller to operate at night during off-peak hours to create chilled water potential via the creation of ice. During the daytime, the glycol loop, connected to the main chilled water system by means of a heat exchanger, is able to extract heat from the chilled water system and use it to melt the ice in the storage tanks, creating “free cooling” during times of more expensive consumption and cutting the GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. Not For Construction June 16, 2009 Chilled Water System 0874.00 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage Two Report electrical demand charges by reducing the amount of energy consumption during peak energy hours. A preliminary system is sized to meet the needs of the first phase of growth and includes one 1000 ton glycol chiller working in conjunction with 43 ice storage tanks for a total possible discharge of 5000 tons and a total daily storage capacity of about 14,000 ton-hours. Should this option be considered, further optimization of the system size should be performed in order to maximize savings. In the 8 alternate net present value runs, the ice storage option consistently yielded lower overall expenditures versus excluding it from the chilled water system expansion. In addition to the obvious setbacks of attempting a rebuild of the existing utility plant, there would not be the appropriate spatial requirements to add ice storage to the existing plant and the campus would not be able to reap the benefits of such a facility until construction of the secondary utility plant. Dual Double Effect Absorbers vs. Single Effect Absorber w/ Steam Turbine The heat recovery steam generator outputs a peak load of roughly 22,000 lbs/hr of 100 psi steam. Currently this steam can be sent to campus for space heating in winter months or routed to one of two absorption chillers to create chilled water in summer months. The existing absorbers are significantly de-rated and are in constant need of maintenance. Since these machines are candidates for replacement, the question remains as to what will be most effective replacement in terms of energy usage and economy. Two options have been considered an analyzed. One is to replace them in kind with two new and efficient absorption chillers. The alternate option is to stage a steam turbine and a single stage absorber in series. In this configuration, during the summer months, the steam turbine would take in steam at 100 psi and generate 275 kW of electricity while outputting 15 psi steam to the single effect absorber for the production of chilled water. Either of these two options will effect in a reduction of on-peak electrical consumption and will help to lower overall demand charges by reducing consumption during peaking hours of the day. According to the net present value analysis, each isolated comparison of these two options came out significantly close to one another. Were they to be completely even, it may be beneficial to lean towards the two absorbers versus the absorber and steam turbine due to the increased complexity of the latter system. Overall, the comparison between all 8 scenarios yields 2 closely matched candidates. The least costly scenario was the result from scenario number 3 and consisted of immediate construction of a new utility plant, the inclusion of an ice storage facility, and the addition of two new double effect absorption chillers. This scenario ran a 25 year net present value of roughly $205,123,000 with a leveled annual cost of $11,441,000 and an annual savings from the worst case scenario of $933,000. The close second was scenario number 4, differing from 3 only by the inclusion of a single effect absorber and steam turbine rather than two double effect absorbers. This scenario came in with a 25 year net present value of roughly $206,577,000 with a leveled annual cost of $11,522,000 and an annual savings of $852,000. The next best scenario resulted in a net present value of $214,784,000. The worst case was scenario number 6, consisting of renovation of the existing plant, no ice storage, and the use of a single effect absorber in conjunction with a steam driven turbine. This scenario resulted in a 25 year net present value of $221,844,000 with a leveled annual cost of $12,374,000. GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. Not For Construction June 16, 2009 Chilled Water System 0874.00 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage Two Report STAGE 1 PRODUCTION DEFICIENCIES Deficiencies on the production side of the chilled water system have been addressed along with expansion of the system for the growth of the campus. STAGE 1 DISTRIBUTION DEFICIENCIES Undersized Pipe Sizes in and Around the Central Utility Plant During an in depth flow analysis it became evident that the chilled water line sizes in and around the central plant area are nearly too small for acceptable flow velocities and that the main distribution header is significantly smaller than ideal, forcing a peak flow of over 15 ft/s. Were the pumping manifold sufficient to successfully deliver flow during peak demand, this would only be an indication of unnecessary energy loss through friction in the pipe, but in consideration of campus and chilled water distribution expansion, the current pipe sizes and configurations in and around the central plant could pose some serious problems in successfully delivering service to all areas of campus. The re-piping of the chilled water plant header has been addressed in expansion for growth and the line sizes around the area of the existing utility plant will grow in capacity once a secondary plant is installed, alleviating the need for the current plant to push chilled water out to every extent of campus. Distribution Pumping Arrangement Another deficiency noted here, common to many existing chilled water systems, is the overall primary-secondary-tertiary pumping arrangement on campus. Were the system constructed brand new today, it would be recommended to use what is known as a direct primary scheme in which there would be only one set of pumps able to output variable flow to campus and sized to take on the entire head loss from the chiller array to the top of the tallest and farthest building and back. The existing arrangement is a cause for some significant energy loss through constant pumping and 3-way valve arrangements, moving an unnecessary amount of flow. The University is currently investing in a program to retrofit existing buildings with a 2-way valve arrangement, alleviating the need for tertiary pumps. This action will ultimately result in significant energy savings in system pumping. Cool Pool Pumping Arrangement Another notable deficiency that had been addressed in a previous study by GLHN is the fact that the thermal energy storage facility is not only open to atmosphere but open to the campus distribution system as well. This means that in order to keep the “cool pool” from overflowing, system pressure has to be killed off in the return chilled water supply. This in turn means that to successfully pump flow back out to campus, the secondary pumping manifold has to take the flow from almost atmospheric pressure back up to 60 or 70 psi, resulting in significant excess energy costs. It should also be noted that the depth of the cool pool is quite shallow and does not allow for appropriate stratification of the varying temperatures between the top and bottom levels. It is recommended that previously submitted materials by GLHN be reviewed and considered in order to generate additional distributional pumping savings GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. Not For Construction June 16, 2009 Chilled Water System 0874.00 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage Two Report Campus Delta T The current 12°F delta T across campus is an acceptable temperature gradient. However, it is not infeasible to obtain a delta T on the order of 16°F for a campus such as this by means of eliminating 3-way valves and constant speed pumps. This issue is addressed above in the distributional pumping arrangement. Absorption Chillers This deficiency is addressed in the planning for campus growth and includes replacement of the existing machines. EMCS It has been observed that the existing data monitoring system for the chilled water system is grossly undersized and fails to capture a comprehensive view of the operation of the distribution system. Not only does the existing system have holes in data capture, processing and storing, there are many buildings that have incomplete monitoring capabilities as currently configured. This deficiency has already been picked up by the University and is currently being improved upon by a dedicated team of personnel. GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. Not For Construction June 16, 2009 Chilled Water System 0874.00 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage Two Report CHILLED WATER PLANT ASSETS Chillers Condenser Mark Model Evaporator Electrical Size (Tons) Type Refrigerant EWT/LWT (°F) Flow (gpm) WPD (ft) EWT/LWT (°F) Flow (gpm) WPD (ft) Volt Phase HZ 1500 Centrifugal HFC-134a 85 / 95 5100 - 54 / 42 3000 - 460 3 60 1500 Centrifugal HFC-134a 85 / 95 5100 - 54 / 42 3000 - 460 3 60 1500 Centrifugal HFC-134a 85 / 95 5100 - 54 / 42 3000 - 460 3 60 CH-3 Carrier 19XR 8787503 EMH68 Carrier 19XR 8787503 EMH68 Carrier 19XR 8787503 EMH68 CH-4 Carrier 16JT-150L 1570 Absorption Water 85 / 95 6750 - 54 / 42 3600 - 460 3 60 CH-5 Carrier 16JT-150L 1570 Absorption Water 85 / 95 6750 - 54 / 42 3600 - 460 3 60 CH-1 CH-2 Totals 7640 28800 Cooling Towers 16200 Outside Air Fan Motor Mark Model Size (Tons) Type EWT/LWT (°F) Flow (gpm) WB (°F) DB (°F) HP PH Volts RPM CT-1 Marley 2812 Counterflow 95 / 85 6750 76 104 60 3 460 1775 CT-2 Marley 2812 Counterflow 95 / 85 6750 76 104 60 3 460 1775 CT-3 Amarillo 2125 Counterflow 95 / 85 5100 76 104 60 3 460 1775 CT-4 Amarillo 2125 Counterflow 95 / 85 5100 76 104 75 3 460 1750 CT-5 Amarillo 2125 Counterflow 95 / 85 5100 76 104 75 3 460 1750 Totals 11999 28800 Pumps Motor Mark Model Flow (gpm) Head (ft) Minimum NPSH (ft) Minimum Efficiency (%) HP PH Volts RPM Speed Control CHWP-1 Cornell 3300 210 - - 200 3 460 1785 VFD CHWP-2 Cornell 3300 210 - - 200 3 460 1785 VFD GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. Not For Construction June 16, 2009 Chilled Water System 0874.00 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage Two Report CHWP-3 Cornell 3300 210 - - 200 3 460 1785 VFD CHWP-4 Cornell 3300 210 - - 200 3 460 1785 VFD Totals 13200 Charg-1 Cornell 4000 80 - - 125 3 460 1800 VFD Charg-2 Cornell 4000 80 - - 125 3 460 1800 VFD - - Totals 8000 CHP-1 Aurora 3100 95 - - 100 3 460 1750 Constant CHP-2 Aurora 3100 95 - - 100 3 460 1750 Constant CHP-3 Aurora 3100 95 - - 100 3 460 1750 Constant Totals 9300 CHP-4 Aurora 3600 150 - - 200 3 460 1750 Constant CHP-5 Aurora 3600 150 - - 200 3 460 1750 Constant Totals 7200 CWP-1 Aurora 5100 65 - - 100 3 460 1188 Constant CWP-2 Aurora 5100 65 - - 100 3 460 1188 Constant CWP-3 Aurora 5100 65 - - 100 3 460 1188 Constant CWP-4 Aurora 6750 95 - - 200 3 460 1188 Constant CWP-5 Aurora 6750 95 - - 200 3 460 1150 Constant Totals GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc. Not For Construction June 16, 2009 28800 Chilled Water System 0874.00 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage Two Report Official_Building_Master_List New Mexico State University Lab (SF/Ton) Current Future 507 592 300 350 Utility Development Plan Acad (SF/Ton) 2009 Housing (SF/Ton) 761 450 Admin (SF/Ton) 592 350 Address Category Chilled Water Distribution System 2009 Bldg. # Building Name Year Built GSF 2014 Tons GPM GSF 2019 Tons GPM GSF 2024 Tons GPM GSF 2029 Tons GPM GSF 2034 Tons GPM GSF Tons Dwg Area GPM EXISTING BUILDINGS 225 Astronomy Building 1959 1320 Frenger Mall ACAD - LAB 278 Branson Library 1951 1305 Frenger Mall ACAD 15,486 31 61 15,486 52 103 15,486 52 103 15,486 52 103 15,486 52 103 15,486 52 103 7 159,696 270 540 159,696 456 913 159,696 456 913 159,696 456 913 159,696 456 913 159,696 456 913 6 184 Breland Hall 1954 1525 Stewart St. ACAD - LAB 95,313 188 376 95,313 318 635 95,313 318 635 31,771 106 212 31,771 106 212 31,771 106 212 7 386 Business Complex Building 1983 1320 University Ave. ACAD - CLASSROOM 54,992 93 186 54,992 157 314 54,992 157 314 54,992 157 314 54,992 157 314 54,992 157 314 3 605 Chamisa Village 2006 1725 Stewart Street HOUSING 114,056 150 300 114,056 253 507 114,056 253 507 114,056 253 507 114,056 253 507 114,056 253 507 7 187 Chemistry Building 1957 1175 North Horseshoe ACAD - LAB 115,878 229 457 115,878 386 773 115,878 386 773 115,878 386 773 115,878 386 773 115,878 386 773 2 24,671 24,671 24,671 24,671 24,671 24,671 364 Clara Belle Williams Hall 1981 1395 International Mall ACAD 126 Computer Center 1966 1275 Stewart St. ACAD - LAB 285 Corbett Center 1968 1600 International Mall AUX 60 Dan W. Williams Hall 1938 1390 E. University Ave. ACAD - LAB 42 83 40,288 79 159 40,288 70 141 70 141 70 141 70 141 70 141 3 134 269 40,288 134 269 40,288 134 269 40,288 134 269 40,288 134 269 6 213,313 361 721 36,857 73 145 213,313 609 1,219 213,313 609 1,219 213,313 609 1,219 213,313 609 1,219 213,313 609 1,219 3 36,857 123 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 60A Dan W. Williams Hall Annex 1984 1390 E. University Ave. ACAD - LAB 11,926 24 47 11,926 40 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 56 Dove Hall 1936 1305 North Horseshoe ADMIN 13,476 23 46 13,476 39 77 13,476 39 77 13,476 39 77 13,476 39 77 13,476 39 77 2 541 Ed and Harold Foreman Engineering Complex 1997 1060 Frenger Mall ACAD - LAB 84,526 167 333 84,526 282 564 84,526 282 564 84,526 282 564 84,526 282 564 84,526 282 564 6 338 Educational Services Center 1978 1780 East University Ave. ADMIN 50,366 85 170 50,366 144 288 50,366 144 288 50,366 144 288 50,366 144 288 50,366 144 288 4 363 Engineering Complex I 1980 1025 Stewart St. ACAD - LAB 55,585 110 219 55,585 185 371 55,585 185 371 55,585 185 371 55,585 185 371 55,585 185 371 6 34 Foster Hall 1930 1200 S. Horseshoe ACAD - LAB 98,084 193 387 98,084 327 654 98,084 327 654 98,084 327 654 98,084 327 654 98,084 327 654 6 154 Garcia Annex 1949 3024 Locust St. ADMIN 275 Garcia Residence Hall 1968 1715 International Mall HOUSING 28,895 49 98 28,895 83 165 28,895 83 165 28,895 83 165 28,895 83 165 28,895 83 165 7 208,371 274 548 208,371 463 926 208,371 463 926 208,371 463 926 208,371 463 926 208,371 463 926 3 188 Gardiner Hall 1957 1255 North Horseshoe ACAD - LAB 63,224 125 249 63,224 211 421 63,224 211 421 63,224 211 421 63,224 211 421 63,224 211 421 2 244 Gerald Thomas Hall 1963 940 College Dr. ACAD - LAB 139,950 276 552 139,950 467 933 139,950 467 933 139,950 467 933 139,950 467 933 139,950 467 933 2 10 Goddard Hall 1913 1100 South Horseshoe ACAD - LAB 31,942 63 126 31,942 106 213 31,942 106 213 31,942 106 213 31,942 106 213 31,942 106 213 2 288 Guthrie Hall 1968 1325 International Mall ACAD - CLASSROOM 41,531 70 140 41,531 119 237 41,531 119 237 41,531 119 237 41,531 119 237 41,531 119 237 3 172 Hadley Hall 1953 2855 Weddell St. ADMIN 38,199 65 129 38,199 109 218 38,199 109 218 38,199 109 218 38,199 109 218 38,199 109 218 2 323 Hardman Hall 1974 2902 McFie Circle ACAD - CLASSROOM 30,370 51 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 590 Health and Social Services Building 2003 1335 International Mall ACAD - CLASSROOM 64,663 109 219 64,663 185 370 64,663 185 370 64,663 185 370 64,663 185 370 64,663 185 370 3 249 Herschell Zohn Theatre 1963 3014 McFie Circle ACAD - CLASSROOM 23,572 40 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 250 Jacobs Hall 1963 2908 McFie Circle ACAD - LAB 321 James B. Delamater Activity Center 1973 1600 Stewart St. ACAD - GYMNASIUM 22,433 44 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 114,109 193 386 114,109 326 652 114,109 326 652 114,109 326 652 114,109 326 652 114,109 326 652 7 190 Jett Annex 1957 1025 Frenger Mall ACAD - LAB 6,529 13 26 6,529 22 44 6,529 22 44 6,529 22 44 6,529 22 44 6,529 22 44 6 189 Jett Hall 1956 1040 South Horseshoe ACAD - LAB 84,091 166 332 84,091 280 561 84,091 280 561 84,091 280 561 84,091 280 561 84,091 280 561 2 397 John Whitlock Hernandez Hall 1988 3035 S. Espina St. ACAD - LAB 44,107 87 174 44,107 147 294 44,107 147 294 44,107 147 294 44,107 147 294 44,107 147 294 6 33 Kent Hall 1929 1280 E. University Ave. ACAD - CLASSROOM 20,473 35 69 20,473 58 117 20,473 58 117 20,473 58 117 20,473 58 117 20,473 58 117 2 368 Knox Hall 1981 2980 South Espina St. ACAD - LAB 75,737 149 299 75,737 252 505 75,737 252 505 75,737 252 505 75,737 252 505 75,737 252 505 6 83 Milton Hall 1941 2915 McFie Circle ACAD - CLASSROOM 99,311 168 336 99,311 284 567 99,311 284 567 99,311 284 567 99,311 284 567 99,311 284 567 3 121,457 160 319 121,457 270 540 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 56,153 95 190 56,153 160 321 56,153 160 321 56,153 160 321 56,153 160 321 56,153 160 321 2 260 Monagle Residence Hall 1965 1525 International Mall HOUSING 389 Music Building 1983 1075 North Horseshoe ACAD - CLASSROOM 330 New Mexico Dept. of Agriculture 1975 3190 South Espina St. IO 28,288 48 96 28,288 81 162 28,288 81 162 28,288 81 162 28,288 81 162 28,288 81 162 6 287 O'Donnell Hall 1968 1220 Stewart St. ACAD - LAB 93,858 185 370 93,858 313 626 93,858 313 626 93,858 313 626 93,858 313 626 93,858 313 626 6 269 OFS Central Heating Plant 1966 3060 Sweet St. POM 21,071 36 71 21,071 60 120 21,071 60 120 21,071 60 120 21,071 60 120 21,071 60 120 6 284 Pan American Center 1968 1810 E. University Ave. AUX 215,633 365 729 215,633 616 1,232 215,633 616 1,232 215,633 616 1,232 215,633 616 1,232 215,633 616 1,232 4 604 Pinon Hall 2006 1760 E. University HOUSING 263 PSL, Clinton P. Anderson Hall 1965 1050 Stewart St. ACAD - LAB 97,395 128 256 97,395 216 433 97,395 216 433 97,395 216 433 97,395 216 433 97,395 216 433 3 135,847 268 536 135,847 453 906 135,847 453 906 135,847 453 906 135,847 453 906 135,847 453 906 6 248 Regents Row 1962 3034 McFie Circle ADMIN 82,386 139 279 82,386 235 471 82,386 235 471 82,386 235 471 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 185 Rhodes-Garrett-Hamiel Res Hall 1955 2735 Jordan St. HOUSING 18,522 24 49 18,522 41 82 18,522 41 82 18,522 41 82 18,522 41 82 18,522 41 82 3 79 Rhodes-Garrett-Hamiel Res Hall 1941 2715 Jordan St. HOUSING 19,604 26 52 19,604 44 87 19,604 44 87 19,604 44 87 19,604 44 87 19,604 44 87 3 80 Rhodes-Garrett-Hamiel Res Hall 1941 2725 Jordan St. HOUSING 27,709 36 73 27,709 62 123 27,709 62 123 27,709 62 123 27,709 62 123 27,709 62 123 3 391 Science Hall 1987 1290 Frenger Mall ACAD - LAB 114,918 227 453 114,918 383 766 114,918 383 766 114,918 383 766 114,918 383 766 114,918 383 766 6 551 Skeen Hall 1999 945 College Dr. ACAD - LAB 135,896 268 536 135,896 453 906 135,896 453 906 135,896 453 906 135,896 453 906 135,896 453 906 2 365 Speech Building 1981 1405 International Mall ACAD - CLASSROOM 28,322 48 96 28,322 81 162 28,322 81 162 28,322 81 162 28,322 81 162 28,322 81 162 3 261 Student Health Center 1965 3080 Breland Dr. AUX 16,456 28 56 16,456 47 94 16,456 47 94 16,456 47 94 16,456 47 94 16,456 47 94 7 301 Thomas & Brown Hall 1972 1125 Frenger Mall ACAD - LAB 49,711 98 196 49,711 166 331 49,711 166 331 49,711 166 331 49,711 166 331 49,711 166 331 6 276 Walden Hall 1966 1200 Frenger Mall ACAD - LAB 36,259 72 143 36,259 121 242 36,259 121 242 36,259 121 242 36,259 121 242 36,259 121 242 6 2745 South Espina St. 35 William B. Conroy Honors Center 1907 585 Wooten Hall 2002 ACAD - CLASSROOM ACAD - LAB 9,505 16 32 9,505 27 54 9,505 27 54 9,505 27 54 9,505 27 54 9,505 27 54 2 29,600 58 117 29,600 99 197 29,600 99 197 29,600 99 197 29,600 99 197 29,600 99 197 6 32 Young Hall 1928 1300 South Horseshoe ACAD - CLASSROOM 12,713 21 43 12,713 36 73 12,713 36 73 12,713 36 73 12,713 36 73 12,713 36 73 2 461 Zuhl Library 1992 2911 McFie Circle ACAD 95,952 162 324 95,952 274 548 95,952 274 548 95,952 274 548 95,952 274 548 95,952 274 548 7 Page 1 Notes Official_Building_Master_List Totals 3,769,275 6,600 13,200 3,692,900 10,925 21,851 3,522,660 10,493 20,986 3,459,118 10,281 20,562 3,376,732 10,046 20,092 3,376,732 10,046 20,092 FIVE-YEAR ADDITIONS 05-01 Arts Complex - Phase 1 2014 - ACAD - CLASSROOM 234,000 669 1,337 234,000 669 1,337 234,000 669 1,337 234,000 669 1,337 234,000 669 1,337 2 05-02 Institute for Public Policy (Domenici Center) 2014 - ACAD - CLASSROOM 55,980 160 320 55,980 160 320 55,980 160 320 55,980 160 320 55,980 160 320 3 05-03 Student Service Facility, Ph. 1 2014 - ADMIN 37,500 107 214 37,500 107 214 37,500 107 214 37,500 107 214 37,500 107 214 3 05-04 Native American Cultural Center 2014 - ACAD - CLASSROOM 26,900 77 154 26,900 77 154 26,900 77 154 26,900 77 154 26,900 77 154 7 05-05 Tech. Lab/Classroom Facility 2014 - ACAD - CLASSROOM/LAB 60,000 200 400 60,000 200 400 60,000 200 400 60,000 200 400 60,000 200 400 3 05-08 Bookstore 2014 - AUX 35,000 100 200 35,000 100 200 35,000 100 200 35,000 100 200 35,000 100 200 3 60,000 171 343 60,000 171 343 60,000 171 343 60,000 171 343 60,000 171 343 6 7,387 21 42 7,387 21 42 7,387 21 42 7,387 21 42 7,387 21 42 3 55,628 124 247 55,628 124 247 55,628 124 247 55,628 124 247 55,628 124 247 7 572,395 1,629 572,395 1,629 572,395 1,629 3,257 572,395 1,629 3,257 572,395 1,629 3,257 05-09 NMDA Building Renovations and Additions 2014 - IO 05-10 Addition to the Health and Social Services Building 2014 - ACAD - CLASSROOM 05-13 Chamisa Dorms, Ph. 2 2014 - HOUSING Totals 0 0 0 3,257 3,257 1 2 NOTES: 1 following demolition of Hardman Hall (323), Jacobs Hall (250), and the Zohn Theatre (249) 2 SF based on assumption that Ph. 2 will double the size of the facility TEN-YEAR ADDITIONS 10-01 West Mixed Use/Graduate Housing 2019 - HOUSING 64,800 144 288 64,800 144 288 64,800 144 288 64,800 144 288 3 1 10-02 East Mixed Use/Graduate Housing, Ph. 1 2019 - HOUSING 116,100 258 516 116,100 258 516 116,100 258 516 116,100 258 516 3 1,2 10-03 Student Service Facility, Ph. 2 2019 - ADMIN 37,500 107 214 37,500 107 214 37,500 107 214 37,500 107 214 3 3,4 10-04 New Undergraduate Housing 2019 - HOUSING 56,520 126 251 56,520 126 251 56,520 126 251 56,520 126 251 3 3,5 10-06 New Married Student Housing 2019 - HOUSING 165,660 368 736 165,660 368 736 165,660 368 736 165,660 368 736 7 5 10-07 Student Activities Expansion 2019 - AUX 87,160 249 498 87,160 249 498 87,160 249 498 87,160 249 498 7 6,9 10-08 New Academic Bulidings 2019 - ACAD - CLASSROOM 263,250 752 1,504 263,250 752 1,504 263,250 752 1,504 263,250 752 1,504 6 1,7 10-14 Jordan Street Gateway 2019 - AUX/Housing 190,000 422 844 190,000 422 844 190,000 422 844 190,000 422 844 3 8 10-16 Arts Complex - Phase II (Visual Arts) 2019 - ACAD - CLASSROOM 71,500 204 409 71,500 204 409 71,500 204 409 71,500 204 409 2 5,261 1,052,490 5,261 1,052,490 Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,052,490 2,631 5,261 1,052,490 2,631 2,631 2,631 5,261 NOTES: 1 SF based on building footprint for three stories 2 following demolition of Delta Zeta and Zeta Tau Alpha sorority houses (213, 163) 3 following demolition of Monagle Hall (260) 4 SF based on assumption that Ph. 2 will double the size of the facility 5 SF based on footprint for three stories 6 7 following demolition of Animal Science (376, 241, 198), Tejada Extension Annex (245), Animal Husbandry Barn (162), Sheep Barns (194), Cattle Feed Barn (240), Small Animal Lab (246), Livestock Judging Pavillion (195) and Neale Hall (164) following demolition of Rentfrow Gymnasium (211) 8 following demolition of D.W. Williams Hall and Annex (60, 60A) 9 SF based on building footprint for single story FIFTEEN-YEAR ADDITIONS 15-01 East Mixed Use/Graduate Housing, Ph. 2 2024 - HOUSING 117,720 262 523 117,720 262 523 117,720 262 523 3 1,2 15-02 Zuhl Library Expansion 2024 - ACAD 110,850 317 633 110,850 317 633 110,850 317 633 7 1,3 15-03 Academic/Lab Building 2024 - ACAD - LAB 15-04 Academic Building 2024 - ACAD - CLASSROOM 26,220 87 175 26,220 87 175 26,220 87 175 6 1 117,600 336 672 117,600 336 672 117,600 336 672 7 1 15-05 Academic/Lab Building 2024 - ACAD - LAB 218,190 727 1,455 218,190 727 1,455 218,190 727 1,455 6 1,4 15-06 Research/Lab Building 2024 - ACAD - LAB 233,250 778 1,555 233,250 778 1,555 233,250 778 1,555 6 1,5 1 15-07 Academic Lab Building 2024 - ACAD - LAB 90,930 303 606 90,930 303 606 90,930 303 606 7 15-14 O'Donnell Hall - Phase II 2024 - ACAD - CLASSROOM 35,000 100 200 35,000 100 200 35,000 100 200 6 15-15 Arts Complex - Phase III (Performance Hall) 2024 - ACAD - CLASSROOM 76,500 219 437 76,500 219 437 76,500 219 437 2 6,256 1,026,260 6,256 1,026,260 Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,026,260 3,128 3,128 3,128 6,256 NOTES: 1 SF based on building footprint for three stories 2 following demolition of Chi Omega sorority houses (268) 3 following demolition of Breland Hall Addition (north part of 184) 4 following demolition of Bull Barn (193), Heardsmen Residence (199), Stucky Hall (282), Animal Husbandry (290), and the Feeding Research Building (303) 5 6 7 following demolition of PSL West Shop (280), Guardhouse (281), Machine Shop (216), Rocket Shop (243) and East Shop (279) following demolition of East and West Greek Complexes (271, 272, 273, 274, 414), Wells Hall (355), Cosmic Ray Lab (398), Theatre Scene Shop (385), Housing Warehouse (467), Ag Service Storage (316) and Flammable Storage (320), SF based on building footprint for two stories SF based on building footprint for two stories TWENTY-YEAR ADDITIONS 20-01 Academic/Lab Building 2029 - ACAD - LAB 118,260 394 788 118,260 394 788 7 1,2 20-02 Academic/Research Building 2029 - ACAD - CLASSROOM 686,350 1,961 3,922 686,350 1,961 3,922 6 3,4 20-03 Academic/Research Building 2029 - ACAD - CLASSROOM 273,440 781 1,563 273,440 781 1,563 7 3,5 Page 2 Official_Building_Master_List 20-04 Family Housing, Ph. 2 2029 - HOUSING 20-08 Arts Complex - Phase IV (Music, Dance, CMI) 2029 - ACAD -CLASSROOM Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 255,064 567 1,134 255,064 567 1,134 7 36,000 103 206 36,000 103 206 2 1,369,114 3,806 7,612 1,369,114 3,806 7,612 3 NOTES: 1 SF based on building footprint for three stories 2 following demolition of Regent's Row Dorms (248) 3 SF based on building footprint for two stories 4 following demolition of Sutherland Village (206) 5 following demolition of Tombaugh Observatory (317, 318, 319) and PE Restroom (314) BEYOND TWENTY-YEAR ADDITIONS 25-01 Academic/Research Buildings 2034 - ACAD - CLASSROOMS 864,366 2,470 4,939 9 1,4 25-02 Academic/Research Buildings 2034 - ACAD - CLASSROOMS 439,110 1,255 2,509 10 2,4 25-03 Academic/Research Buildings 2034 - ACAD - CLASSROOMS 338,655 968 1,935 10 3,4 25-04 Arts Complex - Phase V 2034 - ACAD - CLASSROOMS 251,388 718 1,437 2 4 Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,893,519 5,410 10,820 3,769,275 6,600 13,200 4,265,295 12,554 25,108 5,147,545 14,752 29,504 6,110,263 17,669 35,337 7,396,991 21,239 42,479 9,290,510 26,649 53,299 NOTES: 1 following demolition of Tom Fort Village and Cole Village 2 following demolition of Cervantes Housing 3 following demolition of Genesis Center (394, 395) and Academic Research Center ( 412) 4 SF based on building footprint for three stories OVERALL TOTALS: POM - Productions and Operations Management IO - Independent Operation AUX - Auxiliary Page 3 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST BASIS FOR ESTIMATE CODE A ( No design completed) CODE B (Preliminary design) CODE C (Finished design) COMPUTED BY: DHW CHECKED BY: 6/16/09 SUMMARY 1030 ton dbl eff absorption chiller 2000 ton duplex centrif chiller 1000 ton glycol chiller ice storage tanks 1000 ton cooling tower 2000 gpm CHW pump 4000 gpm CHW pump 3000 gpm CW pump New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan 2009 Chilled Water Capital Costs QUANTITY Proj. No. Dept. Sheet No. MATERIAL No. UNIT UNITS MEAS. PER LABOR TOTAL UNIT 0874.00 Mechanical PER TOTAL UNIT EQUIP TOTAL COST PER UNIT 2 2 1 43 4 2 2 4 ea ea ea ea ea ea lf lf $650,000.00 $1,300,000.00 $81,000.00 $553,000.00 $1,106,000.00 $23,100.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $17,500.00 $14,500.00 $623,500.00 $500.00 $137,375.00 $549,500.00 $8,500.00 $20,900.00 $41,800.00 $1,300.00 $36,750.00 $73,500.00 $2,250.00 $22,050.00 $88,200.00 $1,550.00 10000 1 ton ea $280.00 $2,800,000.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 controls 6000 ton $101.00 $606,000.00 $606,000 secondary plant building 5402 sf $180.00 $972,360.00 $972,360 plant piping repipe existing plant headers $162,000.00 $46,200.00 $17,500.00 $21,500.00 $34,000.00 $2,600.00 $4,500.00 $6,200.00 $1,462,000 $1,152,200 $267,500 $645,000 $583,500 $44,400 $78,000 $94,400 $2,800,000 $500,000 distribution piping (see utility tunnel system) electrical (see electrical power system) $9,205,360 Subtotal Subcontractor Overhead, 10% Subcontractor Profit, 10% Subtotal $920,536 $1,012,590 $11,138,486 General Contractor Overhead, 10% General Contractor Profit, 5% Subtotal $1,113,849 $612,617 $12,864,951 General Contractor Liability, 1.5% General Contractor Bond, 2.5% General Contractor Tax, 5.5% General Contractor Total Soft Costs, 30% Escalation, 3% per year Total $192,974 $321,624 $735,875 $14,115,424 $4,234,627 yrs $18,350,051 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST BASIS FOR ESTIMATE CODE A ( No design completed) CODE B (Preliminary design) CODE C (Finished design) COMPUTED BY: DHW CHECKED BY: 6/16/09 SUMMARY New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan 2014 Chilled Water Capital Costs QUANTITY No. Dept. PER LABOR TOTAL 0874.00 Mechanical Sheet No. MATERIAL UNIT UNITS Proj. No. PER TOTAL TOTAL COST PER MEAS. UNIT 1 2 1 2 ea ea lf lf $553,000.00 $137,375.00 $36,750.00 $22,050.00 plant piping 2000 ton $280.00 $560,000.00 $560,000 controls 2000 ton $101.00 $202,000.00 $202,000 secondary plant building 1332 sf $180.00 $239,760.00 $239,760 2000 ton duplex centrif chiller 1000 ton cooling tower 4000 gpm CHW pump 3000 gpm CW pump UNIT EQUIP $553,000.00 $23,100.00 $274,750.00 $8,500.00 $36,750.00 $2,250.00 $44,100.00 $1,550.00 UNIT $23,100.00 $17,000.00 $2,250.00 $3,100.00 $576,100 $291,750 $39,000 $47,200 distribution piping (see utility tunnel system) electrical (see electrical power system) $1,955,810 Subtotal Subcontractor Overhead, 10% Subcontractor Profit, 10% Subtotal $195,581 $215,139 $2,366,530 General Contractor Overhead, 10% General Contractor Profit, 5% Subtotal $236,653 $130,159 $2,733,342 General Contractor Liability, 1.5% General Contractor Bond, 2.5% General Contractor Tax, 5.5% General Contractor Total Soft Costs, 30% Escalation, 3% per year Total $41,000 $68,334 $156,347 $2,999,023 5 yrs $899,707 $620,967 $4,519,697 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST BASIS FOR ESTIMATE CODE A ( No design completed) CODE B (Preliminary design) CODE C (Finished design) COMPUTED BY: DHW CHECKED BY: 6/16/09 SUMMARY New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan 2019 Chilled Water Capital Costs QUANTITY No. Dept. MEAS. PER LABOR TOTAL UNIT 0874.00 Mechanical Sheet No. MATERIAL UNIT UNITS 2000 ton duplex centrif chiller 1000 ton cooling tower 4000 gpm CHW pump 3000 gpm CW pump Proj. No. PER TOTAL UNIT $553,000.00 $1,106,000.00 $23,100.00 $137,375.00 $549,500.00 $8,500.00 $36,750.00 $73,500.00 $2,250.00 $22,050.00 $88,200.00 $1,550.00 EQUIP TOTAL COST PER UNIT 2 4 2 4 ea ea lf lf $46,200.00 $34,000.00 $4,500.00 $6,200.00 $1,152,200 $583,500 $78,000 $94,400 plant piping 4000 ton $280.00 $1,120,000.00 controls 4000 ton $101.00 $404,000.00 $404,000 secondary plant building 2664 sf $180.00 $479,520.00 $479,520 $1,120,000 distribution piping (see utility tunnel system) electrical (see electrical power system) $3,911,620 Subtotal Subcontractor Overhead, 10% Subcontractor Profit, 10% Subtotal $391,162 $430,278 $4,733,060 General Contractor Overhead, 10% General Contractor Profit, 5% Subtotal $473,306 $260,318 $5,466,685 General Contractor Liability, 1.5% General Contractor Bond, 2.5% General Contractor Tax, 5.5% General Contractor Total Soft Costs, 30% Escalation, 3% per year Total $82,000 $136,667 $312,694 $5,998,046 10 yrs $1,799,414 $2,681,674 $10,479,134 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST BASIS FOR ESTIMATE CODE A ( No design completed) CODE B (Preliminary design) CODE C (Finished design) COMPUTED BY: DHW CHECKED BY: 6/16/09 SUMMARY New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan 2024 Chilled Water Capital Costs QUANTITY Proj. No. Dept. Sheet No. MATERIAL LABOR PER TOTAL EQUIP TOTAL COST No. UNIT PER UNITS MEAS. UNIT 4 4 4 4 ea ea lf lf $553,000.00 $137,375.00 $36,750.00 $22,050.00 plant piping 4000 ton $280.00 $1,120,000.00 $1,120,000 controls 8000 ton $101.00 $808,000.00 $808,000 secondary plant building 2664 sf $180.00 $479,520.00 $479,520 2000 ton duplex centrif chiller 1000 ton cooling tower 4000 gpm CHW pump 3000 gpm CW pump TOTAL 0874.00 Mechanical UNIT $2,212,000.00 $23,100.00 $549,500.00 $8,500.00 $147,000.00 $2,250.00 $88,200.00 $1,550.00 PER UNIT $92,400.00 $34,000.00 $9,000.00 $6,200.00 $2,304,400 $583,500 $156,000 $94,400 distribution piping (see utility tunnel system) electrical (see electrical power system) $5,545,820 Subtotal Subcontractor Overhead, 10% Subcontractor Profit, 10% Subtotal $554,582 $610,040 $6,710,442 General Contractor Overhead, 10% General Contractor Profit, 5% Subtotal $671,044 $369,074 $7,750,561 General Contractor Liability, 1.5% General Contractor Bond, 2.5% General Contractor Tax, 5.5% General Contractor Total Soft Costs, 30% Escalation, 3% per year Total $116,258 $193,764 $443,332 $8,503,915 15 yrs $2,551,175 $6,168,380 $17,223,470 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST BASIS FOR ESTIMATE CODE A ( No design completed) CODE B (Preliminary design) CODE C (Finished design) COMPUTED BY: DHW CHECKED BY: 6/16/09 SUMMARY 1030 ton dbl eff absorption chiller 2000 ton duplex centrif chiller 1000 ton glycol chiller 1000 ton cooling tower 2000 gpm CHW pump 4000 gpm CHW pump 3000 gpm CW pump plant piping controls secondary plant building New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan 2029 Chilled Water Capital Costs QUANTITY Proj. No. Dept. Sheet No. MATERIAL No. UNIT UNITS MEAS. PER LABOR TOTAL UNIT 0874.00 Mechanical PER TOTAL UNIT $650,000.00 $1,300,000.00 $81,000.00 $553,000.00 $2,765,000.00 $23,100.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $17,500.00 $137,375.00 $1,373,750.00 $8,500.00 $20,900.00 $41,800.00 $1,300.00 $36,750.00 $183,750.00 $2,250.00 $22,050.00 $220,500.00 $1,550.00 EQUIP TOTAL COST PER UNIT 2 5 1 10 2 5 10 ea ea ea ea ea lf lf 6000 ton $280.00 $1,680,000.00 $1,680,000 12000 ton $101.00 $1,212,000.00 $1,212,000 3996 sf $180.00 $719,280.00 $162,000.00 $115,500.00 $17,500.00 $85,000.00 $2,600.00 $11,250.00 $15,500.00 $1,462,000 $2,880,500 $267,500 $1,458,750 $44,400 $195,000 $236,000 $719,280 distribution piping (see utility tunnel system) electrical (see electrical power system) $10,155,430 Subtotal Subcontractor Overhead, 10% Subcontractor Profit, 10% Subtotal $1,015,543 $1,117,097 $12,288,070 General Contractor Overhead, 10% General Contractor Profit, 5% Subtotal $1,228,807 $675,844 $14,192,721 General Contractor Liability, 1.5% General Contractor Bond, 2.5% General Contractor Tax, 5.5% General Contractor Total Soft Costs, 30% Escalation, 3% per year Total $212,891 $354,818 $811,824 $15,572,254 20 yrs $4,671,676 $16,318,859 $36,562,789 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST BASIS FOR ESTIMATE CODE A ( No design completed) CODE B (Preliminary design) CODE C (Finished design) COMPUTED BY: DHW CHECKED BY: 6/16/09 SUMMARY New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Arts Complex, Ph I - Initial CHW Delivery QUANTITY Dept. UNIT UNITS MEAS. 2 100 2 ea lf ea concrete slab 600 sf electrical controls 660 660 ton ton PER LABOR TOTAL UNIT PER TOTAL UNIT $193,000.00 $386,000.00 $406.00 $40,600.00 $12,800.00 $25,600.00 $4.11 $2,466.00 $100.00 $50.00 $66,000.00 $33,000.00 0874.00 Mechanical Sheet No. MATERIAL No. 330 ton air cooled recip chiller 10" supply and return piping 1500 gpm chilled water pump EQUIP TOTAL COST PER UNIT $7,725.00 $15,450.00 $1,050.00 $2,100.00 $401,450 $40,600 $27,700 $7.56 $4,536.00 $7,002 $66,000 $33,000 $575,752 Subtotal Subcontractor Overhead, 10% Subcontractor Profit, 10% Subtotal $57,575 $63,333 $696,660 General Contractor Overhead, 10% General Contractor Profit, 5% Subtotal $69,666 $38,316 $804,642 General Contractor Liability, 1.5% General Contractor Bond, 2.5% General Contractor Tax, 5.5% General Contractor Total Soft Costs, 15% Escalation, 3% per year Total Proj. No. $12,070 $20,116 $46,026 $882,853 2 yrs $132,428 $61,831 $1,077,112 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST BASIS FOR ESTIMATE CODE A ( No design completed) CODE B (Preliminary design) CODE C (Finished design) COMPUTED BY: DHW CHECKED BY: 6/16/09 SUMMARY New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Bookstore - Initial CHW Delivery QUANTITY Proj. No. Dept. Sheet No. MATERIAL No. UNIT UNITS PER LABOR TOTAL 0874.00 Mechanical PER TOTAL TOTAL COST PER MEAS. UNIT 100 ton air cooled recip chiller 4" supply and return piping 200 gpm chilled water pump 1 100 2 ea lf ea $68,500.00 $232.00 $3,475.00 $68,500.00 $23,200.00 $6,950.00 $6,075.00 $6,075.00 $540.00 $1,080.00 $74,575 $23,200 $8,030 concrete slab 300 sf $4.11 $1,233.00 $7.56 $2,268.00 $3,501 electrical controls 100 100 ton ton $100.00 $50.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 UNIT $10,000 $5,000 $124,306 Subtotal Subcontractor Overhead, 10% Subcontractor Profit, 10% Subtotal $12,431 $13,674 $150,410 General Contractor Overhead, 10% General Contractor Profit, 5% Subtotal $15,041 $8,273 $173,724 General Contractor Liability, 1.5% General Contractor Bond, 2.5% General Contractor Tax, 5.5% General Contractor Total Soft Costs, 15% Escalation, 3% per year Total UNIT EQUIP $2,606 $4,343 $9,937 $190,610 2 yrs $28,591 $13,349 $232,551 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST BASIS FOR ESTIMATE CODE A ( No design completed) CODE B (Preliminary design) CODE C (Finished design) COMPUTED BY: DHW CHECKED BY: 6/16/09 SUMMARY New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Chamisa, Ph II - Initial CHW Delivery QUANTITY Proj. No. Dept. Sheet No. MATERIAL No. UNIT UNITS PER LABOR TOTAL 0874.00 Mechanical PER TOTAL TOTAL COST PER MEAS. UNIT 130 ton air cooled recip chiller 6" supply and return piping 300 gpm chilled water pump 1 100 2 ea lf ea $88,000.00 $290.00 $4,075.00 $88,000.00 $29,000.00 $8,150.00 $6,350.00 $6,350.00 $700.00 $1,400.00 $94,350 $29,000 $9,550 concrete slab 300 sf $4.11 $1,233.00 $7.56 $2,268.00 $3,501 electrical controls 130 130 ton ton $100.00 $50.00 $13,000.00 $6,500.00 UNIT $13,000 $6,500 $155,901 Subtotal Subcontractor Overhead, 10% Subcontractor Profit, 10% Subtotal $15,590 $17,149 $188,640 General Contractor Overhead, 10% General Contractor Profit, 5% Subtotal $18,864 $10,375 $217,879 General Contractor Liability, 1.5% General Contractor Bond, 2.5% General Contractor Tax, 5.5% General Contractor Total Soft Costs, 15% Escalation, 3% per year Total UNIT EQUIP $3,268 $5,447 $12,463 $239,057 2 yrs $35,859 $16,742 $291,658 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage 2 - 06-16-09 Utility Net Present Value Analysis Summary " " " " ! % & ' # # # # $ $ $ $ + $ ()* . . . ! '& &/ # . &' % !&% %% . /' / . / &'! . ! % .'! !'' ' .!' %& &/& /%/ . % . ' . & . !! ! . ' . '' % . 2 %& . . % $ " - ! ! 0& 1 0 1 0& 1 , , ! & ' ! . && % . ! & ! . %& &'' " 3 /# New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage 2 - 06-16-09 Utility Net Present Value Analysis Scenario 1 ! "# $% &# ! " ' " ( #) &#$ ! # )#" # ! #( $% +!, - $ . -# $ .& ) , , &/ " &! & !%0 #* &! " 3 9 4 : 6 5 8 7 3 33 3 39 34 3: 36 35 38 37 3 9 4 : $8,214,112 $8,214,112 $8,214,112 $8,214,112 $8,214,112 $8,455,265 $8,455,265 $8,455,265 $8,455,265 $8,455,265 $8,827,196 $8,827,196 $8,827,196 $8,827,196 $8,827,196 $9,346,643 $9,346,643 $9,346,643 $9,346,643 $9,346,643 $9,946,761 $9,946,761 $9,946,761 $9,946,761 $9,946,761 $10,838,691 ! ' !) ! 1, ) ! & ) ! 2 3.456.36 29.8 .5 25.643.44 233.565.48 23 .756. 4 23 .63 .3 #! , #! 2 7.67 . 5 28. 34.33 28. 34.33 28. 34.33 28. 34.33 23 . 5:.78: 28.4::. 6: 28.4::. 6: 28.4::. 6: 28.4::. 6: 236.468.696 28.8 5.376 28.8 5.376 28.8 5.376 28.8 5.376 2 3.334.3 9 27.946.649 27.946.649 27.946.649 27.946.649 29:.:99.3 3 27.746.563 27.746.563 27.746.563 27.746.563 23 .898.673 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage 2 - 06-16-09 Utility Net Present Value Analysis Scenario 2 !"! # $% " ! ! &' (%"#" $! )!$ * %+ (%&! ! # % +%$! %"# %* ! &' -#. / ! & " /% ! & " ( + ." . (0 "!$ ! !(# ( #'1 %,!(#!$ ! 4 5 6 ; : 9 7 8 4 5 6 ; : 9 7 8 4 4 44 45 46 4; $8,296,297 $8,296,297 $8,296,297 $8,296,297 $8,296,297 $8,530,348 $8,530,348 $8,530,348 $8,530,348 $8,530,348 $8,895,845 $8,895,845 $8,895,845 $8,895,845 $8,895,845 $9,404,245 $9,404,245 $9,404,245 $9,404,245 $9,404,245 $9,994,764 $9,994,764 $9,994,764 $9,994,764 $9,994,764 $10,877,177 # )!"#+! #" 2. +! # ! (!+! # 345 678 967 35 74 94 35 74 94 3 7 7 66 3 6:4 : 3 4 :68 7 %# . %"# 35 97: 6; 37 48: 489 37 48: 489 37 48: 489 37 48: 489 3 4 5; :7 37 ;5 567 37 ;5 567 37 ;5 567 37 ;5 567 3 4 9 : ;:; 37 78; 76; 37 78; 76; 37 78; 76; 37 78; 76; 34 4 4 :7; 38 6 6 46; 38 6 6 46; 38 6 6 46; 38 6 6 46; 356 : 946 38 886 9:6 38 886 9:6 38 886 9:6 38 886 9:6 3 799 99 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage 2 - 06-16-09 Utility Net Present Value Analysis Scenario 3 !"#" $ %& !# " "!'( )&#$# %"! *"% +!&, )&'" "! $ & ,&%" &#$ &+ "!'( .$/!0 " ' #1 0& "! ' #1 ) , /# /!)2 #"% " ")$! ) $(3 !&-")$"% " ! 6 9 : 7 8 ; 6 66 6 6 6 69 6: 67 68 6; 6 9 $8,046,323 $8,046,323 $8,046,323 $8,046,323 $8,046,323 $8,287,476 $8,287,476 $8,287,476 $8,287,476 $8,287,476 $8,659,408 $8,659,408 $8,659,408 $8,659,408 $8,659,408 $9,178,855 $9,178,855 $9,178,855 $9,178,855 $9,178,855 $9,778,972 $9,778,972 $9,778,972 $9,778,972 $9,778,972 $10,670,903 $ *"#$," $# 4/ ," $ " )"," $ 56718 617 5 18 17 571: 61 56 18 81 56 1 9 16: 581;;81 &$ / &#$ 5 918:81 581 :1 581 :1 581 :1 581 :1 56 16 816;: 581 871 7: 581 871 7: 581 871 7: 581 871 7: 56:1 18 8 581:9;1 8 581:9;1 8 581:9;1 8 581:9;1 8 56;1;871 ;9 5;16781899 5;16781899 5;16781899 5;16781899 5 ;1 ;1 5;17781;7 5;17781;7 5;17781;7 5;17781;7 56 1:7 1; New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage 2 - 06-16-09 Utility Net Present Value Analysis Scenario 4 ! "#$%$!& '( #% $!$#)* +(%&% '$# ,$' -#(. +()$!$# & (! .('$ (%& (- !$#)* 0&1#2 !$ ) % 2( $# ) % + ."1% "1#+3 %$' $ $+&# + &*4 #(/$+&$' $ # : 9 < ; 8 7 : 9 < ; 8 7 : : :: : : :9 $8,128,509 $8,128,509 $8,128,509 $8,128,509 $8,128,509 $8,362,560 $8,362,560 $8,362,560 $8,362,560 $8,362,560 $8,728,057 $8,728,057 $8,728,057 $8,728,057 $8,728,057 $9,236,456 $9,236,456 $9,236,456 $9,236,456 $9,236,456 $9,826,976 $9,826,976 $9,826,976 $9,826,976 $9,826,976 $10,709,389 "& 51 ".$!& $" +$.$!& !,$%&.$!&% 6 78 9 8 6 8: ;: 6 8: ;: 6 <:7 < 68 : 7< 68 8<< :9 (& !!1 (%& 6:; 7< 8 ; 68 :8 9 7 68 :8 9 7 68 :8 9 7 68 :8 9 7 6 : 8 :8 68 <: 9< 68 <: 9< 68 <: 9< 68 <: 9< 6 : 9 8 ;;; 68 ;:8 9; 68 ;:8 9; 68 ;:8 9; 68 ;:8 9; 6: 8<9 < < 67 : < 9< 67 : < 9< 67 : < 9< 67 : < 9< 6:< 8 8< 67 8:< 7;< 67 8:< 7;< 67 8:< 7;< 67 8:< 7;< 6 ; 7 87 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage 2 - 06-16-09 Utility Net Present Value Analysis Scenario 5 #$ %" !" ! & ! ' "( %"# " ("! " "' #$ * + , # ," # -% ( + + %. ! % % $/ ") % ! 8 5 3 2 6 9 4 7 8 88 8 85 83 82 86 89 84 87 8 5 3 2 $8,214,112 $8,214,112 $8,214,112 $8,214,112 $8,214,112 $8,455,265 $8,455,265 $8,455,265 $8,455,265 $8,455,265 $8,827,196 $8,827,196 $8,827,196 $8,827,196 $8,827,196 $9,346,643 $9,346,643 $9,346,643 $9,346,643 $9,346,643 $9,946,761 $9,946,761 $9,946,761 $9,946,761 $9,946,761 $10,838,691 & ( 0+ ( % ( 1 2-343-3 14-934- 14-6 9-8 19-638-33 188-36 -86 188-79 -3 " + " 155-674-28 14- 83-88 14- 83-88 14- 83-88 14- 83-88 189- 5-362 14-322- 62 14-322- 62 14-322- 62 14-322- 62 189-323-586 14-4 9-876 14-4 9-876 14-4 9-876 14-4 9-876 186-744- 45 17-536-635 17-536-635 17-536-635 17-536-635 155-548-5 8 17-736-968 17-736-968 17-736-968 17-736-968 18 -454-678 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage 2 - 06-16-09 Utility Net Present Value Analysis Scenario 6 ! " #$ ! %& '$!"! # ( # ) $* '$% " $ *$# $!" $) %& ,"- . % ! .$ % ! ' * -! - '/ ! # '" ' "&0 $+ '" # 3 8 5 9 : 4 7 6 3 8 5 9 : 4 7 6 3 3 33 38 35 39 $8,296,297 $8,296,297 $8,296,297 $8,296,297 $8,296,297 $8,530,348 $8,530,348 $8,530,348 $8,530,348 $8,530,348 $8,895,845 $8,895,845 $8,895,845 $8,895,845 $8,895,845 $9,404,245 $9,404,245 $9,404,245 $9,404,245 $9,404,245 $9,994,764 $9,994,764 $9,994,764 $9,994,764 $9,994,764 $10,877,177 " ( !"* "! 1- * " ' * " 234 564 677 27 457 3 27 :34 3 28 73 43 2 3: : 2 3 488 : $" - $!" 289 465 379 27 36: 364 27 36: 364 27 36: 364 27 36: 364 2 4 347 957 27 98 857 27 98 857 27 98 857 27 98 857 2 4 933 6:9 27 769 759 27 769 759 27 769 759 27 769 759 2 8 335 6:9 26 5 5 359 26 5 5 359 26 5 5 359 26 5 5 359 288 677 935 26 665 4:5 26 665 4:5 26 665 4:5 26 665 4:5 2 744 44 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage 2 - 06-16-09 Utility Net Present Value Analysis Scenario 7 !"! # $% " ! ! &' (%"#" $! )!$ * %+ (%&! ! # % +%$! %"# %* ! &' -#. / ! & "0 /% ! & "0 ( + ." . (1 "!$ ! !(# ( #'2 %,!(#!$ ! 9 5 7 : 6 8 9 99 9 9 9 95 97 9: 96 98 9 5 $8,214,112 $8,214,112 $8,214,112 $8,214,112 $8,214,112 $8,455,265 $8,455,265 $8,455,265 $8,455,265 $8,455,265 $8,659,408 $8,659,408 $8,659,408 $8,659,408 $8,659,408 $9,178,855 $9,178,855 $9,178,855 $9,178,855 $9,178,855 $9,778,972 $9,778,972 $9,778,972 $9,778,972 $9,778,972 $10,670,903 # )!"#+! #" 3. +! # ! (!+! # 4 50 6 0 4705: 065 0: 4990 7 097 . 4 460: 60 4 06 %# 49 079 09 %"# 0786059 460 9 099 460 9 099 460 9 099 460 9 099 49:0 0 75 460 550 75 460 550 75 460 550 75 460 550 75 4950 0 56 4607580 6 4607580 6 4607580 6 4607580 6 49 088805:5 4809:60655 4809:60655 4809:60655 4809:60655 4 06590 480::608: 480::608: 480::608: 480::608: 49 07: 08 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage 2 - 06-16-09 Utility Net Present Value Analysis Scenario 8 !"#$# % &' "$ # #"() *'$%$ &#" +#& ,"'- *'(# #" % ' -'&# '$% ', #"() /%0"1 # ( $ 1' #" ( $ * -!0$ !0"*2 $#& # #*%" * %)3 "'.#*%#& # " 6 : ; 7 9 8 6 : ; 7 9 8 6 6 66 6 6 6: $8,296,297 $8,296,297 $8,296,297 $8,296,297 $8,296,297 $8,530,348 $8,530,348 $8,530,348 $8,530,348 $8,530,348 $8,728,057 $8,728,057 $8,728,057 $8,728,057 $8,728,057 $9,236,456 $9,236,456 $9,236,456 $9,236,456 $9,236,456 $9,826,976 $9,826,976 $9,826,976 $9,826,976 $9,826,976 $10,709,389 !% +#$%-# %$ 40 !-# % #! *#-# % 567 87 899 59 7 9 6 5; :7 9: 5 96 76 5 ;6 ; 5 6 9 9 ;: '% 0 '$% 5 : 78 69: 59 68; 687 59 68; 687 59 68; 687 59 68; 687 5 7 679 : 9 59 : 9 59 : 9 59 : 9 59 : 9 5 : 68 7 59 769 :7 59 769 :7 59 769 :7 59 769 :7 5 :7 7; 58 6 ; :; 58 6 ; :; 58 6 ; :; 58 6 ; :; 5 87 79; 58 96; 87; 58 96; 87; 58 96; 87; 58 96; 87; 5 7 8 98 New Mexico State University Utility Development Plan Stage 2 - 06-16-09 Simple Payback for Ice Storage Facility Assumptions: Ice Storage Facility consists of one 1000 ton glycol chiller and 43 312 ton-hr tanks for a total of 13,188 ton-hrs of ice storage with a discharge capacity of 4310 tons The below numbers are reflective of on peak operation under EPE proposed rate 26 and are derived from the cogeneration model included in this report The below numbers are a product of an 11,000 ton total campus peak load The figures below represent a preliminary feasibility study only, thus warranting a sensitivity study for optimization Annual Avoided Electrical Demand Annual Avoided OnPeak Electrical Consumption -$90,692 -$122,557 1000 Ton Glycol Chiller: 43 Ice Storage Tanks: Plant Piping: Subtotal: Contractor O&P: Subtotal: Contractor Liability, Bond, Tax: Contractor Total: Soft Costs: Total: Simple Payback Period (years): Annual Cost of Production (offpeak charging) $45,460 $250,000 $623,500 $80,000 $953,500 $190,700 $1,144,200 $108,699 $1,252,899 $187,935 $1,440,834 8.6 Total Annual Savings $167,789 Ø: 6 in Flow: 437 US gpm Vel: 4.857 ft/sec dP: 0.74 psi Ø: 5 in Flow: 117 US gpm Vel: 1.878 ft/sec dP: 0.18 psi Ø: 16 in Flow: 3688 US gpm Vel: 6.701 ft/sec dP: 8.398 psi Ø: 16 in Flow: 4140 US gpm Vel: 7.524 ft/sec dP: 9.084 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1016 US gpm Vel: 2.914 ft/sec dP: (5.421) psi Ø: 4 in Flow: 218 US gpm Vel: 5.499 ft/sec dP: (0.629) psi Ø: 10 in Flow: 1622 US gpm Vel: 6.606 ft/sec dP: 3.015 psi Ø: 10 in Flow: 1438 US gpm Vel: 5.858 ft/sec dP: (0.189) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1728 US gpm Vel: 4.957 ft/sec dP: 6.576 psi Hadley Hall FCV @ 218 US gpm dP: 39.16 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 576.6 US gpm Vel: 6.41 ft/sec dP: 3.242 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 542 US gpm Vel: 6.025 ft/se c dP: 2.882 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 8446 US gpm P: 95.46 psi g Ø: 12 in Flow: 2414 US gpm Vel: 6.926 ft/sec dP: 14.74 psi P: 54.92 psi g P: 45.09 psi g Ø: 10 in Flow: 585.6 US gpm Vel: 2.385 ft/sec dP: 0.092 psi Ø: 10 in Flow: 630.2 US gpm Vel: 2.566 ft/sec dP: 5.824 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 2186 US gpm Vel: 6.272 ft/sec dP: 2.827 psi Ø: 10 in Flow: 662.6 US gpm Vel: 2.698 ft/sec dP: 5.841 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 421 US gpm Vel: 2.702 ft/sec dP: 0.101 psi Gardiner Hall FCV @ 421 US gpm dP: 39.58 psi P: 92.63 psi g Ø: 12 in Flow: 2979 US gpm Vel: 8.546 ft/sec dP: 14.81 psi Ø: 10 in Flow: 1399 US gpm Vel: 5.699 ft/sec dP: 0.875 psi Ø: 10 in Flow: 1630 US gpm Vel: 6.638 ft/sec dP: 2.258 psi Old Chemistry FCV @ 773 US gpm dP: 24.73 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1 Vel: 4. dP: 0.4 P: 90.41 psi g P: 40.19 psi g P: 96.85 psi g Ø: 10 in Flow: 1564 US gpm Vel: 6.369 ft/sec dP: 2.086 psi Ø: 10 in Flow: 1262 US gpm Vel: 5.139 ft/sec dP: 7.595 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 2970 US gpm Vel: 8.52 ft/sec dP: (2.133) psi P: 67.89 psi g Ø: 8 in Flow: 90 Vel: 5. 6 US gpm 816 ft/ sec dP: 0.5 66 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1483 US gpm Vel: 4.254 ft/sec dP: 3.753 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 857.1 US gpm Vel: 5.502 ft/sec dP: 1.948 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 920 US gpm Vel: 5.905 ft/sec dP: 2.422 psi Skeen Hall FCV @ 906 US gpm dP: 26.76 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1448 US gpm Vel: 4.154 ft/sec dP: (7.654) psi P: 90.15 psi g P: 95.76 psi g Ø: 12 in Flow: 1522 US gpm Vel: 4.366 ft/sec dP: (4.886) psi Music Center FCV @ 321 US gpm dP: 31.23 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 791 US gpm Vel: 5.077 ft/sec dP: 1.672 psi Ø: 5 in Flow: 773 US gpm Vel: 12.41 ft/sec dP: 5.111 psi Conroy Honors Center FCV @ 54 US gpm dP: 29.13 psi Kent Hal FCV @ 1 dP: 43.9 Ø: 8 in Flow: 935.4 US gpm Vel: 6.005 ft/sec dP: 2.487 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1643 US gpm Vel: 4.714 ft/sec dP: 6.029 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1643 US gpm Vel: 4.714 ft/sec dP: 0.425 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1484 US gpm Vel: 4.257 ft/sec dP: 1.557 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 927.9 US gpm Vel: 5.956 ft/sec dP: 2.462 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 146.9 US gpm Vel: 0.422 ft/sec dP: (5.6) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1867 US gpm Vel: 5.357 ft/sec dP: 0.856 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1893 US gpm Vel: 5.431 ft/sec Ø: 3 in dP: 5.189 psi Flow: 54 US gpm Ø: 8 in Vel: 2.346 ft/sec Flow: 375 US gpm dP: (4.446) psi Vel: 2.407 ft/sec dP: 5.714 psi Ø: 3 in P: 57.35 psi g Flow: 54 US gpm Vel: 2.346 ft/sec Ø: 8 in dP: 6.879 psi P: 57.34 psi g Flow: 375 US gpm Vel: 2.407 ft/sec dP: 0.109 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1458 US gpm Vel: 4.184 ft/sec dP: (4.056) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1496 US gpm Vel: 4.292 ft/sec dP: (4.909) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1437 US gpm Vel: 4.123 ft/sec dP: 2.636 psi Ø: 4 in Flow: 206 US gpm Vel: 5.196 ft/sec dP: 1.794 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 121.2 US gpm Vel: 0.348 ft/sec dP: (1.29) psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 952.8 US gpm Vel: 6.116 ft/sec dP: (3.029) psi 20-08 Arts Complex, Ph 4 FCV @ 206 US gpm dP: 25.22 psi 15-15 Arts Complex, Ph 3 FCV @ 437 US gpm dP: 29.14 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 321 US gpm Vel: 3.568 ft/sec dP: 0.167 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1337 US gpm Vel: 3.836 ft/sec dP: 0.315 psi 25-04 Arts Complex, Ph 5 FCV @ 1437 US gpm dP: 26.42 psi 10-16 Arts Complex, Ph 2 FCV @ 409 US gpm dP: 28.74 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 409 US gpm Vel: 1.173 ft/sec dP: 0.019 psi 05-01 Arts Complex, Ph 1 FCV @ 1337 US gpm dP: 27.67 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 933 US gpm Vel: 10.37 ft/sec dP: 1.601 psi Ø: 3 in gpm Flow: 152 US ec Vel: 6.603 ft/s Gerald Thomas Hall FCV @ 933 US gpm dP: 18.4 psi Ø: 3 in Flow: Vel: 3 dP: (3 Branson Library 01 FCV @ 152 US gpm i Goddard Hall FCV @ 213 US gpm S gpm ec in : 356.4 US gpm 3.961 ft/sec 1.562 psi dP: 3.48 psi 10-01 W. Mixed Use/Grad Housng FCV @ 288 US gpm dP: 43.29 psi 10-14 Jordan St. Gateway FCV @ 322 US gpm dP: 44.81 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 322 US gpm Vel: 3.579 ft/sec dP: 16.61 psi Ø: 4 in Flow: 200 US gpm Vel: 5.045 ft/sec dP: 15.15 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 7434 US gpm Vel: 5.939 ft/sec dP: 0.503 psi P: 69.6 psi g Ø: 24 in Flow: 7439 US gpm Vel: 5.943 ft/sec dP: (15.06) psi 10-14 Jordan Street Gateway FCV @ 200 US gpm dP: 41.08 psi 05-05 Tech. Lab/Clsrm Facility FCV @ 400 US gpm dP: 39.12 psi Ø: 6 Flo in Ve w: 5 67 l : dP : 4 6.30 US gp .68 2 f 6 p t/se m c si m gp US c in e .3 1 2 3 7 1 ft/s : 5 Ø w: .06 psi Flo l: 1 54 Ve 25. : dP Ø: Fl 1 2 o i Ve w: n 21 l : dP 1 : 4 6.06 4 U S .8 6 gp 77 ft/ P: 42 . 62 p si g Ø: 24 in Flow: 5105 US gpm Vel: 4.078 ft/sec dP: 8.009 psi Ø: 12 in m 82 US gp Flow: 20 3 ft/sec Vel: 5.97 9) psi dP: (3.9 g P: 63. m gp in US ec 1 2 4 0 6 ft/s : 5 i Ø w: s 16 Flo : 1. 2 p l 1 Ve : 1.5 dP P: 27.53 psi g Ø: 6 in Flow: 292 US gpm Vel: 3.246 ft/sec dP: (7.626) psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 10254 US gpm Vel: 8.191 ft/sec dP: 2.024 psi Ø: 4 in Flow: 214 US gpm Vel: 5.398 ft/sec dP: 0.941 psi m Ø: 12 in 76 US gp Flow: 16 c 808 ft/se Vel: 4. i 8 ps dP: 13.5 psi g P: 65.18 i 11 ps P: 41. Milton Hall FCV @ 567 US gpm dP: 37.27 psi .9 US gpm 5 ft/sec psi 10-03 Student Serv Fac, Ph 2 FCV @ 214 US gpm dP: 36.1 psi 05-03 Student Serv Fac, Ph 1 FCV @ 214 US gpm dP: 39.35 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 9826 US gpm Vel: 7.849 ft/sec dP: (5.912) psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 673.9 US gpm Vel: 4.325 ft/sec dP: 3.666 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 737.5 US gpm Vel: 4.734 ft/sec dP: (1.835) psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 5356 US gpm Ø: 6 in Flow: 251 US gpm Vel: 2.79 ft/sec dP: 1.998 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 9382 US gpm Vel: 7.495 ft/sec dP: 17.26 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 2604 US gpm Vel: 7.471 ft/sec dP: 12.21 psi Clara Belle / Speech FCV @ 303 US gpm dP: 42.84 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1931 US gpm Vel: 5.54 ft/sec dP: (10.67) psi Ø: 5 in Flow: 303 US gpm Vel: 4.864 ft/sec dP: 8.002 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 400 US gpm Vel: 4.446 ft/sec dP: 0.511 psi Young Hall FCV @ 73 US gpm dP: 35.57 psi Rhodes-Garrett-Hamiel Res Hall FCV @ 292 US gpm dP: 34.84 psi P: 38.96 psi g Ø: 24 in Flow: 8954 US gpm Vel: 7.153 ft/sec dP: 3.35 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 1137 US gpm Vel: 7.301 ft/sec dP: 1.559 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1917 US gpm Vel: 5.501 ft/sec dP: 7.708 psi Ø: 3 in Flow: 42 US gpm Vel: 1.824 ft/sec dP: 0.243 psi P: 41.19 psi g P: 39.99 psi g Ø: 8 in Flow: 578.3 US gpm Vel: 3.712 ft/sec dP: 8.382 psi m n 73 US gpm 3.171 ft/sec 3.035) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1875 US gpm Vel: 5.38 ft/sec dP: 0.571 psi P: 85.1 psi g P: 84.7 psi g 10-04 New Undergrad Housing FCV @ 251 US gpm dP: 41.03 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 1074 US gpm Vel: 6.893 ft/sec dP: 1.376 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 500.8 US gpm Vel: 3.215 ft/sec dP: 0.998 psi Guthrie Hall FCV @ 237 US gpm dP: 43.62 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 237 US gpm Vel: 1.521 ft/sec dP: 0.048 psi Dove Hall FCV @ 77 US gpm dP: 42.33 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 370 US gpm Vel: 2.375 ft/sec dP: 7.165 psi 05-10 Addition to H&SS FCV @ 42 US gpm dP: 43.78 psi CUP2 CHWP Set @ 30409 US gpm TH: (143.1) ft 5 psi g Ø: 12 in gpm 8.7 US Flow: 89 8 ft/sec Vel: 2.57 7 psi dP: 1.67 Ø: 6 in Flow: 406 US gpm Vel: 4.513 ft/sec dP: 1.946 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 2590 US gpm Vel: 7.431 ft/sec dP: (0.525) psi Vel: 6.747 ft/sec dP: (4.396) psi Health & Social Services Bldg FCV @ 370 US gpm dP: 44.55 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 5874 US gpm Vel: 4.692 ft/sec dP: 0.543 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 5879 US gpm Vel: 4.697 ft/sec dP: 0.544 psi Corbett Center FCV @ 813 US gpm dP: 21.18 psi Ø: 5 in Flow: 165 US gpm Vel: 2.649 ft/sec dP: 0.998 psi Business Administration FCV @ 314 US gpm dP: 44.71 psi Ø: 5 in Flow: 77 US gpm Vel: 1.236 ft/sec dP: 0.138 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 6261 US gpm Vel: 5.002 ft/sec dP: 0.372 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 6266 US gpm Vel: 5.006 ft/sec dP: 0.373 psi P: 37.57 psi g P: 48.64 psi g P: 92.23 psi g Ø: 24 in Flow: 6395 US gpm Vel: 5.109 ft/sec dP: 0.312 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 6917 US gpm Vel: 5.526 ft/sec dP: 0.304 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 7117 US gpm Vel: 5.686 ft/sec dP: 0.5 psi 10-02 E MixUse/Grad Hsng, Ph1 FCV @ 387 US gpm dP: 42.36 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 978 US gpm Vel: 10.87 ft/sec dP: 6.575 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 10983 US gpm Vel: 8.774 ft/sec dP: (4.061) psi Secondary Utility Plant Ø: 24 in Flow: 6912 US gpm Vel: 5.522 ft/sec dP: 0.304 psi P: 22.01 psi g Ø: 6 in Flow: 314 US gpm Vel: 3.49 ft/sec dP: 0.257 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 10130 US gpm Vel: 8.092 ft/sec dP: (4.291) psi P: 85.16 psi g n 1516 US gpm .35 ft/sec 447 psi P: 86.57 psi g m gp US ec in 08 ft/s 6 3 i :8 Ø ow: .90 ps Fl l: 3 811 . Ve : 0 dP Ø: 24 in Flow: 6390 US gpm Vel: 5.105 ft/sec dP: 0.312 psi Ø: 4 in Flow: 214 US gpm Vel: 5.398 ft/sec dP: 2.141 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 320 US gpm Vel: 3.557 ft/sec dP: 0.261 psi m gp c US /se 08 3 f t 8 6 : Ø w: .90 psi o Fl l: 3 806 Ve : 0. dP Ø: 24 in Flow: 7112 US gpm Vel: 5.681 ft/sec dP: 0.499 psi 10-02 E. MixUse/Grad Hsng, Ph1 FCV @ 129 US gpm dP: 43.35 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 322 US gpm Vel: 3.579 ft/sec dP: 13.59 psi Bookstore FCV @ 200 US gpm dP: 43.09 psi m gp c US e in 88 ft/s i 8 s 9 2 : Ø w: .84 9) p o 1 6 Fl l: .3 e 5 ( V : dP ll 117 US gpm 95 psi in 10-14 Jordan St Gateway FCV @ 322 US gpm dP: 42.53 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 387 US gpm Vel: 4.302 ft/sec dP: 7.85 psi 10-01 dP: 1 psi Ø: 4 in Flow: 200 US gpm Vel: 5.045 ft/sec dP: 16.1 psi 05-02 Inst. for Public Policy FCV @ 320 US gpm dP: 43.1 psi Ø: 4 in Flow: 129 US gpm Vel: 3.254 ft/sec dP: 7.717 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 288 US gpm Vel: 1.849 ft/sec dP: 5.84 psi New Corbett Equip Rm FCV @ 406 US gpm dP: 36.93 psi Ø: 12 in 05 US gp Flow: 13 3 ft/sec Vel: 3.74 2 psi dP: 2.10 15-01 E MixUse/Grad Hsng, Ph 2 FCV @ 523 US gpm dP: 39.96 psi Vel: 4.279 ft/sec dP: 0.408 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 5351 US gpm Vel: 4.275 ft/sec dP: 0.408 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 523 US gpm Vel: 5.813 ft/sec dP: 2.908 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 433 US gpm Vel: 2.779 ft/sec dP: (6.893) psi Pinon Residence Hall FCV @ 433 US gpm dP: 34.61 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1943 US gpm Vel: 5.576 ft/sec dP: (1.19) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 2716 US gpm Vel: 7.791 ft/sec dP: 10.96 psi P: 67.28 psi g pm P: 23.51 psi g P: 52.43 psi g Ø: 12 in Flow: 1510 US gpm Vel: 4.333 ft/sec dP: (6.384) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 2283 US gpm Vel: 6.549 ft/sec dP: 5.761 psi P: 1 7 P: 46.67 psi g Ø: 5 Flo in w V e : 288 l: 4 US .6 dP : (3 23 ft/ gpm .6 9 1) p sec si P: 31.52 psi g Ø: 10 in Flow: 926 US gpm Vel: 3.771 ft/sec dP: 0.28 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 5100 US gpm Vel: 4.074 ft/sec dP: (0.871) psi Garcia Residence Hall FCV @ 926 US gpm dP: 39.8 psi .13 psi g Ø: 12 in Flo w: Vel: 1222 dP: 3.50 US gp m 7.3 7 ft/s 87 psi ec Ø: 12 in Flo w: Vel: 1995 US dP: 5.722 gpm (10 ft .51 /sec ) ps i P: 5 7 P: 2 4 .19 psi g .52 psi g Ø: 12 in Flo w: Vel: 1232 US g dP: 3.535 ft/se pm 11.6 c psi Ø: 4 in Flow: 154 US gpm Vel: 3.885 ft/sec dP: 5.093 psi Pan American Center FCV @ 1232 US gpm dP: 31.09 psi EducationalServicesCntr FCV @ 288 US gpm dP: 31.57 psi 15-03 Academic Lab Bldg FCV @ 175 US gpm dP: 34.18 psi Ø: 4 in Flow: 175 US gpm Vel: 4.414 ft/sec dP: 0.632 psi Engineering Complex II FCV @ 294 US gpm dP: 32.34 psi 10-08 New Academic Buildings FCV @ 1504 US gpm dP: 24.24 psi Ø: 16 in Flow: 2228 US gpm Vel: 4.048 ft/sec dP: (8.353) psi Ø: 16 in Flow: 1821 US gpm Vel: 3.309 ft/sec dP: 0.092 psi Ø: 14 in Flow: 831.9 Vel: 1.975 dP: (8.316) Walden Hall FCV @ 242 US gpm dP: 33.39 psi Ø: 14 in Flow: 458.5 US gpm Vel: 1.089 ft/sec dP: (28.19) psi Engineering Complex III 564 FCV Fully Open dP: 0 psi Ø: 14 in Flow: 304.4 US gpm Vel: 0.723 ft/sec dP: 2.842 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 766 US gpm Vel: 4.917 ft/sec dP: 5.177 psi P: 79.9 psi g Ø: 14 in Flow: 704.8 US gpm Vel: 1.673 ft/sec Ø: 14 in dP: (4.155) psi Flow: 657.4 US gpm Vel: 1.561 ft/sec dP: 4.321 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1987 US gpm Vel: 5.701 ft/sec dP: (8.907) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 192.8 US gpm Vel: 0.553 ft/sec dP: 0.026 psi Ø: 10 in Flow: 1706 US gpm Vel: 6.948 ft/sec dP: 1.084 psi Ø: 14 in Flow: 1254 US gpm Vel: 2.977 ft/sec dP: (8.271) psi Ø: 14 in Flow: 958.4 US gpm Vel: 2.275 ft/sec dP: 0.13 psi Ø: 14 in Flow: 600.2 US gpm Vel: 1.425 ft/sec dP: 2.876 psi Ø: 4 in Flow: 242 US gpm Vel: 6.105 ft/sec dP: 1.091 psi Ø: 10 in Flow: 1763 US gpm Vel: 7.179 ft/sec dP: 1.154 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 654 US gpm Vel: 7.269 ft/sec dP: 4.468 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 544 US gpm Vel: 6.047 ft/sec dP: 1.542 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 537.3 US gpm Vel: 1.541 ft/sec dP: 0.098 psi Ø: 14 in P: 88.52 psi g Flow: 358.2 US gpm Ø: 14 in Vel: 0.85 ft/sec Flow: 1016 US gpm dP: 1.427 psi Vel: 2.411 ft/sec dP: (4.127) psi Ø: 14 in P: 51.72 psi g Ø: 14 in Flow: 767.2 US gpm Flow: 62.41 US gpm Vel: 1.821 ft/sec P: 56.03 psi g dP: 4.313 psi Vel: 0.148 ft/sec dP: (4.243) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1628 US gpm Vel: 4.671 ft/sec dP: 0.115 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1504 US gpm Vel: 4.315 ft/sec dP: 9.367 psi Ø: 10 in Flow: 1706 US gpm Vel: 6.948 ft/sec dP: (7.382) psi Thomas & Brown Hall FCV @ 331 US gpm dP: 32.13 psi P: 92.65 psi g Ø: 12 in Flow: 1515 US gpm Vel: 4.348 ft/sec dP: 12.83 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1504 US gpm Vel: 4.315 ft/sec dP: (7.878) psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 605 US gpm Vel: 6.725 ft/sec dP: 5.016 psi Ø: 4 in Flow: 505 US gpm Vel: 12.74 ft/sec dP: 4.541 psi P: 97.69 psi g Ø: 10 in Flow: 1763 US gpm Vel: 7.179 ft/sec dP: 9.664 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1553 US gpm Vel: 4.456 ft/sec dP: 3.673 psi Ø: 5 in Flow: 935 US gpm Vel: 15.01 ft/sec dP: 10.79 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 1201 US gpm Vel: 7.711 ft/sec dP: 1.608 psi Ø: 12 in Jet Annex Flow: 1746 US gpm FCV @ 44 US gpm Vel: 5.008 ft/sec dP: 29.06 psi dP: (1.771) psi Ø: 5 in Flow: 29 4 US gp Vel: 4. m 719 ft/ sec dP: 0.46 8 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 613.2 US gpm Vel: 1.759 ft/sec dP: 8.546 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 588 US gpm Vel: 3.774 ft/sec dP: 0.294 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 1258 US gpm Vel: 8.074 ft/sec dP: 1.236 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 704.5 US gpm Vel: 2.021 ft/sec dP: (8.41) psi P: 69.57 psi g Ø: 8 in Flow: 553.4 US gpm Vel: 3.552 ft/sec dP: 0.364 psi P: 67.97 psi g Ø: 6 in Flow: 197 US gpm Vel: 2.19 ft/sec dP: 0.223 psi Wooten FCV @ 197 US gpm dP: 24.77 psi Ø: 10 in Flow: 1213 US gpm Vel: 4.941 ft/sec dP: 5.272 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 391 US gpm Vel: 4.346 ft/sec dP: 1.836 psi Foster Hall FCV @ 654 US gpm dP: 32.4 psi Knox Hall FCV @ 505 US gpm dP: 18.61 psi P: 95.81 psi g dP: 33.65 psi Ø: 10 in Flow: 1397 Vel: 5.69 ft/ dP: 2.765 p Ø: Flo Vel dP: dP: 32.04 psi Jet Hall FCV @ 561 US gpm dP: 27.41 psi Science FCV @ dP: 33. Engineering Complex I FCV @ 371 US gpm dP: 3.939 psi Ø: 14 in Flow: 65.93 US gpm Vel: 0.157 ft/sec dP: 8.49 psi P: 55.87 psi g Ø: 12 in Flow: 1051 US gpm Vel: 3.015 ft/sec dP: 2.56 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 799.5 US gpm Vel: 2.294 ft/sec dP: 0.298 psi P: 87.79 psi g P: 54.21 psi g Ø: 8 in Flow: 505 US gpm Vel: 3.242 ft/sec dP: 4.585 psi 15-05 Academic/Lab Bldgs FCV @ 1455 US gpm dP: 25.36 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1694 US gpm Vel: 4.86 ft/sec dP: (0.78) psi O'Donnell Hall FCV @ 626 US gpm dP: 31.81 psi PSL Anderson Bldg FCV @ 906 US gpm dP: 26.93 psi 2 15-14 O'Donnell Hall, Ph FCV @ 200 US gpm dP: 32.53 psi US gpm ft/sec ) psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 906 US gpm Vel: 5.816 ft/sec dP: 1.908 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 4368 US gpm Vel: 3.49 ft/sec dP: 2.564 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 906 US gpm Vel: 5.816 ft/sec dP: 6.176 psi Ø F V d Ø: 6 in Flow: 626 US gpm Vel: 6.958 ft/sec dP: 1.063 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 505 US gpm Vel: 3.242 ft/sec dP: 0.338 psi P: 52.46 psi g Ø: 6 in Flow: 269 US gpm Vel: 2.99 ft/sec dP: 0.348 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1080 US gpm Vel: 3.099 ft/sec dP: (1.66) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 2255 US gpm Vel: 6.468 ft/sec dP: 4.396 psi Computer Center FCV @ 269 US gpm dP: 33.6 psi Ø: 4 in Flow: 200 US gpm Vel: 5.045 ft/sec dP: 1.035 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 2346 US gpm Vel: 6.73 ft/sec dP: 4.741 psi CHWSP-1 Set @ 13000 US gpm TH: (113.9) ft P: 90.28 psi g Ø: 12 in Flow: 1455 US gpm Vel: 4.174 ft/sec dP: 2.671 psi OFS Central Heating Plant FCV @ 120 US gpm dP: 34.62 psi Ø: 32 in Flow: 8816 US gpm Vel: 3.843 ft/sec dP: 0.231 psi Ø: 32 in Flow: 13000 US gpm Vel: 5.668 ft/sec dP: 0.054 psi Ø: 32 in Flow: 9010 US gpm Vel: 3.928 ft/sec dP: 0.24 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 890.8 US gpm Vel: 2.556 ft/sec dP: 0.365 psi P: 92.84 psi g Ø: 8 in Flow: 737.5 US gp Vel: 4.734 ft/sec dP: 0.629 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 67 Vel: 4.3 dP: 0.53 Ø: 8 in Flow: 673.9 US gpm Vel: 4.325 ft/sec dP: 0.588 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 304 US gpm Vel: 3.379 ft/sec dP: 4.516 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 737.5 US gpm Vel: 4.734 ft/sec dP: 6.341 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 457 US gpm Vel: 2.934 ft/sec dP: 4.607 psi Ø: 14 in Flow: 307.5 US gpm Vel: 0.73 ft/sec dP: (24.02) psi Ø: Fl 12 o Ve w: in 2 dP l: 7 510 : 1 .20 US 1. 33 1 ft/ g ps sec pm i gpm 2 in US Ø: 1 606.8 : /sec w ft lo 1 F 1.74 si Vel: 2p 0.28 dP: Ø: F l 12 o Ve w: in 3 l dP : 8 055 : 0 .76 US .9 98 5 ft/ g ps sec pm i Ø: 10 in Flow: 548 US gpm Vel: 2.232 ft/sec dP: (6.463) psi Zuhl Library Expansion FCV @ 633 US gpm dP: 32.49 psi Ø: 4 in Flow: 103 US gpm Vel: 2.598 ft/sec dP: 6.252 psi Garcia Annex FCV @ 165 US gpm dP: 21.78 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 633 US gpm Vel: 4.063 ft/sec dP: 1.507 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1093 US gpm Vel: 3.136 ft/sec dP: 5.215 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1187 US gpm Vel: 3.406 ft/sec dP: (3.274) psi P: 50.69 psi g Ø: 12 in Flow: 1014 US gpm Vel: 2.908 ft/sec dP: 5.854 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1240 US gpm Vel: 3.558 ft/sec dP: (5.313) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 2678 US gpm Vel: 7.684 ft/sec dP: 7.178 psi P: 45.38 psi g Ø: 12 in Flow: 3451 US gpm Vel: 9.899 ft/sec dP: (3.177) psi P: 68.36 psi g Ø: 12 in Flow: 2026 US gpm Vel: 5.814 ft/sec dP: 2.628 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 2799 US gpm Vel: 8.029 ft/sec dP: (0.372) psi 10-07 Student Activities Exp. FCV @ 498 US gpm dP: 32.11 psi 15-07 Academic/Lab Bldg FCV @ 606 US gpm dP: 30.52 psi Activity Center FCV @ 652 US gpm dP: 21.35 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 672 US gpm Vel: 4.314 ft/sec dP: 7.008 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1145 US gpm Vel: 3.286 ft/sec dP: 3.834 psi P: 42.2 psi g Ø: 6 in Flow: 94 US gpm Vel: 1.045 ft/sec dP: (2.045) psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 788 US gpm Vel: 5.058 ft/sec dP: (0.748) psi P: 77.56 psi g 15-04 Academic Bldgs FCV @ 672 US gpm dP: 21.82 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 652 US gpm Vel: 7.247 ft/sec dP: 1.453 psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 606 US gpm Vel: 6.736 ft/sec dP: 1.264 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 192.9 US gpm Vel: 0.553 ft/sec dP: (4.234) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1051 US gpm Vel: 3.016 ft/sec dP: (4.733) psi P: 44.64 psi g Ø: 12 in Flow: 798.9 US gpm Vel: 2.292 ft/sec dP: (1.283) psi Ø: 6 in Flow: 498 US gpm Vel: 5.535 ft/sec dP: 0.821 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 234.7 US gpm Vel: 0.673 ft/sec dP: 4.258 psi Breland Hall FCV @ 212 US gpm dP: 30.76 psi P: 75.54 psi g Student Health Center FCV @ 94 US gpm dP: 31.55 psi 20-01 Academ ic Lab Bldg FCV @ 788 US gpm dP: 29.8 ps i Ø: 12 in Flow: 840.7 US gpm Vel: 2.412 ft/sec dP: 1.559 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1665 US gpm Vel: 4.777 ft/sec dP: 1.014 psi Ø: 18 in Flow: 5131 US gpm Vel: 7.366 ft/sec dP: 8.074 psi e Hall @ 766 US gpm .98 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 2422 US gpm Vel: 6.949 ft/sec dP: 1.334 psi Astronomy Bldg FCV @ 103 US gpm dP: 34.93 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1877 US gpm Vel: 5.385 ft/sec dP: 0.95 psi Ø: 18 in Flow: 4831 US gpm Vel: 6.935 ft/sec dP: 7.653 psi Zuhl Library 319.84 FCV @ 548 US gpm dP: 34.88 psi P: 81.39 psi g 9 US gpm 5 ft/sec ) psi Ø: 10 in Flow: 548 US gpm Vel: 2.232 ft/sec dP: 3.438 psi g Ø: 14 in Flow: 121.2 US gpm Vel: 0.288 ft/sec dP: 4.245 psi psi Ø: 14 in Flow: 600.8 US gpm Vel: 1.426 ft/sec dP: (1.383) psi gpm 2 in US Ø: 1 1547 ec : /s w ft Flo 39 4.4 si Vel: .291 p 7 dP: 9.04 Branson Library 03 FCV @ 304 US gpm dP: 35.62 psi p ps /sec m i P: 8 Branson Library 02 FCV @ 457 US gpm dP: 35.45 psi 7 Ø: 12 in Flow: 1354 US gpm Vel: 3.886 ft/sec dP: 9.903 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 2127 US gpm Vel: 6.101 ft/sec dP: (4.476) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 9.522 US gpm Vel: 0.027 ft/sec dP: (2.122) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 762.6 US gpm Vel: 2.188 ft/sec dP: 0.495 psi 05-04 Native Americ Cult Cntr FCV @ 154 US gpm dP: 29.51 psi ~N{031} dP: 10.25 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 256.5 US gpm Vel: 0.736 ft/sec dP: 3.57 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 736 US gpm Vel: 4.724 ft/sec dP: (2.705) psi 10-06 New Married Student Hsg FCV @ 736 US gpm dP: 19.46 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 515.6 US gpm Vel: 1.479 ft/sec dP: 0.106 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 256.5 US gpm Vel: 0.736 ft/sec dP: (4.214) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 762.6 US gpm Vel: 2.188 ft/sec dP: (1.905) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 9.522 US gpm Vel: 0.027 ft/sec dP: 4.244 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 9.522 US gpm Vel: 0.027 ft/sec dP: (2.122) psi P: 58.41 psi g Ø: 6 in Flow: 247 US gpm Vel: 2.745 ft/sec dP: 2.494 psi Chamisa Village FCV @ 507 US gpm Ø: 12 in Flow: 515.6 US gpm Vel: 1.479 ft/sec dP: 7.903 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 762.6 US gpm Vel: 2.188 ft/sec dP: (1.932) psi 05-13 Chamisa Dorms, Ph 2 FCV @ 247 US gpm dP: 29.81 psi P: 28.76 psi g Ø: 24 in Flow: 433 Vel: 3.46 dP: (1.68 NM Dept. of Agriculture FCV @ 505 US gpm dP: 30.13 psi 15-06 Academic Research Lab FCV @ 1555 US gpm dP: 33.75 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 2813 US gpm Vel: 2.247 ft/sec dP: 6.476 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 2781 US gpm Vel: 2.222 ft/sec dP: (6.257) psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1555 US gpm Vel: 4.461 ft/sec dP: 2.403 psi 20-02 Academ/Res Bldgs FCV @ 1961 US gpm dP: 32.62 psi P: 83.33 psi g 20-02 Academic/Res Bldgs FCV @ 1961 US gpm dP: 32.62 psi P: 48.26 psi g Ø: 20 in Flow: 1141 US gpm Vel: 1.318 ft/sec dP: 0.077 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1961 US gpm P: 48.33 psi g Vel: 5.626 ft/sec dP: 4.874 psi Ø: 20 in Flow: 1109 US gpm Vel: 1.281 ft/sec dP: 0.073 psi Ø: 12 in Flow: 1961 US gpm Vel: 5.626 ft/sec dP: 9.185 psi P: 83.4 psi g Ø: 20 in Flow: 1141 US gpm Vel: 1.318 ft/sec dP: (6.166) psi Ø: 20 in Flow: 1109 US gpm Vel: 1.281 ft/sec dP: 6.554 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 1109 US gpm Vel: 0.886 ft/sec dP: (6.331) psi P: 81.07 psi g P: 48.02 psi g Ø: 12 in Flow: 1563 US gpm Vel: 4.484 ft/sec dP: 0.645 psi P: 89.96 psi g Ø: 24 in Flow: 1141 US gpm Vel: 0.911 ft/sec dP: 6.402 psi 20-03 Academic/ Research bldgs FCV @ 1563 US gpm dP: 30.74 psi P: 54.42 psi g Ø: 24 in Flow: 2672 US gpm Vel: 2.134 ft/sec dP: 0.319 psi Ø: 24 in Flow: 2704 US gpm Vel: 2.16 ft/sec dP: 0.326 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 1134 US gpm Vel: 7.279 ft/sec dP: 3.368 psi Ø: 8 in Flow: 1134 US gpm Vel: 7.279 ft/sec dP: 6.756 psi 20-04 Family Housing, Ph2 FCV @ 1134 US gpm dP: 7.272 psi Lineup: System: Date: Company: Project: by: 2034 Distribution (12°dT) 0874.00 NMSU CHW - 2034 06/11/09 10:36 am GLHN 0874.00 NMSU UDP DHW CHW - Stage 2 - Campus Build Out Darcy-Weisbach PIPE-FLO 2007 Flow: US gpm Pressure: psi g Size: in Elevation: ft Velocity: ft/sec Length: ft Volume: gallons