Newsletter April-Eng.pub - Nielsen Television Audience Measurement
Transcription
Newsletter April-Eng.pub - Nielsen Television Audience Measurement
NEWSLETTER 8th Edition, April 2007 This Edition: Data Highlight Data Highlight It’s Prime Time! It’s Sinetron Time! Or Is It? 1 When Local Channels Compete in Local Battle Field 3 Client’s Update A Simple Simulation in Campaign Plan 4 Arianna Customer Experience Survey 5 Arianna Training Schedule on Thursday, 09.30-12.00 Date 5-Apr Subject VB Level Beginner 12-Apr PE Beginner 19-Apr VB Beginner 26-Apr PE Beginner Please contact our Client Service team for you participation. We’re on the Web! www.agbnielsen.co.id It’s Prime Time! It’s Sinetron Time! Or Is It? TV program ranked by rating often posiSinetron is without question, the tion sinetrons on the top list. Then, what’s most important program for many TV staleft if we take out sinetrons? tions and prime time is full of them. Based on the same period of audiSome channels even still compete until ence measurement, excluding sinetron midnight with sinetrons. With various siand FTV, evidently music is being the netron programs, viewers have many most watched program. Generally, enterchoices. If they don’t like one story, then tainment program has the biggest share they can choose another. They can on broadcast hour. This program includes switch easily between two or more sinemusic, traditional entertainment, variety trons at a time. Until now, apparently sishow, reality netrons are still show, light enthe most watched tertainment, program among comedy, quiz, other programs. and game show. Based on broadWith 2134 cast hour in broadcast March (March 1hours/month 24, 2007), even (22% of total though its share program broadof broadcast hour cast hour) for is only 10% entertainment (about 925 hours/ program, viewmonth) of total ers only spend broadcast hour, 10 hours/month sinetron’s audi(13% of time ence share is the spent watching). biggest, which is Among the en24% tertainment (approximately 19 Entertainment’s broadcast hour percentage - Period March 1-24, 2007 genre, music prohours/month/viewer) gram gets the bigamong other progest number of audience. According to its grams. It is one to 18 hours longer than broadcast hour, the percentage of music the time that viewers spend to watch is 47% among other entertainment proother programs. grams. The time spent watching music is With the highest potential audience also the longest among others, which is 4 and the tightest competition among sinetrons during prime time, undoubtedly top hours 25 minutes/month. NEWSLETTER p.1 8t h Ed it i o n, Ap r il 2007 NEWSLETTER Data Highlight March 1-24, 2007, all people, all cities, exclude sinetron and FTV In this period, band collaboration of Ungu and Nidji in Duet Superband Ungu-Nidji (RCTI) is the most watched music program. Meanwhile, KDI (Kontes Dangdut TPI) 4 has started to win viewer’s attention since last December. Its variant, Gerbang, has also been gliding up to the top list of the most watched program. Not to mention Perjalanan Cinta Sang Raja and Radja di Raja (TPI) which are also the most watched programs. Besides music program, another program which has also caught viewer’s attention is special world boxing championship, Fight Back WBA Weather Fight, between our famous Chris John and Jose Rojas from Venezuela. An incident which involves national airline also attracted quite a number of viewers. That special news coverage is Garuda Terbakar (TRANS). Mean- while international soccer program, Liga Italia Serie A: Inter Milan vs Milan (Indosiar) is another sport program that is selected by viewers. Among the top program, we can also see the most favorite talk show program hosted by Tukul Arwana, Empat Mata (TRANS7). It is followed by variety show Extravaganza (TRANS), which started a few years ago, but is still waited by viewers up to now. Indeed, television is a magic box which serves various entertainment and information to the viewers. Nevertheless, rather than information, the entertain role of television is still the most important to the viewers in this country, at least. That is why without sinetron, entertainment program, especially music program either pop or dangdut, gets the most viewers.* TV TELEBUS SURVEY Provide Quick Answers to: What is it? TV Telebus Surveys is a syndicated study providing information about audience opinion in a quick and relatively low cost manner as clients share the setup and fieldwork cost. It avoids all the hassles of financing and organizing a full market research study. How does it work? Numbers of telephone interviews are conducted on a regular basis. Respondents are aged 10 and above randomly recruited, in home among all Socio - Economic Status Group. NEWSLETTER p.2 • • • Questions of audience habit/preference Understand audience reason for choosing a program Know the opinion/perception about certain program genres Area Coverage: Fieldwork is conducted in ten urban cities of Indonesia : Greater Jakarta, Bandung, Medan, Semarang, Greater Surabaya, Makassar, Greater Yogyakarta, Palembang, Denpasar, and Banjarmasin For further information, please contact: Ardiansyah (193), Christina (228), Hellen (193) NEWSLETTER 8th Edition, April 2007 Data Highlight When Local Channels Compete in Local Battle Field Since early 2000, local TV stations with local program content have brought some interesting changes onto the Indonesian broadcast industry. After more than 10 years being dominated by some national private TV stations and a public TV stations, viewers now have alternative programs to be watched on local TVs. Particularly in Jakarta and Bandung, there are eight TV stations which operate locally. Based on AGB Nielsen Media Research audience measurement, those channels are O-Channel, Jak TV, Space Toon, and Cahaya Banten TV in Jakarta, and Bandung TV, Space Toon, STV, City Channel, and Padjajaran TV in Bandung. Similar to national TVs station’s viewing pattern which tends to peak on prime time, the peak of potential audience in Bandung is at 11 AM and between 5 PM to 10 PM. With high potential audience on prime time, local TVs in Bandung have the opportunity to compete with national TVs in stealing audience. Meanwhile, viewing pattern on local TVs in Jakarta tend to be flat with no meaningful additional viewers throughout the day. From the viewing pattern, it seems that Bandung’s local TVs have become viewer’s choice among national TVs. On the contrary, the competition in Jakarta is still dominated by national TVs. Based on audience share, local TVs in Bandung have stolen quite a big share. However this is into the case with local TVs in Jakarta. In a very competitive situation among national TVs, many local TVs have tried to take part in un- Top program on local channels, Jakarta, March 1-24, 2007, all people NEWSLETTER Local channel share in Jakarta and Bandung, March 1-24, 2007, all people usual niche. If national TVs compete tightly with sinetrons, local TVs try to provide alternative programs by serving non-sinetron programs. These programs could be imported programs, but many of them are local programs which contain traditional and local culture. Top rated programs apart from sinetrons in Jakarta are imported programs, such as documentary, movie, children animation, or sport journal. Meanwhile in Bandung, the most watched programs are local programs. In March, local sport journal, Persib on Bandung TV is the most watched program among Bandung viewers. Although the most watched programs in Bandung are quite various, mostly are local Bandung content. Local TVs have their own unique selling proposition to win over the audience. The above table shows that Jakarta’s viewers tend to enjoy watching imported movies, while Bandung’s viewers tend to watch local program related to Bandung. Nevertheless, the choice is on viewers’ hand as channel surfing is as easy as moving your finger to the next button on the remote control. It will be interesting to see on what is to come for these local stations.* Top program on local channels, Bandung, March 1-24, 2007, all people p.3 P aEgW N e S4L E T T E R 8th Edition, April 2007 Client’s Update A Simple Simulation in Campaign Plan Simulation is a module that allows users to simulate campaigns by applying modifications on a previously aired advertising campaign. It enables users to add (could be from other brands) or to delete spots from the campaign that they have ran. The performance simulation of the resulting virtual campaign will be useful in order to optimize future campaigns and advertising expenditure. This analysis will help users in analyzing previous advertising campaign and use it as a reference for the next campaign. For example, a new snack product, let’s say Snack X, is making a planning on its campaign. In order to get better result on its future campaign, Snack X could simulate its campaign by referring to other brand — for example, its main competitor, Snack Y — former campaign. The next table shows campaign performance simulation of Snack Y on three TV stations in a week period. Snack Y Campaign By the simulation numbers, user can appraisal the advertising expenditure and the result that might be achieved from the future campaign. This competitor’s campaign simulation enables Snack X to create benchmarks in a different manner. For example, to achieve 200 GRP (Gross Rating Point) only, instead of buying 94 spots (642,6 million), Snack X should buy 84 spots (553,8 million). In turn, it will also save its expenses up to 88,8 million. Snack X campaign will then be watched 1,07 times instead of 1,11 times if it is advertised for 94 spots. In cumulative, the percentage will be 46,83% which represents the percentage of persons who will be exposed minimum once by the advertisement. By advertising for 84 spots, the cumulative reach is lower than if it advertised for 94 spots (48,52%). But if Snack X wants to get bigger cumu- Based on all people 15+, in all dayparts lative reach, it has to add its spots. It also means more expenditure. In turn, the campaign depends on its campaign objective, whether GRP or reach. Instead of referring to one competitor, Snack X could also refer to two or more competitors. By combining two or more competitors, Snack X might get much better result. The table below is another example which adds two other competitors. Snack W, Snack Y, and Snack Z Combination Campaign Based on all people 15+, in all dayparts By combining three products campaign, Snack X will achieve 200 GRP with 77 spots (588,6 million) only on its future campaign. Based on this combination campaign, with fewer numbers of spot and more expenses, its cumulative reach is higher. Then again, which simulation will be chosen for its future campaign depends on Snack X’s strategy and objective. With the same number of GRP (200 for instance) to be reached, Snack X can prefer a campaign with bigger number of spots, lower cost, and lower reach percentage or a campaign with smaller number of spots, higher cost, and higher reach percentage.* NEWSLETTER p.4 NEWSLETTER 8th Edition, April 2007 Client’s Update Arianna Customer Experience Survey As you are aware every time Arianna is installed or upgraded you will be asked if you would like to take part in the “Customer Experience Survey”. Because the “Customer Experience Survey” provides us with very valuable feedback information on Arianna usage statistics, we would be very happy to have your participation in this on going survey. Once collected the information will be fully analysed to provide us better statistics on Arianna usage. No personal information is collected and you do not need to do anything other than click the participate (accept) button on install or upgrade. The survey can also be turned on and off at any time through the help drop down menu in the main framework. Again for the continual improvement of Arianna, we encourage you to participate. Thank you. NEWSLETTER p.5