WW Jan - Mar 2012 - American Association of Small Ruminant
Transcription
WW Jan - Mar 2012 - American Association of Small Ruminant
In this Issue Letter from the President . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Management Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Welcome New Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Sam B. Guss Memorial Fund Donors and Grant Recipients . . . . 3 Call for Awards Nominations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Wool& Wattles Summary of AASRP Board of Directors Meetings . . . . . . . . . 4 Proposed Changes to the Bylaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Dr. Cleon Kimberling is 2011 Livestock Leader . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Committee Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 AVMA Veterinary Leadership Conference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 The AASRP Newsletter January-March 2012 Volume 40, Issue 1 ASI Annual Convention Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Extralabel Cephalosporin Use Ban . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Announcements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Mission Statement of AASRP Books, Bulletins, and Computer Websites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 “To improve the health and Footvax® Availability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 welfare of sheep, goats, Bunyavirus Surveillance: Cache Valley and Schmallenberg . . . . 7 camelids and cervids, Effects of Parasites – a Youth Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 AASRP-L Q&A - Source of Toxoplasmosis Abortion Storms . . . 10 to further the professional AASRP-L Q&A - Bearing Retainer for Prolapsed Vagina . . . . . . 10 development of the members, AASRP-L Q&A - Ringwomb in Sheep . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 provide resources to elevate AASRP-L Q&A - Selenium Supplementation . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 the standards of small ruminant AASRP-L Q&A - Bottle Feeding Lambs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 AASRP-L Q&A - Iron Deficiency Anemia in Camelids . . . . . . . 12 AASRP-L Q&A - Alpaca Sling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 AASRP-L Q&A - Approach to Sick Alpaca . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 AASRP-L Q&A - Rental Ultrasound Unit for Student Externs . . . 13 Listerial Myelitis in a Goat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 CAE Virus Infection in Rocky Mountain Goats . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Neurologic Form of Maedi-Visna (OPP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Tuberculosis in Camelids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Computer Models for Delaying Anthelmintic Resistance . . . . . 14 Inherited Resistance to Ovine Progressive Pneumonia . . . . . . 15 Eradication Program Affects Time to Eliminate Footrot . . . . . . 15 Bioavailability of Selenium Sources to Ewes . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Ultrasound Pregnancy Diagnosis of Goats . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 AASRP Membership Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Voting Ballot for Directors, Regions 1 and 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 AASRP Board of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 AASRP Veterinary College Liaisons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 practice and to be the voice for small ruminant issues.” Letter from the President Happy Spring, AASRP! While I am welcoming the warmer weather and longer daylight, we have had the driest winter that I can remember and we have not had any measurable precipitation in over two months. The grass is desiccating before our very eyes and you can hear what small growth there is crackling beneath your feet as you walk. Hay prices are still fairly high here after so much hay was shipped to drought-stricken Texas last fall. I am hoping we get some moisture soon so that there will be a first cutting in June. The Board is very appreciative that so many members have already paid their 2012 dues this year, and I am sure that the AASRP student members also appreciate the generous donations from members to the Sam Guss Educational Fund. In order to better facilitate the student applications for funding, copies of completed applications are being sent to the appropriate college liaison so that Dr. Wolf has someone to work with if there are questions about the application or the appropriateness of the externship. Past President Dr. Jim Fallen has been doing a great job working with his College Liaison Committee to improve communications between the AASRP Office, the Board and the liaisons at each of the veterinary colleges. Jim is working closely with Membership Committee Chair Annika Rogers to increase communication with the students in a variety of ways in order to retain student members after graduation. Dr. Rogers was integral in developing the new Student Membership page on the AASRP website and we really appreciate all her hard work. Dr. Michelle Kutzler from Oregon State University is the new Chairman of the Public Relations Committee. She is looking for members interested in helping her develop a survey of the membership so that the Board can make sure we are providing the services that members want as well as determine member opinions on several controversial topics. Those of you that participate on the AASRP-L will have noticed an increasing interest in federal legislative activity, and Board Members are being asked for AASRP policy on several issues on a monthly basis. We are still looking for a Communications Committee Chair and we are seeking someone who can improve information exchange between the Board, the members, and the AASRP representatives to the AVMA Committees and Councils. We are looking for someone in an oversight position that would make sure that AASRP is sending a consistent message and that the opinions expressed would be those of the consensus of the membership. The American Board of Veterinary Practitioners contacted the AASRP Board again to see if AASRP was interested in developing a board certification for small ruminant proficiency. We have talked about this subject several times and have explored the amount of work that would need to be done in order to develop the requirements and set standards. Three of the larger challenges are identifying 20 members who would be willing to devote a large amount of time to develop the Board, finding veterinarians who would be qualified to be Board certified in sheep, goats, camelids and farmed cervids, and paying the costs for development of the specialty. If you are interested in development of a Board Specialty in Small Ruminant Medicine, please contact me at [email protected]. Otherwise, we will continue to monitor the situation but not actively seek a specialty. Please remember that nominations for the George McConnell Memorial Award and the Don Bailey Practitioner of the Year Award are due in the AASRP office by May 31. Nomination Forms were in the January to March 2012 Wool & Wattles and can also be found at www.AASRP.org. Recipients will be announced during the AASRP Annual Membership Meeting that will be held at noon, August 4, 2012 in the AASRP meeting room at the AVMA Annual Convention in San Diego. Thank you all for your continuing participation in AASRP and please let those of us on the Board know what we can do to help you. Best wishes, Joan Bowen 2 Management Report As we mentioned in the December Wool and Wattles issue, AASRP committees continue to raise their level of activity. Both the College Liaison and Membership Committees are meeting on a monthly basis to develop ways to improve communication with students interested in food animal and small ruminant practice and the Membership Committee is providing increased opportunities to interact with students. You will notice there is now a student section on the AASRP website. That section includes information about the student clubs and student club membership at the various veterinary medical colleges. It also has a complete list of college liaisons. The Membership and College Liaison Committees are actively seeking practitioners who would be willing to discuss small ruminant practice with student organizations. These discussions need not take place in person, but can be delivered through various modes of electronic communication. The committees want to encourage practitioners interested in speaking with students and encouraging students to pursue small ruminant practice to contact the AASRP office to put your name on the volunteer list. With the addition of Dr. Michelle Kutzler as chair of the Public Relations Committee, you will see increased communication from AASRP regarding activities of the association and news of interest to veterinarians in small ruminant practice. We would again encourage AASRP members who would like to be involved to contact the office to volunteer their time and talents on one of the AASRP committees. Those of you with email should have received the first edition of the E-news from AASRP. We anticipate the next issue of E-news will be published in mid-April, 2012. We encourage you to submit suggestions for content for the e-newsletter and any comments that you might have regarding improving the appearance or content of the e-newsletter. Franz Management Services is honored to serve AASRP member veterinarians. Tom Johnson STUDENT EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES We receive many requests from veterinary students for information about externship opportunities. We are asking AASRP Veterinary members if they are interested in hosting primarily 4th year students for 2-4 weeks. Information that the students desire includes: - Small ruminant species seen in your practice, - Busiest months of the year relevant to small ruminant work, - Practice location, - Availability of housing, and - Preferred contact information for externship requests. Based on student feedback, we see a need to update externship opportunity information from the membership. Thus we are asking for those of you who wish to host Student externs to contact me directly via email using the following Subject line: AASRP Externships. Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you. Cindy Wolf, DVM [email protected] Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 WELCOME NEW MEMBERS 1st Quarter Full Members Dr. Joe S. Bailey Dr. Kenny Barrett Dr. Natalie Barron Dr. Louise Jane Batt Dr. William A. A. Boyd Dr. Amanda Jane Covington Dr. Jennifer Ayn Enger Dr. Franka Figari Dr. Simon Peter Gascoyne Dr. Sara Emilia Gomez-Ibanez Dr. Eric D. Gordon Dr. Alison Gussack Dr. William Hare Dr. Brian J. Hodes Dr. Brett A. Hoerr Dr. Elizabeth James Dr. Jerrod Cameron Johnson Dr. Allison Lockwood Dr. Colleen Shannon McCoy Dr. Anne C. Murphy Dr. Luis R. Padiilla Dr. Anne Elizabeth Parker Dr. John Pollock Dr. John Howard Porter Dr. Laura Roe Dr. Shakyra Rosario Dr. Angela Sherman Dr. Joseph Seffi Varsano Dr. Ellen Linnea Ziemer Heidi Eberly – Virginia Polytechnic Michael Freifeld - Cornell Samantha Godbey – Auburn Virginia Gregory – Tuskegee Jill Greisman – Cornell Liz Griffin – Auburn Mary Griffin – Auburn Tori Lynn Hall – Mississippi State LeeAnn Hyder – Michigan State Erin Michelle Jones – UC-Davis Kate Kirby – Auburn Martha Lukey – Auburn Laura Mahoney - Tufts Student Members Brigitle Meatee – Auburn Edwin Arriola – St. George’s Megan McClosky – Auburn Bobbie Bush – Univ. of Florida Holly E. Midkiff – Tufts Jehna Bush – St. George’s Alyssa O’Dell – Oklahoma State Beth-Ann Carroll – Auburn Kathleen Crawford – Colorado State Katherine Platt – UC-Davis Nicholas Rachosek – Auburn Anna Daniel – Auburn Henry Reinart – Michigan State Ame Rios – Univ. of Georgia Tora N. Seals – Univ. of Missouri Susan Shaffer – Cornell Peter Skurdal – Washington State Matthew Slentz – Univ. of Wisconsin Lauren Smith – Auburn Jo Smoak – Auburn Amelia Teague – Auburn Samuel Tepper – Oregon State Jolene Tourville – Univ. of Minnesota Roxanne Danae Wallace – Oklahoma State Anne Walsh – Univ. of Prince Edward Island Josh D. Winslow – Univ. of Georgia Ashley Nikki Wright – Univ. of Pennsylvania Samuel B. Guss Memorial Fund Contributions as of March 1, 2012 Dr. Samuel B. Guss (1916-1984) Dr. Don E. Bailey Dr. Katherine Beltaire Dr. Diane R. Biederman-Brynda Dr. Toni Cotton Dr. Rachael Emerson Dr. Rebecca Hall-Cross Dr. Judith L. Jaxtheimer Dr. Pamela Jennings Dr. Michelle Kopcha Dr. Michel Levy Dr. Howard E. Miller Dr. Dawn E. Morin Dr. Eden Myers Dr. Jeanne M. Rankin Dr. Michael Rennick Dr. Ame Rios Dr. Joan Dean Rowe Dr. David Sherman Dr. Robin Skillman Dr. Patrick K. Skipton Dr. Joseph H. Snyder Dr. Robert J. Van Saun Dr. Elizabeth A. Williams Dr. Kathryn N. Wolyn Dr. Amelia R. Woolums In order to assist senior veterinary students interested in small ruminant medicine, AASRP provides grants each year to help student members of AASRP undertake extern opportunities. It is not required that the experience be with small ruminants exclusively, but it should provide at least some chance to observe a modern veterinary practice working with one or more of the small ruminant species. Over one hundred AASRP-member practitioners throughout the United States – as well as Australia, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Israel and Puerto Rico – offer externships to students seeking experience in small ruminant medicine. To learn more about the AASRP Student Externship Program, call the AASRP Management Office at 334-517-1233, or log on at aasrp.org *Donations for the Sam Guss fund can now be made on line without having to go thru the membership renewal. Here is the link: http://aasrp.org/displayemailforms.cfm?emailformnbr=143762 2012 Student Grant Recipients Due to the continued contributions to the Samuel B. Guss Memorial Fund, the following senior veterinary students have been selected and are able to receive grants to help assist with the cost of the externships. Thank you to all of the donors. Your contribution truly makes a difference! Student Amber Berlin – Univ. of Illinois Ken Strawn – Kansas State Univ. Stephan Gibson – Kansas State Univ. Katie Todd – Univ. of Pennsylvania Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 Externship Caine Veterinary Teaching Center Woodburn Veterinary Clinic US Sheep Experiment Station US Sheep Experiment Station 3 CALL FOR AWARD NOMINATIONS The Association is seeking nominations for the Dr. Donald E. Bailey Practitioner of the Year Award as well as the George McConnell Award. Nomination forms are linked to the side bar of the AASRP web site home page, www.aasrp.org. Both forms list the criteria required for a nominee to be considered for each award. Nominations are due May 31st, to the management office of AASRP by mail, email or fax. Nominations are reviewed for appropriate criteria and forwarded to the Board of AASRP for selection of recipient. American Association of Small Ruminant Practitioners P.O. Box 3614 Montgomery, AL 36109 Phone: 334/517-1233 • Fax: 334/270-3399 Email: [email protected] Summary of AASRP Board of Directors Activities for January and February, 2012 The Board of Directors met via conference call on January 19 and February 24, 2012 and took the following actions: • Approved nomination for Dr. Grant Seaman to serve on the AVMA Committee on Environmental Issues. • Approved the nomination for Dr. Joan Bowen to serve on the AVMA Food Safety Advisory Commission • Approved revisions to the AASRP Policy Manual. • Approved Dr. Michelle Kutzler to serve as Chair of the Public Relations Committee • Authorized Franz Management Services to conduct the banking affairs of the American Association of Small Ruminant Practitioners • Discussed the reserve account for AASRP. The previously held certificates of deposit have matured. AASRP will invest $50,000 to $55,000 in a reserve account. The final decisions on investments will be made at the March board meeting. • Approved publishing the by-laws changes in the March Wool and Wattles. If no comments are received from members regarding changes to the by-laws, the changes will become effective 30 days after publication. ARTICLE VII Amendments, Review and Revision Section 1:A change in the Bylaws may be put to a vote of the membership upon receipt of a petition signed by at least five (5) active members within 30 days of publication of the change by the Board of Directors in the membership newsletter.” AMENDED BYLAWS OF AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF SMALL RUMINANT PRACTITIONERS Approved by membership Date ARTICLE V Committees of the Board Section 3: The Board of Directors shall have an Executive Committee comprised of no less than three (3) nor more than seven (7) members—being the President, President Elect, and Past President. In the Board’s discretion, it may select additional members to the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee shall meet as needed and between meetings of the Board of Directors it shall have and may exercise all of the authority of the Board of Directors except to the extent, if any, that such authority shall be limited by the resolution appointing the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee shall not have the authority to recommend to the members the sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the property and assets of the Association other than that in the ordinary and regular course of its business, the voluntary dissolution of the Association or the amendment of the Bylaws of the Association. The President shall be chair of the Executive Committee. • Approved a motion indicating AASRP is opposed to the passage of House Resolution 3798. Section 4: Each member of the Executive Committee shall hold office until his or her successor is elected and qualified. • Section 10: Special committees may be created by the President for such special tasks as circumstances warrant. A special committee shall limit its activities to the accomplishment of the task for which it is appointed and shall have no power to act except as specifically conferred by action of the Board. Upon completion of the task for which created such special committee shall stand discharged. The board is working closely with Membership Committee and the College Liaison Committee to increase communication to AASRP student members, students interested in small ruminant practice and our college liaisons. • Approved the following student educational grants: Ken Strawn - $200; Amber Berlin - $300; Stephan Gibson - $700; Katie Todd - $550. • Accepted applications for 44 new members in January and 18 new members in February, 2012. • The board continues to work with the Membership and College Liaison Committees to improve communication with students interested in food production and small ruminant clubs and college liaisons at the colleges. • The board directed the College Liaison Committee and Franz Management Services to communicate with the college liaisons on a monthly basis reporting activity of board meetings and committee meetings to the college liaisons. • The board continues to meet on a monthly basis via teleconference and has scheduled their annual face-to-face meeting for Saturday, August 4, 2012 at the AVMA Convention in San Diego. 4 AASRP Members, Below you will find your Board of Directors’ suggestions for changes to AASRP bylaws Article V. We have included all the sections that contain suggested changes. The bylaws in their entirety can be found on the AASRP website. (www.aasrp.org ) If you would like the membership to vote on these changes you will need to notify the Management office by June15. If you believe the changes are acceptable no action is necessary as per Article VII of the current bylaws. Section 11: Chairpersons of Standing Committees shall be nominated by the President annually at the Board of Directors’ annual meeting and shall serve for a term of one (1) year. DR. CLEON KIMBERLING 2011 Livestock Leader His business card says Cleon Kimberling specializes in sheep health and bicycling. An unlikely combination, but it’s a perfect description of Kimberling: The 81-year-old veterinarian, who lives east of Fort Collins, is known throughout the West for tackling sheep illness and disease, and he’s dedicated to riding his recumbent-style bicycle for his own health. “Dr. Kimberling is an icon in the Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 sheep industry. He’s helped eradicate lots of disease,” said Terry Engle, a professor in the Colorado State University Department of Animal Sciences whom Kimberling has mentored. “He is well-respected by producers, colleagues and students, and has always been highly focused on making sure his students could implement textbook learning into real-world livestock production. He is also an excellent problem-solver.” The CSU Department of Animal Sciences has named Kimberling the 2011 Livestock Leader for his exceptional contributions to the livestock industry. He was honored Saturday, Jan. 14, during CSU Day at the National Western Stock Show in Denver. Those honored with the prestigious Livestock Leader award are dedicated to the livestock industry and are widely known for leadership and innovation in their fields. “Not in my wildest dreams did I think I should receive an award like this,” Kimberling said, noting his admiration for previous recipients. “I have a holiday every day that I’ve worked.” Kimberling is a valued member of CSU’s agricultural family: He earned a bachelor’s degree in animal science from CSU in 1951, and a degree in veterinary medicine in 1959. For 40 years, from 1965 to 2005, Kimberling was a faculty member in CSU’s renowned College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and during this time also worked as a CSU Extension veterinarian. Through his work, Kimberling has embodied the CSU missions in teaching, research and service, said Kevin Pond, head of the Department of Animal Sciences. “As a CSU faculty member and Extension veterinarian for four decades, Dr. Kimberling dedicated himself to learning about livestock health problems, to the quest for solutions, and to sharing with both students and producers important discoveries,” Pond said. “He is known among friends and colleagues as a lifelong learner and teacher, and we appreciate everything Dr. Kimberling has done to gain and share knowledge about the critical issue of livestock health.” Kimberling has focused on herd health management for dairy cattle, range beef cattle and range sheep. He developed for the dairy industry a brucellosis ring test that allows monitoring and surveillance of infection in large herds using bulk tank sampling. He also helped develop and standardize the antigen used for the brucellosis card test, a rapid test for detecting the disease in beef and dairy cows. This work has aided in a near eradication of brucellosis in many herds and entire states. Kimberling’s contributions to the sheep industry are equally impressive. He championed feed and nutrition standards for flocks, including breakthroughs in the emerging field of micro-nutrients. To more accurately measure the levels of these micro-nutrients, a liver sample was necessary. So Kimberling developed a liver biopsy instrument and a technique to efficiently collect samples. “I have always looked to improve the health of animals because it makes overall animal production more efficient,” Kimberling said. “The big picture is healthier populations of sheep or cattle, and thus great efficiency for the producer.” Kimberling grew up on a farm near Imperial, Neb., and at an early age became interested in animal health after an outbreak of disease on his family farm. It inspired him to enter a profession to help other producers with animal disease prevention. He has poured similar energy into his own health. After he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, at the age of 65, Kimberling embarked on his first long bicycle trip – from Oceanside, Calif., to Bar Harbor, Maine – some 3,500 miles. Several years ago, he rode his bike to Nebraska for his 50th high school reunion. He has also ridden the entire perimeter of the United States. Kimberling’s battle with cancer – currently in remission – comes after his years of work battling diseases that afflict animals. “Like my dedication to promoting advancements in livestock health, my goals with bicycling have always been to keep my mind and body in shape,” Kimberling said. “You can’t let your mind or body deteriorate.” At age 81, Kimberling stays active. He works with Optimal Livestock Services, a Fort Collins-based company that specializes in sheep health, reproduction and management. Kimberling is also involved with the Food Bank for Larimer County and church-related activities. Governance Committee Report The governance committee has completed the annual review of documents concerning AASRP. The documents, Constitution, Bylaws and Policy Manual have been reviewed by the Board of directors and have been made available to the membership on the website. Only the Policy Manual had updates to reflect the new committees determined necessary to increase membership value and to reflect the desire of the Board of Directors to improve and modernize the organization. Dr. Paul Jones Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 Nominating Committee Report The AASRP nominating committee has made recommendations to the Board of Directors to fill available positions representing AASRP on AVMA committees. These nominations have been forwarded to the AVMA Executive Board for approval. The nominating committee also made recommendations to the AASRP President, Joan Bowen, for positions within the organization, namely regional directors and AASRP committee chairpersons. The nominating committee is always seeking members who wish to serve at either the organization or AVMA level. Please let our executive director, Tom Johnson, know if you have a desire to volunteer to work for your organization. Dr. Paul Jones 2012 AVMA Veterinary Leadership Conference Each January, AASRP sends three to five representatives to the AVMA Veterinary Leadership Conference in Chicago for an outstanding educational and networking experience. In 2012, Dr. Paul Jones attended as AASRP delegate to the House of Delegates, Dr. Joan Bowen served as both AASRP President and alternate delegate to the HOD, Dr. Joan Dean Rowe participated as the President-Elect and Dr. Annika Rogers, our Region 4 District Director, was our emerging leader. There are different tracks for different classifications of representatives as well as several joint meetings. All Delegates and alternates attend several working sessions of the House, but the members of the House and other participants also meet in other sessions. Attendees have at least three breakout sessions to discuss the resolutions, bylaws and business with different assortments of attendees. The Allied Caucus is a loosely structured group of representatives from different specie groups as well as veterinarians aligned by their employment status. Members include AASRP, AABP, AASV, AAFP, AAHA, AAAP, AAV, SFT, as well as representatives from CDC, Homeland Security, USDA, Public Health Veterinarians, University Veterinary Clinicians, Uniformed Services, State Veterinarians, Laboratory Animal Practitioners, and Veterinary Technicians. We discussed the newly published AVMA Euthanasia Guidelines and how the three resolutions and two amendments before the House might impact different organizations. Of major concern to AASRP and AABP was the portion of the AVMA Model Veterinary Practice Act describing VCPR because it differs from the USDA version published in the CFR. There are eleven geographic districts in the AVMA and members from each of the states within a district meet together during the District Caucus with the Executive Board member representing their district. I met with all the AVMA members present who were from Colorado, New Mexico, Kansas, Oklahoma, Utah and Arizona and our discussion was guided by AVMA Executive Board President and District 9 Representative Dr. Ted Cohn. I was surprised to discover that our District is the third largest in AVMA. This group was a distinctly different mix than was present in the Allied Caucus, but we discussed the same topics again. Our district was quite concerned about the proposed Annual Rabies Vaccination Waiver and we recommended that the Model Practice Act VCPR section be referred back to committee for further discussion. The final breakout session sent the House of Delegates members to one of 7 different Reference Committees. Once each year, members of the House may request a specific Reference Committee but both delegates may not serve on the same committee. Dr. Jones serves on Reference Committee 1 which deals with Legislative Issues, while Dr. Bowen participates in Reference Committee 7 which is concerned with Scientific Activities. Our Committee receives all of the reports from the Council on Biologics and Therapeutic Agents, Public Health and Regulatory Veterinary Medicine, Animal Agriculture Liaison Committee, Food Safety Advisory Committee, National Association of Veterinary Technicians, and AVM. We were very fortunate to have Dr. Bernadette Dunham present and she provided us with a perspective from FDA on antimicrobial use, veterinary oversight in animal drug use, proposed changes to the veterinary feed directive, and the then unreleased cephalosporin ELDU ban. Voting in the House of Delegates does not occur until all the different breakout sessions have been held and this offers attendees an excellent opportunity to share information and understand how the proposed resolutions and bylaws impact different AVMA groups or members. 5 NOTES FROM THE AMERICAN SHEEP INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION ANNUAL CONVENTION The ASI Annual Convention was held in Phoenix, AZ, January 24-28, 2012. The Association has a number of committees as well as a list of policies and directives many of which are pertinent to animal health. http:// www.sheepusa.org/ASI_Positions The Animal Health Committee met from 3-5 pm on Thursday, January 26. Dr. Diane Sutton of USDA/APHIS reviewed the current highlights from the National Scrapie Eradication Program. The numbers of scrapie cases in sheep have been steadily declining as a result of selective breeding programs and slaughter trace back efforts. She also discussed proposed changes in the Scrapie Flock Certification Program that will be announced this spring. In the last ten years, 25 cases of scrapie in goats have been diagnosed with an increase in the annual numbers in the past 3-5 years. (check out the “monthly report” link on the right at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/ animal_diseases/scrapie/ ) It is likely that the increased numbers are related to increased surveillance. New sampling minimums for slaughtered goats will be coming soon. Dr. Katherine Marshall provided a preliminary report on findings from the 2011 NAHMS Sheep Study which will reflect about 70% of US sheep operations and 85% of the national ewe inventory. Interestingly, results from the on-farm sampling portion of the study indicated that 47% of sheep operations were positive for exposure to toxoplasmosis; 52% of operations were positive for campylobacter, a cause of abortions and human foodborne illness; and 47% of operations were positive for salmonella bacteria. Samples were also taken for Q fever. Of 563 participating operations, samples from 16% tested positive by ELISA. These samples will be further tested by the more specific immunofluorescence assay (IFA). A series of reports will soon be available at their website: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/ nahms/sheep/ . Dr. Margaret Highland of the Animal Disease Research Unit at Pullman, WA, gave an overview of what is currently known about severe pneumonia outbreaks in bighorn sheep and their possible association with contact between bighorns and domestic sheep on public range land. ASI estimates that ~23% of domestic sheep production in the USA utilizes at least some public land grazing. Suggestions for further research were presented. This topic has created considerable controversy and will remain a very important issue for the US sheep industry. Some recent references related to this issue are below.1-3 You can see the abstracts at the National Library of Medicine online search engine http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez . Dr. Don Knowles, Research Leader for the Animal Disease Research Unit at Pullman, WA, provided an update on research into a possible genetic marker for susceptibility to ovine progressive pneumonia virus (OPP). A candidate marker, TMEM154, has been identified which appears to be present more frequently in infected animals.4 Further work needs to be done to validate the findings, but this work suggests that it may be possible to select sheep that are less susceptible to OPP and gradually reduce the prevalence of this disease. During the meeting of the Production Education and Research Council on Friday, Dr. Keith Inskeep of West Virginia University presented an informative review of appropriate uses of CIDR devices, and Dr. Dan Morrical of Iowa State University demonstrated the use of some new ration balancing software for sheep, Sheep BRaNDS, that appears to be user friendly and that utilizes the 2007 NRC Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants data. Dr. Morrical would be a contact for inquiries about this software. For those of you who do not know, ASI publishes the Sheep Production Handbook which would be an excellent source of information for some of your clients. http://www.sheepusa.org/Order_Materials ASI also publishes the Sheep and Goat Research Journal, and the articles, including those in back issues, are available online at http://www.sheepusa.org/Sheep_and_ Goat_Research_Journal . Respectfully submitted, William Shulaw, ASI Animal Health Committee Member, AASRP Board Member Region 1 6 1. Dassanayake RP, Shanthalingam S, Herndon CN, et al. Mannheimia haemolytica serotype A1 exhibits differential pathogenicity in two related species, Ovis canadensis and Ovis aries. Vet Microbiol 2009;133:366-371. 2. Dassanayake RP, Shanthalingam S, Herndon CN, et al. Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae can predispose bighorn sheep to fatal Mannheimia haemolytica pneumonia. Vet Microbiol 2010;145:354-359. 3. Lawrence PK, Shanthalingam S, Dassanayake RP, et al. Transmission of Mannheimia haemolytica from domestic sheep (Ovis aries) to bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis): unequivocal demonstration with green fluorescent protein-tagged organisms. J Wildl Dis 2010;46:706-717. 4. Heaton MP, Clawson ML, Chitko-McKown CG, et al. Reduced lentivirus susceptibility in sheep with TMEM154 mutations. PLoS Genet 2012;8:e1002467 ANNOUNCEMENTS The American Dairy Goat Association’s national show will be held in Loveland Colorado on July 6 & 7, 2012. The Association needs veterinary students to help check in goats for the show. Have your students contact Dr. Joan Bowen if they are available to help. Joan Bowen ([email protected]) The AVMA Annual Convention will be held August 3 - 7, 2012 in San Diego. We have an AASRP Membership Meeting at noon on Saturday August 4 before the afternoon small ruminant sessions with Dr. John Angelos. He will be talking about urolithiasis, predator-inflicted trauma, and pinkeye and other ocular diseases. Sunday is devoted to camelids with Drs. Susan Tornquist (hematology, biochemistry, infectious diseases, and neoplasia of camelids) and Susan McClanahan (parasitic diseases, metabolic and GI diseases, reproduction and dystocia in camelids, and herd health strategies for camelids). Monday features sheep and goat topics with Drs. Joan Dean Rowe (reproduction, abortion, and reproductive ultrasound) and Andrea Mongini (pregnancy toxemia, copper and Boer goats, economics of commercial goat dairies, and meat goat practice). Tuesday morning is back to the basics with Dr. Joe Snyder (parasite control, neonatal necessities, and common foot problems) and range sheep production in the afternoon, including predator control and livestock guardian dogs, with Dr. Nancy East. All our members should look at page 63 of the program for a fun comment by one of our regional Directors, Dr. Patty Scharko. “Camelids, the animals of the future in a changing climate, - reproduction, production and genetics” will be the topic of a symposium to be held from 3rd - 5th August 2012 in Vancouver, Canada. This is a satellite meeting of the 17th International Congress of Animal Reproduction (ICAR) 2012, also in Vancouver July 30 - August 2, 2012. The symposium aims to support camelid research with oral presentations in all aspects of reproduction, as well as to provide a useful Continuing Education Program with leading experts giving papers in specific fields of camelid reproduction, embryo transfer and artificial insemination, genetics, milk and fiber production and general husbandry. For further information follow updates at the ICAR site, <http://www.icar2012.com/>. The XI International Conference on Goats will be held at Gran Canaria, Spain from September 24 to 27th of 2012. The organizers promise to do their utmost to ensure that the XI International Conference on Goats will leave you unforgettable memories not only in terms of Goat Science but also a great experience overall. Keeping abreast of the latest developments in Goat research could help those in the industry maintain or increase their profit margin, so vital to the success of the industry. The conference has a webpage at <http://iga2012.ulpgc.es/IGA_2012/IGA2012. html>. The International Goat Association has moved to <http:// www.iga-goatworld.com/> The International Sheep Veterinary Congress will be held February 18th-22nd, 2012 in Rotorua, on the North Island of New Zealand. The website <http://conference.intsheepvetassoc.org/> will be a good source of updates in the coming months. Add this site to your “Favourites” folder of website addresses for easy future reference. The website includes a feature to sign up for email updates at <http://conference.intsheepvetassoc.org/notifications/> and we strongly recommend that you do Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 this so you can be kept up to date with all the congress arrangements as they happen. In addition to a superb scientific programme, the Congress will feature tours incorporating visits of both farming and tourist/scenic interest through both the North and South Islands of New Zealand. Preliminary outlines of these tours (now ending at Rotorua) are already available on the website at <http://conference.intsheepvetassoc.org/pre-congress-tours/>. The International Sheep Veterinary Congress will be held February 18th-22nd, 2012 in Rotorua, on the North Island of New Zealand. The website <http://conference.intsheepvetassoc.org> will be a good source of updates in the coming months. Add this site to your “Favourites” folder of website addresses for easy future reference. The website includes a feature to sign up for email updates at <http://conference. intsheepvetassoc.org/notifications> and we strongly recommend that you do this so you can be kept up to date with all the congress arrangements as they happen. In addition to a superb scientific programme, the Congress will feature tours incorporating visits of both farming and tourist/scenic interest through both the North and South Islands of New Zealand. Preliminary outlines of these tours (now ending at Rotorua) are already available on the website at <http://conference. intsheepvetassoc.org/pre-congress-tours>. The call for abstracts for both oral and poster presentations is now open at the website, and abstracts must be received by August 31st, 2012. Additionally, delegates presenting papers or posters must register for the conference by the earlybird deadline of October 31st. Registration is now open. BOOKS, BULLETINS, AND COMPUTER WEBSITES Q Fever frequently asked questions are answered at the Washington State University website: http://www.vetmed.wsu.edu/depts_waddl/dx/QFever.aspx A pattern for making a stuffed lamb or kid for 4H or producer training programs is available at <http://www.4-hmall.org/Product/4-hcurriculum-dairy-goat/07514.aspx>. CERVETEC2011, the proceedings of the New Zealand’s Deer Industry annual technical/veterinary conference hosted by the NZ Veterinary Association Deer Branch are now available. They consist of 155 pages of up to date material on deer reproduction, welfare, parasites, paratuberculosis, clinical case reports, Deer industry and diseases in China, and visions for the deer industry. They can be purchased from the Deer Branch NZVA at this address below: Peter Wilson, IVABS, Massey University, PB 11222 Palmerston North, New Zealand, Ph 0064 6 3569099 Ext 7619, Fax 0064 6 3505636 <http://ivabs.massey.ac.nz/centres/deer/default. asp> The cost is NZ$78 to North America, NZ$84 to Europe and elsewhere. The Branch has a standing order list for automatic mailing of future issues. The CERVETEC 2012 conference is scheduled for May 29-31, Queenstown New Zealand. Details will shortly be on the Cervetec website: http://cervetec.co.nz/ DRUGS AND BIOLOGICS Footvax® Availability Many of you know that Footvax® has not been available in the USA for several months now. The American Sheep Industry Association (ASI) and the California Wool Growers Association (CWGA) have had several discussions with the USDA and with the vaccine manufacturer (Intervet/Schering-Plough/Merck) over the past year encouraging them to resume licensed sales. Although no official licensing or approval has been granted at this writing, it appears that USDA may grant the manufacturer the ability to import the product into the US under special permit for limited distribution and research without renewal of their regular license. Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 The vaccine manufacturer and USDA have sought a central US contact to collect producer and veterinary orders. At this time, the CWGA is willing to provide this service and will work with USDA and the vaccine company to help import the amount of product needed by US producers and veterinarians. The cost per dose has not been finalized but is being estimated at about $2.50 per dose. The time frame for importation is not yet set either, but it is hoped that it could occur within the next couple of months. To facilitate this process, the company would like to have an idea of how many doses might be requested. If you are interested in ordering the Footvax® product, please email [email protected] or call 916-444-8122 and let the CWGA know the number of doses that you would like to order along with your name, mailing address, phone number and email address. It may be well for you to contact your clients who may have an interest in order to help get an accurate accounting of potential need. The CWGA will prepare a master list of interested people. Once confirmation is received from USDA that the product can be imported for US use, those who requested vaccine will be notified. The distribution channels are not yet clearly determined. As details become available, requestors will be contacted to confirm what entity within each state can provide the product. It appears from initial discussions that individual state veterinarians will need to apply for permits in order to allow distribution within their states. These permits may carry some product usage and reporting responsibilities with them. It is assumed that the company will be contacting state veterinarians for the permitting process, but it may be well to contact your state veterinarian to alert them of the issue and your, and your clients’, anticipated needs. The above text was prepared with the assistance of ASI and is greatly appreciated. I have not been part of the discussions regarding this issue and do not know the reasons the company has decided not to seek re-licensure of the product in the US. But I do believe that this issue is part of the ongoing larger discussion about maintenance of infrastructure in the sheep industry and keeping numbers up. The Minor Use Minor Species legislation of a few years ago, for example, has helped reduce the cost of getting a therapeutic product available for sheep and goats, but the process still requires a company get on board with a product and “shepherd” it through. Likewise, companies have to be committed and work with USDA/APHIS Center for Veterinary Biologics to get biologics licensed. They won’t do this unless they perceive they will be financially rewarded. I truly believe our ability to access new products in the future depends on our ability to maintain a strong, vibrant, profitable, and enthusiastic industry. Respectfully submitted, William Shulaw BUNYAVIRUS SURVEILLANCE Many of you have likely seen or heard of Schmallenburg virus that has been discussed on the AASRP listserve over the past month or two. In response to this issue and the anecdotal increase in cases of unconfirmed Cache Valley Virus cases over the last few years in the midwest (also previously discussed on the listserve) we are starting to increase our surveillance. Please look over the information below and if you have any arthrogrypotic livestock abortions consider submitting them to us. We do require that cases be submitted by the attending veterinarian. At the present time Schmallenberg virus (SBV) has not been identified in the United States. It can have clinical presentations similar to other orthobunyaviruses that are endemic in the United States such as Cache Valley virus (CVV). SBV was first discovered in Germany in November 2011 and has since been associated with reproductive losses and congenital defects such as arthrogryposis in ruminants in at least five European countries. Other symptoms of SBV infection may include newborn animals with neurologic symptoms ranging from flaccid paralysis to hyperexcitability, ataxia, and blindness. Although SBV has not been reported in North America, the virus could easily be introduced into the United States via an infected animal or arthropod vector. CVV causes clinical signs similar to SBV and is currently one of the leading causes of reproductive loss and arthrogryposis in ruminants in the United States. It is therefore extremely important for the veterinary community to remain vigilant in monitoring for foreign pathogens such as SBV, as well as indigenous pathogens such as CVV. Accordingly, the Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (ISU 7 VDL) is partnering with an industry partner in efforts to increase submissions of fetuses, stillbirths, and neonates with signs suggestive of SBV or CVV infection. To this end, cases submitted to the ISU VDL that meet the criteria described below will receive a $100 credit toward the bill for routine diagnostics related to the submission. Additionally, these cases will be tested for nine orthobunyaviruses by viral neutralization assay (including Schmallenberg virus once our importation and BSL-3 permit is approved). Since significant levels of serologic cross reactivity occur between viruses in this family it is important to compare viral neutralization results from multiple viruses in order to prevent serologic misdiagnosis. If you have questions please feel free to contact me (Paul Plummer - contact information listed in signature at end of post) or Dr. Eric Burrough in the veterinary diagnostic laboratory at [email protected] . To meet criteria for the $100 statement credit, submissions MUST include ALL of the following: 1. An intact fetus/stillborn/neonate with arthrogryposis (bovine, ovine, or caprine) 2. Fresh and formalin-fixed placenta 3. Serum from the dam Cases should be kept chilled and submitted to the ISU VDL as soon as possible using standard submission paperwork. Please note on the submission form `SBV Surveillance Project - Burrough.’ Paul J. Plummer, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University 515-294-8522, [email protected] trition and drain valuable resources away. Some consume your goat’s blood, others invade and destroy tissues, others interfere with digestive processes. Some kinds parasites cause more harm than others; these are like the big holes in the cups. Other parasites do not cause as much trouble; these are like the small holes in the cups. However, as you saw with the water exercise, a lot of small holes can add up to as much impact as a few large holes; the same is true with parasites. What are some examples of very harmful and less harmful parasites of goats? Very harmful parasites = Haemonchus contortus (in large numbers), Nematodirus, Cryptosporidia, Coccidia (in large numbers), some flukes, add others. Less harmful = tapeworms, nasal bots, some flukes, add others. Susan R. Kerr, Goldendale, WA AASRP Constituent Report to AVMA LAC (Legislative Advisory Committee): Submitted by: Seyedmehdi Mobini DVM, MS, DACT The American Association of Small Ruminant Practitioners (AASRP) has approximately 1000 members being primarily mixed veterinary practitioners, researchers or academicians united by their involvement with either/ or sheep, goats, camelids and cervids. Matters of importance to AASRP and concerns for the future are: 1- PARASITES INTERFERE WITH GOAT GROWTH - A YOUTH EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY This activity is best on a hot summer day--a long way off for most of us! It was written for adults working with a group of youth. It can be a fun way to introduce a more traditional lecture-type of presentation because youth then have a foundation for understanding the damage different types of parasites can do. It also helps youth understand that goats have parasites; the types and numbers are what determine the harm done. This activity is best done outside. Youth should either wear waterproof clothing or old clothing and footwear that they won’t mind getting wet. You will need one paper cup per person, one bucket per person, a water supply and various-sized things to poke holes in the bottom of the cup with (pins, pencils, thumbtacks, etc.). Put a varying amount of different-sized holes in the bottom of the paper cups before you hand them out; make sure some cups have many holes and some have very few; some holes should be larger and some should be small. Alternatively, you could let participants put the holes in the bottom of the cups themselves. Give each participant a cup. Tell them their job is to fill up the bucket with water, one cup at a time. Place each person’s bucket about two yards away from the water source. Tell the youth that this is not a competition - they are all working together to demonstrate a concept. If the youth become tired of the activity, you may stop when the buckets are half-full. When you are done, lead the youth through the questions below. Let’s compare the amount water in each bucket. Whose has the most? The least? How many holes did each person have in his/her cup? How many large holes were there? How many small holes were there? How are the size and number of holes related to the amount of water you were able to deliver to each bucket? Let’s say that the bucket represents all the meals a goat needs for it to grow to mature size and each cup represents one meal. Which person’s goat would have grown fastest? Slowest? Why? Which person’s goat would be the most expensive to feed to mature size? Why? Parasites are like the holes in the cups. They compete with your goat for nu- 8 2- Proposed cuts for USDA-APHIS and Agricultural Research Service: a. Possible changes in the Scrapie flock certification program under consideration by VS (Veterinary Services) b. Continued funding to finish Scrapie Eradication through 2017 c. National Animal Disease Traceability System Funding for Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment Program 3- Need to maintain FARAD funding to retain access to science based recommendations for withdrawal periods following Extra-Label Drug Use under AMDUCA to insure that wholesome products free from drug residues reach the consumer. 4- Need to maintain MUADP/NRSP-7 funding so that science based information will be available to FARAD for drug withdrawal information and to the FDA in order to license and label pharmaceuticals for use in minor species such as sheep, goats, camelids, farmed cervids and other minor species. 5- Need to fund research to develop protocols to monitor pain and discomfort in animal species with the intent of developing label and license for anesthetics and analgesics used in other species for similar application in minor species such as sheep, goats, camelids, farmed cervids. 6- Need to maintain Extra-Label Drug Use privileges for minor species due to few pharmaceuticals that are licensed and labeled for use in sheep, goats, camelids and farmed cervids. 7- Need to open movement of small ruminants across the USCanadian border. The original reason for the border closure was to prevent BSE infected animals from entering the USA. The border has been open for breeding cows from Canada to the USA for several years now but the border remains closed to breeding sheep, goats and camelids. Cephalosporin Order of Prohibition Questions and Answers (full document available at the AASRP website) On January 6, 2012, the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) issued an order prohibiting certain uses of the cephalosporin class of antimicrobial drugs in food-producing animals. A copy of the Federal Register document is available at http://www.gpo. gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-01-06/pdf/2012-35.pdf. Although the basis for the order is fully described in the January 6, 2012 final rule, CVM has Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 provided the following questions and answers. What is FDA announcing today? FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine is issuing an order that prohibits the extralabel use of cephalosporin drugs (not including cephapirin) in cattle, swine, chickens, and turkeys. In its order, FDA is prohibiting what are called “extralabel” or unapproved uses of cephalosporins in cattle, swine, chickens and turkeys, the so-called major species of food-producing animals. Specifically, the prohibited uses include: o using cephalosporin drugs at unapproved dose levels, frequencies, durations, or routes of administration; o using cephalosporin drugs in cattle, swine, chickens or turkeys that are not approved for use in that species (e.g., cephalosporin drugs intended for humans or companion animals); o using cephalosporin drugs for disease prevention. The following exceptions to the prohibition apply: o Extralabel use of approved cephapirin products in food-producing animals; o Use to treat or control an extralabel disease indication, as long as this use adheres to a labeled dosage regimen (i.e., dose, route, frequency, and duration of administration) approved for that particular species and production class; and o Extralabel use in food-producing minor species, such as ducks or rabbits. Why is FDA doing this? The cephalosporin class of drugs is important in treating human diseases, such as pneumonia, skin and tissue infections, pelvic inflammatory disease, and other conditions. It is critical to preserve the effectiveness of these drugs. FDA is concerned that certain extralabel uses of cephalosporins in cattle, swine, chickens and turkeys are likely to contribute to cephalosporin-resistant strains of certain bacterial pathogens. If cephalosporins are not effective in treating human diseases from these pathogens, doctors may have to use drugs that are not as effective or that have greater side effects. The Agency is particularly concerned about the extralabel use of cephalosporin drugs that are not approved for use in cattle, swine, chickens and turkeys because little is known about their microbiological or toxicological effects when used in these food-producing animals. How does this action relate to FDA’s overall strategy to address the public health concern of antibiotic use in food producing animals? Addressing antimicrobial resistance is a challenging task that requires the expertise and collaborative efforts of many entities. The order to prohibit certain extralabel uses of cephalosporin drugs in major species of food-producing animals addresses the use of one class of antimicrobial drugs used in animal agriculture for therapeutic purposes. This action is among a number of ongoing FDA activities and initiatives intended to address concerns about the use of antimicrobial drugs in animal agriculture, including: o Monitoring resistance trends in foodborne bacteria through the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) o Assessing antimicrobial resistance risks for new antimicrobial drugs as part of the new animal drug approval process. o Promoting the judicious use of medically important antimicro- bials currently approved for use in food-producing animals in a draft guidance entitled, “The Judicious Use of Medically Important Antimicrobial Drugs in Food-Producing Animals” draft Guidance for Industry #209 (“draft GFI #209”). The agency is working with animal drug sponsors, the veterinary and public health communities, the animal agriculture community, and all other interested stakeholders to address antimicrobial resistance concerns in a manner that is protective of both human and animal health. What are some examples of extralabel uses of cephalosporins that are prohibited by this order? o In ovo chick injections (injections into chicken eggs) is an unapproved use and is prohibited o The use of biobullets in beef cattle is an unapproved use and is o The extralabel use of human cephalosporin drugs in food-producing major species is an unapproved use and is prohibited o Prevention uses in food-producing major species are prohibited What is not prohibited by this order? o Extralabel use of approved cephapirin products in food-producing animals; o Use to treat or control an extralabel disease indication, as long as this use adheres to a labeled dosage regimen (i.e., dose, route, frequency, and duration of administration) approved for that particular species and production class; and o Extralabel use in food-producing minor species, such as ducks or rabbits When does the order go into effect and is there an opportunity for the public to comment? The order of prohibition that published as a final rule on January 6, 2012, will go into effect on April 5, 2012. However, the public can submit comments during a 60-day comment period that closes on March 6, 2012. CVM intends to review and consider all submitted comments prior to the effective date of the order. When the Order of Prohibition takes effect, cephalosporins will be added to the current list of drugs and other substances found in 21 CFR part 530 that are prohibited from extralabel use in food-producing animals as follows: o o o o o o o o o Chloramphenicol Clenbuterol o o o o Fluoroquinolones Diethylstilbesterol (DES) Dimetridazole Ipronidazole Other nitroimidazoles Furazolidone Nitrofurazone Sulfonamide drugs in lactating dairy cattle (except approved use of sulfadimethoxine, sulfabromomethazine, and sulfaethoxypyridazine) Glycopeptides Phenylbutazone in female dairy cattle 20 months of age or older Cephalosporins (not including cephapirin) in cattle, swine, chickens, or turkeys: (i) For disease prevention purposes; (ii) At unapproved doses, durations, or routes of administration; or (iii) If the drug is not approved for that species and production class. prohibited Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 9 Answer 2: On a side note, my limited experience with toxo, mostly in sheep, has let me to believe that there is more to transmission than just cats. We’ve seen toxo abortion in animals on pasture, not being fed from a bunk where cats could defecate in the feed, and where no known kittens or young cats were around. May repeat on farms year after year. So perhaps there is some transmission from placentas or fluids. I admit that one never knows when a stray kitten may show up, but in some of these cases the probability of cat involvement seems vanishingly small. Joe Snyder, Portland OR AASRP-L QUESTION AND ANSWER Bearing Retainer for Prolapsed Vagina In addition, the extralabel use of adamantanes and neuraminidase inhibitors used to treat or prevent influenza A in humans is prohibited in chickens, turkeys, and ducks. AASRP-L QUESTION AND ANSWER Sources of Toxoplasmosis Question: I have a new start-up herd of 90 goats that has had 5 out of 70 pregnant does abort over the past 2 weeks. The Toxo titers on 2 of the does that aborted were extremely high - 162,000 and 54,000 (normal is below 40, above 60 is considered a chronic or acute infection). The fetal heart blood had a Toxo titer of 4000. The brain of the fetus had discrete foci of necrosis and glial scarring. The pathologist thought it was suggestive of Neospora. I am wondering if it is really just Toxo in the brain of the fetus. Lepto, Brucella, BVD are negative. Selenium in the does was within normal limits. Chlamydia CF and Caprine Herpes virus SN in the does still pending. Campylobacter in the fetus negative. A few questions: does anyone have any experience with Toxo abortion storms? How long will the abortions go on? I have stressed the importance of getting the cats out of the barn, out of the grain bin and off the stored hay. Answer 1: It is interesting that in the early days before the oocyst was recognised, many researchers worked with the trophozoite with no health problems. However, once they started working with the oocyst, a number of them developed infection. It is also recognised that humans can get infected by ingesting trophozoites in raw meat, as was the case in France where housewives often licked their fingers when preparing meat for cooking. Our toxoplasma outbreaks occur in sheep running at pasture, usually where they have been fed hay or grain that has been contaminated with cat faeces in the areas where it is stored. Loose grain is like sand as a favoured place for cats to defecate and deposits of cat faeces can be found on hay in sheds when cats are present. We had one outbreak of abortion where the source of the infection was believed to be other than contaminated hay or grain. In this case, ewes in late pregnancy were brought in around the homestead and sheds to eat down the grass and reduce the bushfire risk. There were a number of breeding queens in the environment and the heavy stocking rate of sheep in the area would have disturbed the soil where cats would have buried their faeces. In another case, toxoplasma abortion occurred regularly on a property next to the local council rubbish dump that was frequented by cats. We recommended that the paddocks adjoining the dump be used to graze the young ewes and expose them to infection before they were bred. This reduced, but did not eliminate the losses. In my experience, some detective work may be necessary, but our outbreaks of toxoplasma abortion can be traced back to the oocyst in cat faeces. John W Plant, New South Wales, Australia 10 Question: I have a ewe with a prolapsed vagina. She was straining and the vagina was out up to the beginning of the cervix. A small amount of discharge was coming out. I did an epidural and placed a retainer. She did it again last night and I repeated the procedure. She also got Banamine. She is due in about two weeks. Do I continue doing this or should I do a cesarean on her?? Answer: You might try the bearing retainer one more time and you might provide more external support for holding it in. When Dr. Kimberling first showed me his homemade wire and tubing bearing retainer many, many years ago, I was using it in meat breeds of sheep that had wool to which to tie the handles. His version was a bit bolder than the commercial ewe spoons now available and maybe that helped keep it in as well. It wasn’t until I used it in a wool sheep that had been shorn prior to lambing that we had to be creative about holding these things inside. We use your basic barnyard staple of baling twine rather than the pathetic two pieces of white string that come with the retainer. We tie one end to one side and loop it forward around the ewe’s chest and back to the other side. Pull it very snugly and tie off the second side. Just behind the elbows and vertically around the chest, we put a “stay” piece of twine from one horizontal side of the loop around the ewe over the top and tie to keep the twine from going down and one vertically under the chest to the other side. Now that she looks like a Christmas package in her yellow or orange twine, she will usually keep the retainer in. The twine must be snug but this has worked for us to keep the retainer in until lambing. Ewes can lamb with the retainer in. Joan Bowen, Colorado AASRP-L QUESTION AND ANSWER Ringwomb in Sheep Question: Can prostaglandin (Lutalyse) be used to relax the cervix? What can be used to dilate the cervix if there are already strong contractions but the cervix is not dilated? Is this indeed a strong indication for an immediate cesarean? What if a ewe has been “off” for 3 days and straining on and off for two hours, then you get the call? At this stage should you also assume a very friable uterus and perform an immediate cesarean? Answer: Failure of cervical dilation in ewes can be due to fetal malpositioning (non-engagement in the cervix), uterine torsion, or more likely, a seemingly genetic condition often referred to as ringwomb. If the producer has already noted chorioallantoic rupture and ultrasound demonstrates viable fetus(es) by assessment of a heartbeat, and if the gestational length is within a week of the due date, then c-section is the best option. Some folks have tried to dilate the cervix manually but there is a high risk of vaginal, uterine, or cervical rupture, and in the time it takes to work on her the lambs could die. In other species we often use misoprostol on the cervix but in a case of true ringwomb the cervix is hard and non-responsive. Prostaglandin F2alpha will not result in cervical dilation. In the case you mention, if the ewe has been showing signs of labor and abdominal contractions for 3 days, I would recommend to get a good history from the producer as far as if she is straining because she has diarrhea versus labor, how many days of gestation she is, if there was an early ultrasound Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 exam during pregnancy to count fetuses, etc. If she is pre-term please keep in mind the infectious causes of abortion, a high number of which are zoonotic. At that point, ultrasound exam will show if the uterus is very thin, how much fluid is in the uterus, and if the fetus(es) are viable or beginning to become emphysematous. Cesarean section may demonstrate a very thin uterus with compromised blood flow, especially in cases of uterine torsion, and in those cases you will have to determine if euthanasia is warranted. If the ringwomb is caught early, there is a chance of delivering live lambs. The ewe will eventually open the cervix enough to pass the placenta(s) after surgery, although if they are detached they can be removed during surgery. Otherwise if the tissue appears healthy and the placentomes are still strongly attached, we leave them in situ. Once the progesterone from pregnancy is removed, she should deliver the placentas. Some folks advocate to apply estrogens on the cervix but this is not recommended. Causes and risk factors for ringwomb are not known although a genetic basis is suspected. It is not known if she will have the condition again on subsequent pregnancies and some folks debate whether or not to cull the ewe after weaning and/or any of her female lambs. Lisa Pearson, Washington State University AASRP-L QUESTION AND ANSWER Selenium Supplementation Question: Is there a general consensus that BoSe should be left out of the protocol for pregnant does despite low Selenium in the soil regionally? I prefer supplementation through grain. Answer 1: Selenium supplementation is a challenge in many selenium deficient areas of the US. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates selenium as a food additive, which means we as practitioners cannot prescribe more than the allowable supplementation rate through the diet, thus leaving parenteral supplementation as our recourse. First and foremost one must adequately assess the selenium status of the animals prior to engaging in a supplementation program, inclusive of dietary and parenteral sources. Current regulations allow for supplemental selenium to be added to a diet to a level of 0.3 ppm, this is inclusive of all dietary sources (mineral and diet). The allowable amount in a free choice mineral supplement is 90 ppm for a total intake of 0.7 mg/day, which would calculate out to the 0.3 ppm (2.33 kg/day total intake). Remember these are averages for sheep and goats. Thus, one cannot supplement selenium in both the mineral source and the diet at the “allowable” rate and achieve the legal limit of 0.3 ppm in the total diet. You have options to now use an organic form of selenium (selenomethionine) that is more bioavailable and increases selenium status better than inorganic sources. However, there are more risks for toxicity with the organic form. We recently completed a study looking at selenium supplementation in sheep from inorganic and organic forms (J Anim Sci 2012; 90:568-584) and found that with inorganic forms you hit a ceiling in availability, whereas with organic selenium you can continue to increase blood selenium status with increasing dosing. A balance between inorganic and organic forms is probably a better option. Amount of organic selenium necessary will depend upon your local situation relative to the presence of inhibitory elements (iron and sulfur). We can debate ad infinitum relative to the optimal dietary concentration of selenium to maintain health and performance. There are places in the US where “specialty mixes” provide nearly 3 mg selenium per day for sheep in an effort to maintain “adequate” status. This approach would not be acceptable to FDA, but they are not going to come down on individuals for this situation. To further confound this whole issue, I have become aware of some disturbing data regarding selenium content of feed ingredients and commercial feed products. It seems with the recent drought situations across the US, many cereal grains and soybean meal are coming from the Great Plains area, which is naturally high in selenium. An incident in Oregon has shown that feed companies are not monitoring selenium status of their feed ingredients very well and very high concentrations are being found in a number of products. There was a situation of selenium toxicity in a swine herd (pigs are more sensitive to selenium) that brought this situation to light. In reviewing the data collected by the Oregon Department of Agriculture, the Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 selenium content of many products was higher than one would expect, thus further suggesting you need to play a role in monitoring selenium status for your clients. In these same data, a number of commercial salt products also contained LESS selenium than what was on the label - significantly less to the point that would result in insufficient supplementation rates. I communicated with the feed regulatory person here in Pennsylvania regarding this issue thinking that all state regulatory agencies kept a watch on such things as they do routinely monitor product label quality control. However, I found out that selenium is not routinely assessed. So, this brings it back to the practitioner working with their clients to monitor and maintain an adequate mineral supplementation program. As a shameless plug, I will be addressing selenium and copper metabolism and supplementation at the AASRP program in Montreal with AABP this September and will address mineral supplementation programs at the upcoming New York VMA conference in Ithaca in September also. Bob Van Saun, Penn State Veterinary Extension Answer 2: Selenium must be evaluated by locale. In Wisconsin we can’t get adequate selenium levels with the legally allowable feed supplements. So I use Bo-Se or Multimin in my protocols. My big commercial producers use it at dry-off, otherwise I recommend 45 days prior to kidding along with CDT. I know the Bo-Se label says not to use in pregnant animals but 15 to 20 thousand goats later I’ve not seen any abortion problems. PS, check liver levels from a normal adult. Goats will find a way to break legs or hang themselves so you don’t need to do liver biopsies. Chris Duemler, Brodhead WI AASRP-L QUESTION AND ANSWER Feeding Bottle Lambs Statement: I think the real no-no for newborn lambs and kids is calf milk replacer. The real stuff has never caused me any problems but I have seen lambs and kids on calf replacer and they don’t do well, particularly lambs as they require more fat and less lactose than the other species. Kids fall between lambs and calves in their requirements for fat and lactose and maybe do a little better on calf replacer. However, the fresh cow’s milk must have some other ingredients that make a big difference in all three species. Answer 1: Some of the differences between species can be explained by the nutrient levels in the milks from different species. Values are expressed as % of DM: Cows (Holsteins) fat: 28.7 protein: 25.4 lactose: 40.2 Goats: fat: 29.2 protein: 25.8 lactose: 38.3 Ewes: fat: 32.5 protein: 33.7 lactose: 28.2 Some things really stand out about these numbers: 1. Under natural mom-reared conditions, calves and kids receive milk of approximately the same composition, although the characteristics of the fat globules may be different. In this respect, these two species are relatively similar. 2. Under natural mom-reared conditions, lambs receive milk that is much higher in fat and, most importantly, much lower in lactose, than the other two species. The energy effect of the extra fat in the milk DM is amplified because fat contains 225% more energy than lactose. 3. Lambs don’t produce as much lactase as the other species. 11 4. Large amounts of lactose can result in scours in lambs. Hence the deserved bad reputation of cow’s milk for lambs, especially for bottle-fed lambs as they get older and drink more milk at each meal. 5. Self-feeding systems are particularly good for lambs as they reduce the problems of the surge of lactose caused by bottle-feedings. Well-designed self-feeding systems are also easier on the shepherds and allow them to raise many more orphan lambs. 6. Kids can handle the extra lactose without as much problems as lambs. Bottle-feeding kids has lower risks than bottle-feeding lambs, especially as the neonates get older. 7. Weaning completely eliminates the problem of lactose-induced scours. Hence the attractiveness of early-weaning, especially of lambs (from a health perspective). requirement is 3.5 gm/kg metabolic BW and Dr. Robinson’s is 5 gm/kg metabolic BW). There was a marked improvement in most of the animals when the pen, feeding space and protein levels were increased. We calculated CP requirements at the 5 gm level and adjusted the grain CP higher (from a 14% to a 19% or even 21% CP depending on hay quality). This has solved most of the anemia issues and now the owners are more aggressive about hands-on body condition scoring, especially the lactating group. When they find a thin female, they will move it to the thin group, which is fed better quality forage and the grain is higher CP. They will also do a fecal and monitor body condition weekly. 8. Companies sometimes include soy protein products in calf milk replacers. Some calves react badly to these proteins -- unthrifty, poor growth, scours, etc. The solution is usually to find a milk replacer without those soy-based ingredients. This dialogue could be longer, I have tried to condense almost a year’s worth of frustration and effort into a few paragraphs. I built an Excel spreadsheet that does my CP and energy calculations for me, which I would be happy to share. The farm still have issues with anemias, but not as many and not to the degree that they used to have. Most of improvement has been through management and monitoring, the rest has come from a better awareness of nutrition requirements. Woody Lane, Ph.D., Roseburg OR Tim Cuchna, Stanwood, WA Answer 2: I respect the scientific information that Woody has provided about the differences between cow, goat and sheep milk. But on a practical basis, there are literally thousands of lambs and kids raised on blended commercial whole cow milk each year. They grow well, they have fewer cases of diarrhea and bloating than neonates on commercial milk replacer and it is fed straight out of the container without modification. I would not want to play with osmotic gradients by adding additional protein or fat. AASRP-L QUESTION AND ANSWER Alpaca Sling Joan Bowen, Colorado AASRP-L QUESTION AND ANSWER - Iron Deficiency Anemia in Camelids Question: An 8 year old female alpaca, part of a herd of 30 for 3 years, had no problems until it seemed uncomfortable for about a week before this year’s cria was born at the end of January. She delivered a healthy cria unassisted and was rebred mid-February. When I saw her for some dental work she had dropped weight (from BCS 3.5 at the end of January to about 2.5 out of 5) but otherwise seemed normal. One week later she was acting lethargic and I was shocked at how much weight she had lost in a week - down to a BCS of 1. She was still eating, drinking, passing manure, and nursing her cria who was healthy, vigorous, and a good weight. The only significant finding on the blood panel was a PCV of 8%. Her mucous membranes were ghost white, so I attempted to stabilize her with a blood transfusion and refer her, but she didn’t survive the trip to UC Davis. She was submitted for a necropsy but the only finding was a severe iron deficiency anemia of unknown origin. She was negative for worms or coccidia (she was dewormed in early January with fenbendazole, almost 60 days before she died), negative for Mycoplasma haemolamae by PCR, and her liver iron level is only one point below the reference range. No evidence of hemorrhage was found. The rest of the herd on the same diet and well water are fine, and this animal was not at the bottom of the pecking order. I feel that feed quantity and quality and her appetite remained good until the end. She was not wearing a coat since here in coastal California we had a pretty warm February. Answer: We saw these cases (iron deficient anemia) all too often about three years ago an a farm with ~500 alpacas. Most of the animals that became anemic were in the lactating group. We had all the diagnostic work-ups done (CBC, chem screen, fecals, necropsies, infectious, liver mineral analysis, . . . ) The testing was done on multiple animals, all with frustrating diagnoses. We had anemias, some ulcers, some parasitism, but there was not any one thing that stood out on these animals. They would respond to transfusions (I became good at doing these) and some recovered, some did not. Long, frustrating story short, I kept coming back to nutrition as the underlying problem. I researched the small ruminant NRC and found Dr. Todd Robinson’s (BYU professor) research on alpaca nutrition. There are two major things that we learned from this issue. First, the animals were overcrowded and were not eating as much as the owners thought. Second, most of the animals were being underfed protein (NRC maintenance CP 12 Question: I seem to recall hearing about an alpaca sling at one of the past camelid meetings but can’t remember which conference it was nor can I put my hands on the information. Does anyone recall the source for the alpaca sling? Do any list members use a particular model sling that works well and they would recommend? I would like to have a sling on hand to use for downer cases for my use or that I can lend/rent to owners. Answer: We use the small ruminant or large dog sling using Munk’s design: <http://www.enasco.com/product/Z18629N> We also have a float tank - for alpacas we often use a large cattle water tank, but also use the cow hydrofloatation system by AquaCow: http://www. downcow.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=66&Item id=56 David E Anderson, Kansas State University AASRP-L QUESTION AND ANSWER Approach to Sick Alpaca Question: I have a potential client with a 9 yr old male alpaca that is shivering and off feed today. Owner states he was fine yesterday, but has only eaten a small amount of grain this morning. The owner is reluctant to have me out to examine as I had to admit I had limited alpaca experience. The owner states that manure is normal and the alpaca is urinating fine. The temperature is fairly cold today with a strong, cold breeze in the good old Northeast. I told the owner to deep bed the alpaca in a draft free stall and use some blankets to warm him up. There is a chance that I will be seeing this guy in the near future, so I was just wondering if anyone has a good differentials for this guy. I was wondering about teeth, peptic ulcers or some other GI issue. Answer 1: I would check his body condition first - have seen more than one die of starvation with a nice fleece and owner had NO idea animal was thin. Good place to start anyway. Susan Johnson, Plainfield,NH Answer 2: I would start all sick animal work with a fecal (sugar to detect E. mac and always quantitative) and bloodwork. Assess body condition by fill over the dorsal spine one hand width behind the scapula and prominence of ribs. The owner can take a rectal temperature and give a probiotic and maybe give thiamine if he has it. Many new owners do not know anything about any cudchewers especially alpacas. Alpacas are trickier to get blood on than other species: I think most folks attempt jugular venipuncture medial to C5 lateral process. Hold off a few minutes to allow it to fill. Vein tends to lie fairly superficial toward trachea, not in middle of jugular furrow. I use Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 an 18 gauge on adult males due to thickness of neck skin, 19 gauge on other adults and 20 ga on crias. Tricky to get owner to hold the head properly: I want the neck vertical and the head in a normal position (not nose up or to the side) so I have to train most new owners how to hold them: One hand under the chin and up around to hold the head/ear (handler’s palm flat on the head, not trying to rip the ear off). Other hand on the animal’s back to stop the jump. They always jump at the needle stick. Good to have a second person on the opposite side of the animal to stop it from spinning away from handler #1 or use a wall as the second person. Check out hay quality (soft and green without seed heads is great but at least soft and green) and type of grain (labeled for alpacas?), and look for feeding competition if in a group. They need a three sided shelter where they can get out of the wind and rain (I have found at least two clients who tried to get by with 2 sides and that is not enough.) I strongly recommend that you overnight a copy of the Norm Evans book if you plan to work on alpacas...they are different and there is too much to cover here. Sucralfate 1 gram per 50 # 3 times per day for 2-4 weeks may help with ulcers if owner cannot do the Pantoprazole injections ($), but being off feed can be almost anything. Good luck. I think we will see more and more new owners who need help caring for their new animals as the price has dropped enough that more people can purchase them. B.J. Campbell, Montpelier, VA AABP-L QUESTION AND ANSWER - Rental Ultrasound for Externs Question: Recently I came across a posting (I believe on AETA?) of a veterinary clinic that hosts extern students and rents an U/S machine for the student’s use while at the clinic. Is anyone aware of a company that offers this service? Answer: I rent an ultrasound machine for student extern use for 2-3 weeks. The student only uses the machine while under my direct supervision. I rent a machine through the company from which I have purchased a couple of machines in the past. At first, they were a little reluctant to do this, but they eventually agreed when I pointed out that: 1) I thought they had had enough experience dealing with me that they could trust me; 2) I could rent a car of value equal or greater to any of the machines they might have to rent simply by presenting a valid driver’s license and a credit card and be expected to return it undamaged at the end of the agreed-upon rental period; 3) if I were interested in purchasing a machine they would be willing to loan a demo unit to me for several days at absolutely no cost, hoping that they might make a sale; 4) if I trained a student in the use of ultrasound and s/he became accustomed to the make and model they were selling, that student might become interested in buying or leasing that kind of machine; 5) I would be willing to give the student promotional literature from that company. I suppose that in a larger practice there might be enough equipment that a student could get hands-on ultrasound experience with one of the practice’s machines, but as a solo practitioner, renting a machine has been the only way for me to provide this, and it is sooo much more useful to the student than just looking at images generated by another person performing exams. I suppose the cost of rental might be a deterrent to some, but as I see it, that’s just my contribution to veterinary education. Let me know if you have additional questions, or if I might be of further assistance. Christine T Camann, Unadilla, NY ABSTRACTS PATHOLOGY IN PRACTICE (LISTERIAL MYELITIS) Not every goat with posterior paresis/paralysis has cerebrospinal nematodiasis. A 9-year-old Saanen goat in Brazil had been recently purchased and developed posterior ataxia and weakness 5 days after arriving on the farm. It had a scarred wound in the lumbar area over the vertebral column. On the 8th day posterior paralysis had developed and the goat was dog-sitting, unable Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 to stand. The animal had flaccid paralysis of the hind limbs but tail and anal tone were present. The neurologic lesion was localized to the L4-L6 vertebrae. A CSF sample showed elevated total protein at 48 mg/dL (normal 24 to 40 mg/dL) and a markedly elevated nucleated cell count of 75 cells/uL (normal 0 to 7 cells/uL). The goat was euthanized and necropsy revealed a severe meningitis characterized by a perivascular infiltrate of lymphocytes, plasmacytes and macrophages that extended to the white matter. In the gray matter of the thoracic and lumbar spinal cord but not the brainstem there were multifocal microabscesses composed of neutrophils and macrophages. Yellowish cavitated necrotic lesions in the spinal cord yielded Listeria moncytogenes on culture. Listerial myelitis has been reported previously in sheep, cattle and humans but not in goats (which instead get encephalitic listeriosis characterized by unilateral or bilateral cranial nerve deficits). Whereas poorly fermented silage with pH above 5.5 is often incriminated when small ruminants develop listeriosis in North America and Europe, in Brazil cases are often linked to penetration of the mucosal barrier of the buccal or intestinal tract mucosa or to dental disease. In this goat the authors hypothesize that the organism ascended spinal nerves from the wound on the back to reach the spinal cord. A.C.L. Camara et al. JAVMA 240:269-271, 2012 FATAL CAPRINE ARTHRITIS ENCEPHALITIS VIRUS-LIKE INFECTION IN 4 ROCKY MOUNTAIN GOATS (Oreamnos americanus) Three of the goats had been raised on goat milk from a herd infected with CAEV. Chronic respiratory disease was the main presenting complaint, but spinal cord lesions and chronic arthritis were also seen. Caprine arthritis encephalitis virus (CAEV) is a small ruminant lentivirus with tropism for monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells that integrates into host DNA, causing multisystemic inflammatory disease. Viral infection of the mammary gland epithelial cells is common and transmission of infection is often through ingestion of milk from infected goats. A yearling and a 2 year old Rocky Mountain goat in Oregon developed chronic signs of pneumonia, including rapid respirations, fever, and weight loss. Radiographs of the first animal showed a generalized interstitial lung pattern in the dorsal lung. The second animal also developed a right-sided hemiparesis. Both animals originated from the same herd and had been raised on raw goat milk from a local dairy later shown to be infected with the CAE virus. The animals did not respond to multiple antibiotics and were eventually euthanized and necropsied. A 5 year old Rocky Mountain goat, also raised on milk from the CAEV positive herd, was presented after several weeks of dyspnea unresponsive to antibiotics. A 10 year old goat that had not been raised on goat milk but had been housed with the other affected goats also presented for necropsy after being recumbent for 1 week with signs of pneumonia. The lungs of goats 1, 3 and 4 failed to collapse and showed rib impressions on the pleural surfaces. The lungs were diffusely firm and meaty and had pale tan nodules present in the caudal lung lobes. The cranioventral lung lobes were consolidated and tracheobronchial lymph nodes were enlarged. Two of the goats had increased (600 to 1000 ml) thoracic fluid positive for CAE antibodies. Alveolar septae were fibrotic and foci of type II pneumocytes were present. Lung tissues from all 4 goats were positive for CAEV by immunohistochemistry. Goats 3 and 4, the oldest animals, had arthritis with thickened synovium in hocks or carpi. The spinal cord in the goat with hemiparesis showed lymphoplasmacytic inflammation with necrosis and reactive astrocytes, most prominent in white matter in ventral tracts. The joint and spinal cord lesions were positive for CAEV antigen. Although infection with another crossreacting lentivirus cannot be ruled out, these goats had been exposed to milk from a goat herd with CAEV or had cohabited with infected goats. Raw domestic goat milk should not be fed to Rocky Mountain goats, and Rocky Mountain goats should be tested for CAEV and quarantined before transferring between facilities. Kristin M. Patton et al. J Vet Diagn Invest 24(2):392–396, 2012 13 VISNA/MAEDI VIRUS GENETIC CHARACTERIZATION AND SEROLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTION IN SHEEP FROM A NEUROLOGICAL OUTBREAK Genetic analysis of the virus showed that it was most closely related to A2 strains (Visna/Maedi), not to CAE viruses. Small ruminant lentiviruses can cause a variety of clinical signs, including interstitial pneumonia, interstitial mastitis, arthritis, and encephalitis or myelitis. The viruses are currently classified into 5 genotypes: Genotype A strains are Visna/Maedi virus-like strains (including a clone from the original Icelandic outbreak), Genotype B includes caprine arthritis-encephalitis-like strains, Genotype C is present in strains from sheep and goats in Norway, Genotype D has been identified from Swiss and Spanish sheep, and genotype E has been found in Italian goats. There is epidemiological evidence that some strains of small ruminant lentiviruses have a particular tissue tropism, as in some regions pneumonia and mastitis are common and arthritis and neurologic disease rare. In the Spanish region of Castilla y León, numerous cases of the neurologic form have been diagnosed in sheep, often less than 2 years of age and as young as 4-6 months. In this study serum was collected from 23 sheep with only neurologic disease that were seropositive in the Elitest-MVV and from 11 sheep with only clinical signs of arthritis. Eight of the sheep with Visna-compatible signs (hindlimb weakness, ataxia, recumbency) were euthanized and necropsied. These animals had typical nonsuppurative myelitis characterized by wedge-shaped areas of demyelination in the white matter and mononuclear perivascular cuffs and infiltration of gitter cells in the neuropil. All but one of these animals also showed mild to moderate microscopic lesions of Visna/Maedi in lung and/ or mammary gland. A virus (termed strain 697) was isolated from one of these sheep and fully characterized. It was determined to be of the A2/A3 subtype. Furthermore, the transmembrane protein site had the QH amino acid sequence typical of Visna/Maedi rather than the HQ sequence found in CAEV-like isolates. The GAG and ENV proteins of the virus were analyzed and a synthetic peptide was created related to the ENV protein. An ELISA test was produced using this peptide and was positive in 100% of the 23 sheep with just neurologic signs but in only 9% of the sheep with just arthritic disease. I. Glaria et al. Veterinary Microbiology 155:137-146, 2012 diagnosed in alpaca or llama herds in Great Britain from 2003 to 2009. These animals could be a source of infection to other livestock species or humans. Infection is associated with crowding or close proximity to cattle, with few animals infected in their native habitat. Signs of infection in llamas and alpacas are nonspecific and often involve lethargy, anorexia and weight loss with or without respiratory distress. Some animals show occasional coughing. Sudden death of apparently healthy animals that are then shown to have extensive lesions has also been reported. Infection by Mycobacterium bovis in llamas and alpacas appears to occur mainly by the respiratory route. Lesions are mostly located in lung, pleura and associated lymph nodes and appear as small multifocal white to yellowish caseous nodules. However, generalized infection is not uncommon and may involve pericardial sac, liver, kidney, and associated lymph nodes. The time course from infection to appearance of lesions in natural infections is unknown. Detection of infection in a herd usually occurs after an animal dies or is euthanized with lesions suggestive of tuberculosis. Typically the remainder of the herd of origin is then tested with intradermal or serologic tests but little can be said about the sensitivity and specificity of these tests because not all of the tested animals are subjected to postmortem examination. Usually only a small proportion of herdmates react to skin tests, suggesting either a low sensitivity of the test or low transmission rate of tuberculosis between camelids. The paper summarizes sensitivity and specificity data for single intradermal tuberculin and single comparative intradermal tuberculin tests (attempting to minimize false positive reaction from environmental mycobacteria). The axillary site is usually preferred and maximum values are obtained at 72 to 96 hours post injection. When a heavy M. bovis challenge was injected directly into the trachea of 6 llamas, all animals developed multiple lesions in lungs and other thoracic and abdominal locations in 2 to 5 months. These animals and other experimentally infected SAC have responded to tuberculin testing with high sensitivity and specificity, but the tests do not work as well in naturally infected animals. For instance, in one herd of llamas skin tests detected only 2 of 14 animals with macroscopic lesions typical of tuberculosis while a serologic test (multiantigen print immunoassay, MAPIA) was positive in all 14. Mycobacterium microti, whose primary host is rodents, is able to cause severe disease and similar lesions in SAC. Currently no specific intradermal tests have been developed for M. microti and the efficacy of bovine and avian PPD for detecting infection needs to be assessed. Tuberculosis infection (mineralized abscesses and granulomatous lesions) in dromedaries and bactrian camels appears to be rare and usually due to M bovis, though M. pinnipedii has also been isolated.. Available information suggests that intradermal testing should be done on the axillary skin of camels, with maximum reactions at 5 days. A high proportion of camels often respond to avian tuberculin, suggesting exposure to environmental mycobacteria. J. Alvarez et al. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 59:1-10, 2012 A MULTI-SPECIES MODEL TO ASSESS THE EFFECT OF REFUGIA ON WORM CONTROL AND ANTHELMINTIC RESISTANCE IN SHEEP GRAZING SYSTEMS DIAGNOSIS OF TUBERCULOSIS IN CAMELIDS Old problems, current solutions and future challenges. Tuberculosis in South American camelids (SAC) has gained greater importance in Europe in recent decades as growing numbers of animals have been imported. For example, 42 outbreaks of tuberculosis were 14 A very effective drug or combination product must be used on most of the flock if leaving a small percentage untreated is adopted as a means of delaying resistance. Computer models were used to explore the effect of various management practices on the populations of three parasites in sheep: Teladorsagia (Ostertagia), Haemonchus, and Trichostrongylus. It is known that these parasites influence each other, for instance the presence of Teladorsagia or Haemonchus in the abomasum causes the abomasal pH to increase, which then hinders the establishment of Haemonchus larvae. Administering an anthelmintic that eliminates the worms and restores normal abomasal function will then make the host susceptible to reinfection with Haemonchus. Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 The models used allowed for these interactions and estimated host mortality and inappetence based on worm burdens. Meteorological data was also used in the models. The effects on the flock and on development of anthelmintic resistance of leaving 1 to 10% of sheep untreated (refugia) were explored. The study also looked at the best way to use monepental (Zolvix), the recently introduced anthelmintic of a new class, to maintain its efficacy. The program assumed that resistance to oxfendazole/levamisole combination was due to a single gene, modeled to be present with an initial R-allele frequency of 40%. Resistance to macrocytic lactones was assumed to be incomplete recessive and the initial resistance allele frequency was set at 3%, denoting an emerging resistance problem. For the monepental, initial resistant gene frequency was set at 0.001% against Haemonchus but had to be increased to 0.01% in the model if refugia was high on pasture in order to make resistance appear within 20 years. The effects of deworming with one drug through the year or alternating products were studied in 4 different regions using known meteorological data. The consequences of leaving 1%, 4%, 7%, or 10% of the adult stock untreated as a source of refugia were also modeled. A ewe flock of 500 Merinos and their lambs in New South Wales were monitored over two years for worm burdens, mortality, and body weight and results compared with the predictions of the models. Because of drought conditions the sheep had to be moved frequently between paddocks, which was not ideal for model validation. In general the model predicted that leaving more than 4% of adults (randomly selected (selecting animals based on health or production was judged to be too labor intensive for Australian conditions) untreated did not sufficiently delay development of resistance to justify the increased production risk from such a strategy. It was beneficial to move the sheep onto pastures with low populations of infective larvae, but the dewormer used on the rest of the flock had to be highly efficacious. In areas at high risk for Haemonchus, only moxidectin and monepental gave adequate worm control. As drug resistance increases, many more worms survive treatment and the population of animals that must be left untreated to dilute out these resistant larvae becomes so high that flock health is compromised. RJ Dobson et al. Australian Vet J 89:200-208, 2011 REDUCED LENTIVIRUS SUSCEPTIBILITY IN SHEEP WITH TMEM154 MUTATIONS The alleles with nonfunctional mutations appeared to confer resistance to OPP. Some sheep remain uninfected with ovine progressive pneumonia virus (Maedi-Visna) despite repeated exposure. The authors conducted a genome-wide association study to detect if a genetic variation might provide protection against the lentivirus infection. Sixty-nine matched pairs of infected and uninfected control sheep were identified among 736 naturally exposed sheep older than 5 years. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the ovine SNP50 Bead Chip array (n= 54,241 SNPs) were scored for these sheep. A single SNP on chromosome 17 had a highly significant association with infection, and this was in a gene homologous to the human TMEM154 gene. Another SNP located in the same gene also was significantly associated with risk of infection. Sheep with the ancestral form of the gene (determined by comparing with other artiodactylid species) were three times more likely to become infected than those with more recent nonsense or deletion mutations in the gene. Nine cohorts totaling 2,705 sheep three years and older of various breeds from Nebraska, Idaho, and Iowa were then analyzed and the relative risk of infection was 2.85 for sheep with one copy of a full length gene haplotype associated with infection (CI 2.36 - 3.43). A few sheep homozygous for the deletion gene were identified. One of these was a Suffolk ewe that lived for 11 productive years in confinement in an infected flock without becoming infected herself. Multiple homozygous knockout rams were also identified in the same Nebraska research flock. This suggests that the TMEM154 gene is not essential for sheep health and reproduction and that selecting for the knockout allele could help to eradicate the OPP virus and protect the flock from reinfection. The function Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 of the TMEM154 protein has not been reported for any species and is still unknown. However, in humans the associated mRNA is most abundant in CD19+ B cells and CD14+ monocytes. This is of interest because cells of the monocyte lineage are the target for OPPV infection in sheep. M.P. Heaton et al. PLOS Genetics 8(1):e1002467, 2012 EFFECT ON TIME IN QUARANTINE OF PROGRAM CHOICE FOR ERADICATION OF FOOTROT FROM 196 SHEEP FLOCKS IN SOUTHERN NEW SOUTH WALES Any flock that adheres to an approved program can eventually eradicate footrot, but inspect and footbath was the option that resulted in the longest duration of quarantine. Footrot is a disease of sheep and goats associated with the bacterium Dichelobacter nodosus. Infection begins in the interdigital space and in the case of benign footrot remains there. In virulent forms (strains) of footrot, infection progresses to the sensitive laminae underlying the sole and wall. In 1988, the sheep industry in New South Wales, Australia decided to eradicate virulent footrot, which was possible because the organism can survive for only a short time in the environment. Flock owners could choose from three proven options (‘programs’) or combinations to eradicate the disease: complete destocking of affected flocks or mobs and replacement with footrot-free sheep; identification and culling of infected sheep with subsequent inspections to verify success; and inspection with treatment (either antibiotic injection or paring and footbathing) of affected animals. In the inspect and treat programs, animals that failed to respond to treatment needed to be culled. The footrot eradication program was a success, as more than 6000 flocks in NSW were freed of infections, and only 23 infected flocks remained in November 2008. The program was voluntary, and thus few records of the eradication process were kept for most flocks. However, some flocks were quarantined by the government when they threatened the health of neighboring flocks, and these flocks could only be released from quarantine after eradication was successful. This article reports the flock size, program used, and time to release from quarantine for 213 flocks in two (out of 42) Rural Lands Protection Board areas. During the 1981 to 2010 period, mean annual rainfall in the regions was about 565 mm, with an average of almost 70 days with more than 1 mm rainfall. The regions experienced predominantly winter rainfall, with new outbreaks of footrot occurring as temperatures rose in the spring. The initial inspection of quarantined flocks was made in the summer and entailed careful examination of every foot of every sheep. The quarantine could be lifted if an inspection more than 7 days after destocking revealed the presence of no infected sheep or if a summer eradication program was completed and the whole flock was declared free of virulent footrot after the following (spring) transmission period. Data from 17 flocks were excluded because of inadequate records. A combined program at the outset or a change in program after failure to eradicate the disease caused a further 23 flocks to be excluded from further analysis. Destocking tended to be chosen by smaller flocks (mean 1100 animals) than those that used inspect/treat with antibiotics/cull (mean 1437 sheep), inspect and cull (mean flock size 2616) or inspect/footbath/cull (3539 sheep per flock). When the data from the two groups were combined, the mean time in quarantine was 377 days, with the shortest time in quarantine being achieved by total destocking (284) and the longest by inspect and footbathing (502 d). Inspect and cull (395 days) and treatment with antibiotics (433 days) were intermediate. In principle destocking could have resulted in lifting of the quarantine a week after all the sheep left the farm, but many farmers were reluctant to destock immediately. Inspect and cull was chosen by 41% and total destocking by 35% of the properties. When employed from the outset, professional contractors were more effective at eradicating the infection than were the owners, and they shortened the mean quarantine time by 121 days. K. Mills et al. Aust. Vet. J. 90:14-19, 2012 15 ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SELENIUM: 1. ORAL BIOAVAILABILITY IN EWES Selenium yeast has higher bioavailability and maintains whole blood selenium concentrations well, at the FDA approved rate. Selenium is normally present in the diet in organic forms, selenomethionine or selenocysteine. The FDA permits addition of selenium to the diet as Naselenite, Na-selenate, or Se-yeast in complete feeds, not to exceed 0.3 mg/ kg diet (as fed) or 0.7 mg Se per day per sheep. There is interest in achieving higher levels of selenium to potentially improve health, performance, or disease prevention, but the maximum tolerable level for ruminants is 5 mg/ kg diet. Organic selenium-yeast has higher bioavailability than the inorganic forms and was compared with them in this 12 month study using Polypay, Suffolk, and crossbred ewes. The ewes were grazing selenium deficient pasture supplemented with selenium deficient hays in Corvallis, OR. They were divided into 8 groups of 30 sheep and drenched once weekly with water, 1x FDA allowed weekly selenium as Na-selenate (4.9 mg/hd) or 1x, 3x or 5x the FDA allowed supplemental dose of Na-selenite or Seleniumyeast. The effects on whole blood and serum selenium concentrations were monitored. The effects on immunity (including presence of footrot) will be described in a later report. Selenium concentrations in the sheep decreased in the last third of pregnancy and during peak lactation. Selenium yeast was more effective than either inorganic compound at increasing selenium concentrations in the sheep at the FDA approved dosing level. Supranutritional levels of selenium yeast increased the ewe blood and serum selenium concentrations in a dose-dependent fashion whereas blood selenium was not higher with 5x sodium selenite than 3x Na-selenite. In fact, the selenium yeast at FDA level gave the same blood concentrations as Na-selenite at 3x or 5x, indicating greater bioavailability for the organic form. None of the ewes showed any signs of selenium toxicity. J.A. Hall et al. J Animal Science 90:568-576, 2012 ULTRASONIC ASSESSMENT DURING PREGNANCY IN GOATS - A REVIEW B-mode ultrasound has become the norm and is highly accurate. Reproductive ultrasonography is simple, reliable and non-invasive but efficiency depends on the expertise of the operator, and the technique takes a long time to learn. This paper reviews the published literature, beginning with Amplitude or A-mode ultrasound. A-mode is reportedly 80 to 85% accurate if performed between 60 and 120 days gestation. It cannot evaluate fetal numbers or viability, neither will it correctly diagnose pseudopregnant goats, and it is rarely used now. Doppler devices detect fetal heart beat and blood flow in fetal and uterine vessels. Doppler has not been successful for detecting gestational age, but skilled operators can predict single versus multiple fetuses. B-mode ultrasonography, used transrectally or transabdominally, has become the norm for pregnancy diagnosis in goats and provides nearly 100% accuracy. A 3.5 MHz probe penetrates 17 to 20 cm and can be used for mid-to late-pregnancy diagnosis. A 5 MHz probe penetrates 10 to 17 cm and can be used to detect corpora lutea and early- to mid-pregnancies. A 7.5 MHz probe is useful for identifying ovarian structures and early pregnancies. Examination during the first trimester permits early detection of nonpregnant goats and subsequent prostaglandin treatment of pseudopregnant goats, allowing them to be rebred in the same breeding season. Transrectal ultrasound techniques are preferred for very early pregnancies and permit diagnosis 4 to 5 days earlier than transabdominal techniques. Previous fasting and lifting of the abdomen during scanning improve the accuracy of transrectal pregnancy diagnosis. Because early embryonic losses frequently occur, it is good to wait until days 32 to 34. The fetal heart beat can be detected and fetal viability assessed. Placentomes can be detected by day 30 transrectally and by day 40 transabdominally as small echogenic areas on the surface of the endometrium. Later they appear cup- or donut-shaped, depending on the plane of section. Estimation of fetal numbers permits proper feeding of the doe for the number of fetuses carried. Counting is easiest to do between 40 and 70 days gestation but can be done up to 100 days if a 3.5MHz probe is available. Fasting and lifting the abdomen are again helpful if a transrectal probe is used. It is difficult to distinguish between twins, triplets, and quadruplets at any stage of gestation. Fetal sex determination is performed by locating the genital tubercle next to the umbilical cord of the male or next to the tail of the female. Fetal sexing is highly accurate after day 55, except that accuracy of fetal sexing is confounded by the presence of multiple fetuses. After 50 days the transabdominal route must be used for pregnancy diagnosis. Fetal viability can be monitored by checking fetal heart rate and movements. After 100 days, a sector probe is preferred, as a smaller skin surface area needs to be prepared for the examination. Fetal age determination is useful for knowing when to dry off lactating does or when parturition can be safely induced. The crown-rump length (most upper part of the skull to the end of the sacrum, illustrated in the article) correlates with gestational age. The biparietal diameter is measured when the image of the head is symmetrical and the falx cerebri is seen on the midline, dividing the cerebral hemispheres into two equal parts. It provides a very good correlation with gestation age during the second trimester. Some researchers have used the diameter of the fetal orbit or the long and short axes of the fetal heart for estimating gestational age. The fetal heart rate decreases as pregnancy progresses. The diameter of the placentomes has a low correlation coefficient with gestational age, though this can be improved by measuring only the largest placentomes. Placentomes are difficult to visualize after 100 days gestation. G. Erdogan Reprod Domestic Animals 47:157-163, 2012 2012 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING American Association Of Small Ruminant Practitioners Held In Conjunction With The Avma Annual Convention August 4 – 7, 2012 – San Diego, California San Diego Convention Center • 111 W Harbor Drive Membership Meeting Will Be Held Saturday, August 4, 2012 At 12:00 (Noon) • Room 27B 16 Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 2012 AASRP BOARD OF DIRECTORS – VOTING BALLOT Vote only for the director of the district in which you reside. After making your selection, check the box adjacent to the nominee and sign on the signature line to validate. Ballots must be received by June 1st. Please return your ballot to the management office by faxing to 334/270-3399, by e-mail to [email protected] or by mail to the address at the bottom of the page. (Affiliate, Associate and Student Members are not eligible to cast a vote.) Director, Region 1 (Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Massachusetts, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Quebec, Newfoundland, Labrador, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick) William P. Shulaw, DVM, MS, DACVPM - Dr. Shulaw is a Professor and Extension Veterinarian for cattle and sheep in the Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine at the Ohio State University. His research and Extension interests center around infectious and parasitic diseases of food producing animals and their effect on herd and flock health. Currently he has active projects focusing on diagnosis of Johne’s disease and control of gastrointestinal parasites in sheep. He currently serves on the board and is seeking a second term. Write-In: ________________________________________________________ Director, Region 3 (North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Nunavut Territory) Clifford Shipley, DVM, DACT - Dr. Shipley is a Clinical Associate Professor of Veterinary Clinical Medicine and Attending Veterinarian of the Agricultural Animal Care and Use Program at the University of Illinois. Dr. Shipley’s professional interest is in reproduction in all species with an emphasis on embryo transfer, laprascopic AI, semen collection and semen freezing in small ruminants. He has a special interest in cervid reproduction and herd health. In addition, he is also a beef and small ruminant veterinary extension specialist. He currently serves on the board and is seeking a second term. Write-In: ____________________________________________________ Ballots will be counted on June 1, 2012, and announced at the 2012 AASRP Annual Membership Meeting in San Diego, CA during the AVMA Convention in August. It will also be posted in the next issue of Wool & Wattles. Thank you for your participation in this very important process! Signature: _______________________________ Region/State:____________ Please Print Your Name: ___________________________________________ AASRP • P.O. Box 3614 • Montgomery, AL 36109 Phone: 334/517-1233 • Fax: 334/270-3399 • Email: [email protected] Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 17 AASRP Board of Directors President Dr. Joan Bowen 5036 E County Rd. 60 Wellington, CO 80549 Phone: 970.568.3613 Cell: 970.217.0447 [email protected] Term: 7/11 – 7/13 President Elect Dr. Joan Dean Rowe 24580 Cache Street Capay, CA 95607 Phone: 530.752.0292 Fax: 530.752.4278 [email protected] Term: 7/11 – 7/13 Immediate Past President Dr. Jim Fallen Large Animal Clinic 9300 Guadalupe Trail NW Albuquerque, NM 87114 Phone: 505.897.3787 Fax: 505.898.8402 [email protected] Term: 7/11 – 7/13 Director, Region 1 Dr. William P. Shulaw Veterinary Extension 4030 Alton Darby Creek Rd. Hilliard, OH 43026 Phone: 614-292-9453 Fax: 614-292-4142 [email protected] Term: 7/11 – 7/12 Director, Region 2 Dr. Patty B. Scharko PO Box 102406 Columbia, SC 29224-2406 Phone: 803-788-2269 x290 [email protected] Term: 7/11 – 7/13 Director, Region 3 Dr. Clifford Shipley University of Illinois, CVM 1008 West Hazelwood Dr. Urbana, IL 61802 [email protected] Term: 7/10 – 7/12 Director, Region 4 Dr. Annika M. Rogers 5520 S W Cherry Ave Corvallis, OR 97333 Phone: 541-602-2062 [email protected] Term: 7/11 – 7/13 Management Headquarters Franz Management P. O. Box 3514 Montgomery, AL 36109 Phone: 334/517-1233 Fax: 334/270-3399 Email: [email protected] AVMA Delegate Dr. Paul Jones Woodburn Vet Clinic 225 South Pacific Highway Woodburn, OR 80634 Home: 503.982.2421 Cell: 503.982.2425 [email protected] 2009-2017 Executive Director Dr. Tom Johnson Cell: 515-306-1129 AVMA Alternate Delegate Dr. Joan Bowen 2009-2017 AASRP Representation for AVMA Offices & Committees Executive Board Dr. Mark Helfat (2011-2012) AVMA Delegate Dr. Paul Jones (2009-2017) Alternate Dr. Joan S. Bowen (2009 – 2017) Legislative Advisory Committee Dr. Seyedmehdi Mobini (2011 – 2014) Alternate Dr. Kelly Still Brooks (2011 – 2014) Committee on Environmental Issues Dr. Peregrine Wolff (2006 - 2012) Clinical Practitioners Advisory Committee Andrea Mongini (2010-2013) Alternate Dr. Jonathan Bergmann (2011 – 2014) Animal Agriculture Liaison Committee Dr. Jeanne M. Rankin (2005 – 2014) Alternate Dr. Amy Robinson (2008-2014) Food Safety Advisory Committee Dr. Christine Navarre (2006-2012) Alternate Dr. Joan Bowen (2007-2013) Animal Welfare Committee Dr. Joe Snyder (2007-2013) Alternate Dr. Peregrine Wolff (2007-2013) Committee on Disaster & Emergency Issues Dr. Peregrine Wolff (2008-2012) AASRP Committee Chairs • • • • 18 Nomination – Dr. Paul Jones Continuing Education – Dr. Joan Rowe College Liaison – Dr. Dave Van Metre Governance – Dr. Paul Jones • • • • Membership – Dr. Annika Rogers Budget & Finance – Dr. Betty Scharko Student Educational Opportunities – Dr. Cindy Wolf Sam Guss Fund – Dr. Cindy Wolf Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 AASRP VETERINARY COLLEGE LIAISONS Auburn University Misty Edmonson, DVM 1500 Wire Road Auburn, AL 36849 Ph: 334-844-4490 Fax: 334-844-4368 [email protected] Cornell University Mary C. Smith, DVM Ambulatory/Prod Med Box 29 NYS College of Vet Med Ithaca, NY 14853 Ph: 607-253-3140 [email protected] Colorado State University David Van Metre, DVM, DACVIM Associate Professor Animal Population Health Inst. CVM and Biomedical Sciences Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1678 Ph: 970-297-1299 Fax: 970-297-1275 [email protected] Iowa State University Paul J. Plummer, DVM PhD DACVIM College of Veterinary Medicine 2426 Lloyd Veterinary Medical Center Ames, IA 50011 Ph: 515-294-8522 [email protected] Kansas State University Patricia A. Payne, DVM, PhD Department of Diagnostic Medicine/ Pathobiology College of Vet Medicine 1600 Denison Ave. Manhattan KS 66506 - 5600 Ph: 785-532-4604 [email protected] Louisiana State University Marjorie S. Gill, DVM Vet Teaching Hospital & Clinics Skip Bertman Drive Baton Rouge, LA 70803 Ph: 225-578-9574 [email protected] Michigan State University Michelle Kopcha, DVM, MS Coordinator-Practice-based Ambulatory Large Animal Clinical Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine East Lansing, MI 48824-1314 Ph: 517-355-8491 Fax: 517-432-1092 [email protected] Ph: 919-513-6245 Fax: 919-513-6464 [email protected] Ohio State University Michael Rings, DVM 601 Vernon Tharp Drive Columbus, OH 43210 Ph: 614-292-6661 [email protected] Oklahoma State University Lionel Dawson, DVM Oklahoma State University Boren Vet Med Teaching Hosp Farm Road Stillwater, OK 74078 Ph: 405-744-8584 [email protected] Oregon State University Michelle Kutzler, DVM, PhD, DACT Dept. of Animal Sciences 312 Withycombe Hall Corvallis, OR 97331-6702 Ph: 541-737-1401 Fax: 541-737-4174 [email protected] Purdue University A.N. (Nickie) Baird, DVM, MS Diplomate ACVS Associate Professor Large Animal Surgery Dept. of Vet. Clinical Science 625 Harrison St. West Lafayette, IN 47907-2026 Ph: 765-494-8548 Fax: 765-496-2641 [email protected] Texas A & M University Virginia Fajt, DVM, PhD, DACVCP Clinical Assistant Professor 326-C VMA Dept. of Vet. Physiology & Pharmacology Hwy. 60, VMA Bldg., MS 4466 College Station, TX 77843 Ph: 979-845-7299 Fax: 979-845-6544 [email protected] Tufts University Sandra L. Ayres, DVM 200 West Borough Rd. North Grafton, MA 01536 Ph: 508-839-7956 x 84605 [email protected] Tuskegee University David McKenzie, DVM Dept. of Clinical Sciences School of Veterinary Medicine Mississippi State University Dr. Sherrill Fleming, Associate Professor Tuskegee, AL 36088 Ph: 334-727-8461 Food Animal Medicine [email protected] College of Veterinary Medicine Box 6100 University of California Mississippi State, MS 39762 Joan Dean Rowe, DVM Ph: 662-325-2198 Vet Medical Teaching Hospital [email protected] 24580 Cache St. Capay, CA 95607 North Carolina State University Ph: 530-752-0292 Kevin L. Anderson, DVM, PhD [email protected] Dept of Food Animal Health and Resource Management CVM University of Florida 4700 Hillsborough St. VACANT Raleigh, NC 27606 Wool&Wattles January-March 2012 University of Georgia Lisa Williamson, DVM UGA College of Vet Medicine Large Animal Department 1810 Clotfelter Rd. Athens, GA 30622 Ph: 706-542-9323 [email protected] University of Illinois Clifford F. Shipley, DVM, DACT Assistant Director, AACUP College of Veterinary Medicine 1008 W. Hazelwood Dr. Urbana, IL 61802 Ph: 217-333-2479 Fax: 217-333-7126 Cell: 217-493-2958 [email protected] University of Minnesota Cindy Wolf, DVM 225 VMC, 1365 Gortner Avenue St. Paul, MN 55108 Cell: 507-450-5453 Ph: 612-625-1780 Fax: 612-625-6241 [email protected] University of Missouri Tessa Marshall, BVSc, MS Diplomate ABVP-Dairy Practice Assistant Teaching Professor Production Medicine 900 E Campus Dr. Columbia, MO 65211 Ph: 573-882-6857 [email protected] University of Pennsylvania Marie-Eve Fecteau, DVM Diplomate ACVIM-LA Asst. Professor for Food Animal Medicine and Surgery New Bolton Center 382 W. Street Rd. Kennett Square, PA 19348 Ph: 610-925-6208 Fax: 610-925-8100 [email protected] University of Tennessee Jerry R. Roberson, DVM, PhD Associate Professor Food Animal Medicine/Surgery College of Vet Med, LACS 2407 River Drive Knoxville, TN 37996-45545 Ph: 865-755-8256 Fax: 865-974-5773 [email protected] University of Wisconsin-Madison Susan D. Semrad, DVM School of Veterinary Medicine 2015 Linden Drive West Madison, WI 53706 Ph: 608-263-6695 [email protected] Ph: 540-231-4805 Fax: 540-231-6033 [email protected] Washington State University Steven M. Parish, DVM Professor Large Animal Med/Surgery Diplomat ACVIM New Vet Teaching Hospital College of Veterinary Medicine Pullman, WA 99164 Ph: 509-335-0711 [email protected] Western University of Health Sciences Ronald L. Terra, DVM, MS, MBA Professor, Food Animal Medicine College of Vet Medicine 309 E. 2nd Street Pomona, CA 91766-1854 Ph: 909-469-5693 Fax: 909-469-5635 [email protected] FOREIGN COLLEGE LIAISONS University of Guelph Paula Menzies, MPVM Associate Professor Ruminant Health Management Group Ontario Veterinary College Guelph, Ontario CANADA N1G 2W1 [email protected] University of Montreal Pascal Dubreuil Faculté de médicine vétérinaire 3200 Sicotte St-Hyacinthe PQ J2S 7C6 Ph: 450-773-8521 x8266 Fax: 450-778-8101 Email: [email protected] University of Prince Edward Island Jeffrey Wichtel, BVSC PhD DipACT Associate Professor Chairman, Dept of Health Mgt Atlantic Veterinary College 550 University Avenue Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island CANADA C1A 4P3 [email protected] University of Saskatchewan Lyall Petrie, BVMS, MRCVS Dept of Lg Animal Clinical Sciences Western College of Vet Medicine 52 Campus Drive Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5B4 Ph: 306-966-7087 Fax: 306-966-7174 [email protected] NOTE TO STUDENT: If you cannot reach your liaison contact please contact [email protected] Virginia/Maryland Regional CVM D. Phillip Sponenberg, DVM, Phd Professor, Pathology & Genetics Dept. of Biomedical Sciences 100 Duckpond Drive Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA 24061 19 $ TOTALTOTAL ENCLOSED ENCLOSED Date: Date: Signature: Signature: **A tax**A deductible contribution to the Samuel B. Guss Fund helps small grants to student tax deductible contribution to the Samuel B.Memorial Guss Memorial Fundprovide helps provide small grants to student members of AASRP to undertake extern extern opportunities in veterinary practices, working with one or one more members of AASRP to undertake opportunities in veterinary practices, working with orofmore of the small species. theruminant small ruminant species. PLEASE MAKEMAKE YOURYOUR CHECK PAYABLE TO AASRP PLEASE CHECK PAYABLE TO AASRP AND MAIL WITHWITH THIS THIS FORMFORM TO: TO: AND MAIL AASRP, P.O. BOX AL 36109 AASRP, P.O.3614, BOX MONTGOMERY, 3614, MONTGOMERY, AL 36109 DUES DUES PAYMENTS MADE MADE BY CREDIT CARD CARD MAY BE FAXED TO 334-270-3399 PAYMENTS BY CREDIT MAY BE FAXED TO 334-270-3399 YOU CAN JOIN OR RENEW MEMBERSHIP AT WWW.AASRP.ORG YOUALSO CAN ALSO JOIN OR RENEW MEMBERSHIP AT WWW.AASRP.ORG Exp. Date: Exp. Date: $ $ $ Credit Credit Card Number: Card Number: Payment Method: □ Check □ Mastercard □ Visa □ Visa Payment Method: □ Check □ Mastercard $ $ US Funds US Funds $ $ $ $ $ $ U.S./Canada ForeignForeign U.S./Canada Veterinarians $105 $105 $130 $130 Veterinarians Non-Veterinary Associates $130 $130 Non-Veterinary Associates $105 $105 Veterinary Students $15 $15 $20 $20 Veterinary Students **Contribution to Samuel B. Guss **Contribution to Samuel B. Guss Memorial Fund Fund Memorial RetiredRetired Veterinary Members 50% discount off of regular fee Veterinary Members 50% discount off of regular fee MEMBERSHIP DUESDUES MEMBERSHIP All dues paidbeinpaid U.S.infunds. Allmust duesbe must U.S. funds. ___Ultrasonography for pregnancy diagnosis ___Ultrasonography for pregnancy diagnosis ___Embryo transfertransfer ___Semen collection & evaluation ___Laparoscopic AI ___Transcervical AI ___Embryo ___Semen collection & evaluation ___Laparoscopic AI ___Transcervical AI If you marked yes, doyes, youdo provide: (you may many apply) If you marked you provide: (youselect may as select as as many as apply) Do youDo provide reproductive services for sheep and goats? ___Y ___Y ___N ___N you provide reproductive services for sheep and goats? Would Would you accept externships? ___Yes___Yes ____No you accept externships? ____No Non-Veterinarian: __Associate __Student Non-Veterinarian: __Associate __Student PleasePlease check the category that best you: you: check the category thatdescribes best describes Veterinarian: __Owner/Partner __Associate __Academician/Researcher __Industry __Government Veterinarian: __Owner/Partner __Associate __Academician/Researcher __Industry __Government Other__________________________________ Other__________________________________ VETERINARY COLLEGE______________________________________YEAR GRADUATED___________ VETERINARY COLLEGE______________________________________YEAR GRADUATED___________ E-MAIL________________________________________________________________________________ E-MAIL________________________________________________________________________________ PHONE_______________________________FAX_____________________________________________ PHONE_______________________________FAX_____________________________________________ CITY/STATE/ZIP________________________________________________________________________ CITY/STATE/ZIP________________________________________________________________________ ADDRESS___________________________________________________________ ___ □ Home ___ □ Home □ Office □ Office ADDRESS___________________________________________________________ CLINIC/BUSINESS______________________________________________________________________ CLINIC/BUSINESS______________________________________________________________________ NAME________________________________________________________________________________ NAME________________________________________________________________________________ Membership Membership Application Application AMERICAN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION OF SMALL OF SMALL RUMINANT RUMINANT PRACTITIONERS PRACTITIONERS Wool & Wattles the AASRP Newsletter P.O. Box 3614 Montgomery, AL 36109 NONPROFIT ORG. U.S. POSTAGE Montgomery, AL PERMIT NO. 77 PAID ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED