enjjpt - APAN Community

Transcription

EURO-NATO JOINT JET PILOT TRAINING
ENJJPT
STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
NUMBER 70
BRUGGE, BELGIUM
7 – 11 September 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Members' Approval of Minutes .................................................................................................... i
SC 70 Group Photo ...................................................................................................................... ii
Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ iii
Distribution List .......................................................................................................................... vi
Steering Committee Section
Steering Committee Minutes:
1. Welcome and Opening Remarks ..............................................................................................1
2. Administrative Matters .............................................................................................................1
3. Executive Session .....................................................................................................................1
4. Agenda Approval ......................................................................................................................1
5. SC 69 Minutes Review .............................................................................................................1
6. SC 69 Action Items Review......................................................................................................1
7. MOU Amendment 6 Signature Page Exchange........................................................................4
8. Wing Commander Program Status Brief ..................................................................................4
9. Aircraft Program Briefs ............................................................................................................8
10. Plan of Operation (PO) Changes.............................................................................................8
11. Syllabus Changes ....................................................................................................................9
12. Additional Items......................................................................................................................9
13. Policy Recommendation Subcommittee (PRS) Report ..........................................................9
13.1. Opening/Review of Agenda .....................................................................................9
13.2. PRS Roster .............................................................................................................10
13.3. SC 69 PRS Minutes Review ..................................................................................10
13.4. Proposed IP Extensions..........................................................................................10
13.5. Review of Student Class Entries ............................................................................10
13.6. Completion of PIT and UIP Entries .......................................................................11
13.7. Review of ENJJPT Participation After Student Entries ........................................11
13.8. Category I / II / III Positions ..................................................................................12
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
13.9. Review of Syllabus Changes .................................................................................12
13.10. Plan of Operation Changes ..................................................................................12
13.11. Facilities Projects .................................................................................................13
13.12. Steering Committee Directed Items .....................................................................15
13.13. Other Business .....................................................................................................17
13.14. SC 70 PRS Minutes Approval .............................................................................18
13.15. Closing Comments/Adjourn ................................................................................18
14. Financial Legal Subcommittee (FLS) Report .......................................................................18
14.1. Opening/Administrative Remarks .........................................................................18
14.2. Review/Approval of Agenda .................................................................................18
14.3. FY14 Draft Final Statement of Account ................................................................19
14.4. FY15 EOY Budget.................................................................................................19
14.5. Proposed Legal/Financial PO Changes ..................................................................20
14.6. SC Directed Items ..................................................................................................21
14.7. Other Business .......................................................................................................24
14.8. Review of FLS Minutes .........................................................................................26
14.9. Next Pre-FLS Meeting ...........................................................................................26
14.10. Closing Comments/Adjourn ................................................................................26
15. Other Business ......................................................................................................................27
16. Next SC Meeting...................................................................................................................27
17. Review of Minutes ................................................................................................................27
18. Awards / Recognition of Outgoing Members / Closing Remarks ........................................27
19. SC 70 Action Items ...............................................................................................................27
Attachments:
SC Attach 1 – Participants ..........................................................................................................29
SC Attach 2 – Agenda.................................................................................................................30
SC Attach 3 – Amendment 6 ......................................................................................................31
SC Attach 4 – AI 69-2 Briefing ..................................................................................................43
SC Attach 5 – AI 69-3 Memo .....................................................................................................46
SC Attach 6 – ENJJPT Reorganization Concept ........................................................................47
SC Attach 7 – Wing CC Program Status Brief ...........................................................................48
SC Attach 8 – T-3 Cross-Country TDY Memo ..........................................................................57
SC Attach 9 – T-6 Program Brief ...............................................................................................58
SC Attach 10 – T-38 Program Brief ...........................................................................................60
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SC Attach 11 – Proposed PO Changes Briefing .........................................................................66
SC Attach 11.1 – Section 7 .............................................................................................68
SC Attach 11.2 – Annex 7 ..............................................................................................69
SC Attach 11.3 – Annex 8 ..............................................................................................70
SC Attach 12 – Syllabus Change Briefing ..................................................................................73
SC Attach 13 – US & GE Student Exchange emails ..................................................................74
SC Attach 14 – ENJJPT Financial Update Briefing ...................................................................78
SC Attach 15 – Romanian Chief of Staff Memo ........................................................................80
PRS Attach 1 – Agenda ..............................................................................................................81
PRS Attach 2 – Roster ................................................................................................................82
PRS Attach 3 – UPT and IFF Class Slides .................................................................................85
PRS Attach 4 – PIT and UIP Class Slides ................................................................................103
RPS Attach 5 – Participation Slides..........................................................................................113
PRS Attach 6 – Cat II / IIA Slides ............................................................................................123
PRS Attach 7 – Programmed Flying Training (PFT) Shift Briefing ........................................126
FLS Attach 1 – Attendee Roster ...............................................................................................128
FLS Attach 2 – Agenda.............................................................................................................131
FLS Attach 3 – SC 70 PO Changes ..........................................................................................132
v
DISTRIBUTION LIST
ADDRESSEE
BELGIUM
# COPIES
Air Competency Center .................................................................................................................... 1
Rue De La Grande Lecke
1320 Beauvechain Air Base, Belgium
Embassy of Belgium ......................................................................................................................... 1
Office of the Air Attaché
3330 Garfield Street, NW
Washington DC 20008
CANADA
AF Air Operations Training .............................................................................................................. 1
2 Canadian Air Division
P.O. Box 17000, Stn Forces
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
R3J 3Y5
Directorate Air Simulation and Training 4 ....................................................................................... 1
1 Nicholas, Suite 200
NDHQ - 101 Colonel By Dr
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
K1A 0K2
Embassy of Canada ........................................................................................................................... 1
501 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington DC 20001
DENMARK
Tactical Air Command Denmark ...................................................................................................... 1
Herningvej 30
DK 7470 Karup, Denmark
Embassy of Denmark ........................................................................................................................ 1
3200 Whitehaven St, NW
Washington DC 20008
GERMANY
Oberst i.G. Eberhard Freiherr von Wintzingerode-Knorr ................................................................. 8
KdoEinsVbdeLw Dez FlgWaSysAusb
Postfach 906110 / 501 / 16
51127 Köln, Germany
Brig Gen Gunter Katz ....................................................................................................................... 1
Kdo Fins Vbde Lw
Leiter FA Luft
Lufwaffenkasern e WAHN 504
Postbach 906110
51127 Kon, Germany
vi
DISTRIBUTION LIST
ADDRESSEE
# COPIES
Mrs. Gabriele Bergmann ................................................................................................................... 1
Bud Abteilung Haushalt und Controlling
HCI6
P.O. Box 1328
53003 Bonn, Germany Mr. Marc Luis ................................................................................................................................... 1
Federal German Ministry of Defence
Department for Legal Affairs
RI4
P.O. Box 1328
53003 Bonn, Germany
Embassy of Germany ........................................................................................................................ 1
2300 M Street NW
Washington DC 20037
FlgAusbZLw Holloman .................................................................................................................... 1
950 First Street
Holloman AFB, NM 88330-8036
GREECE
Ministry of National Defense............................................................................................................ 1
Hellenic Air Force General Staff
Branch B/B1/3/Euro NATO Training
T.G.A 1010
Holargos – Athens, Greece
Embassy of Greece ........................................................................................................................... 1
2228 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington DC 20008
ITALY
Air Staff Ops ..................................................................................................................................... 1
SMA - 3 Reparto
Viale dell’Universitá 4
Attn: SMA-332
00100 Roma, Italy
Comando Scuole A.M./III Regione Aerea ........................................................................................ 1
Stato Maggiore-3° Ufficio
Lungomare N. Sauro 39
70121 Bari, Italy
Embassy of Italy ............................................................................................................................... 1
3000 Whitehaven St., N.W.
Washington DC 20008
vii
DISTRIBUTION LIST
ADDRESSEE
THE NETHERLANDS
# COPIES
Air Staff ........................................................................................................................................... 3
Directorate of Personnel
Luchtmachtplein 1
4822 ZB Breda
The Netherlands
Embassy of The Netherlands ............................................................................................................ 1
4200 Linnean Ave, NW
Washington DC 20008
NORWAY
Inspectorate of Air Operations .......................................................................................................... 1
LFTS
Flyplassveien 300
N-1590 Rygge Flystasjon
Norway
Embassy of Norway .......................................................................................................................... 1
2720 34th Street, NW
Washington DC 20008
PORTUGAL
Direccao de Instrucao ....................................................................................................................... 1
Av.Da Forca Aérea Portuguesa
Alfragide
2724-506 Amadora
Portugal
Embassy of Portugal ......................................................................................................................... 1
2310 Tracy Pl, NW
Washington DC 20008
SPAIN
MAPER/DEN/SUFOR/SECFO ........................................................................................................ 1
Avd. Garcia Morato
Acu. Aereo Tablada
41011 Sevilla,
Spain
Cuartel General del Aire/DAE .......................................................................................................... 1
c/ Romeno Robledo 8
28008 Madrid
Spain
viii
DISTRIBUTION LIST
ADDRESSEE
# COPIES
ALA 23 / JESFAS ............................................................................................................................. 1
Base Aerea Talavera
Carretera Madrid-Lisboa S/N
06071 Badajoz, Spain
Embassy of Spain .............................................................................................................................. 1
4801 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite #300
Washington, DC 20016
TURKEY
Hava Egitim Kiligi ............................................................................................................................ 2
Ucus Egitim Sube Mudurlugu
Guzelyali / Izmir / Turkey
2nci Ana Jet Us ................................................................................................................................. 1
124ncu Standardize Filo Komutanligi
Cigli/Izmir, Turkey
Embassy of Turkey ........................................................................................................................... 1
2525 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington DC 20008
UNITED KINGDOM
FT FJ ................................................................................................................................................. 1
22 (Training) Group
Building # 7001
MOD Abbey Wood
Bristol
BS34 8JH
UK
Embassy of United Kingdom ............................................................................................................ 1
3100 Massachusetts, NW
Washington DC 20008
Embassy of United Kingdom ............................................................................................................ 1
Defense Procurement Office
3100 Massachusetts, NW
Washington DC 20008
UNITED STATES - WASHINGTON DC / ODC
HQ USAF/A3O-AC .......................................................................................................................... 1
1480 Air Force Pentagon
Suite 5E1052
Washington DC 20330-1480
ix
DISTRIBUTION LIST
ADDRESSEE
# COPIES
HQ USAF/A5XX .............................................................................................................................. 1
SAF/GCI ........................................................................................................................................... 1
1740 Air Force Pentagon, 4C756
SAF/IARE ......................................................................................................................................... 1
1080 Air Force Pentagon, 5E823
SAF/IAPX ......................................................................................................................................... 1
1080 Air Force Pentagon, 4C253
ODC American Embassy (AF Sec) .................................................................................................. 1
Unit 6857
APO AE 09724 – 1012
ODC American Embassy (AF Sec) .................................................................................................. 1
PSC 73
APO AE 09716
ODC Greece (AF Sec) ...................................................................................................................... 1
PSC 108
Box 42
APO AE 09842
ODC American Embassy (AF) ......................................................................................................... 1
PSC 61
APO AE 09642-0061
ODC Germany (AF Sec) ................................................................................................................... 1
Defense Liaison Office Bonn
PSC 117, Box 340
APO AE 09080
American Embassy Rome ................................................................................................................. 1
ODC (Training Section)
PSC 59, Box 51
APO AE 09624
ODC The Netherlands (AF Sec) ....................................................................................................... 1
PSC 71
Box 1000
APO AE 09715 – 6020
x
DISTRIBUTION LIST
ADDRESSEE
# COPIES
ODC Norway (AF Sec) ..................................................................................................................... 1
PSC 69
Box 1000
APO AE 09707 - 5360
ODC-AFSEC .................................................................................................................................... 1
Unit 5320 Box 204
DPO AE 09726-0204
JUSMMAT ....................................................................................................................................... 1
Attn: AF Sec
Unit 7025
APO AE 09822
ODC United Kingdom (AF Sec)....................................................................................................... 1
PSC 801 Box 54
FPO AE 09498 - 4054
USCINCEUR EC14 .......................................................................................................................... 1
PO New York 09128
NATO Training Group ..................................................................................................................... 1
Chairman Air Force Sub Group
Staff Luchmacht - VS3/TAC
Everse Straat
1140 Brussels, Belgium
OO-ALC/GHMMC ........................................................................................................................... 1
6064 Dogwood Ave, Bldg 1254
Hill AFB, UT 84056-5816
DSCA/OPS/CWD ............................................................................................................................. 1
2475 K STREET, Bldg. 52
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433
UNITED STATES - RANDOLPH AFB
HQ AFPC/DPAOT2 ......................................................................................................................... 1
550 C Street West, Suite 31
JBSA Randolph AFB TX 78150
HQ AETC/IA .................................................................................................................................... 1
251 J Street East
JBSA Randolph AFB TX 78150-4358
HQ AETC/A1M ................................................................................................................................ 1
1850 1st Street West, Suite 1
xi
DISTRIBUTION LIST
ADDRESSEE
# COPIES
HQ AETC/A3FP ............................................................................................................................... 3
1 F Street, Suite 2
HQ AETC/FM .................................................................................................................................. 2
1851 1st Street East, Suite 1
HQ AETC/A1P ................................................................................................................................. 1
1850 1st Street West, Suite 1
HQ AETC/A5R................................................................................................................................. 1
100 H Street, Suite 3
AFSAT/FM ....................................................................................................................................... 2
315 J Street West, Bldg 857
UNITED STATES - SHEPPARD AFB
82 TRW/CC ...................................................................................................................................... 1
419 5th Avenue, Suite 1
Sheppard AFB TX 76311-2941
82 CPTS/FMA .................................................................................................................................. 1
Sheppard AFB TX 76311-2933
82 FSS/FSMM .................................................................................................................................. 1
Sheppard AFB, TX 76311-2929
ENJJPT WING.....................................................................................................................31
Total Distribution ................................................................................................................110
xii
EURO-NATO JOINT JET PILOT TRAINING (ENJJPT)
STEERING COMMITTEE (SC) MEETING NUMBER 70
7-11 SEPTEMBER 2015
Bruges, Belgium
1. WELCOME AND OPENING REMARKS
Nations attending SC 70 were BE, CA, DE, GE, GR, IT, NL, NO, PO, SP, TU, UK, and US.
(See SC 70 Participants at SC Attachment 1.)
2. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS: Nothing Significant to Report (NSTR).
3. EXECUTIVE SESSION MEETING-SC MEMBERS ONLY
3.1. See “SC Members Only” APAN Media Gallery for minutes.
4. AGENDA APPROVAL
NSTR. (See SC Attachment 2)
5. SC 69 MINUTES REVIEW
5.1. The SC 69 Minutes were approved as presented.
6. SC 69 ACTION ITEMS REVIEW
6.1. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 62-1: T-X Acquisition Plan. SC requested to be updated on
the TX Acquisition Plan annually. (Ref. SC 62 Minutes 5.1.-5.1.4.) (OPR: US)
6.1.1. RESPONSE: The update will be provided at SC 71.
6.1.2. SC DECISION: The SC took note.
6.2. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 66-9: MOU Amendment Initiation. The SC tasked the SC
Secretary to execute the initiation of the conformed Amendment 6 for national staffing as
outlined in the ENJJPT Directive 69-1 and as per the needs of the SC. (Ref. SC 66 Minutes
15.1.-15.6.) (OPR: SC Secretary)
6.2.1. RESPONSE: The SC Secretary distributed the conformed version of MOU
Amendment 6 for staffing on 9 July 2015. (See SC Attachment 3)
6.2.2. SC DISCUSSION: None
6.2.3. SC DECISION: The SC took note and closed the Action Item 66-9.
SC 70 Minutes
1
6.3. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 69-1: ENJJPT Wing CC Approval of IP Extensions. The
PRS reviewed the list and accepted the extensions. The PRS feels there is no longer a need to
review and approve extensions at the PRS/SC level, and approval should reside with the ENJJPT
Wing Commander. The SC asked each nation staff the proposal to grant the ENJJPT Wing CC
the authority to approve IP extensions. (Ref SC 69 Minutes 12.4.; 13.9.4-13.9.4.5) (OPR: All
nations)
6.3.1. RESPONSE: All nations staffed the proposal and approved the request to allow
the ENJJPT Wing CC to approve IP extensions.
6.3.2. SC DISCUSSION: None.
6.3.3. SC DECISION: The SC approved and closed the Action Item 69-1.
6.4. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 69-2: ENJJPT Wing PO Fighter Pilot Guidance Review.
The following: 1) Manning Issue: The SC tasked the ENJJPT WING to identify the impacts
involved with the enrollment of non-fighters into the ENJJPT Program. 2) Strategy Issue: The
SC tasked the US to present the strategy for future T-X training. (Ref. SC 69 Minutes 12.11.1.)
(OPR: ENJJPT Wing and US).
6.4.1. RESPONSE: The 80 Operations Group Commander briefed the SC on the impacts
involved with the enrollment of non-fighter instructor pilots into the ENJJPT Program on
the T-6 IP side. (See SC Attachment 4)
6.4.2. SC DISCUSSION#1: Some nations were still concerned that in the future the
number of non-fighter pilots in the T-38 might increase, and therefore the quality of the
graduates might diminish.
6.4.2.1. SC DECISION #1: The SC tasked the PRS to propose a
recommendation on how to mitigate the challenge.
6.4.2.2. SC DECISION #2: The SC tasked the ENJJPT Wing to provide an
annual update on PIT Track B trainee performance.
6.4.2.3. SC DECISION #3: The SC deferred the strategy task to SC 71.
6.5. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 69-3: ENJJPT WING Facility Projects. The SC
approved all six facility projects. The SC Tasked the ENJJPT Wing to develop a plan to
accomplish the paint shed project.
6.5.1. Wing CC provided a response by memo on 30 July 2015. (See SC Attachment 5)
6.5.2. Reference ENJJPT Wing CC Briefing, Section 8.
6.6. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 69-4: PO Change 3, 17th Edition Distribution. The SC
tasked 1) Changes to be sent to nations for approval, if required. 2) Upon approval of the nations,
the SC Secretary will distribute changes as Change 3 to the 17th Edition. (Ref. AI 68-5; Ref. SC
69 Minutes 12.13.2.) (OPR: SC Secretary)
2
SC 70 Minutes
6.6.1. RESPONSE: The SC Secretary staffed PO Change 3, 17th Edition through an out
of cycle process on 20 March 2015. All nations endorsed PO Change 3, 17th edition by
13 July 2015.
6.6.2. SC DECISION: The SC approved 17th Edition, Change 3 (effective date 13 July
2015) and closed Action Item 69-4.
6.7. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 69-5: IP Work Hour Study Implementation Review. The
SC tasked the ENJJPT Wing to provide the SC an update on the SNR’s efforts to decrease the
work week hours to 45 hours, including SNRs COAs and first results.
6.7.1. Reference ENJJPT Wing CC Brief, paragraph 8.7.
6.8. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 69-6: ENJJPT Reorganization Concept. SC 68: The
ENJJPT Wing CC will reevaluate the reorganization proposal and investigate whether the change
would be possible without additional manning (SC 68); SC 69: The SC tasked the ENJJPT Wing
to review the STURON option.
6.8.1. Reference ENJJPT Wing CC Brief, paragraph 8.8.
6.9. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 69-7: BIT Proposal. The SC tasked the ENJJPT Wing to
develop a BIT proposal together with the SNRs for SC 70.
6.9.1. Reference ENJJPT Wing CC Brief, paragraph 8.9
6.10. Action Item 69-8: FY16 ENJJPT Dorm Room Renovation Cost Breakout Update. The
SC tasked the ENJJPT Wing to breakout the cost for a revised ENJJPT Dorm Room Renovation
project. ( Ref. SC 68 Minutes 12.12.16; SC AI 68-1.) (OPR: ENJJPT Wing)
6.10.1. Reference ENJJPT Wing CC Brief, paragraph 8.10
6.11. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 69-9: FY16 ENJJPT Dorm Room Renovation Timeline.
SC 68: See AI 68-2. SC 69: The SC tasked the US to provide a timeline for the ENJJPT Dorm
Room Renovation project pending approval by the SC. (Ref. SC 68 Minutes 12.12.17.) (OPR:
US)
6.11.1. RESPONSE: The US requested to postpone this action item until SC 71.
6.11.2. SC DECISION: The SC asked the US to provide an update during SC 71.
6.12. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 69-10: SC Chairman Candidates. The SC Chairman
asked the nations to submit nominees for the next SC Chairman by the end of July 2015. SC
secretary will distribute the nominees’ résumés to the nations. The election will be conducted
during the next SC meeting in BE. (Ref. SC 69 Minutes 16.3.) (OPR: All nations)
6.12.1. RESPONSE: IT submitted a candidate for consideration. (See SC Attachment 6)
6.12.2. SC DECISION: The SC decided to nominate BG Vincenzo Nuzzo as the next
SC Chairman. The nominee will attend SC 71 and be in place the last day of SC 71.
SC 70 Minutes
3
7. MOU AMENDMENT 6 SIGNATURE PAGE EXCHANGE
7.1. The signature page exchange process will not be completed this week due to only12 nations
providing their signature pages. The SC deferred the issue to the FLS to review the legal aspects.
The ENJJPT Program will abide by Amendment 5 until Amendment 6 is finalized through an
“out of cycle” process.
8. ENJJPT WING COMMANDER’S BRIEF
8.1. DESCRIPTION: The ENJJPT Wing Commander, Colonel Greg Keeton, provided the brief
(See SC Attachment 7). The briefing included the UPT and IFF Mission Status, Aircraft
Maintenance, ENJJPT Wing Commander Projects, Action Items: SC 69-2 (ENJJPT Wing Fighter
Pilot Guidance Review) Task 1; 69-3 (ENJJPT Wing Facility Projects); 69-5 (IP Work Hour
Study Implementation Review); 69-6 (ENJJPT Reorganization Concept); 69-7 (BIT Proposal);
and 69-8 (ENJJPT Dorm Renovation Cost Breakout Update). Topics of interest included:
Program funded T-3 Cross-Country TDYs, Hacker (T-6 Aux Field) Runway Repair, Facility
Project Funding, Proposed PO Annex 8, and T-38 PIT Syllabus Changes for Non-Fighter Pilots.
8.2. ENJJPT WING ISSUE: FY14 Taxiway Shoulder Repair/Demo. The primary cause for
the cost increase in this project was the unforeseen damage to the subgrade of the taxiway
shoulders. In order to properly repair this damage, the underground conduit system for the
taxiway lights must be relocated. The relocation of this conduit system is a major component of
the cost increase…approximately $1.9 million. (See SC Attachment 7, Slide 28) 8.2.1. ENJJPT WING CC RECOMMENDATION: Recommend the SC take note of
the updated costs for this project and defer to the FLS to prepare a recommendation for
the way forward.
8.2.2. SC DECISION: SC deferred the issue to the FLS to prepare a recommendation.
(Ref. 14.3.1.)
8.3. ENJJPT WING ISSUE: FY15 Wing CC Projects Update (Paint Barn Renovation).
(Ref. 8.6.)
8.3.1. ENJJPT WING CC RECOMMENDATION: Defer to the FLS for further
review.
8.3.2. SC DECISION: The SC deferred the issue to the FLS for further review. (Ref.
14.4.1.)
8.4. ENJJPT WING ISSUE: FY16 Wing CC Projects Proposal. Proposed projects included
Replace Cooling Tower; Replace Select Sealant and Repair Spalls Runway 15R/33L; Eliminate
Fire Safety Deficiencies Hangars; and Repair Electrical Distribution Hangar. Cost total $2M.
(See SC Attachment 7, Slide 30)
8.4.1. ENJJPT WING CC RECOMMENDATION: Further details were provided to
the FLS and PRS for review.
4
SC 70 Minutes
8.4.2. SC DECISION: The SC deferred the issue to the PRS and FLS. (Ref. 13.11.1.
and 14.6.6.)
8.5. ENJJPT WING ISSUE: FY17 T-6 Surfaces Repair Project. The T-6 runway and
connecting taxiways were built in 1994. The expected service life of these surfaces was 20 years.
It is past time to begin planning for restoration of these surfaces to lessen further deterioration.
(See SC Attachment 7, Slides 31-33)
8.5.1. ENJJPT WING CC RECOMMENDATION: The ENJJPT share of the
restoration of the existing surfaces is just under $11 million. ENJJPT Wing CC
recommended the Steering Committee place $10.91 million in the draft FY17 budget to
begin the process of addressing the deterioration of the primary T-6 surfaces at Sheppard
AFB.
8.5.2. SC DECISION: The issue was deferred to the FLS and PRS for review. (Ref.
13.11.4. and 14.6.7.)
8.6. ENJJPT WING ISSUE: Action Item SC 69-3 ENJJPT Wing Facilities Projects. SC
tasked the Wing CC to develop a plan to accomplish paint barn project. The contract price for
this project was negotiated at just over $3.3 million. The ENJJPT Wing sent a memo informing
the SC of project cost and suggested the FLS develop a strategy for funding this project this year.
(See SC Attachment 7)
8.6.1. ENJJPT WING CC RECOMMENDATION: FLS develop a strategy for
funding this project this year.
8.6.2. SC DECISION: SC took note and deferred this Action Item to the FLS. (Ref.
14.6.3.)
8.7. ENJJPT WING ISSUE: Action Item SC 69-5 IP Work Hour Study Implementation
Review. The ENJJPT Wing to provide an update on the SNR’s efforts to decrease IP work hours
to 45 hours per week, including SNR COAs and first results. SNRs and ENJJPT Wing has
determined each nation has unique IP work hour restrictions which are separate from the Program
requirements. Therefore, it is not possible for the Program to establish specific IP work hours for
all of the nations. (See SC Attachment 7, Slide 38)
8.7.1. ENJJPT WING CC RECOMMENDATION: The ENJJPT Wing recommends
each nation adjust its own IP manning to satisfy national restrictions while satisfying its
obligations to the Program’s IP requirements.
8.7.2. SC DECISION: SC took note and closed Action Item 69-5.
8.8. ENJJPT WING ISSUE: Action Item 69-6: ENJJPT Reorganization Concept. SC tasked
the Wing CC to review the STURON option. The ENJJPT CC tasked the Ops Group to consider
additional options. After months of review and consideration, no viable options were found.
(See SC Attachment 7, Slide 38)
SC 70 Minutes
5
8.8.1. ENJJPT WING CC RECOMMENDATION: The ENJJPT Wing CC
recommends the ENJJPT Wing not be tasked further on this topic and request the
Steering Committee close this action item.
8.8.2. SC DECISION: SC took note and closed Action Item 69-6.
8.9. ENJJPT WING ISSUE: Action Item 69-7, BIT Proposal. SC tasked the Wing to work
with the SNRs to develop a BIT proposal. (See SC Attachment 7, Slide 39)
8.9.1. ENJJPT WING CC PROPOSAL: The ENJJPT Wing proposes ENJJPT BIT be
performed in accordance with AETC T-38 Graduate Break in Training Guidance with the
exception of Chapter 10, which limits flights to one per month. Users requiring BIT will
inform the 80 OG in writing 30 days or a minimum of 3 weeks prior the number of pilots
using BIT, the expected length of training, the minimum and maximum number of front
cockpit sorties and any training emphasis during the sorties. ENJJPT BIT is limited to
ENJJPT graduates and performed in the aircraft last flown at ENJJPT. BIT will begin no
later than 12 months after the last ENJJPT syllabus sortie and no new events may be
instructed. The 80 OG can approve, modify or deny any requests based on availability or
impact to the ENJJPT training mission. No BIT sorties will be scheduled before 80 OG
approval is obtained.
8.9.2. SC DECISION: SC deferred to the subcommittees for further review. (Ref.
13.12.3. and 14.6.8.)
8.10. ENJJPT WING ISSUE: Action Item 69-8: ENJJPT Wing Dorm Room Renovation
Cost Breakout Update. The SC tasked the ENJJPT Wing to breakout the cost. The ENJJPT
Wing CC explained since SC69, the installation personnel has continued to work with the Army
Corps of Engineers to refine the initial cost estimates to renovate the ENJJPT Dorm. The updated
costs estimates are provided on slide 40. This slide provides updated costs estimates for the
based bid plus 7 options. The seventh option, facility chiller replacement has been added to the
list since SC69. The ENJJPT Wing CC explained the cost estimates do not include the
approximately $1M required for furnishings replacement for the dorm rooms. (See SC
Attachment 7, Slide 40)
8.10.1. ENJJPT WING CC RECOMMENDATION: The ENJJPT Wing CC
recommended the PRS and FLS review the updated cost estimates.
8.10.2. SC DECISION: SC deferred the issue to the PRS and FLS for review. (Ref.
13.11.2. and 14.6.4.)
8.11. ENJJPT WING ISSUE: T-3 Cross Country TDYs. The ENJJPT Wing distributed a
memo on 22 April (See SC Attachment 8) requesting a review of Program funded T-3 cross
country TDYs. According to PO paragraph 7.13.1.2.2, it states T-3 cross country TDYs
exceeding maximum number established by ENJJPTSC are national costs. However, prior to the
15th Edition (Feb 2006) the Wing CC determined Program funded T-3 Cross Country TDY
requirements. There is no record the ENJJPTSC has ever set a maximum number for Program
funded T-3 cross country TDYs.
6
SC 70 Minutes
8.11.1. ENJJPT WING CC RECOMMENDATION 1: The ENJJPT Wing CC
recommended the SC review the following two options. OPTION 1) The SC establish a
maximum number of Program funded T-3 Cross Country TDYs or OPTION 2)
Empower the Wing Commander to determine number of Program funded T-3 Cross
Country TDYs.
8.11.2. ENJJPT WING CC RECOMMENDATION 2: In either case, the ENJJPT
Wing CC recommends the decision be recorded as a change to PO paragraph referenced
above.
8.11.3. SC DECISION: SC took note and deferred the options to the FLS and PRS to
review options. (Ref. 13.12.4. and 14.6.9.)
8.13. ENJJPT WING ISSUE: Facility Project Funding. The average annual expenditure over
these five years was just over $3 million. This information was obtained from the Automated
Civil Engineering System (ACES) by our civil engineering contractor at Sheppard AFB. Also
depicted is the cost estimate for 2015 through 2019 forecast facility projects. The average annual
expenditure to satisfy all these requirements during this five year period is just over $11.6
million. This increase represents an $8.5 million increase in annual spending required to keep up
the ENJJPT facility sustainment requirements. (See SC Attachment 7, Slides 44-46)
8.13.1. ENJJPT WING CC RECOMMENDATION: The SC take note.
8.13.2. SC DECISION: SC took note.
8.14. ENJJPT WING ISSUE: PO Annex 8. Annex 8 to the ENJJPT PO establishes the
monthly student sorties expected from each ENJJPT IP by position. The ENJJPT Management
System uses these sortie numbers within the ENJJPT Manning Formula to calculate the
Program’s IP requirements. The current Annex 8 does not include the IFF student sortie data
which is currently being used to calculate IFF IP requirements. The proposed Annex 8 will
correct this oversight and provide the IP sortie numbers currently used by the ENJJPT
Management System to calculate IFF IP requirements. (See SC Attachment 7, Slide 47)
8.14.1. ENJJPT WING CC RECOMMENDATION: The SC approve the proposed
Annex 8.
8.14.2. SC DECISION: SC took note and deferred to PRS and FLS to review. (Ref.
13.10.4. and 14.5.3.)
8.15. ENJJPT WING ISSUE: T-38 PIT Syllabus Revision. The ENJJPT Wing CC requested
the SC consider changing the T-38 PIT syllabus to accommodate non-fighter background IP
training. (See SC Attachment 7, Slide 48) 8.15.1. ENJJPT WING CC RECOMMENDATION: The ENJJPT Wing CC
recommended a tracked syllabus similar to the T-6 PIT syllabus. The 80 Operations
Group Training Division has developed a proposed T-38 PIT syllabus which will address
this emerging requirement. This syllabus should be ready for review and approval next
SC 70 Minutes
7
March at Steering Committee 71. The ENJJPT Wing recommended the PRS develop
recommendations.
8.15.2. SC DECISION: SC took note and deferred the topic to the PRS to develop
recommendations for moving forward. (Ref. 13.12.2.4.)
9. AIRCRAFT BRIEFINGS
9.1. T-6A Programs Briefing (See SC Attachment 9) was presented by Mr. Bryan Knoll on
behalf of the T-6 SPO.
9.2. T-38 Programs Briefing (See SC Attachment 10) was presented by Mr. Ryan Bruce, T-38
SPO.
9.2.1. T-38 SPO RECOMMENDATION: 1) Approve funding plan. 2) Revise LOA
regarding FY15 budget.
9.2.3. SC DECISION: The SC deferred to the FLS for review.
10. PLAN OF OPERATIONS CHANGES
10.1. RESPONSE: The ENJJPT Wing/EP briefed the SC on the proposed PO Changes (See SC
Attachment 11). Additionally, he asked for guidance on how to proceed with publishing the 18th
Edition of the PO.
10.1.1. SC DECISION: The SC decided to defer the issue to PRS and FLS for
recommendations.
10.2. PO CHANGE ISSUE - Section 7: The US submitted administrative changes to various
paragraphs (18th Edition). (See SC Attachment 12)
10.2.1. SC DECISION: The SC deferred to PRS and FLS. (Ref. 13.10.2. and 14.5.1.)
10.3. PO CHANGE ISSUE - Annex 7: Civilian Simulator Instructor (CSI) Realignment. The
ENJJPT Wing submitted a proposal to swap two T-38 CSI positions for two T-6 CSI positions.
10.4. PO CHANGE ISSUE - Annex 8: The ENJJPT Wing submitted a proposed change to
Annex 8. Current Annex 8 does not include IFF T-1 sorties. Proposed Annex 8 provides a
“baseline” of IFF T-1 student sorties flown by IFF IPs currently used by ENJJPT Management
System to determine IFF IP requirements. The ENJJPT Wing CC does not recommend any
changes to this “baseline” of sorties at this time. (See SC Attachment 14)
8
SC 70 Minutes
11. SYLLABUS CHANGES
11.1. The Syllabus Change Brief was given by 80th Operations Group Commander. (See SC
Attachment 15)
11.2. ENJJPT WING RECOMMENDATION 1: The ENJJPT Wing recommends the reduction
of Simulator to Simulator (Sim to Sim) turn time to 3 hours.
11.3. SC DECISION: The SC deferred it to the PRS for recommendation.
11.4. ENJJPT WING RECOMMENDATION 2: The ENJJPT Wing recommends using the
UTD (Unit Training Device) as an option to offset IFT (Instrument Flight Trainer) deficiencies.
11.5. SC DECISION: The SC deferred it to the PRS for recommendation.
12. ADDITIONAL ITEMS.
12.1. AOB ISSUE #1. US & GE Student Swap: The German AF SNR at ENJJPT will be
moving two German AF students from class 16-07 to class 16-08. The US has agreed. The SC
Chairman has endorsed. All endorsements will be included in the SC 70 minutes book.
12.1.1. SC RESPONSE: The US provided an email to the SC explaining the details of the swap.
12.1.2. SC DECISION: The SC approved during “out of cycle” process.
12.2. AOB ISSUE #3. ENJJPT Financial Update. The US Financial Representative briefed
the SC. (See SC Attachment 17)
12.2.1. RECOMMEDATION: Actions must be taken to prevent failure of the ENJJPT
facilities. The ENJJPT Wing CC explained the ENJJPT Wing will continue to monitor
the aging fleet costs and look for ways to extend fleet life in a cost efficient manner.
12.2.2. SC DECISION: The SC deferred the brief to the FLS for review.
12.3. SC DISCUSSION #4. Romanian Participation Interest. The Chief of the Romanian Air
Force Staff sent a memo to the SC requesting to join the program. (See SC Attachment 18)
12.3.1. SC RESPONSE: The SC accepts their request.
12.3.2. SC DECISION: The SC deferred their request to the FLS and PRS to develop
accession plan. (Ref. 13.12.1. and 14.6.1.)
13. POLICY RECOMMENDATION SUBCOMMITTEE (PRS) REPORT
13.1. OPENING/REVIEW OF AGENDA (See PRS Attachment 1)
13.1.1. PRS DISCUSSION: Col Mundie, PRS Chairman, welcomed members,
introduced himself as the PRS Chairman, and invited the PRS members to introduce
SC 70 Minutes
9
themselves. He also presented Col James Suhr as his replacement. The PRS reviewed
the agenda for SC 70.
13.1.2. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The PRS accepted the agenda as written.
13.2. PRS ROSTER (See PRS Attachment 2)
13.2.1. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS Secretary asked for changes to the PRS roster.
13.2.2. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The PRS Secretary updated the roster.
13.3. SC 69 PRS MINUTES
13.3.1. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS had no changes to SC 69 PRS minutes.
13.3.2. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The PRS approved SC 69 PRS minutes.
13.4. PROPOSED IP EXTENSIONS
13.4.1. DESCRIPTION: Review of proposed IP extensions.
13.4.2. RESPONSE: The PRS did not review proposed IP extensions during SC 70.
13.4.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The SC members approved a PO change giving the ENJJPT
Wing Commander final approval authority for all IP extensions. This item will no longer
be reviewed by the PRS.
13.4.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: None
13.4.5. SC DECISION: SC approved proposed IP extensions and closed AI 69-1.
13.5. REVIEW OF STUDENT CLASS ENTRIES (See PRS Attachment 3).
13.5.1. DESCRIPTION: Review and confirm all nations UPT and IFF student class
entries.
13.5.2. RESPONSE: The ENJJPT Wing presented a list of student entries for FY16 FY20.
13.5.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS Chairman confirmed each nation’s input. Some
changes were made to out years. IT spread out its students to help alleviate class
imbalances as promised at SC69. The US then agreed to reflow some of their students as
well.
13.5.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: SC take note.
13.5.5. SC DISCUSSION: N/A.
10
SC 70 Minutes
13.6. COMPLETION OF PIT and UIP ENTRIES (See PRS Attachment 4).
13.6.1. DESCRIPTION: Post-SC completion of PIT and UIP class entries.
13.6.2. RESPONSE: N/A
13.6.3. PRS DISCUSSION: PIT and UIP entries will be completed at the ENJJPT Wing
after SC 70 adjourns in accordance with the PO.
13.6.5. SC DISCUSSION: N/A
13.7. REVIEW OF ENJJPT PARTICIPATION AFTER STUDENT ENTRIES (See PRS
Attachment 5)
13.7.1. DESCRIPTION: Review of updated participation slides for UPT and IFF.
13.7.2. RESPONSE: The ENJJPT Wing provided updated participation slides to the
PRS.
13.7.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS reviewed updated participation slides for UPT and
IFF, and found the Program short 4 T-38 IPs for FY16. The PRS discussed why this
happened. If the US maximizes the use of US Reserve IPs, the shortfall can be reduced
by approximately 2. In addition, if IT would no longer change 2 T-38 IPs to T-6 IPs, as
asked to do at SC 69, and GE change 1 T-6 IP to a T-38 IP, the T-38 IP manning should
be brought out of deficit. However, both IT and GE would need waivers for FY16 and
FY17 to any possible T-6 IP associated shortfall they may occur due to the changes. The
PRS sent this request to the FLS for input.
13.7.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The SC allows IT and GE to move their T-6 IPs
to T-38s and approves waiving possible associated T-6 FY16 and FY17 shortfall
penalties as a result if SP gets approval for this proposal by 18 Sep 15.
13.7.5. SC DISCUSSION: SP explained their concerns and would prefer a long term
solution. The ENJJPT Wing CC agrees it is long term problem. It allows countries to
participate without sending instructors which could cause a negative effect in the
Program that could not be mitigated. The SC Chairman explains there are two issues: 1)
The short term (IP deficit) and 2) long term solution (waiver process). The ENJJPT
Wing CC explained the origin is part of a clerical error and a pandemic problem that
needs to be solved in the future.
13.7.6. SC DECISION: 1) The FLS will provide SP the financial implications. 2) SP
will staff the financial implications. 3) The long term solution will be addressed in an AI
to the ENJJPT Wing. (AI 70-1)
SC 70 Minutes
11
13.8. CAT I / II / III POSITIONS (See PRS Attachment 6)
13.8.1. DESCRIPTION: Review of CAT I/II/III positions.
13.8.2. RESPONSE: The ENJJPT Wing provided a slide with CAT II and IIA positions
out to 2019.
13.8.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS reviewed each position, making sure nations
programmed to fill positions in FY16 and FY17 could still do so. The PRS also
determined which nations were eligible to fill FY18 and FY19 openings. All FY18
positions were filled, but FY19 positions were not filled at this SC.
13.8.5. SC DISCUSSION: N/A
13.9. REVIEW OF SYLLABUS CHANGES (See PRS Attachment 7)
13.9.1. DESCRIPTION: Review of out of cycle proposed syllabus changes.
13.9.2. RESPONSE: The 80 OG briefed two significant changes to the Apr 2015 T-6
UPT syllabus.
13.9.3. PRS DISCUSSION: GR asked if there would be any restrictions on use of the
UTD. The 80 OG explained their intent to only use the UTD if the other devices were
not available. PRS asked for wording to state that intent, and then approved the proposed
changes.
13.9.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The SC approve changes
13.9.5. SC DISCUSSION: N/A.
13.9.6. SC DECISION: SC approved.
13.10. PLAN OF OPERATION (PO) CHANGES (See SC Attachment 11)
13.10.1. The PRS understand that PO 17th Edition, Change 3 is the current PO.
13.10.2. Section 7.
13.10.2.1. DESCRIPTION: US proposed changes to Section 7.
13.10.2.2. RESPONSE: The PRS reviewed the proposed changes to Section 7.
13.10.2.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS discussed the proposed changes and
agreed with them.
12
SC 70 Minutes
13.10.2.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The SC approves the proposed PO
changes to Section 7 of the PO, 18th Edition.
13.10.2.5. SC DISCUSSION: N/A.
13.10.2.6. SC DECISION: The SC awaits the FLS Out-brief. (Ref. 14.5.1. for
SC decision.)
13.10.3. Annex 7.
13.10.3.1. DESCRIPTION: The Wing proposed changing two CSI positions
from T-38 to T-6.
13.10.3.2. RESPONSE: The PRS reviewed the proposed change to Annex 7.
13.10.3.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS discussed the proposed change and
agreed with it.
13.10.3.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The SC approves the proposed
changes to Annex 7 of the PO, 18th Edition.
SC decision.)
13.10.4. Annex 8.
13.10.4.1. DESCRIPTION: The Wing proposed adding the IFF IP student sortie
requirements to Annex 8.
13.10.4.2. RESPONSE: The PRS reviewed the proposed changes to Annex 8.
13.10.4.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS reviewed the proposed changes and
agreed they should be added to the annex.
13.10.4.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The SC approves the proposed
changes to Annex 8 of the PO, 18th Edition.
SC decision.)
13.11. FACILITY PROJECTS
13.11.1. FY16 Wing Commander Projects. (See SC Attachment 7, Slide 30)
13.11.1.1. DESCRIPTION: The Wing Commander proposed facility projects
for 2016.
SC 70 Minutes
13
13.11.1.2. RESPONSE: The PRS reviewed the ENJJPT Wing Commander’s list
of six facility projects.
13.11.1.3. DISCUSSION: The PRS discussed each of the six projects on the
ENJJPT Wing’s list and agreed each was an operational requirement. GE asked
if the projects were prioritized. The Wing Commander said they were.
13.11.1.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The SC approves the facility projects
provided by the ENJJPT Wing Commander.
SC decision.)
13.11.2. Student dorm renovation. (See SC Attachment 7, Slide 40)
13.11.2.1. DESCRIPTION: Renovation of the ENJJPT student dorm.
13.11.2.2. RESPONSE: The PRS discussed the student dorm renovation.
13.11.2.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS discussed the student dorm renovation
update and reconfirmed that it is still an operational requirement.
13.11.2.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The SC approves student dorm
renovation.
SC decision.)
13.11.3. Taxiway shoulder repair. (See SC Attachment 7, Slide 28)
13.11.3.1. DESCRIPTION: Repair of the taxiway shoulders.
13.11.3.2. RESPONSE: The PRS discussed the repair.
13.11.3.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS discussed and reconfirmed the taxiway
repair update and that it is an operational requirement.
13.11.3.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The SC approves the taxiway shoulder
repair.
13.11.3.5. SC DISCUSION: N/A.
SC decision.)
14
SC 70 Minutes
13.11.4. T-6 runway and taxiway surface repair/ addition. (See SC Attachment 7,
Slides 31-33)
13.11.4.1. DESCRIPTION: Repair of the T-6 runway and taxiways surfaces.
13.11.4.2. RESPONSE: The PRS discussed the repair.
13.11.4.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS discussed the repair and felt it needed
more information before deciding if it is an operational requirement to repair all
parts shown in the project. The PRS asked the ENJJPT Wing to provide
information on breaking up the project by color (i.e. severity). The ENJJPT
Wing provided the information to the PRS.
13.11.4.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: SC approve the project based on
updated estimates.
13.11.4.5. SC DISCUSION: N/A.
SC decision.)
13.12. STEERING COMMITTEE DIRECTED ITEMS
13.12.1. Romania’s request to join ENJJPT.
13.12.1.1. DESCRIPTION: The SC directed the PRS to discuss Romania
request to join ENJJPT and recommend a plan.
13.12.1.2. RESPONSE: The PRS discussed Romania’s request.
13.12.1.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS decided the PRS Chairman could
prepare the MOU amendment 7 change (only change is the addition of Romania
to the signature page) and distribute it with adequate time for national staffing
prior to SC 71. The ENJJPT patch would not change until the signatures to MOU
were received at SC 71.
13.12.1.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The PRS recommends the SC appoint
the PRS Chairman as the single point of contact (POC) for Romania and send a
letter to them welcoming them to ENJJPT, inviting them to attend SC 71, and
introducing them to the POC.
13.12.1.6. SC DECISION: The SC Chairman will respond to Romania’s request
to join and nominates the PRS Chairman as the single point of contact.
13.12.2. Action Item 69-2 non-fighter pilots in T-38s.
13.12.2.1. DESCRIPTION: The SC directed the PRS to discuss AI 69-2.
SC 70 Minutes
15
13.12.2.2. RESPONSE: The PRS discussed how to deal with non-fighter IPs in
T-38s.
13.12.2.3. PRS DISCUSSION: Discussions centered on what can be done to
mitigate the problem, how to best provide feedback to the US and the meaning of
AI 69-2 part two regarding strategy for the T-X. The US discussed its fighter
pilot shortage and how long it could last. The PRS agreed to a tracked syllabus
like that used for T-6 PIT would be needed for T-38 PIT. NO suggested that
each nation’s Minister of Defense contact the US Secretary of Defense and
communicate that nation’s concern. The Chairman also suggested each nation’s
Chief of Staff contact the USAF Chief of Staff to communicate their concern.
The PRS agreed this might be helpful and also agreed the minutes should reflect
the following:
“Section 4 of the ENJJPT PO states that experienced pilots with a fighter
background should be selected for T-38 instructor duty. It further states that a
pilot that does not have a fighter background may only be selected by exception.
It has come to the attention of the ENJJPT Steering Committee that some nations
will be unable to provide fighter background instructors to fill their T-38
instructor pilot requirement and the trend is forecasted to continue for some time.
This departure from the intent of the program is concerning to the partners. The
lack of experienced fighter pilot role models detracts from our primary goal of
producing pilots to succeed in fighter aviation. It is the request of this body to
stress upon all partners the need to prioritize manning ENJJPT with experienced
fighter pilots as soon as possible. The culture and warrior spirit cultivated by
experienced combat fighter pilots is considered a critical element in growing the
next generation of fighter pilots for the NATO alliance”.
The PRS did not fully understand the intent of AI 69-2 part two, but the US
agreed to discuss T-X strategy during the next T-X briefing at SC 71.
13.12.2.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: 1) The SC task the Wing to make
changes to the T-38 PIT syllabus incorporating tracks. 2) The SC endorse the
statement documented in the PRS minutes. 3) The SC task the US to provide its
strategy for the T-X at SC71 and close AI 69-2 and open a new AI.
13.12.2.5. SC DISCUSSION:
TASK 1: The SC Chairman clarifies the PO statement is added to the PRS
minutes, but has not been nationally staffed by each nation. The SC Chairman
recommends each nation discuss the issue within their respective ministries and
send a letter to their Air Chiefs making them aware of the challenges.
TASK 2: The T-X Strategy Update will be provided at SC 71 as the information
becomes available. (AI 70-2)
13.12.2.6. SC DECISION: The SC took note.
16
SC 70 Minutes
13.12.3. Action Item 69-7 ENJJPT Wing BIT proposal.
13.12.3.1. DESCRIPTION: At SC 69, the SC tasked the ENJJPT Wing to work
with SNRs to develop a BIT proposal.
13.12.3.2. RESPONSE: The Wing provided their proposed language during the
Wing Commander’s briefing. (See SC Attachment xx, Slide 39)
13.12.3.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS discussed the proposed language and
found it acceptable.
13.12.3.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The SC approve the Wing’s BIT
proposal language and have it incorporated into Section 3.5 of the PO 18th
edition.
13.12.3.5. SC DISCUSSION: N/A
13.12.3.6. SC DECISION: SC approves.
13.12.4. ENJJPT T-3 Program Funded Cross Countries.
13.12.4.1. DESCRIPTION: During the ENJJPT Wing CC briefing, the Wing
CC asked for guidance on the maximum number of Program funded T-3 cross
countries and provided the SC with two possible options.
13.12.4.2. RESPONSE: The PRS discussed the ENJJPT Wing CC’s options.
13.12.4.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS discussed both options and felt
allowing the Wing CC to define the number would give the most flexibility to the
program.
13.12.4.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The SC approve the ENJJPT Wing CC
setting the number and change the PO 18th edition as required.
SC decision.)
13.13. OTHER BUSINESS
13.13.1. Programmed Flying Training (PFT) shift.
13.13.1.1. PRS DESCRIPTION: Shift the UPT PFT for holiday break.
13.13.1.2. RESPONSE: The 80 OG briefed the PRS on a recommended UPT
PFT shift.
13.13.1.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS discussed the ramifications of a PFT
shift and felt it needed to be looked at for IFF as well as UPT. IT pointed out it
SC 70 Minutes
17
could change student commitments and needs to be looked at by every nation.
The PRS asked the 80 OG to give the briefing to the FLS as well.
13.13.1.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: The SC task the ENJJPT Wing to
include IFF as well as UPT and ensure the proposal is sent to the nations in time
for national staffing prior to SC 71.
13.13.1.6. SC DECISION: The SC issued AI 70-3.
13.13.2. Change to Draft PO, 18th Edition
13.13.2.1. DESCRIPTION: FLS changes to Draft PO, 18th Edition.
13.13.2.2. RESPONSE: FLS briefed all new changes to draft PO 18th Edition
prior to national re-approval.
13.13.2.3. PRS DISCUSSION: The PRS approved/modified all requested
changes.
13.13.2.4. PRS RECOMMENDATION: SC approve changes and re-staff.
13.13.2.6. SC DECISION: The SC awaits the FLS Out-brief. (Ref. 14.5.1.3. for
SC decision.)
13.14. SC 70 PRS MINUTES APPROVAL. The PRS reviewed and approved SC 70 PRS draft
minutes.
13.15. CLOSING COMMENTS/ADJOURN. The PRS Chairman thanked all members for
their hard work and wished them the best in the future, as this was his last SC meeting.
14. FINANCIAL LEGAL SUBCOMMITTEE (FLS)
14.1. OPENING / ADMINISTRATIVE REMARKS
14.1.1. FLS CHAIRMAN INSTRODUCTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS: LTC Kenneth
Øvland, FLS Chairman, welcomed everyone to the FLS Meeting being held at Bruges,
Belgium and provided administrative remarks regarding the week’s activities. Nations
attending were BE, CA, DE, GE, GR, IT, NL, NO, SP, TU, UK, AND US. PO was not
in attendance for FLS. The attendee roster is attached (See FLS Attachment 1).
14.2. AGENDA APPROVAL
14.2.1. The FLS reviewed, modified and approved the updated agenda. The updated
agenda is attached (See FLS Attachment 2).
14.3. FY14 DRAFT FINAL STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT
18
SC 70 Minutes
14.3.1. DESCRIPTION: Taxiway Shoulder Repair and Manning Audit
14.3.1.1. FLS RESPONSE: ENJJPT Financial Manager (FM) stated Manning
Audit was finalized with an increased cost of $164.4K. ENJJPT Financial
Manager also identified Taxiway Shoulder repair was not included in FY14
budget, however, it was discussed during SC67 to be included in Wing CC Fund.
14.3.1.2. FLS DISCUSSION: IT requested taxi runway remain under Wing CC
project fund. IT also identified/requested validation of T-6 ATD/DAS actual
expense. ENJJPT FM was tasked to contact T-6 program manager for actual T-6
validation. FY14 FSA will remain in open until out-of-cycle approval. ENJJPT
FM will confirm receipt of new draft budget with all partner nations.
14.3.1.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: SC take note
14.3.1.5. SC DECISION: SC took note.
14.4. FY15 EOY BUDGET
14.4.1. DESCRIPTION: Paint Barn Project Increase and T-6 CFIS Validation.
14.4.1.1. FLS RESPONSE: ENJJPT FM briefed Paint Barn increase and will
validate T-6 CFIS cost.
14.4.1.2. FLS DISCUSSION: FLS agrees upon the necessity for out-of-cycle
approval of the revised budget. In addition, FLS requested confirmation of
receipt of new revised draft budget. One nation stated that the facility should not
be considered a safety/health project as was identified and presented by US
Financial Manager. The MOU states in paragraph 3-4b that this provision is only
for Modification of Assets. (See SC Attachment 7, Slide 29 and SC Attachment
9, Slide 3)
14.4.1.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: SC Take note
14.4.1.4 SC DISCUSSION: N/A
14.4.2 DESCRIPTION: FY15 EOY T-38 CLS Contract Increase
14.4.2.1 FLS RESPONSE: N/A.
14.4.2.2 FLS DISCUSSION: T-38 CLS contract increased by $758.8K, see T38 Brief presented at SC70. ENJJPT FM will adjust EOY budget for review by
nations. (See SC Attachment 10, Slide 17)
SC 70 Minutes
19
14.5. PROPOSED LEGAL/FINANCIAL PO CHANGES (See FLS Attachment 3)
14.5.1. DESCRIPTION: SC tasked FLS to review PO Section 7 changes to draft PO
Edition 18, in light of the publication of PO 17TH Edition Change 3.
14.5.1.1. FLS RESPONSE: As noted by one nation, additional changes were
needed to PO Edition 18, in order to align with MOU Amendment 6.
14.5.1.2. FLS DISCUSSION: After a full review by the FLS the proposal
referred by the SC to the FLS regarding Para 7.14 was endorsed; the proposals
concerning Para 7.19 and Para 7.39 were endorsed as revised; proposal
concerning Para 7.40.1 was not endorsed as it was inconsistent with the wording
of Section 8 of MOU Amendment 6. The additional proposals noted by one
nation were also reviewed and endorsed by the FLS. (See FLS attachment 3)
14.5.1.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: FLS recommends that the revised draft
of PO 18TH Edition be submitted to the nations for staffing IAW MOU Section 7,
PO Section 8.
14.5.1.5. SC DECISION: The SC created AI 70-4 to submit the PO, 18th Edition
to the nations for staffing IAW MOU Section 7, PO Section 8. The PO, 18th
Edition will be submitted to nation for national staffing by 1 October 2015.
Staffing is to be completed by 1 January 2016.
14.5.2. DESCRIPTION: Annex 7 Review
14.5.2.1. FLS RESPONSE: No financial impact
14.5.2.2. FLS DISCUSSION: N/A
14.5.2.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: FLS recommends that the new Annex 7
be included in the revised draft of PO Edition 18 and submitted to the nations for
staffing IAW MOU Section 7, PO Section 8.
14.5.3. DESCRIPTION: Annex 8 Review
20
SC 70 Minutes
14.5.3.1. FLS RESPONSE: No financial impact
14.5.3.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: FLS recommends that the new Annex 8
be included in the revised draft of PO Edition 18 be submitted to the nations for
staffing IAW MOU Section 7, PO Section 8.
14.6. SC DIRECTED ITEMS
14.6.1. DESCRIPTION: Legal and/or financial impact of Romania accession
14.6.1.1. FLS RESPONSE: The FLS agrees that IAW Section 13 Sub-section 1
of the MOU the Romanian accession will require a new amendment to the
ENJJPT MOU. The FLS recommends that Amendment 7 only address the
Romanian accession and no other changes. If the SC agrees, the US has agreed
to provide a draft amendment to the FLS/SC pursuant to the procedures set forth
in SCD 69-1. No financial impact after accession of Romania until student/IP
participation.
14.6.1.2. FLS DISCUSSION: N/A.
14.6.1.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: SC take note and request US to initiate
the amendment process pursuant to SCD 69-1.
14.6.1.5. SC DECISION: The SC took note and issued AI 70-5 for the SC
Secretary to initiate the MOU amendment process to add Romania pursuant to
SCD 69-1.
14.6.2. DESCRIPTION: MOU Amendment 6
14.6.2.1. FLS RESPONSE: US will receive 13 copies of final signature page
and will collate and distribute complete package to all ENJJPT nations. It will be
an out of cycle process and it will be in effect as soon as final signature page is
received.
14.6.2.2. FLS DISCUSSION:
14.6.2.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: SC take note.
SC 70 Minutes
21
14.6.3. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 69-3
14.6.3.1. FLS RESPONSE: FLS reviewed Paint Barn inclusion to FY15.
14.6.3.2. FLS DISCUSSION: FLS identified waiver is required to exceed $2M
Wing CC fund threshold.
14.6.3.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: SC approve waiver.
14.6.3.5. SC DECISION: The SC approved the waiver.
14.6.4. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 69-8 Review of Dorm Room Renovation estimate
breakdown update. (See SC Attachment 7, Slide 40)
14.6.4.1. FLS RESPONSE: FLS has received the estimate breakdown.
14.6.4.2. FLS DISCUSSION: No further action can be determined before
receiving the timeline. (Ref Action Item 69-9, 14.6.5.)
14.6.5. DESCRIPTION: Action Item 69-9 ENJJPT Dorm Room Renovation Timeline
14.6.5.1. FLS RESPONSE: FLS has not received timeline.
14.6.5.4. SC DISCUSSION: The US Financial Representative explained the
timeline will be provided when US has a better understanding of how much it can
commit to the project and when those funds will become available. CA proposes
the US provide a recommended timeline that synchronizes fleet modification and
facilities, sustainment, restoration and modernization (FSRM) and/or O&M cost.
14.6.5.5. SC DECISION: The SC tasked the US to synchronize fleet
modification and facilities, sustainment, restoration and modernization (FSRM)
and/or O&M cost. The SC created AI 70-6 (Synchronization Timeline).
22
SC 70 Minutes
14.6.6. DESCRIPTION: FY16 Wing CC Projects Update. Projects include: Replace
Cooling Tower; Replace Select Sealant and Repair Spalls Runway 15R/33L; Eliminate
Fire Safety Deficiencies Hangars; and Repair Electrical Distribution Hangar. Cost total
$2M. (See SC Attachment 7, Slide 30)
14.6.6.1. FLS RESPONSE: N/A.
14.6.6.2. FLS DISCUSSION: FLS took note and identified the need for SC
approval to exceed $200K for each requested item.
14.6.6.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: SC approve.
14.6.6.5. SC DECISION: The SC approved.
14.6.7. DESCRIPTION: FY17 T-6 Runway/Taxiway Surfaces Repair Addition Project.
14.6.7.2. FLS DISCUSSION: FLS unable to resolve this issue until further
information is received concerning the definition between MILCON and
Facilities, Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (O&M).
14.6.7.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: SC to task US to provide clear
definitions and references of MILCON and Facilities, Sustainment, Restoration
and Modernization (O&M) prior to Pre-FLS meeting in January 2016.
14.6.7.5. SC DECISION: SC tasked US to provide clear definitions and
references of MILCON and Facilities, Sustainment, Restoration and
Modernization (O&M) prior to Pre-FLS meeting in January 2016. (AI 70-7)
14.6.8. DESCRIPTION: BIT Proposal.
14.6.8.2. FLS DISCUSSION: BIT is charged to the user IAW hours flown and
therefore a national cost.
14.6.8.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: SC to task ENJJPT Wing to implement
BIT proposal as presented into draft PO 18TH Edition.
14.6.8.5. SC DECISION: The SC tasked ENJJPT Wing to implement BIT
proposal as presented into draft PO 18TH Edition. (AI 70-8)
14.6.9. DESCRIPTION: T-3 Cross Country TDYs.
SC 70 Minutes
23
14.6.9.2. FLS DISCUSSION: FLS identified need for PO change.
14.6.9.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: SC approve ENJJPT Wing
Recommendation 2. SC tasked the ENJJPT Wing to add the following language
to draft of PO Edition 18, Section 7.20.1.2, “provided that the Wing CC does not
exceed approved TDY budget line for given FY.” (See FLS Attachment 3)
14.6.9.5. SC DECISION: SC approved.
14.6.10. DESCRIPTION: T-38 Programs Briefing
14.6.10.2. FLS DISCUSSION: FLS noted a financial concern in FY19 and
FY20. CLS cost increase was covered in Item 4.2.
14.6.10.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: SC task US to research the possibility
of spreading the Avionics Component Integrations (AvCI) costs more evenly
across the program years than presented in briefing.
14.6.10.5. SC DECISION: SC tasked the US to research the possibility of
spreading AvCI costs more evenly across the program years. (AI 70-9)
14.6.11. DESCRIPTION: ENJJPT Financial Update.
14.6.11.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: SC task US to provide details on aging
fleet cost and provide details as referenced in Item 6.7.
14.6.11.5. SC DECISION: SC tasked the US to provide details on aging fleet
cost and provide details as referenced in Item 6.7. (AI 70-10)
14.7. OTHER BUSINESS
14.7.1. DESCRIPTION: FLS draft agenda for the upcoming Pre-FLS Meeting in
January 2016.
24
SC 70 Minutes
14.7.2. DESCRIPTION: Timeliness of meeting related documents and briefings
14.7.2.1. FLS RESPONSE: N/A
14.7.2.2. FLS DISCUSSION: The effectiveness of the FLS to make
recommendations at meetings is impacted by the late receipt of documents and
briefings.
14.7.2.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: SC task all presenters to provide
documents and briefings, notwithstanding those leading to a PO change, no later
than 30 days prior to Pre-FLS and SC Meetings.
14.7.2.4. SC DISCUSSION: The SC Chairman inquired if the 30 day deadline
was a realistic goal for the ENJJPT WING and the Aircraft Briefings. The
ENJJPT Wing CC thinks it will limit his ability to provide current information.
The T-6 Briefer commented it was not realistic.
14.7.2.5. SC DECISION: The SC task all presenters to provide draft documents
and briefings, notwithstanding those leading to a PO change, no later than 30
days prior to Pre-FLS and SC Meetings.
14.7.3. DESCRIPTION: Action Item T-38 IP Shortfall
14.7.3.2. FLS DISCUSSION: The FLS understands the PRS reviewed updated
participation slides for UPT and IFF, and the PRS found the Program short 4 T38 IPs for FY16 due to data input mistake. The FLS understands if the US
maximizes the use of US Reserve IPs, the shortfall can be reduced by
approximately 2. In addition, if IT would no longer change 2 T-38 IPs to T-6
IPs, as asked to do at SC 69, and GE change 1 T-6 IP to a T-38 IP, the T-38 IP
manning should be brought out of deficit. However, both IT and GE would need
waivers for FY16 and FY17 to any possible T-6 IP associated shortfall they may
occur due to the changes. Based on the discussion above, FLS determined that
no negative financial implications for IT or GE exist. FLS requested ENJJPT
FM to provide estimated budget to determine financial implications for other
nations.
SC 70 Minutes
25
14.7.3.4. SC DISCUSSION: SP Proposal #1 (Right to Vote): The FLS
commented that from a legal perspective in this specific case SP has a right to
vote as a non-student sending nation. IT needs confirmation they will not be
penalized for sending IPs from T-6 to T-38 track by 18 September 2015. The
financial impact on moving IPs was briefed. It was determined that staffing by
nations would require more time than the constraints listed.
SP Proposal # 2: (IP Cost Mitigation) Additionally, SP announced to forward a
proposal that would regard ways to mitigate the cost and impact associated with
the movement of IPs.
14.7.3.5. SC DECISION: Proposal 1: The SC decided SP has the right to vote
on the proposed waiver. The SC however denied the waiver which resulted in IT
withdrawing their proposal to transfer IPs.
Proposal 2: SC created AI 70-11.
14.8. REVIEW OF FLS MINUTES
14.9. NEXT PRE-FLS MEETING
14.9.1. DESCRIPTION: Location for next Pre-FLS meeting.
14.9.1.2. FLS DISCUSSION: The Pre-FLS meeting will be hosted by
US at Randolph AFB (San Antonio, TX).
14.10. CLOSING COMMENTS AND ADJOURNMENT.
14.10.1. DESCRIPTION: The FLS Chairman presented closing remarks.
14.10.1.2. FLS DISCUSSION: The FLS Chairman thanked Belgium for
hosting the meeting and providing outstanding hospitality. The meeting
was adjourned.
14.10.1.3. FLS RECOMMENDATION: N/A.
26
SC 70 Minutes
15. OTHER BUSINESS
15.1. DESCRIPTION: Approval of ENJJPT Plan of Operations, 18th Edition. (postponed)
15.2. DESCRIPTION: SP request if a nation decides to add students out of cycle the nation
should be allowed to do it as long as the Program can accept it. If a conflict exists between
nations/capacity, that nation who complies with IP requirements will have the priority. This is
attached to condition based waivers.
15.2.1. SC RESPONSE: N/A
15.2.2. SC DECISION: SC tasked the FLS to assess the SP proposal in their pre-meeting
and present the result of the assessment during SC 71. (AI 70-11)
16. NEXT STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING. SC 71 will be at Sheppard AFB, Texas. Dates are
7-11 March 2016.
17. REVIEW OF MINUTES. The SC reviewed the SC 70 Minutes.
18. AWARDS/RECOGNITION OF OUTGOING MEMBERS/CLOSING REMARKS
18.1. The SC Chairman presented a farewell plaque to the outgoing NL SC representative.
18.2. The SC Chairman thanked Belgium for hosting SC 70 and closed the meeting.
19. SC 70 ACTION ITEMS
19.1. Action Item 62-1: T-X Acquisition Plan. SC requested to be updated on the T-X
Acquisition Plan annually. US will brief update at SC 71. (Ref. SC 62 Minutes 5.1.-5.1.4.)
(OPR: US)
19.2 Action Item 70-1: Programmed IP Shortfall Long Term Solution. The SC tasked the
ENJJPT Wing to propose a long term solution to programmed IP shortfalls. (Ref. 13.7.) (OPR:
ENJJPT Wing)
19.3. Action Item 70-2: T-X Future Training Strategy. The SC tasked the US to present the
strategy for future T-X training. (Ref. 13.12.2.2.) (OPR: US)
19.4. Action Item 70-3: Programmed Flying Training (PFT) shift. The SC task the ENJJPT
Wing to include IFF as well as UPT in the proposed PFT shift and ensure the proposal is sent to
the nations in time for national staffing prior to SC 71. (Ref. 13.13.1.4.) (OPR: ENJJPT Wing)
19.5. Action Item 70-4: PO, 18th Edition. The SC tasked the SC Secretary to submit the revised
draft of PO, 18TH Edition to the nations for staffing IAW MOU Section 7, PO Section 8. (Ref.
14.5.1.-14.5.3.) (OPR: SC Secretary)
19.6. Action Item 70-5: MOU Amendment 7 Initiation (Romania Accession). The SC tasked
the SC Secretary to initiate the MOU amendment process to add Romania pursuant to SCD 69-1.
(Ref. 14.6.1.) (OPR: SC Secretary)
SC 70 Minutes
27
19.7. Action Item 70-6: ENJJPT Funding Synchronization Timeline. The SC tasked the US
to provide a recommended timeline that synchronizes fleet modification and facility sustainment,
restoration and modernization (FSRM) and/or O&M costs. (Ref. 14.6.5.) (OPR: US)
19.8. Action Item 70-7: MILCON/FSRM Definitions. The SC tasked the US to provide clear
definitions and references of MILCON and Facilities, Sustainment, Reutilization and
Modernization (FSRM) prior to Pre-FLS meeting in January 2016. (Ref. 14.6.7.) (OPR: US)
19.9. Action Item 70-8: BIT Proposal. The SC tasked the ENJJPT Wing to add the BIT
proposal into draft PO 18th Edition. (Ref. 14.6.8.) (OPR: ENJJPT Wing)
19.10. Action Item 70-9: Avionics Component Integration (AvCI). SC tasked the US to
research the possibility of spreading AvCI costs more evenly across the program years. (Ref.
14.6.10.) (OPR: US)
19.11. Action Item 70-10: Aging Fleet Cost Details. SC tasked the US to provide details on
aging fleet cost and provide details as referenced in Item 6.7. (Ref. 14.6.11) (OPR: US)
19.12. Action Item 70-11: Student Entry Priority. SP requests if a nation decides to add
students out of cycle should the nation be allowed to do it as long as the Program can accept it. If
a conflict exists between nations/capacity, that nation who complies with IP requirements will
have the priority. This is attached to condition based waivers. SC tasked the FLS to assess the
SP proposal in their pre-meeting and present the result of the assessment during SC 71. (Ref.
15.2.2.) (OPR: FLS)
28
SC 70 Minutes
ENJJPT STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING 70 PARTICIPANTS
CHAIRMAN:
Brig Gen Guenter Katz
ENJJPT WING COMMANDER
Col Gregory Keeton
BELGIUM
Col Frederic Givron (SC)
Maj Fons Goethals (FLS)
Maj Benny Vos (PRS)
Lt Col Jan Vandenberghe (SNR/PRS)
CANADA:
Col Denis O’Reilly (SC)
Major Matt Maurice (SNR)
Mrs. Patricia Van Schie (FLS)
DENMARK:
Lt Col Leif Giebel (SC)
Maj Kresten D. Andersen (PRS)
Capt Peter Beck-Ramussen (FLS)
Lt Col Nick K. Hansen (SNR)
GERMANY:
Col Eberhard Wintzingerode-Knorr (SC)
Lt Col Thomas Hullena (PRS)
Lt Col Andreas Seeboerger (FLS)
Mr Michael Lückenbach (FLS)
Ms. Gabriele Bergmann (FLS)
Mr. Marc Luis (FLS)
GREECE:
Col Petros Doulaptsis (SC/PRS)
Capt Panagiotis Theotis (FLS)
ITALY:
Col Roger Vai (SC)
Lt Col Roberto Stimolo (PRS)
Maj Michele Palombella (FLS)
Lt Col Massimo Mancini (FLS)
Lt Col Andrea Tollis (FLS)
THE NETHERLANDS
Col Ruud Schoonderwoerd (SC/FLS)
Lt Col Rien Keij (PRS)
Lt Col Leo van Bruggen (PRS/SNR)
Maj Bart Eissing (FLS)
NORWAY:
Lt Col Christian Waldermo (SC)
Maj Kjetil Braendshoi (PRS)
Lt Col Kenneth Ovland (FLS)
Ms Lene Graham (FLS)
Lt Col Lars Roine (SNR)
PORTUGAL:
Major Jose Oliveira (SC/PRS)
SPAIN:
Maj Jose Fernandez Espejo (SC/PRS)
Lt Col Lucas Pita (FLS)
TURKEY:
Major Erdinc Simsek (SC/PRS)
Capt Omer Saglam (FLS)
Capt M. Kubilay Kartal (OBS)
UNITED KINGDOM:
Gp Capt Eugene Moriarty (SC/PRS)
Squadron Leader Mike Saunders (FLS)
UNITED STATES:
Col Robert Mundie (SC/PRS Chairman)
Col James Suhr (OBS)
Col James Abatti (PRS)
Lt Col David Toogood (US SNR/PRS)
Mr. Larry Bakel (OBS/ENJJPT FM)
Mr. Keith Anderson (FLS)
Mr. Bryan Knoll (PRS Secretary/T-6)
Mr Rick Jellison (AFSAT/FM)
Ms. Sandra Myers (AFSAT/FM)
Ms. Yolanda Patterson (FLS)
Mr. Ryan Bruce (T-38)
Mr. Patrick Frye (T-6)
ENJJPT WING:
Mr. Paolo Baldasso (80th OG Commander)
Mr. Joe Spann (80 FTW/EP)
Mr. Shannon Brown (80 FTW/EPA)
Ms. Carmita Cooke (SC Secretary)
Major Michael Creedon
SC Attachment 1
29
ENJJPT
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training Program
STEERING COMMITTEE
NUMBER 70
Bruges, Belgium
7 – 11 September 2015
AGENDA
ITEM
SUBJECT
1
EXECUTIVE SESSION
2
WELCOME / OPENING REMARKS/INTRODUCTIONS
3
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
4
SC 70 AGENDA APPROVAL
5
SC 69 MINUTES APPROVAL
6
SC 69 ACTION ITEMS REVIEW
7
MOU AMENDMENT 6 SIGNATURE PAGE EXCHANGE
8
ENJJPT WING COMMANDER PROGRAM STATUS
9
AIRCRAFT PROGRAM BRIEFINGS
10
PLAN OF OPERATION CHANGES
a.
Section 7 Changes
b.
CSI Realignment
c.
Revised Annex 8
11
SYLLABUS CHANGES
12
ADDITIONAL ITEMS
a.
US & GE Student Swap
b.
FY13 FSA Approval and ESUP Calculation
c.
ENJJPT Financial Update
d.
Romania Participation Interest
13
POLICY RECOMMENDATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
14
FINANCIAL / LEGAL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
15
OTHER BUSINESS
a.
Approval of ENJJPT Plan of Operation, 18th Edition
16
NEXT STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
17
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES
18
AWARD PRESENTATION/ CLOSING REMARKS / ADJOURN
30
SC Attachment 2
This conformed copy of the ENJJPT MOU is a consolidation of the original MOU as modified by
amendments 1-6. This is an unofficial working copy included in the PO as required by the MOU
and is provided for ease of review.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
(MOU)
between
Minister of National Defence of the
Kingdom of Belgium
Minister of Defence of the Kingdom
of Norway
Minister of National Defence of
Canada
Minister of Defence of Portugal
of Denmark
of Spain
Federal Minister of Defence of the
Federal Republic of Germany
Turkish General Staff of the Republic
of Turkey
Minister of Defence of the Hellenic
Republic
Secretary of State for Defence of the
United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Northern Ireland
Minister of Defence of the Republic
of Italy
Secretary of Defense of the United
States of America
of The Netherlands
Concerning
The EURO-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training (ENJJPT) Program.
PREAMBLE
The signatories (hereinafter referred to as the “Users”), in response to the 17 May 1978 decision of
the EURO Group Defence Ministers, acting in the spirit of the North Atlantic Treaty, undertake to
participate in a cooperative training program for jet pilots known as the EURO-NATO Joint Jet Pilot
Training Program (the “Program”) pursuant to the following provisions.
SECTION 1
PURPOSE, HOST AND STATUS OF FORCES
1. The purpose of the Program is the training of jet pilots for assignment to fighter/fighter-type
aircraft of the armed forces of the Users in furtherance of NATO rationalization
15-1
SC Attachment 3
31
and standardization through mutual cooperation.
2. For the purposes of this MOU, the United States Air Force is the Host.
3. The Agreement Between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty Regarding the Status of Their
Forces, dated 19 June 1951, (NATO SOFA) applies between the Users to activities under this MOU.
SECTION 2
PROGRAM
1. The Program is to be located at Sheppard Air Force Base (AFB), Texas, in the United States
(the “Host base”).
2. The Program encompasses the following modules: Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT), Pilot
Instructor Training (PIT), Upgrade Instructor Pilot (UIP), and Introduction to Fighter Fundamentals (IFF)
all of which may be subdivided in distinguishable phases:. A detailed description of the Program and its
modules will be included in a Plan of Operation (PO) referred to in Section 7 below.
SECTION 3
FACILITIES, ASSETS AND EQUIPMENT
1. In accordance with Section 5, paragraph 2, the Users will determine jointly the facilities, assets
and equipment, including any modifications, additions or extensions thereto, which will be required for the
efficient and economic functioning of the Program, and the identity of the User which will provide
particular facilities, assets and equipment. The term “assets” as used herein is defined as aircraft,
instrument trainers, and related support equipment.
2. The German assets currently located at Sheppard AFB will be provided for
the Program pursuant to an agreement between the Host and German User.
3. The Host will provide facilities at Sheppard AFB, as well as assets and equipment not provided
by other Users that are required for the Program.
4.
a. Assets required for the Program will be modified to the USAF approved standard
15-2
32
SC Attachment 3
configuration prior to being used in the Program. These modifications, if any, will be paid for by the User
owning the assets.
b. Subsequent modifications of assets that are for Safety of Flight, Mission Essential or
Logistics Essential, as defined in the PO, may be accomplished without prior approval of the ENJJPT
Steering Committee (ENJJPTSC). Other subsequent modifications of assets will require ENJJPTSC
approval prior to accomplishment in accordance with Section 5, paragraph 2, below. The subsequent
modifications of assets will be charged to the Program in accordance with Section 8, paragraph 2. Each
modification decision by the ENJJPTSC will be documented in detail and attached to the ENJJPTSC
minutes.
5. All aircraft used in the Program will bear USAF markings while in United States territory or
United States air space.
6.
a. The Host will operate, maintain and support all the above-mentioned facilities, assets
and equipment.
b. The Host will maintain records on all assets and equipment in accordance with USAF
systems and procedures.
SECTION 4
PERSONNEL
1. The Users will determine annually the number of students to be trained within the capacity of
the ENJJPT Wing.
2. The ENJJPT Wing, in accordance with Host regulations, will determine the number of Host
support personnel required for ENJJPT. All cost-shared support personnel positions have to be approved
by the ENJJPTSC.
3. National allocation of wing instructor personnel will be determined jointly by the Users
based on the principle that each User will provide by fiscal year wing instructor personnel for UPT in
proportion to its UPT students and for IFF in proportion to its IFF students. When a
15-3
SC Attachment 3
33
User is unable to provide its proportionate share of IPs, a “shortfall” is created. The shortfall can be met by
IPs from an “Excess IP Pool”. Details for the management of the Excess IP Pool will be outlined in the
PO. Bilateral IP exchange arrangements impacting ENJJPT have to be approved by the ENJJPTSC on a
case-by-case basis.
4. There will be an ENJJPT Wing Commander, provided by the Host, who will be responsible to
HQ AETC and will report to the ENJJPTSC. All other ENJJPT instructor personnel positions will be
manned as provided in the PO. The Host will provide all other personnel, except as determined by the
Users.
5. Each User may designate a Senior National Representative (SNR) to the Program. The SNR
will serve as the link between the Wing Commander and the SNR’s national authorities and as a link
between the Wing Commander and the respective nation’s personnel located at the ENJJPT Wing. After
prior consultation with the Host, the SNR may serve in a liaison capacity on matters other than ENJJPT
provided the associated costs are borne solely by the User concerned. Each User, with Host approval, may
provide at its own expense additional support staff personnel for its national Program purposes at Sheppard
AFB. Provisions concerning SNR and support staff personnel at Sheppard AFB will be set out
in the PO.
6. Provisions relating to jurisdiction and discipline are as set out in the NATO SOFA.
SECTION 5
ADMINISTRATION OF THE PROGRAM
1. The Host will be responsible for the conduct of operations and training, taking into account the
requirements of the Users. The Users, in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Section, will jointly develop
course training standards, training syllabi and training programs.
2. The Users will establish an ENJJPT Steering Committee (ENJJPTSC) composed of one
representative from each User. The ENJJPTSC is responsible for policy formulation and to oversee
and monitor the implementation of the Program. On the matter of decision-making, each User’s
representative will have one vote provided that the User is a student-sending User and has a student in the
15-4
34
SC Attachment 3
Program when the impact of the decision occurs, or provided that the decision to be made has an impact on
that User. On matters that do not have an impact on a non-student-sending User, the User’s representative
will participate as a non-voting adviser. The Terms of Reference of the ENJJPTSC will be included in the
PO.
SECTION 6
COMMAND AND CONTROL
Headquarters, Air Education and Training Command, USAF (HQ AETC), will manage the
Program.
SECTION 7
PLAN OF OPERATION
The MOU will be supplemented by a Plan of Operation (PO) signed by the Users which will
include appropriate details of the Program. The PO may be updated from time to time as determined by the
ENJJPTSC. Updates will be signed by the ENJJPTSC representatives, after securing national authority,
upon republication of the PO. In the case of conflict between the MOU and the PO, the MOU will govern.
A conformed copy of the MOU will be included in the PO.
SECTION 8
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES
1. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Military construction required for the Program is defined as any construction, development,
conversion, or extension as authorized by Host nation law carried out with respect to the Host base,
whether to satisfy temporary or permanent requirements, as defined in Host nation laws and regulations.
Costs of all military construction for the Program will be borne by the Host. If a User or Users desire any
military construction for its or their national use, the costs of that military construction will be borne by that
User or Users.
15-5
SC Attachment 3
35
2. MODIFICATION OF ASSETS
a. Costs of modification of assets will be shared by the Users over the period of years for which
the modification funding is required.
b. The cost share percentage stated for each User in the respective ENJJPTSC decision is derived
from the number of students each User is stating in the decision sheet for the projected timeframe,
generally not to exceed 5 years, unless otherwise decided by the ENJJPTSC. Cost sharing adjustments due
to any deviations from the stated number of students will be addressed in the PO.
c. The resulting commitment for each Non-U.S. User, in accordance to the above-mentioned costsharing percentage, will be reflected in a letter of participation presented to and signed by the studentsending Users annually, and by a corresponding separate line in Letters of Offer and Acceptance (LOAs)
between the Host government and student-sending User’s government.
d. A non-student-sending User which becomes a student-sending User within two years after
completion of a modification will be assessed a re-entry fee. Details will be outlined in the PO.
e.. The contribution of a new User to the Program for former modifications will be subject to the
provisions of the accession arrangements in accordance with Section 13, paragraphs 1 and 3.
3. CAPITAL EXPENDITURES - Capital expenditures which were funded before the effective
date of Amendment 5 to this MOU (September 30, 2005) will be handled in accordance with the
provisions of Section 8, paragraph 1 of the MOU that were in effect immediately prior to that Amendment.
4. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) COSTS
a. The O&M costs, for the purposes of this Program, are all costs which are directly related to
operating and maintaining the Program. Such costs consist of costs of assigned personnel (except IP),
repair of facilities, assets and equipment, and all other costs directly attributable to the operation and
maintenance of the training facility, assets, and equipment employed for the purpose of the training which
are not costs of military construction or modification of assets as described in paragraphs 1 and 2 above.
b. O&M costs are divided into two categories: fixed and variable
c. Fixed O&M costs of the Program will be shared by the student-sending Users in proportion to
15-6
36
SC Attachment 3
their shares of annual direct flying hours actually flown by all student sending Users. The direct flying
hours will be composed of UPT, PIT/UIP and IFF syllabus hours and continuation training flying hours for
all IPs. In the event a User fails to send its pre-established number of UPT students and the resulting
unused capacity of the ENJJPT programmed flying hours is not absorbed by another User, then the
proportion of the shared fixed O&M costs charged to the User failing to send its UPT students will be
computed using the UPT student hours programmed but not flown. This principle applies to IFF as well
with the following exception: if a User is unable to send its pre-established number of IFF students due to
the elimination of a student in the UPT, then the User will not be responsible for the student hours
programmed but not flown in the IFF. Fixed O&M costs will consist of all O&M costs not mentioned in
paragraph d. below and will include the Wing CC ENJJPT Projects Fund.
d. Variable O&M costs of the Program will be charged to each User based only on actual flying
hours flown. These include aviation petroleum, oils and lubricants (AVPOL), materiel support division
(MSD), and flying-related O&M supplies.
e. Each User will bear the costs of its IPs, which include continuation training, PIT/UIP, and
other hours, as well as its national personnel costs. The government of each User sending only IPs to the
Program will conclude a LOA with the Host government To the extent that a student-sending User
provides less than its proportionate share of IPs, that User will be charged the costs of the IP. Details of
this reimbursement and its distribution will be outlined in the PO.
f. An attrition charge will be assessed to the other Users for German and Host assets and
equipment. The attrition charge is 4% for Germany and 1% for the Host, consistent with the regulations of
the German and The Host, respectively. The charge will be split based upon the percentage of assets and
equipment supplied to the Program by Germany and by the Host and calculated in accordance with the PO.
The calculation will be assessed as a percentage of the other User’s annual O&M costs, excluding the Wing
CC Projects Fund. Receipts from this charge will be shared between Germany and the Host on a
proportionate basis, taking into account the number of assets provided and the different percentages of the
attrition charge.
5. The PO will include provisions for any liquidation upon Program termination of any facilities
15-7
SC Attachment 3
37
or equipment that were constructed or procured for the Program on a cost-shared basis.
6. PAYMENT OF PERSONNEL - Each User will be responsible for the payment of pay and
allowances of its own IPs, students and staff personnel assigned to the Program and personnel attached for
national purposes. The payment of the students and personnel attached for national purposes will not be
included in any cost sharing arrangements.
7. ADMINISTRATIVE SURCHARGE - Administrative surcharges will not be levied.
8. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT - The Host will perform the overall financial management of
the Program. Detailed financial management procedures will be developed by the Host, and after approval
by all Users be included in the PO.
9. FISCAL YEAR - The Program fiscal year will be the United States fiscal year (from 1 October
to 30 September).
10. LETTERS OF OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE – Each User will make in advance payments to
cover its share of the approved budget. Payments are to be made as indicated on the LOAs.
SECTION 9
HOUSING AND MESSING
1. The Host will provide on-base housing for non-Host personnel and their dependents on the
same basis of availability and priority as for the personnel of the Host.
2. Non-Host personnel assigned or attached to the ENJJPT will pay directly for messing and
accommodation in the same way as the personnel of the Host.
3. The ENJJPT Dormitory, constructed as a result of the ENJJPT extension, will be managed by
the Host and priority will be given to ENJJPT personnel.
SECTION 10
MEDICAL AND DENTAL CARE
1. Medical and dental care for non-Host personnel and their dependents will be provided in
15-8
38
SC Attachment 3
accordance with the NATO SOFA and the subsequent paragraphs 2 and 3, unless specific other bilateral
agreements or arrangements between the Host and the respective User apply.
2. Non-Host personnel assigned or attached to the Program and their dependents will pay for
medical and dental charges, if any, in accordance with Host national law.
3. Subject to the availability of the appropriate transportation, and subject to full reimbursement,
the Host will also provide for transfer of non-Host personnel or their dependents between medical facilities,
or evacuation to the User’s country if such transportation cannot be provided by the respective User.
SECTION 11
MORALE, WELFARE AND RECREATION FACILITIES
Non-Host Program personnel and their dependents will have access to Host base morale, welfare
and recreation facilities and services on the same basis as Host personnel of equivalent rank and their
dependents.
SECTION 12
SECURITY
1. The security of the base will be the responsibility of the Host. It will be implemented by
personnel and means of the Host in accordance with national legislation.
2. All classified information and material provided or used in connection with this Program will
be transmitted, stored, handled and safeguarded by each User in accordance with its national laws and
regulations, provided such protection is in a manner no less stringent than that provided for NATO
classified information and material as set forth in NATO document C-M(2002)49, dated 17 June 2002,
“Security Within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization”, including all supplements and amendments
thereto. Personnel of Users will be required to comply with the security laws, regulations and procedures
of the Host government while in the United States.
3. Information provided by any User to any other User in confidence, and such information
produced by any User pursuant to this MOU requiring confidentiality, will either retain its original
classification or be assigned a classification that will ensure a degree of protection against disclosure
equivalent to that required by the providing User.
15-9
SC Attachment 3
39
4. Each User will take all lawful steps available to it to keep free from disclosure under any
legislative provision without the consent of the originating User information exchanged in confidence
under this MOU.
5. To assist in providing the desired protection, each User will mark such information furnished to
any other User in confidence with a legend indicating the country of origin, the security classification, the
conditions of release, that the information is related to this MOU, and that it is furnished in confidence.
6. In the event of termination of or withdrawal from this MOU, the User or Users will
ensure the provisions relating to security, disclosure of information and confidentiality will remain in force.
SECTION 13
CHANGES IN PARTICIPATION
1. Participation in the Program is open to all NATO nations. Participation by other nations is
subject to the approval of all the Users. Accession to the Program will be by written amendment to this
MOU. The Host is herewith authorized to negotiate
with such prospective entrant nations on behalf of the Users.
2. Any User desiring to withdraw from the Program will notify the Host and the other Users of its
decision one year in advance of the effective date of withdrawal. If such notice is given prior to Program
budget approval for a given fiscal year, financial responsibility will be incurred by the withdrawing User
for its share of the Program costs only up to the effective date of its withdrawal. If such notice is given
after Program budget approval for a given fiscal year, liability will be incurred by the withdrawing User for
its share of the Program costs for that entire fiscal year. Its share of the costs applicable to approved
modification of assets as described in Section 8, paragraph 2, has to be paid by the withdrawing User
irrespective of the date of withdrawal unless Users decide differently.
3. Acceding to or withdrawing from the Program may require adjustments to the annual
proportionate share of all Users.
4. Users acknowledge that their participation in the Program is subject to funds being made
available for such purposes by their respective legislatures. Should the Host be required to withdraw as a
User, if requested by the ENJJPTSC the Host will nevertheless continue to act as Host subject to a mutually
15-10
40
SC Attachment 3
approved written arrangement.
5. On the withdrawal of any User, the remaining Users will consult as to the future of ENJJPT
and the revision of this MOU.
SECTION 14
WORKING ARRANGEMENTS
The competent authorities of the Users may develop mutually satisfactory working arrangements
for the purpose of carrying out the intent of this MOU.
SECTION 15
GENERAL
1. The language of the Program will be English.
2. The Program has no permanent war role, i.e., ENJJPT wing instructor personnel are not
required to maintain combat ready (CR) status.
3. Any disagreement regarding the interpretation or application of this MOU will be resolved by
consultation between the Users concerned, and will not be referred to an international tribunal or third party
for settlement.
4. This MOU will come into force on the date of last signature and, subject to paragraph 5 below,
will remain in force until 30 September 2026.
5. This MOU may be amended by the mutual consent of the duly authorized representatives of all
Users.
6. One copy of this MOU will be deposited with the Secretary General of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization.
7. The activities of the Users under this MOU will be carried out in accordance with their national
laws.
DONE in 13 originals in the English language only.
15-11
SC Attachment 3
41
This page intentionally left blank
15-12
42
SC Attachment 3
Action Item 69‐2
Steering Committee 70
• Identify the impacts involved with the enrollment of non‐fighter instructor pilots into the ENJJPT Program
Action Item 69‐2
Col Paolo Baldasso
80th Operations Group Commander
September 2015
“Training and Developing Tomorrow’s NATO Air Warriors Today!”
1
Average T‐6 PIT A / B‐Track
Graduation Date Deviations
Tangible Impacts
‐30
Above “On Time” = Early Graduation
‐20
Days Ahead
Longer B‐Track PIT Timeline
Increased number PIT check ride downgrades Increased number of Q2 / Q3
Some correlation between higher percentage of non‐
fighter background IPs and student performance
‐10
Graduation
0
Days Behind
10
20
Below “On Time” = Late Graduation
30
T‐6 B‐Track Ave 16.4 Days Longer in PIT
40
On Time
B‐Track Unsat Sorties
A‐Track
B‐Track
B‐Track PA Sorties
16
30
14
25
12
20
Total PA sorties
10
Total Unsat sorties
•
•
•
•
8
15
10
6
4
5
2
0
0
LL
2
Instrument
1
Form
1
Contact
Trans
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
3
1
1
3
2
1
3
7
3
2
1
1
5
1
1
1
13‐01 13‐02 13‐03 13‐04 13‐05 13‐06 14‐01 14‐02 14‐03 14‐04 14‐05 14‐06 15‐01 15‐02 15‐03 15‐04 15‐05
LL
13‐01 13‐02 13‐03 13‐04 13‐05 13‐06 14‐01 14‐02 14‐03 14‐04 14‐05 14‐06 15‐01 15‐02 15‐03 15‐04 15‐05
1
Instrument
3
17
Contact
5
Trans
1
3
1
Form
12
12
6
3
4
5
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
11
4
1
4
8
3
1
2
4
14
2
11
6
16
2
14
1
1
2
2
4
8
1
1
1
SC Attachment 4
43
T‐6 PIT Checkride Grades
T‐6 IP Mission / Qual Eval Trends
2010/156
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
149
2011/171
0% 0%
0%
2012/163
1%
0% 0%
9%
18%
21%
90
82
82
60
78%
91%
82%
53
44
27
27
31
2013/170
27
2014/140
2% 1%
4
FY11
FY12
6.7%
29.5%
32.9%
FY13
FY14
FY15
30%
37.8%
50.9%
5%
81%
Checkrides
85%
Below Excellent
Student Performance
0% 0%
12%
18%
FY10
2015/77
As of 10 Aug 15
1% 0%
95%
Breakdown of PIT Trainees
10
• Almost imperceptible – One grade difference (Good vs Excellent)
• Mostly correlated to the introduction of Non –Fighter Pilots • Mostly evident in the Formation and Low Level (2 ship) phases due to pilot’s previous experience
9
8
7
6
Total Students
5
Number of Track B students
Number of default students
4
Linear (Number of Track B students)
3
Linear (Number of default students)
2
1
0
•
B‐track heavy PIT trainee periods are cyclical, but there are 2 distinct peaks: 13‐06 & 15‐01…each contained 100% B‐track IPs
Common Form / Nav Check Down Grades
Combined Student Grades
AREA ORIENTATION VFR PATTERN
2%
2%
66.5
66
Other
8%
65.5
BASIC AIRCRAFT CONTROL
2%
WINGWORK
2%
KNOWLEDGE
2%
TASK
3%
ECHELON TURN
3%
65
TACTICAL
13%
FORMATION APP
3%
64.5
64
ALTITUDE CONTROL
3%
Sum
4 per. Mov. Avg. (Sum)
63.5
GROUND OPERATIONS 3%
AIRMANSHIP
8%
63
VISUAL SIGNALS
4%
62.5
EXTENDED TRAIL
6%
EMERGENCY
4%
62
REJOIN
6%
• Dips in student grades noted after larger number of B‐track IPs graduate from PIT
• Following these dips an increase in student performance noted; most likely due to maturation of IP force 44
RISK MANAGEMENT
5%
FINGERTIP
6%
SC Attachment 4
COMM
6%
CLEARING
5%
INFLIGHT PLANNING 5%
Pass / Fail Performance in Form / Nav Checkrides
F4390 Pass Rate
100%
35
95%
30
25
90%
20
F4390 Pass
85%
F4390 Fail
N4290 Pass
15
N4290 Fail
80%
10
16‐03
16‐02
16‐01
15‐08
15‐07
15‐06
15‐05
15‐04
15‐03
15‐02
15‐01
14‐08
14‐07
14‐06
14‐05
14‐04
14‐03
14‐02
14‐01
13‐08
13‐05
13‐04
13‐03
13‐02
12‐08
13‐01
75%
5
0
Check Section Trends
N4290 Pass Rate
100%
98%
96%
94%
92%
90%
88%
86%
84%
82%
16‐03
16‐02
16‐01
15‐08
15‐07
15‐06
15‐05
15‐04
15‐03
15‐02
15‐01
14‐08
14‐07
14‐06
14‐05
14‐04
14‐03
14‐02
14‐01
13‐08
13‐05
13‐04
13‐03
13‐02
13‐01
12‐08
80%
16
Check Section Trends
Bottom Line
• Length of PIT Increasing by 10 ‐ 15%
• All Graduated PIT Trainees Meet/Exceed the Required Standards (50% Excellent)
• OGV Trends Show a Slight Decrease in IP Performance (Formation/Low Level)
• Student Performance – Minimal to Negligible Impact
17
SC Attachment 4
45
46
SC Attachment 5
Aeronautica Militare
Comando Scuole / 3^ Regione Aerea
STATO MAGGIORE Brigadier General Vincenzo NUZZO
Brigadier general Vincenzo NUZZO was born in Maglie
near LECCE on May 16th 1964.
He graduated from the Air Force Academy, class Borea IV
in 1986, subsequently, he graduates from Pilot Training,
flying the MB339 and received his Pilot Wings in 1987 in
LECCE.
Following his qualification on the F-104 Starfighter, his first
operational assignment was 36th Wing, in Gioia del Colle.
He flew in Gioia del Colle from 1988 to 1993 and then was
assigned to 4th Wing in Grosseto as OCU instructor on
TF104 and from 1994 to 1998 he flew Tornado F3 in
Coningsby (UK) as instructor at 56th Sq..
Back at 36th Wing in 1998 was Commander of 12th Squadron
until 2000.
Colonel from 2001 was assigned to the Fighter Air Brigade
in Bari as Chief of OPS.
In 2006 he was Commander of 4th Wing in Grosseto until 2008 when he was assigned to the Air
Staff, Logistic Dept., Chief of “New Aircraft & Weapons Programs” Office, and then deputy chief
of the Department.
From 2011 to 2014 was Italian Air Attaché in Paris.
Ranked Brigadier General in 2015 currently he is the Chief of Staff in Air Education and Training
Command.
Out of his numerous courses he attended the Air War College course in Maxwell-Alabama (USA)
in 2000-2001 and the International Law of Military Operations course in Newport Rhode Island
(USA) 2003.
He has a Master degree in Aerospace science and a Bachelor degree in Social and Psychological
Science.
SC Attachment 6
47
Overview
• Opening Remarks
• UPT and IFF Mission Status
• Aircraft Maintenance
Wing Commander
Program Status Briefing
• Wing CC Projects
• Wing Action Items
Colonel Gregory Keeton
• Topics of Interest
Wing Commander
September 2015
• Closing Comments
1
2
Vision
Mission
“Produce the world’s finest NATO pilots with the skills and attitude to succeed in fighter aviation.”
Be the world’s premier fighter pilot training program
Focus Areas: • Produce Professional Pilots
• Build Relationships
• Develop our Airmen
Raise Warriors
3
4
UPT Graduates
Undergraduate Pilot Training
(Total by FY)
Total to Date: 7,023
• Graduates
300
275
250
225
200
175
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
• Attrition
• IP Manning
19
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
8
19 9
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
2099
2000
0
20 1
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
1
20 4
2015
1
20 6
2017
2018
2019
2020
21
• IP Experience
FY15 to Date: 165
Average Graduates 2005 ‐ 2014 = 175.8 per year
Past
5
48
As of Class 15‐07
SC Attachment 7
Projected
Average
6
ENJJPT Attrition By Phase
UPT Graduates by Nation
1501 – 1507
(Class Year)
CUMULATIVE
#
%
#
%
BELGIUM
1
0.61
50
0.71
CANADA
2
1.21
23
0.33
DENMARK
0
0.00
214
3.05
GERMANY
21
12.73
1,258
17.91
GREECE
0
0.00
0
ITALY
8
4.85
593
8.44
NETHERLANDS
3
1.82
474
6.75
0.00
329
4.68
NORWAY
0
0.00
PORTUGAL
0
0.00
0
0.00
SPAIN
0
0.00
25
0.36
TURKEY
2
1.21
67
UNITED KINDGOM
10%
5%
0%
03
0.95
0
0.00
76
1.08
UNITED STATES
128
77.58
3,914
55.73
Total
165
100.00
7,023
100.00
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
T-6 Actual
T-38 Actual
T-6 Programmed
T-38 Programmed
16
7
8
ENJJPT vs AETC Attrition
UPT CAT II Staff
(Class Year)
(Dep OG, Sq CCs and Ops Off)
T-6
BELGIUM
CANADA
DENMARK
GERMANY
GREECE
ITALY
NETHERLANDS
NORWAY
PORTUGAL
SPAIN
TURKEY
UNITED KINDGOM
UNITED STATES
Total
15%
10%
5%
0%
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
ENJJPT
11
12
13
14
15
1
1
4
5
7
9
1
1
3
4
AETC
10
As of 18 Aug 15
UPT CAT III Supervisors
T‐6 Instructor Manning
(ADOs, Sec CCs & Flt CCs)
REQ
FY15
AVAIL
+/‐
REQ
FY16
AVAIL
+/‐
REQ
FY17
AVAIL
+/‐
0.58
0.00
‐0.58
0.60
0.72
0.12
0.54
1.00
0.46
As of 26 Aug 15
T-6
5
2
T-38
2
2
3
1
13
21
12
19
Total
7
4
3
1
25
40
Authorized
0.04
0.19
0.31
4.80
0.16
2.78
1.53
1.14
0.00
0.15
0.24
0.00
29.65
41
BELGIUM
0.00
0.00
0.72
0.72
0.00
1.00
1.00
DENMARK
2.30
2.00
‐0.30
3.51
2.00
‐1.51
3.24
1.75
‐1.49
GERMANY
CANADA
10.84
14.10
3.26
12.96
13.28
0.32
9.53
10.33
0.80
11
0.00
0.00
GREECE
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.10
1.10
0.00
1.00
1.00
ITALY
13.17
10.10
‐3.07
11.26
15.35
4.09
18.97
16.54
‐2.43
NETHERLANDS
2.82
3.40
0.58
3.19
5.00
1.81
4.07
5.07
1.00
NORWAY
2.88
3.25
0.37
3.02
3.05
0.03
2.78
3.00
0.22
PORTUGAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SPAIN
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TURKEY
3.26
0.79
‐2.47
2.95
1.00
‐1.95
3.22
1.00
‐2.22
UNITED KINGDOM
As of 18 Aug 15
Total
16
9
BELGIUM
CANADA
DENMARK
GERMANY
GREECE
ITALY
NETHERLANDS
NORWAY
PORTUGAL
SPAIN
TURKEY
UNITED KINDGOM
UNITED STATES
Total
T-38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
UNITED STATES
74.29
73.98
‐0.31
68.19
73.52
5.33
66.38
76.19
9.81
TOTAL
110.14 108.62
‐1.52
105.68 115.74
10.06
108.73 116.88
8.15
As of 20 Sep 13
SC Attachment 7
0.00
12
49
T‐38 Instructor Manning
As of 26 Aug 15
REQ
FY15
AVAIL
+/‐
REQ
UPT IP Experience
FY16
AVAIL
+/‐
REQ
FY17
AVAIL
+/‐
BELGIUM
0.48
0.00
‐0.48
0.51
0.00
‐0.51
0.57
0.00
‐0.57
CANADA
0.99
1.00
0.01
1.05
0.99
‐0.06
1.15
1.00
‐0.15
DENMARK
0.98
1.00
0.02
1.51
1.00
‐0.51
2.25
0.75
‐1.50
GERMANY
10.70
11.53
0.83
13.78
12.58
‐1.20
10.49
14.42
3.93
GREECE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ITALY
3.31
3.83
0.52
2.95
3.20
0.25
1.72
3.58
1.86
NETHERLANDS
1.61
4.78
3.17
2.09
3.76
1.67
1.28
2.08
0.80
NORWAY
2.46
2.35
‐0.11
2.60
3.00
0.40
2.75
3.39
0.64
PORTUGAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SPAIN
0.00
1.01
1.01
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
TURKEY
2.20
0.00
‐2.20
3.10
0.00
‐3.10
3.44
0.00
‐3.44
0.00
UNITED KINGDOM
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
UNITED STATES
76.29
77.68
1.39
68.15
66.35
‐1.80
68.90
69.33
0.43
TOTAL
99.02
103.18
4.16
95.74
91.88
‐3.86
92.55
95.55
3.00
FIGHTER BOMBER
BELGIUM
CANADA
DENMARK
GERMANY
GREECE
ITALY
NETHERLANDS
NORWAY
PORTUGAL
SPAIN
TURKEY
UNITED KINGDOM
UNITED STATES *
TOTAL
2
10
1
6
4
3
T‐38
FAIPs
OTHER
FIGHTER BOMBER
1
1
8
4
6
1
FAIPs
OTHER
4
3
4
3
1
1
1
20
47
13
13
16
20
39
46
65
86
Fighter Experience 37.30%
* Includes 97 FTS IPs
13
As of 20 Sep 13
T‐6
As of 20 Aug 15
1
1
19
24
1
1
76.79%
14
PIT Graduates
Pilot Instructor Training
(Total by FY)
FY15 to Date: 59
Average Graduates 2005 - 2014 = 65.8 per year
• Graduates
140
120
• Instructor Manning
100
80
60
40
20
0
Past
15
Projected
Introduction to Fighter Fundamentals
16
IFF Graduates
(Total by FY)
• Graduates
FY15 to Date: 128
Average graduates 2005 – 2014 = 127.7 per year
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
• IP Manning
• IP Experience
Past
17
50
Average
As of 18 Aug 15
As of Class 15MB
SC Attachment 7
Projected
Average
18
UIP Graduates
IFF Graduates by Nation
15AB – 15MB
(Total by FY)
Total to Date: 207
CUMULATIVE
#
%
#
%
BELGIUM
1
0.78
CANADA
2
1.56
20
0.74
DENMARK
2
1.56
26
3
0.97
0.11
16.70
GERMANY
13
10.16
450
GREECE
0
0.00
0
ITALY
0
0.00
0
0.00
NETHERLANDS
3
2.34
212
7.87
NORWAY
6
4.69
119
4.42
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0.00
PORTUGAL
0
0.00
0
0.00
SPAIN
0
0.00
13
0.48
TURKEY
2
1.56
3
0.11
UNITED KINDGOM
0
0.00
0
0.00
UNITED STATES
99
77.34
1,848
68.60
Total
128
100.00
2,694
100.00
Past
19
BELGIUM
CANADA
DENMARK
GERMANY
NETHERLANDS
NORWAY
SPAIN
UNITED STATES
3
TOTAL
4
1
III
Average
20
IFF Instructor Manning
REQ
FY15
AVAIL
+/‐
REQ
FY16
AVAIL
+/‐
REQ
FY17
AVAIL
+/‐
0.31
1.00
0.69
0.29
0.22
‐0.07
0.27
0.00
‐0.27
‐0.47
As of 20 Aug 15
CAT III Auth
BELGIUM
5
0.17
0.03
0.08
1.00
0.33
0.31
0.01
6.06
9
8
1
1
1
1
Projected
As of 18 Aug 15
IFF CAT II & III Staff
II
FY15 to Date: 9
Average Graduates 2005 – 2014 = 10.4 per year
CANADA
0.51
0.00
‐0.51
0.51
0.00
‐0.51
0.47
0.00
DENMARK
0.18
1.00
0.82
0.48
1.00
0.52
0.98
1.00
0.02
GERMANY
5.51
5.00
‐0.51
5.06
5.66
0.60
5.00
4.90
‐0.10
GREECE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ITALY
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
NETHERLANDS
0.55
1.79
1.24
0.90
1.12
0.22
0.49
1.07
0.58
NORWAY
1.49
1.31
‐0.18
1.20
1.11
‐0.09
1.28
1.00
‐0.28
PORTUGAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SPAIN
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TURKEY
0.70
0.00
‐0.70
1.73
0.00
‐1.73
1.51
0.00
‐1.51
UNITED KINGDOM
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
UNITED STATES
28.91
31.21
2.30
31.13
30.35
‐0.78
30.89
30.07
‐0.82
TOTAL
38.16
41.31
3.15
41.30
39.46
‐1.84
40.89
38.04
‐2.85
21
As of 18 Aug 15
0.00
22
T‐6 Aircraft Availability
Aircraft Maintenance
(Oct 09 thru Jun 15)
80
• T‐6 Aircraft Availability
70
Parts
60
• T‐38 UPT Aircraft Availability
Parts
50
• T‐38 IFF Aircraft Availability
40
30
20
10
0
AA METRIC
AETC STD
Trend
23
24
SC Attachment 7
51
T‐38 UPT Aircraft Availability
T‐38 IFF Aircraft Availability
(Oct 09 thru Jun 15)
(Oct 09 thru Jan 15)
80
Aileron TCTOs
70
60
2-014 Work
Card added to
PEs
66%
Spars
30
Aileron TCTOs
Engines & Wing
Work
25
2-014 Work
Card added
to PEs
66% Spars
Engines &
Wing Work
20
50
40
15
30
10
20
5
10
0
0
AA METRIC
AETC STD
Trend
AA METRIC
25
Facility Projects
AETC STD
Trend
26
Taxiway Shoulder Repair / Demo
• FY14 Taxiway Shoulder Repair / Demo
• Project was approved at SC67 for FY14 execution
• FY15 Wing CC Projects Update
• FY16 Wing CC Proposed Projects
ENJJPT
US‐only
Total
SC67 Cost Estimates:
$1.32M
$3.08M
$4.4M
Updated Cost Estimates:
$3.479M
$4.023M
$7.502M
• Cost increases caused by…
• Severe damage to shoulder subgrade requiring extensive restoration
• FY17 T‐6 Surfaces Repair Project
• Relocation underground conduit system servicing taxiway lights
• Recommend SC take note of the updated costs for this project
• Future Facility / Airfield Projects
• Recommend FLS prepare recommendation for way forward
27
28
FY15 Wing CC Projects
FY16 Wing CC Projects
(Alternative Proposal)
Description
Current
Estimate
Aircraft Paint Barn Renovation
$3,303K
Replace Cooling Tower (Building 2320)
$550K
TOTAL
$3,303K
Replace Select Sealant and Repair Spalls Runway 15R/33L
$500K
Description
Current
Estimate
Eliminates Fire Safety Deficiencies Hangars 2404, 2406, 2408, & 2410 $700K
Repair Electrical Distribution Hangar 2406
TOTAL
29
52
SC Attachment 7
$250K
$2,000K
30
July 2015
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report
T‐6 Surfaces
Pavement Failures on RWY
15L/33R
= Deteriorated since 2010 43 PCI 
65 PCI
85 PCI
71 PCI 
 43 PCI
80 PCI 
 57 PCI
66 PCI
Legend
GOOD (86‐100)
POOR (41‐55)
SAT (71‐85)
VERY POOR (26‐40)
FAIR (56‐70)
SERIOUS (11‐25)
T‐6 Surfaces Repair Future Facility Projects
• Runway 15L/33R, Overruns, Taxiways K, L, G (East), and Warmup Aprons
Current
Estimate
Description
• 60% of runway/overruns in fair / poor condition and continue to deteriorate
• Taxiways in fair condition; continue to deteriorate, approaching poor condition
Aircraft Composite Maintenance Clean Room (Building 2320)
$380K
• Shoulders required on Runway / Taxiways per United Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3‐260‐01
Repair and Upgrade Electrical Systems, Shop Areas (Building 2320)
$210K
• Wider Taxiways and Warmup Aprons required per UFC 3‐260‐01
• Requirement
•
Replace CASS Underground Air Lines (ENJJPT Ramp)
$810K
Replace Roof on Building 2325 (Engine Shop)
$880K
Replace Roof, Building 2325, Sections A, C, & D
Full length runway repair, to include overrun repairs
Paint hangar floors with CRU (2404, 2406, 2408 & 2410)
• Repair Taxiways K, L, and G (East) and associated Warmup Aprons
$210K
$1,100K
•
Add Shoulders to all pavements (US‐only cost)
Paint shop floors with CRU (2325, 2407, 2412, 2414 & 2416)
•
Expand Warmup Apron (US‐only cost)
Install HVAC NDI Lab X‐Ray Area
$250K
Replace Roof, Building 2402
$260K
Cost Estimates:
ENJJPT Share
US‐only
Total
$10.91M
$2.15M
$13.19M
Renovate ENJJPT Ops Facility, Building 2320
$8,000K
Repair Fire Suppression System, Building 2414
$1,100K
Recommend / Request SC place $10.91M in FY17 budget for this requirement
34
Future Airfield Projects
Description
Wing Action Items
Current
Estimate
Repair ENJJPT Ramp Tripping Hazards
$200K
Repair Asphalt ENJJPT Apron (East Shoulders)
$260K
Repair Shoulders Taxiway J
$370K
Repair West ENJJPT Apron Roadway
$1,200K
Repair Overruns, Runway 15C / 33C
$200K
Reseal Runway 15R / 33L
Repair RCS Access Road, Runway 33L
$350K
• SC 69‐2: ENJJPT Wing PO Fighter Pilot Guidance
• SC 69‐3: ENJJPT Wing Facilities Projects
• SC 69‐5: IP Work Hour Study Implementation
• SC 69‐6: ENJJPT Reorganization Concept
$1,200K
$330K
Repair ENJJPT Ramp
$2,920K
Replace Airfield Lighting Conduit System
$15,000K
• SC 69‐7: BIT Proposal
• SC 69‐8: ENJJPT Dorm Renovation Update
35
36
SC Attachment 7
53
Wing Action Items
Wing Action Items
(SC AI 69‐2 and 69‐3)
(SC AI 69‐5 and 69‐6)
SC 69‐5: IP Work Hour Study Implementation Review
SC 69‐2: ENJJPT Wing PO Fighter Pilot Guidance Review
• SC tasked the Wing to provide an update on the SNR’s efforts to decrease IP work hours to 45 hours per week, including SNR COAs and first results
• SC tasked the Wing to identity the impacts involved with the enrollment of non‐
fighter pilots as IPs into the Program
• Working with the SNRs, the Wing has determined each nation has unique IP work hour restrictions which are separate from Program requirements
• 80 OG has prepared a briefing for this Action Item
• Recommend ENJJPTSC receive briefing or defer to the PRS
• Recommend each nation adjust its own IP manning to satisfy national restrictions while satisfying its obligations to the Program’s IP requirements SC 69‐3: ENJJPT Wing Facilities Projects
• SC tasked the Wing CC to develop a plan to accomplish paint barn project
• Total project cost increased to just over $3.3M
• Response memo sent on 30 July 2015
SC 69‐6: ENJJPT Reorganization Concept
• SC tasked the Wing CC to review the STURON option
• Additional options considered
• Requested the FLS develop a strategy to fund this project in FY15
• No options are viable at this time
• Recommend the Wing not be tasked further on this topic
• Request the ENJJPTSC close this action item
37
38
BIT Proposal
ENJJPT Dorm Renovation
(SC AI 69‐7)
(SC AI 69‐8)
SC69 Estimates
• ENJJPT BIT performed IAW AETC T‐38 Graduate Break in Training Guidance, 11 March 2013, with the exception of sortie restrictions in Chapter 10
• Users wanting BIT will inform the 80 OG in writing 30 days (3 weeks min) prior
•
•
•
•
Install Dedicated Make‐Up Air Units, replacement of fan coil / forced air units, install exhaust fans and restore finishes
$10,500K
Current Est.
$7,197,516 7 Options
Number of rated pilots using BIT
Length of BIT
Minimum and maximum number of Front Cockpit sorties
Training emphasis during the sorties
• Basic guidelines
• Limited to ENJJPT graduates and performed in aircraft last flown at ENJJPT
• NLT 12 months after last ENJJPT syllabus sortie
• No new events instructed
• 80 OG can approve, modify or deny requests base on availability / impact to the ENJJPT training mission Option 1: Repair Site Drainage
$58K
$44,789
Option 2: Renovate Kitchenette
$690K
$1,007,203
Option 3: Replace Carpeting
$295K
$406,780
Option 4: Repair Windows
$50K
$60,553
Option 5: Bathtub Refurbishment (~25%)
$37.5K
$31,586
Option 6: Replace Exterior Doors
$674K
$827,291
Option 7: Facility Chiller Replacement
• BIT sorties will not be scheduled before 80 OG approval
TOTAL
$158,268
$12,304.5K
$9,733,986
39
Topics of Interest
40
T‐3 Cross Country TDYs
• Program funded T‐3 Cross Country TDYs
• Program funded T‐3 Cross‐Country TDYs
• Per PO paragraph 7.13.1.2.2…T‐3 cross country TDYs exceeding maximum number established by ENJJPTSC are national costs
• Prior to the 15th Edition (Feb 06) the Wing CC determined funded T‐3 Cross Country TDY requirements
• There is no record the ENJJPTSC has ever set a maximum number for funded T‐3 cross country TDYs
• Hacker (T‐6 Aux Field) Runway Repair
• Facility Project Funding
• Request ENJJPTSC establish maximum number of Program funded T‐3 Cross Country TDYs, or…
• Proposed PO Annex 8
• Recommend ENJJPTSC empower the Wing CC to determine number of Program funded T‐3 Cross Country TDYs
• T‐38 PIT Syllabus Changes for Non‐Fighter Pilots
41
54
SC Attachment 7
42
Hacker Runway Repair
Bldg Num
02402
02405
02414
02560
02412
02559
00280
02550
00282
• Major surface failures indicated by red dots
02330
02333
02320
02325
• Major repairs required
• Working with the Army Corps of Engineers to repair runway
• Completion date TBD
02416
02401
02418
02552
02400
• T‐6 auxiliary pattern work moved to Duncan, Oklahoma
02406
02410
02522
02404
11543
02536
02408
Bldg Name
AIRCRAFT PAINT HANGAR
ACFT COR CON
FUEL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE DOCK
COMM FCLTY
SHOP, NON-DESTRUCTIVE
INSPECTION
ELEC PWR STN BLDG
OQ
AIRCRAFT WASH RACK
AIR CONDITIONING PLANT FOR
B280
FLT SIMLTR TNG
PHYSL TNG
FLIGHT TRAINING CLASSROOM
SHOP, JET ENGINE INSPECTION
AND MAINTENANCE
AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
SHOP/STORAGE FACILITY
HAZARD STOR, BSE
AIRCRAFT CORROSION CONTROL
BLD
WTR PMP STN
TST STD (JET ENGINE TEST
FACILITY)
SMALL AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
DOCK
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
SHP,WPN RLSE SYS
SMALL AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
DOCK
RUNWAY CONTROL STRUCTURE
SHP A/M ORGL
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
Fire
Electrical
HVAC
Plumbing
Conveying
Stairs
Finishes
Roof
Interior
Exterior
Basement
Foundations
• Runway closed on 1 Jun 2015
• Heavy rains caused accelerated deterioration of substructure and surface
Superstructure
Facility Condition Index
(T‐6 Auxiliary Airfield)
MDI
85
85
70
80
88
BCI
56
57
60
67
71
A10
0
0
0
0
0
A20
0
0
0
0
0
B10
0
0
0
0
0
B20
80
94
84
89
80
B30
80
89
89
100
89
C10
94
94
94
90
90
C20
97
0
0
90
0
C30
93
93
88
91
90
D10
0
0
0
0
0
D20
61
78
70
44
63
D30
41
30
30
35
62
D40
54
0
80
44
0
D50
31
84
57
89
66
71
62
85
71
65
65
75
71
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
90
85
84
94
61
80
85
82
0
76
94
89
0
95
0
0
87
90
80
0
0
0
0
0
0
49
64
60
50
30
30
49
0
70
0
65
10
49
76
49
70
80
80
75
72
77
78
77
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
94
81
86
95
89
51
82
86
93
94
85
0
0
0
0
75
91
0
88
0
0
0
0
74
77
60
71
65
57
79
50
54
86
0
79
72
90
85
71
75
78
0
0
0
93
81
89
0
94
0
86
43
86
86
81
85
80
81
0
0
0
0
80
0
0
88
80
94
0
94
0
87
81
88
0
0
0
64
0
35
0
56
0
83
71
60
78
74
0
0
0
0
0
0
73
94
71
1
74
93
0
0
74
82
0
0
82
76
79
64
0
0
71
50
61
74
0
0
0
85
93
94
87
93
0
64
31
0
64
61
80
61
76
82
77
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
0
87
78
82
87
80
94
84
88
87
88
0
86
86
86
84
0
0
0
65
88
78
38
77
64
0
0
0
59
83
63
70
61
61
80
78
79
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
95
85
78
88
95
87
92
82
92
98
0
0
82
63
87
0
0
0
0
75
71
68
73
32
0
0
0
84
73
77
MDI*BCI
3714
3673
2816
2646
Rank
1
2
3
4
2546
2476
2174
2147
5
6
7
8
2077
1966
1834
1724
9
10
11
12
1696
13
1673
1637
14
15
1630
1592
16
17
1581
18
1565
1480
1470
19
20
21
22
23
24
30
1428
1369
1365
1267
44
Facility Projects Spending
Year 2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
$ Amount
$2,499,039
$1,036,582
$2,629,411
$406,219
$8,776,881
5 ‐ Year Total $15,348,132
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
$3,774,447
$6,798,001
$19,334,301
$19,619,700
$8,478,800
5 ‐ Year Total $58,005,249 Required Spending Increase
UPT Base Comparison
5‐Year Average
Year
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
5-Year Total
5-Year Average
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
5-Year Total
5-Year Average
$3,069,626 $11,601,050 $8,531,424
Source – Automated Civil Engineering System (ACES)
45
Sheppard
Laughlin
Vance
$2,499,039 $1,275,891 $1,701,631 $1,036,582 $612,257 $980,145 $2,629,411 $17,460,599 $290,726 $406,219 $2,608,920 $129,200 $8,776,881 $10,752,038 $3,856,746 $15,348,132 $32,709,703
$6,958,448
$3,069,626
$6,541,941
$1,391,690
$3,774,447
$7,284,056 $53,691,277
$6,798,001 $10,142,282
$483,663
$19,334,301
$3,459,934
$1,469,420
$19,619,700
$5,104,899
$931,109
$8,478,800
$2,611,723
$3,583,160
$58,005,249 $28,602,894 $60,158,629
$11,601,050
$5,720,579 $12,031,726
Columbus
$1,686,912 $538,409 $40,588,099 $1,723,507 $3,775,933 $48,312,861
$9,662,572
$51,821,711
$20,635,343
$6,533,704
$7,401,295
$4,263,243
$90,655,296
$18,131,059
Source – Automated Civil Engineering System (ACES)
New PO Annex 8
46
T‐38 PIT Syllabus Changes
• PO Annex 8 establishes monthly student (T‐1) sortie requirements per IP position
• ENJJPT Management System (EMS) determines Program IP requirements based on these sortie numbers • Current PO Annex 8 does not include IFF T‐1 sortie data
• ENJJPTSC must consider the need to change the T‐38 PIT Syllabus to accommodate non‐fighter background IP training
• 80 OG Training Division is already working a proposed T‐38 PIT syllabus to satisfy this emerging requirement
• It does not list the IFF T‐1 sorties used by EMS to determine IFF IP requirements • Proposed Annex 8 provides IFF T‐1 sortie data currently used by EMS to determine IFF IP requirements
• Recommend ENJJPTSC approve proposed Annex 8
• Recommend the PRS discuss and provide a recommendation for moving forward
47
48
SC Attachment 7
55
QUESTIONS/COMMENTS
RAISE WARRIORS!!!
49
56
SC Attachment 7
SC Attachment 8
57
Overview
• Funding summary
• T-6 Current & Future Mod’s
ENJJPT SC #70
T-6A Programs
Mr. Patrick Frye
AFLCMC/WLZ (JPATS)
Mr. Bryan Knoll
HQ AETC/A3FP
2
SC70 Funding Timeline (FY)
Summary
Quantities:
ADS‐B Out
CFIS (Canopy Fracture)
ATD DAS II (Control Loading)
Costs ($M):
ADS‐B Out
CFIS (Canopy Fracture)
ATD DAS II (Control Loading)
Total Costs ($M)
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
77
24
26
10
17
10
SC70
77
77
10
Future T-6 Mod’s
SC69
77
77
10
SC68
77
77
10
$7.00 $7.00 $18.30
$0.01 $0.01 $0.01 $0.01
$0.04 $0.09
$1.20
$1.20 $1.20
$0.01 $1.21 $0.01 $0.01 $7.00 $8.24 $19.59
$15.00
$0.30
$1.20
$16.50
1.
• Distribution quantities and funding for ADS‐B Out and CFIS show a new distribution for SC70
• A new cost estimate for ADS‐B Out is in process. The current data indicates it to be significantly less than current estimate. The estimate will include both aircraft and ATD requirements
• New cost estimate for CFIS is lower than originally planned.
Automatic Dependant Surveillance - Broadcast: (ADS-B) Out
– Modify aircraft and ATDs to meet FAA mandated National Airspace
requirements by 1 Jan 2020.
– ENJJPT PO, Annex 10, “Mission Essential”, per HQ AFMC
– Earliest anticipated Sheppard installation: FY19
– Estimated cost: $7M total
AETC FY16 POM strategy for ADS‐B as a separate project versus combined as AVI suite approach. 4
3
Future T-6 Mod’s (cont.)
2.
CFIS (Canopy Fracture Initiation System) Ballistic
– Modify aircraft due to obsolescence of current laser/flash initiated
system. Replace with military certified ballistic system
– ENJJPT PO, Annex 10, “Logistics Essential”, per HQ AFMC
– Earliest anticipated Sheppard installation: FY16 – FY19
•
3.
Retrofit at next scheduled R&R
– Estimated cost: $40K
Wing Rib one repair/correction
– Cracking discovered on top portion of center wing rib (rib one)
– Repair/correction is still TBD, but will be depot level effort
– ENJJPT PO, Annex 10, “Safety of Flight”, per HQ AFMC
– Earliest anticipated Sheppard work: TBD
– Estimated cost: TBD
Cost estimate expected by spring 2017
5
58
SC Attachment 9
6
4. ATD DAS II ‐ Control loading/Flight Deck I/O Retrofit
• Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) elements of legacy platforms to the
Electronic Control Loading System (ECLS) and Flight Deck I/O of the
JPATS ATDs are obsolete and have limited supportability
• Legacy IP-GSNet cards, 429 Cards, and power supplies are out of
production and cannot be supplied by any vendor
• Projections based on current failure rates indicate that ATDs will start
becoming irreparable in 2015. This will cause the number of ATDs for
student training to decrease until insufficient numbers of ATDs are
available to support Program Flying Training throughput mandated by
AETC and CNATRA.
– Estimated cost for Sheppard AFB: 1.2M
ATD DAS II ‐ Control loading/Flight Deck I/O Retrofit (cont.)
Current Production DAS II System
Legacy DRI system
??? Next Generation of COTS Control Loading
7
8
Summary
5. Rudder Binding Repair
• Over two dozen events to date -- similar failure mode (jamming/binding
rudder controls)
• Problem self-corrects on landing
• No mishaps attributed to this condition
• Number of incidents occurring at an increasing rate
• Fault tree aggressively investigated by USG and Contractor
• Determine root cause ECD – Unknown (maximum effort underway)
• Estimated cost of repair – Unknown as root cause and repair method TBD
• Cost figures presented are subject to change due to program delays,
aircraft beddown changes, DoD funding adjustments, efficiencies
not determined, contract restructuring and re-pricing, or other
unforeseen circumstances.
• This info is provided for long range budget planning purposes and
should not be interpreted as a final cost estimate.
• Our goal is to ensure NATO’s future fighter pilot training needs are
met and ENJJPT, with new advanced training systems, will continue
to produce the world’s best pilots.
9
10
Recommendation
Steering Committee take note
11
SC Attachment 9
59
T-38 Life Extension
• Current AETC retirement planned for 2023‐2029
– Follow AETC Drawdown plan
ENJJPT SC #70
T-38 Programs
• Structure is primary concern with T‐38 retirement extension
– Structural modifications and inspections required
• Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) is a significant concern
– Systems affected: Heads‐Up Display, Mission Display Processor, VHF Communication Radio and VHF Navigation Radio
Mr. Ryan Bruce
• Retirement extensions can be managed and risks mitigated with proper lead times
Programs Chief
T-38 Program Office
September 2015
2
SC70 Funding Timeline (FY)
Summary
Pacer Classic III (PCIII)
• Program Objectives
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 SC70 SC69 SC68
Quantities:
PC III Kits
PC III Installs
VDTS Installs
ADS‐B Kits
ADS‐B Installs
AvCI Parts
HUD
MDP
VOR‐ILS‐RCVR
VHF COMM
Costs:
PCIII
VDTS
ADS‐B
AvCI
Total Costs ($M)
9
8
12
22
31
$3.6
$0.2
$5.1
$0.7
$0.8
$3.8
$5.8
$0.8
40
6
9
22
10
9
10
9
10
10
9
10
123
41
41
41
18
18
15
15
18
18
62
62
18
18
10
46
46
18
18
66
66
123
123
123
9
18
18
$12.3 $13.9 $13.9 $15.0 $14.6 $11.0 $9.9
$0.3
$2.6 $0.8 $0.8
$0.7 $8.2 $30.5 $23.2 $0.8
$0.5 $12.6 $13.9 $17.2 $24.0 $45.9 $34.2 $10.7
66
66
123
123
123
66
57
123
123
82
– Ensure structural integrity of 150 aircraft at high risk of grounding prior to FY23
– Ensure execution of AETC mission through FY29
18
18
15
15
$0.8
$0.8
$99.3 $99.3 $99.3
$2.5 $2.5 $2.8
$4.2 $4.2 $4.2
$0.3 $64.5 $64.5 $65.4
$0.3 $170.5 $170.5 $171.7
$0.5
Cost subject to change
Numbers may not add correctly due to rounding
3
4
PCIII Program Overview
Pacer Classic III Way Ahead
• Current planned T‐38C retirement: 2023‐2029 – Additional PCIII aircraft (19 Sheppard a/c = $28.5M)
– Extends kit buy schedule to FY19 and installs through FY21 – Requirement validation ongoing
• Actual structural health assessment for the high‐time airframes
• Destructive testing on replaced components
• Further assess need for more comprehensive/intrusive inspections
• Validate ASIP analysis of structural health and then make informed adjustments
Mod Kit Parts
DLA Parts
60
-
Parts Replaced All The Time (100% Parts)
Parts Replaced as required, Select Structural Components (SSC)
Parts Removed for Access and also SSC
Parts Removed for Access to other parts, but not replaced (RFOM)
5
SC Attachment 10
6
SC70 Funding Timeline
T-38C PC III
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
VDTS/SBIS Program
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
8
10
10
10
7
9
9
9
10
10
$2.5
$3.1
$3.1
$3.1
$2.2
$9.3
$9.9
$9.9
$11.0 $11.0 $11.0
FY21
Total
Quantities:
Kits
9
12
Installs
66
10
9
66
Costs:
Kits
$3.6
$5.1
Installs
$22.7
$9.9
$72.0
Total
$3.6
$5.1
$11.8 $13.0 $13.0 $14.1 $13.2 $11.0
$9.9
$94.7
Non‐US Cost Estimated
$2.7
$1.1
$3.0
$2.5
$25.3
$3.3
$3.3
$3.5
$3.3
$2.8
• Video Data Transfer System (VDTS)
– Replaces current obsolete video tape recorder
• Used for debriefing both SUPT and IFF students
• Especially important on IFF missions for critiquing energy management and validating weapons employment
– Kits purchased in FY10 under Avionics Upgrade Program
– Depot‐level install; remaining jets modified during PCIII mod
• Speed Brake Indicator Switch (SBIS)
• Costs will be reconciled with individual country cost at the end of each
modification period
• Aircraft quantities and costs subject to change
– Inadvertent speed brake actuation common in T‐38
• Caused Class A mishap resulting in loss of aircraft
• SBIS provides a “hands‐off” means of confirming safety of the aircraft during a critical phase of flight
7
– Installed in conjunction with VDTS
8
T-38C VDTS/SBIS
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
Total
8
22 31 40 22
123 $0.3
$0.3
$0.08
$2.5
$2.5
$0.62
Quantities:
Kits
Installs
Costs ($M):
Kits
Installs
Total
New T-38 Modification Efforts
$0.2
$0.2
$0.04
$0.7 $0.8 $0.5
$0.7 $0.8 $0.5
$0.17 $0.21 $0.13
• Installations began June 2011
• Costs paid by US. All costs will be reconciled with individual country cost at the end of the modification
• Costs subject to change
9
10
T-38C Avionics
Component Integration (AvCI)
SC70 FUNDING TIMELINE
T-38C AVCI
• T‐38C requires replacement of key Avionics components due to obsolescence
• Primary components affected
– Heads‐up Display (HUD)
– Mission Display Processor (MDP)
– VHF Navigation Receiver
– VHF Communication Receiver/Transmitter
• Notional FY16 – FY23 development and integration schedule
– Development begins in FY16
– Production and installs begin in FY17 for some components
• Source selection in progress
– Estimated award in Q1 FY16
Quantities (Parts):
HUD
MDP
VHF Navigation Receiver
VHF Communication R/T
Quantities (Installs):
HUD
MDP
VOR‐ILS‐RCVR
VHF COMM
Costs:
HUD
MDP
VHF Navigation Receiver
VHF Communication R/T
Installs
Total
– Costs and schedule are estimates; will revise figures after contract award
11
SC Attachment 10
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22
FY23
Total
18
18
15
15
18
18
62
62
18
18
46
46
18
18
18
18
18
18
15
15
123
123
123
123
18
18
15
15
18
18
62
62
18
18
46
46
18
18
18
18
18
18
15
15
123
123
123
123
$0.3
$0.4
$0.0
$0.7
$0.2
$4.6
$2.9
$0.3
$0.4
$0.0
$8.2
$2.1
$18.3
$11.5
$0.3
$0.4
$0.0
$30.5
$7.6
$13.8
$8.6
$0.3
$0.5
$0.0
$23.2
$5.8
$0.3
$0.5
$0.3
$0.5
$0.3
$0.8
$0.2
$0.8
$0.2
$0.3
$0.1
Still in Source Selection; Costs and year of requirement subject to change
$36.7
$23.0
$2.1
$2.7
$0.0
$64.5
$16.1
12
61
Automatic Dependent
Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B)
ADS- B Funding Timeline (FY)
• FAA is transforming air traffic control to a satellite‐based system known as the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) • Mandatory for all aircraft operating in CONUS by 2020
– Increases safety and efficiency
• Airspace requiring ADS‐B compliance:
– Class A, B, and C
– Class E above 10,000 ft
– Around those airports identified in 14CFR 91, Appendix D
FY17
FY18
FY19
Quantities:
Kits
Installs
123
41
41
41
123
123
Costs:
Kits
Installs
Total
$1.8 $0.8 $2.6 $0.7 $0.8 $0.8 $0.2 $0.8 $0.8 $0.2 $1.8 $2.4 $4.2 $1.1 • AETC T‐38C training syllabi require access to controlled airspace FY20
$0.0 $0.0 Total
Still in Planning Phase
above 10,000 feet
• AF 1067 approved to incorporate ADS‐B in T‐38s Fleet‐wide
• Solution to be determined as part of AvCI contract effort
13
14
Fwd Canopy Development
Background : The T‐38 has experienced 7 Class A mishaps and 3 pilot fatalities since 1964 due to bird strikes to the front canopy transparency. The current T‐38 front canopy has a minimum birdstrike capability of 4 lb. bird at 125 knots. USAF expects to increase the minimum birdstrike capability significantly to be consistent with mission profiles without shattering in order to significantly increase pilot safety. The Program is in the early stages of market research and feasibility testing.
Still in Planning Phase
Sustainment Efforts
15
16
Funding Timeline PCIII
O&A/SSC 3400 Funds
Avionics CLS Contract Increase
• FY15 Contract Logistics Support (CLS) increase of $758,833.75
Quantities:
O&A
SSC
– Damaged parts overrun for option II in FY15 – Overflight of AETC flying hour projections for Option II FY15
– Contractor Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) request for equitable adjustment
– Initial FY15 ENJJPT MIPR balance did not fully cover FY15 flying hours projection
– Option year 3 funds used to cover Option year 2 FY15 cost overruns; Option year 3 funds must be replaced
Costs ($M):
O&A
SSC
Total
FY16
FY17
Total
9
9
9
9
9
9
27
27
$1.25
$.92
$2.17
$0.65
$1.46
$1.08
$2.54
$0.76
$1.46
$1.08
$2.54
$0.76
$4.2
$3.1
$7.3
$2.2
* PCIII Program Description in charts 4 through 6 above. These costs are for PCIII Over and Above and Select Structural Component funding requirements • Refer to FLS for LOA change
17
62
FY15
SC Attachment 10
18
Magnesium to Aluminum
TCTO 1T-38-837
Control Rods and Magnesium Parts Replacement
TCTO 837 addresses two issues in the primary flight control system. Inspections showed that
magnesium CSIs contained corrosion damage. They also showed that control rods were bent
which induces fatigue damage. To correct these issues the control rods will be replaced with
new control rods. To correct the corrosion on the magnesium parts, new parts will be built
out of aluminum and replaced. This is a one time change out of 39 flight control parts.
Control Rods
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
Total
8
8
41
41
43
43
30
30
122
122
$0.00
$0.20
$0.03
$0.23
$0.07
$0.00
$1.60
$0.16
$1.76
$0.53
$0.00
$1.80
$0.47
$2.23
$0.67
$0.00
$1.49
$0.40
$1.88
$0.56
$0.0
$5.04
$1.06
$6.1
$1.8
Quantities:
Kits
Installs
Magnesium Parts
Costs ($M):
Kits*
Installs
O&A
Total
* Kit cost included in the install rate
19
20
TCTO 1T-38-870
Asbestos Removal
Engine Bay Asbestos Removal Effort
Asbestos originally used in the production of T‐38 aircraft in the engine bays and liquid
oxygen system areas as an insulator. It is now recognized asbestos poses a major health
risk and field units are being tasked to perform increasing inspections in these areas due
to aircraft age and usage. Removing the asbestos at depot creates a single controlled
environment for asbestos removal allowing the field perform required inspections more
efficiently without work‐arounds required to mitigate asbestos exposure..
Background: Asbestos is used to isolate the heat shields from the aluminum structure. Asbestos is considered a carcinogenic and requires Hazmat procedures to be in place when performing maintenance in this area. Post 870
Pre 870
Asbestos Removal
21
22
Asbestos Removal Program
Cost Saving Measures
FY14
FY15
FY16
Total
Kits
42
43
37
122
Installs
42
43
37
122
• New LED Beacon Light
• Increased visibility
• Increased mean time between failure
Quantities:
• New Radial Tires
• Increased Landings
• New Generator Stator Housing
Costs ($M):
Kits*
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.0
Installs
$1.54
$1.61
$1.72
$4.9
O&A
$.38
$0.46
$0.50
$1.3
Total
$1.91
$2.07
$2.22
$6.2
$0.57
$0.62
$0.66
$1.9
• Operates at cooler temperatures
• Increased mean time between failure
• Currently implemented
• Improved P‐panel Circuit Cards
• Testing completed
• Technical Review Board (TERB) at Tinker
• TERB and Configuration Control Board at T‐38 SPM
• T‐5 Amp Go No Go Tester
* Material/Kit cost included in the install rate
23
SC Attachment 10
• Capability to test T‐5 Amp before returning to contractor for repair
• Approximately 60% returned to supply as serviceable
24
63
LED Beacon Light
Bias vs Radial Tires
Background: Existing electromechanical rotating beacon light is prone to failure due to age and condition. This light has a mean time between failures of <300 hours. The new LED beacon has no moving parts and is expected to have a MTBF of >27,000 hours. BENEFITS
FEATURES
Bias
Radial
Improved FOD Resistance
Mature Technology
Low Heat Generation
Improved Ride Quality (Reduced
Vibration/flat spots)
Tire Cooling Time Reduced
Less Rolling Resistance
Increased Overload & Taxi Durability
Marginal Safety Benefit
25
26
Generator Stator Housing
Protection Panel Circuit Cards
Background: During depot overhaul, stator housings needed to be condemned due to damage to the stator housing. A redesign was initiated and a new stacked housing was approved. Testing proved that a generator operated at cooler temperatures and service life increased. Several test generators are still in service after 1400 hours.
Background: Legacy P‐panel circuit cards are 1960s technology. New circuit cards use state of the art technology and are expected to increase service life. Legacy and improved p‐panels can be installed on an aircraft with no issues. Operational testing is scheduled soon for final approval.
27
28
Safety Initiatives
Summary
• Cost figures presented are subject to change due to program delays, aircraft beddown changes, DoD funding adjustments, efficiencies not determined, contract restructuring and re‐
pricing, or other unforeseen circumstances.
• This info is provided for long range budget planning purposes and should not be interpreted as a final cost estimate.
• Goal is to ensure NATO’s future fighter pilot training needs are met and ENJJPT, with new advanced training systems, will continue to produce the world’s best pilots.
• Forward Canopy Redesign – Improved bird‐strike resistance
• Flap Y Rod Replacement – TCTO 1T‐38‐875 completed 164 A/C
• Rudder Interconnect Crank Replacement – Deliveries Mar 16
• Rudder Force Producer Spring Replacement – 6 remaining
• Control Stick Bolt Safety Wire – 15 remaining
• Brake Quadrant Replacement – Deliveries Feb 15
29
64
SC Attachment 10
30
Recommendation
Steering Committee approve proposed funding plan
Backup
31
SC Attachment 10
32
65
18th Edition Approval
Option 1
ENJJPT
Plan of Operation (PO)
Changes
•
Assumes MOU Amendment 6 is signed prior to SC70
•
ENJJPTSC members sign 18th Edition signature page on Monday
•
Changes approved at SC70 are published as 18th Edition, Change 1
Option 2
•
Assumes MOU Amendment 6 is signed prior to or at SC70
•
ENJJPTSC members sign 18th Edition signature page on Thursday or Friday
•
Changes approved at SC70 become part of the new 18th Edition, i.e. no Change 1
Option 3
Joe Spann
Chief of Executive Program
•
Assumes MOU Amendment 6 is NOT signed prior to or at SC70
September 2015
•
ENJJPTSC members sign 18th Edition signature page on Thursday or Friday
•
Changes approved at SC70 become part of the new 18th Edition, i.e. no Change 1
•
New PO 18th Edition not published (dated) until MOU Amendment 6 is signed
1
2
SC 70 PO Changes
Section 7 Changes
Submitted by US
•
•
Paragraph 7.14 – Change “final account” to “FSA”
•
Paragraph 7.19 – Delete sentence in paragraph
Section 7 – Administrative changes to various paragraphs (18th Edition) Submitted by ENJJPT Wing
• Annex 7 – Civilian Simulator Instructor (CSI) Realignment
• Swap two T‐38 CSI positions for two T‐6 CSI positions
• Annex 8 – Student Sorties Per Month By Position
• Proposed Annex 8 would add IFF T‐1 sorties
3
4
Section 7 Changes
•
Annex 7
Paragraph 7.39 – Delete last sentence
• Civilian Simulator Instructor realignment
• Swaps two T‐38 CSI positions for two T‐6 CSI positions…
Aircraft / MDS
T-6
CSIs
28
Current
T-38 IFF
26
7
T-6
30
Proposed
T-38 IFF
24
7
T-6
Shift
T-38
IFF
+2
-2
0
• Aligns % of CSI positions with % of simulator sorties
•
Paragraph 7.40.1 – Replace “decision sheet” with “letter of participation”
Aircraft / MDS
•
Sim Sorties
T-6 T-38 IFF
% Sim Sorties
T-6 T-38 IFF
T-6
# CSIs
T-38
IFF
45
49%
30
24
7
36
11
39%
12%
Annex 8 – Adds sorties for IFF IPs
• Current Annex 8 does not include T‐1 student sorties for IFF
• Proposed Annex 8 provides T‐1 students sorties currently used by ENJJPT Management System to determine IFF IP requirements
5
66
SC Attachment 11
6
Current Annex 8
Proposed Annex 8
• Current Annex 8 does not include IFF T‐1 student sorties
• Proposed Annex 8 provides a “baseline” of IFF T‐1 students sorties currently used by ENJJPT Management System to determine IFF IP requirements
• ENJJPT Wing does not recommend any changes to this “baseline” of sorties at this time
7
SC Attachment 11
8
67
68
SC Attachment 11.1
SC Attachment 11.2
69
70
SC Attachment 11.3
SC Attachment 11.3
71
72
SC Attachment 11.3
Sim-to-Sim Turn Time Redux
ENJJPT
Syllabus Change Proposal
for April ‘15 T-6 UPT Syllabus
ENJJPT
• Allow for a 3+00 scheduled (still 2+45 actual) Sim-to-Sim turn time. (Page 6)
•Rationale: Increases scheduling flexibility without degrading training. Acknowledges
shorter sim brief time and different sim device turn times.
UTD Option Proposal
T-6 UPT Apr ‘15
ENJJPT
ENJJPT
• Allow for UTD option in-lieu-of IFT for I2001-2002, 2101-2102, and 2301-2302. (Page 51)
•Rationale: Increases scheduling flexibility without degrading training.
Recommend: PRS approve and
forward Change 1 to Apr ‘15 T-6 UPT
Syllabus to SC#70 for final approval
Questions?
ENJJPT
SC Attachment 12
73
SPANN, JOSEPH A GS-13 USAF AETC 80 FTW/EP
Subject:
Attachments:
FW: Antwort: RE: Antwort: FW: Antwort: FW: FOUO\\ Routine/Action: German request
to swap two ENJJPT students
ATT00001.jpg
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 2:26 AM To: Mundie, Robert B Col USAF (US) Subject: Antwort: FW: Antwort: FW: FOUO\\ Routine/Action: German request to swap two ENJJPT students Bruce, Thank you very much for your mail regarding the movement of German students at ENJJPT. I have no objections with the move, and I suggest that you proceed as you proposed. Hope that your travel plans to Belgium are still on. All the best Katz ________________________________ Günter Katz Brigadegeneral [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Tel.: +49 (0) 30 ‐ 3687 ‐ 3200 AllgFspWNBW: 90 ‐ 8201 ‐ 3200 Kommando Luftwaffe Abteilungsleiter Einsatz [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > General‐
Steinhoff‐Kaserne Kladower Damm 182 14089 Berlin _______________________________ Von: "Mundie, Robert B Col USAF (US)" <[email protected]> An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Kopie: "Cooke, Carmita B CIV USAF AF‐A3‐5 (US)" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Keeton, Gregory S Col USAF 80 FTW (US)" <[email protected]> Datum: 05.05.2015 21:19 Betreff: FW: Antwort: FW: FOUO\\ Routine/Action: German request to swap two ENJJPT students ________________________________ 74
1
SC Attachment 13
Gen Katz, The German AF SNR at ENJJPT would like to move two German AF students from class 16‐07 to class 16‐08. There are currently no German AF students in class 16‐08. This will allow German AF students to graduate in class 16‐08 and be present for a German delegation Okctoberfest event open to the public, and the Chief of the German Air Staff to be the guest speaker for the UPT graduation of class 16‐08. The US is willing to move two USAF students from 16‐08 to 16‐07 in order to balance the class sizes. The US financial rep confirmed that there will be no cost changes passed to any of the partner nations. Baron has confirmed that he is aware and approves of the movement. He also confirmed that there are no expected cost changes that will result from the movement. However, Germany is willing to accept any unexpected costs. With your permission, I would like to send an e‐mail to each SNR that will explain the planned student movement and see if there are any objections. If there are no objections, then I will recommend your approval of the student movement. v/r, COL ROBERT BRUCE MUNDIE Headquarters Air Force A3OR Readiness, Exercises, Flight Hour Program [email protected] [email protected] COM: 703‐697‐1737 / DSN: 227‐1737 STE: 695‐6937 / STE DSN: 225‐6937 ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > ] Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 5:45 AM To: Mundie, Robert B Col USAF (US) Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Antwort: FW: FOUO\\ Routine/Action: German request to swap two ENJJPT students Hi, all best in good old Germany! The GE SNR was in close contact with me and I am fully aware of the planed swap. Therefore GE does not has any objections moving 2 students from class 16‐07 to class 16‐08. If there would be any cost changes GE would accept those. However, speaking to my budget folks, I don't see any upcoming change. GE appreciates your help. See you in Belgium ... v/r Baron ________________________________ Kommando Einsatzverbände Luftwaffe Dez FlgWaSys Ausb 2
SC Attachment 13
75
LwTrKdo Luft Ib Ausb FlgWaSys <mailto:LwTrKdo <mailto:LwTrKdo> <mailto:LwTrKdo <mailto:LwTrKdo> > Luft Ib Ausb FlgWaSys> Luftwaffenkaserne WAHN 504 Postfach 90 61 10 51147 Köln Eberhard Freiherr von Wintzingerode‐Knorr Oberst i.G. [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > Tel: 0 22 03 / 9 08 ‐ 22 55 Fax: 0 22 03 / 62208 FspNBw 90 ‐ 34 51 ‐ 22 55 Einsatzbereit ‐ Professionell ‐ Effizient ________________________________ Von: "Mundie, Robert B Col USAF (US)" <[email protected]> An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Datum: 30.04.2015 22:53 Betreff: FW: FOUO\\ Routine/Action: German request to swap two ENJJPT students _______________________________ Baron, Hope all is well! The German AF SNR at ENJJPT would like to move two German AF students from class 16‐07 to class 16‐08. There are currently no German AF students in class 16‐08. This will allow German AF students to graduate in class 16‐08 and be present for a German delegation Okctoberfest event open to the public, and the Chief of the German Air Staff to be the guest speaker for the UPT graduation of class 16‐08. The US is willing to move two USAF students from 16‐08 to 16‐07 in order to balance the class sizes. The US financial rep confirmed that there will be no cost changes passed to any of the partner nations. If you can confirm that the German AF will accept any cost changes and that you would like to proceed with the swap, I recommend we inform the partner nations senior representatives via e‐mail to see if there are any objections. Best Regards, COL ROBERT BRUCE MUNDIE Headquarters Air Force A3OR Readiness, Exercises, Flight Hour Program [email protected] [email protected] COM: 703‐697‐1737 / DSN: 227‐1737 STE: 695‐6937 / STE DSN: 225‐6937 ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: TOOGOOD, DAVID G Lt Col USAF AETC 80 FTW/US SNR [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > ] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 10:15 AM To: Mundie, Robert B Col USAF (US) Cc: Keeton, Gregory S Col USAF 80 FTW (US); Abatti, James M Col USAF (US); Spann, Joseph A CIV USAF 80 FTW (US) Subject: FOUO\\ Routine/Action: German request to swap two ENJJPT students 76
3
SC Attachment 13
This e‐mail contains FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ______________________________________________________ Col Mundie, Sir, I seek your decision on a request from the German Senior National Representative at ENJJPT to swap two German students from class 16‐07 with two US students in class 16‐08. BACKGROUND: In the fall of 2016 Germany will be celebrating 50 years of pilot training at Sheppard AFB. The German delegation would like to celebrate that milestone with an Okctoberfest event open to the public. On the same weekend they are inviting the Chief of the German Air Staff (US CSAF equivalent) to be the guest speaker for the UPT graduation of class 16‐08 on 23 Sep 2016. However, Germany does not have any students committed to that class. To remedy the issue, Germany would like to move two of their four students from class 16‐07 to class 16‐08 to have representation during the "Anniversary Graduation". To prevent an overall change in class size, Germany is asking the US to move two students from 16‐08 to 16‐07 to compensate their move. IMPACT: There will be no impact to the program nor to any of the other partner nations. However, for the US and Germany there will be a minor shift in Instructor Pilot (IP) requirements between FY15 and FY16. Specifically, for the US, the IP requirement will increase by .21 IPs in FY15 and decrease by .21 IPs in FY16. The change is small enough that there will not be a change in actual manning, but there will be a change in the financial penalty/surplus for those years. In dollars it equates to $31,920 more in FY15 and the same amount less in FY16. The inverse will be true for Germany. Unfortunately for the US, we are currently ‐4.12 for FY15 and project a surplus of 9.33 for FY16 meaning the swap with Germany move us in the wrong direction. Germany has stated that they accept the financial implications. If the swap is not accepted by the US, Germany will need to receive approval from the ENJJPT wing to increase the size of class 16‐08 (and advise of the decrease in 16‐07). Furthermore, there will be a financial impact to all counties when a one for one swap is not achieved. Section 3.2 on page 6 of the Plan of Operation outlines requirements for setting student entries and making shortfall exchanges, but it does not address one‐for‐one swaps between classes. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the student swap between the United States and Germany. Notify the German Steering Committee member of the US acceptance of their proposal and coordinate communication of the change to the remaining Steering Committee members. Please contact me with any questions. V/R, Jethro DAVID G. TOOGOOD, Lt Col, USAF US Senior National Representative Euro‐NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training DSN 736‐5039 COMM 940‐676‐5039 4
SC Attachment 13
77
Air Force Security Assistance Training
Status of Case Closure
• Where are we?
• FY03 – All Countries
•
Closed
•
Air Force Financial
Update to SC70
Closed
•
Closed
• Other Years
• FY06 – 09
• In differing stages of closure – anticipated to close by 30 Sept 15
• Expect no less than four prior years to remain open as
closure process continues
Mr. Rick Jellison
Director of Financial Management
We Train the World
1
2
Financial Health of the Program
• Restructure of the Air Force Financial
Management Team has improved greatly
• An Aging Fleet of Aircraft to Maintain
• The US Air Force is aggressively pursuing a
replacement aircraft for aging T-38 fleet
• Current projected replacement (T-X) to start fielding is
in FY26
• Partners should expect continued increases in their
cost-share moving forward
• Costly repairs to our dedicated fleet makes the current
cost-share model difficult to pallet for some partners
• BL - The cost of participation will continue to rise
moving forward
• More discussion as we move closer to aircraft
procurement and delivery
• Enhanced Case Closure efforts
• Budget/Accounting transparency
• Improved Coordination between agencies
• With an aging fleet of aircraft and facilities, the
cost-share model for ENJJPT partners will
continue to increase
• Aircraft Mods/Repairs have increased by 65% in the
past 5 years (FY12-16) and rising to 77% (FY11-17)
• Facilities sustainment has been underfunded leaving
the program with a significant repair bill for the future
3
4
• Sustaining Aging ENJJPT Facilities
• Sustaining Aging ENJJPT Facilities, Con’t
• We, ENJJPT Partners, have an obligation to ensure we
sustain the facilities that are directly tied to the quality of
training our students receive
• ENJJPT facilities have not been maintained to
adequate levels in the past due to the growing cost of
maintaining facilities
• The USAF spends on average $6.2M per year on other
training Wing facilities
• The US Air Force Installation and Mission Support
Center will take over facilities sustainment funding by
FY17
• This means we will have a new performing organization that
supports our training program
• It is critical that we increase our facilities sustainment
budget to meet our future training needs today
• We do not want to push a facilities bill to you after the fact due
to Safety/Health/Life must pay bills, although this might happen
• Due to cost-model/approved budget USAF spends $1.5M on
ENJJPT facilities annually
• We need to be prepared to increase our facilities
requirement in FY17 to no less than $6.2M annually
• This must change if we want ENJJPT to continue to be
the premier training location for developing basic fighter
pilot skills
• At the current cost-share model that would mean $4.65M USAF
and $1.55M for all other participating partners to share
• USAF has agreed to program for their share of this increase
5
78
SC Attachment 14
6
Closing
• Action must be taken now to prevent failure of our
ENJJPT facilities
• We must also continue to monitor our aging fleet costs
and look for ways to extend fleet life in a cost efficient
manner
Questions
• Request SC Chairman task FLS to discuss aging
facilities concerns and make recommendation to SC on
how to move forward on funding
7
SC Attachment 14
8
79
80
SC Attachment 15
ENJJPT
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
STEERING COMMITTEE
NUMBER 70
Bruges, Belgium
7 - 11 Sep 15
POLICY
RECOMMENDATION
SUBCOMMITTEE
AGENDA
ITEM
SUBJECT
1
OPENING / REVIEW OF AGENDA
2
PRS ROSTER
3
SC 69 PRS MINUTES REVIEW
4
PROPOSED IP EXTENSIONS
5
UPT AND IFF STUDENT (PIT* AND UIP*) CLASS ENTRIES
6
REVIEW OF STUDENT / IP PARTICIPATION (AFTER STUDENT ENTRIES)
7
CAT I / II / III POSITIONS
8
SYLLABUS CHANGES
9
P.O. CHANGES
10
FACILITY PROJECTS
11
STEERING COMMITTEE DIRECTED ITEMS
12
OTHER BUSINESS
13
PRS REPORT/MINUTES REVIEW
14
CLOSING COMMENTS/ADJOURN
* The ENJJPT Management Analyst will calculated these items (dependent on PIT/UIP entries)
after the Steering Committee Adjourns and send out in the Steering Committee minutes.
PRS Attachment 1
81
EURO-NATO JOINT JET PILOT TRAINING (ENJJPT) PROGRAM
STEERING COMMITTEE #70
POLICY RECOMMENDATION SUBCOMMITTEE (PRS) ROSTER
(Representing)
PRS Member Name
Message Address
(Chairman)
Col Bruce Mundie
HQ USAF/A3OR
USA
HQ USAF WASHINGTON DC//A3OR//
Ph: Comm 703-697-1737/DSN 227-1737
E-mail: [email protected]
(Kingdom of Belgium)
Lt Col Jan Vandenberghe
Belgium SNR
ENJJPT
Belgium
Ph : 940-337-4568
Fax: +32-10-68-2665
(Canada)
Maj Matt Maurice
Canadian SNR
ENJJPT
Canada
Ph: 940-249-1676
(Kingdom of Denmark)
Maj Kresten D Andersen (MES)
Danish Defence Command, Air Staff
Herningvej 30
7470 Karup J
Denmark
(Federal Republic of Germany)
Lt Col Thomas Hullena
German SNR
ENJJPT
Germany
82
Ph: +45-72840482
Cell: +45-25591753
Ph: 940-676-2293
Fax: 940-855-2153
PRS Attachment 2
(Hellenic Republic)
Col Petros Doulaptsis
MoD/HAF/B2/2
Holargos
Hellas
(Republic of Italy)
Lt Col Roberto Stimolo
Comando Scuole A.M/3 RA
Via Nazario Sauro 39
Bari 70121
Italy
(Kingdom of the Netherlands)
Lt Col Rien Keij
Royal Netherlands
Air Force Command
Personnel Branch Aircrew Section
Luchtmachtplein 1
4822 ZB, Breda
The Netherlands
(Kingdom of Norway)
Maj Kjetil Braendshoei
F-35 Program, Norway
Fetveien 80 – 86
N-2007 Kjeller
Norway
(Republic of Portugal)
Major João Pires
Portuguese (SC/PRS)
Portugal
(Kingdom of Spain)
Maj Fernandez Espejo
Spain PRS/SC
BA Talavera la Real
Badajoz
Spain
Ph: work +30-210-659-2221
Ph: cell +30-6983519439
E-Mail: [email protected]
Ph: +39-080-5418832
Fax: +39-0805418375
Ph: +31-76-544-7271
Fax: +31-76-544-7007
Ph: +47-95812304 E-mail: [email protected]
Ph: +34-924209532
PRS Attachment 2
83
(Republic of Turkey)
Maj Erdinc Simsek
Turkish SNR/PRS/SC
ENJJPT
Turkey
(United Kingdom)
Gp Capt Eugene Moriarty
Asst. Directorate of Flying Training
Building #7001
MOD Abbeywood
Bristol, England BS34 8JH
UK
(United States of America)
Col James Abatti
HQ AETC/A3F
1 F St, Suite 2
Randolph AFB, TX 78150
USA
(ENJJPT Management Analyst)
Mr. Shannon Brown
80 FTW/EPA
1910 Ave J Suite 6
Sheppard AFB TX 76311
USA
(PRS Secretary)
Mr. Bryan Knoll
HQ AETC/A3FP
1 F St, Suite 2
Randolph AFB, TX 78150
USA
84
Ph: Work 940-676-9001
Fax: Cell 940-337-5377
Ph: +44 30679-80093
Ph: Comm 210-652-2114/ DSN 487-2114
80FTW SHEPPARD AFB TX//CC//
Ph: Comm 940-676-4501/ DSN 736-4501
Ph: Comm 210-652-9649/ DSN 487-9649
PRS Attachment 2
PRS Attachment 3.1
85
16
18
4
12
7
5
1606
14
4
6
2
1607
FY16
5
5
2
4
1608
28-Aug-15
13-Apr-16
5
6
22
0
24
4
0
1
TOTAL
26
SC 67
STUDENT COMMITMENTS SET AT SC 66
19
US
UK
TU
17
26
19
23
20
22
24
26
26
10
193
125
0
6
0
3
2
4
1605
18-Jul-15
26-Feb-16
SP
4
4
1603
5-Jun-15
8-Jan-16
0
3
3
1
1602
25-Apr-15
13-Nov-15
T6 STUDENT ENTRIES
FY2015
PO
NO
NL
IT
GR
GE
DE
CA
BE
1601
CLASS
NATION
1604
12-Mar-15
30-Sep-15
27-Jan-15
19-Aug-15
FY 2015
24-Nov-14
6-Jul-15
10-Oct-14
28-May-15
FY
ENTRY
COMPLETE
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
86
PRS Attachment 3.2
FY
23
1602
1
B
4
A
24
1603
0
B
4
A
22
1604
0
B
4
A
1605
B
19-Nov-15
20-May-16
2016
5
A
1606
2
B
15-Jan-16
1-Jul-16
2
A
1607
2
B
4-Mar-16
12-Aug-16
A
1
12
14
TOT CLASS
TOTAL:
24
22
25
22
0
17
2
18
2
22
19
20
22
19
20
1
169
0
15
125
20
US
18
UK
10
5
4
0
6
18
1
TU
5
0
0
18
2
0
0
24
2
2
1
A
0
3
0
B
175
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
B
TOTALS
SP
3
2
1608
18-Apr-16
23-Sep-16
PO
NO
NL
IT
GR
0
2
A
6-Oct-15
1-Apr-16
2
0
B
25-Aug-15
19-Feb-16
2
25
1601
2015
10-Jul-15
18-Dec-15
DE
3
1
A
3-Jun-15
6-Nov-15
T-38 STUDENT ENTRIES
FY2015 / 2016
GE
CA
BE
NATION
CLASS
TRACK
GRADUATE
ENTRY
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
PRS Attachment 3.3
87
DE
19
3
6
4
15
6
3
1706
16
2
6
1707
FY17
TU
25
TOTAL:
19
US
UK
15
22
20
22
23
24
11
24
24
24
10
5
5
4
1708
31-Aug-16
7-Apr-17
5
4
23
0
18
6
0
1
TOTAL
188
125
0
6
0
3
4
1705
19-Jul-16
24-Feb-17
0
2
5
1703
7-Jun-16
11-Jan-17
SP
2
1702
26-Apr-16
17-Nov-16
T6 STUDENT ENTRIES
FY2016
PO
NO
NL
IT
GR
GE
2
1
BE
CA
1701
CLASS
NATION
1704
11-Mar-16
30-Sep-16
27-Jan-16
19-Aug-16
FY 2016
30-Nov-15
8-Jul-16
13-Oct-15
26-May-16
FY
ENTRY
COMPLETE
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
88
PRS Attachment 3.4
FY
0
B
5
A
20
1703
0
B
4
A
23
1704
0
B
4
A
1705
B
2017
3
A
1706
1
B
18-Jan-17
23-Jun-17
2
A
1707
2-Mar-17
4-Aug-17
B
2
A
18
1708
1
B
13-Apr-17
22-Sep-17
1
A
GE
TOT CLASS
TOTAL:
US
UK
TU
15
24
25
20
20
19
19
23
15
16
0
18
1
18
0
18
19
18
18
11
17
10
1
163
165
2
0
0
0
125
0
6
0
SP
3
0
NO
0
0
2
0
2
0
PO
5
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
18
5
NL
IT
GR
2
0
0
B
TOTALS
4
24
1702
23-Nov-16
12-May-17
2
A
6-Oct-16
30-Mar-17
DE
0
B
24-Aug-16
17-Feb-17
2
25
1701
2016
12-Jul-16
22-Dec-16
2
1
A
2-Jun-16
11-Nov-16
FY2016 / 2017
CA
BE
NATION
CLASS
TRACK
GRADUATE
ENTRY
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
PRS Attachment 3.5
89
IT
20
2
6
4
19
6
2
1806
17
5
5
1807
FY2018
TU
25
SC 67
10
US
UK
15
24
17
25
24
26
14
27
27
28
13
5
6
4
1808
29-Aug-17
12-Apr-18
5
10
34
0
18
8
0
1
TOTAL
206
125
0
5
0
3
4
1805
14-Jul-17
28-Feb-18
0
5
4
1803
1-Jun-17
11-Jan-18
SP
6
2
1802
20-Apr-17
16-Nov-17
T6 STUDENT ENTRIES
FY2017
PO
NO
NL
5
4
GR
2
DE
1
GE
CA
BE
1801
CLASS
NATION
1804
9-Mar-17
29-Sep-17
25-Jan-17
15-Aug-17
FY2017
1-Dec-16
30-Jun-17
17-Oct-16
19-May-17
FY
ENTRY
COMPLETE
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
90
PRS Attachment 3.6
FY
22
1803
0
B
20
4
A
24
1804
0
B
2
4
A
1805
B
19
2
A
1806
1
B
3
A
1807
B
5
4
A
23
1808
1
1
B
18-Apr-18
21-Sep-18
6
173
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
B
18
8
2
1
A
TOTALS
TOT CLASS
TOTAL:
US
UK
TU
NO
21
20
22
15
17
10
24
17
0
21
1
20
0
20
22
20
20
14
22
13
0
170
3
0
0
125
0
5
0
3
4
A
6-Mar-18
10-Aug-18
0
1
1
B
18-Jan-18
29-Jun-18
FY2018
0
22
1802
22-Nov-17
18-May-18
0
2
2
A
5-Oct-17
6-Apr-18
SP
0
B
21-Aug-17
16-Feb-18
PO
20
1801
7-Jul-17
22-Dec-17
FY2017
0
3
4
2
1
A
25-May-17
3-Nov-17
FY2017 / 2018
5
NL
IT
GR
GE
DE
CA
BE
NATION
CLASS
TRACK
GRADUATE
ENTRY
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
PRS Attachment 3.7
91
1
BE
IT
3
6
4
1905
17
6
2
1906
11-Jan-19
17
5
5
1907
28-Feb-19
FY19
13
TOTAL:
28
3
TU
UK
US
25
24
24
27
14
25
27
27
12
5
6
4
1908
11-Apr-19
27-Aug-18
5
10
34
0
18
8
0
1
TOTAL
207
0
125
6
0
20
4
1904
15-Nov-18
17-Jul-18
SP
15
5
4
1903
16-Aug-18
5-Jun-18
0
17
6
2
1902
5-Jul-18
24-Apr-18
T-6 STUDENT ENTRIES
FY2018
PO
NO
NL
5
4
DE
GE
GR
2
CA
1901
CLASS
NATION
24-May-18
COMPLETE
27-Sep-18
13-Mar-18
26-Jan-18
FY 2018
30-Nov-17
16-Oct-17
FY
ENTRY
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
92
PRS Attachment 3.8
FY
0
22
1
15
3
22
0
20
4
24
1904
0
B
3
4
21-Nov-18
17-May-19
A
B
1905
2019
17
2
1
17-Jan-19
28-Jun-19
A
B
1906
17
3
A
1907
6-Mar-19
9-Aug-19
B
22
1
1
5
6
0
0
18
8
2
1
A
TOTAL:
TOT CLASS
22
21
23
24
0
19
1
20
0
21
20
20
21
14
21
171
125
17
13
US
6
0
TU
174
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
B
TOTALS
UK
12
5
4
17-Apr-19
20-Sep-19
A
B
1908
0
23
1
4
A
3-Oct-18
5-Apr-19
0
2
2
22-Aug-18
22-Feb-19
A
B
1903
SP
3
2018
11-Jul-18
21-Dec-18
A
B
1902
FY2018 / 2019
PO
NO
NL
IT
GR
2
4
DE
1
31-May-18
9-Nov-18
A
B
1901
GE
CA
BE
ENTRY
GRADUATE
TRACK
CLASS
NATION
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
PRS Attachment 3.9
93
1
BE
IT
3
5
4
2005
19
5
4
2006
13-Jan-20
13
5
5
4
2007
28-Feb-20
FY20
12
TOTAL:
27
3
TU
UK
US
23
28
24
27
15
28
27
26
12
5
5
4
2008
14-Apr-20
28-Aug-19
5
10
31
0
24
8
0
1
TOTAL
210
0
125
6
0
20
4
2004
14-Nov-19
17-Jul-19
SP
19
5
4
2003
16-Aug-19
5-Jun-19
0
15
6
2
2002
5-Jul-19
23-Apr-19
T-6 STUDENT ENTRIES
FY2019
PO
NO
NL
5
4
DE
GE
GR
2
CA
2001
CLASS
NATION
24-May-19
COMPLETE
27-Sep-19
13-Mar-19
28-Jan-19
FY 2019
29-Nov-18
15-Oct-18
FY
ENTRY
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
94
PRS Attachment 3.10
FY
0
20
1
19
3
22
0
20
24
2004
0
B
3
4
20-Nov-19
15-May-20
A
B
2005
2020
19
4
1
17-Jan-20
2-Jul-20
A
B
2006
13
3
4
5-Mar-20
14-Aug-20
A
B
2007
22
1
1
5
6
0
0
20
8
2
1
A
TOTAL:
TOT CLASS
22
19
22
24
0
23
1
20
0
22
24
20
22
15
21
173
125
15
12
US
6
0
TU
176
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
B
TOTALS
UK
12
5
4
20-Apr-20
25-Sep-20
A
B
2008
0
22
1
4
A
3-Oct-19
3-Apr-20
0
2
2
22-Aug-19
21-Feb-20
A
B
2003
SP
3
2019
11-Jul-19
20-Dec-19
A
B
2002
FY2019 / 2020
PO
NO
NL
IT
GR
2
4
DE
1
31-May-19
8-Nov-19
A
B
2001
GE
CA
BE
ENTRY
GRADUATE
TRACK
CLASS
NATION
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
PRS Attachment 3.11
95
1
BE
IT
3
6
4
2105
19
6
4
2106
13-Jan-21
13
5
5
4
2107
2-Mar-21
FY20
12
TOTAL:
27
3
TU
UK
US
22
28
24
28
15
29
27
27
12
5
6
4
2108
14-Apr-21
28-Aug-20
5
10
33
0
24
8
0
1
TOTAL
212
0
125
6
0
20
4
2104
17-Nov-20
17-Jul-20
SP
19
5
4
2103
18-Aug-20
5-Jun-20
0
15
5
2
2102
8-Jul-20
24-Apr-20
T-6 STUDENT ENTRIES
FY2020
PO
NO
NL
5
4
DE
GE
GR
2
CA
2101
CLASS
NATION
27-May-20
COMPLETE
29-Sep-20
13-Mar-19
28-Jan-20
FY 2020
2-Dec-19
15-Oct-19
FY
ENTRY
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
96
PRS Attachment 3.12
FY
0
20
1
19
3
22
0
20
24
2004
0
B
3
4
23-Nov-20
21-May-21
A
B
2005
2020
19
4
1
20-Jan-21
2-Jul-21
A
B
2006
13
3
4
8-Mar-21
13-Aug-21
A
B
2007
22
1
1
5
6
0
0
20
8
2
1
A
TOTAL:
TOT CLASS
22
19
22
24
0
23
1
20
0
22
24
20
22
15
21
173
125
15
12
US
6
0
TU
176
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
B
TOTALS
UK
12
5
4
20-Apr-21
24-Sep-21
A
B
2008
0
22
1
4
A
5-Oct-20
2-Apr-21
0
2
2
28-Aug-20
21-Feb-21
A
B
2003
SP
3
2019
14-Jul-20
22-Dec-20
A
B
2002
FY2019 / 2020
PO
NO
NL
IT
GR
2
4
DE
1
2-Jun-20
6-Nov-20
A
B
2001
GE
CA
BE
ENTRY
GRADUATE
TRACK
CLASS
NATION
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
PRS Attachment 3.13
97
11
11
TOTAL:
2014
10
3
6
1
15BB
17-Nov-14
BE
CA
DE
GE
GR
IT
NL
NO
PO
SP
TU
UK
US
2
15AB
CLASS
NATION
24-Oct-14
GRADUATE
8-Sep-14
2014
18-Aug-14
FY
ENTRY
11
5
6
15CB
12-Dec-14
1-Oct-14
8
8
15DB
15-Jan-15
23-Oct-14
8
3
4
1
15EB
9-Feb-15
14-Nov-14
11
11
15FB
5-Mar-15
11-Dec-14
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
8
8
15HB
21-Apr-15
9-Feb-15
2015
11
6
1
4
15IB
13-May-15
5-Mar-15
11
11
15JB
5-Jun-15
27-Mar-15
12
7
5
15KB
26-Jun-15
21-Apr-15
11
9
2
15GB
30-Mar-15
14-Jan-15
11
11
15LB
17-Jul-15
13-May-15
11
6
5
15MB
10-Aug-15
4-Jun-15
11
11
15NB
31-Aug-15
25-Jun-15
11
7
4
15OB
22-Sep-15
17-Jul-15
IFF STUDENT ENTRIES
FY2014 / 2015
157
1
2
2
22
0
0
3
6
0
0
2
0
119
TOTAL
98
PRS Attachment 3.14
2015
12
11
11
8
TOTAL:
5
5
4
3
11
3
11
1
16EB
9-Feb-16
2
11
16DB
14-Jan-16
17-Nov-15
3
2
16CB
11-Dec-15
23-Oct-15
2
16BB
17-Nov-15
1-Oct-15
BE
CA
DE
GE
GR
IT
NL
NO
PO
SP
TU
UK
US
1
16AB
CLASS
NATION
23-Oct-15
GRADUATE
8-Sep-15
2015
18-Aug-15
FY
ENTRY
11
11
16FB
7-Mar-16
11-Dec-15
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
11
11
16HB
20-Apr-16
9-Feb-16
2016
11
3
2
2
4
16IB
11-May-16
4-Mar-16
11
11
16JB
6-Jun-16
28-Mar-16
12
8
4
16KB
27-Jun-16
20-Apr-16
12
10
2
16GB
29-Mar-16
13-Jan-16
11
11
16LB
19-Jul-16
12-May-16
12
8
4
16MB
9-Aug-16
3-Jun-16
12
12
16NB
31-Aug-16
27-Jun-16
12
7
5
16OB
22-Sep-16
19-Jul-16
IFF STUDENT ENTRIES
FY2015 / 2016
168
1
2
2
21
0
0
5
5
0
0
7
0
125
TOTAL
PRS Attachment 3.15
99
11
12
TOTAL:
2016
11
2
8
17BB
23-Nov-16
BE
CA
DE
GE
GR
IT
NL
NO
PO
SP
TU
UK
US
2
17AB
CLASS
NATION
28-Oct-16
GRADUATE
12-Sep-16
2016
18-Aug-16
FY
ENTRY
12
3
5
2
2
17CB
19-Dec-16
5-Oct-16
11
11
17DB
18-Jan-17
27-Oct-16
10
4
3
2
1
17EB
10-Feb-17
22-Nov-16
11
11
17FB
7-Mar-17
16-Dec-16
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
11
11
17HB
18-Apr-17
9-Feb-17
2017
12
7
5
17IB
10-May-17
6-Mar-17
11
11
17JB
1-Jun-17
27-Mar-17
12
8
4
17KB
22-Jun-17
18-Apr-17
11
7
2
2
17GB
27-Mar-17
18-Jan-17
12
12
17LB
17-Jul-17
9-May-17
12
5
3
4
17MB
7-Aug-17
31-May-17
11
11
17NB
30-Aug-17
21-Jun-17
13
10
3
17OB
22-Sep-17
14-Jul-17
IFF STUDENT ENTRIES
FY2016 / 2017
172
1
2
4
22
0
0
2
5
0
0
6
0
130
TOTAL
100
PRS Attachment 3.16
11
12
TOTAL:
2017
11
10
18BB
28-Nov-17
BE
CA
DE
GE
GR
IT
NL
NO
PO
SP
TU
UK
US
2
18AB
CLASS
NATION
31-Oct-17
GRADUATE
13-Sep-17
2017
18-Aug-17
FY
ENTRY
12
5
5
2
18CB
20-Dec-17
6-Oct-17
11
11
18DB
22-Jan-18
30-Oct-17
12
3
2
2
4
1
18EB
14-Feb-18
27-Nov-17
11
11
18FB
12-Mar-18
19-Dec-17
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
11
11
18HB
25-Apr-18
14-Feb-18
2018
12
5
3
4
18IB
16-May-18
9-Mar-18
11
11
18JB
7-Jun-18
2-Apr-18
11
7
4
18KB
28-Jun-18
24-Apr-18
11
7
2
2
18GB
3-Apr-18
22-Jan-18
12
12
18LB
20-Jul-18
16-May-18
12
5
3
4
18MB
13-Aug-18
6-Jun-18
11
11
18NB
4-Sep-18
28-Jun-18
12
10
2
18OB
25-Sep-18
20-Jul-18
IFF STUDENT ENTRIES
FY2017 / 2018
172
1
2
6
18
0
0
5
5
0
0
5
0
130
TOTAL
PRS Attachment 3.17
101
11
12
TOTAL:
2018
11
9
19BB
26-Nov-18
BE
CA
DE
GE
GR
IT
NL
NO
PO
SP
TU
UK
US
3
19AB
CLASS
NATION
29-Oct-18
GRADUATE
11-Sep-18
2018
20-Aug-18
FY
ENTRY
12
5
5
2
19CB
18-Dec-18
4-Oct-18
11
11
19DB
18-Jan-19
26-Oct-18
12
2
3
2
4
1
19EB
13-Feb-19
21-Nov-18
11
11
19FB
11-Mar-19
17-Dec-18
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
11
11
19HB
23-Apr-19
12-Feb-19
2019
11
4
3
4
19IB
15-May-19
8-Mar-19
12
12
19JB
6-Jun-19
1-Apr-19
11
7
4
19KB
27-Jun-19
23-Apr-19
11
7
2
2
19GB
2-Apr-19
18-Jan-19
12
12
19LB
19-Jul-19
14-May-19
11
4
3
4
19MB
9-Aug-19
5-Jun-19
12
12
19NB
3-Sep-19
27-Jun-19
12
10
2
19OB
24-Sep-19
19-Jul-19
IFF STUDENT ENTRIES
FY2018 / 2019
172
1
2
6
18
0
0
6
5
0
0
6
0
128
TOTAL
102
PRS Attachment 3.18
11
12
TOTAL:
2019
11
9
20BB
20-Nov-19
BE
CA
DE
GE
GR
IT
NL
NO
PO
SP
TU
UK
US
3
20AB
CLASS
NATION
25-Oct-19
GRADUATE
10-Sep-19
2019
19-Aug-19
FY
ENTRY
12
5
5
2
20CB
16-Dec-19
2-Oct-19
11
11
20DB
17-Jan-20
25-Oct-19
12
2
3
2
4
1
20EB
12-Feb-20
20-Nov-19
11
11
20FB
13-Mar-20
16-Dec-19
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training
11
11
20HB
22-Apr-20
11-Feb-20
2020
11
4
3
4
20IB
14-May-20
6-Mar-20
12
12
20JB
5-Jun-20
31-Mar-20
11
7
4
20KB
26-Jun-20
22-Apr-20
11
7
2
2
20GB
31-Mar-20
17-Jan-20
12
12
20LB
20-Jul-20
13-May-20
11
4
3
4
20MB
10-Aug-20
4-Jun-20
12
12
20NB
1-Sep-20
25-Jun-20
12
10
2
20OB
23-Sep-20
20-Jul-20
IFF STUDENT ENTRIES
FY2019 / 2020
172
1
2
6
18
0
0
6
5
0
0
6
0
128
TOTAL
PRS Attachment 4.1
103
6
9
9
16
16
8
T-6
4
2
4
A/C TOT:
SC 70
CLASS TOT:
2
4
US
8
1
4
5
9
7
9
2
4
3
2
7
5
3
39
18
64
25
15
0
0
UK
2
0
TU
2
0
0
NO
0
0
0
SP
1
0
7
1
8
1
6
1
1
0
T-38C
0
3
1
1
T-38C
0
4
1
1
2
2
T-6
PO
1
5
2
1
1
T-38C
0
3
3
2
1
T-6
TOTAL
3
NL
IT
GR
GE
DE
3
T-38C
1
T-6
1606
6-Sep-16
4-May-16
1
T-38C
1605
26-Jul-16
21-Mar-16
CA
T-6
1604
19-May-16
6-Jan-16
1
T-38C
1603
24-Mar-16
29-Oct-15
1
T-6
1602
11-Jan-16
20-Aug-15
FY2016 PIT
Graduates
BE
T-38C
1601
CLASS
T-6
10-Nov-15
GRADUATE
NATION
7-Jul-15
ENTRY
PROGRAMMED FY 2016 PIT GRADUATES
Euro-NATO Joint
Jet Pilot Training
ENJJPT
104
PRS Attachment 4.2
1701
CLASS
T-6
T-38C
T-6
T-38C
8
9
3
1
3
1
9
5
5
1
11
3
1
4
1
SC 72
CLASS TOT:
4
4
A/C TOT:
5
4
4
5
7
4
6
11
5
3
1
10
7
5
29
15
58
29
20
UK
1
0
0
TU
3
0
0
3
0
0
SP
US
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
5
4
7
PO
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
2
NO
1
1
1
1
NL
IT
GR
GE
DE
1
0
NATION
0
T-38C
TOTAL
CA
T-6
1706
5-Sep-17
1-May-17
0
T-38C
1705
21-Jul-17
20-Mar-17
0
T-6
1704
16-May-17
10-Jan-17
BE
T-38C
1703
23-Mar-17
3-Nov-16
T-38C
T-6
1702
12-Jan-17
23-Aug-16
FY2017 PIT
Graduates
T-6
T-38C
16-Nov-16
GRADUATE
T-6
8-Jul-16
ENTRY
Euro-NATO Joint
Jet Pilot Training
ENJJPT
PRS Attachment 4.3
105
1801
CLASS
T-6
T-38C
T-6
T-38C
7
10
4
10
4
15
10
1
5
2
A/C TOT:
SC 74
CLASS TOT:
4
2
US
UK
TU
SP
4
6
5
4
5
10
3
5
2
6
4
4
3
6
5
9
3
3
61
0
0
0
0
28
0
0
33
20
20
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
5
4
3
PO
1
1
1
0
NL
1
5
1
0
1
1
NO
2
2
0
2
1
2
1
3
IT
GR
GE
DE
1
0
NATION
0
T-38C
TOTAL
CA
T-6
1806
6-Sep-18
4-May-18
0
T-38C
1805
26-Jul-18
23-Mar-18
0
T-6
1804
21-May-18
11-Jan-18
BE
T-38C
1803
29-Mar-18
3-Nov-17
T-38C
T-6
1802
16-Jan-18
22-Aug-17
FY2018 PIT
Graduates
T-6
T-38C
16-Nov-17
GRADUATE
T-6
6-Jul-17
ENTRY
Euro-NATO Joint
Jet Pilot Training
ENJJPT
106
PRS Attachment 4.4
1901
CLASS
T-38C
10
8
10
15
7
2
2
7
2
5
5
A/C TOT:
SC 76
CLASS TOT:
4
5
US
5
3
7
3
9
6
5
2
4
3
57
0
0
0
0
22
0
0
35
17
24
UK
3
0
0
TU
3
0
0
3
0
0
SP
6
0
0
0
0
0
4
5
5
PO
3
1
0
3
2
0
5
2
NO
NL
1
3
0
1
4
1
2
IT
GR
GE
1
0
T-6
0
T-38C
DE
T-6
0
NATION
0
T-38C
TOTAL
CA
T-6
1906
9-Sep-19
7-May-19
0
T-38C
1905
29-Jul-19
26-Mar-19
0
T-6
1904
23-May-19
14-Jan-19
BE
T-38C
1903
1-Apr-19
5-Nov-18
T-38C
T-6
1902
16-Jan-19
23-Aug-18
FY2019 PIT
Graduates
T-6
T-38C
16-Nov-18
GRADUATE
T-6
10-Jul-18
ENTRY
Euro-NATO Joint
Jet Pilot Training
ENJJPT
PRS Attachment 4.5
107
2001
CLASS
T-38C
SC 78
CLASS TOT:
A/C TOT:
2
3
1
4
0
1
1
0
6
11
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
US
2
0
0
UK
2
0
0
TU
0
0
0
1
0
0
SP
1
0
0
PO
2
0
0
NO
2
0
0
NL
0
0
1
0
2
IT
2
0
1
GR
1
5
2
0
GE
6
2
0
T-6
0
T-38C
DE
T-6
0
NATION
0
T-38C
TOTAL
CA
T-6
2006
10-Sep-20
8-May-20
0
T-38C
2005
30-Jul-20
27-Mar-20
0
T-6
2004
27-May-20
15-Jan-20
BE
T-38C
2003
2-Apr-20
6-Nov-19
T-38C
T-6
2002
17-Jan-20
26-Aug-19
FY2020 PIT
Graduates
T-6
T-38C
19-Nov-19
GRADUATE
T-6
12-Jul-19
ENTRY
Euro-NATO Joint
Jet Pilot Training
ENJJPT
108
PRS Attachment 4.6
TOTAL:
SC 70
3
2
3
4
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
2
1
13
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
8
3-Mar-16
20-Jun-16
16CI
BE
CA
DE
GE
GR
IT
NL
NO
PO
SP
TU
UK
US
17-Nov-15
23-Mar-16
16BI
TOTAL
19-Aug-15
10-Dec-15
16AI
ENTRY
GRADUATE
CLASS
NATION
27-May-16
12-Sep-16
16DI
FY2016 IFF
UIP Graduates
PROGRAMMED FY 2016 IFF UIP GRADUATES
Euro-NATO Joint
Jet Pilot Training
ENJJPT
PRS Attachment 4.7
109
TOTAL:
SC 72
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
1
1
1
10
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
8
28-Feb-17
12-Jun-17
17CI
BE
CA
DE
GE
GR
IT
NL
NO
PO
SP
TU
UK
US
18-Nov-16
20-Mar-17
17BI
TOTAL
19-Aug-16
13-Dec-16
17AI
ENTRY
GRADUATE
CLASS
NATION
22-May-17
7-Sep-17
17DI
FY2017 IFF
UIP Graduates
Euro-NATO Joint
Jet Pilot Training
ENJJPT
110
PRS Attachment 4.8
TOTAL:
SC 74
BE
CA
DE
GE
GR
IT
NL
NO
PO
SP
TU
UK
US
ENTRY
GRADUATE
CLASS
NATION
2
2
18-Aug-17
14-Dec-17
18AI
2
2
21-Nov-17
26-Mar-18
18BI
4
2
1
1
5-Mar-18
18-Jun-18
18CI
2
2
29-May-18
11-Sep-18
18DI
10
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
TOTAL
FY2018 IFF
UIP Graduates
Euro-NATO Joint
Jet Pilot Training
ENJJPT
PRS Attachment 4.9
111
TOTAL:
SC 76
3
2
3
4
1
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
13
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
5-Mar-19
18-Jun-19
19CI
BE
CA
DE
GE
GR
IT
NL
NO
PO
SP
TU
UK
US
20-Nov-18
26-Mar-19
19BI
TOTAL
20-Aug-18
13-Dec-18
19AI
ENTRY
GRADUATE
CLASS
NATION
29-May-19
11-Sep-19
19DI
FY2019 IFF
UIP Graduates
Euro-NATO Joint
Jet Pilot Training
ENJJPT
112
PRS Attachment 4.10
TOTAL:
SC 78
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
4-Mar-20
18-Jun-20
20CI
BE
CA
DE
GE
GR
IT
NL
NO
PO
SP
TU
UK
US
20-Nov-19
25-Mar-20
20BI
TOTAL
20-Aug-19
13-Dec-19
20AI
ENTRY
GRADUATE
CLASS
NATION
29-May-20
11-Sep-20
20DI
FY2020 IFF
UIP Graduates
Euro-NATO Joint
Jet Pilot Training
ENJJPT
PRS Attachment 5.1
113
Belgium
Canada
Denmark
Germany
Greece
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
REQUIRED IPs
PLUS
FORMULA
TOTALS
WSL
0.52
0.00
3.02
10.75
0.00
11.21
2.74
2.60
0.00
0.00
2.53
0.00
59.33
%
LOAD
%
T38
of WSL
WSL
of WSL
0.56%
0.38
0.53%
0.00%
0.78
1.10%
3.25%
1.12
1.57%
11.60%
9.70
13.63%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
12.09%
2.19
3.07%
2.95%
1.55
2.18%
2.80%
1.93
2.70%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
2.73%
2.30
3.22%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
64.01%
51.27
71.99%
WEIGHTED STUDENT LOADS
T6 WSL
T38 WSL
92.70
100.00%
71.21
100.00%
0.598
0.64
51.44
50.34
106.87
95.92
LOAD
NATION
STUD
STUD
T6
T38
T6
T6 Req IP/WSL
1.15
T38 Req IP/WSL
1.35
T6
T38
0.60
0.51
0.00
1.05
3.48
1.51
12.40
13.07
0.00
0.00
12.92
2.95
3.16
2.09
2.99
2.59
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.92
3.09
0.00
0.00
68.41
69.05
INSTRUCTOR REQUIREMENT
T6
T38
106.88
95.91
FY 2016
T6
T38
0.72
0.00
0.72
1.10
2.18
1.18
13.90
13.84
1.10
0.00
15.58
3.20
5.00
3.76
3.05
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
72.95
67.53
AVAILABLE
T6
T38
116.21 94.62
AVAILABLE
IPs
+/-
+/-
T38
-1.30
T38
-0.51
0.05
-0.33
0.77
0.00
0.25
1.67
0.41
0.00
1.00
-3.09
0.00
-1.52
Ratio: Avail/WSL
1.25
1.33
T6
9.32
T6
0.12
0.72
-1.30
1.50
1.10
2.66
1.84
0.06
0.00
0.00
-1.92
0.00
4.54
IPs
WEIGHTED IPs AVAILABLE
WITH WEIGHTED STUDENT & IP LOADS AND IP REQUIREMENTS BY AIRCRAFT
ENJJPT UPT PARTICIPATION
STEERING COMMITTEE 70
114
PRS Attachment 5.2
Belgium
Canada
Denmark
Germany
Greece
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
REQUIRED IPs
PLUS
FORMULA
TOTALS
WSL
0.47
0.00
3.80
8.68
0.00
16.33
3.59
2.45
0.00
0.00
2.50
0.00
56.04
%
LOAD
%
T38
of WSL
WSL
of WSL
0.50%
0.41
0.63%
0.00%
0.82
1.26%
4.05%
2.20
3.37%
9.25%
8.01
12.30%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
17.40%
0.95
1.46%
3.82%
0.91
1.40%
2.61%
1.96
3.01%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
2.66%
2.45
3.76%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
59.70%
47.46
72.82%
T6 WSL
T38 WSL
93.87
100.00%
65.17
100.00%
0.598
0.64
51.44
50.34
107.57
92.05
LOAD
NATION
STUD
STUD
T6
T38
T6
T6 Req IP/WSL
1.15
T38 Req IP/WSL
1.41
T6
T38
0.54
0.58
0.00
1.16
4.36
3.10
9.95
11.32
0.00
0.00
18.72
1.34
4.11
1.28
2.81
2.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.86
3.46
0.00
0.00
64.22
67.03
T6
T38
107.57
92.04
FY 2017
T6
T38
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.95
1.95
13.82
16.05
1.00
0.00
19.20
2.31
5.07
2.08
3.00
3.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
75.52
71.85
AVAILABLE
T6
T38
123.57 99.63
AVAILABLE
IPs
+/-
+/-
T38
7.59
T38
-0.58
-0.16
-1.15
4.73
0.00
0.97
0.80
0.62
0.00
1.00
-3.46
0.00
4.82
Ratio: Avail/WSL
1.32
1.53
T6
15.99
T6
0.46
1.00
-1.41
3.87
1.00
0.48
0.96
0.19
0.00
0.00
-1.86
0.00
11.30
IPs
PRS Attachment 5.3
115
Belgium
Canada
Denmark
Germany
Greece
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
REQUIRED IPs
PLUS
FORMULA
TOTALS
WSL
0.49
0.00
3.98
8.38
0.00
16.73
4.84
2.59
0.00
0.00
2.73
0.00
60.97
%
LOAD
%
T38
of WSL
WSL
of WSL
0.49%
0.38
0.53%
0.00%
0.79
1.12%
3.95%
3.05
4.31%
8.32%
7.51
10.63%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
16.61%
1.16
1.65%
4.80%
2.43
3.44%
2.57%
1.88
2.65%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
2.71%
1.98
2.80%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
60.55%
51.51
72.86%
T6 WSL
T38 WSL
100.70
100.00%
70.70
100.00%
0.598
0.64
51.44
50.34
111.66
95.59
LOAD
NATION
STUD
STUD
T6
T38
T6
T6 Req IP/WSL
1.11
T38 Req IP/WSL
1.35
T6
T38
0.54
0.51
0.00
1.07
4.41
4.12
9.29
10.16
0.00
0.00
18.55
1.57
5.36
3.29
2.87
2.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.03
2.68
0.00
0.00
67.61
69.65
T6
T38
111.66
95.59
FY 2018
T6
T38
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
2.93
2.00
15.74
15.38
1.00
0.00
18.24
1.36
5.68
3.33
3.00
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.02
0.99
0.00
0.00
0.00
70.73
72.68
AVAILABLE
T6
T38
120.31 101.17
AVAILABLE
IPs
+/-
+/-
T38
5.58
T38
-0.51
-0.07
-2.12
5.22
0.00
-0.21
0.04
1.86
0.00
1.02
-2.68
0.00
3.03
Ratio: Avail/WSL
1.19
1.43
T6
8.65
T6
0.46
1.00
-1.48
6.45
1.00
-0.31
0.32
0.13
0.00
0.00
-2.04
0.00
3.12
IPs
116
PRS Attachment 5.4
Belgium
Canada
Denmark
Germany
Greece
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
REQUIRED IPs
PLUS
FORMULA
TOTALS
WSL
0.49
0.00
4.00
9.23
0.00
16.19
4.84
2.60
0.00
0.00
2.87
0.00
60.61
%
LOAD
%
T38
of WSL
WSL
of WSL
0.49%
0.39
0.56%
0.00%
0.79
1.12%
3.97%
3.07
4.38%
9.16%
7.44
10.59%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
16.06%
1.15
1.64%
4.80%
2.47
3.52%
2.58%
1.88
2.67%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
2.84%
2.46
3.50%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
60.11%
50.59
72.02%
T6 WSL
T38 WSL
100.83
100.00%
70.25
100.00%
0.598
0.64
51.44
50.34
111.74
95.30
LOAD
NATION
STUD
STUD
T6
T38
T6
T6 Req IP/WSL
1.11
T38 Req IP/WSL
1.36
T6
T38
0.55
0.53
0.00
1.07
4.43
4.17
10.23
10.09
0.00
0.00
17.94
1.56
5.36
3.36
2.88
2.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.18
3.33
0.00
0.00
67.17
68.63
T6
T38
111.74
95.29
FY 2019
T6
T38
0.28
0.00
0.28
0.82
2.82
1.82
15.60
14.47
0.82
0.00
15.45
1.63
5.53
4.00
2.46
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
70.09
73.79
AVAILABLE
T6
T38
114.33 99.53
AVAILABLE
IPs
+/-
+/-
T38
4.24
T38
-0.53
-0.25
-2.35
4.38
0.00
0.07
0.64
-0.55
0.00
1.00
-3.33
0.00
5.16
Ratio: Avail/WSL
1.13
1.42
T6
2.59
T6
-0.27
0.28
-1.61
5.37
0.82
-2.49
0.17
-0.42
0.00
0.00
-2.18
0.00
2.92
IPs
PRS Attachment 5.5
117
Belgium
Canada
Denmark
Germany
Greece
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
REQUIRED IPs
PLUS
FORMULA
TOTALS
WSL
0.51
0.00
4.04
11.50
0.00
15.36
4.84
2.61
0.00
0.00
2.89
0.00
59.80
%
LOAD
%
T38
of WSL
WSL
of WSL
0.51%
0.38
0.53%
0.00%
0.77
1.07%
3.98%
3.07
4.28%
11.32%
8.19
11.41%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
15.13%
1.15
1.60%
4.76%
2.49
3.47%
2.57%
1.93
2.69%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
2.85%
2.43
3.38%
0.00%
0.00
0.00%
58.88%
51.32
71.56%
T6 WSL
T38 WSL
101.56
100.00%
71.72
100.00%
0.598
0.64
51.44
50.34
112.17
96.24
LOAD
NATION
STUD
STUD
T6
T38
T6
T6 Req IP/WSL
1.10
T38 Req IP/WSL
1.34
T6
T38
0.57
0.51
0.00
1.03
4.47
4.12
12.70
10.98
0.00
0.00
16.97
1.54
5.34
3.34
2.88
2.58
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.20
3.26
0.00
0.00
66.05
68.87
T6
T38
112.18
96.23
FY 2020
T6
T38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.81
0.81
14.20
14.10
0.00
0.00
12.13
1.00
5.93
3.74
0.00
1.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
63.78
63.30
AVAILABLE
T6
T38
98.85
85.56
AVAILABLE
IPs
+/-
+/-
T38
-10.67
T38
-0.51
-1.03
-3.31
3.12
0.00
-0.54
0.40
-0.97
0.00
1.00
-3.26
0.00
-5.57
Ratio: Avail/WSL
0.97
1.19
T6
-13.33
T6
-0.57
0.00
-2.66
1.50
0.00
-4.84
0.59
-2.88
0.00
0.00
-2.20
0.00
-2.27
IPs
118
PRS Attachment 5.6
ACTUAL RATIO MANNED
TOTALS
100.00%
30.39
0.635
21.68
40.97
WSL
0.70%
1.24%
1.17%
12.28%
0.00%
0.00%
2.19%
2.92%
0.00%
0.00%
3.63%
0.00%
75.86%
0.21
0.38
0.36
3.73
0.00
0.00
0.67
0.89
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
23.05
Belgium
Canada
Denmark
Germany
Greece
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
WSL
%
STUD
LOAD
NATION
Ratio: Avail/WSL
1.35
1.35
40.90
0.24
0.00
1.00
5.42
0.00
0.00
1.12
1.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
32.01
IPs
AVAIL
Ratio: Req/WSL
40.98
0.29
0.51
0.48
5.03
0.00
0.00
0.90
1.20
0.00
0.00
1.49
0.00
31.08
IPs
REQ
FY 2016
ENJJPT IFF PARTICIPATION
WITH WEIGHTED STUDENT AND IP LOADS
-0.08
-0.05
-0.51
0.52
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.22
-0.09
0.00
0.00
-1.49
0.00
0.93
+/-
PRS Attachment 5.7
119
ACTUAL RATIO MANNED
TOTALS
100.00%
30.68
0.635
21.68
41.16
WSL
0.64%
1.11%
2.32%
11.67%
0.00%
0.00%
1.16%
3.04%
0.00%
0.00%
3.59%
0.00%
76.47%
0.20
0.34
0.71
3.58
0.00
0.00
0.36
0.93
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
23.47
Belgium
Canada
Denmark
Germany
Greece
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
WSL
%
STUD
LOAD
NATION
Ratio: Avail/WSL
1.32
1.34
40.56
0.00
0.00
1.00
4.90
0.00
0.00
1.07
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
32.60
IPs
AVAIL
Ratio: Req/WSL
41.17
0.26
0.46
0.96
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.48
1.25
0.00
0.00
1.48
0.00
31.48
IPs
REQ
FY 2017
-0.60
-0.26
-0.46
0.04
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.59
-0.25
0.00
0.00
-1.48
0.00
1.12
+/-
120
PRS Attachment 5.8
ACTUAL RATIO MANNED
TOTALS
100.00%
30.68
0.635
21.68
41.16
WSL
0.65%
1.16%
3.64%
10.23%
0.00%
0.00%
3.21%
2.95%
0.00%
0.00%
2.96%
0.00%
75.19%
0.20
0.36
1.12
3.14
0.00
0.00
0.98
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.91
0.00
23.07
Belgium
Canada
Denmark
Germany
Greece
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
WSL
%
STUD
LOAD
NATION
Ratio: Avail/WSL
1.46
1.34
44.77
0.00
0.00
1.04
5.00
0.00
0.00
1.30
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
36.44
IPs
AVAIL
Ratio: Req/WSL
41.16
0.27
0.48
1.50
4.21
0.00
0.00
1.32
1.21
0.00
0.00
1.22
0.00
30.95
IPs
REQ
FY 2018
3.62
-0.27
-0.48
-0.46
0.79
0.00
0.00
-0.02
-0.21
0.00
0.00
-1.22
0.00
5.49
+/-
PRS Attachment 5.9
121
ACTUAL RATIO MANNED
TOTALS
100.00%
30.68
0.635
21.68
41.16
WSL
0.68%
1.16%
3.73%
10.23%
0.00%
0.00%
3.43%
3.04%
0.00%
0.00%
3.62%
0.00%
74.11%
0.21
0.36
1.15
3.14
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.93
0.00
0.00
1.11
0.00
22.74
Belgium
Canada
Denmark
Germany
Greece
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
WSL
%
STUD
LOAD
NATION
Ratio: Avail/WSL
1.34
1.34
41.02
0.00
0.00
1.00
5.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
32.30
IPs
AVAIL
Ratio: Req/WSL
41.17
0.28
0.48
1.54
4.21
0.00
0.00
1.41
1.25
0.00
0.00
1.49
0.00
30.51
IPs
REQ
FY 2019
-0.15
-0.28
-0.48
-0.54
0.79
0.00
0.00
0.59
-0.53
0.00
0.00
-1.49
0.00
1.79
+/-
122
PRS Attachment 5.10
ACTUAL RATIO MANNED
TOTALS
100.00%
28.90
0.635
21.68
40.03
WSL
0.74%
1.23%
4.01%
10.98%
0.00%
0.00%
2.50%
3.26%
0.00%
0.00%
3.94%
0.00%
73.34%
0.21
0.36
1.16
3.17
0.00
0.00
0.72
0.94
0.00
0.00
1.14
0.00
21.20
Belgium
Canada
Denmark
Germany
Greece
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States
WSL
%
STUD
LOAD
NATION
Ratio: Avail/WSL
1.35
1.39
38.88
0.00
0.00
1.00
4.94
0.00
0.00
1.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
31.01
IPs
AVAIL
Ratio: Req/WSL
40.04
0.30
0.49
1.60
4.40
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.31
0.00
0.00
1.58
0.00
29.36
IPs
REQ
FY 2020
-1.15
-0.30
-0.49
-0.60
0.54
0.00
0.00
0.94
-1.31
0.00
0.00
-1.58
0.00
1.65
+/-
PRS Attachment 6.1
123
Jun 15
Jun 17
Jun 19
US -> US
US -> US
US -> ??
Jun 13
O
N
2012
S
J
F
M
GE -> NL
US -> ??
NL -> US
Oct 19
Oct 17
Oct 15
Oct 13
OPS
#
| US (2 yr)
| US (2 yr)
US -> GE
A
M
J
A
S
O
| GE (22 mo)
| US (2 yr)
CA -> ??
US -> CA
US -> US
IT -> US
CC
| NL (26 Mo)
N
D
J
F
A
M
J
US -> US
US -> ??
IT -> US
Jun 16
Jun 18
A
S
O
N
D
J
F
Oct 18
Oct 16
Oct 14
Aug 12
OPS
M
J
A
S
O
N
D
J
F
| US (2 yr)
| GE (2 yr)
| NL (2 yr)
| US (2 yr)
J
2015
| US (2 yr)
M
A
M
J
A
S
IT -> ??
GE -> IT
GE -> GE
US -> GE
CC
Jun 19
Jun 17
Jun 15
Apr 13
US -> ??
US -> US
US -> US
GE -> US
459 FTS
O
Jun 19
Jun 17
Jun 15
Jun 13
OPS
N
D
J
F
M
A
M
GE -> NL
IT -> GE
GE -> IT
US -> GE
CC
| NO (2 yr)
Nov 18
Jan 17
Mar 15
May 13
| US (2 yr)
J
A
S
O
| IT (2 yr)
| US (2 yr)
| US (2 yr)
US -> ??
US -> US
US -> US
IT -> US
90 FTS
N
D
J
F
M
Nov 18
Nov 16
Nov 14
Nov 12
OPS
| US (2 yr)
| US (2 yr)
J
2017
| GE (22 Mo)
| US (2 yr)
| CA (2 yr)
J
2016
CHANGE OF COMMAND DATES
| US (2 yr)
A
| IT (22 mo)
M
| US (2 yr)
| US (2 yr)
| US (2 yr)
J
2014
NO -> IT
89 FTS
M
Jun 14
Dec 12
| GE (2 yr)
| US (2 yr)
J
2013
| GE (26 mo)
| US (19 Mo)
D
| IT (27 mo)
A
88 FTS
NO -> US
CC
469 OPS
469 CC
90 OPS
90 CC
459 OPS
459 CC
89 OPS
89 CC
88 OPS
88 CC
POSITION
A
M
J
A
S
O
US -> ??
US -> US
NL -> US
GE -> NL
N
D
J
F
| ?? (2 yr)
A
Jun 19
Jun 17
Jun 15
Apr 13
M
J
A
S
O
| ?? (2 yr)
| ?? (2 yr)
| ?? (2 yr)
NO -> ??
US -> NO
US -> US
Oct 18
Oct 16
Oct 14
Oct 12
OPS
N
| ??
| ?? (2 yr)
J
2019
US -> US
469 FTS
| ?? (2 yr)
CC
M
| NL (22 Mo)
| ?? (2 yr)
| ?? (2 yr)
J
2018
POSITION PLAN
CAT II, IIA
D
J
124
PRS Attachment 6.2
29.07
30.28
0.00
0.00
1.83
0.00
587.44
809.39
THE NETHERLANDS
NORWAY
PORTUGAL
SPAIN
TURKEY
UNITED KINGDOM
UNITED STATES
TOTALS:
1,229.78
851.23
0.00
2.14
6.47
0.33
36.55
53.29
120.60
0.28
143.72
3.70
9.61
1.86
T-38/UPT
291.26
210.25
0.00
0.22
2.03
0.00
10.11
15.93
5.33
0.00
41.89
1.22
3.85
0.43
IFF
TOTAL:
NOTE: FY04 - FY07 UPT WSL was not split by phase.
CAT II FIXED POSITION
OG/CD
SQUADRON CAT II POSITIONS
80 OSS/CC
88 FTS/CC
89 FTS/CC
459 FTS/CC
Effective 2009
90 FTS/CC
469 FTS/CC
Effective 2009
62.59
GERMANY
ITALY
1.01
94.12
DENMARK
0.00
1.48
CANADA
GREECE
1.56
T-6
FY05 - 14 Total WSL
BELGIUM
NATION
US
15
15
15
10.17
15.00
10.17
95.33
15
DESIGNATION
US
3,317.05
2,326.27
0.00
34.66
8.51
0.33
104.09
128.61
269.48
0.28
386.04
28.75
20.72
9.31
YEARS
145.50
109.74
0.00
5.10
0.00
0.00
4.74
3.15
0.00
0.00
17.66
2.27
1.80
1.04
IFF
NATIONAL
357.24
264.28
0.00
11.35
0.00
0.00
9.58
8.64
9.12
0.00
41.78
6.59
3.97
1.93
T-38
TOTAL
ALLOCATION
483.87
303.33
0.00
14.03
0.00
0.00
12.83
18.53
71.83
0.00
46.88
13.95
0.00
2.49
T-6
FY15 - 19 Total WSL
100.0%
70.13%
0.00%
1.04%
0.26%
0.01%
3.14%
3.88%
8.12%
0.01%
11.64%
0.87%
0.62%
0.28%
ALLOC
PERCENT
95.33
66.86
0.00
1.00
0.24
0.01
2.99
3.70
7.74
0.01
11.10
0.83
0.60
0.27
YEARS
ALLOC
93.67
60.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
5.50
9.92
0.00
13.75
0.00
2.00
0.00
YEARS
COMP
1.67
6.36
0.00
1.00
0.24
0.01
0.99
-1.80
-2.17
0.01
-2.65
0.83
-1.40
0.27
YEARS
REMAIN
Squadron Commanders
Category II
0.8
3.2
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.0
0.5
-0.9
-1.1
0.0
-1.3
0.4
-0.7
0.1
# of
TERMS
PRS Attachment 6.3
125
29.07
30.28
0.00
0.00
1.83
0.00
587.44
809.39
THE NETHERLANDS
NORWAY
PORTUGAL
SPAIN
TURKEY
UNITED KINGDOM
UNITED STATES
TOTALS:
1,229.78
851.23
0.00
2.14
6.47
0.33
36.55
53.29
120.60
0.28
143.72
3.70
9.61
1.86
T-38/UPT
IFF
291.26
210.25
0.00
0.22
2.03
0.00
10.11
15.93
5.33
0.00
41.89
1.22
3.85
0.43
TOTAL:
NOTE: FY04 - FY07 UPT WSL was not split by phase.
SQUADRON CAT IIA POSITIONS
80 OSS/DO
88 FTS/DO
89 FTS/DO
459 FTS/DO
Effective 2009
90 FTS/DO
469 FTS/CC
Effective 2009
0.00
94.12
GERMANY
62.59
1.01
DENMARK
ITALY
1.48
CANADA
GREECE
1.56
T-6
FY05 - 14 Total WSL
BELGIUM
NATION
15
15
15
10.17
15
10.17
80.33
ALLOCATION
483.87
303.33
0.00
14.03
0.00
0.00
12.83
18.53
71.83
0.00
46.88
13.95
0.00
2.49
T-6
357.24
264.28
0.00
11.35
0.00
0.00
9.58
8.64
9.12
0.00
41.78
6.59
3.97
1.93
T-38
145.50
109.74
0.00
5.10
0.00
0.00
4.74
3.15
0.00
0.00
17.66
2.27
1.80
1.04
IFF
FY15 - 19 Total WSL
US
DESIGNATION
NATIONAL
3,317.05
2,326.27
0.00
34.66
8.51
0.33
104.09
128.61
269.48
0.28
386.04
28.75
20.72
9.31
TOTAL
100.0%
70.13%
0.00%
1.04%
0.26%
0.01%
3.14%
3.88%
8.12%
0.01%
11.64%
0.87%
0.62%
0.28%
ALLOC
PERCENT
80.33
56.34
0.00
0.84
0.21
0.01
2.52
3.11
6.53
0.01
9.35
0.70
0.50
0.23
YEARS
ALLOC
75.00
51.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.83
2.00
7.75
0.00
8.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
YEARS
COMP
Operations Officers
Category IIA
5.33
5.09
0.00
0.84
0.21
0.01
-3.31
1.11
-1.22
0.01
1.18
0.70
0.50
0.23
YEARS
REMAIN
2.7
2.5
0.0
0.4
0.1
0.0
-1.7
0.6
-0.6
0.0
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.1
# of
TERMS
PFT Shift Proposal
ENJJPT
Train and develop tomorrow’s NATO air warriors today!
• T-6 XX-02 classes historically have been
programmed to graduate around 10 January
PROGRAMMED FLYING
TRAINING (PFT)
Shift Proposal
• This leads to a consistent push to finish those classes
early (before Xmas break) to avoid additional 87 rides
for BIT after Christmas exodus
• 89FTS/DO made a proposal to shift XX-02
classes to the left to be able to graduate them
prior to exodus.
• As we explored the options for shifting these specific
classes, it became clear that shifting the entire
ENJJPT PFT schedule could be advantageous to the
program.
PFT Shift Proposal
PFT Shift Proposal
• If we shift the ENJJPT PFT schedule
approximately 10 training days to the left,
several choke points would be eliminated
• T-6 XX-02 classes would graduate prior to exodus and
show up to the T-38 flight line immediately afterward.
No BIT required.
• T-6 XX-06 classes would graduate prior to the Fourth
of July holiday and associated AETC Family Day
PFT Shift Proposal
PFT Shift Proposal
• This shift would result in an overlap of students
on the flight line for T-6 training
• Four classes (XX-05 through XX-08) would still be on
•
•
•
•
the flight line when we started the next classes (XX-01
through XX-04) early in the FY
XX-05 and XX-01 overlap: 10 Training Days (TD)
XX-06 and XX-02 overlap: 6 TD
• Because T-38 training already has a gap
between classes (due to shorter syllabus), there
is no overlap in T-38
126
PRS Attachment 7
PFT Shift Proposal
PFT Shift Proposal
• Also moves the T-38 graduation date for XX-02
•
•
classes earlier in Dec to avoid graduation
ceremonies on the day prior to exodus
Once the shift was complete in one FY, the
ENJJPT calendar would be restored to the
normal break between T-38 classes in
subsequent FYs
This would make it significantly easier for the T-6
squadrons to allocate resources in a more
uniform manner across all T-6 flights and reduce
requirements for break in training
PRS Attachment 7
• QUESTIONS?
127
EURO-NATO JOINT JET PILOT TRAINING (ENJJPT) PROGRAM
STEERING COMMITTEE #70
FINANCIAL-LEGAL SUBCOMMITTEE (FLS) ROSTER
(Representing)
FLS Members Name
(Chairman)
LTC Kenneth Øvland
Legal Advisor
Air Force Staff
Flyplassveien 300
1590 Rygge Flystasjon
NORWAY
(Kingdom of Belgium)
MAJ Fons Goethals
Military Administrator, Belgian Airforce
Belgian Defense Staff
HR Directorate – HRM/BF
Bruynstraat 1
B-1120 BRUSSELS
BELGIUM
(Canada)
Ms. Patricia Van Schie
Directorate Air Simulation & Training
D Air Sim & Trg 4
1 Nicholas Street, Suite 200
Ottawa, ON
CANADA K1N 7B7
(Kingdom of Denmark)
MAJ Peter Beck Rasmussen, Legal Advisor
Defence Command Denmark
7470 Karup J
Herningvej 30
DENMARK
LTC Andreas Seeboerger
German AirForce Operational Forces Command
Air Training Section
Postfach 906110
51127 Koeln
Mr Marc Luis
Federal Ministry of Defence
Abteilung RI4 International Agreements
Fontainengraben 150, 53123 Bonn
53003 Bonn
GERMANY
Ms Gabriele Bergmann
Federal Ministry of Defence
Budget Directorate HCI6
P.O. Box 1328
53003 Bonn
GERMANY
128
Message Address
PH: +47 9797 4499
FAX:
EMail: [email protected]
PH: +32.2.264.5916
FAX: +32.2.264.5619
PH: 613-998-4373
Blackberry: 613-355-0938
FAX: 613-992-0065
[email protected]
PH: +45 50848696
FAX:
PH: +49-2203-908-4523
FAX: +49-2203-62208
PH: 49-228-12-13842
FAX: 49-228-12-43840
PH: 49-228-12-13666
FAX: 49-228-12-6499
[email protected]
FLS Attachment 1
(Hellenic Republic)
Cpt (HAF) Panagiotis Theotis
Directorate of Finance/Procurement Department
227-231 Mesogeion Avenue, TGA 1010
Athens, Attica
PH: +302106594646
PH Mobile: +306983501104
(Republic of Italy)
LTC Michele Palombella AEROSCUOLE A.M./III.R.A.
Comando Scuole A.M.
Stato Maggiore
Lungomare Nazario Sauro 39
70100 Bari
PH: +39-080-5418-925
FAX: +39-080-5418-439
(Republic of Italy)
LTC Massimo Mancini
Stato Maggiore
6 Reparto
Viale Universita.4
00100 Roma
ITALY
PH: +39 064 986 4521
FAX: +39 064 986 6249
(Republic of Italy)
LTC Andrea Tollis
Stato Maggiore
6 Reparto
Viale Universita.4
00100 Roma
ITALY
PH: +39 064 986 5122
FAX:
Maj. Bart Eissing
Royal Netherlands Air Force
Financial Control Section
Luchtmachtplein 1
4822 ZB Breda
P.O. Box 8762
PH: +31(0) 612989862
FAX:
COL Ruud Schoonderwoerd
Royal Netherlands Air Force
Staffgroup Legal Affairs
Luchtmachtplein 1
4822 ZB Breda
P.O. Box 8762
ROYAL NETHERLANDS
(Kingdom of Norway)
Ms Lene Graham
Rygge Airstation
Air Education & Training Command
Flyplassveien 300
1590 RYGGE
NORWAY
PH: +31765447441 / +31651573716
FAX:
PH: +47-97-62-22-27
FAX:
FLS Attachment 1
129
(Spanish Air Force)
LTC Lucas Pita
Dirección de Enseñanza
Av. Garcia Morato SN.
ACAR Tablada Den / SEGEN
41-011 Sevilla
SPAIN
(Republic of Turkey)
CAPT Ömer SAĞLAM
Turkish Air Force
Plans & Principles Div., Financial Relations Officer
(United Kingdom)
WG CDR Michael Saunders
208 SQN Officer Commanding
Royal Air Force Valley
Anglesey
North Wales LL653NY
UNITED KINGDOM
(United States of America)
Mr Keith Anderson SAF/GCI
SAF/GCI, Room 4C756
(United States Financial Representative)
Mr Rick Jellison AFSAT/FM
AFSAT/FM
100 H Street East, Suite 5
Randolph TX 78150-4418
Ms. Sandra Myers AFSAT/FM
AFSAT/FM
Ms. Yolanda Patterson AFSAT/FM
AFSAT/FM
(FLS Secretary)
Mr. Larry Bakel AFSAT/FM
AFSAT/FM
130
PH: +34 954 288 637+34 689 29 69 06
FAX:
PH: +(90)-312-4142387
FAX:
PH: 0044 1407 762241 x 7247
FAX: 0044 1407 767005
PH: Comm 703-695-5067
DSN 225-5067
FAX:
PH: Comm 210-652-0109
DSN: 487-0109
FAX:
PH: Comm 210-652-8527
DSN: 487-8527
FAX:
PH: Comm 210-652-6759
DSN: 487-6759
FAX:
PH: Comm 210-652-1893
DSN: 487-1893
FAX:
FLS Attachment 1
ENJJPT
FINANCIAL – LEGAL
SUBCOMMITTEE (FLS)
Euro-NATO
Joint Jet Pilot
Training Program
Bruges Belgium
7-11 September 2015
AGENDA
ITEM
SUBJECT
1)
OPENING / ADMINISTRATIVE REMARKS
2)
AGENDA APPROVAL
3)
FY14 DRAFT FINAL STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT
3.1 Runway Repair
4)
FY15 EOY BUDGET
4.1 Paint Barn
4.2 T38 CLS Contract Increase
5)
PROPOSED LEGAL / FINANCIAL P.O. CHANGES
5.1 Section 7
5.2 Annex 7
5.3 Annex 8
6)
SC DIRECTED ITEMS
6.1 Romania Accession
6.2 MOU Amendment 6
6.3 Action Item 69-3
6.6 Wing Commander Briefing
7)
OTHER BUSINESS
7.1 Financial Cost share definitions
8)
REVIEW OF MINUTES
9)
DRAFT AGENDA FOR PRE FLS MEETING
10)
CLOSING COMMENTS / ADJOURN
FLS Attachment 2
131
2.5
The NATO Alliance cooperative spirit will prevail with a consensus required for all
management actions and guidance put forth for the affected Users. In accordance with the
principle set out in the ENJJPT Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), Section 5 paragraph 2,
on the matter of decision-making, each User will have a vote provided that the User is a studentsending User and has a student in the Program when the impact of the decision occurs, or
provided that the decision to be made has an impact on that User. Since the Program consists of
different modules and UPT phases and IFF, the definition of a student sending User having a
student in the Program refers to the modules and phase(s) to which the User sends students. For
modules and phase(s) to which a User does not send students, this User is considered as a nonstudent sending User. On matters that do not have an impact on a non-student sending User, that
User may participate as a non-voting adviser. Resultant management actions and guidance will
support both the Program and cooperative spirit of the NATO Alliance.
Comment [Unbekannt1]: To bring text in line
with Sec. 2 (2) MoU, which allows all modules to
be subdivided into phases.
3.5
Break in Training (BIT). ENJJPT BIT will be performed IAW AETC T-38 Graduate
Break in Training Guidance, 11 March 2013, with the exception of sortie restrictions in Chapter
10.
3.5.1 Users requiring BIT will inform the 80 OG in writing 30 days (3 weeks min) prior
to BIT entry the following:
•
•
•
•
Number of rated pilots using BIT
Length of BIT
Minimum and maximum number of Front Cockpit sorties
Training emphasis during the sorties
3.5.2 Basic guidelines:
•
•
•
BIT is limited to ENJJPT graduates and performed in aircraft last flown at
ENJJPT.
BIT will commence not later than 12 months after last ENJJPT syllabus
sortie.
No new training events will be instructed.
3.5.3 80 OG can approve, modify or deny requests base on availability / impact to the
ENJJPT training mission.
3.5.4 BIT sorties will not be scheduled before 80 OG approval is obtained.
3.1.1 Every effort will be made to smooth flow entrants into classes to provide an equitable
distribution of each User's UPT, PIT and IFF entriestrainees and to use efficiently the Program's
resources and facilities.
3.5
General Structure of Training and Student Entry Points. The Program encompasses
the UPT, IFF, PIT and UIPT modulesconsists of UPT and IFF., whereby ( UPT includes
132
FLS Attachment 3
Comment [Unbekannt2]: UPT entries are no
trainees. Since UIP and PIT entries are dealt with
in Sec. 3.3; those not staying in ENJJPT in Sec.
3.3.2 and 3.3.3. no need to mentioned the
modules by name, UIP were missing anyway.
Phase I, Phase II, Phase III Track A, or Phase III Track B), and the corresponding UPT Pilot
Instructor Training (PIT). IFF includes IFF and the corresponding Upgrade Instructor Pilot
(UIP).
Comment [Unbekannt3]: To bring text in line
with Sec. 2 (2) MoU.
3.7.1 Program Entry and Exit Points. Figure 3.1 above depicts the following options for
entering and exiting the UPT and IFF modulesProgram, subject to the provisions of this PO:
3.15
Non-Disciplinary Elimination. U P T , P I T , I F F , a n d I F F / U I P
students/trainees may be eliminated from ENJJPT courses for:
•
•
•
•
Comment [Unbekannt4]: Is there something
else?
Unsatisfactory flying and/or academic performance
Lack of aptitude
Medical or psychological reasons IAW 80 FTWI 36-2202
Drop on Request
3.16 IFF and Instructor Training Elimination. The Squadron Commander will recommend
for elimination any student/trainee in entree into IFF, PIT, or IFF/UIP or IFF student who fails to
meet course training standards. The Operations Group Commander (OG/CC) will initiate a
training review action to ensure the individual’s training has been properly managed and
documented. The OG/CC will forward his recommendation to the ENJJPT Wing Commander,
who will be the final approval authority for all elimination actions. Each recommendation will
be documented. In each case, the respective SNR will be informed of all actions involving his
personnel. Eliminated US personnel will adhere to procedures outlined in AFI 11-402 and
AETCI 36-2205v6 as applicable. The respective nation will be responsible for reassignment
action.
4.1
Rated Personnel Requirements. The total number of instructor pilots (IPs) required for
each phase module (T-6, T-38 UPT and IFF) will be determined by the ENJJPT Manning
Formula. Users are responsible for providing IPs based upon each User’s percentage of the total
WSL for each phase applied to the total number of IPs required for that phase.
Comment [Unbekannt5]: See. Sec. 3.3.3
PIT/UIP may requests IP as well.
4.4
Rated Personnel Tour of Duty. After completing Pilot Instructor Training (PIT) or
IFF/UIP, permanent party rated-personnel are normally assigned for a three-year tour. Any User
may choose an optional 3.5 year tour for all its rated personnel. For ENJJPT Management
System tracking purposes, all rated personnel from each User will be on the same standard tour
length (3 years or 3.5 years after PIT/UIP). This will not apply to US FAIPs who must remain on
a 3 year post PIT tour per US Air Staff guidance.
4.5
Rated Personnel Tour Extensions. Extensions to the controlled tour may be favorably
considered. Regardless of approved requests for extensions, rated supervisory positions in the
Program will continue to rotate among the Users. Requests for tour extensions of more than six
months will be submitted by the respective User to the Wing Commander for review and
submission to the ENJJPTSC for approval. Tour extensions of less than six months do not need
ENJJPTSC approval.
FLS Attachment 3
Comment [Unbekannt6]: As decided by SC
yesterday
133
5.1.4 UPT Phase III Student Entry Standards. Prospective Users will provide a copy
of their Phase II syllabus and any applicable training manuals to the ENJJPT Wing. 80
OG/OGT will evaluate training material to assess whether it meets the entry standards
for UPT Phase III.
Comment [Unbekannt7]: Iaw Sec. 2 (2) MoU
also are module may be subdivided into phase
7.14 Explanations are to be furnished for each item where there is a difference of more than
10% between the latest approved budget and the FSA. In addition, the FSA is to be prefaced by
a statement indicating the most significant reasons for the difference between the total estimates
and the total FSA.
7.19 The financial definitions for items, sub-items, etc., as shown in the ENJJPT budgets and
final statements of account (FSAs) for the ENJJPT program Definitions will be included in the
fiscal year Budgets and the Final Statement of Accounts
Comment [Unbekannt8]: Is not a part of the
sentence missing? What is it with the FinDEF?
7.20.1.2 TDY expenses (transportation, lodging, meals and incidentals) in support of the
Program. TDY expenses which are not in support of the program (i.e., National Business or T-3
Cross Countries in excess of, the maximum number established by Wing CCENJJPTSC provided
that the Wing CC does not exceed approved TDY budget line for given FY) are national costs
and will not be included in the ENJJPT program budget.
7.21 The fixed O&M-costs will be shared by the student-sending Users in proportion to their
shares of annual direct flying hours actually flown by all student-sending Users, where costs are
directly attributable to a module or UPT training phase or IFF they will only be charged to the
Users of that training. Common costs attributable to the whole program will be segregated by
module or UPT training phase or IFF in proportion to the actual hours flown within the
respective training. Phase III Track A and Phase III Track B are considered one phase for O&M
budgetary purposes. Variable O&M costs will be charged to each User based only on actual
hours flown.
7.21.1 Each modules`sUPT O&M expenditures will be segregated and charged only to
the UPT Users according to their participation in the respective modules or UPT training
phases.
7.21.2 IFF O&M expenditures will be segregated and charged only to IFF Users.
7.21.3 Joint UPT/IFF O&M expenditures will be segregated based on actual UPT, vs.
IFF, PIT and UIP flying hours and charged to the respective UPT/IFF Uusers.
7.23 The allocation of the O&M costs is based on the principle that each User will provide, at
its own expense, wing instructor personnel in proportion to its Weighted Student Load by UPT
training phase or IFF, in accordance with PO Section 4, paragraph 4.1. For IP requirements
Phase III-Track A and Phase III-Track B are considered as one phase.
134
FLS Attachment 3
Comment [Unbekannt9]: Bring text in line
with Sec. 2(2) MoU and 3.3.3.
7.24.2 Shortfall Status. When a User is unable to provide its proportionate share of IPs,
a “shortfall status” need is created. Shortfall needs will be determined using IP
requirements per module or UPT training phase or IFF. For shortfall calculations Phase
III-Track A and Phase III-Track B are considered as one phase. Unless otherwise
determined by the SC, a User cannot compensate a shortfall in one module or UPT
training phase or IFF with an Excess IP in another module or UPT training phase or IFF;
e.g. a T-6 Excess IP cannot compensate a T-38C Shortfall of the same User. Shortfall
Status costs consists of personnel costs and flying hours. This need will be met by IPs
from the “Excess IP Pool”.
7.24.3 Excess IP Pool Costs. Each Excess IP is the financial responsibility of the User
providing the excess IP. If a Shortfall Status need is identified, the Excess IP Pool will be
used to provide IPs during the fiscal year and the credit will be distributed to the Users
with IPs in the Excess IP Pool. Credit will be for personnel, and CT and Other hours’
costs and allocated based on the number of IPs. PIT/UIP hours will not be reimbursed.
Credit will be based on the following formula:
7.26 Upon Program termination the financial consequences resulting will be negotiated
between the UsersParties regarding the residual value of the facilities and equipment that were
constructed or procured for the Program on a cost-shared basis. To this end the military and/or
economic value of these items as well as the proceeds of the sale of any of these items and the
costs paid or shared by the UsersParties will be given due consideration.
7.39 In accordance with Section 3, paragraph 4.b. of the MOU, subsequent modifications of
assets will be charged to the Program as outlined in Section 8, paragraph 2 of the MOU and as
stipulated under this paragraph 7.39 and paragraphs 7.40 to 7.43 below. The costs for
modifications of assets will be segregated by the individual modules and UPT phases and IFF to
which the modification refers to and will only be charged to the User with students in of that
particular module UPT or phase and IFF.
7.39.1 UPT modification costs will be segregated and charged only to Users with UPT
students in the particular UPT phase related to the modification.
7.39.2 IFF modification costs will be segregated and charged only to Users with IFF
students.
7.39.3 Joint UPT/IFF modification costs will be segregated based on most appropriate
indicator (i.e. flying hours, number aircraft, etc.) and charged to the UPT/IFF student
sending Users.
4 7.40.2 The resulting commitment for each Non-US User in accordance to the above
mentioned cost-sharing percentage will be reflected annually in a letter of participation
FLS Attachment 3
135
signed by the student-sending Users and by a corresponding separate line item in Letters
of Offer and Acceptance (LOAs) between the Host government and student-sending
User’s government. In making this determination, each student committed to UPT Phase
III Track B will be calculated as a percentage of syllabus flying hours in UPT Phase III
Track A.
136
FLS Attachment 3

enjjpt - APAN Community

Transcription

Similar documents

Diamir

self explanatory instructions for the assembly of avro arrow model

4016 poster.qxd

WHS lacrosse Wing bowl

angelo`s wing chair

Hwy. 61 Reconstruction brochure

fls microjet features fls microjet features - BD

2_6 WNMN double truck

AeroCare Presentation - the Curry County, NM Meeting Portal.

Wing