1995 COMPARATIVE SURVEY - Afghanistan Digital Collections

Transcription

\
AFGHANISTAN DRUG CONTROL AND REHABILITATION flROGRAMM~
AFG/89/580
1995 COMPARATIVE SURVEY
AC
KU
BADAKHSHAN PROVINCE, AFGHANISTAN
·- · ·.
Funded by
United Nations lntea·national Drug Control Progra-n1n1e
:.
Implen1ented by
United Nations Office for Project Services
Noven1ber 1995
Restricted circulation for internal use in the UN system only .
..
'\
KU
· Afghanistan Drug Control and Rehabilitation Programme (ADCRP)
Box 776, University Town
Peshawar
A project of the United Nati,ons lnternational Drug Control Programme (UNDCP) •
executed by the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS)
AC
Published by the
Afghanistan Drug Control and Rehabilitation Programme (ADCRP)
Box 776, University Town
Peshawar
Available .from the
Afghanistan Drug Control and Rehabilitation Programme (ADCRP)
Box 776, University T9wn
Peshawar
·..t ·~.
.
~
'
This survey and report do not necessarily reflect the opinions, viewpoints or policies of the United Nations International
Drug Control Programme or the United Nations Office for Project Services.
TABLE QJi' CONfENTS
PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MAJOR FINDINGS
VI
IX
INTRODUCTION
Introductory Statement
Survey Objectives
Geographical Background
Agriculture and Irrigation
Survey Area
KU
METHODOLOGY
AC
Background
Sources of Information
Data Collection Tools
Data Collection ,
Method of Data Analysis
Survey and Methodology Limitations
Training
DEMOGRAPHY
Village and ·Family Size
Repatriation
_-_ ·
. Employment Opportunities
Influential Persons in the Village
1
1
1
2
2
4
4
4
4
5
6
6
7
9
9
10
10
11
·\3:,- ·'
AGRICULTURE
ANDl:iuuGATION
Farm Size and Farm Power
Crops Cultivated
Irrigation Sources and Rehabilitation Needs
13
13
14
15
PAGE
STATUS OF OPIUM POPPY CULTIVATION
Opium Poppy Cultiv~tion
Fertilizer Use in Opium Poppy Cultivation
Marketing and Income Assessment of Opium
Attitudes Towards Opium Poppy Cultivation
Prevalence and Type of Drug Abuse
VILLAGE INFRASTRUCTURE
\
KU
.
18
25
26
27
30
32
Road Infrastructur~ and Rehabilitation ,Needs
Housing Infrastructure and Rehabilitation Needs
Assisting Agencies
ANNEXES
18
. \"
AC
Survey Questionnaire ·
Survey District Maps
Crops Cultivated. by ·District
Percentage of Opium Poppy Cultivation per ·Village
NGOs and their Programmes
, ..
11
32
34
35
LIS~f
OF
~fABLES
PAGE
Table 1:
Villages surveyed and number of farmers interviewed
3
Table 2:
Total number offarm families and average size
9
Table 3:
Refugee repatriation pattern .
10
Table 4:
Employment categories
11
Table 5:
Influential persons in the village
12
Table 6:
Average farm size and number of landless families
I]
Table 7:
Farm power
14
Table 8:
Irrigation sources in relation to land under
cultivation
1)
Table 9:
Status of canal and karez irrigation systems·
1h
Table 10:
Canal rehabilitation needs
16
Table 11:
Karez rehabilitation needs
17
Table 12:
History of opium poppy cultivation
18
Number of villages growing opium poppy
19
Table 14:
Table 15:
AC
Table 13:
KU
\
· Comparison of land under opium poppy cultivation
and opium yield per jerib
19
Main reasons for cultivating opium poppy ·
23
Table 16:
Main reasons for not cultivating opium poppy
24
Table 17:
Opium poppy eradication efforts and change in
opium p<>PPY cultivation
24
Table r8:
Fertilizer input in opium poppy cultivation
26
Table 19:
Assessment of opium poppy income
26
111
..
PAGE
Categories of persons involved in discouraging opium
poppy cultivation
29
Table 21:
Community attitudes and intentions towards opium
poppy cultivation
10
Table 22:
Addiction indicators
.11
Table 23:
Village access roads
.12
Table 24:
Rehabilitation needs of village access roads
3.1
Table 25:
Village infrastructure and rehabilitation needs
J4
AC
KU
Table 20:
IV
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
Figure 1:
Percentage of land under opium poppy
cultivation as compared to other crops
Figure 2:
Changes in percentage of land under opium poppy
cultivation (1994-1995)
20
21
Comparison of average yield of opium poppy
.
(1994-1995)
22
Figure 4:
Comparison of netincome from opium (1994-1995)
2H
AC
KU
Figure 3:
v
1995 Comparative Survey Badakhshan Province, Afghanistan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background
The Afghanistan Drug Control and Rehabilitation Programme (ADCRP) in 1989 targeted
Badakhshan as one·of the five provinces for funding multi-sectoral rehabilitation sub-projects and
awareness c~eation on drug abuse issues . aimed at curbing opium poppy cultivation and drug
abuse. To provide data and information on the status of opium poppy cultivation and drug
addiction and assess community needs in areas of project operation a comparative survey was
carried out in 1995 as a follow up to the ADCRP 1994 Baseline survey. The 1995 survey was
conducted by the Agency Co-ordinating Body for Afghanistan Relief"(ACBAR), who fielded the
enumerators in five districts of Badakhshan province between July 15th and August 31st.
KU
Methodology
AC
Five enum~rators and one SUrVey field co-ordinator for ACBAR and two field monitors from the
UNDCP Regional Office (ROSWA) were trained by ADCRP staff on the use of data col lectlon
tools and village survey -interview techniques.
Following training and testing one enumerator and a local guide were assigned to each district.
On the basis of village ·definition, clarified during training, and using survey district maps, the
·services .of local guides we~e utilised in identifying and surveying all villages in five districts of
·sadakhshan. One questionnaire format was completed for each village following group
interviews with five to ten· readjly available farmers .
.
'\
A total of 921 villages were SUJ:Veyed and 5,992 farmers interviewed. The data collected was
entered on a computer database format for processing and analysis.
Demography
The average fan:tily size ·was found to be 9 members in the districts surveyed. Out of 60,262
families, 91% ·were found to have settled in their villages. The total number of refuge families
identified was approximately 8,592 of whom 66% had not repatriated to their vi11age.
Availability of agricultural land in rural areas and employment opportunities in livestock
management and the· government sector played an important role in the repatriation process.
Major factors in the low rate of refugee return were found to be limited labour opportunities,
poor village infrastructure and concerns over long-term security.
vi
1995 ComparatiV<e Survey Badakhshan Province, .Afghanistan
On the basis of data analysed, elders followed by maulavies and government employees were
found to be the most influential persons in the village in order of descending scale. Generally,
the pattern of village leadership had not changed since the pre-war years in Afghanistan.
Agriculture .
The average size of farms was found to be nine jeribs (five jeribs equate to one hectare) and an
average of twelve landless families per village were recorded. Farm power in general was
provided though animal traction supported by limited use of tractors and threshers.
KU
Main cereal crops identified were wheat, maize, rice, millet and barley. Varieties of fruit and tree
crops cultivated included apricots, pomegranates, grapes, peaches, mulberries, walnuts, plums,
pears and apples. Onions, potatoes, tomatoes, egg-plant, carrots, garlic, melon, green beans,
cucumber, squash, turnip~. okra, leeks, spinach and peppers constituted the major vegetable
crops grown.
Cash crops included sugar beet, tobacco, cotton, sunflower, flax seed and mustard. Opium
poppy and Cannabis were also grown in the distripts surveyed.
AC
Of an estimated 717,365 jeribs of total agricultural land surveyed 13% was irrigated. The
remaining 87% was rainfed. Approximately 96% of all irrigated land was fed by canals. An
estimated 78% of canal imgation systems had been damaged or destroyed during the last
fourteen years and a total of 927 canal and 7 karez rehabilitation needs were reported in the
districts surveyed.
.
t·.
__...
:
·~.
Opium Poppy Cultivation . ·
Badakhshan is one of th~ miin opium poppy cultivation provinces in Afghanist~n. A comparison
between the ADCRP .1994 :Baseline Survey and the 1995 Comparative Survey indicated that the
number of villages growing opium poppy had decreased from 51% in 1994 to 4 7% in 1995.
Total land under cultivation increased during this period from 258,639 jeribs in 1994 to 409,063
jeribs. Total land under op~um poppy cultivation decreased from 20,350 jeribs (8%) to 14,857
jeribs (4%) during the same period.
The average yield of wet opium reported as 6 kg per jerib in 1995 had ·not changed since 1994.
This amounted to 122 metric tonnes of wet opium in 1994 and 89 metric tonnes in 1995.
Assuming a 30% reduction upon drying a total of 62 metric tonnes of opium was produced in
1995 compared to 85 metric tonnes in 1994 .
.
'\
\
vii
1995 Comparative Survey Badakhshan
P~ovince,
Afghanistan
Farmers in the 1najority of villages (57%) stated the main reason they cultivated opium puppy
was to obtain a ~igher income.'. However, farmers in 44% of the villages referred to religious
injunctions as being their main reason for not cultivating opium J;>OPPY.
Farmers in 421 out of 921 villages (46%) stated that there have been opium poppy eradicatio·n
efforts in. their villages since last year. When asked to indicate any change in opium poppy
cultivation since last year farrne,rs in 259 villages (38%) out of 686 villages mentioned
eradication had· taken place, in 179 villages (26%) farmers had not noticed any change, in 1-lS
villages (21%) increased production was noted and in 103 villages (15%) farmers confirmed
·
reduced production.
On average 15 kg diammonium phosphate (DAP) and 19 kg urea per jerib were used in opium
poppy cultivation.
KU
The average price per kg of wet opium was estimated by the ·farmers to be Afs.27J,Hll.
Average total grossincome from opium was estimated as being Afs.l,477,709 (net tn come
Afs.l,252,631 per jerib) with average input costs per jerib being Afs.225,078.
\
AC
Among those in the community discouraging farmers from cultivating opium poppy maulavies
ranked first · followed by government employees, elders, commanders and maliks. Farmers
indicated ·that 44% of people from a cross section of the rural community supported complete
eradication, 34% desired continued cultivation and 22% a reduction in opium poppy cultivation.
'
A total of 558 raw opium and 30 hashish addicts were identified in the survey area. Most of the
addicts were found to be in the middle age group.
. Village Infrastructure
Out of921 villages, 285 villages (31 %) had access roads to them. Village access roads were free
of mines but in general .their condition was found to be poor with most only passable in the dry
season as they lacked good drainage and surfacing.
The destruction to schools was higher than that of other village infrastructure but reconstruction
priorities in order of importance were homes first followed by .clinics, schools, mosques and
shops.
Approximately five NGOs were identified as carrying out rehabilitation programmes in the
sectors of agriculture, construction, health, irrigation, roads, education and the provi~ion of
potable water supplies in all the districts surveyed with the exception of Zebak where no NGO
activities were recorded at the time of con~ucting the survey (See ANNEX 5).
Vlll
. 1995 Comparative Survey Badakhshan Province, Afghanistan
MAJOR FINDINGS
t~
Out of 60,262 families 91% were found
be settled in their village.
2.
The average family size in each village recorded consisted of 9 members per family.
3.
The total number of refugee families recorded was 8,592. Approximately two-thirds
(66%) of these. had not yet repatriated to their village.
4.
The majority of available manpower (67%) earned daily wages from labouring while
16% relied on animal husbandry for an income.
5.
Traditional patterns of village leadership were found to be elders first followed by
· maulavies and government employees. No appreciable change in village leadership has
occurred since the pre~war years.
KU
1.
6.
The average size of family farms was 9 jeribs.
7.
On average 12 landless families were recorded ·per village.
8.
A total ofl4,610 pairs of oxen, 20 tractors and 10 threshers were listed in the survey
AC
area.
: '\
9.
Wheat, maize~ rice, :millet and barley formed the main cereal crops. Main fruit and tree
crops cultivate<I ~ere .apricots, pomegranates, grapes, peaches, mulberries, walnuts,
plums, pears and apples. Onions, potatoes, tomatoes, egg-plant, carrots, garlic, melons,
green beans, cucumber, squash, turnips, okra, leeks, spinach, and peppers formed the
main vegetable produce. Sugar. beet, tobacco, cotton, sunflower, flax seed and mustard
constituted the main cash crops including opium poppy and Cannabis.
,
•
.
f"'.-
10.
Of the total area of agricultural land (717,365 jeribs), 13% was irrigated and 87%
rain fed.
11.
96% of irrigation systems were canal fed.
12.
78% of canal irrigation systems had been. damaged or destroyed at some period during
the last 14 years.
ix
/
1995 Comparative Survey Badakhshan Province, Afgha!listan
A total of .927 rehabilitation needs relating to canal irrigation systems were reported in
the districts surveyed.
14.
Badakhshan is one of the main opium poppy cultivation provinces in Afghanistan but
production is well below the two leading provinces of Helmand and Nangarhar.
15.
The total number of villages growing opium poppy decreased from 51% in 1994 to 47%
in 1995.
16.
In comparison to ADCRP's 1994 Baseline Survey data, total agricultural land · under
cultivation increased from 258,639 jeribs in 1994 to 409,063 jeribs in 1995 while the
total area under opium poppy cultivation decreased from 20,350 jeribs (8%) in 199-l to
14,857 jeribs (4%) in 1995.
17.
An average yield of 6 kg of wet opium per jerib was recorded. This was the same as that
recorded in 1994.
18.
Approximately 122 , metric tonnes of wet opium were produced in 1994. In 1995 the
figure was 89 metric tonnes. Assu.ming a 30% reduction upon drying this would equate
to 85 metric tonnes of dry opium production in 1994 as compared to 62 metric tonnes
in 1995.
,
·
.
19.
Farmersin the majoffty of villages (57%),stated the m·ain reason they cultivated opium
poppy was because of its high income potential.
20
Farmers in 44% ·of the villages referred to religious injunctions as being the main reason
for not cultiyating opium poppy . .
21.
Out of 921 villages· farmers in 421 (46%) noted opium poppy eradication efforts as
having taken place ·in their villages since the last season.
AC
KU
13.
---
22.
Out of 386 villages -~~rveyed, 259 (38%) said eradication had occurred, 179 (26%) noted
no change, 145 (2:l%) observed an increase and 103 ·villages (15%) confirmed a
oPPY cultivation had taken place since last year.
reduction in opiumo',P
.
..
""
Earmers in more than two-thirds of the villages (85%) did not apply chemical fertilizer
.
23.
to their opium poppy fields.
24.
On average 15 kg dlammonium phosphate (DAP) and 19 kg urea per jerib were applied
to opium poppy crops bythose farmers who used chemical fertiliser.
\
X
25.
The average price of wet opium was Afs.273,811 per kg.
26.
The average cost of inputs was Afs.225,078 per jerib.
27.
Average total gross income from opium was Afs.l,477,709 and net mcome
Afs.l ,252,631 per jerib.
28.
In order of importance categories of persons discouraging farmers from cultivating opium
poppy were maulavies followed by government employees, elders, commanders and
maliks.
29.
·In the village communities surveyed 44% of the people favoured complete eradication,
34% continued cultivation and 22% a re~uction of opium poppy cultivatinn .
I
A total of 558 raw opium and 30 hashish addicts were identified in the survey area.
31.
Out of 921 villages 285 (31%) had village access roads.
32.
Village access roads in the areas surveyed were free of mines but in general their
condition was fo~nd to be poor with most only passable in the dry season as they lacked
good drainage and surfacing.
33.
In the survey area 13% of village infrastructure was destroyed and 11% damaged during
the last 14 years of war in Afg•1anistan.
34.
Reconstruction priorities among village communities were reported to be houses first
followed by clinics, schools, mosques, and shops.
AC
KU
30.
Xl
INTRODUCTION
Introductory Statement
In 1989 The Afghanistan Drug Control and Rural Rehabilitation Programme (ADCRP) identified
Badakhshan as a target province fo_r the implementation of supply and demand reduction
activities aimed at curbing illicit crop cultivation. This was to be carried out through the funding
of multi-sectoral rehabilitation sub-projects and awareness creation on drug abuse issues.
KU
Main objectives are; to ·reduce significantly and measurably opium poppy cullivarion in selected
· dislricrs in the provinces of Badakhshan, Konar, Nangarhar, Helm and and Qandahar .fhnn 1he
pre-project implementation levels,· to reduce community dependency on income deri\·ed .fi"lnn
opiwn in the project's areas of operation,· to cTeare awareness of rhe dan get:\· l?/'drug uhuse and .
to reduce drug abuse in selected areas qf operation,· ro make available il?fiJrnwlion and daflt on
rhe cultivation, geographical distribution and production of illicit drugs (opium, heroin and
hashish) and the prevalence of drug addiction in operational areas.
\
AC
In line with one of the objectives of ADCRP the 1995 Comparative Survey was carried out to
assess changing trends in the status of opium poppy cultivation and drug abuse and community
rehabilitation needs in Badakhshan province. This information once obtained could then be
compared with data from the 1994 ADCRP Baseline Survey . .
Survey Objectives
Specific objectives of the 1995 Comparative Survey aimed at the collection of accurate and
comprehensive data on the following; ,
1)
2)
3)
4)
The extent of opium poppy cultivation and drug abuse.
Demographical information considered . useful for planning rehabilitation
programmes.
Major aspects of agriculture and irrigation in respect of practices and
rehabilitation requirements.
Village infrastructure and rehabilitation needs.
Geographical Background
Badakhshan province located in the north-east of Afghanistan borders the republic of Tajikistan
in the north, China and Pakistan in the north-east and south-east, Konar, Laghman and Kapisa
in the south and the province of Takhar in the west.
·'
1995 C<?mparative Survey Badakhshan Province, Afghanistan
2
Badakhshan province is well kl)owh for its high mountains, including the Pamir range, and steep
river valleys. The Amu River, known as 'D arya-i-Panj, flows through the province. The altitude
of the Pamir mountains, which are snow covered throughout the year is approximately 3000
meters above sea level. ·
The total estimated area of Badakhshan province is 47,403 sq.km with a population of 61 ~, 156
inhabitants. The climate is generally warn~ in summer except in the region of the Pamir
mountains and cold during winter with heavy snow falls particularly in mountainous areas.
Agriculture and Irrigation
KU
Agriculture and animal husbandry play an important role in the local economy. More than 85% .
of the population are involved in agriculture and animal husbandry. The main agricultural
districts of Badakhshan are Baharak, Faizabad, Keshem, Ishkeshem, Jurn1 and Zebak which are
endowed with large fertile river valleys.
Badakhshan is -very famous for its cumin and pears. Wheat and oil crops are also grown wide! y
in this province. Opium poppy and hashish cu1tivation are common in some districts.
AC
A large proportion of agricultural land, 81% in the districts surveyed is rain fed. The land when
·
irrigated is fed by canal and spring irrigation systems.
Badakhshan is historically one of the poorest provinces in Afghanistan. As a result of the war
approximately 8,592 families left the province and sought refugee status in other countries. With
the fall of the Najibullah Government in 1992 many Afghan refugee families repatriated.
However, the destruction and damage caused to the localeconomy including agriculture and
irrigation systems, compounded by the lack of employment opportunities in the province, created
obstacles to the repatriation process.
Survey Area
The 1995 Comparative Survey, following the ADCRP 1994 Baseline Survey, was carried out
in all villages in five districts ofBadakhshan province where the cultivation of opium poppy was
known to exist (Table 1).
Table 1. Villages surveyed and nun1ber of farmers int.erviewed in 5 districts.
Villages
Surveyed
Farmers
Interviewed
I
No.
District
1
BAHARAK
133
978
2
FAIZABAD
484
2954
3
JURM
106
901
4
ICES HEM
179
1040
5
ZEBAK
19
119.
Total
921
5992
No.
AC
KU
No.
3
4
METI-IODOLOGY
Background
The 1995 ADCRP Comparative Survey, following the 1994 Baseline Survey aimed at the
collection of. data to assess changing trends in demography, agriculture, irrigation, opium poppy
cultivation, drug abuse and village infrastructure in the five known opium poppy producing
districts of Badakhshan province. ·
ADCRP selected ACBAR to conduct a survey in five districts of Badakhshan province. The
survey, carried out in conjunction with the UNDCP Regional Office, was conducted between
July 15th and August 31.st 1995.
Sources of Information
2)
Primary data collection was obtained through the use of survey .. form
questionnaires.
Questionnaires were field tested following a review and
modification of the 1994 Baseline Survey question'na-ire fonn. This was carried
out in January 1995,in conjunction with UNDCP Regional Office staff during a
two day ~orkshop in Peshawar.
AC
1)
KU
Major sources of information included:
Secondary data ·collection was obtained from enumerators, UN mission and site
observation re.ports and reports by Non Governmental Organisations (NGOs) and
information); obtained from the ProvinCial Gazetteer. of Afghanistan.
· Data Collection Tools
Main data collection tools ·included the questionnaire, survey maps
an~
enumerator notebooks.
The questionnaire format was prepared ·in English and translated into Dari by ADCRP staff.
· It included questions on :·demography, agriculture and irrigation, status of opium poppy
cultivation, drug abuse and ·viU~ge infrastructure .
. '\ ;
the
In relation to demography;·.·
questionnaire covered village size, family size, · repatriation
indicators, employment opportunities and village leadership.
The questionnaire focussed on:
farm size, farm power, landless families, crops cultivated, irrigation sources and
rehabilitation needs relating to canal and Karez irrigation systems.
5
. "\
opiulll poppy cultivation and fertilizer use in opium poppy cultivation, marketing and
opium income assessment, attitudes towards opium poppy and prevalence of drug abuse.
~
village infrastructure and road rehabilitation requirements and the level of assistance
being provided through rehabilitation programmes.
Data was collected using .district maps for identifying and locating villages and marking new
villages not previously indicated. Local guides assisted in this task.
Enumerator notes were used to obtain additional information for debriefing purposes and
correcting and preparing the district survey maps by the.cartographer.
Data Collection
KU
In Badakhshan province five districts were surveyed where opium poppy was known to be
cultivated. These districts were selected on the basis of areas covered under the 1994 Baseline
Survey which resulted ~n five districts in Badakhshan province being selected for the 1995
Comparative Survey.
AC
One enumerator and one local guide were assigned to each district. 'Following meetings and
discussions with provincial authorities local guides were provided by the District Administrator
through consultation with the Provincial Shura or a designated liaison body.
The criteria for selection of the target community ~as group representation by 30 to 100 families
with an identifiable geographical area cultivated by them. .
'
Each enumerator utilised ()ne ·questionnaire format per village, mostly between 30 to 100
families, in which a group:of five to ten readily available farmers residing in the village were
·
interviewed during group ~dl~9ssions.
·:!fj,1"
r ·.
This criteria was deemed:!.~{ii~ble to represent a group that constituted a village for which a
formal or popular name was identified and added to the survey map. For a large village of over
100 families there was usually one sub-group or village within the community. In these instances
one or more questionnaires were administered and the addition or 'sub-village' added to the
survey. map. Smaller villages (less' than 30 families) were combine9 with neighboring families
to meet the criteria for ·completing questionnaires. The village group was indicated on the survey
map.
In situations where a village smaller than 30 families existed and which was located at some
distance from a neighboring village exception was made to the group criteria. Such exceptions
were also made in the case of villages larger than 100 families which could not be divided into
6
separate units. This was .because agricul.tural land could not be partitioned between a separate
sub-village and in order to avoid over estimation in total land area.
Groups selected for the interview possessed sound local knowledge of the cultivated land in the
area and their communities.
Field survey work was monitored and assisted by survey staff to ensure accuracy of interviews
conducted. Each completed questionnaire was checked and verified in the field to maintain
accuracy. Moreover, enumerators were debriefed in Peshawar following their return from the
field to extract all necessary information pertaining to the districts surveyed.
Method of Data Analysis
.\
KU
Completed questionnaires were. '\checked and verified for accuracy before computer data entries
were made. The data collected was entered on a database format for processing and analysis.
The data entries were aBo checked and verified before processing for final analysis purposes .
The data was classified and presented in tables rounded to zero decianal points for all districts
surveyed. For data analysis. purposes frequency distribution, percentage and arithmetic average
were used.
AC
The marked maps with village co-ordinates were processed following submission of the data and
an upgraded map showing the results of the survey produced. Production of maps was the
responsibility of the UNDCP Regional Office.
Survey and Methodology Limitations
Although all villages and agricultural land in the survey area were covered, methodology was
inevitably subject to minor errors. These occurred because:
The majority of land untler opium poppy cultivation could not be physically measured
and figures quoted by farmers were by necessity estimates only. It was however proposed
to carry out 'spot' checks on land holdings belonging to selected farmers representing the
family groups. This was carried out by the Field Monitors during the course of their
fieldwork (enumerators were however trained to estimate agricultural land size and prior
experiense last year showed that the farmers estimates were closely aligned with pre 1978
figures available from Afghanistan Government sources).
Group interviews were a useful method of conducting large scale surveys but it was
recognised that such methodology could result in some members of the group not having
an equal opportunity to express their views and in addition to which individuals could be
influenced by _group bias ..
. •.
7
The methodology adopted resulted in 'the exclusion of the views of women. This
however was necessitated by cultural constraints which limited the ability to field female
enumerators.
In light of the above liml~tions a ·certain margin of error was expected. However, by properly
- training the enumerators and. by strict monitoring and cross checking this margin of error was
expected to remain within acceptable limits. -
Training
(
I)
KU
Prior to the collection of data 20·enumerators, a field survey co-ordinator and the field monitors
underwent intensive training by ADCRP staff in Peshawar covering a one week period. ADCRP
trained the enumerators, the field survey co-ordinator and field monitors in the following areas:
Objectives ofthe Comparative Survey .
. "\
2)
Questionnaifes3~;._~·~
. ..
.
.
'..
~.
'
AC
' ~~~<.\:.. ·; '
.
Questionmure.format and criter'ia for completing the structure and composition of
the questionnaire were discussed to ensure survey teams clearly understood the
requirementS. Queries on the format and related questions were clarified.
/
3)
j
•
Maps of the Districts under Survey.
Enumerators_,were familiarised with the parameters which defined the concept of
an Afghan· village.- Each enumerator was provided with a map of the district to
be surveyed and trained in the use of these maps. Enumerators were taught to
utilise both the maps and the services of local guides in identifying and locating
villages. In case of changes to the location of villages they were instructed to .
mark changes to the maps in the space surrounding the village specifying the
exact location of the village consistent with the natural direction of the main
village.
4)
Village Concept.
This related to the definition of village size and geographical dimension.
5)
8
Use of Enumeratpr Notebooks.
To obtain more accurate and reliable information, enumerators were taught the
correct use of enumerator notebooks to enable accurate recording of additional
information covering the survey area. During training sessions it was explained
that alterations or additions to maps had to be entered in the notebooks for
utilisation at debriefing sessions and to ensure accurate updating of maps by the
cartographers as necessary.
6)
Skills and knowledge relating to conducting group interviews and selection of
groups.
7)
Global Positioning System (GPS).
KU
The use of GPS units for identification of village· locations was introduced to
avoid confusion resulting from the use of different names and to identify major
landmarks, river crossings and road junctions. Target communities were briefed
by the field monitors using GPS units as to the purpose of their use.
AC
During training sessions each enumerator was given the opportunity to raise questions in order
to clarify any ambiguities concerning data collection ·tools and methods for conducting group
.
.
\
Interviews.
'
In ·explaining survey objectives emphasis was placed on the need to collect reliable and
comprehensive data.
Following completion of training the performance of each enumerator was evaluated and
verified.
9
DEMOGRAPliY
In line with survey obj~tives the data on village arid family size, repatriation . of refugees,
employment opportunities and village leadership was analysed and interpreted. The provision of
accurate and comprehensive information with regards to these demographic aspects was
considered useful for future planning aimed at curbing opium poppy cultivation and drug abuse
. in target areas.
Village and Family Size
KU
Out of 60,262 families in the districts surveyed 91% were recorded as present in their villages.
The highest percentage of families settled in the districts was in Zebak at I 00% followed by
Jurm with 98%. In .Baharak and Keshem 97%repatriation was reported while in Faizabad this
figure· was 86%. (Table 2). ·
Table 2. Total number ·of families and average fan1ily size. per village in 5 districts
surveyed.
•.
Average No. of Families
,.,
AC
Present in
vH lage
No.
1
.
'.
~
District . -' __
BAHARAIC
.:~~ \ .
.
2
FAIZABAO. '·
;.;.~
3
JURM
4
ICES HEM
5
ZEBAIC
~~t~
., i ......
Total:: ·
)
~~
..
..
~
-:.
Total
No.
· Average
Family
Size
No.
X
No.
7622
97
276
3
7898
11
29240
86
4943
14
34183
8
7322
98
152
2
7474
10
9714
97
293
3
1·0007
7
700
100
0
0
700
11
54598
91
5664
9
60262
9
X
'
.~
>
Refugees
Out of the total number of families recorded only 9% were reported not to have repatriated. The
highest percentage of non-returnee families recorded was 14% in Faizabad followed by 3% in
Baharak and Keshem. The lowest was in Jurm at 2%.
Average family size was reported to be 9 members. This ranged from 7 members per family in
Keshem to 11 in B~harak and Zebak districts.
·1995 Comparative Survey Badakhshan Province, Afghanistan
Repatriation
Indications are that mounting socio-economic problems compounded by war damage, destruction
of village infrastructure, poor economic indicators and unemployment in rural areas have
advers~ly affected the repatriation process.
The total number of refugee families reported was 8,592 of whom two thirds (66%) had not
returned to their village in the survey area. (Table 3).
\
Table 3. Refugee repatriation pattern in 5 districts surveyed.
Families
Not Returned
Returned
District
1
BAHARAK
2
FAJZABAD
3
JURM
4
ICES HEM
5
ZEBAK
Total
No.
No.
%
X
Total No.
of Refugee
Families
KU
No.
407
60
276
40
683
1357
22
. 4943
78
6300
31j!
67
152
33
464
852
74
293
26
1145
0
0
a.
0
0
2928
34
5664
66
8592
AC
....
10
The highest percentage of refugee families identified as not having repatriated was 78% in .
Faizabad followed by 40% in Baharak. The lowest was 26% in Keshem. There were no refugee
families recorded in Zebak district.
The highest percentage of families who had repatriated to their viliage was 74% in Keshem
followed by 67% in Jurm, 60% in Baharak and 22% in Faizabad district.
En1ployment Opportunities
Labour constitutes one of the most important resources available and more than two-thirds of
available manpower (67%) in the districts surveyed relied on daily wages from labouring as their
major source of income. Of the remaining_manpower in the survey area 18% were farmers who
relied on animal husbandry for their income. The number of government employees (7%) and
shopkeepers (4%) was collectively lower in comparison to those employed as labourers. Crafts
and trade activities provided the least in terms of income opportunity employing only 3% and
I % of the labour force (Table 4).
1I
1995 Comparative Survey Badakhshan Province, Afghanistan ·
Table 4. Employment catego.-ies in 5 districts surveyed.
Shopkeeping
Trade
Transport
Livestock
No.
Distdct
No. -
x·
No.
X
No.
X
No.
1
BAHARAK
279
5
411
7
1286
22
411
2
FAIZABAD
n
0
464
2
3068
12
3
JURM
136
2
401
5
1365
17
45
1
389
7
2113
38
ZEBAK
2
0
19
2
247
Total
539
1 . 1684
4
8079
' 4
Labour
No.
X
No.
%
7
858
15 .
2643
45
5888
514
2
1046
4
19904
79
25073
371
5
677
8
5133
64
8083
182
3
370
7
2435
44
5534
27
77
8
79
9
492
54
916
18
1555
3
3030
7
30607
67
45494
.
X
KU
5
KESHEM
Government
Posts
Crafts
Total
Among the districts surveyed, the highest rate of employment for labourers was recorded
Faizabad at 79% and in Jurm with 64%. The lowest was in Keshem at 44%.
111
AC
Livestock ownership, the 'Second major source of income, employed 38% of the available
manpower in Keshem, 27% _in Zebak, 22% in Baharak, 17% in Jurm and 12% in Faizabad. The
highest percentage of available manpower employed in government was reported as 15% in
Baharak followed by 9% in Zebak. The lowest rate of government employees (4%) was found
to be in Faizabad. The highest percentage of shopkeepers employe(l was found in Baharak and
Keshem with 7% each and the lowest percentage was 2% each in Faizabad and Zebak. The
numbers employed as craftsmen was reported as limited with the highest percentage being in
Zebak at 8% and Baharak at 7%. The lowest percentage (2%) was recorded in Faizabad.
Numbers of traders and transporters were very low with the highest percentage (5%) recorded
in Baharak and the lowest ( l %) in Keshem.
·
Survey results shows that limited employment opportunities existed in the districts surveyed.
Where agricultural land and livestock management were concerned labour opportunities were
greater. Existing employment opportunities in trade and transport, crafts and shopkeeping
activities w~re thought to be insufficient in meeting the growing demands of communities.
Influential Persons in the Village
Farmers when asked to state the number of influential persons in their village, on average,
reported 8 elders per village in Baharak, 6 in Faizabad and Jurm, 5 in Zebak and 1 in Keshem
district. (Table 5).
12
Table 5. Influential persons pe•· village in 5 districts surveyed.
No.
District
1
BAHARAK
2
FAIZABAD
Influential Persons
'
Average
No.
Maul avis
Elders
8
Maul avis
Elders
6
1
2
JURM
Elders
6
4
ICES HEM
Maul avis
Government employees
1
1
5
ZEBAIC
Maul avis
Elders
1
5
KU
3
Next to eiders, maulavies were reported as influential persons in the village with two per village
in Faizabad and one in other districts. On average farmers considered only one government
employee per village in Keshem district as having influence in their village.
AC
According to the data analysed traditional patterns of village leadership were elders first closely
followed by maulavies and government employees. This was not thought to · have changed
significantly since 199~.
13
AGRICULTURE AND mRIGATION
Data on farm size, farm power, crops cultivated, irrigation sources and rehabilitation
requirements was analysed and interpreted to provide information useful in planning
rehabilitation programmes aimed at the reduction and eradication of opium poppy cultivation and
·
drug abuse.
Farn1 Size and Farm Power
KU
Badakhshan province comprises steep mountain slopes and narrow valleys and therefore has a
low potential for agriculture. Generally, agricultural land consists of limited size farms. The
average size of family farms was 9 jeribs (5 jeribs equate to 1 hectare) in the districts surveyed.
The maximum size of a farm was reported in Keshem with 22 jeribs and t}1e minimum size was
3 jeribs in Baharak. Farm sizes encompassed 8 jeribs in Faizabad, 6 jeribs in Jurm and 4 jeribs
in Zebak (Table 6).
Table 6. Average farm size and average nun1ber of landless families in 5 distdcts
surveyed.
Average
m.1nber of
landless
families
AC
Average
farm size
(jeribs)
No.
District
1
BAHARAIC
3
10
2
FAIZABAD
8
17
3
JURM
6
20
9
.4
ICES HEM
22
5
ZEBAIC
4
'<
Average
9
2
.
12
On average 12 landless families were recorded per village in the districts surveyed. The highest
number of landless families averaged 20 in Jurm followed by 17 in Faii:abad. The lowest
recorded was 2 in Zebak district.
A total of 14,610 pairs of draught oxen, 20 tractors and 10 threshers were utilised in the districts
surveyed. Keshem with a significant agricultural area and good irrigation potential depended
heavily on animal traction with 5,460 pairs of draught oxen, 9 tractors and 9 threshers. In
Faizabad farm power in use numbered 5,192 pairs of draught oxen supported by 9 tractors. Only
135 pairs of draught oxen were reported in Zebak district (Table 7).
14
Table 7. Number of farm power used in 5 districts surveyed.
Type of Farm Power
Tractors
No.
Pairs
of Oxen
No.
Threshers
No.
No.
District
1
BAHARAIC
1
985
0
2
FAIZABAD
9
5192
0
1
2838
1
3 . JURM
ICES HEM
9
5460
9
5
ZEBAIC
0
135
0
Total
20
14610
10
KU
4
A correlation between farm size ,and rural poverty was indicated and in general animal traction
was found on farms with lower than average area of agricultural land.
a
Crops Cultivated
.
. · .;._, ~
AC
Barley' wheat, maize, millet and rice were the main food crops cultivated by farmers in the
survey area. (See ANNEX-3).
Varieties of fruit and tree crops cultivated in the survey area include pears, peaches, apples,
grapes, apricots, almonds, mulberries, cherries, pistachio, plums, walnuts and pomegranates.
Certain varieties of pears were generally considered as most the valuable fruit crop.
Badakhshan province has a wide diversity of vegetable crops and those grown in the survey area
included tomatoes, onions, potatoes, carrots, turnips, egg-plant, .squash, spinach, cucumbers,
cabbage, garlic, leeks, lettuce, <?kra, spearmint and peppers.
Mustard, flax, cotton, sugar beet, tobacco and sunflower were the main cash crops cultivated
in the districts surveyed.
Farmers in some villages cultivated opium poppy and Cannabis.
I
t
I
1995 Comparative Survey Badakhshan
Provin~e,
15
Afghanistan
Irrigation Sources and Rehabilitation Needs
Of the approximately 717,365jeribs ofagriculturalland in the survey area 13% was irrigated
and 87% rain fed. Canal systems formed the major source of irrigation supplies on 96% of the
total land under irrigation. Spring irrigation systems fed only 4% of the total irrigated land.
(Table 8).
Table 8.
'
Irrigation sources in relation to land under cultivation in 5 distr·icts surveyed.
Irrigation Sources
Cenal
No.
1
BAHARAK
2
Total
land
(jeribs)
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
32565
100
0
0
20
0
o.
0
32585
71
13345.
29
45930
FAIZABAO
13979
84
0
0
2604
16
0
'0
16583
6
242884
94
259467
3
JURM
~2160
. 97
0
0
700
3
0
0
22860
40
34640
60
57500
4
KESHEM
16347
99
0
0
161
1
0
. 0
16508
5
333560
95
350068
5
ZEBAK
4400
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
4400
100
0
0
4400
Total
89451
96
0
0
3485
4
0
0
92936
13
624429
87
717365
KU
District
Well
Rainfed
Land
Cjeri bs)
AC
No.
Spring
Karez,
Irrigated
Land
Cjeribs>
In Baharak and Zebak canal irrigation systems provided the only source of water to 99% of land
under irrigation in Keshem. This percentage was 97% in Jurm and 84% in Faizabad. Spring
systems utilised for irrigation purposes fed 16% of all land under irrigation in Faizabad, 3% in
Jurm and 1% in Keshem. Well and Karez irrigation systems were not utilized in the districts
surveyed.
Out of total rainfed land 95% was located in Keshem, 94% in Faizabad, 60% in jurm and 29% in
Baharak. No rainfed land was reported in Zebak district.
Many of the canal irrigation systems (78%) in the districts surveyed had been either damaged or
destroyed during the 14 years of war. All canal irrigation systems were similarly affected in
Baharak, 89% in Zebak, 87% in Jurm, 64% in Faizabad and 62% in Keshem. Karez irrigation
systems damaged or destroyed were reported as being 3% in Faizabad and 1% in Jurm (Table 9).
16
Table 9. Status of canal ·and karez irrigation system in S districts surveyed.
Karez
Canal
Not
Affected
Affected
No.
No.
District
N·o .
X
1
BAHARAK
0
0
132
2
FAIZABAD
73
36
131
No.
%
'
Not
Affected
Affected
%
No.
X
No.
Total
Total
%
No.
%
100
132
100
0
0
0
0
0
64
204
100
0
0
3
100
3
100
87
102
100
0
0
1
100
1
100
JURM
13
13
89
4
KESHEM
30
38
49
62
79
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
ZEBAK
2
11
17
89
19
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
118
22
418
78 . 536
100
0
0
4
100
4
100
KU
3
A total of 972 rehabilitation needs related to canal irrigation systems were recorded in the survey
area (Table 10).
Table 10. Canal irrigation rehabilitation needs in S districts surveyed .
.
Construction
Aqueducts
Culverts
Syphons
No.
No.
27
0
0
353
100
3
1
25
9
284
100
47
3
2
0
0
183
100
13
12
0
0
0
0
108 100
5
8
18
7
16
0
0
44
100
2
246
25
108
11
25
3
972
100
X
No.
99
28
0
0
65
18
95
63
22
3
1
74
26
2
1
3
2
86
' 29
27
16
15
25 .
16
36
2
37 •
. 209
22
24
No.
X
1
BAHARAK
94
27
2
FAIZABAD
116
41
3
JURM
89
49
4
KESHEM
50
46
5
ZEBAK
11
360
No.
'
Total
%
No.
District
Others
No.
X
No.
Total
Diversions
AC
Intakes
X
%
%
These requirements varied from district to district. Repair and construction needs of intakes were
reported at 49% in Jurm, 46% in Keshem, 41% in Faizabad~ 27% in Baharak and 25% in Zebak.
Percentage requirements for the construction of culverts was recorded as 47% in Jurm, 26% in
Faizabad, 18% each in Baharak and Zebak and 12% in Keshem. Construction of aqueducts was
recorded as 36% in Zebak, 28% in Baharak, 27% in Keshem and 22% in Faizabad. The need for
construction of syphons was 27% in Faizabad and 16% in Zebak. Requirements relating to
construction of diversions was not widely reported but recorded as being 15% in Keshem and 5%
in Zebak. Only 9% of unspecified construction needs were identified and ·recorded in Faizabad
district.
1995 Comparative Survey Badakhshan Province,
17
Afgh~nistan
A total of 7 rehabilitation needs relating to karez irrigation systems were identified of which 43%
included karez damages; 14% karez cleaning, _2 9% demining and 14% unspecified.
The percentage of rehabilitation needs relating to damaged karez was identified as 50% in Jurm and
40% in Faizabad. Only 20% karez cl~ning was · recorded as needed in Faizabad.
.
I
Requirements for demining of karez were recorded at 50% in Jurm and 20% in Faizabad. Only
20% unspecified construction needs were reeorded in Faizabad district. (Table 11).
Table 11. Karez
irrigati~n
rehabilitation needs in 5 districts surveyed.
Rehabilitation Needs
\
Cleaning
Channels
of Karez
Cleaning
Well of
Karez
\
Demining
Security
KU
Karez
Demage
Others
Total
Dhtrict
No.
.X
No.
X
No.
X
No.
X
No.
X
No.
X
No.
%
1
BAHARAK
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
FAIZABAD
2
40
1
20
0
0
1
20
0
0
1
20
5
100
3
JURM
1·
50
0
0
0
0
1
50
0
0
0
0
2 100
4
KESHEM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
ZEBAK
-
·Total
AC
No.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
43
1
14
0
0
2
29
0
0
1
14
7
100
..
'
18
STATUS OF OPIUM POPPY CULTIVATION
In accordance ·with survey objeCtives emphasis was placed on analysis and interpretation of data
concerning opium poppy cultivation, marketing and income, attitudes towards opium poppy
cultivation and prevalence and type of drug abuse. The provision of accurate and reliable
information on facts centred on opium poppy cultivation was considered necessary for a better
understanding of problems facing drug control initiatives in ADCRP operational areas. ·
Opium Poppy Cultivation
In 41% of villages in the area surveyed farmers indicated that opium poppy was traditionally
cultivated in Badakhshan province. In 29% of the villages farmers repo.rted that opium poppy
cultivation commenced during the war (1978-89) and in 28% of the villages fanners stated that it
commenced in the last three years (1992-95) (Table 12).
KU
In 98% of the villages in the districts of Jurm, 43% in Keshem, 34% in Faizabad, 19% in Zebak
and 18% in Baharak farmers indicated that opium poppy was traditionally cultivated.
AC
Farmers in 82% of the villages in Baharak, 81% in Zebak and 43% in Keshem indicated cultivation
as having commenced during the war (1978-89) while in 39% of the villages in Faizabad it was
reported that opium poppy cultivation had begun in the last 3 years only (1992-95). Farmers in 14%
of the villages in Keshem and 3% of the villages in Faizabad were of the opinion that opium poppy
·
cultivation commenced after the war (1990-91).
Table 12. History of opium poppy cultivation in 5 districts surveyed.
Before
· the War
<)978)
During
the \Jar
(1978-89)
After
the \Jar
( 1990-91)
No.
%
No.
X
No.
%
Last
3 Years
( 1992-95)
Total
No.
District
No.
X
No.
1
BAHARAK
11
18
49
82
0
0
J()
0
60
100
2
FAlZABAD
129
34
92
24
10
3
150
39
381
100
3
JURM
79
98
2
2
0
0
0
0
81
100
4
KESHEM
3
43
3
43
1
-14
0
0
7
100
5
ZEBAK
3
19
13
81
0
0
0
0
16
100
Total
225
41
159
29
11
2
150
28
545
100
X
In comparison with the data from the 1994 ADCRP Baseline Survey the total number of villages
cultivating opium poppy decreased from 51% in 1994 to 47% in 1995 in the districts surveyed,
19
Table 13. Number of villages growing opium poppy in 5 districts surveyed (1994-1995).
Opium Poppy Cultivation .by Villages
1994
1995
1994
Total
None
Opium Poppy
No.
X
No.
47
53
40
70
48 262
54
218
78
n
81
76
ICES HEM
64
34
8
ZEBAK
12
Total
435
1995
1994
1995
No.
No
X
53
134
100
133
100
52 222
46
418 100
484
100
23
23
25
24
101
100
106
100
4
124
66
171
96
.188
100
179
100
67 . 16
84
6
33
3
16
51
47
424
49 491
53
No.
Di.strict
No.
~
No.
1
BAHARAK
81
60
63
2
FAIZABAD
200
3
JURM
4
5
%
18 100
859
100
%
19 100
921
100
KU
430
%
An increase in the percentage of villages growing opium poppy was recorded from 67% to 84%
in Zebak and 48% to 54% in Faizabad district during the same period. Among the districts the
percentage decrease in villages growing opium poppy was found to be 34%, 60% and 77% in 1994
and 4·%, 47% and 76% in 1995 in Keshem, Baharak and Jurm districts respectively.
·
AC
In comparison to the 1994 ADCRP Baseline Survey data the total area under cultivation increased
from 258,639 jeribs in 1994 to 409,063 jeribs in 1995 in the districts surveyed. By contrast the
total land under opium poppy cultivation decreased from 20,350 jeribs (8%) in 1994 to 14,857
jeribs (4%)
poppy cultivation
(Table 14) (Figure 1).
. in 1995 in the area of opium
.
.
.
Table 14. Comparison of land -qnder opium poppy cultivation versus total land cultivated
in 5 districts surveyed.
...
Cultivated Land (Jeribs)
Yield
Total
Cultivated
Total
Percent of
Opium Poppy . Opil.llt Poppy
1994
1995
1995
322
2
1
5
6
2220
1877
15630 11722
11
8
7
6
109410
71343
'3661
2777
20
8
5
5
18305
12891
183104
600
17
1
0
5
6
3000
104
1895
4140
15
19
1
0
5
6
75
106
258639
409063
20350
14857
8
4
6
6
122100
89139
1994
' 2n22
37313
444
145488
149136
JURM
18590
35370
4
KESHEM
65444
5
ZEBAK
Total
District
1
BAHARAK
2
FAIZABAD
3
1994
1995
Total Kg
1994
1995
No.
Kg/jerib
1994
1995
20
AC
KU
Other Crops ( 96 . 0%)
Figure 1. Percentag~ , of land under opium poppy cultivation as compared to other
crops in S districts surveyed.
I
The total acreage of land under cultivation in Keshem district increased from 65,444 jeribs in 1994
to 183,104 jeribs in 1995. At the same time a substantial decrease in opium poppy cultivation
occurred from 600 jeribs in 1994 to 17 jeribs in 1995. A substantial increase in total cultivated land
was also recorded in Zebak where it rose from 1,895 jeribs in 1994 to 4,140 jeribs in 1995, in
Jurm this increase was from 18,590 to 35,370 jeribs and in Baharak district from 27,222 jeribs to
37,313 jeribs in the same period.
21
During this period total land under opium _poppy cultivation decreased from 444 jeribs to 322 jeribs
in Baharak. By contrast a .minor increase in opium poppy cultivation in Zebak district from 15
jeribs in 1994 to 19 jeribs in 1995 was recorded (Figure 2).
·
·2 1
20
19
18
17
.
~---------,----- -·- -·
·-- - --- --- --
.~~~: ~:
..: ·. \ .".·l-
-·-
-
·--
--
l
- -·- - --· - - -- - -
I------------------I~$Z~<l-------------------
·/
1 - - - - ' - - - - - - - -- - - -- -t·x:::-;
x·
xr~r---------- ---
16
15
13
•II
01
...c
12
<ll
u
11
1...
10
Ill
<ll
a
9
;;..
8
8
8
E
6
7
:1
5
AC
8
KU
14
4
3
2
0
-~
~~
2
3
4
5
Ois t. ri c t. s
~ "1994
~ 1995
Figure 2.
Changes in percentage of land under opium poppy cultivation (19941995).
22
The average yield of wet opium was recorded at 6 kg per jerib in 1994 and 1995. This equated to
a production of 122,100 kg in 1994 against 89,139 kg in 1995. Assuming a 30% reduction upon
drying 85,470 kg of dry opium was produced in 1994 against 62,397 kg in 1995. (Figure 3) .
--
8
7
I
"
5
4
.Q
L
Ql
......
0
l.!
3
AC
2
KU
6
2
3
4
5
Dist. ri ct.s
~ 1994
Figure 3.
~ 1995
Comparison of average yield of opium poppy (1994-1995).
In general, the average yield of opium varied very little in the area surveyed. No change was
reported in the average yield of opium in Jurm district. This was recorded as being 5 kg per jerib
in 1994 and 1995.
1995
Compa~ative
23
Survey Badakhshan Province, Afghanistan
During the same period the average yield of opium decreased from 7 kg per jerib to 6 kg per jerib
in Faizabad and increased from 5 kg per jerib to 6 kg per jerib in Baharak, Keshem and Zebak
districts.
A substantial decrease was recorded in Keshem district ranging from 3,000 kg in 1994 to 104 kg
in 1995. This was followed by Faizabad with 109,410 kg in 1994 reduced to 71,343 kg in 1995.
The least reduction in the total volume of opium produced was reported in Baharak district from
2,220 kg in 1994 to 1,877 kg in 1995.
An increase in the total quantity of opium produced was reported in Zebak district which rose from
75 kg in 1994 to 106 kg in 1995.
KU
Farmers in 57% of the villages when asked their reasons for cultivating opium poppy gave higher
income potential as being the main reason. Farmers in 29% of the villages indicated no alter~ative
income opportunity as their reason for cultivating opium poppy (Table 15).
Table 15. Main reasons for opiun1 poppy cultivation in 5 districts surveyed.
Traditional
District
No.
1
BAHARAK
24
2
FAIZABAD
3
JURM
4
5
X
21
No.
61
%
53
AC
No.
High Income
No Alternative
Income
No.
X
Encouraged
by others
Total
No.
%
No.
%
30
26
0
0
115
100
7
2
233
54
169
39
21
5
430
100
33
29
80
71
0
0
0
0
113
100
KESHEM
0
0
4
50
3
38
1
13
8
100
ZEBAK
10
37
15
56
2
7
0
0
27
100
Total
74,
11
393
57
204
"29
22
3
693
100
Among the districts surveyed farmers in 80 out of 113 villages in Jurm, in 15 put of 27 villages
in Zebak, in 233 out of 430 villages in Faizabad and in 4 out of 8 villages in Keshem cultivated
opium poppy to obtain a higher income. Farmers in 169 out of 430 villages in Faizabad, in 3 out
of 8 villages in Keshem, in 30 out of 115 villages in Baharak and in 2 out of 27 villages in Zebak
stated the lack of alternative income opportunities as being their' reason for ~ultivating opium
poppy. Farmers in 33 out of 113 villages in Jurm, in 10 out of 27 villages in Ze,bak and in 24 out
of 115 villages in Baharak traditionally cultivated opium poppy.
·
Farmers in 44% of the villages gave religion as their main reason for not cultivating opium poppy,
24% of the villages indicated prohibition by the authorities and 21% of the villages stated
superstition as reasons for not cultivating opium poppy. (Table ~ 6).
•
24
Table 16. Main reasons for not cultivated opium poppy in 5 districts surveyed.
Prohibition
by
Superstition Authority
Religious
No.
District
No.
.
%
No.
%
1
BAHARAK
0
0
0
0
126
2
FAJZABAD
153
43
7
2
3
JURM
7
22
5
4
KESHEM
155
85
5
ZEBAK
0
Total
315
Total
Others
No.
No.
%
100
0
0
126
100
23
6
174
49
357
100
16
0
0
20
63
32
100
9
5
7
4
12
7 183
100
0
0
0
17
100
0
0
17
100
44
21
3
173
24
206
29
715
100
No.
%
KU
%
Among the districts farmers in 155 out of 183 villages in Keshem, in 153 out of 357 villages in
Faizabad and in 7 out of 32 villages in Jurm did not cultivate opium poppy for religious reasons.
However, farmers in 20 out of 32 villages in Jurm and in 174 out 357 villages in Faizabad did not
specify their reasons for not cultivating opium poppy.
AC
Farmers in all villages in Baharak and Zebak and in 23 out 357 villages in Faizabad (6%) stated
that opium poppy cultivation had been prohibited by the authorities.
Farmers in 500 out of 921 villages pointed out that there had been no opium poppy eradication
~fforts in their village since last year. (Table 17).
Table 17. Opium poppyeradicat.ion efforts by villages and change in opiurn poppy cultivation
since the last ·year in 5 districts surveyed.
\
EradicatiOn Efforts by Village
Yes
No
Total
Change in Opium Poppy Cultivation by Village
Reduced
No.
District
No.
X
No.
%
1
BAHARAK
132
99
1
1
133
53
2
FAJZABAD
199'
41
285
59
484
3
JURM
33
31
73
69
4
KESHEM
38
21
141
79
5
ZEBAK
19
100
0
Total
441
46
500
~
54
No.
No.
Increased
The same Eradicated
Total
No.
%
No.
%
No.
40
0
0
9
7
70
53
132
100
7
2
137
34
118
29
139
35
401
100
106
23
27
6
7
51
59
6
7
86
100
179
4
8
2
4
1
2
41
85
48
100
19
16
84
0
0
0
0
3
16
19
100
921
103
15
145
21
179
26
259
38 686
100
%
% No.
%
25
'
District farmers in 141 out of 179 villages
in Keshem, in 73 out of 106 villages in Jurm and in 285
out of 484 villages in Faizabad indicated that there had been no opium poppy eradication efforts
in their village since last year.
However, farmers in all villages in Zebak, in 132_out of 133 villages in Baharak, in 199 out of 484
villages in Faizabad, in 33 out of 106 villages in Jurm and in 38 out of 179 villages in Keshem
reported that there. had been opium poppy eradication efforts in their villages.
Out of 686 villages, farmers in 259 villages (38%) stated eradication as having taken place. In 179
villages (26%) no change was recorded. In 145 villages (21 %) an increase was noted and in 103
villages (15%) opium poppy cultivation had declined since last year.
KU
Fanners in the districts surveyed indicated in 41 out of 48 villages in Keshein, in 70 out of 132
villages in Baharak and in 139 out of 401 villages in Faizabad that opium poppy cultivation had
been eradicated in their v_illages. Farmers in 51 out of 86 villages in Junn and in 118 out of 40 l
villages in Faizabad were of the opinion that the status of opium poppy cultivation had remained
unchanged.
I
Farmers in 137 out of 401 villages in Faizabad, in 6 out of 86 villages in Jurm and in 2 out of 48
villages .in Keshem indicated that opium poppy cultivation had increased in their villages.
AC
Farmers in 16 out of 19 villages in Zebak, in 53 out of 132 villages in Baharak and in 23 out of
86 villages in Jurm pointed .out that opium poppy cultivation had been reduced.
Fertilizer Use in Opium Poppy Cultivation
Farmers in the majority of villages (85%) did not apply chemical fertilizers to their opium poppy
fields in the districts surVeyed. Farmers in all villages in Baharak, Keshem and Zebak, in 424 out
of 484 villages in Faizabad (88%) and· in 29 out of 106 villages in Jurm (27%) did not apply
chemical fertilizers to their opium poppy. However, farmers in 77 out of 106 villages in Jurm
(73%) and in 60 out of 484-- villages in Faizabad (12%) used chemical fertilizers during cultivation
(Table 18).
26
Table 18 • .Fertilizer input in opium poppy cultivated in 5 districts surveyed.
Quantity of
Fertilizer
Fertilizer Use by Villages
Yes
DAP
Urea
Kg/jrb
Kg/jrb
No
No.
Total
No.
District
No.
%
1
BAHARAK
0
0
133
100
133
0
0
2
FAIZABAD
60
12
424
88
484
15
20
3
JURM
n
73
29
27
106
15
18
4
KESHEM
0
0
179 100
179
0
0
5
ZEBAK
0
0
19 100
19
0
0
137
15
921
15
19
784
85
KU
Average
X
On average 15 kg diammonium phosphate (DAP) and 19 kg urea fertiliser were used per jerib in
opium poppy cultivation in the districts surveyed. The average quantity of. DAP fertilizer used per
jerib was 15 kg in Faizabad and Jurm districts. The amount of urea fertilizer used per jerib was
20 kg in Faizabad and 18 kg in Jurm. Chemical fertiliser was not used in the other districts
surveyed.
.-:·~i .
AC
Marketing and Income ~\AsSeSsment of Opium
·,
.
~·
.,::
The average price ofwefopium was reported by the farmers as Afs. 273,811 per kg in the districts
surveyed. The highest price per kg of wet opium was reported as Afs.351 ,875 in Zebak followed
by Afs.350,242 in Baharak while the lowest was Afs.l96,250 in Keshem (Table 19).
Table 19. ASseSsment of opium poppy income i~ 5 districts surveyed .
.
.
.,
.
.•.·.
'
''··
Price
of Wet
Opillll/Kg
Total Gross
Income
tjerib
Total
Cost
/jerib
Net
Income
/jerib
No. :0-i'strict
(Afs)
(Afs)
(Afs)
(Afs)
350242
2189839
181419
2008419
260744 .
1371135
234189
1136947
•
'\
' ,1 ~.\
~~,.;,If. w:, :·.•
. ~ ....-- .;:
1
BAHARAK
2
FAIZABAD
3
JURM
249815
1055432
245309
810123
4
KESHEM
196250
2637500
142250
2495250
5
ZEBAIC
351875
2001250
184063
1817188
273811
147no9
225078
1252631
Average
-
\
27
Average input cost per jerib of opium poppy cu!tivation was estimated by the farmers as
Afs.225,078 in the districts surveyed.
Highest average input cost per jerib of opium poppy cultivation was estimated as Afs.245,309 in
Jurm followed by Afs.234,189 in Faizabad while the lowest was Afs.l42,250 in Keshem. The
variation in average cost per jerib can be attributed to total man-days, wages per jerib, chemical
fertiliser and seed requirements in opium poppy cultivation.
The average gross income from opium poppy in the survey area was estimated at Afs.l ,477,709
per jerib (net Afs.l ,252,631 per jerib).
KU
The highest average gross income reported by the farmers was Afs.2,637,500 per jerib (net
Afs.2,495,250 per jerib) in Keshem followed by Afs.2,189,839 per jerib (net Afs.2,008,419) in
Baharak while the lowest, Afs.l,055,432 per jerib (net Afs.810,123) was reported in Jurm.
(Figure 4).
Attitudes Towards Opium Poppy Cultivation
AC
Drug production and drug abuse were found to be inter-related issues. Since it affects the life of
the villagers themselves certain categories of people even discouraged farmers from cultivating
opium poppy. To better understand the relationship between the t~o issues emphasis was placed
on identifying the nature and characteristics of people discouraging opium poppy cultivation and
community ideas, attitudes and intentions with regard to opium poppy cultivation and drug abuse.
On this basis farmers were . asked to list in order of importance the categories of people
discouraging them from opium poppy cultivation. Maulavies ranked first in Faizabad, Jurm and
Keshem and fourth in the other districts surveyed. Government employees ranked first in Baharak
and Zebak, second in Faizabad and Keshem and fourth in Jurm. Commanders ranked second in
Baharak and Zebak districts, third in Jurm .and Keshem and fourth in Faizabad. Elders ranked
second in Jurm, third in Baharak, Faizabad and Zebak and sixth in Keshem. Maliks ranked fifth
in Baharak and Keshem. No reference was made to the position of maliks in other districts.
In order of importance therefore, the following categories of people were discouraging farmers
from cultivating opium poppy (Table 20).
1.
2.
3.
Maulavies
.,
Government Employees
Commanders
4.
5.
Elders
Maliks
2 .6
2 .4
2 .2
2
1 .8
1 6
~ ~
.o9
..., -
4
1.2
·u,:
~~
<lu
'\
0 .8
0 .6
0 .4
KU
1
.or..
•• .t:'
. ~~
AC
0 .2
c.
0
1 .
2
3
4
5
D i str i cts
Figure 4.
Comparison of net income from opium (1994-1995).
28
29
Table 20. Categories of persons involved in discouraging opium poppy cultivation in 5
districts. surveyed.
No. of Times ranked
District
1 ' BAHARAK
2
3
4
JURM
KESHEM
ZEBAK
Maulavies
Maliks
Conmanders
Elders
Goverrvnent efl1lloyees
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
7
0
8.
5th 6th
Weighted
Rank
0
0
0
0
0
4
88
5
1
81
9
0
Maulavies
259
30
Comnanders
Elders
20
Government efl1lloyees 81
171
14
47
51
12
3
32
17
0
0
0
1
10
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
3
6
2
0
0
6
4
Maulavies
Conmanders
Elders
38
6
7
.2
24
4
Maulavies
Maliks
Comnanders
Elders
Khan
48
4
11
3
10
35
35
3
12
3
2
10
Maulavies
Comnanders
Elders
0
3
AC
5
FAJZABAD
Discouragers
3
68
0
0
1
0
{)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
1
3
2
0
KU
No.
1
1
0
3
1
0
1
10
0
0
0 . 14
0
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
2
3
1
3
2
4
1
4
4
2
3
1
Farmers reported that 44% of a cross section of people from rural communities desired complete
eradication, 34% continuation and 22% reduction when asked to estimate community attitudes and
intentions towards opium poppy cultivation (Table 21).
30
Table 21. Community attitudes and intention towards opium poppy cultivation in 5
districts surveyed.
In Favour of
\
' Continued Reduction in COIJ1)lete
Cultivation Cultivation Eradication
No.
District
1
Total
X
X
X
%
BAHARAK
10
7
83
100
2
FAI~ABAD
45
22
34
100
3
JURM
27
35
38
100
4
ICES HEM
18
42
40
100
5
ZEBAK
4
7
90
100
Total
34
22
44
100
KU
'
AC
Among the districts 90% of the people in Zebak, 83% in Baharak, 40% in Keshem, 38% in Jurm
and 34% in Faizabad desired complete eradication of opium poppy. However, 45% in Faizabad,
27% in Jurm and 18% in Keshem expressea a desire to continue cultivation of opium poppy in their·
villages. Support for reducing opium poppy cultivation was favoured by some people.
·
In Keshem 42% of the people, in Jurm 35%, in Faizabad 22% and in Baharak and Zebak 7% each
expressed a desire for reduced opium poppy cultivation.
Prevalence and Type of Drug Abuse
A total of 558 raw opium and 30 of hashish addicts were identified in the districts sui"Veyed (Table
22) .
1995 Comparative Survey Badakhshan Proyince, Afghanistan
31
Table 22. Number of addicts their age, type and place of drug abuse in 5 districts
surveyed.
District
1
BAHARAK
2
FAIZABAD
3
4
5
JURM
KESHEM
ZEBAIC
Age Group
Place of addiction
Raw opiun
Hashish
, Heroin
58
16
0
45-66
38-56
0-0
City (other country)
and Village
Raw opiun
Hashish
Heroin
3
0
0
25-33
Village
Raw opiun
Hashish
Heroin
17
39-69
30-60
0-0
City (Afghanistan)
and Village
City (other country)
and Battle Front
Village
2
0
0-0
0-0
Raw opiun
Hashish
Heroin
12
0
29-0
20-37
0-0
Raw opiun
Hashish
Heroin
479
0
0
35-73
0-0
0-0
1
Raw opiun
Hashish
Heroin
558
30
0
39-69
29-48
o- o
AC
Total
Nl.llber
of
Addicts
KU
No.
Substance
of
Addiction
A maximum number of 479 raw opium addicts was reported in Zebak while the lowest number was
1 in Keshem in the age group from 35 to 73 years and 29 years respectively. The number of raw
opium addicts recorded was 58 in Baharak and 17 in Jurm in the age group 45 to 66 years and 39
to 69 years respectively.
Sixteen hashish addicts were reported in Baharak, 12 in Keshem and 2 in Jurm in the age groups
38 to 56 years, 20 to 37 years and 30 to 60 years respectively.
In general addiction was widely picked up in cities in Afghanistan, village communities and refugee
camps.
32
VILLAGE INFRASTRUCTURE
Analysis and interpretation of data on village infrastructure included rehabilitation needs of housing,
clinics, schools, mosques and access roads. Agencies considered useful to ADCRP for planning
activities aimed at the reduction ;and eradication of opium poppy cultivation and drug abuse were
also examined.
Road Infrastructure and Rehabilitation Needs
KU
Out of 921 villages only 285 (31%) were reported to have access roads. In the districts surveyed
17 out of 19 villages in Zebak, 92 out of 133 villages in Baharak, 46 out of 106 villages in Jurm,
45 out of 179 villages in Keshem and 85 out of 484 villages in Faizabad were recorded as having
village access roads (Table).
Table 23. Village access roads in 5 districts surveyed.
Village
with
Access Roads
District
No.
X
AC
No.
Vi llag.e
with no
Access Roads
No.
X
Total
No.
X
BAHARAK
92
69
41
31
133
100
FAIZABAD
85
18
399
82
484
100
3
JURM
46
43
60
57
·106
100
4
KESHEM
45
25
134
75
179 100
5
ZEBAK
17
89
2
11
19 100
·Total
285
31
636
69
1
. 2
921
100
Village access roads were free of mines but in general their condition was reported as
unsatisfactory. Most were passable only in the dry season as they required draining and surfacing.
A total number of 1,237 village access roads required rehabilitation. Requirements varied from 279
needing leveling, 168 surfacing, 268 widening, 266 bridge construction and 256 side ditching
(Table 24).
33
Table 24. Rehabilitation needs of village access roads in 5 districts sua·veycd.
To District
Bridge
Side
Level fng Surfacing \.Jidening Construction Demining Ditching
Total
- -----
89
87
0
89
85
82
0
81
357
- - -406
46
46
46
0
46
230
42
45
32
34
0
23
176
17
1
16
17
0
17
1
BAHARAK
89
3
2
FAJZABAD
85
73
3
JURM
46
4
KESHEM
5
ZEBAK
'
---
---
68
-
Total
279
168
268
266
0
. 256
1237
KU
In Baharak district 89 village access roads required leveling, widening and side ditching, 3 village
roads needed surfacing and 87 bridge construction.
acce~s
In Faizabad district 85 village access roads required leveling and widening, 73 surfacing, 82 bridge
construction and 81 side ditching.
AC
In Jurm 46 village access roads required leveling, surfacing, widening, bridge construction and side
·
ditching.
In Keshem 42 village access roads required leveling, 45 surfacing, 32 widening, 34 bridge
construction and 23 side ditching.
In Zebak 17 village access roads required leveling, bridge
surfacing and 16 widening.
c~nstruction
and side ditching, 1
3-l
'
Housing Infrastructure and Rehabilitation
Needs
Village infrastructure including houses, mosques, schools, clinics and shops were heavily damaged
or destroyed during the protracted years of war. In Baharak district 10% of the schools , 9 % of
houses and 3% clinics were damaged while 90% of the schools and 5 % of the hou ses were
destroyed. (Table 25).
Table 25. Village infrastructure and rehabilitation needs in 5 districts sur·veyed.
- - ---
No
District
Village
Infrastructure
Unaffected Damaged
No .
Destroyed
Total
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
87
0
100
100
97
596
3
0
0
5
9
10
0
0
3
325
28
0
0
0
5 6864
90
31
0 143
0
15
0 179
-
-- ,--
-----
_,
Reconstruction
No. of Times Ranked
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
100 3
100 20
100
1
100 95
100
1
6
91
3
20
0
37
1
23
2
1
12
0
4
0
%
5th Priority
--
3
4
5
FAIZABAD
JURM
KESHEM
ZEBAK
Total
House
Schools
Mosques
Clinics
Shops
House
Schools
Mosques
Clinics
Shops
5943
0
143
15
174
KU
2
BAHARAK
14788
0
394
9
347
64
0
66
100
74
3027
11
130
0
6
13 5141
39
17
72
22
0
0
1 115
22 22956
61
28
12
596
9
0
25
468
14
53
38
97
5
---0
6155
0
142
19
367
96
0
98
100
100
237
8
2
0
0
4
24
1
0
0
26
26
1
0
0
0 6418
76
34
1 145
0
19
0 367
100
100
100
100
100
16
18
2
9
0
2
2
1
10
2
House
Schools
Mosques
Clinics
Shops
5939
0
273
3
182
86
0
76
100
74
695
13
69
0
63
10
81
19
0
26
292
3
4 6926
19
16
5 . 359
0
3
1 247
100
100
100
100
100
55
• 33
47
46
0
23
45
54
25
0
31
38
25
26
531 87
0 0
22 100
2 100
45
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
31
0
0
0
607
0
22
2
100
0
100
100
1
2
1
12
6
6
1
2
5
4910
11
6096
13 46456
100
House
Schools
Mosques
Clinics
5450
76
17
0
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
-9
0
0
56
3
0
72
2
4 93
~-
100 367 82
100 32 60
100 59 144
100 12
32
100
0
1
House
Schools
Mosques
Clinics
Shops
AC
1
0
0
1
1
3
2
0
0
- ·- -----
--
3
2
4
1
5
------ - - -
1
3
2
4
5
..
-- --
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
4
3
38
6
3
25
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
4
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
-
5
2
3
5
3
2
4
1
In Faizabad district 39% of schools, 22% of mosques, 13% of houses and 1 % of the ·shops were
damaged while 61% of schools, 25% of shops, 22% of houses and 12% of mosques were
destroyed.
In Jurm district 24% of schools, 4% of houses and 1% of mosques were damaged while 76% of
schools a'nd 1% of mosques were -,(Jestroyed.
35
In Keshem 81% of schools, 26% ' of shops, 19% of mosques and 10% of houses were damaged
while 19% of schools, 5% of mosques, 4% of houses and 1·% of the shops were destroyed.
I
In Zebak district 7% of houses were damaged and 5% destroyed. Mosques and clinics were not
affected.
Assisting Agencies
KU
The destruction to schools. was higher than that caused to homes, mosques, clinics and shops in
many districts. House reconstruction needs ranked first in Faizabad and Keshem, second in Jurm
and third in Baharak and Zebak. Reconstruction of clinics ranked first in Baharak and Zebak, third
in Jurm and Keshem and fourth in Faizabad. Reconstruction of schools ranked first in Jurm, second
in Baharak and Zebak, third in Faizabad and fourth in Keshem. Needs for the reconstruction of
mosques ranked second in Faizabad and Keshem and fourth in other districts. The reconstruction
of shops ranked fifth in the districts surveyed with the exception of Zebak, where it was not
reported.
AC
Five NGOs were involved in carrying out rehabilitation programtnes at v~llage levels in the districts
at the time of conducting the survey with the exception of Zebak where ~o NGOs activities were
reported. Their main activities were in the sectors of agriculture, construction, health, irrigation,
roads construction, education and provi,sion of potable water supplies (See ANNEX 5).
KU
AC
ANNEXE-1
· SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
•
UNOPJ()PS
Questionnaire No: _ ________ _
Survey For1n 1995
Date of data collection
Province
Surveyor Code
District
Number of fanners in the group
interviewed
Main Area
Main Village
Suh Village
GENERAL DATA
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
KU
I.
1. What is the total number of families in the village'?
AC
2. How many refugee families have returned to the village?
3. How many refugee families have not returned to the village ?
4. What. is the average number of family members?
5. How many people are involved in alternative occupations in the village?
Title
6.
Number
Title
Number
Trade/ transport
Crafts
Shopkeeping
Government posts
Livestock
·Labour
Which NGOs are currently working in the village and on what
Name
pr~j~ts
Type of project
I of 6
?
7.
Who are the influential persons in the village '!
F. ----------G. ---------H. ----------1. _ _ _ _ ___
A. --------------8. ---------------
c. --------------0. ---------------
B.
Numher
Title
Number
Title
AGRICULTURE:
8.
What is the size of the farm holding per family in the village?
9.
How many landless families are there ?
10.
What type of farm power is availahle to farmers ?
- - - - - Jcrihs
Number
Type
Oxen (pair)
Tractors
Threshers
What crops are grown ?
Cereal crops:
Fruits:
Vegetables:
Illicit Crops:
c.
1)~~~-- 2) _ _ _ _ __ 3) _ _ _ __
4) - - - - - - - - - -
l)
2) _ _ _ __
4) - - - - - - - - -
l)
2) _ _ _ _ __ 3) _ _ _ __
4) _ _ __
1)
2) _ _ _ _ __
3) _ _ _ __
4) - - - - - - - -
2) _ _ _ _ __ 3) _ _ _ __
4) - - - - - - -
AC
Industrial Crops:
KU
I I.
1)
3) _ _ _ __
IRRIGATIONi
12.
What is the total area of irrigated land? _________ Jeribs
13.
What ~rea is irrigat.1 by ?
Canal:
Jeribs
Spring:
Jerihs
Karez:
Jeri·bs
Well:
Jeribs
14.
What is the total area of raint'ed land (cultivated & fallow) ? _________ Jeri bs
15.
Are the irrgation systems of canal operational ·?
Yes
No
If YES, how many?
If NO, what are .the rehabilitation requirements ?
A.
Repair and ·construction of intakes
D.
Construction of culverts
B.
Construction of aqueducts
E.
Construction of syphons
c.
Construction of diversions
F.
Others, specify:
2 of 6
_
Are the irrigation systems of kareze working '!
16.
If YES,
No _ _ __ .
Yes - - - - -
· how many?
If NO, what are the re~abilitation requirements '?
C. Well of Karez uncleaned
E. Security
B. Channels of Karez uncleaned
D. Mine
F.
Oth~rs , sp~cify
VILLAGE INFRASTRUCTURE:
17.
Are there access roads to the village '!
Yes
______ ,
No
If YES, how many roads?
What are the rehabilitation requirements '!
Rehabilitation
Road 1
Row/3
Road 2
requirement
Graveling
Widening
Bridge Construction
Demining
Side ditching
18.
What is the damage to the village infrastructure and what are the construction priorities '!
Village Infrastructure
Houses
KU
Leveling
AC
D.
A. Karez damaged
Unaffected
Damaged
Schools
Mosques
Clinics
Shops
3 of 6
Destroyed
Rank
Roud -1
II.
OPIUM POPPY DATA
A.
HISTORICAL DIMENSION:
19.
No
Yes- -- - -
Is there any opium poppy cultivation in the village'!
If NO, answer questionswith asteriks.
If YES, answer all questions.
* 21.
For what reasons do farmers not cultivate opium poppy in the village'?
A.
Religious
C.
Prohibition by authority
B.
Superstition
D.
Others, specify:
24.
B.
C.
B.
Yes
··----
No
Has opium poppy cultivation changed since last year '?
A.
Reduced
B.
Increased
C.
The same
D.
Eradicated
What are the main reasons for opium poppy cultivation?
A.
Traditional
B.
Greater income
c.
No alternative income
D.
Encouraged by others
E.
Other reasons, specify:
AC
23.
---
Since last year have there been any opium poppy eradication efforts ?
A.
* 22.
- - -- - --
KU
* 20.
When did opium poppy cultivation start in this village ?
A.
Before the war (before 1978)
C.
After the war ( 1990-~ I)
B.
During the war ( 1978-89)
D.
Last three years (1992-95)
QUANTITATIVE DIMENSION:
* 25 .
What is the total area of cultivated land in the village this year ?
26.
What is the total area of cultivated land under opium poppy cultivation?
27.
What is the wet opium yield per jerih?
- - - - - k g / 1995
ECONOMIC DIMENSION:
28.
Is fertilizer used in opium poppy cultivation this year ?
Yes
No
4 of 6
Jerihs
Jerihs
- - - - - - k g / 1994
\
If YES, Urea _ _ _ _ kg/ Jerih,
_ _ _ _ kg/ Jerih .
29.
How much does it cost to cultivate one jerih of opium poppy ?
Afs .
30.
What is the gross income ·of one jerih of opium poppy '!
Af-;.
31.
What will the farmer receive for a Kg . of wet opium ?
Afs .
REDUCTION OF OPIUM POPPY CULTIVATION:
*
32.
* 33 .
In order of importance list categories of people involved in discouraging opium poppy culti vation :
1.
4.
2.
5.
3.
6.
What are the intentions of local people regarding opium poppy cultivation'!
In Favour of
Continued Cultivation
Reduction in Cultivation
(%)
AC
Complete Eradication
KU
D.
DAP
III. DRUG ABUSE DATA
*
34.
How many people in the village use?
Number
Substance
* 35.
a)
Raw opium
b)
Hashish
c)
Heroin
Where did addicts acquire addiction ?
\
Place of Introduction
Check
City (Afghanistan)
City (Other country) ·
Village
Refugee Camp
Battle Front
5 of 6
Range of age
I.
As
~num~rator
how many opium poppy fields in
th~
observ~d
by you?
No
Were these all the opium poppy fields ?
Y~s
2.
What is the total area of opium poppy land
obs~rved
3.
Measure 3 plots of opium poppy by pacing '!
I. ____________ sqm.
village were
hy you ?
2. ____________ sqm.
jerihs
3. - - - - - - - -
sqm .
What is the percentage of the total cultivated land und~r opium poppy?
5.
Draw a sketch of this village on the back of this questionnaire with its four boundaries including roads and palhs.
Indicate the north direction .
AC
KU
4.
Date:
23 February, 1995-LSE
FILE:
GENERAL\PCSURVE5.TBL
6 of 6
KU
ANNEXE-2
SURVEY DISTRICT MAPS
Available upon request from the UNDCP
AC
Regional Office for Southwest Asia (ROSWA). Islamabad
KU
AC
ANNEXE-3
CROPS CULTIVATED BY DISTRICT
ANNEX 3:
Crops cultivated.
Crops
2
Illicit
Crops
District
Cereal Crops '-
~ruits
Vegetables
Cash Crops
BAHARAK
BARLEY
MAIZE
MILLET
RICE
\JHEAT
APPLES
APRICOTS
BERRIES
CHERRIES
\JALNUTS
CABBAGES
CUCUMBERS
ONIONS
POTATOES
SQUASH
TOMATOES
FLAX SEED
MUSTARD
TOBACCO
OPIUM POPPY
FAIZABAD
BARLEY
MAIZE
MILLET
MUNG BEAN
RICE
\JHEAT
CABBAGES
ALMONDS
CARROTS
APPLES
CORIANDERS
APRICOTS
CUCUMBERS
BERRIES
EGG PLANT
CHERRIES
GARLIC
GRAPES
LEEK
PEACHES
LETTUCE
PEARS
'
PISTACHIOS
·OKRA
ONIONS
PLUMS
POMEGRANATES PEPPERS
WALNUTS
POTATOES
SPEARMINT
SPINACH
SQUASH
TOMATOES
TURNIP
COTTON
FLAX SEED
SUGAR BEET
SUN FLOWER
TOBACCO
HASHISH
OPIUM POPPY
BARLEY
MAIZE
MILLET
WHEAT
--:::
KU
No.
APPLES
APRICOTS
BERRIES
CHERRIES
PEACHES
. PLUMS
\JALNUTS
EGG PLANT
ONIONS
PEPPERS
POTATOES
TOMATOES
TURNIP
OPIUM POPPY
JURM
4
KESHEM
BARLEY
MAIZE
RICE
\JHEAT
ALMONDS
APPLES
APRICOTS
BERRIES
CHERRIES
GRAPES
PEACHES
PISTACHIOS
PLUMS
POMEGRANATES
\JALNUTS
CABBAGES
CUCUMBERS
EGG PLANT
ONIONS
POTATOES
SQUASH
TOMATOES
COTTON
FLAX SEED
MUSTARD
HASHISH
OPIUM POPPY
5
ZEBAK
BARLEY
\JHEAT
APPLES
APRICOTS
BERRIES
CHERRIES
CABBAGES
CUCUMBERS
ONIONS
POTATOES
TOMATOES
MUSTARD
OPIUM POPPY
AC
3
KU
~NNEXE-4
AC
PERCENTAGE OF OPIUM POPPY
CULTIVATION PER VILLAGE
Opium poppy cultivation per village in BAHARAK district/BADAKHSHAN ( 1994-1995)
Form
No.
District
12954 BAHARAK
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
1994
1995
AABCHASHMA·E·PARKHOW AABCHASHMA·E·PA
50.0
250.0
150.0
170.0
2.0
2.0
1.3
1.2
0.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
280.0
500.0
1.0
4.0
0.4
0.8
0.3 .
0.0
AABJEEN
AABJEEN
12962 BAHARAK
AAFERLY
AAFERLY
AAKEENJAN
AAKEENJAN
13011
BAHARAK
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
Area/main·
village
BAHARAK·
12991
opuim poppy
cultivation
(jerib)
1994
1995
1994
1995
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13048 BAHARAK
AARIAN
AARIAN
300.0
250.0
1.0
0.0
13008 BAHARAK
AASTRIP
AASTRIP
35.0
390.0
4.0
5.0
11.4
1.3
AAYIGH GARLIO
AAYlGH GARLIO
25.0
70.0
6.0
2.0
24.0
2.9
13047 BAHARAK
ARIAN 1
ARGHANJ KHAN
150.0
220.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12953 BAHARAK
PARKHAWAB ARGHNDAB
ARKHAI.IAB ARGHANDAB
38.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12930 BAHARAK
AZRIUO
AZRIUO
45.0
300.0
2.0
0.0
4.4
0.0
13014 BAHARAK
SARA SARA
SARA SARA
60.0
98.0
2.0
0.0
3.3
0.0
12992 BAHARAK
SASHAN
BASHAN
150.0
200.0
3.0
5.0
2.0
2.5
13042 SAHARAK
BE\.IEKAN
SEWEKAN
400.0
450.0
13030 BAHARAK
StANJSADE ASLY BARAK BIANJSAO.E ASLY BARAK
12958 BAHARAK
SOSTAN
BAHARAK
0.0
5.0
0.0
1.1
80.0
150.0
1.0
2.0
1.3
1.3
30.0
160.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
KU
13005
BOSTAN
12957 SAHARAK
ZARDIO
BUSHT
60.0
330.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13024 BAHARAK
CHABCH I MAGHZAR
CHABCHI MAGHZAR
120.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
13018 BAHARAK
CHA8CHI YAROAR
CHABCHI YARDAR
600.0
650.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
0.5
CHAKARAN
150.0
110.0
1.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
CHAKARAN
12934 · BAHARAK
12938 BAHARAK
12959 BAHARAK
12943 BAHARAK
12922 BAHARAK
13019 BAHARAK
13031
BAHARAK
13029 BAHARAK
CHAKARAN .·
50.0
90.0
0.0
2. 0
0.0
2.2
SARGHALAN
DARA BALA
50.0
90.0
2.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
OARA·E~QALAT
DARA·E·QALAT
40.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
AC
12987 BAHARAK
SARGALAN
DARGHAB
18.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DASHT
DASHT
50.0
250.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DASHTAK
OASHTAK
90.0
400.0
5.0
4.0
5.6
1.0
\.IAKSHER
DEH BALA
40.0
70.0
5.0
0.0
12.5
0.0
\.IAKH SHER
DEH CHASHMA
230.0
100.0
2.0
0.0
0.9
0.0
13000 BAHARAK
DEH QALAT
DEH QALAT
70.0
350.0
10.0
10.0
14.3
2.9
12944 BAHARAK
SARGHALAN
DEH QAZIAN
20.0
280.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13032 BAHARAK
DO AAB . _)~.::'
1900.0 1000.0
50.0
2.0
2.6
0.2
13036 BA.HARAK
13045 BAHARAK
12995 BAHARAK
·:>'
DO AAB
DUPUL·E~CHAB~HI
DUPUL·E·CHABCHI
120.0 . 120.0
1.0
2.0
0.8
1. 7
FURUM RAGH
FURUM RAGH
250.0
680.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
0.6
GHACHA.N
GHACHAN
150.0
240.0
4.0
3.0
2.7
1.3
12990 BAHARAK
GHAINO
GHAINO
180.0
100.0
1.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
12956 BAHARAK
GHAZALI·E·BALA
GHAZALI-E-BAlA
70.0
280.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12952 BAHARAK
GHAZALIO·E·PAYAN
GHAZALIO-E-PAYA
60.0
220.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
\
Form
No.
District
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
Area/main· ·
village
·
1994
village
1995
opuim poppy
cultivatton
(jerib)
1994
1995
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
12963 BAHARAK
GHOZ MURGH
GHOZ MURGH
40.0
80.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12942 BAHARAK
GHOZIO
GHOZIO
400.0
500.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13046 BAHARAK
GUMAAB
GUMAAB
300.0
250.0
5.0
0.0
1.7
0.0
13017 BAHARAK
HATIMBJGEE
HATIMSIGEE
200.0
400.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
1.3
12983 BAHARAK
ISHTAKAN
ISHTAKAN
40.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12973 BAHARAK
JAY PARYAN
JAY' PARYAN
51.0
130.0
1. 0
0.0
2.0
0.0
JOY BAR
JOY BAR
38.0
120.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13452 BAHARAK
KAIJIK
KAIJIK
0.0
150.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
2.0
12999 BAHARAK
KAZDEH
KAZDEH
60.0
355.0
10.0
5.0
16.7
1.4
12961
BAHARAK
KHASH BEEN
KHASH BEEN
40.0
70.0
20.0
1. 5
50.0
2. 1
KHISRAIJ
KHISRAIJ
28.0
120.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13012 BAHARAK
KHUSH OARIO
KHUSH DARIO
6o : o
15o.o
3.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
13026 BAHARAK
KOH·E·OARAZ
KOH-E·DARAZ
100.0
200.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
12970 BAHARAK
ZAROIO
KORKHO
54.0
150.0
1.0
0.5
1.9
0.3
13013 BAHARAK
KOUCH
KOUCH
100,0
110.0
10.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
KU
13004 BAHARAK
12984 BAHARAK
LAB OARA
50.0
200.0
4.0
0.0
8.0
0.0
MAORABA
150.0
160.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MAORASA 2 RBABI
MADRASA 2 RBABI
250.0
220.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12976 BAHARAK
ZAROIO
MAORASA MALANAB
40.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12998 BAHARAK
MAORASA TEERGHARAN
MAORASA TEERGHA
250.0
400.0
30.0
20.0
12.0
5.0
12986 BAHARAK
MAORASA•E•CHAKARAN
MADRASA-E-CHAKA
180.0
160.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
2.5
LAB OARA
12946 BAHARAK
SARGHALAN
13039 BAHARAK
13022 BAHARAK
13037 BAHARAK
13054 BAHARAK
13041
BAHARAK
13040 BAHARAK
12971
BAHARAK
12966 BAHARAK
AC
12968 BAHARAK
MADRASA-E;,.OASHT FARA MAORASA-E-DASHT
MAORASA·E~. KHAIR
MADRASA-E-KHAIR
MAORASA·E.;;P,AYAN SHAH MADRASA-E-PAYAN SHAH
0.0
10.0
0.0
0.3
410.0
250.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
1.2
80.0
800.0
5.0
5.0
6.3
0.6
0.2
0.6
2950.0 3000.0
MAORASA·E~RA8AB
MADRASA-E·RABAB
600.0
320.0
1.0
2.0
RABABI
MADRASA·E-RABAB
200.0
240.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
2.1
ZAROIO
MAGHAYIB BALA
70.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ZAROIO
MAGHAYIB SUFLA
80.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
1.5
1.7
1.5
12988 BAHARAK
MAHALA·E ·C.HAKARAN
MAHALA CHAKARAN
60.0
100.0
13034 BAHARAK
MARKAZ·E~CHABCH
MARKAZ-E-CHABCH
55.0
500.0
5.0
1.0
9.1
0.2
13033 BAHARAK
MASJIO LAB NAHR
MASJIO LAB NAHR
350.0
400.0
10.0
0.0
2.9
Q.O
13038 BAHARAK
MASJIO•E·PAYAN
MASJID-E-PAYAN
130.0
300.0
2.0
0.0
1. 5
0.0
13023 BAHARAK
MAZAR
MAZAR
300.0
150.0
1.0
1.5
0.3
1.0
BAHARAK
MAZAR
MA~AR
50.0
400.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13053 BAHARAK
MIYAN DEH
MIYAN OEH
900.0
1200.0
3.0
30.0
0.3
2.5
12972 BAHARAK
ZARDIO
MIYAN OEH
70.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ZARDIO
MIYAN OEH YARHO
25.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MOHERKAN·E·CHAKARAN
MOHERKAN-E-.CHAKARAN
70.0
180.0
2.0
4.0
2.9
2.2
12941
12955
BAHARAK
12985 BAHARAK
2
. \
Form
No.
District
Total
cultivated
land (jeri b)
Area/main,.
village
village
opuim poppy
cultivat1on
(jeri b)
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
65.0
160.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
0.6
300.0
210.0
1.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
NAWABAD MALANAB
80.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12969
BAHARAK
ZARDIO
MOHMOODDAN
13044
BAHARAK
NAW ABAD RURUM RAGH
NAW ABAD RURUM RAGH
12978
BAHARAK
ZARDIO
12947 BAHARAK
SARGHALAN
PAlll
25.0
80.0
1.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
12948
BAHARAK
PANJANGIO
PANJANGIO DEH P
19.0
290 . 0
1.0
0.0
5.3
0.0
12979
BAHARAK
PASIRA
PASIRA
50.0
200.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
2.5
12981
BAHARAK
PASS BAGH
PASS BAGH
25.0
180.0
0.0
7.0
0.0
3.9
12964
BAHARAK
PASS .. E.. KHUM
PASS-E-KHUM
40.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13006
BAHARAK
PEASH
PEASH
40.0
190.0
1.0
3.0
2.5
1.6
12974
BAHARAK
PETOW
PETOW
60.0
120.0
2.0
1.0
3.3
0.8
12967
BAHARAK
ZARDIO
PEYOY
110.0
170.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
400.0
150.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
~0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.7
900.0
400.0
1.0
20.0
0.1
5.0
80.0
120.0
2.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
0.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------0.0
0.7
13043 BAHARAK
QALA·E·BAZAR
QALA-E-BAZAR
85.0
150.0
0.0
1.0
BAHARAK
QULOASHT
QULDASHT
13453
BAHARAK
RABAT CHELTAN
RABAT CHELTAN
13021
BAHARAK
DASHT·E·FARAKH
RABAT-E-DASHT-E
12945
BAHARAK
SARGHALAN
RAGHNAKAN
12935
BAHARAK
RIZWAN
12940
BAHARAK
SARGALAN
13007
BAHARAK
RUKHSHAN
BAHARAK
SAFID DARA
BAHARAK
SAGHI
12975
BAHARAK
12924
BAHARAK
12939
BAHARAK
13020
BAHARAK
13028
BAHARAK
13016
BAHARAK
12929
BAHARAK
13027 BAHARAK
RIZWAN
40.0
140.0
1.0
0.0
2.5
RIZWAN - SARKHAN
31.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
3.2
0.0
RUKHSHAN
40.0
210.0
3.0
5.0
7.5
2.4
200.0
195.0
5.0
6.0
2.5
3.1
40.0
200.0
1.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
0·. 0
0.0
0.0
SAFID DARA
SAGHI
AC
13002
12927
KU
13035
SAKHA
SAKHA
30.0
320.0
0. 0
SANG AAB
SANG AAB
65.0
260.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SARGHALAN
SANGAIYAN
20.0
120.0
1.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
DASHT·E·FARAKH
SAR HOUSE
1850.0
1500.0
4.0
10.0
0.2
0.7
SAR S.HAH IR
SAR SHAH I R
90. 0
200.0
0. 0
4.0
0.0
2.0
SAR·E·PULBARDAR
SAR-E-PULBARDAR
1650.0
310.0
l.O
5.0
0.1
1.6
SARASAK
SARASAK
40.0
110.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SARDIA·E .. BAHARAK
SARDIA-E-BAHARAK
150.0
170.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
1.2
12931
BAHARAK
SEELA _
SEELA
13009
BAHARAK
SHAHGAN
SHAHGAN
12936
BAHARAK
SARGHALAN .
SHAKH YARAK
13025
BAHARAK
SHASHPUL·E·FARHAD
SHASHPUL-E-FARHAD
12933
BAHARAK
SARGHALAN
SHER KANI
12923
BAHARAK
SOCHIO
13003
BAHARAK
SUFIAN '
13050
BAHARAK
ARGHANT KHAN
TAKH SAAB
300.0
220.0
5.0
0.0
1.7
0.0
13010
BAHARAK
TARANG
TARANG
300.0
300.0
10.0
12.0
3.3
4.0
0.0
130.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
190.0
640.0
2.0
4.0
1.1
0.6
30.0
110.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1500.0
1200.0
100.0
5.0
6.7
0.4
25.0
160.0
0.0 -
0.0
0.0
0.0
SOCHIO
110.0
160.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SUFIAN
70.0
250.0
5.0
8.0
7.1
3.2
3
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
Form
No.
District
Area/mainvillage
village
14011
BAHARAK
TARWAZA
SI RGALA.N
12920 BAHARAK
13001
BAHARAK
12937 BAHARAK
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
TARWAZA (AWACH)
0.0
80.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TARWAZA YAWACH
70.0
0. 0
0. 0
0. 0
0.0
0.0
300.0
350.0
50.0
15.0
16.7
4.3
30.0
120.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TEERGHARAN(PAYANOEH)
TEERGHARAN
SARGHALAN
WAAYEM
WAKHAL
WAKHAL
170.0
280.0
3.0
7.0
1.8
2.5
WALAR
WALAR
160.0
700.0
10.0
6.0
6.3
0.9
ARGHANJ KHAN
WALAR SAHIR
1200.0
260.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12932 BAHARAK
WANAR
WANAR
150.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13049 BAHARAK
ARGHANJ KHAN
13015
BAHARAK
opuim poppy
cultivat1on
(jerib)
13052 BAHARAK
13051
12960
BAHARAK
BAHARAK
12982 BAHARAK
. WARNAIL
175.0
270.0
1.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
WENJ
WENJ
50.0
130.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
WOSHKAN
WOSHKAN
25.0
80.0
1.0
5.0
4.0
6.3
12977 BAHARAK
ZARDJO
WWEJAINJ
50.0
100.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
BAHARAK
ZARDIO
YABAB-E- KALAN
100.0
120.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ZARDIO
YABAB-E-MAGHAIB
40.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12951
12950 BAHARAK
KU
------------------------~--~------------------------------------------------------
0.0
12949 BAHARAK
YAJJK·E .. PARICHOW
YAJJK-E-PARKHOW
70.0
400.0
1.0
0.0
1.4
0.0
12928 BAHARAK
YAKHCHIO DEH BALA
YAKHCHIO DEH BA
35.0
220.0
1.0
0.0
2.9
0.0
12926 BAHARAK
YAKHCHIO DEH PAYAN
YAKHCHIO DEH PA
45.0
330.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12989 BAHARAK
YAICHSHERA
YAKHSHERA
12965
BAHARAK
ZARDIO .
12921
BAHARAK
YASECH
12925 BAHARAK
12994 BAHARAK
12980 BAHARAK
12993 BAHARAK
YASHJSTAN
95.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
2.1
50.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0~0
YASECH
40.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
YASHISTAN
20.0
130.0
1.0
3.0
5.0
2.3
YAWAR
YAWAR
30.0
t20.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
2.5
YOUYOUNAIC
YOUYOUNAK
90.0
100.0
1.5
0.0
1.7
0.0
AC
12997 BAHARAK
12996 BAHARAK
100.0
YAREEM
YUMAL
YUMAL
120.0
900.0
1.0
10.0
0.8
·1. 1
ZARDIO
ZIORANGE
80.0
420.0
1.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
ZOO
ZOO
30.0
190.0
2.0
5.0
6.7
2.6
BAHARAK Total .
12653
FAIZABAD
13367 FAIZABAO
AUTRANCHI AAB BARile
AAB BARIK BALA
MUNJI
AAB SHAKH-E-BUZ
12761
FAIZABAO
PASI BAND
ABJ OARAH
13444
FAIZABAO
TAGAB
ABRI DARAH
12720
FAJZABAD
ABSJTl
27222
37313
444
322
2
350.0
600.0
80.0
15.0
22.9
2.5
0.0
200.0
0.0
80.0
0.0
40.0
100.0
250.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
160.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ABSITI
1150.0
220.0
0.0
20.0
0.0
9.1
0.0
8.0
0.0
2.5
12711
FAIZ,ABAD
AFAQJ
AFAOI
350.0
320.0
13404
FAIZABAD
AFAQJ MAIDAH
AFAQI MAIDAH
0.0
110.0
0.0
7.0
0.0
6.4
13370
FAIZABAO
DEH BAZAR
AFGHANHA
0.0
20.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
25.0
13426
FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
AL DARAH
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12549
FAIZABAD
DARAYEM
ALAN I
1000.0
1500.0
400.0
115.0
40.0
7.7
4
Opium poppy cultivation per village in FAIZABAD district/BADA~HSHAN ( 1994-1995)
Total
cultivated
land (jerib>
Area/main ..
village
village
12609 FAIZABAD
AliMANGO
ALIMANGO
12707 FAIZABAD
ARGO
ALOCHAHBOLAGH
13417 FA I ZABAD
PASI BAND
ANGORA-E-KALAN
0.0
13430 FAIZABAD
PAS.I BAND
AN IW
0.0
12859 FAIZABAD
AROSHIA, GOZARDARA
AORSHIA
250.0
12614
AQ8URYA
AQBURYA
12750 FAIZABAD
HAWZA MARKAZ
ARGH DARA SANJAL
12870 FAIZABAD
ARQA QESHLAQ
ARQA QESHLAQ
Form
No.
Distri,c t
FAIZABAD
opuim poppy
cultivation
(jerib)
percent of
op i liTl poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
1000.0
270.0
300.0
10.0
30.0
3.7
300.0
75.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
775.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
170.0
900.0
70.0
80.0
41.2
8.9
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
130.0
300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12769 FAIZABAO
ART
ART, SELAGI DASHT
250 . 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12905
FAIZABAO
SPEEN
ARZANCHl
400.0 . 410.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13371
FAIZABAO
OEH BAZAR
ASAO ABAO
0.0
20.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
50.0
14008 FAIZABAO
ASHKASHAN
ASHKASHAN BALA
0.0
110.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12811
FAlZABAO
ASS
ASS
250.0
250.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.2
12918 FAIZABAO
ASS
ASS
180.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12679 FAIZABAO
ARGO
ATEN JELAW
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12648 FAIZABAO
AUTRANCHI ~ E-PAYAN
AUTRANCHI PAYAN
300.0
550.0
100.0
12.0
33.3
2.2
13410 FAlZABAO
AUTRINCHI HESAR~
AUTRINCHI HESAR
0.0
750.0
0.0
0.0
. 0.0
0.0
12675
FAIZABAO
AUZONQUL , . ·
AUZONOUL
250.0
250.0
70.0
8.0
28.0
3.2
12795
FAIZABAO
AWAGAR BALA.
AWGAR BALA
180.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
230.0
0.0
60.0
0.0
26.1
BAGH MUBARAK
350.0
200.0
15.0
80.0
4.3
40.0
BAGHAK
200.0
185.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
AYLAQ SANG I
12598 FAIZABAO
BAGH MUBARAlC
.
KU
13436 FAIZABAO
2800.0 1000.0
AYLAQ SANGI
BAGHAK
12755
TAGAB
BAGHI GERDAK
100.0
35.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
BAGHI SHAH
BAGHI SHAH
130.0
250.0
40.0
40.0
30.8
16.0
AC
12907 FAIZABAO
FAIZABAO
12722 FAIZABAO
12817 FAIZABAO
ARGHANJ !CHULA
BAI NAW
250.0
160.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12615
FAIZABAD
BAKHTISHA
BAKHTISHA
695.0
480.0
150.0
130 . 0
21.6
27.1
12855
FAIZABAD
BAL OARAH
BAt DARAH
150.0
504.0
2.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
13434 FAJZABAO
DAHAN OARA
BALA HESAR
0.0
35.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12900 FAIZABAO
BAGH-E·BALEEN
BALJAB
250.0
170.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12903
FAIZABAD
BAR BAGH
BAR BAGH
400.0
310.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12652
FAIZABAO
BARLAS CHENAR
BARLAS CHENAR
800.0
260.0
300.0
15.0
37.5
5.8
12641
FAIZABAO
BARLAS SHAMAR
BARLAS SHAMAR
1110.0
410.0
500.0
10.0
45.0
2.4
12623 FAIZABAO
ARGO
BARLAS WAKHEYAN
282.0
330.0
20.0
70.0
7.1
21.2
14006 FAIZABAO
BAT ASH
BAT ASH
0.0
240.0
0.0
80.0
0.0 . 33.3
12732 FAIZABAO
BAY MALASI
BAY MALASJ
220.0
240.0
0.0
50 , 0
0.0
20.8
12919 FAJZABAO
BAZARAK·ICONA QESHLAQ BAZARAK
55.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
9.1
0. 0
12754
FAIZABAO
JAWZOON
BAZGERAN
60.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12857 FAIZABAD
BEKHWAH
BEKHWAH OLYA
250.0
754.0
1.5
0.0
0.6
0.0
5
Opium poppy cultivation per village in FAIZABAD district/BADAKHSHAN ( 1994-1995)
Total
cultivated
Form
No.
District
12856
land
Area/main-
C jeri b)
opuim poppy
cultivatton
(jeri b)
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
250.0
1002.0
3.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
60.0
150.0
25.0
6.0
41.7
4.0
450.0
0.0
70.0
0.0
15.6
0.0
100.0
70.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1125.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
150.0
40.0
0.0
40.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
village
village
FAIZABAD
BEKHWAH
BEKHWAH SOFLA
12581
FAIZABAD
DARAYEM
BELAK I
12628
FAIZABAD
BELAQ SANGJ
BELAQ SANGI
12808
FAIZABAD
BOCHI
BOCHI
12704
FA I ZABAD
BOJ MELEf
801 MELEE
12680
FAJZABAD
DOGHALAT KALAN
BOIM CHESHMAH
13400
FAJZABAD
BOINJQARA
BOINJQARA
12667
FAIZABAD
ARGO
BOINIQARAH
12832
FAIZABAD
BROKAN
BROKAN
12_867
FAI ZABAD
CHAH ABOUK
CHAH ABOUK
12773
FAIZABAD
CHAHOSH DARAH BALA
CHAHOSH DARAH
100.0
12781
FAIZABAD
CHAHOSH DARAH
CHAHOSH DARAH
150.0
210.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12630
FAIZABAD
CHAK ABDUL
CHAK ABDUL
400.0
190.0
180.0
40.0
45.0
21.1
12595
FAIZABAD
CHAK HA
CHAK HA
45.0
150.0
5.0
50.0
11. 1
33.3
12617
FAIZABAD
BAKHT-E·SHAH
60.0
1040.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
450.0
1500.0
0.0
7.0
0.0
0.5
300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
CHAPAH
700.0
4100.0
300.0
160.0
42.9
3.9
500.0
150.0
100.0
0.0
20.0
0.0
40.0
0.0
25.0
KU
20.0
0.0
DOGHALAT KALAN
CHAQEL MASJED
CHAQEL QESHLAQ
JAWZON
1.3
50.0
FAIZABAO
FAIZASAD
1.5
0.0
12672
12742
8.0
5o:o
CHAPAH
CHARDARAH .
12 .'0
40.0
FAJZABAD
ARGO
630.0
150.0
12585
FAIZABAD
800.0
250.0 . 100.0
JAWZOON
FAJZABAD
0.0
CHANGA
FAJZABAD
12664
80.0
CHAP DARAH
12749
13390
0.0
0.0
160.0
0.0
CHAROARAH
600.0 . 220.0
10.0
15.0
1. 7
6.8 '
CHASHMA-E-BEED
250.0
113.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12636
FAJZABAD
CHATRAQ
90.0
100.0
50.0
15.0
55.6
15.0
12663
FAIZABAD
ARGO
CHEL KAPAH
650.0
60.0
300.0
5.0
46.2
8.3
12582
FAIZABAD
CHESHMA·E·QALANDER
CHESHMA QALANDE
437.0
200.0
150.0
50.0
34.3
25.0 '
12801
FAJZABAD
TAGAB
CHOCOLCH
65.0
90.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
2.2
13427
FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
COLGI OARAH
0.0
170.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12788
FAJZABAD
TAGAB
DAARAH-E-KALAN
100.0
70.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12597
FAIZABAD
SPIN GUL .
50.0
200.0
5.0
50.0
10.0
25.0
13374
FAJZABAO
KHANDAN 'SHAHER
OAHANA ABJ GAZK
0~0
170.0
0.0
40.0
0.0
23.5
12633
FAIZABAD
DANISHMANDAN
DANISHMANDAN
180.0
300.0
10.0
10.0
5.6
3.3
DARA KHATAK
DARA KHATAK
122.0
180.0
zo~o
40.o
16.4
22.2
DARA RAZAN SALA
110.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.0
70.0
17.0
20.0
56.7
28.6
123.0 . 200.0
53.0
50.0
43.1
25.0
160.0
40.0
18.0
44.4
11.3
AC
CHATRAQ
0.0
12584 . FAJZABAD
·-
.,.,~
12799
FAIZABAD
DARA RAZAN
DAHAN AB
12564
FAJZABAD
DEH MULAIAN
DARA-E-CHARMAGHZ
12576
FAJZABAD
DARAYEM
DARA-E-CHEREK
12534
FAIZABAO
DARA·E-MAHMOOO
DARA-E-MAHMOOO
12656
FAIZABAO
OARAH JANI
OARAH JANI
100.0
115.0
50.0
20.0
50.0
17.4
12768
FAIZABAD
PASJ BAND
DAREl
38.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12771
FAIZABAD
PASJ BAND
DARGAK
120.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6
90.0
Form
No.
District
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
Area/mainvillage
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
opuim poppy
cultivation
(jerib)
village
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
300.0
150.0
150.0
60.0
50.0
250.0
0.0
50.0
0.0
20.0
12620
FAIZABAD
DARKHAN
DARKHAN
250.0
12812
FAIZABAD
DASHT PING
DASHT PING
300.0
12594
FAIZABAD
PASl BAND
DASHTAK
50.0
30.0
0.5
0.0
1.0
0.0
13433
FAIZABAD
SPIN GUL
DASHTOK
0.0
120.0
0.0
20.0
0.0
16.7
12526
FAIZABAD
YAMCHJAN
DAWLAT ABAD
150.0
308.0
30.0
40.0
20.0
13.0
13440
FAI ZABAD
PAS I BAND
DEGA
12763
FAIZABAD
DEGA & KARSYED
12766
FAIZABAD
12602
12344
0.0
280.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DEGA & KARSYED
180.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PASI BAND
DEH BALA
800.0
180.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.6
FAIZABAD
SPIN GUL
DEH AHMADAN
80.0
100.0
5.0
11.0
6.3
11.0
FAIZABAD
SHAKARLAB
DEH BALA
0.0
430.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12831
FAIZABAD
SOROON
DEH BALA
65.0
0. 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12837
FAIZABAD
WARENG
DEH BALA
150.0
180.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12527
FAIZABAD
MUNJI
DEH BALA
220.0
220.0
50.0
90.0
22 . 7
40.9
KU
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0.0
12844 FAIZABAD
SHAKAR LAB
DEH BALA
420.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - 51.4
12567 FAIZABAD
DEH BASI
DEH BASI SUFLA
35.0
200.0
18.0
40.0
0.0
---
20.0
-----------------------------------------------·---------------------------- - - -- ------- 12566
FAIZABAD
DEH BASI
DEH BASI ULYA
27.0
120.0
18.0
30.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------12568 FAIZABAD
OARAYEM
DEH BAZAR
325.0 200.0
150.0
130.0
12767
FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
12619
FAIZABAD
DEH DEHI
DEH BLAND
50.0
1~0.0
0.0
600.0
250.0
60.0
'
160 . 0
0.0
0.0
------------------------------------------------------------12789 FAIZABAD
TAGAB
DEH KALAN
700.0
300.0
FAIZABAD
OEH MARGHAN
13413
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
12592
FAIZABA_D
CHATA
12523
FAIZABAD
YAMCHIAN
OEH MARGHAN,PASIPAND
46.2
65.0
0.0
0.0
64.0
2.0
0.0
0.7
------- - - - -
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
3.0
DEH MIANA
350.0 · 230.0
10.0
3.0
2.9
1.3
DEH MIANAH
260.0
60.0
65.0
23.1
23.2
DEH MIANA
AC
12786
25.0
10 . 0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------DEH DEHI
66.7
280.0
13421
FAIZABAD
JAWZOON
DEH MISHIN
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12565
FAIZABAD
DEH MULAIAN
DEH MULAIAN
200.0
750.0
90.0
150.0
45.0
20.0
12537
FAIZABAD
MUNJI
DEH PAS-E-MUNJI
150.0
180.0
50.0
40.0
33.3
22.2
12835
FAIZABAD
WARBANG
DEH PAYAN
130.0
275.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
1.1
12346
FAIZABAD
SHAKARLAB
DEH PAYAN
o.o
310.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.q
12846
FAIZABAD
SHAKAR LAB
DEH PAYAN
5000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12740
FAIZABAD
JA\.IZON
DEH SHAHANAH
200.0
60.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12538
FAIZABAD
YAMCHIAN
DEH SHEKHAN
60.0
400.0
60.0
150.0
100.0
37.5
12757
FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
DEH TAGAB
60.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12862
FAIZABAD
DEH ZINOAN
DEH ZINDAN
170.0
663.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12616
FAIZABAD
OEHMAGAS
DEHMAGAS
550.0
450.0
200.0
130.0
36.4
28.9
12640
FAIZABAD
ARGO
DEHQAN KHANAH
450.0
350.0
170.0
200.0
37.8
57.1
12746
FAIZABAD
JAW ZOON
DEW DARAH
290.0
80.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13416
FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
DO ABA-E-YAFTAl ·
0.0
200.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
1.0
7
Form
No.
District
12697 FAIZABAO
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
Area/• in·
village
village
DO GHALAT
DO GHALAT KHAWAJA MU
1994
1995
opuim poppy
cultivat1on
(jerib)
1994
1995
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
1000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
250.0
0.0
50.0
0.0
20.0
0.0
80.0
200.0
40.0
80.0
50.0
40.0
12670
FAIZABAD
DO GHALUT
DO GHALUT
12518
FAJZABAD
DOAAB
12774
FAIZABAO
DOAB
DOAAB
DOAB
200.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
12579
FAJZABAD
OOGHALAT
400.0
160.0
150.0
18.0
37.5
11.3
13399
FAJZABAD
0.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14000
FAIZABAD
FAIZABAD
o.o
300.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
1.3
13402
0.0
27.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12719
0.0
15.0
0.0
11.5
12624
DOGHAI.Al ~HUJA MOULt DOGHALAT
DOGHALAl'.KALAN
DOGHALAT KALAN
DOGHALAT.:·
DOULAT ABAD
FAJZABAD
TORUQ
DOWKI
540.0 . 130.0
FAJZABAO
EARGITAL .
EARGITAL
230.0
300.0
90.0
70.0
39.1
23.3
FAIZABAD
13419 FAIZABAD
JAWZOON ·:.
ELGAK
o.o
60.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13422
FAIZABAD ·
ESHAN DARA BAGH
680. 0
90. 0
100. 0
15 . 0
14 . 7
16. 7
12622
FAJZABAD
ESHANA
180.0
270.0
50.0
120.0
27.8
44.4
12866
FAJZABAD
FARGHAMBOL
150.0
32.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12691
FAJZABAD
GAJJ
1000.0
350.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12686
FAJZABAD
GAR AS
1000.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12785
FAJZABAD
114.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FAIZABAD
12604
FAIZABAD
12833
FAIZABAD
12573
FAJZABAD
12820
13443
12828
GAZ DARAH
GAZAN
395.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
GAZAN
260.0
100.0
1.0
20.0
0.4
20.0
GAZANAK
380.0
1200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
.o.o
GAZKEEL
180.0
150.0
50.0
30.0
27.8
20.0
FAIZABAD
GHALA DARAH
200.0
300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FAJZABAD
GHONGA
0.0
150.0
0.0 '
0.0
0.0
0.0
FAIZABAD
GHOOZ MARGH
390.0
787.0
·5.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
12629
FAIZABAD
GHUZAK DARAH
300.0 .
140.0
11.0
40.0
3.7
28.6
12874
FAfZABAD
GOZAR BALA
100.0
65.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12898
FAJZABAD
GOZAR PANJSHER
400.0
150.0
2.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
12883
FAJZABAD
GOZAR-E·CHAOAL
150.0
38.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12899 FAIZABAD
GOZAR-E-MASJED
210.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
GOZAR·E.:PAYAN
100.0
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
GOZER NASHER
300.0
0.0
30.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
GOZER PETOW
AC
12738
KU
12561
12872
FAIZABAD
12599
FAIZABAD
GOZEft .NASHER
12601
FAIZABAD
GOZER
12743
FAIZABAD
12587 FAIZABAD
PETOW .:· \ .
.... -
·~f-::
1000.0
0.0
300.0
0.0
30.0
0.0
GUL DARAH
190.0
90.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
57.1
10.9
DARAYEM
GULAKI
350.0
550.0
200.0
60.0
12869
FAIZABAD
GULAKI
GULAKI BALA
200.0
1500.0
2.0
3.0
1.0
0.2
12765
FAJZABAD
GULAKI
GULAKI PAYAN
40.0 3000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12797
FAJZABAD
TAGAB
GURK KUSHAN
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8
100.0
80.0
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
Form
No.
District
Area/main·
village
village
12533
FAIZABAD
KHASPAK
GUZAR-E~MULABAY
1994
80.0
1995
80.0
percent of
op i urn poppy
cultivation
opuim poppy
cultivatton
(jeri b)
1994
1995
1994
1995 .
10.0
13.0
12.5
16.3
12524
FAIZABAO
YAMCHIAN
HABIB ABAD
200.0
60.0
35.0
10.0
17.5
16.7
12661
FAIZABAD
ARGO
HAFEZ MUGHOL
320.0
340.0
20.0
90.0
6.3
26.5
------~-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------~---------------------------------------------------------------
13372
FAIZABAD
DARAYEM
HAJJ PAHLA\JAN
12702
FAIZABAD
ARGO
HALOAJAR
13412
FAIZABAD
HASAN BEGI
HASAN BEGI
0.0
800.0
0.0
160.0
0.0
20.0
600.0
220.0
0.0
7.0
0.0
3.2
0.0
200.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
1.0
12897 FAIZABAD
HASAN·E·DE\JANAH
HASAN-E-DE\JANAH
450.0
900.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12848
FAIZABAD
HA\JZAKAN
HA\JZAKAN
370.0
1036.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12502
FAIZABAD
BAGH·E·SUFI
HAZAR BAGH SUFI
70.0 . 470.0
30.0
150.0
42.9
31.9
12563
FAIZABAD
HAZARA DARABAGH
294.0
50.0
5.0
10.0
1.7
20.0
HAZARA·E·GA\JI
HAZARA-E-GAUJ
288.0
270.0
88.0
20.0
30.6
7.4
12508
HAZARA·E·KHAIRBEK
HAZARA-E-KHAIRB
50.0
100.0
10.0
35.0
20.0
35.0
12689 FAIZABAD
ARGO
HAZARAH BEDAK
700.0
90.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12714
FAIZABAD
ARGO
HAZARAH 01\JANAH
200.0
110.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12662
FAIZABAO
HAZARAH MISHI
HAZARAH MISHI
250.0
150.0
10.0
16.0
4.0
10.7
HAZARAH OAOAM
1000.0
0.0
0.0
FAIZABAD
12688 FAIZABAD
ARGO
KU
DARAYEM ·
12649 FAIZABAD
450.0
0.0
0.0
------------~----------------~------------------------------------~--------------
12671
FAIZABAD
HO\JZI
12721
FAIZABAD
ARGO
13464
FAIZABAD
ARGO
ISHAK KITI
12634
FAIZABAD
JAMURAD
12510
FAIZABAO
JANGAL BEED
12729
FAIZABAD
IATARCHI
IATARCHI PAYAN
12626 FAIZABAD
210.0
200.0
50.0
0.0
23.8
0.0
1550.0
260.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
3.8
0.0
120.0
0.0
5.0
ISHAK KITJ
500.0
410.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
24.4
JAMURAD
1.70.0
150.0
30.0
2.5
17.6
1.7
50.0
170.0
30.0
46.0
60.0
27.1
450.0
200.0
0.0
40.0
0.0
20.0
70.0
288.0
17.0
88.0
24.3
30.6
JANGAL BEED
AC
12726 FAIZABAD
HO\JZI
JATA
JATA
GHUZAK OARAH
JU\JAZOK
0.0
4.2
·- - - - -
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------12713 FAIZABAD
TORUQ
KACHIKHOR
450.0 100.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
10.0
12503
FAIZABAO
KAFTAR KHANA·E·TAJEK ~AFTAR KHANA
100.0
210.0
30.0
40.0
30.0
19.0
12513
FAIZABAD
KAFTAR KHANA
100.0
130.0
40~0
50.0
40.0
38.5
37.5
KAFTAR KHANA SU
--------------------------------~--------------------------------------------
12504
FAIZABAO
KAFTAR KHANA
KAFTAR KHANA Ul
50.0
80.0
25.0
30.0
50.0
12718 FAIZABAD
TARAQ
KAJEE KHOR TARAQ
12783
FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
KAJI KHAM BALA
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
80.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12777 FAIZABAD
' PASI BAND
KAJI KHAM PAYAN
20.0
80.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.3
1000.0
315.0
0.0
20.0
0.0
6.3
0.0
12710 FAilABAO
KAKAN
KAKAN
13447 FAIZABAD
SPIN GUL
KALAR PINGUL
100.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
10.0
12863
FAIZABAD
KANDILAN
KANDILAN
130.0 2000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12753
FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
KARAKSHAHK
100.0
40.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14004
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
KARSAID
0.0
40.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12577 FAIZABAD
KARSANG
KARSANG
31.0
130.0
17.0
30.0
54.8
23.1
12915
KASHAN DARA
KASHAN DARA PAYAN
80.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FAIZABAD
9
\
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
Form
No.
District
Area/main·
village
village
12912
FAIZABAO
KASHAN DARA
KASHAN DARA ULIA
13386 FAIZABAO
opuim poppy
cultivation
(jeri b)
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
150.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
3.3
0.0
4.8
KASHANDARA OLYA
KASHANOARA OLYA
0.0
104.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
3.3
78.0
350.0
2.0
50.0
2.6
14.3
0.0
1050.0
0.0
50.0
0.0
4.8
300.0
110.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13394
FAIZABAO
ARGO
KATA DARAH
12586
FAIZABAO
KATAH QESHLAQ
KATAH CESHLAQ
14002
FAIZABAD
KATAH QESHLAQ
KATAH QESHLAC
12708
FAIZABAD
ARGO
KAZER
KAZER NISHJR
KA;JER NISHIR
0.0
185.0
0.0
60.0
0.0
32.4
310.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
32.3
72.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14007 FAlZABAO
13435
FAI ZABAO
KAZER PETAW
KAZER PETAW
0.0
14014
FAIZABAO
KESHEN OARAH
KESHEN DARAH SU
0.0
12779
FAIZABAO
PASI BAND
KHAIR ABAD
200.0
60.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
180.0
70.0
80.0
46.7
44.4
FAIZABAD
KHAIRBEK
KHAIRBEK
12685
FAIZABAD
KHAKSARI
KHAKSARI
800.0
700.0
40.0
40.0
5.0
5.7
12658
FAIZABAD
CHAR GOW
KHAM SALEH
700.0
250.0
100.0
20.0
14.3
8.0
12821
FAIZABAD
ARGHANJ KHAW
KHAM BEW
2SO.O
300.0
o.o
o.o
o.o
0.0
12782
FAIZABAO
PASI BAND
KHAM HAFIZ
70.0
300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12540
FAIZABAO
KHAM MIRAHZAR
300.0
250.0
180.0
80.0
60.0
32.0
13406
FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
KHAM SARBANAN
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12758
FAIZABAO
ZARDAICOK DARA
KHAM SARBANAN
40.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12822
FAIZABAD
ICHAM·l·A\lAL
ICHAM·I·AWAL
50.0
300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
KHAM·I·MIR
100.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
80.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
170.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FAIZABAO
PASI BAND
12780
FAIZABAO
PASI BAND
12813
FAIZABAO
12734
FAIZABAD
12580
FAIZABAD
13373
FAIZABAO
12880
FAIZABAD
KHAM MIRAHZAR
ICHAMBEL
AC
12776
KU
12507
150.0
ARGHANJ ICHWA
KHAN AGHA
ICHANAQA
KHANACA
80.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DARAYEM
!CHANDAN SHAHER
450.0
400.0
100.0
50.0
22.2
12.5
!CHANDAN SHAHER
KHANDAN SHAHER
0.0
100.0
0.0
55.0
0.0
55.0
NAR DARAH
KHAS AABAH
150.0
36.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DARAYEM
KHAWAJA-E-BAGH
350.0
450.0
43.0
80.0
12.3
17.8
ARGO
KHAWJAH ASHTAL
650.0
550.0
0.0
35.0
0.0
6.4
SPEEN
KHOB AABAH
180.0
420.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12572
FAIZABAO
12731
FAIZABAO
12914
FAIZABAD
12861
FAIZABAD
YAFTAL PAYAN
KHOGISTAN
110.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13403
FAIZABAD
ARGHUND
ICHUJA CHESHMAH
0.0
90.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
4.4
13398
FAIZABAD
DOGHALAT
KHUJA MOULI
0.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12764
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
KHUMAR OARAH
160.0
250.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
800.0
120.0
0.0
20.0
0.0
16.7
0.0
240.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
1.3
150.0
130.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
3.8
12703
FAIZABAD
ARGO
KHUREK
13393
FAIZABAO
SHATAK
ICHUSHOARAH
12715
FAIZABAO
TORUQ
ICILAK QAZDARAH
13458
FAIZABAD
ICOHAICI
KOHAKI
0.0
300.0
0.0
25.0
0.0
8.3
14005
FAIZABAO
BAT ASH
KOHNA BAlASH
0.0
170.0
0.0
20.0
0.0
11.8
10
Opium poppy cultivation per village in FAIZABAD district/BADAKHSHAN ( 1994-199-5)
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
Form
No.
District
Area/mainvillage
village
12893
FAIZABAD
TORYAB
KOHNA OESHLAO
1994 .
opuirn poppy
cultivatton
(jerib)
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
200.0
610.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
0.3
12804
FAIZABAD
KOHNA QESHLAQ
KOHNA OESHLAQ
200.0
204.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12882
FAIZABAD
DAHAN DARA
KOHNA OESHLAO
295.0
30.0
7.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
12578
FAIZABAD
DARAYEM
KOLABI
1998.0 1500.0
7.0
12745
FAIZABAD
JAWZOON
KOLGA-E-BALA
270.0
12744
FAIZABAD
JAWZOON
KOLGA-E-PAYAN
280.0
200.0
0.4
13.3
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
80.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12793
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
KOLOKH KAN
320.0
70.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12654
FAIZABAD
KORCHESHMAH
KORCHESHMAH
135.0
250.0
35.0
0.0
25.9
0.0
12733
FAIZABAD
KORI
KORI
1000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12819
FAIZABAD
ARGHANJ KHWA
KULAN
100.0
180.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12673
FAIZABAD
ARGO
KUMORKHUR
700.0
250.0
50.0
0.0
7.1
0.0
---------------~----------------------------------
75.0
180.0 .
30.0
60.0
0.0
20.0
0.0
12.5
0.0
20.0
0.0
20.0
66.0
0.0
0.0
0. 0
0.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1150.0 2500.0
FAIZABAD
KUR GYAN
KUR GYAN
12730
FAIZABAD
KURI
KURI
1000.0
160.0
13396
FAIZABAD
ARGO
LAL ABAH
0.0
100.0
13425
FAiZABAD
PASJ BAND
LANGAR
0.0
12889
FAIZABAD
LANGAR
LANGAR
255.0
12562
FAIZABAD
LANGAR
12772
FAIZA8AD
LANGAR
12800
FAIZABAD
LAYABAH
12853
FAIZABAD
L~NGAR
.12610
FAIZABAD
SHAHMARJ
13439
FA I ZABAD
16.7
150.0
200.0
l3 .0
8.0
250.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
iAYABAH
480.0
140.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
300.0
375.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
170. 0 1000. 0
70.0
70.0
41.2
7.0
100.0
50.0
40.0
35.7
LOL OARAH/GULESTANOK LOL DARAH
AQBURYA
45.0
LANGAR
M. JAME AQBURYA
AC
12607 FAIZABAD
KU
12529
M. JAME SHAMASI
250.0
140.0
BAY MALASI
M.H.M.SEDIO
0.0
200.0
0.0
30.0
0.0
15.0
12606 fAIZABAD
SPIN GUL
MADRA SA
300.0
320.0
1.5
80.0
0.5
25.0
12668 FAIZABAD
MADRASA-E-ARGHUND
MADRASA ARGHOND
381.0
350.0
81.0
5.0
21.3
1.4
13454
FAIZABAD
SHATAK
MADRASA SHATAK
0.0
140.0
0.0
25.0
0.0
17.9
12660
FAIZABAD
HAFEZ MUGOL
MADRASAH
300.0
200.0
20.0
60.0
6.7
30 . 0
LAN GAR
MADRASAH
300.0
550.0
25.0
50.0
8.3
9.1
12546 FAIZABAD
13385
FAIZABAD
MAGHZAR
MAGHZAR
0.0
23.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12545
FAIZABAD
HAJJ PAHLAWAN
MAHAJERHA
281.0
300.0
50.0
50.0
17.8
16.7
12725
FAIZABAO
MAIDA DAGHLAT
MAIDA DAGHLA.T
450.0
170.0
0.0
40.0
0.0
23.5
12728 FAIZABAD
BAT ASH
MAKUZ BAlASH
185.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
23.0
145.0
11.0
45.0
47.8
31.0
0.0
60.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
170.0
360.0
50.0
8.0
29.4
2. 2
12575
FAlZABAD
DARAYEM
MALANGA
13420
FAJZABAD
JAWZOON
MALMONEGE
12613
FAI ZABAD
MALWAYDARAH
MALWAYDARAH
13408
FAIZABAD
PASJ BAND
MARGAN DARAH
0.0
60.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12554
FAIZABAD
PENGANI
MASDJID A. AZIZ
25.0
100.0
20.0
20.0
80.0
20.0
YAMCHIAN
MASJED BAHADUR
110.0
500.0
90.0
110.0
81 . 8
22.0
12536 FAIZABAD
11
Opium poppy cultivation per village i~ FAIZABAD district/BADAKHSHAN ( 1994-1995)
Form
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
Area/mainvillage
village
OARAH RAST
MASJED BALA
FAIZABAD
CHATA
MASJED CHARMGAR
FAIZABAD
KOOL DARA
MASJED DEHPAYAN
FAIZABAD
BARLAS CHENAR
MASJED HA\.JAR
No.
District
12868
FAIZABAD
12591
12827
14013
opuirn poppy
cultivat1on
(jerib)
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
100.0
25.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
55.0
86.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.0
420.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
154.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
6.5
FAIZABAD
KESHTGAH
MASJED JAME
0.0
340.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.Q
12669
FAIZABAD
MASJEO JAME ARGHAND
MASJED JAME
1250.0
160.0
23.0
7.0
1.8
4.4
12531
FAJZABAD
YAMCHIAN
MASJED JAMEA
200.0
200.0
100.0
40.0
50.0
20.0
12825
FAIZABAD
SHIR CHANG
MASJEO JAMEE
30.0
405.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12830
FAIZABAD
SOROON
MASJED JAMEE
60.0
515.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12877
FAIZABAD
QOOUQ
MASJED JAMEE
300.0
120.0
0.0
.o.o
0.0
0.0
12501
FAIZABAD
TOR.GANI SUFLA
MASJED KHAIRUDN
500.0
280.0
200.0
100.0
40.0
35.7
13460
FAIZABAD
KAKAN
MASJED M. AHMAD
0.0
210.0
0.0
12.0
0.0
5.7
12553
FAIZABAD
PENGANI
MASJED MADRASA
250.0
400.0
100.0
60.0
40.0
15.0
12560
FAIZABAO
ESHAN OARA BAGH
MASJED MADRASA
245.0
40.0
10.0
8.0
4.1
20.0
12717
FAIZABAD
TORUQ
MASJEO MANDARAH
250.0
180.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
3.3
13397
FAIZABAD
KUMORKHOR
0.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
KU
12396
MASJED NEYAZBY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------MASJED NO\JABAD
0.0
150.0
0.0
4.0
13457 FAIZABAO
AUZONGOL
12887
FAIZABAD
QOOUQ
12816
FAIZABAO
ARGHANJ KHWA
-- - -- - - - - -
0.0
2.7
MASJED PAYAN
200.0
125.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MASJED PAYAN
100.0
180.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MASJED PAYAN
12871
FAIZABAD
DARAH RAST
12678
FAJZABAD
DOGHALAT KALAN
12644
FAIZABAD
GANJA CHESHMAH
13369
FAIZABAD
ESHAN DARA BAGH
12525
FAIZABAO
YAMCHIAN
12583
FAIZABAD
CHAPAH
12650
FAIZABAD
BARLAS CHENAR
MASJED SHASHKAL
350.0
12642
60.0
82.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
650.0
50.0
50.0
0.0
7. 7
0.0
MASJED QAYOMBAY
650.0
700.0
200.0
40.0
30.8
5.7
MASJED SARIHAUS
0.0
50.0
0.0
7.0
0.0
14.0
MASJED SARIPUL
150.0
1100.0
75.0
100.0
50.0
9.1
MASJED SARKOTAL
495.0 3000.0
150.0
120.0
30.3
4.0
80.0
10.0
22.9
6.5
AC
MASJED QABRESTA
FAJZABAD
GANJA CHESHMAH
MASJEO TURSANB.Y
12645• FAIZABAD
GANJA CHESHMAH
MASJED \JAZIRBAY
12677 FAIZABAD
DOGHALAT .
MASJED-E-AAQ KOTAL
155.0
100.0
50.0
28.6
5.6
1050.0
900.0
300.0
70.0
28.6
7.8
300.0
160.0
5.0
3.0
1.7
1.9
350.0 . 900.0
13459
FAIZABAD
KAKAN
MASJEO-E-BABA
0.0
240.0
0.0
15.0
0.0
6.3
13461
FAIZABAD
BOIMI QARAH
MASJED-E-BALA
0.0
420.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
1.4
12608
FAJZABAD
ALIMANGO
MASJED-E-BALA
480.0
250.0
120.0
6.0
25.0
2.4.
12676
FAIZABAD
OOGHALAT KALAN
MASJED-E-BAYHA
300.0
70.0
7.0
0.0
2.3
0.0
12908
FAIZABAD
SPEEN
MASJED-E-DEHKOL
120.0
540.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13365
FAIZABAD
NOW ABAO
MASJED-E-GHULAM
0.0
210.0
0.0
40.0
0.0
19.0
12651
FAJZABAD
BARLAS CHENAR
MASJED-E-HAIDAR
80.0
100.0
30.0
10.0
37.5
10.0
12884
FAIZABAO
TORYAB
MASJEO-E-JAME
300.0
400.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12892
FAIZABAD
BAYD-E·KALAN
MASJED-E-JAME
100.0
145.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
Total
cultivated
land ( j er ib)
Area/mainvillage
village
FAIZABAD
GANJA CHESHMA
MASJED·E·JAME
12647 FAIZABAD
. BARLAS SHAMAR
MASJED·E·JAME
350.0
250.0
JAMURAD
M~SJED·E·JAME
0.0
90.0
Form
No.
Distdct
12643
13405
FAIZABAD
opuim poppy
cultivation
(jerib)
1995
1994
1995
1313 . 0 11 00 . 0
250.0
100.0
0.0
1994
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
80.0
19.0
7.3
6.0
28.6
2.4
2.0
0.0
2.2
14001
FAIZABAD
TORUQ
MASJED·E·JAME
0.0
260.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
3.8
12514
FAIZABAD
TORGANI SUFLA
MASJED·E·JAME
900.0
350.0
300.0
150.0
33.3
42.9
-----------------------------------------------~------------------------
12569 FAIZABAD
CHESHMA-E-QALANDER
13364
450.0
350.0
200.0
100.0
44.4
28.6
CHESHMA-E-QALANDER
MASJED-E·KARIM
0.0
170.0
0.0
40.0
0.0
23.5
13456 FAIZABAD
AUZONGOL
MASJED·E·MORAD
0.0
200.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
3.0
12556 FAIZABAD
PENGANI
MASJED-E·MULA SARDAR
70.0
280.0
25.0
30.0
35.7
10.7
TAGHARCHEK
MASJED-E-MULABU
0.0
125.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13388 FAIZABAD
HAFEZ MUGHOL
MASJED·E·PAYAN
0.0
270.0
0.0
70.0 ·
0.0
25.9
12593
FAIZABAD
CHATA
MASJED·E-RAHIM SHAH
65.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13455
FAIZABAD
HOWZI
MASJED·E·RAHMAT
0.0
144.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13366 FAIZABAD.
MUNJI
MASJED·E·TEGHAH
0.0
140.0
0.0
60.0
0.0
42.9
12901
FAI ZABAD
BAGH-E-BALEEN
12895
FAIZABAD
BED KALAN
12550
FAIZABAD
PENGANI
12570
FAIZABAO
DARAYEM
FAIZABAO
BED KALAN
12890
FAIZABAD
12530 FAIZABAO
NEEM TALAH
13375
NEEM TALAH
MASJED-E·ZARAB
80.0
80.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MASJID A. WALl
80.0
160.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MASJID ABDULLAH
80.0
450.0
25.0
30.0
31.3
6.7
MASJID AHMAD
600.0
100.0
10.0
20.0
1.7
20.0
MASJID DASHT
100.0
155.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1500.0
300.0
500.0
50.0
33.3
16.7
KU
1~387
FAIZABAD
MASJED·E·JAME
MASJID DASTGEER
MASJID DEH BALA
0.0
300.0
0.0
50.0
0.0
16.7
MASJIO DEH BALA
300.0
180.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
2.8
BED KALAN
MASJID HJ.EBRAH
170.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FAIZABAD
AUTRANCHI AB BURIK
MASJID JAME
0.0
400.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
2.5
FAIZABAD
FAIZABAD
CHATA
12894
FAIZABAO
13463
12552
AC
12589 FAIZABAD
PENGANI
MASJID JAME
1000.0
500.0
250.0
40.0
25.0
8.0
13437 FAIZABAO
BAlASH
MASJID JAME
0.0
226.0
0.0
50.0
0.0
22.1
13438 FAIZABAD
KOREC
MASJID JAME
0.0
155.0
0.0
25.0
0.0
16.1
12638 FAIZABAD
QARAH MUGHUL
MASJ .ID JAME
385.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
26.0
0.0
12829 FAIZABAO
YAFTAL SUFLA·BROKAN
MASJID JAMI
70.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12506 FAIZABAD
NEEMTALLAH
MASJID MABAIN
250.0
310.0
25.0
80.0
10.0
25.8
12505
FAIZABAD
NEEM TALAH
MASJID NAMATULA
600.0
250.0
100.0
100.0
16.7
40.0
12555
FAIZABAD
PENGANI
MASJID QURBAN
56.0
220.0
26.0
20.0
46.4
9.1
12551
FAIZABAO
MASJID QUTAN
MASJID QUTAN
160.0
360.0
60.0
30.0
37.5
8.3
13377 FAIZABAO
NEEM TALAH
MASJID ROID AAB
0.0
300.0
0.0
55.0
0.0
18.3
13462
FAIZABAD
MASJIO JAME ARGHUNO
MASJID SHEBAR
0.0
130.0
0.0
6.0
0.0
4.6
12885
FAIZABAO
TOR YAB
MASJID ULIA
260.0
412.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.5
12574
FAIZABAO
OARAYEM
MASJID-E-JAME
800.0
250.0
300.0
50.0
37.5
20.0
12535
FAIZABAD
KHASPAK
MASJID-E-JAME
250.0
160.0
100.0
10.0
40.0
6.3
13
KHSHAN
~994-1995)
percent of
cultivatton
AC
KU
opiun PopPY
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
opuim poppy
cultivation
(jerib)
No.
District
Area/main·
village
village
1994
1995
1994
12632
FAIZABAD
NOW ABAD
NOW ABAD
250.0
0.0
12.0
12705
FAIZABAD
NOW ABAD
NOW ABAD
400.0
0.0
0.0
12910
FAIZABAD
SPEEN
NOWABAD
40.0
0.0
0.0
Form
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -13380
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
OGAR-E-BALA
0.0
170.0
0.0
13451
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
OGAR-1-PAYAN
0.0
80.0
0.0
12840
FAJZABAD
PAHAN OARAH
PAHAN DARAH SUFLA
100.0
56.0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 12850
PAHEN OARAH
PAHEN DARAH ULY
13429 FAIZABAD
FAIZABAD
PALANG OARAH
PALANG DARAH
percent of
opiLm poppy
cultivation
1995
1994
0.0
4 .8
·- - ---- -
1995
0.0
--·-
-
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0. 0
1.0
0.0
0.6
-- --- ---- --- -- ---- - - -
2.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
130.0
155.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
90.0
0.0
0.0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - --- -·- - -
------ - - ---
-
0.0
0.0
- - - - - - - - -JAW
-- - - - - -PARANA
- - -KHAM
------- - - - -- --------- -0.-----0.0
0
0.0
12739 FA(ZABAD
ZOON
180.0 130.0
0.0
12751
FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
PASHEAYAL
190.0
105.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13415
FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
PASI BAND
0.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12631
FAlZABAD
PASI JAR
PASI JAR
25.0
110.0
20.0
12.0
80.0
10.9
DOAAB
PASS SHAKH
100.0
210.0
50.0
90.0
50.0
42.9
12516 FAIZABAD
~~-------------------~----------------- ---------------
PASTA KALAN
PASTA KALAN
130.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13363
PAYAN TONO
PAYAN TOND
260.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PAZLA KHWAH
85.0
135.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
70.0
400.0
0.0
50.0
0.0
12.5
FAIZABAD
KU
12888 FAIZABAD
12836 FAIZABAD
PAZLA KHWAH
12723
FAlZABAD
PECHJQ AND ANGRO
PECHIQ AND ANGR
13401
FAIZABAD
ARGO
PESHKA
0.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0. 0
PESHTEK
0.0
90.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PETAW
265.0
370.0
20.0
15.0
7.5
4.1
PETAWAK
300.0
130.0
150.0
60.0
50.0
46.2
13442
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
12665
FAIZABAD
PETAW
12512
FAIZABAD
PETAWAK
12511
FAIZABAD
PETAWAK
42.0
280.0
15.0
60.0
35.7
21.4
13391
FAIZABAD
KHAKSARI
PSWTA KHOR
0.0
170.0
0.0
30 . 0
0.0
17.6
13432
FA 1ZABAO
PULAR Li ICWEEK
PULAR l1 K\JEE K
0.0
80.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
12 . 5
13424
FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
PUNJTUN
0.0
85.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12621
FAIZABAD
AC
PETAWAK SUFLA
ARGO
QAILAH DARAH
278.0
510.0
70.0
15.0
25.2
2.9
12696 FAIZABAD
QARA KAMA
QARA KAMA
180.0
190.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
1.1
12700 FAIZABAD
QARA QUZI
QARA QUZI
490.0
430.0
0.0
20 . 0
0.0
4.7
12864
FAIZABAD
QARACHAH
QARACHA
260.0
510.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.4
12655
FAIZABAD
QARAH MUGHUL
QARAH MUGHUL
150.0
210.0
60.0
30.0
40.0
14.3
13392
FAlZABAD
ARGO
QARGHAH
0.0
130.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
7.7
12547 FAIZABAD
QARLOQ QROQ
QARLOQ QROQ
450.0 4000.0
100.0
570.0
22.2
14.3
12557 FAlZABAD
QARLOQ ZER ICOTEL
QARLOQ ZER KOTE
12646 FAIZABAD
QASH QULAQ
QASH QULAQ
12590
FAIZABAD
CHATA
QASHQAR BEGI
12681
FAIZABAD
QATAR
12860
FAIZABAD
QAWJZ
QA\JIZ
QAZI QESHLAQ
QAZI QESHLAQ
12588 FAIZABAD
KH~RMAN
QATAR KHERMAN
15
180.0
0.0
20.0
0.0
11.1
0.0
1200.0
260.0
300.0
40.0
25.0
15.4
45.0
147.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
1.0
200.0
220.0
50.0
0.0
25.0
0.0
3.5
106.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.5
390.0
400.0
30.0
30.0
7.7
7.5
\
Total
cultivated
land (jeri b)
Area/main·
village
village
12699 FAIZABAD
ARGO
QOCHI
12519 FAIZABAD
QOWAT All
QO~AT
12741
FAIZABAD
JA~ZON
12911
FAIZABAD
Form
No.
District
opuim poppy
cultivation
(jerib)
percent of .
opium poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
1500 . 0
300.0
0.0
0.0
0. 0
0. 0
100 . 0
750.0
30.0
40.0
30.0
5.3
RABAT
165.0
65.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
250 . 0 1860 . 0
All
RABATAK
RABATAK
0. 0
0.0
0.0
0. 0
13409 FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
RAGH DARAH
0. 0
40.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13441
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
RAZAN BALA
0.~
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12798
FAJZABAO
TAGAB
RAZAN PAYAN
150.0
130.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
RAZAN·E·SOM DARA
RAZAN·E·SOM DARA
45.0
240 . 0
. 0.0
80.0
0.0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - ------12809 FAIZABAD
0. 0
-- -
33.3
12541
FAIZABAD
RESHDARAZ
RESHDARAZ OLYA
30.0
300 . 0
5.0
100.0
16.7
33.3
12542
FAIZABAO
RESHDARAZ
RESHDARAZ SOFLA
70.0
250.0
30.0
90.0
42.9
36.0
12600
FAIZABAO
ROBAT
ROBAT
80.0
200.0
12.0
80.0
15.0
40.0
13368 FAIZABAD
ESHAN OARA BAGH
RUIA DASHT
0.0
25.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
40 . 0
12695
350.0
520.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
102.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
220 . 0
105.0
30.0
8.0
13.6
7.6
FAIZABAD
SABZABAHAR
SAFEDAG PELBANO
SAFEDAG PELBAND
12917 FAIZABAD
SAFEDARAL MANSOOR
SAFEDARAL MANSOOR
12876 FAIZABAb
YAFTAL PAYAN
12709 FAIZABAD
SAMATI
14010
FA.IZABAD
12891
FAIZABAD
LANGAR 1
LANGAR
KU
ARGO
12376 FAJZABAD
SAFIO ARK PASE BAND
240.0
0.0
0. 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SAMATI
100.0
250.0
0.0
0. 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SANG AAB
50.0
60.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12878 FAJZABAD
YAFTAL SUFLA LANGAR
SANG AAB·E·BALA
SANG AB
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12571
FAIZABAD
OARA·E·CHEREk
SANG·E · CALAT
200.0
200.0
30.0
30.0
15.0
15.0
12824
FAJZABAD
kOOL DARA
10.0
215.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12603
FAIZABAO
SPIN GUL
SANJ DARAH
420.0
270.0
2.0
35.0
0.5
13 . 0
12823
FAIZABAD
SHIR CHANG
SAR BAND
100.0
110.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
AC
SANGCHIL ZYARAT
12747 FAIZABAO
JAWZOON
SAR DARAH
250.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12805
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
SAR GALLAHA
900.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12843
FAIZABAO
SHAKAR LAB
SAR NANG
350.0
0.0
0. 0
0.0
0. 0
0. 0
12752
FAIZABAO
PASI BAND
SAR-E·QUL-E-PAS
120.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13411
FAJZABAD
SAR~E-TAL
SAR·E·TAL
0.0
70.0
0.0
250.0
12520 FAJZABAO
DOAAB
SAR·E·TAL
200.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
50 . 0
33.3
12834
FAIZABAO
SAROON
SARBAND
100.0
450.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12343
FAIZABAO
SHAKARLAB
SARI SANG
0.0
160.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12683
FAIZABAO
ARGO
SARIDARAH
165.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0. 0
12796 FAJZABAO
TAGAS
SAROAL TAGAB
200.0
75.0
0.0
0.0
0. 0
0.0
12559 FAJZABAO
OEH BAZAR
SAYEOHA DEHBAZA
687.0
580.0
343.0
200.0
49.9
34.5
13418 FAJZABAO
PASI BAND
SELAGJ DUSHT
12852
SEMEEN JAB
SEMEEN JAB
PASI BA.ND
SENJ IT
FAJZABAD
13407 FAIZABAD
16
0.0 357.1
0.0
60.0
0.0
0.0
0. 0
0.0
600.0
1510.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0. 0
0. 0
0.0
0.0
Opium poppy cultivation per village in FAIZABAD district/BADAKHSHAN ( 1994-1.995)
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
Form
No.
District
Area/mainvillage
village
12760
FAIZABAD
PASJ BAND
12759
FAIZABAD
12693
12770
opuirn poppy
cultivat1on
(jerib)
percent of
op i urn poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
SHAH KALAN
270.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PASI BAND
SHAH KHURD
110.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FAIZABAD
ARGO
SHAH WAZIR .
1000.0
70.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
SHAHID DARAH
60.0
90.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12838
FAIZABAD
SHAKARLAB
SHAHIL
50.0
210.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12612
FAIZABAD
SHAHMARJ
SHAHMARI
250.0
180.0
100.0
80.0
40.0
44.4
12787
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
SHAHZAMIN
20.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12842
FAIZABAD
SHAKARLAB
SHAKARLAB BALA
90.0
3100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12532
FAIZABAD
SHAKH GULLAN
SH~KH
25.0
22.2
31.3
12902
FAIZABAD
SHALKHAH ZAAR
SHALKHAH ZAAR
13423
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
SHAR-E-ZARAN
12684
FAIZABAD
SHATAK
SHATAK
13389
FAIZABAD
SPEEN
SHEKH DARAH
12687
FAIZABAD
ARGO
12841
FAIZABAD
SHER KUSH
12596
FAJZABAD
SHIB DARAH
13431
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
13448
FAJZABAD
SHJWACHI BALA
12625
FAIZABAD
SHJWACHI PAYAN
12736
FAIZABAD
SHORABAK
SHORABAK
12916
FAIZABAD
SIKHDARA·KHANAQA
SIK.HOARA-KHANAQA
12845
FAJZABAD
SHAKAR LAB
SOKHTA KO
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - ----------· -···--- - GULLAN
80.0
450.0
700.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
700.0
210.0
60.0
40.0
8.6
19.0
0.0
300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SHEMQARCHI
800.0
770.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.Q
SHER KUSH
200.0
170.0
1.0
SHIB OARAH
180.0
100.0
12.0
21.0
SHIN DARAH
0.0
75.0
0.0
0.0
SHIWACHI BALA
0.0
250.0
0.0
40.0
0.0
16.0
SHIWACHI PAYAN
50.0
50.0
5.0
10.0
10.0
20.0
120.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.fr
KU
90.0
20.0
AC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- -
12345" FAJZABAD
SHAKARLAB
SOKHTA KOH
0.0
---
-
0.5
0.0
--- -- -- - - - --
6.7
21.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
385.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13446
FAIZABAD
SOM DARA
SOM DARA
0.0
500.0
0.0
170.0
0.0
34.0
12913
FAJZABAD
SPAK
SPAK
50.0
70.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12792
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
SUMCHAN
80.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12784
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
SYA SHAKH
12810
FAJZABAD
ARGHANJ KttWA
TAGABAK
12794
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
12682
FAIZABAD
12618
12737
280.0
104.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
_250.0·
220.0
1.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
TAGH DARAH
280.0
300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TAGHARCHEK
TAGHARCHEK
1500.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FAIZABAD
DEHMAGAS
TAJIK
195.0
150.0
70.0
60.0
35.9
40.0
FAIZABAD
TAKYA
TAKYA
20.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13414
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
TALBAZANG BALA
0.0
?0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12802
FAIZABAO
TAGAB
TALBAZANG PAYAN
165.0
50.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
12674
FAIZABAD
SHATAK
TALDARAH
570.0
50.0
70.0
2.0
12.3
4.0
12712
FAIZABAD
TAOCHAH OARAH
TAQCHAH DARAH
520.0
315.0
0.0
15.0
0.0
4.8
12694
FAIZABAD
ARGO
TAQULAK
270.0
120.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
1.7
12790
FAIZABAD
TAGAB
TAWJAHAD PARAH
270.0
270.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
Form
No.
District
12698
FAIZABAD
Area/main·
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
village
village
ARGO
TOGH BAY
opuim poppy
cultivat1on
(jerib)
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
6800.0
300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
6.7
12706
FAIZABAD
TOGHBULAGH
TOGHBULAGH
400.0
150.0
0.0
12854
FAIZABAD
TOKSHAL
TO~SHAL
155.0
350.0
0.0
12515
FAIZABAD
TOOT DARAH
TOOT DARAH
208.0
400.0
100.0
40.0
48.1
10.0
12509
FAIZABAD
TORGANI
TORGANI ULYA
250.0 · 180.0
150.0
60.0
60.0
33.3
12814
FAIZABAD
ARGHANJ KHWA
TOSOM DARAH
400.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12605
FAIZABAD
SPIN GUL
TURFIKILL
62.0
80.0
1.0
10.0
1.6
12.5
---------------=--------------'---------------- 2.0-- - --0.6
0.0
12735
FAIZABAD
TURGANI
TURGANI
1280~
FAIZABAD
WAGAR PAYAN
WAGAR PAYAN
12839
FAIZABAD
SHAKARLAB
WAJKIL YONS PAHEN DA
12904
FAIZABAD
8.0
90.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
WALAAK
WALAAK-E-PAYAN
300.0 2600.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12906 FAIZABAD
WALAK
WALAK BALA
150.0 2400.0 .
0.0
0.0
0. 0
0.0
12807 FAIZABAD
TAGAB
WARSAK
400.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12803
FAIZABAD
WETRANCHI
WETRANCHI (HESARI)
2000 ~ 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12865
FAIZABAD
YAHAL SUFLA
YAFTAL SUFLA
350.0
.o.o
2.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
12539
FAIZABAD
DARAYEM
YAMCHIAN
250.0
400.0
100.0
95.0
40.0
23.8
12666 FAIZABAD
ARGHUND
12639
YARAN SHAH
12637 FAIZABAD
YARUNSHA
12815
FAIZABAD
JAW ZOON
12701
FAIZABAD
ARGO
KU
FAIZABAD
300.0
YANTAGHLAGH
700.0
110.0
3.0
6.0
0.4
5.5
YARAN SHAH
1200.0
260.0
170.0
40.0
14.2
15.4
YARUNSHA
900.0
0.0
250.0
0.0
27.8
0.0
YASHI
100.0
90.0
0. 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
YUSUF ABAD
800.0
160.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
AC
- - - - - - - - -YOUNAB
- - - - - - - -YOUNAB
---------- - -60.0
- -- -- --- -0.0 -------0.0
-- -----·12690 FAIZABAD
500.0
0.0
0.0
12548 FAIZABAD
ZAHRAK
ZAHRAK
150.0
210.0
90.0
30.0
60.0
14.3
12748 FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
ZAKAK
100.0
180.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12879 FAIZABAD
ZAMASTANAK
ZAMASTANAK
160.0
185.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14009 FAIZABAD
PASI BAND
ZARDALAW
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12762
PASI BAND
ZRANGAN DARALS
50.0
250.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
145488 149136
15630
11722
11
8
40.0
100.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
4.0 .
FAIZABAD
FAIZABAD Total
13103
JURM
AAWAN
AAWAN
13140
JURM
ADINA BAY
ADINA BAY
65.0
120.0
15.0
20.0
23.1
16.7
13146 JURM
AHANGARAN
AHANGARAN
200.0
150.0
50.0
7.0
25.0
4.7
13155
ALAR IS
ALARIB
180.0
150.0
15.0
10.0
8.3
6.7
13088 JURM
AOWAGH JOKHAN
AOWAGH
160.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13382 JURM
ARJENGAN
ARJENGAN
13097 JURM
ARK HE
ARK HE
13378 JURM
ARKHOW
ARK HOW
13133 JURM
ASEL JURM
ASEL JURM
JURM
18
0.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
50.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
150.0 3000.0
50.0
100.0
33.3
3.3
Opium poppy cultivation per village in JURM district/BADAKHSHAN ( 1994-1995)
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
opuim poppy
cultivatton
(jerib)
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
Area/mainvillage
village
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
13057 JURM
ASHNAM
ASHNAM
120.0
70.0
0.0
8.0
0.0
11.4
13106 JURM
ASKAN
ASKAN
250.0
240.0
10.0
20.0
4.0
8.3
13091
JURM
ASTAREY
ASTAREY
150.0
150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13108
JURM
AUG HAN
AUG HAN
30.0
50.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
4.0
13114
JURM
ARIJANJ
AIJRANJ I
130.0
100.0
10.0
20.0
7.7
20.0
13111
JURM
BABA QASEM
BABA CASEM
70.0
60.0
10.0
30.0
14.3
50.0
13120
JURM
BAGHALAK
BAGHALAK
300.0
1100.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
9.1
10.0
50.0
12.5
Form
No.
District
13139 JURM
BAQA BAY
BAQA BAY
30.0
80.0
15.0
13145
JURM
CHAP DARA
CHAP DARA
300.0
180.0
160.0
30.0
53.3
16.7
13381
JURM
JO KHAN
CHARMAGHZISTAN
0.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13131
JURM
OASHT
DAHAN·E·DARA
250.0
50.0
50.0
5.0
20.0
10.0
13384
JURM
OARA PASHKAN
DARA PASHKAN
0.0
70.0
0.0
20.0
0.0
28.6
13082 JURM
DARA KALAFZAR
OARA·E·KALAFZAR
100.0
110.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
4.5
13124 JURM
OAR KHAN
OAR KHAN
250.0
400.0
100.0
50.0 .
40.0
12.5
13074
AUSH"NOGAN
0.0
560.0
0.0
30.0
0.0
5.4
OEH BALA
250.0
100;0
50.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
DEH BALA
240.0
540.0
40.0
40.0
16.7
7.4
DEH BALA
200.0
90.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
4.4
OEH MEYANA
320.0
600.0
40.0
80.0
12.5
13.3
OEH PARAH
250.0
700.0
120.0
100.0
48 . 0
14.3
DEH PAYAN
300.0
400.0
.50.0
40.0
16.7
10.0
DEH CALA
200.0
400.0
40.0
40.0
20.0
10.0
DEHNOW
OEHNOIJ
400.0
1000.0
150.0
200.0
37.5
20.0
DARA-E·HENGAN
EARGHASAK
80.0
600.0
15.0
30.0
18.8
5.0
ERIJAK
ERIJAK
130.0
40.0
8.0
0.0
6.2
0.0
FARGHAMO
FARGHAMO
220.0
400.0
2.0
5.0
0.9
1.3
GHARAS
FARGHANDAJ
100.0
120.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FRECH
FRECH
200.0
430.0
20.0
30.0
10.0
GAUHAR
80.0
380.0
5.0
20.0
6.3
5.3
GAUHAR·E·BALA
100.0
130.0
15.0
6.0
15.0
4.6
GOZAR MASJID
120.0
0.0
20.0
0.0
16.7
0.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
0.0
60.0
0.0
13129 JURM
OEH BALA
13150 JURM
DEH BALA
13065
GHARMI
JURM
13148 JURM
JURM
DEH PARAH
13149 JURM
OEH PAYAN
13061
DEH QALA
JURM
13119 JURM
13081
JURM
13105
JURM
13078 JURM
13066 JURM
13109 JURM
AC
13116
DEH MEYANA
13079 JURM
GAUHAR
13080 JURM
GAUHAR
13059 JURM
PLAAR
13101
_ DASHT
KU
JURM
''
JURM
HELAH
7.0 .
13147 JURM
HESARAK
HESARAK
220.0
200.0
60.0
10.0
27.3
5.0
13118 JURM
KAJGARAN
KAJGARAN
200.0
500.0
40.0
100.0
20.0
20.0
13086
KALAFZAR
KALAFZAR
100.0
200.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
2.5
13112 JURM
DARA FARGHAMUNJ
KAMANGARAN
300.0
350.0
100.0
50.0
33.3
14.3
13154 JURM
KATEEB
KATEEB
200.0
1200.0
80.0
120.0
40 ~ 0
10.0
13090 JURM
ARK HE
KAIJ
250.0
50.0
5.0
2.0
0.0
JURM
19
Total
cultivated
land (jeri b)
Form
No.
District
Area/mainvillage
village
13093
JURM
KHAERANG
KHAERANG
13070
JURM
GHARAS
KHALGA
13379
JURM
GHARMEY
KHASEP
13072
JURM
GHARMJ
KHASH
13095
JURM
13098
JURM
13102
JURM
13087
JURM
1994 ·
opuim poppy
cultivation
(jerib)
1995
1994
150.0
10.0
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1995
1994
1995
--- --- -0.0
0.0
8.3
- --·---- . ----- 0.0
0.0
0.0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - -- --- ----- - - -120.0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -80.0
- -- -----100.0
0.0
-
0.0
50.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
140.0
180.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - ----- -- - --- - -- -
13100 JURM
13383
JURM
13076 JURM
DARA·E~8UZURG
_DARA KHEL
KHASTAK KHOOL
KHAWA
50.0
200.0
4.0
8.0
0.0
KHEL
30.0
60.0
5.0
0.0
16.7
0.0
KHOOL
120.0
200.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
---- --
- --- --
ZARHENGAN
KHORI
120.0
350.0
10.0
20.0
8.3
5.7
KOJAGAK
KOJAGAK
400.0
500.0
60.0
30.0
15.0
6.0
LANGAR H.SAYEEO
LANGAR H.SAYEED
0.0
120.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
4.2
LARKEY
LARKEY
200.0
530.0
50.0
30.0
25.0
5.7
60.0
13094
JURM
L.ERAK ZO
LERAK 20
170.0
20.0
0.0
33.3
0.0
13113
JURM
FARGHAMANJ OEH BALA
MADRASA
150.0 2500.0
20.0
300.0
13.3
12.0
13130
JURM
MADRA SA
MADRA SA
175.0
75.0
40.0
42.9
10.0
JURM
13104
JURM
13135
JURM
13123
JURM
13110 JURM
GHARMI
KU
13068
. MAGHZAR-E-KHOOL
DEH .SANGAN
KHASH
. FARGHAMUNJ OEH BALA
JURM
MASJED MADRASA
13122
JURM
MASJEO-E·MAORASA
13084
JURM
13121
JURM
13136
JURM
13115
JURM
13056
JURM
13075
JURM
13132
JURM
13141 . JURM
MADRA SA
100.0
160.0
0.0
8.0
0.0
5.0
MAGHZAR-E-KHOOL
40.0
80.0
2.0
8.0
5.0
10.0
MAHALA-E-SHIKHAN
300 . 0
100.0
50.0
5.0
16.7
5.0
MAS.JED BALA
270.0
1100.0
100.0
50.0
37.0
4.5
MASJED DEHPAYAN
150.0
140.0
30.0
70.0
20.0
50.0
MASJED MADRASA
350.0
900.0
50.0
30.0
14.3
3.3
MASJED MADRASA
450.0
200.0
200.0
10.0
44.4
5.0
50.0
1600.0
3.0
60.0
6.0
3.8
AC
13085
13127 JURM
400.0
MASJED PAYAN
MASJED PAYAN
MASJEO-E·SAR CHOWK
MASJED SARCHOWK
250.0
1000.0
120.0
50.0
48.0
5.0
OEH SANGAN
MASJID AWAL
300.0
200.0
30.0
10.0
10.0
5.0
MISYANI
MJSYANI
100.0
500.0
40.0
100.0
40.0
20.0
MUGHLA ZAMEER .
MUGHLA ZAMEER
250.0
60.0
100.0
20.0
40.0
33.3
MULLA KHEL
MULLA KHEL
150.0
400.0
70.0
20.0
46.7
5.0
NASHE
NASHE
200.0
560.0
0.0
20.0
0.0
3.6
DASHTAK
NAIJA
80.0
100.0
20.0
6.0
25.0
6.0
NAIJAI JURM
NAIJAI JURM
130.0
200.0
20.0
13.0
15.4
6.5
500.0
60.0
80.0
4.0
16.0
6.7
13134
JURM
OASHTAK
NAWAY BALA
13096
JURM
-DARA-E-BUZURG
NOK
20.0
130.0
2.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
PALAR
PALAR
200.0
1000.0
15.0
30.0
7.5
3.0
PATA GUZER
PATA GUZER
120.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
8.3
0.0
13099 JURM
13152
JURM
13142
JURM
CHANG·E·PAYAN
QAJMAQCHI
400.0
170.0
3.0
10.0
0.8
5.9
13151
JURM
QALA·E-GUNBAD
QALA-E-GUNBAD .
150.0
100.0
15.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
13069
JURM
TAHT DEH
SAFASH
150.0
80.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13138
JUR.,
SANGLAKH
SANGLAKH
200.0 . 300.0
80.0
30.0
40.0
10.0
20
Total
Form
No.
District
cultivated
land (jerib)
Area/main-
opuim poppy
cultivation
{jerib)
village
village
1994
1995
1994
200 . 0
100.0
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1995
1994
1995
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
5.0
13071
JURM
GHARAS
SANO~RY
13064
JURM
SAR SHAKH
SAR SHAKH
50.0
100.0
0.0
13144
JURM
SAR-E-HOUZ
SAR-E-HOUZ
450.0
350.0
50.0
15.0
11.1
4.3
13092
JURM
SARAAB
SARAAB
180.0
140.0
4.0
0.0
2.2
0.0
13073
JURM
GHARAS TAKHT DEH
SARA~ASH
100.0
60.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13137
JURM
SARI TAL
SARI TAL
80.0
240.0
30.d
20.0
37.5
8.3
13117
JURM
KHASH
SARLOLA
300.0
600.0
100.0
100.0
33.3
16.7
13449
JURM
SARSEEL
SARSEEL
13062
JURM
SENAH
SENAH
0.0
60.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
5.0
120.0
250.0
10.0
5.0
8.3
2.0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13125 JURM
.KHASH
SHAHRAN
500.0
150.0
250.0
10.0
50.0
6.7
JURM
CHANG PAYAN
SHASH KAL
300.0
100.0
10.0
10.0
3.3
10.0
13055
JURM
SHIF CHAN
SHlF CHAN
200.0
200.0
1.0
20.0
0.5
10.0
13063
JURM
SHIRIN QESHLAQ
SHIRIN QESHLAQ
40.0
30.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13060
JURM
SOUCH-E-BALA
SOUCH-E-BALA
60.0
300.0
2.0
12.0
3.3
4.0
13058
JURM
SOUCH-E·PAYAN
SOUCH-E-PAYAN
250.0
400.0
10.0
10.0
4.0
2.5
13083
JURM
SPOJMAY
SPOJMAY
250.0
250.0
50.0
10.0
20.0
4.0
· 13128
JURM
TAJEKAN
TAJEKAN
200.0
500.0
88.0
80.0
44.0
16.0
13107
JURM
TEEGARAN
0.0
60.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
3.3
13067
JURM
TAHT DEH
WACH BEE
150.0
60.0
Q.O
0.0
0.0
0.0
13077
JURM
~AJAN
WAJAN
350.0
400.0
6.0
20.0
1.7
5.0
13089
JURM
JOKHAN
WAN I
250. 0
80. 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13153
JURM
13126
JURM
13304
KESHEM
13302
KESHEM
13202
KESHEM
13168
TEERGARAN
AC
JURM Total
KU
13143
YABAB
YABAB
200.0
250.0
80.0
30.0
40.0
12.0
KHASH
YOUZ NAMAT
400.0
300.0
150.0
60.0
37.5
20.0
20
8
1.0
0.0
DEH SAYDAN
300695
AAB SHER AHMAD
AAT
KESHEM
KHAMBAIC
13156
KESHEM
ASHUQAN
ASHUQAN
13212
KESHEM
KOURI
ASIA WANI
13291
KESHEM
GHOURI SANG
ASIAB PATAK
13179
KESHEM
KHAMBAK
ASIABAK
18590
35370
3661
2777
200.0
1600.0
2.0
AAB-E-SHER AHMAD
160.0
1800.0
10.0
0.0
6.3
0.0
AAT
240.0
500.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.2
AFGHAN DARA
983.0
1300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13204
KESHEM
KATOU
AURGHANJ
13239
KESHEM
DARA BOLAQ
BABA
13195
KESHEM
MIYAN SHAHR
BAGH-E-TARK
13280
KESHEM
BALA HESAR
BALA HESAR
13286
KESHEM
TASHKAN BALA
BALA TASHKAN
DAR~ESH
21
0.0
50.0
1480.0
0.0
0.0
1350.0
1000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
38.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
5.3
0.0
150.0
1000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
350.0
900.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1250.0
800.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
380.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
185.0
880.0
5.0
0.0
2.7
0.0
65.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Opium poppy cultivation per village in KESHEM district/BADAKHSHAN ( 1994-1995)
Form
No.
District
12236 KESHEM
13310
KESHEM
opuim poppy
cultivation
(jeri b)
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
Area/main·
village
village
BALA TASHKAL
BALA TEASHKAN
TEASHKAN
BAZAR-E-TEASHKA
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
0.0
700.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
75.0
1300.0
2.0
0.0
2.7
0.0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 13276 KESHEM
BULBUL DARA
BULBUL DARA
percent of
op i Llll poppy
cultivation
200.0
650.0
0.0
-------------------~-------------------------
----- - ------- - - ----
-
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
13255
KESHEM
TEASHKAN
BZKAT
185.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
13205
KESHEM
KATOU BALA
CHAKORAN
600.0
700.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13254 KESHEM
TAKYAH
CHAQAL
AS
450.0
850.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13246 KESHEM
CHAQOUL QESHLAQ
CHAQOUL QESHLAQ
49.0
1200.0
5.0
0.0
10.2
0.0
13277 KESHEM
CHARMAGHZ DARA
CHARMAGHZ DARA
192.0
1300.0
3.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
CHASHM OARAZ
BALA
~ASAR
13317 KESHEM
YA~AL
120.0
1100;0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13184 KESHEM
MIYAN SHAHR
CHEQEL QESHLAO
85.0
900.0,
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DEH
DARA-E-CHASHMAK
18.0
1500.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- ---- ---- -- - ·-- KESHEM.
13172
KESHEM
13196 KESHEM
13214
KESHEM
~ASTAYAN
KHAMBAK
DARA-E-HIR
800.0
900.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
KOURI
DARA-E-SAMB
1300.0
1400.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FARHAN QULI
DASHT SHAMEL
110.0
500.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13173 KESHEM
KHAHBAK
13296 KESHEM
SOSAGAN
13206 KESHEM
KATOU BALA
13189 KESHEM
KARESTI
13197 KESHEM
KOURI
13176 KESHEH
KHAMBAK
13290 KESHEM
ELMICH
KESHEM
13311
KESHEH
13344 KESHEM
13161
KESHEM
13240 KESHEM
13264
KESHEM
13271
KESHEM
DEH KALAN
320.0
1000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DEH MIRI
10.0
1000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
130.0
645.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DO ABI
DOW ABHA
250.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DUSHT-E-BALA
350.0
1200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0. 0
DUSHTAK
230.0
500.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ELMICH
30.0
1000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FAIZANI
FAIZANI
345.0
1200.0
1.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
GAZ DARA
GAZ DARA
150.0
1800.0
4.0
0.0
2.7
0.0
GHELA\JAK
GHELA~AK
690.0
1400.0
3.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
GHELLAN
GHELLAN
105.0
440.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
GOUNG SHAHAR
GOUNG SHAHAR
780.0
800.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
GUNBAO
GUNBAD
700.0
600.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
AC
13303
KU
13284
HAFT CHENAR
HAFT CHENAR
13247 KESHEM
TAKYAH
HAZARA HA
13339 KESHEM
JANAZADARA
13236 KESHEM
DARA-E-JEAM
13293 KESHEM
600.0
700.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1500.0
800.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
JANAZSOARA
150.0
900.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
KAJ DARA
280.0
850.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
GHORI SANG
KA$HO
185.0
1000.0
20.0
0.0
10.8
0.0
13305
KESHEM
KHANA QA
KHANA QA
544.0
900.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13203
KESHEM
KATOU
KHELE ASP
460.0
1200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13334
KESHEM
KHNKAN
KHNKAN
80.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
3.8
0.0
13295
KESHEM
SOSAGAN
KHOLIAN
10.0
1000.0
1.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
KATOU
KHOROUK
950.0
1200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13207 KESHEM
22
Opium poppy cultivation per village in KESHEM district/BADAKHSHAN (1994-1995)
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
Form
No.
District
Area/mainvillage
1994
1994
1995
280.0
1200.0
46.0
0.0
0.0
195.0
1800.0
0.0
village
PALARAN
opuim poppy
cultivation
(jeri b)
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1995
13226
KESHEM
PALARAN
KHOSHK DARAH
13227
KESHEM
DALARAN
KHOSHKDARA BALA
13224
KESHEM
PALARAN
KHOSHKDARA LAB
65.0
850.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13199
KESHEM
KHO~ARK
KHO~ARK
175.0
680.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13228
KESHEM
PALARAN
KHSHK DARA PAIAN
300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13320
KESHEM
KH~AJA
KH~AJA
220.0
1800.0
3.0
0.5
1.4
0.0
0.0
AFGHANI
AFGHANI
13185
KESHEM
PALARAN
KH~AJA
66.0
800.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13313
KESHEM
DARA-E-CAC
KOHNAN CSHLAC
148.0
1400.0
2.0
0.0
1.4
0.0
13201
KESHEM
FARMAN CUll
LIZH DEH
125.0
900.0
0.0
o:o
0.0
0.0
BAGH
13170
KESHEM
AUJIL
M. AUJIL
385.0
500.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13165
KESHEM
MIRKAN
M. BALA
80.0
2000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13158
KESHEM
SHAHEED KAN
M. BALA
600.0
860;0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1317S
KESHEM
KHAMBAK
M. DEH BALA
720.0
600.0
13177
KESHEM
KHAMBAK
13211
KESHEM
JAR SHAH BABA
13231
KESHEM
SAR SHERCI
13166
KESHEM
MIRKAN
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
155.0
620.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
180.0
800.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
530.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1000.0
KU
~ASAT
M.
DE~ALSANG
M. DUST
NO~ROOZ
M. HAJJ MAJID
M. JAMEA
1200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
M. JAMEA
1130.0
1400.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
M. JAMEA
450.0
2300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1250.0
1500.0
3.0
0.0
0.2
0_.0
420.0
670.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
----~---------------------------------------------------
KESHEM
KHAMBAK BALA
13221
KESHEM
NAMAZGA
13258
KESHEM
M. JAMEA TAJARI
13210
KESHEM
13167 KESHEM
13216
KESHEM
13219
KESHEM
13244
KESHEM
13194
KESHEM
13326
KESHEM
M. JAMEA TAJARI
AC
13174
JAR SHAH BABA
M. MIRHA
AUJIL
M. SANG KATAH
25.0
450.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FARAJ GHANI
M. SAR-E-JAR
170.0
1400.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SARI SHARCI MASHHAD
M. SARA KHAN
850.0 . 840.0
MASHHAD
M.
SARAN~AL
KAREST DEH
M.
~ASAT
GANDOM COOL
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
350.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
300.0
600.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
M.ABDUL RAHIM
450.0
1113.0
3.0
0.0
0. 7 ·
0.0
13171
KESHEM
AUJIL
M.AUJIL ULIA
400.0
700.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13342
KESHEM
MUZAFRI
M.HAJI AKHUND
120.0 . 700.0
3.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
13327
KESHEM
GANDOM COOL
M.JAM-A-MASJID
195.0
1305.0
5.0
0.0
2.6
0.0
13336
KESHEM
PASTA KHOR
M.JAMEA
350.0
1600.0
16.0
0.0
4.6
0.0
550.0
1400.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
85.0
1500.0
2.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13306
KESHEM
CEERMASHI
M.JAMEA
13300
KESHEM
MALGANI
M.JAMES MASJID
13261
KESHEM
MASHHAD
M.JAMES SHAR
180.0
1100.0
13329
KESHEM
GANDOM COOL
M.KOORI A.KHALC
400.0
1100.0
5.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
13337
KESHEM
PASTA KHOR
M.PAYAN
60.0
900.0
3.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
13307 KESHEM
ARGHANDKAN
M.CESHLAQ BALA
230.0
700.0
10.0
o:o
4.3
0.0
23
Opium poppy cultivation per village i~ KESHEM district/BADAKHSHAN ( 1994-1995)
Total
cultivated
land (jeri b >
Area/mainvillage
village
KESHEM
HASHHAD
H.WAKIL SHERDEL
KESHEM
KHAMBAK NOW SUFJA
HADRASA -E-JAME
HADRASA-E·KALAN
MADRASA-E-KALAN
195.0
Form
No.
District
13249
13281
13279 ICESHEM
opuim poppy
cultivation
(jerib)
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
85.0
763.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
140.0
1000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1000.0
3.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
1994
13160
KESHEM
SABZ DARA
MAGHZAR
120.0
2500.0
0.0
0.0
13335
KESHEM
HUZAfRI
MAIDAN MUZFRI
450.0
1200.0
3.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
13256 KESHEM
WAKHSHI
HAKHDOM HA
1200.0
. 675.0
1.0
0~0
0. 1
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
0.0
13178
KESHEM
DEH KALAN
HALA·E-HAZARA
68.0
450 . 0
0.0
0.0
13301
KESHEM
DEH SAYOAN
MARGHZAR
70.0
1400 . 0
2.0
0.0
MASJ.HAJI QARA
HASJ.HAJI QARA
110.0
600.0
2.0
0.0
1.8
0.0
MASJED MAKHDOMA
MASJEO MAKHOOMA
950.0
630.0
1.0
1. 0
0.1
0.2
13257 KESHEH
13262
KESHEM
----------~--------------------------------------------------------------------·--------
13251
KESHEM
FARAJGHANI
MASJEO MER.JAN
835.0
700.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------,-------· - ----13245 KESHEM
MASJED SAR TIPA
MASJEO SAR TIPA
40 . 0
150.0
0.0
0.0
( 0.0
0.0
-------------------------------------------------------~---------~~-
13260 · KESHEM
HASJEO-E-BALA
170.0
56p.O
0.0
0.0
----······---- -
0.0
0.0
KESHEH
HASJEO-E-JAHE
MASJEO-E-JAME
190.0
1700 . 0
2.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
13250
KESHEM
HASJID A. AZIZ
MASJID A. AZIZ
800.0
700.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13270
KESHEM
MASJID AESHAN S
MASJID AESHAN S
200.0
800.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13269 KESHEM
KU
13274
--------------:---------------------------------------------------------·
---·-20.0
-··- ---0.0·13331 KESHEM
· GANDOH QOOL
MASJID ABDUL SAMAD
200.0 1000.0
40.0
0.0
.. . .. ·------------------------------------------------------------.:. . .__--_.
HASJID ARBABGIR
MASJID ARBABGIR
250 . 0
1100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13265
KESHEM
MASJIO
MASJID ATABAY
780.0
1200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13318
KESHEM
YAWAL BALA
HASJID BALA
140.0
. 500.0
11 . 0
0.0
7. 9
0.0
13193
KESKEM
HASJID BALA
MASJID BALA
110.0
1000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13157 KESHEM
13343
KESHEM
13341
KESHEM
13323 KESHEM
13267 KESHEM
13308
KESHEM
13316 KESHEM
ATABA ~
MASJIO CHOGOL
HASJIO CHOGOL
150.0
900.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MUZAFRI
MASJIO DAMULLA
200.0
1100.0
4.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
MASJID DARA
MASJID DARA
120.0
1200.0
1. 0
4.0
0.8
0.3
AC
· -- ··
KHAHBAK NOW SfULA
MASJID HJ.DAULA
HASJID HJ.OAULA
170.0
1200.0
25.0
0.0
14.7
0.0
HASJID HJ. TIMAR .
HASJ-10 HJ. TIMAR
300.0
1000 . 0
6.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
ARGHAND KAN
HASJID JAMEA
160.0
1250.0
3.0
0.0
1.9
0.0
YAWAL BALA
MASJID JAMEA
140.0
880.0
8.0
0.0
5.7
0.0
13283
KESHEM
DEH WASTAYAN BALA
MASJID JAMEA
600.0
1600.0
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
13198
KESHEM
SANG AAB ULIA
MASJID JAMEA
250.0
1160.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13183
KESHEM
HIYAN SHAHR
HASJID JAMEA
335.0
1200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13294
KESHEM
SOSGAN
HASJID JAHEA
100.0
800.0
1.5
0.0
L5
0 ;0
13222
KESHEM
KANGOUR CHI
MASJIO JAMEA
270.0
1000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13292
KESHEH
MASJID JAMEA
HASJID JAMEA
120.0
1200.0
2.0
0.0
1.7
0.0
13191
KESHEM
MASJID JAMEA
MASJIO JAMEA
180.0
700.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13324
KESHEM
MASJID JAHEA
MASJID JAMEA
580.0
2000.0
50.0
0.0
8.6
0.0
13182
KESHEM
SANG AAB
MASJID KELKAK
85.0
900.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
GANDOH QOOL
MASJID MAKHOOM
190.0
1600 . 0
3.0
0.0
1.6
0.0
13328 KESHEM
24
Form
No.
District
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
Area/mainvillage
village
opuim poppy
cultivation
(jerib)
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
KESHEM
MASJIO MIAN OEH
MASJIO MIAN DEH
96.0
650.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13278 KESHEM
MASJID ML.ASHOR
MASJIO ML.ASHOR
195.0
470.0
2.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
13268 KESHEM
MASJID HL.JOURA '
MASJIO Ml.JOURA
750.0
1200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13322 KESHEM
MASJIO ML.ZARIF
MASJID Ml.ZARJF
500.0
850.0
60.0
0.0
12.0
0.0
13230 KESHEM
KANGOUR CHI
MASJIO NAGARAN
280.0
1600.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13192
13319
KESHEM
YAWAL BALA
MASJIO NIYAZI
120.0
450.0
4.0
0.0
3.3
0.0
13164
KESHEM
MIRKAN
MASJIO PAYAN
.320.0
1600.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
85.0
700.0
0.0
0.. 0
0.0
0.0
13200 KESHEM
MIYAN SHAHR
MASJIO QASHOAR
KESHEM
KANGOUR CHI
MASJIO SANG KALAN
260.0
1300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13229 KESHEM
KANGOURCHI
MASJIO SAR OARG
400.0
1500.0
0.0 .
0.0
0.0
0.0
14012 KESHEM
KOREST DEH
o.o
13225
MASJIO SAR OOWA
0.0
720.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2. 0 .
0.0
1. 5
0.0
3.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.8
0.0
----------------------------------------------------------~-------------
13190
KESHE~
KRESl DEH
MASJID SAR TAL
130.0
625.0
130.0
0. 0
13298 KESHEM
SHAKHAK
'
MASJ I0
13312 KESHEM
TEASHKAM
MASJID SHARQI
195.0
13330 KESHEM
GANOOM OOOL
MASJID WAKILHA
400.0
1300.0
3.0
0.0
MAULAWI QAZI
135.0
1100.0
9.0
0.0
6.7
0.0
Ml. SECANOAR
150.0
558.0
0.0
0.0
o·.o
·O.o
NAAIB HA
200.0
1000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
KESHEM
GANOOM
13275
KESHEM
ML. SECANDAR
QOOl
13217 KESHEM
NAAIB HA
13218 KESHEM
NABHAI GHARBI
KESHEM
OARA-E-QAQ
1328'5
KESHEM
DEH WASTALAN
13259 KESHEM
13223 KESHEM
13289 KESHEM
13272 KESHEM
13186 KESHEM
13213
KESHEM
13169 KESHEM
NABHAI GHARBI
750.0
1150.0
0.0
4.0
0.0
0.3
NAW ABAD
125.0
1500.0
3.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
NAW ABAD
60,0
1450.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
AC
13314
600.0
KU
13325
SHAKHAK
-----------------------
NAW ABAO
NAW ABAD
800.0
840.0
NAMAZGA
NAZIR BOY
180.0
780.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
KASHO
NOW ABAD
12.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NOW CHAY
NOW CHAY
900.0
1100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PALARAN
PALARAN
FARMANQULI
PAYAN OESHLAQ
KHAMBAK
PLAHRAN
20.0
600.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
580.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2070.0
1300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13252 KESHEM
QARA BOLAQ
QARA ·BOLAQ
700.0
1100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13233 KESHEM
CARlA PALARAN
QARIA KHSHK DARABALA
260.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13238 KESHEM
SUNG AB
QARIA SHAHAOA
925.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13187 KESHEM
QARYA DSHT KHWARK
QARYA OSHT KHWARK
255.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13188 KESHEM
QESHLAQ EASHAN
OESHLAQ EASHAN
35.0
280~0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13163 KESHEM
KHAMBAK
RABAT
475.0
740.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13208 KESHEM
KATOU
R~BAT
280.0
1000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13297 KESHEM
SOSAGAN
ROOGAH
0.0
700.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13162 KESHEM
SABZDARA NEEM OASTA
SABZOARA
600.0
1300.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13332 KESHEM
SAFIO REAG
SAFIO REAG
280.0
1400.0
2.0
1.0
0. 7
0.1
25
Form
No.
13282
Total
cultivated
land (jerib)
District
Area/mainvillage
village
KESHEM
SAMARQANDI
opuim poppy
cultivation
(jerib)
percent of
opium poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
1994
1995
1994
1995
SAMARQANDI
490.0
800.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13180
KESHEM
SANG AAB
SANG AAB
325.0
1200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13340
KESHEM
SANG KALAN
SANG KALAN
350.0
1000.0
3.0
2.0
0.9
0.2
13220
KESHEM
NAMAZGA
SAR SEBAKHSHA
900.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
---------------------------------__,...---,---·- --------- 0.0
0.0
13215 KESHEM
FARMAN QUll
SAR QESHLAO
128.0 1100.0
0.0
0.0
930.0
------------------------~----------- --- -------- --
13248
KESHEM
TAKYAH
SAR-E-JAR
13333
KESHEM
SARPESHANl
SARPESHANI
127.0
1100.0
2.0
13209
KESHEH
KATOU
SHAK DARA
470.0
1300.0
0.0
13235
KESHEM
SHAKESTAGAN
SHAKESTAGAN
189.0
1100.0
0.0
150.0
1600.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.0
1.6
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- --------- - ------ -· 13232 KESHEM
SARI GHARBI MAS
SARI GHARBI MAS
700.0 3600.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - ---- - -- ------------
KESHEM
TAKYAH
SHAKHDAN
150.0
1200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
KESHEM
SHOLASH DARA
SHOLASH DARA
600.0
800.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13241
KESHEM
SUNG AAB
SHUHAOA
1250.0
1800.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-1 3288
KESHEM
\IAJ18
SHUTARGARDAN
50.0
740.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13263
KESHEM
SOFIHA
SOFIHA
280.0
700.0
1.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
13181
KESHEM
SUNG AAB
270.0 1200.0
________
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
--------~-----__.;.
KESHEM
TAJARI
13237
KESHEM
OARA·E·JEAM
13243
KESHEM
DARA·E~JEAM
13338
KESHEM
TOTAIC
13299
ICES HEM
TOUGHAIC .:
13321
KESHEM
GANOOM QOOL
13159
KESHEM
13287
KESHEM
13315
KESHEM
13309
KESHEM
13242
KESHEM
KESHEH Total ·
_______
SSAAR -E-TANGI
__;_
~-- --- -- -- ---- -----··
TAJARI
680.0
750.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TALAK\IA GHIRAT
250.0
550.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TARNAB
200.0
600.0 ·
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTAIC
400.0
130.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOUGHAK
135.0
350.0
2.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
\IAHOAT ABAD
280.0
1300.0
200.0
0.0
71.4
0.0
AC
13266
KU
~3253
13273
KARAST DEH
\IA\IECH
35.0
1150.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
YARSAZ
YARSAZ
95.0
1000.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
YA\IAL
YAWAL PAYAN
560.0
500.0
10.0
0.0
1.8
0.0
OEH SAEYDAN
~AGHM
600.0
1100.0
5.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
OARA·E·JEAM
ZARDKHAK
1000.0
1200.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
OARA
65444
183104
600
0
17
13361
ZEBAK
AID ICHUARO
AID KHUARO
160.0
90.0
2.0
1.0
1.3
1.1
13024
ZEBAK
CHABCHI MAGHZAR
CHABCHI MAGHZAR
0.0
300.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.3
13450
ZEBAK
DAND
DANO
0.0
140.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.7
13359
ZEBAK
OASHT KHAN
DASHT KHAN
70.0
90.0
0.5
1.0
0.7
1.1
13349
ZEBAK
OASHT RABAT
DASHT RABAT
175.0
300.0
1.0
1.0
0.6
0.3
13355
ZEBAK
OEHGUL
DEHGUL
50.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
- - - - - - - - -ESKATOL
- - - - - - - -ESKATOL
------------ - - ---- 1.5- - 1.0
13348 ZEBAK
200.0
130.0
2.0
1.2
----------------------------------~~-----------
13346
ZEBAK
FARQOQ
FAROOQ
85.0
140.0
0.3
0.0
0.3
0.0
13362
ZEBAK
GHARIB
GHARIB
185.0
170.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.6
26
Opium poppy cultivation per village in ZEBAK district/BADAKHSHAN ( 1994-1995)
Form
No.
Total
cultivated
land (jeri b)
opuim poppy
cultivat1on
(jerib)
Area/main·
village
village
1994
1995
1994
GUL KANA
GUL KANA
100.0
150.0
0.0
13358 ZEBAK
ICAZDAN
ICAZDAN
13353 ZEBAK
KHAL KHAN
KHAL KHAN
13350 ZEBAIC
KIDA
ICIDA
Dtstrict
13351· ZEBAK
p~rcent of
op1um poppy
cultivation
1994
1995
1.0
0.0
0.7
0.6
0.4
1995
90.0
250.0
0.5
1.0
100.0
160.0
0.6
1.0
0.6
0.6
55.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
13352 ZEBAIC
KULALHA
KULALHA
70.0
200.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.5
13354 ZEBAK
MARKAZ·E·ZEBAK
MARKAZ·E·ZEBAK
140.0
550.0
3.0
2.0
2. 1
0.4
13356 ZEBAK
NO\JABAO SH 1NGOIC
NOWABAD SHINGOK
70.0
260.0
1.5
2.5
2.1
1.0
13360 ZEBAIC
RAZ RAK
RAZ RAK
60.0
280.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
0.4
SANGLUCH
SANGLUCH
60.0
400.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.3
13347 ZEBAK
TAKYA KHUBAN
TAKYA KHUBAN
25.0
130.0
0.5
0.0
2.0
0.0
13357 ZEBAK
ZAR KHAN
ZAR KHAN
200.0
300.0
2.5
1.0
1.3
0.1.
13345
ZEBAK
ZEBAK Total
Provincial Total
(2)·
15
19
258639 409063
20350
14857
0
8
4
~hanMes ~ comfear,tlve cultiva.lion tmures. at ~Uage h~vel are mainly due to Jwo major
acto s\ T ese a e 9 . anges 1n Vt lage ef1nitaon t rough Improved survey me tho ology and
land be1ng brought anto productaon.
Villages with no data indicated represent abandoned villages.
AC
Note:-( 1 )-
4140
KU
1895
KU
AC
ANNEXE-S
NGO's AND THEIR PROGRAMMES ·
1995 Comparative Survey Badakhshan Province" Afghanistan
ANNEX 5:
NGO's and their programmes.
BAHARAK
NGOs
MID
NAC
SCA
FAIZABAO
. MIO
MID
AAlD
MID
MID
MID
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
PAMJR
PAMJR
P.RB
PRB
SCA
SCA
UNICEF
·JURM
AAID
NCA
NCA
SCA
VITICULTURE
CONSTRUCTION
HEALTH
AGRICULTURE
AGRICULTURE/ROAD CONSTRUCTION
AGRICU~ TURE/IRRIGATION
AGRICULTURE/CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION
HEALTH
CONSTRUCT ION
EDUCATION
EDUCATION/IRRIGATION
HEALTH/CONSTRUCTION
\ HEALTH/CONSTRUCTION
. CONSTRUCTION
POTABLE WATER
ROAD CONST.RUCT ION
ROAD CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION
EDUC.ATION
HEALTH/AGRICULTURE
IRRIGATION
IRRIGATION
ROAD CONSTRUCTION
POTABL.E WATER
·CONSTRUCTION
AC
KESHEM
Type of programme
KU
District

1995 COMPARATIVE SURVEY - Afghanistan Digital Collections

Transcription

Similar documents

azu_acku_hv640_4_a_3_a_33_8_2_w.

CONTESTED COMMONS – MULTIPLE INSECURITIES OF

albar database of ngo activities - Afghanistan Digital Collections