Fiscal Oversight Module 1 - New York State School Boards
Transcription
Fiscal Oversight Module 1 - New York State School Boards
Safeguarding District Resources: Roles & Responsibilities Presenter: Jamie P. McPherson Leadership Development Manager © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY New School Board Member Mandated Training Day Two: Fiscal Oversight Training Module 1: Safeguarding District Resources: Roles & Responsibilities Module 2: Building School District Fiscal Fitness Module 3: Managing School District Fiscal Fitness Module 4: Monitoring School District Fiscal Fitness © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY What is Fiscal Oversight? Fiscal Oversight: • The supervision of a school district’s financial practice & policy implementation, as well as the review & monitoring of financial transactions & reports School Boards: • Stewards of public’s tax dollars • Fiduciary Responsibility: Oversee the district’s fiscal affairs to ensure public monies are properly accounted for, protected, & used efficiently © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Fiscal Management Overview Key Responsibilities: • Annually adopt a fiscally responsible budget • Annually adopt a tax rate sufficient to fund the budget (2% tax levy cap) • Ensure expenditures do not exceed approved budget • Review & monitor district finances on an ongoing basis • Audit all claims & approve all district purchases, or, appoint claims auditor © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Fiscal Management Overview • Adopt & implement policies & procedures that protect & properly account for school district funds & assets • Appoint treasurer, tax collector, audit committee, internal auditor & external auditor • Ensure the district undergoes an annual, independent audit • Designate purchasing agent & to certify payroll • Publish & file financial statements & reports with state © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Public Education in New York State © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Public Education in New York State 210,616 Teachers Total Salary Cost: $18,920,991,119 14,917 Administrators Total Salary Cost: $631,400,824 Source: NYSED © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Total number of buildings 5,247 Total number of charter schools 209 (state cap 406) Where Does the Money Come From? New York (Millions of Dollars) Total Federal State Local 55,244,109 3,694,050 23,111,427 28,438,632 © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Where Does The Money Go? New York State 2010 – 2011 average school district expenditures Source: Office of the State Comptroller © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY The Five Point Plan © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY How did We Get Here? Road to the 5 Point Plan © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY How did We Get Here? Road to the 5 Point Plan • 2002 – 2004: An investigation & audit of Roslyn revealed the largest embezzlement scandal in public education’s history ($11 Million) • 2005 State Legislature mandated OSC to conduct audits on all school districts & BOCES in NY • 2009 OSC completed the audits Source: NY Office of the State Comptroller © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY State Audit Findings Audit Report (733 audits of school districts & BOCES): • 19 school districts identified in outright fraud or theft • $615.4 million excess funds unnecessarily tied up in reserve funds • $7.7 in inappropriate or wasteful expenditures • $49.4 million in contracts awarded without competitive bid process Source: NY Office of the State Comptroller © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY 2005 Legislation - The 5 Point Plan Mandated Fiscal Oversight Training Strengthened Claims /Deputy Claims Auditor Function More Rigorous External Audit Requirements © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Audit “Oversight” Committee Internal Auditor Requirement The Claims Auditor • Claims Auditor: Verifies accuracy & legitimacy of district transactions as they occur throughout the year & reports directly to the board • Claim: Legal document (invoice) from a vendor or contractor demanding payment for provided goods or services • Voucher or Claims Packet: Contains all original documentation for purchases & transactions (purchase order, invoice, packing list / receiving report, requisition & standard claims form) © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY The Claims Auditor • Education Law requires board to audit & approve all claims (vouchers) for payment presented to the school district Two Options for Auditing Claims: 1. School board can audit each voucher packet (documentation for claim 2. School board can create claims auditor position through resolution and works at the pleasure of the board © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY The Claims Auditor 1. School Board as Claims Auditor • Each board member board must audit every voucher & be familiar with auditing process • Cannot delegate auditing responsibility to single member, rotate through different members, or a sub-committee 2. Appointing the Claims Auditor • Once auditor is appointed, board loses authority to audit & approve district bills • Cannot split duty between board & auditor © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY The Claims Auditor • Union Free, Central & Small City Districts with enrollment of 10,000 or more & Large City Districts – board may adopt a resolution to utilize a risk based or sampling methodology of auditing claims (Expires 07/01/14) - © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Methodology must reasonably assure all claims in sample represent proper charges Comptroller will review effectiveness of methodology to ensure accountability & issue report 1/15/14 The Claims Auditor Who Can and Cannot be Appointed? Prohibited from position Can hold position • Board member, clerk or treasurer • Superintendent • Business official or other district official (i.e. audit committee member) • Purchasing agent • Clerical or professional personnel related to district purchasing, accounting or business functions • Internal & external auditor • Residents or non-residents of the school district • District employees who are not specifically prohibited • Inter-municipal cooperative agreements • Shared services • Independent contractors © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY The Claims Auditor’s Responsibilities Audit each claim for payment against the district, verifying that: • The purchase is in compliance with law, regulation & district policy • All requisite forms in voucher packet are present & complete • All required authorization & signatures were obtained In short: Auditor verifies claim is true and accurate and informs treasurer to issue payment © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Auditing & Approving Claims • Suggested to use a standard claims form to ensure all documentation is present in a uniform & organized manner • Is the claim for a valid & legal purpose? • Was the purchase authorized & approved? • Are there sufficient budget appropriations to pay the claim? • Is the claim sufficiently itemized? © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Auditing & Approving Claims • Does the claim meet the legal & policy requirements in relation to competitive bidding & the district’s procurement policy? • Does the approved purchase order match the goods or services received? • Were the goods or services actually received? © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Fiscal AccountabilityThe 5 Point Plan Mandated Fiscal Oversight Training Strengthened Claims /Deputy Claims Auditor Function More Rigorous External Audit Requirements © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Audit “Oversight” Committee Internal Auditor Requirement The Audit Committee Education law requires every school district, except those employing less than eight teachers, to establish an audit committee with at least three members Role of Audit Committee: • An advisory committee that reviews & advises the board on issues relating to the district’s external & internal audit functions. © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Audit Committee Charter • Charter is required & must be board approved • Establishes guidelines, procedures & requirements to allow committee to operate effectively • Reviewed annually Charter Should Outline & Specify • Purpose/Mission • Duties/Responsibilities • Membership & frequency of meetings • Reporting requirements • Self-evaluation requirements © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY The Audit Committee’s Responsibilities External Audit Focus: • Provide recommendations to the board regarding appointment of the external auditor • Meet with external auditor prior to audit – Review engagement letter – Review & discuss risk assessment of district’s fiscal operations – Receive & review the draft annual audit report & draft management letter, including external auditors assessment of internal controls © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY The Audit Committee’s Responsibilities External Audit Focus: • Recommend acceptance of audit report & management letter • Review corrective action plan developed in response to audit report & assist with implementation of plan • Assist board in interpreting documents © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY The Audit Committee’s Responsibilities Internal Audit Focus: • Recommend appointment of internal auditor • Review & discuss annual audit plan to ensure high risk areas & key control activities are periodically tested & evaluated • Review all reports & findings of internal auditor • Monitor district’s implementation of internal auditor’s recommendations to strengthen internal controls • Monitor performance of internal audit function © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Audit Committee Composition Prohibited from position • All current & former (2 yrs) district employees including any board appointed position ( claims auditor, internal auditor, etc.) - includes close & immediate family members • Any current or former (2 yrs) provider of goods or services to district – includes close & immediate family • Anyone with direct or indirect business interest with district – current or within past 2 years © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Can hold position • Board Members - All, Some, or None − 3 members minimal who are financially literate − Do not have to be district resident Audit Committee Meetings & Reporting Meetings • Recommended to meet quarterly (minimum is annually) • Subject to Open Meetings Law • Can enter executive session as defined by law & commissioners regulations • Also enter executive session for reasons pertaining to external audit – Meet with external auditor prior to audit – Review external auditor’s risk assessment – Receive & review the draft annual report & management letter © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Audit Committee Meetings & Reporting Reporting: • Duty & responsibility to report to the board • Scope & breath of committee activities reflective in minutes or a summary of meetings • Committee’s review of draft annual report and accompanying management letter • Suspected fraud, waste, or abuse, or significant findings of internal control function • Significant non-compliances with laws or district policies • Other matters committee believes should be reported © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Audit Committee Self-Evaluation Areas of Focus: • Working relationship with management, auditors & board • Participation & contribution levels of members • Appropriate skill level of members • Committee size & number of meetings • Encourage & help establish “Tone at the Top” • Evaluation of internal auditor • Review of significant control deficiencies identified by internal / external auditors & management’s corrective action plan to address recommendations © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY 2005 Legislation - The 5 Point Plan Mandated Fiscal Oversight Training Strengthened Claims /Deputy Claims Auditor Function More Rigorous External Audit Requirements © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Audit “Oversight” Committee Internal Auditor Requirement Internal Audit – Mandate Relief • Amended: Subdivision 2 of section 2116-b of the Education Law • School districts with actual enrollment of less than 1,500 students in previous years enrollment have option to be exempt from internal audit requirement • Actual enrollment is reflected on annual Property Tax Report Card • Take effect July 1, 2013 © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Internal Audit School accountability law requires an internal audit function unless the district has • Less than eight teachers • General fund expenditures less than $5 million in previous school year • Actual enrollment is less than 1,500 students in previous school year Purpose: • Objective 3rd party that assists the board in ensuring financial risks are identified & appropriate internal controls are in place to address risks © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Internal Audit - Duties Duties Fall into Two Broad Categories: 1. Perform a Risk Assessment: – Includes review of financial policies & procedures, as well as testing & evaluating internal controls – Risk assessment must be reviewed & updated annually 2. Report to the Board of Education: – Make recommendations for improvements in controls & provides board with estimated time frame to implement recommendations © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Internal Audit – Risk Assessment Risk Assessment Process: • Annual test & evaluation of one or more of district’s internal controls to identify risks that could allow fraud and / or error to occur • Analyze / evaluate likelihood risk will result in fraud or error & level of risk • Determine appropriate method & cost to eliminate or control identified risks • Report to board findings of risk assessment & recommend changes to strengthen internal controls © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Internal Audit – Focus Areas Internal audit risk assessment may focus on areas such as • Payroll • Purchasing • Food service • Fixed asset policy • Extra-curricular activities fund • Budget transfers • Bank statements © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Internal Auditor Prohibited from position Can hold position • Anyone who does not meet professional auditing standards • Employee (including close & immediate family) of the district associated with business operations • Employee, officer, or contractor (including close & immediate family) providing goods or services to district • Anyone (including close & immediate family) with any contractual interest with district • Employee of district (with no connection to business operations) • Inter-municipal cooperative agreement • Shared services (as authorized by © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Education Law, Section 1950) • Independent contractor Note: person or firm should have experience with auditing standards & school district financial operations Evaluating the Internal Auditor Focus Areas: • Experience level • Scope of internal audit • Meeting & relationship with audit committee & management • Frequency of reports & significant findings to ensure effective action by management & audit committee © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY 2005 Legislation - The 5 Point Plan Mandated Fiscal Oversight Training Strengthened Claims /Deputy Claims Auditor Function More Rigorous External Audit Requirements © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Audit “Oversight” Committee Internal Auditor Requirement External Audit Laws & regulations require each school district employing eight or more teachers to secure an annual audit by an independent auditor Purpose: • Audit school district financial statements to render an opinion on adherence to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) • Ensure financial statements reflect accurate picture of financial picture of district © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY External Audit • Provide guidance on internal controls & audit testing, including specific types of testing • Audit report is presented to board – Draft is sent to audit committee – Based on findings, management has 90 days to prepare a corrective action plan which will be implemented the next fiscal year (July 1) © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Appointing your External Auditor • Must use RFP (Request for Competitive Proposal) to hire external auditor – Lowest responsible bidder • Engagement cannot exceed five years – After engagement, new RFP – Can use same firm if they win bid, but recommended to use different partner © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY External Auditor Qualifications MUST be a financial professional • Registered & licensed public accountant in NY • Meet required qualifications including at least 80 hours of completed professional education every two years • Have appropriate internal control quality system & undergo an external quality review at least once every three years © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY External Auditor Qualifications • Have experience in audits of governmental entities & federal single audits • Possess sufficient staff to complete a through audit in a timely manner • Be independent in fact & appearance © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Comptroller's Audit Report 2005 - 2009 © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Comptroller’s Audit Report • 2005 – 2009 Office of State Comptroller audited all school districts & BOCES in NY • Focus: Internal controls, policies, practices & operations to ensure adequate protection against fraud, waste, & abuse • Today: OSC conducts audits based on a risk-assessment process that may include – Investigations of alleged improprieties – Previous audit findings – Other financial indicators © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Comptroller Findings Financial Condition Problems • Inadequate reporting & recording of financial data – Prevented boards from monitoring fiscal condition in a timely manner – Over-expending appropriations & fund balances deteriorated, often to deficit Payroll Issues • Separation Payments: Lack of oversight regarding leave balances or payments for unused time were in accordance with contract © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Comptroller Findings Payroll Issues - continued • Payment for personal services without contracts – Poor internal controls & lack of oversight over policies & payroll – Allowed individuals to receive salary & unused leave time payments they were not entitled to Claims Auditor Deficiencies: • Incompatible business functions (authorize transaction & approve payment) • Approved claims without proper documentation or approval • Reported to management instead of board © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Comptroller Findings Information Technology (IT) • No acceptable-use standards for computers, internet, or email • No safeguards for data – anti-virus, password security, remote or physical access controls, or data backup systems • Access to financial software above job duties • No audit logs to identify or track individuals who accessed the system or the transactions they processed (no segregation of duties) © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Fiscal Stress Monitoring System © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Fiscal Stress Monitoring System Office of State Comptroller implemented a system to identify school districts that are in fiscal stress, as well as those showing susceptibility to fiscal stress • Fiscal Stress: School district’s inability to generate enough revenues within its current fiscal period to meet its expenditures • Monitoring will allow early intervention to prevent a district from ending up in severe fiscal stress • System is based on both financial & environmental indicators Source: NYS Office of the State Comptroller © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY How did We Get Here? Road to the 5 Point Plan © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Fiscal Stress Monitoring System • Fiscal Indicator: Calculated using financial data already filed in annual update documents (AUD) – Districts will be classified ranging from “significant fiscal stress” to “not in fiscal stress” • Environmental Indicators: Calculated using data from sources such as US Census Bureau, NYS Department of Labor, Taxation & Finance, Education, & financial information from AUD’s. – Goal: Identify districts that have a negative environmental atmosphere that causes or will potentially lead to fiscal stress Source: NYS Office of the State Comptroller © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Fiscal Stress Monitoring System Source: NYS Office of the State Comptroller © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Fiscal Stress Monitoring System Source: NYS Office of the State Comptroller © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Preventing Fraud, 5Waste Minute Break & Abuse © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Fraud, Waste & Abuse Fraud: The use of one’s occupation for personal enrichment through the deliberate misuse or misapplication of the employing organization’s resources or assets Waste: Not acquiring, protecting, or using resources in the most productive manner to achieve program objectives Abuse: Improper or questionable practice that violates the public trust Source: Association of Certified Fraud Examiners © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY National Fraud Statistics • Typical organization loses 5% of its revenues each year to fraud – in U.S. $652 billion • Median fraud loss was $140,000 - more than 1/5 of cases resulted in a loss of more than $1 million • On average, fraud occurred 18 months before being detected Source: ACFE 2012 Report to the Nations © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY National Fraud Statistics • 49% of victims did not recover any money from perpetrator • 6.4% of fraud occurred in education Source: ACFE 2012 Report to the Nations © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY National Fraud Statistics Education – 88 Cases Source: ACFE 2012 Report to the Nations Scheme Number of Percent of Cases Cases Billing 28 31.8% Expense Reimbursements 23 26.1% Skimming 19 21.6% Payroll 13 14.8% Check Tampering 11 12.5% Non‐Cash 7 8.0% Financial Statement Fraud 4 4.6% © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Who is most likely to commit the highest amount of fraud? © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Fraud Perpetrator Profile • 61% of fraud cases committed by men (higher rate of fraud among older men) • 41.2% of fraud committed by employees • Median loss for fraud committed by executives 3X more than employees • 40% fraud committed by two or more people • 87.9% fraud perpetrators have never been charged or convicted of a crime Source: Red Flags for Fraud ; NY Office of State Comptroller © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Why Does Fraud Occur? The Fraud Triangle Elements of Committing Fraud • Pressure: Some financial pressure that motivates individual to commit illegal act • Opportunity: Low risk of getting caught • Rationalization: Justifies the crime in a way that makes it acceptable Source: Donald R. Cressey, Other People's Money © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Do not view themselves or their actions as criminal Fraud, Waste & Abuse Factors Contributing to Fraud: • Poor internal controls • Management override of internal controls • Collusion between employees • Collusion between employees & third parties Fraud Myths: • Internal or external audits catch most fraud • Usually caused by individuals who have committed a previous crime • Only happens in large organizations © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY National Fraud Statistics Source: ACFE 2012 Report to the Nations © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Areas Most Susceptible to Fraud • Areas involving cash/assets (purchasing, cash receipts) • • • • Payroll & benefits Information Technology (IT) Financial reporting Credit cards, cell phones, travel & conferences © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY The Board’s Role Preventing Fraud, Waste & Abuse Boards should: • Set the tone at the top • Ensures policies exist, are up-to-date, & followed • Develop & receive recommendations for strengthening internal controls & policies • Communicate with audit committee • Read & understand reports • Oversight through observation & analysis (Red Flags) © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY The Role of Policy: Preventing Fraud, Waste & Abuse Use policy to set the tone at the top: • Clearly communicates board’s purpose & direction • Segregates, identifies, & explains fiscal duties (who does what) • Provides a time & method for periodic board monitoring • Is widely disseminated • Consistently reviewed & updated © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY The Policy Role Policies required by law: • Code of Ethics: Sets the standards of conduct reasonably expected of all board members & employees of the district • Investment Policy: Details district’s policies, procedures, & instructions for investing, monitoring & securing funds, as well as reporting investments • Procurement Policy: Policies & procedures for procurement of goods & services not subject to competitive bid © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY The Policy Role Recommended Policies: • Wire Transfer & Online Banking • Budget Transfers • Travel & Conference Reimbursement • Credit Card • Computer Use • District Cell Phone • Capital Asset Control • Claims / Internal / Eternal Auditor • Conflict of Interest • Whistleblower © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Top Ten Fraud Risk Indicators 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Key documents missing No separation of financial duties Accounting system in disarray Lack of policies that establish controls Inadequate monitoring to ensure internal controls work as intended 6. Ineffective accounting, information technology or Internal Audit Staff 7. Documentation that is photocopied or lacking essential information Source: Ohio State Auditor reporting on 8. Unusual employee behavior School Districts in Ohio 9. Tips or complaints about fraud 10. Lack of established code of ethical conduct © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Financial Red Flags • • • • • • • • • Payments made on non-business days “Out of season” payments Rounded payments Excessive transactions, esp. to one vendor Vendor & employee addresses match Purchases without shipping documents, or that bypass normal procedures Incomplete or untimely bank reconciliation Accepting invoice duplicates for payment Excessive number of year-end transactions Source: Red Flags for Fraud ; NY Office of State Comptroller © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Organizational Red Flags • • • • • • • • Weak or lax internal control environment No communication of expectations Too much trust in key employees Lack of proper authorization procedures Lack of attention to detail Lack of separation of duties Lack of physical security and/or key control Weak links in chain of controls and accountability • Lax management style • Inadequate training Source: Red Flags for Fraud ; NY Office of State Comptroller © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Detecting Fraud - Red Flags Source: ACFE 2012 Report to the Nations Behavioral Red Flags Behavioral Red Flags of Perpetrators Behavior % of Cases Reported Living Beyond Means 35.6% Financial Difficulties 27.1% Unusually Close Association with Vendor 19.2% Wheeler‐Dealer Attitude 14.8% Irritable, Suspicious or Defensive 12.6% Addiction Problems 8.4% Refusal to Take Vacations 6.5% Family / Peer Pressure for Success 4.7% © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY If Fraud is Suspected Action Steps: • Ensure district has a Whistleblower Policy & is clearly communicated to all employees • Employees should be able to make tips without fearing for their safety or job • Monitor district finances & ensure claims auditor, internal auditor & audit committee are properly trained to detect red flags 44% of fraud is detected by tip © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY If Fraud is Suspected Action Steps: • Do not ignore red flags – take action (What are the consequences if you don’t?) • Follow the chain of command • If suspect is within the chain contact another source (OSC, school attorney, State Ed, etc) • All reported cases of fraud, waste, or abuse should be investigated by proper authority (sometimes an error is just an error) 44% of fraud is detected by tip © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Summary of Board’s Role in Financial Oversight © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Summary of the Board’s Role in Financial Oversight Monitoring Reviewing & Managing Control Systems Control Activities Policies & Activities to Eliminate or Minimize Risks Risk Assessment Identification & Analysis of Relevant Risks Control Environment “Setting the Tone at the Top” Source: COSO Internal Controls Pyramid © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY Presenter: Jamie P. McPherson – Leadership Development Manager Email: [email protected] Phone: (518) 783 - 0200 © 2013 New York State School Boards Association, Latham NY