Scientific Creativity in Psychiatry

Scientific Creativity in Psychiatry
Published on Physicians Practice (http://www.physicianspractice.com)
Scientific Creativity in Psychiatry
January 26, 2015
By Ronald W. Pies, MD [1]
Readers of Albert Rothenberg’s new book will come away greatly enriched by the author’s own
lifelong, creative synthesis.
BOOK REVIEW
Flight From Wonder: An Investigation of Scientific Creativity
by Albert Rothenberg, MD; New York: Oxford University Press, 2015 (USA)
248 pages • $35.00 (hardcover)
I was a sophomore in college when Dr Albert Rothenberg published his
seminal paper on “Janusian thinking” in the Archives of General Psychiatry.1 Dr Rothenberg defined
Janusian thinking as “. . . the capacity to conceive and utilize two or more opposite or contradictory
ideas, concepts, or images simultaneously” and related this faculty to the creative process in art,
literature, architecture, music, science, and mathematics.
Now, almost 45 years later, Dr Rothenberg has published another groundbreaking work, this time
reporting on an empirical study of Nobel laureates from the US and Europe. Using a semi-structured
interview protocol, Rothenberg’s goal was “. . . to understand the psychological processes in
creativity as thoroughly as possible.” To provide a reasonable control group, Rothenberg also
interviewed a group of accomplished faculty members of a leading engineering institute.
What is the nature of the creative process? This has been the subject of philosophical, poetic, and,
more recently, scientific speculation since ancient times. In Plato’s dialogue, Ion, Socrates insists
that the poet writes through divine inspiration, when “. . . he has been inspired and put out of his
senses, and his mind is no longer in him . . .”2 (The poet, Ion, is dubious of this claim). Indeed, there
is a popular notion that creativity is intimately linked with mental illness or “madness”—a canard
that Dr Rothenberg has debunked in several of his writings. Indeed, in the concluding chapter of the
present book, Rothenberg observes that “. . . full psychological health and lucidity would be optimal
for all types of creativity.”
What faculties or psychological states do foster the highest forms of creativity? Rothenberg’s
research finds that three processes are critical: Janusian thinking, homospatial processes, and
“sep-con articulation.” As noted above, Janusian thinking entails the ability to maintain,
simultaneously, two or more contradictory ideas or images in the mind (Janus was the Roman god
depicted as having one face looking toward the future, the other to the past). Those of a literary bent
will find a striking affinity between the Janusian process and what the poet, John Keats, called
“negative capability”—broadly speaking, “a willingness to let what is mysterious or doubtful remain
just that.”3 Psychiatrists will readily see how this cognitive flexibility relates to the process of doing
psychotherapy—surely, a form of high creativity in the right hands.
Page 1 of 2
Scientific Creativity in Psychiatry
Published on Physicians Practice (http://www.physicianspractice.com)
Homospatial processes involve imagining two or more discrete entities as occupying the same
space. For Rothenberg, such “superimposition” is integral in the formation of metaphors; eg, when
the poet writes, “...the branches were handles of stars,” he places “branches” and “handles of stars”
in the same psychic space.
Finally, there is sep-con articulation—Rothenberg’s shorthand for a process in which the creative
mind uses both separation and connection to achieve an integrated whole. This is the most abstract
and complex of Rothenberg’s three processes, and the hardest to explain. But perhaps we can use
the therapeutic alliance as a useful point of entry.
The therapist, in attempting to understand the patient, is constantly aware of herself as a discrete
person with a unique personal history, separate from that of the patient, but also as someone who
can understand and empathize with the patient’s life experiences—perhaps even entering into the
disturbed inner world of the patient’s psyche, in a transient and controlled way. Through such a
process of ongoing “separation and connection,” the therapist is able to engage in an act of creative
synthesis—facilitating therapeutic change in the patient while also fostering self-understanding.
Rothenberg is able to show how this dyadic “sep-con” process has led to numerous scientific
discoveries, in fields as diverse as genetics and quantum mechanics.
But Rothenberg is well aware that emotion is also a critical part of the creative process, and devotes
an entire chapter to the proposition that creativity requires intense motivation, risk-taking and
courage. Indeed, as psychologist Rollo May3 observed in his book, The Courage to Create, “. . . every
creative encounter is a new event; every time requires another assertion of courage.”4(p26) Real
creativity demands passion. It sometimes involves mastering—or better, harnessing—rebellious or
aggressive feelings, as Rothenberg notes. For all these reasons, one might conclude that creativity is
born not of “madness” or divine possession, but through a painstaking, synergistic process requiring
considerable cognitive and emotional health.
In closing, I believe that readers of Albert Rothenberg’s new book will come away greatly enriched by
the author’s own lifelong, creative synthesis.
References:
1. Rothenberg A. The process of Janusian thinking in creativity. Arch Gen Psychiatry.
1971;24:195-205.
2. Plato’s Ion. Translated by W.R.M. Lamb. http://www.hermes-press.com/plato_ion2.htm. Accessed
January 20, 2015.
3. Hebron S. John Keats and ‘negative capability.
www.bl.uk/romantics-and-victorians/articles/john-keats-and-negative-capability. Accessed January
20, 2015.
4. May R. The Courage to Create. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.; 1975.
Source URL: http://www.physicianspractice.com/psychotherapy/scientific-creativity-psychiatry
Links:
[1] http://www.physicianspractice.com/authors/ronald-w-pies-md
Page 2 of 2