Philippine Coral Reef Fisheries - FTP-UNU
Transcription
Philippine Coral Reef Fisheries - FTP-UNU
Philippine Coral Reef Fisheries - Challenges and Frustrations PORFIRIO M. ALIÑO, PhD The Marine Science Institute University of the Philippines Diliman 1101 Quezon City PHILIPPINES Philippine Coral Reef Fisheries [ In the distant Past] “Teach a man to fish and he will have food for the rest of his life” [ Now] “Teach a man to fish and he will resort to unsustainable methods to remain competitive with the overabundance of fisherman” Anonymous (White and Trinidad-Cruz 1998) The Philippines is blessed with having one of the most extensive coral reefs (2nd to Indonesia in the ASEAN) found in the heart of the highest diversity region in the marine world (Burke et al. 2001). Reef fisheries has been estimated to directly contribute to around 15 – 30% of the total national municipal fisheries (Murdy and Ferraris 1980, Carpenter and Alcala 1977). Its total reef area covers around 27,000 – 44,000 km2 (Table 1) (Burke et al. 2001, Carpenter and Alcala 1977, Gomez 1980 and White and CruzTrinidad 1998). One of the hypothesis for the significance of the high biodiversity in coral reefs concerns the resilience of this ecosystem to various natural stresses, perhaps not including the stresses in relation to fisheries overexploitation (Fig. 1). In this Table 1. Basic geographic and economic indicators (Source: Burke et al. 2001) Figure 1. Major observed threats to coral reefs (Source: Burke et al. 2001) region of high diversity, the Filipinos’ high dependence on this important life support system is put to a test (Table 2). In the Philippines nearly 70% of the protein food intake is from fish. The stark contrast between poverty, hunger and deprivation amidst this increasing want is the rapidly declining reef resources (Fig. 2) (White and Cruz-Trinidad 1998). It is no surprise that it is in the Philippines that reefs are in the highest risk from overexploitation, destructive fishing and other human related impacts such as coastal development and sedimentation (Burke et al. 2001). To date, over 70% are in a poor state and less than 5% are in excellent condition (Licuanan and Gomez 2000). In addition, there is increasing evidence that the Table 2. Total annual economic benefits derived from coral reefs, fisheries and mangroves in the Philippines, 1996. (Source: White and Cruz-Trnidad 1998) Figure 2. Trend of catch per unit of effort in Olango Island Cebu, Philippines. (Source: White and Cruz-Trinidad 1998) susceptibility of reefs to El Niño related bleaching events and their recovery rates is related to the wellbeing of the diverse assemblage of species and functional integrity (e.g. trophic diversity) (Nañola et al. 2000, Arceo et al. 2000). These studies suggest that it is difficult to tease out the interaction of naturally induced stresses vis-à-vis human induced pressures. Jackson et al. (2001) have shown that various fisheries in the world have undergone various phases of decline due to fisheries overexploitation and that reefs are stark examples of phase shifts (i.e., coral dominated to algal domination) in the habitat’s Table 3. Summary of mean catch rate (catch per trap) and catch composition data for trap fishing on reef and associated stocks in the Caribbean, Indian Ocean and South Pacific regions (Source: Dalzell 1996) Table 3. (continuation) benthic community structure (McClanahan, 1990 in Jennings and Lock, 1996). Nowhere is the understanding of reefs and its management, as challenging and frustrating as in the area of highest diversity and of complex societal development demands (Roberts et al. 2002). Consider the Philippines’ experience and learn how from its successes and failures so we may use this to improve our understanding and effectiveness in managing complex ecosystems. This complexity of the coral reef ecosystem is manifested in the varied fishing systems, and fishing gear interactions in the highly diverse multi-species reef fishery. Christensen (1995) has utilized the coral reef as one Table 4. Summary of catch rates (CPUE, catch-per-unit effort) and catch composition from spear fishing on South Pacific reefs. (Source: Dalzell 1996) Table 5. Estimated yields from reef fisheries in the Indian Ocean, Caribbean and South Pacific (Source: Dalzell 1996) of the examples in his ecopath models of a mature ecosystem in his proposition of the linkage of carrying capacity and the ecosystem “maturity” in the development of management approaches to complex marine ecosystems. Polunin et al (1996) cites Aliño et al (1993) that the development of more computer friendly multispecies models may help facilitate investigations and hypotheses generations (Fig. 5). Philippine reef fisheries exemplify not only the various types of overfishing but also the widespread prevalence in the Philippines. From the oceanic reefs Figure 5. Ecopath model of Bolinao reef ecosystem. (Source: Aliño et al 1993) (1) Rakenet usedto collect shellsandsmall fishfromseagrassbeds (2) Seagrassand branchingcoral (Acropora) onthereef flat (3) Seaurchins (Tripneustesgratilla) from thereefflat. of the Kalayaan Islands in the west of the Philippines, the Tubataha reefs in the Sulu Sea, and the fringing reefs around the archipelago we see varying degrees of exploitation. Hilomen et al. 2000, and Aliño et al. 1996 show how understanding the dynamics of reef fish assemblages give an idea of the state and pressures of overexploitation. (4) Small fishcapturedby gillnet onthereef flat. REVISITING THE CONCEPT OF FISHING DOWN THE FOOD CHAIN STORY Figure 6. Scenes from Bolinao reef flat fisheries (part 1). (Source: McManus et al. 1992) (5) Fishtrapcamouflagedwith corals. (6) Creel openedtoreveal several capturedspecies. (7) Anchor designedtocatchon corals. Figure 7. Scenes from the Bolinao reef fisheries (part 2). (Source: McManus et al. 1992) It would seem that the initial reports of Hughes (1994) on how fisheries affect the coral reef‘s benthic community structure complements well with Pauly et al’s fishing down the food chain story. McManus (1997) presentation about the Bolinao reef fisheries (McManus et al 1992, Figs. 6-8) also suggests that indeed there might be this cascading effect in the change in the species composition of its fish assemblages (Fig. 9). Recently, we have suggested that in just less than a decade reef fish standing stocks are half than what has been recorded two decades ago (Deocadez et al. 2001) (Table 6). The case of Bolinao and Lingayen Gulf is a familiar case in many developing countries where much of the fisheries management approaches have been based on “demand” side concerns (e.g. how much allowable catch of single species stocks). In addition the development concerns of the stakeholders have not been appropriately considered (e.g. the scale of the stock boundaries [e.g. area of management vis-àvis stakeholder and user domains and fisheries resources interaction] and the effective tools to manage the resources). COMPLEMENTATION OF SINGLE SPECIES VIS-A-VIS MULTI-SPECIES APPROACH: CONSIDER THE SMALL VERSUS THE LARGE MARINE PROTECTED AREA (10) Spear gunsarecarvedfrom wood, andarepoweredbyrubber strips. (11) Gillnetterslapsthewaterto frightenfishintothenet. (12) Close-upof afishcorral. Figure 8. Scenes from Bolinao reef fisheries (part 3). (Source McManus et al. 1992) Earlier (in the South China Sea lecture) we have learned that with the multispecies approach, one has to take into consideration the species interactions (e.g. predatory losses versus fishing mortality). Its implication to management is that despite the high species diversity of the reef fisheries, its resilience (upper carnivores like sharks have been disseminated and also the sea urchin herbivores) is not as robust as expected and well understood in terms of how fish stocks can withstand increased fishing pressure. In addition, the trajectory of development of the fisheries assemblage is not as easily prescribed (e.g. linear Figure 9. Species abundance profiles of adult reef slope fish from year-end months. (Source: McManus et al 1992) directionality or unidirectionally or the multidimensional aspects are not well determined) both in the social development perspective and in the biophysical context. In Bolinao, ever since the late 1980’s fisheries resources decline have been perceived but the solutions to this situation have not been well agreed upon by the stakeholders in the area. Most fishers contend that there was not really a considerable decline of the stocks but rather just an increase in the number of fishers. Initial interventions in regulating the major harvested stocks by banning the commercial harvest of the sea urchin Tripnuestes gratilla and close season regulations for the rabbitfish Siganus fuscescens have been too late and inadequate (JunioMenez et al. 1998) (Fig. 10). Perhaps the observation’s in Deocadez’s et al. (2001) are already the indication of a phase shift as described by McClanahan (1990) as cited by Jennings and Lock Table 6. Fish abundance in counts per 1000 m-2 in six municipalities in Lingayen Gulf from 1988-2000. (Source: Deocadiz et al. 2001) CRMPA 1988 CRSPA 1992 UNDPB 1997 UNPDB 1998 UNDPB 1999 PANGASINAN Bolinao 764 + 88 800 +164 714 +202 610 +195 831 + 106 Anda 588 + 120 Site SEP.A 1999 SEP.A 2000 315 +121 240 +78 Alaminos Sual A 347 + 179 216+ 52 319 +83 LA UNION Bauang 200 +74 San Fernando 197 +54 Values are lumped over a multiple-year monitoring period censuses were conducted within Malilnep Marine Protected area B This study Figure 10. Sea urchin harvest profile in Bolinao, Pangasinan. (Source: Junio-Meñez et al. 1998) (1996) (Fig.11). Thus after 1995, the sea urchin stock collapsed and smaller rabbitfish are now being harvested. A 150 hectare area was initially proposed based on the spawning migratory route of the rabbitfish (Pastor et al. 2000). After negotiating for over six years for the establishment of a fish sanctuary in the area, the consensually agreed size has been considerably reduced to around 20 hectares without any effective implementation of management. The primary resistance to the establishment of a no-take fish sanctuary is that, it would threaten the livelihood of over a thousand subsistence fishers in the area. Some innovative ways had to be pursued such that the facilitation of setting up of de-facto reproductive reserves was pursued (Arceo et al. 2000 and Pastor et al. 2000). Eventually other village fisher Figure 11. Relationship between the abundance of coral (c), algae (a) and sea urchin (u) after reefs have been subjected to different fishing regimes for a period of 30 years. Adapted from the results of a model developed by McClanahan (1990) as cited by Jennings and Lock (1996) Figure 12. Projected changes in the number of coral species (filled circles), the abundance of corals (open circles) and fish catch (triangles) if sedimentation from logging operations (filled squares) were to continue for a 10 year period at El Nido, Palawan. (Source: Hodgson and Dixon (1988) adapted by McManus 1996) cooperators have been motivated to establish growout areas for sea – urchins and rabbitfish (JuinioMenez et al. 1998 and Pastor et al. 2000). The Bolinao experience shows that establishing notake areas are important but with the complex multispecies fishery and diverse user groups multipronged approaches are necessary to make some headway. In the example of Palawan (Fig. 12) (Hodgson and Dixon 1988), as in the Bolinao fisheries, management measures have to be pursued in the context of integrated coastal management (Arceo et al. 2000), vis-a-vis stopping logging and benefit from ecotourism and sustainable municipal fisheries. Scenes from the Pa-aling Reef Fisheries Adapted from Miclat et al. 1991 Figure 13. Schematic diagram of the Pa-aling drive-in reef fisheries adapted from Miclat et al. 1991. Figure 14. Fishermen with scareline hoses disembarking from mothership. (Source: Miclat et al. 1991) Photo courtesy of BFAR Interagency Task Force Photo courtesy of BFAR Interagency Task Force Figure 15. Fishermen prepare arrangement of scareline hoses with their support compressor boats. (Source: BFAR 1992) Figure 16. A closer look of how the scare line hose (with lead weights) and bubbles blow to scare fish towards the set net . (Source: BFAR 1992) Photo courtesy of BFAR Interagency Task Force Figure 17. Underwater haul of net fishing on reefs not using Pa-aling. (Source: BFAR 1992) Figure 18. An underwater scene of Pa-aling indicates it’s high efficiency in the South China Sea reefs. (Source: BFAR 1992) The importance of a bigger picture outlook is seen in the evolution of the commercial reef fishery called “muro-ami”. Banned in 1986, the clamor to lift the ban on muro-ami was seen more to modify a fishing gear to be less destructive, rather than in regulating a very effective gear (Miclat et al. 1991). Thus, the bubble fishing scareline technique called “pa-aling” was developed (Figs. 13 to 19). The development and eventual permission of this fishing gear required that a mechanism for the monitoring and evaluation of this fishery is put in place. Aside from the child labor concerns associated with the gear, the area of operation for this gear was also restricted in the Sulu Sea and South China Sea. Abesamis et al. 2000 has shown that aside from the difficulties in implementing compliance in the areas of operations for the gear, the high efficiency of the gear has already shown a decline in the catch rates of the reef assemblages (Fig. 19). Indeed, this exacerbates the already fully exploited fisheries in the area and reefs susceptibility to coral bleaching (Alino et al. 1998 and Arceo et al. 2000 in press). The reef fisheries in the Philippines have become very highly evolved and show the great continuing challenges to the science and management of its multispecies fisheries. McManus et al. (1992) and Pastor et al (2000) has shown that reef fisheries management in Bolinao needs to be viewed in a more holistic context of integrated coastal management and a macro-level outlook of societal development (Figs 20 and 21). In addition, marine reproductive reserves in tandem with other enhancement mechanisms are urgently needed. 1996 1997 1998 1.90 to 1.30 mtons/yr 1.30 to 0.70 0.70 to 0.10 Source: UPMSI - DA/BFAR collaboration, Abesamis et al. (in press) Figure 19. Catch-per-unit of effort (CPUE) from monitoring of pa-aling (1996-1998). (Source: UPMSI-DA/BFAR collaboration, Abesamis et al. 2000) Aquaculture has been considered as one of the solutions to the declining fish yields in coastal zone. Unfortunately, with the rapid growth of the industry it has brought considerable environmental and economic concerns. Figure 20. Photos of proliferation of fishepen in Lingayen Gulf by Dr. Gil S. Jacinto of The Marine Science Institute. Some recommendations for future actions Learning from the “pa-aling” reef fisheries not only highlights the concerns and susceptibility of reef fisheries to fishing, but that no-take areas go beyond local boundary concerns. Much as there is susceptibility in some areas, it is important that there are also areas for source of larvae to replenish the areas of death. Indeed, we should turn our frustrations into reefs of hope for the survival of the future generation’s heritage and our life support system. 1. Enhance capabilities of Fisheries and Aquatic Resource Management Councils (FARMC) and foster participation by stakeholders. 2. Clarify development and management goals, and facilitate transparency and accountability in fisheries resource management and governance mechanisms. 3. Explore innovative ways of regulating fishing effort and more effective ways of enforcement and compliance. 4. Explore incentives for livelihood linked to sustainable resource management and disincentives for unsustainable practices. 5. Improve effectiveness of enhancement and rehabilitation measures through an ecosystem and integrated management approach. Figure 21. The participatory municipal coastal development plan of Bolinao, Pangasinan helps to provide an integrated framework through zoning and community stewardship. (Source: Junio-Menez et al. 2000) REFERENCES Abesamis RA, Jocson DG, Aliño PM (2000) Commercial-scale fishing on Philippine coral reefs. Abstracts, 9th Int Coral Reef Symp, 23-27 Oct 2000, Bali, Indonesia, p 275 Aliño PM, Dantis AL (1996) Lessons from the biodiversity studies of reefs: going beyond quantities and qualities of marine life. In Campos WL (ed) Proc Symp Marine Biodiversity in the Visayas and Mindanao, pp 78-85 Aliño PM, Nañola CL, Ochavillo DG, Rañola MC (1998) The fisheries potential of the Kalayaan Island Group, South China Sea. In Morton B (ed) Proc 3rd Int Conf Marine Biology of the South China Sea, Hong Kong, 28 October – 1 November 1996, pp 219-226. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong Aliño PM, McManus LT, McManus JW, Nañola CL Jr, Fortes MD, Trono GC Jr, Jacinto GS (1993) Initial parameter estimations of a coral reef flat ecosystem in Bolinao, Pangasinan, northwestern Philippines, p. 252-258. In V. Christensen and D. Pauly (eds) Trophic models of aquatic ecosystems. ICLARM Conf. Proc. 26:390p. Arceo HO, Quibilan MCC, Aliño PM (2000) Patterns of recovery of bleached reefs in the Philippines: the importance of management strategies. Abstracts, 9th Int Coral Reef Symp, 2327 Oct 2000, Bali, Indonesia, p 261 Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) (1992) Final report on the monitoring and observation of the Pa-aling fishing technique 25 p Philippines Department of Agriculture Burke L, Kura Y, Kassem K, Revenga C, Spalding M, McAllister D (2001) Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: coastal ecosystems. World Resources Institute, Washington DC Carpenter KE, Alcala AC (1977) Philippine coral reef fisheries resources. Part II. Muro-ami and kayakas reef fisheries, benefit or bane? Philipp J Fish 15(2): 217-235 Christensen V (1995) Ecosystem maturity – towards quantification. Ecol Modelling 77: 3-32 Dalzell P (1996) Catch rates, selectivity and yields of reef fishing. In Polunin NVC, Roberts CM (eds) Reef fisheries, pp 161- 192. Chapman and Hall, London Deocadez MD, Aliño PM, Bautista ALS, Gaite PA, Roquillo B and Prado V (2001) Refining indicators of overfishng: revisiting the lessons from Lingayen Gulf. Abstracts, 6th National Symposium in Marine Science, p38, October 2001. Silliman University, Dumaguete City, 65p Gomez ED (1980) Status report on research and degradation problems of the coral reefs of the East Asian Seas. In Meeting of Experts to review the Draft Action Plan for the East Asian Seas, 17-21 June 1980, Baguio City. UNEP/WG 41/INF, South China Sea Fish Dev Coord Prog, Manila, 68 p Hilomen VV, Nañola CL Jr, Dantis RV (2000) Status of Philippine reef fish communities. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Status of Philippine Reefs, 24 Jan 2000, Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City Hodgson G, Dixon JA (2000) El Nido Revisited: Ecotourism, Logging and Fisheries. In: Cesar HSJ (ed) Collected Essays on the Economics of Coral Reefs. CORDIO Department for Biology and Environmental Sciences, Kalmar University, SE39282 KALMAR, Sweden 244 p Jackson JBC, Kriby MX, Berger WH, Bjorndal KA, Botsford LW, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke R, Erlandson J, Estes JA, Hughes TP, Kidwell S, Lange CB, Lenihan HS, Pandolfi JM, Peterson CH, Steneck RS, Tegner MJ and Warner RR (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629-638 Jennings S, Lock JM (1996) Population and ecosystem effects of reef fishing. In Polunin NVC, Roberts CM (eds) Reef fisheries, pp 193-218. Chapman and Hall, London Juinio-Meñez MARJ, Salmo III SG, Tamayo E, Estepa NG, Bangi HGP and Aliño PM (2000) “Bugsay”. Community environmental education: experiences from Bolinao, northern Philippines. Community-Based Coastal Resources Management Program, Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines, 126p. Juinio-Meñez MAR, Macawaris ND, Bangi HD (1998) Community-based sea urchin (Tripneustes gratilla) grow-out culture as a resource management tool. In Jamieson GS, Campbell A (eds) Proc North Pacific Symp on Invertebrate Stock Assessment and Management, Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 125: 393-399 Licuanan WY, Gomez ED (2000) Philippine coral reefs, reef fishes, and associated fisheries: status and recommendations to improve their management. GCRMN Report, 44 p Miclat RI, Aliño PM, Aragones N, Nañola CL jr and Aguilar E (1991) Pa-aling: an alternative to muroami? Philippine Journal of Fisheries 22:39-48 Murdy EO, Ferraris CJ Jr (1980) The contribution of coral reef fisheries to Philippine fisheries production. ICLARM Newsletter 3: 11-21 McManus JW, Nañola CL Jr, Reyes RB Jr, Kesner KN (1992) Resource ecology of the Bolinao coral reef system ICLARMS Stud Rev 22, 117 p McManus JW (1996) Social and economic aspects of reef fisheries and their management. In Polunin NVC, Roberts CM (eds) Reef fisheries, pp 249281. Chapman and Hall, London McManus JW (1997) Tropical marine fisheries and the future of coral reefs - a brief review with emphasis on Southeast Asia. p 129. 8th Int Coral Reef Symp, 1996, Panama, USA Nañola CL Jr, Dantis AL, Quibilan MC, Arceo HO, Abesamis A, Aliño PM. (2000) Fish-benthos correlations in some offshore and shelf reefs in the Philippines. Abstracts, 9th Int Coral Reef Symp, 23-27 Oct 2000, Bali, Indonesia, 242p Pastor DS, Castrence FI, PM Aliño and Junio-Meñez MA (2000) Challenges and frustrations in an overfished multi-species reef fisheries. Abstracts, 9th Int Coral Reef Symp, 23-27 Oct 2000, Bali, Indonesia, 275p Polunin NVC, Roberts CM, Pauly D (1996) Developments in tropical reef fisheries science and management. In Polunin NCV, Roberts CM (eds) Reef fisheries, pp 361-377 Chapman and Hall, London Roberts CM, McClean CJ, Veron JEN, Hawkins, JP, Allen GR, McAllister DE, FcHueler FW, Spalding M, Wells F, Vyime C, Werner TB (2002) Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs. Science 295:1280-1284 White AT, Cruz-Trinidad A (1998) The values of Philippine coastal resources: why protection and management are critical, pp . Coastal Resources Management Project, Cebu City, Philippines, 96 p