here - City of Boynton Beach

Transcription

2
0
1
3
THEDEVELOPMENTATLAS
OF
THECI
TYOFBOYNTON BEACH
De
pa
r
t
me
ntofDe
ve
l
opme
nt
Di
vi
s
i
onofPl
a
nni
nga
ndZoni
ng
Table of Contents
City Boundaries Map
Part 1 – Demographic Trends
I - The population growth
II - Demographic profiles: City and its four sectors
1. Racial and ethnic characteristics
2. Median age, and age distribution
3. Household composition
4. Education
5. Population mobility and foreign-born residents
6. Household income characteristics
Summary of Sector Characteristics
Part 1 Maps
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Nonwhites as percent of population in 2010 by census tract numbers
Blacks/African Americans as percent of population in 2010 by census tract numbers
Hispanics/Latino as percent of population in 2010 by census tract numbers
Haitian population in 2000 by census tract numbers
Haitian population 2007-2011
Median Age of population and percent of persons 65 and older by census tract
Median household income in 2008 by census tract
Average household size and percent of one person household in 2010 by census tract
Median household income 2007-2011 by census tract numbers
Part 2 – Housing and Residential Development
I Changing Stock characteristics and construction activity
1. Existing housing
2. Trends in new construction
II Trends in housing values
1. A look at housing values in City and its sectors
2. Housing values as reflected by City tax roll
3. Residential sales
III Vacant residential land
Part 2 Maps
• Owner occupied housing as percent of all occupied unites in 2010 by census tract numbers
• Units for seasonal/recreational or occasional use as percent of all units in 2010, by census
tract
• Median value of owner occupied housing, 2007-2011 by census tract numbers
Part 3 – Economy and Commercial Development
I Location advantages
II Real property tax base
1. A regional picture
2. The City’s real property tax base
III New commercial development
1. Palm Beach County commercial markets overview
2. Commercial approvals
IV Vacant land
V Boynton’s industry and labor force profiles
1.
2.
The industry profiles
The Boynton’s workforce profile
Appendix A – Boynton Beach Census Geography 2010 and Sector Boundaries
City of Boynton Beach Census Tracts 2010
City of Boynton Beach Census Tracts 2010 with sector boundaries
Appendix B – Demographic Data
Table 1 – Population Profile, Census 2010
Table 2 – Profile of Social Characteristics: 2009-2011
Table 3 – Population Trends and Projections
Table 4 – Population Changes by Census Tract, 2000-2010
Table 5 – Population Age Distribution by Census Tract, 2010
Table 6 – Race and Hispanics by Census Tract, 2010
Table 7 – Household Characteristics by Census Tract, 2010
Table 8 – Household Income Distribution by Census Tract, 2008
Table 9 – Educational Attainment by Census Tract, 2008
Table 10 – Haitian Population by Census Tract, 2000
Appendix C – Housing Data
Table 1 – Boynton Beach Housing Profile: Census 2010 and American Community Survey
2009-2011
Table 2 – Boynton Beach Housing Inventory, 2012
Table 3 – Changes in Housing Stock by Census tract, 2000-2010
Table 4 – Changes in Tenancy Status by Census Tract, 2000-2010
Table 5 – Changes in Housing Occupancy by Census Tract, 2000-2010
Table 6 – Value Distribution of Owner Occupied Units by Census Tract, 2008
Table 6A – Value Distribution of Owner Occupied Units, ACS 2007-2011
Table 7 – Residential Building Permits, 1991-2012
Appendix D – Commercial Development and Economic Data
Table 1 – Boynton Beach Economic Profile, 2009-2011
Table 2 – Changes inn City’s Taxable Value of Residential, Commercial and Industrial Land
Uses, 2000-2012
Table 3 – Commercial and Industrial Permit Values, 1992-2012
Table 4 – New Commercial and Industrial Project Approvals, 2003-2012
Appendix E – Selected County Data
Table 1 – Palm Beach County Profile of Selected Demographic, Housing and Economic
Characteristics, American Community Survey, 2009-2011
Table 2 – Selective Comparative 2012 Statistics for Boynton Beach, Delray Beach and Boca
Raton
Table 3 – Population Changes in Palm Beach County Municipalities, 1990-2010
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
LAW RENC E RD
HYPOLUXO RD
LAW RENC E RD
N FEDE
RA
L HW Y
GATEWAY BLVD
N SEACR EST BLVD
OLD BOYNTON RD
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
S SEACREST BLVD
N CONGR ESS AVE
NW 22N D AVE
S FEDERAL
HWY
FEC
rs ta
te I
-9 5
SW 23RD AVE
I n te
GOLF RD
WOOLBRIGHT RD
0
500 1,000
5
2,000
3,000
4,000
Feet
VD
N OCEAN BL
S CONGRESS AVE
GATEW AY BLVD
HIGH RIDG E RD
MINER RD
Par
t1of3
THEDEVELOPMENTATLASOF
BOYNTON BEACH
De
par
t
me
ntofDe
ve
l
opme
nt
Di
vi
s
i
onofPl
anni
ngandZoni
ng
De
mogr
a
phi
cTr
e
nds
I.
THE POPULATION GROWTH
The population of the City of Boynton Beach grew rapidly, at the average annual rate of
6.3%, throughout the 1960’s and 1970’s. The growth rate decreased in the 1980’s and
1990’s, but remained at a fairly high level of 2.7% until the year 2000. During the last
ten years (2000-2010), the growth rate for the city slowed even more, to an average
annual rate of 1.23%. It is notable that the city is nearing buildout, but this deceleration
in growth is a trend in both the state and the Palm Beach County. Severe recession
combined with high unemployment and sharp downturn in the housing markets nationwide has stalled population influx to Florida.
Average Annual Growth Rates, 1960-2010
7.00%
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
1960/70
1970/80
1980/90
1990/00
2000/10
Boynton Beach
5.64%
7.00%
2.65%
2.70%
1.23%
Palm Beach County
4.34%
5.15%
4.12%
2.74%
1.56%
BOYNTON BEACH POPULATION GROWTH
69,000
66,000
63,000
60,000
57,000
54,000
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Population 60,389 61,816 62,847 64,593 65,208 65,601 67,071 66,872 66,671 66,978 68,217 68,409 68,741
Source: US CENSUS for 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2010. University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research
for 2001-2009 and 2011-2012.
1
The Palm Beach County population projections for the City have been adjusted
downwards in 2013 to reflect the results of the Census 2010 and new BEBR county-level
projections.
Boynton Beach Population Projections
90,000
85,000
80,000
75,000
70,000
65,000
60,000
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
PB County projections
11/11
68,217
72,336
76,603
82,172
86,595
PB County revisions 5/13
68,217
71,752
76,144
79,703
83,901
Source: Census 2010, Palm Beach County Planning Division, Population Allocation Model and University of Florida, Bureau of
Economic and Business Research.
The impacts of the recession and housing crisis can also be linked to the changes in the
population growth components in Palm Beach County. The net domestic migration, a
leading component of growth between 2000 and 2004, turned negative between 2005 and
2007, while net international migration experienced only a small decline. While domestic
migration growth was again positive in the 2008 – 2009 period, international migration is
presently a primary source of population growth in the county.
II. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILES: CITY AND ITS FOUR SUB-SECTORS 1
1. Racial and Ethnic Characteristics
The City has become slightly more racially and ethnically diverse since 1990, when the
share of Whites in the total population was nearly 78%: the 2010 Census shows this share
down at 62%. At the same time, the number of African Americans and Blacks increased
by 122%, more than twice as much as the total population; they now constitute over 30%
of all the City’s residents. This group includes a growing Boynton Beach Haitian
community. The 2000 Census reported 4,009 Haitians living in the City; although the
2010 Census data does not include information on the number of persons of Haitian
origin, the 2007-2011 American Community Survey estimates this number to be about
9,160.
1
See sector’s map in Appendix A
2
Population of Boynton Beach: Racial Composition
2010
2000
0%
40%
20%
60%
White
American Indian/Alaska Native
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
Two or more Races
80%
100%
Black/African American
Asian
Other Race
Source: Census 2000 and 2010
TABLE 1. Changes in race and ethnic origin, 1990-2000 and 2000- 2010
Total
Population
White Alone
Black/ Afr.
American
Alone
Am. Indian/
Alaskan
Native Alone
Asian Alone
Nat. Hawiian/
Other Race
Pacific Isl.
Alone
Alone
Two or More
Races
Hispanic/
Latino (any
race)
3,124
1990 Census
46,284
35,912
9,296
52
279
11
644
X
as % of total
100.0%
77.7%
20.1%
0.1%
0.6%
0.0%
1.4%
X
6.8%
2000 Census
60,389
42,487
13,822
133
918
30
1,428
1,571
5,564
as % of total
100.0%
70.4%
22.9%
0.2%
1.5%
0.0%
2.4%
2.6%
9.2%
2010 Census
68,217
42,599
20,646
196
1,473
26
1,777
1,500
8,702
as % of total
100.0%
62.4%
30.3%
0.3%
2.2%
0.0%
2.6%
2.2%
12.8%
Change in numbers of race/ethnic groups 1990/2000:
Change
14,105
6,575
4,526
81
639
19
784
X
2,440
% Change
30.5%
18.3%
48.7%
155.8%
229.0%
172.7%
121.7%
X
78.1%
Change in numbers of race/ethnic groups 2000/2010
Change
112
6,824
63
555
-4
349
-71
3,138
% Change
13.0%
0.3%
Source: Census 1990, 2000, and 2010
7,828
49.4%
47.4%
60.5%
-13.3%
24.4%
-4.5%
56.4%
Another strong ongoing trend is the increase of the Hispanic population. According to the
2010 Census, the number of Hispanics grew by 2,440 persons, and the share of this ethnic
group in the total population increased from 9.2% in 2000 to 12.8% in 2010.
The racial composition of each of the four sectors of the city (Northeast, Southeast,
Northwest and Southwest) is shown on the following page.
3
Sectors' Population by Race, 2010
Sectors
SW
NW
SE
NE
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
White
Black/African American
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
Other Race
Two or more Races
Source: Census 2010
Table 2: Hispanic and Haitian population by sector
Percent of Hispanics in total population
Sector
Southeast
Northeast
Northwest
Southwest
City
2000
2010
8.8%
12.4%
9.5%
6.0%
9.2%
12.4%
12.6%
15.6%
9.6%
12.8%
Percent of Haitians in
total population 2000
10.7%
9.2%
2.7%
4.8%
6.6%
The Northwest sector has the highest concentration of Hispanics; Table 2 shows a
significant increase in the share of the Hispanic population in this sector between 2000
and 2010. No sector-level data is available on the current distribution of the Haitian
population, but the map at the end of this section shows a census-tract level distribution
(for tracts at least partially within Boynton Beach).
2. Median Age and Age Distribution
The median age for the City’s population remains at 41.9 years, essentially unchanged
from 41.8 registered by the 2000 Census. However, there have been significant changes
in age distribution, as shown in Table 3.
4
TABLE 3. Changes in age distribution, 1990-2010
1990
Number
Total Population
Under 5 years
5 to 9 years
10 to 14 years
15 to 24 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
55 to 64 years
65 to 74 years
75 to 84 years
85 years and over
Under 18 years
65 years and older
Median Age
2000
2010
Change 2000-2010
Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage
46,194
2,695
2,373
2,049
4,584
7,057
5,487
3,680
4,272
6,527
6,044
1,426
9,005
13,997
42.5
100%
5.8%
5.1%
4.4%
9.9%
15.3%
11.9%
8.0%
9.2%
14.1%
13.1%
3.1%
19.5%
30.3%
60,389
3,461
3,413
3,315
5,677
8,056
8,938
6,672
5,277
6,619
6,093
2,868
11,990
15,580
41.8
100%
5.7%
5.7%
5.5%
9.4%
13.3%
14.8%
11.0%
8.7%
11.0%
10.1%
4.7%
19.9%
25.8%
68,217
3,924
3,557
3,529
7,579
9,293
9,018
9,230
7,520
6,270
5,498
2,799
13,150
14,567
41.9
100%
5.8%
5.2%
5.2%
11.1%
13.6%
13.2%
13.5%
11.0%
9.2%
8.1%
4.1%
19.3%
21.4%
7,828
463
144
214
1,902
1,237
80
2,558
2,243
(349)
(595)
(69)
1,160
(1,013)
13%
13%
4%
6%
34%
15%
1%
38%
43%
-5%
-10%
-2%
10%
-7%
Source: Census 1990, 2000 and 2010
•
•
•
The share of persons over 65 in the total population continues to decrease, falling
from 25.8% in the year 2000 to 21.4% in 2010. The number of persons in this age
group dropped by 7% over the last ten years.
Given the above trend, the virtually unchanged 2010 median age of the city’s
residents is due mainly to a significant growth of the 45-to-64 age group. In the
meanwhile, the “under 18” category grew slower than the population as a whole.
The 34% growth of the 15-to-24 age cohort (and the associated increase of its share in
the total population) may potentially be explained by unemployed young adults
staying (or moving back) with their parents. A more detail breakdown shows a 41%
increase in the 20-to-24 group, supporting this assumption.
Table 4 shows significant differences in age distribution in the four sectors.
TABLE 4. Age distribution and median age by sector, 2010
Sector
Southeast
Northeast
Northwest
Southwest
City
% 65 and Over
23.5%
15.4%
12.3%
36.5%
21.4%
% Under 18
17.7%
24.1%
20.4%
14.9%
19.3%
Median Age
43.7
36.4
36.2
52.9
41.9
Source: Census 2010
3. Household Composition
Over the last decade, the two main trends in a household composition in the City were a
shrinking percentage of married-couple families (especially those with children) and an
increasing share of one-person households..
5
•
•
The share of married-couple family households in all households fell from 45.4% to
39%. The share of those with own children under 18 decreased from 14.6% to 13%.
The share of one-person households rose from 33% to 34% (it was 30% in 1990).
About 46% of these householders are 65 or older.
Between 2000 and 2010, the average household size increased slightly, from 2.26 to 2.31
persons, possibly due to the recession-related doubling up of households. Table 5
contains the update on household information for each sector.
TABLE 5. Household composition by sector, 2010
Sector
Southeast
Northeast
Northwest
Southwest
City
Number of Number of
Households Households
2000
2010
5,988
5,667
7,158
7,649
26,462
Average
Household
Size, 2000
Average
Household
Size, 2010
% 1-Person
Households
2010
% Married Couples
w/ own Children
under 18
2010
2.13
2.65
2.24
1.96
2.26
2.22
2.76
2.30
2.08
2.31
39.8%
30.5%
31.4%
35.7%
34.3%
11.5%
12.8%
17.5%
9.2%
13.0%
6,531
5,386
9,282
7,905
29,104
4. Education
Education of the population continues to improve. The overall percentage of population
25 years of age and over with an associate or higher degree increased from 28.5% in
2000 to 34.2% (based on the 2007-2011 American Community Surveys). Some 55% of
the City’s population age 25 or older has at least some education above high school, up
from 51% in 2000.
TABLE 6. Educational attainment, population 25 years and over, 2007-2011
Educational Attainment
Less than 9th grade
9th to 12th grade, no diploma
High school graduate (inc. equivalency)
Some college, no degree
Associate degree
Bachelor's degree
Graduate or professional degree
High school graduate or higher
Bachelor's degree or higher
Palm Beach
County
High school graduate or higher, 2000
Bachelor's degree or higher, 2000
Boca
Raton
Delray
Beach
West Palm
Beach
5.8%
7.1%
26.6%
20.6%
7.7%
20.3%
11.9%
83.7%
27.9%
2.2%
3.5%
18.0%
17.7%
8.0%
30.0%
20.6%
94.4%
55.3%
6.3%
8.9%
27.8%
22.8%
8.6%
16.9%
8.7%
83.5%
22.6%
7.7%
7.1%
21.5%
21.1%
7.6%
23.8%
11.1%
85.1%
34.8%
8.8%
7.7%
25.1%
21.5%
7.0%
18.8%
11.1%
83.5%
29.9%
83.6%
27.7%
92.0%
44.2%
80.5%
20.7%
81.0%
29.3%
75.5%
26.9%
Source: American Community Survey, Census 2000 and pooled samples 2007-2011
6
Boynton
Beach
Also, the American Community Survey’s 2009-2011 estimates show an improvement
over the 2000 figures in the educational attainment of the Boynton Beach population as
compared to that of three other largest municipalities in Palm Beach County and the
County as a whole. The lag declined but it remains significant in the “Bachelor’s Degree
or Higher” category with respect to both the County’s level overall and the level achieved
in the three comparison municipalities. Boca Raton continues to lead with a major higher
educational institution, Florida Atlantic University, within its borders.
IMPROVEMENT IN EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT:
POPULATION 25 YEARS AND OVER
5. Population Mobility and Foreign-Born Residents
The data in Table 7 demonstrates a high mobility of the City’s population, a
characteristic generally shared with population of the County, the state of Florida, and
7
also with the nation as a whole. Approximately 17.5% of persons at least one year old
relocated within County during the last year.
TABLE 7. Geographic mobility: past year by selected characteristics, 2007-2011
MOVED from
TOTAL
Population 1 year and over
RACE AND HISPANIC OR LATINO ORIGIN
One race
White
Black or African American
American Indian and Alaska Native
Asian
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
Some other race
Two or more races
Hispanic or Latino origin (of any race)
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino
CITIZENSHIP STATUS
Native
Foreign born
Naturalized U.S. citizen
Not a U.S. citizen
same
county
different
county
different
state
abroad
66,866
10.90%
2.10%
3.20%
1.30%
66,252
42,113
20,232
98
1,364
24
2,421
614
8,160
36,986
11.00%
9.70%
12.40%
0.00%
13.70%
0.00%
19.10%
7.00%
12.00%
9.90%
2.10%
2.60%
1.40%
0.00%
2.60%
0.00%
1.00%
0.00%
2.60%
2.50%
3.10%
3.40%
1.80%
9.20%
6.20%
0.00%
7.40%
6.50%
3.70%
3.70%
1.30%
0.40%
3.30%
0.00%
2.00%
0.00%
0.50%
0.00%
0.40%
0.40%
50,996
15,870
7,257
8,613
11.20%
10.20%
7.90%
12.00%
2.50%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
3.70%
1.60%
1.40%
1.80%
0.10%
5.00%
2.00%
7.50%
Source: American Community Survey, 2007-2011
TABLE 8. Foreign-born population: Palm Beach County and its four largest cities,
2007-2011
Palm Beach
County
Boynton
Beach
Boca Raton
Delray
Beach
West Palm
Beach
Total foreign-born population
as % of the 2010 population
289,118
21.9%
15,874
23.3%
15,403
18.3%
13,231
21.9%
26,731
26.8%
Year of entry 2000 or later
Naturalized citizen
Not a citizen
94,350
9.8%
90.2%
5,447
14.7%
85.3%
3,604
10.1%
89.9%
4,847
7.8%
92.2%
10,506
7.2%
92.8%
Year of entry 1990 to 1999
Naturalized citizen
Not a citizen
78,611
39.1%
60.9%
4,092
49.8%
50.2%
4,300
51.4%
48.6%
3,363
38.6%
61.4%
6,950
34.1%
65.9%
Year of entry 1980 to 1989
Naturalized citizen
Not a citizen
51,910
61.3%
38.7%
3,045
57.6%
42.4%
2,919
66.9%
33.1%
2,427
50.0%
50.0%
4,150
67.7%
32.3%
Year of entry before 1980
Naturalized citizen
Not a citizen
64,247
85.2%
14.8%
3,290
81.1%
18.9%
4,580
87.2%
12.8%
2,594
85.7%
14.3%
5,125
84.6%
15.4%
8
Some 25% of city residents are foreign-born, higher that 22% in the County as a whole;
approximately 43% are naturalized citizens. The percentage of naturalized citizens is an
approximate measure of assimilation. Increasing numbers of non-assimilated new
residents of the city, who are more likely not to speak fluent English, will have to be
accommodated by the educational and social service systems.
The two largest groups of foreign-born residents in the City are Hispanics and Haitians.
The total number of Hispanics, including both “foreign-born” persons and those born in
the U.S, is captured by the Census 2010, at 8,702 (see Table 1); the number of Haitians is
estimated by the American Community Survey 2007-2011 to be about 8,734.
Proficiency in English is an important factor in assimilation and the successful entry into
the job market. Table 9 indicates the ability to speak English by age:
TABLE 9. Ability to speak English by population 5 years and over: Boynton Beach
and Palm Beach County, 2007-2011
Boynton Beach
ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH
Palm Beach County
Number Percent
Number Percent
1,228,545
63,917
197,071 100.0%
8,790 100.0%
Population 5 to 17 years:
138,573 70.3%
Speak only English
5,443
61.9%
5.3%
3,814
1.9%
463
Speak English not well or not at all
752,915 100.0%
39,957 100.0%
67.1%
522,278 69.4%
Speak only English
26,796
8.3%
7.5%
62,272
2,982
278,559 100.0%
15,170 100.0%
Population 65 years and over:
85.8%
237,541 85.3%
Speak only English
13,021
12,055
4.3%
498
3.3%
78,141
6.4%
3,943
6.2%
TOTAL, SPEAK ENGLISH NOT WELL/NOT AT ALL
POPULATION 5 YEARS OF AGE OR OVER
ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH BY SPANISH SPEAKERS
Speak Spanish, 5 years of age or over
of which speak Spanish:
of which speak English not well or not at all
Population 65 years and over:
7,363
8,790
1,361
115
39,957
5,282
1,240
15,170
719
264
100.0%
15.5%
8.4%
100.0%
13.2%
23.5%
100.0%
4.7%
36.7%
TOTAL, SPANISH SPEAKERS SPEAKING ENGLISH NOT
WELL OR NOT AT ALL
1,619
22.0%
192,735
197,071 100.0%
36,843 18.7%
7.2%
2,642
752,915 100.0%
138,477 18.4%
46,537 33.6%
278,559 100.0%
17,415
6.3%
7,558
43.4%
56,737
29.4%
Generally, the percentage of population with low proficiency in English (6.2%) was
comparable with that in the County as a whole (6.4%). However, among Spanish
speakers, more that one fifth speaks English “not well” or “not at all” and nearly 30% in
9
the County as a whole report low English proficiency. Those percentages are particularly
high in the 18- to 64 age group, a significant issue for people in the workforce.
A percentage of Haitians with a low command of English can only be estimated using
the American Community Survey’s “other Indo-European” language category, which
includes Creole. Approximately one-fifth of the 10,746 persons speaking a language
included in this category speaks English “not well” or “not at all,” which is comparable
with the Spanish-speaking group.
6. Household Income Characteristics
TABLE 10. Household income characteristics for Palm Beach County and the four
largest municipalities, 2007-2011
Median household income
Palm
Beach
County
$52,951
% Households with income $50K and over
% of households w/earnings
Mean earnings
% of households w/Social Security Income
Mean Social Security income
52.8%
70.4%
$78,617
37.7%
$18,318
$45,156
46.1%
70.0%
$60,976
38.2%
$16,988
% of households w/retirement income
Mean retirement income
18.1%
$27,160
16.5%
$23,699
13.3%
15.1%
% of all people with income below poverty level in
the last 12 months
Boynton
Beach
Boca
Raton
Delray
Beach
West Palm
Beach
$71,414
$49,823
$45,806
63.9%
75.7%
$105,834
32.9%
$19,489
50.0%
69.4%
$81,387
37.6%
$16,864
45.9%
75.6%
$70,193
28.3%
$16,325
15.3%
$34,243
17.9%
$26,146
13.7%
$23,041
10.6%
13.9%
18.8%
Source: American Community Survey 2007-2011
Generally, during the 2007-2011 period:
•
•
•
The Boynton Beach median household income continued to lag behind the
countywide median income and that of three other municipalities.
The City had a slightly higher percentage of households in which at least one
member collected Social Security income than both the County as a whole and all
other municipalities.
For households with earnings, Boynton Beach had the lowest mean earnings per
household. This figure could reflect the high percentage of semi-retired households
in which one or more members hold a part-time job.
The American Community Survey one-year estimates, though not as accurate as those
based on surveys over a five-year period, clearly show a recession-based decline in the
median household income in the city, from $48,892 in 2007 to $41,769 in 2011; mean
earnings also fell, from $64,030 to $57,953. However, one-year estimates also indicate
that both median household income and earnings inched up between 2010 and 2011.
10
Geography of household income distribution
For census tracks truncated by the City boundary, the American Community Survey no
longer provides two separate figures (for the part of the track within and the part outside
the City). Therefore, the map of household income distribution in 2006-2010 (see the end
of this section) shows all census tracts that are at least partly within the City.
For the same reason, the 2008 income estimates in Table 11 could not be revised. Still,
they remain a good approximation of the differences among the four City sectors.
TABLE 11. Median household income by sector, 2008
Sectors
Southeast
Northeast
Northwest
Southwest
City
Number of
Households
6,327
6,016
8,876
8,403
29,622
% w/ Income <
$25K
26.1%
31.1%
17.8%
22.6%
23.6%
% w/ Income >
$75K
20.2%
16.2%
25.6%
26.2%
22.7%
Median Income
$
$
$
$
$
43,513
37,678
52,056
46,906
46,209
Source: Claritas, Inc., 2008 estimates
SUMMARY OF SECTOR CHARACTERISTICS
The following section summarizes the basic socio-economic characteristics of the
population residing within each of the four sectors.
NORTHEAST SECTOR:
•
The sector has the second youngest population of all sectors (median age 36.4), and
the highest percentage of residents under 18 years of age (24.1%). It also has the
highest average household size (2.76) and the lowest percentage of one-person
households (30.5%).
•
The non-whites account for the highest share of population (approximately 67%)
among the four sectors. In 2000, the sector had the second highest concentration of
Haitians (9.2% of the population). It is also home to a sizeable Hispanic community:
12.6% of its residents are of Hispanic/Latino origin.
•
In 2008, the sector’s population had the lowest median household income
($37,678); about 31% of households had incomes below $25,000, and only 16.2%
had incomes of $75,000 or more. In 2010, the sector’s best faring census tract had a
median income of only $37,810; its two poorest ones had median incomes between
$29,000 and $30,000.
SOUTHEAST SECTOR
•
The two chief demographic characteristics of this sector are the high concentration
of the elderly (people 65 years of age and over comprise about 24.5% of all
residents) and the highest share of people living alone, who make up nearly 40% of
all households.
11
•
The population is 68% white and 28% Black/African American. Part of the latter
group is a large Haitian community – in 2000, Haitians constituted nearly 11% of
the sector’s residents, the highest percentage among all sectors. The share of
Hispanics in the sector’s population is 12.4%.
•
In 2008, the Southeast sector had the second lowest median household income of
$43,513; 26.1% of households had annual incomes of less than $25,000 and only
one-fifth incomes over $75,000. In 2010, its poorest census tract, 62.03, was also
the poorest in the City, with a median household income of $28,813.
NORTHWEST SECTOR
•
The Northwest is the sector of young families: it has the highest percentage of
married couples with children under 18 (17.5%), as compared with 13.0% for the
city as a whole. Its median age is 36.2, the lowest of all sectors.
•
The sector’s residents are predominantly white; of all sectors, it has the lowest
percentage (27%) of non-white persons (including is a sizeable Asian population of
882 people). The sector is home to the largest Hispanic community of 3,375
residents; Hispanics constitute 15.6% of the area’s population, up from 9.5% in
2000.
•
In 2008, the Northwest sector’s median household income ranked the highest at
$52,056. The sector had the lowest incidence of households with income below
$25,000 (17.8%), as well as the second highest number of households with income
surpassing $75,000 (25.6%). In 2010, three of the sector’s census tracts comprising
57% of its population had estimated median incomes between $55,000 and $63,000.
SOUTHWEST SECTOR
•
.
•
•
The Southwest sector has by far the oldest population in the city. Its median age is
52.9 as compared to 41.9 citywide; people aged 65 and over make up 36.5% of all
residents. The incidence of one-person household is the second highest at 35.7%,
and only 9.2% of all households are married couples with own children.
The Southwest sector has a low percentage (29%) of non-white persons. It has a
small Hispanic population; 35% of Hispanics reside in tract 60.10, where they
comprise about 15% of the population.
In 2008, the sector had a second highest median household income at $46,906, and
the highest percentage of households with incomes over $75,000 (26.2%). In 2010,
two of the sector’s census tracts wholly contained within the City’s boundary had a
median income at about $59,000. These tracts, 60.10 and 66.03, represented 41% of
the sector’s population.
12
Pa
r
t1Ma
ps
NON-WHITES AS PERCENT OF POPULATION IN 2010
BY CENSUS TRACT NUMBERS
HYPOLUXO RD
NW 22ND AVE
GATEWAY BLVD
58.10
57.02
N CONGRESS AVE
58.12
60.12
S CONGRESS AVE
60.08
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
60.09
60.10
62.01
62.02
WOOLBRIGHT RD
62.03
60.05
SW 23RD AVE
VD
N OCEAN BL
GOLF RD
61.00
OLD BOYNTON RD
60.07
N FEDER
AL HW
Y
58.08
57.01
GATEWAY BLVD
S FEDERAL
HW Y
58.13
N SEACREST BLVD
LAWRENCE RD
MINER RD
HIGH RIDGE RD
58.17
58.11
56.01
58.16
S SEACREST BLVD
LAWRENCE RD
58.17
54.11
66.02
FEC
Inte
66.03
rsta
te I
-95
63.00
Legend
Non-Whites as % of Population
Citywide percentage of Non-Whites: 37.6%
Source: Census 2010
2.
5%
42
.3
1
-7
2.
3%
-4
1
29
.1
19
.1
1
-2
9.
1%
1%
-1
9.
9.
31
0.
9
-9
.3
%
0
®
875 1,750
3,500
5,250
7,000
Feet
High Ridge Rd
BLACKS/AFRICAN AMERICANS AS PERCENT OF POPULATION IN 2010
58.17
58.16
58.17
56.01
E Gat
eway
Gateway Blvd
57.02
58.12
61.00
60.12
Old Boynton Rd
Blvd
W Boynton Beach
60.10
Woolbright Rd
60.05
SE 23rd Ave
66.02
63.00
54.11
Hw
y
IN
TE
RS
TA
TE
S.Congress Ave
66.03
62.02
62.03
95
60.08
62.01
S. F
ede
ra l
60.07 60.09
Ocean Ave
Blvd
58.10
Blvd
N Ocea
n
58.11
57.01
58.08
58.13
N. Federal Hwy
Lawrence Rd
Miner Rd
Legend
Blacks/African Americans as % of Population
-6
8.
5%
34
.5
1
-3
4.
5%
24
.5
1
-2
4.
5%
6.
5%
16
.5
1
-1
6.
51
0
-6
.5
%
0
Citywide percentage of Blacks/African Americans: 30.3%
Source: Census 2010
875
1,750
®
3,500
5,250
7,000
Feet
HISPANICS/LATINO AS PERCENT OF POPULATION IN 2010
High Ridge Rd
E Gatew
a
Gateway Blvd
57.02
58.12
61.00
60.12
Old Boynton Rd
h Blvd
W Boynton Beac
60.07 60.09
E Ocean Ave
60.10
62.01
Woolbright Rd
Legend
Hispanics/Latino as % of Population
62.02
62.03
60.05
INT
ERS
TAT
E9
5
SE 23rd Ave
63.00
54.11
66.02
NE 2nd Ave
66.03
S Congress Ave
60.08
y Blvd
27
%
18
.1
-
18
%
12
.1
-
2%
8.
11
08%
0
Citywide percentage of Hispanics/lLatinos: 12.8%
Source: Census 2010
Blvd
58.10
57.01
58.08
58.13
N Ocea
n
58.11
Miner Rd
N Fede
ral Hwy
58.17
56.01
58.16
S Federal Hw
y
Lawrence Rd
58.17
875
1,750
®
3,500
5,250
7,000
Feet
CONGRESS AVE
S MILITARY TRL
HAITIAN POPULATION IN 2000
HYPOLUXO RD
58.09
N FE DE
R
GATE
WAY
BLVD
57.02
N CONGRESS AVE
AL H W
Y
57.01
N. FEDERAL HWY
58.08
56.0
LVD
TB
RES
EAC
NS
58.04
58.05
HIGH RIDGE RD
MINER RD
60.03
61.00
OLD BOYNTON RD
WOOLBRIGHT RD
66.03
62.02
62.03
60.05
SE 23RD AVE
54.03
S FE
DER
AL
66.02
63.00
HW
Y
E9
5
AT
ER
ST
INT
S CONGRESS AVE
60.08
S SEACREST BLVD
62.01
60.02
60.07
GU L FST R EA M B LV D
Legend
Haitian Population, Number of Persons
06
41
5
-8
14
-4
8
10
0
-1
07
0
Note: Census tracts and City boundary of 2000
Source: US Census 2000
N OCEAN
BLVD
D
BOYNTON BEACH BLV
®
900 1,800
3,600
5,400
7,200
Feet
HAITIAN POPULATION 2007-2011
58.07
HYPOLUXO RD
56.01
58.17
MINER RD
58.13
58.12
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
0 - 174
175 - 597
598 - 1,608
60.09
3,000
4,500
95
IN T
6,000
Feet
66.05
SW 23RD AVE
62.02
62.03
63.00
ERS
66.03
62.01
WOOLBRIGHT RD
60.05
TAT
E
60.08
750 1,500
60.10
60.07
Estimated total Haitian population : 8,900
0
61.00
OLD BOYNTON RD
S CONGRESS AVE
Haitians, Number of Persons
®
57.02
60.12
Legend
57.01
N FEDERA
L HWY
58.10
58.08
N CONGRESS AVE
58.11
E RD
IDG
HR
HIG
58.16
KNOLLWOOD RD
56.02
S FEDE RAL
HW Y
LAWRENCE RD
58.15
66.02
65.01
64.01
54.11
MEDIAN AGE OF POPULATION AND PERCENT OF PERSONS 65 AND OLDER
High Ridge Rd
BY CENSUS TRACT
36.9
Miner Rd
39.3
33.7
E Gat
eway
Blvd
Gateway Blvd
38.4
30.2
39.6
40.8
Old Boynton Rd
Blvd
W Boynton Beach
36.9
34.0
Woolbright Rd
53.7
51.4
SE 23rd Ave
74.4
IN
TE
RS
TA
TE
S.Congress Ave
95
52.2
53.7
47.4
44.5
75.4
Hw
y
73.8
S. F
ede
ra l
31.9
Ocean Ave
Blvd
70.3
N Ocea
n
34.5
58.11
36.2
N. Federal Hwy
Lawrence Rd
36.9
40.3
Legend
Percentage Population Age 65 or Older
Citywide percentage of population age 65 or older: 21.4%
Source: Census 2010
-8
0.
7%
48
.9
1
-4
8.
9%
24
.5
1
4.
5%
-2
17
.1
7%
-1
7.
31
%
2.
5
-7
.3
%
0
875
1,750
®
3,500
5,250
7,000
Feet
CONGRESS AVE
S MILITARY TRL
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN 2008
BY CENSUS TRACT
HYPOLUXO RD
$41,047
ATEW
AY B
LV D
AL H W
Y
$50,615
$39,715
G
N FE DE
R
$48,607
HIG H RIDG E RD
MINER RD
$46,339
N. FEDERAL HWY
$59,773
N CONGRESS AVE
$35,252
$54,901
$35,641
OLD BOYNTON RD
$37,321
$40,595
WOOLBRIG HT RD
SE 23RD AVE
HW
AL
SF
ED E
R
$80,729
$43,722
Y
$75,180
E9
5
ER
ST
INT
S CONGR ESS AVE
$67,188
$41,875
$34,899
$43,426
AT
$81,279
S SEACREST BLVD
$43,304
N OC EAN
BLVD
D
BOYNTO N BEACH BLV
GU L FST RE A M BLV D
Legend
Median Household Income
Note: Census tracts and City boundary of 2000
9
8
1,
27
3
-$
,7
7
9
$5
Source: Nielsen-Claritas INC
4
-$
5
9,
77
7
8
,6
0
8
$4
$4
1
,8
7
6
-$
4
8,
60
5
87
1,
4
-$
1
,7
0
7
$3
$3
4
,8
9
9
-$
3
7,
70
0
0
®
875 1,750
3,500
5,250
7,000
Feet
AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE
AND PERCENT OF ONE-PERSON HOUSEHOLD IN 2010
High Ridge Rd
BY CENSUS TRACT
2.76
2.46
Miner Rd
2.72
2.21
E Gat
ew ay
2.02
1.58
N. Federal Hwy
Gateway Blvd
2.85
1.92
2.53
Old Boynton Rd
Blvd
2.58
h Blvd
W Boynton Beac
Ocean Ave
2.34
2.62
3.11
Blvd
Lawrence Rd
2.44
3.01
1.71
Woolbright Rd
1.71
SE 23rd Ave
2.13
1.51
y
Hw
IN
TE
RS
TA
TE
2.56
2.18
S. F
ede
r al
1.81
S.Congress Ave
95
2.15
N O cea
n
1.53
Legend
9%
5
40
.
-5
5.
4%
7
34
.
-4
0.
6%
1
29
.
-3
4.
0%
6
19
.
-2
9.
2
16
.
-1
9.
5%
% One-Person Households
Citywide percentage of one-person households: 34.3%
Source: Census 2010
0
875
1,750
®
3,500
5,250
7,000
Feet
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME 2007-2011
58.07
HYPOLUXO RD
56.01
58.17
56.02
58.16
MINER RD
KNOLLWOOD RD
58.13
57.02
60.12
Legend
61.00
OLD BOYNTON RD
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
Median Household Income
60.07
0
700 1,400
2,800
4,200
66.03
5,600
Feet
62.02
WOOLBRIGHT RD
60.05
62.03
SW 23RD AVE
63.00
TAT
E
®
62.01
60.09
95
60.08
S CONGRESS AVE
Citywide median income: $45,156
60.10
66.02
S SEACREST BLVD
$40,256
$52,173
$64,091
$76,008
$87,926
ERS
-
IN T
$28,338
$40,257
$52,174
$64,092
$76,009
N FEDERAL HWY
58.12
57.01
S FEDE RAL
HW Y
58.10
58.08
N CONGRESS AVE
58.11
HIGH RIDGE RD
LAWRENCE RD
58.15
65.01
66.05
64.01
54.11
Par
t2of3
BOYNTON BEACH
De
par
t
me
ntofDe
ve
l
opme
nt
Di
vi
s
i
onofPl
anni
ngandZoni
ng
Hous
i
nga
nd
Re
s
i
de
nt
i
a
l
De
ve
l
opme
nt
I. CHANGING STOCK CHARACTERISTICS AND CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY
1. Existing Housing
A. Changes in types of housing and tenure
HOUSING STOCK BY TYPE OF STRUCTURE, 2012
Mobile Homes
1%
Apartments
13%
Co-ops
1%
Single-family
Homes
39%
Townhomes &
Villas
13%
Condominiums
33%
Source: Palm Beach County Appraiser’s Office, 2012
TABLE 1. Housing occupancy and housing tenure, 1990-2010
1990
Number
Total Housing Units
Occupied Housing Units
Owner-occupied
Renter-occupied
Vacant Housing Units
Vacant (Seasonal & Rec.)
Percent
2000
Number
25,544 100.0%
20,292
79.4%
15,514
76.5%
4,778
23.5%
5,252
20.6%
2,762
10.8%
30,643
26,210
19,072
7,138
4,433
2,944
Percent
100.0%
85.5%
72.8%
27.2%
14.5%
9.6%
2010
Number
36,289
29,104
19,316
9,788
7,185
3,330
% change
Percent 2000-2010
100.0%
80.2%
66.4%
33.6%
19.8%
9.2%
18.4%
11.0%
1.3%
37.1%
62.1%
13.1%
.
The chart and Table 1 above provide information on the City’s housing stock in terms of
type of structures and tenure choices (owning or renting). The 2010 tenure data reflects
changes brought by a collapse of the housing market. First, there has been a very
significant increase in renter-occupied dwellings, in absolute and especially relative
terms. More than one-third of all units are now rented. Secondly, there has also been a
sharp increase in the overall number of vacant units, from 4,433 in 2000 to 7,185 in 2010.
1
B. Age of housing stock
AGE OF HOUSING STOCK
1960-1969
12%
pre 1960
8%
2005 or later
4%
2000-2004
9%
1990-1999
16%
1970-1979
28%
1980-1989
23%
Source: Census 2010, ACS 2007-2011
Approximately 51% of the City’s residential stock was built in the period of 1970-1989,
and about 8% prior to 1960.
C. Sectoral differences
As expected (see Table 2 below), the housing stock located within the eastern sectors is
much older than housing located west of Interstate 95. Both eastern sectors have a
substantial number of older condominiums. The table also shows a reduction in the 2010
share of owner-occupied units in all sectors as compared to the year 2000. The shift from
the owner to renter occupancy has been particularly noteworthy in the south east sector.
TABLE 2. Selected Housing Characteristics by Sector
TOTAL HOUSING STOCK
Percentage SF (detached) homes
Percentage pre-1960 housing
Percentage owner-occupied, 2000
Percentage owner-occupied, 2010
SE
8,366
43.9%
13.0%
75.4%
53.7%
NE
7,442
35.7%
16.3%
69.9%
63.3%
NW
9,571
39.6%
1.4%
68.9%
64.1%
SW
10,270
54.9%
2.1%
76.5%
70.9%
Source: Claritas, Inc, and Census 2010
2. Trends in New Construction
A. Residential approvals
In 2005, the peak of the residential boom, the City approved a total of 2,981 housing
units (as part of site-planned projects and rezonings with a master plan). The number of
approvals dwindled to 669 in 2006, 254 in 2007 and 47 in 2008; there were no residential
approvals in 2009 and 2010 and only six units were approved in 2011. The 456
multifamily units approved in 2012 replaced previously approved and expired projects.
2
B. Decline in residential permit activity in response to market downturn
Between 2004 and 2008, Boynton Beach permitted 421 single family (detached) units
and 3,369 multifamily units. The activity was particularly high in 2004 and 2005,
followed by a sharp decline in permit numbers starting in 2006, when the level of the
residential permit activity dropped by 65%. In 2009, the drop was even more dramatic
(93%); only 9 permits were issued in 2010. The rebound of housing, reflected by the
increasingly higher number of permits issued in 2011, 2012, and during the first five
months of 2013, is driven mainly by the high demand for rental units.
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS 2004-2013
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Single family permits
2010
2011
2012
2013
May
Multi-family permits
Source: Building Department, City of Boynton Beach (single-family permits include detached units only)
II.
TRENDS IN HOUSING VALUES
TABLE 3. Median Housing Price Trends in Palm Beach County, 2007-2013
YEAR
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
TOWNHOUSE-CONDO
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013 April
Median Sale
Price
% Change
(year-over year)
Median sale
Price
% Change
(year-over-year)
$365,000
$300,000
$235,000
$227,000
$193,000
$212,500
$265,000
x
-17.8%
-21.7%
-3.4%
-14.1%
10.1%
26.2%
$200,000
$146,000
$110,000
$92,000
$78,000
$88,000
$108,000
x
-27.0%
-24.7%
-16.4%
-15.2%
12.8%
20.0%
Source: Realtors Association of the Palm Beaches; data from the Regional Multiple Listing Service.
Note: The November 2012 figures must be regarded with caution, as monthly data may show significant volatility.
Since publication of the last issue of The Development Atlas in March of 2009, the
residential values in Palm Beach County had continued to drop. By 2011, a year experts
agree prices in South Florida hit bottom, median price for all units sold in the County was
3
down roughly 56% from its 2007 peak of $287,000. The trend reversed in 2012; as Table
3 indicates, prices went up significantly in 2012 for all types of dwellings.
1. Housing Values as Reflected by City Tax Roll
A. Changes in Taxable Value
TABLE 4. Changes in Taxable Value of Residential Property, 2000-2012
Taxable Value of
All Real Property
Taxable Value of Residential Property
Total
2000 $ 2,221,736,564 $ 1,517,349,529
2001 $ 2,402,706,325 $ 1,671,747,547
2002 $ 2,636,109,342 $ 1,829,141,969
2003 $ 2,975,816,191 $ 2,134,737,593
2004 $ 3,364,067,217 $ 2,423,973,983
2005 $ 3,975,909,602 $ 2,896,500,352
2006 $ 5,347,478,285 $ 3,768,766,280
2007 $ 5,869,516,099 $ 4,414,576,000
2008 $ 5,344,481,475 $ 3,851,131,700
2009 $ 4,364,061,452 $ 2,923,891,282
2010 $ 3,631,168,241 $ 2,389,870,003
2011 $ 3,522,987,585 $ 2,372,668,214
2012 $ 3,449,429,826 $ 2,312,553,079
Source: Palm Beach County Property Appraiser’s Office
as % of Total
Taxable Value
68.3%
69.6%
69.4%
71.7%
72.1%
72.9%
70.5%
75.2%
72.1%
67.0%
65.8%
67.3%
67.0%
Annual % Change in TV
of Residential Property
X
10.2%
9.4%
16.7%
13.5%
19.5%
30.1%
17.1%
-12.8%
-24.1%
-18.3%
-0.7%
-2.5%
As shown in Table 4 above, between 2000 and 2007 the share of residential taxable value
in the total value grew from 68.3% to 75%, and then declined every year to reach 67% in
2012. Since 2007, the taxable value decreased by 48%. (Note that the drop in residential
taxable value in 2008 was partly due to the legislative changes allowing for an additional
homestead exemption.) The preliminary estimate of the City’s total taxable value for
2013 signals the possible reversal of this trend: the total value increased by 5.5%.
4
TRENDS IN TAXABLE VALUE OF REAL PROPERTY
$5,000,000,000
$4,500,000,000
$4,000,000,000
$3,500,000,000
$3,000,000,000
$2,500,000,000
$2,000,000,000
$1,500,000,000
$1,000,000,000
$500,000,000
$-
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Taxable Value of Residential Real Property
Taxable Value of Other Real Property
.
B. Value of New Residential Construction
TABLE 5. Value of New Residential Construction, 2002-2012
Total Value
Total Value
Percent Residential
YEAR
New Residential
in New Construction
New Construction
Construction
2002
96,039,912 $
$
45,774,490
48%
2003
95,160,396 $
$
75,833,776
80%
2004
$
55,097,497 $
18,595,334
34%
2005
$
97,781,792 $
69,925,622
72%
2006
$
214,209,219 $
150,022,934
70%
2007
$
338,926,436 $
306,235,582
90%
2008
$
232,000,000 $
162,000,000
70%
2009
$
143,528,989 $
32,635,715
23%
2010
$
49,782,272 $
7,642,508
15%
2011
$
92,838,504 $
80,944,193
87%
2012
$
19,478,541 $
8,608,396
44%
Total, 2002-2012 $ 1,434,843,558 $
958,218,550
67%
Source: Palm Beach County Property Appraiser’s Office
The chart and Table 5 above demonstrate the trends in value of new construction. The
value of residential construction surged in 2005 and peaked in 2007 at $306,235,582
when its share reached 90% of total new construction. During the following three years,
residential construction plummeted to $7.6 million, reaching its lowest level in a decade.
Note that the high 2011 numbers reflect completion of the Promenade project, which
constituted 93% of the total value of new residential construction. The 2013 estimate of
new construction (completed by the end of 2012) is $69 million, which reflects the 2011
surge in permit activity.
5
2 Residential Sales
The data in this section presents the analysis of existing home sales in the City.
HOUSING SALE PRICES 2004-2012
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
2004
2005
Single-family
2008
2006
Townhomes
2011
2012
Condominiums
Source: Regional MLS, Inc.
The chart above demonstrates citywide price trends for existing homes from 2004 to
2012. The median 2012 sale prices of existing single-family homes, townhomes and
condominiums were between 65%, 48% and 70%, respectively, off the peak prices
reached in 2005 or 2006. For single-family homes, the median price dropped from
$280,000 to $98,000; for townhomes, from $223,000 to $115,000; and for
condominiums, the price decreased from $185,000 to $55,000.
The chart shows that median prices stabilized in 2012, or at least – in case of singlefamily homes, decreased only slightly. Also, the number of closed sales increased 11%
year-over-year (as compared to 3.6% countywide). Some 18.2% of the sales were lendermediated (which include foreclosures and short sales), slightly lower that 18.9% for the
county as a whole. Table 6 on the following page shows changes in sales and median
price of single-family homes, townhomes and condominiums by sector since 2004.
6
Table 6. Housing Sales by Sector and Type of Dwelling
SECTOR
SF Homes (detached)
Sales Median Price
Townhomes/Villas
Sales Median Price
Condominiums
Sales Median Price
NORTHEAST
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2011
2012
% Change in Median Price
from peak year to 2012
SOUTHEAST
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2011
2012
NORTHWEST
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2011
2012
SOUTHWEST
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2011
2012
115
93
150
89
51
115
120
$125,000
$162,000
$257,000
$235,000
$146,000
$40,000
$50,000
17
27
21
22
14
20
31
$225,000
$287,000
$281,000
$269,000
$172,125
$87,000
$116,875
21
39
16
16
12
0
72
-59.3%
243
231
146
110
112
175
210
$239,000
$324,000
$345,000
$285,000
$234,900
$160,000
$167,450
$179,900
$220,000
$235,000
$185,000
$149,500
$150,000
$101,000
-57.0%
$143,900
$175,000
$205,000
$175,000
$107,500
n/a
$82,500
122
147
119
84
61
152
171
$169,000
$235,000
$237,000
$211,000
$175,000
$125,000
$120,100
151
133
78
96
66
179
188
$150,000
$204,000
$220,000
$202,000
$107,500
$105,000
$104,600
-52.5%
$108,000
$160,000
$182,000
$140,000
$118,750
$83,000
$67,500
-62.9%
13
38
39
31
55
203
170
-49.3%
62
78
45
37
35
89
106
$83,000
$164,800
$168,000
$135,000
$66,500
$32,000
$35,000
-79.2%
-59.8%
-51.5%
237
215
169
130
96
205
237
57
93
120
131
77
79
74
-46.5%
-80.5%
112
144
76
56
40
131
152
$323,000
$401,500
$205,000
$179,900
$136,000
$140,000
$215,000
$159,900
$185,500
$203,000
$165,000
$65,000
$45,000
$57,000
-71.9%
146
81
70
44
50
93
92
$133,900
$174,000
$185,000
$151,000
$126,500
$59,000
$47,000
-74.6%
Source: Regional MLS, Inc.
Table 6 shows that the 2012 sales prices were significantly off their peaks – from 46.5%
to 80.5% - for all types of dwellings in all four sectors.
In most cases, the 2012 sales
activity was higher than in 2011.
7
MEDIAN PRICE OF SINGLE FAMILY HOME
SALES BY SECTOR
$400,000
$350,000
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0
2004
NORTHEAST
2005
2006
2007
SOUTHEAST
2008
NORTHWEST
2011
2012
SOUTHWEST
The chart and Table 6 show that the median price in the Northwest sector was the
highest of all sectors in each of the years reported.
III. VACANT RESIDENTIAL LAND
TABLE 7. Selected Vacant Parcels with Residential Development Potential, January
23, 2013
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
No
7
8
9
10
X
NAME/LOCATION
ACREAGE
DENSITY
High Ridge Country Club
68.4
5
Quantum Park PID outparcel
24.4
11
Palmland Villas
3.7
11
City of Boynton Beach
3.6
7.5
FPL
3.4
5
Bible Church of God
2.3
5
Residential/mixed use projects w/expired site plans
NAME/LOCATION
ACREAGE
DENSITY
500 Ocean (aka Arches)
4.69
80
Harbor Cay
1.43
20
Meadows
7.97
5
Baywalk
2.26
20
TOTAL
122.15
X
UNITS
342
201
40
27
17
11
UNITS*
378
23
34
40
1,113
Note: For numbers 1-6, indicated densities are maximum densities under respective current land use
designations (with the exception of the FPL property – see comment on the following page). For 7-10, the
number of units is as previously approved.
Since 2008 there have been no changes in the inventory of vacant residential parcels of 2
or more acres.
8
The following list provides a brief overview of properties listed in Table 7:
•
Property #1, surrounding the High Ridge Country Club (west of High Ridge Road
and north of Miner Road), is designated Low Density Residential (LDR).
•
Property #2, a Quantum Park outparcel located between Gateway Boulevard and
Miner Road, west of High Ridge Road, and south of a 30-acre county-owned
enclave. The county parcel has an industrial land use classification; the parcel
within the City has an industrial land use classification, a residential single-family
zoning designation and a Conservation Overlay (the parcels contain one of the
largest remaining “A”-classified scrub sites in the City; therefore, any developer
of the property would be required to set aside or preserve at least 25% of the
environmentally sensitive lands). These considerations will have to be balanced
out in any future development scenarios. Although a significant percentage of
Quantum Park has been developed as a mixture of uses with a large residential
component, the city economic development efforts to preserve and expand
industrial acreage may ultimately prevail and lead to industrial zoning designation
on this property as well as the county enclave when annexed.
.
•
Property #3 is an undeveloped parcel in the Palmland Villas development. The
vacant 3.7- acre site could be developed utilizing the remaining unused density
from the 60-unit development.
•
Property #4 is an undeveloped parcel south of Boynton Beach Boulevard and west
of SW 8th Street. The property, classified Moderate Density Residential (MoDR),
was originally earmarked for recreation development. Depending on the
recreational needs of the area being satisfied by existing parks, it could be
developed for residential use.
•
In the same general area of the City, the FPL parcel (#5) is adjacent to Old
Boynton Road, north of Boynton Beach Boulevard. The parcel’s future land use
classification is split between High Density Residential (HDR) and Local Retail
Commercial (LRC). Ultimately, the property will require land use reclassification,
most likely to Low Density Residential (LDR).
•
Property #6, located west of Seacrest Boulevard and north of Boynton Canal, is
classified Moderate Density Residential (MODR).
•
Property #7 is located at the southwest corner of Ocean Avenue and Federal
Highway. Originally approved in 2004 for a project known as The Arches. The
project was modified in 2005 and approved under the new name of “500 Ocean
Plaza” for a mixed use of 378 condominiums and 40,596 square feet of retail in
2005. The site plan expired in 2009. The property changed hands in 2011; a recent
surge of the demand for rental units is likely to bring it back to the market.
9
•
Property #8, located on the east side of Federal Highway, north of Gateway
Boulevard, was approved in 2006 for 23 townhouse project under the name
“Harbor Cay”. The site plan expired in 2008.
•
Property #9 is located within the Meadows 300 Planned Unit Development, north
of Meadows Boulevard and west of Congress Avenue. It was approved for 34
townhomes in 2007; the site plan expired in 2009.
•
Property #10, located on the west side of Federal Highway south of Old Dixie
Highway, was approved for 40 townhomes as the “Baywalk” project in 2006. The
site plan expired in 2010.
A number of other site plans approved for residential projects in recent years are the
subject of legislatively enabled time extensions which will expire in the near future. Such
extension provisions were enacted in recognition of the prolonged recession and difficult
market conditions. As housing prices begin to rise and the economy continues to
improve, the prospects for these projects to be developed is becoming more realistic.
.
10
Pa
r
t2Ma
ps
OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING AS PERCENT OF ALL OCCUPIED UNITS IN 2010
High Ridge Rd
Miner Rd
E Gat
eway
Blvd
Gateway Blvd
58.10
57.02
58.12
61.00
60.12
Old Boynton Rd
d
W Boynton Beach Blv
60.07
60.09
Ocean Ave
60.10
62.01
62.02
Woolbright Rd
60.05
54.11
IN
TE
RS
TA
TE
66.02
63.00
S. F
ede
r al
Hw
y
66.03
S.Congress Ave
95
60.08
62.03
SE 23rd Ave
Blvd
58.11
57.01
58.08
58.13
56.01
N Oce
an
Lawrence Rd
58.17
58.16
N. Federal H
wy
58.17
Legend
Percent of Owner-Occupied Units
Citywide owner-occupancy: 66.4%
Source: Census 2010
5.
3%
71
%
-9
0.
7%
90
.
79
.
51
%
-9
9.
5%
-7
61
.
31
%
-6
%
51
27
.
0.
9
%
-2
1.
3%
7.
5%
0
875
1,750
®
3,500
5,250
7,000
Feet
High Ridge Rd
UNITS FOR SEASONAL/RECREATIONAL OR OCCASIONAL USE
AS PERCENT OF ALL UNITS IN 2010, BY CENSUS TRACT
1%
6%
3%
58.13
E Gat
eway
Gateway Blvd
15%
7%
0%
6%
15%
Old Boynton Rd
d
W Boynton Beach Blv
1%
19%
Blvd
Ocean Ave
6%
21%
2%
Woolbright Rd
16%
SE 23rd Ave
5%
39%
IN
TE
RS
TA
TE
2%
16%
S. F
ede
ral
Hw
y
20%
S.Congress Ave
95
6%
®
Legend
%
00
21
.
01
-3
1.
-2
01
16
.
9.
00
%
6.
-1
1
7.
0
3.
0
1
-7
.0
00
0%
%
.0
0
-3
0
%
% Units for Seasonal/Recreational Use
Citywide percentage of homes for seasonal/recreational use: 9.2%
Source: Census 2010
N Oce
an Blv
d
4%
Miner Rd
11%
N. Federal H
wy
Lawrence Rd
2%
0
875 1,750
3,500
5,250
7,000
Feet
MEDIAN VALUE OF OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING, 2007-2011
58.07
58.15
56.01
58.17
56.02
58.16
MINER RD
GH
HI
KNOLLWOOD RD
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
60.07
Citywide median home value:$188,600
60.09
66.05
62.03
SW 23RD AVE
63.00
TAT
E
ERS
66.03
62.02
WOOLBRIGHT RD
60.05
95
60.08
S CONGRESS AVE
NOTE: These are self-reported values pooled over 5 years of
falling prices. The map illustrates differences across tracts;
the actual values should be regarded with caution.
62.01
60.10
66.02
54.11
S SEACREST BLVD
$112,200
- $171,400
- $228,200
- $293,600
- $575,800
IN T
Median Housing Value
61.00
OLD BOYNTON RD
N FEDERAL HWY
57.02
60.12
Legend
$59,800 $112,201
$171,401
$228,201
$293,601
58.12
N CONGRESS AVE
58.10
58.08
RD
58.11
57.01
E
DG
RI
58.13
S FEDE RAL
HW Y
LAWRENCE RD
®
HYPOLUXO RD
65.01
64.01
0
875 1,750
3,500
5,250
7,000
Feet
Par
t3of3
BOYNTON BEACH
De
par
t
me
ntofDe
ve
l
opme
nt
Di
vi
s
i
onofPl
anni
ngandZoni
ng
Ec
onomya
nd
Comme
r
c
i
a
l
De
ve
l
opme
nt
I.
LOCATION ADVANTAGES
Boynton Beach, the third largest city in Palm Beach County, has a number of significant
location advantages which contribute significantly to its overall economic potential.
•
•
The city, encompassing roughly 16.5 square miles, is located approximately 45
miles north of Miami and 15 miles south of West Palm Beach. This puts it in the
heart of southeast Florida’s tri-county Dade/Broward/Palm Beach metropolitan
areas.
The city has direct access to the Intracoastal Waterway, both Interstate 95 and the
Florida Turnpike, and one of only four ocean inlets existing along 47 miles of
shoreline within Palm Beach County. It also has a market of over 6.5 million
people within a 100 mile radius of the city and ready access to three international
airports, three major seaports, two major rail lines as well as the Tri-Rail
commuter rail system.
These advantages will continue to benefit Boynton Beach, its residents and businesses as
the city is rebounding from a major national recession. The metro area of Palm Beach
County, long recognized as one of the leading metropolitan divisions in the U.S. in terms
of job growth, has been severely affected. Employment in residential and commercial
construction, as well as in manufacturing and financial activities, and trade and utilities
sector, suffered significant losses. The unemployment rate for the county reached 12% in
July 2010; it has since fallen to 6.8% (the April 2013 preliminary estimate).
II. REAL PROPERTY TAX BASE
1. A Regional Picture
TABLE 1. Taxable Real Property Values, 2012: Selected Municipalities
Palm Beach
County, Total
Residential ($)
as % of all uses
Boca Raton
Boynton
Beach
Delray
Beach
West Palm
Beach
95,204,031,203 11,827,804,074 2,312,553,079 4,632,642,518 4,831,351,814
81.0%
74.4%
67.0%
Commercial ($)
15,782,451,546 3,229,139,727
13.4%
20.3%
as % of all uses
Industrial ($)
4,231,046,508
692,369,020
as % of all uses
3.6%
4.4%
Other ($)
2,321,849,147
150,632,690
as % of all uses
2.0%
0.9%
Source: Palm Beach County Appraiser’s Office
739,282,258
21.4%
338,673,090
77.8%
64.0%
975,958,131 2,045,819,052
16.4%
27.1%
280,657,429 424,966,951
9.8%
4.7%
5.6%
58,921,399
68,435,598
251,679,043
1.7%
1.1%
3.3%
Table 1 and the accompanying chart compare the profile of the taxable value of the
Boynton Beach real property with that of Palm Beach County, and the three other largest
municipalities – West Palm Beach, Boca Raton and Delray Beach.
1
2012 TAXABLE VALUES BY USE : PALM BEACH
COUNTY AND SELECTED MUNICIPALITIES
100%
90%
Residential
Commercial
% of Taxable Value
80%
Industrial
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
Other
0%
Palm Beach Boca Raton Boynton
County
Beach
Delray
beach
West Palm
Beach
The data indicates that:
•
As Table 1 and the chart above show, Boynton Beach still has by far the highest
share of industrial properties in its total taxable value, 9.8%, up from 7.0% in
2008, and the second highest overall share – after West Palm Beach - in all
commercial properties (including industrial), at 31.3%.
•
Since 2008, the share of the value of residential real estate in total taxable real
estate property value decreased in the County and in all but one municipality
(Boca Raton) where it increased from 73.5% to 74.4%.
2. The City’s Real Property Tax Base
A. Trends in Taxable Value
Even though the impact of the ongoing real estate recession on the growth of the taxable
value is tempered by the way the Florida Save Our Homes program determines annual
assessments of homesteaded residential properties (they increase with inflation, for a
maximum of 3%), Table 2 shows a remarkable reversal of trends in growth of the City’s
real property taxable value. The decline of the residential value between 2008 and 2012
was almost 38.5%, followed by nearly 30% drop in commercial value; the industrial
sector fared best.
2
TABLE 2. Changes in Real Property’s Taxable Value, 2002-2012
2002
2005
2008
2012
Change
2008/2011
TOTAL TAXABLE ($)
in which:
2,636,109,842
3,975,909,602
5,344,481,475
3,449,429,826
-35.5%
RESIDENTIAL
1,829,142,969
2,896,500,399
3,761,525,883
2,312,553,079
-38.5%
COMMERCIAL
578,841,097
770,213,540
1,051,563,834
739,282,258
-29.7%
INDUSTRIAL
197,200,737
249,268,290
374,727,428
338,673,090
-9.6%
Source: Palm Beach County’s Appraiser’s Office
B. The Property Tax Distribution
There were 30,251 residential properties (excluding apartments) listed on the Boynton
Beach 2012 tax roll. Table 3 shows changes in the property tax distribution in terms of
numbers and percentages of properties that either pay no taxes or pay very little.
TABLE 3. Property Tax Distribution for Residential Properties, 2005 and 2012
Owner-Occupied Residential
Properties
All properties
-Single Family/Townhomes
-Condominiums/Cooperatives
No. of
Properties
Properties
Paying Zero
Taxes
2012
2012
30,251
17,851
12,400
1,307 (4.3%)
391 (2.2%)
916 (7.4%)
Properties paying below $200 in Taxes
2005
3,300 (12.4%)
992 (5.7%)
2,338 (24.5%)
2012
8,859 (29.3%)
4,168(23.3%)
4,691 (37.8%)
Source: Palm Beach County’s Property Appraiser’s Office
The two main causes of the sharp increase in the number of such properties were the
decrease in property values and the enactment in 2008 of the constitutional amendment
allowing for an additional $25,000 homestead exemption. The exemption had a strong
impact on single-family homes, 77% of which are homesteaded, as opposed to only 47%
of condominiums.
C. Principal Taxpayers
The ten principal taxpayers within the city pay 47% of all property taxes, up from 30% in
2008, as shown in the table below.
3
TABLE 4. Ten Principal Taxpayers, 2012
TAXPAYER
Type of Business
1. Florida Power and Light
2. Duke PGC 1 9 LLC
3. Boynton Waterways Investment Association, LLC
4. Boynton JCP Associates, LTD
5. Las Ventanas at Boynton Beach LTD
6. Moreguard Boynton Town Center
7. City National Bank of Florida
8. Boynton Dev. Associates
9. EQR FREWAC 2008 Limited Partnership
10. Villas at Quantum Lakes, INC
Utility
Real estate company
Developer
Retail shopping mall
Rental apartments
Retail
Community bank
Developer
Rental apartments
Rental apartments
Total
TOTAL REAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUES FOR THE CITY
Taxes
($)
% of
Total Taxes
1,958,518
1,613,125
1,374,350
1,170,731
1,169,702
1,051,061
1,002,536
923,745
754,039
754,016
7.89%
6.50%
5.54%
4.72%
4.71%
4.24%
4.04%
3.72%
3.04%
3.04%
11,771,823
47.44%
24,815,543
100.00%
Source: Palm Beach County Appraiser’s Office, Department of Finance
III. NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS
1. Palm Beach County Commercial Markets Overview
To give the context for the review of new commercial approvals for the city, Table 5 on
the following page offers a comparative look at commercial submarkets, which cover
four of the largest Palm Beach County municipalities. As shown, Boynton Beach
submarkets share of the total county market ranges from 14.2% of the retail market and
9.2% of the industrial market, to only 1.9% of the office market. (Note that the retail
submarket includes Lantana.)
None of the four submarkets had retail or office projects under construction during the
first quarter of 2013; West Palm Beach had new industrial development under
construction.
Reports from the commercial real estate firm CB Richard Ellis (CBRE) confirm that,
consistently with a gradual improvement in the Palm Beach County unemployment rate
and active residential sector, the County commercial markets continue a gradual
recovery.
4
TABLE 5. Selected Submarkets of the Palm Beach County Retail, Office and
Industrial Markets, First Quarter of 2013
SUBMARKETS**
Boca Raton
Boynton
Beach
Delray
Beach
West Palm
Beach
TOTAL PALM
BEACH
COUNTY
6,973,532
6,335,182
4,032,661
7,113,100
44,621,560
RETAIL
Building Square Footage
as % of total market
Direct Vacancy Rate %
2013 Net Absorption
Under Construction SF
Avr. Dir. Asking Lease Rate
15.6%
14.2%
9.0%
15.9%
100.0%
4.7%
8.9%
7.5%
7.5%
7.9%
43,063
14,227
230,200
1,516
281,765
0
0
0
0
61,500
$24.14
$15.76
$22.50
$16.14
$17.33
11,334,882
448,063
1,496,872
5,572,311
23,246,311
OFFICE
48.8%
1.9%
6.4%
24.0%
100.0%
Total Vacancy Rate %
23.7%
30.2%
53.4%
23.3%
24.8%
2013 Net Absorption
3,369
(1,472)
(6,586)
(12,629)
17,071
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$17.25
$13.15
$12.66
$17.64
$17.08
7,567,857
4,143,478
2,743,288
13,695,809
45,049,686
INDUSTRIAL
16.8%
9.2%
6.1%
30.4%
100.0%
Total Vacancy Rate %
8.8%
9.1%
14.5%
6.9%
8.1%
2013 Net Absorption
13,424
(34,412)
28,541
(13,521)
166,395
0
0
0
125,000
145,900
$8.80
$7.07
$7.04
$7.40
$6.47
Source: CB Richard Ellis
* Boynton Beach submarket boundaries: north – Lake Worth city limits; south – Delray Beach city limits; west –441
* For Retail, the Boynton Beach submarket includes Lantana.
The County retail market is improving, supported by progress in employment and
tourism as well as climbing home sales and values. The retail market posted 281,765
square feet of positive absorption in the first quarter of 2013. Note that, since CBRE
retail reports do not cover malls, Table 6 omits construction of the 900,000 square foot
outlet mall underway in West Palm Beach. The CBRE short-term forecast predicts the
year-over-year growth in core retail sales (without auto and gas sales) to stay within the
3% to 4% range, and the demand for space to continue at a slower pace as compared to
previous recoveries. A noteworthy trend is that of smaller footprint stores of companies
such as Walmart, Best Buy, Kohl’s, Staples, Target and Office Depot, the response to
competition from internet sellers, rising costs and the weak economy.
5
The vacancy rate for the County office market is improving. It is 2.7 percentage points
lower than total vacancy in the first quarter of 2012 and below 25% for the first time
since first quarter of 2009, reflecting an increase in the job growth. Year-over-year, the
overall average asking lease rates for office space increased 1.3%. No new projects
30,000 square feet or greater have been developed during the past several quarters. The
CBRE analysts’ short-term outlook for the office market is favorable based on the
continued job growth in 2013.
The industrial market also continues to recover. The demand during the first quarter of
2013 resulted in over 166,000 square feet of positive absorption, while the market total
vacancy rate decreased 1.5 percentage points, and asking lease rates increased 1.1
percentage points. Flex properties experienced the largest year-over-year 11.5% increase
of leasing rates. New development has been driven mostly by build-to-suit projects from
tenants looking for opportunities with specifications not readily available in the market.
The CBRE analysts anticipate that scarcity and high pricing of industrial-zoned land in
Miami-Dade and Broward counties will likely start to push demand north to Palm Beach
County.
2. Commercial Approvals
As the charts in this section demonstrate, the recession –high unemployment, the lack of
demand, the unavailability of financing - has had a strong negative impact on the
commercial and industrial sectors in the city. With the exception of a new 93,755 square
foot Walmart in 2010, there have been no new retail project approvals since 2007. Office
approvals, which averaged about 87,000 square feet during the 2000-2006 period, have
been flat, averaging about 9,000 square feet since.
RETAIL AND OFFICE PROJECT APPROVALS
Square footage
100,000
50,000
2006
2007
2008
2009
Retail
2010
Office
Source: Development Department
Note: Approvals with valid development orders
6
2011
2012
2012
Not included in the chart are: (i) three projects not in the retail or office category,
approved in 2010: Casa Del Mar (a yacht club), Timeless Life Care (assisted living
facility), and the Gateway Hotel, for a total of 185,000 square feet; (ii) approvals for three
commercial buildings previously reported in approved master plan for Quantum Village
South, and; (iii) two new Publix stores which replaced old stores in 2012.
INDUSTRIAL PROJECT APPROVALS
350,000
300,000
Square Footage
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
-
2003
2004
2005
2006
Warehouse/Distribution
2008
2007
2009
Manufacturing
2009
2010
2011
2012
TOTAL INDUSTRIAL
With the exception of one small project in 2008, there have been no industrial approvals;
the last approval for a manufacturing facility was in 2003.
7
NON-RESIDENTIAL* NEW CONSTRUCTION: PERMIT VALUES
90,000,000
80,000,000
70,000,000
Current $
60,000,000
50,000,000
40,000,000
30,000,000
20,000,000
10,000,000
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
May
*Note: Includes residential in mixed-use buildings
The permit value chart above includes all non-residential projects. The three highest in
value include a new Walmart store (2011), the Imagine Charter School (2009) and the
reconstruction of a Publix store (2011). After two years of low activity, annual permit
value is rebounding, reflecting the improving economy.
IV. VACANT LAND
There currently remain approximately 75 acres of vacant land with commercial/mixeduse classifications and 26 acres of vacant land with industrial classifications (about 7%
and 7.5% of the total acreage corresponding to each of these land use categories).
TABLE 6. Vacant commercial and Industrial Land as of May 2013
VACANT COMMERCIAL
VACANT INDUSTRIAL
# of Parcels
# of Parcels 1 Total vacant
# of Parcels
# of Parcels 1 Total vacant
under 1 acre
acre or more
under 1acre
acre or more
acreage
acreage
85
17
79 acres
13
11
50 acres
Source: Development Department/Palm Beach County Appraiser’s Office
Note: Vacant commercial inventory includes parcels with a mixed use future land use designations. Vacant
industrial inventory includes 23.3 acre parcel adjacent to the Quantum Industrial Park with the Industrial land
use but with the single-family residential zoning.
Most of vacant parcels are small and unfeasible for larger scale projects: only 17 out of
102 vacant commercial/mixed use and 11 out of 24 vacant industrial properties are 1 acre
or over in size; and only 10 and 6 parcels, respectively, are 2 or more acres.
8
V. BOYNTON’S INDUSTRY AND LABOR FORCE PROFILES
1. The Industry Profiles
A. Employment trends in Palm Beach County
Palm Beach County was for a number of years recognized as one of the leading areas in
the U.S. with respect to job growth. In August 2006 the unemployment rate was 2.8% (as
compared to 3.1% for a State of Florida). Mid-2006 was the peak of the housing boom in
the County; subsequently, the construction sector began to shed jobs.
TABLE 7. Palm Beach County Private Employment Trends
% Change
2006/2009
2006 2009
2012
Total, All Industries, (000)
498.5 440.4 457.3
-8.3%
Manufacturing
20.2
16.3
15.2
-24.8%
Construction
49.5
27.6
24.0
-51.5%
Trade/Transportation/Utilities
106.5
97.3
99.8
-6.3%
Information
11.2
9.5
9.2
-17.9%
Financial Activities
41.2
35.2
36.6
-11.2%
Professional/Business Services
95.8
82.7
90.0
-6.1%
Education and Health Services
77.0
80.1
82.6
7.3%
Leisure and Hospitality
71.9
68.3
72.8
1.3%
Other Services
24.9
23.1
26.8
7.6%
% Change
2009/2012
3.8%
-6.7%
-13.0%
2.6%
-3.2%
4.0%
8.8%
3.1%
6.6%
16.0%
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Note: not seasonally adjusted.
Percentage-wise, job losses between 2006 and 2012 were the highest for the construction
industry, followed by manufacturing, information and financial activities. In terms of
numbers, the construction sector was by far the most affected, with 25.5 thousand jobs
lost.
Between 2009 and 2012, the County’s private sector experienced a 3.8% job growth; a
majority of industries added jobs, but construction, manufacturing and information
continued their losses.
The job losses were reflected in the rapidly rising unemployment rates that only recently
began to drop.
9
TABLE 8. Unemployment Rates, Palm Beach County and Boynton Beach
A. Annual Unemployment Rates, 2003-2012
2005 2006 2007 2008
U.S.
5.1
4.6
4.6
5.8
Florida
3.8
3.3
4.0
6.3
2009
9.3
10.4
2010
9.6
11.3
2011
8.9
10.3
2012
8.1
8.6
Palm Beach County
4.2
3.6
4.2
6.5
10.5
11.4
10.8
8.8
Boynton Beach
3.6
3.0
3.7
5.9
9.8
11.1
10.4
8.5
B. Monthly Unemployment Rates, 2013
Jan
Feb
Mar
U.S.
8.5
8.1
7.6
Florida
8.0
7.6
7.0
Palm Beach County
8.0
7.5
6.9
Boynton Beach
8.1
7.4
6.7
Apr
7.1
6.8
6.8
6.5
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Note: Not seasonally adjusted, preliminary for April except U.S.
B. Boynton Beach Business Profile
This section presents the establishment-based employment by industry using the 2011
estimates furnished by Nielsen-Claritas, Inc. The data comes from businesses and other
establishments located within the City’s limits, showing industry profile of jobs in
Boynton Beach. The residence-based employment data, which provides information on
jobs held by Boynton Beach residents, is provided by the American Community Survey
(see Appendix D).
The comparison of 2007 and 2011 employment estimates for Boynton Beach provided by
Nielsen Claritas Inc. indicates a disappearance of 215 businesses, and a loss of nearly
10.5 thousand jobs over this four-year period. In 2007, 90% of all businesses employed
fewer than 20 people and the average business employed about 11; in 2011, 92.7% had
fewer that 20 employees and the average number was slightly over eight. Boynton Beach
is a city of small business.
As demonstrated by Table 9 on the following page, the industry with by far the highest
share of the total employment in 2011 was retail trade, at almost 27%. The health
services were next at 11.4%, followed by the finance, insurance and real estate group at
8.6%.
10
TABLE 9. Non-Agricultural, Establishment-Based Employment by Industry,
Boynton Beach, 2011
INDUSTRY
Construction
Manufacturing
Transportation/Public Utilities
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Finance/ Insurance/ Real Estate
Services, in which:
Personal Services
Business Services
Legal Services
Health Services
Social Services
Educational Services
Hotels/Other Lodging
Auto and Other Repair
Recreation Services
Eng/Acct/Research/Mgt
Other Services
Public Administration
Other
TOTAL
Number of
Employment
Firms
315
104
117
162
681
403
2,166
981
922
1,100
7,824
2,497
200
219
97
387
70
37
13
166
75
118
114
37
180
Percent with
20 or more
Employment employees
% of Total
Firms
9.0%
3.0%
3.3%
4.6%
19.5%
11.5%
7.5%
3.4%
3.2%
3.8%
26.9%
8.6%
4.4%
15.4%
6.0%
4.3%
13.4%
3.00%
905
5.7%
3.1%
3.5%
1,031
6.3%
3.5%
5.0%
415
2.8%
1.4%
3.1%
3,321 11.1%
11.4%
6.7%
1,178
2.0%
4.1%
15.7%
1,000
1.1%
3.4%
40.5%
147
0.4%
0.5%
30.8%
570
4.7%
2.0%
3.0%
1,198
2.1%
4.1%
16.0%
814
3.4%
2.8%
5.9%
553
3.3%
1.9%
1.8%
1,818
1.1%
6.3%
18.9%
618
5.2%
2.1%
X
3,495
29,058
100%
100%
7.3%
Source: Nielsen- Claritas, Inc.
2. The Boynton’s Workforce Profile
A. Occupational Profile
TABLE 11. Occupations, Boynton Beach and Palm Beach County, 2009-2011
OCCUPATION
Civilian employed population 16 years and
Management, business, science, and arts
Service occupations
Sales and office occupations
Natural resources/ construction/ maintenance
Production/ transportation / material moving
PERCENT OF TOTAL
BOYNTON
BEACH
PALM
BEACH
COUNTY
BOYNTON
BEACH
PALM BEACH
COUNTY
30,508
9,049
8,593
7,887
2,272
2,707
572,078
200,294
125,722
153,608
50,963
41,491
100%
29.7%
28.2%
25.9%
7.4%
8.9%
100%
35.0%
22.0%
26.9%
8.9%
7.3%
Source: U.S. Census: American Community Survey
11
By and large, the Boynton Beach workforce occupational profile mirrors that of Palm
Beach County as a whole. About 30% of the employed city residents hold higher wage
management and professional occupations, lower than the county’s overall 35%. Some
54% are employed in service, sales and office jobs, compared to 49% of those residing
anywhere in the county. A comparable percentage of workers in the City and the County
are self-employed in their own (not incorporated) businesses – 6% and 5.7%,
respectively.
Median earnings for workers 16 age and over during the 2009-2011 time period were
$29,152, $27,375, $27,009 and $33,296 for Boynton Beach, Delray Beach, West Palm
Beach and Boca Raton, respectively. The median earnings were $28,870 for the County
as a whole.
B. Commuting to Work
The American Community Survey 2009-2011 data indicates that about 81.2% of the City
residents drove alone to their place of employment; only about 2.1% used public
transportation while 0.8% walked. The average travel time to work was about 22 minutes.
Public transportation, Tri-Rail and the Palm Tran bus system, could certainly be used by
more commuters, but the location, schedules and other issues cannot offset the
convenience of the proximity of the Interstate 95, which provides good access to
employment centers throughout the tri-county area.
12
Appe
ndi
xA
BOYNTON BEACH CENSUS
GEOGRAPHY2
0
1
0AND SECTOR
BOUNDARI
ES
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CENSUS TRACTS 2010
HYPOLUXO RD
57.01
60.12
OLD BOYNTON RD
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
60.10
60.07 60.09
62.02
WOOLBRIGHT RD
62.03
SW 23RD AVE
60.05
S FE DERA L
HWY
60.08
62.01
61.00
VD
N OC EA N BL
GOLF RD
N SEACREST BLVD
57.02
N F EDE
RA L HW
Y
GATEWAY BLVD
58.12
54.11
66.03
tate
I-95
63.00
Inte
rs
58.10
58.08
NW 22ND AVE
N CONGRESS AVE
GATEWAY BLVD
58.13
S CONGRE SS AVE
LAWRENCE RD
MINER RD
HIGH RIDGE RD
58.17
58.11
56.01
58.16
S SEACR EST BLVD
LAWRENCE RD
58.17
66.02
0
625
5
1,250
2,500
3,750
5,000
Feet
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CENSUS TRACTS 2010
WITH SECTOR BOUNDARIES
HYPOLUXO RD
57.01
57.02
58.12
60.12
OLD BOYNTON RD
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
60.07 60.09
62.02
WOOLBRIGHT RD
62.03
SW 23RD AVE
60.05
S FE DERA L
HWY
60.08
62.01
61.00
VD
N OC EA N BL
GOLF RD
60.10
N F EDE
RA L HW
Y
GATEWAY BLVD
N SEACREST BLVD
58.10
58.08
NW 22ND AVE
N CONGRESS AVE
GATEWAY BLVD
58.13
S CONGRE SS AVE
LAWRENCE RD
MINER RD
HIGH RIDGE RD
58.17
58.11
56.01
58.16
S SEACR EST BLVD
LAWRENCE RD
58.17
54.11
63.00
66.03
66.02
0
625
5
1,250
2,500
3,750
5,000
Feet
Appe
ndi
xB
DEMOGRAPHI
CDATA
TABLE 1. BOYNTON BEACH PROFILE OF GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC
CHARACTERISTICS: CENSUS 2010
General Demographic
NUMBER PERCENT General Demographic Characteristics NUMBER PERCENT
Characteristics
Total population
SEX AND AGE
Male
Female
Under 5 years
5 to 9 years
10 to 14 years
15 to 19 years
20 to 24 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
55 to 59 years
60 to 64 years
65 to 74 years
75 to 84 years
85 years and over
Median age (years)
18 years and over
21 years and over
62 years and over
65 years and over
18 years and over
Male
Female
65 years and over
Male
Female
RACE
Total population
One race
White
Black or African
American Indian/ Alaska
Native
Asian
Native Hawaiian and
Other Pacific Islander
Some other race
Two or more races
68,217
32,196
36,021
3,924
3,557
3,529
3,561
4,018
9,293
9,018
9,230
3,957
3,563
6,270
5,498
2,799
41.9
55,067
52,885
16,752
14,567
25,625
29,442
6,009
8,558
68,217
66,717
42,599
20,646
100 HISPANIC/LATINO AND RACE
Total population
Hispanic or Latino (of any race)
Mexican
5.8 Puerto Rican
5.2 Cuban
5.2 Other Hispanic or Latino
5.2 Not Hispanic or Latino
5.9
13.6 RELATIONSHIP
13.2 Population in Households
13.6 Householder
5.8 Spouse
5.2 Child
9.2 Other relatives
8.1 Nonrelatives
4.1 Unmarried partner
(x)
80.7 HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE
77.5 Total households
24.6 Family households (families)
with own children under 18
21.4
Married-couple families
37.6
Male
householder, no wife
43.2
Female
householder, no husband
8.8
12.5
Nonfamily households
Householder living alone
65 years and over
100
97.8
62.4 Households with people under 18
30.3 Households with people 65 and over
196
1,473
0.3
2.2 Average household size
26
1,777
1,500
0 Average family size
2.6
2.2
68,217
8,702
1,555
2,137
899
4,111
59,515
100
12.8
2.3
3.1
1.3
6
87.2
67,217
29,104
11,357
15,906
5,812
5,038
2,232
98.5
42.7
16.6
23.3
8.5
7.4
3.3
29,104
16,570
6,271
11,357
3,790
1,410
584
3,803
1,897
12,534
9,975
4,572
100
56.9
21.5
39
13
4.8
2
13.1
6.5
43.1
34.3
15.7
7,298
10,323
25.1
35.5
2.31
(x)
3.00
(x)
TABLE 2. BOYNTON BEACH SOCIAL PROFILE, 2009-2011
Selected Social Characteristics
Estimate
Margin of
Error
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
Population 3 years and over enrolled in
school
Selected Social Characteristics
Estimate
Margin of
Error
PLACE OF BIRTH
Nursery school, preschool
Kindergarten
Elementary school (gr. 1-8)
High school (grades 9-12)
14,632
1,069
741
5,441
2,876
College or graduate school
4,505
+/-1,154 Total population
+/-304 Native
+/-262 Born in United States
State of residence
+/-715
Different state
+/-629
68,372
51,095
49,621
20,107
29,514
+/-63
+/-1,680
+/-1,578
+/-1,669
+/-1,607
1,474
17,277
+/-446
+/-1,674
17,277
8,186
9,091
+/-1,674
+/-1,192
+/-1,484
18,751
1,474
320
+/-1,569
+/-446
+/-201
1,154
+/-369
17,277
6,761
10,516
+/-1,674
+/-1,246
+/-1,304
68,372
+/-63
10,618
6,735
6,172
4,906
4,634
4,151
2,241
+/-1,754
+/-963
+/-1,115
+/-729
+/-786
+/-896
+/-581
2,000
+/-522
Born in Puerto Rico, U.S. Island areas, or
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
+/-752 abroad to American parent(s)
Foreign born
Less than 9th grade
9th to 12th grade, no diploma
50,085
2,947
4,260
U.S. CITIZENSHIP STATUS
+/-1,128 Foreign-born population
+/-728 Naturalized U.S. citizen
+/-825 Not a U.S. citizen
High school graduate (includes
equivalency)
14,232
+/-1,358
Some college, no degree
Associate's degree
Bachelor's degree
11,439
4,574
8,527
Population 25 years & over
Graduate or professional degree
% high school grad./ higher
% bachelor's degree/ higher
4,106
X
X
MARITAL STATUS
Males 15 years and over
27,469
Never married
Now married, exc. separated
Separated
Widowed
Divorced
10,331
12,090
566
1,379
3,103
Females 15 years and over
30,551
Never married
Now married, except separated
Separated
Widowed
Divorced
RESIDENCE 1 YEAR AGO
Population 1 year and over
Same house
Different house in the U.S.
Same county
Different county
Same state
Different state
Abroad
9,421
12,013
YEAR OF ENTRY
Population born outside the United
+/-955 States
+/-749 Native
+/-849 Entered 2000 or later
+/-654
Entered before 2000
X Foreign born
X Entered 2000 or later
Entered before 2000
ANCESTRY
+/-896 Total population
West Indian (excluding Hispanic origin
+/-1,006 groups)
+/-808 Irish
+/-361 Italian
+/-292 German
+/-622 English
American
+/-914 Polish
+/-1,003 Russian
+/-856 French (except Basque)
1,597
+/-548
1,009
+/-396 Scottish
791
+/-324
3,688
+/-510 Dutch
743
+/-258
4,420
+/-648 Subsaharan African
French Canadian
Swedish
299
384
429
+/-182
+/-274
+/-181
+/-255 Hungarian
314
+/-130
337
320
68
249
240
147
+/-182
+/-184
+/-58
+/-130
+/-220
+/-93
67,785
55,942
11,010
7,255
3,755
1,926
1,829
+/-1,580
+/-1,424
+/-1,363
+/-915
+/-604
+/-664
833
+/-517
Scotch-Irish
Czech
Swiss
Ukrainian
Arab
Norwegian
TABLE 3.
YEAR
1970
1980
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2015
2020
POPULATION TRENDS 1970-2012 AND
PROJECTIONS FOR 2015 AND 2020
POPULATION
18,115
35,624
44,056
46,310
47,451
46,194
47,022
48,144
48,428
48,848
49,085
50,940
52,311
53,635
55,483
60,389
61,816
62,847
64,593
65,208
65,601
67,071
66,872
66,671
66,978
68,217
68,409
68,741
72,336
76,603
ANNUAL % CHANGE
X
X
X
5.12%
2.46%
-2.60%
1.79%
2.39%
0.59%
0.87%
0.49%
3.78%
2.69%
2.53%
3.45%
8.84%
2.36%
1.67%
2.78%
0.95%
0.60%
2.24%
-0.30%
-0.30%
0.46%
1.85%
0.28%
0.49%
1.70%
1.15%
Source: US Census for 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2010; Bureau of Economic and Business
Research (BEBR), University of Florida and Palm Beach County estimates for
the remaining years; Palm Beach County projections for 2015 and 2020
TABLE 4. POPULATION CHANGES BY CENSUS TRACT, 2000-2010
CENSUS TRACTS
POPULATION
2000
POPULATION
2010
CHANGE (%)
2000/2010
54.03/ now 54.11
56.00/ now 56.01
137
1,605
109
-20.4%
57.01
57.02
58.04/(now 58.10 & 58.11)
58.05/(now 58.12 & 58.13)
58.06
58.07
58.08
58.09 (now 58.16 & 58.17)
60.02/(now 60.09 & 60.10)
60.03/now 60.12
60.05
60.07
60.08
61.00
3,728
5,533
1,962
3,428
5
7
1,270
7,394
4,975
2,458
3,703
2,673
1,268
4,508
5112*
6,185
2,255
4,584
4,717
7,735
5,661
2,364
3,673
3,163
1,254
-4.3%
11.8%
14.9%
33.7%
x
x
43.7%
13.8%
-3.8%
-0.8%
18.3%
-1.1%
62.01
62.02
62.03
63.00
66.02
66.03
4,139
1,765
2,328
4,468
589
2,446
8,345*
2,110
2,161
5,068
601
3,120
-3.5%
19.5%
-7.2%
13.4%
2.0%
27.6%
CITY TOTAL
60,389
54,760
13.0%
Source: U.S. Census 2000 and 2010
* The census tract geography underwent changes in 2010. The new Census 2010 tract numbers
are noted alongside the 2000 ones. In four cases (tracts 56.01 and 57.01 and also 61.00 and 62.01)
tract boundary adjustment necessitated aggregation so that the overall 2000-2010 population
change for the area could be calculated.
TABLE 5.
CENSUS
TRACT
54.11
56.01
57.01
57.02
58.08
58.10
58.11
58.12
58.13
58.16
58.17
60.05,
60.07
60.08
60.09,
60.10,
60.12
61.00
62.01,
62.02,
62.03,
63.00
66.02
66.03
TOTAL
POPULATION AGE DISTRIBUTION BY CENSUS TRACT, CENSUS 2010
Under 18 18 to 34
TOTAL
years
POPULATION
109
1
1
1501
374
345
3611
890
748
6185
1524
1334
4717
741
1733
240
0
2
2,015
433
266
833
141
380
3,751
768
1,148
4,843
1,011
949
2,892
831
537
3,673
554
514
3,163
888
857
1,254
192
183
1,938
9
26
3,723
694
1,108
2,364
491
492
3,726
836
842
4,619
1,198
1,183
2,110
194
447
2,161
214
282
5,068
860
1,009
601
133
67
3,120
173
279
68,217
13,150
14,732
35 to 49
years
50 to 64
years
65 to 84
years
4
304
612
1123
1042
6
467
187
964
1,255
814
684
720
218
62
721
582
781
1,072
319
261
1,068
132
227
13,625
15
244
639
1347
638
65
355
104
602
997
499
760
373
241
334
594
497
772
832
392
347
1,026
167
303
12,143
69
203
601
777
299
145
418
19
228
550
191
884
190
357
1,207
504
242
432
287
637
793
917
91
1,727
11,768
85 years and 65 years Percent 65
over
and over and over
19
19
17.4%
31
31
2.1%
121
121
3.4%
80
80
1.3%
264
264
5.6%
22
167
69.6%
76
494
24.5%
2
21
2.5%
41
269
7.2%
81
631
13.0%
20
211
7.3%
277
1,161
31.6%
135
325
10.3%
63
420
33.5%
300
1,507
77.8%
102
606
16.3%
60
302
12.8%
63
495
13.3%
47
334
7.2%
121
758
35.9%
264
1,057
48.9%
188
1,105
21.8%
11
102
17.0%
411
2,138
68.5%
2,799
21.40%
14,567
Median
age
75.4
36.2
39.3
38.5
33.7
70.3
45.1
30.2
34.5
40.3
36.9
51.4
31.9
52.2
73.8
36.0
40.8
39.6
34.0
53.7
64.3
44.5
47.4
74.4
41.9
TABLE 6.
POPULATION BY RACE/HISPANIC ORIGIN BY CENSUS TRACT, CENSUS 2010
CENSUS
TRACT
Total
Population
White alone
54.11
56.01
57.01
57.02
58.08
58.10
58.11
58.12
58.13
58.16
58.17
60.05,
60.07
60.08
60.09,
60.10,
60.12
61.00
62.01,
62.02,
62.03,
63.00
66.02
66.03
TOTAL
109
1,501
3,611
6,185
4,717
240
2,015
833
3,751
4,843
2,892
3,673
3,163
1,254
1,938
3,723
2,364
3,726
4,619
2,110
2,161
5,068
601
3,120
68,217
108
591
1,312
1,978
3,575
234
1,562
565
2,661
3,532
1,871
2,973
1,203
931
1,894
2,150
1,782
1,023
1,994
1,839
1,597
3,838
555
2,831
42,599
1
763
2,033
3,806
680
1
302
201
711
778
644
496
1,686
248
12
1,285
452
2,549
2,209
162
416
987
27
197
20,646
0
5
14
56
17
0
2
2
6
6
2
4
4
8
1
7
10
5
20
7
11
6
0
3
196
0
10
19
44
191
0
84
14
151
227
178
70
67
37
6
58
37
22
40
36
75
63
9
35
1,473
Native
Hawaiian/ Other
Pacific Islander
alone
0
3
1
1
4
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
1
0
0
3
1
3
0
0
0
4
0
0
26
Percent of
total
100.0%
62.4%
30.3%
0.3%
2.2%
0.0%
American
Black or African
Indian/ Alaska
American alone
Native alone
Asian
alone
Some Other
Race alone
Two or
Hispanic
More
or Latino
Races
0
404
577
673
689
18
247
146
700
786
484
281
340
136
108
565
305
233
791
243
240
505
42
189
0
90
138
168
114
2
38
25
122
157
98
66
103
19
10
134
32
51
230
25
42
85
1
27
1,777
0
39
94
132
136
3
27
26
98
142
98
63
99
11
15
86
50
73
126
41
20
85
9
27
1,500
8,702
2.6%
2.2%
12.8%
TABLE 7. HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS BY CENSUS TRACT, CENSUS 2010
Total
Family
HusbandCENSUS
TRACT Households Households Wife Family
54.11
56.01
57.01
57.02
58.08
58.10
58.11
58.12
58.13
58.16
58.17
60.05
60.07
60.08
60.09
60.10
60.12
61.00
62.01
62.02
62.03
63.00
66.02
66.03
72
498
1,328
2,115
2,262
152
825
434
1,701
1,971
1,048
1,723
1,173
582
1,270
1,520
889
1,445
1,486
1,211
1,264
2,263
235
1,637
35
352
813
1,352
1,038
67
566
190
906
1,305
782
974
767
338
554
853
566
859
961
488
476
1,183
179
966
35
207
496
795
694
60
454
89
584
950
562
728
381
279
487
544
404
437
554
382
342
871
143
879
With Own
Children Under
18
Female Householder
w/Children under 18
One-Person
Households
0
73
186
282
279
0
189
37
259
384
310
190
202
81
0
193
163
148
292
54
52
298
55
63
0
46
117
188
124
0
31
40
133
129
102
59
212
22
0
111
57
144
142
39
43
120
8
30
37
121
441
613
913
72
211
168
587
515
204
619
303
194
666
470
242
470
382
602
706
834
38
567
Percent One- Average
Percent
Household
Person
Family
Size
Households Households
48.6%
70.7%
61.2%
63.9%
45.9%
44.1%
68.6%
43.8%
53.3%
66.2%
74.6%
56.5%
65.4%
58.1%
43.6%
56.1%
63.7%
59.4%
64.7%
40.3%
37.7%
52.3%
76.2%
59.0%
51.4%
24.3%
33.2%
29.0%
40.4%
47.4%
25.6%
38.7%
34.5%
26.1%
19.5%
35.9%
25.8%
33.3%
52.4%
30.9%
27.2%
32.5%
25.7%
49.7%
55.9%
36.9%
16.2%
34.6%
1.51
3.01
2.72
2.85
2.02
1.58
2.44
1.92
2.21
2.46
2.76
2.13
2.62
2.15
1.53
2.34
2.53
2.58
3.11
1.71
1.71
2.18
2.56
1.81
TABLE 8. HOUSEHOLD INCOME DISTRIBUTION BY CENSUS TRACT, 2008
CENSUS
TRACT
Total number
of Households
Less than
$15,000
$15,000024,999
$25,00034,999
$35,00049,999
$50,00074,999
$75,00099,999
$100,000149,999
$150,000249,999
$250,000499,999
$500,000 or
more
Percent
households with
income of $75,000
and over
Median
household
income
54.03
56.00
57.01
57.02
58.04
58.05
58.06
58.07
58.08
58.09
60.02
60.03
60.05
60.07
60.08
61.00
62.01
62.02
62.03
63.00
66.02
66.03
77
714
1,484
1,996
1,038
1,858
2
3
1,294
3,598
3,084
1,083
1,868
1,120
701
1,822
1,352
1,024
1,468
2,154
252
1,630
8
74
216
435
144
124
0
0
256
156
467
85
159
127
26
362
136
175
235
267
14
126
5
95
238
313
107
159
0
0
125
307
401
114
266
119
24
298
137
125
269
265
13
180
5
94
221
243
118
254
0
0
128
392
609
113
309
226
58
236
197
151
232
281
17
163
10
118
267
444
143
429
0
1
259
594
431
171
298
193
84
310
350
126
323
409
21
189
11
147
268
339
246
422
0
1
352
861
658
271
423
246
133
266
279
197
269
449
52
248
6
70
174
135
153
221
0
0
118
629
243
141
248
100
102
112
144
129
81
214
42
184
11
78
83
56
91
205
0
0
56
486
223
130
120
55
111
168
94
50
37
191
53
175
7
24
11
23
31
41
0
0
0
157
52
42
29
36
74
37
10
60
22
45
25
198
6
12
4
8
4
3
0
0
0
12
0
13
14
14
45
28
5
8
0
20
8
106
8
3
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
3
2
3
44
5
0
3
0
13
7
61
49.4%
26.2%
18.6%
11.1%
26.9%
25.3%
0.0%
0.0%
13.4%
35.7%
16.8%
30.4%
22.1%
18.6%
53.6%
19.2%
18.7%
24.4%
9.5%
22.4%
53.6%
44.4%
$75,180
$46,339
$39,715
$35,252
$50,615
$48,607
$37,700
$50,483
$41,047
$59,773
$37,321
$54,901
$43,426
$40,595
$81,279
$35,641
$43,304
$41,875
$34,899
$43,722
$80,729
$67,188
CITY
29,622
3,592
3,560
4,047
5,170
6,138
3,246
2,473
924
310
159
24.0%
$46,209
Source: Claritas, Inc.
Note: The 2008 Claritas data is provided here due to the fact that the ACS no longer provides separate income data for portions of tracts within the City
of Boynton Beach. This is the most recent income data available for ALL tracts, including those only partially within the City boundaries.
47
TABLE 9. EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT FOR POPULATION 25 AND OVER, 2008
CENSUS
TRACT
Population 25
years and over
Less than
9th grade
Some high
school, no
diploma
High school
graduate (includes
equivalency)
Some college,
no degree
Associate
degree
Bachelor's
degree
Graduate or
professional
degree
Percent population
over 25 with
bachelor's or higher
degree
54.03
56.00
57.01
57.02
58.04
58.05
58.06
58.07
58.08
58.09
60.02
60.03
60.05
60.07
60.08
61.00
62.01
62.02
62.03
63.00
66.02
66.03
119
1,215
2,468
3,678
1,640
2,981
3
7
1,993
6,260
4,918
1,846
3,085
1,926
1,128
3,139
2,583
1,530
2,338
3,840
432
2,782
2
162
301
420
61
75
0
0
62
198
280
65
116
58
12
405
236
56
108
250
5
44
5
249
408
682
221
271
1
1
252
580
771
202
360
146
52
651
523
233
431
413
29
200
18
313
752
1,084
615
748
1
2
579
1,539
1,488
575
1,168
677
228
1,076
693
494
847
1,235
79
893
33
194
544
691
301
850
1
2
501
1,609
1,167
427
723
524
280
404
719
319
544
849
103
685
7
64
122
289
120
236
0
1
139
749
256
152
163
132
75
164
177
68
102
264
35
114
33
154
216
334
218
546
0
1
251
1,181
670
283
345
297
329
308
179
261
183
496
134
567
21
79
125
178
104
255
0
0
209
404
286
142
210
92
152
131
56
99
123
333
47
279
45.4%
19.2%
13.8%
13.9%
19.6%
26.9%
0.0%
14.3%
23.1%
25.3%
19.4%
23.0%
18.0%
20.2%
42.6%
14.0%
9.1%
23.5%
13.1%
21.6%
41.9%
30.4%
CITY
49,911
2,916
6,681
15,104
11,470
3,429
6,986
3,325
20.7%
Note: The 2008 Claritas data is provided here due to the fact that the ACS no longer provides this data for portions of tracts within the City
of Boynton Beach. This is the most recent idata available for ALL tracts, including those only partially within the City boundaries.
TABLE 10. HAITIAN POPULATION BY CENSUS
TRACT, 2000
CENSUS
TRACT
54.03
56.0
57.01
57.02
58.04
58.05
58.08
58.09
60.02
60.03
60.05
60.07
60.08
61.0
62.01
62.02
62.03
63.0
66.02
66.03
Total population
145
1,664
3,641
5,533
1,925
3,106
1,242
7,146
4,975
2,594
3,703
2,726
1,269
4,508
4,139
1,657
2,436
4,546
563
2,433
Haitian
population
0
170
259
695
0
4
0
332
100
107
82
508
29
283
806
0
220
414
0
0
% Haitian
population
0.0%
10.2%
7.1%
12.6%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
4.6%
2.0%
4.1%
2.2%
18.6%
2.3%
6.3%
19.5%
0.0%
9.0%
9.1%
0.0%
0.0%
Source: Census 2000, sample data
Note: No updates are available for this data. For a map depicting distribution
of Haitian population by census tracts wholly or partly within Boynton Beach,
see "DemographicTrends" section of this report.
Appe
ndi
xC
HOUSI
NGDATA
TABLE 1. BOYNTON BEACH HOUSING PROFILE
SELECTED HOUSING
CHARACTERISTICS
HOUSING OCCUPANCY 1/
Total housing units
Occupied housing units
Vacant housing units
ESTIMATE
36,289
29,104
6,686
Margin of
Error
SELECTED HOUSING
CHARACTERISTICS
VEHICLES AVAILABLE
X No vehicles available
X 1 vehicle available
X 2 vehicles available
3 or more vehicles available
UNITS IN STRUCTURE
1-unit, detached
1-unit, attached
2 units
3 or 4 units
5 to 9 units
10 to 19 units
20 or more units
Mobile home
Boat, RV, van, etc.
36,310
4,559
589
2,236
1,998
3,003
8,329
551
50
+/-1,081
+/-593
+/-198
+/-419
+/-452
+/-531
+/-719
+/-216
+/-81
YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT
Built 2005 or later
2,140
+/-451
Owner-occupied units
VALUE
Less than $50,000
$50,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $149,999
$150,000 to $199,999
$200,000 to $299,999
$300,000 to $499,999
$500,000 to $999,999
$1,000,000 or more
Median (dollars)
ESTIMATE
Margin of
Error
2,037
13,887
9,295
2,523
+/-389
+/-945
+/-859
+/-439
18,612
+/-987
1,389
3,140
4,415
3,965
3,750
1,477
225
251
153,800
+/-299
+/-480
+/-593
+/-616
+/-583
+/-274
+/-134
+/-120
+/-5,972
11,210
1,538
7,379
468
+/-894
+/-87
+/-680
+/-14
11,210
2,290
1,585
1,330
661
5,344
23
7,229
1,693
1,437
838
928
545
170
1,618
150
+/-894
+/-468
+/-389
+/-305
+/-186
+/-696
+/-38
+/-665
+/-348
+/-294
678
1,412
811
870
521
4,341
497
+/-276
+/-373
+/-285
+/-298
+/-225
+/-656
+/-190
MORTGAGE STATUS/ SELECTED
Built 2000 to 2004
Built 1990 to 1999
Built 1980 to 1989
Built 1970 to 1979
Built 1960 to 1969
Built 1950 to 1959
4,228
4,580
8,214
10,378
9,960
2,317
+/-641 MONTHLY OWNER COSTS
+/-571 Hs units with a mortgage
+/-813 Median (dollars) cost
+/-777 Hs units without a mortgage
+/-752 Median (dollars) cost
+/-476
MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS % OF
Built 1940 to 1949
Built 1939 or earlier
310
157
BEDROOMS
No bedroom
1 bedroom
2 bedrooms
3 bedrooms
4 bedrooms
5 or more bedrooms
437
5,732
17,721
9,773
2,143
504
HOUSING TENURE 1/
Owner-occupied
Renter-occupied
29,104
19,316
9,788
X
X
X
2.28
2.36
X
X
Average household size, O/O
Average household size, R/O
+/-129 HOUSEHOLD INCOME
+/-152 Housing unit with a mortgage
Less than 20.0 percent
20.0 to 24.9 percent
+/-231 25.0 to 29.9 percent
+/-715 30.0 to 34.9 percent
+/-1,133 35.0 percent or more
+/-865 Not computed
+/-484 Unit without a mortgage
+/-204 Less than 10.0 percent
35.0 percent or more
Not computed
+/-225
+/-310
+/-196
+/-100
+/-334
+/-107
GROSS RENT AS % OF HOUSEHOLD
INCOME
YEAR HOUSEHOLD MOVED IN
Moved in 2005 or later
Moved in 2000 to 2004
Moved in 1969 or earlier
13,052
5,611
5,314
2,329
1,096
340
+/-1,018
+/-613
+/-686
+/-456
+/-330
+/-147
Less than 15.0 percent
35.0 percent or more
Not computed
Source: 1/ U.S. CENSUS 2010; all other items from the American Community Survey (pooled samples 2009-2011)
TABLE 2. BOYNTON BEACH HOUSING INVENTORY 2012
TYPE OF DWELLING
Single family homes
Zero-lot line homes
Single Family total
Townhomes/villas
Condominiums
Coops
Apartments
Mobile Homes
TOTAL NO. OF DWELLINGS
NO. OF DWELLINGS
10,987
3,059
14,046
3,851
12,382
246
4,584
437
35,546
Source: Palm Beach County Appraiser's Office, Development Department,
Fire Department
Notes:
*The total number of dwellings in Table 2 is lower than the Census 2010-based
number in Table 1, possibly due to the underestimated 2012 number of
apartments.
*The figure for mobile homes is an estimate.
TABLE 3. CHANGES IN HOUSING STOCK BY CENSUS TRACT, 2000-2010
CENSUS TRACTS
NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS
2000
2010
54.03/ now 54.11
56.00/ now 56.01
57.01
57.02
58.04/(now 58.10 & 58.11)
58.05/(now 58.12 & 58.13)
58.06
58.07
58.08
58.09 (now 58.16 & 58.17)
60.02/(now 60.09 & 60.10)
60.03/now 60.12
60.05
60.07
60.08
61.00
62.01
62.02
62.03
63.00
66.02
66.03
168
620
1,791
2,228
988
2,121
1
3
712
3,205
3,140
1,020
1,918
1,099
678
1,794
1,491
1,585
1,616
2,289
236
1,940
CITY TOTAL
30,643
CHANGE (%)
2000/2010
145
-13.7%
2,407
2,644
1,125
2,330
2,955
3,416
3,447
1,039
2,012
1,264
647
-0.1%
18.7%
13.9%
9.9%
x
x
315.0%
6.6%
9.8%
1.9%
4.9%
15.0%
-4.6%
3,493
2,087
1,714
3,125
253
2,185
6.3%
31.7%
6.1%
36.5%
7.2%
12.6%
36,288
18.4%
* The census tract geography underwent changes in 2010. The new Census 2010 tract numbers
are noted alongside the 2000 ones. In two cases (tracts 56.01 and 57.01 and also 61.00 and 62.01)
tract boundary adjustment necessitated aggregation so that the overall 2000-2010 change in number
of housing units for the area could be calculated.
TABLE 4. CHANGES IN TENANCY STATUS BY CENSUS TRACT, 2000-2010
OCCUPIED
CENSUS
TRACT
54.03/ now 54.11
56.00/ now 56.01
57.01
57.02
58.04/(now 58.10 & 58.11)
58.05/(now 58.12 & 58.13)
58.06
58.07
58.08
58.09 (now 58.16 & 58.17)
60.02/(now 60.09 & 60.10)
60.03/now 60.12
60.05
60.07
60.08
61.00
62.01
62.02
62.03
63.00
66.02
66.03
CITY TOTAL
HOUSING UNITS
2000
79
534
1,459
1,920
880
1,732
1
3
644
3,029
2,717
963
1,782
1,052
592
1,606
1,419
1,053
1,281
1,905
224
1,335
26,210
OWNER-OCCUPIED
2,931
1,211
1,264
2,263
235
1,637
Number
2000
71
439
1,111
1,407
842
577
1
3
383
2,488
2,158
702
1,658
289
402
901
955
715
930
1,609
216
1,215
29,104
19,072
2010
72
1,826
2,115
977
2,135
0
0
2,262
3,019
2,790
889
1,723
1,173
582
RENTER-OCCUPIED
Percent Number Percent
2000
2010
2010
89.9%
64 88.9%
82.2%
76.1%
1,387 76.0%
73.3%
1,240 58.6%
95.7%
929 95.1%
33.3%
960 45.0%
100.0%
x
100.0%
x
59.5%
925 40.89%
82.14%
2,517 83.37%
79.4%
1,854 66.5%
72.9%
707 79.5%
93.0%
1,490 86.5%
27.5%
323 27.5%
67.91%
428 73.54%
56.1%
67.3%
1,675 57.1%
67.9%
677 55.9%
72.6%
775 61.3%
84.5%
1,636 72.3%
96.4%
220 93.6%
91.0%
1,509 92.2%
72.8%
19,316
66.4%
Number Percent
2000
2000
8 10.1%
95 17.8%
348 23.9%
513 26.7%
38
4.3%
1155 66.7%
0.0%
0.0%
261 40.5%
541 17.86%
559 20.6%
261 27.1%
124
7.0%
763 72.5%
190 32.09%
705 43.9%
464 32.7%
338 32.1%
351 27.4%
296 15.5%
8
3.6%
120
9.0%
7,138
27.2%
Number
2010
8
Percent
2010
11.1%
439
875
48
1,175
1,337
502
936
182
233
850
154
24.0%
41.4%
4.9%
55.0%
x
x
59.1%
16.6%
33.5%
20.5%
13.5%
72.5%
26.5%
1,256
534
489
627
15
128
42.9%
44.1%
38.7%
27.7%
6.4%
7.8%
9,788
33.6%
Source: U.S.Census 2000 and 2010
* The census tract geography underwent changes in 2010. The new Census 2010 tract numbers are noted alongside the 2000 ones. In two cases
(tracts 56.01 and 57.01 and also 61.00 and 62.01), tract boundary adjustement necessitated aggregation so that the overall 2000-2010 changes for the
area could be calculated.
TABLE 5. CHANGES IN HOUSING OCCUPANCY BY CENSUS TRACT, 2000-2010
CENSUS TRACT
TOTAL
OCCUPIED
Housing Units
Housing Units
2000
54.03/ now 54.11
56.00/ now 56.01
57.01
57.02
58.04/(now 58.10 & 58.11)
58.05/(now 58.12 & 58.13)
58.06
58.07
58.08
58.09 (now 58.16 & 58.17)
60.02/(now 60.09 & 60.10)
60.03/now 60.12
60.05
60.07
60.08
61.00
62.01
62.02
62.03
63.00
66.02
66.03
CITY TOTAL
168
620
1,791
2,228
988
2,121
1
3
712
3,205
3,140
1,020
1,918
1,099
678
1,794
1,491
1,585
1,616
2,289
236
1,940
30,643
2010
145
2,407
2,644
1,125
2,330
2,955
3,416
3,447
1,039
2,012
1,264
647
3,493
2,087
1,714
3,125
253
2,185
36,288
2000
2010
79
534
1,459
1,920
880
1,732
1
3
644
3,029
2,717
963
1,782
1,052
592
1,606
1,419
1,053
1,281
1,905
224
1,335
72
1,826
2,115
977
2,135
0
0
2,262
3,019
2,790
889
1,723
1,173
582
2,931
1,211
1,264
2,263
235
1,637
26,210 29,104
VACANT UNITS 2000
Seasonal/Recr. Use
No.
% of Total
89
86
332
308
108
389
0
0
68
176
423
57
136
43
86
188
72
532
335
384
12
605
53.0%
13.9%
18.5%
13.8%
10.9%
18.3%
0.0%
0.0%
9.6%
6.2%
13.5%
5.6%
7.1%
3.9%
7.5%
10.5%
4.8%
33.6%
20.7%
16.8%
5.1%
31.2%
4,429 14.5%
No.
% of Vacant
89
50
234
195
55
65
0
0
44
96
258
18
93
5
58
57
19
458
264
304
6
576
100.0%
58.1%
70.5%
63.3%
50.9%
16.7%
X
X
64.7%
57.4%
61.0%
31.6%
68.4%
11.6%
47.4%
30.3%
26.4%
86.1%
78.8%
79.2%
50.0%
95.2%
2,944
66.4%
VACANT UNITS 2010
Seasonal/Recr. Use
No.
% of Total
72
Seasonal/
Recr. Use
Recr. Use
% all units
% all units
No.
% of Vacant
2000
2010
49.7%
57
79.2%
39.3%
581
529
148
195
0
0
693
397
657
150
289
91
65
24.1%
20.0%
13.2%
8.4%
X
X
23.5%
11.6%
19.1%
14.4%
14.4%
7.2%
10.0%
361
197
67
44
X
X
87
59
435
55
108
9
38
62.1%
37.2%
45.3%
22.6%
X
X
12.6%
14.9%
66.2%
36.7%
37.4%
9.9%
58.5%
562
876
450
862
18
548
16.1%
42.0%
26.3%
27.6%
7.1%
25.1%
147
445
271
501
5
444
26.2%
50.8%
60.2%
58.1%
27.8%
81.0%
53.0%
8.1%
13.1%
8.8%
5.6%
3.1%
X
X
6.2%
3.0%
8.2%
1.8%
4.8%
0.5%
8.6%
3.2%
1.3%
28.9%
16.3%
13.3%
2.5%
29.7%
46.4%
9.6%
9.2%
7,183 19.8%
3,330
* The census tract geography underwent changes in 2010. The new Census 2010 tract numbers are noted alongside the 2000 ones. In two cases
(tracts 56.01 and 57.01 and also 61.00 and 62.01), tract boundary adjustement necessitated aggregation so that the overall 2000-2010 changes for the
area could be calculated.
Seasonal/
15.0%
7.5%
6.0%
1.9%
X
X
2.9%
1.7%
12.6%
5.3%
5.4%
0.7%
5.9%
4.2%
21.3%
15.8%
16.0%
2.0%
20.3%
TABLE 6. VALUE DISTRIBUTION OF OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS BY CENSUS TRACT, 2008
CENSUS
TRACT
ALL OWNEROCCUPIED UNITS
MEDIAN
Less than
$40,000 - $80,000 - $100,000- $150,000- $200,000- $300,000- $400,000
VALUE
$40,000
79,999
99,000
149,000
199,999
299,999
399,999
or more
54.03
65
$
715,485
0
1
1
5
6
7
4
41
56.00
57.01
57.02
482
1,140
1,481
$
$
$
168,122
108,567
179,990
11
64
37
42
421
154
33
57
84
112
166
192
99
274
476
89
141
351
31
16
64
65
0
123
58.04
58.05
58.06
58.07
1,005
891
2
2
$
$
$
$
141,372
205,166
150,298
277,720
44
139
0
0
214
113
0
0
84
36
0
0
188
78
0
0
75
61
0
0
82
232
0
1
236
145
0
0
83
87
0
0
58.08
58.09
60.02
814
3,034
2,440
$
$
$
236,737
283,856
179,877
24
154
0
0
40
75
0
8
69
0
64
565
218
205
837
269
1,229
745
181
792
91
121
542
58
60.03
843
$
212,298
0
9
6
64
296
272
83
112
60.05
1,738
$
233,738
20
0
0
87
289
868
335
139
60.07
565
$
343,491
0
0
0
8
2
216
131
209
60.08
594
$
436,323
0
0
0
0
18
122
119
334
61.00
1,051
$
196,147
0
53
43
173
277
319
88
98
62.01
908
$
229,963
0
0
3
80
208
451
133
33
62.02
696
$
138,710
17
110
50
213
141
70
18
77
62.03
1,077
$
122,409
0
153
165
390
266
71
16
16
63.00
1,793
$
233,575
25
56
65
225
289
581
335
217
66.02
66.03
237
1,490
$
$
595,103
224,033
0
5
0
9
0
46
0
373
1
255
13
211
31
92
191
500
Note: The 2008 Claritas data is provided here due to the fact that the ACS no longer provides separate data for portions of tracts within the City
of Boynton Beach. This is the most recent value data available for ALL tracts, including those only partially within the City boundaries.
See Table 6A to see 2007-2011 pooled values; data for census tracts which do not coincide within the city boundaries apply for the entire tract area.
55
TABLE 6A. VALUE DISTRIBUTION OF OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS, 2007-2011
CENSUS
TRACT
ALL
OWNEROCCUPIED
UNITS
54.11
56.01
57.01
57.02
58.08
58.10
58.11
58.12
58.13
58.16
58.17
60.05
60.07
60.08
60.09
60.10
60.12
61.00
62.01
62.02
62.03
63.00
66.02
66.03
1,504
946
1,353
1,271
805
1,085
1,359
784
1,410
1,978
1,310
1,617
619
1,036
1,137
796
1,014
720
918
681
905
1,842
1,211
2,093
CITY TOTAL
28,394
MEDIAN
Less than
VALUE
$40,000
79,999
99,000
149,000
199,999
299,999
399,999
or more
33
81
136
25
0
360
193
197
154
95
0
17
0
40
54
0
36
29
8
25
96
53
10
15
58
132
320
148
34
418
29
203
312
150
52
55
0
0
162
29
37
35
10
100
99
70
0
184
30
59
103
210
85
72
0
93
68
0
30
100
8
12
176
82
32
57
27
146
208
123
13
135
93
275
433
229
73
142
142
18
112
420
0
511
69
45
288
371
206
108
131
105
276
211
13
310
107
133
210
207
201
16
287
85
283
437
200
477
121
107
347
138
220
164
192
146
150
371
17
186
180
248
151
200
316
0
333
121
195
647
589
277
222
342
110
176
361
93
355
78
66
612
213
338
115
5
0
148
88
13
299
52
162
130
276
110
106
119
0
0
122
160
157
45
10
186
303
472
888
13
0
104
8
64
76
15
124
99
163
70
93
371
0
0
0
74
38
36
0
216
642
453
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
575,800
134,300
112,200
155,400
202,700
59,800
209,100
73,300
171,400
187,400
243,300
160,100
254,300
293,600
129,800
138,100
194,800
192,200
214,600
129,400
105,300
217,200
417,700
245,500
$40,000 - $80,000 - $100,000- $150,000- $200,000- $300,000-
$400,000
172,700
Source: American Community Survey, 2007-2011 (pooled samples)
Notes:
* Census tracts with numbers in bold italic font are wholly within the City's boundaries. See Appendix A for a Census Tract Map.
** During the sampling period, housing in most of the City neigborhood continued to lose value. This data was provided for a general tract-level
comparison.
TABLE 7. RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS, 1991-2012
No. of Permits Issued (No. of Units) Construction Values (Current Dollars)
Years
Single-Family
Homes
Multifamily Units
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Total
156
117
195
97
366
417
414
242
168
161
135
51
114
28
159
107
29
36
36
10
0
35
3,073
478
208
6
34
385
333
12
392
395
122
912
366
211
1,119
1,135
347
385
460
0
2
234
310
7,846
Source: Building Department
Single-Family
Homes
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
14,344,395
10,176,029
15,959,339
8,839,026
31,758,038
35,979,761
40,243,857
25,068,196
18,745,507
17,193,484
15,521,390
4,481,524
9,755,550
3,147,133
32,313,922
25,689,002
20,092,009
4,656,498
4,254,528
724,000
3,087,255
X
Multifamily Units
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
16,064,352
7,399,543
278,800
2,657,637
20,493,049
14,579,148
997,144
13,345,768
22,243,070
10,348,909
98,058,511
20,372,929
21,612,097
119,377,687
162,936,448
49,522,439
94,345,517
36,730,958
180,000
20,359,798
18,140,422
X
Average Permit Value
Single-Family Multifamily
Homes
Units
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
91,951
86,975
81,843
91,124
86,771
86,282
97,207
103,588
111,580
106,792
114,973
87,873
85,575
112,398
203,232
240,084
692,828
129,347
118,181
72,400
88,207
X
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
33,607
35,575
46,467
78,166
53,229
43,781
83,095
34,045
56,312
84,827
107,520
55,664
102,427
106,682
143,556
142,716
245,053
79,850
$ 90,000
$ 90,000
$ 90,000
X
Appe
ndi
xD
COMMERCI
ALDEVELOPMENT
AND ECONOMI
CDATA
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1. Boynton Beach Economic Profile Characteristics: ACS 2009-2011
TABLE 2. Changes in City’s Taxable Value by Land Use, 2000-2012
TABLE 3. Commercial and Industrial Building Permits, 1992-2012
TABLE 4. Commercial and Industrial Project Approvals, 2003-2012
TABLE 1. BOYNTON BEACH ECONOMIC PROFILE, 2009-2011
Selected Economic Characteristics
Est
INDUSTRY
Civilian empl. population 16 yrs and older
Agriculture/ forestry/fishing/hunting/mining
Construction
Manufacturing
Wholesale trade
Retail trade
Transportation/warehousing/ utilities
Information
Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental
and leasing
Professional, scientific, and management, and
administrative and waste management services
Educational services, and health care, and social
assistance
Arts, entertainment/recreation and accommodation/
food services
Other services, except publ. admin.
Public administration
30,508
219
1,340
892
772
4,972
1,247
590
Margin of
Error
+/-1,311
+/-164
+/-326
+/-314
+/-336
+/-878
+/-370
+/-229
INCOME AND BENEFITS (IN 2011
INFLATION-ADJUSTED $$)
Total number of households
income:
Less than $10,000
$10,000 to $14,999
$15,000 to $24,999
$25,000 to $34,999
$35,000 to $49,999
$50,000 to $74,999
$75,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $149,999
$150,000 to $199,999
$200,000 or more
Median household income ($$)
Mean household income ($$)
with
586
510
1,961
1,908
2,024
2,995
1,992
+/-204
+/-273
+/-441
+/-372
+/-375
+/-510
+/-398
$100,000 to $149,999
1,927 +/-514
3,744 +/-796
$150,000 to $199,999
839 +/-239
7,359 +/-987
$200,000 or more
233 +/-102
4,100 +/-825
1,978 +/-473
1,395 +/-369
Median family income ($$)
Mean family income ($$)
52,984 +/-4,094
66,744 +/-4,711
Per capita income ($$)
24,630 +/-1,295
Median nonfamily income ($$)
12,767 +/-992
34,893 +/-5,457
Mean nonfamily income ($$)
41,779 +/-2,714
Median earnings for workers ($$)
Median earnings for male full-time, yearround workers ($$)
29,152 +/-3,418
24,778 +/-1,157
3,946 +/-600
1,742 +/-558
42 +/-47
27,742 +/-923
2,081
1,882
3,824
3,516
4,055
5,134
3,162
2,904
890
294
42,468
56,057
+/-418
+/-424
+/-577
+/-520
+/-560
+/-663
+/-526
+/-564
+/-242
+/-115
+/-2,262
+/-2,852
With earnings
Mean earnings ($$)
19,110 +/-838
57,834 +/-3,202
With Social Security
Mean Social Security ($$)
With retirement income
Mean retirement inc. ($$)
With Suppl. Security Income
Mean Supplemental Security Income ($$)
With cash public assistance income
10,638
16,892
4,478
20,696
813
8,387
386
With Food Stamps in the past 12 months
Total number of families
with income:
Less than $10,000
$10,000 to $14,999
$15,000 to $24,999
$25,000 to $34,999
$35,000 to $49,999
$50,000 to $74,999
$75,000 to $99,999
1,900 +/-385
CLASS OF WORKER
Private wage and salary workers
Government workers
Self-employed workers in own not incorporated
business
Unpaid family workers
Margin of
Error
14,975 +/-654
Selected Economic Characteristics Estimate
+/-743
+/-768
+/-469
+/-2,644
+/-242
+/-1,957
+/-162
2,266 +/-447
Median earnings for female full-time, yearround workers ($$)
41,213 +/-1,828
36,756 +/-1,896
PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE
w/INCOME BELOW THE POVERTY
LEVEL IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS
All people
Under 18 years
18 years and over
18 to 64 years
65 years and over
People in families
Unrel. individuals 15 years and over
COMMUTING TO WORK
Mean travel time to work (minutes)
17.1%
29.6%
14.3%
15.5%
11.0%
16.2%
19.5%
22.2
+/-2.6
+/-7.1
+/-2.0
+/-2.5
+/-2.3
+/-3.6
+/-3.4
+/-1.1
Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey, 2009-2011
(pooled samples)
TABLE 2. CHANGES IN CITY'S TAXABLE VALUE OF RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL
AND INDUSTRIAL LAND USES, 2000-2012
2000
2003
2005
2007
3,975,909,602
5,869,516,099
5,344,481,475
4,414,576,000
75.2%
1,041,562,823
17.7%
3,851,131,700
72.1%
1,051,563,834
19.7%
374,727,428
7.0%
TOTAL TAXABLE*
2,221,736,564
2,975,816,191
in which real property:
1.Residential
in % of total taxable
2.Commercial
3.Industrial
1,517,349,529
68.3%
549,948,956
24.8%
154,438,079
7.0%
2,134,737,593 2,896,500,399
71.7%
72.9%
594,520,063
770,213,540
20.0%
19.4%
206,869,860
249,268,290
7.0%
6.3%
2009
2008
346,890,038
5.9%
2010
2011
2012
3,522,987,585
3,449,429,826
TOTAL TAXABLE*
4,364,061,452
3,631,168,241
in which real property:
1.Residential
2.Commercial
3.Industrial
2,923,891,282
67.0%
964,633,059
22.1%
412,852,303
9.5%
2,389,870,003
65.8%
835,657,178
23.0%
352,737,660
9.7%
Source: Palm Beach County Appraiser's Office
*Includes all real property; values per the first certified tax roll
2,372,668,214
67.3%
746,944,112
21.2%
348,003,702
9.9%
2,312,553,079
67.0%
739,282,258
32.0%
338,673,090
9.8%
TABLE 3. NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
PERMIT VALUES, 1992-2012
Year
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013 May
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Construction Values
(Current Dollars)
15,483,480
16,522,970
5,626,216
5,244,776
3,888,000
12,315,005
22,568,663
18,377,934
36,898,723
17,052,582
7,329,262
30,009,225
63,941,812
58,371,103
82,091,208
17,663,588
23,017,955
5,600,000
1,639,500
12,692,153
7,674,116
15,310,000
Source: Building Department
Note: Includes commercial, industrial and institutional construction.
TABLE 4. NEW COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROJECT APPROVALS, 2003-2012
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Square
Footage
Square
Footage
Square
Footage
Square
Footage
Square
Footage
Square
Footage
Square
Footage
Square
Footage
Square
Footage
Square
Footage
Retail
155,254
147,263
454,430
73,267
-
-
-
93,755
-
-
Office
37,225
158,386
165,972
45,058
39,290
6,087
15,869
3,716
14,272
5,950
ALL COMMERCIAL
192,479
305,649
620,402
118,325
39,290
6,087
15,869
97,471
14,272
5,950
Warehouse/Dist.
144,576
17,727
33,866
133,911
-
7,953
-
-
-
-
Manufacturing
182,430
-
-
-
-
-
-
ALL INDUSTRIAL
327,006
-
7,953
-
-
-
-
17,727
33,866
133,911
Appe
ndi
xE
SELECTED COUNTYDATA
TABLE 1. PALM BEACH COUNTY PROFILE OF SELECTED DEMOGRAPHIC,
HOUSING AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, 2009-2011
Selected Characteristics
Total population, 2012 estimate
SEX AND AGE
Male
Female
Median age (years)
18 years and over
21 years and over
62 years and over
65 years and over
RACE
Total population
One race
White
Black or African American
American Indian and Alaska Native
Asian
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Two or more races
HISPANIC OR LATINO
Hispanic or Latino (of any race)
HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE
Total households
Family households (families)
Married-couple families
Householder living alone
65 years and over
Average household size
Average family size
PLACE OF BIRTH
Total population
Native
Foreign born
Naturalized U.S. citizen
Not a U.S. citizen
Estimate
1,321,827 Civilian employed population 16 years
and over
48.4% OCCUPATION
51.6% Management, business,science, and arts
43.6 occupations
79.7% Service occupations
76.0% Sales and office occupations
25.1% Natural resources, construction and
21.7% maintenance occupatios
1,321,827
98.4%
76.5%
17.2%
0.2%
2.3%
0.0%
1.2%
252,237
Speak English less than "very well"
TOTAL HOUSING UNITS
HOUSING TENURE
1,251,185 Median household income ($$)
72.1% With earnings
27.9% Mean earnings (dollars)
13.0% With Social Security income
Median family income ($$)
520,524
71.8%
Renter-occupied
28.2%
Source: US Census, American Community Survey
Estimate
572,078
35.0%
22.0%
26.9%
8.9%
1.3%
6.8%
4.4%
2.9%
13.7%
4.4%
2.0%
8.0%
14.2%
20.7%
11.5%
6.1%
4.0%
82.0%
11.9%
6.0%
0.2%
INCOME in the past 12 months
Owner-occupied
Median Housing Value (dollars)
INDUSTRY
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting,
and mining
Construction
Manufacturing
Wholesale trade
Retail trade
Transport./warehousing/utilities
Information
Finance and insurance, and real estate and
rental and leasing
Prof./scientific/management and
administr./waste management
Educ./health/social assistance
Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and
accommodation, and food services
Other services, exc. public admin.
Public administration
520,524
61.3%
45.4%
38.7%
31.9%
15.2%
2.50
3.17 CLASS OF WORKER
Private wage and salary workers
1,321,827 Government workers
1,024,899 Self-employed workers in own not
296,928 incorporated business
136,008 Unpaid family workers
160,920
LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME
Population 5 years and over
English only
Language other than English
Selected Characteristics
207,400
Individuals
Per capita income
Median earnings for male full-time, yearround workers ($$)
Median earnings for female full-time, yearround workers ($$)
PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE BELOW
POVERTY LEVEL
50,783
69.7%
73,628
38.2%
62,277
31,616
44,510
37,828
14.80%
TABLE 2. SELECTED COMPARATIVE STATISTICS FOR BOYNTON BEACH, DELRAY
BEACH AND BOCA RATON
Population 2012
(University of Florida, BEBR)
Median Household Income 2009-2011
(US Census, ACS)
BOYNTON
BEACH
DELRAY
BEACH
BOCA RATON
WEST PALM
BEACH
68,741
61,495
85,413
101,668
$42,468
$45,720
$68,823
$43,701
$135,000
$99,900
$206,000
$80,000
50,180
96,881
186,154
74,299
Median housing price 2012
(the Realtors Association of the Palm Beaches, Regional MLS,
all housing types)
Taxable property value per capita 2012
Municipal operating/Total millage rate 2012
(all taxing authorities)
Other sources: Palm Beach County Appraiser's Office
7.600/22.6836
7.1992/22.8869 3.4100/19.8047 8.3465/23.6305
TABLE 3. POPULATION CHANGES IN PALM BEACH COUNTY
POPULATION
CENSUS 1990
POPULATION
CENSUS 2000
POPULATION
CENSUS 2010
CHANGE
Boca Raton
South Bay
Manalapan
Mangonia Park
Delray Beach
Gulfstream
Tequesta Village
Lantana
Lake Worth
Lake Park
Atlantis
Riviera Beach
Ocean Ridge
Highland Beach
Cloud Lake
Palm Beach Shores
Belle Glade
Golf Village
North Palm Beach
Glen Ridge
Lake Clarke Shores
Jupiter Inlet Colony
Palm Beach
Pahokee
South Palm Beach
Loxahatchee Groves
Wellington
830
14,589
24,986
22,965
18,683
9,763
1,058
400
2,121
67,643
46,284
61,492
3,558
312
1,453
47,181
690
4,499
8,392
28,564
6,704
1,653
27,639
1,570
3,209
121
1,040
16,177
234
11,343
207
3,364
405
9,814
6,822
1,480
-
2,015
21,523
39,328
35,058
27,569
11,699
1,454
411
3,262
82,103
60,389
74,764
3,859
321
1,283
60,020
716
5,273
9,404
35,133
8,721
2,005
29,884
1,636
3,775
167
1,269
14,906
230
12,064
276
3,451
368
9,676
5,985
1,531
38,216
2,588
34,140
55,156
48,452
37,573
18,928
1,873
601
3,176
99,919
68,217
84,392
4,876
406
1,888
60,522
786
5,629
10,423
34,910
8,155
2,005
32,488
1,786
3,539
135
1,142
17,467
252
12,015
219
3,376
400
8,348
5,649
1,171
3,180
56,508
211.8%
134.0%
120.7%
111.0%
101.1%
93.9%
77.0%
50.3%
49.7%
47.7%
47.4%
37.2%
37.0%
30.1%
29.9%
28.3%
13.9%
25.1%
24.2%
22.2%
21.6%
21.3%
17.5%
13.8%
10.3%
11.6%
9.8%
8.0%
7.7%
5.9%
5.8%
0.4%
-1.2%
-14.9%
-17.2%
-20.9%
x
x
TOTAL INCORPORATED
Unincorporated county
TOTAL
457,245
406,120
863,365
571,528
521,447
1,092,975
732,290
587,844
1,320,134
60.2%
44.7%
52.9%
MUNICIPALITY
Hypoluxo
Royal Palm Beach
Jupiter
Palm Beach Gardens
Greenacres City
Palm Springs
Haverhill
Briny Breezes
Juno Beach
West Palm Beach
Boynton Beach
1990-2010
Breeze into Boynton Beach
America’s Gateway to the Gulfstream
City of Boynton Beach
Department of Development
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
561-742-6350
www.boynton-beach.org

here - City of Boynton Beach

Transcription

Similar documents

Palm Beach - Blue Ocean Apartment

10699 Gulf Blvd, Treasure Island, FL

You`re invited to the 3nd annual Weenie Roast

BROCHURE-ACQUALINA MIAMI

Direct mail your Property Brochure

Litchfield Beach Access

Mrs. House and Mrs. Huba`s STEM Challenge Day

Help Support Our Cause For Paws!

Weenie Roast - Cape Fear Sail and Power Squadron