Using eLoran to Mitigate GNSS/GPS Vulnerabilities
Transcription
Using eLoran to Mitigate GNSS/GPS Vulnerabilities
ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Using eLoran to Mitigate GNSS/GPS Vulnerabilities Presented by Charles Schue With thanks to John Pinks and Tim Hardy - Nautel, Inc. 1 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Outline • What are the problems? • What are possible solutions? • Old versus New • Uses 2 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 What are the problems? U.S. Air Force Space Command Commercial 3 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 What are the problems? • Performance degradation - natural phenomenon • Ionospheric & solar activities • Performance degradation - human factors • Unintentional & intentional (hostile) • Signal blockage • Spectrum competition from non-Rnav systems • Common signal use across GNSS: L1, L2, L5 • Radio frequency interference • System anomalies & failures • Jamming • Spoofing & Counterfeit Signals • Killer satellites 4 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 What are the problems? Unclassified – Sep2008 5 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 What are the problems? Unclassified – Sep2008 6 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Specific problem example – low cost jammers? $116.50 2 - 4 m (200 mW) “Car Phone Charger” $32.29 15 – 20 m “Electronic Gadgets” “Gift” 7 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 What are the solutions? •Loran •PNT service in use in many parts of the northern hemisphere •eLoran •PNT & Data service Got eLoran? •Tactical (e)Loran • Deployable (e)Loran PNT&D service 8 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 What is Loran? • Radio navigation system • 90 – 110 kHz • Ground wave signal • Typically high power • Provides lateral position • Stratum 1 frequency standard • Timing within +/- 100 nS of UTC • Typically +/- 60 nS • Currently operated by 15 nations • Autonomous • Interoperable • Diverse 9 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Loran (Red), Chayka (Green), World’s 50 Busiest Cargo Ports (Blue) Courtesy of the General Lighthouse Authorities of the UK & Ireland 10 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 What is eLoran? • Enhanced Loran • All the good stuff from Loran, plus: • New infrastructure & technology • Solid-state transmitters • Three atomic clocks per station • Precision time & frequency equipment • Whole-station Uninterruptible Power Supply • Robust telecommunications • Two-Way Satellite Time Transfer (TWSTT) • GPS monitoring • NOT directly coupled or controlled 11 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 What is eLoran (continued)? •New operational concepts • Time-of-transmission control • Differential corrections where applicable • All-in-view signals • Data messaging channel(s) • Currently Loran Data Channel or Eurofix • Additional integrity • Differential corrections (DLoran or DGPS) • Other communication / navigation messages • “ComNav” solution 12 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 What is eLoran (continued)? • New user equipment • Combination eLoran/GNSS receivers • Latest digital technology & small form factor • E-field antenna • H-field antenna (eliminates “p-static”) • Can use Chip-Scale Atomic Clocks for Direct Ranging Loran (DRL) • Seamless across multiple modes (like GPS) • Aviation; maritime; land mobile; location based; time & frequency • Autonomous; interoperable; diverse 13 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Old versus New 14 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Old: “antiquated”, “obsolete”, “outdated” 1965 Pontiac GTO www.musclecarsociety.com 15 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 New State-of-the-Art / Science 2010 Mustang GT www.fastcoolcars.com 16 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Service Delivery 17 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Goal: destination / Build: station Popular Mechanics Magazine Photo 18 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Yesterday’s Systems: 1960’s Vintage • Larger SWAIP • Very expensive • Very manpower intensive USCG Photos 19 ION Joint Navigation Conference Yesterday’s Systems: 1970’s Vintage • Large SWAIP • Expensive • Manpower intensive USCG Photos 20 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Today’s Systems: 1980’s, 1990’s, early 2000’s USA, Europe, Asia, Middle East • Large SWAIP • Expensive • Less manpower intensive USCG Photos 21 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Today’s Systems: 2007 - UK • Smaller SWAIP • Less expensive • Zero manpower GLAs & VT Communications Photos 3 container solution 22 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Goal: provide a service / Build: site Thermo Bond Gichner Alkan Shelter One Miller Building Systems 23 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Tomorrow’s System – Available Today eLoran-In-A-Box “ELB” Concept 24 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 “CONEX” Box Timing, Frequency, & Control Antenna Simulator eLoran-In-A-Box “ELB” Concept 25 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Next Generation Prototype (e)Loran Transmitter Low Voltage Power Supply Control Board Antenna Current Probe Exciter Antenna Tuning Power Amps (16 active, 2 spare) and Resistive Damping Modules (1 Active, 1 Spare) Harmonic Filter 375V Power Supply 26 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 “ELB” System Benefits size weight input power maintenance installation time installation personnel installation materials HVAC price manufacturing time logistics tail training staffing shipping sparing … efficiency reliability (MTBF) availability continuity accuracy operational ease Pulses Per Second soft fail capability stability diagnostics & analytics flexibility modulation types & speeds interoperability diversity autonomy … 27 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 User Equipment 28 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 1989 Voyager SportNav Loran Receiver eLoran E-field antenna 2009 reelektronika GPS/dGPS/eLoran Receiver 29 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 2009 reelektronika combined GPS/eLoran Receiver + E-field antenna H-field + GPS cell phone H-field + GPS 30 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Tactical Systems 31 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Tactical Antenna Configurations REQUIREMENTS Frequency: 100kHz Operating Range: 25 nautical miles (46 km) radius Field Strength: +55 dBuv/m (1124 uv/m peak) at ground level Location: Worldwide Soil Type: Conductivity 1 mS/m, Permittivity 15 Minimal physical size, suitable for rapid deployment. A radiated power level of 10 watts (40 watts peak) is necessary to achieve this range. Soil type has a significant effect on antenna ground loss but minimal effect on propagation. Top loading is typically used with electrically short antennas to optimize effective height and efficiency. Peak antenna voltage is the limiting factor in these applications. 32 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 75 Foot Whip with 6 x 70 foot Top Loading guys Ground Radials 60 x 60 feet La=31uH Ca=678pf Rr=0.0287 ohms Rg=4.248 ohms Lc=3741.8uH Rc=2.3ohms Ia=26.4A peak Peak Voltage=62KV Transmitter output – into 625 TLM equivalent – 58 kW Input AC power requirement @ 300 PPS – 551 W Input AC power requirement @ 600 PPS – 702 W 33 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 “Tee” Antenna 60 feet high x 150 feet long Ground Radials 26 x 90 feet and 18 x 135 feet La=27uH Ca=568pf Rr=0.04 ohms Rg=2.319 ohms Lc=4464uH Rc=2.78 ohms Ia=21.6 A peak Peak voltage=60KV Transmitter output – into 625 TLM equivalent – 58 kW Input AC power requirement @ 300 PPS – 487 W Input AC power requirement @ 600 PPS – 573 W 34 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Inverted Cone Antenna 60 x 60 x 60 feet Ground Radials 36 x 60 feet La=10uH Ca=985pf Rr=0.0317 Rg=7.1 ohms Lc=2572uH Rc=1.6 ohms Ia=24 A peak Peak Voltage=38.7KV Transmitter output – into 625 TLM equivalent – 26 kW Input AC power requirement @ 300 PPS – 573 W Input AC power requirement @ 600 PPS – 747 W 35 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Inverted Cone 70 x 70 x 70 feet Ground Radials 36 x 70 feet La=16uH Ca=1145pf Rr=0.0431 Rg=6.81 ohms Lc=2202uH Rc=1.4 ohms Ia=20.5A peak Peak Voltage=28.3KV Transmitter output – into 625 TLM equivalent – 14 kW Input AC power requirement @ 300 PPS – 519 W Input AC power requirement @ 600 PPS – 638 W 36 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Uses 37 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 • Additional security at high-profile events • 2010 / 2012 Olympics • Timing • capable of +/- 30 nS to UTC • maintain 28 – 60 days with no GPS • Interference-enabled crime fighting • car theft, border crossing, tracking felons, toll cheating • Irregular warfare / counterinsurgency (COIN) operations • sky impaired warrior (triple canopy) • pointing (compass) capability • geo-encryption • encrypted data channel 38 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 We are the exclusive worldwide reseller of Nautel and Symmetricom (e)Loran products. 39 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 See us at booths 20 & 21. 40 ION Joint Navigation Conference Additional Information Slides 41 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Loran- C vs. eLoran Metrics FAA 2002 “Murder Board” Requirements Accuracy Availability Integrity Continuity 0.997 Loran-C Definition of Capability* (US FRP) 0.25 nm (463 m) 0.997 10 second alarm/ 25 m error FAA NPA (RNP 0.3)** Requirements 0.16 nm (307 m) 0.999 – 0.9999 0.9999999 (1 x 10-7) 0.999 - 0.9999 over 150 sec 0.997 - 0.999 10 second alarm/ 25 m error (3 x 10-5) 0.9985 – 0.9997 over 3 hours US Coast Guard HEA Requirements 0.004 - 0.01 nm (8 – 20 m) * Includes Stratum 1 timing and frequency capability ** Non-Precision Approach Required Navigation Performance Courtesy of the Federal Aviation Administration 42 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Aviation Mode Support aircraft operations gate-to-gate – Departure, En-Route, Approach, landing Non-precision approaches by providing sufficient horizontal guidance. – Horizontal Accuracy 0.3 Nautical Mile (556 meters) - 307 meters, 95% – Availability: 0.999 – 0.9999 – Integrity: 1 x 10-7 per hour – Continuity: 0.999 – 0.999 Signal Propagation Corrections are published for each airport and applied by the user receiver in real-time during each phase of operation. Most eLoran aviation receivers employ so-called H-field (or, magnetic loop) antennas. Extensive tests have shown that these antennas are almost immune to the effects of the Precipitation Static (P-Static) experienced in rain and snow, which has been a major problem for users of traditional Loran-C airborne receivers. 43 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Maritime Mode e-Navigation will improve: safety, security, maritime economy GNSS is the principal Source: Cannot be guaranteed to meet the required availability and reliability. Combination of GNSS and eLoran will. Harbor Entrance and Approach (HEA) Accuracy: 10 meters (95%) Signal Availability: 0.998 over 2 years Time-to-Alarm: 10 seconds Service Reliability: 0.9997 over 3 hours The signal propagation errors along the channels and throughout the harbors are measured. Corrections are published, and stored in each receiver. Real-time differential corrections are applied to remove small weather induced signal fluctuations. Pointing (compass) capability. 44 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Land Mobile Mode Pointing (compass) capability. Authenticates its own and GNSS data. Signal penetration: indoors, urban canyons, shipping containers, warehouses, triple canopy. Tracking items: High-value Safe and timely delivery must be guaranteed. Hazardous cargo Performance Standards: Unlike aviation and maritime systems, those designed for land tracking applications are generally not required to meet published performance standards. Rather, their performance is normally assessed and optimized for user specific applications. 45 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Location Based Mode Signal penetration: E-911(US) or E-112 (Europe) response systems Location-based encryption systems (geo-encryption) Geo-fencing Weather balloon tracking Offender tracking Location-based billing Performance Standards: These applications, as with those for any land mobile applications, need to be assessed and optimized for user specific applications. 46 ION Joint Navigation Conference June 3, 2009 Time & Frequency Mode eLoran is a viable alternative source of time: Transmissions are precisely synchronized to UTC Loran Data Channel (LDC) – Station ID and Time of day LDC – corrections Recover time to ~50 nSec RMS (UTC) Signals are available indoors: Avoid installing an outside antenna with a clear view of the sky Downtown / urban canyons Meets Stratum 1 even without LDC corrections Possible Uses: Telecommunications networks E-911 or E-112 Power grid phase synchronization; flow control; fault isolation Power system billing assurance 47