Signature Series Turf Type Tall Fescue Blend
Transcription
Signature Series Turf Type Tall Fescue Blend
A Professional Turfgrass Seed Blend backed by the most scientific data in the industry Why is Better? • Varieties are Ranked at the Top by the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) – Justice – Rebel IV – Rebel Exeda • All Seed Used in Blending is Blue Tag Certified • Also Available with the MYCO AdvantageTM Advanced Seed Treatment Technology Festuca arundinacea Growing a better tomorrow, today… Justice is an elite tall fescue turfgrass that requires less irrigation frequency than bluegrass, ryegrass and fine fescues. Justice is a shade tolerant variety and ideal for home lawns, parks, and sod production. It exhibits outstanding wear tolerance and resists hard use on athletic fields, park and home lawns. Justice has an early spring green-up and holds its color late into the fall. Justice has performed well under low to moderate fertility, but performs better under high fertility levels associated with the maintenance of extensively used athletic fields and showcase lawns. TYPE: Elite Turf Type Tall Fescue Experimental Designation – RB2 FEATURES: • • • • • Outstanding color Superb Fine Texture Dwarf upright growing characteristics Improved Disease Resistance Commendable Drought Tolerance BENEFITS: • • • Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Tall Fescue Cultivars Grown at Eighteen Locations in the U.S. Maintained using Schedule “A” Table 1 2004 Data Turfgrass Quality Ratings 1-9; 9=Ideal Turf Cultivar Mean Justice 6.5 Picasso 6.2 Grande II 6.1 Tar Heel II 6.1 Southern Choice 5.7 K-31 E+ 3.5 LSD Value 0.2 These examples represent a few of the varieties tested in the NTEP 2001 National Tall Fescue Report, 2004 Data For complete trial data, go to www.ntep.org • The narrow fine consistency of the leaf blade endows you with a highly sought after dark green turfgrass You will expand less energy, time in addition to less wear and tear on mowers as a result of less vertical growth demonstrated with this variety Scheduling conflicts can be reduced along with the expense of fungicide applications due to increased disease resistance A smaller water bill is always welcome RECOMMENDED USE: • • • • • Golf Courses (Roughs) Sod Farms Park Settings Athletic Fields Home Lawns Growing a better tomorrow, Genetic Color Ratings of Tall Fescue Cultivars Table 12 2004 Data Genetic Color Ratings 1-9; 9=Dark Green Cultivar Mean Hunter 7.6 Justice 6.8 Southern Choice II 6.8 Picasso 6.6 Grande II 6.6 Tar Heel II 6.3 K-31 E+ 4.2 LSD Value 0.2 Festuca arundinacea OPTIMAL ADAPTATION AREAS: Climatic Zones: 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 (may not be adaptable to all areas within each climatic zone) Leaf Texture Ratings of Tall Fescue Cultivars Table 14 2004 Data Leaf Texture Ratings 1-9; 9=very fine Cultivar Mean Coyote II 6.6 Justice 6.2 Grande II 6.0 Picasso 5.7 Tar Heel II 5.6 Southern Choice II 5.2 K-31 E+ 3.3 LSD Value 0.2 SEEDING RATES: Fall Density Ratings of Tall Fescue Cultivars Table 23B 2004 Data Density Rating 1-9; 9=Maximum Density Cultivar Mean Guardian-21 7.6 Justice 7.2 Tar Heel II 6.8 Picasso 6.8 Grande II 6.4 Southern Choice II 5.7 K-31 E+ 3.6 LSD Value 0.5 ESTABLISHMENT: Home Lawns, Parks: 8 - 10 lbs/1000 sq ft (3 ½ - 5 kgs/100 sq meters) Athletic Fields/Parks: 10 - 15 lbs/1000 sq ft (5 – 7 kgs/100 sq meters) Sod Farms: 8 - 10 lbs/1000 sq ft (3 ½ - 5 kgs/100 sq meters) Justice mixes best with 5-7% Kentucky Bluegrass such as Monte Carlo or Chateau for a more luxurious turf. Cover seed to a depth not exceeding 1/4 inch (6.35 mm) and keep seedlings moist until well rooted. The first mowing can be expected after 30 days, or when the grass blades reach a length of 3 inches (76.2 mm). Mow back to 2 inches (50.8 mm) until turf is established. (38.1 mm) MAINTENANCE: These examples represent a few of the varieties tested in the NTEP 2001 National Tall Fescue Report, 2004 Data For complete trial data, go to www.ntep.org Limited use of the area can be expected in 6 weeks. Justice can tolerate a mowing height of 1.5 inches. Festuca arundinacea Growing a better tomorrow, today… Rebel IV is an elite tall fescue turfgrass that requires less irrigation frequency than bluegrass, ryegrass and fine fescues. Rebel IV is a shade tolerant variety and ideal for home lawns, parks, and sod production. It exhibits outstanding wear tolerance and resists hard use on park and home lawns. Rebel IV has an early spring green-up and holds its color late into the fall. Rebel IV has performed well under low to moderate fertility, but performs better under high fertility levels associated with the maintenance of extensively used athletic fields and showcase lawns. TYPE: Elite Turf Type Tall Fescue Experimental Designation – R-4 FEATURES: • Outstanding color • Superb Fine Texture • Dwarf growing characteristics • Improved Disease Resistance • Admirable Drought Tolerance BENEFITS: • Improved Disease resistance reduces the need and cost of fungicide applications • Rebel Sentry will perform well in the area where tall fescue is most widely used The transition zone • Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Tall Fescue Cultivars Grown at Nineteen locations (Selected Locations Shown Below, Mean is for Nineteen Locations) in the U.S., Maintained using “Schedule A” Table 1 2002-05 Data, Turfgrass Quality Ratings 1-9; 9=Ideal Cultivar IN1 KY1 MD1 NC1 NJ1 NJ2 VA1 OVERALL MEAN Rebel IV (R-4) 6.7 7.4 6.4 5.9 6.6 6.2 6.6 6.3 Ultimate 6.5 6.9 6.5 6.5 5.7 5.4 6.7 6.1 (01-RUTOR2 Lexington 6.3 6.9 6.0 6.0 5.2 5.2 6.9 6.0 (UT-RB3) Riverside 6.3 6.0 6.1 5.6 4.9 5.0 6.5 5.9 (Proseeds 5301) KY-31 E+ 3.9 3.9 3.1 4.6 1.2 1.1 4.0 3.6 LSD Value 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.7 1.2 0.2 These examples represent a few of the varieties tested in the NTEP 2001 National Tall Fescue Report, 2002-2005 Data, Final Report For complete trial data, go to www.ntep.org Fall Density relates to summer survival • Everyone desires a dark RECOMMENDED USE: • Golf Courses (Roughs) • Sod Farms • Park Settings • Athletic Fields • Home Lawns Festuca arundinacea Growing a better tomorrow, Table 31 CULTIVAR Rebel IV (R-4) Escalade (01-0RU1) GreenKeeper WAF (K01-WAF) Lexington (UT-RB3) Southern Choice II Coyote II (K01-8015) JTTFF-2000 LSD Value Brown Patch (Warm Temperature) Ratings of Tall Fescue Cultivars (Selected Locations Shown Below, Mean is for Fourteen Locations) 2002-05 Data, Turfgrass Quality Ratings 1-9; 9=No Disease OPTIMAL ADAPTATION AREAS: AR1 GA1 IN1 MA1 MD1 MO1 NJ2 OK1 PA1 VA1 WI1 MEAN 7.2 6.3 8.0 8.7 9.0 4.0 6.2 7.0 8.1 8.7 8.0 6.8 6.8 6.7 9.0 7.0 9.0 4.7 5.7 6.3 8.0 7.3 8.3 6.6 7.8 6.0 7.7 8.0 8.3 5.7 5.4 7.0 7.7 7.0 8.0 6.4 6.7 6.0 7.7 7.3 9.0 6.3 5.2 7.7 7.6 7.0 8.7 6.3 7.8 6.7 8.0 8.0 8.7 4.3 4.2 6.7 6.8 7.3 8.3 6.2 5.5 6.0 7.3 4.7 8.3 4.3 5.0 7.0 6.7 7.3 8.3 5.9 4.8 2.6 5.7 1.3 6.7 1.5 6.0 2.1 8.3 0.9 4.3 1.8 2.6 1.5 6.3 1.6 4.4 1.6 6.7 2.4 7.3 0.9 4.7 0.8 Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Tall Fescue Cultivars Grown Under Traffic Stress at St. Louis, MO Table 13 2002-05 Data, Turfgrass Quality Ratings 1-9; 9=Best Quality Quality Quality Quality Mean Mean Mean CULTIVAR Mean 2003-05 2005 2004 2003 Coyote II (K01-8015) 5.6 5.9 5.6 5.7 Rebel IV (R-4) 5.7 4.9 6.1 5.6 Constitution (ATF-593) 5.1 5.2 5.1 5.1 Olympic Gold 4.9 5.4 4.9 5.1 Silverado II (PST-578) 5.1 4.9 5.1 5.0 Barrobusto (BAR FA 1003) 4.7 5.1 4.7 4.8 KY-31 E+ 2.4 2.8 2.4 2.5 LSD Value 0.8 1.2 1.3 0.5 Leaf Texture Ratings of Tall Fescue Cultivars (Selected Locations Shown Below, Mean is for Twenty-four Locations) Table 16 2002-05 Data, Leaf Texture Ratings 1-9; 9=Very Fine CULTIVAR MD1 MI1 MO1 NC1 NJ1 NY1 PA1 VA1 WI1 Coyote II 7.0 6.7 6.3 5.7 7.3 4.4 7.5 7.8 6.9 (K01-8015) Rebel IV 6.3 5.3 6.0 5.8 6.5 4.3 7.0 7.3 6.8 (R-4) Greenkeeper WAF 6.2 6.0 6.0 5.7 6.4 4.6 6.8 8.0 6.6 (K01-WAF) Barrington 6.0 5.7 6.3 5.6 5.4 4.3 6.9 7.7 7.1 Silverstar 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.4 6.3 4.4 6.5 7.7 6.3 (PST-5ASR) Southern Choice II 5.3 6.3 6.0 5.3 4.2 4.4 5.9 7.2 6.6 KY-31 E+ 3.0 5.0 4.3 4.1 1.2 4.0 3.1 4.0 5.4 LSD Value 0.7 1.0 0.5 1.2 1.4 0.7 1.1 0.9 0.9 These examples represent a few of the varieties tested in the NTEP 2001 National Tall Fescue Report, 2002-2005 Data, Final Report For complete trial data, go to www.ntep.org MEAN 6.6 6.3 6.0 5.9 5.8 5.4 3.5 0.3 Climatic Zones: 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 (may not be adaptable to all areas within each climatic zone) SEEDING RATES: Home Lawns, Parks 8 - 10 lbs/1000 sq ft (3 ½ - 5 kgs/100 sq meters) Athletic Fields/Parks 10 - 15 lbs/1000 sq ft (5 – 7 kgs/100 sq meters) Sod Farms 8 - 10 lbs/1000 sq ft (3 ½ - 5 kgs/100 sq meters) Fairways & Roughs 5 - 10 lbs/1000 sq ft (2 – 5 kgs/100 sq meters) ESTABLISHMENT: Sow in sun or shade in spring or fall. Mid-summer sowing is not recommended except for areas of dense shade that can be well watered. Lime soil to 5.5 – 6.0 pH and follow soil test recommendations for fertilization. Maintain adequate soil moisture for proper germination. Under ideal conditions, germination may begin in as few as 9 days. Full germination may take up to 21 days. First mowing is suggested when plants reach approximately 2 inches. (7.5 cm). MAINTENANCE: Best when managed at 2.5 inches, though will tolerate lower heights. Festuca arundinacea Growing a better tomorrow, today… Rebel Exeda is a high performance, dark green, fine textured tall fescue. It is a cool season perennial grass that develops an extensive fibrous root system in order to adapt to the influences of Mother Nature. Rebel Exeda performs well for use on premium home lawns, park settings, and sports fields along with other high traffic areas. Rebel Exeda is suited for use by the turf professional as well as the discriminating homeowner. TYPE: Elite Turf Type Tall Fescue Experimental Designation - 9501 FEATURES: • Exceptional upright growth habit Good Seedling Vigor & High tiller density Exceptional Green Color Tolerates low water input and heavy traffic wear Does not thin at a low cutting height of 1 1/2 - 2 1/2 inch Outstanding performance in the transition zone Exceptional fall density • • • • • • BENEFITS: • The upright growth allows more airflow to reduce the disease pressure Seedling Vigor & tiller density translates into a rapid establishment Dark green genetic color provides the desired aesthetics Reducing water input saves costs Heavy traffic tolerance at a 2 inch height of cut provides an award winning stand of grass • • • Mean Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings of Tall Fescue Cultivars Grown Under Traffic Stress at St. Louis, MO Table 13 2002-05 Data Turfgrass Quality and Other Ratings 1-9; 9=Best Quality Cultivar Quality Quality Quality Mean Mean Mean Mean 2003-2005 2003 2004 2005 Coyote II (K01-8015) 5.6 5.9 5.6 5.7 Rebel Exeda 5.4 5.7 5.3 5.5 Wolfpack 5.2 5.2 4.8 5.1 2nd Millennium 5.8 5.1 4.2 5.0 Falcon IV (F-4) 5.3 4.8 4.5 4.8 KY-31 E+ 2.4 2.8 2.4 2.5 LSD Value 0.8 1.2 1.3 0.5 These examples represent a few of the varieties tested in the NTEP 2001 National Tall Fescue Report, 2002-2005 Data, Final Report For complete trial data, go to www.ntep.org • RECOMMENDED USE: • • • • • Golf Courses (Roughs) Sod Farms Park Settings Athletic Fields Home Lawns Growing a better tomorrow, Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Tall Fescue Cultivars Grown at Nineteen Locations in the US, Maintained Using “Schedule A” Table 1, 2002-05 Data Turfgrass Quality Ratings 1-9; 9=Ideal Turf Cultivar Mean R-4 6.3 Justice 6.3 Rebel Exeda 6.1 Masterpiece 6.0 Dynasty 5.9 KY-31 E+ 3.6 LSD Value 0.2 Mean Turfgrass Quality Ratings of Tall Fescue Cultivars Grown at Three Locations – In The Southeast Region Table 5, 2002-05 Data Turfgrass Quality Ratings 1-9; 9=Ideal Turf Cultivar AL2 GA1 TX1 Mean Padre (NJ4) 5.9 6.4 5.8 6.1 Rebel Exeda 5.7 6.5 5.5 5.9 Pure Gold 5.5 6.1 5.0 5.5 Southern Choice 5.3 6.1 5.1 5.5 KY-31 E+ 4.3 5.2 4.5 4.7 LSD Value 0.6 0.7 1.2 0.5 Brown Patch (Warm Temperature) of Tall Fescue Cultivars Table 31 , 2002-05 Data Brown Patch Rating 1-9; 9=No Disease Cultivar Mean R-4 6.8 Rebel Exeda 6.6 Southern Choice II 6.2 Pure Gold 5.5 JTTFF-2000 4.7 LSD Value 0.8 These examples represent a few of the varieties tested in the NTEP 2001 National Tall Fescue Report, 2002-2005 Data, Final Report For complete trial data, go to www.ntep.org Festuca arundinacea OPTIMAL ADAPTATION AREAS: Climatic Zones: 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 (may not be adaptable to all areas within each climatic zone) SEEDING RATES: Home Lawns, Parks: 8 - 10 lbs/1000 sq ft (3 ½ - 5 kgs/100 sq meters) Athletic Fields/Parks: 10 - 15 lbs/1000 sq ft (5 – 7 kgs/100 sq meters) Sod Farms: 8 - 10 lbs/1000 sq ft (3 ½ - 5 kgs/100 sq meters) Fairways & Roughs: 5 - 10 lbs/1000 sq ft (2 – 5 kgs/100 sq meters) ESTABLISHMENT: Sow in sun or shade in spring or fall. Mid-summer sowing is not recommended except for areas of dense shade that can be well watered. Lime soil to 5.5 – 6.0 pH and follow soil test recommendations for fertilization. Maintain adequate soil moisture for proper germination. Under ideal conditions, germination may begin in as few as 9 days. Full germination may take up to 21 days. First mowing is suggested when plants reach approximately 2 inches. (7.5 cm). MAINTENANCE: Best when managed at 2.5 inches, though will tolerate lower heights. What are the Advantages of Buying “Blue Tag Certified” Seed? • Certification Begins in the production field – Certified fields must be seeded with breeder seed, foundation seed, or registered seed – The land must be clean, weed free and not previously planted to another variety or class of seed that could affect the genetic purity of the improved variety – There are also requirements for isolation distances between fields of similar crops to prevent cross pollination of varieties – Blue-tag certified seed cannot contain the following weeds• Wild onion/garlic, morning glory, quackgrass, thistle, annual bluegrass, wild oats, hairy chess, brassica spp, cheat grass • Blue Tag Certified Seed Insures Varietal Integrity & Genetic Purity Seeing an OSU Blue Tag on your bag of seed is the only way to know for sure that- “What is on the Tag is actually in the Bag!!!” What is MYCO Advantage ? TM • MYCO AdvantageTM is the Next Step in Customer Satisfaction. – Our customers want outstanding Turf with less inputs (fertilization, water, fungicides, etc.) – Our society is demanding Turf and Landscapes that require less inputs (fertilization, water, fungicides, etc.) • How? – Mycorrhizae • Mycorrhizae reduces the plant’s need for water and increases its efficiency of utilizing fertilizers by– Strengthening the root mass & increasing root depth – Reducing root establishment time from seed – Enhances the plant’s ability to tolerate drought Mycorrhizae Seed Treatment on root tips increases the root mass which increases the plant’s uptake efficiency MYCO AdvantageTM Advanced Mycorrhizal Fungi Technology Growing a better tomorrow, today... Get the most out of the seed you plant with Pennington’s exclusive Myco Advantage™. Pennington’s Myco Advantage™ is an advanced seed additive technology that when added to our highly rated seed varieties, further maximizes their performance. Myco Advantage™ improves the partnership between both the emerging seed roots, establishing turf roots and the beneficial soil fungi. Myco Advantage™ is our exclusive blend of three carefully selected species of endomycorrhizae. These beneficial fungi build a natural microbial system, which greatly enhances plant growth, vigor and tolerance of environmental extremes. MYCO Advantage™ is a liquid seed coating of mycorrhizal fungi that colonize roots and extend into the surrounding soil forming an essential link between plant and soil resources. About 90% of the worlds plant species benefit from mycorrhizae with these endomycorrhizal fungi. Beneficial mycorrhizal fungi expand into the surrounding soil and greatly increase the root’s ability to absorb water and nutrients, while improving plant yields and health. Treated with MYCO AdvantageTM Untreated Mycorrhizae fungi have been around from the beginning of time, though not everyone knew the benefits of these specialized fungi. These fungi have supported Mother Nature by enhancing the plants ability to gather the elements needed to support optimal plant life. Over time many turf managers have come to appreciate the benefits of mycorrhizal fungi and what they can do to enhance their properties, performance of their grounds and increase environmental benefits. Mycorrhizae can reduce the plants need for water plus increase the plants efficient use of less than ideal water, increase the efficiency and utilization of fertilizer, reduce establishment time, strengthen root mass and depth, plus enhance the plants ability to tolerate drought with 30% less water. 2004 Turf Trial: Comparison of established Bentgrass turf plots where one plot used seeds treated with MYCO Advantage™ versus another plot where seeds were left untreated. Seed treated with MYCO AdvantageTM Untreated Type: • Advanced Seed Treatment Technology Features: • Myco Advantage™ can reduce the plants need for water plus increase the plants efficient use of less than ideal water, increase the efficiency and utilization of fertilizer, reduce establishment time, strengthen root mass and depth, plus enhance the plants ability to tolerate salinity and drought. Benefits: Reduces: • • • • Drought stress Water requirements Fertilizer requirements Transplant shock Increases: • Improved seed establishment • Water and nutrient storage and uptake • Root growth • Salt tolerance • Drought tolerance Recommended Use: • We recommend utilizing Pennington’s exclusive Myco Advantage™ advanced seed additive technology on all of your Pennington turf seeds. MYCO AdvantageTM Advanced Mycorrhizal Fungi Technology Growing a better tomorrow, today... Modern day turf managers are stewards of the environment. They have the difficult job of balancing turf to produce an aesthetically pleasing stand of grass while minimizing herbicide, pesticide, fungicide and fertilizer inputs into the environment along with being stewards of water conservation. To further the tools available to today’s Turf Managers, Pennington Seed’s offers their exclusive Myco Advantage™ seed coating. OPTIMAL ADAPTATION AREAS: • Zones: All If Mycorrhizae is naturally abundant in the soil, you may ask why this is necessary. Mycorrhizae require a host to survive in the soil which means when the soil is disturbed during construction or the topsoil is removed or if the land lays fallow for an extended period then the fungi perish. Host plants such as grasses and nursery plants that receive intensive care can survive without Mycorrhizal fungi though the Mycorrhizae cannot survive without the host plants. Myco Advantage™ Test results: Treated with MYCO AdvantageTM 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Untreated Sahara bermuda with MycoApply® Control 5 20 /8/ 0 5/2 5/1 0 2/2 5/2 Percent cover of Apron treated Sahara Bermuda grass with and without treatment with Myco Advantage™ mycorrhizal seed inoculant Tall Fescue Production Fields Myco Advantage™ treated field SEEDING RATES: • Myco Advantage™ does not effect the seeding rate when applied to seed, see individual variety product specifications for specific seeding rates that are applicable to that variety. ESTABLISHMENT: • Myco Advantage™ improves seed establishment. See individual seed varieties for detailed information related to establishment time MAINTENANCE: • Follow the recommended maintenance guidelines for each seed variety. • Myco Advantage™ planted seed will help you get more out of your turf. 06 06 06 06 20 /1/ 5 Establishment photos of Apron treated Sahara Bermuda grass with and without treatment with MycoApply® mycorrhizal seed inoculant Untreated field Mycorrhizae & Turf Type Tall Fescue Tall Fescue Production w/o MYCO AdvantageTM Treatment Tall Fescue Production w/ MYCO AdvantageTM Treatment Percent cover of Apron treated Tall Fescue with & without MYCOAdvantageTM Percent Coverage 35 30 25 Tall fescue w/MYCO Control 20 15 10 5 0 Cover 6/15/06 Dates Cover 6/22/06 Mycorrhizae And Turfgrass Biological tool improves establishment, growth, disease and drought resistance of golf turf grasses Draft 9/27/01 Mike Amaranthus Myco-what? Ten years ago the mention of mycorrhizal fungi to a golf superintendent might have met with a blank stare. Today’s managers are much more knowledgeable regarding the benefits of mycorrhizae. Research studies have shown us all how these specialized fungi can improve fertilizer utilization, rooting depth, the speed of establishment, disease and drought resistance of turf. The golf industry and golf managers take their responsibility for managing the game and the environment seriously. New tools, such as the use of beneficial mycorrhizal fungi, allow golf managers to improve the condition of both turf and soil Golf course management is a balance between the speed of play, golfer’s desire to see perfectly manicured turf grass and the ecological concerns of frequent chemical and water use. Golf courses do not operate in a vacuum but are part of a watershed. The selection of fertilizers, pesticides and water are important not only to the "look" of the course but to the surrounding environment as well. Golf course managers have a new tool in their belt that utilizes nature’s own way for growing plants and conserving resources. Golf course managers can use a group of beneficial soil organisms, the mycorrhizal fungi, to improve the health and vigor of their turf grass. What mycorrhizae are Most grass species in their undisturbed natural environments form a beneficial association with mycorrhizal fungi. The resulting structure is called a mycorrhiza, or literally "fungus-root". Although several types of mycorrhizal fungi form mycorrhizae with plants, the Figure 2 Figure 1 largest group, -endomycorrhiza Arbuscule within root where mycorrhizal or also called arbuscular Glomus mosseae spores (left) fungus and grass root exchange food and mycorrhizae form with most colonized root (center) and hyphae nutrients.(Curtesy of M. Brumett) grass species. Mycorrhizal fungi (right) are present in soil as spores, as hyphae in soil (filaments) or as colonized roots (Figure 1). Hyphae of mycorrhizae penetrate into and between the outer cells of the root. Inside the root the fungus forms special coiled hyphae (arbuscules) (Figure 2) that provide increased surface area for exchanges of food to the fungus and nutrients for the grass. The mycorrhizal fungi once established on the turf root system radiate out from the roots to form a dense network of filaments (Figure 3). These filaments form an extensive system of hyphae that grow into the surrounding soil and provide a variety of benefits for the grass plant. This network of filaments obtains 15 major macro and micro nutrients and water and transport these materials back to the turf root system. Mycorrhizae are especially important for uptake of nutrients that do not readily move through the soil such as phosphorous and many of the micro-nutrients. The elaborate network of hyphae beneath the soil surface greatly increases the potential of the root system to absorb nutrients and Figure 3 water. Conserving and incorporating fertility and water directly into The abundance of hyphae attached to the target turf grass is a goal of golf management professionals and colonized turf grass roots greatly expand the minimizes off site and groundwater movement of fertilizer that is not level of nutrients.(Curtesy of B. Auge) utilized. The network also binds soil particles together, improves soilporosity and the movement of air and water within the soil. Where mycorrhizae are Soils in natural settings are full of beneficial soil organisms including mycorrhizal fungi. Research indicates, however, many common practices can degrade the mycorrhiza-forming potential of soil. Construction practices, tillage, removal of topsoil, site preparation, heavy use of pesticides and chemical fertilizer, compaction, and leaving soils bare are some of the activities that can reduce or eliminate these beneficial soil fungi (Amaranthus et al. 1996; Doer et al. 1984; Dumroese et al. 1998). In many man-made landscapes we have reduced or eliminated healthy diverse populations of mycorrhizal fungi. (Figure 4) Figure 4 Golf Course under construction near Las Vegas, Nevada. Putting greens constructed according to U.S. Golf association standards lack mycorrhizal fungi at the time of sowing and mycorrhizal populations are slow to increase in the green (Koske et al. 1997). All important turf grass species can form a specialized symbiotic (mutually beneficial) relationship with mycorrhizal fungi. Unfortunately, modern golf construction practices often reduce or eliminate these beneficial organisms). New mycorrhizal products designed for the golf industry are now returning these ancient allies of grass back to golf course soils. Show me the data Mycorrhizae are, by far, the most researched aspect of soil biology. Over 48 thousand studies of the mycorrhizal relationship with plants are available in the literature. Figure 5 Studies have shown that grass species in the family Poaceae benefit greatly from mycorrhizal colonization in terms of growth and nutrient acquisition (Gemma and Koske 1989; Sylvia and Burks 1988; Hall et al 1984)(Figure 5 & 6). Warm-season grasses such as bermuda grass with coarse root systems are very dependent upon mycorrhiza for sustained growth (Hetrick et al 1988; 1990). Recent data indicates that cool-season, finer rooted bentgrass species also form abundant mycorrhiza and benefit from the relationship, especially where the phosphorous levels are not too high (Gemma et al. 1995; Gemma et al 1997; Koske et al 1997). It is also well documented that inoculation of grasses with mycorrhizal fungi in soil with low phosphorous concentrations can produce greater shoot and root biomass (Hall et al 1984; Petrovic 1984; Hetrick et al. 1986; 1988). Mycorrhizae inoculated bentgrass (left) and control (right) grown in sandy substrate with low fertility. Recent findings of improved turf grass establishment, root growth, fertilizer utilization, cover percentage, drought, nematode and disease resistance has golf course managers including mycorrhizal inoculations in their construction and maintenance practices. Golf course greens incur environmental stresses caused by compaction, frequent mowing, and artificial sandy substrates lacking nutrient and water holding capacities. Mycorrhizae can benefit many plants and results are often very apparent in situations where environmental stress is high. Water, water everywhere? Attention has focused on water conservation as water becomes a more expensive and environmentally sensitive component of golf course management. Research studies have shown that mycorrhizae can enhance the ability of grasses to avoid water stress (Koske et al 1995; Auge et al. 1995; Allen et. al. 1991). Recent studies from the Journal of Turfgrass Science indicate that creeping bentgrass inoculated with the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices tolerated drought conditions significantly longer than nonmycorrhizal turf (Gemma et al. 1997). Mycorrhizal inoculated turf also recovered more quickly from wilting than non-mycorrhizal turf. Mycorrhizal turf maintained significantly higher (avg. 29% more) chlorophyll concentrations than non mycorrhizal turf during drought events. Other research studies indicate that greater chlorophyll content and enhanced photosynthate production can lead to increased drought resistance. Mycorrhizal inoculations can be a useful tool to managers because sand/peat putting greens dry out quickly and creeping bentgrass is intolerant of drought and difficult to maintain under summer conditions. Figure 6 Faster grow-in Research (Gemma et al, 1997; Green et al. in preparation) indicates that mycorrhizal inoculation at the time of sowing can increase the rate of establishment by turfgrass species. The early Figure 7 establishment of turfgrass in sand/peat medium has received the attention of managers where early playability can have a significant economic payback. In recent trials in Oregon and California, mycorrhizal inoculants at the time of sowing doubled the percent grass cover in the early establishment period.(Figure 7, 8, 9). Figure 8 Creeping Bentgrass cover with mycorrhizal inoculation with endoroots (left) and cover in control area (right). (Courtesy if Robert Green PhD Research Argonomist, University of California) Figure 9 Bermuda grass cover with mycorrhizae inoculation using Glomus intraradices spores (right) and non inoculated control (left). Resistance to disease and nematodes Root pathogenic fungi and parasitic nematodes can be acute problems for golf course managers. Research indicates that the mycorrhizal relationship can improve grasses resistance to the negative effects of these organisms (Newsham et al. 1995; Little and Maun 1996; Thompson and Wildermuth 1989, Linderman 1994). Mycorrhizal fungi improve the plants resistance to soil born diseases in several ways for a wide range of host species (Allen 1991; Linderman 1994). The literature of recent years, indicates that mycorrhizal control of plant diseases may be strongly influenced by enhanced nutrition. Other factors might also play a role, such as less availability of resources for the pathogens, physical changes in roots and root tissues, chemical changes of root and plant tissues, reduction of environmental stresses, and increased concentrations of other beneficial soil organisms around roots. Some specific mycorrhizal fungi like Glomus mosseae (Figure 10) and Glomus intraradices are particularly effective in preventing fusarium, pythium, and phytophora infections (St-Arnauld et al 1995; Sitaramaiah and Sikora 1981; Baghel and Bhatti 1990)) Root infections by pathogenic nematodes are generally less severe on mycorrhizal plants than on non mycorrhizal plants, but the responses may vary, and the mechanisms involved are being studied (Linderman 1992). Symptoms of nematode infection are generally reduced, and often, nematode populations themselves are reduced (Hussey and Roncadori 1978; 1982). One reasonable proposed Figure 10 mechanism is the improvement in turf grass vigor as a Spores from a variety of Glomus mycorrhizal species. result of the mycorrhiza relationship masks yield losses caused by nematode infection. Also, changes in root exudates by mycorrhizae may change the attractiveness of roots to nematode pathogens. Increased production of inhibitory substances by mycorrhizae may additionally affect nematode population and survival. Research has demonstrated mycorrhizal fungal species Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices can help control the negative impacts of parasitic nematodes (Pinochet et al. 1993; Calvert et al. 1993; Zambolim and Schenck 1983; Chou and Schmitthenner 1974). When do I use mycorrhiza? Sand/peat medium incorporated during construction of golf greens is generally devoid of mycorrhizal inoculum (Gemma et al 1997) and is a prime candidate for achieving the benefits of the mycorrhizal relationship. Mycorrhizal inoculum can be incorporated during construction and aerification. Mycorrhizal propagules are then incorporated into the rooting zone where they will be effectively utilized. Mycorrhizal inoculum should be incorporated both spring and fall for several years until healthy populations of mycorrhizae are established. Mycorrhizal colonization assessments are simple tests now available at many soil testing laboratories. Incorporating mycorrhizal inoculum during aerification is an appropriate way of developing a mycorrhizal network in the soil even for greens not inoculated during construction (Figure 11) Figure 11 Use diverse species of mycorrhizal fungi Natural areas generally contain an array of mycorrhizal fungal species. The proportions and abundance of mycorrhizal species often declines following any disturbance. Not all mycorrhizal fungi have the same capacities and tolerances. Because of the wide variety of soil, climatic, and biotic conditions characterizing golf environments, it is improbable that a single mycorrhizal fungus could benefit all turf grasses and adapt to all conditions. For example, the types and activities of mycorrhizal fungi associated with grasses are often different than those associated with woody plants. Mycorrhizal fungi have differing abilities to produce antibiotics that retard soil pathogens. Likewise, some mycorrhizal fungi are better at producing enzymes that facilitate mineral uptake such as phosphorous and iron. Still other mycorrhizal fungi can access organic forms of nitrogen. Selecting mycorrhizal products that contain several mycorrhizal species likely provides a range of benefits to the plant not found with only one species. (Figure 12) Making a commitment Figure 12 A diversity of mycorrhizal spores from the genus Glomus. How often do you think about the impact of your golf course maintenance practices on turf and environmental quality? Annually? Weekly? Daily? If you responded weekly or daily you are probably a person who is interested in organic, environmentally friendly products that will improve turf and soil quality. Mycorrhizal fungi are not new, trendy, genetically engineered organisms. These specialized fungi have been fundamental to the survival and growth of plants for over 400 million years. When you view turf grass at a golf course it is like viewing an ice burg. Between 50 to 80 percent of the energy absorbed by the grasses is allocated below-ground. This energy can be put to work by the manager utilizing specific beneficial soil organisms. New scientific advancements in the cost effective growing of certain mycorrhizal species beneficial to turf grass are rapidly bringing mycorrhizal products to the golf management marketplace. Mycorrhizae can help lower costs over the long run. Healthy living soil and turf will retain nutrients, build soil structure, reduce stress and suppress disease, thus reducing the frequency and level of certain maintenance activities. Choosing to incorporate mycorrhizal fungi into construction and aerification programs will not only benefit the environment but improves turf cover, rooting, fertilizer utilization, disease and drought resistance. Protecting the environment has never made more sense. Myco-what? This may be a question of the past. REFERENCES Allen, M.F. (1991). The Ecology of Mycorrhizae, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. Amaranthus M.P. Dumroese, D.P. Harvey A.E. and Cazares E. (1996) Soil Compaction and organic matter affect conifer seedling and nonmycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal abundance. USDA Pac NW Res. Sta. PNW RP 494 12 pp . Auge, R.M., Stodola, A.J.W., Ebel, R.C. & Duan, X. (1995). Leaf elongation and water relations of mycorrhizal sorghum in response to partial soil drying: Two Glomus species at varying phosphorus fertilization. J. Expt. Bot. 46, 297-307. Baghel, P.P.S., and Bhatti, D.S. (1990). Endomycorrhizal fungus (Glomus mosseae) and mycorphagus nematode (Aphelenchus avenae) on some citrus root stocks. Haryana J. Hortic. Sci. 19:273-279. Calvert, C., Pera, J., and Barea, J.M. (1993). Growth response of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) to inoculation with Glomus mosseae, Trichoderma aureoviride and Pythium ultimum in a peat-perlite mixture. Plant and Soil 148:1-6. Chou, G.L., and Schmitthenner, A.F. (1974). Effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Endogone mosseae on soybean root rot caused by Pythium ultimum ar Phytophthora megasperma var.sojae. Plant Dis. Rep. 58:221-225. Doerr, T.B., Redente, E.F., and Reeves, F.B. Effects of soil disturbance on plant succession and levels of mycorrhizal fungi in a sagebrush-grassland community. J. Range Manage. 37:135-139. Dumroese D.S, Harvey AE., Amaranthus, MP. (1998). Impacts of soil compaction and tree stump removal on soil properties and outplanted seedlings . Can J. Soil Science 78: 29-34 Gemma, J.N. & Koske, R.E. (1989). Field inoculation of America beachgrass (Ammophila breviligulata) with VA. mycorrhizal fungi. J. Environ. Manag. 29. 173-182. Gemma, J.N., Koske, R.E., Roberts, E.M., Jackson, N. & De Antonis, K.M. (1997). Mycorrhizal fungi enhance drought resistance in creeping bentgrass. J. Turfgrass Science 73, in this volume. Hall, I.R., Johnstone, P.D. & Dolby, R. (1984). Interactions between endomycorrhizas and soil nitrogen and phosphorus on the growth of ryegrass. New Phytol. 97, 447-453. Hetrick, B.A.D., Kitt, D.G. & Wilson, G.W.T. (1986). The influence of phosphorus fertilization, fungal species, and nonsterile soil on mycorrhizal growth response in tall grass prairie species. Can. J. Bot. 64, 1199-1203. Hetrick, B.A.D., Kitt, D.G. & Wilson, G.W.T, (1988). Mycorrhizal dependency and growth habit of warm-season and cool-season tallgrass prairie plants. Can. J. Bot. 66, 1376-1380. Hetrick, B.A.D., Wilson, G.W.T., and Leslie, J.F. 1991. Root architecture of warn-and cool-season grasses: relationship to mycorrhizal dependence. Can J. Bot. 69: 112-118. Hetrick, B.A.D., Wilson, G.W.T. & Todd, T.C. (1990). Differential response of C3 and C4 grasses to mycorrhizal symbiosis, P fertilization, and soil microorganisms. Can. J. Bot. 68, 461-467. Hussey, R.S., and Roncadori, R.W. (1978). Interaction of Pratylenchus brachyurus and Gigaspora margarita on cotton. J. Nematol. 10: 18-20. Hussey, R.S., and Roncadori, R.W. (1982). Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae may limit nematode activity and improve plant growth. Plant Dis. 66:9-14. Koske, R.E. , Gemma, J.N. & Jackson, N. (1995). Mycorrhizal fungi benefit putting greens. USGA Green Section Record 33(6). 12-14. Koske, R.E., Gemma, J.N. & Jackson, N. (1997). A preliminary survey of mycorrhizal fungi in putting greens. J. Turfgrass Science 73. Linderman, R.G. (1992). Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and soil microbial interactions. In Mycorrhizae and plant health ASA speical publication No. 54 Madison WI. pp 45-70 Linderman, R.G. (1994). Role of VAM fungi in biocontrol. In: Mycorrhizae and Plant Health. Pfleger, F.L. and Linderman, R.G., cds., APS Press, St. Paul, MN. Pp. 1-26. Little, L.R. & Maun, M.A. (1996). The "Ammophila problem" revisited: a role for mycorrhizal fungi. J. Ecol. 84. 1-7. Newsham, K.K., Fitter, A.H. & Watkinson, A.R. (1995). Arbuscular mycorrhiza protect an annual grass from root pathogenic fungi in the field. J. Ecol. 83, 991-1000. Petrovic. A.M. (1984). Endomycorrhizal fungi: Friend or foe. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Northeastern Turfgrass Conference, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, pp. 18-20. Pinochet, J., Camprubi, A., and Calvet, C. (1993). Effects of the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus vulnus and the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae on the growth of EMLA-26 apple rootstock. Mycorrhiza 4:79-83. Sitaramaiah, K. and Sikora, R.A. (1981). Resistance to Rotylenchulus reniformis in cotton and tomato induced by the endotrophic mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. In, Fortin, J.A. (ed.) Proc. 5th North American Conference on Mycorrhizae. August 16-21, 1981. Quebec, Canada, p. 28. St-Arnaud, M., Hamel, C., Vimard, B., Caron, M., and Fortin, J.A. (1995) Altered growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Chrysanthimi in an in vitro dual culture system with the vesicula arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices growing on Daucus carota transformed roots. Mycorrhiza 5:431-438. Sylvia, D.M. & Burks, J.N. (1988). Selection of a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus for practical inoculation of Uniola paniculata. Mycologia 80, 565-568. Thompson, J.P. & Wildermouth, G.B. (1989). Colonization of crop and pasture species with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and a negative correlation with root infection by Bipolaris sorokiniana. Can J. Bot. 69, 687-693. Zambolim, L., and Schenck, N.C. (1983). Reduction of the effectrs of pathogenic, root-infecting fungi on soybean by the mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus mosseae. Phytopathol. 73:1403-1405.