Folie 1 - ForageHarvester.com

Transcription

Folie 1 - ForageHarvester.com
Competitive comparison
JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 (9090-9040)
Product range 2012
Overview
JAGUAR
980
970
960
950
940
930
Engine
MAN D2862
V12 24.2 l
MAN D2868
V8 16.2 l
OM 502 LA
V8 16 l
OM 502 LA
V8 16 l
OM 502 LA
V8 16 l
OM 460 LA
R6 12.8 l
Exhaust gas standard
TIER 2
TIER 2
TIER 4i
TIER 4i
TIER 4i
TIER 4i
884
775
653
598
510
456
Max. power (ECE R120)
HP
Feeder width / height
in
28.7 / 7.1
28.7 / 7.1
28.7 / 7.1
28.7 / 7.1
28.7 / 7.1
28.7 / 7.1
Cutting cylinder width / Ø
in
29.5 / 24.8
29.5 / 24.8
29.5 / 24.8
29.5 / 24.8
29.5 / 24.8
29.5 / 24.8
24
24
24
24
24
24
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
210° / 225°
210° / 225°
210° / 225°
210° / 225°
210° / 225°
210° / 225°
Cutting cylinder variants
Corn cracker Ø
in
Spout rotation angle
FR
9090/850 9080/700 9060/600 9050/500 9040/450
IVECO Cursor13 IVECO Cursor13 IVECO Cursor9
V8 20.00 l
CAT C18 R6
18.10 l
R6 12.90 l
R6 12.90 l
R6 9 l
TIER 2
TIER 3
TIER 3
TIER 3
TIER 3
824
685
591
500
424
IVECO Vector
Engine
Exhaust gas standard
Max. power (ECE R120)
HP
Feeder width / height
in
33.9 / 7.1
33.9 / 7.1
33.9 / 7.1
33.9 / 7.1
33.9 / 7.1
Cutting cylinder width / Ø
in
34.8 / 28
34.8 / 28
34.8 / 28
34.8 / 28
34.8 / 28
32 / 24 / 16
32 / 24 / 16
32 / 24 / 16
32 / 24 / 16
32 / 24 / 16
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
210°
210°
210°
210°
210°
Cutting cylinder variants
Corn cracker Ø
Spout rotation angle
In
Change in model numbers with updates to various parts of the machine.
2
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Product range 2012
Overview
3
ORBIS 900
30 ft
ORBIS 750
25 ft
ORBIS 600
20 ft
RU 450
15 ft
PU 380 HD
490 FI
480 FI
471 FI
450 FI
441 FI
420 FI
30 ft
25 ft
25 ft
20 ft
20 ft
15 ft
12.5 ft
280 FP
12 ft
PU 300 HD
10 ft
290 FP
17 ft
DD 610
20 ft
DD 520
17 ft
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Made by
Kemper
Crop flow
General
Discharge accelerator
29.5 in x 20.6 in
~2119 rpm
Discharge accelerator
26.8 in x 21.3 in
~2400 rpm
Corn cracker
9.8 in / 22%
99 tooth (9040-9060)
99F/126R tooth (9080-9090
~3516 rpm
Corn cracker
9.8 in / 30% or 40%
100F/125R Tooth
~3200 rpm
Drum
29.5 in x 24.8 in
~1200 rpm
Feeder
28.7 in x 7.1 in
223.1 ft/s
137.8 ft/s
3.3 – 15.8 ft/s
151 ft/s
138 ft/s
Feeder
33. in x 7.1 in
131.2 ft/s
Evenly rising crop flow in combination with
increasing crop speed (CLAAS has more
than 20 years of crop flow experience);
Only minor reduction of crop flow crosssection (7% between feeder and discharge
accelerator).
4
Drum
34.8 in x 28 in
~1130 rpm
190 ft/s
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Evenly rising crop flow and increasing
crop speed;
The wider the cutting cylinder, the more the
downstream crop flow cross-section must
be reduced (13% between feeder and
discharge accelerator).
Feeder
Front attachment matching
Large Drum:
Feeder width 28.3 in = -16%
New Small Drum:
Adjustable feeder cones for
opening width
(23.6-39.4 in)
Perfect interplay of front attachment and
vehicle: ORBIS feeder cones support the
crop flow without restricting the feeder width
(28.7 in);
Undisturbed feeding, regardless of front
attachment cross inclination;
The development of own front attachments
enables optimum matching of crop flow
components.
5
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
The Kemper/John Deere front attachments
cannot make full use of the feeder width
of 33.9 in;
Width reduction followed by spreading
out is quite unlikely.
Dependence on supplier in a very central
crop flow area:
Optimization of front attachment and
machine is not an "in-house" matter.
Feeder
General
7.1 in
7.1 in
33.9 in
28.7 in
Tried-and-tested feeder cross section
designed for up to 1160 hp ensures reliable
pre-compression and high throughput under
all conditions;
Removable wear bars for lower and upper
feed rollers.
6
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
The wider the feeder, the more difficult it is
to achieve high pre-compression from small
crop amounts and/or lightweight crop;
Replaceable wear bars only for upper
feed roller;
Optional lower bar starting in 2012.
Cutting cylinder
Accessibility
V-type opening is possible with front
attachment fitted for quick visual
inspections;
Lateral opening is possible after removing
the front attachment and swinging the feed
roller housing open to the side;
Complete separation is possible. When
carrying out major service work, the feed
roller housing can remain fitted e.g. to the
ORBIS front attachment.
7
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
V-type opening is possible;
Lateral opening is not possible;
Complete separation is possible, but:
The bottom feed and pre-compression
rollers remain connected with the
cylinder housing;
A crane, telescopic loader or front
loader is required.
The cylinder can be completely removed
and put down on feet.
Cutting cylinder
All drums marked in red are only available through parts
Product range
V36 (36/18/12 knives)
V24 (24/12 knives)
V28 (28/14 knives)
V20 (20/10 knives)
Model
LOC
Width
/d
Speed Cutting
frequency
[mm]
[in]
[rpm]
[cuts/min]
V36 980-970, 3.5960-930 37.5
29.5 /
24.8
1200
21,600
V28 960-930
4-31
29.5 /
24.8
1200
16,800
V24 980-970, 4-44
960-930
29.5 /
24.8
1200
14,400
V20 960-930
29.5 /
24.8
1200
12,000
8
5-44
V32 (32/16 knives)
Model
V24 (24/12 knives)
V16 (16/8 knives)
LOC
Width
/d
Speed Cutting
frequency
[mm]
[mm]
[rpm]
[cuts/min]
V32
850-450
3-16
34.8 /
28
1130
18,100
V24
850-450
4-22
34.8 /
28
1130
13,600
V16
850-450
6-33
34.8 /
28
1130
9,066
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Cutting cylinder
Design
V-MAX cutting cylinder:
Cutting forces are absorbed by the
cylinder spiders;
Two bolts / knife;
No knife readjustment is necessary.
V-shaped knife configuration for centered
crop flow;
Modular design for easy replacement of
damaged parts.
9
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Cutting cylinder design according
to Chevron:
Five bolts/knife plus one threaded and
one holding plate/knife;
Readjusting the knives is necessary;
Wear of threaded plates.
V-shaped knife configuration for centered
crop flow;
The cutting cylinder is essentially a basic
structure with bolt-on shafts and knives.
Cutting cylinder
Sharpening and shear bar adjustment
Starting and monitoring of sharpening and
shear bar adjustment from the cab;
Starting and monitoring of sharpening and
shear bar adjustment from the cab;
Only forward sharpening in the offer:
Reverse sharpening is possible upon
request:
An additional drive is required;
No reminder function, no information about
knife condition.
Advantages for forward sharpening
outweigh clearly.
Reminder function, information about "Time
until next sharpening,” knife condition, total
of sharpening cycles (sharpening stone and
machine).
10
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Corn cracker
Product range
CLAAS
Roller crackers
(MCC)
Ø in inches
9.8
Numbers of teeth
100/125
Numbers of teeth through parts
100/125/150
New Holland
Ø in inches
Numbers of teeth
Standard profile
Speed difference in % standard
Profile
Sawtooth
Speed difference in % standard
30 or 40
Speed difference in % option
Belt tensioning
11
Roller cracker
9.8
99 tooth (9040-9060)
99F/126R tooth (9080-9090)
Sawtooth
22
Speed difference in % option
Belt tensioning
20
42
60
hydraulic
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
hydraulic
Corn cracker
New Holland’s Variflow System
Corn cracker retracted / discharge
accelerator in “corn position"
When working in grass, the corn cracker swings out of
the crop flow and is locked in parking position:
According to NH, this takes two minutes;
Complete removal with a swinging jib and a
chain hoist (option) takes 30 minutes (acc. to
manufacturer);
The system reduces the distance between
cylinder and accelerator by 60%;
The manufacturer claims that this saves
40 hp - when working in grass.
Corn cracker extended / discharge
accelerator in "grass position"
12
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Corn cracker
Installation and removal
The corn cracker can be easily moved out
of and into its working position on rails;
In all applications, the discharge accelerator
maintains the optimum position relating to
the upstream and downstream
subassemblies;
When working in grass, the CC can either
remain in the discharge and cooling system
compartment or be removed. At any rate, it
is not driven;
Insert the filler housing into the lower
discharge chute and tighten two brackets.
13
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Easy swinging in and out;
The system reduces the distance between
cutting cylinder and accelerator by 60%;
Necessary because otherwise the crop
flow would be decelerated heavily due
to the reduced cross-section?
The system enlarges the distance between
discharge accelerator and discharge flap:
Problems with sticky material?
Permanently running corn cracker:
Power requirement?
Service life?
Discharge accelerator
General
29.5 in
26.8 in
Four flat paddles/section;
V-type paddle configuration engages
continuously into the crop flow;
Enormous throwing capacity at 223 ft/s for
reliable throw onto trailer;
The throwing capacity can be adapted using
the accelerator gap adjustment (either
manual or electric).
14
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Six thick paddles/section:
50% more clamping points and higher
clamping forces (paddle thickness)
require more power.
Straight paddles (center) engage straight
into the crop flow;
Lower throwing capacity at 190.3 ft/s may
not always be sufficient (Example: making
splits through the field in corn).
Upper discharge chute
General
Wear plates can be accessed from the
outside;
Three extensions available;
225° rotating angle is possible;
Automatic parallel guiding of filling point on
the trailer available;
Two upper discharge chute positions can be
stored and parking position is possible.
15
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Wear plates: The first third is accessible
from above, second third can be accessed
only from below;
Only one extension is available (27.6 in);
Only a rotational angle of 210° is available;
No automatic flap control is available;
Two upper discharge chute positions can be
stored and parking position is possible.
Silaging agent systems
General
Silaging agent systems for conventional and
highly concentrated silaging agents are
available;
Easy control and monitoring through CEBIS;
Quantity- (gal or gal/h) or throughputdependent (gal or gal/t) dosing is possible
without changing nozzles.
16
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Additional tank (75.3 gal) for use as silaging
agent or fuel tank;
Control and monitoring by IntelliView III;
Dosing by variable pump in combination
with three nozzle types:
Only quantity-dependent (gal/h) dosing
is possible.
Crop flow drive concept
Portion of hydraulic and mechanical drives
Hydraulic
Mech.
Front attachment
Feeder
Cutting cylinder
Corn cracker
Discharge accelerator
Sharpening device forward
Sharpening device reverse
Rotary chaff screen suction
Fan
1
1
-
1
1
1
1
"1"
1
Total
2
6
17
Hydraulic
Mech.
Front attachment
Feeder
Cutting cylinder
Corn cracker
Discharge accelerator
Sharpening device forward
Sharpening device reverse
Rotary chaff screen suction
Fan
1
1
1
1
1
-
1
1
1
1
Total
5
4
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Crop flow drive concept
Portion of hydraulic and mechanical drives
Drive concept with a clear goal: Maximum
efficiency. Mechanical drives wherever
possible, hydraulic drives where they are
necessary (comfortable control):
Ø oil circulation: 17.4 gallons;
Small efficiency losses;
Efficient, but simple control system;
No-compromise reliability.
18
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
In general a drive concept with many
hydraulic drives and few mechanical drives:
Ø oil circulation: 26.4 gallons;
Increased efficiency losses = reduced
energy efficiency;
Increased complexity regarding
control system;
Increased failure susceptibility.
Crop flow drive concept
Main, feeder and front attachment drive
Transverse engine for direct power band
belt drive without losses (high efficiency);
Compact feeder drive concept with short
hydraulic hoses:
Minimized efficiency losses;
Changing feeder torques are realized
without a delay.
Immediate deceleration of main drive due to
QUICK STOP, after shutting down;
Front attachment drive by means of
comfortable quick-release coupler.
19
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Longitudinal engine requires angle drive for
power band belt drive:
Loss of efficiency due to power
redirection;
Angle drive must be cooled (power is
consumed).
Feeder drive concept with long hydraulic
hoses:
Increased efficiency losses;
Changing feeder torques arrive with a
delay due to increased absorption of
hydraulic energy in the long hydraulic
hoses.
Engine and surroundings
Overview of engines
JAGUAR 980 970
Engine type
Design
Capacity [l]
TIER
Max. Power
hp
Min. Power1
hp
Fuel tank
[gal]
DEF tank
[gal]
20
960
950
940
930
MAN MAN
MB
MB
MB
MB
D2862 D2868 OM502 OM502 OM502 OM460
V12
V8
V8
V8
V8
R6
24
16
16
16
16
12.8
2
2
4i
4i
4i
4i
884
775
653
598
510
456
333
322
310
-
-
-
357
357
317
317
317
317
-
-
30
30
30
30
FR
9090 9080 9060 9050 9040
850 700 600 500 450
Engine typ
IVECO
CAT
Vector08
C18
Cursor13
Cursor13
Cursor9
V8
R6
R6
R6
R6
20.1
18
12.9
12.9
9
2
3
3
3
3
Max. Power
HP
824
685
591
500
424
Fuel tank [Gal]
320
320
3220
322
322
Design
Capacity [l]
TIER
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
IVECO IVECO IVECO
Engine and surroundings
New Holland’s TURBO COMPOUND SYSTEM
Power
turbine
Exhaust
gases
Gears
Air intake
Air to
charge air
cooler
Power transmission to
crankshaft
Oil feed
flow
Only available for FR 9060;
The residual exhaust gas energy is
converted into mechanical energy and
transmitted to the crankshaft;
Hydroelastic
clutch
The fuel consumption is to drop by 8%;
Oil return line
21
This is said to give an additional 50 hp.
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Engine and surroundings
General
22
Flawless access to all important
engine components;
Worse access due to higher position,
integration and non-removable mud guards;
Silent blocks for low-vibration
engine support.
Silent blocks for low-vibration
engine support.
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Engine and surroundings
Cooling
Fixed rotary chaff screen with rotating air
intake tube.
Large screen surface due to conical shape:
Low air velocity, resulting in less
soiling;
Intake of cleaned air through a large
surface.
Suction effect: Use of suction effect
produced by the discharge accelerator.
23
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Rotating rotary chaff screen with fixed air
intake tube (similar to JAG 880-820):
Sealing by brush, leaving reliability
requirements unsatisfied;
V-belt drive susceptible to wear.
Suction is generated by hydraulic pump
additionally integrated into the floor:
Concept involving a greater effort.
Engine and surroundings
Hydraulic system
Constant-pressure system, i.e. a pressure
of 210 bar is permanently available:
Immediate reaction;
No permanent circulation. Oil is
pumped only when needed;
Less oil heating-up.
All hydraulic lines and hoses are as short as
possible:
Reduced efficiency losses.
24
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Constant-flow system, i.e. oil is pumped
permanently (gal/min):
Pressure must be built up first;
Permanent circulation. Unneeded
oil flows back through a pressure
relief valve;
Increased oil heating-up.
Largely dimensioned hydraulic hoses of
several yard length, some hydraulic lines:
Increased efficiency losses.
Chassis and drives
Vehicle concept
65%
76%
35%
Weighed
Permitted Delta
Total weight:
20.4 tons
19.8 tons
+.6 tons
-0.3 tons
Front axle
weight:
15.5 tons
13.2 tons
+2.3 tons
-0.3 tons
Rear axle
weight:
4.9 tons
7.2 tons
-2.3 tons
Weighed
Permitted Delta
Total weight:
19.8 tons
19.8 tons
0 tons
Front axle
weight:
12.9 tons
13.2 tons
Rear axle
weight:
6.9 tons
7.2 tons
.
No change in weights from Model change
25
24%
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Chassis and drives
Vehicle concept
Well-balanced vehicle concept:
Transverse engine positioned behind
the rear axle;
Drive wheel oriented towards the front
for short distance from the attachment
Optimum weight distribution enables
reduced use of rear ballast.
Optional tire pressure control system for
adapting the pressure to road and field.
26
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Unbalanced vehicle concept:
Longitudinal engine with angle drive
above the rear axle;
Worst weight distribution on the
market, requires increased use of rear
ballast (total weight!);
No tire pressure control system available,
i.e. unadapted tire pressure for road travel
and fieldwork;
Large tires (available up to 42").
Cab
Outside
Flat windshield with A-columns moved
forward:
Hardly any reflections inside the cab;
No impairment of windshield
wiper field;
Optimum air conditioning is possible.
Windshield wipers for front, side and rear
windows;
Adjustable work lights.
27
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Rounded windshield with A-columns moved
back:
Reflections inside the cab;
Rounded windshield is not covered by
windshield wiper;
Restricted ventilation with purely static
A-columns.
Cracks can be seen in curvature.
Work lights cannot be adjusted.
Cab
Inside
Hand-rails on the left and right for
convenient access. Inviting cab access;
Good view of front attachment, to the side
and the rear;
Automatic air conditioner as standard
equipment;
Several trays including cooling
compartments and integrated cooling box.
28
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Access without hand-rail on the right,
access restricted by arm rest / passenger
seat;
Good view of front attachment, to the side
(higher side windows) and the rear;
Air conditioner as standard equipment:
Automatic version available as an
option.
Few trays, no integrated cooling box.
Cab
Control panel
Switch console adjustable in two directions
and joined to the seat, with a wide arm rest;
Ergonomically arranged switches with selfexplaining symbols.
Quick settling-in of new drivers.
29
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Switch console adjustable in one direction
(horizontal) and joined to the seat;
Self-explaining symbols, some
supplemented by text, but only in English;
Unintended actuation of emergency stop
button by hand sliding down;
Settling-in of new drivers is more difficult
(ground speed control lever).
Cab
Ground speed control lever
Change
pushbutton
Driving activation
Ergonomic ground speed control lever with
adjustable hand rest, without any doublefunction pushbuttons;
Path-dependent ground speed control lever:
Any change of ground speed control
lever position has an immediate and
noticeable effect;
The ground speed control lever always
remains in its last position.
30
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Double-function pushbuttons:
A change pushbutton is necessary.
Time-dependent ground speed control lever:
Ground speed control lever always
returns to its neutral position;
The ground speed control lever position
from where an effect can be noticed
must be searched again and again.
Cab
Ground speed control lever
Automatic spout
rotation
Storing spout
position or the
parking position
Lift / lower front
attachment or
lateral levelling
Power Cruise
and/or Auto Pilot
Specifically shaped pushbuttons of different
sizes for intuitive operation;
Two-stage pushbuttons (fast/slow) for front
attachment (lift/lower) and upper discharge
chute rotation;
One double-function pushbutton, but only
when AUTO PILOT is active in combination
with CAM PILOT;
Adjustable hand rest.
31
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Quick stop
Engaging and
disengaging or
reversing the
front attachment
Upper discharge
chute and flap
control
Stored front
attachment
heights
Pushbuttons for front attachment and spout
control have the same size.
Danger of confusion.
Two-stage pushbuttons (fast/slow) for front
attachment (lift/lower) and spout rotation;
Three double-function pushbuttons with
differing response:
Double-click / press and hold /
combination with R-pushbutton.
Cab
Terminal
CEBIS (8.4") as the central control and
information unit;
Drive with Compact Flash Card for data
transfer;
CEBIS and HOTKEY rotary control switches
for quick access to main and auxiliary
functions;
Logic menu guiding for very easy
optimisation of settings.
32
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
IntelliView™ III touchscreen monitor (7.0")
as the central control and information unit;
USB port for data transfer;
No quick access to main and
auxiliary functions;
Limitless amount of information, in small
type-size;
Driver-specific settings are possible.
Summary
TOP TEN DISADVANTAGES
33
Crop flow
Cab
Chassis and drives
Restriction.
Windshield design.
Weight distribution.
Feeder
Engine and surroundings
Feeder width.
Constant-flow hydraulic system.
Cutting cylinder
Crop flow drive concept
Lateral opening.
Longitudinal installed engine.
Corn cracker
Discharge accelerator
Upper discharge chute
Reduce the distance.
Clamping forces.
Access wear plats.
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
Summary
JAGUAR unique selling points
STOP ROCK
Tire pressure regulation
system
CAMPILOT
Accelerator – gap
adjustment
QUICK ACCESS
ACTISILER 20
34
QUICK STOP
DIRECT STOP
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450
TELEMATICS