Folie 1 - ForageHarvester.com
Transcription
Folie 1 - ForageHarvester.com
Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 (9090-9040) Product range 2012 Overview JAGUAR 980 970 960 950 940 930 Engine MAN D2862 V12 24.2 l MAN D2868 V8 16.2 l OM 502 LA V8 16 l OM 502 LA V8 16 l OM 502 LA V8 16 l OM 460 LA R6 12.8 l Exhaust gas standard TIER 2 TIER 2 TIER 4i TIER 4i TIER 4i TIER 4i 884 775 653 598 510 456 Max. power (ECE R120) HP Feeder width / height in 28.7 / 7.1 28.7 / 7.1 28.7 / 7.1 28.7 / 7.1 28.7 / 7.1 28.7 / 7.1 Cutting cylinder width / Ø in 29.5 / 24.8 29.5 / 24.8 29.5 / 24.8 29.5 / 24.8 29.5 / 24.8 29.5 / 24.8 24 24 24 24 24 24 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 210° / 225° 210° / 225° 210° / 225° 210° / 225° 210° / 225° 210° / 225° Cutting cylinder variants Corn cracker Ø in Spout rotation angle FR 9090/850 9080/700 9060/600 9050/500 9040/450 IVECO Cursor13 IVECO Cursor13 IVECO Cursor9 V8 20.00 l CAT C18 R6 18.10 l R6 12.90 l R6 12.90 l R6 9 l TIER 2 TIER 3 TIER 3 TIER 3 TIER 3 824 685 591 500 424 IVECO Vector Engine Exhaust gas standard Max. power (ECE R120) HP Feeder width / height in 33.9 / 7.1 33.9 / 7.1 33.9 / 7.1 33.9 / 7.1 33.9 / 7.1 Cutting cylinder width / Ø in 34.8 / 28 34.8 / 28 34.8 / 28 34.8 / 28 34.8 / 28 32 / 24 / 16 32 / 24 / 16 32 / 24 / 16 32 / 24 / 16 32 / 24 / 16 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 210° 210° 210° 210° 210° Cutting cylinder variants Corn cracker Ø Spout rotation angle In Change in model numbers with updates to various parts of the machine. 2 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Product range 2012 Overview 3 ORBIS 900 30 ft ORBIS 750 25 ft ORBIS 600 20 ft RU 450 15 ft PU 380 HD 490 FI 480 FI 471 FI 450 FI 441 FI 420 FI 30 ft 25 ft 25 ft 20 ft 20 ft 15 ft 12.5 ft 280 FP 12 ft PU 300 HD 10 ft 290 FP 17 ft DD 610 20 ft DD 520 17 ft Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Made by Kemper Crop flow General Discharge accelerator 29.5 in x 20.6 in ~2119 rpm Discharge accelerator 26.8 in x 21.3 in ~2400 rpm Corn cracker 9.8 in / 22% 99 tooth (9040-9060) 99F/126R tooth (9080-9090 ~3516 rpm Corn cracker 9.8 in / 30% or 40% 100F/125R Tooth ~3200 rpm Drum 29.5 in x 24.8 in ~1200 rpm Feeder 28.7 in x 7.1 in 223.1 ft/s 137.8 ft/s 3.3 – 15.8 ft/s 151 ft/s 138 ft/s Feeder 33. in x 7.1 in 131.2 ft/s Evenly rising crop flow in combination with increasing crop speed (CLAAS has more than 20 years of crop flow experience); Only minor reduction of crop flow crosssection (7% between feeder and discharge accelerator). 4 Drum 34.8 in x 28 in ~1130 rpm 190 ft/s Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Evenly rising crop flow and increasing crop speed; The wider the cutting cylinder, the more the downstream crop flow cross-section must be reduced (13% between feeder and discharge accelerator). Feeder Front attachment matching Large Drum: Feeder width 28.3 in = -16% New Small Drum: Adjustable feeder cones for opening width (23.6-39.4 in) Perfect interplay of front attachment and vehicle: ORBIS feeder cones support the crop flow without restricting the feeder width (28.7 in); Undisturbed feeding, regardless of front attachment cross inclination; The development of own front attachments enables optimum matching of crop flow components. 5 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 The Kemper/John Deere front attachments cannot make full use of the feeder width of 33.9 in; Width reduction followed by spreading out is quite unlikely. Dependence on supplier in a very central crop flow area: Optimization of front attachment and machine is not an "in-house" matter. Feeder General 7.1 in 7.1 in 33.9 in 28.7 in Tried-and-tested feeder cross section designed for up to 1160 hp ensures reliable pre-compression and high throughput under all conditions; Removable wear bars for lower and upper feed rollers. 6 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 The wider the feeder, the more difficult it is to achieve high pre-compression from small crop amounts and/or lightweight crop; Replaceable wear bars only for upper feed roller; Optional lower bar starting in 2012. Cutting cylinder Accessibility V-type opening is possible with front attachment fitted for quick visual inspections; Lateral opening is possible after removing the front attachment and swinging the feed roller housing open to the side; Complete separation is possible. When carrying out major service work, the feed roller housing can remain fitted e.g. to the ORBIS front attachment. 7 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 V-type opening is possible; Lateral opening is not possible; Complete separation is possible, but: The bottom feed and pre-compression rollers remain connected with the cylinder housing; A crane, telescopic loader or front loader is required. The cylinder can be completely removed and put down on feet. Cutting cylinder All drums marked in red are only available through parts Product range V36 (36/18/12 knives) V24 (24/12 knives) V28 (28/14 knives) V20 (20/10 knives) Model LOC Width /d Speed Cutting frequency [mm] [in] [rpm] [cuts/min] V36 980-970, 3.5960-930 37.5 29.5 / 24.8 1200 21,600 V28 960-930 4-31 29.5 / 24.8 1200 16,800 V24 980-970, 4-44 960-930 29.5 / 24.8 1200 14,400 V20 960-930 29.5 / 24.8 1200 12,000 8 5-44 V32 (32/16 knives) Model V24 (24/12 knives) V16 (16/8 knives) LOC Width /d Speed Cutting frequency [mm] [mm] [rpm] [cuts/min] V32 850-450 3-16 34.8 / 28 1130 18,100 V24 850-450 4-22 34.8 / 28 1130 13,600 V16 850-450 6-33 34.8 / 28 1130 9,066 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Cutting cylinder Design V-MAX cutting cylinder: Cutting forces are absorbed by the cylinder spiders; Two bolts / knife; No knife readjustment is necessary. V-shaped knife configuration for centered crop flow; Modular design for easy replacement of damaged parts. 9 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Cutting cylinder design according to Chevron: Five bolts/knife plus one threaded and one holding plate/knife; Readjusting the knives is necessary; Wear of threaded plates. V-shaped knife configuration for centered crop flow; The cutting cylinder is essentially a basic structure with bolt-on shafts and knives. Cutting cylinder Sharpening and shear bar adjustment Starting and monitoring of sharpening and shear bar adjustment from the cab; Starting and monitoring of sharpening and shear bar adjustment from the cab; Only forward sharpening in the offer: Reverse sharpening is possible upon request: An additional drive is required; No reminder function, no information about knife condition. Advantages for forward sharpening outweigh clearly. Reminder function, information about "Time until next sharpening,” knife condition, total of sharpening cycles (sharpening stone and machine). 10 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Corn cracker Product range CLAAS Roller crackers (MCC) Ø in inches 9.8 Numbers of teeth 100/125 Numbers of teeth through parts 100/125/150 New Holland Ø in inches Numbers of teeth Standard profile Speed difference in % standard Profile Sawtooth Speed difference in % standard 30 or 40 Speed difference in % option Belt tensioning 11 Roller cracker 9.8 99 tooth (9040-9060) 99F/126R tooth (9080-9090) Sawtooth 22 Speed difference in % option Belt tensioning 20 42 60 hydraulic Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 hydraulic Corn cracker New Holland’s Variflow System Corn cracker retracted / discharge accelerator in “corn position" When working in grass, the corn cracker swings out of the crop flow and is locked in parking position: According to NH, this takes two minutes; Complete removal with a swinging jib and a chain hoist (option) takes 30 minutes (acc. to manufacturer); The system reduces the distance between cylinder and accelerator by 60%; The manufacturer claims that this saves 40 hp - when working in grass. Corn cracker extended / discharge accelerator in "grass position" 12 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Corn cracker Installation and removal The corn cracker can be easily moved out of and into its working position on rails; In all applications, the discharge accelerator maintains the optimum position relating to the upstream and downstream subassemblies; When working in grass, the CC can either remain in the discharge and cooling system compartment or be removed. At any rate, it is not driven; Insert the filler housing into the lower discharge chute and tighten two brackets. 13 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Easy swinging in and out; The system reduces the distance between cutting cylinder and accelerator by 60%; Necessary because otherwise the crop flow would be decelerated heavily due to the reduced cross-section? The system enlarges the distance between discharge accelerator and discharge flap: Problems with sticky material? Permanently running corn cracker: Power requirement? Service life? Discharge accelerator General 29.5 in 26.8 in Four flat paddles/section; V-type paddle configuration engages continuously into the crop flow; Enormous throwing capacity at 223 ft/s for reliable throw onto trailer; The throwing capacity can be adapted using the accelerator gap adjustment (either manual or electric). 14 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Six thick paddles/section: 50% more clamping points and higher clamping forces (paddle thickness) require more power. Straight paddles (center) engage straight into the crop flow; Lower throwing capacity at 190.3 ft/s may not always be sufficient (Example: making splits through the field in corn). Upper discharge chute General Wear plates can be accessed from the outside; Three extensions available; 225° rotating angle is possible; Automatic parallel guiding of filling point on the trailer available; Two upper discharge chute positions can be stored and parking position is possible. 15 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Wear plates: The first third is accessible from above, second third can be accessed only from below; Only one extension is available (27.6 in); Only a rotational angle of 210° is available; No automatic flap control is available; Two upper discharge chute positions can be stored and parking position is possible. Silaging agent systems General Silaging agent systems for conventional and highly concentrated silaging agents are available; Easy control and monitoring through CEBIS; Quantity- (gal or gal/h) or throughputdependent (gal or gal/t) dosing is possible without changing nozzles. 16 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Additional tank (75.3 gal) for use as silaging agent or fuel tank; Control and monitoring by IntelliView III; Dosing by variable pump in combination with three nozzle types: Only quantity-dependent (gal/h) dosing is possible. Crop flow drive concept Portion of hydraulic and mechanical drives Hydraulic Mech. Front attachment Feeder Cutting cylinder Corn cracker Discharge accelerator Sharpening device forward Sharpening device reverse Rotary chaff screen suction Fan 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 "1" 1 Total 2 6 17 Hydraulic Mech. Front attachment Feeder Cutting cylinder Corn cracker Discharge accelerator Sharpening device forward Sharpening device reverse Rotary chaff screen suction Fan 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 Total 5 4 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Crop flow drive concept Portion of hydraulic and mechanical drives Drive concept with a clear goal: Maximum efficiency. Mechanical drives wherever possible, hydraulic drives where they are necessary (comfortable control): Ø oil circulation: 17.4 gallons; Small efficiency losses; Efficient, but simple control system; No-compromise reliability. 18 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 In general a drive concept with many hydraulic drives and few mechanical drives: Ø oil circulation: 26.4 gallons; Increased efficiency losses = reduced energy efficiency; Increased complexity regarding control system; Increased failure susceptibility. Crop flow drive concept Main, feeder and front attachment drive Transverse engine for direct power band belt drive without losses (high efficiency); Compact feeder drive concept with short hydraulic hoses: Minimized efficiency losses; Changing feeder torques are realized without a delay. Immediate deceleration of main drive due to QUICK STOP, after shutting down; Front attachment drive by means of comfortable quick-release coupler. 19 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Longitudinal engine requires angle drive for power band belt drive: Loss of efficiency due to power redirection; Angle drive must be cooled (power is consumed). Feeder drive concept with long hydraulic hoses: Increased efficiency losses; Changing feeder torques arrive with a delay due to increased absorption of hydraulic energy in the long hydraulic hoses. Engine and surroundings Overview of engines JAGUAR 980 970 Engine type Design Capacity [l] TIER Max. Power hp Min. Power1 hp Fuel tank [gal] DEF tank [gal] 20 960 950 940 930 MAN MAN MB MB MB MB D2862 D2868 OM502 OM502 OM502 OM460 V12 V8 V8 V8 V8 R6 24 16 16 16 16 12.8 2 2 4i 4i 4i 4i 884 775 653 598 510 456 333 322 310 - - - 357 357 317 317 317 317 - - 30 30 30 30 FR 9090 9080 9060 9050 9040 850 700 600 500 450 Engine typ IVECO CAT Vector08 C18 Cursor13 Cursor13 Cursor9 V8 R6 R6 R6 R6 20.1 18 12.9 12.9 9 2 3 3 3 3 Max. Power HP 824 685 591 500 424 Fuel tank [Gal] 320 320 3220 322 322 Design Capacity [l] TIER Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 IVECO IVECO IVECO Engine and surroundings New Holland’s TURBO COMPOUND SYSTEM Power turbine Exhaust gases Gears Air intake Air to charge air cooler Power transmission to crankshaft Oil feed flow Only available for FR 9060; The residual exhaust gas energy is converted into mechanical energy and transmitted to the crankshaft; Hydroelastic clutch The fuel consumption is to drop by 8%; Oil return line 21 This is said to give an additional 50 hp. Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Engine and surroundings General 22 Flawless access to all important engine components; Worse access due to higher position, integration and non-removable mud guards; Silent blocks for low-vibration engine support. Silent blocks for low-vibration engine support. Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Engine and surroundings Cooling Fixed rotary chaff screen with rotating air intake tube. Large screen surface due to conical shape: Low air velocity, resulting in less soiling; Intake of cleaned air through a large surface. Suction effect: Use of suction effect produced by the discharge accelerator. 23 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Rotating rotary chaff screen with fixed air intake tube (similar to JAG 880-820): Sealing by brush, leaving reliability requirements unsatisfied; V-belt drive susceptible to wear. Suction is generated by hydraulic pump additionally integrated into the floor: Concept involving a greater effort. Engine and surroundings Hydraulic system Constant-pressure system, i.e. a pressure of 210 bar is permanently available: Immediate reaction; No permanent circulation. Oil is pumped only when needed; Less oil heating-up. All hydraulic lines and hoses are as short as possible: Reduced efficiency losses. 24 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Constant-flow system, i.e. oil is pumped permanently (gal/min): Pressure must be built up first; Permanent circulation. Unneeded oil flows back through a pressure relief valve; Increased oil heating-up. Largely dimensioned hydraulic hoses of several yard length, some hydraulic lines: Increased efficiency losses. Chassis and drives Vehicle concept 65% 76% 35% Weighed Permitted Delta Total weight: 20.4 tons 19.8 tons +.6 tons -0.3 tons Front axle weight: 15.5 tons 13.2 tons +2.3 tons -0.3 tons Rear axle weight: 4.9 tons 7.2 tons -2.3 tons Weighed Permitted Delta Total weight: 19.8 tons 19.8 tons 0 tons Front axle weight: 12.9 tons 13.2 tons Rear axle weight: 6.9 tons 7.2 tons . No change in weights from Model change 25 24% Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Chassis and drives Vehicle concept Well-balanced vehicle concept: Transverse engine positioned behind the rear axle; Drive wheel oriented towards the front for short distance from the attachment Optimum weight distribution enables reduced use of rear ballast. Optional tire pressure control system for adapting the pressure to road and field. 26 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Unbalanced vehicle concept: Longitudinal engine with angle drive above the rear axle; Worst weight distribution on the market, requires increased use of rear ballast (total weight!); No tire pressure control system available, i.e. unadapted tire pressure for road travel and fieldwork; Large tires (available up to 42"). Cab Outside Flat windshield with A-columns moved forward: Hardly any reflections inside the cab; No impairment of windshield wiper field; Optimum air conditioning is possible. Windshield wipers for front, side and rear windows; Adjustable work lights. 27 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Rounded windshield with A-columns moved back: Reflections inside the cab; Rounded windshield is not covered by windshield wiper; Restricted ventilation with purely static A-columns. Cracks can be seen in curvature. Work lights cannot be adjusted. Cab Inside Hand-rails on the left and right for convenient access. Inviting cab access; Good view of front attachment, to the side and the rear; Automatic air conditioner as standard equipment; Several trays including cooling compartments and integrated cooling box. 28 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Access without hand-rail on the right, access restricted by arm rest / passenger seat; Good view of front attachment, to the side (higher side windows) and the rear; Air conditioner as standard equipment: Automatic version available as an option. Few trays, no integrated cooling box. Cab Control panel Switch console adjustable in two directions and joined to the seat, with a wide arm rest; Ergonomically arranged switches with selfexplaining symbols. Quick settling-in of new drivers. 29 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Switch console adjustable in one direction (horizontal) and joined to the seat; Self-explaining symbols, some supplemented by text, but only in English; Unintended actuation of emergency stop button by hand sliding down; Settling-in of new drivers is more difficult (ground speed control lever). Cab Ground speed control lever Change pushbutton Driving activation Ergonomic ground speed control lever with adjustable hand rest, without any doublefunction pushbuttons; Path-dependent ground speed control lever: Any change of ground speed control lever position has an immediate and noticeable effect; The ground speed control lever always remains in its last position. 30 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Double-function pushbuttons: A change pushbutton is necessary. Time-dependent ground speed control lever: Ground speed control lever always returns to its neutral position; The ground speed control lever position from where an effect can be noticed must be searched again and again. Cab Ground speed control lever Automatic spout rotation Storing spout position or the parking position Lift / lower front attachment or lateral levelling Power Cruise and/or Auto Pilot Specifically shaped pushbuttons of different sizes for intuitive operation; Two-stage pushbuttons (fast/slow) for front attachment (lift/lower) and upper discharge chute rotation; One double-function pushbutton, but only when AUTO PILOT is active in combination with CAM PILOT; Adjustable hand rest. 31 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Quick stop Engaging and disengaging or reversing the front attachment Upper discharge chute and flap control Stored front attachment heights Pushbuttons for front attachment and spout control have the same size. Danger of confusion. Two-stage pushbuttons (fast/slow) for front attachment (lift/lower) and spout rotation; Three double-function pushbuttons with differing response: Double-click / press and hold / combination with R-pushbutton. Cab Terminal CEBIS (8.4") as the central control and information unit; Drive with Compact Flash Card for data transfer; CEBIS and HOTKEY rotary control switches for quick access to main and auxiliary functions; Logic menu guiding for very easy optimisation of settings. 32 Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 IntelliView™ III touchscreen monitor (7.0") as the central control and information unit; USB port for data transfer; No quick access to main and auxiliary functions; Limitless amount of information, in small type-size; Driver-specific settings are possible. Summary TOP TEN DISADVANTAGES 33 Crop flow Cab Chassis and drives Restriction. Windshield design. Weight distribution. Feeder Engine and surroundings Feeder width. Constant-flow hydraulic system. Cutting cylinder Crop flow drive concept Lateral opening. Longitudinal installed engine. Corn cracker Discharge accelerator Upper discharge chute Reduce the distance. Clamping forces. Access wear plats. Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 Summary JAGUAR unique selling points STOP ROCK Tire pressure regulation system CAMPILOT Accelerator – gap adjustment QUICK ACCESS ACTISILER 20 34 QUICK STOP DIRECT STOP Competitive comparison JAGUAR 980-930 vs. New Holland FR 850-450 TELEMATICS