American Tire - Thornton Oliver Keller

Transcription

NNN INVESTMENT OFFERING
BTS - 15 Yr Initial Lease Term
American Tire - Single Tenant Building
Nampa, ID 83687
UNDER CONTRACT
FULLY LEASED SINGLE TENANT
$1,077,000 6.5% CAP
John Stevens, CCIM 208.947.0814
OFFERED BY:
[email protected]
TATE
ND
HE
D TO
NS.
AMERICAN TIRE
904 7TH AVE NORTH
NAMPA, ID 83687
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
COMING SOON
AMERICAN TIRE & AUTO SERVICE | FRANKLIN ROAD, NAMPA, IDAHO
ISSUED FOR BUILDING PERMIT
SECTION 1
SECTION 3
SECTION 2
CLIENT
REGISTRATION
PROPERTY
PHOTOS | PLANS
PROPERTY
OFFERING
Confidentiality Agreement
SECTION 4
MARKET
OVERVIEW
Offering Description
1
Property Plans
3
Demographics
10
Property Summary
2
Aerial Photograph
7
Boise Area Overview
14
CONTACT INFORMATION
CIVIL ENGINEER
Tenant Profile
9
VICINITY MAP
MECHANICAL ENGINEER
TIKKER ENGINEERING
9384 W Overland Rd
Boise, ID 83709
CK ENGINEERING
1300 E State Street
Eagle, ID 83616
CONTACT:
Chad Kinkela
869-0590
The information presented has been(208)
obtained
from sources believed reliable.
CONTACT:
Bob Tikker
You(208)
are 658-0218
responsible for confirming its accuracy and completeness.
Any projections, opinions, assumptions or estimates used are for example only and do not represent the current or future
performance of the property. The value of this transaction depends on many factors which should be evaluated through investigation by your advisors.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
GLR ENGINEERS
tokcommercial.com
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
9 S Washington St #213
Spokane, WA 99201
FARREN ENGINEERING
600 W. Curling Drive
Boise, Idaho 83702
CONTACT:
CONTACT:
CLIENT REGISTRATION
TBD FRANKLIN ROAD
CLIENT REGISTRATION
In connection with the offering of TBD Franklin Road (the “Property”) for sale
through the owner’s listing agent, Thornton Oliver Keller Commercial (“TOK”), the
undersigned broker (“Broker”) hereby registers its client identified below (“Client”).
Client represents that Broker is the sole broker, agent or finder retained by Client in
connection with the Property. Client shall immediately notify TOK of the expiration
or earlier termination of Broker’s representation of Client. Broker acknowledges
and agrees that Client has the right to terminate this registration at anytime.
If Client purchases the Property, TOK agrees to pay Broker a fee equal to
3.0% of the gross purchase price for the Property upon TOK’s receipt of the
same from the owner, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
Provided Client has not terminated this registration, Broker shall be entitled to the
fee upon Client’s closing on the purchase of the Property. If for any reason the sale
of the Property does not close, Broker shall not be entitled to the fee or any other
compensation from TOK. “Close” or “closing” shall be deemed to have occurred
AGREEMENT
when funds have been disbursed to the owner and the transfer of title to Client is
complete. Broker and Client acknowledge and agree that if Broker is not a licensee in
good standing with the Idaho State Real Estate Commission, Broker’s compensation
shall be in the form of a referral fee equal to 3% of the total purchase price.
Broker and Client, jointly and severally, agree to defend, indemnify and hold
TOK harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities, expenses, costs
and attorneys’ fees arising from any actions, claims or demands made by any
broker, agent, or finder (including Broker’s associates) who claim to be acting
by or through the Broker or on behalf of Client, in connection with the Property.
This document may
constitute one and
may be executed
mail, and any such
be executed in counterparts, each of which together shall
the same document.
Provided further, this document
electronically and delivered by facsimile or electronic
signature shall have the effect of an original signature.
Best regards,
THORNTON OLIVER KELLER
Michael J. Ballantyne
Managing Partner
BROKER:
CLIENT NAME:
By:
By:
Print Name:
Print Name:
Title
Title
Address:
Address:
Telephone:
Telephone:
Date:
Date:
tokcommercial.com
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
A
15
16
17
3
B
DESCRIPTION
1
18
19
20
21
2
C
A401
2
22
D
A401
6
16
14
2' - 0"
0' - 8"
3
12
16
TOP CMU
114'-0"
16
3
3' - 4"
4
8
8
8
7
8
8
2
6.5%
PROPERTY
NARRATIVE
• Built to suit retail warehouse for American Tire
3
C
A401
Thornton Oliver Keller is proud to offer this
A The property is
exceptional property for sale.
located on Franklin Road in Nampa, Idaho and
1
is strongly positioned in the market. American
Tire’s sales have consistently grown under Jason
Jackman’s ownership, thus, the justification
for a
14
TOP CMU
114'-0"
3
new, high profile location. Occupancy
costs will
16
equate to approximately 4% of 2015
gross sales.
3
B
A401
• 15 year initial lease term commencing at Closing
16
First Year NOI:
$70,000
Increases:
10% Every 5 Yrs
13
TYP
18'-0"
14'-8"
C.J.
$1,077,000
D
17'-4"
PROPERTY
HIGHLIGHTS
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
Offering Price:
15
17'-4"
C.J.
14'-8"
BUILDING ELEVATION - EAST
CAP Rate:
8
LEVEL 1
100'-0"
18'-0"
THE
OFFERING
7
C.J.
5
C.J.
6' - 0"
0' - 8"
1' - 4"
2
• Currently under construction
12
5
9
ALL SHOWINGS SHALL BE COORDINATED THROUGH THE LISTING AGENT.
PLEASE DO NOT VISIT THE PROPERTY WITHOUT AN APPOINTMENT.
10
VEL 1
100'-0"
tokcommercial.com
10
4
LEVEL 1
100'-0"
13
13'-4"
8'-0"
.J.
17'-4"
.J.
17'-4"
.J.
18'-0"
.J.
17'-4"
.J.
17'-4"
.J.
13'-4"
.J.
8'-0"
.J.
CMU
114'-0"
OFFERING
[1]
PROPERTY
SUMMARY
FINANCIAL
STATUS
Offering Price:
$1,077,000
Budgeted NOI:
$70,000
Expenses:
Net Operating Income:
CAP Rate:
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION
$70,000
6.5%
LEASING
STATUS
Type:
Single Tenant Retail
Building Area:
4,320 SF
Construction:
Type V-B
Parcel Size:
Approx. 1 Acre
Completion Date:
Estimated August 2016
Parking:
6.3/1,000
Occupancy Classification:
M/F1 - Auto Retail Store
tokcommercial.com
$0
Current
Occupancy:
100% (Upon Completion)
Tenants:
American Tire & Auto
Lease Term:
15 Year
Term Commencement:
Closing
Lease Rate:
$16.20/SF
Escalation:
10% Every Five Years
financial information is available upon
execution of a confidentiality agreement
[2]
PROPERTY
SITE PLAN
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
J
13
14
E
2"
'5
45 7'
2°
1
S4 81.
N4
4°
1
81 0'5
4
.3
9' "E
1
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
21
N85°28'47"E
11.04'
N89°28'55"W 2648.40'
.06'
N85°28'47"E 214
N70°00'23"E
73.67'
40.00'
IV
H
SEPTIC SYSTEM SEE
CIVIL
W
28' - 6"
6"
CONCRETE
APRON
SIDEWALK
SEE CIVIL
14' - 0"
GAS METER
50' - 0"
FRANKLIN BLVD
6"
CONCRETE
APRON
24' - 0"
NGR
9' - 0"
G
"E
08
5'
°4
5
N4
NOT A
PART
'
59
5.
19
35' - 0"
W
45' - 0"
84' - 4"
CURB SEE
CIVIL
30' - 0"
35' - 0"
TYP
50' - 0"
50' - 0"
40' - 0"
20' - 0"
4' - 6"
94
'
-3
"
40' - 0"
E
PAVING PER
SOILS REPORT
NORTH
C2
D
SITE PLAN
15
30
S0°18'54"W 516.43'
14' - 0"
6" CONCRETE
APRON
0
20' - 0"
135' - 0"
F
25' - 0"
C1
9' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 0"
1
G0
30' - 0"
60' - 0"
130' - 0"
BIKE RACK
DRAINAGE POND
SEE CIVIL
60
90 FEET
1" = 30'
NOT A
PART
C
CURVE TABLE
CURVE RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD DIST. CHORD BRG.
DELTA
355.00
185.70
183.59
N84°18'29"W
29°58'17"
C2
580.00
343.81
338.80
N52°20'26"W
33°57'48"
B
C1
A
4/29/2016 7:37:34 AM
D:\01-SA PROJECTS\16012 American Tire\CD's\16012.rvt
7'
9.6 2"W
13
1'3
5°2
N3
CONTRACTOR:
CONSULTANT:
NO.
REVISION / SUBMISSIONS
DATE
ARCHITECT:
SEAL:
TENANT/OWNER:
PROJECT TITLE:
AMERICAN TIRE
tokcommercial.com
DRAWING TITLE:
ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
SHEET NO:
PROJECT NO:
16012
904 7TH AVE NORTH | NAMPA, ID 83687
04/29/2016
DRAWN BY:
WAS
DATE:
4.29.16
A101
© 2016 STEELE ARCHITECTURE PLLC
[3]
PROPERTY
LANDSCAPE PLAN
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
J
14
15
E
2"
'5
45 7'
2°
1
S4 81.
N4
4°
1
81 0'5
4
.3
9' "E
1
16
17
18
19
20
N85°28'47"E
11.04'
N89°28'55"W 2648.40'
.06'
N85°28'47"E 214
40.00'
IV
H
N70°00'23"E
73.67'
22
21
W
FRANKLIN BLVD
NGR
F
1
G
E
8"
'0
45
5°
4
N
LAWN
G0
W
NOT A
PART
'
59
5.
19
S0°18'54"W 516.43'
E
C1
NORTH
LAWN
D
THE LANDSCAPING CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE 'SUB-TIER' IN THEIR BID. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THAT
THE HEAD LOCATIONS & GENERAL INSTALLATION OF ALL SPRINKLERS' PARTS WORK PROPERLY W/ ALL PLANT LOCATIONS. THE SITE
CONTRACTOR WILL CLEAN, GRUB, THEN ROUGH GRADE ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ± 1/10 OF ONE FT. TO ESTABLISH GRADE
C
B
15
30
60
CIVIL
90 FEET
1" = 30'
1. TOP SOIL: WITH ROUGH GRADE ESTABLISHED BY OTHERS, CONTRACTOR SHALL SPREAD NECESSARY AMOUNT OF TOPSOIL/COMPOST 50/50 MIX
THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT TO EVEN-OUT LOW AREAS
2. CONDITIONING OF SOIL: SOD LAWN (INCLUDING SWALES) ROTOTILL COMPACTED AREAS, REGRADE AS REQUIRED. PLANTER BEDS: IMPORT 1" OF
MERRILLS CHICKEN COMPOST. SPREAD EVENLY ON ALL SURFACES, ROTOTILL IN & MIX W/ THE EXISTING SOIL TO A DEPTH OF (6) IN. REGRADE
AS REQUIRED FOR FURTHER WORK.
3. GRADING & DRAINAGE: IN ALL CASES, ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE BUILDING. ENSURE THAT ALL SOIL IS SETTLED
THOROUGHLY, ALLOW FOR NO PUDDLES OR LOW SPOTS (UNLESS SPECIFICALLY DEFINED BY THE CIVIL SITE GRADING PLAN)
4. PLANT MATERIAL & PLANTING INSTALLATION: ALL PLANT MATERIAL MUST MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI Z60.1 "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR
NURSERY STOCK". FOLLOW SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS IN DETAILS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST PLANT LOCATIONS AS IS REQUIRED TO EVENLY
FILL PLANTERS & AVOID CONFLICTS W/ EXISTING STRUCTURES. TAKE INTO ACCOUNT AVERAGE MATURE WIDTH OF PLANT IN PLANTER WHEN
ESTABLISHING LOCATIONS.
5. FINISH TOPSOIL GRADE: FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF SPRINKLERS & PLANT MATERIAL & BEFORE INSTALLATION OF BARK MULCH OR ROCK
SURFACING, ENSURE THAT ALL SOIL IS SETTLED THOROUGHLY & ALL FINAL SURFACES ARE RAKED SMOOTH W/ NO UNDULATIONS OR POCKETS
FOR WATER ACCUMULATION.
6. INSTALLATION OF BARK MULCH: GENERAL SITE: @ ALL PLANTER BEDS, INSTALL 2" OF CASCADE BLEND COMPOST (AVAILABLE @ CLOVERDALE
NURSERY) OR EQUAL, AS FINAL SURFACE MATERIAL.
7. INSTALLATION OF ACCENT BOULDERS: @ LOCATIONS NOTED, INSTALL ACCENT BOULDERS (T.B.D.)
8. SOD LAWNS: @ ALL AREAS NOTED AS SOD LAWN, INSTALL TALL FESCUE BLEND. STAGGER JOINTS, ENSURE A SMOOTH FINAL SURFACE.
9. EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURBS: INSTALL CURBING @ LOCATIONS SHOWN.
10. INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT OR WATERING TIME & TRANSFER OF WATER MANAGEMENT: IT IS THE INSTALLING LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE W/ THE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR ON INITIAL WATERING TIMES FOR ALL PLANTER AREAS AS SOON AS THEY
ARE INSTALLED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR WATER MANAGEMENT THROUGH MAINTENANCE PERIOD. ESTABLISH AN AGREEMENT W/ THE
OWNER'S WATER MANAGER AS TO NOTIFICATION TO THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR OF ANY PLANTS THAT ARE DOING POORLY DURING
WARRANTY YEAR ONCE MAINTENANCE IS TRANSFERRED TO THE OWNER'S MAINTENANCE COMPANY, SO PREVENTATIVE ACTION MAY BE TAKEN.
11. PROJECT MAINTENANCE: MAINTAIN ENTIRE PROJECT THROUGH DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION (COORDINATE THAT DATE W/ THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR) (A) ENSURE ALL PLANTS ARE BEING WATERED PROPERLY, RESET ANY PLANTS THAT ARE LEANING (B) REMOVE ANY WEEDS &
DEBRIS THAT HAS ACCUMULATED IN ANY OF THE LANDSCAPE AREAS (C) MOW LAWNS WHEN LAWNS REACH 3", REDUCE BY 1"
12. TRANSFER OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE TO OWNER: AFTER SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION, IT IS THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY
TO CONTACT THE OWNER OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVE & TRANSFER THE MAINTENANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE TO THEM. INCLUDE AN ENTIRE
EXPLANATION OF WHAT HAS BEEN DONE UP TO THAT TIME & WHAT NEEDS IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. WALK THROUGH THE ENTIRE PROJECT W/
THE OWNER & INSPECT FOR ACCEPTABILITY
13. PLANT MATERIAL WARRANTY: ALL TREES, SHRUBS & LAWN SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR WARRANTY FROM THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL
COMPLETION. ONE REPLACEMENT ONLY FOR ANY TREE, SHRUB OR LAWN AREA THAT DIES.
14. PROJECT QUALITY: ALL "OR EQUAL" PRODUCTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE DESIGNER IN WRITING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
NOT A
PART
PLANTING SCHEDULE
KEY
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
SIZE
DECIDUOUS SHADE TREES
GD
F.O. AUREAFOLIA
GOLDEN DESERT ASH
2-1/2" CAL B&B
PS
C.O. PAUL'S SCARLET
PAUL'S SCARLET HAWTHORN
2-1/2" CAL B&B
RM
A.GLABRUM
ROCKY MOUNTAIN MAPLE
2-1/2" CAL B&B
A
LANDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES
CONTRACTOR:
4/29/2016 7:37:36 AM
0
SEE
POND.
7'
9.6 2"W
13
1'3
5°2
N3
C2
LANDSCAPE PLAN
CONSULTANT:
NO.
DATE
ARCHITECT:
SEAL:
TENANT/OWNER:
PROJECT TITLE:
AMERICAN TIRE
tokcommercial.com
DRAWING TITLE:
LANDSCAPE PLAN
SHEET NO:
PROJECT NO:
16012
04/29/2016
DRAWN BY:
WAS
DATE:
4.29.16
A112
[4]
PROPERTY
ELEVATIONS
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
J
1
4
3
4
A401
2
1
1
A401
2
6
A
3
B
12
2
C
A401
2
1
D
A401
6
16
1
H
TOP CMU
114'-0"
0' - 8"
3
16
14
2' - 0"
14
3
3
5
4
8
13
13
4
8
8
7
7
8
8
8
LEVEL 1
100'-0"
G
LEVEL 1
100'-0"
TOP CMU
114'-0"
16
3
3' - 4"
5
6
6' - 0"
0' - 8"
1' - 4"
7
12
16
16
13
17'-4"
14'-8"
C.J.
C.J.
BUILDING ELEVATION - NORTH
15
17'-4"
C.J.
14'-8"
C.J.
18'-0"
5'-4"
C.J.
19'-4"
C.J.
5'-4"
TYP
18'-0"
BUILDING ELEVATION - EAST
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
F
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
1
2
1
3
4
4
2
D
3
B
A401
2
16
A
2
1
E
11
C
A401
A401
A401
6
1
14
TOP CMU
114'-0"
14
3
3
16
16
3
12
6
5
5
9
D
13
10
10
4
13
4
TOP CMU
114'-0"
16
7
3
LEVEL 1
100'-0"
LEVEL 1
100'-0"
13
PAINT FINISHES
KEY
B
MANUFACTURER
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
STYLE
PRO MAR 200 - LOW GLOSS
COLOR
SW 6871 POSITIVE RED
SW 7018 DOVETAIL
SW 7015 REPOSE GRAY
SW 7014 EIDER WHITE
SW 7016 MINDFUL GRAY
A
4/29/2016 7:37:42 AM
8'-0"
C.J.
13'-4"
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
CONSULTANT:
17'-4"
BUILDING ELEVATION - WEST
SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0"
CONTRACTOR:
17'-4"
C.J.
18'-0"
C.J.
C.J.
17'-4"
C.J.
17'-4"
C.J.
BUILDING ELEVATION - SOUTH
C
13'-4"
C.J.
8'-0"
C.J.
5'-4"
C.J.
19'-4"
C.J.
5'-4"
NO.
DATE
ARCHITECT:
SEAL:
TENANT/OWNER:
ELEVATION KEYNOTES
NOTES
EG SHELL @ INTERIOR
EG SHELL @ INTERIOR
EG SHELL @ INTERIOR
EG SHELL @ INTERIOR
EG SHELL @ INTERIOR
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
DESCRIPTION
ALUMINUM FASCIA & SOFFIT PANELS. WHITE
ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES. BLACK
PAINTED (P1) SPLIT-FACE CMU
PAINTED (P2) SPLIT-FACE CMU
PAINTED (P3) SMOOTH CMU
1-1/2" EIFS FINISH WALL. MATCH P5
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM. KYNAR RED FINISH
PAINTED (P1) OH DOOR
PAINTED (P2) OH DOOR
PAINTED (P2) HM DOOR & FRAME
INTAKE LOUVER. SEE MECHANICAL PAINT (P1)
EXHAUST FAN. SEE MECHANICAL. PAINT (P3)
STEEL BOLLARD. SEE DETAIL. PAINT (P1)
ALUMINUM GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT. MATCH P5
WRAP WOOD POST WITH ALUMINUM BREAKSHAPE. MATCH STOREFRONT COLOR.
LIGHT FIXTURE SEE ELECTRICAL
PROJECT TITLE:
AMERICAN TIRE
DRAWING TITLE:
EXTERIOR BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
PROJECT NO:
SHEET NO:
16012
tokcommercial.com
04/29/2016
DRAWN BY:
DRN
DATE:
4.29.16
A301
[5]
PROPERTY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
BUILDING SECTIONS
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
22
21
CONTINUOU SEALANT,
EA SIDE (TYP)
CMU WALL
J
CMU BOND BEAM
17
CONTINUOUS SEALANT,
EA SIDE (TYP)
4"
6'-0"
4'-2"
5 3/4"
GROUT FULL
DOOR AND FRAME
REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE
1/4" CG
DOOR AND FRAME
REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE
2"
5 3/4"
FRAME FULLY GROUTED
3'-0"
H
1
NL
HL
(NARROW LIGHT)
FL
(HALF LIGHT)
OH
(FULL LIGHT)
T1
OHW
(FLUSH)
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
TIMELY KD (BLACK)
(OH FULL WINDOW ROW)
DOOR TYPES
1/2"
WINDOW T1
JAMB
WALL
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
1/2"
2"
SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
G
SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
CMU HM DOOR JAMB
DOOR OPENING
1/2"
VL
(VISION LIGHT)
2
DOOR
(SEE SCHEDULE)
WALL
F
(FLUSH DOOR)
CMU HM DOOR HEAD
DOOR FRAME
(SEE SCHEDULE)
SEE PLAN FOR
PARTITION TYPE
2"
6"
10'-0"
4'-9"
2"
2"
6'-0"
4'-9"
2"
2'-9"
2"
2"
HEADER AS INDICATED
2'-9"
2"
CONTINUOUS SEALANT
(BOTH SIDES)
2"
SF1
KYNAR RED
3
DOOR
(SEE SCHEDULE)
SEE PLAN FOR
PARTITION TYPE
4
081113 - INTERIOR DOOR JAMB DETAIL
SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"
WALL
081113 - INTERIOR DOOR HEAD DETAIL
BEYOND
DOOR
(SEE SCHEDULE)
SF3
KYNAR RED
STOREFRONT SF3
SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
INSULATION AS INDICATED
ON PARTITION TYPES
SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
THRESHOLD
SET IN SEALANT
CONCRETE SLAB
WINDOW UNIT
(SEE SCHEDULE)
1/2"
4
A401
GLAZING STOPS
RIGID INSULATION
THERMAL BREAK
WALL
GLAZING, SEE
SCHEDULE
FOUNDATION
(SEE STRUCTURAL)
1/2"
D
JAMB ANCHORS
HEIGHT
7'-0"
7'-0"
7'-0"
7'-0"
7'-0"
7'-0"
7'-0"
12'-0"
12'-0"
12'-0"
12'-0"
12'-0"
12'-0"
8'-0"
MAT'L
ASF
HM
HM
HM
HM
HM
HM
STL
STL
STL
STL
STL
STL
STL
FIN
KR
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P2
P1
P1
P1
P1
P1
P1
P2
TYPE
SF1
1
1
1
1
2
2
FRAME
MAT'L
ASF
TKD
TKD
TKD
TKD
HMW
HMW
FIN
KR
BLK
BLK
BLK
BLK
P2
P2
HEAD
2/A701
2/A701
2/A701
2/A701
1/A701
1/A701
DOOR SCHEDULE ABBREVIATIONS
HM
HMW
ASF
KR
STL
TKD
P#
3/A701
3/A701
3/A701
3/A701
2/A701
2/A701
OTHER
6/A701
FIRE
RATING
HARDWARE
SET
S1
HARDWARE GROUP
NOTES
GROUP 01
ENTRANCE STOREFRONT
EXTERIOR HOLLOW
METAL
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
A
8.
9.
GROUP 03
INTERIOR HOLLOW METAL
1 SET
WEATHER SEAL
1 EA
ACCESSIBLE THRESHOLD (1/2" VERT MAX) EXTRA WIDE TO COVER FN WALL
MS CYLINDER LOCK + DOOR 'UNLOCK SIGN'
HINGES
1 EA
LATCHSET LOCK
1 EA
FLOOR STOP
1 SET
WEATHER SEAL
NO.
DATE
ARCHITECT:
DOOR BOTTOM SEAL
1 EA
DRIP HEAD
1 EA
CLOSER
2 EA
ARMOR PLATE
2 PAIR
HINGES
1 EA
LATCHSET PASSAGE
2 EA
INTERIOR OFFICE
GROUP 05
tokcommercial.com
BACKWRAP E.I.F.S.
JAMB RETURN
CLOSER
HINGES
1 EA
LATCHSET LOCK
1 EA
WALL STOP
1 EA
KICK PLATE
1 EA
CLOSER
1-1/2 PAIR
1 EA
HINGES
LATCHSET PRIVACY LOCK
1 EA
WALL STOP
1 EA
KICK PLATE
1 EA
CLOSER
WOOD HEADER
(SEE STRUCTURAL)
CONTINUOUS SEALANT AND
BACKER ROD
(BOTH SIDES)
WINDOW JAMB AND SILL
(SEE SCHEDULE)
TOP PLATE
T.O. OPNG
10-0" AFF
2x6 WOOD STUD
FULL HEIGHT OF
FRAME
FLOOR STOP
1-1/2 PAIR
SUN
CONTROL
SHADE
SPRAY FOAM INSULATION
2x4" WOOD STUD
FULL HEIGHT OF
FRAME
ARMOR PLATE
1 EA
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
WALL
EXTERIOR WALL FINISH
(E.I.F.S.)
ACCESSIBLE THRESHOLD (1/2" VERT MAX) EXTRA WIDE TO COVER FDN WALL
1 EA
087100 - DOOR THRESHOLD DETAIL
SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"
HEAVY DUTY FLOOR STOP
2 PAIR
6
085123 - WINDOW JAMB/HEAD DETAIL
DOOR BOTTOM SEAL
1 EA
1/4"
"J" BEAD AT
EDGE OF GYP.
BD. (TYPICAL)
"J" BEAD AT
EDGE OF GYP. BD.
(TYP)
7
085113 - EXT - WINDOW JAMB - EIFS
V-GROOVE DRIP EDGE
METAL FLASHING
AT WINDOW HEAD
CONTINUOUS SEALANT
AND BACKER ROD AT
SHIM SPACE
(BOTH SIDES)
WINDOW HEAD w/
INSULATED GLAZING (SEE
SCHEDULE)
3 1/2"
8
085113 - EXT - WINDOW HEAD - EIFS
SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"
SEAL:
TENANT/OWNER:
PROJECT TITLE:
AMERICAN TIRE
4/29/2016 7:37:45 AM
CONSULTANT:
PUSH / PULL SET
1 EA
GROUP 04
TOILET ROOM
CONTRACTOR:
OFF SET PIVOTS
1 EA
1 EA
ALUMINUM FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN
ALUMINUM DOORS TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN WITH MEDIUM STILE
ALUMINUM DOOR GLAZING TO BE 1" LOW-E CLEAR FULLY TEMPERED GLASS
FINAL FINISH SELECTIONS AND APPROVAL OF HARDWARE SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OWNER.
PROVIDE COMPLETE WEATHER TIGHT PACKAGE FOR EXTERIOR DOORS INCLUDING THRESHOLDS, WEATHER-STRIPPING AND
DRIP HEADS.
THRESHOLDS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 INCHES IN HEIGHT. RAISED THRESHOLDS AND LEVEL CHANGES GREATER THAN 0.25
INCHES AT DOORWAY SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NOT GREATER THAN ONE UNIT VERTICAL IN TWO UNITS HORIZONTAL.
DOOR HANDLES, PULLS, LATCHES, LOCKS AND OTHER OPERATING DEVICES REQUIRED TO BE ACCESSIBLE SHALL NOT REQUIRE
TIGHT GRASPING, TIGHT PINCHING OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST TO OPERATE.
ALL NEW HARDWARE TO MEET ICC-ANSI A117. STANDARDS & REQUIREMENTS
ALL EXIT DOORS TO OPEN FROM THE INSIDE WITHOUT SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT - DOES NOT APPLY TO EXTERIOR
DOORS IF THERE IS A DURABLE, NOTICEABLE SIGN OF 1" (MIN.) HIGH LETTERS ABOVE OR ADJACENT TO THE DOOR SAYING "THIS
DOOR TO REMAIN OPEN DURING BUSINESS HOURS".
5
1 SET
1 EA
GROUP 02
DOUBLE STUD JAMBS
DESCRIPTION
1 EA
DOOR SCHEDULE NOTES
HOLLOW METAL
HOLLOW METAL WELDED
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
KYNAR 'RED'
STEEL
TIMELY KNOCK DOWN FRAME
PAINT
CONTINUOUS SEALANT
(BOTH SIDES)
HARDWARE GROUPS
DETAILS
JAMB
WALL
WIDTH
3'-8"
3'-0"
3'-0"
3'-0"
3'-8"
3'-8"
3'-8"
12'-0"
12'-0"
12'-0"
12'-0"
12'-0"
12'-0"
8'-0"
DOOR
TYPE
FL
HL
F
F
HL
F
F
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OH
B
C
DOOR
NO.
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
OH1
OH2
OH3
OH4
OH5
OH6
OH7
5/8"
DOOR SCHEDULE
CONTINUOUS SEALANT
SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"
SF2
STOREFRONT SF1 & SF2
SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"
DOUBLE STUDS
2"
2"
SF2
DOOR FRAME TYPES
T
3'-0"
2
E
1
T
2"
1'-6"
T
JAMB ANCHORS
(3 PER JAMB)
DOOR FRAME
(SEE SCHEDULE)
DOOR OPENING
2'-8"
7'-0"
3'-10"
8'-6"
5'-4"
10'-0"
2"
2'-8"
2"
2"
DOOR WIDTH
F
4"
2"
DOOR HEIGHT
2"
2"
DOOR WIDTH
DOOR HEIGHT
2"
JAMB
4'-0"
3'-8"
2"
1/2"
6"
4'-9"
2"
2"
2"
1/2"MAX
10'-0"
4'-9"
2"
SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"
DRAWING TITLE:
DOOR / WINDOW TYPES AND
SCHEDULES
SHEET NO:
PROJECT NO:
16012
04/29/2016
DRAWN BY:
WAS
DATE:
4.29.16
A701
[6]
PROPERTY
AERIAL IMAGE
SITE
tokcommercial.com
[7]
PROPERTY
LOCATOR MAP
tokcommercial.com
[8]
TENANT
PROFILE
Welcome to American Tire & Service Center, we offer a full line of tires and automotive services for your vehicles.
We are your local guys. You can count on us to be fast and friendly. We offer competitive pricing and honest
recommendation. We offer both great prices and great attitude! Now with two locations to serve you, Nampa, ID
and Marsing, ID.
Are you looking for a new set of tires for your vehicle? We carry popular brand such as Mastercraft, Michelin,
Bridgestone, Nitto and Kumho. If your looking for service for your tires we are your tire installation, repair and siping
experts. We will make the best recommendation for your vehicle.
At American Tire & Service Center, we are here for all your automotive repair needs beyond the tire sale. We preform popular automotive repair such as
alignments, batteries, electrical, brake service, computerized diagnostics, oil changes and other valuable service. Give us a call or contact us online so we can
assess your needs. You won’t be sorry you did.
America Tire’s sales have consistently grown under Jason Jackman’s ownership. Occupancy costs at this property will equate to approximately 4% of 2015
gross sales.
www.americantireandauto.com
tokcommercial.com
PROPERTY
DEMOGRAPHICS
SITE
DETAILS MAP
Site Map
904 7th Ave N, Nampa, Idaho, 83687
Rings: 1, 3, 5 mile radii
American Tire
Latitude: 43.58977
Longitude: -116.55586
DEMOGRAPHIC
SNAPSHOT
2015
5 Mile
Population:
Avg HH Income:
Employees:
Median Age:
1 Mi.
6,231
$32,212
8,647 29.5
3 Mi.
69,424
$48,897
34,183 31.1
5 Mi.
108,941
$54,699
41,718
31.5
3 Mile
1 Mile
tokcommercial.com
[10]
PROPERTY DEMOGRAPHICS
Demographic and Income Profile
American Tire
Latitude: 43.58977
2015
2020
5,931
6,231
6,628
Households
2,082
2,186
2,321
Families
1,317
1,373
1,450
2.83
2.83
2.84
Owner Occupied Housing Units
929
904
938
Renter Occupied Housing Units
1,153
1,283
1,383
Median Age
29.5
30.2
Area
State
National
Population
1.24%
29.4
1.07%
0.75%
Households
1.21%
1.10%
0.77%
Families
Owner HHs
1.10%
0.74%
1.05%
1.14%
0.69%
0.70%
Median Household Income
1.40%
Trends: 2015 - 2020 Annual Rate
2.91%
2.66%
2015
Households by Income
Number
Number
598
27.4%
649
28.0%
$15,000 - $24,999
476
21.8%
413
17.8%
$25,000 - $34,999
348
15.9%
349
15.0%
$35,000 - $49,999
398
18.2%
424
18.3%
$50,000 - $74,999
227
10.4%
266
11.5%
$75,000 - $99,999
101
4.6%
159
6.9%
$100,000 - $149,999
27
1.2%
47
2.0%
$150,000 - $199,999
8
0.4%
11
0.5%
$200,000+
3
0.1%
4
0.2%
$25,389
$32,212
$27,215
$35,800
Per Capita Income
$11,423
$12,659
Census 2010
Population by Age
2015
2020
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
653
11.0%
655
10.5%
673
10.2%
5-9
546
9.2%
589
9.4%
600
9.1%
10 - 14
451
7.6%
526
8.4%
591
8.9%
15 - 19
445
7.5%
408
6.5%
487
7.3%
20 - 24
484
8.2%
482
7.7%
435
6.6%
25 - 34
869
14.7%
952
15.3%
1,023
15.4%
35 - 44
734
12.4%
736
11.8%
797
12.0%
45 - 54
694
11.7%
706
11.3%
701
10.6%
55 - 64
521
8.8%
590
9.5%
632
9.5%
65 - 74
293
4.9%
356
5.7%
439
6.6%
75 - 84
159
2.7%
155
2.5%
182
2.7%
81
1.4%
78
1.3%
68
Census 2010
Race and Ethnicity
2015
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
4,192
70.7%
4,315
69.2%
4,494
67.8%
33
0.6%
46
0.7%
62
0.9%
120
2.0%
129
2.1%
141
2.1%
Asian Alone
32
0.5%
36
0.6%
38
0.6%
Pacific Islander Alone
28
0.5%
29
0.5%
31
0.5%
1,289
21.7%
1,408
22.6%
1,550
23.4%
237
4.0%
269
4.3%
312
4.7%
2,596
43.8%
2,840
45.6%
3,125
47.1%
Two or More Races
Hispanic Origin (Any Race)
Households
Families
Owner HHs
Median HH Income
Population by Age
14
12
10
8
6
2015
2020
0
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-34
2015 Household Income
35-44
$100K - $149K
1.2%
$200K+
$150K
- $199K
$75K
- $99K
0.1%
0.4%
4.6%
$25K - $34K
15.9%
$50K - $74K
10.4%
$35K - $49K
18.2%
45-54
55-64
65-74
75-84
85+
2015 Population by Race
<$15K
27.4%
$15K - $24K
21.8%
1.0%
Black Alone
Some Other Race Alone
Population
2020
White Alone
American Indian Alone
Area
State
USA
0.5
2
Percent
85+
1
4
Number
0-4
1.5
Percent
<$15,000
Average Household Income
2
0
2020
Percent
2.5
Percent
Average Household Size
American Tire
Latitude: 43.58977
Trends 2015-2020
Annual Rate (in percent)
Census 2010
Population
Ring: 1 mile radius
Percent
Summary
1 MILE
Ring: 1 mile radius
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
White
Black
Am. Ind.
Asian
Pacific
Other
Two+
2015 Percent Hispanic Origin: 45.6%
Data Note: Income is expressed in current dollars.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2015 and 2020.
May 13, 2016
©2015 Esri
tokcommercial.com
Page 1 of 6
May 13, 2016
©2015 Esri
Page 2 of 6
[11]
American Tire
Latitude: 43.58977
2015
2020
Population
64,922
69,424
74,769
Households
22,637
24,142
25,954
Families
15,964
16,954
18,184
2.80
2.81
2.82
14,398
14,781
15,971
8,239
9,361
9,982
Median Age
Population
Households
Families
Owner HHs
30.5
31.1
31.1
Area
1.49%
1.46%
1.41%
State
1.07%
1.10%
1.05%
National
0.75%
0.77%
0.69%
1.56%
2.74%
1.14%
2.91%
0.70%
2.66%
2015
Number
Number
3,508
14.5%
3,668
14.1%
$15,000 - $24,999
3,486
14.4%
2,825
10.9%
$25,000 - $34,999
3,255
13.5%
3,002
11.6%
$35,000 - $49,999
4,439
18.4%
4,496
17.3%
$50,000 - $74,999
5,428
22.5%
5,914
22.8%
$75,000 - $99,999
2,464
10.2%
3,643
14.0%
$100,000 - $149,999
1,119
4.6%
1,797
6.9%
$150,000 - $199,999
193
0.8%
277
1.1%
$200,000+
251
1.0%
331
1.3%
$39,871
$48,897
$17,189
Census 2010
Population by Age
$45,651
$56,021
$19,598
2015
2020
Percent
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
6,271
9.7%
6,472
9.3%
6,993
9.4%
5-9
5,882
9.1%
6,091
8.8%
6,513
8.7%
10 - 14
5,287
8.1%
5,716
8.2%
6,254
8.4%
15 - 19
4,789
7.4%
5,198
7.5%
5,819
7.8%
20 - 24
4,767
7.3%
5,028
7.2%
5,213
7.0%
25 - 34
9,949
15.3%
10,194
14.7%
10,869
14.5%
35 - 44
8,250
12.7%
9,110
13.1%
10,083
13.5%
45 - 54
7,123
11.0%
7,488
10.8%
7,658
10.2%
55 - 64
5,644
8.7%
6,158
8.9%
6,458
8.6%
65 - 74
3,661
5.6%
4,594
6.6%
5,132
6.9%
75 - 84
2,164
3.3%
2,201
3.2%
2,606
3.5%
1,138
1.8%
1,174
1.7%
1,173
1.6%
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
White Alone
53,425
82.3%
56,314
81.1%
59,686
79.8%
Black Alone
443
0.7%
633
0.9%
897
1.2%
Census 2010
2015
2020
820
1.3%
892
1.3%
989
1.3%
Asian Alone
562
0.9%
634
0.9%
715
1.0%
209
0.3%
230
0.3%
266
0.4%
7,331
11.3%
8,193
11.8%
9,198
12.3%
Two or More Races
2,131
3.3%
2,527
3.6%
3,018
4.0%
15,371
23.7%
17,250
24.8%
19,410
26.0%
Area
State
USA
0.5
Population
Households
Families
Owner HHs
Median HH Income
Population by Age
14
12
10
8
6
2015
2020
2
Number
Race and Ethnicity
1
4
0-4
85+
1.5
Percent
<$15,000
Per Capita Income
2
0
2020
Percent
2.5
0
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-34
$25K - $34K
13.5%
35-44
65-74
75-84
85+
70
$150K - $199K
0.8%
$200K+
$100K
- $149K
1.0%
4.6%
$75K - $99K
10.2%
$50K - $74K
22.5%
55-64
80
60
<$15K
14.5%
$35K - $49K
18.4%
45-54
$15K - $24K
14.4%
Percent
American Tire
Latitude: 43.58977
Trends 2015-2020
Percent
Census 2010
Ring: 3 mile radius
Ring: 3 mile radius
Summary
3 MILE
50
40
30
20
10
0
White
Black
Am. Ind.
Asian
Pacific
Other
Two+
May 13, 2016
©2015 Esri
tokcommercial.com
Page 3 of 6
May 13, 2016
©2015 Esri
Page 4 of 6
[12]
American Tire
Latitude: 43.58977
Census 2010
2015
2020
101,167
108,941
117,677
Households
34,421
36,936
39,800
Families
25,380
27,138
29,172
2.89
2.90
2.91
23,645
24,536
26,481
10,776
12,400
13,319
Median Age
Population
Households
Families
Owner HHs
31.0
31.5
31.1
Area
1.55%
1.50%
1.46%
State
1.07%
1.10%
1.05%
National
0.75%
0.77%
0.69%
1.54%
2.80%
1.14%
2.91%
0.70%
2.66%
2015
Number
Number
Percent
11.4%
<$15,000
4,396
11.9%
4,532
$15,000 - $24,999
4,610
12.5%
3,698
9.3%
$25,000 - $34,999
4,658
12.6%
4,224
10.6%
$35,000 - $49,999
6,581
17.8%
6,531
16.4%
$50,000 - $74,999
9,064
24.5%
9,635
24.2%
$75,000 - $99,999
4,261
11.5%
6,125
15.4%
$100,000 - $149,999
2,261
6.1%
3,500
8.8%
$150,000 - $199,999
544
1.5%
826
2.1%
$200,000+
561
1.5%
729
1.8%
Per Capita Income
$44,856
$54,699
$18,738
Census 2010
Population by Age
$51,488
$62,761
$21,405
2015
2020
Percent
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
9,533
9.4%
10,002
9.2%
10,943
9.3%
5-9
9,441
9.3%
9,496
8.7%
10,320
8.8%
10 - 14
8,695
8.6%
9,338
8.6%
9,955
8.5%
15 - 19
7,520
7.4%
8,309
7.6%
9,279
7.9%
20 - 24
6,647
6.6%
7,567
6.9%
7,869
6.7%
25 - 34
14,972
14.8%
15,215
14.0%
16,976
14.4%
35 - 44
13,321
13.2%
14,697
13.5%
15,915
13.5%
45 - 54
11,186
11.1%
11,948
11.0%
12,423
10.6%
55 - 64
9,079
9.0%
9,904
9.1%
10,178
8.6%
65 - 74
5,859
5.8%
7,375
6.8%
8,077
6.9%
75 - 84
3,290
3.3%
3,422
3.1%
4,070
3.5%
1,623
1.6%
1,667
1.5%
1,672
1.4%
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
White Alone
84,748
83.8%
89,999
82.6%
95,715
81.3%
Black Alone
697
0.7%
997
0.9%
1,420
1.2%
Census 2010
Asian Alone
Two or More Races
2015
1
Area
State
USA
0.5
Population
Households
Families
Owner HHs
Median HH Income
Population by Age
14
12
10
8
6
2015
2020
2
Number
Race and Ethnicity
1.5
4
0-4
85+
2
0
2020
Percent
2.5
0
0-4
5-9
1.1%
1,221
1.1%
1,358
1.2%
888
0.9%
1,010
0.9%
1,150
1.0%
323
0.3%
353
0.3%
408
0.3%
10,241
10.1%
11,565
10.6%
13,057
11.1%
3,158
3.1%
3,796
3.5%
4,568
3.9%
21,817
21.6%
24,751
22.7%
28,008
23.8%
15-19
20-24
25-34
$25K - $34K
12.6%
$35K - $49K
17.8%
45-54
55-64
65-74
75-84
85+
80
$15K - $24K
12.5%
70
60
<$15K
11.9%
$150K - $199K
1.5%
$100K - $149K
6.1%
$50K - $74K
24.5%
35-44
$200K+
1.5%
2020
1,113
10-14
$75K - $99K
11.5%
Percent
American Tire
Latitude: 43.58977
Trends 2015-2020
Percent
Population
Ring: 5 mile radius
Ring: 5 mile radius
Summary
5 MILE
50
40
30
20
10
0
White
Black
Am. Ind.
Asian
Pacific
Other
Two+
May 13, 2016
©2015 Esri
tokcommercial.com
Page 5 of 6
May 13, 2016
©2015 Esri
Page 6 of 6
[13]
IDAHO TAXES
SUMMARIZED
WHEN YOU PURCHASE PROPERTY IN IDAHO
•
Thecountyassessor’sofficewillsendyouarequestforinformationregardingyourpurchase,i.e.,price,dateofsale,etc.
•
Thecountyassessor’sofficewillsendyouasecondrequestifyoudonotrespondtothefirstrequest.
•
YOUDONOTNEEDTOPROVIDETHISINFORMATION.Idahoisanon-disclosurestate,soeventhoughtheassessorisrequiredbylaw
tovaluethepropertyatmarketvalue,youarenotrequiredbylawtoprovidethatmarketvalueinformation.
ASSESSMENTS &
APPEALS
PAYMENTS
•
PropertytaxassessmentnoticesaremailednolaterthanthefirstMondayinJune
forthecurrentyear.
•
Thereisasmallwindowoftimeduringwhichtheassessedvaluecanbeappealed
forthecurrentyearassessment.ThewindowrunsfromthefirstMondayinJune
thruthefourthMondayinJune(onlyathree-weekwindow).
•
ThorntonOliverKeller’sResearchDepartmentannuallyreviewstheassessedvalues
ofeverycommercialpropertythatThorntonOliverKellermanages.Theassessed
valueiscomparedtothepropertyvaluebasedontheincomeapproachtodetermine
ifanappealshouldberecommended.(Ifthepropertyhasrecentlybeenpurchased,
theassessedvalueiscomparedtothepurchaseprice).
tokcommercial.com
250 S. 5th Street, 2nd Floor
•
Boise, Idaho
•
Annualpropertytaxesarepaidintwoinstallments(inarrears)inDecemberofthe
current year and June of the following year. For example, the first half of 2015
propertytaxeswillbedueonDecember20,2015,andthesecondhalfwillbedue
onJune20,2016.
•
IfyourpurchaseoccurspriortoJune20,the2ndhalfduefortheprioryearwillbe
paidbythesellerinclosing.
•
Sincepropertytaxesarepaidinarrears,youshouldreceiveacreditonyourclosing
statementforthepropertytaxesdueforportionoftheyearthatyoudidnotown
theproperty,sinceyouwillneedtopaythepropertytaxesfortheentireyear.
•
Forsalesthatoccurduringthelasttwomonthsoftheyear,thepropertytaxesdue
fortheportionoftheyearthatyoudidnotownthepropertyarepaidinclosingby
theseller.
•
208.378.4600
•
tokcommercial.com
[14]
BOISE
METRO INFORMATION
BOISE, IDAHO - Boise is not only the capital of Idaho, but the center of commerce, politics, population, cultural events, and the blue field that personifies the Boise State Broncos.
As a high desert community resting at the foot of the mountains, it is surrounded by thriving bedroom communities rich in their own histories and economies, bringing the metro
area population to approximately 652,000. Experts estimate the MSA population will exceed 695,000 by 2018.
Although Boise is famous for the potato market, it has an equally vibrant economic environment for high-tech, healthcare, education, transportation, service, tourism, and retail
industries. Many nationally and globally recognized corporations have a home in Boise including Micron Technology, Hewlett Packard, DirecTV, J.R. Simplot Company, MotivePower,
Materne, and many others.
Forbes consistently ranks Boise as one of the top places in the country to do business, high quality of life, raising a family, entertainment, and recreation. Boise has seen increased
development with The Village at Meridian, the Eighth & Main Building, and the under construction City Center Plaza and JUMP Project. And don’t forget our three time Fiesta Bowl
winning team, the Boise State Broncos!
TOP EMPLOYERS
AREA PROFILE
St. Luke’s
KEY CITIES WITHIN THE BOISE AREA MSA
Boise
235,730
Meridian
91,310
Eagle
24,600
Nampa
89,210
Caldwell
51,800
Total MSA Population (2015)
662,644
Source: Compass 2015 Population Estimates and STDBonline.
Micron Technology, Inc.
•
•
Boise State University
Saint Alphonsus Health System
Walmart
•
Albertsons
•
•
Hewlett-Packard Company
J.R. Simplot Company
•
Idaho Power Company
•
Wells Fargo Bank
EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME
Total Employment (Boise-Nampa MSA 4/15)
NATIONAL ACCOLADES
•
303,884
State Unemployment Rate as of June 2015
4.0%
Per Capita Income
$24,577
$50,850
$66,310
Source: Dept. of Labor and STDBonline.
•
Source 2015 Boise Valley Spotlight
#1TopCityWhereYouGettheMostfor
YourMoney - Business Advice Source,
2015
#9FastestGrowingCity- Yahoo, 2015
#1WheretheJobsWillBeThisSpring Forbes, 2015
#2BestCitytoMovetoin2015- SML,
2015
“BestPlacestoRetire”- Forbes, 2014
#1BestUndertheRadarTechHubSparefoot, 2014
#5MostFairStateTaxSystems-
WalletHub, 2014
#1BestCityforKids- Livability.com,
2014
Top50CitiesforBusinessGrowth MarketWatch, 2013
HOUSING
Single-Family Homes sold in Ada Co. (2015)
Median Home Price
4,743
$198,875
Single-Family Homes sold in Canyon Co. (2015)
Median Home Price
1,808
$128,523
Source: Intermountain MLS and STDBonline.
tokcommercial.com
•
Boise, Idaho
•
208.378.4600
•
tokcommercial.com
[15]
PopulationEstimatesbyCityLimits
AdaCounty
Year
PopulationEstimatesbyCityLimits
AdaCounty
Year
Boise
Eagle
Garden
City
Kuna
Meridian
Star
Unincorpo
rated
Boise
Eagle
Garden
City
Kuna
Meridian
BOISE
Compass Population Estimates - 2015
Star
Unincorpo
rated
Regional
Total
Total
2015
223,670
24,600
12,060
17,320
91,310
7,930
61,780
438,660
646,450
2014
217,730
23,460
11,160
16,070
85,240
7,140
61,130
421,920
620,080
2013
209,700
21,350
11,070
15,960
81,380
6,480
60,930
406,870
599,840
2012
207,730
20,550
11,020
15,650
78,290
6,030
60,400
399,670
590,070
2011
METRO INFORMATION
206,470
20,140
10,980
15,470
76,510
5,900
60,510
395,960
585,810
Regional
(Census)
Total
2010
Total
205,671
19,908
10,972
15,210
75,092
5,793
59,739
392,365
581,288
2015
223,670
24,600
12,060
17,320
91,310
7,930
61,780
438,660
2009
646,450
215,630
21,370
12,670
15,900
75,290
5,980
61,350
408,190
599,110
2014
217,730
23,460
11,160
16,070
85,240
7,140
61,130
421,920
620,080
2008
214,490
21,090
12,580
14,830
73,040
5,690
60,830
402,550
589,720
2013
209,700
21,350
11,070
15,960
81,380
6,480
60,930
406,870
599,840
2007
213,503
20,951
12,352
14,261
71,866
5,548
57,493
395,974
582,232
2012
207,730
20,550
11,020
15,650
78,290
6,030
60,400
399,670
590,070
2006
12,074
12,647
66,565
4,594
55,830
383,314
206,470
20,140
10,980
15,470
76,510
5,900
60,510
395,960
585,810
2005
20,131
559,095
2011
211,473
208,219
18,428
11,914
10,587
56,108
3,028
53,200
361,484
528,625
200,062
16,418
11,675
9,696
47,690
2,552
58,118
346,211
505,742
2010
(Census)
205,671
19,908
10,972
15,210
75,092
5,793
59,739
392,365
2004
581,288
2009
215,630
21,370
12,670
15,900
75,290
5,980
61,350
408,190
2003
599,110
195,931
14,144
11,589
8,649
42,481
2,243
58,772
333,809
485,983
2008
214,490
21,090
12,580
14,830
73,040
5,690
60,830
402,550
2002
589,720
193,085
13,380
11,124
7,386
39,744
2,116
56,326
323,161
467,578
2007
213,503
20,951
12,352
14,261
71,866
5,548
57,493
395,974
2000
582,232
2006
211,473
20,131
12,074
12,647
66,565
4,594
55,830
383,314
559,095
(Census)
185,787
11,085
10,624
5,382
34,919
1,795
51,312
300,904
432,345
2005
208,219
18,428
11,914
10,587
56,108
3,028
53,200
361,484
2004
1990
528,625
(Census)
16,418
11,675
9,696
47,690
2,552
58,118
346,211
505,742
125,738
3,327
6,369
1,955
9,596
648
58,142
205,775
295,851
200,062
2003
195,931
14,144
11,589
8,649
42,481
2,243
58,772
333,809
485,983
2002
193,085
13,380
11,124
7,386
39,744
2,116
56,326
323,161
467,578
2000
(Census)
185,787
11,085
10,624
5,382
34,919
1,795
51,312
300,904
432,345
1990
(Census)
125,738
3,327
6,369
1,955
9,596
648
58,142
205,775
295,851
2014
Year
Caldwell
Greenleaf
Melba
Middleton
Nampa
Notus
Parma
Wilder
570
2,140
1,640
53,800
207,790
84,840
540
2,010
1,540
54,270
198,160
2013
47,580
850
520
5,860
83,840
530
1,990
1,530
50,270
192,970
Unincorpo
rated
2012
46,800
850
520
5,630
82,160
530
1,990
1,530
50,390
190,400
Total
2011
46,730
850
520
5,600
81,920
530
1,990
1,530
50,160
189,850
2010
(Census)
46,237
846
513
5,524
81,557
531
1,983
1,533
50,179
188,923
2009
44,210
920
580
5,870
82,830
650
2,060
1,740
51,930
190,920
2008
42,640
920
570
5,560
81,840
620
2,030
1,710
51,280
187,170
2007
189,850
40,873
912
571
5,151
81,354
588
1,996
1,682
51,124
186,258
2006
38,028
912
561
4,575
76,436
558
1,921
1,582
51,208
175,781
2005
35,086
902
539
4,166
72,211
538
1,891
1,502
50,306
167,141
2004
33,059
878
534
3,868
67,401
506
1,851
1,491
49,943
159,531
2003
30,716
878
511
3,606
63,227
500
1,808
1,484
49,444
152,174
2002
28,857
878
500
3,235
58,952
482
1,792
1,481
48,240
144,417
2000
167,141
(Census)
25,967
862
439
2,978
51,867
458
1,771
1,462
45,637
131,441
18,586
648
252
1,851
28,365
380
1,597
1,232
37,165
90,076
53,800
207,790
2014
47,440
840
520
6,150
84,840
540
2,010
1,540
54,270
198,160
2013
47,580
850
520
5,860
83,840
530
1,990
1,530
50,270
192,970
46,800
850
520
5,630
82,160
530
1,990
1,530
50,390
190,400
1,530
50,160
2010
(Census)
46,237
846
513
5,524
81,557
531
1,983
1,533
50,179
188,923
2009
44,210
920
580
5,870
82,830
650
2,060
1,740
51,930
190,920
2008
42,640
920
570
5,560
81,840
620
2,030
1,710
51,280
187,170
2007
40,873
912
571
5,151
81,354
588
1,996
1,682
51,124
186,258
2006
38,028
912
561
4,575
76,436
558
1,921
1,582
51,208
175,781
2005
35,086
902
539
4,166
72,211
538
1,891
1,502
50,306
2004
33,059
878
534
3,868
67,401
506
1,851
1,491
49,943
2003
30,716
878
511
3,606
63,227
500
1,808
1,484
49,444
(Census)
152,174
2002
28,857
878
500
3,235
58,952
482
1,792
1,481
48,240
144,417
2000
(Census)
25,967
862
439
2,978
51,867
458
1,771
1,462
45,637
131,441
1990
(Census)
5 0 S .1,851
5 t h S28,365
t r e e t , 2380
n d F l1,597
oor
18,586
tokcomme
r c i a l . c648
o m 2252
•
1,232
Total
89,210
1,640
1,990
Unincorpo
rated
6,150
2,140
530
Wilder
7,110
570
81,920
Parma
520
89,210
5,600
Notus
570
7,110
520
Nampa
840
570
850
Middleton
860
860
46,730
Melba
47,440
51,880
2011
Greenleaf
51,880
2015
2012
Caldwell
2015
CanyonCounty
Year
CanyonCounty
159,531
1990
B o37,165
i s e , I 90,076
daho
•
208.378.4600
•
tokcommercial.com
[16]
BOISE
Boise Valley Spotlight 2015 - Excerpt
METRO INFORMATION
tokcommercial.com
•
Boise, Idaho
•
208.378.4600
•
tokcommercial.com
[17]
BOISE
Boise Valley Spotlight 2015 - Excerpt
METRO INFORMATION
tokcommercial.com 250 S. 5th Street, 2nd Floor
•
Boise, Idaho
•
208.378.4600
•
tokcommercial.com
[18]
9 Top Cities Where You Get The Most For Your Money
Page 1 of 2
The Next Top 10 Cities For Tech Jobs | Fast Company | Business + Innovation
Top 15 fastest-growing cities in the U.S. - Yahoo Homes
SMALL BUSINESS
PROFESSIONAL TIPS
JOBS
FINANCE
Business Advice Source - 2015, Yahoo - 2015, Fastcompany.com - 2015
Top 15 fastest-growing
cities in the U.S.
THE FUTURE OF WORK
METRO INFORMATION
Find A Home
9 Top Cities Where You Get the Most for Your MoneyMust-See HomesRelated Posts
Home Finance
Ideas & Projects
BOISE
Subm
Search the site
HOME
Page 1 of 12
By Ilyce R. Glink
May 22, 2015 8:19 PM
THE NEXT TOP 10 CITIES FOR TECH JOBS
   
Where's everyone going?
Recommended Games
5Texas
Pitfalls
Small Businesses
or California; cities in the two states absolutely dominate
Should Avoid
More games »
growing
cities, with 15Travel
for Texas
and 10 for California, according
Top
10 Business
Tips
to numbers
just released by the U.S. Census Bureau.
from
the Pros
SURE, NEW YORK AND SILICON VALLEY WILL ALWAYS BE TECH HUBS,
BUT THESE OTHER U.S. CITIES COULD BE HOME TO THE NEXT BIG
THING.
the ranking of fastest-growing cities with populations of 50,000 or
more. Texas and California alone take up half the top 50 fastest-
BY JARED LINDZON
What to read next
Entrepreneurs and young professionals looking to launch their
career or their startup in an active technology hub have a wide variety
What's more: These aren't big cities. Unless you live near one of
of alternatives to the costly traditional hotspots like New York, Los
Angeles, and Silicon Valley.
these
places,
you've probably
10
Best
Countries
For never heard of most of them. Yet
these towns have seen their populations grow as much as 8 perEntrepreneurs
cent in one year.
largest of
the these
towns
in theatop 15 is Irvine, California,
9The
Highest
Paying
Jobs
With
2The
Year
cityDegree
grew by 11,420 people over the past year to total
The country’s hottest up-and-coming tech scenes in 2015 are
typically found in mid-sized cities eager to make a name for
Curbed Atlanta:
Modern 'Masterpiece'
themselves,
offering big-city resources like universities, access to
Nearly Doubles Price in Two …
talent, and satellite offices of tech industry titans along with lower
248,531. That's nearly a 5 percent growth rate.
costs of living and a greater work/life balance.
The bulk of the growth in California centers around the San Fran-
Even within the United States, the cost of
living can vary drastically depending on
which city you call home. If you would like
to make your dollar stretch a little further,
consider taking up residency in one of these
nine cities:
* Please note that each index in this report
is based off the cost of living in New York
City. For example, a rent index 0f 40%
means that the average rent in that city is
40% of what it is in New York City.
could go to Silicon Valley, but you're going to be facing a lot of folks
who have a lot of experience, who have been there a while, and an
more money and bigger towns surrounding the major cities of San
Cable One Business
Phone Top 15 fastest-growing cities in the U.S. - Yahoo Homes
Francisco and San Jose (which incidentally just joined the elite
incredibly expensive housing market," said Scott Garner, the
communications and content marketing manager of ZipRecruiter, an
group of cities with more than a million people).
In Texas, the fastest-growing towns are spread out among the
All The Phone Features You
Need. Starting as Low as $24/mo.
Call Now
state's largest metro areas, including Houston, San Antonio, Dal-
Sponsored The Motley Fool

Page 5 of 12
las and Austin.
Today, ZipRecruiter released a list of the Top 10 Up-and-Coming
None of the cities on this list are growing unrelated to a major
Cities for Tech Jobs in 2015 based on job market activity across
America. The website tracked hiring patterns to determine which
metropolitan area. Even the ones in Arizona, Colorado, Idaho,
cities
were
listing
industry| at
the fastest
rate,
The Next
Top
10 increasing
Cities For job
Tech
Jobsin| the
Fasttech
Company
Business
+ Innovation
and which have the highest volume of tech jobs compared against
these suburbs are fairly new, and many are consistently ranked
other industries.
on this list.
Median
Rent:
$1,050
"If
you want
take
that first step in your career in tech, or you want to
(Note: We're talking above about growth rates. As far as sheer
As a general rule, most all western cities (excluding those in California) have an average
cost of living on the lower end, and Boise is no exception. The capital city and the largest
city of the state of Idaho, Boise is consistently ranked as having one of the lowest costs of
living of any US city. With beautiful surrounding scenery and a nice “college town”
environment, it is a great residence to consider if you are looking to settle down in a place
that will make your dollar stretch further. Here are the cost of living statistics for Boise,
Idaho:
numbers of people added, New York, Los Angeles and Chicago
Trail, 100,000 acres of parkland, and White River
Garner.
nix, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas and San Jose. But adding
7. BOISE, ID
Boise has cemented itself as an affordable launch pad for tech careers,
people doesn't necessarily mean those cities are really growing
attracting major industry employers like Hewlett Packard and Microsoft along
http://www.fastcompany.com/3048391/the-future-of-work/the-next-top-10-cities-fo
much. New York's growth rate was just 0.6 percent -- while Chica-
with a burgeoning startup ecosystem.
go's was a flatlining 0 percent, meaning that the number of people
it did add was so minuscule a proportion of the total population
that
was atstatistically
meaningless.)
The it
Village
Meridian shopping
center in Meridian, Idaho (CenterCal ProperThese are the top 15 fastest-growing cities by rate of growth.
*Rent Index: 22.89%
*Groceries Index: 58.82%
*Restaurants Index: 72.60%
*Average Cost of Gasoline (Per Gallon): $2.17
*Average Cost of Milk (Per Gallon): $2.95
*Average Monthly Rent of 3 Bedroom Apartment in City’s Centre: $1,173
*Average Monthly Internet Bill: $47
*Average Monthly Utilities for a 915 sq. ft. Apartment: $113
Curbed Chicago: Tour the Building
Recreation
and
Carmel
and Design
District,
Monon said
start
a startup
of Culture:
your own,
these Arts
are great
potential
alternatives,"
Boom Currently
Underway
in Chicago
make up the top three, followed by Houston, Philadelphia, Phoe-
ties)
3 Companies Poised
online To
jobExplode
board.
When Cable Dies
Utah and Florida are all far-flung suburbs of major cities. Typically
1) Boise, Idaho
tokcommercial.com
"If you just got out of school and you're looking to get into tech you
cisco Bay Area, where the tech gold rush has created more jobs,
9. Meridian, Idaho
"It's always one of those places that is ranked near the top of the best places to
Preservation Watch:
50 Shades
live because
of theofquality of life, affordability, recreational opportunities, and
Gray: Matching Concrete and the
it's got a great business environment as well," said Garner.
Challenges …
Total Tech Jobs Open: 8,180
Population: 87,743
Top Five Tech Jobs: Application engineer, firmware engineer,
Growth over the past year: 5.1 percent
A large, western suburb of Boise, Meridian's population has just
software engineer, mobile software developer, and net software
engineer
exploded over the past 25 years. Most of that growth actually hap-
Major College: Boise State University
Recent pened
Posts
in the 1990s, when the city went from just under 10,000
people in 1990 to nearly 35,000 in 2000—an increase of 264 perhttps://homes.yahoo.com/news/top-15-fastest-growing-cities-211809261.html
cent.
But thatYou
growth
hasn't
even if it has slowed. The
10
Things
Can
Dostopped,
To
Increase
Valueinof
Your
population The
was 75,092
2010
and has since grown by 15 perHome
cent.
•
Boise, Idaho
If you would like to share this article with your friends, please click below.
9 Best
in 6 0 0
• Franchises
2 0 8 .to3 Open
78.4
2015
•
Median Rent: $925
7/31/2015
Recreation and
Culture: Hiking, biking, and skiing
8. MANCHESTER, NH
Manchester provides a quant New England feel with easy access to Boston and
Portland without city-sized costs of living. As a leader in floppy-disk
production in the 90s the city is steeped in tech industry roots and home to
t o k c o m m e rsome
c i aof ltoday’s
. c obiggest
m players, including Hewlett Packard and Dell.
[19]
Total Tech Jobs Open: 2,700
10 States with the Best
Top Five Tech Jobs: Ui software engineer, systems architect, java
1/21/2014
down from 7.9% a year before. Only one place on the list has an
unemployment rate substantially above the average, Port Saint Lucie, Fla., at
8.1%. All the others are near or below the national norm. Some are way below:
Fargo, 2.3%; Morgantown, W.V., and Fredericksburg, Tex., both 3.6%.
The Best Places To Retire In 2014 - Forbes
Our focus on a state’s tax climate for retirees takes into account the notion
that what is low tax for retirees isn’t always the same as for working-age folks.
Nine states don’t have a broad-based state income tax–Alaska, Florida,
Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and
Wyoming. But such states tend to make up for that with other, higher taxes,
most notably, higher sales and real estate levies, which can hit seniors harder.
On the other hand, many states with income taxes give special breaks to
ForbesJanuary
2014
retirees, such as light or no taxation of Social Security
and pension
benefits,
and inheritances. In our view, the best states for retirees from a tax
perspective are Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Nevada,
Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah and West Virginia.
BOISE
William P. Barrett, Contributor
I cove r pe rsonal finance , tax e s, re tire m e nt, nonprofits & scandals
P ER S O NA L F I NA NC E | 1/16/2014 @ 9:10AM | 63,297 vie ws
1/21/2014
METRO INFORMATION
The Best Places To Retire In 2014 - Forbes
The Best Places To Retire In
2014
Realtors, trulia.com and zillow.com. Although no one element is
determinative, cost is a major reason only three places in the expensive
Northeast and West Coast make the cut. They are repeat choice Pittsburgh
and Best Places list newcomers State College, Pa., and Bellingham, Wash.
The 25 Best Places To Retire in 2014
If money is truly no object, check out our choices for 25 Top Places To Retire
Rich.
Click here for the Forbes list of The 25 Best Places To Retire In
2014.
Retirement is one of those chances in life to do something really different.
With kids usually out of the house, many people look at it as an opportunity
to move to a place that better fits their likings and budget—somewhere
affordable that’s warmer (or colder), more rural (or urban), with good medical
care and options for an active life, including perhaps a part-time job.
We’ve identified 25 such communities of varying sizes that retirees and those
nearing retirement would do well to consider. These spots are spread across 16
states in all four continental time zones. Four states–Texas, Florida, South
Carolina and Pennsylvania–have two or more listings. About three-quarters
of our picks are in climates considered warm or moderate. That’s not
surprising since weather is one factor taken into account, and polls show
seniors prefer warm climates. Nevertheless, a number of colder cities made
the cut, including Fargo, N.D., Pittsburgh, Pa., and Boise, Idaho.
For the full list, click on the picture above. The listings are in alphabetical
order, meaning that all 25 are considered meritorious and not ranked among
themselves.
Perhaps surprisingly, only three were on last year’s list, although nine graced
our earlier or more narrowly focused lists. That’s because for 2014, we
screened even more locations, took into account additional factors and
broadened acceptable ranges for other factors. But our focus remains, as in
previous years, the identification of places that offer what we consider good
retirement value.
To come up with the best 25, we sifted data on more than 400 cities from
every state. The major factors taken into account were economic. These
included overall cost of living and home prices as compared to national
averages and general state tax climates for retirees (something that Forbes has
been tracking for years).
For cost of living, we draw largely on stats from FindTheData.org. For home
prices, we primarily use numbers collected by the National Association of
http://www.forbes.com/sites/williampbarrett/2014/01/16/the-best-places-to-retire-in-2014/print/
Seniors rightly worry about physical as well as economic security. So we also
give weight to violent crime rates for cities and their surrounding areas as
calculated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.We factor in the number of
doctors per capita as a proxy for the accessibility of health care.
Today’s retirees want to keep fit and active, as well as safe. So we look at
ratings for attributes that encourage an active retirement. One we use is
Bicycling Magazine‘s ratings of cities for “bikability”. High grades here go to
Austin, Boise, Fargo, Charleston, S.C., Pittsburgh and Salt Lake City, Utah.
Another is Walkscore.com ratings for walkability, or the ability to shop and get
places on foot (great for both exercise and non-reliance on cars). Top scores
If for you, as for most folks, money is a consideration, then you may be
hoping to cut your housing costs in retirement. That’s a growing challenge
since the the median home price across the country is $207,000, up 11% from
last year’s $186,000. Still, there are bargains out there. Seven places on our
list have average prices below $140,000. The lowest is Ogden, Utah,
$124,000; followed by Pittsburgh, $130,000; and Clemson, S.C., $135,000.
Moreover, only one city on the list has a typical price more than 10% above
the average, Bellingham at $266,000.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/williampbarrett/2014/01/16/the-best-places-to-retire-in-2014/print/
Cost-of-living is expressed as an index, with 100 being the national average.
We generally look for places with indexes no higher than 105. Two on the list
are higher: Bellingham, again (109) and Bluffton, S.C. (108). Three places
actually have indexes below 90, or more than 10% below the national average:
Abilene, Tex. (87), Ogden (88) and Auburn, Ala. (89).
With more and more retirees working at least part-time, we also consider
estimates of current and future economic prosperity. These include local
unemployment rates as collected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and
prospects for future growth, as gauged in hundreds of cities by the Milken
Institute. For December 2013, the national unemployment rate was 6.7%,
down from 7.9% a year before. Only one place on the list has an
unemployment rate substantially above the average, Port Saint Lucie, Fla., at
8.1%. All the others are near or below the national norm. Some are way below:
Fargo, 2.3%; Morgantown, W.V., and Fredericksburg, Tex., both 3.6%.
Our focus on a state’s tax climate for retirees takes into account the notion
that what is low tax for retirees isn’t always the same as for working-age folks.
Nine states don’t have a broad-based state income tax–Alaska, Florida,
Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and
Wyoming. But such states tend to make up for that with other, higher taxes,
most notably, higher sales and real estate levies, which can hit seniors harder.
On the other hand, many states with income taxes give special breaks to
retirees, such as light or no taxation of Social Security and pension benefits,
and inheritances. In our view, the best states for retirees from a tax
perspective are Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Nevada,
Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota,
Utah and West Virginia.
1/3
Seniors rightly worry about physical as well as economic security. So we also
give weight to violent crime rates for cities and their surrounding areas as
calculated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.We factor in the number of
doctors per capita as a proxy for the accessibility of health care.
loor
•
Boise, Idaho
•
208.378.4600
t o k c o m m e r c i a l . c o m 2 5 0 S . 5 t h S t r e e t , 2 n d FToday’s
retirees want to keep fit and active, as well as safe. So we look at
ratings for attributes that encourage an active retirement. One we use is
Bicycling Magazine‘s ratings of cities for “bikability”. High grades here go to
•
tokcommercial.com
[20]
BOISE
Idaho Business
Review2014
Idaho Business Review > Print > Study: More people moving
to Idaho than
leaving JanuaryPage
1 of 1
METRO INFORMATION
Idaho Business Review
http://idahobusinessreview.com
Study: More people moving to Idaho than leaving
by IBR Staff
Published: January 8th, 2014
More people moved to Idaho in 2013 than
left the state, a change from 2012, when
roughly the same number of people
moved into and out of Idaho, according to
an annual study by Atlas Van Lines.
shipments are classified as “balanced.”
Atlas Van Lines has measured the number
of moving shipments moving into and out
of U.S. states and Canadian provinces
since 1993. If more moving shipments
leave a state in a year, the state is
classified as “outbound,” and if more
shipments enter the state, it’s classified as
“inbound.” States with roughly the same
number of inbound and outbound
The last year Idaho was classified as “inbound” in the Atlas Van Lines study was in 2006. The
state was classified as “balanced” in 2007 and “outbound” in 2008 and 2009. It was
“balanced” from 2010 to 2012.
Idaho neighbor Montana also shifted from “balanced” to “inbound” in 2013, and Oregon was
“inbound” for the second consecutive year. Nevada and Utah maintained “balanced” statuses,
while Washington changed from “inbound” to “balanced.” Wyoming was “outbound” for the
second consecutive year.
Idaho’s population has risen every year over the past decade, according to the U.S. Census
Bureau. The top 10 states from which people moved to Idaho in 2010 – the most recent data
available – were Washington, California, Utah, Oregon, Nevada, Arizona, Texas, Montana,
Colorado and Wyoming, according to the Internal Revenue Service.
Complete URL: http://idahobusinessreview.com/2014/01/08/study-more-people-moving-to-idaho-thanleaving/
tokcommercial.com 250 S. 5th Street, 2nd Floor
•
Boise, Idaho
•
208.378.4600
•
tokcommercial.com
[21]

American Tire - Thornton Oliver Keller

Transcription

Similar documents

Zak McKracken – Mayan Maze Map

Roundup, February 21 - ScholarWorks

Rilo Kiley After Hours

- ScholarWorks - Boise State University

Earth Tracks Newsletter - Idaho Forest Products Commission

15-9 buy id news

Arbiter, May 2 - ScholarWorks

Arbiter, April 25 - ScholarWorks

idaho meth project 2014 annual report

SILENTIUM PM 42S