Transdermal Drug Delivery Opportunity
Transcription
Transdermal Drug Delivery Opportunity
Rubigo Therapeutics’ Site specific delivery technology for active ingredients Investor Presentation – June’12 Dermatology Focus ◦ Treatment of actinic keratosis – a skin condition that if left untreated can lead to non-melanoma skin cancer Unique transdermal delivery platform for “difficult-to-deliver” drugs ◦ Broad Polymer Intellectual Property Experienced Life Science Team ◦ Prior successes, deep industry experience Specialty Pharmaceutical Company ◦ Targeting “approved” drugs that will benefit from our improved delivery system 2 Actinic Keratosis (AK) is largest segment of the non-melanoma skin cancer market ◦ 5 Million newly diagnosed each year in US ◦ AK affects up to 58 million in US [Lewin Group] Imiquimod is a well recognized effective drug but toxic when over applied ◦ Cream formulations are easy to over apply; with concentration and dosing issues ◦ +$400 MM annual sales despite product issues (various sources i.e. 10K, 8Ks) ◦ Reimbursed for management of skin cancer 400 Dermatologists surveyed worldwide, 80% stated that they would prescribe more Imiquimod if inflammation could be reduced ◦ 53% indicated they would at least double prescriptions (Angiogenesis Foundation survey of 400 Dermatologists) > 2x More 2x More Same 50% More 3 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Film design patent (US2011/0033515 A1) and two additional “drug-in-film” patent applications are the basis for the working drug delivery prototypes and current process development. No Office actions to date but ongoing corporate discussions support novelty of approach FILM MATERIALS ◦Available from multiple sources 4 First site specific drug delivery system delivering a more appropriate dose of Imiquimod for the treatment of AK existing drug + enabling delivery system = improved, differentiated product Imiquimod, off-patent and effective for treating AK Proprietary Rubigo Film technology ◦ Developed by 3M, available only in cream due to solubility issues ◦ Cream formulations often require high concentration and lack dose control ◦ Currently approved & marketed drug … simpler regulatory path with reimbursement in place ◦ Sourced from TEVA Pharmaceuticals’ API Division Enabling technology, stabilizes drug Novel polymer matrix protected by fresh IP Controlled dose, avoids overuse by patient Dose can be terminated by removing film Film prevents transfer to unintended areas, people ◦ Simple patient training ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ 5 Transdermal Delivery of Imiquimod Comparison to Therapeutic Target Amount • Rubigo Film delivered appropriate dose • Cream delivered 20X therapeutic target 235 Rubigo’s Film 50 5% Cream µg/cm2 µg/cm2 Stratum Corneum Epidermis/Dermis Therapeutic amount of Imiquimod required in the skin: 0.032 µg 0.043 0.649 Imiquimod Delivered at 24 – Hours Into the Epidermis and Dermal Layers (Human Cadaver Tissue testing @ Cetero) 6 Transdermal Delivery of Imiquimod Comparison to Therapeutic Target Amount •Rubigo Film left no drug on skin at 24 hours •Cream creates sustained “depot” effect, resulting in prolonged overdosing 235 Rubigo’s Film Stratum Corneum 50 µg/cm2 5% Cream 0.328 µg/cm2 0.0 Epidermis/Dermis Therapeutic amount of Imiquimod required in the skin: 0.032 µg Imiquimod Delivered at 24 – Hours Into the Epidermis and Dermal Layers (Human Cadaver Tissue testing @ Cetero) 7 Transdermal Delivery of Imiquimod Comparison to Therapeutic Target Amount 235 Rubigo’s Film Stratum Corneum 50 µg/cm2 5% Cream 0.328 µg/cm2 0.0 Epidermis/Dermis Therapeutic amount of Imiquimod required in the skin: 0.032 µg 0.043 0.649 Imiquimod Delivered at 24 – Hours Into the Epidermis and Dermal Layers (Human Cadaver Tissue testing @ Cetero) 8 $1.4B WW Market Opportunity 15-25% Worldwide Incidence: 8-10 million/yr Prevalence: 75-100 million Surgical Procedures (Cryosurgery, chemical peels, curettage) Positives • Short treatment time • If fully treated, high cure rate Negatives • Cryosurgery, a blind treatment leaving cancer seeds allowing recurrence • Scarring • Poor cosmetic outcome i.e. discoloration • Pain • Expensive Topical Cream Therapies Positives • Good cosmetic effects • High cure rate • Treat large areas • Convenience • Lower cost Negatives • Longer treatment time • Adverse site reactions • Can be painful • May require patient to stay out of the sun for 30-45 days Rubigo IQ Film will address these negative factors. 10 Comparables •Fougera and Perrigo Pharma 1st Year Sales of Imiquimod Generic Cream, $107MM each •Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical acquired Noven in 2009 : $428M, a 4x on trailing sales 11 The company is soliciting $1.5 million thru a Convertible Loan 25% discount to Series A Equity Round Proceeds to fund 1st Tranche leading to FIH Phase I Development – $3.5M Seed Raise 1st Tranche: $1.5M •Establish cGMP (Mfg Partner) •Pre-clinical/IND testing •FDA Pre-IND Meeting 2nd Tranche: $2M •Complete First in Human Study • IND Submission Phase II – Phase I/II and OUS Launch •Series A Financing - $10M •Phase I and II of FDA IND •CE Mark •Q4’14 OUS Commercialization License/Phase III – US launch •Series B Financing/License -$10M •Complete Phase III •US Approval and Launch •Follow on Indications &/or Applications 12 Employees Board of Directors and Advisors Kevin Nickels, CEO (Board) • CEO, serial life science entrepreneur • +25 years, retail, institutional capital, M&A Yogesh Dandiker, PhD (Board) • Drug Discovery and Generic Pharmaceutical History Stan Harpstead, CTO (Board) • Product Development • Biotechnology Post Financing: Project Manager Experience in Pharma Industry Q3’13 Supply Chain Manager CFO/Controller QA Manager Steve LeVahn (Board) • Investor and former-CEO Omni Track Medical William Li, MD (Head of Medical Advisors) • President, Angiogenesis Foundation Rob Kirsner, MD PhD • Dermatologist, U of Miami Vince Li ,MD • Dermatologist, Brigham and Women’s Dick Miller, PhD • Ex-3M Scientist and Inventor of Imiquimod Operational Partners Product Manufacturing • Experienced drug-in-film casting company with successful FDA history Regulatory Strategy and Application • Experienced 505 (b)(2) Drug Regulatory Consultant Clinical Study Contract Research Organization (CRO) • Experience in Drug and Outside USA Clinical Studies Rachel Clark, MD (proposed) • Dermatologist, Brigham and Women’s Key Suppliers/Distribution Partners Imiquimod – TEVA Pharmaceuticals Polymers - Lubrizol & Dow Chemical Distribution - TBD Rubigo Platform Technology Expanded Indications for Imiquimod Film for other forms of Skin Cancer •Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) •Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) Other Indications for Imiquimod Film •Pre-Biopsy Assessment •Vaccine Adjuvant •Etc. Initial Indication: Actinic Keratosis (AK) Other Drugs loaded into Film •Local pain (lidocaine) •Skin fungus (terbinafine) •Etc. 14 Proprietary drug delivery platform Significant initial clinical dermatology opportunity Compelling value creation for a modest investment in a life science company offering Early Knowledge to Impact Life Experienced Life Science Team Thank you for your consideration [email protected] 612.309.5305 15