Single European Sky Air Traffic Management

HELITECH EXPO&CONFERENCE
carlo m borghini
Deputy Executive Director
Sesar Joint Undertaking
Change in Air Traffic Management
infrastructure is inevitable
•
2
CHALLENGES FOR BUILDING ATM CAPACITY
INTEGRATION
OF AIRPORTS
THE 4D
TRAJECTORY
PRINCIPLE
Integrating airports time synchronised
operations of surface
trajectories and flight
turn-around
Integrating airspace
users flight systems
to build predictable
time synchronised
flight precision
THE SYSTEM
WIDE
INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
AUTOMATION
The Intranet
for Air Traffic
Management
Human operators
concentrate on high
value-added tasks
COLLABORATIVE NETWORK PLANNING
Integrated with airport operations planning and
airspace user flight planning
The SJU a unique PPP
2 FOUNDING MEMBERS
European
Union
4
Eurocontr
ol
EUR 2.1 bio
15 other members
13 associate partners = 110 companies in total
20+ countries
3000 people working on SESAR
300+ projects
The SJU a unique PPP
Members
2 FOUNDING MEMBERS
New associate partners since July 2010
5
The SJU a unique PPP
2 FOUNDING
MEMBERS
Ground
Industry
Airports
Air
Navigation
Service
Providers
Airspace
users
6
Airborne
Industry
Staff
associations
National
Authorities/
Military
R&D
community
The SJU a unique PPP
2 FOUNDING MEMBERS
7
The SJU a unique PPP
• Cooperation with
– Other international Programmes (NextGen, …)
– ICAO
– European Defence Agency and NATO
– EUROCAE
– ESA
– Clean SKY
8
The SJU a unique PPP
Industry
Million
Programme Activities (a)
EU
Ectrl
Others
0
499
1 189
239
1 927
665
130
( 595)
( 163)
37
Core Programme
600
98
( 595)
( 103)
0
Demonstration Activities
30
( 30)
0
Other activities/studies
30
( 30)
0
Co-financing (b)
Ectrl Early Projects
AUs, NSAs, Mil, Staff
Running Costs of the SJU
(c)
TOTAL (a+b+c)
9
Members
Total
7
7
5
25
30
35
35
30
700
664
624
100
76
2 064
MASTER PLAN
How SESAR R&D is put in place
PERFORMANCE NEEDS
OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS & ENABLERS
HIGH LEVEL DEPLOYMENT & DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE
PROGRAMME
4D TRAJECTORY
PERFORMANCE VALIDATION TARGETS
CONCEPT & ARCHITECTURE
OPERATIONAL & TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS
CASES
STANDARDISATION & REGULATION PREP.
TRAFFIC SYNCHRONISATION
AIRPORT INTEGRATION
NETWORK MANAGEMENT
CONFLICT MGT. & AUTOMATION
R&D PROJECTS
SWIM
OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
SYSTEM PROTOTYPES
VALIDATION ACTIVITIES & RESULTS
10
R&D PROJECTS
PROGRAMME
MASTER PLAN
How SESAR R&D Delivers
11
Performance
Trajectory Based Operations
Time Based Operations
2020+
2017
2014
SESAR R&D Mid Term Results
By 2012 we have created the change in the European
ATM that demonstrates our ability to deliver benefits to
the community
1. Initial 4D trajectory is validated in an operational environment
supported by satellite based technology
2. 10,000 flights, including 500 military, are SESAR labelled
3. 80% of SESAR projects have tested their outputs in a real life
environment
4. First SWIM pilots are in place to exchange data across at least 5
domains
5. The first remote tower is ready for operation
6. SESAR benefits are demonstrated in city pairs connecting 8
European airports
7. Airspace users have signed up to the SESAR business case for
time based operations
12
=
SESAR Release 1 (2011 – Feb 2012)
– 25 Validation Exercises addressing 15 OFAs
– Examples of Key Results
• Point merge in complex TMA
– 16% reduction in air traffic controller workload
– 2% decrease in fuel burn
– 4% increase in average runaway throughput
• Integrated AMAN DMAN
– 9% decrease of average taxi time
– 7,8% improvement in cut delays
– 14,6 kg of fuel per flight average reduction (-46,6 kg in CO2)
• … see Release 1 Results’ report
13
SESAR Release 2 (2012)
– 30 Validation Exercises addressing 18 OFA
– 7 achievements for future implementation, of which
• 2 SESAR Solutions:
–
–
Time Based Separation
Automated support for dynamic sectorisation
– Examples of Key Results
•
Enhanced Runaway Throughput
–
–
–
•
Free Routing
–
14
•
Up to 5 additional aircrafts per hour
No difference in controller workload
Reduction of holding times
7% reduction of average flown distance
… see Release 2 Results’ report
SESAR Releases 2013 … 2016
•
Release 3 (ongoing)
– 19 validation exercises covering 5 Priority Strategic
Business Needs
– Focus on
• Airport operations management and platform safety
• Airborne operations
• ATC operations
• Network Management
•
Release 4 (2014, in preparation)
– Top down definition
– 22 validation exercises in the pipeline
15
SESAR Solution Packs (Dec 2013)
• Provide the technical data pack for each SESAR
Solution
• resulting from Release delivery activities
• based on the outcome of the Validation exercises
• comprising available deliverables required for
further industrialization
• Indicate additional activities to be conducted during
deployment, e.g. regulatory, standardisation,
certification and oversight aspects
• Consider the IPRs, SJU and Members foreground
Background (1st Reporting to the ADB on IPRs
management sent on 27 June)
16
SESAR Solution Packs (Dec 2013)
• PRNAV in a Complex TMA
•
RNP1 and FUA to increase capacity and reduce noise in busy TMAs
• Validation of LPV
•
Integrating safely satellite based nav procedures in ATC ops environments
• En Route Air Traffic Organiser
•
Providing tools for the ATCO to better organize traffic
• Enhanced STCA for TMA
•
Providing tools for the ATCO to better prevent conflicts in traffic
• Enhanced ACAS
•
Introducing altitude capture laws to improve safety
• DMAN Baseline
•
Establishing pre-departure
predictability
• Low Cost Departure Panel
•
17
Reducing the
functionalities
ATM
sequencing
equipment
cost
in
while
order
to
increase
introducing
new
traffic
needed
SESAR contribution to Step 1 Targets
SES High Level Goals (Strategic Performance Objectives) - 100% Basis
SESAR Targets
SECURED through Validation &Releases
FUEL EFFICIENCY
100%
80%
60%
SAFETY
40%
COST EFFICIENCY
20%
0%
AIRPORT CAPACITY
AIRSPACE CAPACITY
• Part of SES High
Level Goals is
apportioned to
SESAR in Master
Plan 2012
• Performance targets
are set for each
project
• Performance
achievement is
measured through
validation
SESAR complementing activities
• Ad hoc studies completed
•
•
•
•
•
•
Optimi
Sat Optimi
Macroeconomic Study on the SESAR deployment
Military study
Communication Study
…
• Ad hoc studies ongoing/in pipeline
•
•
•
•
•
19
Key Performance Area Dependencies Study
ACAS X
Cyber Security
VDL Mode 2
…
SESAR Demonstration Activities:
bridging R&D and Deployment
• AIRE (Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce
Emissions)
• Between 2008 until 2011, 24 projects co-financed
• around 100 partners involving airlines, airports, ANSPs,
industry
• accelerate implementation of environmentally friendly
procedures
• validate the benefits of these improvements
20
SESAR Demonstration Activities:
bridging R&D and Deployment
• Large Scale Demonstration Activities and AIRE
(>2012)
• 18 contracts awarded all demonstrating
complementarity with the SESAR Programme
strong
• 20 airlines, general aviation, 18 ANSPs, 6 airports and
over 20 additional partners from the supply industry
• Number of commercial flights expected: + 5000
• Full results expected mid 2014
21
SESAR Demonstration Activities:
bridging R&D and Deployment
• RPAS Demonstration Activities
• select pre-operational
integration of RPAS
(feasibility by 2016)
demo projects to assess
in non-segregated airspace
• 9 proposals awarded with a co-financing of 4,2M€ + 1
proposal subject to review for 0,4M€
• Offers selected: 37 companies from 8 States
• Start of activities: Q4 2013
22
Moving from Development to Deployment
• The SJU was mandated by the European
Commission to prepare the Pilot Common Project
• 6 packages identified
Key functional
improvements
addressing critical
network performance
deficiencies
Building the
infrastructure of
the future
23
1.
Extended AMAN and PBN in high density TMAs
2.
Airport Integration and Throughput Functionalities
3.
Flexible Airspace Management and Free Route
4.
Network Collaborative Management
5.
iSWIM: ground-ground integration and aeronautical data
management & sharing
6.
Initial Trajectory Information Sharing: air-ground integration
towards i4D
SESAR PCP: PERFORMANCE BENEFITS
& GLOBAL CBA
Costs
ANSP
Productivity
gains
-2,5 bn €
(-3,8 bn €
undiscounted)
(+3,4%)
Airspace
capacity
(+12,6%
TMA, +8,7%
En-Route)
Fuel burn
(85,8
Kg/flight
-2,1%)
Main influence
factors for PCP
benefits
Airport
Capacity
(+3,9%)
Delay length
(-12,2%)
Delayed
flights (9,8%)
24
Benefits
4,9 bn €
(12,1 bn €
undiscounted)
Net Benefits
2,4 bn € NPV
The European ATM Master Plan:
departure point … closing the loop
• The SJU and its Members are in charge of the
execution and maintenance of the Master Plan
• European ATM Master Plan 2012 was released in
October 2012
• Complementary information
requested by the EC):
• Business View
• Military cost
• Risk management
• ANC12 outcome
end
of
• Next significant update: mid 2015
25
July
2013
(as
The SESAR Programme 2020
26
The SESAR Programme 2020
27
The SESAR Programme 2020:
Applied Research, Pre-Industrial Development and
Validation
Trajectory Performance & Journey Management
Enhanced Network Management DCB
Conflict Management & Automation
Integrated Airport Management
28
Traffic Synchronisation
Large Scale Demonstrations
The SESAR Programme 2020:
Transversal Work across Strategic Priority
Business Needs for SES
29
The Rotorcraft dimension in the
SESAR Conops 2012
• Extracts of CONOPS 2012*
• updated to provide further clarity on military, general
aviation and rotorcraft aspects which were recognised as
being deficient at the close out of the Definition Phase
• … Rotorcraft and … all have intentions and their specific
trajectories have different characteristics. Due to the
multiplicity of these trajectories and limited resources
like airspace and airport capacity it is not possible to
achieve the original intention of the airspace users for all
of these flights. A compromise has to be found to
optimise the execution of all flights taking into account
priorities and remaining as close as possible to original
intentions.
30
*developed with the contribution of EHA
The Rotorcraft dimension in the SESAR Conops
2012
• SWIM
• some types of operation, e.g. some GA and Rotorcraft
operations are conducted at low level in remote areas
where the ability to interface with SWIM may be limited
• Improved information management will also enhance
safety by providing timely information and will be
particularly beneficial to … Rotorcraft
• Trajectory management
• Trajectories may also be defined by handing agents or
pilots on behalf … rotorcraft flights, ...
• The essential point for ATM is that, instead of having
several versions of the trajectory in the system, there is
a unique accurate trajectory for each flight that is used
throughout the ATM network.
31
The Rotorcraft dimension in the SESAR Conops
2012
• Airports
• In SESAR, airports (and heliports) are fully integrated
into the ATM network as nodes in the system
• Rotorcraft activities will be integrated into airport
operations
through
Simultaneous
Non-Interfering
procedures and off-runway movements
• Capacity can be enhanced by facilitating Simultaneous
Non Interfering (SNI) operations by Rotorcraft that have
specific VFR and IFR approach and departure procedures
and do not require runway use
32
• … On the day of operation the additional information is
available via the Network Operations Plan. Runways and
Final Approach and Take Off areas for rotorcraft (FATOs)
in use are declared and expected arrival and departure
routings may be included in the SBMT
The Rotorcraft dimension in the SESAR Conops
2012
• Final Approach and Take-Off (FATO) Operations
for Rotorcraft
33
• A FATO is a defined area over which the final phase of
the rotorcraft approach manoeuvre to hover or landing is
• completed and from which the take-off manoeuvre is
commenced. FATOs may exist within airport boundaries
and anywhere else where rotorcraft operations take
place (e.g. heliports, hospitals, oil-rigs)
• The establishment of a FATO at an airport with a
compatible runway layout will permit Simultaneous Non
Interfering (SNI) rotorcraft procedures and so avoid
interference with runway arrivals and departures, and
provide flexibility in procedure design to meet IFR traffic
separation
requirements.
A
“Point-in-Space”
is
introduced in SNI arrival procedures to allow rotorcraft
IFR traffic to operate to / from VFR FATOs located at
airports.
The NASCIO Project
Navigation SESAR Concepts Involving
Operators
Project Ongoing
34
Conclusions: What do people associate
the SJU with?
Demonstration
Deployment
preparation
Competitive leadership
Innovation
Europe
Full cycle
Performance
Results
Long-term vision
Partnership
Tomorrow’s ATM
35
Research
Validation
Interoperability
Conclusions
Partnership
Long-term
commitment
and critical
mass of funds
Industrial
Leadership
Powerful
instrument for
addressing
critical issues
Seamless and
coherent
funding from
idea to market
Societal
Challenges
Capitalise on
experience
and guide
development
36
Excellent
Science
THE SESAR
PROGRAMME
THE SJU
2020