PR Power – using research and data to determine influence
Transcription
PR Power – using research and data to determine influence
Using research and data to determine influence Toby Saul – Kantar Media News Intelligence MIPAA Conference, August 2014 Magazines/websites identified as influential by marketing science departments are often based on demographics and readership data. = 2 3 What do Status Seekers look like? 4 In our experience, Marketing and PR teams don’t always operate in the most connected way. Unfeasible media targets for PR Minimal internal contact 5 What is your internal process for identifying influence ahead of a launch or big event? Media Planning Media planning agencies have been known to set AVE targets for PR departments to hit in specific titles. Pre-event Postevent PR teams can be tasked with hitting certain titles/sites, even if there is no logical relationship with the brand’s values or products. 6 The number of tools for analysing social media is growing. Make use of them. Twitter, for example, can be measured by impressions, retweets, hashtags, Kred or Klout scores. 7 How have our clients used data to help form their PR Strategy? Case Study One Objective: What is the impact of pre-show releases? How do we measure their effectiveness? 8 How have our clients used data to help form their PR Strategy? Selected brands’ coverage by day English online news | Paris motor show First Press Day 200 180 Sept. 5th: “Manufacturer Four has revealed details of the model X hatchback in Amsterdam ahead of its debut at the Paris Motor Show later this month” (autocar.co.uk). Brand ranking: 1st= 7.4% S e p t . 1 2th: “ M a n u f a c t u r e r Three’s concept has been revealed two weeks ahead of its official debut at the 2012 Paris Motor Show” (trendhunter.com). Brand ranking: 1st= 7.4% Model X and X Concept. Brand ranking: 1st= 7.4% S e p t 2 8th: “ 2 0 1 3 Manufacturer Five X model leaves us feeling blue in Paris” (torquezilla.com). Brand ranking: 23rd, 1.7% 160 140 100 80 60 40 Manufacturer One Manufacturer Two Manufacturer Three Brand rankings and SoV % for period Aug. 20th – Oct. 11th among all brands Manufacturer Four Manufacturer Five 11-Oct-12 10-Oct-12 09-Oct-12 08-Oct-12 07-Oct-12 06-Oct-12 05-Oct-12 04-Oct-12 03-Oct-12 02-Oct-12 01-Oct-12 30-Sep-12 29-Sep-12 28-Sep-12 27-Sep-12 26-Sep-12 25-Sep-12 24-Sep-12 23-Sep-12 22-Sep-12 21-Sep-12 20-Sep-12 19-Sep-12 18-Sep-12 17-Sep-12 16-Sep-12 15-Sep-12 14-Sep-12 13-Sep-12 11-Sep-12 12-Sep-12 10-Sep-12 09-Sep-12 08-Sep-12 07-Sep-12 06-Sep-12 05-Sep-12 04-Sep-12 03-Sep-12 02-Sep-12 01-Sep-12 31-Aug-12 30-Aug-12 29-Aug-12 28-Aug-12 27-Aug-12 26-Aug-12 25-Aug-12 24-Aug-12 23-Aug-12 22-Aug-12 0 21-Aug-12 20 20-Aug-12 Volume 120 How have our clients used data to help form their PR Strategy? Selected brands’ coverage by day English online news | Geneva motor show First Press Day 450 400 Feb. 15th: “2013 model X leaked? C o u l d d e b u t a t Geneva” (worldcarfans.com). Feb. 23rd: “More pictures of the 2013 model X say hello to the Internet” (news.car2be.com). Brand ranking: 3rd, 8.1% Feb. 28th: “Following images leaked to the press last week, Manufacturer Five has officially announced it will reveal the all-new X model at a press conference at the 2012 Geneva Motor S h o w o n 6 t h March” (newcarnet.co.uk). Brand ranking: 11th 3.8% 350 “Manufacturer One has unveiled four new X ‘design studies’ at the Geneva Motor Show” (honestjohn.co.uk). Brand ranking: 1st 10.0% 250 Feb. 29th: “Manufacturer One drops top on production of model X a h e a d o f G e n e v a debut” (gmperformancetuning.co m). Brand ranking: 1st 10.0% 200 150 100 Manufacturer One Manufacturer Two Manufacturer Three Brand rankings and SoV % for period Feb. 4th – Mar. 22nd among all brands Manufacturer Four Manufacturer Five 22-Mar-12 21-Mar-12 20-Mar-12 19-Mar-12 18-Mar-12 17-Mar-12 16-Mar-12 15-Mar-12 14-Mar-12 13-Mar-12 11-Mar-12 12-Mar-12 10-Mar-12 09-Mar-12 08-Mar-12 07-Mar-12 06-Mar-12 05-Mar-12 04-Mar-12 03-Mar-12 02-Mar-12 01-Mar-12 29-Feb-12 28-Feb-12 27-Feb-12 26-Feb-12 25-Feb-12 24-Feb-12 23-Feb-12 22-Feb-12 21-Feb-12 20-Feb-12 19-Feb-12 18-Feb-12 17-Feb-12 16-Feb-12 15-Feb-12 14-Feb-12 13-Feb-12 11-Feb-12 12-Feb-12 10-Feb-12 09-Feb-12 08-Feb-12 07-Feb-12 06-Feb-12 0 05-Feb-12 50 04-Feb-12 Volume 300 “2013 Manufacturer Two’s model debuts at 2012 Geneva Motor Show” (Washingtonpost.com). Brand ranking: 2nd 8.6% How have our clients used data to help form their PR Strategy? Case Study Two Objective: When did we achieve the greatest exposure in our key media titles for the Geneva Motor Show? 0 Social content model X 3/9/2014 Brand Reading list Model X 3/30/2014 3/29/2014 3/28/2014 3/27/2014 3/26/2014 3/25/2014 3/24/2014 3/23/2014 3/22/2014 3/21/2014 3/20/2014 3/19/2014 3/18/2014 3/17/2014 3/16/2014 3/15/2014 3/14/2014 3/13/2014 3/12/2014 3/11/2014 3/10/2014 2,000 35 1,500 25 1,000 15 500 Brand Reading list verba<m count (Green) 2,500 3/8/2014 10th Feb: Prior to Geneva, photos released for model X achieved higher volumes of coverage in Brand X’s reading list than on the day the car was revealed at Geneva. 3/7/2014 3/6/2014 3/5/2014 3/4/2014 3/3/2014 3/2/2014 3/1/2014 2/28/2014 2/27/2014 2/26/2014 2/25/2014 2/24/2014 2/23/2014 2/22/2014 2/21/2014 2/20/2014 2/19/2014 2/18/2014 2/17/2014 2/16/2014 2/15/2014 2/14/2014 2/13/2014 2/12/2014 2/11/2014 2/10/2014 Social verba<um count (Blue) How have our clients used data to help form their PR Strategy? Trend of model X verbatim: Reading list vs Social verbatim | Geneva H o w e v e r, s o c i a l m e d i a content boomed during the Show, with a repeated references to the car ’s “aggressive design”. 50 45 40 30 20 10 5 0 How have our clients used data to help form their PR Strategy? Case Study Three Objective: What was the return from our motor show and events spend? How have our clients used data to help form their PR Strategy? Detroit Motor Show 2013 2014 Brand SoV % 2.5 2.3 Euros per 0.1% SoV gained 86,800 136,087 Geneva Motor Show 2012 2013 5.5 5.2 64,727 60,000 Frankfurt Motor Show 2011 2013 4.0 3.5 74,000 76,571 Paris Motor Show 2010 2012 4.8 3.1 54,792 105,484 CES Motor Show 2013 2014 2.5 2.3 3,200 3,478 Mobile World Congress 2013 2014 24.0 19.3 125 181 Content is key What would you like to talk about? Who is already talking about that? How can you become part of that conversation? The biggest obstacle for established PR agencies & comms teams..? Proving who owns social media? “The Barcelona Principles” Principle 1: Importance of Goal Setting and Measurement Goal-setting and measurement are fundamental aspects of any public relations program Principle 2: Measuring the Effect on Outcomes is Preferred to Measuring Outputs Outcomes include shifts in awareness, comprehension, attitude and behavior related to purchase, donations, brand equity, corporate reputation, employee engagement, public policy, investment decisions, and other shifts in stakeholders regarding a company, NGO, government or entity, as well as the stakeholder’s own beliefs and behaviors Principle 3: The Effect on Business Results Can and Should Be Measured Where Possible The PR industry needs to understand the value and implications of market mix models for accurate evaluation of consumer marketing PR, in contrast to other measurement approaches “The Barcelona Principles” Principle 4: Media Measurement Requires Quantity and Quality Quality of the media coverage including: • Tone • Credibility and Relevance of the Medium to the Stakeholder or Audience • Message Delivery • Inclusion of a 3rd party or company spokesperson • Prominence as Relevant to the Medium Principle 5: AVEs are Not the Value of Public Relations Lets deal with that separately…... Principle 6: Social Media Can and Should Be Measured Organizations need clearly defined goals and outcomes for social media Media content analysis should be supplemented by web and search analytics, sales and CRM data, survey data and other methods Evaluating quality and quantity is critical, just as it is with conventional media. Principle 7: Transparency and Replicability are Paramount to Sound Measurement PR measurement should be done in a manner that is transparent and replicable for all steps in the process. CHANGE DRIVEN BY SOCIAL NETWORKS 70 60 Between 2010 And 2011: 50 • Internet behaviour is shifting to social content • Trends within social – facebook, video, mobile 40 30 20 10 0 2010 2011 % adults in GB Visited any social networking site in the last 4 weeks Visited any social networking site in the last 4 weeks 58 65 Internet Users are engaging more with Social Media 2010 2011 % adults in France 63 66 2010 2011 % adults in Germany 65 66 2010 2011 % adults in Spain 45 48 km Base: All adults aged 15+ Source: TGI Europa 2009, 2010 & 2011 SOCIAL MEDIA – WHAT PEOPLE DO NOW Most Cited Reasons For Using Social Media 1. To communicate with friends 64% 2. To take part in forums & chat rooms 20% 3. To express opinions on public websites 17% 4. To read opinions on public websites 56% Communicate with Friends 64% Reading opinions 56% 5. To publish a blog 6. To read blogs 8% 26% Reading blogs 26% Watch video 7. To upload video 13% 8. To watch video 64% Base: All adults aged 15+ who use the Internet every day or most days 64% Source: TGI Europa 2011 BUT BRANDS CAN CREATE OPPORTUNITIES TO INFLUENCE Source: TNS Digital Life 2012 INFLUENCE IS BASED ON GOOD CONTENT % Of Brand Content Shared On Facebook % Facebook shares by content type Video Photo % Shared Link Status update 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Source: Facebook / Zuum 2012 What is our Social Media “wish list” What do you hope to achieve? • Promote your company or a product? • Engage customers? • Build your brand? • Provide a customer service channel? • Build PR? • Launch special offers or loyalty programmes? • Lead thought leadership? • Understand competitor weak points? • Increasing your share of voice? • Changing brand association? • Improve sentiment? (be careful!!!) • Brand defence? • Learn what sites to advertise on? Taking the first step…. But who are the people we should listen to? 25 When the data comes back it will look something like this. 26 What weight should be put on a particular person’s social media output? Mavens Rank @mikakosinska 100.0 @catherinemep 57.8 @eu_health 20.6 @gleniswillmoN 19.2 @baseickhout 14.7 @eu_consumer 12.2 @epha_eu 11.4 @juliegirling 10.8 @beuctweet 6.3 @eurocommerce 6.0 @consumers_int 5.5 @eufoodchat 5.4 @mimicaeu 5.1 @nestleeu 4.6 @nathanrgray 4.6 @gerbrandy 4.5 @epode_network 3.1 @giovannilavia 2.9 @who_europe 2.8 @eurohealthnet1 2.7 Connectors Rank @mikakosinska 100.0 @catherinemep 58.5 @eu_health 24.2 @gleniswillmoN 20.2 @baseickhout 14.4 @eu_consumer 12.6 @epha_eu 12.1 @juliegirling 11.1 @beuctweet 7.5 @eufoodchat 6.3 @eurocommerce 5.9 @consumers_int 5.7 @eu_commission 5.4 @nestleeu 5.0 @nathanrgray 4.9 @mimicaeu 4.6 @gerbrandy 4.3 @epode_network 3.1 @giovannilavia 3.1 @who_europe 2.7 27 MIPAA SOCIAL MEDIA POWER INDEX • • • • The MIPAA Social Media Power Index profiles the top 100 most influential online motor industry communicators. It provides a comparative ranking based on a range of quantitative and qualitative metrics and insight. Who’s in, who’s not? Whose power is rising, whose is falling? Who are the ones to watch? The MIPAA Social Media Power Index supports targeting of PR campaigns and easy assessment of communication influence 28