Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans ICS Experience
Transcription
Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans ICS Experience
Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans ICS Experience Pre-Katrina Preparedness Experience with weathering small storms left them underprepared for a major storm in spite of dire warnings from researchers •While many understood the flooding potential, they had not experienced first had devastation of what a flood can do. •The mindset was that ‘we will be back home in 24-48 hours’. • There were no plans for Evacuation, Sheltering, Mass Care for those who did not have the means to leave on their own or found injured •Incident Plans existed only as documents and not used to respond under a structured framework like ICS or similar command structure •No pre-vision on how to operationalize such plans Planning for a Storm and not Flood caused all Rescue Equipment 10ft under water, rendering them useless. What We Saw When We Arrived Pre-Katrina Preparedness (2) •ICS was only being used for fire incidents by the Fire Department •The EOC staff was not trained in ICS •They operated under a different, but effective management structure. •Due to the devastation, the EOC staff were all victims themselves •The department heads were skeptical at best to try ICS Much of the Infrastructure was Compromised • Significant infrastructure failures… • Roadways were blocked or destroyed -Supply lines were compromised • A lack of pre-positioned food, water and fuel created a logistics crisis Volunteers Showed Up in Droves • Volunteers from all over came with boats to try to help... No plan or process for tracking them… Logistical nightmare Assistance Teams Arrived to Find a State of Chaos • A “temporary” EOC was constructed at the Hyatt Hotel What We Did About It. EOC/Control Room, Incident Response Teams and ICS • Support Systems had to be implemented “onthe-fly” • Establishing Command and Control was a nightmare! Deployed Emergency Systems (Unisys) • Immediately deployed a satellitebased communications system to support voice / data communications • Connected City Hall, the EOC, State Federal Govt., and NGOs. Deployed Emergency Systems • Deployed 100 computer stations in the Hyatt Hotel to handle 24-hour vital work by officials and agencies Ed Minyard, Juan Godoy Assisting Organizations brought ICS Principles and Tools Responding Incident Management Teams •Introduced and trained ICS to the EOC staff and government officials at city level • Set up a 20 position Public Information Center (311) – also in the Hyatt Additional Problems Identified •There was no on-site coordination between the line departments… IE: the water department was on one corner, electric company on another but not talking to each other •State/Local plans were not consistent with national terminology •Provided trained & experienced “Deputies” to support the local ICS “Section Chiefs” I.T. solution (Previstar CPS) was introduced to operationalize ICS •ICS Forms and Daily Briefs •Decision support, Resource Deployment •Community Support (311 center) •Damage Assessment •Cost Recovery •Military Personnel, and National Guards had their own command structure and were not ready to deviate. Conclusion: Attempting to change management structures during an event is not ideal– people under stress are reluctant to deviate from the familiar ICS Applied to the EOC Organization Assignment ICS 207 (ICS implementation was actually a hybrid) •First an Organization Assignment List (ICS 203/207) /Command Structure was created. Placards were placed on tables to make sure EOC staff immediately knew their ICS Groups. External IMT members that were not city employees served as “Deputies” and not Chiefs because govt. employees will only recognize their elected or selected leaders. •City departments were divided into Branches & Groups under Operations Section based on their functions. It was difficult in the beginning due to unfamiliarity and lack of buy-in. But within a week each department started to get the benefits from an unified command structure, organized workflow and better decision support. Operations Section (ICS 207)…Continued ICS Applied to the EOC …Continued •A “daily brief” was conducted by various departments (ICS Groups) reflecting their status for the last operational period lead by the Planning, Operations, Logistics, and Finance Section Chiefs. •Following the brief, a planning meeting was conducted by the City’s Chief Operating Officer representing the Mayor resulting in the preparation of Incident Action Plan (IAP) •This internal briefing was also sanitized by the Pubic Information Officer (assigned to mayor’s chief of staff) and given to the press/media. Situation Reports – Hurricane Katrina/Rita SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES Future 24-48 Hours Expand RTA bus routes. Continue to install stop signs or traffic signals for all major intersections including the “Look and Leave” area Continue environmental testing (Air, water, Hazmat) Continue with debris and trash removal in all areas of the city. Continue Levee repairs and inspections Restoration of electric, gas, and telephone service. Continue to provide appropriate Health and Human Services. Assessment Criteria SIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES Future 24-48 Hours Continue to provide public information for re-entry and conduct a 311 information line. • Green: 75 - 100% functional. (Satisfactory) • Amber: 25 – 74% functional. (Marginal) • Red: 0 – 24% functional. (Unsatisfactory) Ensure public security for reentry and “Look and Leave”. Operations of DRCs. Continued support (i.e. feeding centers) of re-entry areas. Coordinate placement of temporary housing with infrastructure (i.e. water, electric) capability. Based on city and outside resources Focus on inspections and permitting in identified zip codes. Electricity(Power) Status – Nov.6, 2005 G G G G A G G A G A R G R U R R G G A G G A G G A G A R G R U A R Cty Pk 70119 G G G A G G A G G A G A R G R U R R Gentilly 70122 A G A G G G A G G A G G R G R U R R Downman 126-L A G R G G G A G G R G A R G R U R R Downman 126-U A G A G G G A G G R G A R G R U R R NO East 70127 A G A G G G A G G R G A R G R U R R NO East 70128 A G A G G G A G G R G G R G R U R R NO East 70129 A G G A G G A G G R G R R G R U G R 9th Ward 117-U G G A A G G A G G A G R R G R U R R 9th Ward 117-L R R R R R G R R G R G R R G R U R R B S eb r ld g In Co sp m m Le erc e ve e C om m un A i ca ca de tio m ns ic s H G G ou sin g Fo od M ed ic al Tr an sp La ort at w io En n fo Fir rc e em en 91 t 1 G Xavier 70125 is EM Lk View 70124 Se w er W at er E le ct ric G ity as D Assessment Rollup For ICS to work during a major emergency: Learning a Lesson •ICS must be accepted and used by all agencies, including: Electric/Gas, PWD, Health, police, fire, national guard, military personnel, NGO s etc. • Remember that a Hurricane/Cyclone is one of the very few disasters that you can at least see coming… • Are we prepared for what could happen tomorrow…or today? Do we have a plan that can be activated? Do we know who is trained in doing what (Skills/Credentialing) ? Do we know where are our resources? Are we familiar with and trained on the Response Guidelines ? Have we done exercises with a solution that we can use during a response? •Elected officials must accept and follow the system •Standardization is necessary to avoid confusion when outside support arrives. Common terminology is critical especially when working with • disparate organizations • • The right I.T. solution must be used to support the administration to • • properly manage, process and disseminate information along with making • informative decisions. Conclusion Incident Response Guidelines 1.All parties must know about it 2.Management must accept it & mandate it, 3.Everyone must train on it and practice it, 4.IT solutions must be used to support any real or simulated incident. Bottom Line: ICS must become part of the organizational culture Thank You Himadri Banerjee (C.T.O) Previstar Inc. ICS Roles served: Logistics Documentation Unit Incident Response Team Member (Unisys/Previstar)