Use of ALA for data-driven analysis of biological survey gaps
Transcription
Use of ALA for data-driven analysis of biological survey gaps
Use of ALA for data-driven analysis of biological survey gaps supports species discovery through Bush Blitz Kristen Williams, Brian Hawkins, Jacqui Meyers, Art Langston, Justin Perry, Daniel P Faith, Glenn Manion, Tom Harwood, Simon Ferrier, Jo Harding 12 May 2016, Ecology and Environment Session 2 Atlas of Living Australia Symposium 11-12th May 2016, Kensington Science Centre, WA CSIRO LAND & WATER Species Discovery Program www.bushblitz.org.au Bush Blitz II is a four-year $12M partnership between the Australian Government, BHP Billiton Sustainable Communities and Earthwatch Australia Collaborating with Australia’s museums and herbaria, Conservation Land Managers, Australian Science Teachers Association, State Conservation Agencies, and CSIRO Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 2 Providing baseline scientific data informing the protection and management of biodiversity Since 2010 Bush Blitz has discovered about 900 new and undescribed species and added thousands of species to what is already known CSIRO is supporting the program through data-driven analyses of biological survey gaps to enhance local targeting and national coverage of field surveys Salticidae cytaea plumbeiventris - Fish River Station © R Whyte Candalides delospila, Wongalara Station©MFBraby Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 3 As at 2014 ~41 putative new species 61 putative new species Work-inprogress 140 putative new species 39 putative new species Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 4 Framework for strategic targeting of knowledge gaps Remote-derived environmental variables Other sources of information Modelling and prediction of biological diversity Strategic biodiversity and conservation assessments/planning Expert knowledge Available biological survey data Strategic location of additional survey sites Update data driven analysis of biological survey gaps Figure adapted from: Ferrier 2002, Systematic Biology, 51 Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 5 The ‘Environmental Diversity’ framework is used to evaluate biological survey gaps Principles and application of ‘Environmental Diversity’ (ED) framework for evaluating biological survey gaps 1. The best new survey site is the one that fills the largest gap in the environmental space as defined by the biggest improvement in the ED score. 2. ED score is a theoretical estimate of the number of species still to be represented (complementing those already represented in a biological database), given a set of previously survey localities. 3. ED seeks to minimise the sum of distances from each point of “demand” in an underlying multi-dimensional environmental space to its nearest already-surveyed site. 4. Here, we use environmental space scaled by a model of species composition patterns using GDM, to derive the “distances”. Adapted from, Williams, Ferrier, … Faith, et al (2010) Harnessing Continent-Wide Biodiversity Datasets for Prioritising National Conservation Investment, https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/pub?list=BRO&pid=csiro:EP102983 Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 6 Assume a map in environmental space at the left Is represented by a set of grid cells at the right Patterns of biological diversity ‘mapped’ in multiple dimensions of environmental space, schematically shown here in two dimensions Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 7 Centre points of the set of grid cells evenly span environmental space where biodiversity could potentially be sampled (i.e., demand points) Assume individual species have bell-shaped distributions, uniformly spaced among these demand points Patterns of biological diversity ‘mapped’ in multiple dimensions of environmental space, schematically shown here in two dimensions Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 8 Centre points of a set of grid cells represent the putative centres of species’ bell-shaped distributions in GDM-scaled environmental space Find the best 5 localities (orange dots) to represent the entire environmental space. Each has minimised its sum of distances to the nearest set of black “demand” points. The ED method measures how well the space is spanned as an inference of how many species have been sampled....and it can indicate where to add a sample (fill a gap) in order to sample the most new species Faith DP, Walker PA (1996) Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 5(4), 399-415. Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 9 Framework for strategic targeting of knowledge gaps Remote-derived environmental variables Other sources of information Modelling and prediction of biological diversity Strategic biodiversity and conservation assessments/planning Expert knowledge Available biological survey data Strategic location of additional survey sites CSIRO modelling informs: Update data driven analysis of biological survey gaps Figure adapted from: Ferrier 2002, Systematic Biology, 51 Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 10 (1) selection of new areas (2) possible survey locations Models of four biological groups as surrogate indicators of environmental heterogeneity Amphibians Gastropods images: http://www.bushblitz.org.au/mediacentre.php Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 11 Reptiles Vascular plants Occurrence records of four biological groups used as indicators of survey completeness Amphibians Gastropods Reptiles Vascular plants >2 species >5 species >5 species >10 species Previously surveyed locations were sourced from data aggregators such as ANHAT and Atlas of Living Australia, filtered by species richness to represent completeness Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 12 Identify survey gaps in environmental space National context for each taxonomic group: Extract survey data Model environmental heterogeneity Identify gaps in environmental space Amphibians Gastropods Reptiles Vascular plants >2 species >5 species >5 species >10 species Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 13 Identify national & local sites to survey Local Area Analysis - Kiwirrkurra Suggest locations Pre-survey Local areas surveyed 2014 - 2015 Post-survey Amphibians Gastropods Iterations 1 2 3 4 Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 15 Reptiles Plants Iterative model output highlighting under sampled areas with contrasting environmental conditions for 4 taxonomic groups Where are the largest survey gaps now? Now have more Bush Blitz surveys to combine data from the Atlas of Living Australia Analysis updated July 2015 Amphibians Gastropods Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 16 Reptiles Vascular plants Next Steps • Continuing to support selection of survey sites for local areas • Conducting a final analysis of National gaps taking into account actual locations of surveys before and after Bush Blitz I and II • This data-driven work wraps up mid 2017 Bush Blitz Survey Gap Analysis | Kristen Williams et al. | Page 17 WHILE INVERTEBRATE DATA ARE A CORE GROUP FOR BUSH BLITZ DISCOVERY THERE IS NOT YET ENOUGH DATA MOBILISED DIGITALLY TO USE IN THESE META-ANALYSES Thank you Fish River Survey © R Whyte CSIRO Land & Water Kristen Williams Discocharopa 'mimic' New species Tasmania © K Bonham Group Leader t +61 2 6246 4213 e [email protected] w http://people.csiro.au/Kristen-Williams.aspx Wolf Spider © D Paul, Museum Victoria LAND & WATER