Johns Hopkins University Tristan A. Sharp, Lars Pastewka, Mark O
Transcription
Johns Hopkins University Tristan A. Sharp, Lars Pastewka, Mark O
Johns Hopkins University Scale effects in static friction between rough solids Tristan A. Sharp, Lars Pastewka, Mark O. Robbins Dislocations decrease static friction Method: Molecular Dynamics and Greens Function - MD sandia.gov Introduction Understanding small-scale deformation and energy dissipation between contacting solids is important in applications that range from nanoscale mechanical devices to jet engines. Even finelysmoothed parts exhibit roughness, and contact between solids generally occurs only at asperities, often approximated as spheres. Here, we use molecular dynamics simulation to investigate sliding of a single asperity and to identify scale effects of the static friction coefficient, μ. (eV / Å) Force on surface atoms 𝐹𝑓𝑢𝑙𝑙 Rigid spherical asperity radius R ~O(Nsurface) runtime Processor-seconds per MD step Error 𝐹𝑓𝑢𝑙𝑙 − 𝐹𝑔𝑓𝑚𝑑 If a>bcore, the sphere need not overcome the corrugation stress all at once. Nucleation of a dislocation results in partial slip. Dislocation annihilation at the center moves the contact one Burger’s vector, b. Friction trace: Static friction 1000 GFMD slope ≈ 2 System size, linear dimension L σx Surface atoms’ displacement, u (Å) (4.07 Å unit cell) Also, implemented on GPU. Also, fewer atoms means shorter convergence time -1.5 0 Shear force, fx (L-J units) 1.5 0 dislocation nucleated 0 Sliding distance 6σ Scale effects in friction Contact Stresses p Isotropic elastic flat Young’s modulus, E Poisson ratio, ν = 0.5 bcore: Dislocation core size Elastic-interfacial energy balance: bcore = bE/3τavg Full slope ≈ 3 slope = 2 Slide, x-dir σx O(u2) convergence slope = 1 Atomic diameter, b = 21/6 σ Shear stress, σx before nucleation after nucleation To study large systems, we helped develop a parallel, multi-scale simulation package which accelerates molecular dynamics simulation. The acceleration is achieved by replacing part of a solid with its Greens function response. The method requires calculating the energy about a reference state and Taylor expanding to second order in the atomic displacements, u. Once the Greens function is calculated, calculations can be performed quickly, scaling with the number of atoms on the surface of the solid, Nsurface. μ Static friction coefficient s. contact radius Tomlinson regime μ constant Contact radius, a We simulate the quasistatic sliding of an asperity composed of a bent lattice, choosing the lateral spacing of the surface atoms to be commensurate with the lattice of the substrate. Repulsive Lennard-Jones (LJ) interactions produce a square (x-y) lattice of atomic corrugations. The substrate is controlled by the Green’s function of isotropic linear elasticity4. model2, Simple dislocation adapted Hertzian dislocation model Full MD Peierls stress arrests dislocations (a2/Rb)x(16m/9π) NSF IGERT 0801471; AFOSR FA9550-0910232; OCI-0963185 References: 1 JA Hurtado and Kim. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 1999 1471-2946 2 Yanfei Gao J. Mech. Phys. Solids 58 (2010) 2023-2032 4 L. Pastewka, T. Sharp, M. O. Robbins. PRB 86 075459 (2012) 5 S. Plimpton. J Comp Phys, 117, 1-19 (1995) Shear stresses at the edge cannot exceed the normal pressure, p, times the corrugation max slope, m. This explains the correspondence with the Mindlin continuum model (which uses Hertz pressure and a local friction coefficient, μ0). In the simulations, atomic corrugation slope mimics the role of μ0. Applying sufficient stress causes the sphere to coherently hop one atomic diameter.. Small contact regime: static friction requires overcoming corrugation stress (m x pressure) over the full contact area. Large contact regime: friction drops as (a2/R)-1/2 due to contact edge stress maximum nucleating dislocations. printed by Very large contact regime: Peierls stress dominates www.postersession.com