PROJECT NAME: 40 FATHOM GROTTO PROJECT NUMBER

Transcription

PROJECT NAME: 40 FATHOM GROTTO
PROJECT NUMBER: 2007050050
APPLICATION: MAJOR SITE PLAN #15136
Met with staff 1/8/15, DRC on 1/12/15
1.
DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW
REVIEW ITEM: 6.13.10.B - Copy of NPDES Permit or NOI
STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER ACKNOWLEDGED INFO COMMENT
REMARKS: Demonstrate compliance with FDEP’s NPDES by providing a copy of the permit or
NOI prior to construction, if applicable.
2.
DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW
REVIEW ITEM: Additional Stormwater comments
REMARKS: The DRA maintenance sign is no longer a requirement of the LDC.
3.
DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW
REVIEW ITEM: 6.11.4.E - Sight triangle
REMARKS: 12/1/2014: Per Miles Anderson 12-1-2014, he made a site visit and ensured that
sight distance was sufficient.
4.
DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.4.K - List of approved waivers, their conditions, and the date of approval
REMARKS: Add waivers associated with this major site plan if requested in the future.
5.
DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
REVIEW ITEM: Additional Development Review Comments
REMARKS: After approval, plans will be electronically stamped by the county. The applicant will
receive an email indicating that approved plans are available for download and are located in the
ePlans project Approved folder. For Development Review submittals, with the exception of Final
Plats and Minor Site Plans, applicants are required to print, obtain required signatures, and sign
and seal two 24”x 36” sets of the electronically stamped approved plan and deliver them to the
Office of County Engineer, Development Review Section, located at 412 SE 25th Avenue Ocala,
FL 34471. Upon receipt, a development order will be issued. Until such time as that development
order is issued, the project does not have final approval and construction, if applicable, shall not
commence. For plans requiring As-Builts, As-Builts and associated documentation shall be
submitted on paper in accordance with current county requirements.
6.
DEPARTMENT: UTIL - MARION COUNTY UTILITIES
REVIEW ITEM: Project is located within other private or municipal utility service area.
REMARKS: No central water or sewer available at this time
7.
DEPARTMENT: DOH - ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
REVIEW ITEM: Additional Health comments
REMARKS: Will need further review once floor plans of building are received.
8.
DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.9/6.12.2.B - Comp Plan Future Thoroughfares R/W Provided (TE Map)?
REMARKS: NW 115th Avenue is not a Comp Plan designated Arterial/Collector, but is a Section
Line roadway.
9.
DEPARTMENT: 911 - 911 MANAGEMENT
REVIEW ITEM: Additional 911 comments
REMARKS: Addresses will be verified at the permitting stage.
10. DEPARTMENT: ZONE - ZONING DEPARTMENT
REVIEW ITEM: 4.4.4 -Sign (provisions for advertising signage), if it is a multi occupancy
complex like shopping centers they must submit a master sign plan.
REMARKS: Please note that no signs are proposed in this plan
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.27 - Show location of outside storage areas
REMARKS: No outside storage indicated
12. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.4.L(9)(b) - Data Block (Impervious Area)
STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER WILL COMPLY
REMARKS: Please indicate the total (existing and proposed) impervious area on the cover
sheet.
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.13/14/15 - General Exhibits
REMARKS: Provide a soils and NWI map.
REVIEW ITEM: 6.13.2 C - Geotechnical Investigation Report
REMARKS: Please provide a geotechnical report and associated data to demonstrate a
complete stormwater design which includes recovery and soil parameters.
2
REVIEW ITEM: 6.13.4 - Stormwater Quantity Criteria
STATUS OF REVIEW: STAFF RECOMMENDS CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF WAIVER OF
A COMPLETE STORMWATER ANALYSIS FOR THE ENTIRE SITE SUBJECT TO REDUCING
THE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS AREA, PROVIDING STORMWATER CONTROLS TO
ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND ADDRESSING THE STAFF
COMMENTS PROVIDED.
REMARKS: While the applicant is demonstrating an overall benefit to watershed (WS-1) by
reducing the CN value (millings removed) and potentially providing some level of compensation
to the flood plain, it does not fully meet the stormwater criteria under section 6.13 of the LDC and
a full review cannot be performed at this time. Watersheds WS-2 and WS-3 are not proposed to
be modified but also do not meet LDC criteria for stormwater. Therefore, additional comments
may be warranted based on DRC direction.
REVIEW ITEM: 6.13.9 - Grading Criteria
REMARKS: Provide additional grades at the parking areas. Will there actually be detention onsite with the storage area?
REVIEW ITEM: 6.13.2.A(11)(b) - Erosion Control
REMARKS: Please indicate the location of the silt fence on the plan as needed.
REVIEW ITEM: 6.13.2.A(12)/6.12.5 - Stormwater Details, Cross Sections, References
REMARKS: Provide a typical section for the parking areas.
REVIEW ITEM: 6.10 - Karst Topography and High Recharge Areas
STATUS OF REVIEW: STAFF RECOMMENDS CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF WAIVER TO
THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT COMPONENT OF THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO
PROVIDING A KARST BUFFER OVER THE GROTTO WATERSHED AND PROVIDE A BMP
DOCUMENT.
REMARKS: Please provide a geologic analysis of the site in accordance with section 6.10 of the
LDC and address this section of the code. (Untreated stormwater from surface runoff or
operational runoff, hazardous materials, conservation, and buffers.) Note that a buffer must be
delineated around the grotto on the major site plan as a condition of the SUP.
REVIEW ITEM: 6.13.12 - Operation and Maintenance
REMARKS: Please provide a separate operation and maintenance document with the owners
certification that states the following: “I hereby certify that I, my successors, and assigns shall
perpetually operate and maintain the stormwater management system and associated elements
in accordance with the specifications shown herein and on the approved plan.” (With the final
copy signed by the owner) The document should include language to address the storage area,
gravel parking?, BMP’s for the operations of the grotto etc.)
3
21. DEPARTMENT: ENGTRF - TRAFFIC REVIEW
REVIEW ITEM: 6.11.5 - Driveway access
REMARKS: 12/1/2014: Driveway apron must have a 25' radii and have pavement thickness in
accordance to technical standards 24 of the LDC. Please show in plans.
REVIEW ITEM: 6.11.9.B - Traffic signs
REMARKS: 12/1/2014: Please provide Stop sign and stop bar at optimum location to improve
sight distance.
REVIEW ITEM: 6.11.9.C - Pavement marking
REMARKS: 12/1/2014: Please provide Stop sign and stop bar at optimum location to improve
sight distance.
24. DEPARTMENT: ENGIN - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
REVIEW ITEM: 2.21.2.B - Major Site Plan application fee
REMARKS: The application fee of $250.00 + ($5.00 x total site acreage) made payable to
Marion County BCC is due when this plan is resubmitted. Refer to Resolution 10-R-630 for the
current fee schedule. Additionally, please include a separate review fee for $40.00 made
payable to the Marion County Health Department.
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.3 - Title block on all sheets denoting type of application; project name,
location, county, and state; and date of original and all revisions
REMARKS: Type of application is not included in title blocks.
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.4.F - Licensed professional certification on cover sheet with signature and
seal on all sheets prior to plan approval
REMARKS: Include language from this section of code with certification.
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.4.G - A key location or vicinity map, with north arrow, with reference to
surrounding properties, streets, municipal boundaries, sections, ranges, and township
REMARKS: There are no road names for reference.
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.4.H - A portrait oriented minimal 3 inches × 5 inches space, located 2¾
inches from the right edge of paper and ¾ inches from the top edge of paper, shall remain blank
to allow for a County approval stamp
REMARKS:
4
29. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.4.L(2)/3.2.3 - Use Consistent with FLU Designation?
REMARKS: Revise the plan to list the site's Future Land Use Designation within the site Data
Block.
30. DEPARTMENT: LUCURR - LAND USE CURRENT REVIEW
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.4.L(7 & 9) - Building Uses/Identifiers/Designations Provided for 911?
REMARKS: Revise the plan to provide individual/unique identifiers and the use for each
building/structure (e.g, 1, 2, 3...or A, B, C..., etc.). (Some identifiers/use are provided but not for
all buildings and some are duplicated so one cannot be differentiated from another.)
31. DEPARTMENT: ENGSUR - SURVEY REVIEW
REVIEW ITEM: 6.4.7.A(2 & 3) - One copy of the vertical control field notes shall be submitted to
the Office of the County Engineer for review
REMARKS: Please provide.
REVIEW ITEM: 6.4.7.B(2) - Horizontal control points shall be monumented and referenced to the
Florida State Plane Coordinate System
REMARKS: Add State Plane Coordinates to boundary monuments.
REVIEW ITEM: 6.4.7.B(4) - Provide a statement or table detailing horizontal datum, adjustment,
and coordinate values
REMARKS: Please provide along with coordinates.
REVIEW ITEM: 6.4.7.B(4) - Provide one copy of the horizontal control notes along with reduction
reports shall be submitted to the Office of the County Engineer for review
REMARKS: Please provide.
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.11 - Provide an aerial map of the site with a layout of the development
REMARKS: Please provide an overlay of the project onto an aerial.
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.4.L(1) - Parcel number
REMARKS: Please correct parcel numbers
5
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.21/6.3.1.C(10) - Land use and zoning on project and on adjacent properties
shown
REMARKS: Please provide Land use /zoning, and current use of all adjacent properties.
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.23/4.2 -Setbacks, dimensions for all improvements, and easements
REMARKS: Please provide exact setback to proposed structure.
REVIEW ITEM: 2.12.4.L(10) - Parking requirements, service entrances, space size paved
parking isle and access to parking area/6.11.8 - Off-street parking requirements/6.11.7 - Loading
Areas/ 6.11.6 - Construction access/route
REMARKS: Parking calculations is for 30 students. Special Use permit was granted for 40
students. What will be the maximum capacity of proposed dormitory?
THURSDAY STAFF MEETING 1/8/15
DRC MEMBERS PRESENT:
Sam Martsolf (Planning/Zoning
STAFF PRESENT:
Chris Rison (Planning/Zoning)
Jon Harvey (Planning/Zoning)
Kevin Smith (Planning/Zoning)
Lisa Wargo (Planning/Zoning)
Jim Couillard (Parks)
Ed Brown (Health)
Janet Warbach (911)
Ken McCann (Fire)
Susan Heyen (Utilities)
Paul Wildman (Office of the County Engineer)
Brian Snyder (Office of the County Engineer)
Gerry Gowen (Office of the County Engineer)
Wendy Walters (Office of the County Engineer)
6
40 Fathom Grotto
PID# 12339-002-00 & 12339-003-00
PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com

PROJECT NAME: 40 FATHOM GROTTO PROJECT NUMBER

Transcription

Similar documents

Products

A new beginning in Subsea

Studnet Branch March 2015 Event

MAJ Jakob C. Bruhl, P.E. OIC, 14th Engineer Detachment 130th

Shahaan Engineer first Indian national to participate

K`Source Leave Behind

Biography

Primary Engineer - Engineering Professors` Council

POLIS DIRAJA MALAYS`IA

Urban sprawl in Harju County