The Khuff Formation: Play Elements and Development History of an

1 The Khuff Formation: Play Elements and
Development History of an Epicontinental
Carbonate Platform
The Khuff Petroleum System
Vast hydrocarbon resources (>5000 MM BOE) are suspected in the Arabian epicontinental basin (BP
2012). The Permo-Triassic Khuff layer is an important part of the basin fill covering some 3.7MM km2,
one of the largest carbonate ramps in the Earth’s history. Its reserves are estimated at 2680 TcF of gas,
of which the North Dome Field alone contains some 1826 TcF (IHS 2012).
Some 70 Khuff discoveries have been made up to December 2011 in the epicontinental basin. Of those, 23
are in UAE, 20 in Iran, 16 in Saudi, 7 in Oman, 5 in Qatar and 1 in Bahrain. These are largely gas-condensate
accumulations with only 6 oil or oil-gas discoveries. Of those discoveries however only a small percentage,
i.e., 21 accumulations, are producing at the time of publication (IHS 2012). Despite the vast extent of the Khuff
play, hydrocarbon accumulations are largely concentrated around the wider Qatar Arch (Konert et al. 2001)
and hosted predominantly in grainstone. Conceptual geological models are paramount for Khuff exploration
because conventional seismic-based techniques are of limited value. Khuff grainstone is largely of sub-seismic
thickness and exhibits only subtle seismic geometries (Figure 2). The fact that seismic surveys are commonly
plagued by multiples further reduces the value of seismic play characterisation.
Chapter
Author
1
Pöppelreiter
2
Oosterhout
3
Singh
4
Richoz
5
Forke
6
Angiolini
7
Kavoosi
8
Faqira
9
Aqrawi
10
Esrafili
11
Knaust
12
Janson
13
Husain
14
Perez-Gomez
15
Pöppelreiter
Figure 1: Map of the Arabian Peninsula and surrounding areas, indicated are study areas covered by the
individual chapters of this volume.
9
Chapter 1
Figure 2: Layer-cake
type reservoir as seen in
outcrops of NE Oman
and the subsurface of
Oman (from Aigner and
Pöppelreiter 2011).
The elements of the Khuff petroleum system and its evolution through the Earth’s history are reflected in this EAGE publication (Figure 1). Its 15 chapters cover 6 countries across the Arabian basin
(Figure 1). The Khuff petroleum system and its exploration and development history on a plate-wide
scale are outlined in chapter 1 by Pöppelreiter and Marshall.
Structure
Palaeomorphology is one important control of facies distribution of the Khuff play. It influences source
rock occurrence and richness, grainstone occurrence and thickness and evaporite and shale distribution
that constitute the top seal. Genetically palaeomorphology is typically linked to structural evolution.
Examples are basement composition, deep-seated faults, location of Cambrian salt basins and the
dynamic interaction of these components with paleotectonics through the Earth’s history. Virtually all
known Khuff accumulations are structural traps, some with stratigraphic components. Trap style is
controlled by the structural setting of the region and the evolution of the Arabian Plate through time as
outlined in chapter 2 by Oosterhout and Pöppelreiter. The Proterozoic consolidation of the Arabian plate
through amalgamation of some 20 individual terrains (Teasdale, oral communication), the following
Infra-Cambrian rifting and associate salt deposition as well as inverted basement fault tectonics influenced structure and facies distribution through the stratigraphic record (Ziegler 2001, Johnson 2008).
The interplay and imprint of the early structural-stratigraphic framework on Khuff facies distribution,
burial history and structuration are discussed by Singh et al. in chapter 3. Specific examples of technology, i.e., gravity and seismic inversion used to visualise basement position are shown in this chapter.
The case study from Kuwait on basement morphology is used as a proxy for the prediction of source
rocks. The investigations showed that two broad trap classes can be distinguished on a basin-wide scale:
anticline structures that include N-S structures above Cambrian basement highs (e.g., North Field,
Qatar/Iran) and Zagros trending anticlines (e.g., Kangan Field, Iran). The second type of structures are
salt dome structures: Hormuz (Cambrian) salt domes (e.g., Zakum Field, UAE, offshore Fars, Iran)
(Szabo and Kheradpir 1978).
In purely stratigraphic traps however, no economic hydrocarbon accumulations have been
encountered so far. Potential stratigraphic geometries in the Khuff include unconformity traps (e.g.,
Central Oman and W Kuwait); traps below intraformational seals (e.g., Iran, Iraq), toe of slope grainstone at the platform edge (e.g., Iraq, NW UAE); off platform isolated platforms (e.g., Oman) and
grainstone in bypass channels at the platform edge (e.g., Oman). Evolving conceptual models and
improved seismic resolution might reveal potential stratigraphic trap configurations, particularly at
the platform edge, as exploration targets in the near future.
Tectonic elements and their relationship to Khuff facies across the platform margin are outlined
by Richoz et al., in chapter 4. The sections described are palaeogeographically located at distal
10
The Khuff Formation: Play Elements and Development History of an Epicontinental Carbonate Platform
platform, slope, tilted block, basement and deepwater settings. The observations derived from outcrop descriptions in Oman/UAE might be applicable to similar settings in Iran and Iraq (Aqrawi et
al. 2009). The longevity of structural movements, including volcanic activity is documented from
well data near the Iranian platform margin in chapter 7 by Karvoosi. Contrasting to commonly held
opinion that volcanism and related stratigraphic expressions are restricted to initial Khuff deposition
there is evidence of top Middle Permian volcanism and block faulting. Syn-sedimentary movements
of basement blocks, erosion, seismic activity and volcanism have been documented previously from
the lowermost Khuff (Weidlich and Bernecker 2012, Bendias et al. 2013. Walz et al. 2013). Minor
seismic activity was recognised in the Lower Triassic Upper Khuff and Sudair at the platform edge
in Oman and the UAE (Pöppelreiter et al. 2011, Toland 2006).
Source
The source of Khuff gas is Silurian organic-rich graptolite shale in vast parts of the Arabian basin, as
discussed by Faqira in chapter 8. The shale is part of the Qusaiba Formation and its time equivalents.
It is a typical type II source rock with a distinct geochemical signature (Cole et al. 1994). Elements of
the Khuff play, specifically the source rock distribution and maturity, are characterised across the vast
Arabian platform in chapter 8 and together with migration, put into a context of structural evolution and
salt movements. Source rock distribution and richness are controlled by syndepositional palaeotopography
and post-depositional Hercynian tectonics. Mini-basins for example developed above glacial erosive relief
(Spaak and Ross 2011), which tend to accumulate shale with higher TOC concentrations (Konert 2001).
Similarly areas of stronger differential subsidence preferentially accumulated hot shale. Lower organic
content is found above morphological highs, areas of slower differential subsidence and the landward
platform margin (Bell et al. 2008). More importantly Hercynian uplift caused erosion of Silurian organicrich shale particularly atop inverted basement faults. Examples of such missing Silurian hot shale intervals
are the Burgan High and the Ghawar High (Strohmenger et al. 2002, Faqira et al. 2009). Another proven
source rock is the Pre-Cambrian Q-oil in Oman (Terken et al. 2001) where escaped oil from older, leaky
Palaeozoic reservoirs is re-trapped in Khuff carbonates (Perez-Gomez chapter 14).
Speculative sources are Intra-Khuff shale that has been observed in the KS-6 and the KS-2 sequences
in Iraq, Iran and Oman (Aqrawi et al. chapter 9, Leda et al. 2013, Bendias et al. 2013) or intraformational microbial laminites, which are suspected to generate hydrocarbons (Dessort et al. 2006). Potentially
Upper Devonian shales and the Mississippian Ora Formation in northern Iraq and Iran (Aqrawi et al.
chapter 9) may act as source rocks in places such as the Proto Palmyra Graben (Konert 2001).
These alternative Palaeozoic source rocks might extend the prospectivity of the Khuff play.
Charge
Charge is controlled by regional basin evolution (Faqira et al. 2009, Perez-Gomez et al. chapter 14).
Migration into Khuff structures is likely related to faults, as basal Khuff shales, tight carbonates in the
lower Khuff and the overlying Median anhydrite make migration through matrix unlikely. Hence the
established charge model assumes reactivated basement faults acting as pathways for vertical migration
(Wender et al. 1998). Charge risk is present in areas with absent or overmature Qusaiba source rock
such as in parts of Kuwait, Iraq and Oman. Deeply buried structures exhibiting high levels of CO2 and
N2 are known from north-western Lorestan, Iran and deeply buried areas in the Gulf, along the Bandar
Abbas fault (Iran-UAE-Saudi) and from the Zagros fore-deep in Iraq, Iran and Kuwait. In similar areas,
the risk of encountering largely non-hydrocarbon gasses (H2S, CO2, N2, He) is significant (Nederloff et
al. 2011). Basin, organic geochemistry and diagenesis modelling are vital tools for assessing this risk
(Faquira et al. chapter 8).
11
Chapter 1
Reservoir
Economic success in the Khuff play is primarily controlled by the presence of permeable grainstone.
Khuff rocks with mud-dominated textures may have some porosity, but low permeablity, due to cementation by anhydrite or carbonate. Khuff grainstone occurs either as limestone or dolomite and consists
largely of ooids and peloids with skeletal components being less common constituents (Haase et al.
2011). The Khuff ranges in thickness from 100 m (500 ft) in Saudi Arabian outcrops to 1500 m (4000
ft) in Iran platform margin settings (Al-Jallal, 1995). The Khuff and Permian Pre-Khuff clastics are
separated from the underlying Palaeozoic clastics by the Hercynian unconformity.
This unconformity is covered by Permian clastics as shown from outcrops in Saudi Arabia (Evans
et al. 1997). These Permian clastics in turn are truncated by a break-up unconformity associated with the
opening of the Neotethys Ocean (Bell and Spaak 2011).
The base of the Khuff is a time-transgressive lithostratigraphic boundary above this break-up unconformity and covered by patchily developed Pre-Khuff clastics (Le Nindre et al. 2012).
The stratigraphic framework of the Khuff presented by Forke et al. in chapter 5 is based on extensive
biostratigraphic analysis tied to sequence stratigraphy.
This framework is extended to the Lower Khuff type sections in the interior of Oman by Angilioni et
al. in chapter 6.
High-resolution biostratigraphy and detailed documentation of macrofossils (Partoazar 2002) content
of this skeletal-carbonate-dominated succession highlight the reservoir characteristics of the less wellknown lower Khuff. Skeletal grains, commonly occurring in the foreshoal section at the seaward edge
of the Khuff platform, are portrayed by Angiolini, chapter 6. The fauna consists of moderately diverse,
high-abundance fossil association i.e. corals, brachiopods, foraminifer, algae, gastropods, crinoids.
Typical carbonate producers such as corals and green algae are interdispersed. A few decimetre thick
microbial biostroms (Heydari et al. 2003) are widespread above the Permo-Triassic boundary (Svensen
et al. 2009). However build-ups or reefs are largely absent in the Khuff Formation. Environmental conditions such as water stratification and hypersalinity might have reduced fossil abundance and diversity.
A narrow fringe of skeletal components exists during the Permian in the most open marine parts of the
platform. Deepwater deposits are uncommon in the Khuff and restricted to the outer platform margin
extending through Oman, Iran and Iraq. Importantly some of these open marine layers (KS-6, KS-2) may
contain organic-rich shales (Bendias et al. 2013, Aqrawi et al. chapter 9, Leda et al. (2013).
Reservoir characteristics of oolitic grainstone deposited in shoal environments, is exemplified by the
Iranian South Pars Field presented in chapter 10 by Esrafili et al. Reservoir quality is attributed to the
interplay of relative sea level and basin morphology (Harchegani et al. 2011).
Several post-depositional factors are important in controlling Khuff reservoir properties. Early dolomitisation may significantly improve reservoir quality whereas precipitation of pores occluding anhydrite
cements can transform originally porous rocks to non-reservoir rock. Carbonates exhibiting muddy textures
and poorly cemented grain-dominated rocks tend to show physical and chemical compaction-related porosity loss.
Compaction, particularly associated with structures buried deeper than 3000 m, can be significant,
especially in limestone. Dolomite tends to withstand depth-related porosity loss by physical and chemical compaction to greater depth than limestone. Consequently porosity in dolostone is often preserved at
a greater depth compared with limestone (Ehrenberg et al. 2005). Early charge, especially gas, tends to
reduce physical and chemical compaction (Zampetti et al. 2010). Breaching of structures and hydrocarbon
loss can negate the porosity preserving process. Burial diagenesis, in particular charge related processes
such as fault-related thermochemical sulphate reduction (TSR), can further modify reservoir quality on a
100s to 1000s m scale.
The authors characterise shoal and back shoal Khuff grainstone from the subsurface of Oman that
12
The Khuff Formation: Play Elements and Development History of an Epicontinental Carbonate Platform
experienced a complex evolution in a structurally complex setting at the edge of an Infra-Cambrian salt
basin. They authors relate structural position and overall basin evolution to the succession of shallow and
burial diagenetic processes that modified the permeability architecture of this grainstone (Gomez-Perez et
al. in chapter 14).
The anatomy of oolitic grainstone bodies in a near shore inter-tidal environment is illustrated by Janson
in chapter 12. The outcrop study from Saudi Arabia places particular emphasis on grainstone architecture
and its link to petrophysics. This occurrence of thin but clean and porous grainstone, near the platform
margin, exposed to shallow burial only, highlights the potential of similar palaeogeographic settings, such
as the Palmyra Graben in Syria and comparable areas in NE Iraq.
Predominantly low-energy lagoonal deposits are described in chapter 13 by Husain et al. The authors
emphasise the genetic link between primary facies and reservoir quality. Chapter 13 illustrates the expression of a palaeo-high, the Burgan Arch, on reservoir quality. The area above the high is covered preferentially by muddy texture that formed in low-energy probably lagoonal settings. This example illustrates the
interplay between basement tectonics, palaeomorphology and Khuff sedimentation.
The diversity of sedimentary structures in the Khuff Formation is generally low. Common are normal
grading, low-angle lamination and trough cross-bedding. Widespread in lower energy settings is microbial
lamination and bioturbation. The nature and importance of bioturbation on petrophysical properties are
outlined by Knaust in chapter 11. A new tool for reservoir characterisation is petrophysically-biased bioturbation analysis. Khuff grainstone typically contains porosity of 3–30% and with a permeability of 0.1 to
1000 mD. Porosity in limestone is largely mouldic and thus the permeability is commonly below 1 mD.
However bioturbation may enhance permeability significantly on a bed-scale. The influence of bioturbation
on permeability architecture in the Khuff is shown from the South Pars Field in Iran.
Figure 3: Methodology for a Khuff outcrop study in Oman (from Aigner and Pöppelreiter 2011).
13
Chapter 1
Seal
The Khuff reservoir is regionally sealed by the overlying Sudair Formation and its stratigraphic equivalents, as
outlined by Pöppelreiter and Obermaier in chapter 15. The widespread Sudair Formation, often misleadingly
referred to as ‘Sudair shales’, is 300 ft to 1200 ft thick (Alsharhan and Nairn 1997). Its evaporites and shales,
probably deposited in lagoonal and mudflat environments, act as top seals to the Khuff reservoir below.
Distinct facies belts are mapped in the Sudair (Ziegler 2001, Poppelreiter et al. 2011, Obermaier
2013). Shale is dominating a landward belt, extending along the southern platform margin. It passes into
a shale-anhydrite belt covering the platform interior. Largely tight carbonates (Ziegler 2011) constitute
a seaward platform-margin belt.
Sealing lithology above the Khuff reservoir seems present across the Arabian platform. Hence seal
risk is generally low.
Only in areas where the Khuff Formation is truncated by erosive unconformities it may be sealed by
shale of Jurassic or Cretaceous age. Examples are found in Oman and Kuwait (Konert 2001). Top seal
presence and integrity are minor exploration risks.
The bottom seal can be tight carbonate. Established intraformational seals are tight carbonates (e.g.,
KS-4 in Oman) and anhydrites such as the Median anhydrite in Iran.
Overview of exploration and development of the Khuff Formation
Although exploitation of the Khuff reservoir was initially slow, the emergence of gas as a preferred
energy source, along with significant technical advances (LNG and GtL) in the development of sour gas
resources have resulted in an upturn in the number of Khuff developments coming on-stream in recent
years. The steady discovery of significant hydrocarbon volumes in Khuff strata, as shown in Figure 5,
highlights the future potential of the play.
Reserves Cumulative Khuff / Dalan Reservoirs Creaming Curve showing Cumulative Gas MMboe
and Cumulative Liquid MMbbl
Figure 4: Creaming curve of the Khuff.
14
The Khuff Formation: Play Elements and Development History of an Epicontinental Carbonate Platform
Bahrain
The first Khuff gas discovery was made in Bahrain in 1948 when a shallow crestal well, Awali-52, was
deepened to a depth of 10,078 ft (3,072 m) and encountered gas in Khuff carbonates. The reservoir
remained undeveloped for some 20 years until 1969 when Bahrain embarked on an industrialisation
scheme and gas was required to provide feedstock for a newly constructed aluminium smelter.
Two commercial development wells were drilled in 1969 and Khuff gas was brought on-stream at an
initial production of 50 MMcf/d, gradually increasing over time to meet the expansion of power plants
and gas-dependant industries.
A second phase of development took place during the 1970s. Khuff gas from an additional nine wells
replaced previously-used, condensate-rich Arab Formation gas used for injection and artificial lift in oil
reservoirs, power generation and as feed stock and fuel in refinery operations. With the continued industrial expansion in Bahrain further development campaigns took place throughout the 1980s to 2000s.
BAPCO most recently undertook a Khuff gas development program between 2008–2011, including the
drilling of the first directional gas well in Bahrain to the pre-Khuff.
Saudi Arabia
Aramco first encountered non-associated Khuff gas in commercial quantities in 1957 at Dammam-43, a
wildcat in Dammam field that produced 25,000 Mcf/d.
Although Khuff gas was discovered in south Ghawar Field in 1971, it was not until 1975, with an
ever increasing need for non-associated gas that an exploration campaign commenced in earnest. Khuff
discoveries followed at Qatif and Berri fields in the mid to late 1970s; north Ghawar Field in 1975, east
Ghawar Field, south Ghawar Field and Abu Sa’fah in the early 1980s; Khursaniyah Field in 1987; and
Harmaliyah Field in 1990.
Aramco brought the first Ghawar Field Khuff well on-stream in December 1983, with subsequent
development centred on the Shedgum/Ain Dar and Uthmaniyah gas plants. In 1995, Saudi Aramco
embarked on an aggressive non-associated gas development program, aimed at fully exploiting Ghawar
Fields’s non-associated gas resources. The program focused on the Haradh and Hawiyah areas. Saudi
Aramco’s first gas plant dedicated to processing non-associated gas was brought on-stream at Hawiyah
in September 2001. It was initially designed to process 1.6 Bcf/d feed gas, 1,200 MMcf/d from the
Khuff and 400 MMcf/d from the Pre-Khuff. By September 2001, 44 Khuff wells were on-stream, producing 1.4 Bcfg/d. Trial production from the Haradh gas plant started on 23 April 2003, including 770
MMcf/d from the sour Khuff reservoir. Between 2000 and 2001, the Khuff gas processing facilities were
expanded to 2.4 Bcf/d at Shedgum, through a 400 MMcf/d de-bottlenecking project and to 2.3 Bcf/d at
Uthmaniyah.
Between 2003 and 2009, a further eight Khuff discoveries were made. The most significant of these,
Karan Field, was the first non-associated gas discovery in Saudi Arabian territorial waters in the Gulf.
The field was discovered in 2006, when Karan-6 found 770 ft (235 m) net pay over four Khuff intervals,
believed to be the thickest Khuff reservoir section in the country. Karan will eventually contribute 1.8
Bcfg/d to Saudi Aramco’s Master Gas System. Early production of some 400 MMcf/d was commissioned during 2011, with three other platforms scheduled for completion and tie-in by June 2012, with
a final platform due on-stream in April 2013. Gas will then be transported onshore to the Khursaniyah
Gas Plant (KGP). The success at Karan Field was followed by Khuff discoveries at Arabiyah and Hasbah
fields in 2008 and 2009. Both discoveries were fast-tracked for development. Saudi Aramco intends to
produce 1.2 Bcf/d from the Arabiya and 1.3 Bcf/d from the Hasbah offshore gas fields by 4Q 2013 as
part of the Wasit Development.
15
Chapter 1
Oman
Whilst Khuff exploration had been underway for some time in the other Gulf States, it was not until
oil was discovered in the formation at Yibal in 1986 that the Khuff Formation became a significant
target for oil exploration in Oman. The deep exploration well, Yibal-85, drilled on the Yibal structure
in North Oman 1977, confirmed sour gas and condensate from the K2 unit at a depth of 2,910 m.
However, the presence of oil was not identified and the gas was classified as non-associated. The well
was suspended as sweet gas was abundant in shallower and economically more attractive reservoirs.
Almost a decade later, a deep gas exploration well, Yibal-192, drilled in 1985 under the Government
Gas Exploration Programme, tested oil from the K2, K3 and K4 Khuff units, gas/condensate from K1
and K5 and volatile oil from the deeper Gharif sands. As a result, the K1, K2, K3 reservoir units were
re-classified as saturated oil reservoirs with a gas cap. Later drilling confirmed high levels of H2S and
CO2. A long-term production pilot was conducted at Yibal in 1987, though terminated in 1997 following corrosion problems and operating difficulties.
A 2006, re-evaluation of the Khuff reservoir at Yibal concluded there was scope to develop one
oil rim reservoir and two sour gas reservoirs through a single facility at the field. The FDP for the
Yibal Khuff sour development project was scheduled for completion in 2011, with full Khuff reservoir
development anticipated by 2019.
Following the early success at Yibal, a Khuff appraisal well drilled in 1987 at Al Huwaisah-46
tested 2,360 bo/d from Khuff K1 and 5.5 MMcf/d sour gas from Khuff K5.
UAE
In 1975, the first Khuff Formation exploration well, Mender-1, was drilled in Abu Dhabi. The well, located
in the south-east of the state, proved unsuccessful. It was not until 1979, with the drilling of the Umm
Shaif-88 offshore deep exploration well that gas was discovered in commercial quantities within the Khuff,
at rates of 220 MMcf/d. Subsequent Khuff discoveries were made throughout the 1980s at Hair Dalmah,
Fateh, Zakum, Nasr, Abu Al Bukhoosh, Satah, Bu Haseer, Sath Al Raaz Boot and Arzanah fields.
Significant Khuff development projects have included the launching of an US$ 350 million major
gas development project by Adma-Opco in the 1980s for the Umm Shaif field. Khuff gas is used
for pressure maintenance of the Middle Jurassic Uweinat reservoir and as a feedstock for the Abu
Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company (ADGAS) LNG plant located on Das Island. The Umm Shaif Gas
Development project was commissioned in 1994. In 2002, Adma-Opco completed a pilot project
using Khuff Formation gas from Abu Al Bukhoosh Field for gas lift at Upper Zakum Field.
The exploration and development of the Khuff reservoir throughout the region are illustrated in
Figure 5. Discoveries are shown by decade from the 1940s to 2010s, from the first Khuff gas discovery in Bahrain in 1948 until the surge in Khuff-equivalent discoveries in Iran during the 2000s.
Resulting developments by decade are presented from the 1960s to 2010s, highlighting the development activity that has taken place in the central Gulf region, notably through the 1990s and 2000s.
Qatar
Qatar’s giant North Field was discovered by Shell in 1971 with the drilling of the North West Dome-1
exploration well on a broad regional high. The well reached a TD of 11,350 ft (3,459 m). It penetrated
the entire Khuff succession and tested 46 MMcf/d plus condensate and water from a 83 ft (25 m) interval
of Khuff K2 between 8,687 ft (2,648 m) and 8,770 ft (2,673 m). The field is the world’s largest nonassociated gas field, extending over 6,000 sq km and contains approximately 900 Tcf recoverable natural
gas within the Khuff, Khuff K4 being the most prolific.
16
The Khuff Formation: Play Elements and Development History of an Epicontinental Carbonate Platform
Figure 5: Khuff reservoir discoveries by decade (1940s to 2010s) and developments by decade (1960s to 2010s).
The magnitude of North Field’s non-associated gas reserves enables it to support world class gas utilisation projects. The field includes three main contract areas; RasGas, Qatargas and North Field Alpha.
The North Field Alpha complex, operated by Qatar Petroleum, was the first to come on-stream and was
officially inaugurated on 3 September 1991. The first phase of the Al Khaleej Gas Project started up in
2005 and the Dolphin Gas Project became operational in 2007. The Barzan Gas Project is scheduled for
completion in 2015.
Since 1997, Qatar has been exporting LNG from the North Field. Some 14 LNG trains are now
operational; seven operated by RasGas and seven by Qatargas. In 2006, Qatar became the world’s largest
LNG exporter. The advent of Gas-to-Liquids technology has enabled the construction of the Oryx GTL
Plant, the first of its kind in Qatar. The Oryx GTL plant was commissioned in 2007 and the giant Pearl
GTL plant is currently under construction.
It is not only Qatar’s North Field that holds significant Khuff non-associated gas reserves. Gas was
discovered in the Khuff at Dukhan Field in 1940, although the reservoir was not developed until 1976.
The Khuff reservoir was shut-in when production began from the North Field and from 1992 surplus
North Field gas was re-injected into Dukhan’s Khuff reservoir. The Khuff reservoir at Dukhan Field
has since become a strategic gas reserve, where excess North Field gas is stored. The Khuff wellhead
treatment plants at Dukhan Field are run on a rotational basis to work as a ‘hot’ standby, to ensure rapid
start-up if the North Field platforms are shut-down.
The increasing interest in gas is also reflected in the time from discovery to first production (Figure 6).
17
Chapter 1
Time to production from discovery: Khuff reservoirs
Figure 6: Khuff
Discovery and time
to production.
Iran
The first discovery in Iran’s Khuff-equivalent Dalan and Kangan formations was Ferdows Field in 1966.
However, Iran’s giant South Pars field, which represents the northward continuation of the North Field of
Qatar, holds the greatest reserves, some 500 Tcf recoverable. The National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) is
planning to develop the field in 24 phases, capable of producing between 25 and 30 Bcf of natural gas per day.
At least 20 large fields and discoveries have since been made in Khuff-equivalent reservoirs in Iran.
Development activities have taken place at Salman Field (an extension of Abu Al Bukhoosh Field),
Kangan, Aghar, Nar, Homa, Day and Sefid Zakhur fields.
Iraq
In Iraq, limestone and shale of the Upper Permian Chia Zairi Formation are equivalent to the Khuff
Formation of the Gulf region and the Dalan Formation of southwest Iran. The formation, which reaches
up to 810 m thickness in the area, has been drilled in only a handful of wells. Atshan-1, drilled in 1955
by the Mosul Petroleum Company, intersected 295 m of oolitic and argillaceous limestone, silty dolomite, shale and sandstone. The formation was found to be tight at this location. The Chia Zairi Formation
was also penetrated at Jabal Kand-1 and Kifl West-1. The formation may be a prospect for gas, with the
intraformational Satina Evaporite Member providing the seal.
Kuwait
The Khuff Formation has rarely been drilled in Kuwait. In 1984, the deeper pool well Umm Gudair-33,
drilled on the Umm Gudair High, intersected 546 m of the Khuff Formation. The Khuff C reservoir is
107 m (350 ft) thick over the West Umm Gudair Field. Seismic inversion and lithology modelling studies
of the Khuff Formation have been carried out by Rahaman et al. (2011) and Shereef et al. (2011). Results
18
The Khuff Formation: Play Elements and Development History of an Epicontinental Carbonate Platform
indicate that the porosity of the Khuff C reservoir varies from 2–3% in the Minagish/Umm Gudair area.
Best reservoir potential is observed over the East Umm Gudair anticline, suggesting that this may be an
area for future exploration.
Synthesis
The presentations, summarised in this volume, reflect a paradigm shift in Khuff interpretation; the
importance of tectonics in controlling all aspects of the Khuff play, a stratigraphic unit previously
considered ‘atectonic’ by some workers. Integrated investigations of epicontinental platforms might
improve predictability of rock properties in plays such as the Khuff where layer-cake type architecture
on a seismic-scale is in sharp contrast to permeability variations over several orders of magnitude. The
papers in this volume aim at shedding new light on the elements of the Khuff petroleum system. The
Khuff reservoir is largely associated with high-energy (oolitic, peloidal) lime or dolo-grainstone as they
constitute a permeable reservoir. Reefs as potential reservoirs are largely absent. Khuff grainstone is
typically of sub-seismic thickness.
Gentle platform geometries yield subtle seismic geometries and attributes that typically are only
interpretable in high-energy grainstone zones that mimic palaeomorphology. Grainstone occurs in
irregular sheets deposited as interplay between climate, eustasy and palaeomorphology resulting in for
example differential subsidence of basement structures and salt basins. Diagenesis may have either a
positive or negative impact on the storage capacity of grainstone. More importantly it modifies grainstone permeability through pore type alterations. Non-grainstone facies generally have a poorer storage
capacity but thick intervals can hold significant volumes.
The very subtle expression of palaeotectonics across the Arabian platform has emerged as a key
controlling factor on the Khuff play.
The authors, editor and reviewers hope to provide the reader with a comprehensive overview of the
latest understanding of stratigraphy, reservoir occurrence and technology as set out at the beginning of
this conference and enthusiasm in unravelling controls on epicontinental platforms.
Acknowledgements
The meticulous reviews of this chapter by R. Koepnick, M. Vroon and P. Wagner are gratefully
acknowledged.
References
Al-Jallal, I.A. (1995) The Khuff Formation: It’s Reservoir Potential in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf
Countries; Depositional and Stratigraphic Approach. In Al-Husseini, M.I. ed. Middle East Petroleum
Geosciences. GEO’94, Gulf PetroLink, Bahrain, 103–119.
Aigner, T. and Pöppelreiter, M. (2011) The Khuff Outcrop Project in the Oman Mountains: Framework
and Research Approach. Third Arabian Plate Geology Workshop, abstract volume.
Aqrawi, A.A.M., Goff, J.C., Horbury, A.D. and Sadooni, F.N. (2010) The Petroleum Geology of Iraq.
Scientific Press, Beaconsfield, U.K., 424p.
Aqrawi, A.A.M., Al-Hadidy, A.H and Horbury, A.D. (2013) Hydrocarbon potential of the Upper Permian
Chia Zairi Formation in Iraq. EAGE Special Volume Permo-Triassic sequence of the Arabian Plate.
19
Chapter 1
Alsharhan, A.S. and Nairn, A.E.M. (1997) Sedimentary Basins and Petroleum Geology of the Middle
East. Elsevier, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, 843. Angiolini, L., Berra, F., Stephenson, M.H. and
Vachard, D. (2013) The Khuff Formation (Guadalupian) of Interior Oman. EAGE Special Volume
Permo-Triassic sequence of the Arabian Plate.
Baud, A. and Richoz, S. (2013) Stratigraphic Note: The Permian-Triassic transition and the Saiq/
Mahil Boundary in the Oman Mountains: Proposed correction for lithostratigraphic nomenclature.
GeoArabia, 18(3), 87–98.
Bell, A., Nederlof, P. and Voggenreiter, W. (2008) Charge evaluation of the South Rub’ Al-Khali Basin,
Saudi Arabia (Part I, for Part II see Nederlof et al.). 8th Middle East Geosciences Conference, GEO
2008. GeoArabia, Abstract, 13(1), 134.
Bell, A. and Spaak, P. (2012) The opening of Neo-Tethys and the formation of the Khuff passive margin.
In The Permo-Triassic Sequence of the Arabian Plate, Abstracts of the EAGE’s Third Arabian Plate
Geology Workshop, Kuwait. Abstract, GeoArabia, 17(1), 204.
Bendias, D., Aigner, T., Pöppelreiter, M. and Koehrer, B. (2012) Khuff Sequence KS6: Paleorelief
influenced facies and sequence patterns in the Lower Khuff Formation, Sultanate of Oman. In
Third Arabian Plate Geology Workshop, Part I The Permo-Triassic Sequence of the Arabian Plate,
GeoArabia, 17(1), 204–206.
Bendias, D., Koehrer, B., Obermaier, M. and Aigner, T. (2013) Mid-Permian Khuff Sequence KS6:
Paleorelief-influenced facies and sequence patterns in the Lower Khuff time-equivalent strata, Oman
Mountains, Sultanate of Oman. GeoArabia, 18(3), 135–178.
BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2012. www.bp.com
Cole, G.A., Abu-Ali, M.A., Aoudeh, S.M., Carrigan, W.J., Chen, H.H., Colling, E.L., Gwathney, W.J.,
Al-Hajji, A.A., Halpern, H.I., Sharidi, S.H. and Tobey, M.H. (1994) Organic geochemistry of the
Paleozoic petroleum system of Saudi Arabia. Energy and Fuels, 8, 1425–1442.
Dessort, D., Caillet, G., Lescanne, M., Insalaco, E. and Montel, F. (2006) Geochemical characterization
and interpretation of Khuff Reservoir Fluids, North Dome. GEO 2006 Middle East Conference and
Exhibition, 27–29 March, Manama, Bahrain, abstract volume.
Ehrenberg, S.N., Nadeau, P.H. and Aqrawi, A.A.M. (2005) A regional comparison of Khuff and Arab
reservoir potential throughout the Middle East. IPTC10222.
Ehrenberg, S.N., Svana, T.A. and Swart, P.K. (2008) Uranium depletion across the Permian- Triassic
boundary in Middle East carbonates: Signature of oceanic anoxia. AAPG Bulletin, 92(6), 691–707.
Esrafili-Dizaji, B., Kiani Harchegani, F., Hossain, R.-B. and Kamali, M. (2013) Interrelations of
Depositional Setting, Diagenetic History and Reservoir Quality in a Sequence Stratigraphic
Framework; Early Triassic Kangan Formation, offshore Zagros. In EAGE Special Volume PermoTriassic Sequence of the Arabian Plate.
20
The Khuff Formation: Play Elements and Development History of an Epicontinental Carbonate Platform
Evans, D.S., Bahabri, B.H. and Al-Otaibi, A.M. (1997) Stratigraphic trap in the Permian Unayzah
Formation, Central Saudi Arabia. GeoArabia, 2(3), 259–278.
Faqira, M., Bakhiet, A.F., Tang, D.Z., Tan, W. and Ahmed, A. (2013) A Review of the Permo-Triassic
Gas Play in the Arabian Gulf Region. In EAGE Special Volume Permo-Triassic Sequence of the
Arabian Plate.
Faqira, M., Rademakers, M. and Afifi, A.M. (2009) New insights into the Hercynian Orogeny and their
implications for the Paleozoic Hydrocarbon System in the Arabian Plate. GeoArabia, 14, 199–228.
Forke, H.C., Koehrer, B., Walz, L., Bendias, D. and Aigner, T. (2013) Time intervals in the Khuff based
on integrated bio- and sequence stratigraphy of the Saiq and lower Mahil formations in the Al Jabal
al-Akhdar outcrops, Sultanate of Oman. In EAGE Special Volume Permo-Triassic Sequence of the
Arabian Plate.
Gomez-Perez, I., Farqani, S., Claps, M. and Peters, H. (2013) Diagenetic evolution of a Permo-Triassic
Khuff oolitic reservoir in north Oman. EAGE Special Volume Permo-Triassic Sequence of the
Arabian Plate.
Haase, M., Aigner, T. and Forke, H. (2011) The Khuff Sequence KS4: high resolution anatomy of
a Middle Khuff grainstone package, Oman Mountains, Sultanate of Oman. The Permo-Triassic
Sequence of the Arabian Plate. EAGE’s Third Arabian Plate Geology Workshop, 28 November–1
December, 2011, Kuwait City, abstract volume.
Haase, M.L. and Aigner, T. (2013) High-resolution anatomy of a grainstone package in Khuff Sequence
KS4, Oman Mountains, Sultanate of Oman. GeoArabia, 18(4), 17–44.
Harchegani, F.K., Kamali, M.R. and Esrafili-Dizaji, B. (2011) Microfacies, diagenesis and reservoir
quality of Early Triassic Kangan Formation in offshore Zagros: A case study. The Permo-Triassic
Sequence of the Arabian Plate. EAGE’s Third Arabian Plate Geology Workshop, 28 November–1
December, 2011, Kuwait City.
Heydari, E., Hassanzadeh, J., Wade, W.J. and Ghazi, A.M. (2003) Permian-Triassic boundary interval
in the Abadeh section of Iran with implications for mass extinction: Part 1 – Sedimentology.
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatololgy Palaeoecology, 193, 405–423.
Husain, R., Khan, D.A., Sajer, A. and Al-Ammar, N. (2013) Khuff Formation in Kuwait: An Overview.
In EAGE Special Volume Permo-Triassic sequence of the Arabian Plate.
IHS International Exploration & Production Database June 2012. www.ihs.com
Janson, X., Lucia, J., Jennings, J.W., Bellian, J.A., Abdul Jaleel, A., AbuBshait, Raed K. Al-Dukhayyil,
Mueller, H.W. and Cantrell, D. (2013) Outcrop-based 3D geological and reservoir model of the
uppermost Khuff Formation in central Saudi Arabia. In EAGE Special Volume Permo-Triassic
sequence of the Arabian Plate.
Johnson, C. (2008) Phanerozoic Plate Reconstruction of the Middle East: Insights into the context of
Arabian Tectonics and sedimentation. SPE 118062
21
Chapter 1
Kavoosi, M.A. Volcano-clastics in the Middle Permian Nar Member of the Dalan Formation, southwest
Iran. In EAGE Special Volume Permo-Triassic sequence of the Arabian Plate.
Knaust, D. (2013) Bioturbation and reservoir quality in carbonates: towards a genetic approach. In EAGE
Special Volume Permo-Triassic sequence of the Arabian Plate.
Konert, G., Al-Afifi, A.M., Al-Hajri, S.A. and Droste, H.J. (2001) Paleozoic stratigraphy and
hydrocarbon habitat of the Arabian Plate. GeoArabia, 6(3), 407–442.
Leda, L., Korn, D., Ghaderi, A., Hairapetian, V., Struck, U. and Reimold, W.-U. Lithostratigraphy and
carbonate microfacies across the Permian-Triassic boundary near Julfa (NW Iran) and in the Baghuk
Mountains (Central Iran).
Le Nindre, Y.-M. and Lasseur, E. (2012) Uncertainties on Basal Khuff Clastics in outcrop in Saudi
Arabia. In The Permo–Triassic Sequence of the Arabian Plate, Abstracts of the EAGE’s Third Arabian
Plate Geology Workshop, Kuwait. Abstract. GeoArabia, 17(1), 220–223.
Nederlof, P., Bell, A., Naafs, D., Carlson, T., Clarke, E., Hashem, M., Holstege, G., Daou, E. and Briner,
A. (2011) Fluid property and geochemical evaluation of exploration well in the South Rub’ Al-Khali
Basin: Implications for the regional subsurface model. 9th Middle East Geosciences Conference, GEO
2010. GeoArabia, Abstract, 16(3).
Obermaier, M. (2013) The Geology of the Triassic Sudair and Jilh Formations in Outcrops and
Subsurface (Sultanate of Oman). PhD Thesis. University of Tübingen, 323.
Oosterhout, C. and van Pöppelreiter, M. (2013) Plate Reconstructions and distribution of sedimentary
facies during Permo-Triassic opening of Neo-Tethys Ocean. In EAGE Special Volume Permo-Triassic
Sequence of the Arabian Plate.
Partoazar, H. (2002) Permian-Triassic boundary conodonts from Julfa-Abadeh Belt along Northwest and
Central Iran. Permophiles 41, 34–40.
Perez-Gomez, I., Farqani, S. Claps, M. and Peters, H. (2013) Diagenetic Evolution of a Permo-Triassic
Khuff Oolitic Reservoir in North Oman. In EAGE Special Volume Permo-Triassic sequence of the
Arabian Plate.
Pöppelreiter, M., Schneider, C., Obermaier, M., Forke, H.C., Koehrer, B. and Aigner, T. (2011) Seal turns
into reservoir: Sudair equivalents in outcrops, Jebel Al Akhdar, Sultanate of Oman. GeoArabia, 16(1),
69–108.
Pöppelreiter, M.C. and Marshall, E. (2013) The Khuff: Play Segments and Development History of an
Intracratonic Carbonate Play. In EAGE Special Volume Permo-Triassic Sequence of the Arabian
Plate.
Pöppelreiter, M.C. and Obermaier, M. (2013) Regional Top Seal of the Khuff Reservoir: The Sudair
Formation. In EAGE Special Volume Permo-Triassic Sequence of the Arabian Plate.
22
The Khuff Formation: Play Elements and Development History of an Epicontinental Carbonate Platform
Richoz, S., Baud, A., Beauchamp, B., Grasby, S.E., Henderson, C. and Krystyn, L. (2013) Khuff margin:
slope to oceanic deposits (Permian-Triassic Allochthons and Exotics, Oman). In EAGE Special
Volume Permo-Triassic Sequence of the Arabian Plate.
Spaak, P. and Ross, M. (2011) A tale of two glaciations. 9th Middle East Geosciences Conference, GEO
2010. GeoArabia, Abstract, 16(4), 168.
Sharland, P.R., Archer, R., Casey, D.M., Davis, R.B., Hall, S.H., Heward, A.P., Horbury, A.D. and
Simmons, M.D. (2001) Arabian Plate Sequence Stratigraphy. GeoArabia, Special Publication 2,
Bahrain, 371.
Singh, P., Husain R., Al-Khaled, O., Rahaman, M., Shereef, H., Al-Zuabi, Y., Ebrahim, M., Hafez, M.,
Al-Rashid, T., Al-Ghareeb, S., Al-Kandhari, A. and Al-Fares, A.M. (2013) Basement configuration
and its impact on Permo-Triassic prospectivity in Kuwait. In EAGE Special Volume Permo-Triassic
Sequence of the Arabian Plate.
Strohmenger, C.J., Always, R.H.S., Broomhall, R.W., Hulstrand, R.F., Al-Mansouri, A., Abdalla, A.A.
and Al-Aidarous, A. (2002) Sequence stratigraphy of the Khuff Formation comprising subsurface and
outcrop data (Arabian Plate, UAE). SPE paper 78535, 558–568.
Svensen, H., Planke, S., Polozov, A.G., Schmidbauer N., Corfu, F., Podladchikov, Y.Y. and Jamtveit, B.
(2009) Siberian gas venting and the end-Permian environmental crisis. Earth Planet Scientific Letters
277, 490–500.
Szabo, F. and Kheradpir, A. (1978) Permian and Triassic stratigraphy, Zagros basin, south-west Iran.
Journal of Petroleum Geology, 1(2), 57–82.
Teasdale et al. 2003.
Terken, J.M.J., Frewin, N.L. and Indrelid, S.L. (2001) Petroleum Systems of Oman: Charge Timing and
Risks. AAPG Bulletin, 85(10), 1817–1845.
Toland, C. (2006) The Khuff Formation: Outcrop Analogues from the Oman Mountains. 7th Middle East
Geosciences Conference and Exhibition, Manama, Bahrain, March 27–29, 2006.
Walz, L. and Aigner, T. 2012. Khuff Sequence 5 (KS5), Oman Mountains: Lateral facies and sequence
variability – a record of differential subsidence? In The Permo-Triassic Sequence of the Arabian
Plate, Abstracts of the EAGE’s Third Arabian Plate Geology Workshop, Kuwait. Abstract, GeoArabia,
17(1), 250–252
Walz, L., Aigner, T. and Koehrer, B. (2013) Khuff sequence KS5 outcrop equivalents in the Oman
Mountains, Sultanate of Oman: Variations to the simple “layer-cake” stratigraphy. GeoArabia, 18(4).
Weidlich, O. and Bernecker, M. (2012) Earthquake-triggered post-depositional Deformation at the rim of
the Arabian platform (Permian-Triassic), Oman Mountains. GeoArabia, 17(2), 253–256
Wender, L.E., Bryant, J.W., Dickens, M.F., Neville, A.S. and Al-Moqbel, A.M. (1998) Paleozoic (PreKhuff) Hydrocarbon Geology of the Ghawar Area, Eastern Saudi Arabia. GeoArabia, 3, 273–302.
23
Zampetti, V., Borkhataria, R. and Vroon, M. (2010) Multi-Scale Assessment of the Middle Eastern
Permo-Triassic Khuff Carbonate: Structural Evolution and Its Impact from Reservoir Properties.
AAPG GEO 2010 Middle East. Geoscience Conference & Exhibition, March 7–10, 2010. Manama,
Bahrain.
Ziegler, M.A. (2001) Late Permian to Holocene paleofacies evolution of the Arabian Plate and its
hydrocarbon occurrences. GeoArabia, 6(3), 445–504.