ARBY`S - DataSsential

Transcription

ARBY`S - DataSsential
generated: June 2014
ARBY’S
BrandFingerprints™
contact Datassential (Dave Jenkins)
847-903-5744 | [email protected]
fingerprint identifiers
PERFORMANCE
CRAVE-ABILITY
OCCASIONS
17
33
5
PROXIMITY
VISIT DRIVERS
24
TRAFFIC
ENGAGEMENT
10
44
UNMET NEEDS
28
48
Each restaurant chain has a unique
fingerprint – a set of factors that determine
who its customers are, why they visit.
2
FINGERPRINT™
Analysis
3
OVERVIEW
Arby’s Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
Weaknesses
Meal appeal
Traffic / visitation
Dinner on the way home
Ad recall
Lunch offerings
Unaided awareness
Food quality
Social occasion appeal
Freshness
Ethnic consumer appeal
Taste
Millennial appeal
Unique menu items
Breakfast
Meal appeal
Kids menu
Sandwiches
Affordability
Appetizers / snacks
Snacking & beverage visits
Hot beverage program
4
OCCASIONS
5
28 occasions
OCCASIONS are the scenarios for which
consumers eat and drink away from home; they
describe the underlying motivators for AFH activity.
work lunch
casual lunch
romantic meal
family meal
last minute dinner
casual dinner
quick bite
dinner on the way
home
brunch
special occasion
morning commute
hanging with
friends
social gathering
running errands
before an event
work break
impressing
someone
cheap bite
food for energy
festive
with co-workers
after work
formal dinner
relaxing at home
guy‘s night out
girl‘s night out
holdover
weekend
breakfast
road trip
6
OCCASIONS
Current Visit Patterns
Festive
Impressing someone
Celebration
Coworkers after work
Work break
Work lunch
Girls' night out
Guys' night out
Before event
Social gathering
Hanging with friends
Romantic meal
Holdover
Food as fuel
Weekend breakfast
Relaxing at home
Formal dinner
Brunch
Family meal
Road trip
Running errands
Morning commute
Dinner on way home
Cheap bite
Quick bite
Casual dinner
Last minute dinner
Casual lunch
POSITIVE gap vs. top LSR’s
Arby’s
NEGATIVE gap vs. top LSR’s
% OF VISITS BELONGING TO THAT OCCASION
Compared to other LSRs, Arby’s is particularly
likely to be visited for dinner on the way home…
… with lower visitation for away from both socialbased and morning eating occasions.
0%
5%
10%
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
15%
20%
25%
30%
7
OCCASIONS
POSITIVE gap vs. top LSR’s
Arby’s
Appeal
NEGATIVE gap vs. top LSR’s
Festive
Impressing someone
Celebration
Coworkers after work
Work break
Work lunch
Girls' night out
Guys' night out
Before event
Social gathering
Hanging with friends
Romantic meal
Holdover
Food as fuel
Weekend breakfast
Relaxing at home
Formal dinner
Brunch
Family meal
Road trip
Running errands
Morning commute
Dinner on way home
Cheap bite
Quick bite
Casual dinner
Last minute dinner
Casual lunch
APPEAL FOR THAT OCCASION
Arby’s appeal rates
lower than other leading
LSRs in multiple areas.
It is, however, thought
to be a comparatively
better option for a
casual lunch, last
minute dinner, or dinner
on the way home.
0%
5%
10%
15%
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
8
OCCASIONS
Target Opportunities
CURRENT CORE FOCUS
Arby’s Relative Appeal (versus other top LSRs)
SECONDARY FOCUS
Dinner way home
Holdover
Food as fuel
Last minute dinner
Casual lunch
Running errands
Casual dinner
Road trip
Before event
Quick bite
Work break
Work lunch
Guys' night out
Family meal
Relaxing at home
Co-workers after work
Girls' night out
Hanging w/ friends
Cheap bite
Formal dinner
Romantic meal
Festive
Impressing someone
Morning commute
Brunch
Social gathering
Celebration
LESS CRITICAL
Despite being in the “less critical”
quadrant, Arbys’ low appeal for
morning occasions is a concern.
Weekend breakfast
WHITESPACE
Occasion Frequency (total AFH)
9
TRAFFIC
10
TRAFFIC
Arby’s
Eater Types
average across top LSRs
Basic Eaters
Quality
Essentialists
Progressives
Experientialists
dispassionate about food,
focusing more on value and
convenience.
quality matters to a certain
point; it’s got to be good, but
doesn’t have to be great
passionate about food and
health, and more willing to
try new things
go beyond the food to also
focus on the experiential
aspects of eating & drinking
15%
22%
30%
33%
12%
22%
31%
35%
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
11
TRAFFIC
Arby’s
EMPLOYMENT
Patron Demography
HH
SIZE
White collar
45%
Blue collar
18%
White collar
52%
2.8
Blue collar
16%
(3.0)
Urban 33%
Do not work
32%
41%
White
African
Amer.
Hispanic
6% 9%
Asian
GENERATIONS
30%
26%
25%
9%
3%
1% 2%
Other
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
Millennials
Top LSR
13%
25%
45%
17%
Rural 26%
40%
31%
5%
Arby's
14%
28%
45%
13%
Rural 30%
Suburban 34%
ETHNICITY
6% 8%
Under $25k
$25k - $50k
$50k - $100k
Over $100k
Suburban 36%
Urban 40%
82%
72%
INCOME
Do not work
37%
51% (51%)
HOME
49% (49%)
average across top LSRs
Gen X
Boomers
2%
Silent
Generation
12
TRAFFIC
Arby’s Users
Patron Behavior & Values
average across top LSRs
38%
% OF MEALS EATEN…
Arby‘s
Users
Top LSR
Average
Delta
At home
68%
66%
+2%
Away from home
32%
34%
-2%
34%
33%
OF RESTAURANT VISITS, % THAT ARE AT…
Arby's
Users
Top LSR
Average
Delta
Major chains
60%
57%
+3%
Local chains
22%
24%
-2%
Independents
18%
20%
-2%
31%
Foodie
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
Healthy-focused
13
TRAFFIC
Patron Values
IMPORTANCE
of various factors
to Arby’s Customers
Arby‘s Users
Top LSR Average
Delta
Great taste
66%
66%
+0%
Consistent food quality
64%
60%
+4%
Food is fresh
63%
61%
+1%
Cleanliness of the place
62%
60%
+2%
Good value for the money
62%
59%
+3%
High quality food
61%
57%
+4%
Affordable
60%
57%
+3%
Food is made to order
56%
53%
+3%
Quality of the ingredients used
56%
54%
+1%
Friendly service
52%
53%
-1%
Good portion sizes
51%
51%
+1%
Nearby / conveniently located
50%
49%
+1%
Fast / able to get in and out quickly
48%
46%
+2%
High end / premium ingredients
46%
43%
+3%
Discounts & special deals
45%
43%
+2%
Food is attractively presented
44%
41%
+3%
Very low prices
42%
39%
+3%
Family friendly setting
41%
40%
+1%
Lots of variety on the menu
41%
42%
-1%
Menu is organized well / easy to read
41%
41%
-1%
Dishes / foods I can’t easily have at home
39%
40%
-1%
Natural ingredients
36%
38%
-2%
Selection of condiments / sauces to use
34%
34%
+0%
Availability of healthy options
33%
36%
-3%
Kid friendly
32%
33%
-1%
Appealing décor / ambiance
30%
30%
+0%
Foods are new and interesting
30%
32%
-2%
Staff provides helpful recommendations
29%
31%
-2%
Authentic dishes
29%
30%
-1%
Availability of locally sourced ingredients
27%
29%
-2%
Place gives back to / helps the local community
27%
28%
-2%
Typical clientele matches my age / lifestyle / personality
25%
27%
-2%
Cool / hip setting
20%
23%
-3%
Ethnic food options
18%
19%
-2%
14
TRAFFIC
Arby’s
Consumer Reach & Habituality
average across top LSRs
RECENCY OF LAST VISIT
89% have ever visited Arby’s
30%
15% have done so in the last 30 days
(versus 25% for the typical top LSR)
25%
21%
18%
17%
17%
15%
14%
11%
12%
11%
9%
Past 30 days
Past 3 months
Past 6 months
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
Past year
More than year
Never visited
15
TRAFFIC
Competitive Crossover
% OF ARBY’S USERS WHO ALSO EAT AT…
72%
60%
53%
52%
52%
41%
39%
38%
33%
31%
30%
29%
28%
21%
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
Jack-in-the-Box
Chipotle
Panera
Sonic
Chick-Fil-A
Domino's
Dunkin' Donuts
KFC
Pizza Hut
Starbucks
Wendy's
Burger King
Taco Bell
Subway
McDonald's
16%
16
CRAVE-ABILITY
17
CRAVE-ABILITY
highest
Food-Specific Mindshare
second highest
TOTAL UNAIDED AWARENESS (% mentioning that chain when thinking about…)
Arby's
Burger King
Chick-Fil-A
Chipotle
Domino's
Dunkin Donuts
Jack in the Box
KFC
McDonald's
Panera
Pizza Hut
Sonic
Starbucks
Subway
Taco Bell
Wendy's
Burger
Pizza
Chicken
Sandwich
Deli
Sandwich
French
Fries
Sweet
Bakery Item
Coffee
Drink
Frozen
Treat
Breakfast
Item
Strips /
Nuggets
4%
65%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
1%
69%
0%
1%
14%
0%
1%
1%
47%
0%
0%
0%
0%
63%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
77%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
30%
31%
0%
0%
0%
4%
37%
46%
3%
0%
3%
0%
11%
1%
29%
5%
2%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
2%
3%
6%
2%
0%
1%
88%
1%
2%
12%
52%
4%
0%
0%
0%
7%
4%
76%
0%
0%
9%
0%
1%
0%
49%
2%
3%
0%
0%
1%
36%
1%
1%
6%
20%
1%
1%
18%
1%
0%
2%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
44%
1%
0%
39%
5%
0%
1%
74%
2%
1%
2%
2%
7%
1%
0%
0%
1%
1%
1%
28%
0%
0%
15%
1%
0%
0%
18%
1%
25%
3%
0%
1%
17%
4%
1%
63%
7%
1%
4%
7%
10%
10%
5%
3%
27%
16%
0%
1%
0%
3%
47%
62%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
26%
Arby’s garners low mindshare for both chicken sandwiches and deli sandwiches… and in fact earns its greatest food mindshare
for its FRENCH FRIES.
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
18
CRAVE-ABILITY
highest
Food-Specific Mindshare
second highest
TOP OF MIND AWARENESS (% first mentioning that chain when thinking about…)
Burger
Pizza
Chicken
Sandwich
Deli
Sandwich
French
Fries
Sweet
Bakery Item
Coffee
Drink
Frozen
Treat
Breakfast
Item
Strips /
Nuggets
Arby's
0%
0%
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Burger King
22%
0%
6%
0%
10%
1%
0%
1%
3%
4%
Chick-Fil-A
0%
0%
23%
0%
1%
0%
0%
1%
0%
8%
Chipotle
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Domino's
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Dunkin Donuts
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
21%
17%
1%
5%
0%
Jack in the Box
1%
0%
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1%
1%
KFC
0%
0%
17%
0%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
25%
McDonald's
34%
0%
15%
2%
59%
2%
11%
7%
38%
35%
Panera
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
13%
1%
0%
3%
0%
Pizza Hut
0%
41%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Sonic
2%
0%
1%
0%
1%
1%
0%
5%
1%
1%
Starbucks
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
53%
0%
3%
0%
Subway
0%
0%
5%
78%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
Taco Bell
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
Wendy's
9%
0%
8%
1%
6%
0%
0%
5%
1%
3%
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
19
CRAVE-ABILITY
PAST 12 Months (May 2013 - Apr 2014)
% OF NEW ITEMS / LTOs
Menu Activity Focus
Appetizers / Sides
--
4%
--
--
--
3%
9%
5%
4%
11%
--
Sandwiches
45%
20%
18%
--
--
9%
15%
5%
13%
5%
--
Burgers / Hot Dogs
--
11%
--
--
--
--
12%
--
22%
--
--
Soup
--
--
6%
--
--
--
--
--
--
8%
--
Salads
--
2%
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
8%
--
Center of Plate Entrees
--
4%
12%
--
80%
--
--
10%
--
--
--
Pizza
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
67%
Pasta Dishes
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
11%
--
Mexican Entrees
--
--
--
100%
--
--
9%
--
--
--
--
Rice Entrees
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Other Entrees
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Breakfast Entrees
--
2%
41%
--
--
18%
18%
--
11%
5%
--
Kid's Entrees
--
2%
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Combo / Value Meals
45%
43%
--
--
20%
2%
12%
81%
24%
--
33%
Desserts
9%
7%
24%
--
--
23%
9%
--
13%
35%
--
Beverages
--
4%
--
--
--
45%
18%
--
13%
16%
--
Condiments
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Source: Datassential MenuTrends INSIDER™
20
CRAVE-ABILITY
PAST 12 Months (May 2013 - Apr 2014)
% OF NEW ITEMS / LTOs
Menu Activity Focus (cont.)
Appetizers / Sides
6%
13%
2%
8%
5%
Sandwiches
11%
5%
4%
50%
36%
Burgers / Hot Dogs
14%
--
--
--
23%
Soup
--
--
--
--
--
Salads
--
4%
--
--
23%
Center of Plate Entrees
3%
--
--
--
Pizza
--
--
--
Pasta Dishes
--
--
Mexican Entrees
--
Rice Entrees
TOTAL MENU ACTIVITY
(# of introductions)
Most
Recent
12
Months
Past 3
Months
Arby's
33
9
Burger King
46
9
--
Chick-Fil-A
17
6
17%
--
Chipotle
1
1
--
--
--
Domino's
5
4
Dunkin' Donuts
66
17
--
30%
--
--
Jack-in-the-Box
34
6
--
--
2%
--
--
KFC
21
8
Other Entrees
--
--
--
--
--
McDonald's
54
8
Breakfast Entrees
11%
8%
32%
4%
--
Panera
37
3
Kid's Entrees
--
--
--
--
5%
Pizza Hut
9
4
Sonic
35
13
Combo / Value Meals
3%
--
5%
8%
5%
Starbucks
78
13
Desserts
49%
40%
4%
4%
5%
Subway
24
9
Beverages
3%
31%
21%
--
--
Taco Bell
56
20
Condiments
--
--
--
8%
--
Wendy's
22
6
Source: Datassential MenuTrends INSIDER™
21
CRAVE-ABILITY
Impact on Visitation
“There are specific items on its menu that I think about and crave” (among visitors to that chain)
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
44%
43%
43%
Burger King
50%
Subway
51%
McDonald's
52%
Wendy's
53%
Domino's
56%
Pizza Hut
56%
Starbucks
58%
Panera
58%
Dunkin' Donuts
59%
Sonic
60%
KFC
Taco Bell
Jack-in-the-Box
Chipotle
60%
Chick-Fil-A
64%
Arby's
66%
Although Arby’s is less often top of mind among the general population, its traffic is frequently
driven by a specific craving. The key is to extend that craving to a larger audience.
22
CRAVE-ABILITY
Specific Menu Items
TOP OF MIND FOODS & OFFERINGS AT ARBY’S
FREQUENTLY MENTIONED
Roast Beef
Cheddar
Curly Fries
Shakes
Sandwiches
Jamocha
French Dip
Reuben
Turnovers
Turkey
Chicken
Melt
Fish
Onion Rings
Mozzarella Sticks
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
23
VISIT DRIVERS
24
VISIT DRIVERS
Motivations
REASONS FOR VISITING
(% indicating as a motivation
for their last visit)
Arby's
Top LSR
Average
Delta
Specific food craving
56%
50%
+7%
Conviently located
37%
45%
-8%
Better quality food
34%
34%
+0%
Fresher food
25%
29%
-4%
Been a while; wanted to give it a try
24%
17%
+7%
Better menu variety
21%
25%
-4%
Affordable
19%
32%
-13%
More consistent
17%
26%
-9%
Better service
15%
21%
-6%
To try a new LTO
15%
14%
+1%
Healthier options
14%
20%
-6%
Better ambiance / setting
10%
15%
-4%
To see what's new on the menu
10%
13%
-3%
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
25
VISIT DRIVERS
meal
Type of Visit / Purchase
beverage
only
snack
Arby’s traffic skews heavily toward full meals (87%), far more so than other top LSRs (73%).
Snacking and beverage-only trips to Arby’s are comparatively rare, and a potential area for improvement.
3%
12%
11%
15%
Arby’s
average among
87% meal
73% meal
TOP LSRs
73%
87%
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
26
VISIT DRIVERS
Arby’s
Timing
average across top LSRs
DEGREE OF PLANNING
% PLANNED IN ADVANCE
46%
40%
32%
28%
Last second decision /
already on the road
28%
Decided before leaving, but
didn't spend time doing so
26%
Planned in advance
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
Domino’s
45%
Panera
42%
Pizza Hut
42%
KFC
35%
Starbucks
35%
Chipotle
34%
Chick-Fil-A
33%
Subway
33%
Dunkin’Donuts
33%
Jack-in-the-Box
31%
Burger King
29%
Arby’s
26%
Taco Bell
26%
Sonic
25%
McDonald’s
24%
Wendy’s
24%
27
ENGAGEMENT
28
ENGAGEMENT
True Loyalty
TRUE LOYALTY RATIO (% of visits driven by a true desire, rather than just convenience)
69%
62%
58%
56%
53%
53%
52%
52%
51%
51%
50%
50%
47%
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
Burger King
Jack-in-the-Box
Arby's
Sonic
Domino's
Taco Bell
Wendy's
Dunkin' Dounts
KFC
Subway
Pizza Hut
Starbucks
Panera
Chick-Fil-A
Chipotle
36%
33%
McDonald's
63%
29
ENGAGEMENT
Excitement & Knowledge
% AGREEING
STRONGLY
Arby's
Top LSR
Average
Delta
Excites me to visit
27%
29%
-2%
Can recite several specific items from
menu
36%
39%
-3%
Offers a unique experience
35%
35%
-1%
Specific items on menu I think about and
crave
60%
54%
+5%
Staff cares about providing a great
customer experience
39%
41%
-2%
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
30
ENGAGEMENT
perceived as “FAST-CASUAL”
Segment Perception
perceived as “traditional FAST FOOD”
91%
96%
McDonald's
78%
87%
90%
4%
6%
94%
Burger King
78%
84%
13%
9%
Taco Bell
76%
38%
68%
22%
Arby's
62%
65%
30%
22%
Dunkin' Donuts
60%
32%
KFC
40%
35%
Subway
16%
10%
Jack-in-the-Box
QSR vs. FAST-CASUAL PERCEPTION
70%
58%
42%
24%
92%
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
Wendy's
Sonic
Domino's
Chick-Fil-A
Starbucks
Pizza Hut
Chipotle
Panera
8%
31
ENGAGEMENT
Arby’s
Ad Recall & Recommend Activity
average across top LSRs
IN THE PAST MONTH…
50%
47%
44%
39%
Ad recall and recommend activity among Arby’s
users trails that of other LSR’s.
Recall advertising
Have recommended to
friends / family
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
32
PERFORMANCE
33
Net Promoter Score (NPS) is calculated as the difference
between brand “Promoters” and “Detractors”. Scores can range
from -100 to +100, with higher scores indicating a more loyal
customer base for that brand.
PERFORMANCE
Net Promoter
“How likely are you to recommend Arby’s to your family and friends?” (10 = extremely likely)
19%
Arby’s NPS:
+2
15%
11%
3%
1%
0
1%
1
18%
17%
12%
3%
1%
2
3
4
detractor: 31%
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
5
6
7
8
passive: 36%
9
10
promoter: 33%
34
PERFORMANCE
NPS Rankings
“How likely are you to recommend Arby’s to your family and friends?” (NPS Summary)
Chick-Fil-A
+32
Panera
+30
Subway
+24
Chipotle
+19
Starbucks
+18
Dunkin' Donuts
+11
Wendy's
+11
Pizza Hut
+10
Sonic
+6
Arby's
+2
Taco Bell
+1
KFC
-1
Domino's
-2
McDonald's
Fast-casual concepts tend to occupy the top spots on this
list, with Chick-Fil-A and Subway being notable exceptions.
-3
Jack-in-the-Box
Burger King
Arby’s ranks below average in NPS, trailing leaders ChickFil-A, Panera, and Subway by a considerable margin.
-4
-5
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
35
PERFORMANCE
BOTTOM BOXES: Arby’s ranking among 16 top LSRs for that
consumer group. A ranking of “1” is best; “16” is worst.
NPS Detail
+6
+0
+2
+5
+1
+4
+1
+6
+7
-4
-4
10
11
10
15
16
16
14
10
10
13
12
10
15
14
African Amer.
Hispanic
Asian
Under $25k
$25 - $50k
$50 - $100k
$100k+
White Collar
Blue Collar
Kids under 13
No kids under 13
-14
10
White
Experientialist
15
Silent Gen
Progressive
10
Boomers
Quality Essentialist
13
Gen X
13
Millennials
12
Women
9
Men
11
Basic Eater
-12
-10
-7
-5
-5
-3
+1
+6
+6
+7
“How likely are you to recommend Arby’s to your family and friends?” (NPS Summary)
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
36
PERFORMANCE
Mega Attributes (Satisfaction)
Food quality
highest: 81%
Service
Ambiance
highest: 78%
highest: 67%
range for top LSRs
Arby’s
74%
avg. (68%)
Arby’s
avg. (59%)
lowest: 48%
lowest: 46%
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
avg. (49%)
61%
Arby’s
50%
lowest: 33%
37
PERFORMANCE
Food & Beverage Quality
% rating “Very Good” or “Excellent”
Arby's
LSR
Average
Delta
Highest
LSR
Lowest
LSR
Freshness of food
66%
62%
+5%
82%
37%
Great tasting food
72%
66%
+6%
82%
42%
Food is made to order
67%
63%
+4%
81%
38%
High quality food
65%
58%
+7%
79%
31%
High-end / premium ingredients
57%
51%
+6%
76%
25%
Food is attractively presented
54%
55%
-1%
77%
29%
Arby’s average F&B QUALITY vs. other Top LSRs:
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
+4%
38
PERFORMANCE
Menu Appeal
% rating “Very Good” or “Excellent”
Arby's
LSR
Average
Delta
Highest
LSR
Lowest
LSR
Innovative menu / always something new to try
47%
46%
+1%
62%
29%
Menu is well organized
61%
57%
+3%
73%
41%
Offers items I can’t easily have at home
59%
54%
+5%
67%
34%
Wide variety of appealing menu choices
57%
56%
+1%
76%
38%
Health-conscious choices
39%
41%
-2%
74%
21%
Seasonal or limited time menu items
45%
44%
+1%
64%
32%
Offers items you can’t get at other restaurants
68%
54%
+13%
68%
30%
Kids menu
43%
47%
-4%
67%
26%
Arby’s average MENU APPEAL vs. other Top LSRs:
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
+2%
39
PERFORMANCE
Value Proposition
% rating “Very Good” or “Excellent”
Arby's
LSR
Average
Delta
Highest
LSR
Lowest
LSR
Overall value for the dollar
51%
56%
-5%
69%
33%
Affordability
51%
56%
-6%
70%
27%
Appealing discounts / special deals
49%
48%
+1%
65%
32%
Portion sizes
63%
59%
+4%
72%
43%
Arby’s average VALUE vs. other Top LSRs:
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
-2%
40
PERFORMANCE
Customer Experience
% rating “Very Good” or “Excellent”
Arby's
LSR
Average
Delta
Highest
LSR
Lowest
LSR
Fast / able to get in and out quickly
66%
63%
+3%
71%
53%
Appealing décor / ambiance
52%
49%
+2%
71%
31%
Helpful and friendly staff
63%
60%
+3%
79%
40%
Consistent experience every time you visit
63%
62%
+1%
77%
41%
Staff always gets your order right
63%
61%
+2%
78%
38%
Cleanliness
64%
62%
+2%
79%
43%
Takeout packaging
62%
60%
+1%
71%
48%
All of its locations offer a consistent experience
59%
59%
+0%
76%
41%
Good place to bring your kids
54%
57%
-3%
80%
34%
Arby’s average EXPERIENCE vs. other Top LSRs:
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
+1%
41
PERFORMANCE
Daypart Offerings
Breakfast items
highest: 73%
Lunch items
highest: 88%
Dinner items
highest: 84%
range for top LSRs
Arby’s
Arby’s
78%
avg. (71%)
avg. (74%)
76%
avg. (57%)
Arby’s
48%
lowest: 40%
lowest: 44%
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
lowest: 53%
42
PERFORMANCE
Menu Categories
% rating “Very Good” or “Excellent”
Arby's
LSR
Average
Delta
Highest
LSR
Lowest
LSR
Cold beverages
67%
66%
+2%
87%
56%
Hot beverages
48%
54%
-7%
91%
36%
Appetizer / snack items
65%
59%
+7%
74%
40%
Salads
52%
53%
-1%
81%
35%
Sandwiches
81%
62%
+19%
88%
39%
French Fries
68%
67%
+1%
78%
54%
Side dishes (other than french fries)
61%
54%
+6%
71%
33%
Ethnic items
37%
38%
-1%
71%
19%
Desserts
56%
56%
+0%
80%
41%
Arby’s average FOOD SCORE vs. other Top LSRs:
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
+3%
43
PROXIMITY
44
Indianapolis
Atlanta
Minneapolis
Cleveland
Detroit
Salt Lake City
Chicago
Dallas
Phoenix
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Nashville
Cincinnati
Denver
Columbus OH
St. Louis
Los Angeles
Lexington
Grand Rapids
Tulsa
Birmingham
Tampa
Washington DC
Kansas City
Oklahoma City
Louisville
Greenville
Dayton
Seattle
Charleston
Orlando
Charlotte
Mobile
Knoxville
Greensboro
Milwaukee
Toledo
Houston
Harrisburg
Richmond
Portland OR
Raleigh
Flint
Little Rock
Ft. Wayne
Wichita
Omaha
Lincoln & Hastings
Youngstown
Baltimore
ARBY’S: UNIT DISTRIBUTION & DENSITY (top metros)
# OF UNITS
DENSITY (units per 1mm people)
100
45
90
40
80
35
70
30
60
25
50
20
40
30
15
20
10
10
5
0
0
45
Source: Datassential Firefly™
1.9%
1.9%
1.6%
1.5%
1.1%
0.9%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0.4%
0.4%
0.3%
0.2%
Steakhouse
Other Asian
BBQ
Mediterranean
Thai
Mixed Ethnicity
Other European
Indian
South American
French
Caribbean
Korean
2.6%
Japanese
Seafood
2.7%
Italian
4.6%
Coffee / Bakery
3.2%
4.8%
Chinese
Southern
5.1%
Dessert / Snack
8.9%
10.8%
Pizza
Mexican
11.2%
12.7%
Sandwich / Deli
Burger
American
21.7%
PROXIMITY
Competitive Radius
Restaurant Menu Types within a
ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS of ARBY’S STORES
46
PROXIMITY
Closest Competitors
*within metros where both chains operate
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
McDonald's
Subway Sandwiches & Salads
Taco Bell
Burger King
Starbucks Coffee Co
Pizza Hut
Kfc
Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburgers
Little Caesar's Pizza
Dairy Queen
Applebee's Neighborhood Grill
Domino's Pizza
Sonic Drive-in
Papa John's Pizza
Waffle House
Chick-fil-a
Dunkin Donuts
Panera Bread
Jimmy John's
Long John Silver's
Denny's
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Hardee's
Chili's Grill & Bar
Panda Express
Source: Datassential Firefly™
Avg. Miles
to Nearest*
OVERLAP RATIO (% of stores within _______ miles of that other chain)
0.5 miles 1 mile
3 miles
5 miles 10 miles 20 miles 50 miles
1.2
52.4%
70.5%
94.0%
96.5%
98.4%
99.5%
99.9%
1.1
40.9%
60.8%
95.0%
98.0%
99.4%
99.9%
100.0%
2.7
33.8%
50.2%
80.3%
87.5%
92.1%
96.7%
99.1%
2.7
32.0%
45.4%
79.7%
88.7%
93.4%
97.1%
99.5%
5.5
26.6%
39.7%
66.8%
74.0%
81.0%
88.0%
97.9%
2.4
25.2%
42.0%
80.7%
90.3%
95.5%
98.7%
99.8%
3.5
23.8%
36.5%
70.8%
83.0%
90.4%
96.0%
99.4%
5.8
17.4%
26.9%
51.6%
65.7%
81.2%
91.2%
98.6%
4.8
16.2%
26.0%
65.9%
77.5%
85.5%
91.8%
98.3%
5.0
14.0%
25.8%
58.8%
72.4%
83.6%
92.5%
97.8%
6.6
13.1%
21.7%
46.9%
64.4%
78.3%
87.6%
97.3%
4.3
12.8%
26.5%
70.3%
80.8%
87.9%
94.0%
99.1%
8.7
11.9%
20.2%
42.0%
52.6%
66.3%
76.9%
91.1%
5.9
11.8%
22.4%
59.2%
72.9%
80.3%
87.8%
96.8%
10.8
9.9%
14.4%
27.5%
34.8%
42.8%
50.9%
65.3%
10.3
9.8%
15.9%
33.2%
44.4%
56.2%
66.1%
82.3%
10.6
9.5%
15.5%
33.6%
43.7%
53.7%
63.1%
80.2%
8.8
9.5%
16.6%
38.2%
51.2%
62.9%
72.2%
86.3%
10.9
8.5%
14.9%
36.2%
46.7%
58.9%
69.3%
89.1%
11.2
8.5%
12.3%
27.6%
39.5%
53.7%
68.1%
86.1%
11.2
7.8%
12.4%
29.7%
41.6%
57.4%
70.6%
90.4%
11.3
7.7%
12.6%
29.6%
41.0%
52.9%
63.8%
82.2%
11.6
7.2%
11.8%
26.4%
33.8%
42.9%
54.3%
71.0%
9.9
7.1%
12.7%
31.2%
47.7%
63.5%
73.9%
90.2%
12.7
6.8%
11.3%
25.4%
34.1%
44.5%
53.9%
73.2%
47
UNMET NEEDS
48
UNMET NEEDS
Consumer Whitespace
select
verbatims
“Offer fish sandwiches year round. My Arby’s only offers one flavor of shake while others offer a better choice.”
“Arby's prices have gotten too high to be able to afford for a family of four without coupons. Orders are rarely right whether they are busy or not, it
is disappointing especially when you only order a few items for two people. They need to better label Cherry and Apple turnovers, I get tired of
ordering one, checking the receipt and when I get home finding out that at least one of them if wrong!!”
“Offer regular fries. The curly fries are rarely done well - always over or under cooked making them soggy or too crunchy.”
“Arby's seems to have a policy of only hiring minorities, and this often leads to a somewhat annoying language barrier. The food, while quite good, is
not always worth the money. No single fast food sandwich should be 4 dollars.”
“I would like to see faster service... that is, the time it takes for me to get my order should be at a minimum.”
“Working with their employees on customer service. The last couple times I have been to Arby’s, the employees are more focused on talking to each
other than customer service.”
“Bring back the Homestyle fries, not everyone likes curly fries and a potato cake is not appealing to me. Used to think the Homestyle fries were
actually one of the better fries offered at a fast food restaurant, then one day they were just no longer available so I no longer order any side.”
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
49
UNMET NEEDS
Consumer Whitespace
select
verbatims
“Offer a better value. Improve portion sizes or lower prices. For example a 5 piece onion ring costs 2.99. That's 60 cents for a single onion ring. Too
expensive and too small portions.”
“I would like to see their prices lower. Their prices are very high, and not especially worth it for what you get.”
“Keeping up the quality of their food, but getting the cost a little lower especially for just a sandwich.”
“I wish they had a wider variety of sandwiches. I really do not care for the curly fries either. Change the fries would be good for me but that is my
preference. Arby’s needs a wider variety of sandwiches to chose from and different fries.”
“Price. Arby's is a little pricey. But you do get what you pay for very good food. They should have more deals.”
“Bring back some of the great special sandwiches they had like the mushroom one and the brisket bbq one.”
“Lower prices. they are way overpriced and usually go some other place because of it. All Arby’s are not the same. some have good tasting juicy beef
while others like the one local to me always taste dried out and old. the beverages are flat a lot of the time. they don't know how to hook up their
fountain drinks right as they all have a bad taste to them at our local Arby's.”
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
50
UNMET NEEDS
Consumer Whitespace
select
verbatims
“The employees are mostly teens who don't care if you're there and they are often not very friendly, the sandwiches are good but look like someone
sat on them before it got to me.”
“Last time I was there I was upset because I had to wait forever for 2 Jr Roast beefs. The car ahead of me ordered a huge sack full of food and it took
sooooo looooonnnngggg. I wish they would do like other places do and have the car pull up and walk their order out instead of having me wait so
long behind them. Numerous times I almost just left the line.”
“Better presentation. MY sandwich was a pile of mess. It literally looked like it was thrown together as quick as possible, by someone with their hands
tied and eyes closed. HOWEVER, it was DELICIOUS!!!!! And we love the 2 for $5 deal. The curly fries are always good. But the presentation is ALWAYS
terrible.”
“I would really like it if that had normal fries you can see then on the website but no Arby's I know carries then they have seasons friend. I would eat
there more often if they had normal fries available.”
“Arby's is a favorite 'take home' meal for us because you don't have to worry about them cooling off. I love the sandwiches for travel and will buy
them ahead to take with us. Also for lunches that I have to eat at work. So for me they hit all the points that are important to me. Better prices
would be the only area that I would like improved. Value menus are extremely important in today's economy.”
“The prices are very unaffordable. T wo people for lunch cost $18 last time I went. No way I can afford this very often. Took a long time to get our
food.”
“The decor is tired and boring. Some stores are somewhat outdated and a bit on the dark side.”
Source: Datassential Consumer Insights
51
WE KNOW FOOD
DATASSENTIAL is your best source for food industry insights – from the
latest menu trends to the products shoppers want at the grocery store.
for more information, contact DAVE JENKINS at
847-903-5744 or [email protected]
DATASSENTIAL PROGRAM RESEARCH
BrandFingerprints
Restaurant brand metrics
that truly drive consumer
behavior
Every restaurant chain has a unique fingerprint – a set of factors
that determine who its customers are and why they visit.
Dissect the DNA of top chains in this brand new consumer study
from Datassential. This is the most thorough and meaningful
analysis of each chain, answering the WHY behind the what.
LIMITED SERVICE CHAIN REPORTS
Arby's
Domino's
McDonald's
Starbucks
Burger King
Dunkin' Donuts
Panera
Subway
Chick-Fil-A
Jack-in-Box
Pizza Hut
Taco Bell
Chipotle
KFC
Sonic
Wendy's
FULL SERVICE CHAIN REPORTS
Applebee's
Cheesecake Factory
Golden Corral
Olive Garden
Ruby Tuesday
Beef O'Bradys
Chili's Grill & Bar
Hooters
Outback Steakhouse
Sizzler
Bob Evans
Cracker Barrel
Huddle House
P F Chang's
Texas Roadhouse
Buffalo Wild Wings
Denny's
IHOP
Perkins
TGI Friday's
California Pizza Kitchen
Friendly's Restaurant
Logan's Roadhouse
Red Lobster
Village Inn
Carrabba's Italian Grill
Fuddruckers
Longhorn Steakhouse
Red Robin
Waffle House
FS
CPG
DATASSENTIAL INNOVATION TOOLS
MenuTrends
The industry’s most accurate
system for identifying, tracking,
and predicting flavor trends
FS
CPG
10x
larger than other menu
and flavor databases
15 million
menu examples from
more than 100k menus
LTOs
new and limited-time
items updated weekly
contact Datassential (Dave Jenkins)
847-903-5744 | [email protected]
DATASSENTIAL INNOVATION TOOLS
LTO Analytics
On-demand analysis of new
item and LTO activity at
hundreds of restaurant chains
FS
CPG
benchmark
detailed activity reports
for each chain versus its
competitive set
weekly
new items and LTOs are
updated each week
historic
track over 100 months of
LTO activity, dating back
to 2006.
contact Datassential (Dave Jenkins)
847-903-5744 | [email protected]
DATASSENTIAL INNOVATION TOOLS
SCORES
Consumer ratings for hundreds of
new items and LTOs each month,
right as they hit the menu
ratings
thousands of LTOs rated
for appeal, uniqueness,
value, draw, and more
immediate
consumer ratings are
posted each month as
new items and LTOs hit
the menu
benchmark
compare new product
ideas with norms for
thousands of items that
have actually made it
onto the menu
FS
CPG
DATASSENTIAL INNOVATION TOOLS
Trend Spotting
Affordable trend reports that keeps
your organization in the know
FS
CPG
trends
new food, flavors, and
prep methods
global
ethnic and regional foods
from the US and around
the world
monthly
dozens of key trends
profiled each month
DATASSENTIAL SALES TOOLS
Firefly
The first true universal operator database,
verified by 5 million phone calls each year
FS
CPG
census
phone-validated profiles
for every FS location in
the US – restaurants, onsite, and retail food.
sell better
generate target lists by
segment, menu type,
operational attributes, or
even what’s on the menu
analytics
contact Datassential (Dave Jenkins)
847-903-5744 | [email protected]
analyze local markets,
brand performance, and
more than 10,000 chains
DATASSENTIAL CUSTOM RESEARCH
Consumer
Segmentation
Concept testing
Proprietary flavor trackers
Category / AAU
Brand strength
Market entry analysis
Customer satisfaction
TURF analysis
Price optimization
Extraordinary eater and
shopper insights that reveal
the “why” behind the “what”
FS
CPG
foodservice
target users of specific
restaurants, c-stores, and
other segments.
retail / cpg
survey shoppers by store
type or specific brand.
global reach
execute research in more
than 70 countries, with full
translation capability.
contact Datassential (Dave Jenkins)
847-903-5744 | [email protected]
DATASSENTIAL CUSTOM RESEARCH
Operator
Expert insights from the
industry’s largest panel of
foodservice decision makers
FS
CPG
40k panelists
Concept testing
Category management
Category AAU
Brand tracking
In-store testing
Market entry analysis
Package testing
by far the industry’s
largest operator panel,
with 40,000 purchase
decision makers
all segments
reach operators from all
segments – LSR, FSR,
lodging, healthcare, K-12,
C&U, B&I, and more.
true feedback
a panel built exclusively
for research, balanced
and unbiased.
contact Datassential (Dave Jenkins)
847-903-5744 | [email protected]