PUBLIC OPEN SPACE and COMMUNITY PURPOSES

Transcription

Moreton Bay Regional Council – Redcliffe City
Planning Scheme Policy
PSP4 Part 8.4.3 Development Contributions for Trunk
Infrastructure – Public Open Space and Community
Purposes
Moreton Bay Regional Council – Redcliffe City
PSP4 Part 8.4.3 Development Contributions for Trunk
Infrastructure – Public Open Space and Community
Purposes
ADOPTION
Moreton Bay Regional Council adopted this planning scheme policy on 28 November 2005.
COMMENCEMENT
This planning scheme policy took effect from 12 December 2005.
Amendment
ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT
Moreton Bay Regional Council adopted this amendment to the planning scheme policy on 8
September 2009.
COMMENCEMENT OF AMENDMENT
This amendment to the planning scheme policy took effect from 29 October 2009.
This document contains the corrections identified in the "Planning Scheme Policies List of
Corrections" document, and reflects the directive by the CEO to implement those corrections. The
adopted version of the PSPs and the "Planning Scheme Policies List of Corrections" document can
be accessed at Council's webpage.
I, Daryl Hitzman, A/Chief Executive Officer, of the Moreton Bay Regional Council, hereby
certify that this document is a true copy of the original.
Daryl Hitzman
A/Chief Executive Officer
PLANNING SCHEME POLICY PSP26 – DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FOR TRUNK INFRASTRUCTURE – OPEN SPACE
Effective from 29 October 2009
Page 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
HEAD OF POWER ............................................................................................................................................ 1
OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................................................................................... 1
DEFINITIONS / APPLICATION ........................................................................................................................ 1
POLICY STATEMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 1
1 SCOPE ....................................................................................................................................................... 1
2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION............................................................................................................... 2
3 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND COMMUNITY PURPOSE METHODOLOGY............................................. 2
3.1
METHODOLOGY FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND COMMUNITY PURPOSE NETWORK .................................... 2
3.2
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND COMMUNITY PURPOSE SERVICE CATCHMENTS ................................................ 3
3.3
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND COMMUNITY PURPOSE DEMAND ASSUMPTIONS ............................................... 3
4 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND COMMUNITY PURPOSE PLAN FOR TRUNK INFRASTRUCTURE ....... 4
4.1
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND COMMUNITY PURPOSE INFRASTRUCTURE VALUATIONS .................................... 4
4.2
EXISTING AND FUTURE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND COMMUNITY PURPOSE INFRASTRUCTURE ..................... 6
4.3
TOTAL COST PER NETWORK COMPONENT ............................................................................................ 12
SCHEDULE A: DEMAND FACTORS............................................................................................................. 13
SCHEDULE B: INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRIBUTION RATES.................................................................... 14
SCHEDULE C: NETWORK ASSET MAPS .................................................................................................... 15
SCHEDULE D: DESIRED STANDARDS OF SERVICE ................................................................................ 19
REVIEW TRIGGERS....................................................................................................................................... 22
RESPONSIBILITY........................................................................................................................................... 22
VERSION CONTROL...................................................................................................................................... 22
Moreton Bay Regional Council
REDCLIFFE CITY PLANNING SCHEME
PLANNING SCHEME POLICY PSP4 Part 8.4.3 – DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FOR TRUNK INFRASTRUCTURE – PUBLIC OPEN SPACE & COMMUNITY
PURPOSES
PSP4 Part 8.4.3 – DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FOR
TRUNK INFRASTRUCTURE – PUBLIC OPEN SPACE and
COMMUNITY PURPOSES
Head of Power
This document is a Planning Scheme Policy for the purposes of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 (the Act)
and is made in compliance with the process prescribed in Schedule 3 of the Act.
Objective
The objective of this policy is to apportion the cost of over all benefiting development (existing and future)
commensurate with the demand or load that existing and future development will place on existing and
planned future infrastructure, while ensuring a reasonable and equitable distribution of the costs of public open
space and community purposes trunk infrastructure between Council and developers of land in the former
Redcliffe City.
Definitions / Application
Application
This policy applies to all applications for development which has been made assessable against the Redcliffe
City Planning Scheme and which will utilise any part of the Public Open Space and Community Purpose Trunk
Infrastructure Network. For the purposes of this policy, the extent of the Public Open Space and Community
Purpose Trunk Infrastructure Network within the City is shown in Schedule C.
The policy outlines the basis of Council’s Infrastructure Contributions Regime for the Public Open Space and
Community Purpose Trunk Infrastructure Network in the former Redcliffe City. It is to be read in conjunction
with PSP4 Part 8.4.1 Development Contributions for Trunk Infrastructure – Administration Policy.
Payment of any monetary contribution under this policy will in no way relieve the development proponent from
any requirement under a condition of development approval to undertake non-trunk infrastructure works.
Nothing contained in this policy precludes Council and the development proponent from entering into an
infrastructure agreement in regard to the matters dealt with by this policy.
Definitions
The definitions of applicable terms are contained in PSP4 Part 8.4.1 Development Contributions for Trunk
Infrastructure – Administration Policy. Where a term used in this policy is not defined in PSP4 Part 8.4.1, that
term shall, unless the context indicates or requires otherwise, have the meaning assigned to it in the Redcliffe
City Planning Scheme or in the Integrated Planning Act 1997.
Policy Statement
1
Scope
This policy sets out the basis for the determination of Development Contributions for Public Open Space and
Community Purpose Trunk Infrastructure which Council will impose as conditions of development approval.
The provisions of this policy shall apply to applications for development within the former Redcliffe City which,
in the opinion of Council, may generate a need for or actually impose a load on its Public Open Space and
Community Purposes Trunk Infrastructure either immediately or at some time in the future. This policy:
•
•
•
•
•
is to be read in conjunction with Planning Scheme Policy PSP 4 Part 8.4.1 Development Contributions for
Trunk Infrastructure – Administration Policy;
specifies the assumptions made in determining the rate of the contribution payable towards the cost of
Public Open Space and Community Purposes Trunk Infrastructure within the former Redcliffe City;
specifies the works, structures or equipment, which the Council determines to be Public Open Space and
Community Purposes Trunk Infrastructure;
establishes the estimated cost of works and basic embellishments of the Public Open Space and
Community Purposes Trunk Infrastructure Network in respect of which contributions are to be made; and
lists the applicable Demand Factors and Schedules of Infrastructure Contribution Rates.
Page 1
PURPOSES
2
Background Information
The methodology used in establishing the amount of required Trunk Infrastructure Contributions under this
policy is based on the work undertaken by Council in the preparation of its proposed Priority Infrastructure
Plan under the Integrated Planning Act 1997.
3
3.1
Public Open Space and Community Purpose Methodology
Methodology for Public Open Space and Community Purpose Network
The methodology used for determining the rate of infrastructure contributions for Council Public Open Space
and Community Purpose trunk infrastructure under this policy is based upon the method set out in the
Department of Local Government and Planning's IPA Guidelines 1/04 and 2/04 (dated 4th October 2004).
This methodology applies an equitable distribution of trunk infrastructure costs between Council (on behalf of
the existing community) and entities proposing new development. Each development proponent will only be
responsible for meeting the establishment costs of that proportion of the public open space (and community
purposes) trunk infrastructure network to be consumed by that entity’s development proposal.
Step 1 – Determine Desired Standards of Service (refer Schedule D):
The DSS were developed through an assessment of the current provision of public open space and
community purposes and the typical embellishments included in them during the work undertaken by Council
in the preparation of its proposed Priority Infrastructure Plan.
Step 2 – Assess Existing Network:
The existing infrastructure, including parks embellishments, was determined from Council’s asset
management records.
Step 3 – Determine Plan for Trunk Infrastructure:
Analysis of the land area of Redcliffe City showed that the existing quantity of land in the public open space
and community purpose network met the land quantity component of the DSS and no further acquisitions
were necessary in the future. An exercise was conducted to ensure that 90% of households were within
800m of local park facilities and the land provision was found to be compliant. However, upgrades to existing
embellishments are required to fully meet the DSS, and those have been determined for each individual
network item and were valued by applying the 2005 unit rates for embellishments shown in Table 4.1A ,
escalated to 01 January 2009 values (refer Table 4.2.1).
Step 4 - Determine External Use of the Network:
It has been assumed regional parks and sports facilities are used by users external to the former Redcliffe City
and a 30% allowance has been attributed to external use. This has been taken into account in the calculation
of the Infrastructure Contribution Rate applicable to users within the former Redcliffe City.
Step 5 - Calculate Contribution Rates
Add the valuations of existing infrastructure items and the net present value of the future infrastructure items
minus any value allocated to external catchment or non-residential users to determine the ‘total (chargeable)
network value’.
To satisfy the discounted cash flow methodology requirements of calculating the infrastructure contribution
rates, existing demand is added to the value of future demand which has been indexed for anticipated
fluctuations in construction costs (general increases) and discounted for cost of capital, resulting in NPV
Demand.
The ‘total (chargeable) network value’ is then divided by the NPV demand to arrive at the contribution rate.
Step 6 – Determine Plan for Trunk Infrastructure
The Plan for Trunk Infrastructure was developed by comparing the existing infrastructure to Council’s adopted
desired standards of service and establishing a reasonable upgrading program based on perceived demand.
A relatively uniform rate of growth in demand across the City suggests that a program of linear expenditure
distribution over the Planning Horizon to upgrade the Public Open Space and Community Purposes Network
is appropriate.
Page 2
PURPOSES
3.2
Public Open Space and Community Purpose Service Catchments
Given the nature and size of the former Redcliffe City local government area, it is reasonable to consider it as
one single service catchment.
The concept of an External Catchment has been introduced to acknowledge that the Public Open Space and
Community Purpose Trunk Infrastructure Network is an open network. This allows for the identification of a
proportion of users of the network that come from within the City and users that come from areas External to
the City for the purpose of fair cost apportionment.
3.3
Public Open Space and Community Purpose Demand Assumptions
Demand Units
The Public Open Space and Community Purpose Infrastructure contributions regime relies on population
projections as a means of determining infrastructure needs. For Public Open Space and Community Purpose
Infrastructure, the Equivalent Person (EP) has been adopted as the standard unit against which the demand
for capacity and hence contributions are assessed. Equivalent Persons for Public Open Space and
Community Purpose network planning have been derived from the Population Projections.
Projected Demand
Projected ultimate demand for the public open space and community purposes network is shown in Table
3.3A. To satisfy the discounted cash flow methodology requirements of calculating the infrastructure
contribution rates, existing demand is added to the value of future demand indexed for anticipated fluctuations
in construction costs (generally increases) and discounted for cost of capital, resulting in NPV Demand.
Table 3.3A - Equivalent Persons (EPs)
EP's for residential development
EP’s based on GFA for non residential demand
Total
Actual 2021 EPs
60,740
2,539
63,279
NPV 2021 EPs
60,257
2,525
62,782
Page 3
PURPOSE
4
Public Open Space and Community Purpose Plan for Trunk Infrastructure
The Public Open Space and Community Purpose network consists of the following components:
•
Recreation parks: local, neighbourhood or regional;
•
Sporting facilities: district or regional; and
•
Land for community facilities.
4.1
Public Open Space and Community Purpose Infrastructure Valuations
There is no Land Acquisition component cost factored into the valuations for the Public Open Space and
Community Purpose network.
Table 4.1A outlines the typical embellishments by park type required to meet Council’s adopted DSS, as well
the relevant Unit Rates for those embellishments. This is an indicative list only. An analysis was conducted on
each park within the City to determine appropriate embellishments based on the function performed by each
site.
Table 4.1A: Typical Embellishments per Park Type
Embellishment type
Concept plan
Park toilets
Change room/shower
Shade shelters
BBQ Shelters
Small play equipment
Large play equipment
Playground Fencing Small
Playground Fencing Large
Impact Absorption Small
Impact Absorption Large
Playground Shade Cover Small
Playground Shade Cover Large
Picnic tables
Park bench seats
Park Name Signage
Park Bins
Recycle Bins
Turf irrigation
Garden irrigation
Recycled Water Storage
Sport field irrigation
Drink fountain
Water tap
Outdoor Beach Showers
Property pole
Park lighting
Feature Lighting
Pathway lighting
Facility lighting
Field lighting
Carpark lighting
BBQ
Local
Neighbourhood
Regional
Sports
$28,900
$3,468
$2,312
$2,312
$1,734
$57,800
$28,900
$11,560
$150,280
$5,780
$2,312
$13,872
$5,780
$4,624
$4,046
$5,780
$11,560
$1,156
$23,120
$57,800
$34,680
$34,680
$34,680
$46,240
$173,400
$92,480
$234,000
$28,900
Cost
$10,000
Community
$4,046
$23,120
$8,670
$9,248
Page 4
PURPOSE
Embellishment type
Power outlets
Pathways
Bike Ways/Shared Footpath
Footbridges
Boardwalks
Ramps
Steps
Retaining walls
Barrier bollards
Park Drainage
Shade tree planting
Garden/Shrub beds
Turf – Parks
Turf - Playing Field
Site establishment
Fishing platforms
Fish cleaning station
Boat Ramp
Trailer Parking
Skate Park
BMX Park
Tennis rebound wall
Ball activities
Exercise station
Half-court basketball
Goal Posts
Cricket Nets
Sports Surfacing
Athletics Facilities
Field Safety Fencing
Basic Spectator Seating
Memorial Plaques
Feature Infrastructure
Monuments
Car Parking Small
Car Parking Large
Wheelchair Pram Crossings
Bike Racks
Local
Neighbourhood
Regional
Sports
Community
Cost
$5,780
$150,280
$1,156
$80,920
$173,400
$173,400
$57,800
$578
$86,700
$57,800
$57,800
$34,680
$115,600
$115,600
$17,340
$57,800
$17,340
$115,600
$115,600
$173,400
$52,020
$52,020
$34,680
$57,800
$23,120
$4,624
$52,020
$289,000
$462,400
$57,800
$57,800
$11,560
$57,800
$11,560
$57,800
$173,400
$3,468
$2,312
Page 5
PURPOSE
4.2
Existing and Future Public Open Space and Community Purpose Infrastructure
As previously indicated, analysis of the land area of the former Redcliffe City showed that the existing quantity
of public open space and community purpose network land met the quantity component of the DSS and no
further acquisitions were necessary in the future. An exercise was conducted to ensure that 90% of households
were within 800m of local park facilities and the land provision was found to be compliant. Table 4.2A outlines
the split of park types and their hierarchies across the network.
Table 4.2A: Total land provision
Park Type
Recreation Park
Sporting Facilities
Community Facilities
Total
Hierarchy Level
Local
Neighbourhood
Regional
District
Regional
All
Total Land Area (Ha)
95.9
125.3
34.4
68.7
4.5
328.8 Ha
No land cost has been included for the Public Open Space and Community Purpose network, only the
embellishments have been costed and shared equally across all users, existing and future.
The future works to be undertaken within the network are limited to embellishments to improve the usability and
access features of existing facilities.
The following tables outline the existing value of the Public Open Space and Community Purpose infrastructure
and the Net Present Value of future works to be undertaken, all measured in 01 January 2009 dollars.
Page 6
PLANNING SCHEME POLICY PSP4 Part 8.4.3 – DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FOR TRUNK INFRASTRUCTURE – PUBLIC OPEN SPACE & COMMUNITY PURPOSE
Local Park
Park Number
PK79
PK80
PK81
PK82
PK83
PK84
PK85
PK86
PK87
PK88
PK89
PK90
PK91
PK92
PK93
PK94
PK95
PK96
PK97
PK98
PK99
PK100
PK101
PK102
PK103
PK104
PK105
PK106
PK107
PK108
PK109
PK110
PK111
PK112
PK113
PK114
PK115
PK116
PK117
PK118
PK119
PK120
PK121
PK122
PK123
PK124
Park Name
ALBATROSS CANAL
ASHMOLE CNR/GRIFFITH
BEACON PARK
BELLS PARK
BERTIE DOW PARK
BEVINGTON WOODLAND
BINGARRA PARK
BOAMA PARK
BOARDMAN ROAD drainage reserve
CHARTWELLPARK
CLAYFIELD STREET
CLONTARF BEACH PARK
COMAN PARK
COOPERPARK
CORESCADDEN PARK
CORMORANT CANAL
CURLEW CANAL ( 6)
DAPHNE CARPENTER PARK
Donkin Street (Unnamed Soubiruos 1)
EUSTON STREET / fleet drive
FALCON CANAL
GARNNET CANAL
GLANVILLE PARK
GRANT PARK
HALAMKA PARK
HAWK CANAL
HAYSMOUTH PARADE
HERON CANAL
HITCHINSPARK
HOMEFIELD STREET centre median
HUBNERPARK
IBIS CANAL
INTREPID PARK
JABIRU CANAL
JIM FINLAY PARK
JIM MCGAHEY PARK
JOHN OXLEY PARK
KENNA PARK
KIRKWOOD SQUARE - HOMEFIELD STREET
LESLIE SLAUGHTER PARK
LIONS MEMORIAL PARK
MACFARLANEPARK
MACKENZIEPARK
MADELEINE CT
MAGNOLIAPARK
MAHOGANYPARK
Park Type
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Existing Value
$$$ 30,518
$$ 1,907
$ 76,296
$ 35,605
$174,209
$$115,716
$$644,701
$ 3,815
$$364,949
$ 1,272
$$ 13,988
$ 1,272
$$$$170,394
$178,024
$147,506
$$$$ 1,907
$$ 2,543
$$ 61,037
$$ 2,543
$ 2,543
$ 86,469
$ 67,395
$$148,777
$ 58,494
$264,493
$ 8,901
$ 1,907
$ 73,753
$ 86,469
NPV of Future Works
$$$124,661
$ 46,433
$$ 77,389
$ 5,159
$ 11,158
$$ 5,159
$$116,083
$$$557,198
$$$ 18,057
$$$$$288,917
$ 85,127
$216,688
$$$$$$$$134,140
$$ 45,143
$ 45,143
$ 11,158
$ 73,519
$ 5,159
$105,764
$ 91,126
$196,051
$$$$ 7,739
Less External Users
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$-
Total Park Cost
$$$155,179
$46,433
$1,907
$153,685
$40,764
$185,367
$$120,875
$$760,784
$3,815
$$922,147
$1,272
$$32,045
$1,272
$$$$459,312
$263,151
$364,194
$$$$1,907
$$2,543
$$195,177
$$47,687
$47,687
$97,626
$140,914
$5,159
$254,542
$149,619
$460,544
$8,901
$1,907
$73,753
$94,208
Page 7
Park Number
PK125
PK126
PK127
PK128
PK129
PK130
PK131
PK132
PK133
PK134
PK135
PK136
PK137
PK138
PK139
PK140
PK141
PK142
PK143
PK144
PK145
PK146
PK147
PK148
PK149
PK150
PK151
PK152
PK153
PK154
PK155
PK156
PK157
Totals
Park Name
MARSALAPARK
MARSALA ST DRAIN reserve
MORRIS PARK
OASIS CRT
OSPREY CANAL
PACIFICPARK
PARADISE PARK
PARSONS PARK
PASKPARK
PELICAN CANAL
PETREL CANAL
PLUMEPARK
QUEENSPARK
QUEENS BEACH PARK
QUEENS BEACH SOUTH PARK
REGENCY PARK
ROTHWELL RESERVOIR ( )
SANDPIPER CANAL
SEAEAGLE CANAL
SEAGULL CANAL
SEAHAWK CANAL
SHEARWATER CANAL
SPOONBILL CANAL
SWAN CANAL
TERN CANAL
TINGIRAPARK
TOM CURRY PARK
TOM WALLACE PARK
UNNAMED PARK OFF HAYSMOUTH PDE
VISTA COURT WALKWAY
WALSH ST
WATTLEPARK
YOURELLPARK
Park Type
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Local park
Existing Value
$ 54,679
$$ 10,173
$$$$ 55,950
$ 80,111
$ 86,469
$ 2,543
$$ 12,716
$ 66,123
$324,258
$ 17,802
$ 7,630
$$ 2,543
$$$$$ 63,580
$$ 12,716
$ 83,926
$ 50,864
$ 47,049
$$$$ 3,815
$109,358
$ 3,919,707
NPV of Future Works
$ 69,650
$$ 55,462
$$$$$335,351
$ 10,318
$$$163,355
$ 6,449
$146,588
$153,037
$ 18,057
$$$$$$$$$$ 94,156
$$$$$$$ 67,070
$ 3,386,466
Less External Users
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$-
Total Park Cost
$124,329
$$65,635
$$$$55,950
$415,461
$96,787
$2,543
$$176,071
$72,572
$470,846
$170,839
$25,687
$$2,543
$$$$$63,580
$$12,716
$178,082
$50,864
$47,049
$$$$3,815
$176,428
$ 7,306,173
Page 8
Neighbourhood Park
Park Number
PK28a
PK29
PK30
PK31
PK32
PK33
PK34
PK35
PK36
PK37
PK38
PK39
PK40
PK41
PK42
PK43
PK44
PK45
PK46
PK47
PK48
PK49
PK50
PK51
PK52
PK53
PK54
PK55
PK56
PK57
PK58
PK59
PK60
PK61
PK62
PK63
PK64
PK65
PK66
PK67
PK68
PK69
PK70
PK71
PK72
PK73
Park Name
ADMINISTRATION CENTRE
AMITY PARK
ANZAC PLACE
APEX PARK
ATKINSON PARK
BARRY BOLTON
BELLEVUE PARK
BELLS BEACH PARK
BILL ROGERS PARK
CAPTAIN COOK PARK
CARRICKPARK
CHARLISHPARK
DOBELL PARK
ENDEAVOUR PARK
GAYUNDAH ARBORETUM PARK
GREG ENRIGHT PARK
HENRY PIEPER PARK
HUMPYBONG CREEK PARK NORTH
HUMPYBONG CREEK PARK SOUTH
JAMIESONPARK
KALOWENPARK
KIRAMIPARK
KROLL GARDENS
LAHORE PARK
LANCASTERPARK
LANGTREE PARK
M.J. BROWN PARK
MCKILLOPPARK
MORGANPARK
MUNGARAPARK
NEWPORT PARK - stage 22
OWEN PARK
OXLEY AVE JETTY
OXLEY AVE hall
PETER MORRIS PARK
PIKETTPARK
QUEENS BEACH NORTH PARK
REDCLIFFE BOTANIC GARDENS
REDCLIFFE MEMORIAL SWIMMING POOL PARK
ROBERT DALTON PARK
ROMAPARK
ROTARYPARK
SCOTTS POINT PROGRESS PARK
SEACRESTPARK
SOUTHERN CROSS PARK
SUNSTATE PARK
Park Type
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Existing Value
691,750
66,123
493,381
432,344
353,505
308,999
282,295
362,406
466,677
587,479
100,456
460,319
356,048
496,560
689,970
479,393
779,491
726,084
1,035,464
104,271
225,709
445,314
105,543
57,222
7,630
438,702
703,831
476,977
53,407
137,333
247,962
227,616
1,272
509,276
191,503
1,373,328
703,195
621,812
144,072
297,300
362,787
1,066,109
433,616
2,543
492,109
NPV of Future Works
37,404
109,634
442,405
39,984
161,226
70,940
256,672
7,739
407,580
60,621
853,854
697,787
37,404
196,051
41,274
883,520
159,936
2,580
25,796
254,093
104,475
6,449
236,035
234,745
301,816
419,188
322,452
103,185
266,991
286,338
12,898
33,535
99,315
357,277
183,153
3,869
313,424
Less External Users
-
Total Park Cost
$691,750
$103,528
$493,381
$432,344
$463,139
$751,404
$322,279
$523,632
$537,617
$844,151
$108,195
$867,899
$416,669
$ 1,350,414
$ 1,387,757
$37,404
$675,444
$820,765
$ 1,609,603
$ 1,195,400
$106,851
$251,505
$699,407
$210,017
$57,222
$14,079
$674,737
$938,576
$476,977
$355,223
$556,521
$247,962
$550,069
$1,272
$612,461
$191,503
$ 1,640,319
$989,533
$621,812
$156,970
$330,835
$462,103
$ 1,423,387
$616,769
$6,413
$805,533
Page 9
Park Number
PK74
PK75
PK76
PK77
PK78
Totals
Park Name
TACOMA PARK
TARADALE PARK
WALKER PARK
WOODCLIFFEPARK
WOODY POINT PARK
Park Type
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Neighbourhood park
Existing Value
226,090
251,777
52,136
16,531
261,950
19,407,668
NPV of Future Works
5,159
10,318
180,573
128,981
8,356,679
Less External Users
-
Total Park Cost
$231,250
$262,095
$52,136
$197,104
$390,931
$27,764,347
1. Regional Park
Park Number
PK16
PK17
PK18
PK19
PK20
PK21
PK22
PK23
PK24
PK25
PK26
PK27
Totals
Park Name
BICENTENNIAL PARK
CROCKATT PARK
CULTURAL PRECINCT PARK
MARGATE BEACHPARK
PELICAN PARK
REDCLIFFE JETTY PARK
SCARBOROUGH BEACHPARK
SETTLEMENT COVE PARK
SUTTONS BEACH
THURECHTPARK
WOODY POINT BEACH PARK
YOUTHPARK
Park Type
Regional park
Regional park
Regional park
Regional park
Regional park
Regional park
Regional park
Regional park
Regional park
Regional park
Regional park
Regional park
Existing Value
$ 1,195,685
$ 1,396,980
$462,862
$ 4,225,527
$ 1,761,166
$ 1,304,662
$ 1,985,858
$ 2,528,322
$ 3,102,704
$ 1,307,205
$ 1,174,958
$670,133
$ 21,116,062
NPV of Future Works
$629,427
$632,007
$ 58,041
$ 18,057
$877,064
$ 7,739
$915,765
$510,765
$$829,348
$ 15,478
$201,210
$ 4,694,903
Less External Users
$ 547,534
$ 608,696
$ 156,271
$1,273,075
$ 791,469
$ 393,720
$ 870,487
$ 911,726
$ 930,811
$ 640,966
$ 357,131
$ 261,403
$7,743,289
Total Park Cost
$ 1,277,579
$ 1,420,291
$364,633
$ 2,970,509
$ 1,846,761
$918,680
$ 2,031,136
$ 2,127,361
$ 2,171,893
$ 1,495,587
$833,305
$609,940
$18,067,676
Sports Facility
Park Number
PK1
PK2
PK3
PK4
PK5
PK6
PK8
PK9
PK7
PK10
PK11
PK12
PK13
PK14
PK15
Totals
Park Name
A.J. (JOCK) KELLY PARK
BOARDMAN PARK
BRADLEY PARK
DALTON PARK
FILMER PARK
GEORGE MORRIS FIELDS
K.R.BENSON
LANGDON PARK
MARY NANN HOCKEY FIELDS
OXLEY AVE
PEARSON PARK
RAY FRAWLEY FIELDS
REDCLIFFE SHOWGROUNDS PARK (HOCKEY FIELDS)
ROTHWELLPARK
TALOBILLA 1 PARK
Park Type
Sports facility
Sports facility
Sports facility
Sports facility
Sports facility
Sports facility
Sports facility
Sports facility
Sports facility
Sports facility
Sports facility
Sports facility
Sports facility
Sports facility
Sports facility
Existing Value
1,093,067
994,773
385,931
982,057
920,384
37,894
2,066,986
1,021,095
694,294
226,345
200,913
818,402
924,453
829,719
1,674,697
$ 12,871,008
NPV of Future Works
88,351.98
168,965.10
334,060.78
626,847.63
321,162.68
69,649.74
211,528.83
257,961.99
317,293.25
288,917.43
292,786.86
1,434,268.01
835,796.20
1,204,681.58
$ 6,452,273
Less External Users
354,426
349,121
215,997
482,671
372,464
32,263
683,554
383,717
303,476
67,903
146,949
333,357
707,616
499,655
863,814
$5,796,984
Total Park Cost
$826,994
$814,616
$503,994
$ 1,126,233
$869,083
$75,280
$ 1,594,960
$895,340
$708,111
$158,441
$342,881
$777,832
$ 1,651,105
$ 1,165,861
$ 2,015,565
$13,526,297
Page 10
Community Purpose
Park Number
PK158
PK159
PK160
PK161
Totals
Park Name
CULTURAL PRECINCT (Redcliffe Museum)
MUSEUM PARK
P.C.Y.C.
REDCLIFFE LIBRARY
Park Type
Community area
Community area
Community area
Community area
Existing Value
$ 34,333
$ 34,333
$ 34,333
$ 34,333
$137,333
NPV of Future Works
$$$$$-
Less External Users
$$$$$-
Total Park Cost
$34,333
$34,333
$34,333
$34,333
$137,333
Page 11
PURPOSE
4.3
Total Cost per Network Component
Table 4.3A: Total Infrastructure Value as at 01 January 2009
Park Type
Community area
Local park
Neighbourhood park
Regional park
Sports facility
Grand Total
Existing Value
$137,333
$ 3,919,707
$19,407,668
$21,116,062
$12,871,008
$57,451,778
NPV of Future Works
$$ 3,386,465
$ 8,356,679
$ 4,694,902
$ 6,452,272
$22,890,318
Less External Users
$$$$ 7,743,289
$ 5,796,984
$13,540,273
Total Park Cost
$137,333
$ 7,306,172
$27,764,346
$18,067,675
$13,526,296
$66,801,822
The proportion of future infrastructure expenditure anticipated to be collected from future development after 01
January 2009 is equivalent to 35%. The proportion of the value of the overall network anticipated to be collected
from future development after 01 January 2009 is equivalent to 10.5% without giving regard to the capping
regime. The remainder of future embellishment costs will be funded directly by Council so that costs associated
with ‘deficiencies’ within the existing network and the use of facilities by external users are not passed to
proponents of development approved after 01 January 2009.
Page 12
PURPOSE
Schedule A: Demand Factors
Table A shows the demand factors expressed in Equivalent Persons (EPs) for different uses.
Table A - Demand Factors for Public Open Space and Community Purpose Infrastructure
Contributions
Land Use Category
Detached residential
Attached residential
Non-residential use
Non-residential use
(reconfiguring a lot)
Demand Unit (EP)
2.9 EP/dwelling unit
1.3 EP/dwelling unit
0.3 EP/100 m2 GFA
1 EP/lot
Page 13
PURPOSE
Schedule B: Infrastructure Contribution Rates
Table B shows the Infrastructure Contribution Rates for the network.
Table B: Public Open Space and Community Purpose Infrastructure Contribution Rates
Charge
ICR per EP
City-wide charge
$1,064.03
Page 14
PURPOSE
Schedule C: Network Asset Maps
Page 15
Open Space Network
PK86
^
^
^
PK118
^
D
ec
e
^
PK114
n
io
pt
^
PK40
PK81
PK6
^
PK62
^
^
Gr
PK127
PK14
^
^
PK74
^
PK75
PK84
Anzac A
venue
^
PK58
PK43
^
PK44
Klingn
er
Hercule
s Road
Local Park
PK140
Neighbourhood Park
^
Regional Park
PK2
Road
^
^
PK120
^
PK160
PK29
^
^
^
^
^
^
PK48
PK116
beth
Community Purpose
nue
Ave
DISA Boundary
.
^
E li za
Sports Facility
Copyright Moreton Bay Regional Council and Department of Natural Resources and Water.
0
h
PK15
Chelsea
Park/FacilityType
t
iffi
^
PK132
Park - Future Embellishment
^
Street
^
^
^
^
Legend
PK53
ad
PK109
PK55
Ro
^
^
B oa rdman Ro
ad
treet
Coman
S
oa
d
R
PK103
PK101
y
Ba
^
^
500
Metres
1:20,000
1,000
Moreton Bay Regional Council supplies this map under the following conditions:- Mapping details are supplied from information contained in
the Council's records which may have been furnished to the Council by other persons. Moreton Bay Regional Council gives no warranty
or guarantee of any kind, expressed, implied, or statutory, to the correctness or accuracy of the map details or the degree of compliance with
any Council standards in this matter. Persons making decisions with financial or legal implications must not rely upon the map details shown
on this plan for the purpose of determining whether any particular facts or circumstances exist and the Moreton Bay Regional Council (and
its officers and agents) expressly disclaim responsibility for any loss or damage suffered as a result of placing reliance upon this information.
PK49
^
^
12
21
33
^
MORETON BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL
Redcliffe City
^
Map No: 1
EFFECTIVE FROM 29 October 2009
Open Space Network
PK150
^ ^
PK47
O xle y
A v enue
^
PK25
PK22
^
PK41
^
^
PK113
PK72
^
^
^
PK111
^
^
a
Ro
PK127
^
PK75
An
za
s Road
Community Purpose
0
500
Metres
1:20,000
1,000
PK11
PK37
^
PK49
^
PK139
PK57
PK67
^
^
^
^
PK161
PK13
nue
^
PK48
^
^
ve
th A
DISA Boundary
.
^
PK133
abe
E li z
Sports Facility
^
^
PK102
R oad
^
^
^
PK1
PK45
^
^ ^
^
^ ^
^
^
^
^
PK69
PK7
Aven ue
Regional Park
PK116
PK29
PK125
Klin gner
PK34
O xley
^
PK160
^
e
nu
PK140
Neighbourhood Park
PK120
ve
cA
Local Park
^
PK2
^
^
^
e R o ad
^
Che ls ea
Park/FacilityType
^
Bo a rdman Ro
ad
PK15
^
Hercule
^
^
^
Legend
PK138
PK58
^
PK43
PK44
^ ^
PK137
A sh mol
^
S tree t
PK84
d
ith
^
ri f
f
PK53
PK68
G
^
PK40
PK64
PK21
^
^
PK39
^
12
^
21
33
Redcliffe City
Map No: 2
^
^
^
Open Space
Network
^
^
^
za
v en u
c
A
^
e
PK67
Eliz
H ercu le
PK1
PK49
^
^
^
PK73
^ ^
PK158
PK3
PK115
PK38
^
PK50
PK36
PK54
^
^
PK85
^
PK124
PK33
^
^
^
h Av enue
PK27
PK117
^
^
PK19
PK9
Eliz ab et
PK12
^
PK159
^
PK71
^
nn ell Ro
ad
^
ve nu e
^
^
PK136
PK88
^
PK23
PK93
Oxle y A
^
PK18
PK32
Macdo
PK96
PK21
^
^
^ ^
^
PK46
^
^
^
PK39
PK65
^
PK69
PK7
PK45
e
s R oa
d
u
v en
th A
abe
^
^
PK13
^
le R oa
d
PK116
^
^
PK161
An
PK140
^
A sh mo
^
^
^
PK157
^
PK8
^
PK51
Victoria
Ave nue
^
PK4
PK35
Legend
^
n ibro
H or
ok
Espla
na de
^
^
PK82
PK16
^
^
PK20
Park/FacilityType
PK90
Local Park
^
^
Neighbourhood Park
Regional Park
^
PK70
PK5
PK78
^
PK26
^
^
^
PK60
Sports Facility
^
PK17
PK77
^
PK42
PK119
^
^
Community Purpose
DISA Boundary
.
0
500
Metres
1:20,000
1,000
12
21
33
Redcliffe City
Map No: 3
PURPOSE
Schedule D: Desired Standards of Service
The planning provisions for the entire network are outlined in Table D and include some general considerations
for each type of park within the hierarchy. The DSS were developed through an assessment of the current
provision of public open space and community purposes and the typical embellishments included in them during
the work undertaken by Council in the preparation of its proposed Priority Infrastructure Plan. The network is
planned and designed to meet a hierarchy of user needs. Each park type/facility meets different needs within
the community and the DSS aims to provide embellishments which service a variety of reasonable user needs.
Page 19
Table D Desired Standards of Service for the Public Open Space and Community Purpose Network
Facility Item
Local Park/ Informal
Areas
Neighbourhood park
Regional Park
Sports Facilities
Community Purpose
Park/facility
Description
Smallest public open space
recreation area which may be
either named or unnamed,
These spaces provide
informal recreation
opportunities where children
can play and/or adults can
relax in a pleasant setting.
Park space may also provide
a buffering role to
conservation/environmental
areas.
Regular daily or weekend
visits. Users are encouraged
to enjoy the resource ‘as is’.
However, visitation may vary
and is directly related to what
activities may be undertaken
in the space available.
Moderate size public
recreation area which can
provide multiple informal
recreation opportunities for
small events, gatherings,
family parties and
celebrations.
Large public recreation areas
which provide multiple formal
and informal recreation
opportunities. The
recreational, leisure and visual
amenity of these parks is
highly desirable.
Special purpose public activity
area designed and used for
formal/organised sporting
activities e.g. soccer field. .
Where feasible multi use and
co habitation of user groups is
to be encouraged.
Special purpose community
activity area designed and
used for predominant by
indoor use e.g. Library.
Intensive day or weekend
visits, with visitation higher at
weekends and public
holidays. Use is directly
related to what activities may
be undertaken, such as active
and passive recreation,
picnicking, games, socialising
and other activities.
Visitation rate usually tied to
activity type and frequency
However, it is generally
aligned to regular
programmed and structured
participation in designated
sporting activities and may
also be aligned with
advertised and ticketed
events.
Up to 5 kilometres travel
distance of facility but may
attract visitation from outside
this range.
Sportsfield area is dependent
on that required for associated
ancillary facilities such as car
parks and the playing field
configuration - Refer to
sport/code regulations.
Size will generally be within a
range of 1.5 to 5.5 hectares
but may be greater.
Most of these facilities are
aligned to regular
programmed and structured
participation in designated
indoor activities and may also
be aligned with advertised and
ticketed events.
Visitation
Levels
Catchment
Area
Up to 850 metres walking
distance of facility.
Extensive daily or weekend
visits, providing opportunity for
individual and/or group
participation. Use is directly
related to what activities may
be undertaken in the space
available. Prolonged visitation
would be expected due to the
options available for
recreation.
Up to 1.5 kilometres travel
distance of facility.
Area Criteria
range of 0.1 to 1 hectare but
may be greater.
but may be greater.
attract day visitation from
outer regions.
but may be greater.
attract visitation from outside
this range’s.
Area is dependent on that
required for building footprint
and associated ancillary
facilities such as car parks.
May be any size but would
usually be greater than 1
hectare in size.
Page 20
Facility Item
Local Park/ Informal
Areas
Neighbourhood park
Regional Park
Sports Facilities
Community Purpose
Social
Interaction
The facility is to provide
avenues for Individuals or
groups to be involved in social
interaction.
avenues for individuals or
groups to be involved in
interaction, and other activities
which may attract spectator
audience.
avenues for a variety of
groups and individuals to have
protracted contact and allow
for both visible and audible
sharing of facilities.
and sporting interaction. The
sports activity may be
unstructured or structured but
usually attracts spectator
audience.
and cultural activities.
Page 21
PURPOSE
REVIEW TRIGGERS
This policy is reviewed internally for applicability, continuing effect and consistency with related documents and
other legislative provisions when any of the following occurs:
(1) The related documents are amended;
(2) The related documents are replaced by new documents;
(3) Amendments which affect the allowable scope and effect of a policy of this nature are made to the head of
power; and
(4) Other circumstances as determined from time to time by a resolution of Council.
RESPONSIBILITY
This policy is to be:
(1) implemented by the Senior Manager Development Services; and
(2) reviewed and amended in accordance with the "Review Triggers" by the Senior Manager Strategic
Direction and Sustainability in consultation with the Senior Manager Regional and Environmental Planning
and Development Services.
VERSION CONTROL
CEO Approval Date
15/09/2009
Related Links:
Page 22
PURPOSE
ENDNOTES
Date Adopted –
8 September 2009
Amendment
Planning Scheme Policy
Reference
PSP 4 Part 8.4.3
Effective Date –
29 October 2009
Description of Amendment
Amendments to this policy reflect the intent of the draft Redcliffe Priority
Infrastructure Plan and incorporated changes to bring cost estimates up to
current values.
Page 23

PUBLIC OPEN SPACE and COMMUNITY PURPOSES

Transcription

Similar documents

2148 Linby St

| PARCUL ALBASTRU | 1 NEGLECTED SQUARE | 7 DAYS | 2

Item 5 - Neighbourhood Teams

Lake Wisconsin Map - Lodi and Lake Wisconsin

Luminere Collection

History Trunk Show - Gordon

print : IDC We Run Bay Vol 3 One Sheet : simplebooklet.com

NDP-S012 - Woolhead

11 March 2016 CHARTS – Childers Art Space 7am start A delightful

Flyer 2015 - Moreton Bay Boys` College