Overview of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer (IBL) Project
Transcription
Overview of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer (IBL) Project
14th International Workshop on Radiation Imaging Detectors 1st-5th July 2012, Figueira da Foz, Portugal Overview of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer (IBL) Project F. Djama (CPPM Marseilles) On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration July 4th, 2012 IBL: A Fourth Layer for the ATLAS Pixel Detector IBL: Insertable B-Layer (Present Pixel Detector barrel layers are called: B-Layer, Layer 1 and Layer 2). Performance of present Pixel Detector shown by P. Morettini. Sensors at a radius of 3.3 cm (Current B-Layer at 5.5 cm). A new, lighter and smaller beam pipe. Tracking robustness: Better performance: F. Djama Compensates for module failures. Helps with effects of increasing luminosity: Local saturations in the current B-Layer modules. Provides additional redundancy against fake combinations of hits. Small z pitch (along the beam direction). Closer to interaction point: Better vertexing and b-tagging capabilities. Better Front-End (FE) chip performance. _ Physics use case: Study of Higgs boson properties in WH → b b. Goal: Install the IBL in the first long shutdown of the LHC (LS1, beamto-beam: December 2012-July 2014). ATLAS IBL Overview 2 LHC Upgrades and Long Shutdowns LHC startup, s = 900 GeV bunch spacing s=7~8 TeV, L=6x1033 4x cm-2 s-1, bunch, spacing 50 ns 50 ns ~20-25 fb-1 Go to design energy, nominal luminosity 2525 nsns s=13~14 TeV, L~1x1034 cm-2 s-1, ,bunch bunchspacing spacing ~75-100 fb-1 Injector and LHC Phase-1 upgrade to full design luminosity s=14 TeV, L~2x1034 cm-2 s-1, ,bunch bunchspacing spacing25 25ns ns ~350 fb-1 HL-LHC Phase-2 upgrade, IR, crab cavities? ?, IR s=14 TeV, L=5x1034 cm-2 s-1, luminosity levelling 3 F. Djama ATLAS IBL Overview 3 Radiation Environment IBL will operate: This corresponds to an integrated luminosity of about 550 fb-1 . PHOJET/FLUKA simulation, including safety factors: IBL elements in the detector volume must withstand benchmark of: F. Djama Till the long shutdown LS3, in 2022. at a peak luminosity 2 x 1034 cm-2 s-1. at a radius of 3.3 cm. A NIEL of 5 x 1015 1 MeV neutrons/cm2 . A dose of 2.5 MGy (250 Mrad). Comparison with B-Layer: 1015 1 MeV neutrons/cm2 and 0.5 MGy. ATLAS IBL Overview 4 Main Requirements IBL to be inserted in a very small space between new beam pipe and B-Layer: F. Djama No possible overlap between modules along the beam direction (no « shingling »). Gaps in z direction between modules: Unvoidable inefficiencies. Minimize inefficiencies by developping sensors with active edge or slim edge. Minimize the material. Target is 1.5 % of radiation length. Consequences on sensors, front-ends, mechanics, cooling and services. Tight clearances: Development of complex toolings for present beam pipe removal, IBL integration and insertion. ATLAS IBL Overview 5 Requirements on Sensors F. Djama Inactive edge less than 450 µm for two-chip sensors and less than 225 µm for single chip sensors. Thickness less than 250 µm. Power dissipation less than 200 mW/cm2 at -1000 V bias (planar sensors) at a temperature smaller than -15° C. Leakage current less than 100 nA/pixel. Hit efficiency greater than 97 % after irradiation at benchmark fluence. ATLAS IBL Overview 6 Overall Layout Cylindrical layer formed by 14 staves, with sensors at an average radius of 3.3 cm. Stave length: 72 cm. Staves loaded with pixel modules: sensor-chip(s) assemblies. 12 millions 50 × 250 µm2 pixels. F. Djama ATLAS IBL Overview 7 The Stave Assembly wing Carbon foam (light weight, thermal conductivity). Foam is surrounded by carbon fiber laminate (omega shell) for stiffness. Foam houses a titanium cooling pipe (0.1 mm wall thickness and 1.5 mm inner radius). 14 circuits of CO2 evaporative cooling. Fluid temperature at -40° C, for a sensor temperature of -25° C. Services and signals are routed using a polyimide-aluminium-copper multilayer circuit, the stave flex, glued on the stave. It is connected to each front-end chip by « wings ». F. Djama ATLAS IBL Overview 8 Sensors on the Stave F. Djama IBL to be inserted earlier than forseen in the begining. Only « mature » technologies among the candidate could make it: n-on-n planar silicon sensor with slim edge, and double-sided thin edge 3D silicon sensors. 3D sensors placed at high pseudorapidity (η around 2.8), to benefit from the vertical orientation of electrodes in measuring z coordinates, especially after heavy irradiation. ATLAS IBL Overview 9 Slim Edge Planar Silicon Sensors Manufactured by CiS (Erfurt, Germany). n-in-n design, moderate p-spray isolation. Read by 2 FE-I4 Chips (2 × 80 columns × 336 rows). Physical dimensions: 41.3 × 18.54 mm2. 200 µm thick, 250 × 50 µm pixels except: The two central rows, between the 2 FE: 450 × 50 µm2. The two external rows have their pixel extended beyond the guard ring and have 500 × 50 µm2. This is the slim edge concept: Figure: S. Grinstein in ATL-INDET-PROC-2102-004 F. Djama ATLAS IBL Overview 10 3D Silicon Sensors Manufactured by CNM (Barcelona, Spain) and FBK (Povo di Trento, Italy). p-type bulk, two different flavor designs (same geometry and same performance). Read by one FE-I4 chip (20.5 × 18.8 mm2). 230 µm thick, p-n distance of ~ 70 µm. More in G.-F. Della Betta Talk. CNM design F. Djama ATLAS IBL Overview 11 20.2 mm Front End Chip FE-I4 18.8 mm FE-I4 Manufactured in IBM 130 nm CMOS process. 26880 channels, 150 µm thick. FE-I4A/B DC coupling, electron collection. Each pixel: Amplification, shaping, discrimination at a tuned threshold. Digital processing (buffering, trigger, encoding) shared by 2 x 2 pixels region. 4 bits dynamic range, 256 cycles latency, 160 Mb/s bandwidth. 2.0 mm Bump-bonded to sensors by silver-tin solder. F. Djama ATLAS IBL Overview 12 Leakage Current and Breakdown Voltage Batch: Wafer: ATLAS10 1 ATLAS10 - W1 - FEI4 sensor total current 230 value # of good detectors 6 # of ~ good detectors # of bad detectors 0 2 Class S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 NOK OK NOK OK OK OK OK OK CiS sorting thresholds o Current @ 20V [nA] 2.00E+06 2.42E+02 2.00E+06 1.94E+02 2.15E+02 1.64E+02 1.69E+02 2.93E+02 o 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 "slope" (15÷20)V [#] 1.000 1.384 1.000 1.215 1.284 1.447 1.211 1.331 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Breakdown Voltage [V] 8 38 6 38 39 46 47 42 1E+04 1 0 2 2.5 1E+03 1 0 0 0 1E+02 o FBK 0 0 25 30 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 V_rev [V] Notes S4 OK S7 OK Confortable plateau before breakdown. Similar irradiation. S1 after S3 S6 OK S8 OK NOK 3D sensors:S2 OK o S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 1E+01 2000 5000 NOK F. Djama 1E+05 Planar sensors: o o 1E+06 (nominal value/measured value) (measured value/not available) I [nA] Wafer thickness [µm] Wafer bow [µm] S5 OK Modest depletion voltage. Small leakage current. ATLAS IBL Overview 13 80 Beam Test : Edge Efficiency Planar 3D Figure: I. Rubinsky in ATL-INDET-PROC-2102-007 Sensors scanned with 120 GeV pion beams at CERN. Both technologies managed to reduce the inefficient edge to about 200 µm. F. Djama ATLAS IBL Overview 14 Beam Test: Cell Efficiency • Planars:Some loss of efficiency after high radiation dose under the bias grid even for large bias voltage. • 3D: Losses at position of electrodes, reduced for tilted tracks. • Both technologies within the specifications. F. Djama ATLAS IBL Overview 15 Cluster Properties of CNM 3D Sensors Normal incidence, 1.6 T magnetic field F. Djama ATLAS IBL Overview 16 Cluster Properties of 3D FBK Sensors 15° incidence, no magnetic field F. Djama ATLAS IBL Overview 17 Cluster Size for High Pseudorapidity Tracks (η1.7) in 3D Sensors F. Djama 120 GeV pions incident at 80° along the long pixel dimension: a pseudorapidity of 1.7 in ATLAS. Naive projection gives a cluster width of 6. Cluster width still at 4.5 after irradiation. Spacial resolution analysis on going. Tests at higher pseudorapidity forseen. ATLAS IBL Overview 18 Spacial Resolution F. Djama 120 GeV pions incident at 15°. 2-pixel clusters. ATLAS IBL Overview 19 IBL Simulation in ATLAS: Pixel hits F. Djama ATLAS IBL Overview 20 ATLAS B-tagging performance with IBL _ F. Djama Simulation of t t events in ATLAS. IBL will bring rejection of light jets with phase 0 pileup at its level without pileup, with the present ATLAS Pixel Detector. Performance will improve when using a neural network based clustering. It will improve resolution on close tracks in jet cores (see T. Peres poster). ATLAS IBL Overview 21 Production status F. Djama Sensors: 100 % delivered, including spares. Yield of 89 and 62 % for planar and 3D respectively. FE-I4B chips: 70 % delivered. Yield of 62 % up to now. Already have 672 IBL quality chips (448 needed, excluding spares). Module flex: To be received end of July 2012. Staves: 2 in hands, last delivery in October 2012. Stave flex: Last delivery November 2012. Stave 0 demonstrator loaded with test modules using FE-I4A version: ATLAS IBL Overview 22 IBL schedule overview Activities Starting Ending FEI4-B Sept 11: Submission Dec 11 chips received, testing 1st batch complete end Feb 2012. Bump bonding Aug 11: pre-production Nov 12: Completion (incl. Spares) Module assembly End May 12: 1st modules ready for loading Feb 13 (spare and contingency incl) Module loading Aug 12: 4 staves to be ready by Oct 12 May 13: Completion (spare and contingency incl) Stave loading Mar 13: starting with the June 13: Completion 1st large batch of available staves Final tests and commissioning July 13 F. Djama Sept 13: IBL Installation (Nov 13 with contingency) ATLAS IBL Overview 23 Conclusions F. Djama ATLAS will have a 4-hits Pixel Detector after the first long LHC shutdown. R&D efforts converged towards an achievable new layer within the allocated time. Tests under beam and laboratory measurements showed that required performance is met, including after irradiation. Detailled ATLAS simulation showed significant improvement in tracking, vertexing and heavy flavor tagging. New specific developments are expected soon. Sensors and front-end chips already secured. Stave loading will start in august 2012. ATLAS IBL Overview 24 Backup DBM F. Djama DBM: Diamond Beam Monitors: 4 telescopes of 3 diamond pixel sensors on each side of the ATLAS interaction point. Sensors have the FE-I4 size. Will be installed if the IBL is inserted on surface. Decision on December 2012. ATLAS IBL Overview 26 nSQP F. Djama SQP: Service Quarter Panel: holds connections and services for the present Pixel Detector. Significant mortality of VCSEL in the optical boards. Need to bring optoboards from inside the tracker volume to the first patch panel outside it (PP1). Construction of new SQP (nSQP). Will be installed only if the IBL is to be inserted on surface. ATLAS IBL Overview 27