Power 2 Wheels and eCall Alfonso Brazalez, Spanish pilot site

#heero
“Spain” Pilot site
eCall for P2W
Alfonso Brazalez
[email protected]
HeERO International Conference
21 November 2013
Bucharest, Romania
Summary
•
•
•
•
•
2
Strategy for the e-Call Deployment in Spain
Consortium
Spanish pilot Architecture
Where we are and next steps
eCall for P2W
Spanish Emergency PSAPs
Emergencies centralized in 112
But by regions
-3-
Consortium
• Coordinator
• Sub-directorate General for Mobility
• Administrations
• DGT (Level1 PSAP) y 112 (Level 2 PSAP)
• Companies & Research Institutes
• Advisory board
• Sub-directorate General for Civil Protection
• Sub-directorate General of Network and
Telecommunication Operators
-4-
Spanish Pilot. Architecture
Traffic
Incident
liated ecivreS
seirujni dna selcihev deppotS
20:51 1102/90/41
GNSS
Traffic Control Centers
(DGT-CGT) /(Highway C.C.) /
RACC Infotransit
Vehicle
position
MSD Data
for TM
eCall
raised
Accident
Traffic Event
DATEX II
Aditional
Data
na ni devlovni srac owt era erehT
.edis thgir enal ta deppots ,tnedicca
.demrifnoc era seirujni namuH
ITS Traffic Data
Dissemination to
Traffic Centres
MNO
Intermediate
PSAP
ITS Traffic
Data
Most appropiate 112
Data + Voice
Reroute
Page 5
2009/02/19
Spanish pilot. Tests
-6-
Spanish pilot. Main features
Level 1: Intermediate PSAP in DGT- Madrid
• MSD reception, decoding and filtering. Send MSD to regional 112
• Intermediate PSAP assessment
• Communication con TCC/TIC in own DGT building and Traffic Police
• Relation of MSD with the Spanish VIN and accident database (DGT)
Level 2: Regional 112 PSAPs: Castilla León, Galicia, Madrid y Valencia (WP2)
• Integration of eCall in own 112 emergency system
• MSD reception
MNO
• Implementation of eflag in mobile telecommunication network
• Assessment of MSD correct transmission in mobile network
IVS: equipment of vehicle M1 & L3 classes
Added Value
• PTW: sensor in helmets, eCall testing & proposal for future eCall standard
extension
• eCall Interoperability between 2 regional 112
-7-
Vehicles ready
for testing
HMI MODULE
Example of IVS system composed by IVS and HMI
-8-
And PSAP in DGT
-9-
Spanish Pilot. Situation
Equipment already installed
Now
Verifying global system
Definition of evaluation methodology
In 2014
Training operators
Test and results
-10-
P2W: powered two wheelers
Needs
eCall – P2W
Detection
• No trigger
• Additional limitations
• Weight
• Cost
Call
Global Architecture
Detection. Architecture
• Different source information integration
– Sensors
•
•
•
•
Acelerometers
Compass
Gyroscope
GPS
• Previous phases
–
–
–
–
P2W accidents classification
Algorithm implementation
Initial test in races
Algorithm tunning
Call. Features
• MSD: proposal of additional information
• Development: PSAP simulator of u-blox
On board unit & helmet integration
• 2 functions:
– Voice communication during call by bluetooth
– Accident severity detection
•
•
•
•
Developed by NZI
Fusion of information given by 12 sensors
Helps to complete MSD
Communication with the main module by Bluetooth
MSD proposal
Name
Control
VIN
Time stamp
Location
Service provider
Vehicle type
PTW Control
Size [B] Type
1 Integer
20 String
4 Integer
4 Integer
1
1
Integer
Integer
Slave location
4
Integer
Master severity
Slave severity
1
1
Integer
Integer
Description
VIN number according to ISO 3779
UTC seconds
Latitude (WGS-84) in ms
Service provider
PTW
b7 Master sensor in vehicle
b6 Master sensor in helmet
b5 Slave sensor communication lost
b4 Presence of passenger
Latitude (WGS-84) in ms
Longitude (WGS-84) in ms
Direction on degrees
Detection of severity of master device
Detection of severity of slave device
Questionnaire
• Helps to define really
important issues for
MSD
• Questionnaire for PSAP.
• Useful information for
emergency services
• First approach
19
Post crash. Position & orientation
• Is it useful to differentiate
between the position of the
driver and the position of
the motorbike in the MSD?
• Is it useful to communicate the orientation of the
driver and the motorbike in the MSD?
• Is it useful to communicate the distance between the
driver and the motorbike in the MSD?
20
Updating position & orientation
• How often the positions of the driver
have to be updated?
• How long should be the duration of
the update of the positions of the
driver?
• How often the positions of the
motorbike have to be updated?
• How long should be the duration of
the update of the positions of the
motorbike?
21
Passenger related questions
• Is it useful to know if there is any passenger
on the motorbike?
22
Communication related question
• Is it useful to know if the
communication between the
driver and the motorbike has
been lost?
• Is it useful to know previous
motorbike information
regarding precrash
information, e.g. velocity, time
to stop…?
23
Crash severity related questions
• Is it useful to know a “crash severity index”
given by the data registered in the motorbike?
• Is it useful to know a “crash severity index”
given by the data registered in the helmet?
24
Generic additional question
• Which additional information makes sense in
the MSD for P2V?
25
Tests. Planning and status
• Preliminary tests for the integration OBU-Helmet in lab
• Test for the detection in races
– First meeting for the installation in motorcycle
• Test for the global integration with PSAP in a controlled
environment. Simulating automatic eCall.
– Distance between motorcycle and helmet
– Automatic and manual triggered eCall
Conclussions
• Proposal for MSD for P2W
• Adaptation of the OBU for the integration with the helmet
sensors has been completed
• The integration tests have been finished
• The OBU has been integrated in a racing motorcycle
• The season is over. Use of riding school for testing the algorithm
and eCall trigger
• Preliminary controlled test done with Intermediate PSAP in
Madrid
• Controlled tests programmed for next moths.
Thank you for your attention!
Questions?
Alfonso Brazalez ([email protected])
28