to Left-Ventricular Filling Pressures in Advanced Heart Failure
Transcription
to Left-Ventricular Filling Pressures in Advanced Heart Failure
Relationship of Right- to Left-Ventricular Filling Pressures in Advanced Heart Failure: Insights from the ESCAPE Trial Drazner et al: Ratio of RAP to PCWP in Advanced Heart Failure Mark H. Drazner*, MD, MSc; Mariella Velez-Martinez*, MD; Colby Ayers†, MS; Sharon C. Reimold*, MD; Jennifer T. Thibodeau*, MD; Joseph D. Mishkin*, MD; Pradeep P.A. Mammen*, MD; David W. Markham*, MD; Chetan B. Patel‡, MD Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Division of Cardiology*, Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Biostatistics†, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX Division of Cardiology‡, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, am, NC Correspondence to:: Mark Drazner, MD, MSc University of Texas So Sout Southwestern uthw ut hw wes este tern te rn M Medical ed dic ical al C Center ente en terr te lvdd D lv Dallas alla al lass T Texas exas ex as 75 75390 7539 3900 90 9047 47 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, Texas, 75390-9047 E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: 214-645-7500 Fax: 214-645-7501 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000204 Journal Subject Codes: Heart failure: [11] Other heart failure 1 Abstract Background—Although right atrial pressure (RAP) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) are correlated in heart failure, in a sizeable minority of patients the RAP and PCWP are not tightly coupled. The basis of this variability in the RAP to PCWP ratio, and whether it conveys prognostic value, is not known. Methods and Results—We analyzed the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) database. Baseline characteristics Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 including echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular (RV) structure and function, and invasively measured hemodynamic parameters, were compared among tertiles of the RAP/PCWP ssoc ss occia iati tion ti on ooff RA RAP P ratio. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models assessed the association RAP/PCWP ratio CAPE CAP APE AP E ou outc outcome t om ome [6-month death oorr hospitalizatio hospitalization ion (days)] adjust io adju t with the primary ESCAPE adjusting for systolic N six N, six i minut te wa alk distance, distancce, and n PCWP. PCW WP. P The Thee RAP/PCWP RAP P/P PCW WP ttertiles erttilee were: 0.27-0.4 blood pressure, BUN, minute walk .6 622-1. 1 21 1. 21(t (tter e tilee 33). ). IIncreasing nccre reas a in as ingg RAP/PCWP wa a associated with (tertile 1); 0.41-0.6155 (tertile 2), and 0.6 0.62-1.21(tertile was resp re spec ecti t ve ti vely l , p< ly pp<0.005), <0. 00.005), 005) 00 5 , RV 5) R aarea reaa in diastole (21, re ghtt at gh atrial atri rial all aarea reaa (2 re (23, 3, 226, 66,, 2299 cm2, respectively, increasing median right 27, 27 cm2, respectively, p<0.005), and pulmonary vascular resistance (2.4, 2.9, 3.6 woods units, respectively, p=0.003), and lower RV stroke work index (8.6, 8.4, 5.5 g-m/m2 per beat, respectively, p<0.001). RAP/PCWP ratio was associated with death or hospitalization within 6 months [HR 1.16 (1, 1.4), p<0.05]. Conclusions—Increased RAP/PCWP ratio was associated with higher pulmonary vascular resistance, reduced RV function (manifest as a larger right atrium and ventricle and lower RV stroke work index), and an increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure. Key Words: hemodynamics, heart failure, right ventricle, renal function, pulmonary hypertension 2 Elevated right-ventricular and left-ventricular filling pressures contribute to many of the symptoms of patients with advanced heart failure. In both systolic1 and diastolic2 heart failure, right-ventricular filling pressure (i.e., right atrial pressure, RAP) is significantly correlated to left-ventricular filling pressure (i.e., pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, PCWP). This relationship is robust enough such that estimation of the PCWP is often based upon assessment of the jugular venous pressure (JVP) in patients with heart failure.3 Further, the relationship of the RAP and PCWP has been shown to be stable over a 14 year time period (1993 to 2007) in the Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Cardiac Transplant Research Database (CTRD), a registry of patients with advanced heart failure ority of patien patients nts with heart undergoing cardiac transplantation.4 However, in a sizeable minority failure (25-30%), the RAP and PCWP are not tightly coupled.4, 5 The hee bbasis a is ooff th as the variability in the relationship of rightigh igh ghtt- to le lleft-sided ft-s ft - id ded ventricular ven entr tric tr iccul ular a filling ar fillliingg pressures pre ress ssur ss u es (wh ur (which whic wh icch ca ich cann be b expressed as the ratio of the RAP to PCWP) PCWP PC WP))4 iss no nnott w well ell uunderstood. nder nd erst er stoo st ood. oo d F Further, urth ur ther th er, wh er whet whether ethe et herr the he th he ratio rati ra t o of ti of the RAP to PCWP is associated w with ithh ou it outc outcome tcom tc omee in tthe om he bbroader road ro adeer ad ad adva advanced vanc va nced nc ed heart hea eart rt failure fai ailu lure lu re population, p pu po pula lati la tii as it is in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation6 or cardiac transplantation,4 has not previously been assessed to our knowledge. The ESCAPE (Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness) trial, in which patients with advanced heart failure underwent careful hemodynamic and echocardiographic assessment, as well as longitudinal follow-up, afforded an excellent opportunity to further define the physiologic basis and prognostic utility of the ratio of RAP to PCWP in this patient population. 3 Methods ESCAPE Trial The ESCAPE trial assessed the effectiveness of right heart catheterization in hospitalized patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) IV symptomatic heart failure. Patients had to have left ventricular ejection fraction 30%, 3 months of symptoms despite ACE-inhibitor and diuretic therapy, a systolic blood pressure 125 mm Hg, and at least one sign and one symptom of congestion. Of the 433 patients randomly assigned, 215 were assigned to the Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 pulmonary artery catheter arm. The trial was conducted in the United States and Canada between een published d.7 The protocols 2000 and 2003 at 26 sites. The primary results of the trial have been published. were approved at each site and written informed consent was obtained taineed from from all all patients p prior to randomization. This analysis ESCAPE an s was was conducted con ondu duct du cted ct ed with wit ithh a public pub bli licc release reele leas ase as se off tthe he E SCAP SC A E database. Right heart catheterization e iz eriz er izat atio at ion io n and and hemodynamic hemo he mody mo dyyna nami micc classification mi clas cl assi as sifi si fica fi cati ca tion ti on The sites participating in ESCAPE were selected for known expertise in invasive monitoring and clinical management of patients with HF. Paper printouts were used for hemodynamic measurements. Cardiac output was measured by thermodilution in triplicate. In this analysis, we assessed both the initial hemodynamics and the final hemodynamics at right heart catheter removal. The average length of time the right heart catheter was in place was 1.9 days. We excluded three patients due to measurements that were extreme outliers possibly due to erroneous data entry: two with baseline RAPs of 71 and 85 mm Hg, respectively, and one with PCWP of 0 mm Hg. Subjects were classified into tertiles of the ratio of RAP to PCWP: 0.27 to 0.40 (tertile 1); 0.41 to 0.61 (tertile 2); and 0.62 to 1.21 (tertile 3). 4 Echocardiography Details of components of the echocardiographic examination in ESCAPE have been published.8 In brief, echocardiograms were performed within 24 hours of right heart catheterization. Echocardiograms were analyzed at the core center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Measurements were performed offline by a single sonographer or physician in accordance with the criteria of the American Society of Echocardiography, and were made in triplicate and averaged. Measurements were obtained from the apical 4-chamber view (right Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 atrial area, RV area at end-diastole and end-systole, left atrial area, mitral regurgitant color jet area, and left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes by Simpson Simpson’ss m method of discs), pirat attio ion) n).. De n) Deri rive ri v measures and subcostal view (inferior vena cava size in inspiration and expiration). Derived ulaar ejection ejecctiion fraction, fra ract ctt on, right ctio rig ght ventricular ven ntrriccular ular fractional ul frac fr a ti ac tion o al shortening sho hort rtten rten enin ingg [(RV area in included left ventricular ystole)/RV yst tol ole) e)/R )/R RV area area diastole], diaast stol ole], an ol andd th the he ratio rati ra tioo of tthe ti he m mitral ittra rall regurgita rregurgitant egu gurg rg gitta color jet area diastole- RV area systole)/RV to the left atrial area.. Variable definitions Creatinine clearance was estimated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation.9 Transpulmonary gradient was calculated as mean pulmonary artery-PCWP. Pulmonary vascular resistance was calculated as transpulmonary gradient/cardiac output. Right ventricular stroke work index was calculated as (cardiac index/heart rate) x (mean pulmonary artery pressure-mean RAP) x 13.6. Pulmonary compliance was calculated as stroke volume/(PA systolic pressure-PA diastolic pressure).10 5 Statistics Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage). To compare characteristics across ordinal, increasing tertiles of baseline RAP/PCWP, we used the CochranArmitage trend test for categorical variables and the Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test for continuous data. The chi-squared statistic was used to assess any overall racial significance. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated between baseline RAP/PCWP and other invasively measured hemodynamics. Outcome analysis was with the primary outcome of Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 ESCAPE, number of days alive outside the hospital at 180 days post randomization. In a ents who underwent undder ew secondary analysis, we used overall morality as an outcome. Patients nsorred in in another anot an othhe ot he analysis. For LVAD/transplant were treated as dead in 1 analysis and were censored sis, we excluded si ex xcllud uded ed patients pat atie ient ie ntss who nt whho were weree lost we los ostt to follow-up fol ollo l ww-up up (N=5). (N= N=5) N= 5). After 5) A the outcomes analysis, observing f r the the Schoenfeld S ho Sc hoen en nfe feld d residuals, ressiiddua uals ls, Cox ls Coox proportional prop pr opor op orti or tion ti onal on al hazards haz azar ards ar dss models mod odee were used to no trends with time for or a 1 sstandard tand ta ndar nd ardd de ar devi viat vi atiion iincrease at ncre nc reas re asee in tthe as he R AP/P AP /PCW /P CWP CW P ra rati tioo in ti i both assess hazard ratios ffor deviation RAP/PCWP ratio unadjusted and adjusted analyses. For the adjusted analyses, model 1 adjusted for six minute walk, BUN, Systolic blood pressure. Model 2 adjusted for the covariates in model 1 with the addition of PCWP. Two-sided probability values (p-value) were used in all statistical analysis with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS (v. 9.2; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina). Results The distribution of the ratio of the RAP/PCWP is shown (Figure 1). The median (interquartile range) was 0.50 (0.37, 0.68). The RAP was significantly correlated with the PCWP (r=0.59, p<0.001). The ratio RAP/PCWP measured on the initial hemodynamics was significantly 6 correlated to that measured on the hemodynamics measured at the time of right heart catheter removal (r=0.49, p<0.001). Of subjects with baseline RAP/PCWP tertile 1, 12% had shifted to RAP/PCWP tertile 3 when hemodynamics were reassessed prior to right heart catheterization removal. Similarly, 11% of subjects with baseline RAP/PCWP tertile 3 shifted to final RAP/PCWP tertile 1 (Table 1). Relationship of baseline characteristics and renal function to RAP/PCWP ratio Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Baseline characteristics are shown by tertile of RAP/PCWP (Table 2). Increasing RAP/PCWP gher baselinee ccreatinine r was associated with impaired renal function as evidenced by a higher and als lsoo associated asso as soci so ciat ci at with the BUN and a lower creatinine clearance. Increasing RAP/PCWP was also al B al UN (2 ((28, 28, 8 333, 8, 3, 440 0 mg mg/d /d dl) l , di ddischarge sccharg rgee BU rg BUN N (2 (25, 334, 4, 335 5 mg mg/d / l and discharge maximum in-hospital BUN mg/dl), mg/dl), m mg g/d /dl) l), l) ) re resp spec sp e ti tive veely l ((p0.005 p0.00 0055 for for all). all)). Increasing al Inc ncre reeas asin ing RAP/PCWP in RAP/ RA P/P P/ P creatinine (1.2, 1.5, 1.66 mg/d mg/dl), respectively was also rig ight ht sided sid ided ed heart hea eart rt failure fail ilur uree including ur incl in clud cl udin ud ingg elevated in elev el evat ev ated at ed jugular jugu ju g la gu larr venous veno ve nouu pressure, no associated with signss of right ascites and peripheral edema. In contrast, there was no association of elevated RAP/PCWP with orthopnea and other clinical predictors associated with worse outcomes such as NYHA class and systolic blood pressure. Relationship of invasively-measured hemodynamics to RAP/PCWP ratio Invasively measured hemodynamics (Table 3) are shown by tertile RAP/PCWP. Increasing RAP/PCWP was associated with a higher right atrial pressure but was not associated with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Subjects with a higher RAP/PCWP also had a higher mean PA pressure, transpulmonary gradient, and pulmonary vascular resistance than those with a lower RAP/PCWP. Cardiac index and RV stroke work index were lower in those with higher 7 RAP/PCWP. In correlation analysis, RAP/PCWP ratio correlated significantly with RAP (r=0.78, p<0.001), transpulmonary gradient (r=0.24, p=0.001), pulmonary vascular resistance (r=0.23, p=0.002), cardiac index (r=-0.15, p<0.05), and RV stroke work index (r=-0.43, p<0.001), but not PCWP (r=0.01, p=0.9). In a subgroup analysis restricted to subjects with a PCWP 22 mm Hg, similar associations of RAP/PCWP ratio with invasively measured hemodynamics were found including increasing PVR among those with increasing RAP/PCWP: 2.4 (tertile 1); 3 (tertile 2); 4.3 Wood units (tertile 3), P<0.001 (other data not shown). There was Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 no difference in administration of milrinone (p=0.75), nitroprusside (p=0.15) or dobutamine (p=0.6) among tertiles RAP/PCWP. hocardio ho ogr grap aphi ap hicc parameters hi para pa rame ra m teers me r too RA RAP/ P/PC P/ PCWP PC WP ratio rat atio io Relationship of echocardiographic RAP/PCWP pparameters rame ra mete me mete ters rss aare ree sshown hown ho wn amo mong mo ng te erttille RA RAP/ P PC P/ PCWP WP aatt ba bbaseline seli se line li ne ((Figure 2). Echocardiographic para among tertile RAP/PCWP her R AP/P AP /PCW /P CWP CW P ra rati tioo ha ti hadd ec echo hoca ho card ca rdio rd iogr io g ap gr phi hicc ma mark rker rk erss of rright er ight ig htt ventricular Subjects with a higher RAP/PCWP ratio echocardiographic markers dysfunction including a larger right atrial area, right ventricular area in both systole and diastole, and a larger inferior vena cava both in inspiration and expiration. There was no significant association of RAP/PCWP ratio with right ventricular fractional shortening (0.25 [0.2, 0.3] tertile 1; 0.2 [0.13, 0.29] tertile 2; 0.21 [0.15, 0.28] tertile 3, p=0.2). There was also no significant association of the RAP/PCWP ratio with left atrial area, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV enddiastolic or end-systolic volume, LV ejection fraction, or ratio of mitral regurgitation to left atrial area (p0.2 for all; data not shown). 8 Relationship of RAP/PCWP ratio and outcome The association of the baseline and final RAP/PCWP with six-month outcome (Table 4) is shown. In the whole cohort, increasing baseline RAP/PCWP was associated with death or hospitalization (days) in a model adjusted for six minute walk, systolic blood pressure, BUN, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. The correlation between RAP/PCWP and PCWP was statistically insignificant, and thus multicollinearity was not an issue. In the subgroup of subjects who had elevated PCWP (22 mm Hg), increasing baseline RAP/PCWP was associated with Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 death or hospitalization (days) both in univariate and multivariable analysis. In analyses in which PCWP, qualita taati the final RAP/PCWP ratio was substituted for the baseline RAP/PCWP, qualitatively similar in ng si ssix-month x mo xmonnt nth mortality as associations with outcome were noted. In our secondary analysis usin using ven ven entt rate in in increasing i cr in crea easi ea sing si ng baseline baasseliine n RAP/PCWP RAP P/P /PCW CWP CW P wa w 16% % (t (ter erti er tile ti l 1), 21% (tertile the outcome, the event wass 16 (tertile p=00.09. p=0 .009. 2), 29% (tertile 3), p=0.09. Discussion Although right-ventricular and left-ventricular filling pressures are significantly correlated in patients with advanced heart failure, there is a large distribution of the RAP/PCWP ratio. The basis for the variability of this trait (RAP/PCWP ratio) is not well understood, nor is its prognostic utility. In the ESCAPE trial which enrolled patients with advanced heart failure selected for signs and symptoms of congestion, most of whom had elevated PCWPs, increasing RAP/PCWP ratio resulted from increasing RAP. Subjects with a low RAP/PCWP ratio had better right ventricular function as assessed by several echocardiographic measures (including smaller right atrial and right ventricular area) and by the right ventricular stroke work index, while those with a higher RAP/PCWP ratio had a higher pulmonary vascular resistance. 9 Additionally, an elevated RAP/PCWP ratio was associated with a lower cardiac index and impaired renal function at baseline and with a worse outcome at 6 months. Whether the RAP/PCWP ratio is a stable and reproducible parameter in patients with heart failure is not well known. In the CTRD, there was a significant correlation (r=0.33) of the RAP/PCWP ratio when measured at least 1 day apart (median time 188 days).4 In the present study, we confirmed this finding in patients with decompensated, advanced heart failure. In the ESCAPE trial, the correlation between ratios of RAP/PCWP measured ~1.9 days apart was 0.49 Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 (p<0.001). Additionally, there was relatively little shifting (11-12% of subjects) between tertiles er, these data su sug 1 and 3 from baseline to final hemodynamic assessment. Together, suggest that the it in n ppatients atie at ieent ntss wi w t advanced RAP/PCWP ratio does, in part, reflect an underlying intrinsic trait with heart failure. AP/P AP /PCW CWP CW P ca cann be be iinfluenced nflu nf lu uen nce cedd by cchanges han ange gess in eeither ge ithe it herr th he thee RA RAP P oorr the PCWP. In The ratio RAP/PCWP high gh R AP/P AP /PCW /P CWP CW P oc occu curr cu rred rr ed oon n th thee ba basi siss of aan si n el elev evat ev ated at ed R AP rather than a the ESCAPE trial, a hi RAP/PCWP occurred basis elevated RAP reduced PCWP (Table 3). In addition to a higher measured RAP, subjects in the highest tertile of RAP/PCWP ratio also had clinical findings that provided confirmation of an elevated RAP including more severe peripheral edema and ascites, and an elevated jugular venous pressure. In contrast, in the CTRD, subjects in the highest quartile of RAP/PCWP ratio not only had the highest RAP but they also had the lowest PCWP.4 This difference is likely due to the selection of patients for the ESCAPE trial on the basis of signs and symptoms of congestion. To our knowledge, only two prior studies have attempted to determine characteristics associated with the relationship of the RAP to PCWP in patients with heart failure.4, 5 In a cohort of patients with advanced heart failure undergoing cardiac transplant evaluation, female gender was the only characteristic found to be associated with the RAP to PCWP relationship as 10 assessed by 4 categories based on whether the RAP was 10 mm Hg and PCWP 22 mm Hg.5 In the present study, female gender was not associated with RAP/PCWP ratio. Also in contrast to the present study, renal dysfunction, PVR, cardiac index, and echocardiographic assessment of RV dysfunction were not significantly different among the four hemodynamic profiles in the prior study.5 We postulate that this difference is in part based on the analytic approach used; i.e., a hemodynamic classification based on dichotomous values of RAP and PCWP or via the RAP/PCWP ratio. Nevertheless, both studies demonstrated significant variability in the Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 relationship of right and left ventricular filling pressures in patients with advanced heart failure. ssociated with h younger yo In the CTRD, increasing quartile of RAP/PCWP was associated age, sch chem em mic ic,, in inc female gender, etiology of cardiomyopathy other than idiopathic or is ischemic, increased number s hhigher s, igherr PV PVR, R llower R, owe werr CI CI, an nd lo oweer cr crea eati ea tini ti niine cle lear le aran ar ance an ce..4 In ce In the present of prior sternotomies, and lower creatinine clearance. a oc assoc ocia i te ia tedd with with h the the R AP/P AP /PCW /P CWP CW P ra rratio. ati t o. T ti hiss di hi diff ffeere ff renc ncee ma nc mayy bbee due to inclusion study, age was not associated RAP/PCWP This difference of a broader range off patients pati pa tien ti ents en ts in the the CTRD CTR TRD D (e.g., ( .g (e g.,, complex com ompl plex pl ex congenital con onge g ni ge nita tall heart ta hear he artt disease) ar dise di seaa than in the se ESCAPE trial. In the ESCAPE database, the number of prior sternotomies was not captured. The present study confirmed the association of increasing RAP/PCWP with declining renal function, reduced cardiac index, and higher PVR first reported in the CTRD,4 indicating that these associations warrant further discussion. Increasingly, it is recognized that systemic venous congestion is an important contributor to the cardiorenal syndrome.11, 12 In the ESCAPE trial, an elevated RAP previously was shown to be weakly correlated with baseline renal function13 consistent with the findings of the present study. Here we show that impaired renal function was prominent when right- and left-sided ventricular filling pressures began to approximate one another. In such subjects, pericardial constraint may lead to exaggerated diastolic ventricular interaction.14, 15 This pathophysiology 11 may mediate the reduction in cardiac index associated with increasing RAP/PCWP ratio. A disproportionately elevated RAP in relationship to the PCWP may therefore represent one “hemodynamic signature” of patients with advanced systolic heart failure and cardiorenal syndrome, and suggests that consideration of the right-left relationship may be important when considering therapeutic strategies for treating congestion in heart. The RAP/PCWP ratio also appears to have important relationships to the pulmonary vasculature and the performance of the right ventricle. Increasing RAP/PCWP ratio was found to Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 be a marker for RV failure manifested by an enlarged right atrial area, enlarged right ventricular ndex. The RAP/PCWP RAP/ P//P P area (both in systole and diastole) and a lower RV stroke work index. ratio was veeri rity ty of m itr regurgitation, it not associated with left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, or seve severity mitral tha at thiss ra rati t o re refl flec ecte tedd ri te rright ghht ve entri ricu ri cula cu l r pe pperformance. rfor rf o ma manc nce. nc e. T e. he hhemodynamic further emphasizing th that ratio reflected ventricular The a tthe at he R AP/P AP /P PCW CWP ra rratio tio wa ti wass re rrelated late la t d to cchanges te hang ha nges ng ess iin n th thee pu pulm lm mon on data also suggest that RAP/PCWP pulmonary vasculature AP/P AP /PCW /P CWP CW P ra rati tioo wa ti wass as asso soci so ciat ci ated at ed w ithh a hi it high g er P gh VR despite des espi pite pi te a similar PCWP because increasing R RAP/PCWP ratio associated with higher PVR in each tertile. It is well known that there is variability in the increase of the pulmonary artery pressure and PVR in response to an elevated PCWP in patients with heart failure. The basis of this variability is not yet well understood16 but pulmonary hypertension is now being tested as a therapeutic target in patients with heart failure.17 We hypothesize that an exaggerated response in the pulmonary vasculature in response to an elevated PCWP (i.e., an increased PVR) is a proximal pathophysiological event, leading to RV dysfunction and subsequently an increased RAP/PCWP ratio. Studies with serial imaging and hemodynamic assessments are needed to test this hypothesis. Whether the ratio of RAP/PCWP is associated with outcome in patients with heart failure has not previously been investigated to our knowledge. A high RAP/PCWP ratio was associated 12 with worse outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure who undergo LVAD implantation6 or transplantation.4 An elevated jugular venous pressure, consistent with a high RAP, has been shown to be an independent risk factor for outcome in patients with NYHA class II-III heart failure.18 In the ESCAPE trial (Table 4), a high baseline RAP to PCWP ratio was associated with adverse events at 6 months as assessed by the primary outcome of the ESCAPE trial (number of days alive outside the hospital) but not with crude mortality. A lack of association with mortality may represent limited power given that a higher RAP/PCWP ratio was associated Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 with markers of RV dysfunction and with impaired renal function, both well known risk factors a as with for adverse outcomes in heart failure.19-22 The final RAP/PCWP was similarlyy associated the primary ESCAPE outcome. The association of increasing RAP/PCWP AP/PC PC CWP ratio rat atio io w with outcome was more consistentt in thosee with of assessing wit i h a PCWP PCWP PC WP WP 22 22 mm m Hg, Hg, highlighting highl ig ghl h ig ght h in ng the the importance impo im port po ra this ratio in patients who whom hom ho m ha hhave ave ve el elev elevated evatted lleft-sided ev eftef t-si tside si dedd ventricular de v nt ve ntri ricu ri cula cu larr filling la fil illi lliingg pressures. pre r ss s ur u es es. Overall, these findings reinforce the h importance he imp mpor orta or tanc ta ncee off RV nc RV function func fu ncti nc tion ti on in in patients p ti pa tien ents en ts with wit ithh advanced adv dvan ance an cedd heart ce hear he artt failure. ar Limitations This was a retrospective analysis. The associations of RAP/PCWP with death and hospitalization did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance in all models, perhaps because the overall size of the cohort in ESCAPE who underwent right heart catheterization was relatively small. As such, the prognostic utility of the RAP/PCWP ratio needs to be validated in other, larger datasets. 13 Conclusions In patients with advanced heart failure selected for signs and symptoms of congestion, there was a wide distribution in the ratio of RAP to PCWP. A high RAP/PCWP ratio was associated with a high RAP, underlying RV dysfunction in the setting of an elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, and was an adverse prognostic finding associated with impaired renal function and a worse 6-month outcome. Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Sources of Funding iology at UT Southwestern So Dr. Drazner is supported by the James M. Wooten Chair in Cardiology Medical Center. Disc Di sclo sc losu lo su ure r s Disclosures None. References 1. Drazner MH, Hamilton MA, Fonarow G, Creaser J, Flavell C, Stevenson LW. Relationship between right and left-sided filling pressures in 1000 patients with advanced heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999;18:1126-32. 2. Drazner MH, Prasad A, Ayers C, Markham DW, Hastings J, Bhella PS, Shibata S, Levine BD. The relationship of right- and left-sided filling pressures in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction. Circulation: Heart Fail. 2010;3:202-6. 3. Drazner MH, Hellkamp AS, Leier CV, Shah MR, Miller LW, Russell SD, Young JB, Califf RM, Nohria A. Value of clinician assessment of hemodynamics in advanced heart failure: the ESCAPE trial. Circulation: Heart Fail. 2008;1:170-7. 4. Drazner MH, Brown RN, Kaiser PA, Cabuay B, Lewis NP, Semigran MJ, Torre-Amione G, Naftel DC, Kirklin JK. Relationship of right- and left-sided filling pressures in patients with advanced heart failure: a 14-year multi-institutional analysis. The J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012;31:67-72. 5. Campbell P, Drazner MH, Kato M, Lakdawala N, Palardy M, Nohria A, Stevenson LW. Mismatch of right- and left-sided filling pressures in chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2011;17:561-8. 14 Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 6. Kormos RL, Teuteberg JJ, Pagani FD, Russell SD, John R, Miller LW, Massey T, Milano CA, Moazami N, Sundareswaran KS, Farrar DJ. Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes. J Thor Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:1316-24. 7. Binanay C, Califf RM, Hasselblad V, O'Connor CM, Shah MR, Sopko G, Stevenson LW, Francis GS, Leier CV, Miller LW. Evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness: the ESCAPE trial. JAMA. 2005;294:1625-33. 8. Palardy M, Stevenson LW, Tasissa G, Hamilton MA, Bourge RC, Disalvo TG, Elkayam U, Hill JA, Reimold SC. Reduction in mitral regurgitation during therapy guided by measured filling pressures in the ESCAPE trial. Circulation: Heart Fail. 2009;2:181-8. 9. O'Meara E, Chong KS, Gardner RS, Jardine AG, Neilly JB, McDonagh TA. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations provide valid estimations of glomerular filtration rates in patients with advanced heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2006;8:63-7. 10. Tedford RJ, Hassoun PM, Mathai SC, Girgis RE, Russell SD, Thiemann DR, Cingolani OH, Mudd JO, Borlaug BA, Redfield MM, Lederer DJ, Kass DA. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure augments right ventricular pulsatile loading. Circulation. 2012;125:289-97. nn DR, Cingolani 11. Tedford RJ, Hassoun PM, Mathai SC, Girgis RE, Russell SD, Thieman Thiemann A Importance A. Imp mpor orta or tanc ta ncee of venous nc OH, Mudd JO, Borlaug BA, Redfield MM, Lederer DJ, Kass DA. ensat atted d hheart eart ea rt ffailure. a il ai congestion for worsening of renal function in advanced decompensated J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:589-96. 89-96. 89-9 -9 96. 6. 12. Damman K, van HL. va Deursen Deur urrse sen e VM, VM Navis Navi Na v s G, Voors vi Vooorss AA, Voo AA van vann Veldhuisen va V ld Ve ldhu dhu huis i en DJ, DJ, J Hillege H Increased central venous n u pressur nous no pressure u e is aassociated sssociate teed w with ithh im impaired mpa pairred d ren renal nall ffunction unct ctio ct on and an nd mortality in a broad spectrum of patients atiien ati ents ts with witth cardiovascular caard rdio ova v sc s ullar ddisease. i ea is ease see. J Am Coll Col olll Ca Card Cardiol. rdio rd i l. io l 2009;53:582-8. 200 0099 13. Nohria A, Hasselblad CW, Califf asselblad V, Stebbins Steb bbi bins ns A, A, Pauly P Pa Paul u y DF, ul DF, Fonarow Foona n ro row w GC, Shah M, Yancy Y RM, Stevenson LW,, Hill ESCAPE Hill JA. JA. Cardiorenal Car ardi dior di oren or enal en al interactions: int nter eraact er ctio ions io ns:: insights ns insi in sigh si g ts from gh fro rom m th thee ES ESCA CAP CA P trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1268-74. 51:1268-74 51:1 51 :126 :1 26826 8 74 814. Applegate RJ, Johnston WE, Vinten-Johansen J, Klopfenstein HS, Little WC. Restraining effect of intact pericardium during acute volume loading. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:H1725-33. 15. Atherton JJ, Moore TD, Lele SS, Thomson HL, Galbraith AJ, Belenkie I, Tyberg JV, Frenneaux MP. Diastolic ventricular interaction in chronic heart failure. Lancet. 1997;349:17204. 16. Guazzi M, Arena R. Pulmonary hypertension with left-sided heart disease. Nature Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:648-59. 17. Guazzi M, Vicenzi M, Arena R, Guazzi MD. Pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a target of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition in a 1-year study. Circulation. 2011;124:164-74. 18. Drazner MH, Rame JE, Stevenson LW, Dries DL. Prognostic importance of elevated jugular venous pressure and a third heart sound in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:574-81. 19. Fonarow GC, Adams KF, Jr., Abraham WT, Yancy CW, Boscardin WJ. Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure: classification and regression tree analysis. JAMA. 2005;293:572-80. 20. Di Salvo TG, Mathier M, Semigran MJ, Dec GW. Preserved right ventricular ejection fraction predicts exercise capacity and survival in advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1143-53. 15 21. Ghio S, Gavazzi A, Campana C, Inserra C, Klersy C, Sebastiani R, Arbustini E, Recusani F, Tavazzi L. Independent and additive prognostic value of right ventricular systolic function and pulmonary artery pressure in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:183-8. 22. O'Connor CM, Hasselblad V, Mehta RH, Tasissa G, Califf RM, Fiuzat M, Rogers JG, Leier CV, Stevenson LW. Triage after hospitalization with advanced heart failure: the ESCAPE (Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness) risk model and discharge score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:872-8. Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 16 Table 1. Relationship of the baseline to final RAP/PCWP tertile Final RAP/PCWP tertile T1 T2 T3 Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Baseline T1 27 (54%) 17 (34%) 6 (12%) RAP/PCWP T2 16 (34%) 15 (32%) 16 (34%) tertile T3 5 (11%) 16 (35%) 25 (54%) Data are presented as number (% of subjects within baseline RAP/PCWP tertile who were within denoted final RAP/PCWP tertile). 17 Table 2. Baseline characteristics by baseline ratio of RAP to PCWP Tertile RAP/PCWP P 1 2 3 N=63 N=62 N=63 57 [47, 63] 58 [50, 66] 59 [48, 70] 0.14 Ethnicity: White 35 (56%) 39 (63%) 36 (57%) 0.7 Male 42 (67%) 48 (77%) 49 (78%) 0.16 Ischemic etiology 35 (56%) 31 (50%) 33 (52%) 0.7 Idiopathic etiology 21(33%) 22(36%) 23(37%) 23 ( 7% (3 7%)) 0.7 Hypertension 32 (51%) 28 (45%) 32 (51%) (51 51%) % 1.000 Diabetes 14 (24%) (24 24%) % 255 (40%) (40% (4 0%)) 0% 22 (36%) (36 36%) %) 0.2 NYHA class IV 60 ((95%) 95%) 554 4 (8 (87% (87%) 7%)) 7% 555 ((87%) 87% 87 %) 0.1 JVP 8 cm 47 ((77%) 7 %) 77 559 9 (9 (98% (98%) 8%)) 8% 59 (97%) (97 ) 0.0002 Ascites moderate 1 (2%) 11 (18%) 16 (25%) 0.0002 Peripheral edema 2+ 9 (14%) 28 (45%) 39 (62%) <.0001 Orthopnea 2 pillows 54 (86%) 50 (81%) 51 (82%) 0.6 109 [98, 120] 0.7 Age, y Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 111 [97, 120] 108 [98, 116] Heart rate, bpm 81 [71, 91] 79 [67, 91] 81 [69, 91] 0.8 Body mass index, kg/m2 25 [22, 30] 27 [24, 32] 29 [24, 35] 0.03 1.3 [0.9, 1.6] 1.5 [1.1, 1.8] 1.5 [1.2, 2] 0.004 CrCl, ml/min 62 [41, 91] 52 [44, 67] 52 [37, 68] 0.010 BUN, mg/dL 26 [16, 33] 33 [22, 51] 30 [22, 49] 0.003 Creatinine, mg/dL 18 Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Table 3. Association of baseline RAP to PCWP ratio with invasively measured hemodynamics Tertile RAP/PCWP P 1 2 3 6 [4, 8] 13.5 [11, 17] 20 [13, 23] <.0001 Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, mm Hg 23 [18, 30] 225 5 [2 [22, 2, 32] 24 [19, 30] 0.7 Pulmonary artery systolic, mm Hg 50 [[40, 4 , 60 40 60] 0] 58 [[50, 50,, 70] 50 52 [42, 67] 0.08 Pulmonary artery diastolic, mm Hg 24 [[18, 1 , 29 18 29]] 29 [25,, 36] 25 [20, 35] 0.02 Mean pulmonary artery pressure, mm Hg 42 42 [33, [333 49] [3 49] 49 49 [42, [422 56] [4 45 [35, 57] 0.049 9 [7, 12] 12 [8, 15] 13 [9, 17] 0.001 2.4 [1.8, 3.4] 2.9 [2, 4.1] 3.6 [2, 4.7] 0.003 3.9 [3, 4.5] 3.9 [3.2, 4.6] 3.3 [2.8, 4.9] 0.2 Cardiac index, liters/min/m2 2.1 [1.7, 2.3] 1.9 [1.7, 2.3] 1.8 [1.5, 2.2] 0.049 Mixed venous saturation, % 60 [44, 67] 54 [41, 62] 55 [44, 68] 0.45 Stroke volume, ml 47 [39, 56] 51 [41, 63] 44 [33, 60] 0.6 Right atrial pressure, mm Hg Transpulmonary gradient, mm Hg Pulmonary vascular resistance, WU Cardiac output, liters/min 19 Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Systemic vascular resistance, dyne-sec-cm-5 Right ventricular stroke work index, g-m/m2 per beat Pulmonary arterial compliance, ml/mm Hg 1387 [1042, 1664] 1310 [1089, 1596.5] 1322 [848, 1987] 0.9 8.6 [6.9, 12] 8.4 [6.1, 11] 5.5 [4, 7.6] <.0001 1.83 [1.33, 2.58] 1.61 [1.3, 2.47] 1.65 [1.14, 2.27] 0.25 20 Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Table 4. Association of the RAP to PCWP ratio with death or hospitalization (days) at 6 months Whole cohort* Subgroup PCWP22 mm Hg* Transplant/LVAD Transplant/LVAD Transplant/LVAD Transplant/LVAD count as dead count as alive count as dead count as alive HR (95% CI) P Value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P Value HR (95% CI) P value Baseline RAP/PCWP P Unadjusted 1.1 (0.97, 1.3) 0.14 4 11.12 1. 12 ((0.97, 0.97, 0.97 0. 97, 1. 97 1.3) 3 3) 00.14 .1 14 1.18 1. 18 ((1, 1, 11. 1.4) . <0.05 1.2 (1.01, 1.4) 0.04 Adjusted 1.13 (0.97, 1.3) 0.12 2 1.14 (0.99 (0.99, 9 , 1. 99 1.3) 3) 00.08 .088 .0 1.18 (0.98, 1.4) 0.08 1.2 (1, 1.5) <0.05 1.16 (1, 1.4) <0.05 1.19 (1.02, 1.4) 0.03 1.2 (1.02, 1.5) 0.03 1.3 (1.04, 1.5) 0.02 Model 1 Adjusted Model 2 Final RAP/PCWP Unadjusted Adjusted 1.2 (1.1, 1.5) 0.001 1.3 (1.1, 1.5) 0.009 1.8 (1.2, 2.8) 0.009 1.8 (1.1, 2.7) 0.01 1.17 (0.99, 1.3) 0.07 1.17 (0.99, 1.4) 0.07 1.8 (1.1, 3.1) 0.03 1.8 (1.05, 3.1) 0.03 21 Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Model 1 Adjusted 1.19 (.99, 1.4) 0.06 1.19 (0.99, 1.4) 0.06 1.7 (1.01, 3) 0.04 1.7 (0.99, 3) 0.05 Model 2 *Whole cohort: N=183 for baseline RAP/PCWP; N=137 for final RAP/PCWP; Subgroup PCWP 22 mm Hg: N=137 for baseline RAP/PCWP; N=35 for final RAP/PCWP. Model 1 adjusted for six minute walk, BUN, Systolic blood pressure. Model 2 adjusted for six minute walk, BUN, systolic blood pressure, PCWP. Hazard ratios in whole cohort shown are for unit standard baseline uni ratio un rattio o cchange hang ha ngee (1 sta ng t nd ta dard rd ddeviation) evia ev iaati t onn) ba base seli se line li ne RAP/PCWP=0.235; for final RAP/PCWP=0.306. Hazard ratios for subgroup u P up PCWP22 C P22 CW 222 mm mm Hg are are for for o unit uni nit i ratio change ch hange (1 standard deviation) baseline RAP/PCWP 0.235; for final RAP/PCWP 0.20. 0 22 Figure Legends Figure 1. The distribution of the RAP/PCWP ratio in the study cohort. RAP = right atrial pressure; PCWP = pulmonary capillary wedge pressure Figure 2. Association of echocardiographic measures of right ventricular dysfunction with Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 RAP/PCWP ratio (tertiles). A. Right atrial area B. Right ventricular area (diastole) are reaa (systole) re (ssys y to ole l ) C. Right ventricular area ize (expi pirrattioon)) D. Inferior vena cavaa ssize (expiration) n). n) E. Inferior vena cavaa size (inspiration) (inspiration). as box-and-whisker boxx-an boxbo andand d wh dwhisker his i ke k r plots. plot pl plots otts Data are presented as RAP/PCWP ratios were Tertile 1 (T1): 0.27-0.4; Tertile 2 (T2): 0.41-0.61; Tertile 3 (T3): 0.62 – 1.21. *P<0.005 † P<0.01 23 Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Relationship of Right- to Left-Ventricular Filling Pressures in Advanced Heart Failure: Insights from the ESCAPE Trial Mark H. Drazner, Mariella Velez-Martinez, Colby Ayers, Sharon C. Reimold, Jennifer T. Thibodeau, Joseph D. Mishkin, Pradeep P.A. Mammen, David W. Markham and Chetan B. Patel Downloaded from http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/ by guest on November 20, 2016 Circ Heart Fail. published online February 7, 2013; Circulation: Heart Failure is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231 Copyright © 2013 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 1941-3289. Online ISSN: 1941-3297 The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org/content/early/2013/02/07/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000204 Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published in Circulation: Heart Failure can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about this process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document. Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at: http://www.lww.com/reprints Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Circulation: Heart Failure is online at: http://circheartfailure.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/