handout.
Transcription
handout.
Slide 1 Sexual Harassment ___________________________________ Prevention, Correction and Litigation ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 2 ___________________________________ Introduction Well, all the guys want to have sex with me all the time. Every day I come to work it`s nonstop sexual harassment. They had to have some people from General Electric come down and talk to us about it. There`s a lawsuit that`s about to happen. But other than that, it`s been great. – Mindy Kaling on being one of only 2 female writers on a staff of 14 for "The Office" (2005) ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 3 ___________________________________ Coworker Liability Effective January 1, 2001, employees at all levels who sexually harass a coworker can be sued individually. If the Employer concludes that you engaged in sexual harassment, it will not defend you or pay the damages. If your own insurance does not pay, you could lose your property. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 4 ___________________________________ What is it? sex-u-al ha-rass-ment \`sek-sh(e-)wel he`ras-ment\ n (1975): •According to Merriman-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (3rd Ed.), it is: uninvited and unwelcome verbal or physical conduct directed at an employee because of his or her sex. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 5 ___________________________________ A Legal Definition ___________________________________ Sexual harassment is any unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature when: ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 6 Quid Pro Quo Submission to the conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of instruction, employment, or participation in other employment activity, Submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as a You got basis for evaluation in making academic the job! or personnel decisions, or ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 7 ___________________________________ Hostile Environment Such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual’s performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive University environment. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 8 ___________________________________ Necessary Showings The conduct must be unwelcome, and Either result in a tangible employment action, (Quid pro quo), or Be sufficiently severe or pervasive “to alter the conditions of employment and create an abusive working environment.” (Hostile environment) ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 9 ___________________________________ “Unwelcome” Is Not the Same As “Involuntary.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 10 ___________________________________ The Banker and the Teller ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 11 ___________________________________ Is this conduct welcome? Taylor, the branch manager, invites Vinson, a recently hired teller-trainee, out to dinner and during the meal suggests that they go to a hotel to have sexual relations. After at first refusing, Vinson subsequently agrees. Over the next several years Vinson and Taylor have intercourse some 40 or 50 times. During this period, Vinson is promoted to teller, head teller, and assistant branch manager. These activities cease when Vinson starts going with a steady boyfriend. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 12 Do the following facts change your mind? Vinson says that she eventually agreed to have sex with Taylor because she was afraid to lose her job. Taylor makes repeated demands for sexual favors, usually at the branch, both during and after business hours. Taylor fondles Vinson in front of other employees. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 13 ___________________________________ What about these facts? ___________________________________ Taylor follows Vinson into the women’s restroom when she goes there alone. Taylor exposes himself to Vinson. Taylor forcibly rapes Vinson. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 14 And how about these facts? Do they change your mind? Vinson never reports Taylor and never attempts to use the Bank’s complaint procedure. Taylor denies everything and claims that Vinson is lying because of a business-related dispute. Vinson dresses provocatively and publicly expresses sexual fantasies. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 15 ___________________________________ The Reasonable Person Pervasiveness and severity are judged by a reasonable person standard. The reasonable victim’s perspective must be considered in determining whether or not a reasonable person would find the conduct offensive. Employers are not required to accommodate the individualized concerns of hyper-sensitive employees. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 16 ___________________________________ The Lovelorn Revenue Agent ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 17 Is this a hostile work environment? Ellison and Gray are revenue agents in the same office. According to Ellison, Gray pesters her and hangs around her desk. Ellison declines an invitation to go out for drinks and suggests lunch the next week but then tries to stay away from the office during lunch time to avoid having to go. Sometime during the next week, Gray uncharacteristically wears a three piece suit and asks Ellison to lunch. She declines. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 18 ___________________________________ Is it now? Gray gives Ellison the following note: “I cried over you last night and I’m totally drained today. I have never been in such constant term oil (sic). Thank you for talking with me. I could not stand to feel your hatred for another day.” Ellison leaves the room after reading the note and Gray follows her. Ellison leaves the building. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 19 ___________________________________ What should the supervisor do? Ellison shows the note to Miller who supervises both Ellison and Gray but asks Miller not to do anything because she wants to handle it herself. Ellison asks a male co-worker to tell Gray that she is not interested. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 20 ___________________________________ The story continues: Ellison gets Gray’s note on Wednesday. He calls in sick on Thursday and Ellison is off Friday. The next Monday she starts four weeks of training out of town. Gray sends Ellison a three-page, typed, single spaced letter which states in part: “I know you are worth knowing with or without sex.... Leaving aside the hassles and disasters of recent weeks, I have enjoyed you so much over these past few months. Watching you. Experiencing you from O so far away. Admiring your style and élan.... Don’t you think it odd that two people who have never even talked together, alone, are striking off such intense sparks. . . I will [write] another letter in the near future.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 21 What should the supervisor do now? Ellison immediately telephones Miller. She tells Miller that she is frightened and upset. Ellison asks Miller to transfer either her or Gray because she would not be comfortable working in the same office with Gray. Miller discusses the problem with her supervisor, Benton, and meets with Gray. Miller tells Gray to leave Ellison alone. Over the next week, Miller advises labor relations of the situation and reminds Gray “many times” not to contact Ellison. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 22 And now what should the supervisor do? Gray transfers to another office before Ellison’s return but files a grievance requesting to be transferred back. The grievance is settled permitting Gray to return provided he spends four more months away and promises to leave Ellison alone. When Ellison learns that Gray will be returning she files a sex harassment complaint and transfers to another office. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 23 ___________________________________ Does Gray’s intent matter? Suppose Gray sees himself as a modern day Cyrano de Begerac wishing no more than to woo Ellison with his words? There is no evidence that Gray harbors any ill will toward Ellison. In his three page love letter, Gray offers to leave Ellison alone if she wishes. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 24 Ellison v. Brady ___________________________________ AKA: The Lovelorn Revenue Agent “We realize that there is a broad range of viewpoints among women as a group, but we believe that many women share common concerns which men do not necessarily share. For example, because women are disproportionately victims of rape and sexual assault, women have a stronger incentive to be concerned with sexual behavior. Women who are victims of mild forms of sexual harassment may understandably worry whether a harasser’s conduct is merely a prelude to violent sexual assault. Men, who are rarely victims of sexual assault, may view sexual conduct in a vacuum without a full appreciation of the social setting or the underlying threat of violence that a woman may perceive.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 25 When is an environment “hostile” or “abusive”? Look at all circumstances. How frequent is the conduct? How severe is the conduct? Is the conduct physically threatening or humiliating? Is it “a mere offensive utterance”? Does it unreasonably interfere with work or school performance? ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 26 Social Context Determining whether a reasonable person would consider behavior to be severe requires “careful consideration of the social context in which the particular behavior occurs and is experienced by its target.” “The real social impact of workplace behavior often depends on a constellation of surrounding circumstance, expectations, and relationships which are not fully captured by a simple recitation of the words used or the physical acts performed.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 27 ___________________________________ Example Is a football player’s environment severely or pervasively abusive if the coach smacks him on the buttocks as he heads onto the field? Would the same behavior reasonably be experienced as abusive by the coach’s secretary back at the office? ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 28 ___________________________________ Sexual Harassment Charges ___________________________________ 16000 14000 12000 10000 Men Women 8000 6000 ___________________________________ 4000 2000 0 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 29 ___________________________________ The Risks of Romance ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Can I date a fellow employee? ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 30 ___________________________________ It’s a bad idea No rule or policy forbids dating a fellow employee except where expressly stated in manual. Consensual relationships between a supervisor and a subordinate are suspect given the power difference. Claims of harassment may also be made by other employees who believe they are treated unfairly because of the relationship. What if the relationship sours? ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 31 Power imbalances and changing circumstances Everyone interprets events based upon their own background, experiences, hopes and wishes. You cannot be sure that someone who depends on your good favor will view a pass as innocent or believe that rejection would be free of consequences. Current events will be interpreted in light of subsequent events. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 32 ___________________________________ What do you see? A fashionable young woman from a bygone era? An ugly hag? Which one is the truth? ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 33 ___________________________________ Date at your own risk If you date and your former love object alleges that the whole thing was sexual harassment, you are on your own. The Employer will not defend you, so check your homeowner’s policy. You might lose more than money, like your spouse and family. Oh yes, and your job could also be at stake because, while dating is not against the rules, harassment is. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 34 Supervisor Responsibilities ___________________________________ What should you do if: An employee who you supervise tells you that she is being sexually harassed? You overhear two non-supervisory employees talking about their sexual conquests? Another supervisor tells you that he has been dating a coworker? You see an employee looking at a porno web site? You receive a sexual joke as an e-mail attachment? ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 35 Supervisors Must Take “Reasonable Care” The Supreme Court has given employers a defense in some hostile environment cases. To take advantage of the defense an employer must show that it “exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any sexually harassing behavior.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Faragher v. City of Boca Raton ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 36 What Is “Reasonable Care?” YOU MUST DO SOMETHING WHEN YOU LEARN ABOUT HARASSMENT: The Supreme Court denied the defense to the employer where the victim of harassment actually told a supervisor, Gordon, about the harassing conduct and he had done nothing. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE: Gordon had similar informal talks with other women but felt it was not his place to report the conduct. YOU HAVE TO PAY ATTENTION: The Supreme Court also noted that the employer had “made no attempt to keep track of the conduct of supervisors.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 37 ___________________________________ Report all inappropriate conduct The Employer can be held to know what you know. Your failure to report will be judged using 20-20 hindsight. When in doubt, shout. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 38 ___________________________________ Why Not Handle It Yourself? Most managers and supervisors see harassment claims only rarely and so have little experience. If you talk to the alleged discriminator you can make matters worse, triggering retaliation, or giving him a chance to “get his story straight.” You might not learn of other facts that should influence your decision making. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 39 ___________________________________ Express disapproval Take down offensive jokes and cartoons. If you overhear sexually explicit conversations or language, say that it is inappropriate in the workplace. If you hear discriminatory language, verbalize disapproval Do not laugh at racy jokes, no matter who tells them. You are a role model. You set the tone. Say it is not okay. Dare to be square. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 40 ___________________________________ Why react to minor incidents? While a single utterance generally will not be held to create a pervasively hostile work environment, you will not see or hear about all incidents. You may be seeing only the proverbial tip of the iceberg. You set the tone. An employee who sees you laughing at sexual jokes is unlikely to feel that she can complain to you; thus, you would never learn about the rest of that iceberg. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 41 ___________________________________ Take disciplinary action If you learn of conduct that may constitute sexual harassment, you must take disciplinary action. It is not enough that the conduct stops. At minimum, the harasser must be advised in strong terms that the conduct is wrong and that further discipline will be imposed if it is repeated. In many circumstances, much stronger action must be taken. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 42 ___________________________________ Follow Up The victim may have useful suggestions. You may end up preventing further harassment. If it turns out that the remedy was inadequate, you might learn about it before the complaint turns into a lawsuit. You might prevent a constructive discharge. You might deter others from engaging in harassment. You communicate a seriousness of purpose. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 43 ___________________________________ What not to do If you get a complaint, do not suggest that it is trivial or that the complaining person has simply misinterpreted the facts. Do not ignore it or conclude that it is not your place to do anything about it. Do not discount claims made by “trouble makers” or by employees who are having other difficulties at work. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 44 Role Play ___________________________________ What should you say? You overhear two non-supervisory employees talking about their sexual conquests? You see an employee looking at a porno web site? You receive a sexual joke as an e-mail attachment? ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 45 ___________________________________ The Worried Word Processor ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 46 What action should the manager take? Management had received complaints that Moore made sexually suggestive remarks and engaged in unwelcome touching of female clerical workers well before Caroline began working there. Peterson, who was responsible for the office, had met with all staff to warn the men not to engage in conduct that could be construed as sexual harassment. He met privately with Moore to caution him against sexual harassment. Moore and Peterson interview Caroline for a word processing job, during which Moore asks her what she would do if subjected to sexual harassment. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 47 Is the remedial action sufficient? Shortly after Caroline starts work, Moore makes sexually suggestive remarks, and once rubs his hands on her back, refusing to stop when she asks him to do so. A month latter, Caroline accepts a ride home from Moore after a snow storm that leaves her stranded. He makes repeated suggestive remarks, kisses her, insists on entering her apartment and, while there, kisses her and rubs his hands on her back. At first he refuses to leave but eventually does. Moore is warned in writing: “If there are any recurrences. . .such will be grounds for immediate termination” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 48 How can a manager avoid these problems? Unknown to Peterson, Moore continues his sexual innuendo and improper touching of women workers (other than Caroline) after the initial warning from Peterson. After Caroline complains, Peterson also revokes Moore’s security clearance as a punishment. Caroline feels that this revocation increases her contact with Moore because she does not have clearance and they will spend more time in the same area as a result. Caroline feels that the actions taken are inadequate and quits. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 49 ___________________________________ The Case of the Kissing Chancellor ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 50 ___________________________________ Is this sexual harassment? Fall is hired by Caul to promote classes at a satellite location despite budgetary concerns expressed by the Chancellor. Chancellor Cohen sends an e-mail message to Fall requesting that she make an appointment to discuss legislative issues. During the appointment, Cohen closes the door, says the appointment was a “ruse” to get Fall alone, grabs Fall “like a gorilla,” kisses her, forcing his tongue into her mouth, and forces his hand down her blouse. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 51 Did the University exercise reasonable care? Fall did not at first report the incident, doing so only after hearing from Chancellor Cohen at a party that “there is probably going to be a cut in off-campus programs and we know where that cut will be.” Once Fall reports the conduct, an expansive investigation is conducted, as a result of which Cohen resigns and takes a one-year sabbatical. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 52 Do these facts change your mind? When Fall first reports the Chancellor’s behavior, Caul says that “this was not the first time someone had complained about Cohen.” On learning of the incident, the first reaction of Lamon, the ViceChancellor for Academic Affairs is: “Oh no, not again.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 53 ___________________________________ What about these facts? The previous complaint referred to by Caul and Lamont had been made five years before. Although the University investigated the previous complaint, it took no corrective action “because the victim did not want any further action taken.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 54 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ The Indifferent Administrator ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 55 The sordid tale A heterosexual male hospital admitting clerk contends he is subjected to harassment by homosexual male co-workers, including his supervisors. The harassment includes sexual advances and propositions, lewd comments, and physically touching intimate parts of the admitting clerk’s body. The clerk is told by co-workers that his is “a gay job” and they, particularly the supervisors, are angered by his rebuffs. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 56 Can the employer raise a defense? When the situation becomes intolerable, the clerk meets with the Medical Director who says that he had been aware of ongoing harassment long before the clerk came on the scene. However, the Director is leaving on vacation. He tells the clerk to meet with the Administrative Director. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 57 What should the administrator have done instead? The Administrative Director initially refuses to meet with the clerk, doing so only when he insists. The administrator characterizes the complaint as “trivial and insignificant” and “belittle[s] the clerk’s experiences and reactions.” The administrator promises confidentiality but immediately telephones one of the supervisors to tell him that the clerk has accused him of harassment. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 58 Monetary Benefits Obtained by Law Enforcement Agencies $60,000,000.00 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ $50,000,000.00 $40,000,000.00 ___________________________________ $30,000,000.00 $20,000,000.00 $10,000,000.00 $0.00 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 59 ___________________________________ Employment Law Jury Verdicts Year 2003 Median Jury Verdict $315,000 Average Jury Verdict $1,014,046 2004 $300,000 $1,924,007 20055 $350,000 $535,834 2006 $545,172 $1,409,793 2007 $386,000 $992,774 2008 $250,000 $2,506,132 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 60 Verdicts for Selected Claims: 2011 Type of Claim Percent Plaintiff Verdicts Number of Claims Average Verdict Median Verdict Retaliation/ Whistleblowing 46% 52 $1,432,987 $300,000 Gender Discrimination 50% 12 $2,336,205 $300,000 56% 34 $669,695 $516,917 Sexual Harassment ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 61 ___________________________________ THE ANSWERS What the Courts Decided ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 62 ___________________________________ The Banker and the Teller Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson ___________________________________ Hostile environment claims are recognized as unlawful sex discrimination: “Sexual harassment which creates a hostile or offensive environment for members of one sex is every bit the arbitrary barrier to sexual equality at the workplace that racial harassment is to racial equality. Surely, a requirement that a man or woman run a gauntlet of sexual abuse in return for the privilege of being allowed to work and make a living can be as demeaning and disconcerting as the harshest of racial epithets.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 63 ___________________________________ The Banker and the Teller Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson ___________________________________ The conduct must be unwelcome: “[T]he fact that sex-related conduct was ‘voluntary,’ in the sense that the complainant was not forced to participate against her will, is not a defense to a sexual harassment suit brought under Title VII. The gravamen of any sexual harassment claim is that the alleged sexual advances were ‘unwelcome.’ [Citation omitted.]” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 64 ___________________________________ The Banker and the Teller Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson ___________________________________ The conduct must be severe or pervasive: “For sexual harassment to be actionable, it must be sufficiently severe or pervasive ‘to alter the conditions of the victim’s employment and create an abusive working environment. . . [Vinson’s] allegations in this case—which include not only pervasive harassment but also criminal conduct of the most serious nature—are plainly sufficient to state a claim for ‘hostile environment’ sexual harassment.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 65 ___________________________________ The Banker and the Teller Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson “[W]e reject [the Bank’s] view that the mere existence of a grievance procedure and a policy against discrimination coupled with [Vinson’s] failure to invoke that procedure, must insulate [the Bank] from liability.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 66 ___________________________________ The Lovelorn Revenue Agent Ellison v. Brady ___________________________________ The “reasonable woman” standard is adopted: “[I]n evaluating the severity and pervasiveness of sexual harassment, we should focus on the perspective of the victim….If we only examined whether a reasonable person would engage in allegedly harassing conduct, we would run the risk of reinforcing the prevailing level of discrimination. Harassers could continue to harass merely because a particular discriminatory practice was common, and victims of harassment would have no remedy. We therefore prefer to analyze harassment from the victim’s perspective.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 67 The Lovelorn Revenue Agent ___________________________________ Ellison v. Brady The employer’s remedial action was inadequate: “We strongly believe that the victim of sexual harassment should not have to work in a less desirable location as a result of an employer’s remedy for sexual harassment.” “Ellison’s employer did not express strong disapproval,. . . did not reprimand Gray, did not put him on probation, and did not inform him that repeated harassment would result in suspension or termination. Apparently, Gray’s employer only told him to stop harassing Ellison. Title VII requires more that a mere request to refrain from discriminatory conduct. Employers send the wrong message to potential harassers when they do not discipline employees for sexual harassment.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 68 ___________________________________ The Worried Word Processor Caroline v. Unisys Corporation Summary judgment for the employer reversed. Caroline’s evidence held to “cast doubt on the adequacy of [the employer’s] remedies.” The previous reprimand of Moore “had failed to deter him from striking again” and the revocation of Moore’s security clearance actually increased Caroline’s chance of encountering Moore in the office. A reasonable fact finder could infer that the company “intended Moore’s earlier reprimand as nothing more than a slap on the wrist or perhaps even an outright sham.” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 69 The Case of the Kissing Chancellor ___________________________________ Fall v. Indiana University Board of Trustees A reasonable jury could conclude that the conduct was severe or pervasive, even though it was a one time occurrence. The University took reasonable steps to promptly correct the sexual harassment endured by Fall in that it conducted an expansive investigation resulting in Cohen’s resignation immediately upon learning of the incident. However, judgment could not be granted to the University because it had not taken reasonable steps to prevent Cohen’s harassment from occurring in the first place. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 70 The Case of the Kissing Chancellor ___________________________________ Fall v. Indiana University Board of Trustees The previous complaint put the University on notice. Notice exists whenever information comes to the attention of someone who has the power to terminate the harassment or who can reasonably be expected to report or refer a matter “up the ladder.” Notice exists, even where the complete facts are unknown, if a reasonable employer might think there was some probability that harassment was taking place. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 71 ___________________________________ The Indifferent Administrator Matthews v. The Regents of the University of California Individual supervisors can be held liable for sexual harassment and retaliation. “[S]exual harassment perpetrated by a supervisor. . .is a particularly personal form of. . .discrimination. . . .[T]he responsibility for such acts must be borne both by the offender as well as the employer who tolerates the offense. . . .” ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 72 ___________________________________ Legal Evaluation Concerns Jury Trial Simulation Voir Dire/Juror Selection Witness Preparation Trial Monitoring Expert Witness Testimony Testing Arguments & Exploring Case Issues Among Jurors & Other Target Groups By: Qualitative Research & Quantitative ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Research ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 73 ___________________________________ JURY TRIAL SIMULATI0N Ad hoc design to fit the case and counsel needs Basics: - jury panel from potential juror pool v. retired judge - client lawyers representing plaintiff/defense (role playing as needed - witnesses needing rehearsal - suitable research venue w/ recruitment/facilities/ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ - ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 74 ___________________________________ Survey Research—Voir Dire Purposes: To test hypotheses about case issues among designated target groups To prove or disprove claims made by Plaintiffs and Defendants in Case filings Ultimately generating statistically significant or otherwise reliable information (trend data) covering key issues of people’s perceptions, attitudes and behavior involved in the claims. Face2Face, Phone, Internet modalities ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 75 ___________________________________ Discovery Tools Interrogatories Document Demands Requests for Admission Depositions Subpoenas Expert Witnesses Private Investigation ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 76 ___________________________________ Final Thoughts “Beauty provokes harassment, the law says, but it looks through men's eyes when deciding what provokes it.” ― Naomi Wolf, The Beauty Myth I will stop just short of calling this harassment, ... I will leave that to my attorneys. ― Nicole Brown ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 77 ___________________________________ Thank you! Arthur J. Travieso, Esq. The Rallo Law Firm 3070 Bristol Street, Suite 560, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 O 714.850.0690 F 714.659.6491 [email protected] ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________
Similar documents
ALL IN! The ever-expanding reach of employment discrimination law
• “Abusive" (or "hostile," which in this context I take to mean the same thing) does not seem to me a very clear standard—and I do not think clarity is at all increased by adding the adverb "objec...
More information