Fall 2008
Transcription
Fall 2008
Special NACE Issue See the Audatex calendar of NACE events on back cover Audatex Directions News from Audatex North America, Inc. Vol 03 Shrinking Talent Pool and Vehicle Complexity Fuel Estimatics Innovation New 3D vehicle graphics a n d a n i m a t i o n s p ro v i d e built-in intelligence Audatex Directions Audatex Directions is a quarterly newsletter that provides in-depth trends and industry analysis on the auto physical damage market. It is published by Audatex North America, Inc., a Solera Company. Editor Kate Los Corporate Communications Manager Contributing Writers Michael T. Anderson Sr. Director of Data Analytics, Audatex Contents 3 4 Managing Director’s Message Feature Article – Shrinking Talent Pool and Vehicle Complexity Fuel Estimatics Innovation Diane Klund Regulatory Compliance Manager, Audatex Avi Pelc Sr. Product Manager, Hollander Patrick Rice VP, Database Development, Audatex 7 A Look Into Future Costs – The Cost of High-Tech Safety Features Rick Tuuri Associate VP of Industry Relations, Audatex Request Copies To request a printed copy of this publication, please email: Kate Los Corporate Communications Manager [email protected] 10 Insurance Update 12 Recycler Update – Pay-as-You-Drive Insurance – Expense Management through Quality Management To download the pdf, please visit our website: www.audatex.us/audatexdirections Local focus. Global knowledge. 14 Regulatory Highlights – Paint and Materials: Included or Not Included? Audatex is the leading global claims solutions provider. As part of the Solera group of companies, we draw on our broad global claims market experience to identify and implement the best-practice processes that drive continuous improvement for our local customers and their trading partners. Solera companies serve the automotive industry in more than 50 countries across six continents. 16 – Voice of the Customer: Audatex Holds Second Strategic Advisory Council Meeting and Forms New Technical Advisory Council 18 © 2008 Audatex North America, Inc. All rights reserved. Audatex, AudaInsight, Autosource, Audatex Estimating, Audatex Win-EMR, PenPro and Shoplink are trademarks or registered trademarks of Audatex. All other company and/or product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners in the United States and other countries. Industry Collaboration Audatex News and Events – Audatex Receives IACET® 2008 Exemplar Award – In Memoriam: A Tribute to Julie Verran – Upcoming Industry Events Managing Director’s Message Meeting Industry Demands with Intelligent Innovation: Special NACE Edition In an increasingly demanding marketplace, an event like NACE provides a much needed venue for discussing industry issues, exploring new innovation and collaborating with others. In this special NACE edition of Audatex Directions, we aim to supplement your NACE experience by providing you with data on the latest industry trends and exploring how your input has guided the creation of solutions that help you keep pace in an everchanging marketplace. Be sure to review the back cover of this newsletter to see special Audatex events we’re holding at NACE. In our feature article, “Shrinking Talent Pool and Vehicle Complexity Fuel Estimatics Innovation,” we explore market factors that are driving a demand for new technology that both supplements workforce knowledge and improves overall claims performance. We examine how new 3D vehicle graphics and animations in the 2009 release of Audatex Estimating™ will provide built-in intelligence that will help you maintain a competitive edge despite new market challenges. Many of the features in this upcoming Audatex Estimating release were greatly influenced by user feedback. On this note, we talk more about the ways in which we’re gathering such input in the article, “Voice of the Customer: Audatex Holds Second Strategic Advisory Council Meeting and Forms New Technical Advisory Council.” On the insurance front, we take a closer look at “The Cost of High-Tech Safety Features” and “Pay-as-You-Drive Insurance,” and we explore why data analysis is key to making informed pricing decisions and forecasts. Best practices are at the heart of the article, “Expense Management though Quality Management,” which looks at processes recyclers can implement to ensure part quality, reduce cycle times and improve customer satisfaction. ‘‘ ’’ ...your input has guided the creation of solutions that help you keep pace Our regulatory updates in this issue are focused around paint and materials, specifically legislation that is designed to ensure fair practices are in place even without the availability of any purely “surface” or “area-based” methods in North America today. Finally, on an Audatex news front, this issue is marked by mixed emotions. We are excited to report that our efforts to help customers make the most of their investments through continuing education and training have been recognized in our winning the IACET® 2008 Exemplar Award. But on a more somber note, this summer we lost our dear friend and colleague Julie Verran, the acting manager of our Milwaukie, Oregon, site who dedicated over 30 years of her life to the insurance industry. Please take a moment to learn more about the contributions Julie made by reading the tribute article in this issue. I hope to see you during the NACE conference or at another industry event. Regards, in an ever-changing marketplace. John Kotsopoulos, Managing Director Audatex North America, Inc. www.audatex.com 3 Feature Article Shrinking Talent Pool and Vehicle Complexity Fuel Estimatics Innovation By Michael T. Anderson and Patrick Rice The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics forecasts that the demand for auto repair cost estimators within body shops will increase 26.1% in the next 8 years. Similar forecasts from the Bureau reflect an increasing demand for insurance auto damage appraisers (7.6%) and insurance adjusters (31.5%) during the same timeframe. With the aging U.S. population retiring and the retirement rate forecasted to double this year, the industry is likely to face new challenges due to a diminishing availability of experienced technicians, appraisers, adjusters and frontline material damage managers. Compounding the situation is the everincreasing number and complexity of vehicle makes and models that are introduced to the North American market each year. For example, in 2000, appraisers were required to have proficiency in approximately 1,206 vehicle models. Since 2000, that number has risen 49% to 1,794. Dramatic changes have also been seen in the number of countries producing vehicles, the degree of design complexity, the variety of repair processes, and the array of parts and materials used in vehicle production. On top of this, the situation facing today’s market is further complicated by new developments such as advanced electronics, increasingly varied metals, a range of fuel systems, refined structural engineering and sophisticated refinish technologies. As a result of these factors, the next generation of technicians and adjusters will need to be proficient in a much broader spectrum of technology over a shorter period of time. Driven to ensure their appraisers maintain a competitive edge despite today’s challenging marketplace, some insurance companies have invested millions of dollars in state-of-the-art research and training facilities. However, this approach may not work for all organizations. Sam Mercanti, President and CEO of CARSTAR, Canada comments, “While multi-million dollar training facilities are beneficial to those companies that are willing and able to make such an investment, many organizations will continue to look to the estimating platform companies to help manage these challenges. Continued next page 4 Audatex Directions Vol 3 Figure 1: In this preview of new 3D imaging technology within Audatex Estimating, front bumper assembly can be moved in any direction, allowing the user to select parts dynamically from any view. Feature Article C o n t i n u e d f ro m p re v i o u s p a g e Audatex studies show that enhanced multi-dimensional visual depiction of vehicle assemblies and parts improves original estimate accuracy by an average of 8%. Clear identification of parts that may be missed in the original estimate, as well as identification of increasingly complex substrate materials (see figure 2), drives accurate estimate preparation and repair processes. Estimating providers will need to stay ahead of the curve and provide users with new products that address the challenges presented by anticipated changes in the workforce, increased vehicle complexity, and the proliferation in the number of vehicle makes and models.” To address these market challenges and enable clients to stay ahead of the training curve, Audatex will be introducing intelligent graphics featuring 3D vehicle depictions and animations in the upcoming release of Audatex Estimating (see figure 1). Multi-dimensional depiction of vehicle parts and data makes the information more accessible to both novice and experienced users alike. Figure 2: Clear identification of substrate materials during the estimate preparation process is imperative to an accurate estimate and proper repair methods. www.audatex.com To insurers and repairers, an 8% improvement in first-time accuracy represents significant financial benefits and process improvements. In the past 12 months, the costs for insurers to re-inspect a vehicle and process a supplement have risen dramatically, while improved cycle-time continues to have a direct correlation to costs, as well as to customer satisfaction and retention. How Do Intelligent Graphics Work? Multi-dimensional technology has long been available in other industries where time, costs and even lives are at risk. Industries such as aviation, emergency medical response, fire and rescue, and surgical and medical technology have all taken advantage of this technology. Multi-dimensional 3D technology facilitates training and enables knowledge retention in shorter timeframes and in a more cost-effective manner. The Audatex Estimating multi-dimensional 3D technology shows complete views of vehicle parts in relation to their assemblies. Damaged parts are selected from the enhanced part views and can be quickly rotated/positioned by the user to provide optimal views of the parts data. Furthermore, the technology provides 3D animations of the removal and replacement of parts and assemblies, a feature that was specifically designed to demonstrate new and unfamiliar procedures (see figure 3 on next page). These new intelligent graphics provide a more complete understanding of what needs to be included in the estimate. For technicians, appraisers and adjusters who have limited experience with a particular vehicle or procedure, the intelligent graphics greatly improve decision making. ‘‘ Estimating providers will need to stay ahead of the curve and provide users with new products that address the challenges presented by anticipated changes in the workforce, increased vehicle complexity, and the proliferation in the number of vehicle ’’ makes and models. Sam Mercanti, President and CEO of CARSTAR, Canada Continued next page 5 Feature Article C o n t i n u e d f ro m p re v i o u s p a g e Figure 3: 3D animations of the removal and replacement of parts and assemblies in Audatex Estimating will aid users in new and unfamiliar procedures. Illustrated here is an exploded brake assembly view showing the caliper removal procedure. In addition to improving accuracy, cycle time and repair costs, this technology helps the appraiser or repairer educate their customers on the repair process. This can be of vital importance because understanding the claim and repair processes has been identified by some insurers as the number-one concern regarding their relationships with customers. Conclusion Repairers and insurers require innovative, cost-effective tools to compete in today’s rapidly changing marketplace. Forecasts by 2009 Models – New Audi Q5 BMW X6 Chevrolet Traverse Dodge Journey Ford Flex Hummer H3T Hyundai Genesis Jaguar XF Kia Borrego Lincoln MKS 6 Mercedes-Benz GLK Nissan GT-R Pontiac G8 Suzuki Equator Toyota Venza Volkswagen Passat CC Volkswagen Routan Volkswagen Tiguan Volvo XC60 the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics suggest that an increased demand for skilled appraisers and estimators across the entire market is likely. This is compounded by a dramatic increase in the number and complexity of vehicles that estimators are encountering. When used during the estimating process, intelligent graphics featuring 3D vehicle depiction and animations will provide Audatex clients with a competitive advantage by supplementing workforce knowledge and improving estimate accuracy—both which improve overall claims performance. n 2009 Models – Redesigned Acura TL Acura TSX Audi A4 Dodge Ram Ford F-150 Honda Fit Honda Pilot Infiniti FX Mazda6 Nissan Maxima Nissan Murano Pontiac Vibe Subaru Forester Toyota Corolla Toyota Matrix Audatex Directions Vol 3 A Look Into Future Costs The Cost of High-Tech Safety Features By Michael T. Anderson With many 2009 model year vehicles arriving at car dealerships, claims organizations and repairers are getting their first glimpse of newly introduced and redesigned models. Fuel economy and increased safety technology are just some of the new features found on the 2009 models. Over the past several years, vehicle manufacturers have made significant strides in advanced safety options that protect vehicle occupants during crashes and quite possibly help drivers avoid accidents altogether. In the last edition of Audatex Directions, we focused on high-intensity discharge xenon headlamps and how those parts relate to accident frequency and paid losses. Here, we take a similar look at the cost of high-tech safety features. As the 2007, 2008 and 2009 model years begin to represent an increasing percentage of estimates written, it is important for claims, underwriting and actuarial experts to understand how technological advances introduced during those years may impact frequency, loss costs and symbol ratings used by insurers in the rate making process. For example, when considering costs, Audatex data shows that replacement costs for high-tech safety parts can be significant, as illustrated in figure 1. At the forefront of safety innovation are highly sophisticated accident-avoidance systems. Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) systems were first introduced by Toyota in May 1998 in its Progrés luxury sedan, sold exclusively in Japan. Nissan soon followed with its own system in the Cima 41LV-2, also sold exclusively in Japan. In the United States, collision avoidance systems can now be found in over 140 models from virtually every vehicle manufacturer. Accident avoidance systems can be standard or optional equipment. Drivers who have such systems can benefit from them in terms of accident avoidance, but alongside that, these systems can also significantly increase repair costs. For example, if an ACC distance sensor www.audatex.com High-Tech Parts – Average Replacement Costs $1,800 $1,600 in a luxury European $1,400 vehicle requires $1,200 replacement, part costs $1,000 can increase by as much $800 $600 as $3,760, excluding $400 labor. In addition, proper $200 replacement is critical to $0 the system’s Distance Rear Bumper Curtain Front Bumper performance because Sensors Cameras Airbags Sensors sensors require a very accurate alignment to be Source: Audatex Insight Figure 1: Replacement effective. Some manufacturers suggest that as costs for high-tech safety little as a one-degree horizontal misalignment parts can significantly will result in a degradation of performance. impact repair costs. Therefore, the realignment process is complex, often requiring the use of special OE tools and detailed procedure manuals. Similarly, deployed curtain airbags, while significantly reducing head-related bodily injury claims, can add $400 in airbag part costs (not including other damaged parts). The following table highlights some increasingly common high-tech safety technologies whose safety benefits and associated costs should be carefully juxtaposed when considering pricing adjustments. Continued next page 7 A Look Into Future Costs C o n t i n u e d f ro m p re v i o u s p a g e Adaptive Cruise Control Cruise control has been an option in most vehicles for many years. ACC systems available today can differ from each other in that they may utilize either radar or lidar (light detecting and ranging) technology to monitor the distance between a vehicle and the one in front of it. Often mounted behind the windshield or within either the grill or bumper, ACC technology systematically notifies a driver that a safe distance is no longer being maintained and that the vehicle requires a change in speed. In some models, the vehicle systematically adjusts speed to re-establish a safe following distance. Advanced Collision Warning Systems Advanced collision warning systems include lane departure warning systems, proximity detection systems, and blind spot monitoring systems. Lane departure warning systems consist of cameras and/or infrared sensors located inside the vehicle, the front bumper or the grill. These systems develop a predictive model of where the road is going and correlate the lane markings on the road to vehicle turn signals. If a lane departure begins to occur without a corresponding turn signal, the driver is systematically alerted. Some advanced systems monitor driving performance and if they sense inattentive or sleepy driving patters, they will vibrate the steering wheel and seat. Proximity detection systems equipped in vehicles with ACC warn drivers if they are too close to another vehicle, suggesting an accident may be imminent. In some models, the vehicle may systematically apply the brakes to avoid the collision, or it may detect when brakes are applied at a rapid rate and as a result systematically apply maximum braking pressure. Every year, approximately 826,000 accidents are related to drivers’ inability to see their blind spots. Blind spot monitoring systems use externally mounted cameras, radar-based systems, dash-mounted displays and even thermal imaging to alert the driver if another vehicle has approached a blind spot. These technologies, in addition to the use of back-up cameras often located in the rear bumper or window, are becoming increasingly common in newer vehicles. Collision Detection Systems Typically found in high-end European vehicles, collision detection systems consist of proximity sensors that identity when a vehicle is about to be involved in a collision. If a collision is anticipated, the system takes proactive measures to minimize the damage to the vehicle and its occupants. Such measures may include systematic application of the brakes and/or adjustments to the seat belt restraints. Curtain Airbags Installed above the side windows, curtain airbags are designed to protect occupants from ejection and debris. Some manufacturers offer an advanced canopy-designed system that detects instances of a rollover and deploys the curtain airbags. According to data from 2005 to 2008, the frequency of airbag deployment has risen by 144%. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety estimates this has reduced the frequency of head-related deaths by nearly 37%. Electronic Stability Control Electronic Stability Control (ESC) has been heralded by many as the single most important improvement in automotive safety since anti-lock brakes. The Insurance Highway Institute for Safety believes ESC has the potential to save as many as 10,000 lives per year. ESC systems apply brakes at different rates and intervals when they sense a vehicle is about to enter, or has already entered into, a skid. By applying complex braking patterns and pressure, ESC systems assist in keeping the vehicle on its original course of travel. Continued next page 8 Audatex Directions Vol 3 A Look Into Future Costs C o n t i n u e d f ro m p re v i o u s p a g e Summary Independent studies show that not all high-tech, high-cost safety features yield their anticipated benefits. For example, a 2008 study performed by Consumer Reports found that some blind spot monitoring systems “are often set off by retaining walls, road barriers, or hedges even when there is no vehicle present. Occasionally they also miss an actual car in the blind spot.” Additionally, lane departure systems are reported to work well on freeways, but not as well on rural single lane roads or complex intersections. Recognizing how this new technology impacts accident frequency, knowing the percentage of vehicles within your policies in force that have these optional technologies, www.audatex.com and understanding related claims costs are imperative to substantiating not only safety related discounts, but possibly increased premiums due to repair costs. Mainstream vehicles will invariably adopt some of this technology in years to come. With the Audatex Insight™ Parts Analytics module, Audatex clients will have the ability to identify which vehicles contain these features, where the associated equipment is physically located on the vehicle, and how these features impact claim frequency and repair costs. As a result, organizations can use this powerful claims data in partnership with their underwriting and actuarial partners to make better informed pricing decisions and forecasts. n 9 Insurance Update Pay-as-You-Drive Insurance Insurers, regulators and vehicle owners team up in attempts to reduce premiums and emissions. By Michael T. Anderson In August, California became the latest state to propose legislation that would enable insurers to install devices that monitor actual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as a basis for insurance premiums. Currently, 34 U.S. states, Canada, many European countries and Japan offer “Pay-as-You-Drive” (PAYD) insurance, and such programs are increasing in popularity. By allowing vehicle owners to pay for insurance in proportion to VMT, these programs may encourage drivers to reduce time on the road, which in turn may help reduce the emission of greenhouse gasses. As a result PAYD programs have gained the support of insurance departments, legislatures, environmentalists, insurers and consumers alike. Insurers offering PAYD programs either provide transponders (costs starting at $50) to their policyholders or require routine mileage or odometer verification. The use of transponders provides the most accurate and timely information to insurers, but it also raises privacy concerns. To address these concerns, some U.S. states (but not all) limit the use of electronic monitoring to total VMT and restrict the tracking of how or where someone drives. For example, drivers in Progressive Insurance’s “MyRate” PAYD program agree to install in their vehicle a small wireless device that transmits data back to Progressive on total VMT. In some states, attributes such as speed, acceleration and braking patterns are also captured. GMAC Insurance Group, whose PAYD program utilizes General Motors On-Star® System to gather miles traveled, reports a reduction of customer premiums of 13% to 54%. According to some California estimates, if a third of all licensed drivers were to opt into a PAYD program, the result would be equivalent to removing 10 million vehicles from the road, saving California drivers $40 billion in car-related expenses over the next 11 years. In a recent study, “Pay-as-You-Drive Auto Insurance: A Simple Way to Reduce Driving-Related Harms and Increase Equity,” the Brookings Institution estimates that if widely adopted in the U.S., PAYD insurance could reduce VMT by approximately 8%. Their research also suggests that if PAYD programs are adopted, two-thirds of the nation’s drivers may experience premium reductions averaging $276 per vehicle. In particular, the biggest benefit would be realized by lower-income motorists who tend to drive their vehicles less. Continued next page 10 Audatex Directions Vol 3 Insurance Update C o n t i n u e d f ro m p re v i o u s p a g e Some reasons cited by the Brookings Institution for this apparent discrepancy are as follows: • Higher-mileage drivers typically are more skilled than lower-mileage drivers. • Newer (thus, mechanically safer) vehicles tend to be driven more. • Urban drivers usually have higher crash rates and lower annual mileage. • Higher-mileage drivers tend to do a greater share of driving on safer, grade-separated highways. While not a proportionate relationship, few experts disagree that once VMT materially declines, it will have an impact on claims frequency. Economist Aaron Edlin in “Per Mile Premiums for Auto Insurance” states that the point of elasticity of accidents with respect to VMT is approximately 1.7. Simply stated, a reduction in VMT by 10% would result in a 17% reduction in claims frequency. www.audatex.com The current pricing structure utilized by most auto insurance companies, which pools drivers similar in age, gender, location and driving safety record regardless if they drive 10,000 or 50,000 miles annually, may be changing. As auto insurers seek to gain competitive advantages, many are looking towards new ways to attract and retain customers, while also maintaining underwriting profitability. Actuaries have always known that mileage is an important risk factor, and as such, annual VMT is increasingly being used as a consideration factor when placing an insured in his or her respective use class. However, until recently, insurance Figure 1: A high-mileage motorist may be only twice as likely to have an accident as a low-mileage motorist who drives one-fourth as much. Shown here is collision claims by annual mileage. A similar trend is seen for property-damage liability. Claims by Annual Mileage - Collision 0.09 0.08 35,000 30,000 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Collision Annual Miles Driven Claim Frequency According to the Brookings Institution report, the relationship between claims frequency and VMT is not always proportionate. In fact, motorists who drive more tend to have fewer accidents per mile. For example, as illustrated by collision claims per annual mileage (figure 1), data suggests a high-mileage motorist may be only twice as likely to have an accident as a low-mileage motorist who drives one-forth as much. A similar trend is seen for property-damage liability. Conclusion Miles Todd Litman of the Victoria Policy Institute in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, indicates that the greatest risk to insurers would occur if program participants significantly reduced annual mileage, and therefore premium payments, without providing proportionate reductions in crashes and claim costs. For example, if participants reduced annual VMT to 15,000 miles or kilometers and paid 25% less in premiums, but their crash rate only declined 10%, insurers would be financially worse off. However, Litman projects that “this problem can be addressed by adjusting rates as needed to accurately reflect actual per-mile or kilometer insurance costs.” Collision Claims Per Year companies have been reluctant to require motorists to provide verified mileage readings of their annual mileage. When not verified, most motorists significantly underestimate their annual mileage and therefore the results are often inaccurate and of limited use for pricing purposes. Due to its many benefits, interest in PAYD pricing is growing among insurance companies, insurance departments, motorists and the general public. Insurance companies are increasing the number of PAYD programs offered, which provides evidence that some have found it technically feasible, desired by consumers, and financially attractive. If PAYD programs are implemented in greater numbers, some research suggests that insurers will likely see a positive impact on claim frequency; the majority of consumers will incur lower premiums, and the environment may consequently be improved when drivers are encouraged to travel fewer miles. n References: Bordoff, Jason E. and Nowel, Pascal J. “Pay-as-You-Drive Auto Insurance: A Simple Way to Reduce Driving-Related Harms and Increase Equity,” Discussion Paper 2008-09, The Hamilton Project, Washington, DC. Edlin, Aaron S. “Per Mile Premiums for Auto Insurance,” in Economics for an Imperfect World: Essays In Honor of Joseph Stiglitz, edited by Richard Arnott, Bruce Greenwald, Ravi Kanbur, and Barry Nalebuff, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003. Litman, Todd. “Pay-as-You-Drive In British Columbia,” October 6, 2007, Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Lifsher, Marc. “State Considers Pay-as-You-Drive Auto Insurance,” July 15, 2008, Los Angeles Times. 11 Recycler Update Expense Management through Quality Management By Avi Pelc It is estimated that each year quality-related returns negate approximately 3% to 5% of automotive recycler sales, costing the industry nearly $30 million. Facing increased operating costs and accountability, recyclers are re-examining their operating models and, in some cases, are implementing detailed processes to improve part quality, as well as accuracy in ordering and fulfillment. While significant improvements have been made recently, leading automotive recyclers and the Automotive Recyclers Association (ARA) continue to look towards new technology, processes and training programs that may further improve results. Many have implemented the five-step Recycled Parts Quality Assurance Process that is described in figure 1. This method aims to improve quality assurance by adhering to ARA part-grading standards and focusing on key considerations that must be made in each step of the recycling process, including purchase, inventory, dismantling, order and shipping. Some industry leaders have enhanced the benefits of this five-step method by employing staff with appropriate levels of expertise, adopting technology that aids accuracy, and implementing supplemental processes. Such additional measures can significantly impact the success of a quality management program. For example, because the skill of those responsible for inspecting and evaluating incoming parts is critical, many recyclers are hiring former shop technicians, estimators and insurance adjusters to examine parts Continued next page Recycled Parts Quality Vehicle is washed to disclose all possible damage. Detailed notes on part condition and damage are entered into the computer system. Damage is described using up to five different methods. Photos taken. At Purchase or Arrival Make note of acceptable and not acceptable parts. Focus on buying fewer, but high-quality, vehicles. 2 3 When Inventorying the Vehicle During Disman Compare part c to inventory des looking for varia including hidden not visible previ Inventory record corrected as ne Figure 1: Many recyclers have implemented a five-step process to improve quality assurance and manage undue expenses. 12 Audatex Directions Vol 3 C o n t i n u e d f ro m p re v i o u s p a g e from a customer viewpoint and ensure proper representation. On the technology front, some recyclers are utilizing strictly controlled conditions, such as fluorescent lighting systems similar to those used by OEMs, to identify part imperfections and grade them accordingly. Others have implemented the use of electrometers to gauge paint depth and determine if a part has experienced prior damage. Participation in certification programs, such as the ARA Certified Automotive Recycler (CAR) and Gold Seal, is also on the rise. Aimed at driving consistency and quality throughout the recycling industry, the ARA program uses performance-based management and customersatisfaction metrics to measure part quality, fulfillment accuracy, and a recycler’s overall ability to resolve customer issues. Over the past three years, the ARA has seen its members show a steady rise in all key performance indicators, with all scores exceeding 90%. Part quality impacts the overall auto-repair process, particularly repair costs and related cycle times. To promote the use of recycled parts, many recyclers have taken significant steps to ensure that parts are properly represented and quality is assured. Faced with demanding economic conditions and an increasingly competitive environment, all recyclers must strive to implement new methods for quality assurance and customer satisfaction. have taken For more information on the ARA, visit www.a-r-a.org. n quality is assured. Corroborate current condition to description. Bring to sales person’s attention if not as described so sales person can advise customer. When Retrieving/Removing the Part for an Order condition scription ance, n damage iously. d is eeded. of recycled parts, many recyclers Conclusion Assurance Process ntling To promote the use 5 When Loading the Part or Upon Delivery Corroborate current condition to description prior to packaging or loading. Bring to sales person’s attention if not as described so sales person can advise customer. Most parts are wrapped to protect them in transit. Part is inspected with the customer upon delivery. significant steps to ensure that parts are properly represented and Acceptance 3 Recycler Update Our special thanks to the following leading recyclers who contributed data for this article: Mark Hortman of John’s Auto Parts in Blaine, MN; Marty Hollingshead of Northlake Auto Recyclers in Hammond, IN; Roger Fugere of LeCavalier Auto Parts in Sainte-Sophie, Quebec; Eric Schultz of AAA Auto Salvage in Rosemount, MN; Shannon Nordstrom of Nordstrom’s Automotive in Garretson, SD; and Don Partin of Stricker Auto Parts in Batavia, OH. In addition, our special thanks to Ginny Whelan of the ARA Educational Foundation’s ARA University and Jennifer Johnson of the ARA. www.audatex.com 13 Regulatory Highlights Paint and Materials: Included or Not Included? By Diane Klund and Rick Tuuri Anyone who has seen a collision industry publication in the past 12 months has likely read articles surrounding the use of, and compensation for, paint and materials. While the cost for paint and materials represents approximately 7.2% of the average estimate, it has become a high priority to some. Over the past year, legislation has been passed in several U.S. states to address two key issues related to paint and materials—accepted calculation methodologies and the use of thresholds (also known as “capping”). In this article, we highlight some of these legislative trends and discuss what these changes may mean to you. Currently, most North American information providers’ estimating systems employ a generally-accepted paint-and-materials formula that calculates cost by multiplying a userassigned materials dollar value by estimated refinish hours. This methodology was established by the collision industry decades ago and adopted by most providers because of its universal acceptance. Although other calculators are available today, this traditional “dollars multiplied by refinish hours” method remains the only universally-accepted and most widely-used approach. Even with the recent legislative changes, this methodology is still widely accepted throughout North America, including every U.S. state and every Canadian province. In fact, even systems with alternative paint-and-materials formulas rely on refinish time as part of their calculation, meaning there is still no purely “surface” or “area-based” method available in North America today. constitutes an acceptable paint-and-materials calculation program, as long as the insurer can document that the materials rate is sufficient. Driving the New Jersey bulletin is not the calculation methodology itself, but rather the overall monetary compensation amount for paint and materials within an estimate. California In California, Senate Bill 1371 defines the state’s recognized paint-and-materials calculation methods, including the most commonly-accepted method of multiplying a dollar rate by labor units (hours). This bill prohibits the capping of paint-and-materials dollar compensation, which is defined as “offering or paying an amount that is unrelated to a methodology used in determining paint and materials charges that is accepted by automobile repair shops and insurers.” On September 30, 2008, the bill was signed into law by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger for an effective date of January 1, 2009. Similar to New Jersey bulletin, California Senate Bill 1371 is focused on the acceptable dollar value for paint and materials and not on the methodology of calculation. Continued next page New Jersey Due to issues regarding paint and materials brought forward by some repairers, the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance (NJDOBI) recently issued Bulletin Number 07-20 concerning repair allowances for paint and materials stating that, in some cases, the traditional paint-and-materials formula may be “inadequate or recessive.” Since issuing the bulletin, the NJDOBI has clarified that the standard “dollars multiplied by refinish hours” 14 Audatex Directions Vol 3 Regulatory Highlights C o n t i n u e d f ro m p re v i o u s p a g e Virginia Recent legislation that deals with capping has also been passed in Virginia. Senate Bill 697, which was signed into law on March 2, 2008, prohibits capping, which the law defines as setting “arbitrary and unreasonable limits on what an insurer will allow as reimbursement for paint and materials.” New York and Maryland Legislation has also been forwarded in other states, including New York and Maryland, to address capping. Almost all the bills forwarded contain verbiage similar to the bills previously described, and most provide guidance whereby any “threshold” or “cap” that is set may be negated if a repairer can provide back-up documentation that validates higher paint and material costs. Such documentation requirements are commonplace in many business situations, such as when an employer requires receipts to verify an employee’s expense report. While it may be more difficult to provide this type of documentation in the paint-and-materials realm, it is possible and, as a result, it may eventually become a requirement. Once again, in the legislation addressed in these states, the methodology is not at issue. General Conclusion The paint-and-materials formula in the Audatex system is acceptable in any state, provided the values determined can be documented as reasonable and sufficient. Audatex Estimating calculates reimbursement by multiplying the net refinish hours by a userassigned dollar value. This method of calculation was developed and adopted by the North American collision industry and it remains the most widely-accepted calculation methodology in use today. It is important to note that the Audatex system does not include or define paint and materials. Instead, the value is user-assigned and the materials are user-defined. This provides the flexibility that is needed to ensure a proper estimate. Audatex, however, does provide the refinish labor value. This includes the time needed to perform most standard operations related to refinish, such as time to “cover the car” for protection (whether bagging, masking, applying foam or any combination thereof) and time for flex additive (when required). (A complete list of included and not included operations can be found in the Audatex Database reference manual.) Even with the availability of these labor values, it is up to the estimate preparer to determine the costs associated with required materials. While some estimators include these costs directly in the paint-and-material calculation, most often they are represented as line items. This ensures that the costs for required materials is properly accounted for and is clearly defined in the estimate. Many believe that this is the best way to present these costs because it explicitly lists both the nature of the item and a finite dollar value. ...even systems with alternative paint-and-materials formulas rely on refinish time as part of their calculation, meaning there is still no purely “surface” or “areabased” method available in North America today. Ultimately, it is important for the repairer and insurer to work together to communicate, negotiate, understand and agree upon costs and how to reflect them in the estimate. n www.audatex.com 15 Industry Collaboration Voice of the Customer: Audatex Holds Second Strategic Advisory Council Meeting and Forms New Technical Advisory Council For the second time this year, Audatex hosted an inter-industry forum that brought together clients and industry leaders as part of its Strategic Advisory Council. The meeting was held in Chicago from September 16-18, 2008 and included insurers and repairers from both the United States and Canada. Rick Tuuri, VP of Industry Relations for Audatex, describes the aim of the Strategic Advisory Council, saying, “Audatex is committed to hearing and responding to the voice of our customers and the industry. Building upon our outstanding inaugural meeting in March, this Chicago event was another opportunity to keep the lines of communication open.” Tuuri continues, “Getting both repairers and insurers together in the room helps us ensure that their mutual needs are met. Their input and direction helps guide us on both a strategic and technical level. Along these lines, we are building upon the Strategic Advisory Council model to form an inter-industry Technical Advisory Council that will kickoff at NACE 2008. This new Technical Advisory Council will help us ensure that both our strategic direction and our product offerings continue to meet industry needs in the best possible manner.” Agenda Highlights The agenda for the Chicago Strategic Advisory Council meeting was diverse, ranging from global trends to local key performance indicators. Audatex’s global presence in over 50 countries served as the foundation behind the kickoff session, which was presented by John Kotsopoulos, Managing Director of Audatex North America. Kotsopoulos shared an update on global trends in automotive design and their impact on the North American repair community. Worldwide, Audatex has over 35,000 repair customers, works with over 900 insurers and processes approximately 25 million claims annually, giving Kotsopoulos a rich base of data to share with the Council. During his kickoff talk, Kotsopoulos explained, “With strong ties to 85 OEMs around the world, Audatex is working closely with vehicle manufacturers, along with expert repair and research centers around the globe, to stay ahead of technology.” He went on to say, “We are committed to providing you with the information you need to be competitive in your respective markets, including everything from identification of exotic substrates to OEM procedures in the estimating system.” Continued next page 16 Audatex Directions Vol 3 Industry Collaboration C o n t i n u e d f ro m p re v i o u s p a g e Following the kickoff presentation, the Audatex senior management team presented updates on key business areas. Eli Rosner, VP, Chief Delivery Officer, Business Delivery, Americas, highlighted specific product roadmap developments that have been made based on the Council’s recommendations from the inaugural meeting. For example, he demonstrated new user interface enhancements for Audatex Estimating that address key user requests. Additionally, he previewed new user interface functionality, explaining to attendees, “You told us that you wanted to see bigger and better graphics, so we delivered. The new interface uses 80% of the screen to show you parts, and you can switch that to virtually 100% with the click of a button. You can even select parts with a single-click and add photos any time you want.” Zulfiqar Rashid, Chief Information and Database Officer for Audatex, outlined the Audatex global development strategy, describing how the company will leverage its six global development centers to improve time to delivery, efficiency and accuracy within its database. “Leveraging what we are learning around the globe, we are able to provide users right here in the U.S. and Canada with intelligent 3D graphics and animations, as well as best practice OEM repair procedures,” said Rashid. “These enhancements will be phased into our global database starting in 2009 and will provide our repair and insurance customers with a distinct advantage both visually and technically.” Michael Anderson, Sr. Director of Data Analytics for Audatex, reviewed technical trends and cited the impact of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on accidents and claims frequency. He explained, “Although VMT has declined by 2.7% in 2008 alone, accident and claims frequency may not trend consistently with VMT. This is because high-mileage drivers have fewer accidents per miles driven, while urban drivers who have lower annual mileage actually have a higher crash frequency.” Anderson also shared trends on increasing part prices and the projected increase in total losses today and in the future. “Based on industry analytics, we were able to project the current state of total losses and share these projections with our Strategic Advisory Council www.audatex.com members, as well as with the industry at large. That is the value and power of analytics—not just seeing what happened, but understanding why, and using that knowledge to intelligently predict the future.” Council Guidance The presentations by the Audatex Senior Management team served as a launching point for discussion by the Council. Tuuri explains, “The Council is designed to be interactive, so even though Audatex provides the group with an abundance of information, it is really the insight gained from the ensuing discussion that helps guide our future efforts in a manner that will best meet customer needs.” The Council recommended nine key initiatives they would like Audatex to focus on in future development. These include intelligent 3D graphics and animations, inclusion of OEM procedures, and more effective ways to ensure 100% complete and accurate vehicle identification, going beyond VIN decode. Tuuri elaborated upon this last point, explaining, “In Europe, Audatex has a product called AudaVIN, which links the VIN to the specific vehicle ‘build data.’ Using this enhanced decoding system, every option on the vehicle being estimated is automatically identified and included in the estimate. By eliminating any user-error in the option identification process, this system ensures that part numbers, prices and labor times are precise. As a result, users attain a more accurate estimate and a better valuation for total losses, which is good for everyone.” ‘‘ ’’ This meeting is just one step in the process of folding the voice of our customers into our strategic direction and product set. John Kotsopoulos, Managing Director, Audatex North America, Inc. Future Efforts While Council members unanimously proclaimed that the meeting was a tremendous success, continuing to build upon this momentum is imperative. Kotsopoulos reiterates this point, saying, “This meeting is just one step in the process of folding the voice of our customers into our strategic direction and product set. At the end of the day, Audatex doesn’t develop solutions for insurers or repairers; we develop solutions for insurers and repairers. Getting them in the same room, upstream of our design and development process, is good for them, good for us and good for the industry.” n 17 Audatex News and Events Audatex Associate Appointed IACET Commissioner Debra Sawin, Senior Instructional Designer on Audatex’s Education and Web Services team and administrator of their accreditation program, has been appointed to a three-year term as an IACET Commissioner. In this role, she will work with other commissioners to review IACET Authorized Provider applications, make application recommendations, conduct applicant site visits and report findings to the IACET Commission. Audatex Receives IACET® 2008 Exemplar Award After just eight months as an approved Authorized Provider by the International Association for Continuing Education and Training (IACET), Audatex has won the association’s 2008 Exemplar Award. This annual award recognizes outstanding results-oriented programs that demonstrate cost-effective, significant and relevant impact to the field of continuing education and training and on the populations served. As an IACET Authorized Provider, Audatex, as directed by Solera, Inc. offers IACET CEUs for certain designated programs that qualify under the ANSI/IACET 1-2007 Standard for Continuing Education and Training. The ANSI/IACET Standard measures all aspects of an education provider’s program development. As the recipient of the 2008 IACET Exemplar Award, Audatex demonstrated principles of good practice for its program adoption by customers and its active partnerships with numerous industry-specific organizations such as ASE/CASE®, I-CAR® and AMI®. The program’s success has been marked by a 31.4% increase in participation and an 88.2% CEU success rate. Another noted benefit of the program is the variety of venues through which training is available. By offering self-paced computer-based training, classroom-based instruction and virtual instructorbased training, the Audatex Accreditation Program makes it easy for customers to reduce training costs and maximize return on investment. Michael Kerrigan, Property Damage Claims Manager for Safeway Insurance Company, says that his appraisal team appreciates the convenience of virtual training courses that let them earn accreditation points and gain a deeper understanding of the technology. He explains that this opportunity directly helps his team in their work. “When a repair shop’s staff asks questions of our appraisers in the field, they now feel more confident in answering those questions. It is incumbent upon us to understand how a vehicle should be repaired, especially with all the new vehicle models, different metals and varying paint/material chemicals constantly changing in the marketplace. Our staff needs to know what can be safely repaired and what can’t. The last thing anyone wants is to have an improperly repaired vehicle approved for delivery to a client.” For more information on the organizations described, please contact: Audatex Accreditation Program (www.training.audatex.us), IACET (www.iacet.org), I-CAR (www.i-car.com), AMI (www.amionline.org). n A Tribute to Julie Verran: Saying Goodbye to Our Friend and Colleague On August 15, 2008, Audatex lost a friend and colleague in Julie Verran. Her untimely death left us profoundly saddened, and we’d like to take this time to pay tribute to her. Born in Germany, Julie moved to the U.S. and grew up on an eastern Washington farm, where she fostered an early love for nature that extended most recently into family camping trips with her husband Norm and young son Dylan. Julie Verran April 6, 1958 August 15, 2008 18 After graduating from Central Washington University, Julie moved to Seattle and spent ten years at PEMCO insurance, the first step in an insurance industry career unparalleled in its commitment to company excellence and customer satisfaction. Julie joined the Audatex team in 1987 and during her time with us she held a number of roles, including Marketing Director, Account Representative, Valuation Services Manager, Data Services Operations Director, Senior Client Services Director, and most recently Acting Manager of the Milwaukie, Oregon, Autosource office for Audatex. No matter what role she was in, Julie received many accolades for her outstanding performance. She had a keen ability to develop good rapport with colleagues and customers alike. A true team player, Julie is remembered by her colleagues as a “generous and sincere mentor.” Her team commitment even extended outside of the office when she joined a colleague’s 200-mile relay running team as a support volunteer and driver. As simply stated by her friend and colleague Don Clark, “Julie was a once-in-a-lifetime person.” We will miss her. n Audatex Directions Vol 3 Audatex News and Events C o n t i n u e d f ro m p re v i o u s p a g e Catch Audatex at the next industry event or trade show. 2008 Nov 4 Nov 6-8 Collision Industry Conference (CIC) Meeting Las Vegas, Nevada Mandalay Bay, 8:00 a.m.- 5:00 p.m. NACE (National Autobody Congress Expo) Las Vegas, Nevada, Booth N3553 See Back Cover for Full Schedule of NACE Events! 2009 Jan 14-16 Jan 24 Feb 24-26 Mar 22-25 Apr 6-7 CIC Planning Session Scottsdale, Arizona Canadian Collision Industry Forum (CCIF) Meeting Toronto, Ontario Strategic Advisory Council - By Invitation Only Miami, Florida PLRB/LIRB Claims Conference Seattle, Washington Insurance Data Management Association’s Annual Seminar, “Insurance Business Intelligence– How Smart Are You?” Philadelphia, PA Apr 18 Apr 19-23 CCIF Meeting Edmonton, Alberta Apr 22-23 Apr 26-28 CIC Meeting Hartford, Connecticut Jul 29-30 www.audatex.com Risk and Insurance Management Society (RIMS) 2009 Annual Conference and Exhibition Orlando, Florida The Brian Sullivan 2009 Auto Insurance Report National Conference Naples, Florida CIC Meeting in conjunction with I-CAR Annual Meeting Washington D.C NACE Booth N3553 Audatex Calendar of NACE Events Technical Advisory Council By Invitation Only Wednesday, November 5 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. 7 Tips to Increase Estimating Efficiency Friday, November 7 8:30 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. Location: Palm B, Level 3, Mandalay Convention Center Audatex Hosted Reception for Collision Repair Professionals Friday, November 7 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Location: Booth N3553 © 2008 Audatex North America, Inc. All rights reserved. All other registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners.