KEEPING UP WITH F1 SUPERSTAR LEWIS HAMILTON
Transcription
KEEPING UP WITH F1 SUPERSTAR LEWIS HAMILTON
Bombardier Business Aircraft Magazine Issue 22 2014 keeping up with f1 superstar lewis Hamilton meet the learjet 75 aircraft + corporate angels take flight Inside indochina + swiss watchmaking secrets + private fiji travel: Craftsmanship switzerland The Best of Times An exclusive look inside the houses of Cartier and Montblanc reveals two vastly different approaches to luxury watchmaking – wherein each is redefining the art. By Carol Besler | photos by Joss M c Kinley Brand standards (Clockwise from left) Cartier’s famous blue watch hands; vintage advertisement featuring the brand’s emblematic panther; the Duchess of Windsor was a particular fan; (opposite) Montre Rotonde de Cartier Double Tourbillon Mystérieux. I feel a little bit like Indiana Jones standing before the Ark of the Covenant as I climb out of the car in front of the spectacular glass-walled Cartier building in La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland. It’s a long way from the pistes of St. Moritz and the glamour of Gstaad. For a watch lover, though, there is no place more sacred than this: the Jura, birthplace of Swiss watchmaking. In its sleepy valley towns, the world’s top luxury brands produce timepieces much the same way they have for the past century, working out of the part-atelier, part-factory “manufactures,” where human hands are the dominant technology. T wo elements define a luxury timepiece. The first is an upper echelon mechanical movement, made “inhouse” – entirely by one manufacture – with each component, even those we never see, finished by hand. The second (but not secondary) is an intensely artful outer finish that involves enameling, engraving, miniature painting, marquetry and gemsetting, known collectively as les métiers d’art. I am here to watch these processes in action by visiting two vastly different manufactures. Both produce their own unique, sublime versions of haute horology, but at the extreme – and opposing – ends of the fine watchmaking spectrum. The Montblanc-owned Institut Minerva de Recherche en Haute Horlogerie in the village of Villeret, just east of La Chaux-de-Fonds, represents the essence of slow watchmaking. Highly skilled master craftsmen fashion fewer than 300 timepieces a year completely by hand, using traditional, customized tools based on those used a century ago. Cartier, on the other hand, makes about 800,000 watches 48 Experience a year, all of which begin with a process that is fully automated, with CNC (computer numerical control) milling machines, but end with the same exacting hand-finished process as that practiced in the Minerva workshop. Where one manages to mass-produce an item that is nevertheless the epitome of a luxury product, the other makes by hand everything that is now mostly automated elsewhere in the industry, yet does so with machine-like precision. The Innovator Cartier’s strength has always been its extraordinary culture of creativity, consistently surprising its admirers over the past century with one stunning jewelry and watch creation after another. The Duchess of Windsor was a particular fan (her vast collection of watches and jewelry went to auction in December), and Brazilian aviator and socialite Alberto Santos-Dumont was the recipient of one of the world’s first wristwatches, the Santos, made for him by Cartier. Along the way, the brand has launched a string of icons, including the Tank Experience 49 Craftsmanship travel: switzerland best face forward A craftsman shapes, polishes and places a lense for the Montre Rotonde de Cartier Mystérieuse (pictured, far right); one of the mysteries behind this complex timepiece is how its hands appear to float in a void. and the Panther, a signature motif that appears in many jewelry and watch creations. It has also demonstrated a particular mastery of the métiers, deftly administering the mark of the artisan that has become the defining element of the brand. Most importantly, Cartier has, over the last 13 years, abandoned its reliance on other movement makers in favor of manufacturing its own. In the process, it has become a serious innovator in the field of mechanical watchmaking, pouring millions into the development of new calibers that reinterpret the codes of traditional watchmaking. Cartier shares the limelight with Rolex and Omega; together they are considered the world’s top three luxury watchmakers, at least in terms of production. When it comes to innovation and sheer creativity, however, I am not alone in my view that Cartier reigns supreme. For one thing, it strikes me as astounding how such a global entity, with a head office in Paris, facilities in Switzerland, a vast retail empire and legions of marketing executives, can still manage to be so consistently creative. In the watchmaking division, the company does this by employing a secret weapon: Carole Forestier-Kasapi, an horological genius who hails from a family of watchmakers and learned the intricacies of the mechanical gear train at a young age. In 2005, she was appointed director of luxury watchmaking, in charge of movement development. Under her direction, the brand has launched one showpiece after another, including five new calibers, or movements, this year alone. Developing a caliber takes years and can cost millions, including design, industrialization, prototyping and quality control. ForestierKasapi’s department, which produces only prototypes, is larger than the entire manufacture of many other elite brands. 50 Experience Last year’s chef-d’œuvre was the Double Tourbillon Mystérieux, a suspended flying tourbillon that appears to be unconnected to any gear train or to the hands that tell time, thanks to a system of rotating sapphire crystal disks. It’s a miniaturized wristwatch version of the company’s famous early-19th-century Mystery Clocks, reinvented and engineered to incorporate one of watchmaking’s most prized complications, the tourbillon. It is just one of the sensations that has made Forestier-Kasapi a star among watchmakers and watch geeks alike, yet despite her prima status, she is no prima donna. She is warm, humble and humorous, and graciously takes three hours of her day to show me around the manufacture. “I love this picture. I love this picture!” she says as we pass a poster in one of the corridors, an enlarged photo from a 1970s advertising campaign of a full-grown panther standing on his hind legs with his paws on the ledge as he peers into the window of the Cartier boutique on Rue de la Paix in Paris. Her respect for the maison is palpable. Beyond her mastery of micromechanics, her trick has been to combine creative license and a mandate to break new ground within the somewhat strict design codes of Cartier. “There is always a cabochon on the crown, there are always blue hands, always Roman numerals. There are a lot of codes, but always with creativity,” she explains. “For me it’s like if we are looking at art in Japan. They are really in deep with tradition, but there is always something new inside. It’s important to keep this spirit in the Maison Cartier. I can’t imagine Cartier without it.” Like a proud mother, she wastes no time in showing me the It’s astounding how a global entity with a vast retail empire and legions of marketing executives can be so consistently creative. masterpiece introduced at this year’s Salon International de la Haute Horlogerie, the invitation-only watch fair over which Cartier presides annually in Geneva. Upon seeing the piece, I am immediately baffled. It is a perpetual calendar, an elite complication – normally comprised of a dizzying mesh of wheels, cams and levers – that indicates not only day, date and year but also leap years. It also distinguishes between months of 30 days and 31. Creating a new in-house perpetual calendar is impressive enough, but this one reinvents the genre. There is nary a lever. It is all wheels. “ Yes, all wheels,” she repeats, as I stare in wonder, “many wheels.” In an ordinary perpetual calendar there would be about 30. This one has 67. The official name is the Rotonde de Cartier Astrocalendaire, but Forestier-Kasapi keeps calling it “the Arena” because of its resemblance to a Roman amphitheater. Three stepped concentric tiers rise from a central axis where a flying tourbillon makes its one-minute rotation in a flourish of oscillations. Each tier is a bridge, a stationary part of the movement that holds the moving components in place, doubling here as indexes for day, date and month. Blue PVD windows revolve around the tiered bridges to frame the appropriate indications. A patented central wheel with retractable teeth, “the brain” as Forestier-Kasapi calls it, runs the whole operation. It can be set directly from the crown instead of a tiny pusher, usually on the case side, the same way we set the time. The all-gear construction allows the wearer to set the calendar without damaging the mechanism and ensures that the torque required from the mainspring is more constant, resulting in an 80-percent improvement in amplitude, which is directly related to accuracy. The Astrocalendaire will be produced in a limited series of 100 pieces, each priced at €150,000. Forestier-Kasapi’s respect for watchmaking’s forebears matches her respect for the brand. “You have to first research what perpetual calendars are in the whole history of watchmaking to be able to create a new one,” she says. “I don’t know how to work in another way. This is my function. I need this cultural base of particular mechanisms to be able to create something afterwards. Without it, it’s impossible for me.” The Traditionalist The hushed air of the Minerva Institute is a world away from the excitement of Cartier, with its hum of CNC machines, 1,000-strong workforce and stream of executives constantly checking in from Paris, but there is nevertheless something magical about Villeret. My tour is conducted by Demetrio Cabiddu, Minerva’s technical director and longtime horological genius in residence – his signature is engraved on the caseback of every watch, along with the words “Fait main à Villeret.” Experience 51 Craftsmanship Parts and labor (Top left) Montblanc dials await placement; (bottom left) the Montblanc Meisterstück Heritage Pulsograph, a limited edition Monopusher based on a vintage Minerva movement; (right) a watchmaker’s desk stocked with tiny tools of the trade. Indeed, every watch is rigorously handmade to an extent rarely seen among the elite brands. The result is a very limited production and a very high degree of refinement. The watches are not advertised, but sold mainly by word of mouth, and there is a waiting list. Minerva specializes in chronographs, and it still produces modern versions of its original manual-wound calibers, the 1321 and the 1629, patented in the early 1900s. The company had been around long enough to be chosen to time the 1936 Olympics, something only a maker of highly reliable chronographs, or stopwatches, could do. It is still creating the same precision calibers, in much the same way as it always has. Most of the Institute’s machinery, including the presses used to stamp base plates (a process now largely replaced in the industry by automated CNC machines), hails from the 1940s. Its tools constitute “modern” versions of the original equipment used by the area’s first watchmakers. Every component is angled and beveled by hand or by using manually operated machines, which means it takes between five and ten hours to finish a single component. The brand even manufactures its own hairsprings, a painstaking process of stretching and shaping metal wires. Most watchmakers today acquire hairsprings from specialist makers, most of which are also in Switzerland. “Our watches are dedicated to collectors, for whom it is important to offer something no one else can,” says Cabiddu. Hence, a bespoke division – unique in the watchmaking world – that creates fewer than 10 custom pieces a year, with the client’s choice of caliber, case material, dial, bezel and strap. “We do it,” he says, “because we can.” Since the workshop is dedicated to the production of small quantities, and because all components are made by hand, the process lends itself to customization. There are no high-volume machines to reprogram for one small change; the most important tools in this atelier are human hands. In 2006, Minerva was acquired by luxury watch conglomerate Richemont, the same company that owns Cartier. Surprisingly, Richemont decided to dedicate Minerva’s movements exclusively to 52 Experience Montblanc, a brand primarily known for writing instruments, rather than to one of its heritage watchmaking brands like Jaeger-LeCoultre or Vacheron Constantin. “Richemont did the right thing,” says Cabiddu. “People thought they would eat us up, turn Minerva into a production site for one of the other brands, or they would change Minerva because they have their own watchmaking traditions and heritage.” Instead, Montblanc, which only began to produce watches in 1997, was considered a clean slate and therefore the ideal recipient of Minerva’s masterly movements. Especially since Montblanc, too, specializes in chronographs, now also made in-house. Since the merger, the star introduction has been the Tourbillon Bi-Cylindrique, fitted with not one but two hairsprings, one beating inside the other, to improve accuracy. It has a unique double-loop bridge that takes 50 hours to hand-finish. In some cases, “unofficial” tools are used – that double-loop bridge, for example, receives its final polish with the soft but firm stem of the gentian flower, which grows in the nearby hills. Another finish is performed using an angled twig from a local boxwood tree. The Minerva name goes on the movements only, and the watches, branded both Montblanc and Villeret, are priced between €35,000 and €200,000. No more than 300 watches a year emerge from this workshop, with most series made in extremely limited editions, rarely exceeding 20 of each. Cabiddu cites a recent study published by Italian watch magazine L’Orologio that ranked brands according to the highest average time spent making a single watch. The Montblanc-Villeret brand came out on top. Taken together, it is incredible to see how both Montblanc and Cartier are pushing the industry forward. For now it appears that Richemont has every intention of maintaining the brands’ separate identities and unique methodologies. Among today’s sophisticated watch aficionados, there is a market for both the precision of automation and the quality of the human touch. A true collector covets one of each – and then some.