Medical Malpractice: what every vascular surgeon should know
Transcription
Medical Malpractice: what every vascular surgeon should know
Medical Malpractice: What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You O. William Brown, MD, JD Chief, Division of Vascular Surgery William Beaumont Hospital Interim Chief, Division of Vascular Surgery Wayne State University School of Medicine Clinical Professor of Surgery Wayne State University School of Medicine Adjunct Professor of Law Michigan State University College of Law Friday, October 9, 2009 Friday, October 9, 2009 Components of malpractice suit Physician-Patient Relationship Breach of the Standard of Care Proximate Cause Damages Friday, October 9, 2009 Physician Patient Relationship Friday, October 9, 2009 Physician Patient Relationship Direct patient contact Phone call Social setting Side-walk consult ? Payment unimportant Friday, October 9, 2009 Guest at party asks vascular surgeon if 3 month history of leg swelling is significant Surgeon states swelling unlikely to be significant but suggests that individual see her medical physician Individual does not see her medical physician and suffers a PE one week later and dies Friday, October 9, 2009 Was a physician patient relationship established? Friday, October 9, 2009 The law is what the judge and the jury say it is Friday, October 9, 2009 How Terminate Relationship Get fired Physician withdraws from care after giving sufficient notice to patient Resolution of patients medical problem Friday, October 9, 2009 Standard of Care Friday, October 9, 2009 Breach of Duty (Standard of Care) Expert witness Defendant’s admission Res ipsa loquitor (sponge in the abdomen) Plaintiff is a medical expert Common knowledge (radiation of a pregnant female) Friday, October 9, 2009 “The existence of a medical injury shall not create any Friday, October 9, 2009 “The failure of a health care provider to order, perform, Friday, October 9, 2009 Standard of Care National standard “Locality” rule only for hospital equipment Standard of care is different for a resident or fellow Standard of care is the same for a general surgeon and a vascular surgeon performing a vascular procedure Friday, October 9, 2009 Proximate Cause Patient dies on first post operative night following an open AAA resection At autopsy, retained sponge is found No recovery for retained sponge since it did not cause the patient’s death Friday, October 9, 2009 Informed Consent Friday, October 9, 2009 Informed Consent Diagnosis Treatment plan Risks and benefits Treatment alternatives Prognosis (with and without treatment) Friday, October 9, 2009 Informed Consent Must tell patient anything that could affect patients decision whether or not to proceed with treatment Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice Informed consent is NOT the same thing as a consent form Obtaining informed consent is a non delegable duty Friday, October 9, 2009 Cases Johnson v Kokemoor (individual MD experience and results) Open versus Endovascular -Standard of Care for isolated 2cm common iliac stenosis -Standard of Care for AAA in 75 yr. Old male with “perfect anatomy” for endograft and history of CAD Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Records Anything written in preparation for litigation is privileged. Can not give records or discuss patient’s condition with anyone unless you have patient’s written permission. (This includes patient’s attorney or another defense attorney) Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Records “The Paper Trail” If you don’t write it down, it didn’t happen Take the time to write down your thought process, not just your conclusions Friday, October 9, 2009 Expert Witness This is the single greatest problem in medical malpractice today. Friday, October 9, 2009 Expert witness in Florida Must specialize in the same specialty as defendant or Specialize in similar specialty treating similar patients However last line of expert witness statute states: Friday, October 9, 2009 “This section does not limit the power of the trial court Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice Are Vascular Surgeons who have completed the certifying process through the American Board of Surgery “Board Certified”? Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice Are Vascular Surgeons who have completed the certifying process through the American Board of Surgery “Board Certified”? Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice Are Vascular Surgeons who have completed the certifying process through the American Board of Surgery “Board Certified”? Yes Friday, October 9, 2009 Malpractice Defenses Reasonably prudent physician Error in judgment Assumption of the risk Contributory and Comparative negligence Friday, October 9, 2009 Good Samaritan Acts Roadside In hospital (Grodin v. Beaumont) In OR Friday, October 9, 2009 Friday, October 9, 2009 Joint and Several Liability Hospital Sponsored Insurance Joint defense with the hospital Pitfalls Friday, October 9, 2009 Statute of Limitations Fraudulent concealment Wrongful death Friday, October 9, 2009 Conduct of a Medical Malpractice Suit Complaint (Notice of Intent) Discovery -interrogatories -discovery depositions Friday, October 9, 2009 Discovery deposition “Nail down” defendant’s opinions Witness evaluation Friday, October 9, 2009 Relevant Anything that tends to make a material fact more or less likely to be true. Friday, October 9, 2009 Witness investigation Google search Curriculum vitae Past depositions Past legal problems (medical and non medical) Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “Now doctor, isn’t it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn’t know about it until the next morning?” Friday, October 9, 2009 Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?” Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?” Witness: “Yes.” Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?” Witness: “Yes.” Attorney: “And what were you doing at that Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?” Witness: “Yes.” Attorney: “And what were you doing at that time” Friday, October 9, 2009 Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “You were not shot in the fracas?” Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “You were not shot in the fracas?” Witness: “No, I was shot midway between Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “You were not shot in the fracas?” Witness: “No, I was shot midway between the naval and the fracas. Friday, October 9, 2009 Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “Are you qualified to give a urine specimen?” Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “Are you qualified to give a urine specimen?” Witness: “I have been since early Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “Are you qualified to give a urine specimen?” Witness: “I have been since early childhood.” Friday, October 9, 2009 Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people?” Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people?” Witness: “All of my autopsies are Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people?” Witness: “All of my autopsies are performed on dead people”. Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?” Witness: “No” Attorney: “Did you check for blood pressure?” Witness: “No” Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “Did you check for breathing?” Witness: “No” Attorney: “So, it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?” Witness: “No” Friday, October 9, 2009 Attorney: “How can you be so sure, Doctor?” Witness: “Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.” Attorney: “But could the patient have still been alive nevertheless?” Friday, October 9, 2009 Witness: “It is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law somewhere.” Friday, October 9, 2009 Deposition Testimony Maintain composure Answer only direct questions Answer only the question that is asked Never try to educate the plaintiff’s attorney Be prepared Friday, October 9, 2009 Lack of concentration can be fatal Friday, October 9, 2009 Conduct of Medical Malpractice Suit Case evaluation Settlement conference Trial Friday, October 9, 2009 “Perhaps the witness would like to reconsider his answer to my question.” Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice Can I sue the plaintiff’s attorney for filing a frivolous law suit? Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice In general the answer is No. Exceptions 1. Malicious prosecution 2. Law suits filed in violation of court rules. Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice If I settle the case, am I admitting that I committed malpractice? Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice If I settle the case, am I admitting that I committed malpractice? Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice If I settle the case, am I admitting that I committed malpractice? NO Friday, October 9, 2009 Settling a Case (Advantages) No No No No Friday, October 9, 2009 loss of time going to trial risk of excess personal liability admission of liability finding of liability Medical Malpractice Best to Avoid Being Sued Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice Can’t Avoid Being Sued Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice Know how to avoid obvious risk Understand basic legal concepts of a medical malpractice suit Know when to “hold’em and when to fold’em and Friday, October 9, 2009 Medical Malpractice Document Document Document Document Document Document Friday, October 9, 2009 Document Document Document