Auswertung zu 5807V Programming Applications for

Sommersemester 2016 (Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik) Lehrevaluation, Programming Applications for Mobile Interaction (Prof. Dr. Kranz)
Auswertung zu 5807V Programming Applications for Mobile Interaction
Liebe Dozentin, lieber Dozent,
anbei erhalten Sie die Ergebnisse der Evaluation Ihrer Lehrveranstaltung.
Zu dieser Veranstaltung wurden 15 Bewertungen abgegeben.
Erläuterungen zu den Diagrammen befinden sich am Ende dieses Dokuments.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Das Evaluationsteam
Personal information
Which degree programme are you enrolled in?
A B.Sc. Computer Science (0)
B B.Sc. Internet Computing (0)
C B.Sc. Mobile and Embedded Systems (4)
D B.Sc. Mathematics (0)
E M.Sc. Computer Science (10)
F M.Sc. IT Security (or Diplom Informatik) (1)
G Sec. Ed. (Gymnasium) teacher education (Mathematics) (0)
H Sec. Ed. (Gymnasium) teacher education (Computer Science) (0)
I Sec. Ed. (Realschule) teacher education programme (0)
J Sec. Ed. (Hauptschule) teacher education programme (0)
K Primary education teacher education programme (0)
L Other programme (0)
Indicate your current stage of study (number of completed semesters on the
programme):
Have you previously taken the lecture under evaluation (in an earlier
semester)?
How many times did you not attend the lecture?
How many hours per week did you spend on independent study for this
lecture?
(This includes course preparation, follow-up study and working through the
exercises on your own.)
How many hours did you plan to spend on exam preparation?
How frequently did you ask the lecturer a question?
–1–
Sommersemester 2016 (Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik) Lehrevaluation, Programming Applications for Mobile Interaction (Prof. Dr. Kranz)
Questions concerning the lecture
The lecturer was motivated.
1 strongly agree (5)
2 agree (8)
3 neither agree nor disagree (1)
4 disagree (0)
5 strongly disagree (0)
The lecturer explained the lecture topics well.
1 strongly agree (6)
2 agree (7)
3 neither agree nor disagree (1)
4 disagree (0)
5 strongly disagree (0)
The lecturer answered students' questions competently.
1 strongly agree (9)
2 agree (5)
3 neither agree nor disagree (0)
4 disagree (0)
5 strongly disagree (0)
How would you rate the pace of the lecture?
How would you rate the level of difficulty of this lecture compared to other
lectures?
1 much more difficult (0)
2 more difficult (6)
3 neither more nor less difficult (6)
4 less difficult (3)
5 much less difficult (0)
How challenging did you personally consider the lecture to be?
Were there any written materials for this lecture (books, slides, course
readers, photos of boards, etc.)?
If you answered 'yes' above, would you agree with the following statement:
The written materials were useful.
1 strongly agree (4)
2 agree (9)
3 neither agree nor disagree (2)
4 disagree (0)
5 strongly disagree (0)
–2–
Sommersemester 2016 (Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik) Lehrevaluation, Programming Applications for Mobile Interaction (Prof. Dr. Kranz)
The lecturer made good use of presentation methods, such as the board,
slides, films, etc., during the lecture.
1 strongly agree (5)
2 agree (9)
3 neither agree nor disagree (0)
4 disagree (0)
5 strongly disagree (0)
Overall, how would you rate the course?
Freitextkommentare
Would you like to leave any additional comments or suggestions about this course?
–3–
Sommersemester 2016 (Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik) Lehrevaluation, Programming Applications for Mobile Interaction (Prof. Dr. Kranz)
Grafiklegende
–4–
Sommersemester 2016 (Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik) Lehrevaluation, Programming Applications for Mobile Interaction (Prof. Dr. Kranz)
Auswertung zur Übungsgruppe von Dr. Hölzl zur Veranstaltung "Programming
Applications for Mobile Interaction"
Liebe Dozentin, lieber Dozent,
Diese Auswertung der Übungsgruppe ist nur Ihnen und der Übungsgruppenleiterin / dem Übungsgruppenleiter zugegangen. Bitte besprechen Sie gegebenenfalls die
Ergebnisse persönlich mit ihr / ihm und behandeln Sie sie ansonsten vertraulich.
Questions concerning the tutorial
Did you regularly attend the lecture and tutorials (i.e. more than 80% of
contact hours)?
How actively did you participate (asking questions, getting involved in
discussions, offering solutions)?
How would you rate the level of difficulty of the tutorial exercises compared to
other tutorials?
1 much more difficult (2)
2 more difficult (5)
3 neither more nor less difficult (5)
4 less difficult (3)
5 much less difficult (0)
How challenging did you personally consider the tutorial to be?
The tutorial topics tied in closely with the lecture topics.
1 strongly agree (1)
2 agree (7)
3 neither agree nor disagree (2)
4 disagree (4)
5 strongly disagree (0)
The tutor had good subject knowledge.
1 strongly agree (7)
2 agree (6)
3 neither agree nor disagree (1)
4 disagree (0)
5 strongly disagree (0)
The tutor was competent at explaining concepts and imparting knowledge to
students.
1 strongly agree (6)
2 agree (6)
3 neither agree nor disagree (1)
4 disagree (1)
5 strongly disagree (0)
The tutor demonstrated good linguistic competence.
1 strongly agree (7)
2 agree (6)
3 neither agree nor disagree (2)
4 disagree (0)
5 strongly disagree (0)
–5–
Sommersemester 2016 (Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik) Lehrevaluation, Programming Applications for Mobile Interaction (Prof. Dr. Kranz)
Please answer this question only if there was a written correction as part of
the tutorial: how would you rate the quality of the written corrections of your
exercises?
Overall, how would you rate the tutorial?
Grafiklegende
–6–