- Quaternary Science Journal

Transcription

E&G
Quaternary Science Journal
Volume 63 / Number 1 / 2014 / 78-98 / DOI 10.3285/eg.63.1.05
www.quaternary-science.net
GEOZON SCIENCE MEDIA
ISSN 0424-7116
Holotype skulls, stratigraphy, bone taphonomy and excavation
history in the Zoolithen Cave and new theory about Esper’s
“great deluge”
Cajus Diedrich
How to cite:
Diedrich, C. (2014): Holotype skulls, stratigraphy, bone taphonomy and excavation history in the Zoolithen Cave and new theory
about Esper’s “great deluge”. – E&G Quaternary Science Journal, 63 (1): 78–98. DOI: 10.3285/eg.63.1.05
Abstract: The Zoolithen Cave, in the Wiesent River Valley of Upper Franconia, Bavaria, South Germany, has a very long excavation history.
The site is of international paleobiological importance as the Type site for five Pleistocene top predators (cave bear, Ice Age hyena,
lion, wolf, dhole). This large cave system has developed in three elevations and preserves three fluvial sedimentary sequences including two speleothem genesis phases representing changing ponor, dry and wet stages from the Oligocene/Miocene (Neogene),
over the Pliocene/Early Pleistocene to Late Pleistocene. The cave bear Ursus deningeri used the cave as den during the MIS 6–9
(Holsteinian interglacial-Saalian glacial). Single P4 tooth and skull shape analyses (“= cave bear clock”) date different cave bear
species (U. spelaeus eremus/spelaeus, U. ingressus) within the Late Pleistocene (MIS 3–5d). Finally the bones of other Pleistocene
megamammals were washed from two former cave entrances at elevations of about 455 m a.s.l. up to 30 meters deep into lower
elevation cave parts, during the Last Glacial Maximum (Post-U. deningeri times or Postglacial), -historically believed to be the result
of the “great deluge”. The young “river terrace dolomite gravels” which occur as relic sediments at elevations of about 455 a.s.l in
several caves around Muggendorf cannot be explained by natural erosion/river terrace stratigraphy, and must relate to an uncertain
glacial context. Finally Iron Age (La Tène) humans left secondary burials (human skulls and long bones with pottery and after-life
food animal donations) only in the first deep vertical shaft (Aufzugsschacht) similar to the situation in the nearby Esper’s Cave.
Holotypen-Schädel, Stratigraphie, Knochen-Taphonomie und Ausgrabungs-Historie in der Zoolithenhöhle und eine neue
Theorie über Esper’s „biblische Sintflut“
Kurzfassung: Kurzfassung: Die Zoolithenhöhle liegt entlang des Wiesenttals (Oberfranken, Bayern, Süd-Deutschland) und hat eine lange
„Spatenforschungs“-Historie. Die Fundstelle ist von internationaler Bedeutung aufgrund ihrer fünf validen Holotypen-EiszeittierSchädeln des „Höhlenbären“ sowie Top-Prädatoren (Eiszeit-Löwe, -Hyäne, -Wolf und -Rotwolf). Das große Höhlensystem entwickelte sich auf drei Etagen und hat drei fluviale Haupt-Sedimentsequenzen inklusive zwei Haupt-Speleothem-Genesephasen unter
wechselnden Ponor-, Trocken- und Nassphasen während des Oligozän/Miozän (Neogen) über das Pliozän/Frühpleistozän bis hin
zum Spät-Pleistozän. Die ersten Höhlenbären-Populationen Oberfrankens mit Ursus deningeri nutzen die Höhle als Horst bereits
im MIS 6–8 (Holstein-Interglazial/Saale-Glazial). Isolierte P4 Zahn- sowie die Schädelmorphotypen (= “Höhlenbären-Uhr”) datieren verschiedene Höhlenbären-Arten/Unterarten (U. spelaeus eremus/spelaeus, U. ingressus) in das Spät-Pleistozän (MIS 3–5d).
Ihre Knochen wurden in etlichen Fällen zuerst durch Top-Prädatoren beschädigt. Letztendlich wurden die Knochen aller pleistozänen Großsäuger während des Hochglazials (= Last Glacial Maximum, Post-U. deninger-Zeit oder Postglazial) von zwei ehemaligen
Eingangsbereichen in Höhenlagen um 455 m NHN bis zu 30 Meter in tiefere Höhlenbereiche besonders über die Vertikalschäfte
durch Hochflutereignisse verschwemmt. Dieses wurde in historischer Zeit als „biblische Sintflut“ interpretiert. Die jüngsten „Flussterrassen-Dolomitkiese“ in Höhlenlagen um 455 m NHN werden als Reliktsedimente in verschiedenen Höhlen um Muggendorf
angetroffen und können in solchen extremen Höhenlagen 130 Meter über der heutigen Wiesent nicht mehr mit „natürlicher Erosion/Flussterrassenstratigraphie“ erklärt werden. Sie müssen im noch unklaren glazialen Kontext stehen. Letztendlich hinterließen
Eisenzeit-La Tène-Menschen Sekundärbestattungen (Schädel, Langknochen, Keramik und Jenseits-Nahrungs-Haustier-Beigaben)
nur im ersten tiefen Vertikalschaft (= Aufzugschacht), ähnlich wie in der nahegelegenden Esperhöhle.
Keywords: Holotype skulls, stratigraphy, bone taphonomy, excavation history of the Zoolithen Cave, new theory about Esper's "great deluge"
Address of author:
C. Diedrich, PaleoLogic Research Institute, Petra Bezruce 96, CZ-26751 Zdice, Czech Republic, www.paleologic.eu, [email protected]
1 Introduction
Upper Franconia (Bavaria) along the Wiesent and tributary valleys has the highest density of caves in the Franconian Alb (e.g. Kaulich & Schaaf 1993, Groiss et al. 1998) and
is one of the most cave–rich regions of Europe, worthy of
“speleopark” designation in the future. The caves are eroded
into the massive Upper Jurassic reef and lagoon/inter-reef
dolomites (Meyer & Schmidt-Kaler 1992, Groiss et al.
1998), which additionally are famous climbing areas. Most
of the caves are only small clefts or cavities, with only a few
larger caves are present.
The Franconian Karst in Germany is one of the most important regions for megafaunal and palaeoclimatic research
of the Middle/Late Pleistocene in Europe due to its multiple archaeo-biological-archives. The extremely Pleistocene
bone-rich caves, which also contain important sedimentary
sequences, allow landscape and erosion modeling which is
potentially important for comparisons within other regions
of central Europe.
78
E&G / Vol. 63 / No. 1 / 2014 / 78–98 / DOI 10.3285/eg.63.1.05 / © Authors / Creative Commons Attribution License
Fig. 1: The first Zoolithen Cave researchers of the
„early spade research time: J.F. Esper, J.C. Rosenmüller, A. Goldfuss, G. Cuvier, W. Buckland
and Graf zu Münster. Below: First page of the
catalogue of the selling contract of the Rosenmüller-1794 collection (former times Preußische
Geologische Reichsanstalt Berlin, today Naturkundemuseum der Humboldt-Universität Berlin).
Abb. 1: Die ersten Zoolithenhöhlen-Erforscher
während der „frühen Spatenforschungszeit“:, J.F.
Esper, J.C. Rosenmüller, A. Goldfuss, G. Cuvier, W. Buckland und Graf zu Münster. Unten: Erste Seite der Kataloges des Kaufvertrages
der Rosenmüller-1794-Sammlung (damals Preußische Geologische Reichsanstalt Berlin, heute
Naturkundemuseum der Humboldt-Universität
Berlin).
Those caves, and especially the Zoolithen Cave, was one
of the first and most famously targeted fossil cave bear localities, where many famous German, French and English pioneering researchers excavated or studied material, including Esper, Rosenmüller, Goldfuss, Cuvier, Buckland &
Graf zu Münster (Fig. 1). The most famous and largest fossil collection assembled by Rosenmüller (labeled in 1797)
that contains several of the famous skulls, was thought to
be lost, but has been relocated by the current author, in the
Preußische Geologische Landesanstalt (see Rosenmüller
catalogue, Fig. 1). During the DDR socialist Republic times
this collection was forgotten but is now recognized to be of
international importance. Further important researchers included Goldfuss & Buckland who provided the first illustrations of the cave and excavation areas (Fig. 2A). Sadly, in
more recent times (after the Second World War), large newly
discovered parts and old areas were emptied with old-style
methods by Groiss (Fig. 2B).
Mainly cave bear remains have been found from the
Pleistocene layers in the Zoolithen Cave as the first and most
well-known and one of the richest cave bear bone site of Europe (Esper 1774, Rosenmüller 1794, Goldfuss 1810, 1818,
1821, 1823, Buckland 1823), which herein estimated has/had
a half million of remains. This and other larger bone-rich
caves in Upper Franconia (Fig. 3A) are all in higher elevations between 550 to 400 m a.s.l. (Zoolithen Cave former entrance 455 m NHN, Sophie’s and Große Teufels Cave former
entrances 410 m NHN) and contain mainly Late Pleistocene
megafaunas in the Große Teufels Cave, Sophie’s Cave, or
Geisloch Cave such as the herein discussed Zoolithen Cave,
which will be demonstrated to have been used by early cave
bears even earlier already in the Middle Pleistocene. At minimum four larger Pleistocene cave bear dens are known today (Fig. 3A). Smaller and fewer cave bear remain containing caves are the Zahnloch Cave, Neideck Cave, Moggaster
Cave, König-Ludwigs-Cave, Wunder Cave and Esper Cave
(Diedrich 2013a, Fig. 3B).
1774–1794 – Esper to Rosenmüller – “surface collecting times”
The reports of Heller (1972) do contain a compilation of the
history, but do not reflect the real situation. After the first
reports of the cave fauna by Esper (1774), he collected, described and figured “bones of extinct animals” (= cave bears
and others) from the Zoolithen Cave. These bones were not
found in the Entrance Hall (455 a.s.l.), but in the area of the
79
Fig. 2: A. Cross section of the historical excavation areas of W. Buckland (from Buckland
1823). This section Dieser Aufriss-Querschnitt
shows the historic discoveries of the anterior
cave parts and excavation areas in the Entrance
Hall, Wühlschacht Shaft (= Iron Age secondary
burials) and the Aufzugs-/Museumsschacht
Shafts (sections cf. Fig. 4) of the “early spade
research time”. In the Museumsschacht-Shaft
partly the herein illustrated wooden planks
of the ladders are preserved until today in the
Museumsschacht Saft.. B. Not time-adequate
and sadly useless “finding map sketch” of the
bonebed surface in the „Bärenkammer“ of the
Löwengruben Hall of the “late spade research
time” (from Groiss 1971). The removed material
can not be relocated today anymore to the places
(lacking documentation due to quick-emptying
action), nor were the nones osteologically determined.
Abb. 2: A. Querschnitt der historischen Grabungsbereiche von W. Buckland (aus Buckland 1823). Dieser Aufriss-Querschnitt zeigt
die damaligen Entdeckungen des vorderen
Höhlenbereiches und Grabungsstellen in der
Eingangshalle, dem Wühlschacht (= eisenzeitlicher Sekundär-Bestattungsschacht) und dem
Aufzugs-/Museumsschacht (Profile vgl. Abb. 4)
in der „frühen Spatenforschungszeit“. Im Museumsschacht sind noch heute Balken der Leitern
vorhanden, die hier teilweise eingezeichnet sind.
B. Nicht zeitgemäße unbrauchbare „BefundplanSkizze“ der Bonebed-Oberfläche in der „Bärenkammer“ der Löwengruben-Halle in der „späten
Spatenforschungszeit“ (aus Groiss 1971). Die
geborgenen Funde können heute weder zugeordnet werden (fehlende Dokumentation aufgrund
einer Schnell-Entleerungs-Aktion), noch sind die
Knochen osteologisch bestimmt worden.
“Aufzugsschacht”, which was a 2 m bone filled shaft, described as resulting from a “biblical flooding event” (Esper
1774). Initially, bones were easy to collect from the surfaces,
starting in the Aufzugssschcht Shaft area. The cave bear, lion and dhole holotype skulls must have been collected by
Rosenmüller from the surfaces in those first two larger
shafts in the cave system before 1797, because the other cave
parts (2/3 of the today’s known cave) behind the Aufzugsschacht had not been discovered at that time (cf. Rosenmüller
1794, Buckland 1823, Niggemeyer & Schubert 1972).
1810–1823 – Goldfuss to Buckland – “first excavation period”
The sketch of Buckland (Fig. 2B) demonstrates the main
bone excavation areas around 1823. Groiss (1979) believed
this illustration not to be correct, but it is (see reidentifications in Fig. 2A), even the last shaft can be demonstrated to
be the Museumsschacht (after illustrations with two speleothem layers, old ladder material and dump) and not the
Wühlschacht. Even today preserved historical ladder material and dumps in the last shaft (Museumsschacht) prove the
80
deep and extensive excavations at that time, being well figured by Buckland (1823). Those areas can be seen well until today in the cave. Buckland’s excavations began in the
Entrance Hall, which can be seen in his illustrations (Buckland 1823, Fig. 2B). The bones are there in primary positions (not water transported) in a silty medium brown and
dolomite ash sediment (cf. section in Fig. 4), which minerals gave the bones a typical medium-to dark brown colour.
Two preservation and bone colour types Goldfuss (1823)
are known, the brown form and the more abundant “white
yellowish” form. This old excavation area was partly reopened during the own studies (Fig. 4) and some bones (large
proportions) and teeth (multiconed enamel surfaces) of U.
ingressus were found, which are important for dating. The
Entrance Hall was not – as wrongly believed – fully excavated, because the sections demonstrate autochthonous and
dark-brown coloured cave bear bones, which form a loose
bonebed. Furthermore larger speleothems still cover most
of the hall, which is only overlain by few Iron Age period
and Holocene sediments (Fig. 4). This Hall was less of interest, because in the first shafts (Wühlschacht/Aufzugsschacht/
?
A
Geisloch
Cave
North Sea
Sophie's
Cave
Rabenstein
Castle
STREITBERG
Cave bears
(Ursus spelaeus
spelaeus/eremus
and Ursus ingressus)
KIRCHAHORN
König-Ludwigs
Cave
Steppe lion
(Panthera leo spelaea)
Ice Age spotted hyena
(Crocuta crocuta spelaea)
MUGGENDORF
Berlin
GERMANY
Neideck Esper
Cave
Cave
Study area
EBERMANNSTADT
Ice Age marten
(Martes sp.)
POTTENSTEIN
Castle Burggaillenreuth
GÖSSWEINSTEIN
400 m
AUSTRIA
Große Teufels
Cave
5 km
100 km
SWITZERLAND
?
0
m
Late Late Pleistocene
(High glacial = LGM)
41
Sophie's
Cave
?
D
LGM/Post-LGM terrace
sediments, also in cave entrances
(dolomite gravels)
Study
area 1
LGM/Post-LGM terrace
sediments in cave entrances
(glauconite clay/sandy gravels)
?
Wunders
Cave
Neideck
Cave
Porcupine
(Hystrix (A.) brachyura)
Hasenloch
Cave
Moggaster
Cave
500 m
Munich
Ice Age wolverine
(Gulo gulo)
Mouse weasel
(Mustela erminea subsp.)
BURGGAILENREUTH
Bavaria
Basel
Zahnloch
Cave
Zoolithen
Cave
CZECH
REPUBLIC
Nuernberg
FRANCE
Wunders
Cave
nt
ese
Wi
Neideck
Castle
Ice Age wolve
(Canis lupus spelaeus)
LGM/Post-LGM terraces
?LGM-valey glaciers
? Snow fields
(on plateau depresions)
LG
M
?
Esper's
45
5
ac ?
Cave
m
cu Sn
m ow Zoolithen
ul f
at ie Cave
io ld
n
ar
ea
Study
area 2
?
Hasenloch
Cave
Große Teufels
Cave
m
B
5 km
0
400 m
41
500 m
Study
area 3
Fig. 3: A. Late Pleistocene cave bear, hyena, wolf, marten and weasel den cave sites in Upper Franconia (northern Bavaria). B. Three sedimentological
studied areas in Upper Franconia (Große Teufels Cave, Sophie’s Cave and Zoolithen Cave) with questionable “valley glacier situation” explaining best the
high elevation of the Wiesent River terrace on 455 a.s.l. elevations and large gorges along during the late Late Pleistocene (high glacial) and terrace relict
sediments (especially glauconite till sediments) explaining the possibilities of the flooding situation. The problem is the correlation of the different elevated
Sophie’s/Große Teufels caves (410 m a.s.l.) elevation and similar old different terrace sediments in the Muggendorf area (Neideck/Wunders/Zoolithen caves
about 455 m a.s.l.).
Abb. 3: A. Spät-Pleistozäne Höhlenbären, Hyänen, Wolf, Marder und Wiesel-Horst-Höhlen in Oberfranken (Nord-Bayern). B. Drei sedimentologisch
untersuchte Regionen in Oberfranken (Große Teufelshöhle, Sophienhöhle und Zoolithenhöhle) mit fraglicher „Tal-Vergletscherungs-Situation“, die am
besten die hohe Wiesent-Flussterrassenlage auf 455 m ü. NHN und tiefen Schluchten während des späten Ober-Pleistozäns (Hochglazial) und TerrassenReliktsedimente (besonders Glaukonit-Tillsedimente) und Flutung der Zoolithenhöhle erklären könnte. Das Problem ist die Korrelation der unterschiedlich
hoch gelegenen Sophien-/Großen Teufelshöhle (410 m NHN) und gleichaltrige unterschiedliche Terrassensedimente in der Muggendorf-Region (Neideck-/
Wunders-/Zoolithenhöhle ca. 455 m NHN).
Museumsschacht) the bone beds were extremely dense and
material was easy to obtain. The material was found in the
“bonebed breccias” (= cemented doloash sand-dolomite pebble layers cemented by speleothems) below the upper speleothem layer. Also Graf zu Münster collected there in the
19th century (Weiss 1937), with his collections now curated
in the Urweltmuseum Oberfranken Bayreuth. The sediment
of those excavations and further ones of the 19th century was
back-filled into the Wühlschacht (pers. com. M. Conrad).
This shaft was closed again after 1823 already historically
with reworked sediments. These first discovered areas of the
anterior cave separated for long the deeper cave parts which
were discovered in 1971 after removal of the sediments (cf.
Niggemeyer & Schubert 1972). The many hundreds of cubic meters of material protected the deeper parts of the cave
and were reworked 25–20 years ago (pers. com. M. Conrad).
1971 – “second research period”
The second chimney (Wühlschacht) was also filled up with
densely packed bones and was the key to today’s much larger known cave system, the middle part of which was discovered in 1971 (cf. Groiss 1971, 1979). After the reopening
of the Wühlschacht about 25 years ago, a new cave part and
thousands (e.g. the University Erlangen collection of 100,000
bones) of untouched bonebeds were quickly removed. Those
bones were taken without adequate documentation in the
Knochenschacht and partly in the Bärenkammer (cf. Fig.
2B). The Guloloch and Wolfskammer shafts produced mainly
cave bear bones, and many new skulls, but also other Pleistocene carnivore faunal remains (cf. Groiss 1979). From
those excavations a perfectly preserved hyena skull subsequently became a paratype skull (Diedrich 2011a, 2014).
Some thousands of other bones have been dumped after
81
Dipping speleothem block
D
eleothem
Sediment
layer
below ero
de
E
r stal
Younge
Older sp
s
es
mit
lag
agmite
d by flood
F
er
sta
Doloash sand
Old
M
ic
ro
t
ec
to
s
ni
cs
C
Red clay
Mud cracks
Entrance
Hall 2
G
Younger candle stalagmites
A
Museumsschacht
Shaft
Auftstiegshalle
Wühlschacht
Shaft
Shaft
Entrance
Hall 1
Säulenhalle
Chamber
Older stalagnates
H
50 cm
Level 1
Floods
0
Entrance
Hall 1
Entrance
Hall 2
Level 2
Säulenhalle
Chamber
-10
s
ebed Wühlschacht
Shaft
Bon
-20
Museumsschacht
Shaft
Auftstiegshalle
Shaft
Dolomite ash/red clay series
Level 3
Meters
Legend, see standard
section below
Sections,
see above
Vertically dropped mixed sediments
Candle-stalagmites
Cave genesis
Holocene
La Téne -Iron Age
human bones, ceramics
Rounded
limestone pebbles,
with few rounded speleothems,
and loess sand matrix
"24.000" BP
LATE
Early-Middle
U. ingressus
Bonebed-Breccias
U. spelaeus
subsp.
Bones
Bonebeds
342.000 BP
III
MIDDLE
Thick speleothems
U. deningeri
+ 71.400
Broken speleothems
Mud cracks
Bats
Red clay
(with concretions)
Sequence II
Underground
river
(ponor)
Bones
?EARLY
Speleothem phase1
(vadose)
PLEISTOCENE
Bones
Valley river
floods
(intermediate)
P. eversmanni
M. martes V. vulpes/
lagopus
C. lupus spelaeus
C. alpinus cavernalis
0,1%
G. gulo
0,5%
P. p. spelaeus
3,4% 1%
P. l. spelaea
0,2%
0,2%
(?P. l. fossilis)
2,5%
In valleys migrating
steppe fauna
(imported prey)
C. antiquitatis
R. tarandus,
C. elaphus
C. c. spelaea 1,6%
(?C. c. praespelaea)
Boreal forest
karst fauna
(carnivore and
cave bear den)
91%
Carbonate concretions
U. ingressus/U. spelaeus subsp./
and U. deningeri
Microtectonic
structures
Grey clay
Fine dolomite ash sand,
lamination, clay layers
I
NEOGENE
-30
Zoolithen Cave
Pleistocene
bone asamblage
NISP = 6.200
13.720 BP
+ 125
-
Late
Speleothem phase 2
(vadose)
B
UPPER
JURASSIC
Reef-Dolomite
I
Fig. 4: Sections in the Zoolithen Cave, dating and interpretation of main sedimentary fluvial (underground river and valley river) series (absolute data
from Kempe et al. 2002, Rosendahl & Kempe 2004). A. Important sections. B. Cave levels and similar elevated sedimentary sequences. C. Collapsed main
speleothem layer, below eroded clay and present red clay of the sequence 2 in the Lehmhalle. D. Mud-crack negatives on the base of the main speleothem
layer in the Löwengrube. E. Tipping speleothem layer in a vertical shaft, which moved downwards, and on which candle stalagmites with different angles
developed. F. Dolomite ash sands/red clay layers of the sequence 2 with microtectonic horst structures. G. Candle stalagmites of the Alleröd humid phase
(second speleothem generation) in the Löwengrube. H. Large stalagnates from the first speleothem phase in the Säulenhalle. I. Compiled generalized section, and faunal composition of the Late Pleistocene bonebeds.
Abb. 4: Profile in der Zoolithenhöhle, Datierung und Interpretation von fluvialen (Untergrundfluss und Talfluss) sedimentären Hauptzyklen (Absolut-Daten nach Kempe et al. 2002, Rosendahl & Kempe 2004). A. Wichtige Profile. B. Höhlen-Etagen und in gleichen Höhenlagen vorhandene Sediment-Sequenzen. C. Eingestürzte Sinterdecke, unterhalb erodierter Lehm und vorhandener roter Lehm der Sequenz 2 in der Lehmhalle. D. Trockenriss-Negative auf der
Unterseite der ersten Hauptspeläothem-Lage in der Löwengrube. E. In einem Vertikalschacht verkippte Sinterdecke, die sich gravitativ nach unten bewegte
und auf der sich mehrere Kerzenstalagmiten-Generationen mit unterschiedlichen Winkeln entwickelten. F. Dolomite-Aschen/rote Lehm-Lagen der Sequenz 2 mit Mikrotektonik-Horststrukturen. G. Kerzenstalagmiten der humiden Alleröd-Zeit (zweite Speläothem-Generation) in der Löwengrube. H. Große
Stalagnaten der ersten Speläothem-Generation in der Säulenhalle. I. Generalisiertes Gesamtprofil und Faunenkomposition der spätpleistozänen Bonebeds.
82
14.000
CAVE BEAR TOOTH AND SKULL MORPHOLOGY AND DATING
Postglacial
18.000
Maximum glaciation
Extinction of cave bears in Europe
Ursus ingressus
Type E2
MIS 3
LATE
22.000
Multiple
35.000
MIS 4
MIDDLE
LATE
10 cm
Herbivorous
Type D
Four
Ursus spelaeus eremus
65.000
MIS 5a-d
Type C
EARLY
PLEISTOCENE
Type E1
Type C
Omnivorous,
mainly herbivorous
115.000
MIS 5e
EEMIAN
10 cm
Type B
Three
128.000
MIS 6-8
Type A
320.000
MIS 9
SAALIAN
HOLSTEINIAN
MIDDLE
Ursus deningeri
Lower jaw P4
342.000 BP
+ 71.400
-
Upper jaw P
4
Oldest Speleothems
10 cm
Fig. 5: “Cave bear clock” – dating the cave bears by P4 and skull shape morphologies. The tooth material is from the dump infront of the cave but demonstrate a cross-section through all primitive deningeri to ingressus cave bear tooth morphotypes sensu Rabeder (1999). All teeth in occlusal view. U.
ingressus skull Graf zu Münster-coll. Urweltmuseum Oberfranken Bayreuth; U. spelaeus eremus skull Buchhaupt-coll.; U. deningeri skull Rosenmüller
1794-coll. MB).
Abb. 5: „Höhlenbären-Uhr“ – Datierung der Höhlenbären mit Hilfe der P4 und Schädel-Morphotypen. Das Zahnmaterial stammt aus der Halde vor der
Höhle, zeigt aber den Querschnitt durch alle primitiven deningeri bis ingressus-Höhlenbärenzahn-Morphotypen sensu Rabeder (1999). Alle Zähne in Occlusalansicht. U. ingressus-Schädel Graf zu Münster-Slg. Urweltmuseum Oberfranken Bayreuth; U. spelaeus eremus-Schädel Buchhaupt-Slg.; U. deningeriSchädel Rosenmüller 1794 Slg. MB).
1971 due to the continuing excavations (FHKF = Forschungsgruppe Höhle und Karst Franken e.V., Nürnberg) in the “Museum” in the cave, and still remain there. This bone material
is from the approximately two meter thick bonebeds of Aufzugsschacht/Wühlschacht and the Museumsschacht vertical
shafts. Most of the sediment was simply transported in front
of the cave, whereas the teeth were taken by the spelunkers,
who dumped the “bad bones” in the Museums area. The new
“old” reworked bone material is still of high importance in
the reconstruction of the exact locations of lion and hyena
remains (Fig. 14), to the understanding of the cave bear bone
taphonomy, and to the compilation of the rare non-cave bear
skeletons necessary to obtain complete faunal accounts.
2000–2010 – Modern Research
The descriptions of Heller (1966) do not fit this cave or other caves, where he believed, that those sites were “emptied”.
After the new discoveries of untouched bonebeds which are
luckily still intact in at least some areas (Fig. 15), the cave
was explored further in the past decade leading to the dis-
83
covery of another extension to the south (= Dreyerhalle area, pers. com. M. Conrad, Fig. 14). Also, a few more bones
and skulls were found even deeper in the cave system, obviously in secondary (carnivore caused scattering) or even
third (floods, gravity-driven transport) positions. The Museums area dump was sorted by the author in 2010. During
this preliminary collections management, all non-cave bear
material was extracted (together with human remains, and
pottery, and Holocene fauna). The hyenas and lion material
has already been published, together with the accessible historical finds (cf. Diedrich 2011a/b, 2014).
The international important forgotten Pleistocene holotype skull collection
Two “cave bear” skeletons were compiled of bones from different individuals and even cave bear subspecies/species as
known today (Fig. 5, 6A–B). In total five Pleistocene species (Figs. 7–13) were named based on the Zoolithen Cave
skulls – which make this site to the most important Pleistocene cave megafauna locality in Europe. Today only five
of the six holotype skulls remain as valid Pleistocene species.
The holotype of the “cave bear Ursus spelaeus” described by
Rosenmüller (1794) was identified in his collection (Diedrich 2009, Fig. 7). Newly identified here is the Ursus deningeri Reichenau 1904 skull (Fig. 8) of the Rosenmüller
collection, which was historically believed to represent a
“brown bear”. A larger bone collection including most of the
known large lions remains and the holotype of Panthera leo
spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) (Fig. 9) from the Zoolithen Cave
was collected/excavated by Rosenmüller himself since the
end of the 18th century. Also the rediscovered hyena Crocuta crocuta spelaea (Goldfuss 1823) (Fig. 10) holotype
skull (Diedrich 2008, 2014), revalidated wolf Canis lupus
spelaeus (Goldfuss 1823) (Fig. 11), the new rediscovered
dhole skull of Cuon alpinus cavernalis (Rosenmüller 1797)
(Fig. 12), and the subsequently invalidated Gulo gulo spelaea (Goldfuss 1818) (Fig. 13) must have been found in the
first two vertical shafts (Aufzugs-/Wühlschacht). However,
the invalid “cave tiger Panthera tigris spelaea (Goldfuss)”
holotype material described by Groiss (1996) was revised
to represent subadult individual remains of P. l. spelaea (cf.
Diedrich 2011b).
2 Material and methods
Fig. 6: A. Compiled cave bear skeleton of different individual remains and
species of the Zoolithen Cave (exhibition of the Museum für Ur- und Ortsgeschichte Bottrop). B. Compiled cave bear skeleton of different individual
remains of the Zoolithen Cave (skeleton exhibition of the Museum Tüchersfeld).
Abb. 6: A. Höhlenbären-Skelett-Komposit verschiedener Individuen und
Arten aus der Zoolithenhöhle (Skelette-Ausstellung Museum für Ur- und
Ortsgeschichte Bottrop). B. Höhlenbären-Skelett-Komposit verschiedener
Individuen aus der Zoolithenhöhle (Ausstellung Museum Tüchersfeld).
84
To understand the cave bear bone taphonomy and distribution of the “bone breccias” (= bone beds), and to document
two articulated skeletons (Fig. 14), a new cave survey was
made in spring of 2010, in parallel with a History Channel
film project. Open sections in the cave, that resulted from
historical digs (cf. Buckland 1823, Fig. 2B) and also the digs
of the FHKF since 1971, were studied sedimentologically
and stratigraphically to allow the presentation of a generalized overview section for the currently known cave system
(Fig. 4). The most complete Middle to Late Pleistocene (MIS
3–9) section was found in the “Aufzugsschacht”. Some thinner sections at other places allow the reconstruction of three
main fluvial sedimentary cave filling sequences and two
main speleothem genetic phases in three cave levels (Fig. 4).
The bone material in the “Museum” (= sorted bones from the
1971 and later reworked sediments from FHKF activities)
Fig. 7: Ursus ingressus Rabeder & Hofreiter 2004 holotype skull of “the cave bear Ursus spelaeus” of an early adult male. Latest Late Pleistocene (which
seems to be a subadult Ursus ingressus; coll. MB, from Diedrich 2009).
Abb. 7: Ursus ingressus Rabeder & Hofreiter 2004 Holotyp-Schädel „des Höhlenbären Ursus spelaeus“ eines frühadulten männlichen Bären, späteres
Spät-Pleistozän (Ursus spelaeus spelaeus Rabeder & Hofreiter 2004, vermutlich ein subadulter Ursus ingressus; Slg MB, aus Diedrich 2009).
was sorted and protected against further trampling damage
by spelunkers. Non-cave bear bone material was extracted
(Pleistocene carnivores, Holocene fauna, human bones).
About 2,000 bones remain until today there behind a locked
door. Furthermore the dump in front of the cave was checked
for its contents with a smaller trench. From this about 1,500
finds (Pleistocene bones, pottery and human teeth) were rescued from the illegal excavation activities of private collectors.
The 1971 and later excavated and already twice redeposited bones and fragments of the non-cave bears are in
the Ziegler-collection (former owner of the cave at that
time) of the Forschungsgruppe Höhle und Karst Franken
e.V., Nürnberg (= FHKF). The collection of Esper cannot be
relocated. The most famous and largest collection, that of
Rosenmüller, who labelled the site as “Gaylenreuther Höhle, 1797” (cf. Fig. 1B) was formerly stored in the collection
of the “Preußische Geologische Landesanstalt”, and then in
the “Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe”,
Berlin (= BGR). These collections were recently moved to
the “Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität
Berlin” (= MB). The Goldfuss collection, which was taken
from the cave between 1810–1823, is partially housed in the
Goldfuss-Museum Bonn (e.g. hyena holotype skull, possibly also “lost wolf skull” there). The Graf zu Münster collection which containing well preserved hyena, lion and wolf
material is in the Urweltmuseum Oberfranken Bayreuth (=
U-OB). A composite skeleton was studied in the Museum
Ur- und Ortsgeschichte Bottrop (= MUOB), and the Museum
in Tüchersfeld (= MT). One hyena skull and several cave bear
skulls are in the British Museum (Natural History), London
(= BMNHL). The Buckland collection was not relocated in
Oxford in the University Museum after requests, but might
be hidden somewhere. The largest collection (estimated at
100,000 bones after pers. com. Ministry of Culture of Bavaria) is housed in the University Erlangen (= UE, 1971 Groiss
“excavations” = cave owner property of R. Ziegler until today).
85
Fig. 8: A-E. Early Deninger cave bear Ursus deningeri Reichenau 1904
skull, Middle Pleistocene (“Ursus arctoideus” in the Rosenmüller 1794-coll.
MB).
Abb. 8: A-E. Früher Deninger-Höhlenbär Ursus deningeri Reichenau 1904
Schädel “Ursus arctoideus”, Mittel-Pleistozän (“Ursus arctoideus” Rosenmüller 1794-coll. MB).
Fig. 9: A-E. Steppe lion Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) holotype skull “Felis spelaeus”, Late Pleistocene (Rosenmüller 1794-coll.
MB,drawing from Goldfuss 1810, original from Diedrich 2011b).
Abb. 9: A-E. Steppenlöwe Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) HolotypSchädel “Felis spelaeus”, Spät-Pleistozän (Rosenmüller 1794-Slg. MB,
Zeichnung aus Goldfuss 1810, Original aus Diedrich 2011b).
86
3 Results and discussion
River terrace relicts in caves and valley genesis in Upper Franconia
Neischl (1904) remarked first, that sediments in caves along
Upper Franconia river valleys are important for the landscape and glacial dewatering system reconstruction. The first
identifications of river terraces and their possible elevations
were discussed by Spöker (1952) for the Franconia Pegnitz
valley. Problems of the valley genesis and dating including
micromammal fauna containing caves (e.g. Brunner 1933,
1954) were reviewed (Habbe 1989). Only coarse karst evolution models were presented, especially for the earlier “Cretaceous to Tertiary” periods, but not in detail for the Pleistocene valley genesis (cf. Groiss et al. 1998). A new discussion about Plio-/Pleistocene river terraces in the valleys of
Upper Franconia appeared with the new sedimentological
research at Sophie’s Cave of the Ahorn Valley (Diedrich
2013a). At Zoolithen Cave along the Wiesent Valley, the
entrance is 130 m above modern river level and must have
been flooded postglacially in the Late Pleistocene, as dated
by cave bear tooth morphology and stratigraphy (Diedrich
2011a, 2013a; Fig. 2). This presented a new idea in the understanding of the much more rapid valley genesis which is
further discussed here, but can be completed only with further studies of the many caves along the river valleys. A first
model for the Wiesent Valley branching Ahorn Valley has already demonstrated the exact elevation estimates of Middle
(one terrace) to Late Pleistocene (three terraces, Diedrich
2013a) Ailsbach River terraces, whereas the different cave
bear species/subspecies are highly important for the sediment dating. Those cave sections cannot yet be correlated
herein simply to the Wiesent Valley terraces, but both have
similar sedimentary sequences in the Late Pleistocene. Important for the understanding of the valley genesis in Upper
Franconia are the bonebeds (and different cave bear species/
subspecies) and faunal remains in general with their taphonomic record, found especially in caves along the valleys.
Cave genesis, refill stages and animal den use
After a new systematic exploration of the cave in the spring
of 2010, its sedimentology/morphology, cave history and geology can be reconstructed including former speleothem and
micromammal age determinations, starting with its development in the Tertiary, when the cave was eroded into Upper
Jurassic massive dolomites (cf. Groiss et al. 1998, Meyer &
Schmidt-Kaler 1992). The lower cave areas and the upper
parts whose levels developed under phreatic underground
Fig. 10: A-D. Hyena Crocuta crocuta spelaea (Goldfuss 1823) holotype skull “Hyaena spelaea”, mirrored, Late Pleistocene (Goldfuss -coll. GMB, drawing
from Goldfuss 1823), E-H. New paratype skull (Ziegler-coll UE, from Diedrich 2011a), I-J. Skull with bite damage, original of Soemmering, 1828 (from
Diedrich 2011a), K-L. Maxillary, original of Cuvier, 1822 (coll GZG).
Abb. 10: Hyäne Crocuta crocuta spelaea (Goldfuss 1823) Holotyp-Schädel “Hyaena spelaea”,, gespiegelt, Spät-Pleistozän (Goldfuss-Slg. GMB, Teichnung
aus Goldfuss 1823), E-H. Neuer Paratyp-Schädel (Ziegler-Slg. UE, aus Diedrich 2011a), I-J. Schädel mit Bissverletzung, Original von Soemmering, 1828
(aus Diedrich 2011a), K-L. Maxillare, Original von Cuvier 1822 (coll. GZG).
87
river conditions seem to have been connected by vadose speleogenesis, following the cleft system (cf. Poll 1972), which
explains the often small and vertical partly-branched shafts
which connect the three known cave levels (Fig. 2). There
must be a deeper active system, resulting in gravity movements in vertical shafts deeper than the lowermost level
(about 30 m).
A. Initial ponor cave (“Oligocene/Miocene”)
The 550 a.s.l. high elevated Franconian Moggaster Cave was
filled during the Early to Middle Palaeogene (= Palaeocene
- Eocene, Groiss et al. 1998). The Zoolithen Cave (455 .a.s.l.)
is intermediate in elevation between Moggaster Cave (550
a.s.l., Palaeocene/Eocene genesis) and Sophie’s Cave (410
a.s.l., Pliocene genesis, cf. Diedrich 2013a) and seem to have
been filled with their first sediments no earlier than the Neogene. Here an Oligocene/Miocene age for Zoolithen Cave is
expected based on the elevations and dated refill history of
Moggaster and Sophie’s caves (cf. Groiss et al. 1998, Diedrich 2013e). The first fluvial sedimentary cycle of the Zoo-
lithen Cave is the so-called “dolomite residuum/grey clay sequence” (sequence 1, Fig. 2), whereas those dolomitic sands
and silts are typical products of dolomite weathering and
fluvial erosion (Burger 1989). This series was deposited in
level 1 in the Entrance Hall (Fig. 2) by an underground river
of a Neogene Upper Frankonian Plateau landscape origin,
which seem to have been present until the Pliocene (Diedrich 2013a).
B. Final ponor cave (Pliocene-Early Pleistocene)
In the Zoolithen Cave, the underground river continued
creating two deeper ponor cave levels reaching 25 m deep.
Typical scallops (cf. Jenning 1985) on the cave walls are best
visible and preserved (i.e. without vadose overprint) in then
lowermost level 3 (Fig. 2) in the newest discovered last third
of the cave system (branching horizontal parts around the
“Siebenschläfer” chamber). The dolomite sands are overlain
by up to several meters of red homogenous clay, which contains up to 20 cm large caliche-like concretions in some areas. Those clays are sometimes covered by mud cracks on the
Fig. 11: A-C. Wolf Canis lupus spelaeus (Goldfuss 1823) lost holotype skull “Canis spelaeus” of a cub and mandible of an adult wolf (from Goldfuss,
1823). D-F. New lectotype skull (Rosenmüller 1794-coll. MB).
Abb. 11: A-C Wolf Canis lupus spelaeus (Goldfuss 1823) Verlorener Holotyp-Schädel „Canis spelaeus“ eines Jungtieres und Unterkiefer eines adulten
Wolfes (aus Goldfuss, 1823). D-F. Neuer Lectotyp-Schädel (Rosenmüller 1794-Slg. MB).
88
uppermost surfaces (Fig. 2) which might date into Pliocene/
Early Pleistocene. Absolute dating is not yet available, but
a comparison to the Pliocene/Early Pleistocene similar fluvial dolomite sand/clay sequence series sediments of the
Sophie’s Cave (Diedrich 2013e) and the Bing Cave (Brand
2006) underground river sediments permits a coarse preliminary dating. In the Zoolithen Cave those fluvial series are
at higher elevations of about 445–420 a.s.l. (Fig. 2, therefore
expected to be older) and in Sophie’s Cave at an elevation
of 410–400 a.s.l. (expected to be younger). The elevation of
this sediment series is even different within the Zoolithen
Cave, and sediments are found undisturbed below speleothem layers only in the “second cave level” (Fig. 2), which
is some meters deeper than the sedimentary series of the
Neogene (level 1 = Entrance Hall). First gravitational vertical
transport below the massive speleothem layer (well seen in
the Lehmgrube and Siebenschläferkammer, Fig. 2) of those
sediments or even possibly earthquakes are documented by
micro-horst structures (branch of Säulenhalle, Fig. 2) within
the yellowish-white silt/fine sand layers. Such earthquake
signs in caves are also reported for the “Middle Pleistocene”
of Franconia by Spöker (1952) and Diedrich (2013a), which
would indicate an uplift of Franconia even in the Ice Age,
which explains fractured speleothems, or speleothem fragment layers (e.g. in Zoolithen Cave layer below first speleothem phase in the Aufzugsschacht, Fig. 2).
Fig. 12: Dole Cuon alpinus cavernalis (Rosenmüller 1794). A. Holotype
skull “Canis cavernalis” of an early adult, Middle or Late Pleistocene
(Rosenmüller 1794-coll. MB).
Abb. 12: Rotwolf Cuon alpinus cavernalis (Rosenmüller 1794). A. HolotypSchädel “Canis cavernalis” eines subadulten Tieres, Mittel- oder Spät-Pleistozän (Rosenmüller 1794-Slg. MB).
C. Vadose Cave (Middle Pleistocene – first speleothem
deposition)
The red and mud-cracked clays demonstrate the drying of
the cave, followed by a humid warm period. During this
time the main (thickest) Middle Pleistocene speleothem layer
developed, and also formed the larger stalagmites/stalactites
in the cave. A stalagmite age determination (sample ZooHSi2; first speleothem generation) is reported around 342,050
± 71.400 years for samples of the Aufzugsschacht section (cf.
Kempe et al. 2002) which corresponds to the MIS 9 interglacial period after the Holstein Interglacial at the early Saalian
of the Late Middle Pleistocene (cf. Gibbard & Cohen 2008).
After the speleothem deposition at the end of the Middle
Pleistocene gravitational sediment transport happened all
over the cave and more extensively later in the Late Pleistocene, whereas at many places today spaces between the
clay surface and speleothem layer are between 0.5 to 2 meters. Damages like shedding on cracked and healed stalagmites (Fig. 2), seem to result from such earthquakes or gravity movements on the clay sediments, and are not to interpret
as signs of an “Ice Cave”.
D. Dry cave – cave bear, hyena, wolf den (Early-Middle
Late Pleistocene)
One articulated early-adult male cave bear skeleton and one
skeleton of a cub, still being present in-situ, were mapped in
the central but high elevation cave area (“Säulenhalle” and
“Zaunikhalle”, Fig. 14). These are important to understand
the cave bear bone taphonomy and possible original hibernation areas, and the flood directions. Those are in areas
which are difficult to access, and isolated by vertical shafts.
Their positions would fit to the theory that cave bears hibernated as deep in caves as possible to protect themselves
against top predators, especially lions (Diedrich 2011b). The
Fig. 13: Wolverine Gulo gulo spelaea (Goldfuss 1818) holotype skull (coll.
MB), today attributed to Gulo gulo Linnaeus, 1758 (therefore no longer
valid holotype).
Abb. 13: Vielfraß Gulo gulo spelaea (Goldfuss 1818) Holotyp-Schädel (Slg.
MB), heute zu Gulo gulo Linnaeus, 1758 gestellt (daher kein valider Holotyp).
89
10 cm
10 cm
Zoolithen Cave
Panthera leo spelaea
remains
Burggaillenreuth, Bavaria (Germany)
Orgelkammer
Cave-No.: D 109
453 m ü. NN
16120
47
Säulenhalle
47c
Cave bear
skeleton
remains
-3
46
47
Adolescents
44a
-
47a
44
47b
44
173
48
43
43
-3
173
126
24
124
123
21
27124a
26
18
20
HP
28
9
10
12
10
A
3
175
3
12
10b
ns Ev4
po en
(la
te
r t
st o tat floo
La f b ion di
te on d ng
Pl es ire
ct
ei
io
st
n
oc
en
e)
4
HP
11
+0,2
115
176
175
10a
116
177
175
108
105
86
107
86
2
3a
4b
Aussenvermessung
Aussenvermessung mit allen Höhlen
1
1
Original
Cave bear, hyena and wolve den area
with bone accumulations
2
110
109
214
Crocuta
crocuta
spelaea
remains
10a
10b
tra
Aufzugschacht
104
111
10c
4a
114
67
178
Museum
112
201
200
12a
5a
5a
5
65
66
67
-16,2
90
30
6
137
10c
5
72
180
85
88
96
91
3a
165
165
142
119
141
7
-5
176
105
423,8
-29,2
214
14 8
139
68
65
11
?
178/
179
102
87
210
213
89
94
93
86
n
Females
Wolfskammer
A
-6
104
Dreyerhalle
25
122
125
22
13
138
191
71
64
60
212
-9
-26
215
217
106
148
L
216
3c
216
218
217a
218
L
149
219
Eingangshalle
Grown up
males/females
149
157
220
220
164
Entrance
217
215
106
148
Sandhalle
220a
220a
g io
in ct
od ire
lo d
tf n s
en atio ne
Ev ort f bo
p o
s
n
tra
S
6/6a
9
66
103
85 W
85
91-96
90
30
7
136
70
63
101
213
87
88
68/69
-5
+
180
177
-11
-8,5
71
?
72
Bärenkammer
-6
-3
89
Schacht II
37
59
Windspalte
63
100
-18,5
-3
135
39
55
133
191
-11
64
8
190
54
62
61
Lehmhalle
130
38
?
39
37
97
98
98
-4
18/19
14
73
54
70
97
99
99
28/29
140
188
56
Schacht I
218
27
20
13
131
188
57
53
132
73
54
62
61
Males
26
-7
190
58
58
21
23
117
16
75
74
75
4
38
?
118
187
40
186
184
181
74
53
9
Amount of lion bones
127
32
1515
17
185
41 189
80
79
52d
184
181
23
1
16
Guloloch
186 40
2
X-Spalte
25
119
22
76
36a
52a
52
52
-22,8
Cub
Angle
24
17
187
187
41
185
76
128
84
78
183
52c
182
183
182
52d
433,8
-19,2
81
77
77
52c
Cave bear skeleton
remains articulated
120
31
82
33
-11,4
36
52e
52b
52
15
170
83
50
36
52e
52b
Löwengrube
42
170 42
35
-8
84
-9
Bonebed
River terrace
gravels
Measuring point
Ladder
32
172
33/34
-7
Large basin
Elevation from to the
cave entrance elevation [m]
121
129
31
171
35
50
Ramp
120
143
172
-5,3
171
49
Zaunikhalle
Micro basin
121
143
Massengrab
3
13
Studentenkammer
Aufstiegshalle Wühlschacht
48
49
Slope
Vertical shaft
-14,5
Early adult male
Fallen stalaktites
Speleothem floors
449,5 Heigth [m. above NN]
47a
-0,6
-9,5
Dropped stalagmite
Cascades
Ramp with elevation [m]
46
H
Pillar
Deeper branch
45
48418
Stalagmite with Stalaktite
Abri
44b
Coordinates: R
Stalaktite
Possible continuing
Meißelkammer
L
55
Stalagmite
Blocks
Artificial installed stalagmite
45
44
Rock massif
Rocks
Cave wall
164
163
3b
163
155
-23
L
150
150
156
162
151
151
N
153
-3
154
152
152
-3
159
158
-7,7
159
160
160
-13
156
162
153
154
Adolescents
158
161
161
+
Cubs
0
10 m
Siebenschläferkammer
Skull
1m
n
tio
rta
o
sp
n
tive
Humerus
tra
Costa
vita
a
Gr
Astragalus
Tibia
Pelvic
Humerus
Calcaneus
Femur
Metapodial
Femur
Early adult
male skeleton
Thoracic
vertebra
Bacculum
Skull
Mandible
Cub
skeleton
Cervical
vertebra
Femur
Scapula
Niche
Tibia
10 cm
Fig. 14: Different cave bear taphonomy in Zoolithen Cave. Bones redeposited by floods accumulated in bonebeds (red) and two more or less articulated
skeletons of a cub and early adult male, which skeleton parts are still on place.
Abb. 14: Unterschiedliche Höhlenbären-Taphonomie in der Zoolithenhöhle. Durch Flutung umgelagerte Knochen, akkumuliert in Bonebeds (rot), und zwei
mehr oder weniger artikulierte Skelettreste eines Jungtieres und eines frühadulten Bären, die in situ liegen.
90
two incomplete skeletons were found on the “upper cave level”, where the Late Pleistocene floods obviously had no impact at all, so it remains unclear how those bears could have
reached the “Säulenhalle” and “Zaunikhalle”. The vertical
shafts surrounding those are deep and nearly impossible to
climb. The early adult male skeleton is most probably of an
U. ingressus species (skull shape and large bone proportions,
covered and fixed by speleothem layer) in a niche – which
was his hibernation “nesting area” (Fig. 14), and shows well
the slow gravitational movement on speleothem surfaces in
chambers. First the skull and larger bones such as the limb
bones or the pelvic drifted downwards, through the action of
dripping waters.
The hyena and lion remains in the cave bear bonebeds
must have accumulated by primary deposition most probably over some thousands of years, from several hyena populations over many generations during the early to beginning
of the late Late Pleistocene (Diedrich 2011a/b). Already in
the Entrance Hall, most probably cannibalistic chewed hyena bones (Figs. 16) indicate carcass movements and damages
of the material. Cave bear, hyena or lion bones themselves
have sometimes well-preserved irregular chewed margins
(= zigzag margins) and bite marks (Fig. 16) resulting from
large carnivore activities (resulting from the breaking/scissor dentition). Similar bone bed taphonomic studies have
been recently performed at Sophie’s Cave, where cave bear
scavenging was convincingly proven on partly articulated
vertebral columns of individual skeletons which were found
with many other scattered and often bite-damaged bones or
articulated body parts (Diedrich 2013e). Fragmentation and
damage of cave bear bones must have resulted mainly from
the well-known hyena scavenging activities (especially bone
crushing, Fig. 16, Diedrich 2011a), and also by a few lion
predatory activities (only joint chewing) and finally by wolf
scavenging activities (cf. Diedrich 2013b). The Zoolithen
Cave taphonomic study and model (Fig. 17) of the “historically non-collected” incomplete cave bear bones shows the
same incomplete bone preservations that is being reported
from many European caves (Diedrich 2009, 2013a/b/c), if
incomplete material is included in the studies in such cave
bear dens. The new interpretation of scavenging activities by
hyenas, and the specialization in middle mountainous boreal
forest regions of cave bears as a result of the absence or scarcity of steppe megafauna prey animals (especially mammoth,
rhinoceros and steppe bison) in the Zoolithen Cave was recently proven by the large hyena population and den use as a
cub raising and commuting den type (Diedrich 2011a), and
also the very large lion population (Diedrich 2011b).
Skull pathologies – Neanderthal or animal conflicts?
Groiss (1978) believed the figured frontal holes and damages
to adult cave bear skulls (two different species: U. spealeus
subsp., U. ingressus, Fig. 17) were the result of “Palaeolithic
human hunters” (i.e. cave bear hunting and “spear attack”
signs), but in the surrounding cave not one stone tool or
Palaeolithic site is known. The only two small Middle Palaeolithic cave sites in the area are near Große Teufels Cave
(Diedrich 2013a). The incomplete bear skulls are obviously
in a hyena and lion predatory context and have damage to
each left frontal; in one case the deep penetration is nearly healed, whereas in the other skull the hole is still open
Fig. 15: Cave bear bone taphonomy in the “Massengrab Chamber” of Zoolithen Cave with untouched and still on-place preserved non-sediment containing packed and loose cave bear bonebeds (Photos H. Schabdach, FHKF).
Abb. 15: Höhlenbären-Knochentaphonomie im „Massengrab-Raum“ der
Zoolithenhöhle mit unangetasteten und noch Original ohne Sediment dicht
gepackten und lose erhaltenen Höhlenbären-Knochenschichten (Photos H.
Schabdach, FHKF).
and only the surrounding bone shows an early stage of the
healing process (Fig. 17). The interpretation here is different in presenting a cave use model including all three large
carnivores (lions, hyenas and wolves) and herbivorous cave
bears (Fig. 17). There, mainly lions and possibly hyenas and
wolves produced osteological damage during their attacks
on the cave bears, although mostly during scavenging activities. Overlooked completely by Groiss (1971, 1978) are
bite wounds on the sagital crests of the steppe lion holotype skull from the Zoolithen Cave (Diedrich 2008, 2011b).
The most famous hyena skull with a really deep sagital bite
wound (Soemmering von 1828; Diedrich 2011a) is another
excellent case of a skull with bite damage from Zoolithen
Cave. All three specimens have canine tooth bites damage in
the areas of the skull where carnivores/bears typically inflict
damage during predatory or defensive attacks – the head is
the main focus of attack – as in modern hyena/lion conflicts
(Diedrich 2011c, Rothschild & Diedrich 2012).
Ursus ingressus or Ursus spelaeus spelaeus – what is
the holotype skull?
Whereas the systematics of all the bears of the Zoolithen
91
P2
P3
Cracked
P3
Punctured
P4
Chewing
joints
10 cm
Cracking
shafts
A
CROCUTA
M1
P3
P4
P2
I 1-3
P1
C
Bone
P4
C
P3 P2
I 1-3
Cutting
1 cm
B
Cracking
Zig-zag margin
and triangular/oval impact marks
on compacta (distal Radius)
Chewed
Triangular
Nibbling
Catching
Elongated
Oval to round
Chewed
longbones
Chewed
3
2
1
1 cm
Zig-zag margin
and bite scratches on compacta
(distal Humerus)
Chewed
4
5
Chewed
Chewed,
nibbled
Chewed
10 cm
Chewed
7
6
Chewed
9
8
Chewed
Chewed
Cracked
11
10
Chewed
Chewed,
nibbled
C
Nibbling
stick
Cracked
longbones
Punctured
13
D
12
Nibbled
10 cm
14
E
Fig. 16: Postcranial cave bear bones from the Zoolithen Cave and damage history by chew, bite and crush damages (mainly caused by Ice Age spotted hyenas). A. Damaging of a cave bear cub femur. B. Typical triangular, oval and elongated bite mars resulting of different teeth on distally chewed longbone
shafts. C. Selected samples of chewed cave bear longbones. D. “Nibbling stick” – a bone fragment used mainly by hyena cubs for teething purposes.
E. Fragments of cracked cave bear longbones.
Abb. 16: Postcraniale Höhlenbären-Knochen aus der Zoolithenhöhle und Zerstörungsgeschichte durch Abschneiden, Verbeißen und Zerknacken (primär
verursacht durch eiszeitliche Fleckenhyänen). A. Zerstörungsgeschichte eines Jungbären-Femurs. B. Typische triangulare, ovale und längliche Bissspuren,
die von unterschiedlichen Zähnen der Hyänen herrühren und an den distalen abgefressenen Langnochenschäften zu finden sind. D. „Knabberstick“ – ein
Knochenfragment, das besonders von Junghyänen zum Abzahnen verwendet wurde. E. Langknochenfragmente zerknackter Höhlenbärenknochen.
92
Cave has not yet been completely solved, the most recent
DNA-analysis of cave bears distinguished at least two different species/subspecies, with Ursus spelaeus spelaeus
(Rabeder & Hofreiter 2004), and U. ingressus (Rabeder
& Hofreiter 2004) extant during the Late Pleistocene. The
„cave bear“ holotype (Fig. 3C) seems to belong to the latter
species/subspecies. Similar results have been published for
the Sophie’s Cave cave bears (Diedrich 2013). Finally, even
Ursus arctos (Holocene) and another brown bear type of the
Late Pleistocene seem to be represented in Zoolithen Cave.
Dating of the cave bears and species taxonomy
Some cave bear teeth in the bonebeds (Ursus spelaeus spelaeus sensu Hofreiter et al. 2001) were dated by radiocarbon reaching nearly the limit of this method (around 40.484
BP, Hofreiter et al. 2001) suggesting cave bears have used
the cave as a den until the early Late Pleistocene. Other direct and indirect dating methods, which have to be verified
with new methods, dated all bonebed material within the
early to late Late Pleistocene between “72,000–24,000” BP
(cf. Groiss et al. 1998). Rosendahl & Kempe (2004) dated
with modern methods some speleothems at the bottom of
the cave (Aufzugsschacht) and suggested a mixed bonebedfauna to range from the MIS 3–8 (late Middle Pleistocene,
late Saalian to late Late Pleistocene). However, the megafauna was present already as herein now corrected by the
rediscovery of a nearly complete Ursus deningeri skull (Fig.
8), which was misidentified as “Ursus arctoides Reichenau
1904” (brown bear, after Rosenmüller 1794). This skull is
securely dated as MIS 6–8 (late Holsteinian interglacial or
late Saalian glacial). Also the P4 tooth morphotypes (Type
A) newly presented here after first studies by Rabeder
(1999), that are intermediate between deningeroid and spelaeoid cave bears (see also Fig. 5) support the view that older cave bear populations were present. The Zoolithen Cave
is the earliest known cave bear den in Upper Franconia,
starting with cave bear denning in the cave during MIS 8-9
(Holsteinian-beginning of Saalian, Fig. 5). Using cave bear
skull morphotypes (cf. the new compiled “cave bear clock”
in Diedrich 2013b), cave bears seem to have established
peak populations during the Eemian interglacial (126,000
BP). These smaller classical cave bears (most P4 are of Type
C–D) of Ursus spelaeus eremus/spelaeus (cf. Fig. 5) occupied
the cave during the early to middle Late Pleistocene (MIS
3–5d), whereas U. ingressus forms seem to have used the
Entrance Hall during the late Late Pleistocene (32–25,000
BP), but also seem to have climbed deeper into the “Säulenhalle” (cf. Fig. 14). The cave use by carnivore and cave
bear megamammals ended with the glacial peak around
25,000 BP, following climate change, flood events and cave
entrance collapses.
E. River terrace floods (early post glacial peak of the
Latest Pleistocene)
In the largest room of the cave, the Entrance Hall, the section starts above a speleothem layer with a medium-brown,
large, well-rounded, limestone pebble layer (Fig. 4). In this
~60 cm thick layer, a few cave bear bones or teeth (also P4)
have been found only in the lower part, all dark brown (iron/
manganese mineral impregnation) in their color. Above
those gravels a dark-brown, medium-sized, dense-packed
gravel layer (including rounded reworked speleothem gravels) is similar, but the yellowish, loess-like, one meter thick
gravel sediment, is without any bone records. Those gravels
are isochronous to the bone beds. The Late Pleistocene sedimentary fluvial cycle continues with the bone beds which
vary in thickness as a result of their occurrence mainly in
the vertical shafts and its branches (Fig. 4, 14, Diedrich
2011a). The sediment between the densely-packed bones
(Fig. 15) is coarse grey-greenish mixed dolomite silt/sand,
often consisting of very small white speleothem pieces. All
the bones are in secondary positions (Groiss 1979), and
must have been washed at some places up to 30 m deep (e.g.
Wolfskammer). They are in most cases non-rounded and
even chewing marks are well preserved (Fig. 16), indicating
only short-distance and rapid redeposition within the cave.
In total, on all the megafaunal and hyena bones fluvial damage or polishing of edges is rarely observed, which supports
the idea of rapid transport of bones, not of “animals and
carcasses as described by the “great deluge flood scenario”
by Esper (1774), but who was correct in the general idea of
“floods”. The bone material was washed from two different areas and directions of the cave into its central parts
(Fig. 14). Most material must have been transported from
the Entrance Hall to the central vertical and diagonal shafts
(= Aufzugsschacht, Wühlschacht, Guloschacht, Museumsschacht, Wolfsschacht areas, Fig. 14). In the Entrance Hall,
the original bone-layers were nearly completely replaced
by the river terrace gravels, which were deposited only
in the upper layers also in the first vertical shaft, the Aufzugssschacht, but not deeper. The other flooding direction
was estimated to have washed bones from their primary
deposition site in the Dreyer Hall area into the Löwengrube
Chamber and other parts of the western cave (Fig. 14), but
there, the river gravels are absent. Nearly all the bones must
have been transported in the final Upper Pleistocene (LGM/
early Postglacial) into the middle cave part by floods due
to a highly elevated Wiesent River terrace and braided PreWiesent River system which must have risen enormously to
an elevation of 455 a.s.l. – today’s entrance level is now 130
above the today’s Wiesent River valley elevation (Diedrich
2011a), which cannot be explained by natural river terrace
stratigraphy, and only by glaciation models. The floods and
river gravels being present only as “Pre-Wiesent River terrace relicts” in only the Entrance Hall area can be dated indirectly into the high to early post high glacial period with
cave bear remains which were found below the river terrace
gravels in the Entrance Hall (Fig. 3). Those large cave bears
(bones brown in colour) are of U. ingressus which existed
about 32,000–25,000 BP in Europe (Hofreiter 2002, Pacher
& Stuart 2008, Stiller et al. 2010, Münzel et al. 2011). In
similar elevated caves (e.g. Oswald Cave, opposite Wiesent
Valley side) similar river terrace dolomite gravels are preserved again in relicts, and are absent along the steep valley
margins. The final Late Pleistocene flooding events caused
further gravitational vertical transport which caused speleothem collapses and sliding of those fragments into the vertical shafts. Different speleothem generations with different
growth angles (well seen in the Lehmgrube, Fig. 4) on such
moving speleothem slabs prove long-term mass-movement
activity.
93
A
1a
2a
Non-healed
bite
impact
Healed
bite
impact
1b
2b
10 cm
1 cm
1c
1 cm
B
3
4
1d
Bite
impact
Bite
impact
Bite
impact
Hyena den
Cave bear den
Small cave
branch
More secure zone
"Vertical shaft"
hyena antagonist
conflicts
Canis
10 cm
Ursus
Panthera
Crocuta
Panthera
Hibernation area
Crocuta
Ursus
Cave bear beds
Conflict zone
C
Mammoth steppe
Boreal forests
Absence
of Mammoth
Absence
of Cave bear
M. primigenius
P. eversmanni
Mammuthus primigenius
M. meles
3%
4%
11%
1%
26%
20%
2% 1% 7%
8%
C. c. spelaea
22%
B. priscus
6%
R. tarandus
11%
5% 2%
1% 8%
12%
1%
4%
3%
1%
1%
0,1%
G. gulo
P. pardus
0,5%
0,2%
1%
2% 1% 2%
P. l. spelaea
0,2%
2,5%
3,5% 1%
1,6%
4%
37%
1%
C. lupus
subsp. V. vulpes
0,1%
C. antiquitatis
6% 1% 6%
18%
10%
5%
94%
67%
E. c. przewalskii
91%
U. "spelaeus"
C. elaphus
M. giganteus
E. c. hydruntinus
Westeregeln, Central Germany Teufelskammer Cave, West Germany
NISP = 199
NISP = 398
Wolves, hyenas, felids
Perick Caves, West Germany
NISP = 2.275
Bilstein Cave, West Germany Zoolithen Cave, South Germany
NISP = 1.120
NISP = 6.200
Cave bear predation/scavenging specialization
of large carnivores onto cave bears
F. The Alleröd (second speleothem genesis and humid
cave)
Loose limestone gravels in the Entrance Hall area on the
top of the river gravels which are partly cemented by the
younger speleothem generation indicate a final Late Pleistocene frost impact. Speleothem dates (uranium/thorium)
94
Fig. 17: Bite pathologies on skulls and conflict model for the Zoolithen Cave. A. 1.
Senile male cave bear skull (Ursus ingressus) with bite damage in the frontal being
partly healed (UE no. 142), 2. Early adult
cave bear skull (Ursus spelaeus subsp.) with
non-healed bite damage in the frontal (UE
no. 132). B. 3. Lion Panthera leo spelaea
holotype skull with bite scratch on the saggital crest (original to Goldfuss 1810).
4. Hyena Crocuta crocuta spelaea skull
with massive bite damage on the saggital
crest (original to Soemmering 1828). Cave
model with conflict zones and antagonism
between all three large predators (lions,
hyenas, wolves) and herbivorous cave bears
hibernating as deep as possible in their den
cave to protect against the carnivores. C.
Cave bear hunt/scavenging specialization in
boreal forest mountainous regions (modified
after Diedrich 2011a).
Abb. 17: Bissverletzungen an Schädeln und
Konfliktmodell für die Zoolithenhöhle. A.
1. Seniler männlicher Höhlenbären-Schädel
(Ursus ingressus) mit teilverheilter Bissverletzung im Frontalbereich (UE no. 142),
2. Frühadulter Höhlenbärenschädel (Ursus
spelaeus subsp.) mit unverheilter Bissverletzung im Frontalbereich (UE no. 132). B. 3.
Löwen Panthera leo spelaea Holotyp-Schädel
mit Biss auf dem Scheitelkamm (Original
von Goldfuss 1810). 4. Hyäne Crocuta
crocuta spelaea-Schädel mit massivem
Bissschaden auf dem Scheitelkamm (original
von Soemmering 1828). Höhlen-Modell mit
Konfliktzonen und Antagonismus zwischen
allen drei großen Prädatoren (Löwen, Hyänen, Wölfe) und herbivoren Höhlenbären,
die tief in Höhlen zum Schutz gegen die
Raubtiere überwinterten. C. Spezialisierung
auf Höhlenbären-Jagd/Fressen in borealen
Nadelwald-Gebirgsgebieten (verändert aus
Diedrich 2011a).
of a candle stalagmite (last speleothem generation) on the
bone breccias (Aufzugsschacht) give ages on the upper and
last speleothem layer of about 11,720 ± 125 BP (older data
from 1950, see Poll 1972), which is calibrated now 13,720 ±
125 BP. Those final Upper Pleistocene aged thin candle-like
stalagmites are typical throughout the cave system (Fig. 4).
B
A
1 cm
Fig. 18: Iron Age (La Tène) and Holocene bone finds – from the dump
infron tof the cave (originating
from the Wühlschacht which was
secondary burial place). A. Human
incisive tooth and B. Human hand
phalanx I. C. Some selected pottery
sheds. D. Domestic small cattle
teeth and bones. E. Domestic or
wild pig teeth and bones.
C
D
1 cm
These seem to be the result of the latest Upper Pleistocene
Alleröd climatic change to a warmer period (13,500–12,700
BP; cf. Kempe et al. 2002). At this time, higher vadose water activity resulted the last speleothem generation all over
the Zoolithen Cave. This represents the end period of the
massive Pre-Wiesent River terrace erosion in the Pre-Wiesent Valley, now at 130 m lower elevation (measured from
Entrance Hall level). As demonstrated for Upper Franconia
during the end of the Alleröd Epipalaeolithic, human reindeer hunters had already settled on rock shelters few meters above the today’s river valley elevations (e.g. Ahorn and
Wiesent Valleys, Diedrich 2013a). Possibly the bone beds
also moved further downwards by gravity in some vertical
shafts, and must have dropped at some places up to 30 m
deep (e.g. Wolfskammer).
G. Holocene – Iron Age
The Holocene material was not well distinguished at all from
the Pleistocene bones by Groiss (1971, 1979) giving an incorrect view of the “Pleistocene forest fauna” because it included domestic or Holocene wild animal remains (cf. Fig. 18).
The Holocene bones were imported mainly by badgers, foxes
E
Abb. 18: Eisenzeit (La Tène) und
Holozän-Knochenfunde – aus der
Halde vor der Höhle (ursprünglich
aus dem Aufzugsschacht der der
Sekundärbestattungsort war). A.
Menschen-Incisivus-Zahn und
B. Menschen-Hand-Phalanx I. C.
Einige selektierte Keramikscherben. D. Kleines Hausrind, Zähne
und Knochen. E. Haus- oder Wildschwein, Zähne und Knochen.
and martens (Meles, Vulpes, Martes) to their cave den with
different animals (Felis, Lepus, Cervus, Capreolus, Sus). Also
Iron Age humans deposited domestic animal bones (Bos, Sus,
Ovis/Capra, Canis), which were left in the Aufzugssschacht
together with human bones (juvenile and adult longbones,
mainly) and pottery (Fig. 18). Also in the Entrance Hall remains of the already known La Tène (Iron Age) culture (cf.
Sommer 2006) are still present in the black sediments.
Conclusions
The sedimentological research gives a first overview of 12
accessible sections in the Zoolithen Cave along the Wiesent
River Valley (Bavaria, Upper Franconia Karst, south-Germany). The cave has three main fluvial (two underground river,
one valley river) sedimentary sequences, and two main speleothem phases. The first Neogene (Oligocene/Miocene) sediments are only found in the uppermost level of the Entrance
Hall and consist of dolomitic sand/grey clay beds resulting
from the early ponor cave stage and underground river. The
second and third levels, up to 25 m deeper, formed in further
underground rivers, which left facets and a second sedimen-
95
tary series with a yellow dolomite sand/red clay series, being
most probably of Pliocene/Early Pleistocene in age. Microtectonic structures in dolomite silt/sand layers and clay beds
document tectonic activities, such as fractured stalagmites or
a speleothem fragment layer. The top of the several meters
thick red clay has mud cracks on the surface, and bat remains, indicating a dry cave stage. This changed to a vadose
cave in which the first massive speleothem layer developed,
dated about 342,050 ± 71,400 in the late Middle Pleistocene
warm MIS 9 zone. From this time the oldest Upper Franconian cave bears, of Ursus deningeri, used the cave during
MIS 6–8 as a den site, especially during the dry late Saalian
period. The cave continued to by dry and was used mainly
during the Eemian to late Late Pleistocene (MIS 3–5e) by
cave bears for hibernation. P4 tooth morphology and skull
shapes allow the separation of three species/subspecies during the Late Pleistocene: smaller U. spelaeus eremus/spelaeus
and large U. ingressus. Two incomplete skeletons are still on
place in the middle of the cave, indicating hibernation as
deep as possible to protect against top predator attacks. Hyena clans used the Entrance Hall periodically as a cub-raising
and commuting den, and are mainly responsible for the cave
bear bone damage resulting from a scavenging specialization in boreal mountain forests regions. A large steppe lion
population indicates also those lions to have specialized on
cave bears, but with active hunts deep in the caves. Wolves
must have also sporadically used the entrance area as den
site, and must have fed on cave bears, too, as has been well
demonstrated at the nearby Sophie’s Cave. All megafaunal
bones are of a boreal forest assemblage accumulated mainly
in the Entrance and Dreyer Hall areas. At the High Glacial
(= LGM, about 20,000 BP), a possible valley glacier situation model is presented here using three cave sites and sedimentary sequences around Muggendorf. Pottenstein and
Kirchahorn. The Pre-Wiesent River valley was filled only at
Muggendorf and the terrace built at 455 a.s.l. In the other areas, glauconitic sandy clays/gravels were found only at 410
a.s.l. elevation (Sophie’s Cave, Große Teufels Cave), which
makes correlations difficult. The dewatering direction might
also have been opposite of the today’s direction but more
cave sections are needed to develop a more detailed model.
The dolomite gravels are found today only as relicts in the
caves on both valley sides around Muggendorf. In the Zoolithen Cave, the gravels replaced at least parts of the bone
beds in the Entrance Hall, when the bones were washed by
flood events into the middle part of the cave and, also from
another side of a today’s blocked entrance close to Dreyer
Hall. This bone material was transported into the Löwengrube, Bärenkammer, and other parts surrounding the Lehmhalle and contains nearly no hyena, lion or wolf remains
– those mainly used the Entrance Hall area. Stronger corrosion on speleothems (especially well below Dreyer Hall)
and collapsed speleothem plateaus underline the massive
flood impact at the end of the Ice Age (around LGM/Postglacial). Most of the bones were redeposited quickly by those
floods (glacier melting waters and seasonally in spring time)
in some cave parts and accumulated mainly in the vertical
shafts and branching areas where they built up into bone
beds several meters thick. With such an unexpected high
river terrace position (if those gravels are river terrace layers and not side moraine till deposits flooded over glaciers
96
into the caves), and high ground water level at the LGM, the
“great deluge theory” of Esper becomes nearly “true” – he
was right about the floods, but not with the transport of “live
animals and complete carcasses” – indeed only animal bones
were washed into the deeper parts of the cave.
There are no “Ice Age human” (Neanderthal or Cromagnons: Middle to Late Palaeolithics) records from the cave.
After the floods the river terrace moved rapidly down (also
demonstrated at Sophie’s and Große Teufels caves – 50 meters deep erosion LGM/Post LGM) which can only be explained by the presence of valley glacier. Water masses from
these valley glaciers caused the steep valley morphology and
130 m of lowering within only about 10,000 years. Finally
at the end of the Ice Age in the in the Alleröd humid phase,
another speleothem generation with typical candle-like speleothems developed in the Zoolithen Cave around 13,720 ±
125 BP. During the Holocene, in the first and second vertical
shafts (Aufzugsschacht), Iron Age La Tène humans left numerous secondary burials (skulls and long bones with pottery and after-life food animal donations), but those were
thrown only into the first deep vertical shaft. Many new
finds of human bones including children and old persons
found between the old excavation bone dumps, prove the
use of this cave and surrounding caves (e.g. Esper Cave), as
burial places – but only in the vertical shafts, this being typical for that time.
Remarks to the future – problems of cave protection
and fossil collection
In the dump in front of the cave today, visitors are able to
take “souvenirs”, whereas professionals are prevented from
saving remaining small bones and teeth by the “Archaeological Monument Survey of Bavaria” legislation. These remains
are potentially important for the “region” (local museums
project) and an international Natural Monument and potential UNESCO-world fossil heritage site designation. The
cave is still in private hands and under control of the FHKF
(rented the cave from recent owner). The public collections
of the University Erlangen and Urweltmuseum Oberfranken
or the Museum Tüchersfeld remain difficult to access, even
for professionals, whereas even the Ministry of Culture and
Education does not act at all positively. More positively, the
Bavarian Landtag recently discussed the problems of collection accessibility in Bavarian Museums and Universities, the
protection of the excavation spoil dump and the proposal of
the author to make a “paleontological/archaeological” monument by purchasing the cave by the province and thereby
preserving Europe’s most famous Pleistocene cave fossil site
(protection rejected by the Bavarian Landtag Petition no.
HO.0594.16).
Acknowledgements
Access to the historic Rosenmüller collection of the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin of the Humboldt University was
possible due to PD Dr. O. Hampe. Dr. B. Hilpert supported
the study of the Groiss material from 1971 in the University
Erlangen. The material study in the Goldfuss-Museum of
the Rheinische Wilhelms University Bonn of the Goldfuss
collection was possible by Dr. G. Heumann. The curator A.
Currant of the Pleistocene collection in the British Museum
of Natural History London gave access to the material from
the Zoolithen Cave. Bone material was studied with support
of T. Rathgeber in the Staatliches Naturhistorisches Museum Stuttgart. Dr. R. Rabold supported the work on the Graf
zu Muenster collection in the Urweltmuseum Oberfranken
in Bayreuth. H. Buchhaupt allowed to the author to figure
material from his private collection. I thank especially J. and
M. Conrad, B. Nerreter, H. Schabdach, M. Harder, and
others of the Forschungsgruppe Höhle und Karst Franken
e.V. Nürnberg for the new exploration and cave survey support and collection access, and also when History Channel
was filming the “lions of the Zoolithen Cave” there in 2010.
Furthermore I thank Dr. F. Knolle and D. Mol for their critical and helpful reviews of the first manuscript draft such as
Prof Dr. D. McFarlane for a spell-check and comment support of the final version. Final supporting comments were
made by PD Dr. H. Freund.
References
Brand, F. (2006): Was können wir aus lehmigen Ablagerungen der Binghöhle ablesen? – In: Brand, F., Illmann, R., Leja, F., Preu, D. & Schabdach, H. (eds.), Die Binghöhle bei Streitberg – Auf den Spuren eines
unterirdischen Flusses: 28−34.
Brunner, G. (1933): Eine präglaziale Fauna aus dem Windloch bei Sackdilling (Oberpfalz). – Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Geologie und Paläontologie, B 71: 303–328.
Brunner, G. (1954): Das Fuchsloch bei Siegmannsbrunn (Oberfr.), eine
mediterrane Riss-Würm-Fauna. – Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und
Paläontologie Abhandlungen, 100: 83–118.
Buckland, W. (1823): Reliquiae Diluvianae, or observations on the organic
remains contained in caves, fissures, and diluvial gravel, and other geological phenomena, attesting the action of an universal deluge. – 303
pp.; London (Murray).
Burger, D. (1989): Dolomite weathering and micromorphology of paleosoils in the Frankonian Jura. – Catena Supplementaria, 15: 261–267.
Diedrich, C. (2008): The holotypes of the upper Pleistocene Crocuta crocuta
spelaea (Goldfuss 1823: Hyaenidae) and Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810: Felidae) of the Zoolithen Cave hyena den (South Germany)
and their palaeo-ecological interpretation. – Zoological Journal of the
Linnean Society London, 154: 822–831.
Diedrich, C. (2009): The rediscovered cave bear “Ursus spelaeus Rosenmüller 1794” holotype of the Zoolithen Cave (Germany) from the historic Rosenmüller collection. – Acta Carsologica Slovacia, 47 (1): 25–32.
Diedrich, C. (2011a): The late Pleistocene spotted hyena Crocuta crocuta
spelaea (Goldfuss 1823) with its type specimens from the Zoolithen
Cave at Gailenreuth (Bavaria, South Germany): a hyena cub rising den
of specialised cave bear scavengers in boreal forest environments of
Central Europe. – Historical Biology, 23(4): 335–367.
Diedrich, C. (2011b): The largest European lion Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss) population from the Zoolithen Cave, Germany – specialized cave
bear predators of Europe. – Historical Biology, 23 (2–3): 271–311.
Diedrich, C. (2011c): Cave bear killers and scavengers from the last ice age
of central Europe: Feeding specializations in response to the absence
of mammoth steppe fauna from mountainous regions. – Quaternary
International, 255: 59–78.
Diedrich, C. (2011d): The Late Pleistocene Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss
1810) skeletons from the Sloup and Srbsko Caves in Czech Republic
(central Europe) and contribution to steppe lion cranial pathologies and
postmortally damages as results of interspecies fights, hyena antagonism and cave bear attacks. – Bulletin of Geosciences, 86(4): 817–840.
Diedrich, C. (2013a): Ice Age geomorphological Ahorn Valley and Ailsbach
River terrace evolution– and its importance for the cave use possibilities by cave bears, top predators (hyenas, wolves and lions) and humans (Late Magdalénians) in the Frankonia Karst – case studies in the
Sophie’s Cave near Kirchahorn, Bavaria. – E&G Quaternary Science
Journal, 62(2): 162–174.
Diedrich, C. (2013b): Evolution, Horste, Taphonomie und Prädatoren der
Rübeländer Höhlenbären, Harz (Norddeutschland). – Mitteilungen des
Verbandes der deutschen Höhlen- und Karstforscher, 59(1): 4–29.
Diedrich, C. (2013c): Late Ice Age wolves as cave bear scavengers in the Sophie’s Cave of Germany – extinctions of cave bears as result of climate/
habitat change and large carnivore predation stress in Europe. – ISRN
Zoology 2013: 1–25.
Diedrich, C. (2014): Palaeopopulations of Late Pleistocene top predators in
Europe: Ice Age spotted hyenas and steppe lions in battle and competition about prey. – Paleontology Journal, 2014: 1–34.
Esper, J.F. (1774): Ausführliche Nachricht von neu entdeckten Zoolithen
unbekannter vierfüssiger Thiere und denen sie enthaltenden, so wie
verschiedenen andern, denkwürdigen Grüften der Obergebürgischen
Lande des Markgrafthums Bayreuth. – 148 pp.; Nürnberg.
Gibbard, P.L., & Cohen, K.M. (2009): Global Chronostratigraphical correlation table for the last 2.7 million years. – Episodes, 31(2): 243–247.
Goldfuss, G.A. (1810): Die Umgebungen von Muggendorf. Ein Taschenbuch für Freunde der Natur und Altertumskunde. – 351 pp.; Erlangen.
Goldfuss, G.A. (1818): Beschreibung eines fossilen Vielfrassschädels aus
der Geilenreuther Höhle. − Nova Acta Physico-Medica Academiea
Caesarae Leopoldino-Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum, 11: 313−322.
Goldfuss, G.A. (1821): Osteologische Beiträge zur Kenntnis verschiedener
Saugethiere der Vorwelt: IV. − Ueber den Schaedel des Hoehlenloewen.
Verhandlungen der kaiserlichen leopoldinischen carolinaeischen Akademie der Naturfreunde. 10(2): 489−494.
Goldfuss, G.A. (1823): Osteologische Beiträge zur Kenntnis verschiedener
Säugethiere der Vorwelt. VI. Ueber die Hölen-Hyäne (Hyaena spelaea).
− Nova Acta Physico-Medica Academiea Caesarae Leopoldino-Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum, 3(2): 456−490.
Groiss, J.T. (1971): Paläontologische Untersuchungen in der Zoolithenhöhle
bei Burggaillenreuth – ein vorläufiger Bericht. – Erlanger Forschungen
Reihe B Naturwissenschaften, 5: 79–93.
Groiss, J.T. (1978): Über pathologische Bildungen an Skelettresten jungquartärer Säugetiere aus der Zoolithenhöhle bei Burggaillenreuth. −
Geologische Blätter NO-Bayern, 28(1): 1−21.
Groiss, J.T. (1979): Geologische und paläontologische Untersuchungen in
der Zoolithenhöhle. − Geologische Blätter NO-Bayern, 29(1): 26−50.
Groiss, J.T. (1996): Der Höhlentiger Panthera tigris spelaea (Goldfuss). –
Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte 1996(7):
399–414.
Groiss, J.T., Kamphausen, D., Michel, U. (1998): Höhlen der nördlichen
Fränkischen Alb: Entwicklung, Fauna, Karst-Hydrologie. – Erlanger geologische Abhandlungen, Sonderband 2: 161–168.
Habbe, K.-A. (1989): Der Karst der Fränkischen Alb – Formen, Prozesse,
Datierungsprobleme. Die Fränkische Alb. – Schriften des Zentralen Institutes für fränkische Landeskunde Universität Erlangen, 28: 35–69.
Heller, F. (1966): Die berühmten Knochenhöhlen des fränkischen Jura und
das Schicksal ihres Fundinhaltes. Nach zeitgenössischen Berichten und
Quellen. – Berichte der Naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft Bayreuth,
12: 5−20.
Heller, F. (1972): Die Forschungen in der Zoolithenhöhle bei Burggaillenreuth von Esper bis zur Gegenwart. – Erlanger Forschungen B Naturwissenschaften, 5: 7−56.
Hofreiter, M., Jaenicke, V., Serre, D., Haeseler Av. A. & Pääbo, S. (2001):
DNA sequences from multiple amplifications reveal artefacts induced
by cytosine deamination in ancient DNA. – Nucleic Acids Research,
29: 4793–4799.
Hofreiter, M. (2002): Genetic stability and replacement in late Pleistocene
cave bear populations. – Abhandlungen zur Karst- und Höhlenkunde,
34: 64−67.
Jennings, J.N. (1985): Karst Geomorphology. – 293 pp.; Oxford (Blackwell).
Kaulich, B. & Schaaf, H. (1993): Kleiner Führer zu den Höhlen um Muggendorf. – 125 pp.; Nürnberg.
Kempe, S., Rosendahl, W., Wiegand, B. & Eisenhauer, A. (2002): New speleothem dates from caves in Germany and their importance for the
Middle and Upper Pleistocene climate reconstruction. – Acta Geologica
Polonica, 52(1): 55–61.
Neischl, A. (1904): Die Höhlen der Fränkischen Schweiz und ihre Bedeutung für die Entstehung der dortigen Täler. – 95 pp.; Nürnberg (Schrag).
Niggemeyer, B. & Schubert, D. (1972): Neuentdeckungen in der Zoolithenhöhle bei Burggaillenreuth. – Erlanger Forschungen B Naturwissenschaften, 5: 57–62.
Meyer, R.K.F. & Schmidt-Kaler, H. (1992): Wanderungen in die Erdgeschichte (5). Durch die Fränkische Schweiz. – 167 pp.; München (PfeilVerlag).
Münzel, S.C., Stiller, M., Hofreiter, M. Mittnik, A., Conard, N.J., Bocherens, H. (2011): Pleistocene bears in the Swabian Jura (Germany):
Genetic replacement, ecological displacement, extinctions and survival.
− Quaternary International, 245(2): 225–237.
97
Pacher, M. & Stuart, A.J. (2008): Extinction chronology and palaeobiology
of the cave bear (Ursus spelaeus). – Boreas, 38(2): 189−206.
Poll, K.G. (1972): Die Zoolithenhöhle bei Burggaillenreuth und ihre Beziehung zum fränkischen Höhlen- und Kluftsystem. – Erlanger Forschungen B Naturwissenschaften, 5: 63−76.
Rabeder, G. (1999): Die Evolution des Höhlenbärgebisses. – Mitteilung der
Kommission für Quartärforschung der Österreichischen Akademie der
Wissenschaften, 11: 1−102.
Rabeder, G. & Hofreiter, M. (2004): Der neue Stammbaum der Höhlenbären. − Die Höhle, 55: 1−19.
Rosendahl, W. & Kempe, S. (2004): New geological and palaeontological
investigations in the Zoolithen Cave, southern Germany. – Cahiers scientifiques Muséum Lyon, 2: 69−74.
Rosenmüller, J.C. (1794): Quedam de ossibus fossilibus animalis cuiusdam, historiam eius et cognitionem accuratiorem illustrantia, dissertatio, quam d. 22. Octob. 1794 ad disputandum proposuit Ioannes Christ.
Rosenmüller Heßberga-Francus, LL.AA.M. in Theatro anatomico Lipsiensi Prosector assumto socio Io. Chr. Aug. Heinroth Lips. Med. Stud.
Cum tabula aenea. – 1−34; Leipzig.
Rothschild, B.M. & Diedrich, C. (2012): Comparison of pathologies in the
extinct Pleistocene Eurasian steppe lion Pantherea leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) to those in the modern lion, Panthera leo – Results of fights
with hyenas, bears and lions and other ecological stress. – International
Journal of Paleopathology, (in press) DOI: 0.1016/j.ijpp.2012.09.004
98
Stiller, M., Baryshnikov, G., Bocherens, H., Grandal d’Anglade, A.,
Hilpert, B., Munzel, S.C., Pinhasi, R, Rabeder, G., Rosendahl, W.,
Trinkaus, E., Hofreiter, M., Knapp, M. (2010): Withering away 25,000 years of genetic decline preceded cave bear extinction. − Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27(5): 975−978.
Soemmerring, S.T. von (1828): Über die geheilte Verletzung eines fossilen
Hyänenschädels. − Nova Acta physico-medica Academiae Caesar Leopoldiana, 14: 1−44.
Sommer, C.S. (2006): Archäologie in Bayern – Fenster zur Vergangenheit.
Zusammengestellt von C. Sebastian Sommer 25 Jahre nach Gründung
der Gesellschaft für Archäologie in Bayern. – 336 pp.; Regensburg (Verlag Friedrich Pustet).
Spöcker, R.G. (1952): Zur Landschafts-Entwicklung im Karst des oberen
und mittleren Pegnitz-Gebietes. – 60 pp.;, Remagen (Verlag des Amtes
für Landeskunde).
Stiller, M., Baryshnikov, G., Bocherens, H., Grandal d‘Anglade, A.,
Hilpert, B., Munzel, S.C., Pinhasi, R., Rabeder, G., Rosendahl, W.,
Trinkaus, E., Hofreiter, M. & Knapp, M. (2010): Withering away –
25,000 years of genetic decline preceded cave bear extinction. – Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27(5): 975–978.
Weiss, G.W. (1937): Bayreuth als Stätte alter erdgeschichtlicher Entdeckungen. – 48 pp.; Bayreuth (Gauverlag Bayerische Ostmark).
White, W.B. (2007): Cave sediments and paleoclimate. – Journal of Cave
and Karst Studies, 69(1): 76–93.

- Quaternary Science Journal

Transcription

Similar documents

Oh, Malawi!

südafrika südafrika - das land der kontraste das

Neue Montagehalle: Offizielle Einweihung

Versunkene Kulturen III

No/Nr: 25.

Literatur zum Schwerpunktmodul I (03-ARC

pdf-version - Mensch werden - mensch

Prag in Bewegung - Prague City Tourism

Zum Verhältnis von Gender Mainstreaming und

Hinterlandwoche 2010 - Arbeitsgemeinschaft Höhle und Karst

- Altstadtverein Bad Wildungen

Hochwertige Zahn-Implantate nach dem sanften MIMI®

Datei in EST hochladen - EST

philippinen - LOGO! Reisen

Funde fossiler Säugetierknochen im Blauhöhlensystem

Mitteilungen

Wo wurd`s gefunden? - Duwe

19. Juni 2016 - Lutherstadt Eisleben