Prof. Dr. Manfred Dietel
Transcription
Prof. Dr. Manfred Dietel
Fortschritte in der personalisierten Medizin M. Dietel Institute of Pathology (Rudolf-Virchow-Haus) Humboldt University, Berlin Rudolf Virchow 1821 - 1902 1710 - 2010 e-mail: [email protected] 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 1 Allgemeine Definition Es geht nicht darum, für einen Patienten ein individuell predictive maßgeschneidertes Medikament zu tests based entwickeln und dann zu verabreichen. on reliable BM Definition in der Onkologie Unter personalisierter Medizin in der Onkologie wird die durch die Arzneimittelzulassungsbehörde bindend vorgeschriebene prädiktive Biomarker-basierte Diagnostik als Voraussetzung zur Applikation eines zielgerichteten Arzneimittels verstanden. Es wird also vor Gabe eines Medikamentes der Nachweis seiner Wirksamkeit gefordert (compagnon diagnostic). FDA: Drug-Diagnostic Co-development Initiative 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 3 Prediction is difficult, especially about the future Niels Bohr, 1885-1962 2010 Thinking back to infectious diseases and seeing the current development in cancer – HER2, KRAS, BRAF, EGFR etc. - we shouldn’t be too pessimistic. In oncology, the predictive power of tissue based analyses is underestimated. 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 4 Predictive tissue-based biomarkers for targeted therapies FDA / EMA-approved drugs associated with eligibility tests* (selection) • Trastuzumab → metastatic breast cancer, overexpression/amplification of HER-2 • Cetuximab → metastatic colorectal cancer, overexpressing EGFR/wild-type KRAS • Panitumumab → now, colorectal KRAS a (mutation excluded) Already incancer 35%with of wild-type all tumors predictive • Gefitinib → non-small cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR • is appropriate. Notably, molecular Erlotinib → non-smalltest cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR • Crizotinib → non-small cell lung cancer with mutated EML4-ALK • Nimotuzumab → metastatic colorectal cancer (still experimental) • Lapatinib → metastatic breast cancer overexpression HER-2/neu (?) • Vemurafenib (PX4032) → malignant melanoma with mutated B-RAF • All→these substances(activated have PK), been Imatinib CML, bcr/abl–positive • Imatinib → GIST with activated c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase/CD117, exon 9 mut • Rituximab (+ CHOP), Y90-Ibritumomab, I131-Tositumomab → NHLymphoma with CD20 • Gemtuzumab-Ozogamicin AML importance with CD33 ( > 60 yrs.), mal. melanoma This underlines→ the of biobanks. • Tamoxifen+/- chemo → ER+/HER2 - breast cancer, mutation pattern - multigene assays prediction of tumour response is exclusively tissue-based. developed on the basis of histologically characterised human tissue. *Strongly suggested by FDA’s Drug-Diagnostic Co-Development Initiative 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 5 Recommendations for sample preparation and molecular analysis Surgery Surgical Pathology tumour resection grossing paraffin embedding histological evaluation Oncological treatment manualmicrodissection microdissection manual Molecular Pathology DNA isolation amplification detection 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 6 Manual microdissection Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin Director: Prof. M. Dietel To Dr. ########## ############# Charitéplatz 1 10117 Berlin Tel. 0049 30 450 536 001 Fax 0049 30 450 536 900 E-mail: [email protected] Incoming XXXXX Name Birth Molecular pathology report Combined Report on Anatomic and Molecular Pathology Without manual microdissection the error rate can be Material: external colon biopsy, FFPE - block no. ##### -10 up to 8%* due only to inadequate samples, Clinical Data: Met. ### cancer ### independent of any technicalHistopath.: problems Malignant epithelial ………. Weichert W et al. J Mol Diagn;12:35-42 BRAFV600mut Nerv Forward Automated DNA extraction Reverse Sequencing Mol. analysis: KRAS mutation GGTGGC to GATGGC (ca. 40%) XXXXX Combined patho-report: Metastasized adenocarcinoma of the ##### with ### mutation as indicated. Pathologist………………….. 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 7 Die aktuell immer wieder gestellte Frage … Sind die Ergebnisse so überzeugend, dass der enorme Aufwand und die exorbitanten Kosten der onkologsch orientierten PM gerechtfertigt sind? •Kosten der F&E ca. 2 Mrd.€ pro neue Substanz •Kosten pro Therapiezyklus ca. 30-40 T€ Die aktuell immer wieder gestellte Frage Was sind überzeugende Ergebnisse? Einige Beispiele ……….. Ulzeriertes Dickdarmkarzinom Dieser Tumor bzw. seine Metastasen können mit einem zielgerichteten Medikament (therapeutischer AK) behandelt werden, wenn mittels molekularer Analysen ein KRAS-Wildtyp nachgewiesen wurde. Warum? KRAS-MAPK signalling pathway Y Y Ligands Panitumumab and cetuximab inhibit ligand binding, dimerisation, activation of the receptor and the signalling pathway EGFR KRAS mutant KRAS (Wild-type) RAF MEK Mutant KRAS constitutively active – 40% of patients* ERK ELK Activation of • Proliferation • Angiogenesis • Malignant phenotype 09.10.2013 Nucleus Schubbert S et al. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:295-308; für Pathologie Charité Berlin *Friday BB, Adjei Institut AA. Biochim. Biophys.–Acta. 2005; 1756:127-144. 11 Metastasierte Colon-Ca: Wild-type/mut KRAS/BSC 1.0 Proportion Event Free (%) 0.9 Pmab + BSC WT BSC alleine Pmab + BSC Mut 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 115/124 (93) 114/119 (96) 12,3 7,3 76/84 (90) 7,4 HR = 0,45 (95% CI: 0,34–0,59) Stratified log-rank, P < 0,0001 0.4 0.3 Events N (%) Median (weeks) 16 weeks 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 Weeks Patients at Risk Pmab + BSC 124 119 112 106 80 69 63 58 50 45 44 44 33 25 21 20 17 13 13 13 10 7 7 6 5 5 BSC alleine 119 109 91 81 38 20 15 15 14 11 10 9 9 6 6 6 6 5 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 Amado R, et al. ESMO 2007;a0007; JCO, 26 (2008 1626-1634 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin, Campus Mitte Treatment efficacy - according to mut status In CRC ca. 55% are KRAS wild type. Out of these only ca. 50% (i.e. 25% of all CRC) respond to EGFR antibodies. Why? How can they be detected or stratified? 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 13 Mutations in KRAS and NRAS genes in colorectal cancer KRAS 1 2 3 4 12/13 59/61 117/146 40% 4% 6% 2 3 4 12/13 59/61 117/146 3.5% 4% 0% 5 6 exon mutation position frequency NRAS 1 non-coding exon coding exon 09.10.2013 5 6 7 exon mutation position frequency When the rare mutations are added they represent 17.5 % of all CRC and they are associated with resistance! Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 14 20020408 Trial RAS (Exon 4) Analysis PFS in Patients with WT RAS* mCRC Events n/N (%) Median weeks (95% CI) Panitumumab + BSC (n=73) 70 (96) 14.1 (10.3–23.3) BSC (n=63) 61 (97) 7.0 (6.0–7.4) 100 90 80 70 HR=0.36 (95% Cl: 0.25–0.52) p<0.001 Proportion Event-Free % 60 50 40 30 20 22 weeks 10 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 Weeks *WT KRAS and NRAS exons 2, 3, and 4 Patterson SD, et al. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 3617). NSCLC - Macroscopy aeno carcinoma broncho-alveolar type Für diese Tumoren kommt eine Therapie mit Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitoren in Betracht, wenn im Einzelfall bestimmte Mutationen nachgewiesen werden können. central squamous cell carcinoma peripheral adenocarcinoma NSCLC: Past and Current Landscape 1999 Histology-driven selection1 2012 Targeting oncogenic drivers NO MUTATION DETECTED Adenocarcinoma Squamous-cell carcinoma Large cell carcinoma AKT1 NRAS MEK1 MET AMP HER2 PIK3CA BRAF 2% DOUBLE MUTANTS 3% EML4-ALK 7% KRAS 22% EGFR 17% Actionable driver mutations identified in 54% of lung adenocarcinoma tumours LCMC, Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium 09.10.2013 Kris MG, et al. Presented at ASCO 2011; Abstract CRA7506 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 17 Rapid Responses Seen In Some Patients Ou et al. J Thoracic Oncol 2010;5:2044–2046 Camidge RD et al.: ASCO 2011 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 18 Tumour responses to crizotinib by patient Decrease or increase from baseline (%) 100 Study A8081001 N=1161 PROFILE 1005 N=2402* 100 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 –20 –20 –40 –40 –60 –60 –80 –80 –100 –100 Best objective response according to RECIST: PD SD PR 1. Camidge DR, et al. Lancet Oncol 2012;10:1011−9; 2. Kim DW, et al. Presented at ASCO 2012; Abstract 7533 09.10.2013 CR *Mature population, excluding those with early death, indeterminate response and non-measurable disease Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 19 EML4-ALK Fusion in NSCLC Chromosom 2 ALK EML4 Anaplastic lymphoma kinase Exon20 Exon13 constitutive activation Alk 11 variants EML4 20 13 PF02341066 20 20 20 6a, b EML4-Alk EGFRwt KRASwt Modified according to Soda et al. nature 448:561 (2007). Institut für Pathologie – Charité Campus Mitte ALK EML4 Anaplastic lymphoma kinase Exon20 Alk 09.10.2013 Exon13 EML4 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 21 E23002-11_ALK-BA Malignant Melanoma 50% of all malignant melanomas exhibit a BRAF-Mutation *Total V600 mutation rate for BRIM-3 (cobas® 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test); 9.9% of the cobas-positive cases subjected to retrospective Sanger sequencing had V600K mutations 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 22 Overall survival (%) Vemurafenib phase I overall survival: Updated KM estimates (08. 2011) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 year 2 years BRAF-mutated — V600E dose escalation (n=16) — Extension (n=32) — WT or sub-therapeutic exposure (n=33) wild-type 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 Median OS (month) Time since first dose (months) Extension cohort landmark Estimated survival: 1 year = 50%, 2 years = 38% 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin Dose escalation 25.2 Extension 13.8 WT or sub-therapeutic. 4.18 23 Vemurafenib inhibits V600 mutated BRAF kinase Response to BRAF-inhibitors is given only if a BRAF mutation is present This has to be tested prior to the therapy. 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 24 Vemurafenib inhibits V600 mutated BRAF kinase RTK RAS 50-60%* of melanomas RAFV600mut BRAF ATP • Constitutive activation is independent of extracellular factors VEMURAFENIB (PLX4032, RG7204, RO5185426) MEK-IB MEK ATP • Not responsive to normal regulatory signals ERK Cellular Proliferation Cellular Survival *Total V600 mutation rate for BRIM-3 (cobas® 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test); 9.9% of the cobas-positive cases subjected to retrospective Sanger sequencing had V600K mutations Presented in Vienna at ESMO 09/2012: Flaherty (NEJM, 2012): OS from 5.8 months with monotherapy to 9.9 months with combinational targeted therapy. Institut für Pathologie – Charité Campus Mitte Next Steps in Molecular Pathology – Multigene Assays in Breast Cancer • Multi-gene analyses, predictive molecular pathology and response to chemotherapy in breast cancer • Which patient with ER+ and Her2 neg. breast carcinoma will show a good prognosis when treated by endocrine therapy only?“ 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 27 EPclin: Validation ABCSG-6 – mol. + clin. EP 1 96% 0.8 78% Martin Filipits, Margaretha Rudas, Raimund Jakesz, et al. 0.6 Following the EPclin-based predictive data 96% of the A new molecular predictor of distant recurrence in low-risk patients do not show-up with metastases P < 0.001 ER-positiveHER2-negative breast cancer adds 0.4 independent information to conventional after 10 years.HR 7.97 (3.56-17.83) clinical risk factors. Clin Cancer Res Published OnlineFirst August 1, 2011. 0.2 EPclin low EPclin high 0 0 20 40 numbers at risk: 09.10.2013 60 80 months 100 120 208 200 194 129 120 114 91 170 156 141 87 76 71 57 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 28 Stratification by EndoPredictclin ® 1702 Patientinnen in ABCSG 6 & 8 nach S3-Leitlinien 248 Pat. „low risk“* 5,3 % Metastasen w/o Endopredict these patients may have recieved CTx 09.10.2013 1.371 Pat. „intermed. risk“* 840 EPclin „low risk“ 4,5 % Metastasen 531 EPclin „high risk“ 83 Pat. „high risk“* 44,5 % Metastasen 19,7 % Metastasen *nach S3-Leitlinien Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 29 A look into the future, exemplified by a current case 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 30 Up-coming Molecular Diagnostic histological diagnosis metastasized neuro-endocrine carcinoma, grade 3 standard sequential molecular diagnostics KRAS BRAF EGFR exons 18,19, 21 cKIT usw. parallel molecular diagnostics IonAmpliseq* Cancer Panel in 46 gene (total 604 loci). other relevant mutations no mutations ???? *Ion Torrent 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 31 Proprietary Semiconductor Sequencing Technology Ion Torrent®, the chip is the mashine If a nucleotide, for example a C, is added to a DNA template and is then incorporated into a strand of DNA, a hydrogen ion will be released. The charge from that ion will change the pH of the solution, which can be detected by our proprietary ion sensor. 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 32 Up-coming Molecular Diagnostic histological diagnosis metastasized neuro-endocrine carcinoma, grade 3 standard sequential molecular diagnostics parallel molecular diagnostics KRAS BRAF EGFR exons 18,19, 21 cKIT usw. IonAmpliseq* Cancer Panel in 46 gene (total 604 loci). ABL APC ALK KRAS BRAF no mutations Iressa ⇒ EGFR mut exon 20 ERBB2 FGFR2 mut FGFR-inhibitor ⇒ FGFR3 cKIT sorafinib/sufitinib ⇒ KDL mut 604 further loci……. *Ion Torrent 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 33 Clinical data tissue Digital pathology wild type normal + mutated Personalisierte (Onko-)Medizin basiert auf einer All test are done on formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue komplexen diagnostischen Prozedur, die Pathologie und Klinik gleichermaßen zu erfüllen haben. Multigene Weitere Fortschritte, z.B. neue Substanzen, neue SubstanzAssays Kombinationen, weitere Tumorentitäten etc., werden im Verbund von Akademia und forschender Pharma-Industrie in den kommenden Jahren erreicht werden. 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 34 Institute of Pathology, Institut für Pathologie, Rudolph-Virchow-Haus, Charité Rudolf-Virchow-Haus, Charité Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Berliner Medizinhistorisches Museum Berlin Wall The Berliner Mauer Alexander Ufer Institut für Pathologie – Charité, Berlin, Campus Mitte 35 Multidisciplinary cooperation enables personalised oncology Cohorts: Clinical Trials Tumour Registries Radiology Sampling Tumour board Endoscopy Surgery Patient Oncologist Targeted therapies pre-analytic Predictive biomarkers Results Diagnosis IHC Pathology QA/QC I+D+i In situ hybridization PC R Publications Consensus Teaching Conde E, et al. Clin Transl Oncol 2013;15:503–8; AMP Whole Genome Analysis WG. J Mol Diagn 2011;13:249–51 09.10.2013 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin 36 Three Cellular RAS Genes Encode Four Highly Homologous 21 kD Proteins Hypervariable region G domain P loop 12 Switch I 13 Switch II 61 1 189 KRAS4A C CIIM 12 13 61 1 188 KRAS4B KKKKKK 12 13 CVIM 61 1 189 NRAS C 1 12 10 13 16 32 38 61 59 67 85 165 CVVM 189 HRAS C C 09.10.2013 CVLS 37 Institut für Pathologie – Charité Berlin *Boxes at the bottom of each isoform representation show the conserved residues in magenta and the variable residues in pink. Adapted from Schubbert S, et al. Nat Rev Cancer 2007; 7:295-308. 20020408 Trial RAS (Exon 4) Analysis PFS in Patients with WT KRAS Exon 2 mCRC Events n (%) Median weeks (95% CI) Panitumumab + BSC (n=124) 115 (93) 12.3 (8.3–16.1) BSC (n=119) 114 (96) 7.3 (7.0–7.7) 100 90 80 70 HR=0.45 (95% Cl: 0.34–0.59) p<0.001 Proportion Event-Free % 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 Weeks Patterson SD, et al. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 3617); 1. Amado RG, et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:1626-34. Overall Survival Kaplan-Meier Plot in Patients with Non-Mutated RAS Overall 20020408 Trial RAS (Exon 4) Analysis PFS in Patients with MT RAS* Exon mCRC Events n/N (%) Median weeks (95% CI) Panitumumab + BSC (n=99) 90 (91) 7.4 (7.3–7.7) BSC (n=114) 108 (95) 7.3 (6.4–7.9) 100 90 80 70 HR=0.97 (95% Cl: 0.73–1.29) p=0.729 Proportion Event-Free % 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 86 Weeks *MT in any KRAS and NRAS exons 2, 3, and 4 Patterson SD, et al. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 3617). Predictive Molecular Pathology and Personalized Medicine A prerequisite of personalized medicine is the capability to predict pre-therapeutically the response of individual tumors to certain (targeted) drug. For this prediction one needs reliable and reproducible biomarker and predictive assays. This is the current challenge of predictive molecular pathology.