Bibliography Ulrike Aust - Department für Kognitionsbiologie

Bibliography Ulrike Aust - Department für Kognitionsbiologie

Bibliography Ulrike Aust
Published papers
[1]
Huber, L., Aust, U., Michelbach, G., Ölzant, S., & Nowotny, R. (1999).
Limits of symmetry conceptualization in pigeons. The Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 351-379.
[2]
Troje, N. F., Huber, L., Loidolt, M., Aust, U. & Fieder, M. (1999).
Categorical learning in pigeons: The role of texture and shape in
complex static stimuli. Vision Research, 39, 353-366.
[3]
Huber, L., Troje, N. F., Loidolt, M., Aust, U., & Grass, D. (2000). Natural
categorization through multiple feature learning in pigeons. The
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53B, 343-357.
[4]
Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2001). The role of item-and category-specific
information in the discrimination of people versus nonpeople images
by pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 29, 107-119.
[5]
Huber, L., & Aust, U. (2001). The relevance of evolution, species
comparison, color, and categorization for the object identity problem.
Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 20, 221229.
[6]
Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2002). Target-defining features in a “peoplepresent/people-absent” discrimination task by pigeons. Animal
Learning & Behavior, 30, 165-176.
[7]
Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2003). Elemental versus configural perception in a
people-present/people-absent discrimination task by pigeons. Learning
& Behavior, 31 (3), 213-224.
[8]
Loidolt, M., Aust, U., Meran, I. & Huber, L. (2003). Pigeons use itemspecific and category-level information in the identification and
categorization of human face stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 261-276.
[9]
Aust, U. & Huber, L. (2006). Does the use of natural stimuli facilitate
amodal completion in pigeons? Perception, 35, 333-349.
[10]
Loidolt, M., Aust, U., Steurer, M., Troje, N. F., & Huber, L. (2006). Limits of
dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation
does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape.
Learning & Behaviour, 34, 71-85.
[11]
Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2006). Picture-object recognition in pigeons:
Evidence of representational insight in a visual categorization task
using a Complementary Information Procedure. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 190-195.
[12]
Yamazaki, Y., Aust, U., Huber, L., Hausmann, M. & Güntürkün, O. (2007).
Lateralized cognition: Asymmetrical and complementary strategies of
pigeons during discrimination of the "human concept". Cognition, 104,
315-344.
Available
online
14
August
2006;
DOI:
10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.004.
[13]
Range, F., Aust, U., Steurer, M., & Huber, L. (2007). Visual categorization
of natural stimuli by domestic dogs. Animal Cognition, 11, 339-347.
Available online 17 November 2007; DOI: 10.1007/s10071-007-0123-2.
[14]
Aust, U., Range, F., Steurer, M., & Huber, L. (2008). Inferential reasoning
by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans. Animal Cognition, 11, 587597. Available online 29 February 2008; DOI: 10.1007/s10071-008-01490.
[15]
Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2010). Representational insight in pigeons:
comparing subjects with and without real-life experience. Animal
Cognition, 13, 207-218. Available online 14 July 2009; DOI
10.1007/s10071-009-0258-4.
[16]
Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2010). The role of skin-related information in
pigeons’ categorization and recognition of humans in pictures. Vision
Research, 50, 1941-1948. Available online 13 August 2010; DOI
10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.012.
Book chapters
[17]
Aust, U., Apfalter, W., & Huber, L. (2005). Pigeon categorization:
Classification strategies in a non-linguistic species. In: Grialou, P.,
Longo, G., & Okada, M. (Eds.). Images and Reasoning. Interdisciplinary
Conference Series on Reasoning Studies, 1, 183-204. Keio University Press.
[18]
Huber, L., & Aust, U. (2006). A modified feature theory as an account to
pigeon visual categorization. In: T. Zentall & E. Wasserman (Eds.)
Comparative Cognition: Experimental Explorations of Animal Intelligence,
325-342. Oxford University Press.
[19]
Aust,
U.
(2007).
Picture-object
recognition
in
pigeons:
feature
discrimination or representational insight? In: S. Watanabe, & M.
Hofman (Eds.), Integration of comparative neuroanatomy and comparative
cognition, 161-176. Keio University Press.
[20]
Schlögl Ch., Bugnyar, T., & Aust, U. (2009). Exclusion performances in
Non-human animals: From pigeons to chimpanzees and back again. In:
S. Watanabe, A. P. Blaisdell, L. Huber, & Young, A. (Eds.), Rational
animals, irrational humans, 217-234. Keio University Press.
In preparation
[21]
Loidolt, M., Seebacher, D., Steurer, M., Aust, U., & Huber, L. Prototype
effects without peak shift in pigeons.
[22]
Aust, U.. Steurer, M., & Huber, L. Effects of simultaneous presentation of
multiple stimuli on visual categorization in pigeons.
[23]
Aust, U., & Huber, L. The influence of pre-experimental experience on the
categorization of natural stimuli by pigeons.
[24]
Aust, U., & Huber, L. Do methodological parameters affect the acquisition
of a symmetry concept in pigeons?
Published abstracts
[25]
Aust, U., & Huber, L. (1997). Associative learning experiments under seminatural conditions. Ethology, 32, 300.
[26]
Loidolt, M., Troje, N. F., Huber, L., Aust, U., & Fieder, M. (1997). The role
of texture and shape in complex visual perception in pigeons. In:
Taborsky, M. & Taborsky, B. (Hrsg.), Advances in Ethology (Suppl. to
Ethology), Vol. 32 (Contributions to the XXV International Ethological
Conference, Vienna, Austria, 20-27 August, 1997), p. 92. Berlin, Wien:
Blackwell.
[27]
Huber, L., Troje, N. F., Loidolt, M. & Aust, U. (1998). The pigeon paradigm:
Complex categorisation with simple perceptual tools. Perception, 27,
128.
[28]
Loidolt, M., Aust, U., Huber, L., Troje, N. & Fieder, M. (1998). Die
Bedeutung von Textur und Form in einer komplexen
Kategorisierungsaufgabe bei Tauben. In: Bülthoff, H. H.; M. Fahle; K.
R. Gegenfurtner & H. A. Mallot (Hrsg.), Visuelle Wahrnehmung: Beiträge
zur 1. Tübinger Wahrnehmungskonferenz, p. 110. Kirchentellinsfurt:
Knirsch Verlag.
[29]
Troje, N.F., Huber, L., Loidolt, M., Aust, U. & Fieder, M. (1998).
Correspondence-based representations of complex object classes: The
role of visual texture and shape in classification experiments with
pigeons. Zoology, 101 (Suppl.), 8.
[30]
Aust, U., Loidolt, M., & Huber, L. (1999). Acquisition of a people “concept”
vs. use of simple features. Perception, 28 (supp.), 21.
[31]
Huber, L., Troje, N. F., Loidolt, M., & Aust, U. (1999). Pigeons classify
human faces by attending to their surface properties. Perception, 28
(supp.), 73.
[32]
Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2001). How do pigeons solve a “peoplepresent/people-absent” discrimination task? In: Apfelbach, R., Fendt,
M, Krämer, S. & Siemers, B. M. (Hrsg.), Advances in Ethology (Suppl. to
Ethology), Vol. 36 (Contributions to the XXVII International
Ethological Conference, Tübingen, Germany, 22-29 August, 2001), p.
118. Berlin, Wien: Blackwell.
[33]
Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2003) Use of elemental versus configural
information in the visual categorization of pigeons. In: Bülthoff, H. H.;
K. R. Gegenfurtner & H. A. Mallot, R. Ulrich & F. A. Wichmann
(Hrsg.), 6. Tübinger Wahrnehmungskonferenz, Proceedings, p. 146.
Kirchentellinsfurt: Knirsch Verlag.
[34]
Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2003) What does a pigeon see in a person? In: C. R.
Ruiz-Miranda, M. J. R. Paranhos da Costa, R. H. Macedo, A. V. Peretti
& C. Ades (Hrsg.), Revista de Etologia, Suplemento, Vol. 5
(Contributions to the XXVIII International Ethological Conference,
Florianópolis, Brazil, 20-26 August 2003), p. 27. Sao Paolo: SBEt.
[35]
Yamazaki, Y., Aust, U., Huber, L. & Güntürkün, O. (2003). Concept
formation and its lateralization in pigeons. In: C. R. Ruiz-Miranda, M.
J. R. Paranhos da Costa, R. H. Macedo, A. V. Peretti & C. Ades (Hrsg.),
Revista de Etologia, Suplemento, Vol. 5 (Contributions to the XXVIII
International Ethological Conference, Florianópolis, Brazil, 20-26
August 2003), p. 29. Sao Paolo: SBEt.
[36]
Yamazaki, Y., Aust, U., Huber, L. & Güntürkün, O. (2003). Concept
formation and its lateralization in pigeons.
Psychophysiology, 17, 187-187. Meeting abstract.
[37]
Journal
of
Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2006). Categorisation of colour photographs by
pigeons: Evidence of picture-object recognition. Perception, 35 (supp.),
75.
[38]
Steurer, M. M., Seebacher, D., Aust, U., Loidolt, M., & Huber, L. (2006).
Prototype effects without peak shift in pigeons. Perception, 35 (supp.),
p. 142.
[39]
Aust, U., Range, F., Steurer, M., & Huber, L. (2007). Reasoning by exclusion
in pigeons, dogs, and humans. Perception, 36 (suppl.), p. 175.
[40]
Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2007). Representational insight by pigeons.
Perception, 36 (suppl.), p. 154.
[41]
Kramer, K., Aust, U., Steurer, M., & Huber, L. (2007). Ultra-rapid
categorization in pigeons. Perception, 36 (suppl.), p. 174.
[42]
Kramer, J., Aust, U., Steurer, M., & Huber, L. (2007). Perception of rotating
objects by pigeons. Perception, 36 (suppl.), p. 187.
[43]
Range, F., Bayer, K., Aust, U., Steurer, M., & Huber, L. (2008). The touchscreen method as an implement for dog experiments. EDICIWorkshop, University of Vienna, 5-7 March 2008.
[44]
Troje, N. F., & Aust, U. (2010). “Biological motion perception in pigeons: global
shape or local motion?”. 9th International Congress of Neuroethology,
Salamanca, Spain, 2-7 August 2010.
Unpublished
[45]
Aust, U. (1994). Vorstudien zum seriellen Lernen bei Salaria pavo (RISSO).
Preliminary study, University of Vienna.
[46]
Aust, U. (1995). Serielles Lernen bei Fischen (Salaria pavo und Lepomis
gibbosus). Master thesis, University of Vienna.
Talks
[47]
“The role of texture and shape in complex visual perception in pigeons”, tog. with
Loidolt, M., Huber, L., Troje, N. F., & Fieder, M. XXV International
Ethological Conference, Vienna, 20-27 August 1997.
[48]
“Associative learning experiments under semi-natural conditions”, tog. with
Huber, L., XXV International Ethological Conference, Vienna, 20-27
August 1997.
[49]
“Die
Bedeutung
von
Textur
und
Form
in
einer
komplexen
Kategorisierungsaufgabe bei Tauben”, zus. mit Loidolt, M., Huber, L.,
Troje, N. F., & Fieder, M. 1. Tübinger Wahrnehmungskonferenz,
February 1998.
[50]
“The pigeon paradigm: Complex categorization with simple perceptual tools”, tog.
with Huber, L., Troje, N. F., & Loidolt, M. European Conference on
Visual Perception, Oxford, England, U.K., 24-28 August 1998.
[51]
“Acquisition of a people concept vs. use of simple features”, tog. with Huber, L.,
& Loidolt, M. European Conference on Visual Perception, Trieste, Italy,
22-26 August 1999. *) **).
[52]
“Pigeons classify human faces by attending to their surface properties”, tog. with
Huber, L., Troje, N. F., & Loidolt, M. European Conference on Visual
Perception, Trieste, Italy, 22-26 August 1999.
[53]
“Das Personen-‘Konzept’ bei Tauben. Untersuchungen zur Rolle von reiz- und
kategoriespezifischer Information sowie zur Bedeutung bestimmter
Reizelemente als Klassifikationsgrundlage”, Forschungskolloquium
Biopsychologie der Fakultät für Psychologie, Ruhr-Universität
Bochum, Deutschland. November, 2000. *) **)
[54]
“Target-defining features in the classification of people-present/people-absent
pictures by pigeons”, International Conference on Comparative
Cognition, Melbourne, Florida, U.S.A., 15-17 March 2001. *)
[55]
“How do pigeons solve a “people-present/people-absent” discrimination task?”,
tog. with Huber, L., XXVII International Ethological Conference,
Tübingen, Germany, 22-29 August 2001. *)
[56]
“Elemental versus configural perception in pigeon categorization”, tog. with
Huber, L. Associative Learning Symposium VII, Gregynog, University
of Wales, Newton, Powys, Wales, U.K., 15-17 April 2003. *)
[57]
“What does a pigeon see in a person?”, tog. with Huber, L. XXVIII
International Ethological Conference, Florianópolis, Brazil, 20-26
August 2003. *)
[58]
“Concept formation and its lateralization in pigeons”, tog. with Yamazaki, Y.,
Aust, U., Huber, L. & Güntürkün, O. XXVIII International Ethological
Conference, Florianópolis, Brazil, 20-26 August 2003.
[59]
“Elemental vs. configural perception in pigeon visual
categorization”,
Forschungskolloquium Biopsychologie der Fakultät für Psychologie,
Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Deutschland. September, 2004. *) **)
[60]
“Categorization of color photographs by pigeons: formation of a “person”
concept”. Neuroscience Seminar 04/05 of the Austrian Neuroscience
Association, Vienna, 12 January 2005. *) **)
[61]
“Do pigeons ‘know’ what humans are? Evidence of picture/object recognition in a
visual discrimination task”, tog. with Huber, L., Associative Learning
Symposium IX, Gregynog, University of Wales, Newton, Powys,
Wales, U.K., 22-24 March 2005. *)
[62]
“Pigeons recognize the relation between pictures and their 3D-referents”, tog.
with Huber, L. XXIX International Ethological Conference, Budapest,
Hungary, 20-27 August 2005. *) **)
[63]
“Categorisation of colour photographs by pigeons: Evidence of picture-object
recognition”, tog. with Huber, L. European Conference on Visual
Perception, St. Petersburg, Russia, 20-25 August 2006. *)
[64]
“Mechanisms
of
picture-object
recognition
in
pigeons”.
International
Symposium on Integration of Comparative Neuroanatomy and
Cognition, Tokyo, Japan, 27-28 August 2006. *) **)
[65]
“Comparative investigation of fast mapping in pigeons, dogs, and humans in a
forced two-choice procedure”, tog. with Huber, L. XXX International
Ethological Conference, Halifax, Canada, 15-23 August 2007. *)
[66]
“Visual categorization of natural stimuli in domestic dogs”, tog. with Range, F.,
Bayer, K., Steurer, M., & Huber, L. XXX International Ethological
Conference, Halifax, Canada, 15-23 August 2007.
[67]
“Reasoning by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans”, tog. with Range, F.,
Steurer, M., & Huber, L. 30th European Conference on Visual
Perception, Arezzo, Italy, 27-31 August 2007. *)
[68]
“Ultra-rapid categorization in pigeons”, tog. with Kramer, K., Steurer, M., &
Huber, L. 30th European Conference on Visual Perception, Arezzo,
Italy, 27-31 August 2007.
[69]
“Levels of categorization in animals and humans”. Darwin Day 2008,
“Communication”, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis,
Oslo, Norway, 12 February 2008. *) **)
[70]
“Reasoning by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans”. Seminar of the
Department of Psychology, Queen’s University, Kingston/Onario,
Canada, April 2008. *)
[71]
“Die Taube – Ein Minigehirn mit erstaunlichen Fähigkeiten”. Talk at the
“Österreichischer Naturschutzbund Wien”, 8 October, 2008. *) **)
[72]
“Reasoning by exclusion: A comparative study of pigeons, dogs, and humans”.
Opening conference of the ESF network on comparative social
cognition, Budapest, 13-16 May 2009. *)
[73]
“Pigeons are able to recognize the representational nature of pictures”. XXXI
International Ethological Conference, Rennes, France, 19-24 August
2009. *)
[74]
“Learning, transfer, and limitations of an ‘oddity’-rule by pigeons”. Associative
Learning Symposium XV, Gregynog, University of Wales, Newton,
Powys, Wales, U.K., 12-14 April 2011. *)
*)
Speaker: U. Aust
**)
Invited Talk