Document 6452104

Transcription

Document 6452104
508 U2 AOS2: Intelligence and personality
What are psychometric tests?
A psychometric test is a standardised measure of a selected aspect of an individual’s
behaviour. It is an instrument used to identify individual differences in psychological
functioning among people. Psychometric tests:
-- measure one selected aspect of an individual’s psychological functioning
-- provide a score to allow an individual to be compared with other people
-- allow predictions to be made about an individual’s future performance or behaviour
-- are used by psychologists as part of an assessment process, either for a group of people
or for individuals.
Examples of psychometric tests of intelligence
Figure 18.1 A school
psychologist gives a
student a Wechsler
Intelligence Scale test.
This tests cognitive
abilities in children and
adults.
Intelligence tests are standardised measures of a person’s general mental ability. These
tests are designed to measure an individual’s probable level of intelligence.
There is a variety of individual tests for measuring intelligence available to
psychologists. Two of the most commonly used tests are the Stanford–Binet
Intelligence Scales and the Wechsler Intelligence Scales. These tests are carefully
designed and must be administered and scored by fully trained psychologists.
FS
O
Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales
O
R
The Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales test wasP
designed in 1905 by Alfred
E originally
Binet, a French psychologist. It was laterG
revised
in 1916 by Lewis Terman, a professor
AIt has been revised several times since then, and
of psychology at Stanford University.
P
D
the current version is the fifth
edition.
E
T
This test is designed
individuals according to age. A psychologist who is
Cto assess
E
testing a 10-year-old
child
will
start
asking the test questions for 9-year-olds. If the
R these questions,bythe
R
child is able
to
answer
psychologist then proceeds to the questions
O
C
for 10-year-olds.
If these are answered correctly, then the child is asked the questions
UN
for
11-year-olds and so on until the child reaches a set of age-related questions for
which he or she is unable to provide answers.
The psychologist then computes the intelligence quotient (IQ) score by comparing
the child’s scores with the norms for 10-year-olds set out in the tables provided by the
test designers. (IQ scores are discussed in detail below, on page XXX.)The mean IQ
for each age is 100. A child who has answered questions for children from an older
age group will generally score a higher-than-average IQ score, whereas a child who
was unable to answer the relevant questions for his or her age group would score a
lower-than-average IQ.
The most recent version of this test (SB-V) provides a single IQ score and also
provides scores for various aspects of intelligence:
-- fluid reasoning
-- knowledge
-- qualitative processing
-- visual–spatial processing
-- working memory.
CH 18: Methods of measuring intelligence 511
Test types
Psychometric tests can either be group tests or individual tests.
In group tests, paper-and-pencil tests are given to a group of people at the
same time. For example, the Differential Aptitude Test (DAT) is a test of school
achievement which is often given to students in Year 10 for the purpose of course
selection and vocational guidance.
Individual tests are administered by a psychologist in a one-on-one situation
with a client. These tests may involve paper-and-pencil tests, oral (spoken) and aural
(listening) tests, as well as manipulation of objects such as blocks and puzzle pieces.
Examples of individual tests include the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children IV
(WISC-IV) and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale V (SB-V).
Issues in psychometric testing
Psychometric tests can be quick and inexpensive ways of obtaining information about
the psychological functioning of one or many people. There are, however, some
drawbacks with these tests that psychologists must always consider when using them
for assessment. These drawbacks can sometimes contribute to incorrect measurements
of a person’s true psychological functioning. The main considerations regarding
psychometric testing are shown in Figure 18.3.
It is very important that psychometric tests are designed and carried out in a way that
ensures high quality and fair measurement. To do this several areas must be dealt with:
P
E
AG
P
D
TE
C
RE
Standardisation
Test conditions must be the same
for all.
R
O
C
UN
Motivation
Some participants are more eager to
do well than others.
Issues in
psychometric testing
Reliabilty
A test must be consistent – yielding the same scores
under the same circumstances on different
occasions–this is referred to as the reliabilty of the test.
Application of results
> Tests are only one form of assessment and must
not be used on their own to form an impression of a
person’s psychological functioning.
> A test only takes a sample of a person’s psychological
functioning on any given day. This is similar to a blood
test, which is only a sample of a person’s physiological
functioning at a particular time and place, where
blood sugar and adrenaline levels can vary. Similarly,
when sitting psychological tests an individual may be
nervous, unwell, tired or distracted. These variables
can influence test results from one day to the next.
Validity
The test measure what it intends to measure – this is referred
to as the validity test.
Figure 18.3 Issues in psychometric testing
S
Practice
Some people are more experienced in
sitting tests and may do better than
those who are inexperienced.
Fairness of test design
Culture and linguistic bias – some
tests may unintentionally favour one
population more than another.
Quality control in test design
Tests must truly measure the property they
have been designed to measure (validity), and
they must be consistent from one test sitting
to the next (reliability).
F
O
RO
CH 18: Methods of measuring intelligence 517
a Yuin
b Wonnarua
c Bundjalung
d Thungutti.
11 Who is Michael O’Loughlin?
c yellow
d black.
16 If a wharki caught you, what would
have you?
a an NSL player
b an NRL footballer
c an AFL player
d an NBL player.
12 If you were playing ‘coon-can’,
would you be playing:
a
b
c
d
a card game
the spoons
a children’s game
a musical instrument made out
of cans?
13 What are munyas?
a money
b scabies
c head lice
d swollen feet.
14 Deb Mailman is:
a a postal worker
b an athlete
c a news reader
d an actor.
15 Which colour is not on the Koori
flag?
O
C
UN
a red
b green
a an old man
b a policeman
c an evil spirit
d a welfare officer.
17 What would you do with a Wilcannia
boomerang?
a throw it
b hang it on your wall
c tackle it
d paint it.
18 Linda Burney is:
a Chairperson of ATSIC
b President of NSW AECG Inc
c Chairperson of NACCHO
d State Member for Canterbury.
19 What organisation funds CDEPs?
P
E
a AEC
AG
P
b DET
ED
T
c ASA
C
F
O
RO
S
E d ATSIC
R
R 20Where is Dodge City?
a
b
c
d
near Singleton
near Texas, Queensland
near Brewarrina
near Wallaga Lake
Other factors that influence intelligence test scores
Performance on intelligence tests can be influenced by non-intellectual factors, which
are things that might reduce or improve an individual’s performance. These include:
-- Physical impairment: Sight or hearing disability might prevent an examinee from
performing to the best of his or her ability. Motor impairment might restrict an
individual’s ability to use a pencil or to manipulate blocks. Physical impairments must
be taken into account by the psychologist because they have the potential for causing
the examinee’s true intellectual ability to be misrepresented by the scores obtained.
-- Test anxiety or shyness: Some individuals may be shy with the examiner or very
nervous about their performance on the test and this could hinder them doing their
best. In this instance, obtained scores would not be truly representative of their ability.
-- Test familiarity: Some individuals might have sat the very same test within the
previous two years. If the psychologist is aware of this, then an alternative test can be
used. If not, the examinee might obtain a score that is higher than he or she might
have otherwise achieved.
overmatter
518 U2 AOS2: Intelligence and personality
Figure 18.7 Physical
impairments can influence
performance on IQ tests.
S
F
O
IQ tests and school performance O
R by qualified psychologists
IQ tests that are formally recognised and administered
P
E an individual’s potential for learning
can make reasonably accurate predictions about
G
in school, including the ability to understand,
PA remember, follow instructions, use
language, and solve problems. D
It must be emphasised, however, that an IQ score
E
does not explain or predict
actual school performance. It is possible for an individual
T
C
with a high IQ score
Eto perform poorly at school for various reasons; for example,
R
sickness and absence
from school, or an unsettled family or social life. It is important
R
O
to remember
intelligence tests and IQs are measurements and scores, not
C forthathow
N
explanations
students actually perform at school.
U
Figure 18.8
Performance in tests
at school can be
influenced by sickness,
absence from school,
an unsettled family
life, or personal issues
with other students or
friends.
CH 18: Methods of measuring intelligence 519
Advantages and disadvantages of
intelligence tests
There are advantages and disadvantages in using psychometric tests to attempt to
establish the level of an individual’s intellectual ability.
Advantages
-- Intelligence tests provide a standardised IQ score.
-- They are easy, quick and cheap to administer and score.
-- If the tests have been properly constructed, they may be more objective and fairer than
an interview or face-to-face assessment.
-- They enable individuals to be compared against other people their age.
-- They are helpful in making predictions about academic performance.
-- They can be useful for selection purposes for people best suited to certain tasks,
careers or particular intervention, such as those with intellectual disability or
giftedness.
Disadvantages
F
O
RO
S
-- Intelligence tests are rarely perfect and may disadvantage individuals if they are used
inappropriately.
-- They must not be used unless there is evidence that they have strong reliability,
validity, and standardised testing and scoring procedures.
-- They do not take into account individual differences, such as nervousness, personality
characteristics, experience in testing and motivation.
-- Most intelligence tests tend to measure cognitive abilities and do not include other
forms of intelligence, such as those suggested by Gardner and Sternberg or the CHC
model.
-- Intelligence tests tend to be culturally and linguistically biased.
-- There is the potential for intelligence test results to be used to label people unfairly,
either positively or negatively.
P
E
AG
P
D
TE
C
O
C
UN
E
R
R
Ethical issues in intelligence testing
Binet designed his original intelligence test as a means of identifying children
who might need support in their education because their level of intelligence was
abnormal. Therefore, his aim was to assist children in their education.
Yet, during the early 1900s Binet realised that intelligence tests such as his also had
the potential to be used for purposes that were different to those he had intended. His
main concerns were:
-- Intelligence tests could be incorrectly used as a way to label people.
-- Intelligence was deemed to be genetic (inherited) by some members of the scientific
community, and this could lead to discrimination against some groups of people on
the basis of their genetic background.
Binet’s point was that intelligence tests will never provide the whole picture about
an individual’s general mental ability. Instead, the tests must be used in conjunction
with other means for making decisions about a person’s intellectual potential.
History demonstrated that Binet’s concerns were borne out during the twentieth
century in several episodes in the United States.