Part 2 - FIFA.com

Transcription

Part 2 - FIFA.com

Diagram
Humidity
38
Spain
11 3
' 82
La Coruilla 800/,,
Viqo
6
Madrid
651,, ,
Barcelona 7 I1
P
MáIaga
6~ ~
Monterrey o
a
~-,ada~nj,3ra o
Leo n
Irapuatc)
T,-)Iuc,3,,~` Mexico'D.F .
-Tuebi a
c,
Average humidity
atvenues
52%
40%
27%
o
ci
.R
2
.2
cc
m
'70
2
0
m
ci
4)
.0
C
o
114
Environmental Infloences on Sporttnq Performanc e
Thus humidity must be considered i n
conjunction with the temperature prevailing at kick-off time . in order to b e
able to estimate the. total stress on pla y
er s
The r-nap shows the average values fo r
humidity in Mexico . emphasising that
humidity decreases with allitude eve n
though temperatures Temain the sam e
This provides even more maileriaj to b e
taken into account when discussing th e
problem of dehydration, and makes a
solution even more of a challeng e
Other Environmental Factors
Affecting Performance
The World Youth Championship in Mex- In the 1982 World Cup report the condi lions in the Calderon Stadium in Madri d
ico took place in densely- populated
were specially considere d
areas, as shown on the following map
The external conditions there (stadiu m
construction, kick-off tfroe, temperatur e
It is by no rneans typical of Mexico tha t
and altitude) cast a different light on th e
densely-populated areas are also area s
result s
of heavy airpollotio n
Concern has already been expresse d
about the construction of stadiums fro m
the point of view of temperature and th e
possible formation of hear- traps . ari d
this consideration becomes of eve n
greater importance in densely-populated area s
Air pollution increases with the CO2 co n
lent and this leads to a simultaneous reduclion in the amount of 02 in the ai r
In conjunction with the other factors
mentioned this condition must be regarded as a limitation on performance
Similar consideration also apply to man y
of the games played during the Worl d
Youth Championship in Mexico
Two examples Ilustraie the possible ad verse effect s
There is a large steel works in the m mediate vicinity of the stadium in Monterrey If Ihis is in operation before o r
during a game then the importance t o
be attached to air pollution as a performance-limiting factor increases significantly It is left to the reader to imagin e
the relationships between the degree o f
air pollution, temperature . kick-off tim e
and hurniclity
Population
Diagram 39
11 5
This diagram shows total population per venue and capacity of stadia at venue s
of World Youth Championship in Mexic o
ra
-11
Le6n
L
3 000 000
500 U0 0
700000
,q3 )-i,1
-
Irapuat o
350,000
Toluca
600D00
73 114
Mexico D .F .
1
Monterre y
1 li 7 93~~
i
1111111E
116
Environmental Influences on Sporling Performanc e
Also, in densely -populated regions the
In the case of Mexico City then the pro traffic density is high usually reaching a blems of temperalure, stadium construc ~
maximum at the end of the working day tion and altitude are of primary irnpor tance, in Monterrey humidit y
This leads— paricularly in Mexic o
City—to addifonal air pollution, the nor The only point of these observations i s
that in future planning, kick-ofi times an d
mal big city level being exceeded a t
these time s
office closing times should also be considered
If the evening ~(rush lhouo~ coincides wil h
kick-off time . then this factor alone has a For clarity ' s sake . populalion and indus multiplicative effect on performance de- trial densities are presented on the fol tenoration
)owing ma p
The Possible Effects of Travel o n
Tournament Performanc e
It was mentioned in an earlier chapte r
that people today have become mor e
adaptable, compared to those part(cipa t
ing in the Olympics or World Cups o f
15 and 13 years ag o
Jet travel or local journey,, in aircondi -
tioned buses are regarded today as be Ing much less fatiguin g
However, the problem of travel shoul d
not be regarded as a single entity, but Te quires a more complex approach
Travel
Diagram 40
I
11 7
Travelling to Mexico was particularly important beca u se]
of acclimatisation .
I
L-
China PR
Korea Rep .
Ivory Coast
Nigeria
Mexico
USA
Argentina
Brazil
-
19 .5 .
17 .5 .
10 .5 .
23 .5 .
—
31 .5 .
20 .5 .
22 .5 .
Uruguay
Australia
Austria
CSSR
Netherlands
Poland
Scotland
USSR
-
29 .5 .
29 .5 .
31 .5 .
28 .5 .
26 .5 .
28 .5 .
31 .5 . (24 .5. to USA )
28 .5 .
--j
118
Environmental friflaences on Sportinq Performanc e
1 . Arriva l
The extreme conditions in Mexico made This all the more important when the en pre -planning necessary for all teams
vironmental conclilions are extreme. O n
free days players should have a chanc e
to rechartje their batterie s
Evaluation of a questionnaire sent to th e
learnS shows arrivals between 3 week s
arid 3 days before the start
For this reason hotels located outsid e
the populated areas are preferable t o
those in the cit y
There is certainly a justifiable reason fo r
each of these periods, but hindsigh t
would now cause some of the tearns t o
Training facilities should be available i n
come to other conclusion s
the immediate vicinity of the hotel s
The questionnaire about arrival date s
shows a spread from a 3-week ' in sit e '
adjustment period llvory Coast and P R
China) to arrivals 3 days before the firs t
match (Austria and USSR)
Background information on this subjec t
is either lacking or insufficient, so that n o
general conclusions can be reached Accomoclation in Mexico was enlirely i n
hotels, but this fact alone does mea n
that conditions were arranged whic h
were always favourabl e
The evaluation of the suftahilityof accornodation during World Youth Chary i
pionships cannot and should not b e
judged just on the quality of the rooms ,
service and cookin g
Travel During the Competitio n
From the sporting point of view othe r
considerations take priority relaxatio n
after garnes and training
However, this requirement is oppose d
by reality, since both hotels and sladiums are often centrally located Still, it i s
not likely that a 40 min trip will in an y
way diminish the positive effects of a
successful training sessio n
It was seen during the 1982 World Cup ,
and is in fact generally accepted, tha t
teams that have to travel to a new venu e
after a game are at a disadvantage, des pite all modern conveniences The travelling team must waste a well-earne d
day of rest in a bus or plane with all th e
problerns and stress that this involve s
while the opponent is recuperating O f
ten decisive reserves of strength can b e
lost in this wa y
Statistics showing journeys of relativel y
short distances only confuse the overal l
picture, for the distance involved mus t
be considered in the context of the envi ronmental factors previously mentioned – temperature altitude changes ,
humidity, hotel changes et c
The following section provides an ana ;ysis of these team-specific factors
-
Travel
Otagrarn 4 1
F
1
rxMM
11 9
km 1304 244 15721758
J
760 1443 79 1
570 445
1383 731
510 385
94 9
127 64
1—076 93 1
19 1
Travel during a tournament involved additional strain :
distances in kilometres between the venues are show n
in this diagram.
120
Environmental Influences on Sporttnq Performanc e
A possible solution for the future woul d
must be noted that even the best possibe to concentrate the teams in 4 grou p
ble organisation would not be able t o
centres Certain advantages would b e
provide conditions equally favourabl e
achieved, against which the risk of a los s for all participating team s
of public interest would have to be balance d
Nor will the most intensive and scientifi c
learn preparation be able to reproduc e
To conclude this chapter, however, it
all the environmental factor s
This diagram illustrates the problem s
of adjustment to time .
23
1
24 01
1
02 03 04
ao
171
1
Li
~
06 07 08
05
1
-
-
09 10 1 1
-
Chapter6
12 7
Analysi s
of the Gam e
General Tendencies
Defence
Midfiel d
Attack
Stationary Bal l
Physical Conditio n
Techniqu e
Individual Playe r
General Survey
12-2
AnalVsis of rhe Game
43
A
at 1982 World Cup i n
Spain: this diagram clraws,~
a parallel between yout h
and national teams .
Ai
r
140-&
Tk
ESPANA 82
123
Analysis of the Gam e
It was noted with pleasure that in comparison to the previous World Yout h
Championship there was a further rise i n
the quality of play This continues th e
trend noted since 1979 in Japa n
This rise in the quality of play has severa l
cause s
1 . The value of the World Youth Championships in building up the nationa l
team has been recognised since th e
1982 World Cup (see separate chapter) .
2 The World Youth Championship i s
rated highly within the confederation s
and is a fixed itern on the continental fixture list (see separate chapter )
3 The siror)gly contested qualificatio n
matches result in early talent scoutin g
and development. Team performance s
thus become more consislent and rnor e
determined (see separate chapter )
4 . Expectation of a strong competitio n
meanS more intensive team preparatio n
(see separate chapter )
5 Anotherdecisivefactor—alread y
mentioned — is that most players alread y
belong to first division clubs The hig h
levels demanded — particularly in training — are obviously reflected in the over all standard of the World Youth Championshi p
Naturally, new tactical concepts canno t
be expected from a World Youth Cha m
pionship It is rather a testing ground fo r
ideas gained from the last World Cu p
and an opportunity for analysing trends
As already mentioned the trainers of th e
teams in Mexico were in close contac t
with their own national sides It would b e
unrealistic to expect anything other tha n
a parallel to the style of the nationa l
team .
As a reminder . those teams are show n
here. whose national side .,.; took parl i n
the 1982 World Cup, thus providing a d i
rectly comparitive stud y
For the others the general statement s
previously noted should appl y
Although there were no differences du e
to formation . certain points of similarit y
can be riote d
All the youth teams worked better together than many of the national team s
in Spai n
The reasons forthis will again be comple x
I More time was available for buildin g
the tearn than in the case of the nationa l
team . where players with a regular place
in a 1st division side are subjected to th e
extra stresses of national and international competition s
2 . The trend towards block formation s
already noted in the World Cup 1982 analysis was even more pronounced in th e
World Youth Championship, a fact leading almost directly to greater harmon y
within the parts of the tearn .
3 In preparation for the World Yout h
Championship coaches were able to pa y
more attention to the development of
124
team play by undertaking competitiv e
tours and entering tournaments Durin g
preparation the greatest emphasis wa s
frequently on the learns s skill s
4 It also emerged that juniors are mor e
(~coachable)i . their style not yet bein g
moulded to a fixed pattern It was als o
observed that the players showed more
initiative and greater willingness to tak e
risk s
It is exactly these last two qualities tha t
enliven the game making it less predict able and more attractive for the spectator s
This is certainly one of the reasons fo r
the strong public interest during th e
World Youth Championship in Mexic o
The educational element was very i m
portant for both coaches and player s
The trend towards more compact tea m
play (see World Cup Report 82) continued during lhe World Youth Chamonship The same observalions wer e
made here as had been previously publishe d
The consequences of more compac t
play have already been dealt with in th e
chapter or) Youth Training Method s
The tactics involved in the compact
game have lechnical and conditionin g
requirements which need only to b e
briefly restated her e
Techniqo e
Shori, quick, refined surprising passing .
plus possession in confined space s
Conditionin g
Speed instead of pure siarnina enablin g
the player to explode '' away from hi s
opponent and take advantage of ope n
space s
5 When the points mentioned above ar e
Versatility and manoeuvrability instea d
taker) into account it is not surprisin g
of strength (See separate chapter )
that during the enlire tournament th e
majority of teams showed a preferenc e
for an attacking style of pla y
Obviously offensive football, based o n
attacking and having the courage to lak e
risks and show initiative . has not ye t
been influenced by defensive tactics .
where the only considerations are su c
cess, prestige or commercial interest s
It was pleasing to note that the goo d
standard of the first and second round s
was maintained right through the quarter- and semi-finals into the final itsel f
Poorer games in the I/ri-finals could b e
explained by the fact that neither tea m
had anythmg left to play for
General Trends
Diagram 44
Broniszewski, M .
i
Hitzel, Gerhar d
Mario Velarde
Kiselev, Nikola y
A
Roxburgh, Andre w
~7ì,e£
1~,~
~ -,-i
zg
05
Odjedje,
njamin
M,ry C,
Christopher Udomezue
N,p,~ ,
~,
1~
Jial-Yang-ChenPR C
Plì
-
o
ulo
1
/
Park-Jong-Whan
~,- 1, - ,
f
~ 'I , (~
ì-`
/,~-
Les Scheinflug
J
This diagram shows
the correlatio n
between FIFA development
projects P1/P7 . The national coaches participated in the
FIFA/Coca-Cola International Academies .
125
126
Tactical Analysi s
Mention has already been made of th e
tactical formations and the style of th e
national team, as well as of observation s
made during the World Cup 1982
The open spaces that used to exist between the various parts of the team — de fence, mid-field, attack —are simply n o
longer ther e
11 is natural that the execution of tactic s
will not be as perfect during Worl d
Youth Championships as with nationa l
tearns . Any shortcomings . however, ca n
often be compensated for by determination and spontaneit y
Again . it should be pointed out to youn g
players that it requires a lot of experience —plus self-confidence and authority—to risk going forward with an attac k
arid temporarily neglect organisationa l
duties in defence .
1 it was clear that the majority of team s
had first-class goalkeepers . and there fore it is difficult to select an outstandin g
player in this position Only very rarel y
can a goalkeeper be held responsible fo r
a team s losing a game Here the positive aspects are dominan t
In comparison to national teams ther e
were fewer noticeably offensive defenders Independent of statements alread y
made, similar arguments could be produced here as were seen in the analysi s
of the position of the offensive libero
These remarks about goalkeepers underline the tendency for thern to make a
name for themselves during a Worl d
Cup e g Chanov (Russia) and Kaszimierski (Poland), to name but tw o
2 In defencelhe emphasis was on disci-
plined play . without . as previously mentioned, the adoption of stubbornly defensive tactic s
As a safety factor a defensive player covered the zone behind the back fou r
The proper timing of such movement s
was too great a demand for most of th e
player s
3 Mid- field play was both offensivel y
and defensively oriented In this area th e
differences in formation and style wer e
most noticeabl e
The Latin Americans played compactly ,
i e both defensively arid offensively oriented, while those of the Europea n
school were more position-consciou s
playing the traditional mid field garn e
The player employed here was see n
more as a defence organiser than as a
starting point for attacks
In all direct comparisons the superiorit y
of the Latin Americans was apparen t
They were more harmonious and mor e
supponive both in attack and defence
The observation was again made tha t
the offensive role of the libero is only occasionally exercised . due to the modern .
cornpact, mid field arrangement
The game between Argentina and Nether lands seems to confirm this rule On th e
basis of their performance in Mexico th e
Dutch and their mid-field in this garne
Defence
45
might well be counted in with the Latin ,
American group The opposite was tru e
in the final between Brazil and Argen tina, in which the Argentines, despit e
their compact style, came closer to a Eu ropean mid-field game Traditional mid f ield play often assigns offensive an d
defensive functions individually and th e
pattern is thus not easily discerne d
This fact alone requires a lot of space
72 7
and the previously mentioned technica l
and tactical consideration s
During attacking play the mid-field personalities emerge and in this contex t
four examples should be mentione d
I Brazi l
2 Argentin a
3 Mexico
4 Netherland s
Basic forms in defence man-to-man marking with space marking sweepers
128
Analysis of the Game
Midtield
Diagram 4 6
An important tactical rnanoeuvre has a l
The same applies to Polster (Austria )
ready been noted, in which an attacke r
who was not able to assume the leadin g
drops back to escape man to man mark- role expected of him within his learn
ing and thus opens a space tip front for a
4 In the light of the above remarks . it i s
mid-fielder to attack As an exampl e
not therefore surprising that the mos t
Zahere, the young Argentinian No 10,
outstanding players are found in the at rate . is selecte d
tack since they are the ones who mak e
attacking football possible, as describe d
Mid-field playmakers, still to some ex tent evident in Japan and Australia, wer e abov e
Forwards were Marked man-to man exalmost completely absent in Mexic o
actly as in national teams It should als o
This is explained by the lack of ope n
be recorded that practically all the team s
spaces into which the ball could b e
played with real wingers This forced th e
played Even a player like Vanenbur g
~the Netherlands) could not play the rol e opposing backs into a more defensiv e
that was expected of him on the basis o f orientation since there was less room fo r
his expetience with the national A-team them to move forward if they wanted t o
Basic formsm midfield comnact
1 ~_
-r .
.
t'~ ~~*~
~~
4
10,
~'
1
I
f,
ra
I,
láw
Diagram 47
Attack
Surprises were thus produced by the i n
dividual efforts of the winger s
The World Youth Championship in Me x
ico brought to light a wealth of talente d
forwards .
But the transition from youth to international level requires a significant adjustment—especially for forwards .
A selection of the most talented player s
could include the following narTie s
(diagram 54, page 143)
Mention has already been made of th e
connection between the greater influence of coaches and the general level o f
play, but to end the technical/tactical analysis a look will be taken at " set-piec e
situation s
Even during the World Cup in Mexico a
number of well-planned variations were
seen often leading to a successful conclusio n
The following situations are presente d
as examples .
Basic forms in attack . wtng play
—
_:c
1
-
A
_>_
—
129
130
Stationary Ball
Diagrams 481,49
Some standard forms with stationary ball free-kick
,9
141
I~p
Diagram 50
Stationary Ball
Standard forms of stationary ball corner
G
13 7
of the Gam e
132
Technical Analysi s
Conditto n
In their efforts to make the TechnicalAna/ysiseven more valuable and to presen t
their impressions of the standard of pla y
in a more detailed manner, the nierTiber s
of the Technical Study Group awarde d
precise marks to every team for condition and technique, since these tvvo factors are often key elements in a team s
performanc e
compare the final results of the point s
analysis vvilh the team s actual succes s
in the tournamen t
The sarne system was used to evaluat e
the technical Jeve) and the results wer e
presented in similar for m
Without losing siqlit of the importanc e
of the collective effort . it is recogmse d
that a learn s performance is largely governed by the sum of the qualities of it s
The previous practice of evaluating a
individual players so the final collectiv e
team ' s attributes in a sub)ective and un values
for condition and technique were.
defined manner was replaced by a mark multiplied
by the number of outstandin g
mg system running from 'very good '
personalities on the tea m
down to '' poor '
I
2 = very goo d
4 = goo d
6 ~ satisfactor y
8 = poo r
As the following tables show, this method of evaluation produced surprisin g
results which, however unlikely this ma y
appear . accurately reflected the actua l
outcome of the World Youth Champion shi p
Metho d
During each round the learns wer e
awarded points based on the abov e
scale Dividing the total number of
points by the number of games playe d
produced the average per gam e
As a team progressed lion) one round t o
the next its points total increased but thi s
was then divided by the new total nUM ber of games playe d
Thus it was possible to compare perfo r
mances in the different rounds . and to
Members of the Technical Study Grou p
were instructed to single out those play ers who, in their opinion, had a decisiv e
influence on their learn s pertorr-nance
133
Physical Conditio n
Remarks on the Fitness of Teams Eliminated in the '/a-Finals :
(Group games )
Group 1
Mexico lAtistrafi a
In this group in parlicular, the qualifyin g
games were hotly contested, as all ab servers will certainly remember Despit e
relatively high levels of fitness, superio r
in some cases to those of teams that di d
qualify for the qUarter-finals . both Mexico and Australia were eliminated Th e
reasons for this must be sought in other ,
less obvious aspects of their performance
Group 2
awarded clearly show the superiority o f
the other two teams which did qualifi y
for the next roun d
The poor ratings earned are all the mor e
surprising in view of the fact that th e
Ivory Coast had a relatively long adjust merit period in Mexico and lhe USA ha d
been to a special high altitude trainin g
camp in Colorado . as a direct preparation for the altitude in Mexic o
In this case the skills and experience o f
the Polish and Uruguayan team were the.
telling factor s
Ivory CoastIUSA
Comparison of the fitness points
lì
1
JM
=
1
1
-
4,
r
Group 3
IngfuLjp3 in whichAustria arid P R
China were eliminated there is a paralle l
to group 2 Both teams, Austria and P R
China . had at least on paper very well planned preparations with early arriva l
(PR China) and altilude training (Austria )
Their opponents Argentina and Czechoslovakia . who it should be note d
achieved approximately the same fitness ratings had better individual pla y
ers plus greater experienc e
Group 4
1 n gfoup 4 it was indeed the f itter teams
that qualified Nigeria were knocked out ,
though their excellent preparation (altitude . arrival) paid off . above all in th e
first game Their success over the Russians was a warning for their other tw o
opponents, and despite consistent performances in regard to fitness they
could riot manage another victor y
What is remarkable here is the poor fi t
ness rating of the USSR It appears that a
number of factors coincided to produc e
this decrease in fitness ~Iate arrival r
demoralisation after the defeat by Nigeria environmental conditions . such a s
hurnicity and smog )
Remarks on the Fitness of Teams Eliminated in the Quarter-Final s
Scotlan d
Although their fitness was one of th e
factors that gave Scotland the edge ove r
their opponents in the group games, th e
team literally ran out of steam in th e
quarter final game against Korea Re p
To throw some light or) this occurrenc e
it should be added that it was clear righ t
from the first game, that despite at tempts at acclimatisation (in Colorado ,
USA), the players were suffering unde r
the Mexican conditions
Some of the players had obviously no t
recovered physically from the strains o f
the professional league and the Euro pean cup competitions and thus Wer e
unable to make use of their undoubte d
skill s
The Polish team, however, der-nonstrated greater fitness than in the firs t
round, this being all the more effectiv e
since their collective style of play economised or) energy under the difficul t
tournament and envir-onmenlal condilions
Physical condition
Czechoslovakia
Despite losing to the Brazilians . th e
Czechs showed themselves to be as fi t
as their opponents The ratings the tea m
obtained reflected their scientific preparation, their performance from the fitness angle being even better than in th e
previous roun d
Without doubt their failure to reach th e
semi-finals must be attributed to othe r
aspects of the gam(~ (skills and a greate r
number of outstanding players )
Urugua y
All the other technical qualities of th e
South Americans were not sufficient t o
compensate for their failing strengt h
This observation is all the more vali d
since their quarier-final opponent . Korea
135
Rep ., not only demonstrated better skill s
but also greater fitness than in the previousroun d
Doubts about the U rug uayans ' corid itio n
had been shown in the last group gam e
against the Ivory Coast, and a let-up i n
their tactical concentration was notice d
Netherland s
The Dutch position is much the same a s
that of Czechoslovakia In regard to fi t
ness there was little to choose betwee n
them and their opponents, Argentina I n
this quarter-final game the complexitie s
of football were illustrated When tw o
learns are equal in terms of tactics/lechnique and fitness . siutattons develop i n
the course of the game in which the factors analysed here become unimportan t
and other attributes lip the scales on e
way or the other .
Remarks on the Fitness of the Losing Teams in the Semi-Finals and Fina l
Korea Rep . went down against Brazil ,
despite absolutely equal fitness rating s
Once again other factors play the decisive role, and these cannot be itemise d
her e
In the second semi-final, Argentina wer e
able to show an improvement, while th e
Poles were not able to raise their standard as they had done in the quarter final
Their better physical performance in th e
semi-finals made Korea Rep favourite t o
win against Poland in the play-off fo r
third place However, it was interestin g
to observe that the individual style of th e
Korean players was less economica l
than the more collective team play of th e
Poles
136
Aiialysis of the Game
51
This rational style showed its effect mos t In comparison to Argentina the mos t
clearly in the greater concentration in ex- striking features of the Brazilians pla y
ploiting goal-scoring opportunities .
were their zone marking, their bette r
control of the rhythm of the game an d
Looked at this way it is not paradoxica l
their overall technical abilit y
to assert that fitness alone will not wi n
game s
These technical skills of the Brazilians .
A lesson for the. Korean side especiall y
plus their excellent physical preparatio n
resulted in an average rating of 3 .3 fo r
In the final itself both teams not onl y
the whole Tournament Only one teani
maintained the fitness levels shown i n
obtained a higher rating —Korea Re p
earlier rounds but were to some exten t
with 3,1 Korea s 4th place and their difable to improve on thi s
ficult games in the preliminary and inter As the game progressed however, it be - mediate rounds were among 1he high came clear that the more rational style of lights of the World Youth Championshi p
the Brazilians seemed to be giving them This performance earned Korea Rep th e
respect of the other participating team s
an advantage
I
l(rvAA Ron
Scotland
Ivory Coast
1112
11
+6
13
Uruguay
14
1+]
19b-11
174=4 . 2
~5
~3
- 1+6
+4
28 6 =4. 6
174-4 .2
5, 3
16 3
~ 6~1
Austria
China PR
1+2
5.3 .
163
Poland
USA
1+2
A,
3
5 .0
.3
4.6
Czechoslovaki a
4
154-3
Netherland s
4
164-4. 0
.7 1+2
Nigeria
33
4.3
TSSR
§S—R__ 15 3
0
Ptq sicai titoess of teams in r-narke —
overallpresentui g
i
13 7
Technique
Techniqu e
Statistical Evaluation of th e
Technical Level of Teams Eliminate d
in the Preliminary Roun d
team was lacking in this respect All th e
games were exciting and entertainin g
for the spectator s
Group 1
Group 2
MexicolAustralia
Once again the experts evaluation of th e
technical level contains a clear messag e
The diffp.rence in ratings between th e
tearns qualdying and those eliminated i s
all too obvious The undoubted technica l
abilities of these teams could not be full y
utilised because of deficiences in thei r
physical conditio n
The previous evaluation of the level o f
conditioning pointed out the, evennes s
wilhin this group The same proved tru e
of their technical abilities .
It is certainly true that the standard o f
play was the highest in this group and no
W
~-V - _, -13,-
Mt^ 1b-, -
738
Group 3
hi comparison to group 2 the situatio n
here is different The teams eliminate d
were rated technically just as high a s
those that qualified However . in comparison to the other groups the genera l
technical level was below that of th e
group winners and runners-u p
top teams in the group in fact surpassing these to some extent in mcmdua l
skills, even though the group winner s
were Brazi l
Group 4
The Russians were technically disappointing for all their skills were demonstrated at only a relatively slow pace Be cause of this lack of speed none of thei r
technical refinements could decisivel y
influence a gam e
Ehrumaied USSR and Nigeri a
Once again the performance of the Nigerian team deserves special mentio n
Compared to the Russians, they man aged to match the technical level of the
The Netherlands and Brazil offered a
better combination of skills and condition which proved decisive, particularl y
because of the speed elemen t
Remarks on the Technical Level of Team s
Eliminated in the Quarter-Final s
As a preface to this section it should b e
rioted that all the quarter-final game s
were of a consistently high standar d
The observation is confirmed by the statistical rating s
Generally speaking, the tearns that wer e
eliminated were those will) fewer ou t
standing players, technique and fitnes s
being approximately equal all roun d
This point will be referred to again later
It is particularly worthwhile to study th e
performance of the Korean team, whic h
demonstrated skills of a very high orde r
They were later defeated by Brazil in th e
semi-firial . because of a lack of out standing individual players, and by Po land in the play-off for third place be cause of their failure to make use of thei r
goal scoring opportunities . a con sequence of their decrease in menta l
concentration
Diagram 52
Technique
739
Remarks on the Technical Level o f
the Semi-Finals and Fina l
The semi-final between Brazil and Kore a
Rep . deserves special mention It wa s
probably the most skillful game in th e
whole tournamen t
mance of the Poles whose game wa s
characterised by longer passes . greate r
determination and above all by bette r
finishin g
In the second semi-final the two team s
differed considerably in technical abilit y
In this situation the players were not abl e
to demonstrate their skills so brilliantl y
In the final the two teams were onc e
again of different technical standard Al though the talent was available on bot h
sides, the Brazilians used theirs more fo r
brilliant individual efforts, while the Argentinians employed their skills more i n
collective pla y
In the play-off for third place the individual skills of the Koreans were no matc h
for the more homogeneous team perfor -
Team
Match 1-3
Australia
123
4.0
Korea Rep,
Mexico
11
113
1
3 .6
163
5. 3
Scotland
Ivory Coast
Poland
Uruguay
' Final
'/. Final
+2
+4
112
13
USA
ger
g
a ni
163
Austria
China PR
143
4 .6
133
14
4.3
Czechoslovakia
Netherlands
16
Nigeria
USSR
133
4 .. 1
16LL:j.:
5 .3]—
3
1+3
+
1+5
1+4
Fina l
15 4 = 3.7
+4
+2
3,dPlace
~2
25 6 - 4 . 1
154–3.7
53
4
F+i___2$_,6- 471 j
+5
194-4 .7
+5
21 4 -5 .2
1
Marks on teams techniqu e
140
AnalysIs of the Gam e
The Outstanding Player s
An analysis oi the garnes in terms oi ou t
standing players shows that next to fi t
ness and technique the quality of the inclividual players is the decisive facto r
Fighth-Final s
Those teams that went out in the preliminary round did not have more than thre e
outstanding players in their ranks, at though PR China with four and Nigeri a
with five were exceptions to this rul e
However it must be added I ial, excep .
tional though these players
re, the r
lack of international experien , large~ y
prevented them from being able t o
stamp their mark on their team ' s pla y
In this respective the Russian and Austrian teams were disappointing, partic u
larly since most of their players belon g
to first division teams in their hom e
countries
Quarler-Final s
Even the teams eliminated at this stag e
had an average of five outstanding pla y
ers in their sides, which explains th e
high standard of these matches Howe ver this was not sufficient, since th e
successto I teams here had an average o f
six outstanding players on the fiel d
Serni-Final s
There the more homogeneous and betler-balanced teams, averaging seve n
outstanding players each, came out o n
to p
Both in the final itself and in the play-off
for third place all the teanns were able t o
raise their games once again and aver aged no less than eight outstanding per formers per tea m
Regarded from this angle, team performances became more homogeneous a s
the tournament progressed
,,
%~,
EpORT E
'
1
h.
* 4
4
liv- >% :'
"j..X '1
A"
*-J3
mo
~k
;'%
> ".
1*MI
47h
;
Il
I-
IN>
L
~
I# t
-
~.
.
,
-t~ í
-k.
'.O.A
t
#4
-à~úá^ tà.A
ru
142
Diagram 53
This can clearly be traced back to th e
fact that the Poles ' success was due to a
collective effort whereas Brazil Argen tina and Korea Rep [lad won through t o
the finals more on the strength of thei r
individual brilliant players Thus it is no t
surprising to find the very best players o f
the tournament in these three team s
The following table lists once again th e
outstanding individual players of th e
1983 World Youth Championship i n
Mexic o
The following graphical presentatio n
shows the evaluation of the rating s
given The raised figures indicate the i n
div(dual players who were selected o n
more than one occasio n
When comparing the last four teams . i t
is readily apparent that Brazil and Arge n
tina the finalists had a greater wealth o f
outstanding individual players than di d
Poland . who finished Ihird
Outstanding individual players in teams of World Youth Champ~onship Th e
number indicates the player the exponent indicates reverition of his mentio n
Match 1-3
Team
Australia
9, {~, 19
Korea Rep.
1,
I~ Final
Final
Mexico
5 .42. DI 9, 11) . 2
43 52102 ___ 17,103,93
—
63 112 22
3
Scotiand
1, 62, W . 4
lvory Coast
2
POW1(11
7,143,42
112. 4
2
USA
014
61
14
tp,,p
China PR
15 147
Czechoslovaki a
W. 7
~"
Netherlari
USS13
j
7
1
_[14
Sì
s i
__fó~
0, 42.82
F105 73 2
71
o
Austria
Nigeria
5
li, 9.1 ___F1610
'
W, 9 5, il
uruguay
[31dPIIIácé --TFin.I
3 1
IL-
VI
i. i
4
15
133,8.3
15
1 6
lo, li, 1119
613
1
8
p Im-
3
82 .9,1
5
5
2
EEE~___4
83 ,
i
1 &. 112. 9, "
ß
54
Outstanding Players
((The All-Star Team))
r
Tw_
i,~7-ì
*
`
k
!,Ias, LU, s
Bas—Id . FM,m,
— ,> e,
(N ,
ECI
5IIva~ GIovann ,
G
.-M
,
1
Va~ bu,g
——d
. Gerald
4,1
_
io;
Zarate Po " rto
A,, B~w,
143
144
of the Gam e
Overall Survey s
The following table summarises the evaluations given to the different teams fo r
condition, technique and number of ou t
standing player s
The table effectively confirms the result s
that the teams in fact obtained on th e
pitc h
Group 1
Corictlion and technical evaluation s
were relatively even here Scotland ari d
Korea Rep deservedly winning throug h
against stiff opposition with Korea eve n
tually going furthes t
was riot dependent or) just a few to p
player s
Group 3
In this group too, the message to b e
read from the condition ratings is ver y
clear, especially in the cases of the tw o
eliminated teams . while Argentina, th e
group winners . stand alone as far a s
technique goes Looking at the numbe r
of outstanding players removes an y
doubt that Argentina was a worthy grou p
winner and eventual finalis t
Group 4
The separate ratings for this group hav e
The decisive element seems to hav e
already been dealt with The summar y
been the greater number of players ca p
shows the clear superiority of the Brazili able of turning a gam e
ans in all respects . while the Nether lands not only had a plus over Nigeria i n
,
it is interesting to note that the Koreans
terms of fitness, but were probably give n
after some hard qualifying matches ,
the decisive edge by the greater experiwere able to maintain their form an d
could quite justifiably be regarded as th e ence of their individual player s
best team from this grou p
The order produced by this new evalua iion system produces a striking confirGroup 2
rination of the actual match result s
It has already been mentioned that thi s
group was less even and so the tw o
qualifying teams had an easier passag e Brazil (58A Points ~
Worthy World Champions thanks t o
their excellent condition and technique ,
The clear differences in the conditio n
plus the greatest number of outstandin g
arid technical ratings makes this super i
player s
ority even more apparen t
A remarkable feature is the round-t o
round iMprovement shown by the Polis h
tea m
Argentina (553 Points )
Silver medallists despite good condition not quite equal to their final opponents in technique nor in the number o f
outstanding players .
A closer analysis, however indicate s
that this was an improvement of th e
whole team and that their performance
Poland (52 2 Points )
Thirdplace largely due to the whole
Overall
team ' s improvement from round t o
round, as already mentioned The dominating factor here was the level of collective team play .
Korea Rep (46,2 Points )
Fourth place— by no means surprising i f
the ratings are studied The team was at most able to match the Brazilians in al l
respects However . the excellent individual players were not so successful at integrating themselves into a hornogenous teani effort This observation applie s
both to the serni-final defeat agains t
Brazil and the play-off for third plac e
against Poland Their opponents ' greate r
international experience appeared to b e
the telling factor in every gam e
The Netherlands (46,0 Points )
The total of 46,0 points confirms the impvession that the team made on th e
field The defeat by Argentina was e x
tremely close, and this game can well b e
regarded as the best of all the quarte r
finals After a very even garne the Dutc h
lost by a whisker In the opinion of th e
experts the Netherlands was the most talented team after the top South American s
While Scotland and Uruguay were al most able to hold their own as quarter-finalists . the Czechs disappointed with a
poor performance against the eventua l
winners, Brazil .
11 should also be noted that the Uruguay /
Korea Rep . and Scotland/Poland game s
were more fiercely contested, while i n
their game against Czechoslovakia th e
Brazilians were more easily able to demonstrate their superiority, and tha t
without any great physical effort
Nigeria, with 42,0 points . was the bes t
team to be eliminated in the preliminary
145
round This evaluation is due to the fac t
that the team managed to beat the Russians —one of the tournament favounte s
and a traditionally strong team — an d
also produced similar, excellent performances in the games against Brazil an d
the Netherland s
The performances shown by the Ivor y
Coast and Austria must certainly be regarded as unsatisfactory
During the tournament neither team wa s
able to repvoduce the form shown in th e
continental qualificalion oanies
146
Diawam 55
No clue to these teanns ' inabi(ity to play
well can be obtained by looking at thei r
preparatory training, since this was wel l
planned in every respect Nor do poo r
condition . skills and lack of good player s
provide an exp)anaipo n
As the statistics show . other tearns wer e
equally handicapped in these respects .
but compensated through other attributes not listed in the statistics (efforts ,
will to win, discipline etc )
Toralfr7arksofcondirton tachniquean d
-~I
Il
- IA
1
ouIstanffing players
LeA_,
.0
2.0
,v
25.2
22A
20 . 6
19 .6
A
9
Outirt. Playors
3
7
3
5
1
6
5
3,7 S~ 3 4.11 -4 6 ~4—3
11513 6 1 ~—7 5 3 .4 .1
Techinkliiin
4D
CondWm
3 6 1 3 .1
1
4
2
13 1 4 .2 5,3 1 4 .6 4 .2 5,3 3'8~ 5 .0 4~6
3
k~71
~O
m
D
<
ci
CI>
o
DS
'0
, S
~
,
'
o
CO
o
2
5
Z7 g,1 5.2
b-7 W 4 .6_
i
^
0'
ce
2
I
:D
(n
I
I=,
:3
<
S~
U'
_U;
C)
C
5
2
4 .1
5. 3
4.3 5.0
2
=
Q>
m
z
m
21
Z
5
i
Z
cc
v)
i D
14 7
Qualification s
Within Confederation s
AF C
CA F
CONCACA F
CONMEBO L
UEFA
Intercontinental Qualification
Lo
E
ct
Asian Football Confederation - AFC
Kore a
China P R
/,j Chinese Taipe i
r—
1,13
1 1
9
r Af91hanista
Afgli a is
nista
a n
1
Macao
jr.tnam SH
T3
C)
ra n
Syriaa
Lenanon
s~rakàl
Pa'3 k i s t a n n
Jraq
1 ra q
ni e,
'Il
Bahrd,i i akJErmratps–I
1
p
_Iordan Qata r
( ~a.9 n
Saudi
1, Arabia
r,
Yemen r,Arab
Pbi)ubli -
Y-
rì P R
enPD
Ind,
3
,..i
kune
,
Sri Lanka
S
Philippine s
'-Ay
23rd Asian Youth Football Tournament
18th—22nd December 1982, Bangko k
Date
Match
181282
181282
China PR
UAE
Iraq
China PR
Korea Rep
UAE
201282
201282
22 12 .82
2212 .82
Champions
Runner-up
3rd Place
4th Place
-
Iraq
Korea Rep
UAE
Korea Rep
Iraq
China PR
Result
Refere e
2
Steven Ovinis . Malaysi a
Koh Guan Kial, Malaysi a
Parnon Saismutir Thailan d
T Gurukan, Philippine s
Vichat Charupunt Thailan d
Sebastian Yap, Singapore
1
04
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
Korea Rep .
China P R
Ira q
United Arab Emirates
QUalitied for the FIFA/Coca Cola WmId Youth Climrpiuwship, Mexico 198 3
KOREA REPUBLIC and PEOPLE ' S REPUBLIC OF CHIN A
Diagram 57
150
i-
Con k
GarT-
G
Sierra
15 1
Qualifications Within Confederations
III African Youth Cu p
1/8 Final s
13662
27882
5982
19982
15882
24882
Khailourn
Cairo
Conakry
Lom6
Libreville
Lagos
15882
24882
Mbabane
Harare
15882
29882
15882
Ludrida
Yaound(~
25782
6882
19982
26982
Banjul
Alger
Rabat
Abidjan
TUMS
114 Final s
31 1082
Cairo
14 11 82
Conakry
23 1082
7 11 82
37 1082
14 11 82
31 1082
'13 11 82
Lagos
Bulawayo
Yaounde
Abidjan
Alger
Mohamecha
Sudan v Egypt
Egyptv Sudan
Guineav Togo
Togo v Guinea
Gabon v Nigeria
Nigeriav Gabon
Swazilandv Zimbabwe
withdrawai Swazilan d
qualified Zimbabwe
Angolav Cameroon
Camerconv Angola
Ivory Coast v EquaionaiGuinea *
* Equ Guinea disqualified for havin g
used non qua6fied ptayet s
q,,ahbed l,n,yC,,as r
I I
31
G Mapiinda,7anzani a
Said Ali Khamis. Keny a
2 1
1 1
M Conieh Sierra Leon e
S Sow6 . Gambi a
01
20
H Opangault Cong o
M Dormoh . Liberia
15
1 M Costa, Mozambiqu e
of
2 1
T Albert CrinlialAlric a
K Kambal,,Zair e
41
M Tutu . Ghana
Gambiav Algeria
Algenav Gambia
Maroccov TUnisa
Tunisiav Morocco
00
2 1
Y Ngom Senega l
T H Zaglout Libya
40
00
R Medliba Alqeri a
Morched, . Egyp t
Egypt v Guinea
Guoneav Egypt
' Resul i after penalty kicks
Nigeria v Zirnbabwe
Zimbabwev Nigeria
Cameroon v Ivory Coast
IvoryCoastv Cameroon
10
1 0*
8 7
31
10
H Ben Hamida Tunisi a
Fall Babacar . Mauritani a
02
32
20
31
Kabongo Kambali Zair e
Y Thiombiano . Upper Volt a
ldrissaTraore Mal i
B Sary, Senega l
2 1
20
10
Baba Laouissi, Morocc o
H Opangauit . Cong o
M Donnoh Liberi a
Algeria v Morocco
Moroi Algeria
Saleh M Ada] Liby a
ZO Bundala Tanzani a
Semi-Final s
19 1282
8 1 83
19 1282
Conakry
Lagos
Abidjan
Guineav Nigeria
Nigertav Guinea
Ivory Coast ~ Algeria
Alger
Algeria v Ivory Coast
21
H Ben Hamida Tunisi a
Qualified for the. FIFA/Coca Cola Cupfn Mexicci NIGERIA and IVORY COAST
9
1 83
Finals
Firsi Match
1/2/3 April 19&~
Second Match
15/16/17Aprii 19&3
Ivory Coast v N ;ger a
Hussain El Din . Egypt
Nigeria v Ivory Coast
IdTissaTraofe Mal ,
152
Quahbcat~on Within Confederatlons
r4
IL-
,i
40
ri-
Diagram 58
Confederación Norte- Centroamerican a
y del Caribe de Fútbol - CONCA CA F
kI14-,
4,!~k
Canad a
USA
Bermuda
u
k
~' «ì
1
BaNma s
C t1 1
. '
H, ~[i(Iuras
El Salvador
ík
Ni~ aiII(.)a~
Costa
Janiaica
L),- !iiif[iican Republi c
I~~
Ptjert, Rico~~ì
RicaA _
Arìtgu a
íì~
I.
Panama
' M
Ne1herIarì(Is Ari,111es
1
Trirudad 3nd T~,ìhaqe,
Gu
Ba, ' ,
s
753
CONCACAF
1982 CONCACAF Youth Tournamen t
15 .8 .-5 .9 .a2 in Guatemala-City
First Roun d
Group I (USA Guatemala Jamaica Puerto Rico )
158
198
Classification
Puerlo Rico v USA
Guatemala v Jamaica
USA v Jamaica
Puerio Rico v Guatemala
Jarrialf 'av Puerto RICO
Guaien-alav USA
I USA
2 Guatemala
3 Jamaica
4 P.en . Rico
P Mendez Molina Guatemal a
A Bralsis US A
R Reyes Rodas, El Salvado r
R Mnse.s NP.1h Antille s
J L Uirer),i Raroos G—ternal a
C L Alfaro Venegas Costa Ric a
05(01)
3 0 ~O 0)
00(00)
02(01)
60(20)
1 3j1 2)
3
3
3
3
12
2
2
1
0
5
1
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
3
5
81
63
63
0 13
2020
5
4
3
0
12
Groupli (Honduras, Trinodadand Tobago, Cinada Nethe0andsAnri8es )
R Rannirez Zermehn . Mexic o
Honduras v Trin and lob
22(l 0)
C L Altaro Vetiegas Costa Ric a
Ca .adéi v Nelheïlands Aniffles 3 1 (2 01
D Arron Godoy Guatemal a
Hond-as, Neth Antilles
30(l 0)
B Uljo~j Moo,~,i Coma Rica
C~.nada .
and lobago 2 0(l 0)
J M Montane Puerto Ric o
228
Trin arid lob v Netti Antilles 5 1 (2 0)
M Gracias Regalado Guate m
Canada v Honduras
1 2(01)
Classification
1 Honduras
2 Canada
3 Tri, and Tob
4 Neni Antilles
3
3
3
3
12
2
2
1
0
5
1
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
3
5
Group 111 (El Salvador Nicaragua~ Costa Rica Berrnuda ~
178
El Salvadot v Nicaragua
80~40)
Costa Riri v Bermuda
1 0(00)
198
Costa Rica v Nicaragua
80(30)
FI Salvador v Bermuda
2 1 (1 0)
228
Nicaragua v Bermuda
1 2(0 1)
FI Sal .ddor v Costa Rica
23(02)
1 Costa Rica
2 El Salvador
3 Be ' niudd
4 Nicaragua
3
3
3
3
12
3
2
1
0
6
73
63
75
211
2222
5
4
3
0
12
FI Tuomp Neth Antille s
P Clarke Canad a
G OrlaridoPalma Hondura s
J A Narvaez Mexico
R Ramcharéin Ton and To b
M E Nequeros C Guatemal a
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
6
122
124
34
1 18
2828
6
4
2
0
12
754
Qualifications Within Coofederations
CONCACA F
Second Roun d
Group A (PSA CclsfaRici3 Canada )
USA v Canad a
Canada v Costa Ric a
2/8
USA v Costa Ric a
298
Classification
I USA
2 Costa Ric a
3 Canada
Group B (Honduras, Guatemala, EI Salvador )
Guaternala v Hondura s
Honduras v El Salvador
278
Guatemala v El Salvado r
298
Classification
1 Hondufa s
2 Guatemal a
3 El Salvador
32(12)
22(11)
00(00)
2
2
2
6
1
0
0
1
IF Ramire7Zerme6o Mexico
A Mendez Molina Guatemal a
H Tromp Nell, Antille s
1
2
1
4
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
3
3
2
1
6
P Clarke Canad a
j A Narvaez Mexic o
A Brats .s USA
03(02)
2 1 (0 1)
1 0 io 0)
2
2
2
6
32
22
45
99
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
41
1 2
13
66
4
2
0
6
Semi-Final s
19
Gualernalav USA
13(11)
H Trornp Nelh Antille s
19
Honduras v Costa Ric a
1 0(00)
J A Narvae7 Mexico
Costa Rica v Guatemal a
32(1 1)
P Clarke Canad a
USA v Honduras
01(00)
R Mendez Molina . Guatemal a
Third Place Matc h
59
Fina l
b9
Diagram 59
r-- -
CONMEBOL
755
156
Gualfficarions Within Confederation s
X Campeonato Sudamericano «Juventud de América» 198 3
22 .11—13 .2 .1983 - Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivi a
Group matche s
Group A
22
1
iBrazil Colonibi~i Chdo, Fcuador Uri.,goay)
83
241 83
271 83
291 83
1 283
Classification
Chilev Colombia
Brazil v Ecuador
UFUgLJaYV Chile
Braz,lv Colombia
Chile v Ecuador
Uruquayv Columbia
Colombia v Ecuador
Brazil v Uruguay
Uruguayv Ecuador
Brazliv Chile
1
2
3
4
5
Brazil
Uruguay
Chile
Ecuador
Colombia
12(
)
30 (1 O l
1 0(1 0 )
30(00 )
32(00 )
32(11 )
1 2(01 )
3 1 (1 0)
32(1 0)
I 0~1 0)
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
1
1
1
C Montalvdri Per u
J Aritecluerd Bolivi a
JC Lowista(i Argentin a
J Vefgara Venezuel a
G Gu .nlez Paraguay
J Antequera Bolivi a
JC LouslaU Argentina
L SdesCaldwon CoslaRic a
J Vergara . Venezuel a
C Montaivan Penj
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
3
0
3
0 10
101
8 7
46
610
59
3333
8
6
2
2
2
20
Group IS - (Argentind Bolivia Paragoav Pero Venezuela )
2 3 1 P-I
25 1 B3
281 83
301 83
2283
Classification
Peru v Argentina
Boliviav Venezuela
Argentina v Paraguay
Boliviav Peru
Pafaguayv Peru
Argentina v Venezuela
Peru v Venezuela
Paraguayv Bolivia
Paraguay v Venezuela
Bol,v,av Atgenhna
02(0 1)
40(20)
2 0 ~O 0)
3 1 (2 1)
42(2 1)
2 1 it 1)
80(30)
3 1 ~3 0)
01 (01)
1 3i(T 2)
1 Argentina
2 Bolivia
3 Paraguay
4 Peru
5 Venezuela
4
4
4
4
4
20
4
2
2
1
1
10
R Arripi B,az, l
E JacomeG Ecuado r
L Site$ Calderon Costa Ric a
A Blanquiceil-i Colombi a
H Silva Chil e
A Sencion . Urugua y
A BlanquiCelh Colombi a
A SeFIC1011 Urugua y
H Silva Chil e
R Arpp, Brazi l
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
3
3
92
97
76
11 9
2 14
8
4
4
2
2
0
10
3838
20
CONMEBOL
157
Final Round
5283
6283
9283
Brazil v Bolivia
30(1 0)
Argentina v Uruguay
33(00)
Brazil v Uruguay
0 0 (0 0~
Argentina v Bolivia
32(2 1)
Uruguay v Bolivia
32(2 1)
Bra7ilv Argentina *
32(12)
match abandoned at 81 st minut e
12283
13283
Final
Classification
I
2
3
4
Brazil
Uruguay
Argentina
Bolivia
3
3
3
3
12
2
1
1
0
4
E Jacorne G Ecuado r
G Gonzales Paragua y
H Silva Chil e
C Monialvan Per u
A Blanquiceth . Colombi a
L SilesCalderon CostaRic a
1
2
1
0
4
0
0
1
3
4
62
65
88
49
24 24
5
4
3
0
12
South American Youth Champions BRAZI L
Otia I it - I f-
It
o IF IF A/C- i ( dki (up
BRAZIL - URUGUAY - ARGENTIN A
World Yout h Champions I ip Mexico 1983 -
%7Union of European Football Associations - UEF A
Q)) i
Q)
Norway
Scotlan d
Ireland N(-rT[ ,
Ireland Repubi ,1(
4
wal -
JG
Denmar k
Lrig lan d
USSR
P~ 1
p
r, ;
;I j
1~
rg,,
Germany Fed R
rI
Dechtens, ein
~~, -1" .e ' llhu
t_
~-z
Poriupla
. l
(J
;: r,1 n C í,
---/, -ra
~2
(
3~5
Z
M
3
G t, rman Dem.
I
Mali a
Reo
11?2*
759
UEFA
11 . European Championship for A-Youth Team s
11 . Championnat d ' Europe pour équipes juniors A
11 . Campeonato Europeo para equipos juveniles A
11 . Europameisterschaft f 6r A-Junioren-Nationalmannschafte n
Venue
Lieu
L ugar
0, r
Match
Match
Parrido
sp " l
Result
RiOsultar
Resultadr,
Resul r,, r
Referee
Arbirre
Arbitro
Sch~easri ch re r
21,5
Salo
23 .5
Para-en
Raisio
Paimio
Turku
Ausiria v . USS R
Germany FR v, Ireland Rpp
Austria ,, G,,miny F R
USSR v . Ireland Rep .
Austria v, Ireland Rep
USSR v . Germany FI R
1 4 (0 :1 )
1 0 (0 :W
4 1 12 0)
2 0 (2 0)
4 2 (3 :2)
1 0 (1 :0)
E . Golksel . Turke y
P . Kothprla . Albani a
J . Marko . Cze, hoslovaki a
A . Thomas, Netherlands
K Hope . Scotlan d
M Da Silva Luis, Portuga l
Karja a
Hank o
KLIu,ankosk .
Sal o
Karja a
Nummel a
Spain v . Bulgari a
Poland v . Belgiu m
Spain v Polan d
Bulgaria v . Belgiu m
Spain v . Belgiu m
Bulgaria v . Polan d
1 :2 (1 :1 l
1 0 (0 :0)
0 1 (a 1)
0 . 1 (0 :0)
1,3 (1 :1)
0 0 (0 :0)
L . Gyori, Hungar y
A . Ravander, Finlan d
K Hope, Scutlin d
M . Da Silva Luis, Portuga l
J . Marko, Czechoslovaki a
A . Thomas, Netherland s
Kuusankosk i
Hyvinkaa
Kuusankosk i
Kouvol a
Laht i
Hemol a
Portugal v . Hungar y
Czechoslovakia v . Finlan d
Portugal v . Czechoslovaki a
Hungary v . Finlan d
Portugal v . Finlan d
Hungary v . Czechoslovaki a
2 1 (2 1)
2 1 (1 :1~
1~1 (1 :0)
2 3 (1 .2)
I 1 (0 . 1 l
0 :2 (0 2)
D . Dimitrov, Bulgari a
Scotland v . Albani a
Turkey v . Netherland s
Scotland v . Turke y
Albania v . Netherland s
Scotland v . Netherlands
Albania v . Turkey
3 :0 l2 :0)
1 ~3 (0 :3)
2 0 (1 :0)
1 :3 (1 :2)
1 :1 (0 :11
1 :1 (1 :1)
F . Latzin, Austri a
K . Kwiatkowski, Polan d
E . Az,m Zade, USS R
J . Miguel Perez, Spai n
D . Dimitrov, Bulgari a
L . Delsernme, Belgium
Date
Date
Fecha
Da t .. .. 7
Group A
25,5,
Tu, k .
Group B
21 .5
23 .5
25 .5,
Group C
21 .5 .
23 .5 .
25 .5,
Group D
21 .5 .
Kotk a
Anlalankosk i
23 .5 .
Hamin a
Lov,is a
25 .5 .
Anialankosk i
Kotka
L . Delsernme, Belgiu m
K H Tritschler, GF R
P . Daly, Ireland Rep .
E . Azim Zade, USS R
F . Latzin, Austri a
Qualifications Within Confederation s
760
Classifica rions a frer group rratches
Group A
I USSR
2 Austria
3 . Germany FIR
4 Ireland Rep .
Group B
I . Poland
2~ Belgium
3, Bulgaria
4, Spain
Group C
I Czechoslovakia
2, Portugal
3 . Finland
4 . Hungary
Group D
1 , Scoiland
2 . Netherlands
3 Turkey
4, Albania
3
3
3
3
3
0
1
77
9 :7
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
25
3
2 :7
12
6
0
6
20 20
12
3
3
3
3
2
2
0
1
1
3
2 0
1
0
1
0
1
0
2 :6
5
4
3
0
12
5
2
5
10 10
12
3
3
3
3
2
1
1
2
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
3
5 :2
4 :3
55
37
5
4
3
0
12
4
4
4
17 .17
12
3
3
3
3
2
2
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
61
2
2
2 :6
2 :7
5
5
1
1
12
4
4
4
2
4,2
22
7 :3
6
4
2
0
17 17 1 2
Semi Finals / Demi finales / Semifinales / Halbfinal s
28,5 .
Hirneecl,nna
Lathi
D . Dilnitl` QV, Bulgari a
A . Ra,ander . Finlan d
0 1 (0 01
USSR v . Czechoslovakia
Poland v . Scolland
0 2 (0 2)
Match for 3rd place / Match pour la 3e place / Partido por at 3ero puesto / Spiel um den 3 . Platz
A Thomas, Netherland s
3 .1 lo 1)
USSR v . Poland
30 5~
Helsrik,
Final / Final e
30 5
Helsinki
Czechoslovakia v Scotland
K-H Tritschler, GF R
1 3 00 1)
The European Championship also served as qualifying round for the FIFAICoca Cola Cup World Youth Championship . Mexico 19&3 The teams to have qualifie d
were
POLE N
AUSTRI A
THE NETHERLAND S
SCOTLAND
CZECHOSLOVAKIA
USSR
Intercontinental Tournament in San Josd, Costa Ric a
I Australia
2 Israel
3 Cusla Rica
Oijalified lor Ow FIFACoca C()I3CLJP
0
0
1
1
1
1
3
95
63
18
6
b
1
5
2
5
16 16
12
4
4
4
3
12
2
World Youth Charripionqruc~ Mexico 198:3
AUSTRALIA
Diagram 61
Intercontinental Qualification
Israe l
Costa Rica
F1 F A
Intercontinenta l
Australia
76 1
Oualifications Within Confederation s
162
Group C
Group A
1 Mexico
2 Australia
3 Korea Republic
4 Scotland
9 China FIR
(PRC )
(ARG )
10 Argentina
11 Czechoslovakia (CS R )
12 Austria
(AUT )
(MEX )
(AUS )
JKOR )
(SCO)
Group D
Group B
5 Poland
6 Ivory Coast
7 Uruguay
8 USA
13 USSR
14 Nigeria
15 Netherlands
16 Brazil
(POO
(CIV)
(URU)
(USA)
(U RS )
JNGR )
(HOL )
(BRA )
Match Programme
F—, R—d
MEX ~ AU S
14 9
A2
2 J—
KOR
A3
F, . J.,
3 j—
~ SCO
A4
CSR,
c' i
IRC ~ AFIG
—
4 J.—
cio
C9
POL .
85
—
S—d-
o.
A3
~ ME .
.~rSA
SCO ~ AUS
A4
A9
A2
—
URU . US A
Is?
88
CIV
96
UT
I éIOL ,
c,
D
i URS ~ NG R
~ 0,3
DI .
R.
—i
7
- -~11
I.
0,6
ßRA~
NGA
D14
AUT ~ ARG
C12
C70
ME X , SCO
A,
A4
a j—
AUSI KOR
A2 43
POL, US A
85 68
M—, N,, 28
DI - C2
i
S- """'
M—I, i ., 3,d P1 -
ciIr
cs,
~ nu
Morri, No 2 1
CI
1
02
o,,
NGR
c
r-
7
i
~
~ 1R ~
csn
ci,
',
-
86
Th—,I. ,
9 j...
M, r,h N, 25
B2
-o
e
ci ~ ~~~~ i.AA~s
1 ci ~G
1 0—1 .1 F—I .
UR S
0 . . . i' UL
95
L17
Z21 5
---Im.11 1,1 26 ~
B, 1 A 2
-1
1
11—
2-
'-" ,
', 3
i F--
2
29
30
.
- --
L- - ~ - -~ --
163
Individual Analysi s
of World Yout h
Championship Teams
764
Individual Analvsis of WYC Team s
Australia
Hitherto participation 198 1
In 1981, Australia, as host country . did not have to qualify, this time they had t o
compete in intercontinental qualification games and did so successfully — evidence
of further footbalhng progress in that continent The association prepared the tea m
excellently in every respect, sparing neither time nor money The hope was to reac h
at least the quarter-fina l
26 1 133
30183
1283
3283
Austrahav Isiael
Costa Rica v Australia
Israel v Australia
Australia v Costa Rica
1 3
13
1 2
3 0
1 Austfaiia
2 Israel
3 Costa Rica
4 3 0
4 2
1
4 0 1
1
1
3
1 Scotland
2 Korea Rep
3 Australia
4 Mexico
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
95
63
18
6
5
1
First Final Roun d
GroupA
26
36
56
56
86
86
Mox,ccj, Australia, KoreaRepubfic, Scollarid
Mexico v Australia
Korea Rep v Scolland
Korea Rep v Mexico
Scollandv Australia
Mexicov Scotland
Austral ia v Korea Rep
1 1(10 )
02(00 )
2 1 (1 1)
1 2~00)
01 (01)
1 2(02)
2
2
T
0
0
0
1
1
42
44
44
24
4
4
3
1
165
Individual Analysis of WYC Teams
Team : AUSTRALI A
MexicoDF
Venue
Toluca
Toluc a
2665 m
2665 rn
Attitude
Temp .
'_'
~i
28 *
37%
Humidity
Km
24*
27%
27%
16 h
16 h
60
Before a record crowd for the openin g
garne the Australians overcame thei r
initial nervousness and their dra w
against the Mexicans was a good resul t
The viclory over Scolland, one of th e
~avo
i
u n les i n their next game, under ned he p ogress they had made an d
awakened hopes of a place in th e
quarter-final s
The decision had to fall in the gam e
against the strong Korean side Th e
aggressive (attackmg) play of the Asian s
prevented theAusiralians from makin g
LiSe Of their own tactical concep t
Travel
L
Kickof
Resuf
pp_nt
tf
Opp .ft.. nt
R .suit
0
21 h
Mexico
1 :1
Scotland KoreaRe p
2:1
Tearn List
No ~ Pla
NoTlPlaye
7No
layer
~r
1
Humme l
2
Maie r
3
McCulloch
4
Dakos
5
Jone s
6
Stewart
7
Farin a
8
Patika s
9
Brow n
10
Lo-e
11
lncantalup o
12
Dale y
13
Rizzo" o
14
Vlietstr a
15
Licat a
16
Glockne r
17
Wright
18
Franken
Match 2
1 :2
This defeat meant that they did no t
qualify for the next roun d
766
Ind(vidualAnalvsis of INYC Team s
Mexico
Hitherto participation 1977,1979,198 1
o,
I, ì*
t-
0g,
9
Jì~
A
-
11.~~
C
-
Expectations ran much higher than the team ' s preparatory showing would justify
This did not alter the fact that the Mexicans, having qualified for every World Yout h
Championship since 1977 . and now playing at home, had to be regarded as ho t
favouriles However . their well-planned preparatory prograrnme suffered repeate d
interruptions, for various reasons . and was not a total success However, it was stil l
thought that the team ' s performance would be strong enough aided b y
determination and public support to bring them success
Automatically qualified as host
Indwidual Analvsis of WYC Teams
167
Team : MEXIC O
Mexico D F . Mexico D .F I Mexico D F .
Venue
7
—MU—M—Muffl—
m
The Mexican team brought good skill s
(tactics, technique and fitness) to th e
tournament but were unable to cop e
~ith the mental strain High expectations were not matched by result s
Altitude
35'
28 '
~
'
Temp .___
Humidity
25 *
37%
40%
42%
21 h
21 h
21 1 ,
Km
Travel
Kick off
1 0—
140
4
1 ' %.
p
I A.st, .I, . Korea Rep Scotlan d
11
F7T7
0:1
Matchl
Match2
Match
M
.' c ', 3,
Team List
Nl~o
Player
1
Navaor o
2
Hernande z
3
lylacedc,
4
Quintero
5
Villega s
6
Berna l
7
Garci a
8
Espari a
9
Mucifio
10
Reyn a
11
Moren o
12
Nava
13 1 Gamboa
1 14 ~ Pajarito
15 Huert a
16 Gonzàle z
17 Vazque z
18
Panduro
elu
-.ad
met ,
=7
As the. tournament progressed their ne r
vouS tension increased resulting in a
drop in the standard of play and less fle x
(" hTym 1he ' r styl e
All tDur teams in this group were quit e
evenly matched but the Mexicans, a s
hosts and tavouriles . carried an extr a
l,ijrdp,n which led to their prematur e
' .111ninaiion destine passionate 5UpPor l
fron) enthusiastic spectator s
168
Individual Analvsts of WYC Team s
Ivory Coast
«q~ wàM~-&~
4, a r Il1
IVIII
~v
ah
í§
ì21 -
This was their second appearance at a World Youth Championship After the first ever tournament in Tunisia in 1977, this requalification indicated the progress mad e
in youth football in the Ivory Coast . In the qualifying round, played on a home-andaway basis, they managed to reach the final . and despite losing this game t o
Nigeria, still qualified for Mexico . After a short bu)ld-up penod, the team Weil l
through an impressive preparatory programme and set off for Mexico with hig h
hopes
15882
'/. Finafs
31 1082
Ivory Coasiv Equatorial
4 1
Cameroon v Ivory Coast
Ivory Coast V Cameroon
0 2
3 2
Final s
19 12 82
1~j
9 1 83
1 0
Ivory Coast v Algeria
Algeria v )vury Coast
2 1
First Final Round
Group B
36
36
56
66
86
86
Puland Ivory Coast, Utuguay, USA
Poland v Ivory Coast
Uruguay, USA
USAv IvoryCoast
Uruguayv Poland
Po)and v USA
Ivory Coast v Uruguay
72(30)
32(l 0)
10 ~O 0)
31 (00)
20(DD)
00(00)
1 Uruguay
2 Poland
3 USA
4 Ivory Coast
3
3
3
3
2
2
)
0
7
0
0
1
0
1
2
2
63
105
35
28
5
4
2
1
169
Team : IVORY COAST
Venue
-77
20
1 --
Puebla
I Puebla
lrarivat o
2162 m
2162-
2037 m
C ,I
\,,
1~j
Attitude
- --
0 ,,—
I
1_1~
30 *
26 *
Temp .
M~ì
Humidity
, ~—
1^
52%
14%
,
I
A
USA
14
4451h
0
Km
Travel
Kick off
0
Opponent
Result
-Ir
14h
14
0 h
15 h
Poland
US A
Urugua y
2 :7
1
0 :11
Tearn List
No
Player
1
Lancin a
2
D .d i
3
Gued e
4
Soro
5
Baroa n
6
Bousso u
7
Gbezi e
8
Sacr e
9
Tchetch e
10
Diab y
11
Gbal a
12
Gb a
13
Ka h
14
Fofana
15
Kassy
16
Ouma r
17
On
la
Assieoussou
Match 2
1
0:0
-lie heavydeleal in their opening gam e
againsl Poland destroyed all hope fo r
the ivory Coast lear n
At least the severity of this defeat could
have beer) avoided but a naive tactica l
plan perhaps due to a lack of intern a
tional experience ruined all their prospect s
Their problems were compounded by
the unfarnihar environment and inco r
reci evaluation of their own abilit y
le 11,e garee against the USA thei r
desoe to rehabilitate the selves wi s
obviotis but they were, unable io matc h
this with the quality of jheir play and th e
spectators suffered a poor gam e
Only against Uruguay who had alread y
qualified for the quarter-finais did th e
team show a ray of hope and they man aged a remarkable result . at least fro m
1—1—1— 111—1loivievv
The lesson learned tFOfn their exoe n
ences in MeXLCQ will be. to play less em a
tionallyand with more self-control i n
folure hopefully producing mor e
170
Individual Analysis of WYC Team s
USA
~
511
kl-7:~,17-4
This was the USA s second consecutive qualification and it was regarded as a sig n
of the positive development of football in the States, and confirmation that they ha d
got the basics right Their good preparatory programme was rounded off at a hig h
almucle training camp in Colorado, on the way to Mexico, and hopes of reaching th e
quarter-final seemed realisti c
15882
19882
22882
25882
29882
os
Puerio ffico v USA
USA v Jamaica
Guatemalav USA
USAv Canada
USA v Costa Rica
00
1 3
32
0 0
~ Finajs
5 10 82 USA ~ Guatemala
Fina l
81082 Hondurasv USA
3 1
1 0
First Final Roun d
Group B
36
36
56
66
86
86
Poland Ivory
Coas I. Uruguay USA
Poland v Nory Coast
Uruguayv USA
USA v ivory Coast
Urugijayv Poland
Poland v USA
Ivory Coas(v Uruguay
7 2 13 D~
32(l 0 )
1 0(00)
31 (00)
20(00)
00(00)
1 Uruguay
2 Poland
3 USA
4 lv(jrvCoasi
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
2
63
105
35
2
28
5
4
2
1
InottividualAnalt,sis
17 1
of WYC Teams
Team : US A
Gundalaraja
Venue
Puebla
2162
1567 m
Attitude
lr
XI-L
2162
2m
~
~
26 '
21
26*
17%
16%
'-;~Y
Temp .
m
Puebl
abl a
I
i
46%
Humidity
725
Km
Travel
Kick
0
01111
Opponent
Result
I
19h
14 h
114
16%
62
eb
2h6.
m
l ea
Polan d
,
1
2 :3
1
1 :0
1
0:2
Team List
Player
No
1
Dubac k
2
Pea t
3
Blac k
47
Caligiuri
5
Groessor
6
Maure r
7
a
Ste-a, d
I
Arya
9
Brady
10
Ervin e
'
Ill
Ramo s
12
Snyde r
13
Forero
14
e1novatch
O er
111
5~ HH
16
Pere z
17
Sanderso n
18
Snyder
Match 2
1~11---!s
In 3
The I ISA team started their programm e
;it ' he World Youth Championship with a
~jamP against one of the lavourites . Ur u
j,jay Despite. playing well they lost thi s
encounte r
Tineir next game, against the Ivory Coas t
was a relatively poor one both team s
wanting to make up for their openin g
defeats The. level of play was low an d
the game suffered from many fouls an d
infringement s
The final match was charactersed by th e
Pi)I: sh learn s taciical concept The Pole s
wa iled to quality for the quarter final a t
iny cost and adopted a classical cou n
tering formation against which the U S
team could nor find an effective answe r
Ir, spite. of good individual playe' s
(Mauref No 16) ihe level within the tea m
was too uneven However, Their overal l
performance was encouragin g
17-2
Austria
J,AL
Austria s qualification in their European group was rather a surprise Th e
association took up the challenge and gave the team thorough preparation over a n
extended period This triggered off the hope that they would prove the. sensation o f
the tournament as they had done in the European Championship s
21 582
23582
25582
Ausinav USSR
Austria v Germany FR
Ausirrav IreJand Rep
14
41
42
1 USS R
2 Austri a
3 GerrnanyP R
4 rerland Rep
3
3
3
3
3
2
1
0
1 Argenfina
2 Czechoslovak,a
3 China PR
4 Austria
3
3
3
3
3
2
1
0
0 0 7 1
0 1 97
0 2 25
0 3 27
6
4
2
0
First Final Roun d
Group :C - China PR. Argentina Czechosiovakia Austri a
46
46
China PR v Argentina
Czechosiovakia v Austria
05(0 1 )
40J7 01
76
76
96
96
Ausiria v Argenlina
Czecinosiovakiav ChinaPR
Argeni,na v Czechosiovakia
China PR v Austria
03(03)
32(1 0)
2 0 Il 0)
30100)
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
100
74
58
010
6
4
2
0
173
Individual Analvsis of WYC Teams
Team : AUSTRI A
Venue
~
Puebla
2162 m
1
León
2037 m
Iraputito
2037 m
In every respect the Austrian team s
showing was a disappointment At n o
point did they reach the expected leve l
and they were unable to obtain the kin d
of results hoped fo r
Altitude
jj~ 35
1 29
27 "
Temp
i
1/~ ~'
,
Humidity
Km
',
1^
40%
545
-100
52%
Travel
CI
14h
CSSR
04
Team List
No
Player
1
Wohlfahrl
2
Cvetk o
3
Frind
4
Klembichle r
5
Stumpf l
6
Tatar
7
09ris
8 1 Weinrich
9 TP.Isl r
10
Haizinge r
11
Mark o
12
G.n
13
Riede,
14
Hirstic
15
Strob l
16
Gabriel
17
0 exe ~
Icher
19
1
o
Arge .tinaChnaPIF11
0 3
33J
PR
11
Match 1
Match 2
r1m
1
Match 3
OW777
A sco resheetof three defeats in thre e
qames and0goals for, 10against doe s
nut need elaboratin g
A careful internal analysiswill certainl y
hrtng out the reasons for this dramati c
decline That the reasons lie outside th e
purely footballing domain is one conle c
ture, since the team s preparation ha d
been goo d
774
Individual A nalysis of WYC Teams
China PR
ìr
For the Chinese this was the first time a tearn had ever qualified for the final roun d
of an official FIFA competilion The team was prepared with Chinese thoroughness .
and tour matches were arranged to gain experience at international level Thei r
immediate aim was to qualify for the quarier-final s
31 782
2882
4882
6882
China PR v Hong Kong
Korea Hep v China PR
Singapur v China PR
China PR v Malaysia
40
02
02
91
~~ Final s
12882 Ch,naPR . Thadand
Fina l
14882 ChinaPPv KoreaDPR
1 0
1 0
Group C - Chtna PR. ArgenPna Czéchos~ovaksa Austri a
46
46
76
76
96
96
China PH v Argentina
Czechoslovakia v Austria
Austria v Argenitna
Czechoslovakia v China PH
Argentina v Czechoslovakia
China PH v Austria
05(01 )
40(1 0)
03(03)
32(10)
2011 0)
3 OlOO)
1 Argentina
2 Czechoslovakia
3 China PH
4 Austria
3
3
3
3
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
100
74
58
010
6
4
2
0
175
Team : CHINA P R
Venue
Mexico D F
I
Irapuato_ Irapuato
2240 m
2037 ,
V,
Altitude
1
26 '
30 '
30 '
52%
55%,
Temp
37%
Humidity
Km
320
Travel
Kick of
f
10
Opponent
IT,
Result
1
12 h
rgentina
051
15h
15 h
CSSR
Austri a
2 3
1
3 :0
Team List
[N ~Plu aya,
14
1 Fu
Match 2
i
2
Wan g
3
Ji a
4
Ma i
5 1 Hu
6 ~ Zhon g
7
Li, Huayu n
8
Zh u
Chen
10
Fa n
11
Li . Yon g
12
Gu o
13
Che n
14
Wan g
15
Li u
16
Duan
17
Sha n
18
Li, Zhiga o
-.dldg
1
The l ack of intemalional experienc e
q uo ed above (especially agai nst Sout h
American opponents) made the weaknesses of The Team apparent in the first
gam e
If they were guilty of paying too muc h
respect to the big names in that game ,
they certainly managed to shake [his of f
in the next against Czechoslovakia, an d
played a much better and more conce n
trated gam e
Their last group game, against Austri a
confirmed quis improvement and the.
resi 11 mearil an horioutable departur e
Their well disciplined behaviour t o
Mexico won the entire delegation a lot o f
friend s
176
IndividualAnalysis of WYC Team s
Nigeria
4
Nigeria ' s first-ever qualification for a World Youth Championship spurred th e
association to specially intensive preparatory efforts After beating the Ivory Coas t
in the final of the African qualifying group the tearn went on tours specifically t o
prepare for the Mexican geographical conditions and to gain experience o f
tournament play against strong opposition The results achieved were encouraging ,
and both players and officials approached the Championship in Mexico optirnisticall y
15882
24882
'/. Final s
23 1082
7 7182
Group D
46
46
66
66
96
96
Gabon v Nigeria
Nigenav Gabon
0 1
2 0
Nigeriav Zimbabwe
Z(mbabwev Nigeria
3 1
1 0
!t Fmal s
19 12 82
8 1 83
Guinea v N .gena
Nigeria v Sumea
2 1
20
USSR Nigeria, Netherlands . Brazi l
Netherrandsv Brazil
USSRv Nigeria
Brazil v Nigeria
Nelherlaridsv USSR
LISSRv Brazil
Nigeria v Netheirlands,
I 1 (00 )
01 (00 )
30(30 )
32(l 0 )
1 2100 )
00(00)
1 Brazii
2 Netheriands
3 Nigeria
4 USSR
3
3
3
3
2
1
1
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
3
62
43
13
36
5
4
3
0
77 7
Team : NIGERI A
Venue
Monterrey Guadalajara Monterre y
I
156 7
I ;"N
" -
538 m
—
32 *
(
28 *
538 m
1 W.
Temp .
Humidity
Kan
1
68%
46%
660
660
17h
19 h
21 h
Brazil
Netherland s
0 :3
0:0
72%,
Travel
Kick o "
Opponen
ul t j
Result
—
0
t 40 4
t USSR
1 :0
Team List
No
Ployer
1
Adebani o
2
Jeje
6
Okhik u
7
Olukann i
8
Dahir u
9
Otti
10
Kpako
11
Ahanmb a
12
Akhaha n
13
Sieste
14
Buraimoh
15
Akinlota n
16
Ehilegbu
17
Anigala
18 Olukanni
voll
One of the surprise teams in thecomp e
tition Their performance in a stron g
group and especially the, victory ove r
the Russians and the draw with th e
Netherlands were significant result s
Even the 0 3 defeat by The evenlUal wi n
ners Brazil did riot dismay This tea m
Their showing in Mexico proved the m
worthy representauvP.s of African too t
ball and documented the progres s
made in that conlinent a trend that ha d
already been noticed during the Vvorl d
Ctip in Spain in 1982
178
lodividualAnalysis of WYC Team s
USSR
Hitherto participation 1977, 197 9
Ilia
A7
Based on their sporting record and well-known thoroughness in preparation, th e
opinion was that the Russian youth team would be one of the favourites, althoug h
the delegation leaders tried to play this down, stressing that they were re-buildin g
after falling to reach the final round of the previous World Youth Championship i n
Australi a
21 582
23582
25582
'6 Finals
28582
3rd Plac e
30582
Austriav USSR
USSR v Ireland Rep
USSRv GermanyFR
1 4
20
I ()
USSR v CSSR
0 1
USSRv Poland
3 1
1 USSR
2 Ausina
3 Germany FR
4 Ireland Rep
3
3
3
3
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
71
97
25
27
6
4
2
0
1 Brazil
2 NelheancI5
3 Nigeria
4 USSR
3
3
3
3
2
1
1
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
3
62
43
13
36
5
4
3
0
1
First Finsi Roun d
Group D - USSR Nigeria. Nethertaods, Brazi l
46
46
66
66
96
96
Nelherlands v Brazil
USSR v Nigeria
Brazil v Nigeria
Nelherlandsv USSR
USSR v Brazil
Nigenav Netherlands
1 1 (00 )
0 1 (0 q
30130)
32(10)
1 2 JO 0)
00(00)
179
Individual Analysts of WYC Teams
Team : USS R
It cameasa surprise that in thei r
Montefrev ~Mon1úrrey Guadelaiatl
a
opening match . against the suppose d
outsidersfrom Nigeria . the Russian s
1567 nri
were not at)fe to perform as everyon e
5M m
had expecte d
Venue
Aftitude
~28 *
Temp .
86%
Hunniclity
78%
,
660
Km
Travel
Kick-of
f
1
46%
1
(D
Oppon
o
è" q.
17 h
21 h
Nigeria ~NetherI»nds~
4
Ar
-
0 :1
1
2 :3
Team List
No[ Player
1
Palamarchuk
2
Islamo v
3
Agapo v
4
Dochi a
5
Karatae v
Match 1
6 ~ M .tiiiski,
7
Eremerik o
8
1akcivenk o
9
Litovchenko
10
Petro v
11
Protasov
12
Salirno v
13
Dernido v
14
Tkebuchav a
15
Rc>dneno k
16
Cherchesci v
17
Dimitriev
18 . Liaviandrauskas
Ig h
_da@
1
Brazi l
1 :2
The mainly individual style of the Afr i
cans who had prepared very thoroughl y
for the tournament was more than th e
Russians, playing a more collective tea m
game . could cope wit h
With the burden of this defeat on thei r
shoulders they were unable to gathe r
themselves together lot the Iw o
~emami, nq games against the Nethe r
ands a A Brazil where their nervou s
ness was eviden t
Once again they hnished last in thei r
group and thus one of the favourileswa s
soon on the way hom e
A detailed analysis of the technical lea d
- - . of the Russian team will certainly
resul I in better performances in th e
future The players potential also sup ports lh is theor y
780
Individual Analysis of WYC Teal77s
Scotlan d
The Scots were repeatedly named as one of the top faVOUrites . coming as they di d
with the European title in their pockets Not only did the title raise expectations fo r
this tearn . but hopes were backed up by the quality of their individual players . thei r
professional backgrounds and their successes with club learns In a short but well planned preparatory prograrnme it was hoped to make the team even mor e
effective arid thus iustify its role as favourit e
21 582
23582
25582
'~ Finals
Final
GTOup A
36
~' (i
56
86
6 (3
r4
Scoi[and v Albania
SCOt1dr)dV Turkey
Scol ;andv Nelhetiands
Poland v Scolland
CSSRv Scotland
30
20
1 1
02
1 3
3
3
3
3
2
2
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
2
2
61
73
26
27
5
5
3
1
1 Scrilland
2 Korea Rep
3 Australia
4 Mexico
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
0
0
0
1
7
1
1
1
2
42
44
44
24
4
4
3
1
Mexico, Australia. Korea Republic Scollan d
Mexico v Australia
Korea Rep v Scuiland
Korea Rep v Mexico
Scotland v Australia
Me~,cov Scotland
Australia v Korea Rev)
? I (I or
02(00 )
2 1 (1 1)
1 2(00)
01 (01)
1 2(02~
',( ,tlarid
0 1 (() 1 )
Final s
11c
1 Scotland
2 Netherlands
3 Torkey
4 Albania
v
Poland
hidividual Analysis of WYC Team s
18 1
Team : SCOTLAN D
Venue
Toluca
Toluca
2665 m
2665 m
Mexico D .F. l MexicoD F .
I
2240 m
2240 m
rhe preliminary round alread y
~howed that the Scolswcul d
11ave a hard time justifyin g
11,etr role as one of the faVOLi r
t' s
A" ude
_
Temp .
. . ....
27%
j26
24
27%
37%
Humidity
Kim
the strong Korean tea m
caLi5ed them problems at th e
~4]
0025'
beginning but in the secon d
half the Scots pulled oif a
ILickywi n
40%
%
It seemed that having a nu m
ber of players already in pr o
tessional sides hada negativ e
,r,i %—ncP (titledness after a
seaso n
60
Travel
15h
f 46 4
'-W. r
KoreaRep
1
__
_
2 :0
T
16 h
Aust
20 h
.7 Mexico
'"
—
1 :2
j
10
12 h
j1an
0 1 d
0 1
Yet the, g realef experience di d
IT . . . the decisive grou p
!"1~11"'I'l-aq ." .'I Mexico
As against Korea Rep th e
goal came at a decisive m e
men t
Team List
Player
Match 3
Gun n
Beaumont
3
Bowma n
4
Blac k
5
Clark e
6
Cooper
7
Dic k
8
Dobbi n
9
McClai r
1( )
McGinni s
11
McInall y
12
Westwater
L13
McPherson
14
Mcsta y
15
Macka y
16
Nevi n
17
Philliben
18
Rice3
'A Fina l
Thanks to building-up extr a
fitness at a high attitude cam p
. . . Colorado, USA) on Thei r
way to Mexico . the Scots were
able to reach the quarter fina l
but their energy ran out, an d
they were not able to over come the more consistent Po l
' sh team
Overall more had been ex .
pecled from the reigning European Champions The ac cent in Their play was not o n
technical skill s
_911111
low
182
IndIvidual A nalysis of WYC Team s
Uruguay
Hitherto participation 1977, 1979, 198 1
Their record of parlicipation and success in previous tournaments made them a c o
favourite for the title of World Youth Champions . all the more so since they wer e
able to call Upon a good group of players for their careful preparatory programme ,
and conditions in Mexico would be relatively familia r
24 1 83
27 1 83
29 1 B3
1 2 K3
10
32
31
32
Uruguayv Chile
Uruguay v Columbia
Bf,3711 V Uruguay
Uruguayv Ecuador
1 Brazil
3 Chile
4 Ecuador
5 Colornnia
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
3
3
10 1
87
46
610
59
8
6
2
2
1 Brazil
2 Uruguay
3 Argentina
4 Bolivia
3
3
3
3
2
1
1
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
1
3
62
65
88
49
5
4
3
0
1 Uruguay
2 Poland
3 USA
4 Ivory Coast
3
2
3
3
3
2
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
2
2
63
105
35
28
5
4
2
1
2 Uruguay
2
Final Roun d
6283
92W
12 2 B3
Group 8
36
36
56
66
86
86
Argentinav Uruguay
Brazil v Uruguay
Uruguay v Bolivia
3 3 ~O 0)
00 (0 0~
32(2 1)
PoYand Ivory Coast Uruguay. USA
Polandv ivory Coast
Uruguayv USA
USA v Ivory Coast
UrL]guayy Poland
Poland v USA
Ivory Coasiv Uruguay
72(30)
32(l 0 )
1 0 io 0)
3 1 (00)
20(00)
00100)
OrUgUaYv KoreaReto
1 2 * (00 1 1)
Final s
6
183
Tea- : U R U G UA Y
Venue
'
__V"
1
Guadalajara
I—
1567 m
, 5.( "" - —
2~xc —
Le6n
-55T7_m
538 m
nn~' ~' ~ -
Attitude
30 *
The. group game against th e
1.) .';A was of a good standard .
the Uruguayans needing thei r
j,ealer international expen P.nce to Come Out on top Finally decisive were their mor e
,ompact style of play an d
,peater consistency withu) th e
lrapuato Monterrey
_MT1_
m
32 *
30'
t_~
Temp .
f'A
'1
tea m
1!/ '
46%
40%
52%
Km
A v,n against the strong Polish team laid the foundation
for a qualification for the quar
te, fina l
86%
Humidity
660
I l--e,
the tean, —th lh e
number (.)i appeafa n
W .rid Yo .th Chaml—r)slhipswasdenred a piac e
,ri Tho. semi final by the con %lanfly improving Korean s
Travel
D,
Kick-of
f
Opponent
I
Resutt
I
_4
'.%~
P
119h
17h
USA
Poland
3 ;2
3 :1
15 h
F
IZ—1yCoast I Korea Rep
1
0 :0
Team List
No
Player
1
Picu n
2
Martinez, C .
3
Ubart i
4
Esna l
5
Perclomo
6
Silva
7
Miranda
8
ZBlaze r
9
Aguilers
10
Martinez .J .
11
Sosa
12
Fuente s
13
De Le6 n
14
Anchet a
15
Pintos
16
Montan o
17
Olivera
is Ayala
Match 3
—..dd
17 h
1
1 :2 '
1
A theoretical question i s
whether the disappoinling 0 0
against the ivory Coast in the
ld~t group ganiupsel the.
Uruguayains rhythIn and led
in their eliminalion in th e
;uairter fina l
184
Individuai Analysis of WYC Teain s
Czechoslovaki a
The Czechrs had juntiably high hopes of doing well . since lhey were not onl y
European runners-up but also underwent thorough team preparalio n
In a group of strong learns, particularly from South America, their airn was to reac h
the quarter-fina l
21 582
23582
25582
'~ Final
Final
GroupC
46
46
76
76
96
96
14
Cze.choslDvakiav Finland
PO ' lugal V Czechoslovakia
Hungary v Czechoslovakia
USSR v CSSR
CSSR v Scolland
2 1
1
1
02
() 1
3
3
3 Finland
4 H,ngary
3
3
2
1
1
0
1 Argentina
2 C7e&oslovakia
3 China PH
4 AL]stna
3
3
3
3
3
2
1
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
3
52
43
55
37
5
4
3
0
0
1
100
74
58
010
6
4
1 3
China PR Argentina Czechoslovakia Austna
China PH v Argenlina
Czechoslovakia v Ausiria
Ausinav Argennna
Czechoslovakia v China PH
Argentinav Czechoslovakia
China PH v Ausina
05(0 1 )
40(l 0 )
0 3 (0 3~
3 2 (1 O~
20(1 0)
30(00)
Brazil v Czechoslovakia
4 1 (3 1)
Final s
26
1 Czechoslovakia
2 Parluga)
0
0
0
0
2
3
2
0
185
Team : CZECHOSLOVAKI A
Venue
"~7-2~«
I.
Puebla lrapuato
,1—
2162 m
_ — 2037 m
León
2037 ni
j
Guadalajar a
1567 m
(XX
Altìtude
"
2*
30'
27'
Temp .
4
f
Humidity
17%
,
52%
Km
445
mio ~
14 h
'q~0~F4
15h
Austria
China PA
4 :0
1
Krbece k
2
Hate k
3
Vrb a
4
Kopt a
5
Baian t
6
Kubi k
7
Dosth l
8
1
Match 2
Kula . V .
—A d
9 Karoch
10
Kula, K .
11
Mitkulf
12
Fieber
13 Halkoc i
14 Hirk o
15
Suka d
16
Ho " at h
1 7 Zblegh k
1 8 Pfibyl
11111101111MEN
1
17 h
rgentine
0 2
1
Team List
Player
46%
100
Trovai
No
40%
I
-6
14 h
Bra M
I r) their first garne the Czech s
made short work of their r e
nowned neighbours fro m
Austria whoseopen style o f
play posed no problems fo r
the Czechoslovakian tea m
However inthefollowinglw o
games their limitations wer e
P.xposed, and they had a muc h
harder time against team s
whose abilities were relalivel y
E ,,nknown
they earhPd th e
;,i`a hey had
d f.,
'N I i,'~ : w s a quarter fina l
plac,! But that was l he end o f
the road for 11he Czechs wh o
were I el minaled by the stron g
Braz, ian tea m
Nonetheless the Czechs pa r
lJ
4Ah
t,c,pabonm the World Yout h
pionship had its pos i
live side since their talented
young players were. a ble t o
gather international exper i
ence against less familiar sy s
Terns and styles of pla y
Individoal_Analysis of WYC Team s
186
Netherland s
After qualifying successfully in the European Championships, the Dutch made th e
most of their opportunity Despite strong competition, the learn s extremel y
thorough preparation and the quality of its players led to high expectation s
21 582
23582
25582
Turkeyv Netherlands
Albaniav Netherlands
Scotland v Netherlands
13
13
1
Group D - LISSR Nigeria Netherlands . Brazi l
1 1 (00 )
46
Netherlandsv Brazil
0 1 (00)
USSR v Nigeria
46
30(30)
Brazilv Nigeria
66
32(1 0)
Nelherlandsv USSR
66
1 2(00)
ijSSRv Brazil
96
00(00)
Nugenav Netherlands
96
2 1 (0 1)
Arqentinav Netherlands
126
1 Scotland
2 Netherlands
3 Turkey
4 Albania
3
3
3
1 Brazil
2 Netherlands
3 Nigeria
4 USSR
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
2
2
1
1
1
0
2
2
2
0
0
1
0
2
61
73
26
27
5
5
1
1
0
0
1
3
6 2
43
13
36
5
4
3
0
187
Team : NETHERLAND S
Venue
Guadalajara Monterrey
7-
2~
1,.
Altitude
2000 —
1 15wIM) "
,'
Monterrey
Le6n
_'MJ/ m
1567 m
538 an
31 '
538 m
032 '*
30'
Against Argentina one of th e
tournament favountes. th e
Dutch were able to raise thei r
gam e
Temp.
46%
Humidity
Kra
86%
83%,
660
560
In a hard-fought game, th e
SOLJ[h Americans proved th e
cleverer team and won a pa s
sage to the next roun d
Travel
Kick of
f
®r
Opponent
Result
0
1
19h
21 h
21 h
12 h
Brazil
USSR
Nigeria
Argentin a
1 :1
1
0 :0
1
0 :0
Team List
No
Player
1
Menzo
2
Koo t
3
Duu t
4
Siloo y
5
Teube n
6
Snoe i
7
Schip, van ' t
a
Vanenbur g
9
Basten, va n
10
Roor d
11
Wit, de
12
Boogaard, v .d .
13
Been
14
Goose
15
Krame r
16
Laurs
17
Bakke r
18
Panhuis
Match 3
l
The results of the preliminary
round do not accurately re
liect the talent present in thi s
team, since despite playin g
wel I . too many lapses of co n
centration crept in especiall y
in finishin g
1
1 .2
The Dutch learn came to me ,
cu, very well prepared an d
wor, a lot of h, " ds 1h .r e
Their style of play was ver y
modern and their talentecimdividua) players provided a
real challenge for the Sout h
American s
788
Individual Analysis of INYC Team s
Korea Rep .
Hitherto participation 1979,198 1
Korea s qualification for Mexico can ultimately be traced back to experienc e
gathered at previous World Youth Championships After qualifying, the tea m
underwent a concentrated preparatory training programme and hoped to be able t o
repeat earlier successe s
2882
4882
6882
8882
Group A
0 2
06
6 1
06
Korea Rep v Korea DPR
Maiaysia v Korea Rep
Korea Rep v Hung Kong
Singapore v Korea Rep
1 T (I O ~
02(00 )
2 1 (1 1 )
1 2lOO)
0 1 (01 )
1 2 ~O 2)
~
P,griay
~ 1(mea R,~p
á Final s
'
1
il .
e,
1 Scollari(I
2 Korea Rep
3 Australia
4 Mexico
3rd
~~ Final s
16
3
1 4
Me—co Atisfraha Korea Rep Scotlan d
Mexikov Australia
Korea Rep v Scolland
Korea Rep v Mextro
Scoiland v Ausiralia
Mexico v Scotland
AusIraha v Korea Rep
26
36
56
56
86
86
t Final s
Ktirea DPR v Kti—a Her;
3,d Place
Thailand v Korea Rep
'
K : 1-1 ~~ep
1
BIa2d
1
2 ' (0 0 1 t ~~
1
~I C,
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
42
44
44
24
4
4
3
1
Piac e
I
'
~
lar d , Korea Rep
2
1 '
(0 1 1 1 l
189
Team : KOREA REP .
Toluc
a —
Mexico D . F
---
Venue
Attitude
i
,- I xx
'
538 m
~2 4 *
27%
1
37%
60
15 h
12 h
Scotlan d
Mexico
02
2 :1
Travel
Result
29%
60
C.
~
I
538 m
30'
30 *
26 *
~f5*
26 *
85%
86%
46%
1
1
Km
I Monterrey ~uadaleje r
1567 m
-
~N
Humidity
Opponent
Monterrey
2665 m
I
Temp
Kick of
f
Toluca
I
m
-2666
60
t
16 h
1040
660
17
19 h
Australia Uruguay
2 :1
1
21 *
Brazil
1
Polan d
1 :2 '
1 :2
1
1
Team List
tch 3 1 ". Final
r11-TPl-1a-1
1 Kim . P . J .
2
Kim . P . K .
3
Moo n
4
No
Final
1 31, Plac e
did -..Ngd.
Yo o
Jan g
1
7
Lee, T . H
8
Lee, K . K .
9
Kim . J . B .
I
10 1 Shi n
11
Lee .S .-H .
12 Cho,J-H ,
i
-..ggd
13 K m, H . K .
14 Kan g
15 K,m,J .-K .
16
hot .
17 Lee, H .-C .
18 j Lee, M . Y .
-.Mdgd .
- .Md~~L'9991
I
190
The Korean teani played better round by round i n
the preliminary games and deservedly qualified fo r
thequarter final s
This improvement continued and their sport s
man~htp won Them extra friends in Mexic o
Their playing ability reinforced by great enlh u
siasin for the. game brought thern Ithrough th e
quarTer-final game against Uruguay into a se.m i
final encounter with Brazi l
in what was perhaps the best game of the whol e
tournament in Mexico it looked tot a while as if th e
eventual champions were in for a surprise hot th e
greater professional and international experienc e
of the South Americans finally turned the gam e
theirway
Kore a
A criticism levelled at the Koreans in the. earlie r
rounds was a failure to take good scoring chance s
and cerlainly greater success in this respect woul d
have bionghl a better result in the play-off for thir d
plac e
Nevertheless the Korean learn has a right to b e
proud of its achievement leaving many highl y
favoured European and South American team s
below Them in the final placings and obtaining th e
highest posilion ever reached byan Asian team i n
a FIFAYouth Competitio n
It is hoped that this succes s" will have an influenc e
on The Asian Confederation and provide mo h
vation for the further development of football
Polan d
Despite initial unconvin~irlj pertormances in th e
group games, the Poles were able to collec t
enough points against their less internationall y
experienced opponents to enter the quarter final s
Thanks to a more homogeneous and more consisterif team performance, the Poles beat Scotlan d
in this all-European battle in the hea t
Despite losing to Argentina in the serni-final th e
Poles had once again demonstrated their knack of
being able to play better in !the hio loollball Tourn a
ment s
Against the Koreans they were able loclinch a
scarcely hoped-for victory and thus end up th e
most highly placed of all the European team s
Although they did not shine vviih the individua l
brilliance of the South Americans their solid lear n
performance was most impressiv e
,Iii — , ,
-
A~
~0
.C
792
Individual Analysis of NYC Teams
Poland
Hitherto parlicipalion 1979, 198 1
I
Polish youth teams have a tradition of doing well at World Youth Championships ,
and this lifted the 1983 side into the group of fancied tearris, while recognising tha t
environmental factors might possibly disturb the learn s harmon y
21 532
23582
25582
'/, Final s
28582
3rd Plac e
30582
Group B
36
36
56
66
86
86
1/4
I C
0 1
0C
Poland v Scotland
0 2
USSR v Poland
3 1
Uruguayv USA
USA v Ivory Coast
Uruguayv Poland
Poland v USA
72(30 )
3 2~1 0 1
1 0(00 )
3 1 (00)
20(00)
00(00)
Poland
Belgium
Bulgaria
Spain
1 Uruguay
2 Poland
3 USA
4 Ivory Coast
3rcì
Scoliano v
PoJand
e i lo
li
Final s
156
I
2
3
4
3 2
3 2
3
1
3 0
1
0
1
0
0
20
1 42
1
22
3 26
5
4
3
0
Potand. ivory Coast Uruguay USA
Final s
i1 6
1,t,
Poland v Belgium
Spain v Poland
BUlganav Poland
Poland
v
Argentina
01(00)
1 'H
i ',
3
3
3
3
2
1 0
2 0 1
1 0 2
0 1
2
63
105
35
28
5
4
2
1
Piac e
, Ko,ea
Rep
2
)* ~O 1 1 l ~
Individual Analysts of WYC Teams
193
Team : POLAN D
Venue
Leon
Puebla
2162 m
Puebla
2162 m
2037 m
Mexico D F Mexico D .F, Guadalajar a
2240 m 1 2240 m
1567 rin
Attitude
32 *
2
26 *
Temp .
Humidity
Km
17%
40%
14%
545
545
125
14 h
17h
14 h
27'
26 *
24*
37%
40%
46%
600
Travel
lvoryCoastj Uruguay I
7 :2
1
13
1
USA
2 :0
12 h
1
Wandzi k
2
Piotro-ic z
3
Wenciewsk i
4
Gorgoil
5
Modrzeiewsk i
6
Gruszeck i
7
My * liiisk i
8
Wrag a
9
Klemenz
10 , Beaszczyk
11
Krauz e
12 Bak o
13 Wat;riiewsk i
14 Dobrovvolsk i
15 Szczepailsk i
16 Stroifisk i
17 Ludwicza k
18 Letniak
tch 2
M
1
19 h
Scotland Arqentina~ Korea Rep .
1~0
Team List
Nof Ptayer
20 h
'1. Final
1
01
j
2
I QA
Argentina
Hitherto participation 1979 . )98 1
~\ j
é1-~
Mf
- .
i
~
iiiiliwA
~ *
1
.
á>I. W
Taking early successes into account it-leant that Argentina had to be aniong th e
close favourites Potential, preparation and experience raised them above the leve l
of the other teams The earlier exploits of the Argentines, with MHradona, Diaz ,
Barbas etc are still remembered —a rerninder to other tearns but perhaps a burde n
for the Argentines themselves .
231 83
25 1 83
28 1 B3
2 2 80
PeTuv Argenima
Argentina v Paraguay
Argentina v Venezuela
Bolivia v Argentina
02
20
21
13
Final Roun d
Argeniinav Uruguay
33
62W
32
92M
Argeniinav Bolivia
13283
Brazil v Argentina '
32
' match abandoned al 81st minute
Group C
46
46
76
76
96
96
'/4 Finals
126
Argenimav Netherlands
2 1 (0 1)
Polandv Argentina
0 1 (00)
Finals
i ~, 6
1,~
China PR Argen tina Czechoslovakia Austri a
China PH v Argentina
05(01 )
Czechoslovakia v Austria
40(l 0 )
03(03)
Auslfiav Argentina
Czectiosi v ChinaPR
32(l 0)
20(1 0)
Argenimav Czechosl
China PH v Austria
30100)
1 Argeni~na
2 Bolivia
3 Paraguay
4 Peru
S Venezuela
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
3
3
92
97
76
119
2 14
8
4
4
2
2
1 Brazil
2 Uruguay
3 Argentina
4 Bolivia
3
3
3
3
2
1
1
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
3
62
65
88
49
5
4
3
0
1 Argentina
2 Czechoslovakia
3 China PR
4 Ausv,a
3
3
3
3
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
100
74
58
010
6
4
2
0
Fina l
196 Argenwia~ 6,11,1
0 1 (0 1 )
795
Team : ARGENTIN A
Venue
I ~-~
'~ : ~ -
Altitude
"I
Temp .
Mexico D Fj Le6n
2240 rn
2037 in
i 1
30 '
37%
I
Leon
Leon
2037 on
2037 rn
35 '
32.
4
!
1
40%
40%
1
Mexico7DF F-- Mexico D Fj
2240 on
2240 rn
32 '
1
26,
40%
37%
1
27 '
~
3-p~,.
Humidity
Km
42 0
- - Aw— - ---~ "
Travel
Kick-o "
Opponent
Result
-11W.J~
I
I
0
0
-r"
404
% jr
12h
19 h
17h
I
China PR
A stria
50
10
12 It
20 h
12 h
1
CSSR_ Netherlands Poland
2 0
21
Brazil
~
0 1 j
Team List
Nol Plaver
1
Isla s
2
Borell i
1
3 1
livera
4
Basualdo
5
Dos Santo s
6 Theile r
7
1
Garci a
8
Vanernera k
9
Gabric h
Match 1
a:t~ch
L
ch2
~2Match
Mat
Match
2
3 L
1w
~~M
I
1 0 Zarate
11 Dertyci a
12
Prono
13 Moren o
14 Gracian i
15 Solaberriet a
16 Dezott i
17 1 Acost a
18 Gaona
Final
'~ Fina
Fine IL
l
Fina l j j'~
M
-.9910
,
j
L, ,
1,
~
tA
~ ,k
p
, 1,4
', , ,
-
-
1 , ,
i
x~ V
7~,
~
T
1
I<
'
1, ~
~
Ar-
'4LI
—* i' ,
o
, )~ ~, t 'r
.a>"
, ~` ì-.
N
~
1
~ 1",
~i
1 ~
~,
',
,
~ ,
1 0,il14,..
1 ,
~ ,
1
p
1
,
l' .
-
M
t
iq , .
lk
.
k
, ~",
,I' - :~ ~í
11
. ,
~*
;
-~
ro
"00 , - -
-
C1-1,4
~~
I-
í I.
1
'N ì
-è l
It
I
I
,
198
By their resu its it) I he preliminary round I he Argen
lines emphatically underlined their position as
favourites and many observer% saw them as likely
successors to the team thaT won the. World Yout h
Championship in Japan in 1979
A real challenge was provided tor them rn the
quarter final by a very well disioDstnoried D
learn The Aigentines emerged as the lucky "to
winners in a hard fought match
In a somewhat easier semi-final match against
Poland they demonstrated all their skills and the
positive aspects of South American football
which had been so impressive throughout the
championship
tin a
This win over the best placed European tea m
brought thern into the final not undeservedly i t
their overal~ performance fs considered
In the final local rivalry dominated and the rea l
skills were only sporadically displayed Th e
expected football demonstration which attracte d
110,000 spectators into the A?iec Stadium did no t
come, to pass Physical and lactical aspects wer e
dominant the, Argentines adopting a defensiv e
formation to stop the Brazilians developing thei r
gam e
A single penalty goal prevented the Argentinian s
from repeating their 1979 victor y
Brazil
The high point of their games in Guadalajara ( 3
preliminaries and quarter final) was definitely th e
match against Czechoslovaki a
At last their technical superiority seemed to b e
paying off in terms of results
This victory effectively confirmed their position a s
favourile s
The Brazilians were superior to the Czechs in ever y
respect Above all their attacking play was ver y
impressive, with every player technically brilliant .
playing a part
199
in the semi-tinal the Koreans forced the Brazilian s
to use every bit of their ability, and even threatene d
to keep them out of the final In the last quarter o f
an hour the Brazilians managed to raise their gam e
even a bit more . and assured themselves ol victor y
in a match that produced the best skills and th e
best football of the whole tournamen t
As mentioned in the case of Argentina, the tina l
provided no further improvement Ultimately thei r
greater numberof outstanding individual player s
made Brazil worthywinners of the 1983 Worl d
Youth Championship in Mexico
200
Individual A oalysis of WYC Team s
Brazil
Hitherto participation 1977,198 1
Even before the tournament they were the top favountes The environmenta l
conditions and the potential of their players only strengthened the experts ' opinio n
22 1 B3
24 1 83
291 83
I 2a3
30
30
31
10
1 Brazil
2 Uruguay
3 Chile
4 Ecuador
5 Columbia
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
30
Brazil v Bolivia
00
Btazilv Uruguay
32
Bra2ljv Arge,,l,na *
' Triatch abandoned at 81 st rumulu
1 Brazil
2 Uniguay
3 Argentina
4 Bolivia
1 Brazil
2 Netherlands
3 Nigeria
4 USSR
BraMv Ecuador
Brazil v Columbia
Brazil v Uruguay
Brazil v Chile
1
1
0
0
(J
0
0
0
1
3
3
3
10 1
87
46
610
59
8
6
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
1
)
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
3
62
65
88
49
5
4
3
0
3
3
3
3
2
1
1
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
3
62
43
13
36
5
4
3
0
1
Final Round
5283
92B3
13283
Group D
46
46
66
66
96
96
4
Finals
C,
USSR, Nigeria Netherlands Braz d
Netherlandsv Brazil
USSR v Nigeria
Brazil v Nigeria
Neiheflandsv USSR
USSRv Braid
Nigeriav Netherlands
1 1 io 0 )
01 (00 )
30(30)
32(1 0)
1 2(00)
00(00)
Braid v Czechoslovakia
4 1 (3 1 j
Korea Rep ~ Brazil
1 2 (1 1)
Final s
I ,~ Final s
I i, 6
,
.4 f
,
Brazil
01 (01 )
20 1
Team : BRAZI L
—~~~GuadalajaraIGuadalalara~uadalaiara Monterrey
Venue
1567 m
1567 m
1567 m
I
1567 m
M
o
2240
538 m
Attitude
30
'
30W
j 31 ' _I 32'
30
*
Temp .
:,
46%
~111
Humidity
46%
'
52%
I
50 ~o
I
86%
27
371. -
I
Km
660
980
14h
17 h
12 h
CSSR
Korea Rep
41
21
Travel
Kick off
as.lt
Opponent
_R
(D
,
1 40 4
-k ~-
19 h
19 h
19 h
1
Netherlands
1 1
N,ge, . a ~ USSR
1
3 :0
1
21
Match 2
1
Match 3
Team List
No
Player
1
Duarte
2
Bonifacio
3
Alve s
4
CamarinJunio r
5
Coelho Filho
6
Machad o
7
Vilell a
8
Silv a
9
Santos
10
Gamade0liveir a
11
Ferreira Pri- o
I
Brigatti
13
Campo s
14
Bagati m
15
Angel i
16
Bledom Verri
17 Oliveir a
18
Tobias
'
1
'
Fina l
.Final
~M
m,
t
l1 (0
1
~ rg eart
n ,
7
"
7,
-,:
-, ,
-
1 ,
' é~- à
p,
-
1
1 ,
14,
acKd
>
~- , -)tk
rt .
t~ 1
. 4
;r
Il
vi, ,
vi
1 lì
-
-
tv~ì I
,,m i *
"
'
AR&
"\
.
i
f
oi
>
l~l
~ ,
-1
~ -
.~
A
.-
-
l~-
1 ~
'1
1
1
.
14M
1-~ ,-0
1
.1
203
General
Statistics
Team Lists
Fair Pla y
Goal-scorer s
Substitution s
Awards
204
General Statistics
FIFA/Coca-Cola Cup — World Youth Championship, Mexico 1983
Official Results / Rdsultats officials / Resultaclos oficiales / Offizielle Resultat e
First Final Round
Group A - Mexico Australo Korea Republic Sco0an d
26
36
56
b6
86
86
Mexico
Toluca
Mexico
Toluca
Mexico
Toluca
Mexicov Australia
Korea Rep v Scotland
Korea Rep v Mexico
Scotlandv Australia
Mexico v Scolland
Australia v Korea Rep
1 1(10)
02(00 )
2 1 (1 1)
1 2(00)
01(01)
1 2(02)
Classificatio n
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
42
44
44
24
4
4
3
1
3
3
3
3
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
63
105
35
28
5
4
2
1
3
3
3
3
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
too
74
58
010
6
4
2
0
3
3
3
3
2
1
1
0
1
2
1
0
C
0
1
3
62
43
13
36
5
4
3
0
1 Scniland
2 Korea Rep
3 A,istralha
4 Mexico
GroupB-Poland IvaryCoast Urugual, USA
36
36
56
66
86
86
Pw~bla
Guadalajara
Puebla
Le6n
Puebla
Irapualu
Uruguayv USA
USA v Ivory Coast
Uruguay v Poland
Poland v USA
72(30)
32(l 0 )
1 0(00)
31 (00)
20ji)0~
00(00)
classdicatio n
1 Uruguay
2 Poland
3 IJSA
4 Ivory Coast
1
1
2
2
Group C - China PR . Argentina Czechoslovakia, Austri a
Mexica
Puebla
Le6n
frapualu
Lecin
Irapuatu
46
46
76
76
96
96
China PR v Argentina
Czechoslovakiav Austria
Ausinav Argentina
Czechosl v ChinaPR
Argentinav Czechosl
China FIR v Austria
05(01)
40(l 0)
0 3 (0 31j
32(10)
20(1 0)
30(00)
class,ficatio n
1 Argentina
2 Czechos~ovakfa
3 China PR
4 Austria
Group D - USSR Nigeto, Netherlands Brazi l
46
46
66
66
96
96
Guadalajara
Monterrey
Guadalajara
Monterrey
Guadalajara
Monterrey
1 1(00)
01 (00 )
30(30)
32(1 0)
1 2(00)
00(00)
Netherlands v Brazil
USSR v Nigeria
Brazil v Nigeria
Netherlandsv USSR
USSR v Brazil
N)geriav Netherlands
C(assifical ' o n
1 Brazil
2 Netherlands
3 Nigeria
4 USSR
Quarter Finals / Quarts de finale I Cuartos de final I Viertelfinal s
i-,,aiitied lor Sern, Final s
Polan d
Scotland v Poland
0 1(01)
11 6 Mexico
1 2*
Korea Repubb c
1 6 Monterrey
Ufuguayv Korea Rep
(00 .1 1 )
726 Leon
Argentina v Netherlands
26 Guadalajara BranIv Czechosinvakia
2 1 ~0 1)
4 1 (3 1)
Serni- Finals/ Derni- finales/ Sernifinales / Halbfinals
Puld,d , A,gon--ina
I " F)
M— '' u
ol (00)
li,13 Monterrey
Korea Rep v Brazil
12(1 1)
4~genl,na
Brazi l
0,aldiedforl ' ,,a l
Argenima
Brazi l
Match for 3rd place / Match pour 3a place / Partido por el 3er puesto / Spiel unn don 3 . Plat z
~ 1~
t,
-, .~
I
1 ', 1,,! ,
K4
o-a Hq~
11
1 '
[0
1
1
1 l
Final / Finale / Endspiel
Argunlinav BraM
196 Mexico
%7(tet extra tirne apr6s proicingarron
0 1 jo 1)
despu6s de twrripo
1 . Brazil
2 . Argentina
:1
i . ?,
3 . Poland
4 . Korea Republi c
I P,Jangemriq
205
Group Matches
Group Matches / Matches de groupe / Partidos de grupo / Gruppenspiel e
Group A — Mexico, Australia, Korea Republic, Scotlan d
1
2 .6 .
21 .00
Mexico
Mexico
Y.
Australia
Mexico : 1 Navarro . 2 Hernandez . 3 Macedo, 4 Quintero, 5 Villegas .
8 Espaiiia . 9 Muci~o (66 min 17 VaZqUez), 10 Reyna, 11 Moren o
Res . : 12 Nava . 13 Gamboa, 16 GonzSlez, 17 Vazquez, 18 Pandur o
1 :1 (1 :0 )
6 Bernal, 7 Garcia ,
Australia : 18 Franken, 2 Maier, 3 McCulloch, 5 Jones, 6 Stewart (46 min 4 Dakos~, 7 Farina ,
8 Patikas, 9 Brown, 10 Lowe . 11 Incantalupo (59 min 15 Licata), 14 Viietstr a
Res, 1 Hummel, 4 Dakos . 13 Ri7totio . 15 Licata, 16 Gluckne r
a) 1 :0 (16 min) 6 Bernal / 1 1 (73 mm) 7 Farin a
bl
A, Biguet (France) - H . Silva (Chile) . H Brummeier (Austria )
c) 108,90 0
d) Mexico : 4 Quintero / Australia 6 Russel l
e) -
2
3 .6 .
15 .00
Toluca
Korea Rep . v . Scotland
0 :2 (0 :0 )
Korea Rep . : 1 Pung Joo, 2 Pan-Keun, 3 Won-Keun, 4 In-Woo, 5 Byting-Ok, 6 Jang Jung ,
7 Tae Hyung, 8 Kee-Keung (59 min 9 Jong-Boo), 10 Yon-Ho .
16 Yong-K,l
J64 mi n
15 Jung-Kon), 17 Hyun-Chu l
Res . 18 Moon Young, 15 Jong-Kon . 13 Heung-Kwon, 11 Sung Hee . 9 Jong Bo o
Scotland : 1 Gunn, 2 Beaumont, 6 Cooper, 13 McPherson, 1 1 McInally . 14 McSiay, 3 Bowman ,
8 Dobbin, 16 Nevin, 9 McCtair (55 min 7 DickJ, 4 Black 180 inin 10 McGinnis )
Res ~ 12 Westwater, 17 Phillibpn . 18 Rice, 10 McGinnis . 7 Dic k
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
9
0 :1 (62 min) 8 Dobbin 1 0 :2 (76 min) 8 Dobbi n
E . Bellhon (USA) - J . Keizer (Netherlands), C, Esposito (Argentina )
26,19 1
Korea Rep . : 6 Jang Jun g
-
5 .6 .
12.00
Mexico
Korea Rep . v . Mexico
2 :1 (1 :1 )
Korea Rep- 18 Moon Young, 2 Pan Keun, 3 Won-Keun, 5 Byung Ok, 6 Jang Jung, 4 in Wo o
157 min 16 Yong-Kil), 15 Jong-Kon, 7 Tae-Hyung, 9 Jong-Boo, 10 Yon-Ho, I I Sung He e
J64 min 14 Jae-Soon )
Res . 1 Pung-Joo, 8 Kee-Keun, 13 Heung-Kwon, 14 Jae-Scion, 16 Yong Ki l
Mex1co, 1 Navarro . 2 Hernandez, 3 Macedo, 4 Quintero (64 niin 12 Nava), 5 Villegas, 6 Bernal .
7 Garcia, 8 Espai5a, 9 Muc ;ho (65 min 17 Vazquez~, 10 Reyna, 11 Moren o
Res . 18 Paunduro, 12 Nava, 15 HLierta, 17 Vazquez, 16 Gonzale z
a) 0 :1 J10 min) 10 Reyna 1 1 J29 min~ 4 ln-Woo ~ 2~1 (89 min) 10 Yofi-H o
b)
J . Keizer (Netheriands) - A Brguel JFrance), E . Beilion (USA )
c) 71,19 8
ci) e)
General Sta tístics
206
10
5 .6 .
16 .00
Toluca
Scotland v . Australia
1 :2 10 :0 )
Scorland I Gunn, 2 Beaumont, 3 Bovvman, 4 Black, 5 Clarke, 6 Cooper . 8 Dobbin (70 mi n
7 Dick), 13 McPherson, 14 McStay, 16 Nevin, 18 Rice (70 rilin 10 McGinnis )
Rp,s 12 Wesiwater, 7 Dick, 10 McGinnis, 15 McKay, 17 Phillibe n
Australia : 18 Frankpn . 2 Maier, 13 Rizzotto, 14 Viietstra, 4 Dakos, 8 Patikas, 6 Stewart ,
7 Fdrina (58 min 17 Wright), 10 Lowe, 9 Brown, 1 1 Incantalupo (63 min 15 Licata )
Res 1 Hummel . 5 Jones, 12 Daley, 15 Licata, 17 Wrigh t
a) 0 1 152 min) 1 1 Incantalupo 1 1 161 min) 14 r\AcStay ~ 1 :2 (87 min) 8 Patika s
H Brummeter (Austria), L Felix (Brazil )
p~ C Esposito (Argentina)
c) 22,11 1
cO Australia 13Rizzotto .9Brow n
el -
17
8 .6 ~
20 .00
Mexico
Mexico v . Scotland
0 :1 (0 :1 )
. 4 Quintero, 5 Villegas
Mexico : 1 Navarro, 2 Hernandez (46 roin 16 Gonzalez), / Garcia
151 min 13 Gamboa), 6 Bernal, 8 Espaha, 10 Reyna, 11 Moreno, 15 HIJeria, 17 Vazque z
Res ., 18 Pandora, 12 Nava, 13 GaToblaa, 16 Gonzalez, 9 MijciFi o
,
SCOrl3r?d I GLmn, 3 Bowman, 5 Clarke, 6 Cooper, 7 Dick (84 min 15 McKay), 8 Dobbin
10 McGinnis, 1 1 McInally, 14 McStaV, 16 Nevin 172 inin 4 Black), 17 Phillibe n
Res , 12 Westwatpr, 2 Beaumont . 4 Black, 9 McClair, 15 McKa y
a) 0 1 05 min) 5 Clark e
h) L Felix iBrdzll) — E . Bellion (USA) . J, Keizer (Netherlands )
0 86,58 2
(1) Scotland 7 Dic k
e) -
18
8 .6.
16 .00
Toluca
Australia i . Korea Rep .
1 :2 10 :2 )
. 8 Papkas .
Australia 18 Franken . 2 Maier, 3 McCulloch, 14 Viietstra, 4 Dakos, 13 Rj7zotto
Foin 15 Licata )
9 Brown .6 Stewart 165 min 7 Farina), 10 Lowe, I I IncantalLIP0 (35
Res . 1 Hummel, 5 Jones, 15 Licata, 16 Glockner, 7 Farin a
,
Korea Rep . : 1 Pung-Joo, 2 Pan Keon, 3 Won K,,un, 4 In-Woo, 5 Byung-Ol 6 Jang Jung
7 Tae Hyung (65 min 13 Heung Kwon), 9 Jong Boo, 10 Yon-Ho, 15 Jong Kon, 17 Hyun-Chu l
(56 min 8 Kee-Keun )
.~Soo n
Res ., 18 Moon Young, 8 Kee KeLin, 1 1 Sung Hee. . 13 HeUng Kwon, 14 Jap
a) O~ 1 (16 imn) 15 Jong Kon 0 2 (34 min) 9 Jong-Boo , 1 2 (53 nitn) 9 Brow n
b) H Brommeier lAustria) — C . Esposito (Argentina), H . Silva (Chile )
r) 24,81 2
(1) Australia 2 Maier , Korea Rep , 3 Won-Keu n
e) —
207
Group Matches
Group B — PolatW, Ivory Coast, Uruguay, US A
3
3.6 .
14 .00
Puebla
Poland v . Ivory Coast
7 :2 (3 :0 )
7 Gorgon ,
1 7 VVenclevvskj,
2 Piotrovicz
(72 ,in
14 Kra .ze),
Poland :
I Wandzik,
16 Modrzejewski, 10 Wraga, 8 Gruszecki, 9 Klemenz, 5 Mislinski, 1 1 Blaszcyk, 15 Lesnia k
Res . 12 Baku, 4 Stroinski, 6 Dobrovvolski, 13 Ludwiczak, 14 Krauz e
Ivory Coast : 1 Lancina, 13 Kah (46 rnin 4 Soro), 8 Sacrp, 9 Tchetche, I I Gbala, 17 On ,
6 Boussou (62 min 12 Gbal, 16 Ournar, 15 Kassy, 14 Fofana, 2 Dich
Res . : 18 Assieciussou, 4 Soro, 7 Gbezie, 12 Gba, 3 Gued e
a) 1 :0 (4 min) 9 Klemenz / 2 0 (21 min) 9 Klemenz ~ 3 0 122 minl, 7 Gorgon ~ 4 0 (48 min )
10 Wrap / 5 0 (51 min) 9 Klorneni / 6 0 (59 -in) 5 Myslinskt / 6 1 (67 m) 2 D ' d s
6 .2 180 min) 15 KassV 1 7 2 (85 -,n) 15 Le—191,
b~ Zhang Daqwo (PR China) - F Okubule (Ntgerkal . R . Yushka (USSR I
c) 14,13 0
d) Ivory Coast 4 Sor o
P. )
4
3 .6 .
19~0o
Guadalajara
Uruguay v . USA
3 :2 (11 : W
Uruguay : 1 Picum . 2 I\Aariinez, 3 Uberti, 4 Esna~, 5 Pi,~rdomo, 1,1 Anchpia, 7 Miranda (70 mi n
13 De Leon), 8 Salazar . 9 Aquilera, 16 MonWio (81 moi 10 Martinez~, 11 Sus a
Res- 12 Fuentes, 13 De Leon, 18 Ayala, 15 Salda?ia, 10 Martine z
USA
I Duback . 4 Caligturi, 5 Grop.sser, 6 Maurer, 8 Arya (75 min 7 Stewart), 10 ErvinL .
11 Ramos (65 Min 9 Brady~, 14 GeIncivatch, 15 Hooker, 16 Perez, 17 Sanderso n
Res . : 2 Peat, 13 Forero, 7 Stewart, 9 Brady, 12 T . Snyde r
a) 1 0 il min~ 9 Aguilpra i' 2 :0 (57 min) 1 1 Sosa / 2 1 160 min) 15 Hooker !'
3 1 (64 min) 11 Sosa / 3 :2 (67 min) 16 Pere z
b) i . Gregir (Czechoslovakia) - C .L . Alfaro (Costa Rica), K Hackett (Englind )
c) 17,82 1
d) USA 10 Ervin e
e) -
11
5.6 .
14 .00
Puebla
USA v . Ivory Coast
1 :0 0 :0 )
USA . I Duback, 3 Black (66 min 13 Forero) . 4 Caliguiri, 5 Groesser . 18 Scott Snyder (46 rni n
I I Rdmos), i0 Ervine, 14 Gelnovatch, 9 Brady, 17 Sanderson, 16 Perez, 15 Hooke r
Res . 2 Peat, 8 Arya . 1 1 Ramos, 12 Troy Snyder, 13 Forero
Ivory Coasf : 18 AssicoussoLi, 3 Guede (74 mi n 4 Soro), 8 Sacre, 7 Glcezie, 9 Tchetche, 12 Gba .
2 Dici, 17 Ori, 15 Kassy, 5 Barcan, 14 Fofan a
Res . 4 Soro, 16 Curnar, 13 Kah, 6 Boussou, 10 Diab y
a)
b)
c)
c11
eI
1,0 (79 min) 14 Ge.1novatc h
C. Pagano (Peru)
R, Yushka (USSR), Zhang Daqiao (PR China )
11,83 6
Ivory Coast : 12 Gba, 17 Ori, 15 Ka5sy
General Statistic s
206
12
6 .6 .
17 .00
León
Uruguay v . Puland
3 :1 10 :0 1
U, .9,d Y
I P, oni, 2 Carlos Martinez, 3 Ul 4 Esna~, 5 Perdomo (80 "' in 10 Jorge
Martinez), 14 Ancheta, 7 Miranda (66 min 18 Ayala), 8 Salazar, 9 Aquitera . 16 Montaho ,
I I Sos a
Rf-~ 12 Fuentes . 13 Di~ Leon, 6 Silva, 18 AVala . 10 Jorge MartmP 7
. 9 Klemenz, 10 Wraga, 1 1 B(aszczyk ,
Poland 1 Wancl7il 4 Stromki, 7 Gorgon, 8 Gw5zecki
13 Luclvv~czak, 15 Lesmak, 16 Modrzejewski, 17 Wenclewsk i
Res ., 3 Szc7epansl 5 Myslinski, 6 Dubrovvolski, 12 Bako, 18 Wasmewsk i
1 0 l52 min) 8 Salazar 2 :0 l54 mini 9 Al ' 2 1 (57 min) 9 Klemenz ,
3 1 (66 min 19 Agui ler a
Mendoza lMexico )
kO M . Larache iMorocco) - B . McGiniay (Scollancil, E
C) 23,11 7
ci) UrLIqLldy 3 Uberi t
Pl
ai
19
8 .6 .
14 .00
Puebla
2 :0 (0 :0 )
Poland ~ . USA
Poldrid: I Wancizilk, 2 Pintrowicz, 7 Gorgon, 8 Gruszecl 9 Klemenz, 10 Wraga, 1 1 B,aszczyk ,
14 Kratize (86 min 6 Dobrowolski), 15 Lesmak (79 rnin 3 Szc7epanski), 16 Modrzelewski .
18 lNasn iewsk i
Res, 3 Siczepanski, 5 Myslinski, 6 Dobrowolski, 12 Bako, 13 Ludvv1c7a k
6 Maurer (59 min 17 Sanderson), 5 Groesser, 4 Catigiuri, 10 Er~ine, 8 Ary a
USA . 1 D~jl
r
(37 min 3 Black) . 14 Gelnovatch, 9 Brady, 16 Perez, 18 Scott Snyder, 15 Hooke
Res 17 Sanderson, 7 Stewart, 2 Ppar, 12 Troy Snyder, 3 Blac k
a)
h)
ci
CI)
ci
1 0 (76 min) 15 Lesnial, : 2 :0 (85 nim) 3 51czepansk i
F, Okul ~Niqeriai — Zhanq Dailsao (PR China), C Pagano (PP.ru )
16 .10 3
Poland 11 B~aszczv k
20
8 .6 .
15 .00
lirapuatu
18 Assie.oussou, 4 Soro,
16 Ournar, 6 Boussou, 2 Dicli, 14 Fofan a
Res 10 Diahy . 11 Gijala, 1 Dolumbi a
lvory
Coas t,
Ivory Coasi
Y.
Uruguay
0 : 0 (0 : 0 )
8 Sacre, 3 Guede. . 9 T chetche, 5 Barcan, 13 Kah ,
Uruguay 1 Picum, 15 Salclaria, 13 Dp Leon . 2 Carlos Martinez, 6 SOva, 8 Salazar, 14 Ancheta ,
10 Jorge Martinez 162 min 16 Montaft), 7 Miranda . 9 AgUllera (46 min 17 Clivera), 18 Ayal a
Res 12 Fuentes, 4 Esnal, 3 Uberl I I Olivera, 16 Mootah o
al
W Lee Do Ha (Korea Rep ) C, Barnbridge (Ausl M . Karim ~Bahram )
0 15,31 7
(1) Ivory Coast ~ 14 Fotana ~ Uruguay 16 Montari o
P) -
209
Group Matches
Group C — PR China, Argentina, Czechoslovakia, Austri a
5
4 .6 .
12 .00
Mexico
PR China v . Argentina
0 :5 (0 :1 )
PR China : 18 Lt Zhigao, 2 Wang VVenzhong (74 min 17 Shan Gunp) . 3 Jia Xiuquan, 4 Mai
Chao, 5 Hu Yilun . 6 Zhong YunVue, 7 Lt Huayun, 8 Zhu Ping, 9 Cheng Fangping (46 mi n
14 Wang Jun~, 15 Liu Haiguang, 166 Duan Ju
Res . : 1 Fu Yubin, 1 1 L, Yong, 12 Guo Yijun, 14 Wang Jun, 17 Shan Cunj i
Argentina . I Islas, 4 Basualdo, 15 SolabeTriela, 6 Theiler, 3 OI,vpra, 18 Gaona, 9 Vanemerak ,
10 Zarate . 7 Garcia, 9 Gabrich, 1 1 Dertvcia (72 min 17 Acost O
Res, : 12 Prono . 13 Moreno, 14 Graciani, 16 Dezotti, 17 Acost a
a) 0 :1 (16 min) 9 Gabrich 0 :2 (53 min) 7 Garcia ~ 0 :3 (70 min) 11 Dertyci a
0 4 (81 mini 10 Zarete 0 5 (89 min) 17 Acost a
H . Silva (Chile) — L . Felix (Brazil), A, Biguet lFrance )
b)
c) 19,376
d) PR China : 2 Wang VVenzhon g
el -
6
4 .6 .
14 .00
Puebla
Czechoslovakia v . Austria
4 :0 (1 :0 )
Czech,,sloviA,d 18 P,hyl, '.) H,,~k, 3 VrIba, 4 Kopca, ~i Ha/arit, 6 Kubik (81 min / Dostal) ,
8 Vlastimil Kula, 9 Karoch, 10 Karel Kula, 11 Miskut (66 min 13 Hdikoci), 14 H ' rk o
Res~ 1 Krbecek, 7 Dostai, 12 Fleber, 13 Halkoci, 15 Suka c
Austria : I VVoiilfahrt, 2 Cvetku, 4 Kleiribichler, 5 Stumpil, 6 Tatar . 7 Ogris (33 min 13 Riecipr) ,
8 Weinrich . 9 Poister, 10 Haizinqpr (54 min 14 I-Irstic) . 1 1 Marko, 3 Frin d
Res ~ 13 Rieder, 14 Hirstic . 16 Gabriel, 17 Obexer . 12 Gor t
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
15
1 :0 ~9 min) 8 Vlastimil Kula / 2,0 148 min) 9 Karoch / 3 0 (71 min) 8 Vlastimil Kul a
4 0 (89 min) 14 Hirk o
R, Yushka iUSSR) — C . Pagano (Peru), F . OkUbule (Nigeria )
21,11 2
Austria 5 Stumpil, 6 Tatar, 14 Hysti c
-
7 .6 .
19 .00
Leon
Austria v . Argentina
0 :3 (0 :3 )
Austria . I VVohlfahrt, 2 Cvelko, 3 Frind, 4 K(Pinbichler (54 min 10 Haizinger), 5 Stumpfl .
6 Tatar, 7 Ogrss, 8 Weinrich (67 min 1 1 Marko), 9 Polster, 13 Rieder, 14 Hirsti c
Res ., 12 Gort, 10 l 11 Marko . 15 Strobl, 17 CibeXe T
Argentina . I Islas, 4 Basualdo . 15 Solaberrieta . 6 Theilier, 3 Clivera, 18 Gaona, 8 Vanemerak ,
10 Zarate, 7 Garcia 161 min 16 Dezotti), 9 Gabrich, 17 Acost a
Res ., 12 Prono, 2 Borel h, 14 Gracian 1, 16 Dezotu, I I Dprtyci a
a) 0 : 1 il 3 min) 9 Gabrich 0 :2 (20 min) 10 Zaratp. 1 0 3 (28 min) 9 Gabric h
b) B . McGinlay (Scotland)
B Grah (Ivory Coast), M, Larache (Morocco )
c) 31,IA 4
c!) Austria 14 I-Irstic Argentina : 15 Solaberrieta, 6 Theilpr, 16 Dezott i
el Austria 9Poister
210
16
General Statistic s
7 .6 .
15 .00
Irapuatu
Czechoslovakia v . PR China
3 :2 11 :0 1
Czechoslovakia . IS Pribyl, 2 Hasek, 3 Vrba, 4 Kolica, 5 Bazant (66 min 12 Fieber), 7 Costal ,
8 VIasbm,l Kula (61 min 1 1 Miskut), 9 Karoch, 10 Karel Kula, 13 Halkoci, 14 Hirk o
Reh~ : I Krbecek, 6 KLJb)k, 11 Mi~skul, 12 Fieber, 16 Horvat h
PR China : I Fij Yubin, 3 Jia XiLiquan, 4 Mai Chao, 6 Zincing Yunyue, 7 Li Huayun, 12 Gu o
Yqur 161 min I I Lt Yonq~, 13 Chen Gyozhong, 14 Wang Jun, 15 Liu Ha(guang, 16 Duan j u
(38 min 9 Chen Fangping), 17 Shan Cun p
Res, IS Li Zhigao, 8 Zhu Ping, 9 Chen Fangptn_q . 11 Li Yong, 5 Hu Yiju n
a) 1 0 (34 min], 7 Dostat 1 1 1 (49 mtn) 4 Mai Cliao ' 1 :2 (56 min) 7 Li Huavun /
2 2 (75 min) 10 Karp.I Kula i 3 :2 (89 rnin) 7 Dosia l
b) M Karin) (Sahrain) - Lee Do Ha (Kofei Relij, C . Banibrtdg(-. (Australia l
e) 15 .31 7
d) Czeefiosiovakii 3 Vrba, 4 Kopca, 8 Vlastimil KuIj ' PR China, 3 1a Xiuqua n
e)
2
21
9 .6,
17 .00
Leon
Argentina Y . Czechoslovakia
2 :0 (1 :0 )
Argentina . I Islas, 4 Basualdo, 15 Suiatierriela (65 min 2 Barelh), 6 Theiler, 3 Olivera ,
18 Gaona, 8 Vanemerak, 10 Zarate, 7 Garcia (84 min 14 Gracfan)), 9 Galortch, 17 Acosta
Res 12 Prono . 2 Borelli, 13 Moreno . 14 Graciam, 16 Dpzott i
Czechosfovakta ' 18 Priby( . 2 Hasek, 4 Konica, 6 Kubik, 7 Costal (73 min 9 KarocW, I I M ' sku t
(58 min 17 Zalesak), 12 Fteber, 13 HdIkoci, 14 Hirko, 15 Sukac, 16 Horvat h
Res . I Krbecpk, 3 Vrba, 8 Vlastimil Kula, 9 Karoch, 17 Zalp.sa k
a) 1 0 (15 min) 8 Vanemerak ) 2 :0 (77 min) 9 Gabric h
bi B, Grah (Ivory Coast) - M Laradhe IMurocco), 8 McGinlay ~Scotland l
c) 14,14 3
d) Argentina, I Islas, 15Solaberrieta
e) -
22
9 .6 .
15.00
lirapuatu
PR China v . Austria
3 :0 (0 :0 )
PR China, I Fu Yubin, 3 Jia XlUqLlafl, 4 Mai Chao . 6 Zhong " UrIYUP, I Li HiJayun, 9 Chen g
Fangluing (24 min 8 Zhu Pingl, 12 GUO Yijun, 14 Wang Jun . 15 Liu Haiguang, 16 Duan JU .
17 Shan Cun p
Res~ 18 Li Zhigao, 5 Hu Yijun, 8 Zhu Ping, 13 Chen Gyozhong, 11 U Yon g
Austria I Wol-iffahirt, 2 Cvetko ~34 (nin 8 Weinnehi, 3 Frfnd, 4 Kleinhichipir, 6 Tatar, 7 Oqri s
(58 rmn 5 SIUMIDO), 10 Hatzinger, 11 Marko . 12 Gort, 13 Rieder, 16 Gabrie l
Res, 5 SilimPfl, 8 ~Neinrich, 15 Strobl, IS Watche r
a) 1!0 (48 rnin) 15 Liu Haiguing ~ 2 0 (79 mun) 12 GUO YI]Lin ~ 3 0 (88 min) 16 Duan J u
b) C . Bdimbridge (Australia) - M, Karlin (Bahrain), Lee Do Ha (Korea RP.P .
0 15,31 7
& PR China 17 Shan Cunji ' Austria 2 Cv~ik o
e) -
21 1
Matches
Group D — USSR, Nigeria, Netherlarids, Brazil
7
4 .6 .
19 .00
Guadalajara
Netherlands v . Brazil
1 :1 (0 :0 )
1 Laurs, 2 Koot . 3 Duul, 4 Siloov, 5 Teuben, 6 Snoei, 7 Van ' t
Netherlands .
8 Vanenburg, 9 Van Basten, 10 Roord, 17 Bakker (46 min 13 Been )
Res . 12 Van der Boogaard, 13 Been, 15 Kramer . 16 Snelders, 18 Panhu) s
Schip ,
Brazil : 1 Duarte, 2 Bonifacio, 3 Alves, 4 Camarin . 5 Coelho Filho (55 min 17 Oliveira) ,
7 Vilella, 8 Silva, 9 Santos (64 min 10 Gama tie Oliveira), 11 Ferreira, 13 Campos, 16 Bledor n
Res . 6 Machado, 10 Garna de Oliveira . 12 Brigatti, 14 Bagatini . 17 Oliveir a
a) 1 :0 (49 min) 13 Been 1 1 177 min) 8 Silv a
1 . Gregir (Czechoslovakia) . C . Aliaro lCosta Roca )
b) R Ericsson (Sweden)
') 68,130
d) Netherlands 4 Solooy, 5 Teub,,n, 17 Bakker ~ Brazil 2 Bontiario, 3 Alves, S Solv a
e)
a
4 .6 .
17 .00
Monte,,ey
USSR
%i .
Nigeria
0 : 1 (0 :0 )
USSR . I Palamarcri 2 islamov W6 min 15 Rodnenok) . 3 Agapov, 4 Duchid, 5 Karataev ,
6 Metlitskiy, 7 Eremenko, 10 Petrov, I I Protasov, 12 Salimov, IS Liaviandrauskas (46 mi n
17 Dmitnev )
Res, 13 Demidov, 14 Tkebuchava, 75 Rodnenok, 16 Chprchesov, 17 Dmttrie v
Nigeria : 18 Udoh, 8 Jele., 13 Otti, 4 Okoku, 12 Disu, 15 Aclesma, 1 1 Okoronvvania, 3 Olukarml .
10 Akinlotan (59 min 9 Akhahan 1, 2 Ehilegbu, 14 Eclohor (78 min 7 Anigala )
Res . 17 Ade.banjo, 6 Shofoluvvp, 7 Anigala, 9 Akhahan, 5 Sad i
a) 0 1 178 min) 11 Okoronwanta
A . Libich (Poland) . J . Martinez (UrugUaVll
b) F . Ramirez (Mexico)
c) 37,83 7
LI) USSR 7 Eremenko / Nigeria : 15 Adesm a
e) -
13
6.6 .
19 .00
Guadalajara
Brazil v . Nigeria
3 :0 (3 :0 )
Brazil. 1 Duarte, 2 Bonnfacio . 3 Alves, 4 Camarin, 7 Vilella, 16 Blecorn, 9 Santos, 11 Ferreir a
(60 min 18 Tobias), 13 Campos, 8 Silva, 17 Oliveira (76 min 5 Coelho Filho )
Res .~ 5 Coelho Filho, 10 Gama de Oliveira, 12 Brigatti, 14 Sagatini, 18 Tobia s
Nigeria : 18 Udoh (45 min 1 AbcIonavibareO, 8 Jele, 13 Otti, 4 Okoku, 12 Disu, 15 Adesma ,
11 Okoronwanta, 3 Olukanni, 5 Sadi 145 min 9 Akhahan) . 2 Ehtlegbu, 14 Eclobo r
Res, 1 Abgonavbare, 6 Shofoluvve, 7 Anigala, 10 Akinlotan, 9 Akhaha n
a) 1 :0 (7 min) 17 Oliveira 2 :0 (32 min) 9 Santos / 3 :0 (43 min) 8 Silv a
b) C . Alfaro (Costa Rica)
K . Hackett (England), R . Ericsson (Sweden )
c) 41,18 2
d) Brazil : 3 Alves / Nigeria 2 Ehilegbu, 4 Okoku, 15 Adesin a
el —
General Statistics
212
14
6 .6 .
21 .00
Monterrey
Netherlands v . USSR
3 :2 (11 :0 )
Netherlands . 1 Laurs, 2 Koot, .3 Duut, 4 Silociv, 5 Teubpri, 6 Snoe, (31 min 15 Krame r
8 Vanenburg, 10 Roord, 9 Van Basten . 13 Been, 17 Bakker ( 79 111r, 12 Van der Boogaard )
Res . 11 De. Wit, 14 Godep- 15 Kramer, 12 Vat) der Boogaard, 16 Snelder s
USSR : 1 Palamarchuk . 15 Rodnenok, 3 Agapov, 4 Dochia, 5 Karataev, 7 Erernenko (68 mi n
17 Dmitriev), 8 lakovenko . 9 Litovchenko, 1 1 Protasov, 12 Sahmov, 13 Derniclo v
Res . 6 Methiskiv . 10 Petrov, 17 Dmitriev, 18 Liavianurau5kas, 16 Chercheso v
1 0 (12 min) 3 Duut ~' 1 1 (40 min) 12 Salimov , 1 2 (46 min ; 1 1 Protasov ,
2 2 (48 min) 13 Been 3 .2 149 min 1 9 Van Baste n
F . Ramircz Z . (Mexico), A . Libich (Poland )
b) J, Mdritnez (UtUgUdy)
0 2?,13 6
d) Netherlands 13 Bee n
e)
a)
23
9 .6 .
19 .00
Guadalajara
USSR v . Brazil
1 :2 (0 :0 )
n
USSR- 16 Cherche.sov, 15 Rodnenok, 13 Dpn)idov, 3 Agalpov, 5 Karataev, 6 Mpti,tskly 183 mi
.
.
7
Eremenko
(63
min
18
Liaviandrauskas),
8
lakoveriko,
9
Litovcherilka,
I
I
Protasov
4 Cochia)
12 Sal i mo v
k
Res, 4 Dochia, 14 Tkebuchava . 17 Dmitriev, 18 Liaviandrauskas . 1 PalamarchLi
Gama ti e
Brazil . I Duarte . 2 Bonilacio, 4 Cannatin, 7 Vitella, 8 Silva, 9 Santos (46 min 10
Oliveira), 11 Ferreira, 13 Campos, 14 Bagatim . 16 Bledorn . 17 Oliveir a
s
Res . : 5 Coelho Filho, 6 Machado, 10 Garna cle Oliveira, 12 Brigam, 1 R Tobia
(80 min), 8 Silva 1 2 (86 min) 9 Litovchenk o
a) 0 1 147 min) 3 Agapov (own goall, ~ 0 2
)
b) K . Hackett (England) - R, Ericsson ~Svvrdpnl, 1, Gregr (Czechoslovakia
c) 31 .380
o
d) USSR 15 Rodnenok, 8 lakovenko, 9 LitovchLnk
e) USSR : 1 1 Protaso v
24
9 .6 .
21 .00
Monterrey
Nigeria v . Netherlands
0 : 0 (0 : 0 )
a
Nigeria, 1 AgbonavIbarp . 8 Jele, 13 Ott,, 4 Okoku, 12 DiSLA . 6 Shofolkiwe . 11 Olkoron,r,ant
(75 min 7 Anigala), 3 Olukanni, 9 Akhahan (53 min 10 Alkinlotan), 2 Ehkeghi,J, 14 Edobo r
Res 1 7 Adebanio, 7 Anigala, 10 Aksirilotan, 16 Edema . 5 Dahir u
.n, 6 Snoei, 8 Vanpnburg, 9 Va n
Netherlands: 1 Laurs, 2 Kooi, 3 DWit . 4 SilooV . 5 Teub,,i
79 min 15 Kramer )
Basten, 10 Roord, 13 Been, 14 Godee (46 min 12 Van den Boogaard Res 12 Van den Boogaard, 15 Kramer, 16 Snelders . 17 Bakker, 18 PanhLJI S
a) b) A . Libich iPoland) - T Martinez (Uruquay~, F . Ramirez Z (Mexico )
C) 41,28 3
(1) Nigeria 10 Alkinlota n
e)
21 3
Ouarter FInals
Quarter Finals / Quarts de finale / Cuartos de final / Viertelfinal s
25
11 .6 .
12 .00
Mexico
Scotland v . Poland
0 :1 (0 :1 )
Scotland. I Gunn, 3 Bowman (75 min 9 McClair), 5 Clarke, 6 Cooper, 7 Dick, 8 Dobbi n
10 McGinnis, 11 McInally (46 min 4 Black~, 14 McStay, 16 Nevin, 17 Phillibp n
Res ., 12 Westwater, 2 Beaumont, 4 Black, 9 McClair, 15 Mcka V
Poland . I Wandzik, 2 P,otravv,cz, 5 Myshnski (69 min 13 Ludwiczak) . 7 Gorgon, 8 Gruszecki ,
9 Klemenz, 10 Wraga, 1 1 Blaszczyk (79 min 3 Szczepanski), 15 Lesniak, 16 Modrzelevvski ,
18 Wasnuevvsk i
Res . : 3 Szczepanski, 4 Stroinski, 12 Bako, 6 Dobrovvoiski, 13 Ludvvicza k
a) 0 1 (5 min) 9 Klemen z
b) A . Biguet lFrance) - L . Felix (Brazil), C Esposito (Argentina )
c) 11,98 6
& Po$ancl~ 2 P,otrowicz, 13 Klemen t
V )
26
11 .6 .
17 .00
Monterrey
Uruguay v . Korea Rep .
1 :2 * (0 :0 . 1 :1 )
Utuguay . I Picury' , 14 Anclieta, 2 Carlos Martinez, 3 Uberti, 4 Esnal . 8 Salazar . 5 Perdonlo .
16 MontaRo (57 min 10 Jorge Martinez), 7 Miranda (46 min 18 Ayala), 9 AgOilera, I I Sos a
Res . 12 Fuentes, 13 De Leon, 10 Jorge Martinez, 15 Saldaria, 18 Aval a
Korea Re. p . 18 Moon Young, 2 Pan Keon, 3 Won-Keun, 4 In-Woo, 5 ByOng-Ok, 6 Jang Jung .
7 Tae Hyung (64 min 8 Kee-Keun), 9 Jong Boo, 10 Yon-Ho, I I Sung-Hee, 15 Jong Ko n
Res_~ I Pung-Joo, 8 Kee~Keun, 12 lk-HNan, 13 Heung-Kwon, 14 Jae-Soo n
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
.
27
0 1 (54 min) 10 Yon-Ho i 1 1 (71 min) 10 Jorge Martinez ; 1 .2 (104 min) 10 Yon H o
C .L . Alfaro (Costa Rica) — H . Silva (Chile), J . Keizer (Netherlands )
39,87 6
Uruguay : 5 Perdomo, 16 Monta6c,
—
after extra-time lapr6s prolongation Idespueis de tiernpo suplementariv loach Vertangerun g
12 .6 .
12 .00
Leon
Argentina
Y.
Netherlands
2 :1 (0 :1 1
Argentina
I Islas, 4 Basuaido, 2 Borellh, 6 Theiler, 3 Olivera, 18 Gaona . 8 Vanernerak ,
10 Zarate, 7 Garcia, 9 Gabrich, 17 Acost a
Res . : 12 Prono, 5 Dos Santos, 13 Moreno, 14 Graciant, 16 Dezott t
Netherlands : 1 Laurs, 2 Knot, 3 DULIt . 4 Silocy, 5 Teuben, 6 Snoei, 7 Van ' l Schip ,
8 Vanenburg, 9 Van Basten, 10 Roord, 13 Been (78 min 11 De Wit )
Res . 11 De Wit, 14 Godee, 17 Bakker, 15 Kramer, 16 Snelder s
al 0 : 1 (4 minIl 9 Van Basten / 1 1 (65 m1nIl 2 Borelli 1 2 :1 (90 min) 18 Gaon a
b) K . Hackett lEngland)
A . bloich lPoland), F . OkLibule iNigeria )
c) 24,83 0
d) Argentina 2 Borelli, 7 Garcia, 9 Gabrich I Netherlands 3 Duut, 6 Snoei, 7 Van ' t Schi p
el Netherlands 5 Teuben, 8 VanenbUTY
214
28
General Statistics
12.6 .
12 .00
Guadalajara
Brazil v . Czechoslovakia
4 :1 (3 :1 )
Brazil: 1 Duarte, 2 Bonifacio, 3 Alves, 4 Camarin, 7 Vilella, 8 Silva, 10 Gama de Oliveira .
11 Ferreira, 13 Campus, 16 Bleclorn, 17 Oliveira (77 min 5 Coelho Filho ~
Res .~ 12 Br?gatti, 5 Coelho Filho, 6 Machado . 9 Dos Santus, 14 Bagati m
CzechoslovaAia . 16 Prsbyl, 2 Hasek, 3 Vrba, 4 Kopca, 5 Bazant, 6 KLibik, 7 Dostal (61 rni n
9 Karoch), 8 Vlastimil Kula, 10 Karel Kula, 14 Hirko (76 min 13 Halkoc(), 15 Suka c
Res . : I Krbecek, 9 Karoch, I I Miskut, 12 Ffeber, 73 Halkoc t
a) 0 :1 (6 min) 7 Dostal / 1 1 (18 mini 16 Bledorn / 2 1 (29 min) 10 Gama de Oliveira :
3 :1 (40 min) 8 Silva / 41 (60 min) B Silv a
J . Martinez (Uruguay), C . Bambridge (Au5tralta )
bl F Ramirez Z . lMexico)
c) 36,183
d) Brazil 2 Bonifacio, 13 Campos, 11 Ferreira i' Czechoslovakia~ 2 Hasek, 4 Kopci ,
10 Karel Kul a
e) -
Semi- Finals il Demi- Finales il Sem if inales il Halbf inal s
29
15 .6 .
17 .00
Mexico
Poland v . Argentina
0 :1 10 :0 1
(76 min 3 Szczepanski), 7 Gorgon ,
I Wa n d z, k, 2 Picitro-,cz, 6 Dubrowolski
Poland :
9 Klemenz, 10 Wraga, I I B[aszczyk (76 min 5 Myslinskid, 15 Lesmak, 16 Modirzelewski ,
17 Wenclewski, 18 Wasniewsk i
Res 3 Szczepanski, 5 Myslinski, 8 Gruszecki, 12 Hako, 13 Ludvvicza k
Algentena ., 1 Islas, 4 Basualdo, 2 Borelli, 6 Theiler, 8 Oliveira, 18 Gaona, 8 Vanerneralk ,
10 Zarate, 7 Garcia, 9 Gabrich, 17 Acosta (26 min 16 Dezoti O
Res~ 12 Prono, 5 Dos Santos, 13 Moreno, 14 Graciam, 16 Dezott i
a)
b)
cl
d)
P)
30
0 : 1 (59 min) 10 Zarat e
J .L . Martinez B . (Oruguay) - C, Barnbridge (Australia), F . Ramirez Z . iMexico )
39,89 6
Poland 10 VVraga / Argentina 18 Gaona, 10 Zarat e
-
15 .6 .
17 .00
Monterrey
Korea Rep . v . Brazil
1 :2 (1 :1 1
Korea Rep- : 18 Moon-Young, 2 Pan Keun, 3 V'Jon KeUn, 4 in Woo (46 min 13 Heung-Kvvon) ,
5 Byung-Ok . 6 Jang Aing, 7 Tae-Hyung (61 min 14 Jae-Soon), 9 Jong Roo, 10 Yon Ho ,
15 Jong Kon, 17 HVUn-Chu l
Re.s . : I Pung-Joo, 12 Ik Hwan, 13 Heung-Kvvon, 14 Jap-Soon, 8 Kee-Keu n
Brazil : 12 Brigatti, 4 Caniarm, 3 Alves, 7 Vilella, 8 Silva, 10 Gami dp Oliveira (71 mi n
9 Santos), 11 Ferreira, 13 Camoob, 14 Bagatini, 17 Oliveira, 16 81pdor n
Res, 1 Duarte, 5 Coelho Filho, 6 Machado, 9 Santos, 15 Angel t
a) 1 0 (14 min) 9 Jonq~Boo 1 1 1 (22 mini 17 Oliveira 1 1 2 (81 rniW 9 Santo s
b) J . Ke,zer lNetherlands) - H . Silva ~Chde), G, Biguet lFrance )
c) 55,91 4
dI Korea Rep . 4 in Woo, 9 Jong Bo o
e) -
Finals
21 5
Match for 3rd place / Match pciur la 3e plac e
Partido por el 3er puesto / Spiel um den 3 . Plat z
31
18 .6.
19 .00
Guadalajara
Poland ~ . Korea Rep .
2 :1 * (0 :1, 1 :1 1
Poland, 1 VVandzik, 2 Piotrov~ic7, 7 Gorgon 146 min 6 Dcibrov~olski) . 9 Klemenz, 10 Vvraga ,
11 Blaszczyk (71 min 3 Szczepanski), 14 KraLl7e . 15 Lesniak, 16 Modrzelp.wski . 17 Wenclewski ,
18 Wasniewsk i
Res~ : 3 Szczepanski, 4 Stromski, 6 Dobrovvolski, 12 Bako, 13 Ludvyicza k
Korea Rep. : 1 Pung-Joo, 2 Pan-KPLin, 3 Won KeLm, 5 ByLing Ok, 6 Jang Jung, 8 Kee-Keu n
167 min 10 Yon-Ho), 9 Jong Boo, 11 Sung-Hee. . 13 Heung Kwon, 14 Jae Soon, 15 Jong-Ko n
(59 min 4 In-Viloo )
Res 18 Moor) Young, 4 in Woo, 10 Yon Hii . 12 Ik Hwan, 16 Yong Ki l
a) 0 :1 (37 min) 8 Kee.-Keun / 1 1 177 min) 14 Krauze / 2 :1 (103 rnin) 3 Szczepansk i
b) L .C . Felix (Brazil) - C . Esposito (Argentina), H . Silva (Chile )
c) 35 .000
d) Poland, 2 Piotrowicz / Korea RPF) .~ 5 Byung O k
e) . after extra-ttme lapr6s prolongation Idespu6s de tiempo suplementarto ' nach Veriangerung
Final / Finale
32
19 .6 .
12 .00
Mexico
Argentina v . Brazil
0 :1 (0 :1 )
Argentina . I Islas, 4 Basualdo, 2 Borellh, 6 Thpiler . 3 Oliveira, 18 Gaona (75 m ' n 14 Graciarn) ,
8 Vanemprak . 10 Zarate, 7 Garcia, 9 Gabrich, 16 Deiott i
Res : 12 Prono, 11 Dertycia, 13Moreno, 14 Graciarn, 15Solaberriet a
Brazil: 1 Duarte, 2 Bonifacio, 4 Camarm, 7 Vilella, 8 Silva, 9 Santos (82 min 10 Gama d e
Oliveira), 1 1 Ferreira, 13 Campos, 14 Bagatini, 16 Bledorn, 17 Oliveira ~69 min 5 Coelho Filho )
Res . : 12 Brigatti . 3 Alves, 5 Coelho Filho, 6 Machado, 10 Garna de Oliveir a
a) O~ 1 (39 min) 8 Silva
b) A, Biquet (France) - F . Ramirez Z, lMexico), C . Bambrtdge (Australia )
e) 110,00 0
(1) Argentina 2Boreii,,8VanerTierak ' Brazii~14Bagatini .16B[edurn,5CoelhoFtlh o
e) -
1
Ch
A>
C 9~
E
2
~
>
-
~
F ~ Pl-mp.
9
~
,
91
n
C 1 N
—
Tea.s
o —
Pi, a
5
i
dedwt d
Z.,
i
m.
&
afr,, f-r
~
rch
.
S—d ~h
Points
* ,
1
,
~, ~*
,
711
11
j~ ~ ~ ,
,
1
~i
1
~+
~+
1 ~~
1
Il
deducred
ThildMalch
Pbin a deducred
ofter third march
+ 1 +.
.
,
à, ,
,
il
F . .Ith —t
ìz
'
N—b—fp.mt.
fw fo-th
h
~
1.
1
~
~
~
1
~
1
-
1
,
,
i
~
I
1
-
I
l~
Pi.a dM.ct d
Numberofpoin a
Sé— F,,al~
machfo,3MPI~
-1
F.
.. d Fi
3
a
Numb~rofpoin n
+,
~
~
1.
.1
Il
31
51
S.,
i~
:~Z
-
N -
883:
Il Il
~l
E
.
.
~
Il
,
Il
j.~
~
~
Il
li
I.
:- :.
~jl
.
E I.
&SI~`lg
di~iddby
—
f—tc o5
Fi-Iva
(—.g.
ding
Fair
21 7
"
FrDIRAFION
93Bstn
INIIRNA1IONALI
Di
"
FUOIBALI
,
~A
4,
4R~
E~M~A
d ìà
1
,
í/ , —,
m1m?~e
IZ,
C5
A~ ',O(AAIIO \
- %
218
Substitution
Diagram 62
4
3
á
i
/INI \V/ -A/
11
o
3
1
~
-
~
6
2
~
~- ~- ~
—.
3
11
I
I
~
15
1
- I
\VAN \NI
1
12
9
111
I
3
i, MM, kK /A,
2
i
3
1
313
~
I .-
,
,
,
.
~
24
27
18
"
27
~ "f \V/\VI N/ A
30
0
1;
!1
1
33
1
3 2
'
i
~
.
36
1
3
Z2
—
Spain 82
Substitution
39
~42
2
11
2
4
Mexico 83
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
1
27
1
30
33
1
1
36
2
39
4
42
11
i
63
Goal Statistics
21 9
5~
4
222
48
3
333
3 3
51
2
54
3 1 31222
15
222
57
2
2
60
1
2
63
222
2
66
69
2112
1
2
75
72
2
1
1
78
333
81
4
2
87
84
2
90
3 1 12
5
Mexico 83
Goal statistic s
A
i
Spain 82
7
6
-- -
1 1 5
-
r
$o
~
A
v]
,
~ ~ » ~ .
5 ,
o 2
5 ,
,
0-5 ,
,
5
4 4 4
4 4
V3
k
2
222
2
2
2
48
51
i
54
il i 1
57
60
2 2 2 5 2
2
2
2
63
2
66
1 6 2 3 44 4
69
1
2
72
75
1 1 3 2 4 62
78
81
442
2
1
84
1
1 2
87
90
1
-1
220
Awards
General Statistics
adidas competition :
Ball " for the best player, and " Golden Shoe " fo r
the best goal-scorer of the tournament
" Golden
" Golden Ball "
Winner of the Golden Bal l
Geovanni Silva, Brazi l
266 points
Winner of the Silver Bal l
Zarate Roberto, Argentin a
178 points
Winner of the Bronze Ball
Islas Luis, Argentina
157 point s
Winner of the. Golden Shoe
Geovanni Silva, Brazil
6 goal s
Winner of the Silver Shoe
Klementz Joachim, Poland
5 goal s
Winner of the Bronze Shoe
Gabrich Jorge, Argentina
4 goals
" Golden Shoe "
222
General StatistIc s
Reference s
a) FIFA publications :
- National Associations of FIFA . 1982 Editio n
- 1968 Olympic Football Tournamen t
Report on Final Competition in Mexic o
Results of Preliminary and Final Competition . Englis h
- Official FIFA Report ,
1970World Cup, Mexic o
1982 FIFA World Cup Spai n
b) Mexican Football Association .
- Officia[ source s
El Campeonato Muridial Juveni l
La Capa FJFA/Coca-CoJa 1
La Copa FIFA/Coca-Cola I l
c) Magazine " E urop6ische Trainer- Union " :
- Gerhard Bauer, Munic h
Möglichkeiten und Probleme der Talentsuche im Fussbal l
- Dr HermannAndrecs DieSch~ilerliga—einModelldesSchulsport s
- Dr NorbertBachl,W[e n
Die Belastbarkeit des Jugendlichen aus sportmedizinischer Sicht
M
FIFA/Coca-Cola Cu p
World Youth Championship —Mexico 198 3
Technical Study Grou p
í,
René Hüss y
tSvvitzerland)
Heinz Marotzk e
(Germany FR )
P
O
i ,
Walter Gag g
(Svviizerland ~
Responsibl e
~à
f,
José Bonett i
IBr~izil)
fA, ~.._
Billy Bingha m
INoilliern Ireland)

Part 2 - FIFA.com

Transcription

Similar documents

Examples Elf on the Shelf Tony the Tiger Geico Gecko

Hist 19 The History of Mexico

City Design Tour

Ecoclubs (or “Ecoclubes” in Spanish) are democratic civil society

HUT Internacional

Where are we now? - Trekking the Planet

open pdf file - Neighborhood Christian School

External Students in the University of Guadalaj ara

Doc 1985 - Céu Aberto

BOP/MG/153: Lake-Side House For Sale, Varginha, Minas Gerais