Prostate cancer: management of advanced disease Introduction
Transcription
Prostate cancer: management of advanced disease Introduction
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdf644 Prostate cancer: management of advanced disease J.-P. Droz, A. Fléchon & C. Terret Centre Léon-Bérard, Department of Medical Oncology, Lyon, France Introduction Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer Hormone deprivation is the major treatment at this stage of the evolution. Principles of first-line hormone suppression The basis of first-line hormone suppression is castration by either bilateral orchidectomy or LH-RH agonist administration. Three questions are important at this stage: what is the role of complete anti-androgen blockade (CAB)? What is the impact of hormone suppression on survival? What is the optimal timing of hormone suppression? Role of complete androgen blockade Mechanism of action of therapeutics Normal and malignant prostatic cells are sensitive to androgens. There are two major sources of androgens: testicles, which produce testosterone (95% of all androgens), and adrenal glands (dehydroandrosterone, dehydroandrosterone sulphate and androstenedione). Testicles and, to a lesser extent, adrenal glands are under the control of the anterior lobe of the pituitary. Luteinizing hormone (LH) stimulates testosterone production by the testes. Luteinizing hormone secretion is under the control of hypothalamic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH). Production of LH-RH is pulsatile. It is reduced as a function of the serum testosterone level (feedback mechanism). There are specific androgen receptors on normal and malignant prostate cells which allow the internalization of testosterone. Testosterone is then transformed into dihydrotestosterone (DHT), the active form of the hormone, which is transported into the nucleus where it induces cell proliferation (Figure 1). Drug and hormone manipulations have different © 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology Different trials were designed to study the impact of antiandrogen addition to castration. Only several trials included a sufficient number of patients. One Intergroup trial in the USA, which compared leuprolide with and without flutamide, demonstrated a significantly longer progression-free survival and median overall survival in the group of patients who received CAB [3]. However, further large-scale trials failed to demonstrate such a significant difference [4] even when trials were designed to study good-prognosis patients. Metaanalysis was performed [5] but failed to demonstrate any significant impact of CAB on survival. Consequently, CAB cannot be recommended as standard treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer. Impact of androgen blockade on overall survival A UK randomized trial has demonstrated a slight impact of immediate versus deferred hormone suppression in advanced prostate cancer [6]. The majority of patients had non- Downloaded from http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on September 9, 2014 Advanced prostate cancer is an incurable disease. Treatment objective is palliation only. The major observation is that prostate cancer is a hormone-sensitive tumour. Huggins and Hodges [1] were the first to demonstrate that castration and estrogen injection had therapeutic activity in men with metastatic prostate cancer. The most frequent metastatic sites in prostate cancer are bone (85%), lymph nodes and further visceral metastases (liver, central nervous system, lungs) (45%) [2]. However, consequences of widespread metastases are important: bone pain, nervous compression and haematological and metabolic consequences. All these conditions must be taken into account in order to select the best treatment options leading to a better quality of life for the patient. This chapter focuses on the practical management of patients with advanced disease; treatment evaluation criteria and new therapeutic approaches will be developed in another section of this educational program. mechanisms of action. The most simple androgen suppressor is castration. The mechanism of action of other hormone treatments are shown in Table 1. LH-RH agonists act as orchidectomy, other drugs are peripheral inhibitors of androgens. The major side effect of hormone suppression is loss of potency. Other toxicities are shown in Table 1. However, one particular side effect of LH-RH agonists, the flare syndrome, must be prevented. At the beginning of treatment with LH-RH agonists, a surge of LH, and a secondary increase of serum testosterone level, is observed. This may induce an increase in pain and, more importantly, tumour growth with bladder retention, and spinal cord compression. It can be prevented by anti-androgens administered 15 days before the first injection of the LH-RH agonist. 90 metastatic but locally advanced disease (55%) at the time of randomization. Patients of the deferred treatment group were treated when clinically significant progression occurred. All events occurred more rapidly in the deferred treatment group: progression from M0 to M1 disease, development of pain, need of transuretheral resection for local progression, pathological fractures, spinal cord compression, ureteral obstruction and development of visceral metastases. Early androgen blockade in patients with PSA level increase after treatment of local disease The rise of serum PSA levels after curative treatment (either surgery or radiotherapy) is an indicator of infraclinical metastatic disease. Large randomized trials of immediate versus delayed androgen blockade have been performed. No data are yet available. Early treatment may not be recommended on the basis of current knowledge. Role of intermittent androgen blockade The aim of this intermittent treatment is to delay the occurrence of androgen refractoriness and to decrease adverse events of hormone suppression. Different phase II trials have been published, phase III trials are on-going. This type of treatment is still not standard [7]. Anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome When patients are treated with the combination of LH-RH agonist (or orchidectomy) and anti-androgens, it is observed that anti-androgen withdrawal may induce some form of benefit in almost 30% of patients, such as a decrease in pain or a reduction of serum PSA levels [8]. This phenomenon seems to be dependent on the occurrence of mutations on androgen receptors and their ability to use anti-androgens as substrate. It is thus recommended that anti-androgen therapy be stopped when hormone resistance occurs after CAB. Hormone resistance Progression of prostate cancer to the hormone refractory status is a universal phenomenon which is not well understood. It may be the result of an altered structure or expression of androgen receptors or altered androgen receptor signalling and interactions with other signal transduction pathways, which possibly involve growth factor receptors [9]. Hormone refractoriness is clinically expressed in different situations: increases in serum PSA levels, progression of Downloaded from http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on September 9, 2014 Figure 1. Regulation of androgens. T, testosterone; 5αR, 5-α-reductase; DHT, dihydrotestosterone; DHEA, dehydroandrosterone. 91 Table 1. Hormone treatments in prostate cancer: mechanisms of action and side effects Drug Mechanism of action Side effects Negative feedback of pulsatile secretion of LH; initial LH surge Flare-up syndrome, loss of potency, hot flushes Competitive blockade of DHT to receptors Diarrhoea, hepatotoxicity, flushing reactions, hemeralopy, pulmonary fibrosis LH-RH agonists Leuprorelin Goserelin Buserelin Triptorelin Non-steroidal anti-androgens Flutamide Bicalutamide Nilutamide Steroidal anti-androgen Inhibition of LH release; competitive blockade of DHT to receptors Estrogens Diethyl-stilbestrol Inhibition of LH release; inhibition of 5-α-reductase activity; direct cytotoxic effect Loss of potency; gynaecomastia; thromboembolism Fosfestrol DHT, dihydrotestosterone; LH, luteinizing hormone; LH-RH, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. metastases, progression of pain and other symptoms while hormone deprivation is continued. pain for several days after treatment, whereas moderate thrombocytopenia is observed in 5% of cases. This treatment is indicated when diffuse pain is due to diffuse osseous metastases on bone scan. Other therapeutic problems in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer Second- and third-line hormone therapy The major observation is that no treatment has survival impact at this disease stage. Only a few trials have studied the survival impact of therapeutics, but none have shown any survival benefit. Thus, treatment only has symptomatic (palliative) impact. Symptoms are either local or diffuse. Treatment options are based on the observation of symptoms. Symptoms and therapeutic tools are summarized in Table 2. Systemic treatment of metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer is discussed elsewhere in this issue. The most frequently used further hormone therapy lines are anti-androgens, inhibitors of aromatase and estrogens [12]. Response rate is generally low at 10–20%. However, estrogens have a symptomatic effect, even in heavily pretreated patients. Estramustine phosphate must be considered as a chemotherapeutic agent, even though it is partly composed of an estrogen molecule, because it acts as an inhibitor of microtubules. It is more active when combined with other cytotoxic drugs. Therapeutic tools Clinical problems Radiotherapy Pain Radiotherapy is active in the treatment of localized pain with a response rate of 80%. It is administered in split courses because its objective is only palliative. Pain is the most frequent problem. The origin of pain is most often central, sometimes neuropathic. Pharmacological treatment is specific for each mechanism. However, specific treatments, mostly radiotherapy and radiopharmaceutics, are indicated. Radiopharmaceuticals Two radiopharmaceuticals are used in the routine treatment of diffuse metastatic bone pains: strontium [10] and samarium [11]. They induce a 40% objective diminution of diffuse pains. Toxicity is rare: patients may experience slightly increased Spinal cord compression Spinal bone involvement is observed in 80% of patients. However, spinal cord compression occurs is only 6% of patients. Downloaded from http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on September 9, 2014 Cyproterone acetate 92 Table 2. Symptoms in advanced disease prostate cancer and therapeutic tools Symptoms Therapeutic tools Local symptoms Local pain Radiotherapy Spinal cord compression Surgery, radiotherapy Urethral compression Transurethral resection Ureteral compression Ureteral catheter Cranial nerve compression Radiotherapy Diffuse symptoms Diffuse pain Hormone manipulation, chemotherapy, radiopharmaceuticals Inflammatory symptoms Fatigue, osteoporosis, denutrition Corticosteroids, non-steroidal drugs Urinary system compression Consequences of long-term hormone suppression Intracranial central nervous system involvement Patients with hormone suppression develop osteoporosis. This phenomenon has been well demonstrated in patients who receive hormone suppression for local-stage prostate cancer without bone metastasis. These patients have markers of osteoporosis: osteocalcin pro-collagen, C-terminal propeptide and collagen C-telopeptides. The estimated risk of fracture is 5% [14]. However, a majority of patients have osteoblastic bone metastases. Thus, a combination of osteoblastic and osteolytic metastases occurs in roughly 30% of patients. Bisphosphonates have been studied in this patient population in randomized trials. They support the use of bisphosphonates that have been shown to improve pain control and quality of life. A large National Cancer Institute Canada Protocol comparing mitoxantrone plus prednisone with or without intravenous clodronate for patients with symptomatic bone metastases has been completed. Intracranial involvement is classically infrequent, with only a 7% incidence in autopsy studies. Recent clinical experience may suggest an increased incidence of these types of metastases. They are most commonly related to dural involvement. The most frequent symptoms are jugular foramen syndrome (pain of occiput, auricular region and shoulder), clivus syndrome (headache and VI to XII palsies), cavernous sinus syndrome (III to VI palsies, ophthalmoplegia, facial numbness), orbital syndrome (pain and exophtalmy), and mental neuropathy [15]. Several patients have true encephalopathy syndrome. Diagnosis of dural involvement is often made by MRI imaging. Radiotherapy is often active against symptoms. However, all these symptoms must be differentiated from cerebrovascular disorders which are frequent in this elderly patient population. Urinary system compression is a frequent symptom in patients who have not received previous specific local treatment for prostate cancer, but may also occur after prostate radiotherapy and, rarely, after prostatectomy. It induces bladder retention requiring transurethral resection. The major risk is urinary incontinence. Sometimes the tumour involves the trigon and spreads around the ureters. Unilateral or bilateral hydronephrosis is then observed, with a risk of renal failure. This evolution generally requires the use of an intraureteral catheter. Follow-up by urinary tract ultrasonography is proposed. Haematological disorders Surgery of bone metastases As in other bone metastases, several orthopedic procedures may be used: vertebrectomy with consolidation, intramedullar nail, total hip replacement. The principal problems are linked to the fact that bones are grossly involved and material may not be well fixed. After surgery bone is generally irradiated in split courses. Pancytopenia (mostly anaemia and thrombocytopenia) may be due to bone marrow involvement. Haematological diagnosis must be made because it may lead to active treatment by chemotherapy and/or estrogens [16]. Intravascular coagulopathy is frequently observed. It includes thrombocytopenia, decrease of coagulation factors (II and VII), increase of D-dimers, of degradation products of Downloaded from http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on September 9, 2014 Symptoms are local pain with characteristic metameric irradiations, dysesthesia in the same area and neurological central nervous compression signs in the legs, and eventually paraplegia [13]. Treatment is difficult. The risk of spinal compression is evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Radiotherapy is active in reducing pain, but may be insufficient to prevent spinal compression. Surgery is difficult because the benefits of laminectomy are generally only short-lived and more extensive surgery with consolidation procedures is generally impossible due to multiple vertebral involvement. Further prospective strategies must be developed. 93 fibrin, and presence of schizocytes. It is often only a biological phenomenon without clinical significance. When clinically expressed (haemorrhage), it is treated by low-dose heparin, fibrinogen and platelet transfusions, and specific treatment (low-dose estrogens, high-dose estrogens, such as fosfestrol phosphate, or chemotherapy). However prognosis is poor. Inflammatory syndrome Patients with advanced disease and multiple treatment lines express inflammatory syndrome. At this end-stage, fever and weight loss are frequent. Treatment is only symptomatic, although corticosteroids and estrogens (diethylstilbestrol 1 mg) may induce some palliative benefit. The median survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer is 3 years, though it is only 1 year when the tumour is hormone refractory. The number of possible problems is great, but the major one is pain. The number of therapeutics is also great. They have only palliative and symptomatic impact. Early hormone suppression in patients with advanced disease may have slight survival impact. Thus, a general scheme of management can be proposed, based on several principles: • Early hormone suppression is proposed in metastatic prostate cancer. Hormone suppression is achieved either by castration or treatment with LH-RH agonists. Table 3 summarizes the different problems encountered and proposes a timetable of successive treatments. Several questions still remain unsolved: • Is simple androgen blockade or even anti-androgen alone sufficient? • What is the true usefulness of third-line hormone treatment? However, it seems that second-line treatment, being either anti-androgen withdrawal or anti-androgen addition depending on first line treatment, has some symptomatic activity. Table 3. Proposed chronology of treatment Advanced disease: early first-line treatment Androgen-blockade (castration or LH-RH agonist) Hormone refractory disease: therapeutics are indicated on symptom occurrence General treatment Second-line hormone therapy Specific treatment Local therapeutics Antiandrogens Local radiotherapy Aromatase inhibitors Transurethral resection Chemotherapy Endoureteral catheter Mitoxantrone prednisone Spinal cord compression surgery Trial Orthopaedic surgery Radiopharmaceutical Corticosteroid plus estrogens Drugs Analgesic Bisphosphonate Calcium and vitamin D3 Treatment of intravascular coagulopathy Corticosteroids Terminal care LH-RH, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. Downloaded from http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on September 9, 2014 Practical management of patients • Powerful tools must be used to measure palliative impact: pain and analgesic scales, quality of life evaluation. PSA decrease may only be a surrogate of clinical response evaluation. • After first-line hormone suppression, indication of further hormone therapy, chemotherapy and radiopharmaceutics is based only on symptomatic progression. It is not based on tumour progression as measured by PSA increase or metastasis evolution, because it is well established that, to date, treatment has only a palliative effect. • Management of local problems (urinary obstruction, fracture, nerve compression) must be done depending on the situation. • Other general problems occur which require specific management. • Patients must be clearly informed of the palliative endpoints, therapeutic tools, current side effects and goals of treatment. The strategy must be prospectively explained in the early stages of treatment. 94 • What are the maximal fields of radiotherapy which do not impair the use of chemotherapy and radiopharmaceuticals? • What is the best timing for chemotherapy and radiopharmaceuticals? The relative activity of different treatment sequences is unknown. Furthermore, these treatments have not been compared together. It may also be possible that chemotherapy induces more platelet toxicity after radiopharmaceutical administration. • What should the timing of treatment (radiotherapy, surgery) be in metastatic disease to the backbone? • Should there be a particular management strategy for elderly patients? There are arguments to think that comprehensive geriatric assessment may help to tailor more actively specific treatments [17]. Acknowledgements The authors thank Mrs Marie-France Mévélec for help in the preparation of the material and Mrs Marie-Dominique Reynaud for editing the manuscript. References 1. Huggins C, Hodges CV. Studies on prostatic cancer. I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer J Clin 1972; 22: 232–240. 2. Bubendorf L, Schopfer A, Wagner U et al. Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1589 patients. Hum Pathol 2000; 31: 578–583. 3. Crawford ED, Eisenberger MA, McLeod DG et al. A controlled trial of leuprolide with and without flutamide in prostatic carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 419–424. 5. Prostate Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: an overview of 22 randomised trials with 3283 deaths in 5710 patients. Lancet 1995; 346: 265–269. 6. The Medical Research Council Prostate Cancer Working Party Investigators Group. Immediate versus deferred treatment for advanced prostatic cancer: initial results of the Medical Research Council Trial. Br J Urol 1997; 79: 235–246. 7. Dawson NA. Intermittent androgen deprivation. Curr Oncol Rep 2000; 2: 409–416. 8. Scher HI, Zhang ZF, Nanus D, Kelly WK. Hormone and antihormone withdrawal: implications for the management of androgenindependent prostate cancer. Urology 1996; 47: 61–69. 9. Mitsiades CS, Koutsilieris M. Molecular biology and cellular physiology of refractoriness to androgen ablation therapy in advanced prostate cancer. Exp Opin Invest Drugs 2001; 10: 1099–1115. 10. Quilty PM, Kirk D, Bolger JJ et al. A comparison of the palliative effects of strontium-89 and external beam radiotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 1994; 31: 33–40. 11. Collins C, Eary JF, Donaldson G et al. Samarium-153-EDTMP in bone metastases of hormone refractory prostate carcinoma: a phase I/ II trial. J Nucl Med 1993; 34: 1839–1844. 12 . Farrugia D, Ansell W, Singh M et al. Stilboestrol plus adrenal suppression as salvage treatment for patients failing treatment with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues and orchidectomy. Br J Urol Int 2000; 85: 1069–1073. 13. Bayley A, Milosevic M, Blend R et al. A prospective study of factors predicting clinically occult spinal cord compression in patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2001; 92: 303–310. 14. Oefelein MG, Ricchuiti V, Conrad W et al. Skeletal fracture associated with androgen suppression induced osteoporosis: the clinical incidence and risk factors for patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 2001; 166: 1724–1728. 15. Ransom DT, Dinapoli RP, Richardson RL. Cranial nerve lesions due to base of the skull metastases in prostate carcinoma. Cancer 1990; 65: 586–589. 16. Burgess NA, Hudd C, Rees RW. Haemostatic pitfalls in advanced prostatic cancer. Br J Urol 1993; 71: 231–233. 17. Balducci L, Extermann M. Management of cancer in the older person: a practical approach. Oncologist 2000; 5: 224–237. Downloaded from http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on September 9, 2014 However, it is recommended that patients with metastatic prostate cancer should be included in prospective trials armed to demonstrate either palliative or survival impact. Although these patients must be evaluated carefully before any decisions about treatment are made. Decisions are always multidisciplinary. Evaluation of treatment results must be performed at each step of therapy. 4. Eisenberger MA, Blumenstein BA, Crawford ED et al. Bilateral orchiectomy with or without flutamide for metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1036–1042.