Why we will export or perish S. Adikesavan

6/12/13
Why we will export or perish | Business Line
Why we will export or perish
S. Adikesavan
www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/why-we-will-export-or-perish/article4804275.ece?homepage=true&css=print
1/5
6/12/13
Why we will export or perish | Business Line
Exports need a push in these stressful times. — Sushil Kumar Verma
There is no sector more deserving of ‘priority’ status for bank loans today than exports.
At a time when the rupee is under pressure from widening current account deficits and drying up of foreign capital
inflows, promoting exports should be top priority for the country’s policy-makers. The old slogan, “export or perish”,
cannot be more relevant for the Indian economy than in today’s troubled times.
It is in this context that the recent report of a Reserve Bank of India (RBI) technical committee, headed by its
Executive Director, G. Padmanabhan, deserves to be taken seriously. From a banker’s perspective, it contains many
realistic and workable recommendations that have the potential to substantially improve the flow of credit and reduce
transaction costs for the export sector.
Export credit as a proportion of total bank loans declined from 9.3 per cent in 2001 to 3.7 per cent in 2012, as
outlined in the Finance Ministry’s latest Economic Survey for 2012-13. This happened even as the value of India’s
exports grew from $44.56 billion in 2000-01 to $304.62 billion in 2011-12.
While this data would suggest that bank finance is not so much of a driver for export growth, the importance of the
flow of credit, especially when exports are plunging (they fell to $300.6 billion in 2012-13), cannot be underplayed.
There are at least three key recommendations of the RBI technical committee that can and need to be implemented
straightway.
A national priority
The first is the suggestion to include export credit under the Priority Sector Lending (PSL) targets set for Indian
banks. All commercial banks in India are mandated by the RBI to direct 40 per cent of their net bank credit to the
‘priority sectors’, which broadly cover agriculture, micro and small enterprises, loans to weaker sections, and
educational/housing loans.
There is no other sectoral deployment of credit that is monitored by the central bank so closely as the PSL target, and
rightly so. Most of the segments under PSL are employment-intensive sectors and contribute to both economic growth
and equity.
www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/why-we-will-export-or-perish/article4804275.ece?homepage=true&css=print
2/5
6/12/13
Why we will export or perish | Business Line
The RBI has also stipulated stiff penalties for non-achievement of PSL targets, with banks having to contribute the
amount of shortfall to the Rural Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF), where they would earn yields less than
their cost of funds.
The close monitoring of the PSL target achievements and the ‘RIDF penalty’ impacting their bottomline makes banks
strive hard to increase coverage under the PSL segment.
Given that the banking industry as a whole has been running short of its PSL targets during the last decade, making
export finance a part of PSL will bring better focus to export credit marketing by banks. It would also afford an
opportunity to banks to get a better return by lending for exports, rather than contribute to the RIDF. In the process,
there is also the real possibility of the cost of export credit being reduced further.
As the average return on RIDF deployment is not more than 6 per cent, it would make better sense to lend to
exporters even at their ‘base rate’ (below which banks cannot lend) provided the credit risk on the borrower is
acceptable.
As regards extending ‘priority’ status to exports, no one can really grudge that in today’s situation where the country
is grappling with extreme balance of payments stress, bringing back memories of the dark days of 1990-91. In terms
of credit decision-making, the PSL tag will help exporters as collateral security and other norms are generally viewed
sympathetically when it comes to exposures to the ‘priority sectors’ by commercial banks.
Statutory relaxations
The second key recommendation by the Padmanabhan Committee is that Foreign Currency Non-Resident (FCNR)
deposits and Export Earner’s Foreign Currency (EEFC) balances should be exempt from cash reserve ratio/statutory
liquidity ratio requirements, to the extent banks deploy these to extend export finance.
The logic advanced by the panel for this proposal is that export credit re-discounted by Indian banks abroad is at
present already exempt from CRR/SLR requirements. In effect, what the committee has suggested is to level the field
for foreign currency sources used by Indian banks for on-lending to exporters.
The elimination of the burden of CRR/SLR on both pre-shipment and post-shipment credit in foreign currency will
surely improve the cost-effectiveness of export finance, benefiting both exporters and banks, again with a strong
www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/why-we-will-export-or-perish/article4804275.ece?homepage=true&css=print
3/5
6/12/13
Why we will export or perish | Business Line
possibility of reduction in interest rates. Alternatively, the panel has proposed that exporters be allowed to borrow
under the RBI’s ‘trade credit’ norms directly from banks abroad, on the strength of letters of comfort issued by Indian
banks. As of now, this facility is available for importers under what is called ‘buyers credit’ and the cost of such loans
is only about 200-250 basis points above the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR).
If importers can avail cheap finance from abroad, there is definitely no reason to not offer the same facility to
exporters.
Merchanting trade
The third recommendation pertains to issues relating to ‘merchanting trade’ transactions, which refer to exports and
imports undertaken by domestic entities where the goods per se do not enter nor are from the country. Merchanting
trade volumes are mainly determined by the availability of banking facilities for document handling and ease of
finance.
It is true that merchanting trade does not contribute directly to exports from India, but these transactions can still
lead to net foreign exchange inflows by way of profits accruing to the Indian entities undertaking them from overseas
locations. The possibility of this is even higher, when one takes into account Mumbai’s potential to become a major
financial centre rivalling Singapore or Dubai.
It is most appropriate, therefore, that the technical committee has suggested major relaxations in the existing RBI
norms pertaining to merchanting trade, which are rather restrictive. On the whole, what sets apart the Padmanabhan
committee report is that it is focused and practically oriented. No high-flying rhetoric – just sensible suggestions
which can be implemented without much ado.
(The author is with the State Bank of Patiala. The views expressed are personal)
(This article was published on June 11, 2013)
Keywords: Export, policy-makers, foreign capital inflows, bank loans, Reserve Bank of India, export credit, trade
volumes
Printable version | Jun 12, 2013 6:08:02 PM | http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/why-we-will-export-or-perish/article4804275.ece © The Hindu
Business Line
www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/why-we-will-export-or-perish/article4804275.ece?homepage=true&css=print
4/5
6/12/13
Why we will export or perish | Business Line
www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/why-we-will-export-or-perish/article4804275.ece?homepage=true&css=print
5/5